Age, Growth, and Mortality of Lane Snapper from Southern Florida Charles S

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Age, Growth, and Mortality of Lane Snapper from Southern Florida Charles S View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Aquila Digital Community Northeast Gulf Science Volume 7 Article 8 Number 1 Number 1 7-1984 Age, Growth, and Mortality of Lane Snapper from Southern Florida Charles S. Manooch III National Marine Fisheries Service Diane L. Mason National Marine Fisheries Service DOI: 10.18785/negs.0701.08 Follow this and additional works at: https://aquila.usm.edu/goms Recommended Citation Manooch, C. S. III and D. L. Mason. 1984. Age, Growth, and Mortality of Lane Snapper from Southern Florida. Northeast Gulf Science 7 (1). Retrieved from https://aquila.usm.edu/goms/vol7/iss1/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by The Aquila Digital Community. It has been accepted for inclusion in Gulf of Mexico Science by an authorized editor of The Aquila Digital Community. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Manooch and Mason: Age, Growth, and Mortality of Lane Snapper from Southern Florida Northeast Gulf Science Vol. 7, No.1, p. 109·115 July 1984 AGE, GROWTH, AND MORTALITY OF LANE SNAPPER FROM SOUTHERN FLORIDA Charles S. Manooch, Ill and Diane L. Mason National Marine Fisheries Service Southeast Fisheries Center Beaufort Laboratory Beaufort, N C 28516-9722 Abstract: Rings on sectioned otoliths were used to determine ages of lane snapper, Lutjanlis synagris, sampled from the south Florida headboat and commericial handline and trap fisheries. Rings were identified and counted on 76% of the otoliths examined, and measurements were made on 61%. The oldest fish encountered was 10 years and 512 mm TL. Back-calculated mean lengths at annulus formation were 135, 196, 233, 261, 285, 310, 338, 367, 411 and 426 mm TL for age groups 1 to 10, resNectively. The von Bertalanffy 0 133 49 equation describing theoretical ~rowth wasQ = 501 (1- 6- · (I+ 1 · ~. The length-weight rei a· 6524 1 tionship was W = 0.000102TL · • The relationship of fork length to total length was TL = -2.6252 + 1.0891 FL. Lane snapper were fully recruited to the hook·and·line fishery as 5 year old fish. A Beverton and Holt yield·per-recruit model suggests a maximum yield· per-recruit of 500 g when instantaneous fishing mortality was 0.5 and recruitment ages were 1.5 to 3.0 years. The lane snapper, Lutjanus common throughout its range and is synagris, known in Latin America as caught by hook-and-line, beach seines, Pargo biajaiba and Dibujo de una fish traps, and trawls. Recreational biajaiba, is a tropical and warm anglers fish for reef fish from headboats temperate marine fish, which common­ or smaller private boats, using manual or ly occurs in the western Atlantic from the electric reels, sturdy boat rods, heavy northern coasts of Florida to monofilament line, and two-hook bottom southeastern Brazil and is often reef rigs baited with squid or cut fish (Hunt­ associated. Occasionally, juveniles are sman 1976). This form of deep water found as far north as North Carolina as fishing is very popular off Florida where a result of Gulf Stream transport of the lane snapper is caught along with eggs and larvae and are probably not in­ mutton snapper, Lutjanus ana/is, gray dicative of local, established popula­ snapper, L. griseus, red snapper, L. tions. The habitat of adults is highly campechanus, and yellowtail snapper, variable. It includes irregular substrates Ocyurus chrysurus, as well as grunts such as coral reefs, rock outcroppings, (Haemulidae), groupers (Serranidae), and and shipwrecks offshore, and smooth porgies (Sparidae). Smaller reef fish, in­ bottom usually associated with seagrass cluding young lane snappers, are caught beds and mangrove thickets inshore. by anglers fishing from piers, jetties, Larger individuals generally occur off­ bridges, and the shore. shore, smaller fish are found in estuaries Three previous studies have been and coastal waters (Starck and published on the age and growth of lane Schroeder 1971) . snapper (Rodriguez Pino 1962; Alegria . Like other iutjanids, the lane snap­ and Menezes 1970; and Claro and per is important to both recreational and Reshetnikov 1981). However, all three commercial fisheries. The species is were primarily directed at small (young) 109 Published by The Aquila Digital Community, 1984 1 Gulf of Mexico Science, Vol. 7 [1984], No. 1, Art. 8 110 C. S. Manooch, Ill and D. L. Mason .fish, hence the data are only marginally were mounted dry between two glass useful in calculating growth parameters slides and were examined at 40X on an needed to derive harvest strategy,models Everbach 1 scale projector. for the fishable stock(s) off Florida. Otoliths (sagittae) were removed Our research was part of the Na­ either by making a cross cut in the tional Marine Fisheries S'ervice, cranium with a hacksaw, thus exposing Southeast Fisheries Center's