DOCSLIB.ORG

Proposal for Senegal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Proposal for Senegal AFB/PPRC.18-19/4 6 June 2016 Adaptation Fund Board Project and Programme Review Committee PROPOSAL FOR SENEGAL AFB/PPRC.18-19/4 Background 1. The Operational Policies and Guidelines (OPG) for Parties to Access Resources from the Adaptation Fund (the Fund), adopted by the Adaptation Fund Board (the Board), state in paragraph 45 that regular adaptation project and programme proposals, i.e. those that request funding exceeding US$ 1 million, would undergo either a one-step, or a two-step approval process. In case of the one-step process, the proponent would directly submit a fully-developed project proposal. In the two-step process, the proponent would first submit a brief project concept, which would be reviewed by the Project and Programme Review Committee (PPRC) and would have to receive the endorsement of the Board. In the second step, the fully- developed project/programme document would be reviewed by the PPRC, and would ultimately require the Board’s approval. 2. The Templates approved by the Board (OPG, Annex 4) do not include a separate template for project and programme concepts but provide that these are to be submitted using the project and programme proposal template. The section on Adaptation Fund Project Review Criteria states: For regular projects using the two-step approval process, only the first four criteria will be applied when reviewing the 1st step for regular project concept. In addition, the information provided in the 1st step approval process with respect to the review criteria for the regular project concept could be less detailed than the information in the request for approval template submitted at the 2nd step approval process. Furthermore, a final project document is required for regular projects for the 2nd step approval, in addition to the approval template. 3. The first four criteria mentioned above are: 1. Country Eligibility, 2. Project Eligibility, 3. Resource Availability, and 4. Eligibility of NIE/MIE. 4. The fifth criterion, applied when reviewing a fully-developed project document, is: 5. Implementation Arrangements. 5. It is worth noting that since the twenty-second Board meeting, the Environmental and Social (E&S) Policy of the Fund was approved and consequently compliance with the Policy has been included in the review criteria both for concept documents and fully-developed project documents. The proposals template was revised as well, to include sections requesting demonstration of compliance of the project/programme with the E&S Policy. 6. At its seventeenth meeting, the Board decided (Decision B.17/7) to approve “Instructions for preparing a request for project or programme funding from the Adaptation Fund”, contained in the Annex to document AFB/PPRC.8/4, which further outlines applicable review criteria for both concepts and fully-developed proposals. The latest version of this document was launched in conjunction with the revision of the Operational Policies and Guidelines in November 2013. 7. Based on the Board Decision B.9/2, the first call for project and programme proposals was issued and an invitation letter to eligible Parties to submit project and programme proposals to the Fund was sent out on April 8, 2010. 1 AFB/PPRC.18-19/4 8. At its twenty-third meeting, the Adaptation Fund Board (the Board) discussed a recommendation made by the Project and Programme Review Committee (PPRC) of the Board, on arranging intersessional review of project and programme proposals. Having considered the comments and recommendation of the PPRC, the Board decided to: (a) Arrange one intersessional project/programme review cycle annually, during an intersessional period of 24 weeks or more between two consecutive Board meetings, as outlined in document AFB/PPRC.14/13; (b) While recognizing that any proposal can be submitted to regular meetings of the Board, require that all first submissions of concepts and fully-developed project/programme documents continue to be considered in regular meetings of the PPRC; (c) Request the secretariat to review, during such intersessional review cycles, resubmissions of project/programme concepts and fully-developed project/programme documents submitted on time by proponents for consideration during such intersessional review cycles; (d) Request the PPRC to consider intersessionally the technical review of such proposals as prepared by the secretariat and to make intersessional recommendations to the Board; (e) Consider such intersessionally reviewed proposals for intersessional approval in accordance with the Rules of Procedure; (f) Inform implementing entities and other stakeholders about the new arrangement by sending a letter to this effect, and make the calendar of upcoming regular and intersessional review cycles available on the Adaptation Fund website and arrange the first such cycle between the twenty-third and twenty-fourth meetings of the Board; (g) Request the PPRC to defer to the next Board meeting any matters related to the competencies of the Ethics and Finance Committee that may come up during the intersessional review of projects/programmes and to refrain from making a recommendation on such proposals until the relevant matters are addressed; and (h) Request the secretariat to present, in the fifteenth meeting of the PPRC, and annually following each intersessional review cycle, an analysis of the intersessional review cycle. (Decision B.23/15) 9. At the twenty-fifth Board meeting, the secretariat had requested to the Board to consider whether the rules in the intersessional project review cycle could be made more accommodating, with a view to speeding up the process. The Board subsequently decided to: (a) Amend Decision B.23/15 and require that all first submissions of concepts under the two-step approval process and all first submissions of fully-developed project/programme documents under the one-step process continue to be considered in regular meetings of the Project and Programme Review Committee (PPRC); 2 AFB/PPRC.18-19/4 (b) Request the secretariat to review, during its