DOCSLIB.ORG

Exploring Hominins and Animals in the Swabian Jura: Study of the Paleolithic Fauna from Hohlenstein-Stadel

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Exploring Hominins and Animals in the Swabian Jura: Study of the Paleolithic Fauna from Hohlenstein-Stadel Exploring hominins and animals in the Swabian Jura: Study of the Paleolithic fauna from Hohlenstein-Stadel Dissertation der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen zur Erlangung des Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften (Dr. rer. nat.) vorgelegt von Keiko Kitagawa aus Tokio/Japan Tübingen 2014 Tag der mündlichen Qualifikation: 27.02. 2014 Dekan: Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Rosenstiel 1. Berichterstatter: Prof. Dr. Nicholas J. Conard 2. Berichterstatter: Prof. Dr. Mary C. Stiner Acknowledgements This dissertation has not been possible without the help of many, many people. My dissertation advisor, Dr. Nicholas J. Conard has been supportive from the beginning of my dissertation and provided opportunities to broaden my perspective and to delve into my research. I owe many thanks to Dr. Mary C. Stiner, who has been provided inspiration through her work as well as thoughtful comments and advices. Despite the fact that she is far from Tübingen, she has helped me tremendously. I would also like to give my thanks to Dr. Michael Bolus and Dr. Chris Miller. Their expertise on the Swabian Jura as well as their comments to my work has been insightful and helpful. I am very grateful for Kurt Wehrberger from Ulmer Museum, who has been supportive from the beginning of the dissertation and allowed me to have access to the material from the previous excavation as well as numerous references and resources. The analysis of the material from the excavation 2009-2011 has been not possible without the generous help and support from Dr. Joachim-Claus Kind and Thomas Beutelspacher from Denkmalpflege Baden-Württemberg as well as the crew at the excavation in Hohlenstein-Stadel. I would also like to thank Dr. Gamble, who kindly gave me information on his previous work. Also, I am truly grateful for Diane Kerns for her quick and efficient editing. I would like to thank many people at the Institute. First and foremost, Susanne Münzel who has been very generous in sharing her time and teaching me a lot in this field (as well as German) and for her collaboration – thank you very much. Petra Krönneck has helped me identifying the bird remains and I would like to thank her for being a great officemate. Can Gündem has been given me thoughtful insights and advises. He was also very generous in taking his time to read and comment on my work. Thank you so much. I also owe many thanks to Marie-Anne Julien, Farnaz Boroushaki, Britt Starkovich, Maria Malina, Ximena Villagran, Hugo Reyes-Centeno and Miguel Prieto-Valle. Also, I have not listed out all the people in the Department of Archaeological Sciences and Prehistory who have been great companions and coworkers. I am truly grateful. I would also like to thank many from my previous university. Dr. Lawrence G. Straus inspired me to work in the field of Paleolithic archaeology and zooarchaeology class taught by Dr. Donald Grayson has formed a fundamental basis of my work. Thank you. Also, I truly appreciate the kind help and inspiration I received from Dr. Ann Ramenofsky and Dr. Frances Hayashida. My dissertation was supported partially by funding from DAAD (Deutscher Akademischer Austausch Dienst) as well as generous help from the UNESCO group and Denkmalpflege Baden-Württemberg. Lastly, I would like to dedicate this work to my family- my mother, my sister and especially