Covered Bridges Nhl Context Study ======B

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Covered Bridges Nhl Context Study ======B NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (Rev. 08-2002) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form This form is used for documenting multiple property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in How to Complete the Multiple Property Documentation Form (National Register Bulletin 16B). Complete each item by entering the requested information. For additional space, use continuation sheets (Form 10-900-a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer to complete all items. X New Submission Amended Submission ======================================================================================= A. Name of Multiple Property Listing ======================================================================================= COVERED BRIDGES NHL CONTEXT STUDY ======================================================================================= B. Associated Historic Contexts ======================================================================================= ======================================================================================= C. Form Prepared by ======================================================================================= name/title Lola Bennett, Historian organization Heritage Documentation Programs, National Park Service address 1201 I Street NW, 7th Floor city/town Washington state DC zip code 20005 ======================================================================================= D. Certification ======================================================================================= As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this documentation form meets the National Register documentation standards and sets forth requirements for the listing of related properties consistent with the National Register criteria. This submission meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60 and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines for Archeology and Historic Preservation. (See continuation sheet for additional comments.) ____________________________________________ _________________________________ Signature and Title of Certifying Official Date ____________________________________________ _________________________________ State or Federal Agency or Tribal Government Date I hereby certify that this multiple property documentation form has been approved by the National Register as a basis for evaluating related properties for listing in the National Register. ____________________________________________ _________________________________ Signature of the Keeper Date NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (Rev. 08-2002) COVERED BRIDGES NHL CONTEXT STUDY Page 2 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form Provide the following information on continuation sheets. Cite the letter and the title before each section of the narrative. Assign page numbers according to the instructions for continuation sheets in How to Complete the Multiple Property Documentation Form (National Register Bulletin 16B). Fill in page numbers for each section in the space below. Page Number E. Statement of Historic Contexts 3 F. Associated Property Types 28 G. Geographical Data 31 H. Summary of Identification and Evaluation Methods 32 Covered Bridges Proposed for National Historic Landmark Consideration 35 I. Major Bibliographical References 42 =============================================================================== Paperwork Reduction Act Statement: This information is being collected for applications to the National Register of Historic Places to nominate properties for listing or determine eligibility for listing, to list properties, and to amend existing listings. Response to this request is required to obtain a benefit in accordance with the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 470 et seq.). A federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. Estimated Burden Statement: Public reporting burden for this form is estimated to average 120 hours per response including the time for reviewing instructions, gathering and maintaining data, and completing and reviewing the form. Direct comments regarding this burden estimate or any aspect of this form to the National Register of Historic Places, National Park Service, 1849 C St., NW, Washington, DC 20240. NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (Rev. 08-2002) COVERED BRIDGES NHL CONTEXT STUDY Page 3 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form E. STATEMENT OF HISTORIC CONTEXTS Covered bridges are a pre-eminently American phenomenon. Nowhere else in the world were such impressive timber bridges attempted, and nowhere else were they built in such vast numbers.1 Over the course of two centuries, covered bridges have played a significant role in American life, by facilitating settlement, transportation, and commerce. They also represent a period of remarkable achievement in civil engineering, during which bridge building evolved from an empirical craft to a science. At the height of covered bridge building, around 1870, there were well over 10,000 covered bridges in the United States.2 Timber bridges have been built in forested regions of the world for centuries.3 Wood is an excellent material for building; it is strong, relatively lightweight, and easy to work with. Since most species of wood suitable for structural applications deteriorate rapidly when exposed to the weather, bridge builders quickly learned the value of covering wood bridges with roofs and siding to protect the underlying framework.4 Several European covered bridges have survived for more than three centuries, while a few in the United States are nearing the two-century mark.5 Following the American Revolutionary War, the demand for roads and bridges, coupled with access to abundant forests, spurred the independent development of timber bridge design in the United States.6 In 1805, America's first known covered bridge was completed across the Schuylkill River at Philadelphia. By 1810, there were covered bridges at most major river crossings in the Northeast. From Philadelphia, covered bridge building spread northward, southward, and westward at a rapid pace. The construction of timber bridges utilized readily available materials and common hand tools. Skilled carpenters could erect an average-sized covered bridge within a few weeks. By 1850, there were covered bridges in most settled regions