inter-sessional review cycles: (i) First submissions of fully-developed project/programme documents for which the concepts had already been considered in regular meetings of the PPRC and subsequently endorsed by the Board; (ii) Resubmissions of project/programme concepts and resubmissions of fully- developed project/programme documents; (c) Request the PPRC to consider intersessionally the technical review of such proposals as prepared by the secretariat and to make intersessional recommendations to the Board; (d) Consider such intersessionally reviewed proposals for intersessional approval in accordance with the Rules of Procedure; and (e) Inform implementing entities and other stakeholders about the updated arrangement by sending a letter to this effect, and make effective such amendment as of the first day of the review cycle between the twenty-fifth and twenty-sixth meetings of the Board. (Decision B.25/2) 10. The following fully-developed project document titled “Reducing vulnerability and increasing resilience of coastal communities in the Saloum Islands (Dionewar)” was submitted by the Centre de Suivi Ecologique (CSE), which is a National Implementing Entity of the Adaptation Fund. 11. This is the fourth submission of the proposal and second submission as a fully- developed project document. It was first submitted as a concept to the twenty-fifth meeting of the Adaptation Fund Board and the Board decided not to endorse it. It was then submitted as a concept to the twenty-sixth meeting, along with a request for Project Formulation Grant (PFG), and the Board decided to: (a) Endorse the project concept, as supplemented by the clarification response provided by the Centre de Suivi Ecologique (CSE) to the request made by the technical review; (b) Request the secretariat to transmit to CSE the observations in the review sheet annexed to the notification of the Board’s decision, as well as the following issues: (i) The fully-developed project document should provide a better justification on the link between climate change and fisheries production; (ii) The fully-developed project document should consider addressing harmful overexploitation of resources through a more comprehensive approach rather than focusing only updating and formalizing rules; 3 AFB/PPRC.18-19/4 (iii) The fully-developed project document should elaborate on how the access to benefits from the project would be equitable; (iv) The fully-developed project document should be based on a more comprehensive risk screening, and contain environmental and social impact assessment studies, and an Environmental and Social Management Plan (ESMP); (c) Approve the Project Formulation Grant of US$ 30,000; (d) Request CSE to transmit the observations under item (b) to the Government of Senegal; and (e) Encourage the Government of Senegal to submit through CSE a fully-developed project proposal that would also address the observations under item (b) above. (Decision B.26/6) 12. It was then submitted as a fully-developed project document to the twenty-seventh meeting of the Adaptation Fund Board but was withdrawn following the initial review. 13. The present submission was received by the secretariat in time to be considered for the intersessional project/programme proposal review cycle between the twenty-seventh and twenty-eighth meetings. The secretariat carried out a technical review of the project proposal, with the diary number SEN/NIE/Coastal/2015/1, and completed a review sheet. 14. In accordance with a request to the secretariat made by the Board in its 10th meeting, the secretariat shared this review sheet with CSE, and offered it the opportunity of providing responses before the review sheet was sent to the PPRC. 15. The secretariat received on 11 May 2016 comments regarding the proposal, sent by the Adaptation Fund NGO Network, on behalf of Mr. Emmanuel Seck, ENDA. The secretariat considered these comments as reference when conducting the technical review of the proposal. In accordance with Decision B.18/24 (b), which required that such comments be made publicly available on the Adaptation Fund website, they were posted together with the project proposal, and added as an annex to the present document.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Livelihood Zone Descriptions
    Government of Senegal COMPREHENSIVE FOOD SECURITY AND VULNERABILITY ANALYSIS (CFSVA) Livelihood Zone Descriptions WFP/FAO/SE-CNSA/CSE/FEWS NET Introduction The WFP, FAO, CSE (Centre de Suivi Ecologique), SE/CNSA (Commissariat National à la Sécurité Alimentaire) and FEWS NET conducted a zoning exercise with the goal of defining zones with fairly homogenous livelihoods in order to better monitor vulnerability and early warning indicators. This exercise led to the development of a Livelihood Zone Map, showing zones within which people share broadly the same pattern of livelihood and means of subsistence. These zones are characterized by the following three factors, which influence household food consumption and are integral to analyzing vulnerability: 1) Geography – natural (topography, altitude, soil, climate, vegetation, waterways, etc.) and infrastructure (roads, railroads, telecommunications, etc.) 2) Production – agricultural, agro-pastoral, pastoral, and cash crop systems, based on local labor, hunter-gatherers, etc. 3) Market access/trade – ability to trade, sell goods and services, and find employment. Key factors include demand, the effectiveness of marketing systems, and the existence of basic infrastructure. Methodology The zoning exercise consisted of three important steps: 1) Document review and compilation of secondary data to constitute a working base and triangulate information 2) Consultations with national-level contacts to draft initial livelihood zone maps and descriptions 3) Consultations with contacts during workshops in each region to revise maps and descriptions. 1. Consolidating secondary data Work with national- and regional-level contacts was facilitated by a document review and compilation of secondary data on aspects of topography, production systems/land use, land and vegetation, and population density.
