DOCSLIB.ORG

Regional Transit Study Final Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Regional Transit Study Final Report Regional Transit Study Final Report October 2018 Table of Contents CHAPTER 1: STUDY INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE .......................................................................................... 1 1.1 STUDY PURPOSE AND SCOPE ............................................................................................................................. 2 1.2 STUDY BENEFITS ..................................................................................................................................................... 4 1.3 COORDINATION WITH OTHER STUDIES AND PLANS ............................................................................. 4 1.4 RTS WORK PRODUCT ............................................................................................................................................. 5 CHAPTER 2: BASE CONDITIONS .................................................................................................................................... 6 2.1 EXISTING TRANSIT NETWORKS ....................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 EXISTING PREMIUM TRANSIT SERVICES ...................................................................................................... 8 2.3 TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT PLANS .................................................................................................................... 10 2.3.1 Central Florida Regional Transportation Authority – LYNX TDP ............................................. 10 2.3.2 Votran TDP ...................................................................................................................................................... 11 2.3.3 Space Coast Area Transit TDP ................................................................................................................. 11 2.3.4 Lakeland Area Mass Transit District (LAMTD) / Polk TPO TDP ............................................... 11 2.3.5 Lake~Sumter TDP ........................................................................................................................................ 11 2.3.6 Ocala / Marion County TPO - SunTran TDP....................................................................................... 12 2.4 MPO / TPO Long Range Transportation Plans ........................................................................................... 12 2.4.1 MetroPlan Orlando 2040 LRTP ............................................................................................................ 12 2.4.2 River to Sea Transportation Planning Organization 2040 LRTP .............................................. 13 2.4.3 Space Coast TPO 2040 LRTP .................................................................................................................... 13 2.4.4 Polk County TPO 2040 LRTP ................................................................................................................... 13 2.4.5 Lake~Sumter Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) LRTP ............................................ 14 2.4.6 Ocala / Marion County TPO 2040 LRTP .............................................................................................. 14 2.5 BASE FUNDING-COST FEASIBLE NETWORKS ........................................................................................... 17 2.6 FUTURE FUNDING-NEEDS NETWORKS ....................................................................................................... 18 CHAPTER 3: REGIONAL TRAVEL PATTERN/MARKET ANALYSIS ................................................................ 20 3.1 TRAVEL FLOWS: DEVELOPMENT ................................................................................................................... 20 3.2 TRAVEL MARKET THRESHOLD FOR MAJOR CAPITAL INVESTMENT ............................................ 21 3.3 TRAVEL FLOWS: ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................................... 21 3.3.1 MPO / TPO Urbanized / Non-Urbanized Areas ................................................................................ 21 3.3.2 County to County .......................................................................................................................................... 24 3.3.3 Major Activity Centers ................................................................................................................................ 25 i Table of Contents CHAPTER 4: LAND USE POLICY ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................. 29 4.1 REVIEW OF COMPREHENSIVE PLANS FOR THE RTS COUNTIES ...................................................... 30 4.1.1 Brevard County Comprehensive Plan .................................................................................................. 31 4.1.2 Flagler County Comprehensive Plan .................................................................................................... 32 4.1.3 Lake County Comprehensive Plan ......................................................................................................... 32 4.1.4 Marion County Comprehensive Plan .................................................................................................... 