continuing the earbones, or by opening the otic major research program on reef fisheries. bulba with a wood chisel and entering Special appreciation . is exterded to the cranium from under the operculum. Robert L. Dixon, Beaufort Laljloratory, The latter technique was used to avoid and Harold Brusher, Panama City disfiguring fish, which were to be sold. Laboratory, who directed field sampling Otoliths were stored dry in labeled vials activities along the east coast of Florida or coin envelopes and were examined and in the Florida Keys, respectively. first whole and then again after being The objectives of this study were to: sectioned. Whole otoliths were placed in 1) determine the age structure and a blackened-bottom watch glass contain­ growth rates of lane snapper. in south ing clove oil and were viewed under a Florida, 2) estimate total inst~ntaneous dissecting microscope at 20X using mortality rates from catch curves derived reflected light. Reflected light revealed from recreational headboat catches, and two distinct types of rings, an opaque 3) construct a yield-per-recruit·model to ring that appeared white and a trans­ demonstrate the effects of ~ifferent luscent or hyaline band that looked dark. levels of fishing and recruitment age on Opaque rings were counted as annuli. potential yields. Such information is Measurements were made from the core needed by various regional :Fishery to each ring and to the otolith radius. Management Councils for preparing reef Since the field of measurement may vary fishery management plans as provided between species, we examined represen­ for under the Fishery Conservqtion and tative otoliths microscopically before Management Act of 1976. sectioning to identify the area where rings were more legible and where METHODS erosion of the edge was minimal. Otoliths were then aligned and mounted Lane snapper were sampled from in a chuck to prevent lateral movement recreational and commercial boats and sectioned with a Buehler1 lsomet operating out of ports along ,the east 11-1180 low speed saw yielding three, coast of Florida from Jack~onville 0.012-inch sections. Sections were read southward to Key West, 1977 td 1982. A and measured in the same manner as total of 931 fish were weighed to the described above for whole otoliths. A nearest tenth of a kilogram and detailed discussion of methods for measured (total length or fork length to preparing and sectioning otoliths is pro­ the nearest millimeter), and scales and vided by Matheson (1981). otoliths were removed from 423 lane snapper. Fork lengths were later con­ RESULTS AND DISCUSSION verted to total lengths. Scales were removed from under the Examination of several hundred tip of the posteriorly extended pe.ctoral fin and were placed in labeled. coin 'Mention of products does not mean an endorse­ envelopes. Four to six scales per sample ment by the NMFS, NOAA. https://aquila.usm.edu/goms/vol7/iss1/8 2 DOI: 10.18785/negs.0701.08 Manooch and Mason: Age, Growth, and Mortality of Lane Snapper from Southern Florida Lane snapper from southern Florida 111 scales from 150 fish of various sizes access to young fish (ages 0 to 3) revealed that scales were not useful in throughout the year, and had docu­ aging lane snapper. The majority of the mented the time of annulus formation. scales examined were regenerated. Those that were not regenerated were Length Conversions thick, often abnormally formed, and An equation to convert fork length rarely possessed a consistent pattern of (FL) to total length (TL) was developed markings. Scales and urohyal bones since some of the fish in this study were removed from lane snapper in Cuban measured in FL and some were mea­ waters had numerous false rings (Claro sured in TL, and all previously pub­ and Reshetnikov 1981). lished papers referred only to FL. The Whole otoliths (as used by Rodri­ following equation was based on random guez Pino 1961; Alegda and Menezes stratified sampling of fish lengths: 1970; and Claro and Reshetnikov 1981) were somewhat more readable than TL = - 2.6252 + 1.0891 FL; scales, but sectioned otoliths were even r = 0.999 and n = 100. more legible. On sectioned otoliths, rings were clear and, since they were formed Observed Growth around the entire structure, were easily Exclusion of smaller size classes by counted and measured. Growth marks the hook-and-line fishery reduced the could be identified on 76% of all those availability of younger fish for our study; examined, and measurements could be only one young-of-year fish (168 mm) was made on 61%. collected (Table 1). Rodrfguez Pino (1962) Validating that rings occurring on found young-of-year lane snapper in fish hardparts are true annuli and repre­ Cuban waters ranging from 60 to 159 mm sent age, is important yet particularly dif­ FL (63 to 171 mm TL). ficult for subject species that inhabit Although mean observed length in­ tropical waters, where temperatures are creased with age, there was much varia­ relatively stable.