my father, who made everything in my life possible and are always by my side. Thank you. i Table of Contents Summary xiii Zusammenfassung xv Chapter 1: Introduction 1 Neanderthals and modern humans 1 Interaction of animals and humans in the Paleolithic 6 The aim of the present study 9 Summary 10 Chapter 2: The Swabian Jura: Background 12 Geography and Geology 12 The Ach and Lone Valleys 14 Past environment: trends in Central Europe during MIS 5-3 15 Past environments in the Swabian Jura 22 Prehistory in the Swabian Jura: The Chronostratigraphy 25 Summary 37 Chapter 3: Hohlenstein-Stadel and other Sites in the Swabia Jura 39 Hohlenstein and the history of research 39 Robert Wetzel’s Excavation 44 Recent Excavations by the University of Tübingen 48 Recent Excavations by the Denkmalpflege of Baden-Württemberg 49 Dating and Stratigraphy 52 Artifacts from the Middle Paleolithic 61 Artifacts from the Aurignacian 61 The Löwenmensch (Lionman) 63 Hominin remains 66 Other Sites in the Swabian Jura 68 ii Summary 74 Chapter 4: Methods and Fauna 76 Fauna at Hohlenstein-Stadel 76 Method 95 Identification 96 Cave Bears 97 Carnivores and ungulates 99 Quantification 99 Ageing / Sexing 107 Seasonality 112 Taphonomy 112 Density mediated attrition 114 Anthropogenic modifications 114 Trampling 117 Carnivore modifications 118 Other modifications 120 Summary 121 Chapter 5 Results from Hohlenstein-Stadel 122 Previous work on the fauna 122 Sampling 126 Species abundance 128 Results from the excavation of 1939 128 Excavations 2009-2011 136 Comparison of the excavations of 1939 and 2009-2011 146 Combined assemblage 152 Cave bears, herbivores and carnivores 161 Diversity 162 iii Taphonomy 163 Preservation of faunal remains 163 Anthropogenic modification 165 Carnivore modification 170 Other modifications 175 Skeletal representation and Ageing 176 Cave Bears 176 Prey Animals 185 Ivory and antler 191 Small animals 196 Seasonality 198 Carnivores 198 Coprolite 202 Summary 204 Chapter 6: Regional Perspectives in the Swabian Jura 205 The Lone Valley: Bockstein and Vogelherd 205 The Ach Valley: Hohle Fels, Geißenklösterle and Kogelstein 206 Comparison: stratigraphy and sampling 208 Species abundance 209 Individual species 213 Diversity 224 Prey Animals 225 Cave bear 235 Carnivores 239 Taphonomy 241 Lithic 248 Exploitation of cave bears 248 iv Hohlenstein-Stadel in a regional context 251 Subsistence practice of Neanderthals and modern humans 252 Settlement pattern and interaction between hominins and animals 255 Chapter 7: Summary and Conclusions 257 References 261 v List of Figures 2.1 Topographical map of the Ach and Lone valleys with the names of the major Paleolithic sites 12 3.1 Map of Hohlenstein complex. From the West: Bärenhöhle, Kleine Scheuer, Stadel and Ostloch (Schmid et al., 1989) 40 3.2 Entrance of Hohlenstein-Stadel on the left and Kleine Scheuer on the right (Photo courtesy of Kurt Wehrberger, Ulmer Museum) 41 3.3 map of Hohlenstein-Stadel and the excavated area. Yellow areas indicate recent excavations. The Blue lines indicate areas excavated by R. Wetzel. Image from Kind and Beutelspacher (2010) 44 3.4 Original profile created by Völzing and Wetzel between Abbaumeter 10/11 (Wetzel 1961) 54 3.5 Stratigraphic profile of Hohlenstein-Stadel running N/S Quadrants 192/193-172 to 192/193-174 from modern excavations are represented (Beutelspacher et al, 2011) 56 3.6 Lithic artifacts from Beck’s analysis: 1 Doppelspitze, (Double point) 2-3 Spitzen (Point) (Beck, 1999). 61 3.7 Personal ornaments from the Aurignacian at Hohlenstein-Stadel (Photo courtesy of Kurt Wehrberger, Ulmer Museum) 63 3.8 Ivory sculpture of the Löwenmensch (Lion man), a therianthropic creature with human and lion traits from the Aurignacian of Hohlenstein-Stadel, 31.1 (Photo courtesy of Kurt Wehrberger, Ulmer Museum). 