Note on the Application of Transient Wave Packets for Wave–Ice Interaction Experiments

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Note on the Application of Transient Wave Packets for Wave–Ice Interaction Experiments water Article Note on the Application of Transient Wave Packets for Wave–Ice Interaction Experiments Marco Klein 1,* , Moritz Hartmann 2 and Franz von Bock und Polach 2,3 1 Offshore Dynamics Group, Hamburg University of Technology, 21073 Hamburg, Germany 2 Ship Structural Design and Analysis, Hamburg University of Technology, 21073 Hamburg, Germany; [email protected] (M.H.); [email protected] (F.v.B.u.P.) 3 Institut für Meereskunde, Universität Hamburg, 20146 Hamburg, Germany * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: This paper presents the transient wave packet (TWP) technique as an efficient method for wave–ice interaction experiments. TWPs are deterministic wave groups, where both the amplitude spectrum and the associated phases are tailor-made and manipulated, being well established for efficient wave–structure interaction experiments. One major benefit of TWPs is the possibility to determine the response amplitude operator (RAO) of a structure in a single test run compared to the classical approach by investigating regular waves of different wave lengths. Thus, applying TWPs for wave–ice interaction offers the determination of the RAO of the ice at specific locations. In this context, the determination of RAO means that the ice characteristics in terms of wave damping over a wide frequency range are obtained. Besides this, the wave dispersion of the underlying wave components of the TWP can be additionally investigated between the specific locations with the same single test run. For the purpose of this study, experiments in an ice tank, capable of generating tailored waves, were performed with a solid ice sheet. Besides the generation of one TWP, regular waves of different wave lengths were generated as a reference to validate the TWP results for specific Citation: Klein, M.; Hartmann, M.; wave periods. It is shown that the TWP technique is not only applicable for wave–ice interaction von Bock und Polach, F. Note on the investigations, but is also an efficient alternative to investigations with regular waves. Application of Transient Wave Packets for Wave–Ice Interaction Keywords: wave–ice interaction; wave–ice experiments; transient wave packets; wave damping; Experiments. Water 2021, 13, 1699. wave dispersion https://doi.org/10.3390/w13121699 Academic Editor: Luca Martinelli 1. Introduction Received: 14 May 2021 The interaction of ice and waves is a very complex process involving ice mechanics Accepted: 16 June 2021 Published: 19 June 2021 and wave theory. The influencing parameters are the ice type, size, thickness, distribution and ice covered area as well as mechanical properties of the ice. The ice field affects Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral the incoming waves and the waves have a strong influence on the ice field. The waves with regard to jurisdictional claims in displace and may break the ice while the ice causes a change in wave properties due to published maps and institutional affil- its flexural deformation as well as attenuation of waves due to scattering, damping and iations. frictional effects. The effect of ice on wave propagation is related to the dispersion of the waves and can be divided into a direct effect on the wave number and the attenuation of waves due to scattering and dissipation. The presence of the ice, and therewith a changed boundary condition, alters the wave dispersion immediately compared to the open water solution, Copyright: © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. affecting wave properties in terms of wave length, group velocity and amplitude. In This article is an open access article addition, the attenuation of the wave energy during the propagation under ice causes a distributed under the terms and decrease in the wave amplitude. conditions of the Creative Commons Most experimental studies related to wave–ice interaction have investigated the atten- Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// uation of waves, as field measurements are easier to obtain (e.g., [1–4]). The attenuation creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ can be described as an exponential decay of the wave energy when passing the ice field 4.0/). due to wave scattering and dissipation [5,6]. The attenuation depends on the ice state and Water 2021, 13, 1699. