Atlas of Australian Birds Project Reported White-Faced Herons Feeding on Road Kills (Blakers Et Al

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Atlas of Australian Birds Project Reported White-Faced Herons Feeding on Road Kills (Blakers Et Al AUSTRALIAN 210 ASHTON: Welcome Swallow Breeding in Fairy Martin Nest BIRD WATCHER Atlas of Australian Birds project reported White-faced Herons feeding on road kills (Blakers et al. 1984). One of six White-faced Herons collected at Westernport Bay, Victoria in June 1979 while feeding in pastures had 13 adult flies (Diptera, unspecified) in its stomach (Lowe 1983). Feeding on garbage tips has been recorded in other members of the Ardeidae. Slater (1970) included garbage tips in the habitat of the Pied Heron Ardea picata. He did not indicate the food taken. Dean (1978) listed references to Cattle Egrets Ardeola ibis feeding on refuse tips in Uganda, Seychelles and Morocco. Food was not identified but one observer thought insects were the attraction, not refuse. Cattle Egrets seen by me at a garbage tip at Greenwell Point, New South Wales in 1976 were also feeding on flies which they caught both on the ground and while airborne, snatching them from the air with ease. Again to apply the terms of Hancock & Kushlan (1984), they used Standing Flycatching and Aerial Flycatching methods. I did not see them take any refuse. References Blakers, M., Davies, S.J.J.F. & Reilly, P.N. (1984), The Atlas of Australian Birds, Melbourne University Press, Melbourne. Dean, AR, (1978), 'Cattle Egrets feeding on refuse tip', Brit Birds 71, 268. Hancock, J. & Kushlan, J. (1984), The Herons Handbook, Croom Helm Ltd., London. Klapste, J. (1982), 'White-faced Heron Ardea novaehollandiae feeding on carrion', Aust. Bird Watcher 9, 171-172. Lowe, K W. (1983), 'Feeding behaviour and diet of the White-faced Heron Ardea novaehollandie in Westernport Bay, Victoria', Corella 7, 101-108. Slater, P. (1980), A Field Guide to Australian Birds, Non-Passerines, Rigby Ltd., Adelaide. By J.N. HOBBS, 12 Hume Street, Dareton, NS. W 2717 • Welcome Swallow Breeding in a Fairy Martin Nest Marchant & Fullagar (1983), in an analysis of 1169 nest records for the Welcome Swallow Hirundo neoxena, did not record it breeding in the nest of another species nor have I found reference to this in a limited survey of the literature. An account of the breeding of Welcome Swallows in a broken nest of the Fairy Martin Cecropis ariel follows. A Welcome Swallow was seen at times perched near a road culvert at Aldinga Beach, South Australia (35° 17'S, 138° 27'E) from mid August 1983. Casual inspections of the partly water-filled culvert revealed only about 20 Fairy Martin nests of previous breeding seasons until close inspection became possible on 11 October 1983. Then a broken Fairy Martin nest amongst others at the southern end of the culvert was found to contain four well-feathered young Welcome Swallows which were being fed by the parents. Fairy Martins had been recorded in 1980-82 breeding seasons at these nests and vandalism to them had been noted. The nest being used by the Swallows had lost its neck, the line of attachment to the culvert roof being clearly marked. The bulb of the nest remaining formed a deep saucer, a small section of the rim of which 3.0 x 1.5 em had been repaired by more recently applied mud. The nest was thickly lined with soft material including feathers. On 6 October two of the young fledged