«™h†™ ßÕÕ Contemporary Sociological eory

Kieran Healy [email protected]

Spring óþÕä. Sociology/Psychology ìóÉ. Tues Õþ:þ¢am–Õó:ì¢pm.

Say what you mean. Bear witness. Iterate. John M. Ford, De Vermis. h™¶§«u ou«h§†£±†™• is graduate-level course is an introduction to some main themes in sociological theory since the ÕÉ¢þs. It is the second of the two-part theory sequence required of rst year Ph.D students in the sociology department. It is not a general introduction either to social theory broadly conceived or to humanities-style “eory”.

§u¤¶†§u“u•±« Z•o uì£uh±Z±†™•« is is a seminar. I take for granted that you have a basic interest in the material and an enthusiastic attitude toward participation. I expect you to attend each meeting, do the reading thoroughly and in advance, and participate actively in class. You should also be reading beyond the requirements as much as possible. In addition, two other kinds of work are required:

Õ da2fd97 on 2016/01/16 ó

×. Each week (except for the rst week), you will write a brief (ó-¦ page) memo and put it in the class Dropbox folder by ìpm the day before class. is is a hard deadline. e memos should discuss topics or questions arising from the week’s reading. ey are writing and thinking exercises, not nished papers or polished short essays. However, I expect them to engage with the readings in an intelligent way. ey should be used to develop ideas informally, and raise issues that seem to you worth developing in class or in your own writing. I will read them each week and sometimes give you written feedback, in addition to using them to help focus class discussion.

ö. ere will be either a nal paper assignment or the option to write a paper of your own. We will discuss the alternatives as we go.

Z 뙧o Zf™¶± ±„u Z££§™Zh„ Last semester, you followed the more or less conventional sequence of “classical” socio- logical theorists through the long nineteenth century. You ended a generation later with Talcott Parsons’s ešort to unify these thinkers into some sort of research program. Along with the rest of the social sciences, Sociology grew and dišerentiated rapidly aŸer World War II. Parsons tried to ground his historical synthesis in a systems framework. Structural-functionalism’s period of dominance was disputed and relatively brief, but much of what followed in American Sociology can be seen as a reaction to its failure. Some of the theory groups that followed began working out parts of the post-Parsonian wreckage. Sometimes this was accompanied by a self-consciously modest view about the scope and limits of theory, but sometimes they sought to replace the entire frame- work using a single part of the original. Others attempted to build a new canon of previously neglected classics, or imported work from outside the eld. Amongst the most inžuential in practice were attempts to develop theory in direct engagement with empirical research rather than by way of quasi-philosophical system-building or armchair cultural criticism. is semester, we read some of this material. We cannot be comprehensive and we will not try, if only because that would be pedagogically insane. One of the easiest moves in the eory Game is to say “I can’t believe we’re not reading x”, for any x. But this move depends for its ešectiveness on the word “theory” (or “eory”) continuing to have its old disciplinary power, and the “theory course” continuing to exercise its old, canon-dening function. is has not been true in Sociology since the Õɘþs. I have tried to avoid producing miniature replications of the theory sections of other courses ošered in the department. You should take those courses. Nor will we examine very much of the theoretical work that’s been done over the same period in other social sciences, in the humanities, and elsewhere. Instead, we will mostly ì examine ideas and research programs generated and pursued within the discipline, and that remain relevant to current sociological research. at relevance may take the form of descent, critique, or elephant in the room. You should see this seminar as a starting point from which to read more widely and deeply than the material we can cover in our allotted time. It provides you with some basic ideas within the discipline together with a framework for interpreting the many critiques, reactions, reformulations, and recombinations of those ideas in the literature.

§uZo†•« Readings are available either via a link in the syllabus or through the course Dropbox folder. e contents of the Dropbox supersede the contents of this syllabus. I encourage you to buy and read as many of the required and recommended books as you can. ese books—even the quite obscure ones—can generally be acquired cheaply online. e following texts are useful for getting oriented.

Barry Barnes. ÕÉÉ¢. e Elements of Social eory. Princeton: Princeton University Press. omas J. Fararo. ÕɘÉ. e Meaning of General eoretical Sociology. New York: Cambridge University Press. Hans Joas and Wolfgang Knöbl. óþþÉ. Social eory: Twenty Introductory Lectures. New York: Cambridge University Press. Donald Levine. ÕÉÉ¢. Visions of the Sociological Tradition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Nicos Mouzelis. ÕÉÉ¢. Sociological eory: What went wrong? London: Routledge.

€¶•h±†™•Z†«“ Z•o †±« o†«h™•±u•±« Assignment Come to class having re-read your work from last semester.

Required

Note: is week’s readings are best read in the order listed. Talcott Parsons. ÕÉ¢É. “e School Class as a Social System: Some of its Functions in American Society.” Harvard Educational Review óÉ:óÉß–ì՘. Talcott Parsons and Edward A. Shils. ÕÉ¢Õ. “Values, Motives and Systems of Action.” In Toward a General eory of Action, edited by Talcott Parsons and Edward A. Shils, ¢ì–ßÉ. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Talcott Parsons. ÕÉ¢ó. e Social System. Glencoe, IL: Free Press. Excerpts. ¦

David Lockwood. ÕÉ¢ä. “Some Remarks on ‘e Social System’.” British Journal of Sociology ß:Õ즖զä. David Lockwood. ÕÉä¦. “Social Integration and System Integration.” In Explorations in Social Change, edited by G.K. Zollschan and W. Hirsch, ó¦É–óäß. London: Routledge. Robert K. Merton. ÕÉä˜. Social eory and Social Structure. Enlarged Edition. Glencoe: Free Press. Pp. ìÉ-ÕÕß, Õߢ-óÕì. Jon Elster. Õɘó. “Marxism, Functionalism, and Game eory.” eory and Society ÕÕ:¦¢ì–¦˜ó.