33 4.1.5 Orange County Comprehensive Plan .................................................................................................... 34 4.1.6 Osceola County Comprehensive Plan ................................................................................................... 35 4.1.7 Polk County Comprehensive Plan .......................................................................................................... 37 4.1.8 Seminole County Comprehensive Plan ................................................................................................ 37 4.1.9 Sumter County Comprehensive Plan .................................................................................................... 39 4.1.10 Volusia County Comprehensive Plan .................................................................................................... 39 4.2 NEXT STEPS .............................................................................................................................................................. 41 CHAPTER 5: REGIONAL TRANSIT VISION ............................................................................................................... 43 5.1 REGIONAL FRAMEWORK ................................................................................................................................... 43 5.1.1 SunRail .............................................................................................................................................................. 43 5.1.2 Brightline ......................................................................................................................................................... 45 5.1.3 Private Intercity Bus .................................................................................................................................... 49 5.1.4 Individual MPO / TPO Plan Elements .................................................................................................. 53 5.2 OCALA / MARION COUNTY ................................................................................................................................ 56 5.2.1 Public Services ............................................................................................................................................... 56 5.2.2 Private Services ............................................................................................................................................. 57 5.2.3 Demand Analysis .......................................................................................................................................... 57 5.2.4 Subarea Regional Transit Vision Framework ................................................................................... 59 5.3 LAKE / SUMTER COUNTY ................................................................................................................................... 60 5.3.1 Public Services ............................................................................................................................................... 60 5.3.2 Private Services ............................................................................................................................................. 61 5.3.3 Demand Analysis .......................................................................................................................................... 62 5.3.4 Subarea Regional Transit Vision Framework ................................................................................... 64 5.4 POLK COUNTY ......................................................................................................................................................... 67 5.4.1 Public Services ............................................................................................................................................... 67 5.4.2 Private Services ............................................................................................................................................. 70 5.4.3 Demand Analysis .........................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Examining the Traffic Safety Effects of Urban Rail Transit
    Examining the Traffic Safety Effects of Urban Rail Transit: A Review of the National Transit Database and a Before-After Analysis of the Orlando SunRail and Charlotte Lynx Systems April 15, 2020 Eric Dumbaugh, Ph.D. Dibakar Saha, Ph.D. Florida Atlantic University Candace Brakewood, Ph.D. Abubakr Ziedan University of Tennessee 1 www.roadsafety.unc.edu U.S. DOT Disclaimer The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the information presented herein. This document is disseminated in the interest of information exchange. The report is funded, partially or entirely, by a grant from the U.S. Department of Transportation’s University Transportation Centers Program. However, the U.S. Government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof. Acknowledgement of Sponsorship This project was supported by the Collaborative Sciences Center for Road Safety, www.roadsafety.unc.edu, a U.S. Department of Transportation National University Transportation Center promoting safety. www.roadsafety.unc.edu 2 www.roadsafety.unc.edu TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. CSCRS-R{X}CSCRS-R18 4. Title and Subtitle: 5. Report Date Examining the Traffic Safety Effects of Urban Rail Transit: A Review April 15, 2020 of the National Transit Database and a Before-After Analysis of the 6. Performing Organization Code Orlando SunRail and Charlotte Lynx Systems 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Eric Dumbaugh, Ph.D. Dibakar Saha, Ph.D. Candace Brakewood, Ph.D. Abubakr Ziedan 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Examination of Passenger Assaults on Bus Transit Systems