Recommended publications
  • Full Text in Pdf Format
    Vol. 9: 185–192, 2010 AQUATIC BIOLOGY Published online May 12 doi: 10.3354/ab00250 Aquat Biol Microparasite ecology and health status of common bluestriped snapper Lutjanus kasmira from the Pacific Islands Thierry M. Work1,*, Matthias Vignon2, 3, Greta S. Aeby4 1US Geological Survey, National Wildlife Health Center, Honolulu Field Station, PO Box 50167, Honolulu, Hawaii 96850, USA 2Centre de Biologie et d’Ecologie Tropicale et Méditerranéenne, UMR 5244 CNRS-EPHE-UPVD, avenue Paul Alduy, 66860 Perpignan Cedex, France 3Centre de Recherches Insulaires et Observatoire de l’Environnement (CRIOBE), USR 3278 CNRS-EPHE, BP 1013 Papetoia, Moorea, French Polynesia 4Hawaii Institute of Marine Biology, PO Box 1346, Kaneohe, Hawaii 96744, USA ABSTRACT: Common bluestriped snappers Lutjanus kasmira were intentionally introduced into Hawaii from the South Pacific in the 1950s and have become well established throughout the archi- pelago. We examined health, prevalence and infection intensity of 2 microparasites, coccidia and epitheliocystis-like organisms (ELO), in L. kasmira from their introduced and native range including the islands where translocated fish originated (Tahiti and Marquesas Islands, French Polynesia) and from several other islands (American Samoa, Fiji and New Caledonia). In addition, we did a longitu- dinal survey of these parasites in the introduced range. Coccidia and ELO were widely distributed and were found on all islands except for New Caledonia. Health indices, as measured by overall organ lesions, body condition and parasite intensity, indicated that fish from Samoa were the least healthy, and fish from Midway (Hawaiian Archipelago) were the healthiest. Microparasite diversity was highest on Midway and Hawaii and lowest on New Caledonia.
    [Show full text]
  • Reef Snappers (Lutjanidae)
    #05 Reef snappers (Lutjanidae) Two-spot red snapper (Lutjanus bohar) Mangrove red snapper Blacktail snapper (Lutjanus argentimaculatus) (Lutjanus fulvus) Common bluestripe snapper (Lutjanus kasmira) Humpback red snapper Emperor red snapper (Lutjanus gibbus) (Lutjanus sebae) Species & Distribution Habitats & Feeding The family Lutjanidae contains more than 100 species of Although most snappers live near coral reefs, some species tropical and sub-tropical fi sh known as snappers. are found in areas of less salty water in the mouths of rivers. Most species of interest in the inshore fi sheries of Pacifi c Islands belong to the genus Lutjanus, which contains about The young of some species school on seagrass beds and 60 species. sandy areas, while larger fi sh may be more solitary and live on coral reefs. Many species gather in large feeding schools One of the most widely distributed of the snappers in the around coral formations during daylight hours. Pacifi c Ocean is the common bluestripe snapper, Lutjanus kasmira, which reaches lengths of about 30 cm. The species Snappers feed on smaller fi sh, crabs, shrimps, and sea snails. is found in many Pacifi c Islands and was introduced into They are eaten by a number of larger fi sh. In some locations, Hawaii in the 1950s. species such as the two-spot red snapper, Lutjanus bohar, are responsible for ciguatera fi sh poisoning (see the glossary in the Guide to Information Sheets). #05 Reef snappers (Lutjanidae) Reproduction & Life cycle Snappers have separate sexes. Smaller species have a maximum lifespan of about 4 years and larger species live for more than 15 years.
