Foreign Aid and Its Role in Economic Development

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Foreign Aid and Its Role in Economic Development IPRI Journal i C ONTENTS Volume V Summer 2005 Number 2 Articles 1. Is Foreign Aid Necessary for the Economic Development of Less 1 Developed Countries with Special Reference to Pakistan? Syed Akhtar Hussain Shah, Imtiaz Ahmad, Muhammad Sarwar Zahid 2. The Reforms Agenda in Iran 28 Maqsudul Hasan Nuri 3. China’s Kashmir Policy: Back to Neutrality 43 Ghulam Ali 4. World Trade Organization: Apprehensions of the Developing Countries 62 Nuzhat Khanum 5. Devolution of Power in Pakistan 83 Asifa Hasan 6. The Political Economy of Pakistan-South Korea Relations: 1947-2004 101 Ahmad Rashid Malik 7. NFC Award Controversy: A Broader Perspective 116 Rashid Ahmad Khan IPRI Journal 1 IS FOREIGN AID NECESSARY FOR THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF LESS DEVELOPED COUNTRIES WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO PAKISTAN? Syed Akhtar Hussain Shah, Imtiaz Ahmad, Muhammad Sarwar Zahid∗ Introduction oreign aid is the transfer of resources from developed countries to under-developed countries, either through bilateral donors or F multilateral donors. Many countries in the world accept foreign assistan ce and get different benefits along with a few adverse results. The implication of foreign assistance has made it a debatable issue. There are different schools of thought on foreign assistance, i.e. Extensionist School (ES) and Non-Extensionist School (NES). The Extensionist point of view is held by most of the developed countries, which claim that they give foreign aid to developing countries for their socio-economic and political development at individual as well as societal level. In the case of foreign assistance for Pakistan, a group of economists lead by Hollis Chennery and Arthur MacEwan and followed by Pakistani economists, express the need for foreign assistance to Pakistan for accelerated growth. Non-Extensionist School of thought comprising Griffen and Enos (1970), Weisskopf (1972), Ridell (1987) and White (1992), followed by Pakistani economist Shahrukh Rafi Khan, point to the existence of a negative relationship between assistance and growth. Foreign aid is normally subject to certain limitations, which reflect the motives of the donors as to how much they are sincere to the development and welfare of the developing countries, or pursue their own overt and covert interests. Both the parties have progressive designs for optimization of their respective utilities. The underlying motive is not retarding or the ruthless exploitation of any of the parties; rather both the parties have the same direction of development of their local as well as international status. It is in fact a form of generalized reciprocity between two states (the donor and recipient), which leads to transaction of money, goods, and services in lieu of implementation of policies of the donors by the recipient state. However, the unit of exchange for transaction varies from time to time and is highly influenced by the ∗ The authors are respectively Deputy Secretary, Government of NWFP, Lecturer in Economics, Government College, Daska (Sialkot), and Assistant Chief in Planning and Development Division Islamabad. The authors are currently associated with PhD programme in Economics at Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, Islamabad. 2 IPRI Journal international geo-political scenario and global economic trends. Similarly, the endogenous factors such as internal political stability, economic strength and public support to government policies also affect the bargaining power of a recipient country. The more stable a state is, the higher bargaining power it posses. Then the frequency of foreign aid transaction decreases with the increasing stability of the Least Developed Country (LDC) and vice versa. It is an important fact that large-scale flow of funds/foreign assistance is taking place from multilateral and bilateral donors. Hence we will have to analyze different issues pertaining to actual foreign assistance, such as how much is the flow of and what role it plays in the overall development of a country? Whether to accept foreign assistance or not? Which type of foreign aid should be accepted? This paper highlights the theoretical aspects of foreign assistance, different types of foreign aid, the objectives of donors and the applied aspect of foreign aid. What is the impact of foreign aid, which type of foreign aid should be accepted and how foreign aid can optimally be utilized? To analyze the issue we have divided this paper into a number of sections. Section I explains the meaning of foreign aid. Section II deals with the various forms of foreign aid, which are determined by the conditions of the donors. Section III explains the motives of donors, while section IV tells why developing countries accept aid. Section V discusses the most important aspect of foreign aid, that is the role of foreign aid