    Examination of Passenger Assaults On Bus Transit Systems FDOT Task Work Order #943-26 University Master Agreement BDV25 FINAL REPORT December 2015 PREPARED FOR Florida Department of Transportation Office of Freight, Logistics and Passenger Operations Examination of Passenger Assaults On Bus Transit Systems Final Report Funded By: FDOT Project Manager: Victor Wiley, Transit Safety Programs Manager Florida Department of Transportation 605 Suwannee Street, MS-26 Tallahassee, FL 32399-0450 Prepared By: USF Center for Urban Transportation Research Lisa Staes, Program Director – Transit Safety and Workforce Development Jan Davis, Deputy Director – Transportation Finance, Management and Administration Contributor: Jodi Godfrey, Research Associate December 2015 Final Report i Disclaimer The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the information presented herein. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Florida Department of Transportation, in the interest of information exchange. The Florida Department of Transportation assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof. The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Florida Department of Transportation. Final Report ii Technical Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. 4. Title and Subtitle: 5. Report Date Examination of Passenger Assaults on Bus Transit Systems December 2015 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report Lisa Staes, Jan Davis, Jodi Godfrey No. BDV25 Task Work Order #943-26 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) National Center for Transit Research Center for Urban Transportation Research University of South Florida 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2007 TOD Sketchbook
    Central Florida Commuter Rail Summer 2007 Central Florida Commuter Rail On the Inside: page Introduction ........................................ 1 DeLand Station................................... 5 Fort Florida Station ............................ 7 Sanford Station................................... 9 Lake Mary Station ............................ 11 Longwood Station............................. 13 Altamonte Springs Station................ 15 Maitland Station............................... 17 Winter Park Station.......................... 19 Florida Hospital Station ................... 21 LYNX Central Station......................... 23 Church Street Station........................ 25 Orlando Amtrak Station ................... 27 Sand Lake Road Station................... 29 Meadow Woods Station .................... 31 Osceola Parkway Station .................. 33 Kissimmee Station............................ 35 Poinciana Station.............................. 37 The Central Florida Commuter Rail project will provide the opportunity not only to move people more efficiently, but to also build new, walkable, transit-oriented communities around some of its stations and strengthen existing communities around others. In February 2007, FDOT conducted a week long charrette process, individually meeting with the agencies and major stakeholders from DeLand each of the jurisdictions along the proposed 61-mile commuter rail corridor. These The plans and concepts included: Volusia County, Seminole County, illustrated in this report Orange County,
    [Show full text]
  • Central Florida Things to Do
    ,9 ST '!' lf<~NE .. iE .'!' E• . " f;j ......... ""'~" ~ ~ ~ ~N. fST ~ ~ ~;oj_...~· . E. ROSE ST ..... - . z -- "" ,.\ MAP OF POLK COUNTY .......... o,,_ "Is.. CEOARST ~ ~ma~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~""""' ~tral FIOriCta ..., .,,,,, 1-800-828-7655 or 863-420-2586 W. MAJ.;;T 13 LAKE £.MAIN ST ~ ~ E. MAIN ST ~ ... -··· MIRROR - Interstate tt1 ~ . trA"3MS1 www.VisitCentralFlorida.org ~ - Divided Hwy. i ~ 43~ I ~ \. ~ ... ~ E. LEMON ST E. LEMON ST ~ W. L!MON ST ~ ~ ~ i - Highway ~ - ~o_.s-r ~ ; g ~ s J K ~ ~ 8 0 !" ;; ?; - Toll Road ~ ~ 19 z < ~ Must See i W~GEST;; E. ORANGE ST ~ ~ LORANGE ST c I F H . ~ :1 B I I D I E I G I ~ ~ ~ OTRUS LN { Attraction ~ • 46 ~ W. UMEST E. UMEST E. UMEST Golf Courses ~ lermont E. WALNUTST • OlNEST ~o~"" Visitor Information .:/"~ Center D W WALNUT E. WAL.NUT \ ~ VISTABULA ST ~ 2 I • I I 11 ----- Amtrak LAKE I 474 Railroad Station MORTON E. CHILES ST ~ "I WHIOCOl!Y OSCEOLA ST ~ Lakeland Linder 42 Regional Airport ·~ E.PALMETTO e Sand Mine Rd. BURNS AVE - §] oc " c: . ., 8 1' :z UNCOLNAVE i! • I 1 d n m > ~ ~ ~,.~ r:- ~ ~ ~ ~ 31 :a 2 ; 11 I c::. :a Deen Still Rd . ""I DR. J.A. WILTSHIRE AVE W DR. J.A. WILTSHIRE AVE NORTH HILLSIDE AVE " <O LAKE '!' ~ § OORSITTAVE WAILES !i ~ ;: !J SEABOARD AVE ~ ~ WllDABON AVE @ ~ I 4 !il N. LAKESHORE BLVD I ~ N z z W. CRYSTAL AVE A ~ <( > W. ORANGE AVE ~ y Key To Attractions W. PARKAVE LAKE COOPER W. STUART AVE LAKE WAILES ----- E. aNTRAL.AVf. 5 Top S Must s.. s !"' !"' !"' .,, W. CENTRAL AVE ~ I Lal<e 0 ~ ~ ~ 31: 0 LEGOLAND' Florida Resort IE ;; E ii! I ii l!5 Juliana Hain:S Citv .g ;: ;x 0 i ~ A!fid 111 J ~ r ~ •n ~ ~ ~ .