64 3.9 Femur shaft from a Neanderthal excavated by Wetzel and Völzing (© Flora Gröning / Neanderthal Museum / Ulmer Museum from NESPOS) 67 3.10 Juvenile human teeth. Canine and lower 3 rd premolar. 67 4.1 Triangular plot for age groups (Stiner, 1990, 2009) 108 4.2 Specimen with heavy weathering and flaking 113 vi 4.3 Specimens with digestive corrosion 120 5.1 Frequency distribution of speciments in weight from the excavation in 1939. 131 5.2 Correlation of NISP taxa from Gamble and the current analysis of material from 1939. The correlation is high and significant (p-value=.001). 136 5.3 Number of specimens with for each body size class 1-5 from the excavation 2009-2011 144 5.4 Frequency of specimens per weight from the excavation of 1939 and 2009-2011 148 5.5 Number of specimens identified to body size class from the excavation of 1939 and 2009- 2011 148 5.6 Correlation of logNISP taxa of old and new excavations. All the correlation are also significant (p-value = <0.01). Values with high residuals were labeled. 148 5.7 %NISP of mammalian taxa for combined assemblage. 154 5.8 %WISP of mammalian taxa for combined assemblage. 155 5.9 %MNI and MNI of mammalian taxa for combined assemblage. 156 5.10 Correlation of NISP taxa from Gamble and the combined assemblage. The correlation is high and significant (p-value=.001). 158 5.11 % NISP of carnivores, bears and herbivores per cultural layer 161 5.12 Weathering stages for each horizon 164 5.13 Cut marks on a bear rib with a close-up 168 5.14 Number of specimens with different types of carnivore modification per horizon 171 5.15 NISP abundance of skeletal elements for cave bear 176 5.16 % Weight of skeletal element for cave bear from combined assemblage. 178 5.17 Scatterplot of measurement of cave bear canine 184 5.18 %NISP of body part for horse 186 vii 5.19 %NISP of body part for reindeer 187 5.20 Age groups of horse from the MP 189 5.21 Age groups of rhinoceros from the MP 190 5.22 Frequency and weight of ivory fragments (excluding the tusks from the MP R which is described below and modified fragments) 192 5.23 Two tusk fragments from the MP, both ~17cm (Photo courtesy of Kurt Wehrberger, Ulmer Museum) 193 5.24 shed reindeer antler with carnivore modification from the MP 194 5.25 Frequency of antlers 194 5.26 Measurement of the pedicle of reindeer antler 195 5.27 pharyngeal of Cyprinid from
Load more

Recommended publications
  • B39 Homo Neanderthalensis and Archaic Homo Sapiens
    138 Chapter b THE GREAT ICE AGE The Present is the Key to the Past: HUGH RANCE b39 Homo neanderthalensis and archaic Homo sapiens < 160,000 years, burial, care > Haud ignara mali miseris succurrere disco. [Not unacquainted with distress, I have learned to succor the unfortunate.] —Virgil proverb.1 Hybridization may be ‘the grossest blunder in sexual preference which we can conceive of an animal making’[—Ronald Fisher, 1930], but it is nonetheless a regular event. The fraction of species that hybridize is variable, but on average around 10% of animal and 25% of plant species are known to hybridize with at least one other species. —James Mallet.2 Peripatetic though they were, Cro-Magnon (moderns) did not intermix with other human groups that existed, but kept to themselves for mating purposes, and then prevailed to the complete demise of competitors wherever they roamed.3 Invading species succeed often by virtue of leaving behind their predators, parasites, and pathogens.4 Humanity has decreased in overall robustness (healthy body mass) since 11,000 years ago. With adult heights that average 5' 4" and observed range of 1' 10½" (Gul Mohammed) to 8' 11"( Robert P. Wadlow), we Cro-Magnon descendants are 13% less their body size that Christopher B. Ruff has estimated from their fossilized bones. In Europe, Cro-Magnon developed an ivory, antler, and bone toolkit with apparel-making needles (Magdalenian culture) and had arrived equipped with stone-pointed projectiles (Aurignation technology).5 Moderns were in frigid Russia (Kostenki sites) 45,000