in the economic development of the developing countries. This section is divided into two sub- sections. In the first sub-section the arguments in favour of foreign aid are discussed and we see what positive role it plays in the economic development of developing countries. While in the second sub-section the discussion relates to the harmful impact of the foreign aid, which shows how it hampers the economic development of developing countries. After considering the positive and negative roles of foreign aid in the economic development of developing countries, the concluding remarks give the guidelines as to what type of aid should be accepted and how optimally it be utilized. Meaning of Foreign Aid Foreign aid has been given different meanings by different schools of thought with respect to its structure, its factors such as interest rate determination, repayment period and other modalities. Foreign aid takes place when a recipient country receives additional resources in foreign currency over and above the capacity to import generated by exports. Foreign aid means those additional resources, which are used to raise the performance of the recipient country above the existing level. IPRI Journal 3 Foreign aid can be defined as the debt that is given by a country to another country on the concessional rates (Saeed 1995). The concessional elements may be: i. Rates of interest lower than the prevailing rates of interest in the international commercial money market. ii. Longer period for repayment. iii. Grant, which does not entail the payment of the principal or interest i.e. a free gift. Strictly speaking the concessional element of a foreign aid loan is the difference between the amount of the loan and the present discounted value of the repayment. If the capital market rates enter the present value calculations as discount rates and if they in fact exceed the interest ratio charged by the lender, then the present value of the stream of repayments is less than the amount of the loan. The lender has made a concession to the borrower. These concessional elements in foreign aid can involve at least three of the terms of the loans. The present value of the repayment is zero and hence the concessional element is 100% of the grant amount. The concessional element for a loan depends on: i. The interest rate; ii. Length of period for repayment; iii. Grace period. Foreign Aid in terms of Official Data All kinds of resources inflow that are publicly granted and are made either from government to government or from financial institutions to a government, only economic aid is included while military aid is excluded (Saeed 1995). The main points of this definition are: a. Resource inflow b. Publicly granted c. From government to government i.e. bilateral aid d. From financial agencies to government i.e. multi-lateral aid e. Economic aid, the aid that is used for economic purposes and for dams, projects, industries etc. Table 1 shows the disbursement of Official Development Assistance (ODA) by principal donors both in total amount and as percentage of GNP in 1996 and 2001. Although the United States (along with Japan) remains the largest donor in absolute terms, relative to others it provides lower percentage of GNP—0.12% in 1996, compared to an average of 0.25% for all industrial countries. 4 IPRI Journal Table 1 Official Development Assistance Disbursements from Major Donor Countries 1996 and 2001 1996 2001 Donor Country Millions of Percentage Millions of Percentag US Dollars of GNP US Dollars e of GNP Canada 1795 0.32 1533 0.22 Denmark 1772 1.04 1634 1.03 France 7451 0.48 4198 0.32 Germany 7601 0.32 4990 0.27 Italy 2416 0.20 1627 0.15 Japan 9439 0.20 9847 0.23 Netherlands 3246 0.81 3172 0.82 Sweden 1999 0.84 1666 0.81 Switzerland 1026 0.34 908 0.34 United Kingdom 3199 0.27 4579 0.32 United States 9377 0.12 11429 0.11 Total (21 countries) 55622 0.25 52336 0.22 Source: World Bank, World Debt Tables, 2002-03, tab. 6.9; World Bank 2003 World Development Indicators (Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 2003), tab. 6.9 and 6.10. Economics and Foreign Aid Economics suggests that foreign aid should meet two criteria. i. The objective should be non-commercial from the point of view of the donor. ii. It should be characterized by concessional terms in respect of interest rate and repayment period of borrowed capital; and these terms should be softer than commercial terms. It is the flow of resources and technical assistance to developing nations directly from the government of developed countries or from international organizations such as the World Bank. Foreign aid is defined by the authors of this paper as the flow of funds to a country having lower per capita income from a country with higher per capita income and transaction of services/ commodities by a country having comparative advantage to another country with less comparative advantage. IPRI Journal 5 Types of Foreign Aid Foreign aid is the transfer of resources from a rich country to a poor country.
