The Microbiological Quality of Private and Communal Boreholes in the Tshitale-Hlanganani Region of the Limpopo Province, South Africa

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Microbiological Quality of Private and Communal Boreholes in the Tshitale-Hlanganani Region of the Limpopo Province, South Africa THE MICROBIOLOGICAL QUALITY OF PRIVATE AND COMMUNAL BOREHOLES IN THE TSHITALE-HLANGANANI REGION OF THE LIMPOPO PROVINCE, SOUTH AFRICA Potgieter N*, Mudau LS and Maluleke FRS *Dept of Microbiology, University of Venda for Science and Technology, Private Bag X5050, Thohoyandou, 0950, Limpopo Province, Republic of South Africa. [email protected] ABSTRACT A cross-sectional study was carried out to assess the microbiological quality of 97 private and 97 communal boreholes in the rural Thitale-Hlanganani area of the Limpopo Province, South Africa. Both bacterial and viral indicator microorganisms were used and included total coliform bacteria, faecal coliform bacteria, faecal streptococci bacteria, heterotrophic bacteria, Clostridium perfringens (vegetative cells and spores) and somatic bacteriophages. The South African criteria guidelines of good (negligible risk of microbial infection; fit for human consumption), marginal (slight risk of microbial infection; must be treated before consumption), and poor (risk of infectious disease transmission; not fit for human consumption) for water used for human consumption, with the relevant counts for each indicator organism, was used to group the private and communal boreholes according to the relevant indicator organism. Results indicated that although the majority of boreholes were placed into the good category, some boreholes did however fall into the marginal and poor categories for each indictor organism. This indicated the potential health risk present to the consumers using these boreholes for domestic water sources. Observations at the boreholes identified various potential sources of pollutions that could affect the microbiological quality of the borehole water. In conclusion, this study indicated the need for more intense monitoring of privately owned boreholes and the education of the rural communities on the installation and the maintenance of both private and communal boreholes. INTRODUCTION The World Health Organization (WHO) estimate that 1,5 billion people in the world do not have access to safe water and that an estimated 1,8 million people in developing countries, die every year from diseases associated with unsafe water and inadequate sanitation (1; 2; 3). South Africa (SA) is a developing country and was rated number 26 worldwide during 1997 in terms of water availability per person out of 149 countries (4). The backlog of water and sanitation in rural villages in SA is addressed through Reconstruction and Development (RDP) programs on water and sanitation, using intersectoral approaches within communities (5; 6; 7). The sole and most cost effective source of potable water supply in SA is groundwater (8). Ground water has the potential of serving communities in areas where water infra-structure does not exist and where water delivery is difficult due to arid conditions (9). It is estimated that almost two thirds of the rural population in South Africa depends on groundwater sources for domestic purposes (9). The majority of rural communities use groundwater without any treatment (10). In addition, the number of on-site sanitation systems in the villages makes the underground water aquifers vulnerable to contamination and the microbiological quality of borehole water is not always guaranteed to be microbiologically safe for human consumption (11). Consequently, the presence of viruses, bacteria, protozoa and helminthes can cause diarrhoeal diseases. In addition, the presence of certain chemicals such as iron, copper, zinc, cobalt, magnesium, selenium and chromium in ground water can also be detrimental to human health (10). Therefore, the quality of borehole water for domestic use needs to be monitored and the health risk associated with contaminated drinking water should be considered, hence the need for this study. MATERIALS AND METHODS Study site and water sampling procedures The study was carried out in the Tshitale–Hlanganani area, in the Vhembe District Municipality of the Limpopo Province of South Africa. This area is predominantly rural with a low social economic income (12). Groundwater is used as a major source of water supply (13). The majority of borehole pumps used in the area are either engine or electricity driven and a few pumps are operated manually. Only a few of the electric and engine driven pump the underground water directly to communal stand pipes. With the majority of the boreholes, the electric and engine driven pumps distributes the groundwater via storage tanks and reservoirs to the stand pipes (13). A simple random selection method was used to select 30 of 40 villages in the study area. In these 30 villages, a total of 97 communal boreholes and 97 privately owned boreholes were identified to be assessed in this study. Water samples were collected monthly from both private and communal