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13121699 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/water Water 2021, 13, 1699 2 of 21 mechanical properties of the ice as well as the wave length. Short waves within a wave spectrum are scattered and damped quickly, whereby the longer waves penetrate deep into the ice field [7,8], where they can travel long distances, dissipating energy only slowly (e.g., [9,10]). However, major uncertainties exist regarding the attenuation coefficient and its dependency on ice state and temperature [5,6]. The effect on the dispersion of waves under ice is complex and also strongly depends on the ice state and temperature. Field observations have shown that the presence of ice can lead to shorter or longer waves compared to waves in open water (e.g., [9,11–13]). The results indicate that ice type, ice thickness and the incoming wave period affect the dispersion in different ways. Different dispersion models have been developed with increasing complexity to account for the relevant physical mechanisms—from added mass and elastic plate models to viscous-layer models. A detailed study on different dispersion models and their effects on wave length as well as the area of validity of the different models can be found in Collins III et al. [14]. Measurements of wave dispersion in ice—field measurements as well as model tests in a more controllable environment—have indicated that a distinct conclusion on which dispersion model fits best is not possible. Moreover, due to the variability of the ice state, temperature and incoming wave field in terms of wave frequencies, all dispersion models appear to be suitable for certain conditions (e.g., [15–19]). Summing up, the attenuation and dispersion of waves under ice are two important interacting physical mechanisms and integral parts of the breaking up of the ice-covered sea [2,8]. Thus, exact knowledge of the physics of wave–ice interaction is indispensable for an accurate description of the dynamic processes within the marginal ice zone (MIZ). Therefore, modelling of the processes in both the long and short term is required such for questions related to climate change investigations or weather forecasts, including maintaining and predicting ship routes. Besides full-scale measurements, which give real-world insights, wave–ice investigations in the controlled environment of a test facility are essential for fundamental research. In this context, experiments exclusively focused on wave–ice interactions are a quite recent research field compared to the originally intended structure–ice investigations featuring the classical application area of ice tanks. Thus, the established model ice has been developed to physically test its interaction with structures on a small scale. Following Froude and Cauchy scaling laws, the model ice has particular mechanical properties, which are adjusted to scale the downward breaking of a ship in ice correctly (e.g., [20,21]). The adjustment is done by crystal size and added chemicals. The main objective here is the correct scaling of the global forces (resistance) on the ship, while accepting that some of the resistance components might not be scaled correctly. Generally, model ice has been developed over recent decades to overcome or reduce certain problems such as plasticity or ductility (e.g., [21–23]). Although model ice might represent the force level correctly, it has a significant amount of plasticity. The latter has been shown numerically for a different model ice type (fine-grained) by von Bock und Polach [24] and on the basis of measurement data for most existing model ice types [25]. Due to the plasticity of the model ice, the ice undergoes larger deformation to reach the critical failure stress than actual ice (sea ice, lake ice) would [26,27]. Consequently, the higher proportion of plasticity in model ice is likely to affect the energy dissipation of waves underneath the ice sheet which will introduce a scale effect in terms of higher damping. However, several wave–ice interaction experiments in the controlled environments of test facilities have been conducted in recent years, focusing either on regular waves or irregular sea states. The research questions are manifold, from fundamental research on theoretical wave–ice propagation models to ships and structures in waves. Most of the studies deal with fundamental research questions such as damping and attenuation, wave characteristics and dispersion as well as the consequences for the ice under various different ice conditions. These studies are normally conducted with regular waves, as they can be used to answer specific research questions in a clearly defined manner [16–18,28–36]. Those experiments comprise the generation of a set of regular waves to cover a wide Water 2021, 13, 1699 3 of 21 frequency range, so that a long test campaign may affect the ice characteristics. On the one hand, the cooling control system regulates the temperature with the target to keep ice properties constant during the experiments. However, ice properties are affected by various parameters, which vary over the time of the experiments, such as water temperature, ice thickness or entrapped chemicals and, consequently, a certain dynamic or variation of the ice properties is inevitable. On the other hand, the persistent bending of the ice due to the presence of the waves may affect the micro-structure and the mechanical behaviour of the ice by various causes, such as the growth of micro-cracks and increased plasticity up to the limit of fatigue strength. This strongly implies that the ice characteristics in terms of wave damping can also change during the course of the test campaign. In consequence, the scalability of experiments is affected by both inherent ice scale effects, such as excessive plasticity, and dynamic variations of ice properties, which can also cause unintended breakup and macro-crack formation due to fatigue.