    [Show full text]
  • The Occurrence of the Lessepsian Migrant Lutjanus Argentimaculatus
    ISSN: 0001-5113 ACTA ADRIAT., SHORT COMMUNICATION AADRAY 60(1): 99 - 102, 2019 The occurrence of the Lessepsian migrant Lutjanus argentimaculatus in the Mediterranean, (Actinopterygii: Perciformes: Lutjanidae) first record from the coast of Israel Oren SONIN1, Dor EDELIST 2 and Daniel GOLANI3* 1 Department of Fisheries, Ministry of Agriculture. P.O. Box 1213 Kiryat Haim, 26105 Israel 2 Department of Maritime Civilizations, Charney School for Marine Sciences, University of Haifa. Mount Carmel, Haifa 31905, Israel 3 National Natural History Collections and Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 91904 Jerusalem, Israel * Corresponding author, email: [email protected] Two specimens of the Lessepsian migrant, the Mangrove red snapper Lutjanus argentimaculatus are reported from the Mediterranean coast of Israel. L. argentimaculatus was first recorded in the Mediterranean in 1979 by a single specimen. Over three decades later and only in the last two years four specimens, including the two reported herein, were recorded. This pattern strongly suggests that L. argentimaculatus has established a sustainable population in the Mediterranean. Key words: Lessepsian migrant, Lutjanus argentimaculatus, first record, Israel INTRODUCTION Therefore, the Israeli specimens constitute the fourth and fifth records from the Mediterranean, The phenomenon of invasion by Red Sea strongly suggesting that, after an initial lag, this organisms into the Mediterranean via the Suez species has recently established a viable popula- Canal is an ongoing process showing no signs tion in its new region. of ceasing or slowing. Among these “Lessep- sian migrants” are more than 100 fish species MATERIAL AND METHODS (FRICKE et al, 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Snapper and Grouper: SFP Fisheries Sustainability Overview 2015
    Snapper and Grouper: SFP Fisheries Sustainability Overview 2015 Snapper and Grouper: SFP Fisheries Sustainability Overview 2015 Snapper and Grouper: SFP Fisheries Sustainability Overview 2015 Patrícia Amorim | Fishery Analyst, Systems Division | [email protected] Megan Westmeyer | Fishery Analyst, Strategy Communications and Analyze Division | [email protected] CITATION Amorim, P. and M. Westmeyer. 2016. Snapper and Grouper: SFP Fisheries Sustainability Overview 2015. Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation. 18 pp. Available from www.fishsource.com. PHOTO CREDITS left: Image courtesy of Pedro Veiga (Pedro Veiga Photography) right: Image courtesy of Pedro Veiga (Pedro Veiga Photography) © Sustainable Fisheries Partnership February 2016 KEYWORDS Developing countries, FAO, fisheries, grouper, improvements, seafood sector, small-scale fisheries, snapper, sustainability www.sustainablefish.org i Snapper and Grouper: SFP Fisheries Sustainability Overview 2015 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The goal of this report is to provide a brief overview of the current status and trends of the snapper and grouper seafood sector, as well as to identify the main gaps of knowledge and highlight areas where improvements are critical to ensure long-term sustainability. Snapper and grouper are important fishery resources with great commercial value for exporters to major international markets. The fisheries also support the livelihoods and food security of many local, small-scale fishing communities worldwide. It is therefore all the more critical that management of these fisheries improves, thus ensuring this important resource will remain available to provide both food and income. Landings of snapper and grouper have been steadily increasing: in the 1950s, total landings were about 50,000 tonnes, but they had grown to more than 612,000 tonnes by 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Biochemical and Morphometric Analyses for Phylogenic Relationships Between Seven Snapper Species (Subfamily Lutjaninae) of the Western Atlantic