and the remainder had done so by 9 October. On 20 October three eggs were found in the same nest to which an VOL. 11 (6) JUNE 1986 SCHULZ: Straw-necked Ibis taking a Western Brown Snake 211 adult Swallow carried a feather. Brooding followed and two young had hatched by 14 November and fledged on 2-3 December. No Fairy Martins nested in the culvert, though present in the area, during this season. When the culvert was inspected during the 1984 breeding season it was found that previous nests had been swept away by water and no other nests built. Reference Marchant, S. & Fullagar, P.J. ( 1983), 'Nest records of the Welcome Swallow', Emu 83, 66-74. By C.B. ASHTON, P.O. Box 125, Aldinga Beach, S.A. 5173 • Straw-necked Ibis Taking a Western Brown Snake In the literature there are scattered accounts of snakes, including venomous species, being captured by large species of wading birds: Australasian Bittern Botaurus poiciloptilus (Hobbs 1979); Intermediate Egret Egretta intermedia (Gill 1963); Black-necked Stork Xenorhynchus asiaticus and Great Egret Egretta alba (Coburn 1977); Sacred Ibis Threskiornis aethiopica (Vestjens 1977). I could find no first-hand accounts of the Straw-necked Ibis Threskiornis spinicollis feeding on snakes, although several references (Frith 1969, Vestjens 1976) mention snakes as part of the bird's diet. Most references to diet refer to its marked preference for grasshoppers and locusts (e.g. Ellis 1958, Carrick 1959, Macdonald 1973, Cowling 1974, Vestjens 1976). Rose (1973) examined the stomach contents of two Straw-necked Ibis and found the remains of a variety of insects, centipedes, a spider and a snail but no traces of any reptiles. On 25 July 1985 a flock of 30 Straw-necked Ibis were observed foraging on grassland dominated by Danthonia caespitosa adjacent to Clarkes Creek, 4.5 km south of Wanganella in south-west New South Wales. One Ibis was suddenly observed holding a snake in its beak, grasping it by the mid section. In order to identify the snake I forced the Ibis to take flight, which resulted in the snake being dropped. The snake, identified as a Western Brown Snake Pseudonaja nucha/is, was found to be in poor condition and subsequently died. This is a common species of snake widespread in inland Australia (Cogger 1983). It weighed 17.5 g and had a total length of 43.5 em. References Carrick, R (1959), 'The food and feeding habits of the Straw-necked Ibis and the White Ibis in Australia', CSIRO Wild/. Res. 4, 69-92. Coburn, M. (1977), 'The snake catchers', Bird Obs. 547, 49. Cogger, H.G. (1983), Reptiles and Amphibians of Australia, revised edn, Reed, Sydney. Cowling, S.J. (1974), 'Observations on ibis feeding on the Australian Plague Locust', Emu 74, 256-257. Ellis, R (1958), 'Observations on the Straw-necked Ibis', Emu 58, 312. Frith, H.J. (ed.) (1969), Birds in the Australian High Country, Reed, Sydney. Gill, R.G. (1963), 'Plumed Egret eating a snake', Aust. Bird Watcher 2, 20. Hobbs, J.N. (1979), 'Australasian Bittern taking a Black Snake', Aust. Birds 14, 43. Macdonald, J.D (1973), Birds of Australia, Reed, Sydney. Rose, A.B. (1973), 'Food of some Australian birds', Emu 73, 177-183. Vestjens, W.J.M. (1976), 'Straw-necked Ibis', in Reader's Digest Complete Book of Australian Birds, 89, Reader's Digest Services, Sydney. -- (1977), 'Reptilian predation on birds and eggs at Lake Cowal, N.S.W.', Emu 77, 36-37. By MARTIN SCHULZ, 167 South Beach Road, Bittern, Victoria 3918 • .