Recommended publications
  • Pakistan-U.S. Relations
    Pakistan-U.S. Relations K. Alan Kronstadt Specialist in South Asian Affairs July 1, 2009 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL33498 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Pakistan-U.S. Relations Summary A stable, democratic, prosperous Pakistan actively combating religious militancy is considered vital to U.S. interests. U.S. concerns regarding Pakistan include regional and global terrorism; Afghan stability; democratization and human rights protection; the ongoing Kashmir problem and Pakistan-India tensions; and economic development. A U.S.-Pakistan relationship marked by periods of both cooperation and discord was transformed by the September 2001 terrorist attacks on the United States and the ensuing enlistment of Pakistan as a key ally in U.S.-led counterterrorism efforts. Top U.S. officials praise Pakistan for its ongoing cooperation, although long-held doubts exist about Islamabad’s commitment to some core U.S. interests. Pakistan is identified as a base for terrorist groups and their supporters operating in Kashmir, India, and Afghanistan. Pakistan’s army has conducted unprecedented and, until recently, largely ineffectual counterinsurgency operations in the country’s western tribal areas, where Al Qaeda operatives and pro-Taliban militants are said to enjoy “safe haven.” U.S. officials increasingly are concerned that indigenous religious extremists represent a serious threat to the stability of the Pakistani state. The United States strongly encourages maintenance of a bilateral cease-fire and a continuation of substantive dialogue between Pakistan and neighboring India, which have fought three wars since 1947. A perceived Pakistan-India nuclear arms race has been the focus of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • THE STRATEGIC PURPOSES of the POST-9/11 US FOREIGN AID to PAKISTAN and ITS IMPACTS Hongsong Liu
    Global Journal of Political Science and Administration Vol.7, No.2, pp.50-66, May 2019 ___Published by European Centre for Research Training and Development UK (www.eajournals.org) THE STRATEGIC PURPOSES OF THE POST-9/11 US FOREIGN AID TO PAKISTAN AND ITS IMPACTS Hongsong Liu. Professor at the School of International Relations and Public Affairs, Shanghai International Studies University, Shanghai PR China Muhammadi*, PhD candidate at the School of International Relations and Public Affairs, Shanghai International Studies University, Shanghai PR China Corresponding Author’s Email: [email protected]* Hussain Iqtidar, PhD candidate at the School of International Relations and Public Affairs, Shanghai International Studies University, Shanghai PR China Abbas Jaffar PhD candidate at the School of International Relations and Public Affairs, Shanghai International Studies University, Shanghai PR China ABSTRACT: This paper investigates why donor countries/institutions provide foreign aid to South Asian countries, in particular, US foreign aid to Pakistan, and how foreign aids impacts on internal politics of a recipient country based on donor’s development strategy, and how US foreign aid on counterterrorism policies in Pakistan. This study also focused on examining how US foreign aid policy changed and shifted towards South Asia after 9/11 terrorist attacks on USA, and how South Asia became a primary recipient of US foreign aid. This study explored that foreign aid’s primary focus was military and security-oriented objectives instead of economic development in the recipient country. Additionally, the investigation also revealed that US foreign aid also affected Pakistan’s internal politics as it allocated more support to security-oriented purposes to strengthen military rule in the political economy to reduce the effects of terrorism in Pakistan.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Analysis of Chinese and UK's Aid Policy to Pakistan
    Luiss Guido Carli University Graduate Program in International Relations For the degree of Master of Political Science A comparative analysis of Chinese and UK's aid policy to Pakistan Supervisor: Silvia Menegazzi Candidate: LIU RENXUE Co-Supervisor:YOUNGAH GUAHK Serial number: 642502 Academic Year 2019-2020 1 A comparative analysis of Chinese and UK's aid policy to Pakistan CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................ ChapterⅠIntroduction 5 Section 1.Literature review.........................................................................................................5 1. Literature on Aid Theory................................................................................................ 5 2 Literature on China's official aid to Pakistan.................................................................. 6 3 Literature on UK's official assistance to Pakistan........................................................... 7 Section 2 Definition of Concept................................................................................................. 8 1 Definition of the concept of aid.......................................................................................8 2. Definition of the period of official assistance.............................................................. 10 Section 3 Research Significance...............................................................................................10 1. Explore the motivation behind the foreign