Recommended Ludwig von Bertlanšy. ÕÉ¢þ. “An Outline of General Systems eory.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science Õ:Õ즖Õä¢. doi:10.1093/bjps/I.2.134. Max Black. ÕÉäÕ. “Some Questions about Parsons’ eories.” In e Social eories of Talcott Parsons: A Critical Examination, edited by Max Black, ó䘖ó˜þ. Englewood Clišs: Prentice Hall. Charles Camic. ÕɘÉ. “‘Structure’ AŸer FiŸy Years: Anatomy of a Charter.” American Journal of Sociology É¢:옖Õþß. N.J. Demerath and Richard A. Peterson, eds. ÕÉäß. System, Change and Conžict. New York: Free Press. Anthony Giddens. ÕÉßÉ. Central Problems in Social eory. London: Macmillan, chapter ß, “e Prospects for Social eory Today”. Peter Hamilton. Õɘì. Talcott Parsons. Tavistock: Routledge. John Heritage. Õɘ¦. Garnkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press. Pp. ß–ìä. David Lockwood. ÕÉÉó. Solidarity and Schism: “e Problem of Disorder” in Durkheimian and Marxist Sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Eden Medina. óþÕÕ. Cybernetic Revolutionaries: Technology and Politics in Allende’s Chile. Cambridge: MIT Press.

£Z§± †: €§Z“u•±« ™€ §™u ±„u™§í ó. †•±u§Zh±†™• 놱„™¶± Zh±™§« Required Erving Gošman. ÕÉ¢É. e Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor Books. Excerpts. Erving Gošman. Õɘó. Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. New York: Pantheon. Excerpts. Harold Garnkel. ÕɦÉ. “Notes on Inter- and Intra-Racial Homicides.” Social Forces óß:ìäÉ–ì˜Õ. Harold Garnkel. ÕÉäß. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Clišs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Excerpts. ¢

Arlie Hochschild. ÕÉßÉ. “Emotion Work, Feeling Rules and Social Structure.” American Journal of Sociology ˜¢:¢¢Õ–ߢ.

Recommended Howard Becker. ÕÉ¢ì. “Becoming a Marihuana User.” American Journal of Sociology ¢É:ó좖ó¦ó. Randall Collins. óþþ¦. Interaction Ritual Chains. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Harold Garnkel. ÕÉä¦. “Studies of the Routine Grounds of Everyday Activities.” Social Problems ÕÕ:óó¢–ó¢þ. http://www.jstor.org/stable/798722. Erving Gošman. ÕÉߦ. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press. Erving Gošman. Õɘä. Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. New York: Simon & Schuster. John Heritage. Õɘ¦. Garnkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press. D.W Maynard, Jeremy Freese, and Nora Cate Schaešer. óþÕþ. “Calling for Participation: Requests, Blocking Moves, and Rational (Inter)action in Survey Introductions.” American Sociological Review ߢ:ßÉÕ–˜Õ¦. Karin Martin. ÕÉɘ. “Becoming a Gendered Body: Practices of Preschools.” American Sociological Review äì:¦É¦–¢ÕÕ. Candace West and Don Zimmerman. Õɘß. “Doing Gender.” Gender and Society Õ:Õó¢–Õ¢Õ. Laurel Westbrook and Kristen Schilt. óþÕ¦. “Doing Gender, Determining Gender: Transgender People, Gender Panics, and the Maintenance of the Sex/Gender/Sexuality System.” Gender and Society ó˜:ìó–¢ß.

ì. «±§¶h±¶§u« 놱„™¶± €¶•h±†™•« Required Peter Bearman. ÕÉÉß. “Generalized Exchange.” American Journal of Sociology Õþó:Õì˜ì– Õ¦Õ¢. Peter M. Blau. ÕÉßßa. “A Macrosociological eory of Social Structure.” American Journal of Sociology ˜ì:óä–¢¦. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2777762. Ronald L. Breiger. ÕÉߦ. “e Duality of Persons and Groups.” Social Forces ¢ì:Õ˜Õ–ÕÉþ. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2576011. Eric Leifer. Õɘ˜. “Interaction Preludes to Role Setting: Exploratory Local Action.” American Sociological Review ¢ì:˜ä¢–˜ß˜. http://www.jstor.org/stable/ 2095896. Harrison C. White, Scott A. Boorman, and Ronald L. Breiger. ÕÉßä. “Social Structure from Multiple Networks I: Blockmodels of Roles and Positions.” American Journal of Sociology ˜Õ:ßìþ–ßßÉ. Sandra Susan Smith. óþþ¢. ““Don’t put my name on it”: Social Capital Activation and Job-Finding Assistance among the Black Urban Poor.” American Journal of Sociology ÕÕÕ:Õ–¢ß. ä

Recommended Peter M. Blau. ÕÉßßb. Inequality and Heterogeneity. Free Press. Kathleen Carley. ÕÉÉÕ. “A eory of Group Stability.” American Sociological Review: ììՖ좦. http: //www.jstor.org/stable/2096108. Emily Erikson. óþÕì. “Formalist and Relationalist eory in Social Network Analysis.” Sociological eory ìÕ:óÕÉ–ó¦ó. doi:10.1177/0735275113501998. Anthony Giddens. ÕÉßÉ. Central Problems in Social eory. London: Macmillan, Chapter Õ, “Structuralism and the eory of the Subject”. Mark Granovetter. Õɘ¢. “Economic Action and Social Structure: e problem of embeddedness.” American Journal of Sociology ÉÕ:¦˜Õ–¢Õþ. Claude Lévi-Strauss. ÕÉߦ. Structural Anthropology. New York: Basic Books, “Structural Analysis in Linguistics and Anthroplogy”,“e Structural Study of Myth”,“Social Structure”. Bruce H. Mayhew and Roger L. Levinger. ÕÉßä. “On the Emergence of Oligarchy in Human Interaction.” American Journal of Sociology ˜Õ:ÕþÕß–Õþ¦É. S.F. Nadel. ÕÉ¢ß. e eory of Social Structure. Glencoe, IL: Free Press, Pp. Õ–ÕÉ, äì–ßÉ, Éß–Õþ¦, զߖբó. J. Miller McPherson. Õɘì. “An Ecology of A›liation.” American Sociological Review ¦˜:¢ÕÉ–¢ìó. Douglas Porpora. ÕɘÉ. “Four Concepts of Social Structure.” Journal for the eory of Social Behavior ÕÉ:ÕÉ¢–óÕÕ.

