Desireemartinez.Pdf
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
From the Office of Certified Genealogist & Researcher Lorraine “Rain Cloud” Escobar, CG/NALSM Inam Mec Tanotc The True Lineage of Desiree Renee Martinez (born 1973) By Lorraine Escobar, CG December 2, 2015 Introduction At the request of Chairman Andrew Salas, of the Kizh Nation, Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians, in response to his claims that Desiree Renee Martinez is not a descendant of Gabrieleno, or California, Indians, I agreed to conduct a genealogical investigation of her lineage. The result of this investigation demonstrates Martinez is not of Gabrieleno or California Indian descent. This report provides the evidence and analysis which led to that conclusion. There is no doubt Martinez has presented herself as a Gabrieleno [aka Tongva]. Without going into the many sources there are on this topic, this much is clear from her own words as published in O, My Ancestor, Recognition and Renewal for the Gabrielino Tongva People of the Los Angeles Area. 1 Considering her true lineage, it is possible she, like many others, was misled by the unsubstantiated paperwork generated by the Bureau of Indian Affairs in response to the 1928 California Indian Judgment Act [CIJA]. But, it is unknown to this author if Martinez knowingly deceived agencies and individuals or if she was simply too naïve and/or negligent in her responsibility to verify her claims. To be clear, this report addresses the facts, not her motives. Therefore, I have requested Chairman Salas to deliver a copy of this report to Martinez before placing it in the public domain. In view of my conclusion, the reader may deem it odd that some of the evidence states some of Martinez’s ancestors were Indian. [See Appendix I & II] But, like many others, her family’s story of being Native American had a beginning around 1930. Many of her ancestors had a historical association with Mission San Gabriel. Then, in 1928, the United States Congress passed a law to reimburse California Indian descendants for undelivered treaty land. During the Great Depression Era, many Spanish-Mexican families took advantage of the 1928 CIJA enrollment process (1929-1932) which meant money and services even though they were not California Indians. Then, as two more CIJA enrollment periods came and went (1950 and 1969), second and third generations were just learning they were “Indian” because of something their parents or grandparents did in 1928. From there, the stories seem to build, especially in face of the federal acknowledgment process (for tribes) and a desire to recover a story, and culture that, actually, does not belong to them. But, now that the truth and real evidence is readily 1 Jurmain, Claudia & McCawley, William, O, My Ancestor, “A Conversation with Desiree Martinez,” (Berkeley: Heyday, 2009), pp. 175-192. No photocopy provided. PO Box 579741, Modesto, CA 95357 Hm: (209) 524-6348 Cell: (209) 985-9282 [email protected] The True Lineage of Desiree Martinez By Lorraine Escobar, CG Page 2 of 40 available, many of these “Indian” stories are now coming to an end. This is the case for Desiree Martinez.2 In her interview, Martinez claimed her “Tongva” lineage comes through her maternal grandmother. Accordingly, she gave some clues for this genealogy which I was able to verify: 1. Her age was 34 (at the time of the interview); 2. Her mother was born in 1947; 3. Her maternal grandmother was born in 1922; 4. Her maternal grandmother had six siblings, some of which attended the Sherman Institute (school for Indians). 5. Her maternal great-grandparents were born in the 1880’s; and, 6. Her maternal great-grandmother died in 1934. The evidence supports these facts but it refutes her claim about being a Gabrieleño Indian. So, by working in tandem with the clues from that interview, the correct lineage can now be revealed. All of the reviewed evidence was evaluated according to genealogical proof standards and is cited in this report as appropriate. Photocopies of the evidence were arranged in separate files which are included in the submission of this report. As directed by Chairman Salas, the cited evidence was submitted to the Gabrieleño Tribe for their use in defending their tribal petition for federal acknowledgment. Additional copies of this report and attached evidence are available upon request directly from Chairman Salas. Acronyms and General Notes Pedigree Chart Notes As most extensive genealogies go, it is generally difficult to follow each generation through the written word. But, one characteristic of this lineage might make it particularly difficult to follow; due to two unions between relatives, the pedigree chart shows a repeat of Valenzuela and Ontiveros ancestors. One union was between first cousins and the other was between a second-cousin and a second-cousin, once removed. So, in order to best follow the persons being discussed in this report, I highly recommend using the accompanying genealogical pedigree chart as a guide [enclosed in left pocket of the binder in which the report and evidence are assembled and presented]. Transcription Notes The bold and Italics font is used to highlight the name or term exactly as it was spelled in the referenced document. If a name is spelled differently than what might be expected as 2 See Appendix I, Timeline of Martinez/Bermudes Ethnic Identifications 1900 to Present. 