    [Show full text]
  • Aid and Irritants in Pak-US Relations in the Wake of 9/11 Incident
    Liberal Arts & Social Sciences International Journal (LASSIJ) eISSN: 2664-8148 (online) https://www.ideapublishers.org/index.php/lassij Vol. 5, No. 1, (January-June 2021): 266-278 Research Article | Original Research https://doi.org/10.47264/idea.lassij/5.1.18 Aid and irritants in Pak-US relations in the wake of 9/11 incident Shahid Yaqoob* | Noman Sattar Area Study Center, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan. *Correspondence Emails: [email protected] | [email protected] Abstract This paper analyses the nature of post 9/11 relations and its impact on South Article History Asia especially Pakistan. Pak-US relations have been perplexing and intricate since inception of their relations. This relationship manifests the Received: classical example of convergence and divergence of national interests. January 27, 2021 Client-patron state relations between Pakistan and United States measure Last Revised: level of interaction and commitments. The 9/11 was a hapless event, which May 21, 2021 drastically changed the scope of relationship and level of engagement. This dastard act was the tipping point of revitalized bilateral relationship in Accepted: altogether different circumstances. United States was bent on hunting May 25, 2021 perpetrators of heinous act of 9/11 at any cost and it was not possible without cooperation and facilitation of Pakistan being next door neighbour Published: of Afghanistan. Pakistan grabbed this opening to end international isolation June 16, 2021 and overcome its economic handicaps. Pakistan again became strategic partner of US in war on terror and being frontline state earned the title of the US major non-NATO ally. However, the relations remained fraught due to various allied factors such as distrust and lack of confidence.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Aid to Pakistan During the Tenures of Democrat and Republican Administrations
    U.S. Aid toIPRI Pakistan Journal during XVI, the TenuresNo.2 (Summer of Democrat 2016): and 31 Republican-48 Administrations U.S. Aid to Pakistan during the Tenures of Democrat and Republican Administrations Dr Murad Ali* Abstract This article examines the allocation of economic and military aid from the United States (U.S.) to Pakistan during the tenures of Democrat and Republican presidents. Focusing on the aggregate and annual U.S. bilateral aid to Pakistan from 1948 to 2015 covering key regional and global events including the Cold War, the post-Cold War and the War on Terror periods, the analysis illustrates that there are many fluctuations during the administrations of both political parties. It concludes that the ebb and flow in foreign (aid) policy vis-à-vis Pakistan highlights the irrelevance of U.S. presidential party affiliation, especially during times of crisis. The numbers show that regardless of which administration sits in Congress or the White House, America‟s foreign policy goals are to safeguard its global interests, rather than its allies. Key words: Pakistan, U.S. Aid, Democrats, Republicans. Introduction t the global level, the birth of foreign aid is linked with two strikingly coincidental phenomena: the idea to reconstruct and A revive the economy and infrastructure of Europe at the end of World War II; and to win the allegiance of newly decolonised states. Concerning the former, U.S. Secretary of State George Marshall outlined a detailed programme for the rebuilding of war-ravaged Europe. Under Marshall‟s eponymous Plan, the U.S. provided $13 billion to Europe to restore its economy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Bilateral Aid: an Inquiry Into Selectivity and Effectiveness of the United States Foreign Aid to Pakistan Tariq
    THE POLITICS OF BILATERAL AID: AN INQUIRY INTO SELECTIVITY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF THE UNITED STATES FOREIGN AID TO PAKISTAN TARIQ RAHIM AUGUST 2017 i THE POLITICS OF BILATERAL AID: AN INQUIRY INTO SELECTIVITY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF THE UNITED STATES FOREIGN AID TO PAKISTAN A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD OF GRADUATE PROGRAMS OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY, NORTHERN CYPRUS CAMPUS BY TARIQ RAHIM IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN THE POLITICAL SCIENCE AND INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS PROGRAM AUGUST 2017 ii ETHICAL DECLARATION I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name: TARIQ RAHIM Signature: iii ABSTRACT THE POLITICS OF BILATERAL AID: AN INQUIRY INTO SELECTIVITY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF THE UNITED STATES FOREIGN AID TO PAKISTAN Tariq, Rahim MS., Department of Political Science and International Relations Supervisor: Assist. Prof. Dr. Yonca Ozdemir August 2017, 182 pages This thesis aims to analyze two aspects of the United States (US) foreign aid given to Pakistan bilaterally; namely, selectivity and effectiveness. In relation to the first aspect, it attempts to explore the motives and objectives of the US which led its policymakers to choose Pakistan as a recipient country. For the sake of a comprehensive analysis, the study examines the US bilateral aid both historically and contemporarily and thus it focuses on the allocation of aid to Pakistan during the Cold War period and in the post- Cold War era.