    [Show full text]
  • The Origin and Spread of Modern Humans 1. Modern
    THE ORIGIN AND SPREAD OF MODERN HUMANS • Modern Humans • The Advent of Behavioral Modernity • Advances in Technology • Glacial Retreat • Cave Art • The Settling of Australia • Settling the Americas • The Peopling of the Pacific 1. MODERN HUMANS Anatomically modern humans (AMHs) evolved from an archaic Homo sapiens African ancestor • Eventually AMHs spread to other areas, including western Europe, where they replaced, or Interbred with, Neandertals Out of Africa II • Accumulating to support African origin for AMHs • White and Asfaw: finds near village of Herto are generally anatomically modern • Leakey: Omo Kibish remains from 195,000 B.P. appear to be earliest AMH fossils yet found • Sites in South Africa of early African AMHs 1 • Anatomically modern specimens, including skull found at Skhūl, date to 100,000 B.P. • Early AMHs in Western Europe often referred to as Cro Magnons, after earliest fossil find of an anatomically modern human in France • AMHs may have inhabited Middle East before the Neandertals GENETIC EVIDENCE FOR OUT OF AFRICA II • Researchers from Berkeley generated a computerized model of Homo evolution • Based upon the average rate of mutation in known samples of mtDNA • Only the mother contributes mtDNA • Everyone alive today has mtDNA that descends from a woman (dubbed Eve) who lived in sub-Saharan Africa around 200,000 years ago GENETIC EVIDENCE FOR OUT OF AFRICA II • In 1997, mtDNA extracted showed that the Neandertals differed significantly from modern humans • 27 differences between modern humans and Neandertal •
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Remains from the Smokemont Site in the Appalachian Mountains of North Carolina
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 8-2013 Plant Remains from the Smokemont Site in the Appalachian Mountains of North Carolina Gabrielle Casio Purcell [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Purcell, Gabrielle Casio, "Plant Remains from the Smokemont Site in the Appalachian Mountains of North Carolina. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2013. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/2447 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Gabrielle Casio Purcell entitled "Plant Remains from the Smokemont Site in the Appalachian Mountains of North Carolina." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Arts, with a major in Anthropology. Kandace D. Hollenbach, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Gerald Schroedl, Michael Logan Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) i Plant Remains from the Smokemont Site in the Appalachian Mountains of North Carolina A Thesis Presented for the Master of Arts Degree The University of Tennessee, Knoxville Gabrielle Casio Purcell August 2013 ii Copyright © 2013 by Gabrielle Casio Purcell All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • The Janus-Faced Dilemma of Rock Art Heritage