Recommended publications
  • The Migration of Swallows in South Australia. by A
    116 MOl?llA.N-Thc Migrat'ion 'of Swallows in S.A.. The Migration of Swallows in South Australia. By A. ,M. MORGAN, M.B., Ch.B. Four swallows inhabit South Australia. They are the Welcome-Swallow (Hirundo neoaJena), the Tree Swallow (Hylo­ c7wlidon nigricans caleyi), the Fairy Martin '01' Bottle Swallow (Lagenoplastes ariel), and the White-breasted Swallow (Ohera· mreca lC1tcosternon stonei). None is rconflned to South Aus­ tralia; 'the first theeebave been recorded from every part of the Australian Commonwealth, the fourth from every State except Tasmania, which it does not visit. Authorities differ considerably in their opinions as to the migratory habits of these birds on the Australian Continent. As regards 'I'asmania, all 'are agreed that they are purely migratory, leaving in: the winter, and returning next summer to nest. The flairy mrurtin is' probably only an occasional visitor, since Littler (Birds of Tas~ania) has not seen it. Gould (Handbook of the Birds 'of Australia) says of the welcome swallows-v'Dbe arrival of this bird in the southern portions of Australia is hailed as a welcome indication of the approach of .spring, and .is associated with precisely the same ideas as those popularly entertained respecting our own pretty swallow 'in Europe. The two species are, in fact, beautiful representatives of each other, and, assimilate ... in their migratory movements." Quoting Caley, he says further, "the earliest perjod of the year that I noticed the 'appearance of swallows. was July 12th, 1803, when 1 saw two . The latest period I 'observed them was 30th Ma~, 1806, when It number of them were flying high in the air." Gould also says, " ,u.
    [Show full text]
  • The Foraqinq Behaviour of Herons and Egrets on the Mageia Creek Rood Plain
    'T-\«i. •:•,} A o '<\'_ o o u x 4 Technical MemorandS;ili ; '4 The Foraqinq Behaviour of Herons and egrets on the Mageia creek Rood Plain, Northern Terr*™V../ 6' H.r- Rechei m Supervising Saenm?' for the Alligator River, pernor # OSS* -TH - ^ M Supervising Scientist for the Alligator Rivers Region TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM 4 THE FORAGING BEHAVIOUR OF HERONS AND EGRETS ON THE MAGELA CREEK FLOOD PLAIN, NORTHERN TERRITORY H.F. Recher and R.T. Holmes MARCH 1982 Austrauan Government Publishing Service Canberra 1982 This Technical Memorandum was prepared by H J. RECHER AND R.T. HOLMES* of THE AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM, SYDNEY acting as consultants to the Supervising Scientist for the Alligator Rivers Region, Northern Territory Office of the Supervising Scientist P.O. Box 387 Bondi Junction, N.S.W. Australia, 2022 ® Commonwealth of Australia 1982 ISBN 0 644 01216 1 * Present address: Department of Biological Sciences Dartmouth College Hanover New Hampshire, U.S.A. PRINTED BY J. S MCMILLAN PRINTING GROUP (02)684 1700 CONTENTS SUMMARY 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 METHODS 2 3 RESULTS 3 3.1 Great Egret 3 3.2 White-necked Heron 4 3.3 Plumed Egret 4 3.4 Little Egret 5 3.5 Pied Heron 5 3.6 Other Species 6 4 FORAGING TERRITORIES AND AGONISTIC BEHAVIOUR 6 5 DISCUSSION 7 5.1 Foraging Behaviour and Habitat 7 5.2 Types of Prey Taken 8 5.3 Effects of Contaminants on Heron Species 9 6 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 10 7 REFERENCES 10 TABLES 1 Numbers of different types of herons sighted at different times 12 of day in West Plains channel and Jabiluka Billabong 2 Culmen, wing and tarsus measurements of different types of heron 13 3 Foraging depths for different species of heron 14 4 Rate of movement and foraging success for different species of heron 15 5 Comparative foraging behaviour of herons on the Magela flood plain 16 iii SUMMARY Recher, H.F.