    [Show full text]
  • USAID Wula Nafaa Project QUARTERLY REPORT
    USAID Wula Nafaa Project QUARTERLY REPORT JANUARY – MARCH 2012 April 2012 This publication was produced for the United States Agency for International Development by International Resources Group (IRG). USAID Wula Nafaa Project QUARTERLY REPORT JANUARY - MARCH 2012 CONTRACT NO. 685-C-00-08-00063-00 Notice: The points of view expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or of the Government of the USA. Table of contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................................. III 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................... 1 2. INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................... 2 3. PROGRESS ACHIEVED DURING THE QUARTER ............................................................. 5 3.1. Agriculture: Productivity and markets ....................................................... 5 3.1.1. Millet/sorghum and maize value chains ..................................................................... 5 3.1.2. Rice value chains ............................................................................................................. 9 3.1.3. Fisheries products ....................................................................................................... 11 3.1.4. Forest and agroforestry products ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping and Remote Sensing of the Resources of the Republic of Senegal
    MAPPING AND REMOTE SENSING OF THE RESOURCES OF THE REPUBLIC OF SENEGAL A STUDY OF THE GEOLOGY, HYDROLOGY, SOILS, VEGETATION AND LAND USE POTENTIAL SDSU-RSI-86-O 1 -Al DIRECTION DE __ Agency for International REMOTE SENSING INSTITUTE L'AMENAGEMENT Development DU TERRITOIRE ..i..... MAPPING AND REMOTE SENSING OF THE RESOURCES OF THE REPUBLIC OF SENEGAL A STUDY OF THE GEOLOGY, HYDROLOGY, SOILS, VEGETATION AND LAND USE POTENTIAL For THE REPUBLIC OF SENEGAL LE MINISTERE DE L'INTERIEUP SECRETARIAT D'ETAT A LA DECENTRALISATION Prepared by THE REMOTE SENSING INSTITUTE SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY BROOKINGS, SOUTH DAKOTA 57007, USA Project Director - Victor I. Myers Chief of Party - Andrew S. Stancioff Authors Geology and Hydrology - Andrew Stancioff Soils/Land Capability - Marc Staljanssens Vegetation/Land Use - Gray Tappan Under Contract To THE UNITED STATED AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT MAPPING AND REMOTE SENSING PROJECT CONTRACT N0 -AID/afr-685-0233-C-00-2013-00 Cover Photographs Top Left: A pasture among baobabs on the Bargny Plateau. Top Right: Rice fields and swamp priairesof Basse Casamance. Bottom Left: A portion of a Landsat image of Basse Casamance taken on February 21, 1973 (dry season). Bottom Right: A low altitude, oblique aerial photograph of a series of niayes northeast of Fas Boye. Altitude: 700 m; Date: April 27, 1984. PREFACE Science's only hope of escaping a Tower of Babel calamity is the preparationfrom time to time of works which sumarize and which popularize the endless series of disconnected technical contributions. Carl L. Hubbs 1935 This report contains the results of a 1982-1985 survey of the resources of Senegal for the National Plan for Land Use and Development.