Recommended publications
  • The Roland Von Glasow Air-Sea-Ice Chamber (Rvg-ASIC)
    https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2020-392 Preprint. Discussion started: 14 October 2020 c Author(s) 2020. CC BY 4.0 License. The Roland von Glasow Air-Sea-Ice Chamber (RvG-ASIC): an experimental facility for studying ocean/sea-ice/atmosphere interactions Max Thomas1, James France1,2,3, Odile Crabeck1, Benjamin Hall4, Verena Hof5, Dirk Notz5,6, Tokoloho Rampai4, Leif Riemenschneider5, Oliver Tooth1, Mathilde Tranter1, and Jan Kaiser1 1Centre for Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences, School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, UK, NR4 7TJ 2British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, Cambridge CB3 0ET, UK 3Department of Earth Sciences, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham TW20 0EX, UK 4Chemical Engineering Deptartment, University of Cape Town, South Africa 5Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany 6Center for Earth System Research and Sustainability (CEN), University of Hamburg, Germany Correspondence: Jan Kaiser ([email protected]) Abstract. Sea ice is difficult, expensive, and potentially dangerous to observe in nature. The remoteness of the Arctic and Southern Oceans complicates sampling logistics, while the heterogeneous nature of sea ice and rapidly changing environmental conditions present challenges for conducting process studies. Here, we describe the Roland von Glasow Air-Sea-Ice Chamber (RvG-ASIC), a laboratory facility designed to reproduce polar processes and overcome some of these challenges. The RvG- 5 ASIC is an open-topped 3.5 m3 glass tank housed in a coldroom (temperature range: -55 to +30 oC). The RvG-ASIC is equipped with a wide suite of instruments for ocean, sea ice, and atmospheric measurements, as well as visible and UV lighting.
    [Show full text]
  • Ice Trials in Antarctica • New Rules on the Northern Sea Route • Processing Barge to the Arctic • Equipment for the Navy in This Issue
    Arctic Passion News No. 1 | 2020 | issue 19 • Ice trials in Antarctica • New rules on the Northern Sea Route • Processing barge to the Arctic • Equipment for the Navy In this issue Page 4 Page 8 Page 11 Page 16 New rules on the Northern Xue Long 2 in Equipment for the Navy Barge for mining project Sea Route ice trials Table of contents From the Managing Director.................................. 3 Front cover New regime and regulations on the NSR...............4 Sami Saarinen spent six weeks travelling to Antarctica Xue Long 2 in successful ice trials.......................... 8 and back, onboard both of China’s icebreakers Xue Equipment for Navy corvettes.......................... ….11 Long and Xue Long 2. Read about his voyage and Safe and reliable shipping of crude oil................. 12 Xue Long 2’s ice trials on page 8. Feasibility study for Qilak LNG.........................….14 Aalto Ice Tank opens.............................................15 Contact details Pavlovskoe mining project.....................................16 AKER ARCTIC TECHNOLOGY INC Reducing ice friction since 1969 ...........................18 Merenkulkijankatu 6, FI-00980 HELSINKI Active Heeling systems.........................................20 Tel.: +358 10 323 6300 News in brief.........................................................21 www.akerarctic.fi Announcements....................................................23 Study tour to Gothenburg.....................................24 Join our subscription list Our services Please send your message to www.akerarctic.fi
    [Show full text]
  • Peer Review of the Finnish Shipbuilding Industry Peer Review of the Finnish Shipbuilding Industry
    PEER REVIEW OF THE FINNISH SHIPBUILDING INDUSTRY PEER REVIEW OF THE FINNISH SHIPBUILDING INDUSTRY FOREWORD This report was prepared under the Council Working Party on Shipbuilding (WP6) peer review process. The opinions expressed and the arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of OECD member countries. The report will be made available on the WP6 website: http://www.oecd.org/sti/shipbuilding. This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. © OECD 2018; Cover photo: © Meyer Turku. You can copy, download or print OECD content for your own use, and you can include excerpts from OECD publications, databases and multimedia products in your own documents, presentations, blogs, websites and teaching materials, provided that suitable acknowledgment of OECD as source and copyright owner is given. All requests for commercial use and translation rights should be submitted to [email protected]. 