    The Janus-faced dilemma of rock art heritage management in Europe: a double dialectic process between conservation and public outreach, transmission and exclusion Mélanie Duval, Christophe Gauchon To cite this version: Mélanie Duval, Christophe Gauchon. The Janus-faced dilemma of rock art heritage management in Europe: a double dialectic process between conservation and public outreach, transmission and exclusion. Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites, Taylor & Francis, In press, 10.1080/13505033.2020.1860329. hal-03078965 HAL Id: hal-03078965 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03078965 Submitted on 21 Feb 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Duval Mélanie, Gauchon Christophe, 2021. The Janus-faced dilemma of rock art heritage management in Europe: a double dialectic process between conservation and public outreach, transmission and exclusion, Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites, doi.org/10.1080/13505033.2020.1860329 Authors: Mélanie Duval and Christophe Gauchon Mélanie Duval: *Université Grenoble Alpes (UGA), Université Savoie Mont Blanc (USMB), CNRS, Environnements, Dynamics and Territories of Mountains (EDYTEM), Chambéry, France; * Rock Art Research Institute GAES, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. Christophe Gauchon: *Université Grenoble Alpes (UGA), Université Savoie Mont Blanc (USMB), CNRS, Environnements, Dynamics and Territories of Mountains (EDYTEM), Chambéry, France.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Pleistocene Human Remains from Vindija Cave, Croatia, Yugoslavia
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY 54~499-545(1981) Upper Pleistocene Human Remains From Vindija Cave, Croatia, Yugoslavia MILFORD H. WOLPOFF, FRED H. SMITH, MIRKO MALEZ, JAKOV RADOVCIC, AND DARKO RUKAVINA Department of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 (MH.W.1,Department of Anthropology, University of Tennessee, Kmxuille, Tennessee 37916 (FHS.),and Institute for Paleontology and Quaternary Geology, Yugoslav Academy of Sciences and Arts, 41000 Zagreb, Yugoslavia (M.M., J.R., D.R.) KEY WORDS Vindija, Neandertal, South Central Europe, Modern Homo sapiens origin, Evolution ABSTRACT Human remains excavated from Vindija cave include a large although fragmentary sample of late Mousterian-associated specimens and a few additional individuals from the overlying early Upper Paleolithic levels. The Mousterian-associated sample is similar to European Neandertals from other regions. Compared with earlier Neandertals from south central Europe, this sam- ple evinces evolutionary trends in the direction of Upper Paleolithic Europeans. Compared with the western European Neandertals, the same trends can be demon- strated, although the magnitude of difference is less, and there is a potential for confusing temporal with regional sources of variation. The early Upper Paleo- lithic-associated sample cannot be distinguished from the Mousterian-associated hominids. We believe that this site provides support for Hrdlicka’s “Neandertal phase” of human evolution, as it was originally applied in Europe. The Pannonian Basin and surrounding val- the earliest chronometrically dated Upper leys of south central Europe have yielded a Paleolithic-associated hominid in Europe large and significant series of Upper Pleisto- (Smith, 1976a). cene fossil hominids (e.g. Jelinek, 1969) as well This report presents a detailed comparative as extensive evidence of their cultural behavior description of a sample of fossil hominids re- (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • World Karst Science Reviews