    [Show full text]
  • Wula Nafaa Ii Local Governance Component Observations and Opportunities Volume 1: Report
    WULA NAFAA II LOCAL GOVERNANCE COMPONENT OBSERVATIONS AND OPPORTUNITIES VOLUME 1: REPORT December 2008 This report is made possible by the support of the American People through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). It was prepared by International Resources Group (IRG). WULA NAFAA II LOCAL GOVERNANCE COMPONENT OBSERVATION AND OPPORTUNITIES VOLUME 1: REPORT Charles Benjamin International Resources Group December 1, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ·································································································· 7 2. COMPONENT OBJECTIVES AND EXPECTED OUTCOMES···························· 8 3. BACKGROUND ··································································································· 9 3.1. Pilot ......................................................................................................................9 3.2. Challenges ...........................................................................................................9 3.3. Vision/Guiding Principles ....................................................................................11 3.4. Support other USAID programs ..........................................................................12 4. APPROACH······································································································· 14 4.1. Mechanisms for decentralized NRM ...................................................................14 4.1.1. Land and Forest Resources..............................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • IMPORTANT You Must Read the Following Before Continuing. The
    IMPORTANT You must read the following before continuing. The following applies to the Prospectus following this page, and you are therefore required to read this carefully before reading, accessing or making any other use of the Prospectus. In accessing the Prospectus, you agree to be bound by the following terms and conditions, including any modifications to them any time you receive any information from us as a result of such access. THE FOLLOWING PROSPECTUS MAY NOT BE FORWARDED OR DISTRIBUTED OTHER THAN AS PROVIDED BELOW AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED IN ANY MANNER WHATSOEVER. THIS PROSPECTUS MAY ONLY BE DISTRIBUTED OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES AND WITHIN THE UNITED STATES TO “QUALIFIED INSTITUTIONAL BUYERS” (QIBs) AS DEFINED IN AND PURSUANT TO RULE 144A OF THE U.S. SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED (THE SECURITIES ACT) (RULE 144A). ANY FORWARDING, DISTRIBUTION OR REPRODUCTION OF THIS DOCUMENT IN WHOLE OR IN PART IS UNAUTHORISED. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS DIRECTIVE MAY RESULT IN A VIOLATION OF THE SECURITIES ACT OR THE APPLICABLE LAWS OF OTHER JURISDICTIONS. IF YOU HAVE GAINED ACCESS TO THIS TRANSMISSION CONTRARY TO ANY OF THE FOREGOING RESTRICTIONS, YOU ARE NOT AUTHORISED AND WILL NOT BE ABLE TO PURCHASE ANY OF THE NOTES DESCRIBED IN THE ATTACHED DOCUMENT. NOTHING IN THIS ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION CONSTITUTES AN OFFER TO SELL OR THE SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY ANY SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION. THE SECURITIES HAVE NOT BEEN AND WILL NOT BE REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OR WITH ANY SECURITIES REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF ANY STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF THE UNITED STATES AND MAY NOT BE OFFERED OR SOLD WITHIN THE UNITED STATES EXCEPT TO QIBs PURSUANT TO RULE 144A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wolof of Saloum: Social Structure and Rural Development in Senegal Stellingen
    The Wolof of Saloum: social structure and rural development in Senegal Stellingen 1. Ein van de voorwaarden voor succesvolle toepassing van ossetrekkracht in de landbouw is een passende bedrijfsgrootte. In vele samenlevingen in West-Afrika wordt aan deze voor- waarde niet voldaan, omdat de leden van de huishoudgroep niet gezamenlijk, maar afzonder- lijk een bedrijf beheren. Dit proefschrift. 2. De conclusie dat in niet-westerse gebieden de positie van de vrouw verslechtert door opname in de marktecanomie en modernisering van de landbouw, is niet van toepassing op de Wolof-samenleving. Door de verbouw van handelsgewassen werd haar rol in de landbouw be- langrijker en nam haar inkomen toe. De recente toepassing van dierlijke trekkracht ver- lichtte haar taak op haar eigen veld. Postel-Coster, E. & J. Schrijvers, 1976. Vrouwen op weg; ontwikkeling naar emanci- patie. Van Gorcum, Assen. Dit proefschrift. 3. Moore verklaart de deelname aan werkgroepen met een maaltijd als beloning ('festive labour') mede uit de afhankelijkheid van de deelnemers ten opzichte van de begunstigde. Hierbij wordt over het hoofd gezien dat het voorkomt dat slechts een persoon deelneemt vanwege zijn afhankelijkheid van de begunstigde en dat deze persoon de overige deelnemers rekruteert volgens de regels van reciprociteit. Moore, M.P., 1975. Co-operative labour in peasant agriculture. Journal of Peasant Studies 2(3): 270-291. Dit proefschrift. 4. De gebruikelijke definitie van een marabout als zijnde een heilige en religieus leider met erg veel invloed is niet van toepassing op de Wolof, omdat hier vele marabouts slechts lokale bekendheid genieten. Dit proefschrift. 5. Er wordt vaak geen rekening gehouden met het feit dat de materiele positie van de kleine boer in ontwikkelingslanden niet alleen bepaald wordt door zijn activiteit als pro- ducent, maar tevens door zijn activiteit als handelaar.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimating the Burden of Malaria in Senegal: Bayesian Zero-Inflated Binomial Geostatistical Modeling of the MIS 2008 Data