    [Show full text]
  • Community Services Department
    FY 2019 Budget Workshop Community Services Department May 8, 2018 Community Services Department Dottie Keedy, Director Community Services Department Outline • Overview of Department – Organizational Chart – Overview of Divisions • Accomplishments • Efficiencies • Benchmarks (Volusia, Seminole, Orange, Osceola, Polk, Sumter, Marion) – Proposed Division Budget – Departmental Budget – Summary Community Services Department Overview • The Lake County Community Services Department serves as the link between government and the community and works with numerous partners to improve the quality of life of Lake County residents in need of assistance. • The Department includes the Transit, Housing and Community Development, Health and Human Services and Probation Divisions. Community Services Department Organizational Chart 42 FTEs Community Services Department Administration (5 FTEs) Health & Human Housing & Services Community Transit Division Probation Division Division Development Division ( 5 FTEs) (15 FTEs) (7 FTEs) (10 FTEs) Health & Human Services Division Allison Thall, Health & Human Services Division Manager Health & Human Services Overview • The Health and Human Services Division provides services to Lake County citizens in need of assistance and includes the following sections and programs: Children and Elder Services, the Community Health Worker Program, and Veterans Services. • The Division also manages the state mandated programs related to Medicaid, inmate medical, and public health. Health & Human Services Organizational Chart 7
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Trend Polk Community Profile
    Polk County By Susan Shalhoub Polk County has big plans. Areas like downtown Lakeland have a built-in, cool vibe that can’t be easily formulated — Lake Wales and Winter Haven have an organic character that makes them unique. Paired with strong leadership and economic development, Polk is poised to be unstoppable. PHOTO COURTESY VISIT CENTRAL FLORIDA COURTESY PHOTO FLORIDATREND.COM MAY 2020 41 POLK COUNTY “We have 17 very unique cities and dynamic business leaders, with creative Downtown Winter Haven redevelopment groups that are supported Multifaceted Economy, Location by the city and care about value and Are Polk County’s Strengths profit, not just profit.” A central location along I-4 and focus on innovation, technology and – Mike Herr City Manager, manufacturing create a place to have a real impact. City of Winter Haven Citing its business-friendly climate With its beginnings in a University of and balance of economic growth with South Florida (USF) startup program, the smaller-community character, Sean Malott, company grew in San Francisco, outsourc- president and CEO of the Central Florida ing manufacturing before deciding on Development Council, calls it a great time Lakeland for its research and advanced- to be in Polk County. He and other busi- manufacturing hub. It became official The trade, transportation ness leaders see connectedness, diversity, last year, with the company investing in and utilities industry communication, innovation and location renovation, acquiring a Lakeland address category showed as key in Polk’s upward mobility. The fact and initially hiring 12 people. Polk County’s highest that the county is on the smaller side is an The city offered tax incentives in return percentage of average attribute, he says.