    [Show full text]
  • Innovative Foraging by the House Sparrow Passer Domesticus
    46 AUSTRALIAN FIELD ORNITHOLOGY 2005, 22, 46--47 Innovative Foraging by the House Sparrow Passer domesticus NEIL SHELLEY 16 Birdrock Avenue, Mount Martha, Victoria 3934 (Email: [email protected]) Summary This note describes an incidental observation of House Sparrows Passer domesticus foraging for insects trapped within the engine bay of motor vehicles in south-eastern Australia. Introduction The House Sparrow Passer domesticus is commensal with man and its global range has increased significantly recently, closely following human settlement on most continents and many islands (Long 1981, Cramp 1994). It is native to Eurasia and northern Africa (Cramp 1994) and was introduced to Australia in the mid 19th century (Biakers et al. 1984, Schodde & Tidemann 1997, Pizzey & Knight 1999). It is now common in cities and towns throughout eastern Australia (Biakers et al. 1984, Schodde & Tidemann 1997, Pizzey & Knight 1999, Barrett et al. 2003), particularly in association with human habitation (Schodde & Tidemann 1997), but is decreasing nationally (Barrett et al. 2003). Observation On 13 January 2003 at c. 1745 h Eastern Summer Time, a small group of House Sparrows was observed foraging in the street outside a restaurant in Port Fairy, on the south-western coast of Victoria (38°23' S, 142°14' E). Several motor vehicles were angle-parked in the street, nose to the kerb, adjacent to the restaurant. The restaurant had a few tables and chairs on the footpath for outside dining. The Sparrows appeared to be foraging only for food scraps, when one of them entered the front of a parked vehicle and emerged shortly after with an insect, which it then consumed.
    [Show full text]
  • Aves: Hirundinidae)
    1 2 Received Date : 19-Jun-2016 3 Revised Date : 14-Oct-2016 4 Accepted Date : 19-Oct-2016 5 Article type : Original Research 6 7 8 Convergent evolution in social swallows (Aves: Hirundinidae) 9 Running Title: Social swallows are morphologically convergent 10 Authors: Allison E. Johnson1*, Jonathan S. Mitchell2, Mary Bomberger Brown3 11 Affiliations: 12 1Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago 13 2Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan 14 3 School of Natural Resources, University of Nebraska 15 Contact: 16 Allison E. Johnson*, Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago, 1101 E 57th Street, 17 Chicago, IL 60637, phone: 773-702-3070, email: [email protected] 18 Jonathan S. Mitchell, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, 19 Ruthven Museums Building, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, email: [email protected] 20 Mary Bomberger Brown, School of Natural Resources, University of Nebraska, Hardin Hall, 3310 21 Holdrege Street, Lincoln, NE 68583, phone: 402-472-8878, email: [email protected] 22 23 *Corresponding author. 24 Data archiving: Social and morphological data and R code utilized for data analysis have been 25 submitted as supplementary material associated with this manuscript. 26 27 Abstract: BehavioralAuthor Manuscript shifts can initiate morphological evolution by pushing lineages into new adaptive 28 zones. This has primarily been examined in ecological behaviors, such as foraging, but social behaviors 29 may also alter morphology. Swallows and martins (Hirundinidae) are aerial insectivores that exhibit a This is the author manuscript accepted for publication and has undergone full peer review but has not been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process, which may lead to differences between this version and the Version of Record.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to the Birds of Barrow Island
    A Guide to the Birds of Barrow Island Operated by Chevron Australia This document has been printed by a Sustainable Green Printer on stock that is certified carbon in joint venture with neutral and is Forestry Stewardship Council (FSC) mix certified, ensuring fibres are sourced from certified and well managed forests. The stock 55% recycled (30% pre consumer, 25% post- Cert no. L2/0011.2010 consumer) and has an ISO 14001 Environmental Certification. ISBN 978-0-9871120-1-9 Gorgon Project Osaka Gas | Tokyo Gas | Chubu Electric Power Chevron’s Policy on Working in Sensitive Areas Protecting the safety and health of people and the environment is a Chevron core value. About the Authors Therefore, we: • Strive to design our facilities and conduct our operations to avoid adverse impacts to human health and to operate in an environmentally sound, reliable and Dr Dorian Moro efficient manner. • Conduct our operations responsibly in all areas, including environments with sensitive Dorian Moro works for Chevron Australia as the Terrestrial Ecologist biological characteristics. in the Australasia Strategic Business Unit. His Bachelor of Science Chevron strives to avoid or reduce significant risks and impacts our projects and (Hons) studies at La Trobe University (Victoria), focused on small operations may pose to sensitive species, habitats and ecosystems. This means that we: mammal communities in coastal areas of Victoria. His PhD (University • Integrate biodiversity into our business decision-making and management through our of Western Australia)