2 PEER REVIEW OF THE FINNISH SHIPBUILDING INDUSTRY TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD ................................................................................................................................................... 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................. 4 PEER REVIEW OF THE FINNISH MARITIME INDUSTRY ....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 50 Years of Ice Model Testing
    SHIP CONSULTING ICE MODEL OFFSHORE Design & Engineering & Project Development & Full Scale Testing Development 50 Years of Ice Model Testing Topi Leiviskä Head of Research and Testing Aker Arctic Technology inc 28.2.2019 4 March, 2019 Slide 1 Manhattan project (ESSO) ¡ Mid 1960s large oil reservuars were localized in the Alaskan Noth Slope ¡ It could be feasibly transported to the market through the Northwest Passage ¡ A decision was taken to modify an existing 106,000 DWT tanker, SS Manhattan ¡ Manhattan was refitted for the arctic voyage with an icebreaker bow in 1968–69 ¡ During the retrofit process, the oil company Esso (Humble Oil) suggested to study the performance in ice of the newly designed bow in model-scale ¡ Esso decided to invest in construction of the first ice model testing facility in Finland ¡ The first ice model test basin in Finland was ready for testing at the end of 1969 4 March, 2019 Slide 2 Icebreaker design in Finland 1933-1970 Name (previous names) Year Name (previous names) Year Louhi (ex-Sisu) 1939 Kiev 1965 Voima 1954 Askiplios (ex-Hanse) 1966 Kapitan Belousov 1954 Murmansk 1968 Kapitan Voronin 1955 Varma 1968 Kapitan Meheklov 1956 Vladivostok 1969 Oden 1957 Polar Star (ex-Njord) 1969 Karu (ex-Karhu) 1958 Dudinka (ex-Apu) 1970 Murtaja 1959 Ale 1973 Moskva 1960 Mega (ex-Aatos, Teuvo) 1973 Sampo 1961 Ermak 1974 Leningrad 1961 Atle 1974 Tor 1964 Urho 1975 4 March, 2019 Slide 3 WIMB Presentation Video 4 March, 2019 Slide 4 Time line of the ice model testing facilities (Kværner) Wärtsilä Masa-Yards Wärtsilä Arctic
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 DP Conference Cover Page Format
    Jenssen, et al Arctic/Ice Operations DYPIC DYNAMIC POSITIONING CONFERENCE October 9-10, 2012 Arctic/Ice Operations DYPIC – A Multi-National R&D Project on DP Technology in Ice by Nils Albert Jenssen Kongsberg Maritime, Kongsberg, Norway (editor) Torbjørn Hals Kongsberg Maritime, Kongsberg, Norway Peter Jochmann HSVA (Hamburg Ship Model Basin), Hamburg, Germany (presenter) Andrea Haase HSVA (Hamburg Ship Model Basin), Hamburg, Germany Xavier dal Santo DCNS Research / Sirehna, Nantes, France Sofien Kerkeni DCNS Research / Sirehna, Nantes, France Olivier Doucy DCNS Research / Srehna, Nantes, France Arne Gürtner Statoil, Trondheim, Norway Susanne Støle Hetschel DNV, Oslo, Norway Per Olav Moslet DNV, Oslo, Norway Ivan Metrikin NTNU (Norwegian University of Science and Technology), Trondheim, Norway Sveinung Løset NTNU (Norwegian University of Science and Technology), Trondheim, Norway MTS Dynamic Positioning Conference October 9-10, 2012 Page 1 Jenssen, et al Arctic/Ice Operations DYPIC Introduction The desire for exploration of oil and gas in arctic regions increases the demand of station keeping under ice drift conditions of arctic drill ships, icebreakers and offshore supply vessels. Physical model tests, such as oblique tests, are historically used to determine the necessary design parameters for ice going vessels. HSVA (Hamburg Ship model Basin) has long experience in ice model testing and initiated the DYPIC project [1] to improve its testing capabilities of DP vessel. The objectives of the R&D project: • Development and fabrication of a DP System for ice model testing • Prediction of station keeping capabilities of vessels under ice loads by means of model tests • Definition of model test procedures to determine necessary DP parameters • Evaluation of the feasibility of DP in various ice conditions During the project it became evident that a numeric dynamic ice load model should be developed in order to further develop and evaluate different DP control schemes and as a first tool for evaluating DP vessel concepts [2].