    REVIEWS AND REPORTS / POROčILA world karst science reviews International Journal of Speleology ISSN 0392-6672 October 2008 Volume 37, Number 3 Contact: Jo De Waele [email protected] Website: �ttp://www.ijs.speleo.it/ Special issue on Palaeoclimate, guest editor: Dominique Genty TABLE OF CONTENTS Report of a t�ree-year monitoring programme at Hes�ang Cave, Central C�ina. Hu C., Henderson G.M., Huang J., C�en Z. and Jo�nson K.R., pp. 143 -151. The environmental features of t�e Monte Corc�ia cave system (Apuan Alps, Central Italy) and t�eir effects on spele- ot�em growt�. Piccini L., Zanc�etta G., Drysdale R.N., Hellstrom J., Isola I., Fallick A.E., Leone G., Doveri M., Mussi M., Mantelli F., Molli G., Lotti L., Roncioni A., Regattieri E., Mecc�eri M. and Vaselli L., pp. 153-172. Palaeoclimate Researc� in Villars Cave (Dordogne, SW-France). Genty D., pp. 173-191. Annually Laminated Speleot�ems: a Review. Baker A., Smit� C.L., Jex C., Fairc�ild I.J., Genty D. and Fuller L., pp. 193-206. Environmental Monitoring in t�e Mec�ara caves, Sout�eastern Et�iopia: Implications for Speleot�em Palaeoclimate Studies. Asrat A., Baker A., Leng M.J., Gunn J. and Umer M., pp. 207-220. Monitoring climatological, �ydrological and geoc�emical parameters in t�e Père Noël cave (Belgium): implication for t�e interpretation of speleot�em isotopic and geoc�emical time-series. Ver�eyden S., Genty D., Deflandre G., Quinif Y. and Keppens E., pp. 221-234. BOOK REVIEWS Jo De Waele Inside mot�er Eart� (Max Wiss�ak, Edition Reuss, 152 pages, 2008 - ISBN 978-3-934020-67-2) Arrigo A.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleoanthropology of the Balkans and Anatolia, Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology, DOI 10.1007/978-94-024-0874-4 326 Index
    Index A Bajloni’s calotte BAJ, 17, 19–20 Accretion model of Neanderthal evolution, 29 Balanica Acculturation, 164–165, 253 BH-1, 15, 24–29, 309 Acheulean, 80, 148, 172, 177, 201, 205, 306, 308, 310 hominin, 15–17, 29 large flake, 129, 132, 218 Mala, vi, 16, 24, 30, 139–140, 144–145, lithic artifacts, 80 148, 309–311 Lower, 308 Velika, 24, 36, 139–140, 144–145, 148 Middle, 308 Balıtepe, 214, 223–224 Admixture, vi, 29, 258 Balkan, v, 3, 139, 159, 171, 187, 218, 229, 274, 282, 303 Neanderthal, 51–64 and Anatolia, 308–310 Adriatic, 46, 154, 157, 162, 164–166 Central, vi, 3, 15–30, 139–150 Aegean, 29–30, 74–76, 116, 119, 121–122, 134–135, 148, 213, implications for earliest settlement of Europe, 220–221, 261, 283, 305, 316 187–210 Aizanoi, 221 Mountains, 69, 187 Akçeşme, 214, 223–224 and neighbouring regions, 229–261 Aktaş, 214, 217 Peninsula, 51, 70, 74, 119, 134, 150, 187, 201, 208 Alluvial plain, 125, 314 Southern, 3, 12, 47, 275 Alykes, 270, 272 Bañolas mandible, 28 Amărăști, 176–177, 181 Basalt, 201, 217–218, 220, 284 Anatolia (Asia Minor), 3, 79–80, 308–310 Basins, 51, 74, 99, 119, 139, 213, 281, 303 Central (Region), 128, 132, 134, 213, 217–218, 220, 223, 313 Anagni, 306 Eastern (Region), 217 Apennine, 310, 314 and hominin dispersals, 213–225 Beni Fouda, 307 North, 120 Čačak-Kraljevo, 140 Southeastern (Region), 215, 217, 220, 223 Carpathian, 51, 148 west, 119, 121 Denizli, 83 Anatomically modern human, 23, 36, 41, 44, 46, 55–56, 62, 70, 72, evolution on archaeological distributions, 313–317 76, 95, 111, 153, 165–166, 229 Grevena, 269, 272 Apidima, 4, 7–8, 11–12, 96, 310–311 Kalloni, 121–122 Apolakkia, 270–271 Megalopolis, 9, 12, 134–135, 298 Apollonia, 74, 270, 273, 276–277, 286–287 Mygdonia, 12, 273 Arago, 10, 25, 29, 56, 59, 87–90, 149, 312 Niš, 139, 146 Archaeological pattern, 303, 305 Pannonian, 15, 23, 319 Areopolis, 97 Thessalian, 310 Asprochaliko, 95, 148, 238–239, 253, 260 Venosa, 306 Assimilation model, 162 Belen Tepe, 221–222, 225 Atapuerca, 28, 276, 285, 287, 312, 318 Benkovski, 187, 205–209, 309 Sima de los Huesos, 27–29, 304, 306–307 BH-1.