boreholes between August 2002 and August 2003 to include dry and rainy seasons. Each borehole water sample (2 l) was taken using the standard collection technique as specified by SABS (14), and transported on ice to the laboratory. In locations where hand water pumps were used, the water samples were taken directly from the hand pump. In locations where the borehole was connected to a tap or distributed via storage tanks or reservoir, water samples were collected from the nearest tap from the borehole (14; 15). Detection of indicator organisms The membrane filtration technique (16) was used and all test were performed in duplicate. A volume of 100 ml of each water sample was passed through 0.45µm pore size, 47 mm diameter sterile filter membranes (Millipore, SA) and the membranes placed on the relevant substrate medium before incubation (16). The average number of colony forming units per 100 milliliter (cfu.100ml-1) was calculated and recorded. For the detection of total coliform bacteria in the water samples, m-Endo (DIFCO) agar plates were prepared in 90 mm Petri dishes according to the manufacturer’s specifications (Merck, SA). After placing the membranes the bacteria onto the agar media, the plates were incubated aerobically for 24 hours at 370C. All colonies with a golden metallic sheen were counted as total coliforms. For the detection of faecal coliform bacteria in the water samples, m-FC (DIFCO) agar plates were prepared in 90mm Petri dishes according to the manufacturer’s specifications (Merck, SA). After placing the membranes with bacteria onto the agar media, the plates were incubated aerobically for 24 hours at 44.50C. All dark blue colonies were counted as faecal coliforms. For the detection of faecal enterococci in the water samples, m-Enterococcus (DIFCO) agar plates were prepared in 90mm Petri dishes according to the manufacturer’s specifications (Merck, SA). After placing the membranes with the bacteria onto the agar media, the plates were incubated aerobically for 48 hours at 370C. All red-pink colonies were counted as faecal enterococci. Clostridium perfringens counts (vegetative cells and spores) were determined using specific perfringens selective OPSP medium (Oxoid, SA) with supplements. The OPSP agar plates were prepared in 90 mm Petri dishes according to the specifications of the manufacturer’s (Oxoid, SA). After placing the membranes with bacteria onto the agar plates, the plates were incubated in anaerobic conditions at 37˚C for 48 h using anaerogens sachets in order to produce anaerobic environment. Colonies appearing as dark brown to black were counted. Somatic phages were assayed according to the methods described by Grabow et al., (17) with Escherichia coli strain WG5 (18) as host. Presence-absence test was carried out according to the method described by Uys (19). Briefly: A volume of 500 ml of each water sample was poured into a sterile plastic 1l water collection bottle to which 5g Trypticase peptone, 4g Sodium Chloride and 5ml of a Calcium-Glucose solution were added. The presence-absence sample one milliliter of the specific host culture was added to each of the water sample and incubated at 37˚C for 24 h. The presence of somatic coliphages were determined by spot plating 5 µl of the presence-absence sample to a prepared phage plates containing a lawn of the WG5 host. The spot plates were incubated overnight at 37˚C and the bacteriophages allowed to produce zones of lysis or plaques where the suspensions have been spotted. Classification criteria for borehole water quality Both private and communal borehole water results were grouped into categories according to the total number of a specific indicator organism detected. The classification system described by DWAF (15) and SABS (16) was used to categorize each borehole: 1. good (negligible risk of microbial infection; fit for human consumption) 2. marginal (slight risk of microbial infection; must be treated before consumption) 3. poor (risk of infectious disease transmission; not fit for human consumption) Table 1 Categories used for water quality assessment (15; 16) Indicator Water quality assessment criteria Organism Good Marginal Poor Total coliform 10 cfu.100 ml-1 11-100 cfu.100 ml-1 > 100 cfu.100 ml-1 Faecal coliform 0 cfu.100 ml 1-10 cfu.100 ml-1 > 10 cfu.100 ml-1 Faecal enterococci 0 cfu.100 ml 1 cfu.100 ml-1 > 1 cfu.100 ml-1 Clostridium perfringens 0 cfu.100 ml 1 cfu.100 ml-1 > 1 cfu.100 ml-1 Somatic coliphages 0 cfu.10 ml-1 1 cfu.10 ml-1 > 1 cfu.10 ml-1 Cfu = colony forming units good = fit for human consumption poor = poses a health risk Statistical analysis Data was presented and entered into Microsoft Excel 2000. STATA version 7 Shapiro Facia was used to determine the normality assumption for continuous variables. For comparison of categorical data, Fisher exact test or chi-square test was used (if no expected cell values were less than five). The Mann-Whitney test (sample size, mean and standard deviation) was also used. RESULTS Total coliform The total coliforms results for water samples tested in private and communal boreholes during dry and rainy seasons were showed in Figure 1.