    [Show full text]
  • Accelerated Icebreaker Development
    Accelerated icebreaker development Imagine a ship owner having the right to refuse to take delivery of a new container vessel if it does not sail at 2 knots in 1.5-meter thick ice. Would anyone guarantee the performance of a new, innovative vessel in advance? 2 generations 1|13 his is not a theoretical example but a real- organization has a long history in researching and life situation. Aker Arctic Technology Inc. developing maritime ice technologies and a unique is probably one-of-a-kind in giving such a set of groundbreaking achievements to go with it. guarantee. The owner is Norilsk Nickel, the Tworld’s largest exporter of nickel and palladium and “Computer simulations estimate how much power a in need of an ice-breaking container ship. vessel will need to meet specific ice conditions,” says Uuskallio, adding that these need to be verified in As a so-called double acting ship, this type of vessel model testing. is designed to lead the way in open water and thin ice, then turn around and proceed astern (back- Model testing is done in our ice tank, which is 75 wards) in heavy ice conditions, sucking the ice in meters long and 8 meters wide, with a water depth under the ship with its Azipod® thrusters. Such ships of up to 2.1 meters. We can also do tests in Aalto can operate independently in severe ice conditions University’s ice tank, which is 40 by 40 meters and without icebreaker assistance, while performing more suitable for testing maneuverability. better in open waters compared with traditional ice- breaking vessels.
    [Show full text]
  • Finnish Solutions for the Entire Icebreaking Value Chain
    FINNISH SOLUTIONS FOR THE ENTIRE ICEBREAKING VALUE CHAIN AN AMERICAN-FINNISH PARTNERSHIP 2 3 4 FINNISH SOLUTIONS FOR THE ENTIRE ICEBREAKING VALUE CHAIN TABLE OF 6 ICEBREAKING SOLUTIONS DELIVERED ON TIME AND ON BUDGET CONTENTS 8 THE POLAR MARITIME NETWORK IN FINLAND 12 RESEARCH 12 AALTO UNIVERSITY 14 DESIGN 14 AKER ARCTIC 18 BUILD 18 RAUMA MARINE CONSTRUCTIONS 22 OPERATE 22 ARCTIA 26 EQUIPMENT & SYSTEM SUPPLIERS / DIGITAL SERVICE PROVIDERS 28 LAMOR 30 ABB 32 NESTIX 34 WÄRTSILÄ 38 TRAFOTEK 40 MARIOFF 42 STARKICE 44 ICEYE 46 CRAFTMER 48 PEMAMEK 50 STEERPROP 52 NAVIDIUM 54 DANFOSS 56 POLARIS: THE FIRST LNG-POWERED ICEBREAKER IN THE WORLD 58 BENEFITS OF AN AMERICAN-FINNISH PARTNERSHIP PHOTO BY TIM BIRD 4 5 Finnish companies have designed about 80 percent of the world’s icebreakers, and about 60 percent of them have been built by Finnish shipyards. We have a creative and FINNISH agile polar maritime network that is known for delivering on schedule and on budget. We are also known for delivering sustainable, innovative and effective solutions SOLUTIONS for demanding tasks in Arctic conditions. Finland is the only nation in the world that offers ice- proven products and services with a solid, cost-effective FOR THE ENTIRE value chain. This value chain covers R&D, education, ship design, engineering, building, operation, program management and life cycle support services. Globally ICEBREAKING recognized Finnish companies and shipyards offer icebreaking solutions for the U.S polar icebreaker program that can be considered as a complete package or VALUE CHAIN configured as individual options to suit specific needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Seminar Program
    12 th Arctic Passion Seminar Thursday, March 2nd, 2017, Helsinki Program Aker Arctic The Ice Technology Partner 12th APSPrctic assion eminar rogram 8.00 Bus transfer from Scandic Grand Marina Hotel to Aker Arctic 8.30 Registration 9.00 Welcome: Reko-Antti Suojanen, CEO, Managing Director, Aker Arctic Technology Inc 9.05Opening Speech: Finland's Chairmanship of the Arctic Council in 2017–2019, Aleksi Härkönen, The Ambassador for Arctic Affairs, Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland 9.15 Latest News from Aker Arctic, Reko-Antti Suojanen, CEO, Managing Director, Aker Arctic Technology Inc Aalto Ice Tank and Co-operation with Aker Arctic, Gary Marquis, Dean, Professor, Aalto University 9.40 Experiences of Polaris Icebreaker in the Northern Baltic, Tero Vauraste, CEO, Arctia Ltd. 10.00 Coffee Break 10.30 Economic Development of the Arctic Zone of Russia – The Forecast of Freight Traffic and Tasks for Shipbuilding, Mikhail Grigoryev, Director, GECON 10.50Polar Expeditions Cruises by Ponant - Expedition Cruise Challenge in Harsh