    Estimating the Burden of Malaria in Senegal: Bayesian Zero-Inflated Binomial Geostatistical Modeling of the MIS 2008 Data Federica Giardina1,2, Laura Gosoniu1,2, Lassana Konate3, Mame Birame Diouf4, Robert Perry5, Oumar Gaye6, Ousmane Faye3, Penelope Vounatsou1,2* 1 Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland, 2 University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland, 3 Faculte´ des Sciences et Techniques, UCAD Dakar, Se´ne´gal, 4 National Malaria Control Programme, Dakar, Se´ne´gal, 5 Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America, 6 Faculte´ de Me´decine, Pharmacie et Odontologie, UCAD Dakar, Se´ne´gal Abstract The Research Center for Human Development in Dakar (CRDH) with the technical assistance of ICF Macro and the National Malaria Control Programme (NMCP) conducted in 2008/2009 the Senegal Malaria Indicator Survey (SMIS), the first nationally representative household survey collecting parasitological data and malaria-related indicators. In this paper, we present spatially explicit parasitaemia risk estimates and number of infected children below 5 years. Geostatistical Zero-Inflated Binomial models (ZIB) were developed to take into account the large number of zero-prevalence survey locations (70%) in the data. Bayesian variable selection methods were incorporated within a geostatistical framework in order to choose the best set of environmental and climatic covariates associated with the parasitaemia risk. Model validation confirmed that the ZIB model had a better predictive ability than the standard Binomial analogue. Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods were used for inference. Several insecticide treated nets (ITN) coverage indicators were calculated to assess the effectiveness of interventions.
    [Show full text]
  • There Is Enormous Suffering” Serious Abuses Against Talibé Children in Senegal, 2017-2018
    “There Is Enormous Suffering” Serious Abuses Against Talibé Children in Senegal, 2017-2018 HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH “There Is Enormous Suffering” Serious Abuses Against Talibé Children in Senegal, 2017-2018 Copyright © 2019 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 978-1-6231-37380 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch defends the rights of people worldwide. We scrupulously investigate abuses, expose the facts widely, and pressure those with power to respect rights and secure justice. Human Rights Watch is an independent, international organization that works as part of a vibrant movement to uphold human dignity and advance the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit our website: http://www.hrw.org JUNE 2019 ISBN: 978-1-6231-37380 “There Is Enormous Suffering” Serious Abuses Against Talibé Children in Senegal, 2017-2018 Map 1: Locations of Research in Senegal ............................................................................. i Map 2: Talibé Migration Routes .......................................................................................... ii Terminology and Abbreviations ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Senegal Mapping the Poor in Senegal : Technical Report
    REPUBLIQUE DU SENEGAL MINISTERE DE L’ECONOMIE, DES FINANCES ET DU PLAN AGENCE NATIONALE DE LA STATISTIQUE ET DE LA DEMOGRAPHIE (A.N.S.D.) SENEGAL MAPPING THE POOR IN SENEGAL : TECHNICAL REPORT 2016 MAPPING THE POOR IN SENEGAL: TECHNICAL REPORT DRAFT VERSION 1. Introduction Senegal has been successful on many fronts such as social stability and democratic development; its record of economic growth and poverty reduction however has been one of mixed results. The recently completed poverty assessment in Senegal (World Bank, 2015b) shows that national poverty rates fell by 6.9 percentage points between 2001/02 and 2005/06, but subsequent progress diminished to a mere 1.6 percentage point decline between 2005/06 and 2011, from 55.2 percent in 2001 to 48.3 percent in 2005/06 to 46.7 percent in 2011. In addition, large regional disparities across the regions within Senegal exist with poverty rates decreasing from North to South (with the notable exception of Dakar). The spatial pattern of poverty in Senegal can be explained by factors such as the lack of market access and connectivity in the more isolated regions to the East and South. Inequality remains at a moderately low level on a national basis but about two-thirds of overall inequality in Senegal is due to within-region inequality and between-region inequality as a share of total inequality has been on the rise during the 2000s. As a Sahelian country, Senegal faces a critical constraint, inadequate and unreliable rainfall, which limits the opportunities in the rural economy where the majority of the population still lives to differing extents across the regions.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Guide: Senegal Opportunities for Investment