Recommended publications
  • Hlanganani Sub District of Makhado Magisterial District
    # # C! # # # ## ^ C!# .!C!# # # # C! # # # # # # # # # # C!^ # # # # # ^ # # # # ^ C! # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # C!# # # C!C! # # # # # # # # # #C! # # # # # C!# # # # # # C! # ^ # # # # # # # ^ # # # # # # # # C! # # C! # #^ # # # # # # # ## # # #C! # # # # # # # C! # # # # # C! # # # # # # # #C! # C! # # # # # # # # ^ # # # # # # # # # # # # # C! # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #C! # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## C! # # # # # # # # # # # # # C! # # # # # # # # C! # # # # # # # # # C! # # ^ # # # # # C! # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # C! # # # ##^ C! # C!# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #C! ^ # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # C! C! # # # # # ## # # C!# # # # C! # ! # # # # # # # C# # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # ## ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # C! # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ^ C! # # # # # # # ^ # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # C! C! # # # # # # # # C! # # #C! # # # # # # C!# ## # # # # # # # # # # C! # # # # # ## # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # C! # # # # # # # # # # # ### C! # # C! # # # # C! # ## ## ## C! ! # # C # .! # # # # # # # HHllaannggaannaannii SSuubb DDiissttrriicctt ooff MMaakkhhaaddoo MMaagg# iisstteerriiaall DDiissttrriicctt # # # # ## # # C! # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # ROXONSTONE SANDFONTEIN Phiphidi # # # BEESTON ZWARTHOEK PUNCH BOWL CLIFFSIDE WATERVAL RIETBOK WATERFALL # COLERBRE # # 232 # GREYSTONE Nzhelele # ^ # # 795 799 812 Matshavhawe # M ### # # HIGHFIELD VLAKFONTEIN
    [Show full text]
  • Eskom Holdings SOC Limited
    Eskom Holdings SOC Limited Environmen tal Impact Assessment for the Proposed 1x40 0kV Tabor-Bokmakirie (Nzhelele) and 4 X 250MVA 400kV/132kV Nzhelele Mai n Transmission Station, Limpopo Province SOCIO-ECONOMIC IMPACT REPORT DEA EIA Reference Number: 14/12/16/3/3/2/317 NEAS Ref Number: DEA/EIA/0001132/2012 LDEDET Ref Number: 12/1/9/E-V178 Date: February 2013 Report Version: Draft 1 Lidwala Consulting Engineers (SA) (Pty) Ltd Randburg Office: Pretoria Office: 11th Church Avenue, Ruiterhof, Randburg, 2194, 1121 Hertzog Street, Office F005, Waverley, Pretoria, 0186, PO Box 4221, Northcliff, 2115. PO Box 32497, Waverley, Pretoria, 0135, Tel: 0861 543 9252 Tel/faxs: 0861 543 9252 Polokwane Office : Nelspruit Office: 128 Marshall Street, Amy Park no. 5, Polokwane 39 Emkhe Street, Nelpruit, 1200 PO Box 3558, Polokwane, 0700 PO Box 2930, Nelspruit, 1200 Tel: 0861 543 9252 Tel: 0861 543 9252 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction 5 1.1. Methodology 5 2. Social impacts expected during all project stages: 5 3. Description of the socio-economic setting – demographic information regarding the area in which the proposed line will be constructed: 6 3.1 Demographic profiles 7 3.2 Economic activities, Tourism and farming: 9 3.2.2 Tourism 9 3.2.3 Farming in the MLM 10 3.3 Employment rates and livelihoods 12 3.4 Access to services 12 3.4.1 Electricity 12 3.4.2. Access to water and sanitation facilities 13 3.4.3 Waste management 14 3.4.4 Transport 14 3.4.5 Educational facilities and libraries 14 3.4.6 Health facilities 15 3.4.7 Telecommunication and Postal Services 15 3.5 Conclusions from the social and economic environment within which the new power line is planned 16 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2015/2016