    [Show full text]
  • RFA for SAIL Financing, Including 2017 NHTF
    Reflects 9-13-17 and 9-15-17 and 10-3-17 Modifications REQUEST FOR APPLICATIONS 2017-108 SAIL FINANCING OF AFFORDABLE MULTIFAMILY HOUSING DEVELOPMENTS TO BE USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH TAX-EXEMPT BOND FINANCING AND NON-COMPETITIVE HOUSING CREDITS Issued By: FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION Issued: August 31, 2017 Due: October 12, 2017 Page 1 of 148 RFA 2017-108 Reflects 9-13-17 and 9-15-17 and 10-3-17 Modifications SECTION ONE INTRODUCTION This Request for Applications (RFA) is open to Applicants proposing the development of affordable, multifamily housing for Families and the Elderly utilizing State Apartment Incentive Loan (SAIL) funding in conjunction with (i) Tax-Exempt Bond financing (i.e., Corporation-issued Multifamily Mortgage Revenue Bonds (MMRB) or Non-Corporation-issued Tax-Exempt Bonds obtained through a Public Housing Authority (established under Chapter 421, F.S.), a County Housing Finance Authority (established pursuant to Section 159.604, F.S.), or a Local Government), (ii) Non-Competitive Housing Credits (HC), and, if applicable, (iii) National Housing Trust Fund (NHTF). A. SAIL Florida Housing Finance Corporation (the Corporation) expects to offer an estimated $87,320,000, comprised of a part of the Family and Elderly Demographic portion of the SAIL funding appropriated by the 2016 Florida Legislature. The amounts listed in 1 below include ELI Loan funding to cover the units that must be set aside for Extremely Low Income (ELI) Households, including the commitment for a portion of ELI Set-Aside units as Link Units for Persons with Special Needs, as further outlined in Sections Four A.6.d.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlantis Launch Story 071112
    Go For Launch by Ellsworth Chou How our 2011 summer vacation began with the final launch of the United States Space Shuttle program As the end of Joni’s spring semester of 2011 from anywhere on the planet. Lots of mosquito approached, we were once again faced with repellent for the brief and vicious Alaskan the possibility that this would be Joni’s summer. last summer break. If things go as expected, she’ll be the chair of her cinema Another candidate trip was to attend one department by 2012, and she goes from of the last launches of the U.S. Space being a 10-month employee to a 12-month, Shuttle program. But the schedule for the with only a few weeks off a year. (As I’m Shuttle was constantly in flux, and until well editing this at the beginning of March of 2012, into 2011, we didn’t really know whether it months after starting this article, Joni is four weeks would coincide with Joni’s summer break. At one into her new position as chair of the Cinema/TV point, STS-134 was to be the final launch of the Department of Los Angeles City College. -E) Shuttle program in mid-May – when Joni would still Thinking this change was imminent, we bought a be teaching classes. As spring ended, Shuttle Atlantis motor home in the spring of 2010 and took a massive was confirmed to fly STS-135, the final mission of 7,800 mile, 40-day journey around the country (and the 30-year Space Shuttle program, on July 8, 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Division of Law
    Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Division of Law Enforcement Weekly Report Patrol, Protect, Preserve August 30, 2019 through September 12, 2019 This report represents some events the FWC handled over the past two weeks; however, it does not include all actions taken by the Division of Law Enforcement. NORTHWEST REGION CASES GULF COUNTY Officer Specialists M. Webb and H. Webb saw a vessel with three people on board pull into the St. Joe City Ramp. A resource inspection revealed the captain was in possession of four pints of scallop meat. He was cited accordingly. Officer Specialist H. Webb was conducting marine fisheries inspections at St. Joe boat ramp when a recreational fishing boat with several people on board returned from spearfishing. A resource inspection revealed that the captain and crew had an undersized gag grouper and an undersized mangrove snapper. The captain was issued citations accordingly. Officer Lipford was conducting resource inspections at the Eagle Harbor boat ramp. An inspection of a vessel with three subjects on board revealed they had over the daily bag limit of bay scallops. The appropriate citation was issued. OKALOOSA COUNTY Officer Corbin and Officer McVaney conducted an inspection on a vessel that had been anchored in the Santa Rosa Sound for several nights without an anchor light. While speaking to the owner on board, it was determined that the vessel was in derelict condition and inoperable. A check with dispatch revealed the owner had an active warrant for his arrest for failure to appear for possession of narcotics, loitering and prowling. The owner was arrested on the warrant and issued a derelict vessel citation.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Discusses the Various Design/Build Alternatives, As Well As the No-Build Alternative