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign Aid—Blessing Or Curse: Evidence from Pakistan
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by The Pakistan Development Review The Pakistan Development Review 46 : 3 (Autumn 2007) pp. 215–240 Foreign Aid—Blessing or Curse: Evidence from Pakistan * MUHAMMAD ARSHAD KHAN and AYAZ AHMED The role of foreign aid in promoting economic growth is a debatable issue and remains unsettled at both theoretical and empirical levels. Pakistan has received a substantial amount of foreign aid since its Independence in 1947 but little improvement has been observed in its socio-economic development. This study considers the question as to whether foreign aid is a blessing or a curse for Pakistan. The empirical analysis is based on the ARDL cointegration approach. We examine the aid-growth link at the aggregate and disaggregate levels for the period 1972–2006. The results show negative and insignificant effects of foreign aid on the growth at the aggregate as well at the disaggregate level. The findings further suggest that domestic investment, export growth, and inflows of foreign direct investment are important contributors in enhancing economic growth in Pakistan. JEL classification: C13, C22, F23, F35, O11 Keywords: Foreign Aid, Economic Growth, FDI, Cointegration 1. INTRODUCTION Foreign aid is an important source of income in developing countries and carries potential to play a key role in promoting economic growth. 1 The traditional literature on economic growth emphasises the positive role of foreign aid in the process of economic development. Foreign aid inflow influences the process of growth by reducing the saving-investment gap, increasing productivity and transferring the modern technology.
    [Show full text]
  • The Failure of Foreign Aid to Pakistan
    28 April 2015 The Failure of Foreign Aid to Pakistan Sunil Dasgupta believes that external foreign aid hasn’t helped curtail extremist violence in Pakistan. That’s because the aid has focused too much on minimizing the Pakistani state’s weaknesses and ignored the real problem — too many people in the country believe that violent extremism is politically legitimate. By Sunil Dasgupta for ISN According to a recent Financial Times report, Pakistan is in the process of buying eight Chinese submarines worth $4-5 billion. To paraphrase the American national security writer William Arkin, this means that U.S. aid to Pakistan now goes toward buying Chinese weapons for a war against India that everyone is hoping will not happen, and if it does, will not be fought at sea. Through billions of dollars in foreign aid, the United States has tried to convince the Pakistani state, its leaders, and perhaps even the country’s elite to turn the tide against Islamist extremism in the country. Do not expect an obituary, but this foreign aid policy should now be recognized as a complete failure. By focusing on strengthening the extant Pakistani state and military, these policies have ignored and even aggravated the social sources of the country’s problems. Beyond the state The basic facts of the case about Pakistan are well known. For years, the country has been at the center of a number of international security concerns. First, Pakistan has become the source of Islamist extremism and violence. It is now home to a number of terrorist groups, which erupt into violence regularly at home, in the region, and sometimes across the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring the Effectiveness of US Development Aid to Pakistan
    Measuring the Effectiveness of US Development Aid to Pakistan Thesis: International Politics Honors Seminar Advisor: Professor Kai-Henrik Barth Kimberly Fernandes 18/04/2011 I affirm that my paper is free of plagiarism; I have examined the citations and references in my paper and I affirm that they are complete and correct; I have verified that this version is indeed the version that I intend to submit. Kim Fernandes 2 Measuring the Effectiveness of US Development Aid to Pakistan Table of Contents Abstract 4 Chapter One: Introduction 5 The Nature and Purpose of Foreign Aid as a Tool of Foreign Policy: A Definition 6 US Development Assistance to Pakistan Since 9/11: A Brief History 8 Literature Review and Contribution of the Paper 12 Outline of the Paper 18 Chapter Two: Measuring the Effectiveness of US Aid in Achieving Diplomatic Objectives 21 The Role of Aid in Strengthening the US-Pakistan Relationship at the Elite Level 22 Aid and the Hearts and Minds of the Pakistani People 29 Chapter Three: Measuring the Effectiveness of US Aid in Achieving Development Objectives 40 Methodological Approach and Limitations 41 Counterarguments 43 What Can $7.5 Billion Do Over Five Years? 44 The Effectiveness of USAID/Pakistan’s Education Program 47 The Effectiveness of USAID/Pakistan’s Democracy and Governance Program 49 The Effectiveness of USAID/Pakistan’s Earthquake Reconstruction Activities 53 The Effectiveness of USAID/Pakistan’s Humanitarian Assistance Program 54 Kim Fernandes 3 Measuring the Effectiveness of US Development Aid to Pakistan The
    [Show full text]
  • China–Pakistan Economic Corridor and Maritime Security Collaboration