    BULLETIN OF MARINE SCIENCE, 50(3): 508-519,1992 CORAL REEF PAPER BIOCHEMICAL AND MORPHOMETRIC ANALYSES FOR PHYLOGENIC RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN SEVEN SNAPPER SPECIES (SUBFAMILY LUTJANINAE) OF THE WESTERN ATLANTIC Seinen Chow and Patrick J. Walsh ABSTRACT Fourteen snapper species belonging to the three genera (Lutjanus and two mono typic genera Ocyurus and Rhomboplites) of the subfamily Lutjaninae have been described in the western Atlantic. Electrophoretic (on 25 enzyme loci) and skull morphometric (by analysis of variance and discriminant analysis) comparisons among seven species of the three genera were per- formed. Average Nei's genetic distances were 0.566 ± 0.207 among five species of Lutjanus, 0.687 ± 0.148 between five species of Lutjanus and O. chrysurus, 0.869 ± 0.224 between five species of Lutjallus and R. aurorubens. and 0.877 between O. chrysurus and R. aurorubens. Cluster and additive tree analyses based on the genetic distance indicated that: I) there are at least two distinct groups (gray and red snapper groups) within the genus Lutjanus; 2) the lane snapper (L. synagris) has a closer relationship with the red snapper group (L. analis and L. vivanus) than with the gray snapper group (L. apodus and L. griseus); and 3) there is a closer relationship between Lutjanus and O. chrysurus than between R. aurorubens and Lutjanus or O. chrysurus. On the other hand, the skull morphometric analysis indicated that: I) the lane snapper (L. synagris) has greater affinity with the gray snapper group than with L. analis (red snapper); and 2) although O. chrysurus has some affinities with R. aurorubens, this monotypic genus showed much less distance than R.
    [Show full text]
  • Seafood Watch Seafood Report
    Seafood Watch Seafood Report Commercially Important Gulf of Mexico/South Atlantic Snappers Red snapper, Lutjanus campechanus Vermilion snapper, Rhomboplites aurorubens Yellowtail snapper, Ocyurus chrysurus With minor reference to: Gray snapper, Lutjanus griseus Mutton snapper, Lutjanus analis Lane snapper, Lutjanus synagris Lutjanus campechanus Illustration ©Monterey Bay Aquarium Original Report dated April 20, 2004 Last updated February 4, 2009 Melissa M Stevens Fisheries Research Analyst Monterey Bay Aquarium Seafood Watch® Gulf of Mexico/South Atlantic Snappers Report February 4, 2009 About Seafood Watch® and the Seafood Reports Monterey Bay Aquarium’s Seafood Watch® program evaluates the ecological sustainability of wild-caught and farmed seafood commonly found in the United States marketplace. Seafood Watch® defines sustainable seafood as originating from sources, whether wild-caught or farmed, which can maintain or increase production in the long-term without jeopardizing the structure or function of affected ecosystems. Seafood Watch® makes its science-based recommendations available to the public in the form of regional pocket guides that can be downloaded from the Internet (seafoodwatch.org) or obtained from the Seafood Watch® program by emailing [email protected]. The program’s goals are to raise awareness of important ocean conservation issues and empower seafood consumers and businesses to make choices for healthy oceans. Each sustainability recommendation on the regional pocket guides is supported by a Seafood Report. Each report synthesizes and analyzes the most current ecological, fisheries and ecosystem science on a species, then evaluates this information against the program’s conservation ethic to arrive at a recommendation of “Best Choices”, “Good Alternatives” or “Avoid.” The detailed evaluation methodology is available upon request.
    [Show full text]
  • Lane Snapper (Lutjanus Synagris)
    Tab B, No. 8(b) 2/18/2020 Lane Snapper (Lutjanus synagris) Description: Lane snapper is a member of the snapper family (Lutjanidae). It is typically almond-shaped, colored pink- red around the edges with a silvery body color, and has a number of pink and yellow lines running along the body from head to tail. It often has a distinctive spot on its upper side and can be easily confused with mutton snapper. The Gulf of Mexico stock is distinct from the Atlantic. Lane snapper occurs in a variety of habitats such a reefs and inshore sandy bottom vegetated habitats. Lane snapper are experiencing overfishing (2019) but its stock status is Photo credit: Dylan Hubbard unknown (SEDAR 49 2016). Gulf Stock Characteristics: (SEDAR 49 2016) Natural mortality rate (M): 0.33/year (max. age of 19 years) Reproductive maturity: 50% of females are mature at ~9 inches (24.0 cm) fork length (FL); ~age 1-2 Maximum age: 19 years Maximum weight: 13 lbs (5.9 kg) whole weight Maximum length: 18 inches (44.9 cm) FL Discard mortality: 5-15% (fleet dependent) Life History and Distribution: (SEDAR 49 2016) Lane snapper is distributed from the North Atlantic off North Carolina through the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean to Southern Brazil. It generally feeds at night and preys upon a variety of species such as smaller fish, shrimp, and crabs. Peak spawning occurs along shelf habitats from June through August. Larvae settle around 21-66 days on near-shore shell ridge habitats as well as muddy habitats. Adults often occur in high- relief offshore habitats in water depths up to 430 feet (~132 meters) and in areas with high salinity (>30 psu) with variable water temperatures (16-29 ̊C).