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Nest Construction in Swallows (Hirundinidae) Is Associated with the Decrease of Clutch Size
    © Biologiezentrum Linz/Austria; download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Linzer biol. Beitr. 38/1 711-716 21.7.2006 The evolution of nest construction in swallows (Hirundinidae) is associated with the decrease of clutch size P. HENEBERG A b s t r a c t : Variability of the nest construction in swallows (Hirundinidae) is more diverse than in other families of oscine birds. I compared the nest-building behaviour with pooled data of clutch size and overall hatching success for 20 species of swallows. The clutch size was significantly higher in temperate cavity-adopting swallow species than in species using other nesting modes including species breeding in evolutionarily advanced mud nests (P<0.05) except of the burrow-excavating Bank Swallow. Decrease of the clutch size during the evolution of nest construction is not compensated by the increase of the overall hatching success. K e y w o r d s : Hirundinidae, nest construction, clutch size, evolution Birds use distinct methods to avoid nest-predation: active nest defence, nest camouflage and concealment or sheltered nesting. While large and powerful species prefer active nest-defence, swallows and martins usually prefer construction of sheltered nests (LLOYD 2004). The nests of swallows vary from natural cavities in trees and rocks, to self-exca- vated burrows to mud retorts and cups attached to vertical faces. Much attention has been devoted to the importance of controlling for phylogeny in com- parative tests (HARVEY & PAGEL 1991), including molecular phylogenetic studies of swallows (WINKLER & SHELDON 1993). Interactions between the nest-construction va- riability and the clutch size, however, had been ignored.
    [Show full text]
  • ISPL-Insight-Aussie-Backyard-Bird-Count
    Integrate Sustainability 18 October 2019 Environment Unique Birds of Australia: The Aussie Backyard Bird Count Samantha Mickan – Environmental Specialist It’s that time of year again, time for the Aussie Backyard Bird Count (Backyard Bird Count). Now in its 6th year, the Aussie Backyard Bird Count is occurring between 21st till the 27th of October and is facilitated by Birdlife Australia. Over the course the week participants are encouraged to observe birds around them for 20 minutes using the Aussie Backyard Bird Count app. What is cool is you don’t have to stay in your backyard, you can visit your local pack, nature reserve or head to the beach. Who can’t find 20 minutes, to stop and observe bird occurring in your local area? Who is BirdLife Australia? Birdlife Australia is the largest, independent, non-profit bird conservation organisation in Australia. They run the Backyard Bird Count each year to obtain valuable data on bird communities throughout Australia. The trends extrapolated from this data can be used to get a glimpse into the changes bird populations are undergoing, and subsequently the environment, as Australia’s Unique changes in populations are a reflection of changes in the environment. The count is Birds held in October each year to capture migratory birds which are returning to Australia from the northern hemisphere for nesting, breeding and flocking. Many of these migratory birds are water birds that flock to our coasts where most human populations are situated, making it an ideal time of year for counts. Backyard Bird Count Results 2018 In 2018, 76,918 people in Australia counted 2,751,113 birds over the 7-days period.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft National Recovery Plan for the Australian Fairy Tern Sternula Nereis Nereis