    SOUTH AFRICAN POLICE SERVICE: VOTE 23 ANNUAL REPORT 2015/2016 ANNUAL REPORT 2015/16 SOUTH AFRICAN POLICE SERVICE VOTE 23 2015/16 ANNUAL REPORT REPORT ANNUAL www.saps.gov.za BACK TO BASICS TOWARDS A SAFER TOMORROW #CrimeMustFall A SOUTH AFRICAN POLICE SERVICE: VOTE 23 ANNUAL REPORT 2015/2016 B SOUTH AFRICAN POLICE SERVICE: VOTE 23 ANNUAL REPORT 2015/2016 Compiled by: SAPS Strategic Management Layout and Design: SAPS Corporate Communication Corporate Identity and Design Photographs: SAPS Corporate Communication Language Editing: SAPS Corporate Communication Further information on the Annual Report for the South African Police Service for 2015/2016 may be obtained from: SAPS Strategic Management (Head Office) Telephone: 012 393 3082 RP Number: RP188/2016 ISBN Number: 978-0-621-44668-5 i SOUTH AFRICAN POLICE SERVICE: VOTE 23 ANNUAL REPORT 2015/2016 SUBMISSION OF THE ANNUAL REPORT TO THE MINISTER OF POLICE Mr NPT Nhleko MINISTER OF POLICE I have the honour of submitting the Annual Report of the Department of Police for the period 1 April 2015 to 31 March 2016. LIEUTENANT GENERAL JK PHAHLANE Date: 31 August 2016 ii SOUTH AFRICAN POLICE SERVICE: VOTE 23 ANNUAL REPORT 2015/2016 CONTENTS PART A: GENERAL INFORMATION 1. GENERAL INFORMATION OF THE DEPARTMENT 1 2. LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS/ACRONYMS 2 3. FOREWORD BY THE MINISTER 7 4. DEPUTY MINISTER’S STATEMENT 10 5. REPORT OF THE ACCOUNTING OFFICER 13 6. STATEMENT OF RESPONSIBILITY AND CONFIRMATION OF ACCURACY FOR THE ANNUAL REPORT 24 7. STRATEGIC OVERVIEW 25 7.1 VISION 25 7.2 MISSION 25 7.3 VALUES 25 7.4 CODE OF CONDUCT 25 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Limpopo Proposed Main Seat / Sub District Within the Proposed Magisterial District Tshitale Sub District of Makhado Magisterial
    # # C! # # # # # ^ C! # .!C!# # # # C! # # # # # # # # # # C!^ # # # # # ^ # # # # ^ C! # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # C!# # # C!C! # # # # # # # # # #C! # # # # # C!# # # # # # C! ^ # # # # # # # # ^ # # # C! # # # # # # # C! # #^ # # # # # # # # # # #C! # # # # # # # C! # # # # # C! # # # # # # # # C! # C! # # # # # # # ^ # # # # # # # # # # # # # # C! # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #C! # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # C! # # # # # # # # # C! # # # # # # # # # # C! # # # # # # # # # # C!# # # ^ # # # C! # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #C! # # # # # # # ^ # # C! # C!# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #C! ^ # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # C! C! # # # # # # # # C!# # # ##! # # # # C # C! # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # C! # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # C! # # # ^ # # # # # # ^ # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # C! # ## # # C! #C! # # # # # # # #C! # # # # # # C! ## # # # # # # # # # C! # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # C! # # # # # # # # # # # ### # ! C! # # C # # # # C! # # ## ## C! # # C! .! # # # # # # # # # # # # # # C! # ## # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ^ # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # C! # # # # ^ # # # # # # # C! # # # # # # # # ## ## # # # # # C! # # # # C!## # # # ## # C! # # # # C!# # # # # # # C! # C! # # # # # # ^ # # # C! # ^ # ! # ## C # # C! #C! ## # # # # # # # # # ## # # # ## # C! # # # # # # # # # # # # # #C! # # # # # #
    [Show full text]
  • Post Settlement Challenges for Land Reform Beneficiaries: Three Case Studies from Limpopo Province’ Is My Own Work