of the United States. The golden era of covered bridge building lasted about a century in most areas of United States, and even longer in areas where timber was plentiful.7 In the late-nineteenth century, timber truss bridges were eclipsed by comparable spans of iron. Railroads enabled manufacturers to ship prefabricated metal bridges to distant markets and compete with local builders for contracts. The last decade of the nineteenth century saw the rise of the Good Roads Movement and growing demand for modern bridges, a trend that gained momentum with the advent of the automobile. In the face of the technological and industrial advances of the first decades of the 1900s, covered bridges, now traversed by motorized vehicles or glimpsed from modern highways, generated powerful 1 American scholars have recently become aware of hundreds of ancient covered bridges in China; however, most of these bridges were built for pedestrian use and their construction techniques and reason for covering differ from the Western tradition. 2 This is only a rough estimate of known covered bridges that existed c.1870. Initial data compiled by the “Covered Spans of Yesteryear Project,” http://www.lostbridges.org, suggests that this figure may be too low. 3 In 55 BC, Julius Caesar (100 BC-44 BC) built the world’s first major timber bridge across the Rhine River near present-day Koblenz, Germany. 4 It is believed that this practice originated in Switzerland. 5 Hyde Hall Bridge (1825) is believed to be the oldest covered bridge in the United States. See HAER No. NY-330, Hyde Hall Bridge, Otsego County, New York. 6 While it is likely that American builders were aware of covered bridges in Europe, there is very little documentation to suggest a direct transfer of knowledge from Europe to America. 7 Covered bridge building persisted longer in different regions. For example, it ended in New England around 1920, in the Midwest around 1925, and in the South around 1935. Covered bridges continued to be built in Oregon into the 1950s. NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (Rev. 08-2002) COVERED BRIDGES NHL CONTEXT STUDY Page 4 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form feelings of nostalgia for many Americans. In the 1930s, covered bridges emerged in popular culture. During this period, antiquarians and hobbyists also set out to visit, photograph, and gather information about those structures that survived. Collecting images and information about these historic structures led to the formation of covered bridge societies in the 1940s. As this movement gained momentum in the 1950s and 60s, local and state officials began to promote covered bridges as tourist attractions to boost their local economies.
Recommended publications
  • Télécharger La Page En Format
    Portail de l'éducation de Historica Canada Canada's Game - The Modern Era Overview This lesson plan is based on viewing the Footprints videos for Gordie Howe, Bobby Orr, Father David Bauer, Bobby Hull,Wayne Gretzky, and The Forum. Throughout hockey's history, though they are not presented in the Footprints, francophone players like Guy Lafleur, Mario Lemieux, Raymond Bourque, Jacques Lemaire, and Patrick Roy also made a significant contribution to the sport. Parents still watch their children skate around cold arenas before the sun is up and backyard rinks remain national landmarks. But hockey is no longer just Canada's game. Now played in cities better known for their golf courses than their ice rinks, hockey is an international game. Hockey superstars and hallowed ice rinks became national icons as the game matured and Canadians negotiated their role in the modern era. Aims To increase student awareness of the development of the game of hockey in Canada; to increase student recognition of the contributions made by hockey players as innovators and their contributions to the game; to examine their accomplishments in their historical context; to explore how hockey has evolved into the modern game; to understand the role of memory and commemoration in our understanding of the past and present; and to critically investigate myth-making as a way of understanding the game’s relationship to national identity. Background Frozen fans huddled in the open air and helmet-less players battled for the puck in a -28 degree Celsius wind chill. The festive celebration was the second-ever outdoor National Hockey League game, held on 22 November 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Testing and Structural Analysis of Burr Arch Covered Bridges in Pennsylvania
    Field Testing and Structural Analysis of Burr Arch Covered Bridges in Pennsylvania Douglas Rammer1, James Wacker2, Travis Hosteng3, Justin Dahlberg4 and Yaohua Deng5 ABSTRACT: The Federal Highway Administration sponsored a comprehensive research program on Historic Covered Timber Bridges in the USA. This national program's main purpose is to develop improved methods to preserve, rehabilitate, and restore timber bridge trusses that were developed during the early 1800s and, in many cases, are still in service today. One of the many ongoing research studies is aimed at establishing a procedure for safely and reliably load- rating historic covered bridges though physical testing and improved structural modelling. This paper focuses on recent field work and analysis of four Burr Arch through-truss-type covered bridges located in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. An overview of field evaluation methods, loading testing, and structural modelling procedures are included along with a comparison of field measurements and structural model prediction of bridge behaviour. KEYWORDS: loading rating, structural analysis, covered bridges, historical landmark, burr arch 1 INTRODUCTION 123 established for historic covered bridges. Given the historic nature and unusual geometric features of these The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), in structures, a procedure needs to be established detailing partnership with the USDA Forest Products Laboratory how to safely and reliably determine load ratings for and the National Park Service (NPS), sponsored a historic covered timber bridges through physical testing. comprehensive national research program on Historic Covered Timber Bridges in the USA. The main purpose Similarly, the complex behavior and unique details of is to develop improved methods to preserve, rehabilitate, covered bridges make structural modeling a daunting task and restore timber bridge trusses that were first developed for the typical bridge engineer.