    Draft National Recovery Plan for the Australian Fairy Tern Sternula nereis nereis The Species Profile and Threats Database pages linked to this recovery plan is obtainable from: http://www.environment.gov.au/cgi-bin/sprat/public/sprat.pl Image credit: Adult Australian Fairy Tern (Sternula nereis nereis) over Rottnest Island, Western Australia © Georgina Steytler © Copyright Commonwealth of Australia, 2019. The National Recovery Plan for the Australian Fairy Tern (Sternula nereis nereis) is licensed by the Commonwealth of Australia for use under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence with the exception of the Coat of Arms of the Commonwealth of Australia, the logo of the agency responsible for publishing the report, content supplied by third parties, and any images depicting people. For licence conditions see: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. This report should be attributed as ‘National Recovery Plan for the Australian Fairy Tern (Sternula nereis nereis), Commonwealth of Australia 2019’. The Commonwealth of Australia has made all reasonable efforts to identify content supplied by third parties using the following format ‘© Copyright, [name of third party] ’. Disclaimer While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure that the contents of this publication are factually correct, the Commonwealth does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the contents, and shall not be liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of, or reliance on, the
    [Show full text]
  • LOCAL ACTION PLAN for the COORONG FAIRY TERN Sternula
    LOCAL ACTION PLAN FOR THE COORONG FAIRY TERN Sternula nereis SOUTH AUSTRALIA David Baker-Gabb and Clare Manning Cover Page: Adult Fairy Tern, Coorong National Park. P. Gower 2011 © Local Action Plan for the Coorong Fairy Tern Sternula nereis South Australia David Baker-Gabb1 and Clare Manning2 1 Elanus Pty Ltd, PO BOX 131, St. Andrews VICTORIA 3761, Australia 2 Department of Environment and Natural Resources, PO BOC 314, Goolwa, SOUTH AUSTRALIA 5214, Australia Final Local Action Plan for the Department of Environment and Natural Resources Recommended Citation: Baker-Gabb, D., and Manning, C., (2011) Local Action Plan the Coorong fairy tern Sternula nereis, South Australia. Final Plan for the Department of Environment and Natural Resources. Acknowledgements The authors express thanks to the people who shared their ideas and gave their time and comments. We are particularly grateful to Associate Professor David Paton of the University of Adelaide and to the following staff from the Department of Environment and Natural Resources; Daniel Rogers, Peter Copley, Erin Sautter, Kerri-Ann Bartley, Arkellah Hall, Ben Taylor, Glynn Ricketts and Hafiz Stewart for the care with which they reviewed the original draft. Through the assistance of Lachlan Sutherland, we thank members of the Ngarrindjeri Nation who shared ideas, experiences and observations. Community volunteer wardens have contributed significant time and support in the monitoring of the Coorong fairy tern and the data collected has informed the development of the Plan. The authors gratefully appreciate that your time volunteering must be valued but one can never put a value on that time. Executive Summary The Local Action Plan for the Coorong fairy tern (the Plan) has been written in a way that, with a minimum of revision, may inform a National and State fairy tern Recovery Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Birdquest Australia (Western and Christmas
    Chestnut-backed Button-quail in the north was a bonus, showing brilliantly for a long time – unheard of for this family (Andy Jensen) WESTERN AUSTRALIA 5/10 – 27 SEPTEMBER 2017 LEADER: ANDY JENSEN ASSISTANT: STUART PICKERING ! ! 1 BirdQuest Tour Report: Western Australia (including Christmas Island) 2017 www.birdquest-tours.com Western Shrike-tit was one of the many highlights in the southwest (Andy Jensen) Western Australia, if it were a country, would be the 10th largest in the world! The BirdQuest Western Australia (including Christmas Island) 2017 tour offered an unrivalled opportunity to cover a large portion of this area, as well as the offshore territory of Christmas Island (located closer to Indonesia than mainland Australia). Western Australia is a highly diverse region with a range of habitats. It has been shaped by the isolation caused by the surrounding deserts. This isolation has resulted in a richly diverse fauna, with a high degree of endemism. A must visit for any birder. This tour covered a wide range of the habitats Western Australia has to offer as is possible in three weeks, including the temperate Karri and Wandoo woodlands and mallee of the southwest, the coastal heathlands of the southcoast, dry scrub and extensive uncleared woodlands of the goldfields, coastal plains and mangroves around Broome, and the red-earth savannah habitats and tropical woodland of the Kimberley. The climate varied dramatically Conditions ranged from minus 1c in the Sterling Ranges where we were scraping ice off the windscreen, to nearly 40c in the Kimberley, where it was dust needing to be removed from the windscreen! We were fortunate with the weather – aside from a few minutes of drizzle as we staked out one of the skulkers in the Sterling Ranges, it remained dry the whole time.