    [Show full text]
  • Dating Aurignacian Rock Art in Altxerri B Cave (Northern Spain)
    Journal of Human Evolution 65 (2013) 457e464 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Human Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jhevol Not only Chauvet: Dating Aurignacian rock art in Altxerri B Cave (northern Spain) C. González-Sainz a, A. Ruiz-Redondo a,*, D. Garate-Maidagan b, E. Iriarte-Avilés c a Instituto Internacional de Investigaciones Prehistóricas de Cantabria (IIIPC), Avenida de los Castros s/n, 39005 Santander, Spain b CREAP Cartailhac-TRACES-UMR 5608, University de Toulouse-Le Mirail, 5 allées Antonio Machado, 31058 Toulouse Cedex 9, France c Laboratorio de Evolución Humana, Dpto. CC. Históricas y Geografía, University de Burgos, Plaza de Misael Bañuelos s/n, Edificio IþDþi, 09001 Burgos, Spain article info abstract Article history: The discovery and first dates of the paintings in Grotte Chauvet provoked a new debate on the origin and Received 29 May 2013 characteristics of the first figurative Palaeolithic art. Since then, other art ensembles in France and Italy Accepted 2 August 2013 (Aldène, Fumane, Arcy-sur-Cure and Castanet) have enlarged our knowledge of graphic activity in the early Available online 3 September 2013 Upper Palaeolithic. This paper presents a chronological assessment of the Palaeolithic parietal ensemble in Altxerri B (northern Spain). When the study began in 2011, one of our main objectives was to determine the Keywords: age of this pictorial phase in the cave. Archaeological, geological and stylistic evidence, together with Upper Palaeolithic radiometric dates, suggest an Aurignacian chronology for this art. The ensemble in Altxerri B can therefore Radiocarbon dating Cantabrian region be added to the small but growing number of sites dated in this period, corroborating the hypothesis of fi Cave painting more complex and varied gurative art than had been supposed in the early Upper Palaeolithic.
    [Show full text]
  • 1422 Dating French and Spanish Prehistoric
    DATING FRENCH AND SPANISH PREHISTORIC DECORATED CAVES IN THEIR ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONTEXTS H Valladas1 • E Kaltnecker1 • A Quiles1 • N Tisnérat-Laborde1 • D Genty1 • M Arnold2 • E Delqué-KoliË3 • C Moreau3 • D Baffier4 • J J Cleyet Merle5 • J Clottes6 • M Girard7 • J Monney8 • R Montes9 • C Sainz10 • J L Sanchidrian11 • R Simonnet12 ABSTRACT. The Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement (LSCE) research program on prehistoric art conducts chronological studies of parietal representations with their associated archaeological context. This multidisciplinary approach provides chronological arguments about the creation period of parietal representations. This article presents chrono- logical investigations carried out in several decorated caves in France (La Grande Grotte, Labastide, Lascaux, La Tête-du- Lion, Villars) and Spain (La Garma, Nerja, La Pileta, Urdiales). Several types of organic materials, collected from different areas of the caves close to the walls and in connection with parietal art, were dated to determine the periods of human presence in the cave, a presence that may have been related to artistic activities. These new radiocarbon results range from 33,000– 29,000 (La Grande Grotte) to 16,000–14,000 cal BP (Urdiales). INTRODUCTION Developing a chronological framework for Paleolithic parietal art (paintings and drawings) remains a difficult and controversial issue. Indeed, direct radiocarbon dating on paintings is exceptional, pri- marily because of preservation concerns and also due to the scarcity of organic pigments. Therefore, the results are not numerous and are often challenged. Reservations bear upon the taphonomic evo- lution of cave walls and especially upon the possible presence of extraneous organic materials, which can contaminate the parietal representations and thus distort the dating results.
    [Show full text]
  • Gilliane Monnier,* Gilbert Tostevin,⁑ Goran Pajović,** Nikola Borovinić,*** Mile Baković***
    Gilliane Monnier,* Gilbert Tostevin,⁑ Goran Pajović,** Nikola Borovinić,*** Mile Baković*** Nova istraživanja paleolitskog nalazišta Crvena Stijena, istorijski kontekst Abstract: The rockshelter of Crvena Stijena (Nikšić municipality, Montenegro) is one of the most important Paleolithic sites in southeastern Europe. Its 20-meter deep sequence of archaeological deposits spans the Middle Paleolithic through the Bronze Age. The Middle Paleolithic deposits themselves, which cover an astonishing 12 meters in depth, contain one of the longest records of Neanderthal occupation in the region. Since its discovery in 1954, the site has been the subject of two major research projects; the data they have produced have helped make it a critical type-site for the Paleolithic in the Balkans. In this paper, our goal is to introduce the aims and methodologies of the new research collaboration at Crvena Stijena that we established in 2016. We first present the site within the context of the Middle Paleolithic of the western Balkans. We then describe the history of research at Crvena Stijena, and summarize the results of the last project, which were recently published1. Finally, we describe the research questions that are guiding our new investigations, and the methods we are applying in order to answer these questions while preserving as much of the site as possible for future generations of archaeologists. Keywords: Middle Paleolithic, Neanderthals, Balkans, fire, stone tools I. Uvod Nova istraživanja se sprovode u kontekstu saradnje Narodnog muzeja Crne Gore i Univerziteta Minesota, uspostavljene 2016. godine. Njihova svrha je ispitivanje sloja srednjeg paleolita na poznatom lokalitetu Crvena Stijena.U ovom radu predstavljamo istoriju istraživanja na Crvenoj stijeni, koja je iskopavana od 1954.