Environments, Nicolas Dubreuil, Director of Expedition Cruises, Etienne Garcia, Captain, Compagnie du Ponant 11.10 Yamal LNG Carrier Development, Sung-Pyo Kim, Deputy Director, Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering Co., Ltd.; Ilkka Saisto, Team Leader, Hull Design and Hydrodynamics, Aker Arctic Technology Inc 11.30 Demonstration Ice Model Test 12.00 Buffet Lunch 13.20 Case Studies: Ice Propeller Development, Kari Laukia, Director, Ship Design and Engineering, Aker Arctic Technology Inc; Ari Viinikkala, Deputy Managing Director, TEVO; Alexander Ilyintsev, Deputy Director General, JSC Shiprepairing Center Zvyozdochka 13.45Ice Strengthened Lifeboat, Evan Martin, President, Aker Arctic Canada Inc. 14.10 Design and Construction of the First Ever Arctic Condensate Carrier, Li Tao, Managing Director of Business & Marketing Dept., Guangzhou Shipyard International Co., Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Numerical Simulations of a Tanker Collision with a Bergy Bit Incorporating Hydrodynamics, a Validated Ice Model and Damage to the Vessel
    Cold Regions Science and Technology 81 (2012) 26–35 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Cold Regions Science and Technology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/coldregions Numerical simulations of a tanker collision with a bergy bit incorporating hydrodynamics, a validated ice model and damage to the vessel R.E. Gagnon ⁎, J. Wang Ocean, Coastal and River Engineering, National Research Council of Canada, St. John's, NL, Canada A1B 3T5 article info abstract Article history: Numerical simulations of a collision between a loaded tanker and a bergy bit have been conducted using LS- Received 8 March 2012 Dyna™ software. The simulations incorporated hydrodynamics, via LS-Dyna's ALE formulation, and a validat- Accepted 16 April 2012 ed crushable foam ice model. The major portion of the vessel was treated as a rigid body and a section of the hull, located on the starboard side of the forward bow where the ice contact occurred, was modeled as typical Keywords: ship grillage that could deform and sustain damage as a result of the collision. Strategies for dealing with the Bergy bit collision highly varying mesh densities needed for the simulations are discussed as well as load and pressure distribu- Numerical simulation Ship damage tion on the grillage throughout the course of the collision. Realistic movement of the bergy bit due to the ves- sel's bow wave prior to contact with the ice was observed and the damage to the grillage resembled published results from actual grillage damage tests in the lab. A load measurement from the lab tests com- pared reasonably well with a rough estimate from the simulation.
    [Show full text]
  • Coast Guard Polar Icebreaker Modernization
    Coast Guard Polar Security Cutter (Polar Icebreaker) Program: Background and Issues for Congress Updated September 15, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov RL34391 Coast Guard Polar Security Cutter (Polar Icebreaker) Program Summary The Coast Guard Polar Security Cutter (PSC) program is a program to acquire three new PSCs (i.e., heavy polar icebreakers), to be followed years from now by the acquisition of up to three new Arctic Security Cutters (ASCs) (i.e., medium polar icebreakers). The PSC program has received a total of $1,754.6 million (i.e., about $1.8 billion) in procurement funding through FY2021, including $300 million that was provided through the Navy’s shipbuilding account in FY2017 and FY2018. With the funding the program has received through FY2021, the first two PSCs are now fully funded. The Coast Guard’s proposed FY2022 budget requests $170.0 million in procurement funding for the PSC program, which would be used for, among other things, procuring long leadtime materials (LLTM) for the third PSC. The Navy and Coast Guard in 2020 estimated the total procurement costs of the PSCs in then- year dollars as $1,038 million (i.e., about $1.0 billion) for the first ship, $794 million for the second ship, and $841 million for the third ship, for a combined estimated cost of $2,673 million (i.e., about $2.7 billion). Within those figures, the shipbuilder’s portion of the total procurement cost is $746 million for the first ship, $544 million for the second ship, and $535 million for the third ship, for a combined estimated shipbuilder’s cost of $1,825 million (i.e., about $1.8 billion).