¦. †•«±†±¶±†™•« 놱„™¶± «í«±u“« Required Peter Berger and omas Luckmann. ÕÉäß. e Social Construction of Reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Anchor Books. Pp. Õ–Õó˜. Paul J. DiMaggio and Walter W. Powell. Õɘì. “e Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Journal of Sociology ¦˜:զߖÕäþ. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2095101. Ann Hironaka. óþÕ¦. Greening the Globe: World Society and Environmental Change. New York: Cambridge University Press. Excerpts. John W. Meyer and Brian Rowan. ÕÉÉÕ. “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony”in Powell and DiMaggio ÕÉÉÕ, ¦Õ–äó. John W. Meyer. ÕÉßß. “e Ešects of Education as an Institution.” American Journal of Sociology ˜ì:¢¢–ßß. John W. Meyer et al. ÕÉÉß. “World Society and the Nation State.” American Journal of Sociology Õþì:Õ¦¦–՘Õ.

Recommended Paul J. DiMaggio and Walter W. Powell. ÕÉÉÕ. “Introduction”in Powell and DiMaggio ÕÉÉÕ, Õ–ì˜. John Meyer. óþþþ. “e Evolution of Modern Stratication Systems.” In Social Stratication, Second, edited by David B. Grusky, ˜˜Õ–˜Éþ. Boulder: Westview Press. David Frank and John Meyer. óþþó. “e Profusion of Individual Roles and Identities in the Postwar Period.” Sociological eory óþ:˜ä–Õþ¢. ß

John W. Meyer and Ronald L. Jepperson. óþþþ. “e ‘Actors’ of Modern Society: e Cultural Construc- tion of Social Agency.” Sociological eory ՘:Õþþ–Õóþ. http://www.jstor.org/stable/223284. Alfred Schütz. Õɦì. “e Problem of Rationality in the Social World.” Economica, New Series, Õþ (ì˜): Õìþ–Õ¦É. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2549460. Evan Schofer and John W. Meyer. óþþ¢. “e Worldwide Expansion of Education in the Twentieth Century.” American Sociological Review ßþ:˜É˜–Éþó. John Searle. óþÕþ. Making the Social World: e Structure of Human Civilization. New York: Oxford University Press.

¢. h¶±¶§u 놱„™¶± êZ¶u« Required C. Wright Mills. Õɦþ. “Situated Actions and Vocabularies of Motive.” American Sociological Review ¢:Éþ¦–ÉÕì Marvin B. Scott and Stanford M. Lyman. ÕÉä˜. “Accounts.” American Sociological Review ìì (Õ): ¦ä–äó. Clišord Geertz. ÕÉßì. e Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books. Excerpts. Michèle Lamont. ÕÉÉó. Money, Morals and Manners: e Culture of the French and the American Upper-Middle Class. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Ann Swidler. Õɘä. “Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies.” American Sociological Review ¢Õ:óßì–ó˜ä. Ann Swidler. óþþì. Talk of Love. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Excerpts.

Recommended Robert Wuthnow. ÕɘÉ. Meaning and Moral Order. Berkeley: University of California Press, “Cultural Analysis”,“Beyond the Problem of Meaning”. Mark Schneider. ÕÉÉì. Culture and Enchantment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Colin Campbell. ÕÉɘ. e Myth of Social Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

£Z§± ††: “uZ•ë„†u, †• hZ£†±Z†«“ ä. hZ«« «±§¶h±¶§u Z•o «™h†Z h™«¶§u Required Erik Olin Wright. ÕÉÉß. Class Counts: Comparative Studies in Class Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press. Chapters Õ–¢, É, Õß. Raymond Murphy. Õɘ˜. Social Closure: e eory of Monopolization and Exclusion. Oxford. Clarendon Press. Excerpts. Frank Parkin. ÕÉßÉ. Marxism and Class eory: A Bourgeois Critique. New York: Columbia University Press. Excerpts. ˜

Rosemary Crompton. ÕɘÉ. “Class eory and Gender.” British Journal of Sociology ¦þ:¢ä¢–¢˜ß. http://www.jstor.org/stable/590889. Kim Weeden. óþþó. “Why do Some Occupations Pay More than Others? Social Closure and Earnings Inequality in the United States.” American Journal of Sociology Õþ˜:¢¢–ÕþÕ.

Recommended Oliver Cromwell Cox. ÕÉ¢É. Caste, Class and Race: A Study in Social Dynamics. New York: Monthly Review Press. R.W. Connell. ÕÉßÉ. “A Critique of the Althusserian Approach to Class.” eory and Society ˜:ìþì–즢. Andrew Abbott. ÕɘÕ. “Status and Status Strain in the Professions.” American Journal of Sociology ˜ä (¦): ˜ÕÉ–˜ì¢. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2778344. Robert Erikson and John H. Goldthorpe. ÕÉÉì. e Constant Flux: A Study of Class Mobility in Industrial Societies. Oxford. Clarendon Press. Kim Weeden and David Grusky. óþþ¢. “e Case for a New Class Map.” American Journal of Sociology ÕÕÕ:Õ¦Õ–óÕó. Erik Olin Wright, ed. óþþ¢. Approaches to Class Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press. omas Piketty. óþÕì. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

ß. hZ«« Z•o †±« †•±u§«uh±†™•« Required C.L.R. James. ÕɘÉ. e Black Jacobins. ónd ed. New York: Vintage. Basil Bernstein. ÕÉä¦. “Elaborated and Restricted Codes: eir social origins and some consequences.” American Anthropologist ä:¢¢–äÉ. Paul Willis. ÕɘÕ. Learning to Labor. New York: Columbia University Press. Dorothy Smith. ÕɘÉ. e Everyday World as Problematic. Boston: Northeastern. Kimberle Crenshaw. ÕÉÉÕ. “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Color.” Stanford Law Review ¦ì:Õó¦Õ–ÕóÉÉ. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1229039.