    [Show full text]
  • Amerindian Cosmologies and European Prehistoric Cave Art: Reasons for and Usefulness of a Comparison
    Arts 2014, 3, 1- 14; doi:10.3390/arts3010001 OPEN ACCESS arts ISSN 2076-0752 www.mdpi.com/journal/arts Article Amerindian Cosmologies and European Prehistoric Cave Art: Reasons for and Usefulness of a Comparison Enrico Comba Università degli Studi di Torino, Dipartimento Culture, Politica e Società, Lungo Dora Siena, 100, Torino 10153, Italy; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-011-670-4805. Received: 28 October 2013; in revised form: 2 December 2013 / Accepted: 17 December 2013 / Published: 27 December 2013 Abstract: Several anthropological studies conducted in recent years among different Native American cultures have revealed a series of common features in ontological premises and cosmological frameworks. These features seem to be shared by most of the Native peoples in both North and South America. They include: a system of relationships between humans and non-human beings based on an ontology “of persons” as contrasted to the ontology “of things” typical of the Western attitude towards Nature; a structure of the cosmos made by superposed layers, which express the idea of a reality represented as comprising hidden dimensions and invisible domains; and the key role played by ecstatic practitioners in establishing relationships with and acquiring knowledge from these multiple dimensions of the universe. Here, the idea is suggested that these elements could be profitably utilized to interpret the meaning of Paleolithic cave art, not simply implying a series of typological likenesses, but suggesting the possibility of historic (pre-historic) links. It should be remembered that the main settlement of the Americas occurred in a period (from 30,000–20,000 years B.P.) which is contemporaneous with the creation of the masterworks in the caves of France and Spain.
    [Show full text]
  • A Lesson in Stone: Examining Patterns of Lithic Resource Use and Craft-Learning in the Minas Basin Region of Nova Scotia By
    A Lesson in Stone: Examining Patterns of Lithic Resource Use and Craft-learning in the Minas Basin Region of Nova Scotia By © Catherine L. Jalbert A thesis submitted to the School of Graduate Studies for partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts. Department of Archaeology Memorial University of Newfoundland May 2011 St. John’s Newfoundland Abstract Examining the Late Woodland (1500-450 BP) quarry/workshop site of Davidson Cove, located in the Minas Basin region of Nova Scotia, a sample of debitage and a collection of stone implements appear to provide correlates of the novice and raw material production practices. Many researchers have hypothesized that lithic materials discovered at multiple sites within the region originated from the outcrop at Davidson Cove, however little information is available on lithic sourcing of the Minas Basin cherts. Considering the lack of archaeological knowledge concerning lithic procurement and production, patterns of resource use among the prehistoric indigenous populations in this region of Nova Scotia are established through the analysis of existing collections. By analysing the lithic materials quarried and initially reduced at the quarry/workshop with other contemporaneous assemblages from the region, an interpretation of craft-learning can be situated in the overall technological organization and subsistence strategy for the study area. ii Acknowledgements It is a pleasure to thank all those who made this thesis achievable. First and foremost, this thesis would not have been possible without the guidance and support provided by my supervisor, Dr. Michael Deal. His insight throughout the entire thesis process was invaluable. I would also like to thank Dr.
    [Show full text]