    [Show full text]
  • A Look at Bridges: a Study of Types, Histories, and the Marriage of Engineering and Architecture Cody Chase Connecticut College
    Connecticut College Digital Commons @ Connecticut College Architectural Studies Integrative Projects Art History and Architectural Studies 2015 A Look at Bridges: A Study of Types, Histories, and the Marriage of Engineering and Architecture Cody Chase Connecticut College Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.conncoll.edu/archstudintproj Recommended Citation Chase, Cody, "A Look at Bridges: A Study of Types, Histories, and the Marriage of Engineering and Architecture" (2015). Architectural Studies Integrative Projects. Paper 73. http://digitalcommons.conncoll.edu/archstudintproj/73 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Art History and Architectural Studies at Digital Commons @ Connecticut College. It has been accepted for inclusion in Architectural Studies Integrative Projects by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Connecticut College. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The views expressed in this paper are solely those of the author. CODY CHASE SENIOR INTEGRATIVE PROJECT: INDEPENDENT STUDY ARCHITECTURAL STUDIES CONNECTICUT COLLEGE 2015 A"LOOK"INTO"BRIDGES" A"Study"of"Types,"Histories,"and"the"Marriage"of" Engineering"and"Architecture" " Cody"Chase"‘15" Architectural"Studies"Major,"Art"History"Minor" Senior"IntegraHve"Project" " Why Bridges? Where to begin? TYPES OTHER • Arch • Glossary • Beam/Girder/Stringer • Materials • Truss • History of Failures • Suspension • Models • Cable-Stayed • Moveable Span What makes a bridge stand up? FORCES ***Compression:
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Bridges of Somerset County Pennsylvania
    HISTORIC BRIDGES OF SOMERSET COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA Scott D. Heberling Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration HISTORIC BRIDGES OF SOMERSET COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA Scott D. Heberling Photographs by Scott D. Heberling and Stephen Simpson except as noted Layout and design by Christopher Yohn This publication was produced by Heberling Associates, Inc. for the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration © 2010 Pennsylvania Department of Transportation ISBN-10: 0-89271-126-4 ISBN-13: 978-0-89271-126-0 CONTENTS 1 Somerset County’s Historic Bridges 3 Bridge Building in Pennsylvania 6 Stone Arch Bridges 10 Wooden Covered Bridges 21 Metal Truss Bridges 35 Concrete Bridges 43 Bridge Location Map 44 Sources Glessner Bridge Salisbury Viaduct Somerset County’s Historic Bridges Somerset County, high in the Laurel Highlands of southwestern Pennsylvania, is renowned for its stunning natural beauty and expansive rural landscapes. It is also rich in history. The county’s many historic farms, villages, and winding country roads contribute to a strong “sense of place” that appeals to residents and visitors alike. The people who have called Somerset County home for thousands of years have created a unique cultural environment unlike any other. From the ancient settlements in the “Turkeyfoot” region of the south, to the rolling farm country of Brothers Valley in the center, to the coal patch towns of the north, history is everywhere in Somerset County. Something interesting always seems to lie just around the next bend in the road. The county’s development was shaped by its hydrology and rugged topography. Although its forested hills hid immeasurable mineral wealth just below the surface they also limited the areas suitable for settlement and agriculture.