    [Show full text]
  • Yellowtail Snapper
    UM Independent System for Peer Reviews Consultant Report on: 8th South East Data, Assessment, and Review (SEDAR) for Caribbean Yellowtail, Caribbean Spiny Lobster, and SE US Spiny Lobster Stock Assessments 16-20th May 2005, San Juan, PR Paul A. Medley Sunny View Jack Hole Alne, YO61 1RT UK [email protected] 1 Contents Executive Summary.......................................................................................................3 Background....................................................................................................................4 Description of Review Activities...................................................................................4 Caribbean Standardisation of Abundance Indices .........................................................5 Summary of Findings.................................................................................................5 Conclusions and Recommendations ..........................................................................6 Caribbean Yellowtail Snapper .......................................................................................7 Summary of Findings.................................................................................................7 Data........................................................................................................................7 Catch Free Model...................................................................................................8 Conclusions and Recommendations ..........................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Species List
    Appendix P List of Fish Species Found in the CHSJS Estuary 5-1 Species list of fishes, decapod crustaceans and bivalve molluscs collected from the CHSJS Estuary. Species are listed in phylogenetic order. Common name Scientific name Common name Scientific name Scallops Argopecten spp. Sand perch Diplectrum formosum Bay scallop Argopecten irradians Belted sandfish Serranus subligarius Eastern oyster Crassostrea virginica Sunfishes Lepomis spp. Pink shrimp Farfantepenaeus duorarum Redbreast sunfish Lepomis auritus Brackish grass shrimp Palaemonetes intermedius Bluegill Lepomis macrochirus Riverine grass shrimp Palaemonetes paludosus Dollar sunfish Lepomis marginatus Daggerblade grass shrimp Palaemonetes pugio Redear sunfish Lepomis microlophus Longtail grass shrimp Periclimenes longicaudatus Spotted sunfish Lepomis punctatus Florida grass shrimp Palaemon floridanus Largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides Snapping shrimp Alpheidae spp. Warmouth Lepomis gulosus Zostera shrimp Hippolyte zostericola Swamp darter Etheostoma fusiforme Peppermint shrimp Lysmata wurdemanni Bluefish Pomatomus saltatrix Rathbun cleaner shrimp Lysmata rathbunae Cobia Rachycentron canadum Arrow shrimp Tozeuma carolinense Live sharksucker Echeneis naucrates Squat grass shrimp Thor dobkini Whitefinsharksucker Echeneis neucratoides Night shrimp Ambidexter symmetricus Crevalle jack Caranx hippos Blue crab Callinectes sapidus Horse-eye jack Caranx latus Ornate blue crab Callinectes ornatus Atlantic bumper Chloroscombrus chrysurus Swimming crab Portunus spp. Leatherjack Oligoplites
    [Show full text]
  • Lane Snapper (Lutjanus Synagris)
    Tab B, No. 11(b) 2/18/2020 Lane Snapper (Lutjanus synagris) Description: Lane snapper is a member of the snapper family (Lutjanidae). It is typically almond-shaped, colored pink- red around the edges with a silvery body color, and has a number of pink and yellow lines running along the body from head to tail. It often has a distinctive spot on its upper side and can be easily confused with mutton snapper. The Gulf of Mexico stock is distinct from the Atlantic. Lane snapper occurs in a variety of habitats such a reefs and inshore sandy bottom vegetated habitats. Lane snapper are experiencing overfishing (2019) but its stock status is Photo credit: Dylan Hubbard unknown (SEDAR 49 2016). Gulf Stock Characteristics: (SEDAR 49 2016) Natural mortality rate (M): 0.33/year (max. age of 19 years) Reproductive maturity: 50% of females are mature at ~9 inches (24.0 cm) fork length (FL); ~age 1-2 Maximum age: 19 years Maximum weight: 13 lbs (5.9 kg) whole weight Maximum length: 18 inches (44.9 cm) FL Discard mortality: 5-15% (fleet dependent) Life History and Distribution: (SEDAR 49 2016) Lane snapper is distributed from the North Atlantic off North Carolina through the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean to Southern Brazil. It generally feeds at night and preys upon a variety of species such as smaller fish, shrimp, and crabs. Peak spawning occurs along shelf habitats from June through August. Larvae settle around 21-66 days on near-shore shell ridge habitats as well as muddy habitats. Adults often occur in high- relief offshore habitats in water depths up to 430 feet (~132 meters) and in areas with high salinity (>30 psu) with variable water temperatures (16-29 ̊C).