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by UWC Theses and Dissertations POST SETTLEMENT CHALLENGES FOR LAND REFORM BENEFICIARIES: THREE CASE STUDIES FROM LIMPOPO PROVINCE A mini-thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Masters Philosophy (Land and Agrarian Studies) Tshililo Justice Manenzhe Programme for Land and Agrarian Studies (PLAAS) Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences University of the Western Cape (UWC) May 2007 DECLARATION I declare that ‘Post Settlement Challenges for Land Reform Beneficiaries: Three case studies from Limpopo Province’ is my own work. All other sources, used or quoted, have been indicated and acknowledged by means of complete references. This thesis has not been submitted for a degree at another university. Tshililo Justice Manenzhe May 2007 Signature ………………………………..…………………… Supervisor: Dr. Edward Lahiff (University of the Western Cape, South Africa) ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Many people have helped me in various ways to complete this thesis, and I thank them. I would like specifically to thank my supervisor, Dr. Edward Lahiff, who patiently read many drafts of this thesis. I am grateful for his support. My gratitude goes to Nkuzi Development Association, my previous employer, for their support and for providing me with financial resources and time off for study purposes. I would like to extend my sincere appreciation to Mr. Marc Wegerif (Ex-director of Nkuzi) for his motivation. I thank the CPA members who welcomed me into their houses, their ploughing fields and their meetings. I am grateful to them because, to the best of their abilities, they shared with me information which in most cases was emotional and sensitive.
    [Show full text]
  • Tiyani Sub District of Malamulele Magisterial District
    !C !C^ !.!C !C !C^ ^ ^ !C !C !C!C !C !C !C ^ ^ !C !C ^ !C !C !C !C !C ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C ^ !C !C ^ !C !C !C ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C ^ !C ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !. !C ^ ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C ^ !C ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C ^ !C !. !C !C !C !C ^ !C ^ !C ^ !C ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C TTiiyyaannii SSuubb DDiissttrriicctt ooff MMaallaammuulleellee MMaaggiisstteerriiaall DDiissttrriicctt ^ !C !C !C !C DOORNSPRUIT LT WATERBOOM LANGVERWACHT VYGEBOOMSPRUIT 41 179 DRIEFONTEIN 30 SCHUYNSHOOGTE 27 er 286 !C 33 Malamulele rivi ing ELIM WOLFEROODE 29 or BALLYMORE WATERVAL LEVUBU !C D SHIRLEY ^ 38 WELGEVONDEN VAALKOP NABOOMKOP Main Seat 42 SAPS ONGEDACHT ñ Waterval 36 49 50 VYGEBOOMSDRIFT Shirindi MELKHOUTKOPJES KRUISFONTEIN Mashau 52 SCHIEL STYLDRIFT !C 53 314 WATERVAL 48 54 46 GROOTFONTEIN WATERVAL SAPS 47 45 Masia Vuwani MAMPAKUIL Louis Nkhesane Nkhensani Shikari 313 BOSCHKOPJE DE HOOP MODDERVLEI !C VUWANI TSHIMBUPFE 315 68 ONVERWACHT OOG VAN Trichardt 44 Sinthumule Mabodi Sub SAPS DOORNRIVIER Hlanganani 66 NIEUW MADOBI Davhana 318 ñ 230 Main Seat ENGELAND 81 District MAKHADO VLEYFONTEIN MASCHAPPE !C MALMESBURY 60 NIEUWVLAKTE MIDDELFONTEIN SAPS 310 82 ZEEKOEGAT 72 58 78 THORNDALE !C 79 LOCATIE VALDIGLEN 73 R578 !C !C ST VAN TABAAN 326 PIESANGFONTEIN Makhasa BUNGENI Ntshushi KHOMANANI MIDDELPLAATS 55 ROSSBACH BUSHY Hlanganani 658 HOOGMOED !C NK!CURI ZWARTFONTEIN UITSCHOT Klein-Letab Ka-Majosi NIEUWVELD 59 83 PARK a 69 BANKOP DIEPGEZET 392 84 GROENVALLEI PIESANGFONTEIN MARSEILLE 61 76 !C 319 89 Sub 71 WAGENDRIFT 390 SYFERFONTEIN !C 65 !C BELLEVUE
    [Show full text]
  • Manual South African Police Service Section 14