    [Show full text]
  • A Preliminary Risk Assessment of Cane Toads in Kakadu National Park Scientist Report 164, Supervising Scientist, Darwin NT
    supervising scientist 164 report A preliminary risk assessment of cane toads in Kakadu National Park RA van Dam, DJ Walden & GW Begg supervising scientist national centre for tropical wetland research This report has been prepared by staff of the Environmental Research Institute of the Supervising Scientist (eriss) as part of our commitment to the National Centre for Tropical Wetland Research Rick A van Dam Environmental Research Institute of the Supervising Scientist, Locked Bag 2, Jabiru NT 0886, Australia (Present address: Sinclair Knight Merz, 100 Christie St, St Leonards NSW 2065, Australia) David J Walden Environmental Research Institute of the Supervising Scientist, GPO Box 461, Darwin NT 0801, Australia George W Begg Environmental Research Institute of the Supervising Scientist, GPO Box 461, Darwin NT 0801, Australia This report should be cited as follows: van Dam RA, Walden DJ & Begg GW 2002 A preliminary risk assessment of cane toads in Kakadu National Park Scientist Report 164, Supervising Scientist, Darwin NT The Supervising Scientist is part of Environment Australia, the environmental program of the Commonwealth Department of Environment and Heritage © Commonwealth of Australia 2002 Supervising Scientist Environment Australia GPO Box 461, Darwin NT 0801 Australia ISSN 1325-1554 ISBN 0 642 24370 0 This work is copyright Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Supervising Scientist Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction
    [Show full text]
  • REVIEWS Edited by J
    REVIEWS Edited by J. M. Penhallurick BOOKS A Field Guide to the Seabirds of Britain and the World by is consistent in the text (pp 264 - 5) but uses Fleshy-footed Gerald Tuck and Hermann Heinzel, 1978. London: Collins. (a bette~name) in the map (p. 270). Pp xxviii + 292, b. & w. ills.?. 56-, col. pll2 +48, maps 314. 130 x 200 mm. B.25. Parslow does not use scientific names and his English A Field Guide to the Seabirds of Australia and the World by names follow the British custom of dropping the locally Gerald Tuck and Hermann Heinzel, 1980. London: Collins. superfluous adjectives, Thus his names are Leach's Storm- Pp xxviii + 276, b. & w. ills c. 56, col. pll2 + 48, maps 300. Petrel, with a hyphen, and Storm Petrel, without a hyphen; 130 x 200 mm. $A 19.95. and then the Fulmar, the Gannet, the Cormorant, the Shag, A Guide to Seabirds on the Ocean Routes by Gerald Tuck, the Kittiwake and the Puffin. On page 44 we find also 1980. London: Collins. Pp 144, b. & w. ills 58, maps 2. Storm Petrel but elsewhere Hydrobates pelagicus is called 130 x 200 mm. Approx. fi.50. the British Storm-Petrel. A fourth variation in names occurs on page xxv for Comparison of the first two of these books reveals a ridi- seabirds on the danger list of the Red Data Book, where culous discrepancy in price, which is about the only impor- Macgillivray's Petrel is a Pterodroma but on page 44 it is tant difference between them.
    [Show full text]