    SUMMARY AND COMMITMENTS S.1 INTRODUCTION The potential for high speed rail to address a portion of the transportation needs of the State of Florida has a long history. The current effort to evaluate high speed rail’s potential was initiated following an enactment by Florida’s voters. In November 2000, Florida’s voters adopted an amendment to the Constitution of the State of Florida that mandated the construction of a high speed transportation system in the state. The amendment required the use of train technologies that operate at speeds in excess of 120 miles per hour (mph) and consist of dedicated rails or guideways separated from motor vehicle traffic. The system was to link the five largest urban areas of Florida and construction was mandated to begin by November 1, 2003, to address a high speed ground transportation system. The purpose of Article 10, Section 19 of the Constitution of the State of Florida was, “to reduce traffic congestion and provide alternatives to the traveling public.” In June 2001, the Florida State Legislature, through the Florida High Speed Rail Authority Act, created the Florida High Speed Rail Authority (FHSRA) and charged the organization with the responsibility for planning, administering, and implementing a high speed rail system in Florida. The act also mandated that the initial segment of the system be developed and operated between St. Petersburg, Tampa, and Orlando areas with future service to the Miami area. Following its creation in 2001, the FHSRA proceeded to implement the responsibilities set forth in the Florida High Speed Rail Authority Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Brevard Lake Orange Osceola Seminole Sumter Volusia
    2015 East Central Florida Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy Brevard Lake Orange Osceola Seminole Sumter Volusia This report was prepared by the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council under award number 048306904 from the U.S. Economic Development Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce "By leveraging resources across the Federal government and building on regional strengths, we'll improve business opportunities, enhance our nation's global economic competitiveness and create sustainable, 21st century jobs." - Gary Locke, Former Secretary of Commerce Breakbulk cargo vessel 2 Port Canaveral, Florida East Central Florida Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy Table of Contents 11 Background 39 CEDS Goals and Objectives 43 CEDS Plan of Action 47 Strategic Projects, Programs and Activities 63 Analysis of Economic Development Problems and Opportunities 79 Performance Measures and Six Pillars Indicators 81 Community and Private Sector Participation 85 Appendix 3 2015 EAST CENTRAL FLORIDA CEDS STRATEGY COMMITTEE Mike Aller Kathy Judkins Michelle Middleton Energy Florida Sumter Electric Cooperative Main Street Leasing Bradley Arnold Dale Ketcham Belinda Ortiz Kirkegard Sumter County Spaceport Research & City of Kissimmee Technology Institute Carey Beam Elizabeth Krekel Ken Peach Craig Technologies Central Florida Health Council of International Trade Office East Central Florida Jada Ciftci Pedro Leon Troy Post Sumter County Volusia County North Brevard Economic Economic Development Development Zone Dr. Diane Culpepper
    [Show full text]
  • The Exchange News October 2018 Newsletter of the Florida Transit Marketing Network Vol 13 Issue 2
    The Exchange News October 2018 Newsletter of the Florida Transit Marketing Network Vol 13 Issue 2 “Ride with Jim” Changes the Face of Transit in Brevard PSTA Awarded $9.5M 2 for Bus Rapid Transit n late 2017, Space Coast Area Space Coast Area Transit Director, Transit began a promotion Scott Nelson, and other key PalmTran Earns NACo 3 called Ride with Jim, with staff members, to ensure each Achievement Award I a goal of actively seeking Ride with Jim participant out increased transparency receives personalized TECO Line Streetcar in the planning of transit’s attention “Our entire team is Going Fare Free future in Brevard County. is passionate about what we Stakeholders, riders, and the do,” said Nelson. “Many of our Marketing Awards at 4 FPTA Conference general public were provided customers rely on Space Coast an opportunity to share coffee & Area Transit for their livelihood; BCT Employees conversation with those who help shape the transportation service we provide Donate School the local transit system. Some of the pre- enables them to feed their family. We Supplies registered riders experienced transit for actively listen to everyone’s input and do the first time, while others enjoyed an op- our best to act on their needs. Most of Citrus Connection 5 portunity to meet in an informal setting to the Ride with Jim attendees would never Celebrates ask questions or suggest transit improve- attend a County Commission meeting, Improvement in ments. More than a year after starting the but that doesn’t make their input any less Education program, Ride with Jim has become a phe- important,” he said.
    [Show full text]