    MANUAL OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN POLICE SERVICE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 14 OF THE PROMOTION OF ACCESS TO INFORMATION ACT, 2000 (ACT NO. 2 OF 2000) ISSUED BY THE INFORMATION OFFICER OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN POLICE SERVICE 2002 CONTENT NO.SUBJECT PAGE 1.STRUCTURE OF THE SERVICE 1.1 NATIONAL LEVEL..................................................................1 1.2 PROVINCIAL / AREA / STATION LEVEL ...........................2 (1)EASTERN CAPE ...........................................................2 (2)FREE STATE..................................................................3 (3)GAUTENG.......................................................................4 (4)KWAZULU-NATAL .......................................................5 (5)LIMPOPO ........................................................................6 (6)MPUMALANGA .............................................................7 (7)NORTHERN CAPE ........................................................8 (8)NORTH WEST ................................................................9 (9)WESTERN CAPE ...........................................................10 2.FUNCTIONS ......................................................................................11 2.1NATIONAL LEVEL ...................................................................11 (1)CAREER MANAGEMENT ............................................11 (2)CRIME INTELLIGENCE ..............................................11 (3)CRIME PREVENTION .................................................12 (4)DETECTIVE SERVICES ...............................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Development Plan
    IInnttegraateed DDeeveellooppmmenntt Pllann 201111//112 ADOPTTEDD IIDDP RREVVIIEEW 0 LIST OF ACRONYMS DME Department of Minerals and Energy DBSA Development Bank of South Africa CDWs Community Development Workers HIV Human Immuno Deficieny Virus GIS Geographic Information Systems P.T.O Permission to Occupy SDF Spatial Development Framework SMMEs Small Medium and Micro Enterprises IDP Integrated Development Planning KPIs Key Perfomance Indicators LED Local Economic Development NGOs Non Governmental Organisations EPWP Expanded Public Works Programme SDBIP Service Delivery and Budget Implementation Plan MTEF Medium Term Expenditure Framework IT Information Technology DRP Disaster Recovery Plan PMS Pefomance Management System MSA Municipal System Act 32 of 2000 VDM Vhembe District Municipality DPW Department of Public Works TLSPDI Trans Limpopo Spatial Development Initiative RWS Regional Water Scheme VIP Ventilated Pit Latrine FBW Free Basic Water FBE Free Basic Energy PHP People Housing Process/Project DLGH Department of Local Government and Housing CBD Central Business District ABET Adult Basic Education LTT Louis Trichardt GDP Gross Domestic Product CTA Community Tourism Association CFO Chief Financial Officer PL Post Level KRA Key Result Area INEP Integrated National Electricity Grant MSIG Municipal System Infrastructure Grant MIG Municipal Infrastracuture Grant DEDET/LEDET Department of Economic Development, Environment and Tourism/Limpopo Economic Development, Environment and Tourism DEAT Department of Economic Development and Tourism 1 VAT Value Added Tax RDP Reconstruction and Development Programme MLM Makhado Local Municipality LDOE Limpopo Department of Education SAPS South African Police Service LM Local Municipality ESKOM Electricity Supply Commision RAL Road Agency Limpopo MM Municipal Manager HRM Human Resource Management 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Item Description Page no.1 no 1 SECTION A: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 1.1 Introduction 7 1.1.1 Powers and functions 8 1.2 Organisational arrangements 9 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Louis Trichardt Sheriff Service Area Louis Trichardt Sheriff Service Area