2 The True Lineage of Desiree Martinez By Lorraine Escobar, CG Page 3 of 40 the usual spelling, it is not a typo. Rather, it is a means to illustrate the exact spellings (or dates) as they were seen in the referenced document. The term—sic—is a designation to show the transcriber acknowledges the name was spelled as such in the original document and no effort was made to correct that spelling. Terms or missing letters that provide clarification are inserted in brackets [ ]. Acronyms & Terms abt about aft after B baptism record BC birth certificate bap baptized C confirmation record BP Catholic Church, Santa Barbara Presidio Chapel, Santa Barbara, CA CME California Mission Extractions, as compiled by Thomas Temple Workman II, Cindy Buglio, Marie Northrop, et al; on file with the Genealogical Society of Utah D burial record DC death certificate ECPP The Huntington Library, Early California Population Project, 2006, Database of the California Mission Records 1769-1850 FHL Family History Library, Genealogical Society of Utah LA La Plaza Church, Los Angeles, CA M marriage record Razon A term taken from the phrase—Gente de Razon [literally, people of reason]—used by the mission priests to describe persons who were not Indians. SBV Catholic Church, Mission San Buenaventura, Ventura, CA SCL Catholic Church, Mission Santa Clara, Santa Clara, CA SD Catholic Church, Mission San Diego, San Diego, CA SG Catholic Church, Mission San Gabriel, San Gabriel, CA Generation 1 Desiree Renee Martinez (born 1973) According to her county-issued birth certificate, Desiree Renee Martinez was born September 19, 1973, in Arcadia, Los Angeles County, California.3 Her parents were identified as Carol Cortez, 25 years old, born in California, and David George Martinez, 29 years old, born in California. The mother’s residence was given as 4036 Gilman, El Monte, California. Both parents were identified as Caucasian. The informant’s name was 3 Martinez, Desiree Renee (1973), birth certificate (informational copy); issued County of Los Angeles-Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk, California, 2 Jun 2015. 3 The True Lineage of Desiree Martinez By Lorraine Escobar, CG Page 4 of 40 blacked out on the certificate but it was reviewed and signed on September 19, 1973. As per the usual routine, the mother was likely the informant, which indicates she thought of herself as Caucasian and not Native American Indian. [See Generation 2 for Desiree Martinez’s parents.] Generation 2 Carol Ann Cortez (born 1947) & David George Martinez (born 1944) According to the county-issued birth certificate of Carol Ann Cortez, she was born November 22, 1947, in Montebello, California.4 Her parents were identified as Lupe Martinez, Mexican, age: 25, born in California, and Roy Perez Cortez, Mexican, age: 27, born in Idaho. The mother’s mailing address was given as 213 Bluff Road, Montebello, California. All information was furnished by Mrs. Cortez, Mother,” which indicates she thought of herself as Mexican and not Native American Indian. The county-issued birth certificate for David George Martinez indicated he was born June 1, 1944, in Belvedere Township, California.5 His parents were identified as Beatrice Cardenas, age: 22, Mexican, and born in Mexico, and Frank J. Martinez, age: 26, Mexican, and born in Texas. Since David’s lineage traces to Mexico and Texas, these facts eliminate Martinez’s father as possessing any California Indian blood. According to their marriage certificate, David Martinez and Carol Cortez were married in Clark County, Nevada, on May 29, 1970.6 While the marriage affidavit did not name the parents, it confirmed their birth dates as June 1, 1944, for David, and November 22, 1947, for Carol.7 It also stated the bride was a resident of El Monte, California. [See Generation 3 for Carol Cortez’s parents.] Generation 3 Lupe Martinez (born 1922) & Roy Perez Cortez (1921-2004) Since Martinez claims her maternal grandfather [Roy Perez Cortez] was Mexican, and this claim is supported by her mother’s birth certificate, his lineage is eliminated for the purposes of this report. 4 Cortez, Carol Ann (1947), certificate of live birth (informational copy), issued by County of Los Angeles-Register-Recorder/County Clerk, CA, on 18 Jun 2015. 5 Martinez, David George (1944); certificate of live birth (informational copy), issued by County of Los Angeles-Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk, CA, on 18 Jun 2015. 6 Martinez/Cortez (1970), certified marriage certificate No.