Recommended Vincent Brown. óþþ˜. e Reaper’s Garden: Death and Power in the World of Atlantic Slavery. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Paul Gilroy. ÕÉÉ¢. e Black Atlantic: Modernity and Double-Consciousness. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. David Warren Sabean. Õɘ¦. Power in the Blood: Popular Culture and Village Discourse in Early Modern Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. M.N. Srinivas. ÕÉßä. e Remembered Village. Delhi: Oxford University Press. É

£Z§± †††: §u“ZŽ†• «í«±u“« ˜. «±§¶h±¶§u ™¶± ™€ h„™†hu« Required Barry Barnes. ÕÉÉ¢. e Elements of Social eory. Princeton: Princeton University Press, Chapter Õ, “Individualism.” James S. Coleman. Õɘä. “Social eory, Social Research, and a eory of Action.” American Journal of Sociology ÉÕ:ÕìþÉ–Õìì¢. http://www.jstor.org/stable/ 2779798. Michael Suk-Young Chwe. óþþÕ. Rational Ritual: Culture, Coordination, and Common Knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press, Pp. ÕÉ–ßì. omas Schelling. ÕÉߘ. Micromotives and Macrobehavior. Norton, Chapters Õ–¦. Elizabeth Aura McClintock. óþÕ¦. “Beauty and Status: e Illusion of Exchange in Partner Selection?” American Sociological Review ßÉ:¢ß¢–äþ¦.

Recommended Margaret Frye. óþÕó. “Bright Futures in Malawi’s New Dawn: Educational Aspirations as Assertions of Identity.” American Journal of Sociology ÕÕß:բ䢖Õäó¦. John H. Goldthorpe. óþþþ. On Sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Ken Binmore. óþÕÕ. Rational Decisions. Princeton: Princeton University Press. James S. Coleman. ÕÉÉþ. Foundations of Social eory. Cambridge: Belknap Press. Shaun Hargreaves Heap et al. ÕÉÉó. e eory of Choice: A Critical Guide. Oxford: Blackwell. Shaun Hargreaves Heap and Yanis Varoufakis. óþþ¦. Game eory: A critical text. Second. New York: Routledge.

É. €†uo« ™¶± ™€ £§Zh±†hu Sherry Ortner. Õɘ¦. “eory in Anthropology since the Sixties.” Comparative Studies in Society and History óä:Õóä–Õää. http://www.jstor.org/stable/178524. Pierre Bourdieu and Loïc Wacquant. ÕÉÉó. An Invitation to Režexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Excerpts. Pierre Bourdieu. ÕÉßß. Outline of a eory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge Univer- sity Press. Excerpts. Pierre Bourdieu. ÕÉÉþ. e Logic of Practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press. A very short excerpt indeed. Pierre Bourdieu. ÕÉÉì. e Field of Cultural Production. New York: Columbia University Press. Excerpts. Ronald L. Breiger. óþþþ. “A Tool-kit for Practice eory.” Poetics óß:ÉÕ–ÕÕ¢. Õþ

Jessica McCrory Calarco. óþÕ¦. “Coached for the Classroom: Parents’ Cultural Trans- mission and Children’s Reproduction of Inequalities.” American Sociological Review ßÉ:ÕþÕ¢–Õþìß William H. Sewell. ÕÉÉÉ. “e Concept(s) of Culture.” In Beyond the Cultural Turn: New Directions in the Study of Society and Culture, edited by Victoria Bonnell and Lynn E. Hunt, 좖äÕ. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Recommended David Bloor. Õɘì. Wittgenstein: A social theory of knowledge. London: Macmillan. Pierre Bourdieu. Õɘ¦. Distinction. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Jon Elster. ÕɘÕ. “Snobs.” London Review of Books ì (óþ): Õþ–Õó. Neil Fligstein and Doug McAdam. óþÕó. A eory of Fields. New York: Oxford University Press. Annette Lareau. óþþì. Unequal Childhoods: Class, race and family life. Berkeley: University of California Press. John Levi Martin. óþþì. “What is Field eory?” American Journal of Sociology ÕþÉ:Õ–¦É. Andreas Reckwitz. óþþó. “Toward a eory of Social Practices: A Development in Culturalist eorizing.” European Journal of Social eory ¢:ó¦ì–óäì. doi:10.1177/13684310222225432. Stephen Turner. ÕÉɦ. e Social eory of Practices: Tradition, Tacit Knowledge, and Presuppositions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Loïc Wacquant. óþþ¢. “Habitus.” In International Encyclopedia of Economic Sociology, edited by Jens Beckert and Milan Zarofski, ìÕ¢–ìÕÉ. London: Routledge.

Õþ. 뙧o« ™¶± ™€ ±„u™§í Required Bruno Latour. Õɘ˜. Science in Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Excerpts. Bruno Latour. óþþß. Reassembling the Social. New York: Oxford University Press. Excerpts. Karin Knorr Cetina. óþþÉ. “e Synthetic Situation: Interactionism for a Global World.” Symbolic Interaction ìó:äÕ–˜ß. Donald MacKenzie. óþþä. An Engine, Not a Camera: How Financial Models Shape Markets. Cambridge: MIT Press. Michel Callon. ÕÉɘ. “e Embeddedness of Economic Markets in Economics.” In e Laws of the Market, edited by Michel Callon, Õ–¢ß. Oxford: Blackwell.

Recommended David Bloor. ÕÉÉÉ. “Anti-Latour.” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science ìþ:˜Õ–ÕÕó. Donald MacKenzie, Fabian Muniesa, and Lucia Siu, eds. óþþß. Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ÕÕ

ÕÕ. •u±ë™§Ž« ™¶± ™€ hZ±u™§†u« Required Paul DiMaggio. ÕÉÉó. “Nadel’s Paradox Revisited: Relational and Cultural Aspects of Organizational Structure.” In Networks and Organizations, edited by Nitin Nohira and Robert G. Eccles, Õ՘–Õ¦ó. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Mustafa Emirbayer and Ješ Goodwin. ÕÉɦ. “Network Analysis, Culture, and the Problem of Agency.” American Journal of Sociology ÉÉ:Õ¦ÕÕ–¢¦. Jan A. Fuhse. óþþÉ. “e Meaning Structure of Social Networks.” Sociological eory óß:¢Õ–ßì. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9558.2009.00338.x. Ann Mische. óþþÉ. “Projects and Possibilities: Researching Futures in Action.” Socio- logical Forum ó¦:äɦ–ßþ¦ Mark A. Pachucki and Ronald L. Breiger. óþÕþ. “Cultural Holes: Beyond Relationality in Social Networks and Culture.” Annual Review of Sociology ìä:óþ¢–ó¦. doi:10. 1146/annurev.soc.012809.102615. Stephen Vaisey and Omar Lizardo. óþÕþ. “Can cultural worldviews inžuence network composition?” Social Forces ˜˜:բɢ–Õä՘.