    LLoouuiiss TTrriicchhaarrddtt SShheerriiffff SSeerrvviiccee AArreeaa # OVER VLAKTE BESKOW 805 ASLYETHMPLE 125 126 rSCHRODA p ivie WEIPE o 118 por lo 119 BERGEN po o RIVER im 46 47 g OP ZOOM DE KLUNDERT Malou SAMARIA L n # tswa o 124 ISLET 28 GREEFSWALD RIEDEL K NEWMARK AMERSHAM 132 141 17 DEN 137 37 48 121 ERFRUST K LANDBOU PARMA PONT STAAT R572 BISMARCK 127 MATOLEGE 5 DRIFT 27 o HACKTHORNE 123 RATHO l S 116 WELTON JANBERRY T TEMPELHOF PARMA 12 o 863 t171 1 p 133 WIMPSH o 40 134 e 30 44 ROSSLYNLEE lo 150 ts 16 KILSYTH KONINGSMARK GOEREE u R521 !C e 168 139 o BRESLAU MONTROW TS p FAURE HORISON 117 172 S MARYLAND o 164 6 l 42 MUNNICHSHAUSEN o 1 2 K K 33 56 151 ol SARDINIA LUCCA GIESENDAM NEANDERHOHLE HALTO#N 190 Limpoporivier VERGENOEGD BALERNO op HARTJESVELD i e HARTBEESTFONTEIN 43 169 ELBERFELD MALALA EENDVOGELPAN d SOMERVILLE 54 D'ERESBY 174 173 167 166 HANLEY 2 a 7 18 35 222 158 VRYHEID HOEK INYATI 3 k o 9 ANGLICAN ROZENTHAL DOVEDALE 13 # a k S 52 165 ### MESSINA 8 MASISI o e BOUWLUST l GLEN Musina Ext5 m HALCYON 186 RANCH h FLORA ONRUST t TWILIGHT le a 24 o ^ l 156 !C# t o KONGO 194 # e SAPS k VERNON Nancefield !.C l b 69 Musina (Messina) 16 a i # ESMEFOUR 80 a AVON 53 175 EHRENBREITSTEIN # ñ# LIMPOPO e HADDON RATHO d 64 BREWSIDE !C # h 87 94 M ARCADIA 856 z 29 # a LIZZULEA 180 $ Musina NU 183 MOERDYK 189 Messina Traffic Musina N BALI M # 1 74 62 LUNA 57 199 BOSCHRAND VIEW 27 28 Sigonde ENDORA KILRUSHControl Centre TER # REGINA 61 MIMRRIORIR OIR 178 BELVEDERE 185 857 188 ROSENTAWICH Baobab Tree UDINI ZISAAN WENDY 84 # WELTEVREDEN 66
    [Show full text]
  • Musina Local Municipality Idp Review 2006 / 2007
    MUSINA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY IDP REVIEW 2006 / 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS VISION MISSION SECTION 1: REVIEW PLANNING PROCESS 1.1 BACKGROUND 0 1.2 INTRODUCTION 0 1.3 LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR IDP REVIEW 0 SECTION 2: PHASE I: ANALYSIS 2.1 SPATIAL ANALYSIS 0 2.2 SOCIO ECONOMIC ANALYSIS 0 2.3 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 0 2.4 INSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS 0 2.5 TABLES OF RE-PRIORITIZATION 0 2.6 IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS OF PRIORITY ISSUES 0 SECTION 3: PHASE II: DEVELOPMENTAL STRATEGIES AND OBJECTIVES 0 SECTION 4: PHASE III: PROJECTS PROPOSALS 0 SECTION 5: APPROVAL 0 ANNEXURES: A: MUSINA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY BUDGET SUMMARY (DRAFT) 0 ANNEXURES: B: SECTOR PLANS 0 ANNEXURES: C: ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE 0 ANNEXURES: D: SECTOR DEPARTMENTS PLANS 0 MUSINA IDP 2006/07 ANALYSIS REVIEW OUR VISION “VEHICLE OF AFFORDABLE QUALITY SERVICES AND STABILITY THROUGH SOCIO-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND COLLECTIVE LEADERSHIP” OUR MISSION “TO BE A COMMUNITY DRIVEN MUNICIPALITY WITH A DEVELOPING AND ADAPTING INFRASTRUCTURE, SERVING ALL PEOPLE IN A FOCUSED EFFICIENT AND ACCOUNTABLE MANNER” SECTION 1: REVIEW PLANNING PROCESS 1.1 BACKGROUND Musina Local Municipality was established in terms of the Municipal structures Act, 117 of 1998, which provides for the establishment of municipalities, their categories, competencies powers and functions. The townships of Musina and Musina-Nancefield comprises 11 000 ha in extent and is situated in the Vhembe district of the Limpopo province and within the magisterial district of Musina. The municipality is situated approximately 15 km to the south of the Limpopo River, which forms the international boundary with Zimbabwe. The international border post is Beit Bridge.