    [Show full text]
  • 2009-2010 Colorado Avalanche Media Guide
    Qwest_AVS_MediaGuide.pdf 8/3/09 1:12:35 PM UCQRGQRFCDDGAG?J GEF³NCCB LRCPLCR PMTGBCPMDRFC Colorado MJMP?BMT?J?LAFCÍ Upgrade your speed. CUG@CP³NRGA?QR LRCPLCRDPMKUCQR®. Available only in select areas Choice of connection speeds up to: C M Y For always-on Internet households, wide-load CM Mbps data transfers and multi-HD video downloads. MY CY CMY For HD movies, video chat, content sharing K Mbps and frequent multi-tasking. For real-time movie streaming, Mbps gaming and fast music downloads. For basic Internet browsing, Mbps shopping and e-mail. ���.���.���� qwest.com/avs Qwest Connect: Service not available in all areas. Connection speeds are based on sync rates. Download speeds will be up to 15% lower due to network requirements and may vary for reasons such as customer location, websites accessed, Internet congestion and customer equipment. Fiber-optics exists from the neighborhood terminal to the Internet. Speed tiers of 7 Mbps and lower are provided over fiber optics in selected areas only. Requires compatible modem. Subject to additional restrictions and subscriber agreement. All trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Copyright © 2009 Qwest. All Rights Reserved. TABLE OF CONTENTS Joe Sakic ...........................................................................2-3 FRANCHISE RECORD BOOK Avalanche Directory ............................................................... 4 All-Time Record ..........................................................134-135 GM’s, Coaches .................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Eldean Bridge NHL Nomination
    NPS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 ELDEAN BRIDGE Page 1 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 1. NAME OF PROPERTY Historic Name: Eldean Bridge (preferred historic common name) Other Name/Site Number: Allen’s Mill Bridge (original historic name); Marshall Bridge; World Guide #35-55-01; Farver Road Bridge 0.15 2. LOCATION Street Address: Spanning Great Miami River at bypassed section of Eldean Road/CR33 (bypassed section of Eldean Road is now the west part of Farver Road) Not for Publication: City/Town: Troy vicinity, Concord Township-Staunton Township Vicinity: X State: Ohio County: Miami Code: 055 Zip Code: 45373 3. CLASSIFICATION Ownership of Property Category of Property Private: ___ Building(s): ___ Public-Local: X District: ___ Public-State: ___ Site: ___ Public-Federal: ___ Structure: X Object: ___ Number of Resources within Property Contributing Noncontributing buildings buildings sites sites 1 structures structures objects objects 1 Total 0 Total Number of Contributing Resources Previously Listed in the National Register: 1 Name of Related MultipleDRAFT Property Listing: NPS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 ELDEAN BRIDGE Page 2 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 4. STATE/FEDERAL AGENCY CERTIFICATION As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this ____ nomination ____ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.
    [Show full text]
  • Kintersburg Bridge, PA-32-05
    THE THEODORE BURR COVERED BRIDGE SOCIETY OF PENNSYLVANIA, INC. VOLUME 40 - NUMBER 1 WINTER 2017 Kintersburg Bridge, PA-32-05 J. S. Fleming built this bridge across Crooked Creek in 1877 at a cost of $893. The 68 ft., single span crossing is one of only five Howe Truss covered bridges in the Commonwealth. It was named for Isaac Kinter, a local shopkeeper. Bypassed many years ago by a modern bridge, it is located off Tanoma Road on Musser Road in Rayne Township. One of four remaining covered bridges in Indiana County, PA, all are easily visited in one afternoon tour. - Photo by Thomas E. Walczak, September 25, 2016 - 1 - WOODEN COVERED SPANS VOLUME 40 - NUMBER 1, WINTER 2017 THE THEODORE BURR COVERED BRIDGE SOCIETY OF PENNSYLVANIA, INC. The material herein shall not be reproduced without prior written permission from this society. Editor Thomas E. Walczak 3012 Old Pittsburgh Road New Castle, PA 16101 The Old Covered Bridge Email: [email protected] By Charles Clevenger OFFICERS 2016-2017 New Boston, Ohio President .........................................................Thomas E. Walczak 3012 Old Pittsburgh Road A dusty dirt road meanders the ridge, New Castle, PA 16101 Then curves downhill 1st Vice-President ...................................................James Smedley To an old covered bridge. 4 Gamewell Garth Where I, in my youth, Nottingham, MD 21236 Spent hours at play; 2nd Vice-President ..................................................Ray Finkelstein Oh, I remember—‘tho it were yesterday. 4720 Horseshoe Trail Macungie, PA 180625 There, hearts of love, I carved on its beams, 3rd Vice-President ................................................... Steve Wolfhope 706 Jonathan Drive ‘Twas only yesterday- or so it seems.