Recommended Gary Alan Fine and Sherryl Kleinman. Õɘì. “Network and Meaning: An interactionist approach to culture.” Symbolic Interaction ä:Éß–ÕÕþ. Jennifer Lena. óþÕó. Banding Together: How Communities Create Genres in Popular Music. Princeton: Princeton University Press. J. Miller McPherson, Lynn Smith-Lovin, and James M. Cook. óþþÕ. “Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks.” Annual Review of Sociology óß:¦Õ¢–¦¦¦. http://arjournals.annualreviews. org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415.

Õó. h¶±¶§u ™¶± ™€ h™•†±†™• Required Paul DiMaggio. ÕÉÉß. “Culture and Cognition.” Annual Review of Sociology óì:óäì–ó˜ß. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.23.1.263. Vanina Leschziner and Adam Isaiah Green. óþÕì. “inking about Food and Sex: Deliberate Cognition in the Routine Practices of a Field.” Sociological eory ìÕ:ÕÕä–Õ¦¦. doi:10.1177/0735275113489806. Omar Lizardo and Michael Strand. óþÕþ. “Skills, toolkits, contexts and institutions: Clarifying the relationship between dišerent approaches to cognition in cultural sociology.” Poetics ì˜:óþ¦–óóß. doi:10.1016/j.poetic.2009.11.003. Õó

Sameer Srivastava and Mahzarin Banaji. óþÕÕ. “Culture, Cognition, and Collaborative Networks in Organiations.” American Sociological Review ßä:óþß–óìì. doi:10. 1177/0003122411399390. Stephen Vaisey. óþþÉ. “Motivation and Justication: A Dual-Process Model of Culture in Action.” American Journal of Sociology ÕÕ¦:Õäߢ–ÕßÕ¢.

Recommended Edwin Hutchins. ÕÉÉä. Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge: MIT Press. Excerpts.

Õì, Õ¦, Õ¢. hZ±h„-¶£ Z•o ±™£†h« Z§†«†• Õì

Blau, Peter M. ÕÉßßa. “A Macrosociological eory of Social Structure.” American Journal of So- ciology ˜ì:óä–¢¦. http://www.jstor.org/ stable/2777762. . ÕÉßßb. Inequality and Heterogeneity. Free Press. References Bloor, David. Õɘì. Wittgenstein: A social theory of knowledge. London: Macmillan. . ÕÉÉÉ. “Anti-Latour.” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science ìþ:˜Õ–ÕÕó. Abbott, Andrew. ÕɘÕ. “Status and Status Strain in Bourdieu, Pierre. ÕÉßß. Outline of a eory of Prac- the Professions.” American Journal of Sociol- tice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ogy ˜ä (¦): ˜ÕÉ–˜ì¢. http://www.jstor.org/ stable/2778344. . Õɘ¦. Distinction. Cambridge: Harvard Uni- versity Press. Barnes, Barry. ÕÉÉ¢. e Elements of Social eory. Princeton: Princeton University Press. . ÕÉÉþ. e Logic of Practice. Stanford: Stan- ford University Press. Bearman, Peter. ÕÉÉß. “Generalized Exchange.” Amer- ican Journal of Sociology Õþó:Õì˜ì–Õ¦Õ¢. . ÕÉÉì. e Field of Cultural Production. New York: Columbia University Press. Becker, Howard. ÕÉ¢ì. “Becoming a Marihuana User.” American Journal of Sociology ¢É:ó좖ó¦ó. Bourdieu, Pierre, and Loïc Wacquant. ÕÉÉó. An In- vitation to Režexive Sociology. Chicago: Uni- Berger, Peter, and omas Luckmann. ÕÉäß. e versity of Chicago Press. Social Construction of Reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Anchor Breiger, Ronald L. ÕÉߦ. “e Duality of Persons Books. and Groups.” Social Forces ¢ì:Õ˜Õ–ÕÉþ. http: . Bernstein, Basil. ÕÉä¦. “Elaborated and Restricted //www.jstor.org/stable/2576011 Codes: eir social origins and some conse- . óþþþ. “A Tool-kit for Practice eory.” quences.” American Anthropologist ä:¢¢–äÉ. Poetics óß:ÉÕ–ÕÕ¢. Bertlanšy, Ludwig von. ÕÉ¢þ. “An Outline of Gen- Brown, Vincent. óþþ˜. e Reaper’s Garden: Death eral Systems eory.” British Journal for the and Power in the World of Atlantic Slavery. Philosophy of Science Õ:Õ즖Õä¢. doi:10.1093/ Cambridge: Harvard University Press. bjps/I.2.134. Calarco, Jessica McCrory. óþÕ¦. “Coached for the Binmore, Ken. óþÕÕ. Rational Decisions. Princeton: Classroom: Parents’ Cultural Transmission Princeton University Press. and Children’sReproduction of Inequalities.” American Sociological Review ßÉ:ÕþÕ¢–Õþìß. Black, Max. ÕÉäÕ. “Some Questions about Parsons’ eories.” In e Social eories of Talcott Callon, Michel. ÕÉɘ. “e Embeddedness of Eco- Parsons: A Critical Examination, edited by nomic Markets in Economics.” In e Laws Max Black, ó䘖ó˜þ. Englewood Clišs: Pren- of the Market, edited by Michel Callon, Õ–¢ß. tice Hall. Oxford: Blackwell. Camic, Charles. ÕɘÉ. “‘Structure’ AŸer FiŸy Years: Anatomy of a Charter.” American Journal of Sociology É¢:옖Õþß. Õ¦

Campbell, Colin. ÕÉɘ. e Myth of Social Action. DiMaggio, Paul. ÕÉÉó. “Nadel’s Paradox Revisited: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Relational and Cultural Aspects of Organiza- tional Structure.” In Networks and Organiza- Carley, Kathleen. ÕÉÉÕ. “A eory of Group Stabil- tions, edited by Nitin Nohira and Robert G. ity.” American Sociological Review: ììՖ좦. Eccles, Õ՘–Õ¦ó. Cambridge: Harvard Univer- http://www.jstor.org/stable/2096108. sity Press.