    [Show full text]
  • Vhembe District Profile
    2 PROFILE: MANGAUNG METRO PROFILE: MANGAUNG METRO 3 Table of Contents 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................. 6 2. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 8 2.1 Location .......................................................................................................................................... 8 2.2 Historical Perspective ................................................................................................................... 8 2.3 Spatial Status ................................................................................................................................. 9 3. SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT PROFILE .............................................................................................. 9 3.1 Key Social Demographics ............................................................................................................. 9 3.1.1 Population .............................................................................................................................. 9 3.1.2 Race Gender and Age .........................................................................................................10 3.1.3 Households ..........................................................................................................................11 3.1.3.1 Child Headed ....................................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Makhado Local Economic Development Strategy
    1 MAKHADO LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY MAKHADO LOCAL ECONOMIC 2013 DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY Physical Address: 83 Krogh Street, Makhado | Tel: (015)519-3000 2 MAKHADO LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY ACRONYMS AND ABREVIATIONS AIDS : Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome CBD : Central Business District CBO : Community Based Organisation CRDP : Comprehensive Rural Development Programme CSIR : Council for Scientific and Industrial Research CTA : Community Tourism Association DC : Development Corridors DDP : Department of Development and Planning DGP : District Growth Point District : Vhembe District Municipality DMR : Department of Mineral Resources DoL : Department of Labour DTI : Department of Trade and Industry FET : Further Education and Training GVA : Gross Value Added HDI : Human Development Index HIV : Human Immunodeficiency Virus IDP : Integrated Development Plan LDA : Limpopo Department of Agriculture LDRT : Limpopo Department of Roads and Transport LED : Local Economic Development LEDET : Limpopo Economic Development, Environment and Tourism Department LEDA : Limpopo Economic Development Agency LEGDP : Limpopo Employment, Growth and Development Plan Limpopo : Limpopo Province LSP : Local Service Point LTA : Limpopo Tourism Authority Makhado : Makhado Local Municipality MGP : Municipal Growth Point MINTEK : Mining Technology MLM : Makhado Local Municipality 3 MAKHADO LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY Municipality : Makhado Local Municipality NAFCOC : National African Chamber of Commerce and Industry NSDP : National Spatial
    [Show full text]