    The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available on Emerald Insight at: www.emeraldinsight.com/2397-3757.htm – Maritime China Pakistan economic corridor security and maritime security collaboration collaboration A growing bilateral interests 217 Yen-Chiang Chang Received 31 January 2019 Revised 21 February 2019 School of Law, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian, Liaoning, China, and Accepted 21 February 2019 Mehran Idris Khan School of Law, Shandong University, Qingdao, Shandong, China Abstract Purpose – This study aims to explore why marine development and maritime security in Pakistan are significant and what the Chinese concerns are. Therefore, the objective of this research is to analyse a growing Pak–China bilateral interests, particularly at Gwadar, to achieve the geostrategic objectives of China– Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). Design/methodology/approach – The study adopts a qualitative means to discuss the significance of China’s ambitions towards the CPEC project concerning strategic deep-sea management and maritime regulations in the region, with a particular focus on the Gwadar Port. Findings – The paper concludes that the Gwadar Port is a critical element for maritime security in the whole region. The study also provides an analysis of national and international, security and legal challenges associated with CPEC. Originality/value – Most of the potential outcomes have already been discussed in public, though a limited academic discussion is available on the legal aspects. It is particularly so with regard to the development and capacity building in the maritime sector of Pakistan under this project. This study aims to explore why marine development and maritime security in Pakistan is significant and what the Chinese concerns are.
    [Show full text]
  • Pakistan: U.S. Foreign Assistance
    Pakistan: U.S. Foreign Assistance Susan B. Epstein Specialist in Foreign Policy K. Alan Kronstadt Specialist in South Asian Affairs April 10, 2012 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R41856 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Pakistan: U.S. Foreign Assistance Summary The 112th Congress has been focused measures to reduce the federal budget deficit. This backdrop may influence congressional debate over the third-ranking U.S. aid recipient, Pakistan—a country vital to U.S. national security interests but that some say lacks accountability and even credibility. Pakistan has been among the leading recipients of U.S. foreign assistance both historically and in recent years. The country arguably is as important to forwarding U.S. security interests as any in the world. Developments in 2011 put immense strains on bilateral relations, making uncertain the future direction of U.S. aid to Pakistan. Disruptions included the May killing of Osama bin Laden in a Pakistani city and a November NATO military raid into Pakistani territory near Afghanistan that inadvertently left 24 Pakistani soldiers dead. For many lawmakers, the core issue remains balancing Pakistan’s strategic importance to the United States with the pervasive and mounting distrust in the U.S.-Pakistan relationship, as well as with budget deficit-reduction pressures. U.S. assistance to Pakistan has fluctuated considerably over the past 60 years. In the wake of 9/11, however, aid to Pakistan has increased steadily as the Bush and Obama Administrations both characterized Pakistan as a crucial U.S. partner in efforts to combat terrorism and to promote stability in both Afghanistan and South Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • US Foreign Aid to Pakistan and Democracy: an Overview
    Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences (PJSS) Vol. 29, No. 2 (December 2009), pp. 247-258 US Foreign Aid to Pakistan and Democracy: An Overview Murad Ali Doctoral Candidate, Massey University, New Zealand E-mail : [email protected] Abstract This paper examines United States (US) bilateral aid flows to Pakistan from 1947 to 2006 to determine the extent to which the assistance has been linked with the strengthening of democracy in Pakistan vis-à-vis US perceived geo-strategic and security interests. Comparing the allocation of US economic and military aid to democratic and dictatorial regimes in Pakistan (in terms of total, average annual, and per capita per year), the paper finds that US aid shows a consistent pattern of high flows for military dictatorships and low or negligible flows for democratic governments, indicating that US aid has not been used to promote democracy in Pakistan; in fact, it has undermined it. The national and regional events responsible for the ebb and flow of US aid are discussed, showing that the US has maintained warm cooperative relationships with military dictators to use Pakistan to pursue its own political, security and geo-strategic goals. Keywords: United States; Pakistan; Aid; Democracy; Military regime I. Introduction On June 16, 2009, the US Senate’s Foreign Relations Committee passed the Enhanced Partnership with Pakistan Act, known as the Kerry-Lugar Bill (KLB) and on October 15, President Obama signed the bill into law. The bipartisan bill tripling non- military aid to the country authorises the provision of US$ 1.5 billion to Pakistan annually for five years (2009-2013).
    [Show full text]