Cetina, Karin Knorr. óþþÉ. “e Synthetic Situ- . ÕÉÉß. “Culture and Cognition.” Annual Re- ation: Interactionism for a Global World.” view of Sociology óì:óäì–ó˜ß. doi:10.1146/ Symbolic Interaction ìó:äÕ–˜ß. annurev.soc.23.1.263. Chwe, Michael Suk-Young. óþþÕ. Rational Ritual: DiMaggio, Paul J., and Walter W.Powell. Õɘì. “e Culture, Coordination, and Common Knowl- Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism edge. Princeton: Princeton University Press. and Collective Rationality in Organizational Coleman, James S. Õɘä. “Social eory, Social Re- Fields.” American Journal of Sociology ¦˜:զߖ search, and a eory of Action.” American Õäþ. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2095101. Journal of Sociology ÉÕ:ÕìþÉ–Õìì¢. http : / / . ÕÉÉÕ. “Introduction.” In Powell and DiMag- www.jstor.org/stable/2779798. gio ÕÉÉÕ, Õ–ì˜.

. ÕÉÉþ. Foundations of Social eory. Cam- Elster, Jon. ÕɘÕ. “Snobs.” London Review of Books bridge: Belknap Press. ì (óþ): Õþ–Õó. Collins, Randall. óþþ¦. Interaction Ritual Chains. . Õɘó. “Marxism, Functionalism, and Game Princeton: Princeton University Press. eory.” eory and Society ÕÕ:¦¢ì–¦˜ó. Connell, R.W.ÕÉßÉ. “A Critique of the Althusserian Emirbayer, Mustafa, and Ješ Goodwin. ÕÉɦ. “Net- Approach to Class.” eory and Society ˜:ìþì– work Analysis, Culture, and the Problem of 즢. Agency.” American Journal of Sociology ÉÉ:Õ¦ÕÕ– Cox, Oliver Cromwell. ÕÉ¢É. Caste, Class and Race: ¢¦. A Study in Social Dynamics. New York: Monthly Erikson, Emily. óþÕì. “Formalist and Relational- Review Press. ist eory in Social Network Analysis.” So- Crenshaw, Kimberle. ÕÉÉÕ. “Mapping the Margins: ciological eory ìÕ:óÕÉ–ó¦ó. doi:10.1177/ Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Vio- 0735275113501998. lence Against Women of Color.” Stanford Erikson, Robert, and John H. Goldthorpe. ÕÉÉì. e Law Review ¦ì:Õó¦Õ–ÕóÉÉ. http://www.jstor. Constant Flux: A Study of Class Mobility in org/stable/1229039. Industrial Societies. Oxford. Clarendon Press. Crompton, Rosemary. ÕɘÉ. “Class eory and Gen- Fararo, omas J. ÕɘÉ. e Meaning of General der.” British Journal of Sociology ¦þ:¢ä¢–¢˜ß. eoretical Sociology. New York: Cambridge http://www.jstor.org/stable/590889. University Press. Demerath, N.J., and Richard A. Peterson, eds. ÕÉäß. Fine, Gary Alan, and Sherryl Kleinman. Õɘì. “Net- System, Change and Conžict. New York: Free work and Meaning: An interactionist approach Press. to culture.” Symbolic Interaction ä:Éß–ÕÕþ. Fligstein, Neil, and Doug McAdam. óþÕó. A eory of Fields. New York: Oxford University Press. Õ¢

Frank, David, and John Meyer. óþþó. “e Profu- Granovetter, Mark. Õɘ¢. “Economic Action and sion of Individual Roles and Identities in the Social Structure: e problem of embedded- Postwar Period.” Sociological eory óþ:˜ä– ness.” American Journal of Sociology ÉÕ:¦˜Õ– Õþ¢. ¢Õþ.

Frye, Margaret. óþÕó. “Bright Futures in Malawi’s Hamilton, Peter. Õɘì. Talcott Parsons. Tavistock: New Dawn: Educational Aspirations as As- Routledge. sertions of Identity.” American Journal of So- ciology ÕÕß:բ䢖Õäó¦. Heap, Shaun Hargreaves, Martin Hollis, Bruce Lyons, Robert Sugden, and Albert Weale. ÕÉÉó. e Fuhse, Jan A. óþþÉ. “e Meaning Structure of So- eory of Choice: A Critical Guide. Oxford: cial Networks.” Sociological eory óß:¢Õ–ßì. Blackwell. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9558.2009.00338.x. Heap, Shaun Hargreaves, and Yanis Varoufakis. óþþ¦. Garnkel, Harold. ÕɦÉ. “Notes on Inter- and Intra- Game eory: A critical text. Second. New Racial Homicides.” Social Forces óß:ìäÉ–ì˜Õ. York: Routledge. . ÕÉä¦. “Studies of the Routine Grounds of Heritage, John. Õɘ¦. Garnkel and Ethnomethodol- Everyday Activities.” Social Problems ÕÕ:óó¢– ogy. Cambridge: Polity Press. ó¢þ. http://www.jstor.org/stable/798722. Hironaka, Ann. óþÕ¦. Greening the Globe: World So- . ÕÉäß. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Engle- ciety and Environmental Change. New York: wood Clišs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Cambridge University Press.

Geertz, Clišord. ÕÉßì. e Interpretation of Cultures. Hochschild, Arlie. ÕÉßÉ. “Emotion Work, Feeling New York: Basic Books. Rules and Social Structure.” American Jour- nal of Sociology ˜¢:¢¢Õ–ߢ. Giddens, Anthony. ÕÉßÉ. Central Problems in Social eory. London: Macmillan. Hutchins, Edwin. ÕÉÉä. Cognition in the Wild. Cam- bridge: MIT Press. Gilroy, Paul. ÕÉÉ¢. e Black Atlantic: Modernity and Double-Consciousness. Cambridge: Har- James, C.L.R. ÕɘÉ. e Black Jacobins. ónd ed. New vard University Press. York: Vintage.