    [Show full text]
  • SEDAR Caribbean Mutton Snapper
    SEDAR Southeast Data, Assessment, and Review _________________________________________________________________ SEDAR 14 Stock Assessment Report Caribbean Mutton Snapper SEDAR 14 Stock Assessment Report 2 2007 SEDAR 4055 Faber Place #201 North Charleston, SC 29401 (843) 571-4366 Table of Contents Section 1. Introduction Section 2. Data Workshop Report Section 3. Assessment Workshop Report Section 4. Review Workshop Reports Section 5. Addenda and Post-Review Updates SEDAR 14 Stock Assessment Report 2 Caribbean Mutton Snapper SECTION I. Introduction Introduction Table of Contenst 1. SEDAR Overview............................................................................................................. 1 2. Mutton Snapper Management Overview.......................................................................... 2 3. SoutheastRegionMaps......................................................................................................10 SEDAR 14 Caribbean Mutton Snapper 1. SEDAR Overview SEDAR (Southeast Data, Assessment and Review) was initially developed by the Southeast Fisheries Science Center and the South Atlantic Fishery Management Council to improve the quality and reliability of stock assessments and to ensure a robust and independent peer review of stock assessment products. SEDAR was expanded in 2003 to address the assessment needs of all three Fishery Management Council in the Southeast Region (South Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean) and to provide a platform for reviewing assessments developed through the Atlantic
    [Show full text]
  • Synopsis of Puerto Rican Commercial Fisheries
    NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-SEFSC-622 Synopsis of Puerto Rican Commercial Fisheries By Flávia C. Tonioli Cooperative Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Studies 4600 Rickenbacker Causeway University of Miami Miami, Florida 33149 Juan J. Agar Social Science Research Group National Marine Fisheries Service Southeast Fisheries Science Center 75 Virginia Beach Dr. Miami, Florida 33149 September 2011 NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-SEFSC-622 Synopsis of Puerto Rican Commercial Fisheries Flávia C. Tonioli Cooperative Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Studies University of Miami 4600 Rickenbacker Causeway Miami, Florida 33149 Juan J. Agar Social Science Research Group National Marine Fisheries Service Southeast Fisheries Science Center 75 Virginia Beach Dr. Miami, Florida 33149 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Rebecca Blank, Acting Secretary NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION Jane Lubchenco, Undersecretary for Oceans and Atmosphere NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE Eric C. Schwaab, Assistant Administrator for Fisheries September 2011 This Technical Memorandum series is used for documentation and timely communication of preliminary results, interim reports, or similar special-purpose information. Although the memoranda are not subject to complete formal review, editorial control, or detailed editing, they are expected to reflect sound professional work. NOTICE The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) does not approve, recommend or endorse any proprietary product or material mentioned in this publication. No reference shall be made to NMFS or to this publication furnished by NMFS, in any advertising or sales promotion which would imply that NMFS approves, recommends, or endorses any proprietary product or proprietary material mentioned herein which has as its purpose any intent to cause directly or indirectly the advertised product to be used or purchased because of this NMFS publication.
    [Show full text]