    Economic Guide: Senegal Opportunities for investment FOREWORD Preface Invest in Senegal Invest in the Future Senegal and the United States of America have a long history of mutual trust, based on shared values of freedom, democracy and respect for human rights. On both sides of the Atlantic, we believe in free enterprise and the strengths of the market as driv- ers of growth, wealth creation and development. Senegal is less than an eight-hour flight from the East Coast of the United States— it takes less time to get to America than it does to reach the east or south of Africa. And so we are also neighbors. At a political level, the relationship between our governments has always been character- ized by trust and friendly collaboration. Senegal benefits from the support of US aid in a number of areas, including as part of the Millennium Challenge Account (MCA). We are currently in the process of defining a second MCA compact, focused primarily on energy, and this follows on from the success of the first compact, which concentrated on infrastructure and agriculture. All of these factors justify the continuation of our partnership, especially with the private sector in America, with support from the US Chamber of Commerce. I have already had an opportunity to meet with the Chamber’s offi- cials and appreciate the extent of the friendship and respect which they hold for our country. © YOURI LENQUETTE The major projects in the fields of infrastructure, energy, agriculture, mining, tourism, ICT and services included in the Emerging Senegal Plan offer us a broad spectrum of possibilities on which to build intelligent, innovative and mutually beneficial partnerships.
    [Show full text]
  • The Republic of Senegal Us$1,100,000,000 6.250% Amortising Notes Due 2033 Issue Price: 100%
    PROSPECTUS NOT FOR GENERAL CIRCULATION IN THE UNITED STATES THE REPUBLIC OF SENEGAL US$1,100,000,000 6.250% AMORTISING NOTES DUE 2033 ISSUE PRICE: 100% The US$1,100,000,000 6.250% Amortising Notes due 2033 (the Notes) are issued by the Republic of Senegal (the Republic or Senegal). The Notes will bear interest on their outstanding principal amount from time to time. Interest on the Notes will be paid on 23 May and 23 November in each year. The first payment of interest will be made on 23 November 2017 for the period from and including 23 May 2017 to but excluding 23 November 2017. The Notes will, unless previously redeemed or cancelled, be redeemed in three instalments of US$366,666,666.66 on 23 May 2031, US$366,666,666.67 on 23 May 2032 and US$366,666,666.67 on 23 May 2033. See “Conditions of the Notes—7, Redemption and Purchase”. The Notes initially will be sold to investors at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount thereof. For a more detailed description of the Notes, see “Conditions of the Notes” beginning on page 21. The Notes have not been and will not be registered under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act) or with any securities regulatory authority of any state or other jurisdiction of the United States and may not be offered, sold or delivered within the United States except pursuant to an exemption from, or in a transaction not subject to, the registration requirements of the Securities Act and applicable state securities laws.
    [Show full text]
  • DHS-I, 1986 -X- Census, 1988 F DHS-11, 1992-93
    POPULATION DYNAMICS OF SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA cap verde 0 The Gambia- Guln Biss Mauritius NOTE: This map, which has been prepared solely for the convenience of readers, does not purport to express political boundaries or relationships. The scale is a composite of several forms of projection. POPULATION DYNAMICS OF SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA Gilles Pison, Kenneth H. Hill, Barney Cohen, and Karen A. Foote. Editors Working Group on Senegal Panel on the Population Dynamics of Sub-Saharan Africa Committee on Population Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education National Research Council NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS Washington, D.C. 1995 NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS 2101 Constitution Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20418 NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences and with regard for appropriate balance. This report has been reviewed by a group other than the authors according to procedures approved by a Report Review Committee consisting of members of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. The National Academy of Sciences is a private. nonprofit, self-perpetuating society of distinguished scholars engaged in scientific and engineering research, dedicated to the further- ance of science and technology and to their use for the general welfare. Upon the authority of the charter granted to it by the Congress in 1863, the Academy has a mandate that requires it to advise the federal government on scientific and technical matters.
    [Show full text]