Gošman, Erving. ÕÉ¢É. e Presentation of Self in Joas, Hans, and Wolfgang Knöbl. óþþÉ. Social e- Everyday Life. New York: Anchor Books. ory: Twenty Introductory Lectures. New York: Cambridge University Press. . ÕÉߦ. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Orga- nization of Experience. Boston: Northeastern Lamont, Michèle. ÕÉÉó. Money, Morals and Man- University Press. ners: e Culture of the French and the Ameri- can Upper-Middle Class. Chicago: University . Õɘó. Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to- of Chicago Press. Face Behavior. New York: Pantheon. Lareau, Annette. óþþì. Unequal Childhoods: Class, . Õɘä. Stigma: Notes on the Management of race and family life. Berkeley: University of Spoiled Identity. New York: Simon & Schus- California Press. ter. Latour, Bruno. Õɘ˜. Science in Action. Cambridge: Goldthorpe, John H. óþþþ. On Sociology. Oxford: Harvard University Press. Oxford University Press. . óþþß. Reassembling the Social. New York: Oxford University Press. Õä

Leifer, Eric. Õɘ˜. “Interaction Preludes to Role Set- Martin, Karin. ÕÉɘ. “Becoming a Gendered Body: ting: Exploratory Local Action.” American Practices of Preschools.” American Sociologi- Sociological Review ¢ì:˜ä¢–˜ß˜. http://www. cal Review äì:¦É¦–¢ÕÕ. jstor.org/stable/2095896. Mayhew, Bruce H., and Roger L. Levinger. ÕÉßä. Lena, Jennifer. óþÕó. Banding Together: How Com- “On the Emergence of Oligarchy in Human munities Create Genres in Popular Music. Prince- Interaction.” American Journal of Sociology ton: Princeton University Press. ˜Õ:ÕþÕß–Õþ¦É. Leschziner, Vanina, and Adam Isaiah Green. óþÕì. Maynard, D.W, Jeremy Freese, and Nora Cate Scha- “inking about Food and Sex: Deliberate ešer. óþÕþ. “Calling for Participation: Requests, Cognition in the Routine Practices of a Field.” Blocking Moves, and Rational (Inter)action Sociological eory ìÕ:ÕÕä–Õ¦¦. doi:10.1177/ in Survey Introductions.” American Sociolog- 0735275113489806. ical Review ߢ:ßÉÕ–˜Õ¦. Levine, Donald. ÕÉÉ¢. Visions of the Sociological Tra- McClintock, Elizabeth Aura. óþÕ¦. “Beauty and Sta- dition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. tus: e Illusion of Exchange in Partner Selec- tion?” American Sociological Review ßÉ:¢ß¢– Lévi-Strauss, Claude. ÕÉߦ. Structural Anthropology. äþ¦. New York: Basic Books. McPherson, J. Miller. Õɘì. “An Ecology of A›lia- Lizardo, Omar, and Michael Strand. óþÕþ. “Skills, tion.” American Sociological Review ¦˜:¢ÕÉ– toolkits, contexts and institutions: Clarifying ¢ìó. the relationship between dišerent approaches to cognition in cultural sociology.” Poetics McPherson, J. Miller, Lynn Smith-Lovin, and James ì˜:óþ¦–óóß. doi:10.1016/j.poetic.2009. M. Cook. óþþÕ. “Birds of a Feather: Homophily 11.003. in Social Networks.” Annual Review of Sociol- ogy óß:¦Õ¢–¦¦¦. http://arjournals.annualreviews. Lockwood, David. ÕÉ¢ä. “Some Remarks on ‘e org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1. Social System’.” British Journal of Sociology 415. ß:Õ즖զä. Medina, Eden. óþÕÕ. Cybernetic Revolutionaries: Tech- . ÕÉä¦. “Social Integration and System In- nology and Politics in Allende’s Chile. Cam- tegration.” In Explorations in Social Change, bridge: MIT Press. edited by G.K. Zollschan and W.Hirsch, ó¦É– óäß. London: Routledge. Merton, Robert K. ÕÉä˜. Social eory and Social Structure. Enlarged Edition. Glencoe: Free . ÕÉÉó. Solidarity and Schism: “e Problem Press. of Disorder” in Durkheimian and Marxist So- ciology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Meyer, John. óþþþ. “e Evolution of Modern Strat- ication Systems.” In Social Stratication, Sec- MacKenzie, Donald. óþþä. An Engine, Not a Cam- ond, edited by David B. Grusky, ˜˜Õ–˜Éþ. era: How Financial Models Shape Markets. Boulder: Westview Press. Cambridge: MIT Press. Meyer, John W.ÕÉßß. “e Ešects of Education as an MacKenzie, Donald, Fabian Muniesa, and Lucia Institution.” American Journal of Sociology Siu, eds. óþþß. Do Economists Make Markets? ˜ì:¢¢–ßß. On the Performativity of Economics. Prince- ton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Meyer, John W.,John Boli, George M. omas, and Francisco O. Ramirez. ÕÉÉß. “World Society Martin, John Levi. óþþì. “What is Field eory?” and the Nation State.” American Journal of American Journal of Sociology ÕþÉ:Õ–¦É. Sociology Õþì:Õ¦¦–՘Õ. Õß