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Northern Sea Route
    1 History of the Northern Sea Route ``History is a lantern to the future, which shines to us from the past'' V.O. Klyuchevskiy 1.1 FIRST VOYAGES (V.Ye. Borodachev, V.Yu. Alexandrov) The history of the exploration of the North is full of heroic spirit andtragedyÐthe voyages andexpeditionsthat accompaniedgeographical discoveriesÐthe history of scienti®c studiesÐorganization of a system of stationary and non-stationary observa- tionsÐcreation of the scienti®c±technical support service for the Northern Sea Route (NSR)Ðall in all, the history of a ®erce battle against the incredibly severe conditions of the Arctic. It is challenging to comprehensively reconstruct the backgroundto this history. The famous Norwegian polar explorer andscientist Fridtjof Nansen wrote: ``We speak about the ®rst discovery of the NorthÐbut how can we know when the ®rst man appearedin the Earth's northern regions? We know nothing except for the very last migration stages of humanity. What occurredduring these long centuries is still hidden from us'' (Nansen, 1911). Indeed, we have some evidence on Pytheas, a Greek from Massalia, who between 350 and310 bc reachedEnglandandthen a ``gloomy land''he calledThule, beyond which ``there is no sea or landor air with some mixture of all these elements hanging in space'' (Belkin, 1983). Such a perception of the earth's northern regions was preserved for many centuries andonly began to change in the 9th to 11th centuries with the appearance of ®rst the Norsemen in the Barents andWhite Seas. Between 870 and 890 ad, more than a thousandyears after the voyage of Pytheas, the Norwegian seafarer Ottar rounded the northern tip of Europe and explored the Barents and White Seas.
    [Show full text]
  • General Guidance and Introduction to Ice Model Testing
    ITTC – Recommended 7.5-02 -04-01 Procedures and Guidelines Page 1 of 10 General Guidance and Introduction to Effective Date Revision Ice Model Testing 2017 02 ITTC Quality System Manual Recommended Procedures and Guidelines Guideline General Guidance and Introduction to Ice Model Testing 7.5 Process Control 7.5-02 Testing and Extrapolation Methods 7.5-02-04 Ice Testing 7.5-02-04-01 General Guidance and Introduction to Ice Model Testing Updated / Edited by Approved Specialist Committee on Ice of the 28th ITTC 28th ITTC 2017 Date: 03/2017 Date: 09/2017 ITTC – Recommended 7.5-02 -04-01 Procedures and Guidelines Page 1 of 10 General Guidance and Introduction to Effective Date Revision Ice Model Testing 2017 02 Table of Contents 2.4 Modellig of different ice conditions.. 5 1. PURPOSE OF THE PROCEDURE .... 2 2.4.1 Level Ice ....................................... 5 2. GENERAL GUIDELINES ................... 2 2.4.2 Presawn Ice .................................. 5 2.1 Facilities, Ice Conditions and Ship 2.4.3 Modelling of ice floes .................. 5 Model .................................................. 2 2.4.4 Modeling of managed ice ............. 6 2.2 Model Ice Production ........................ 2 2.4.5 Brash ice channel ......................... 6 2.2.1 Model Ice Production Methods .... 3 2.4.6 First year ridges ............................ 6 2.2.1.1 Seeding Method ............................ 4 2.4.7 Rubble ice fields ........................... 6 2.2.1.2 Spraying Method .......................... 4 2.5 The ship model parameters ............... 7 2.3 Scaling ................................................. 4 3. BENCHMARK TESTS ......................... 7 4. REFERENCES ...................................... 7 7.5-02 ITTC – Recommended -04-01 Procedures and Guidelines Page 2 of 10 General Guidance and Introduction to Effective Date Revision Ice Model Testing 2017 02 General Guidance and Introduction to Ice Model Testing the ship should proceed in ice at least two ship lengths (see 15th ITTC).
    [Show full text]