    [Show full text]
  • Bridge Types in NSW Historical Overviews 2006
    Bridge Types in NSW Historical overviews 2006 These historical overviews of bridge types in NSW are extracts compiled from bridge population studies commissioned by RTA Environment Branch. CONTENTS Section Page 1. Masonry Bridges 1 2. Timber Beam Bridges 12 3. Timber Truss Bridges 25 4. Pre-1930 Metal Bridges 57 5. Concrete Beam Bridges 75 6. Concrete Slab and Arch Bridges 101 Masonry Bridges Heritage Study of Masonry Bridges in NSW 2005 1 Historical Overview of Bridge Types in NSW: Extract from the Study of Masonry Bridges in NSW HISTORICAL BACKGROUND TO MASONRY BRIDGES IN NSW 1.1 History of early bridges constructed in NSW Bridges constructed prior to the 1830s were relatively simple forms. The majority of these were timber structures, with the occasional use of stone piers. The first bridge constructed in NSW was built in 1788. The bridge was a simple timber bridge constructed over the Tank Stream, near what is today the intersection of George and Bridge Streets in the Central Business District of Sydney. Soon after it was washed away and needed to be replaced. The first "permanent" bridge in NSW was this bridge's successor. This was a masonry and timber arch bridge with a span of 24 feet erected in 1803 (Figure 1.1). However this was not a triumph of colonial bridge engineering, as it collapsed after only three years' service. It took a further five years for the bridge to be rebuilt in an improved form. The contractor who undertook this work received payment of 660 gallons of spirits, this being an alternative currency in the Colony at the time (Main Roads, 1950: 37) Figure 1.1 “View of Sydney from The Rocks, 1803”, by John Lancashire (Dixson Galleries, SLNSW).
    [Show full text]
  • “A People Who Have Not the Pride to Record Their History Will Not Long
    STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE i “A people who have not the pride to record their History will not long have virtues to make History worth recording; and Introduction no people who At the rear of Old Main at Bethany College, the sun shines through are indifferent an arcade. This passageway is filled with students today, just as it was more than a hundred years ago, as shown in a c.1885 photograph. to their past During my several visits to this college, I have lingered here enjoying the light and the student activity. It reminds me that we are part of the past need hope to as well as today. People can connect to historic resources through their make their character and setting as well as the stories they tell and the memories they make. future great.” The National Register of Historic Places recognizes historic re- sources such as Old Main. In 2000, the State Historic Preservation Office Virgil A. Lewis, first published Historic West Virginia which provided brief descriptions noted historian of our state’s National Register listings. This second edition adds approx- Mason County, imately 265 new listings, including the Huntington home of Civil Rights West Virginia activist Memphis Tennessee Garrison, the New River Gorge Bridge, Camp Caesar in Webster County, Fort Mill Ridge in Hampshire County, the Ananias Pitsenbarger Farm in Pendleton County and the Nuttallburg Coal Mining Complex in Fayette County. Each reveals the richness of our past and celebrates the stories and accomplishments of our citizens. I hope you enjoy and learn from Historic West Virginia.
    [Show full text]
  • Bridge Summary
    BRIDGE SUMMARY KEY PBB Prestressed Butted Boxes PIB Prestressed I-Beams Each bridge has data listed on three lines, the top line being structure specific PSB Prestressed Spread Boxes information, the second line being comments and roadway specific information. PSC Prestressed Concrete The third line being the condition of major elements of the bridge. PSS Prestressed Solid Slabs PTB Prestressed Tee Beams The Top line consists of PVS Prestressed Voided Slabs SA Steel Arch Bridge Coordinate Number SRF Steel Rigid Frame Facility Carried by the Structure SWING Swing Bridge Feature Crossed TB Timber Bridge Date of most recent Inspection TB-C Covered Bridge Federal Sufficiency Rating (%) TB-CS Timber Bridge Conc. Slab Owner of the bridge TPG Thru Plate Girder Type of Bridge: TS Timber Slab BAIB Bailey or similar bridge TS-P Prestressed Timber Slab BAS Bascule Span BGB Beam Girder Bridge Width of the bridge CA Concrete Arch Some buried structures are coded with Zero Width CACUL Concrete Arch Culvert Length of the bridge CAR Concrete Arch Rib Number of bridge spans CB Concrete Box A flag indicating that the structure meets the federal definition of a CB-P Concrete Box-Precast bridge CP Concrete Pipe Recommended Weight limit Posting: CRF Concrete Rigid Frame CRF-P Concrete Rigid Frame-Precast E1, E2, C1, C2 & C3 - Restrictions for Certified Vehicles. CS Concrete Slab CPP Corrugated Polymer Pipe NOTE: The NHDOT has taken the position that the Town or City is CTB Concrete Tee Beam responsible for the evaluation of their bridges. Until evaluated, we CTC Concrete Timber Composite recommend all Town and City owned bridges be Posted "E-2".