Meyer, John W., and Ronald L. Jepperson. óþþþ. Parsons, Talcott, and Edward A. Shils. ÕÉ¢Õ. “Values, “e ‘Actors’ of Modern Society: e Cultural Motives and Systems of Action.” In Toward Construction of Social Agency.” Sociological a General eory of Action, edited by Talcott eory ՘:Õþþ–Õóþ. http://www.jstor.org/ Parsons and Edward A. Shils, ¢ì–ßÉ. Cam- stable/223284. bridge: Harvard University Press. Meyer, John W., and Brian Rowan. ÕÉÉÕ. “Institu- Piketty, omas. óþÕì. Capital in the Twenty-First tionalized Organizations: Formal Structure Century. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. as Myth and Ceremony.” In Powell and DiMag- gio ÕÉÉÕ, ¦Õ–äó. Porpora, Douglas. ÕɘÉ. “Four Concepts of Social Structure.” Journal for the eory of Social Mills, C. Wright. Õɦþ. “Situated Actions and Vo- Behavior ÕÉ:ÕÉ¢–óÕÕ. cabularies of Motive.” American Sociological Review ¢:Éþ¦–ÉÕì. Powell, Walter W., and Paul J. DiMaggio, eds. ÕÉÉÕ. e New Institutionalism and Organizational Mische, Ann. óþþÉ. “Projects and Possibilities: Re- Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. searching Futures in Action.” Sociological Fo- rum ó¦:äɦ–ßþ¦. Reckwitz, Andreas. óþþó. “Toward a eory of So- cial Practices: A Development in Culturalist Mouzelis, Nicos. ÕÉÉ¢. Sociological eory: What eorizing.” European Journal of Social e- went wrong? London: Routledge. ory ¢:ó¦ì–óäì. doi:10.1177/13684310222225432. Murphy, Raymond. Õɘ˜. Social Closure: e e- Sabean, David Warren. Õɘ¦. Power in the Blood: ory of Monopolization and Exclusion. Oxford. Popular Culture and Village Discourse in Early Clarendon Press. Modern Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Nadel, S.F.ÕÉ¢ß. e eory of Social Structure. Glen- coe, IL: Free Press. Schelling, omas. ÕÉߘ. Micromotives and Mac- robehavior. Norton. Ortner, Sherry. Õɘ¦. “eory in Anthropology since the Sixties.” Comparative Studies in Society Schneider, Mark. ÕÉÉì. Culture and Enchantment. and History óä:Õóä–Õää. http://www.jstor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. org/stable/178524. Schofer, Evan, and John W.Meyer. óþþ¢. “e World- Pachucki, Mark A., and Ronald L. Breiger. óþÕþ. wide Expansion of Education in the Twenti- “Cultural Holes: Beyond Relationality in So- eth Century.” American Sociological Review cial Networks and Culture.” Annual Review ßþ:˜É˜–Éþó. of Sociology ìä:óþ¢–ó¦. doi:10.1146/annurev. Schütz, Alfred. Õɦì. “e Problem of Rationality soc.012809.102615. in the Social World.” Economica, New Series, Parkin, Frank. ÕÉßÉ. Marxism and Class eory: Õþ (ì˜): Õìþ–Õ¦É. http://www.jstor.org/ A Bourgeois Critique. New York: Columbia stable/2549460. University Press. Scott, Marvin B., and Stanford M. Lyman. ÕÉä˜. Parsons, Talcott. ÕÉ¢ó. e Social System. Glencoe, “Accounts.” American Sociological Review ìì IL: Free Press. (Õ): ¦ä–äó.

. ÕÉ¢É. “e School Class as a Social System: Searle, John. óþÕþ. Making the Social World: e Some of its Functions in American Society.” Structure of Human Civilization. New York: Harvard Educational Review óÉ:óÉß–ì՘. Oxford University Press. ՘

Sewell, William H. ÕÉÉÉ. “e Concept(s) of Cul- Weeden, Kim, and David Grusky. óþþ¢. “e Case ture.” In Beyond the Cultural Turn: New Di- for a New Class Map.” American Journal of rections in the Study of Society and Culture, Sociology ÕÕÕ:Õ¦Õ–óÕó. edited by Victoria Bonnell and Lynn E. Hunt, 좖äÕ. Berkeley: University of California Press. West, Candace, and Don Zimmerman. Õɘß. “Do- ing Gender.” Gender and Society Õ:Õó¢–Õ¢Õ. Smith, Dorothy. ÕɘÉ. e Everyday World as Prob- lematic. Boston: Northeastern. Westbrook, Laurel, and Kristen Schilt. óþÕ¦. “Doing Gender, Determining Gender: Transgender Smith, Sandra Susan. óþþ¢. ““Don’t put my name People, Gender Panics, and the Maintenance on it”: Social Capital Activation and Job-Finding of the Sex/Gender/Sexuality System.” Gender Assistance among the Black Urban Poor.” and Society ó˜:ìó–¢ß. American Journal of Sociology ÕÕÕ:Õ–¢ß. White, Harrison C., Scott A. Boorman, and Ronald Srinivas, M.N. ÕÉßä. e Remembered Village. Delhi: L. Breiger. ÕÉßä. “Social Structure from Multi- Oxford University Press. ple Networks I: Blockmodels of Roles and Po- sitions.” American Journal of Sociology ˜Õ:ßìþ– Srivastava, Sameer, and Mahzarin Banaji. óþÕÕ. “Cul- ßßÉ. ture, Cognition, and Collaborative Networks in Organiations.” American Sociological Re- Willis, Paul. ÕɘÕ. Learning to Labor. New York: view ßä:óþß–óìì. doi:10.1177/0003122411399390. Columbia University Press. Swidler, Ann. Õɘä. “Culture in Action: Symbols Wright, Erik Olin. ÕÉÉß. Class Counts: Comparative and Strategies.” American Sociological Review Studies in Class Analysis. New York: Cam- ¢Õ:óßì–ó˜ä. bridge University Press.

. óþþì. Talk of Love. Chicago: University of , ed. óþþ¢. Approaches to Class Analysis. New Chicago Press. York: Cambridge University Press.

Turner, Stephen. ÕÉɦ. e Social eory of Prac- Wuthnow, Robert. ÕɘÉ. Meaning and Moral Order. tices: Tradition, Tacit Knowledge, and Presup- Berkeley: University of California Press. positions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Vaisey, Stephen. óþþÉ. “Motivation and Justica- tion: A Dual-Process Model of Culture in Ac- tion.” American Journal of Sociology ÕÕ¦:Õäߢ– ÕßÕ¢. Vaisey, Stephen, and Omar Lizardo. óþÕþ. “Can cultural worldviews inžuence network com- position?” Social Forces ˜˜:բɢ–Õä՘. Wacquant, Loïc. óþþ¢. “Habitus.” In International Encyclopedia of Economic Sociology, edited by Jens Beckert and Milan Zarofski, ìÕ¢–ìÕÉ. London: Routledge. Weeden, Kim. óþþó. “Why do Some Occupations Pay More than Others? Social Closure and Earnings Inequality in the United States.” American Journal of Sociology Õþ˜:¢¢–ÕþÕ.