    [Show full text]
  • Timber Bridges Design, Construction, Inspection, and Maintenance
    Timber Bridges Design, Construction, Inspection, and Maintenance Michael A. Ritter, Structural Engineer United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Ritter, Michael A. 1990. Timber Bridges: Design, Construction, Inspection, and Maintenance. Washington, DC: 944 p. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author acknowledges the following individuals, Agencies, and Associations for the substantial contributions they made to this publication: For contributions to Chapter 1, Fong Ou, Ph.D., Civil Engineer, USDA Forest Service, Engineering Staff, Washington Office. For contributions to Chapter 3, Jerry Winandy, Research Forest Products Technologist, USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory. For contributions to Chapter 8, Terry Wipf, P.E., Ph.D., Associate Professor of Structural Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa. For administrative overview and support, Clyde Weller, Civil Engineer, USDA Forest Service, Engineering Staff, Washington Office. For consultation and assistance during preparation and review, USDA Forest Service Bridge Engineers, Steve Bunnell, Frank Muchmore, Sakee Poulakidas, Ron Schmidt, Merv Eriksson, and David Summy; Russ Moody and Alan Freas (retired) of the USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory; Dave Pollock of the National Forest Products Association; and Lorraine Krahn and James Wacker, former students at the University of Wisconsin at Madison. In addition, special thanks to Mary Jane Baggett and Jim Anderson for editorial consultation, JoAnn Benisch for graphics preparation and layout, and Stephen Schmieding and James Vargo for photographic support. iii iv CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 TIMBER AS A BRIDGE MATERIAL 1.1 Introduction .............................................................................. l- 1 1.2 Historical Development of Timber Bridges ............................. l-2 Prehistory Through the Middle Ages ....................................... l-3 Middle Ages Through the 18th Century ................................... l-5 19th Century ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pregame Notes
    PREGAME NOTES 2019 TIM HORTONS NHL HERITAGE CLASSIC WINNIPEG JETS vs. CALGARY FLAMES MOSAIC STADIUM, REGINA, SASK. – OCT. 26, 2019 JETS, FLAMES FACE OFF OUTDOORS The Winnipeg Jets and Calgary Flames face off tonight in the 2019 Tim Hortons NHL Heritage Classic (10 p.m. ET / 8 p.m. CST, CBC, SN1, CITY, TVAS2, NBCSN) – the League’s 28th regular-season outdoor game and fifth in the Heritage Classic series. The Jets and Flames each have participated in one prior outdoor game, both under the Heritage Classic umbrella. Winnipeg played host to the 2016 Tim Hortons NHL Heritage Classic at Investors Group Field, falling 3-0 to the Edmonton Oilers. Nine Jets players who appeared in that game remain with the team: Kyle Connor, Nikolaj Ehlers, Connor Hellebuyck, Patrik Laine, Adam Lowry, Josh Morrissey, Mathieu Perreault, Mark Scheifele and Blake Wheeler. Current Calgary goaltender Cam Talbot started for Edmonton in that contest, stopping all 31 shots he faced for the third shutout in outdoor NHL game history. Current Jets forward Mark Letestu scored the winning goal (while shorthanded), as a member of the Oilers. And current Flames forward Milan Lucic recorded two penalty minutes for Edmonton. Calgary served as hosts for the 2011 Tim Hortons NHL Heritage Classic at McMahon Stadium, defeating the Montreal Canadiens 4-0. Two players who appeared in that game remain with the Flames: Mikael Backlund and Mark Giordano. Overall, the Jets feature 11 players who have participated in a prior outdoor NHL game (minimum: 1 GP in 2019-20), while the Flames have four. Talbot leads that group with four such appearances, though he served as a backup goaltender for three of them (2014 SS w/ NYR [2 GP], 2019 SS w/ PHI).
    [Show full text]