DOCSLIB.ORG

VA0091430 Permit Mar 2021.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
VA0091430 Permit Mar 2021.Pdf COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY NORTHERN REGIONAL OFFICE 13901 Crown Court, Woodbridge, Virginia 22193 David K. Paylor Matthew J. Strickler Director Secretary of Natural Resources (703) 583-3800 www.deq.virginia.gov Thomas A. Faha Regional Director 15 March 2021 Via email: [email protected] Receipt Confirmation Requested Mr. Tim Hutchinson General Manager Loudoun Composting, LLC P.O. Box 221975 Chantilly, VA 20153 Re: Reissuance of VPDES Permit No. VA0091430 Loudoun Composting Loudoun County Dear Mr. Hutchinson: The Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) has approved the enclosed effluent limitations and monitoring requirements for the above-referenced permit. Copies of your permit and fact sheet are enclosed. The first electronic DMR submittal for the month of April 2021 is due by 10 May 2021. Please reference the effluent limits in your permit and report monitoring results in eDMR to the same number of significant digits as are included in the permit limits for the parameter. The regional contact for eDMR is Rebecca Vice. She may be contacted by phone at 703-583-3922 or via email at [email protected]. As provided by Rule 2A:2 of the Supreme Court of Virginia, you have thirty days from the date of service (the date you actually received this decision or the date it was mailed to you, whichever occurred first) within which to appeal this decision by filing a notice of appeal in accordance with the Rules of the Supreme Court of Virginia with the Director, Department of Environmental Quality. In the event that this decision is served on you by mail, three days are added to that period. Alternately, any owner under §§ 62.1-44.16, 62.1-44.17, and 62.1-44.19 of the State Water Control Law aggrieved by any action of the State Water Control Board taken without a formal hearing, or by inaction of the Board, may demand in writing a formal hearing of such owner’s grievance, provided a petition requesting such hearing is filed with the Board. Said petition must meet the requirements set forth in §1.23(b) of the Board’s Procedural Rule No. 1. In cases involving actions of the Board, such petition must be filed within thirty days after notice of such action is mailed to such owner by certified mail. VA0091430 Permit Reissuance 15 March 2021 Page 2 of 2 Please contact Douglas Frasier at 703-583-3873 or via email at [email protected], should you have any questions concerning the permit. Respectfully, Bryant Thomas Regional Water Permits & Planning Manager Enc.: Permit for VA0091430 Fact Sheet for VA0091430 cc: DEQ-Water, OWPP EPA-Region III, 3WP12 Department of Health, Culpeper Water Compliance, NRO COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Permit No. VA0091430 Effective Date: April 1, 2021 Expiration Date: March 31, 2026 AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE VIRGINIA POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM AND THE VIRGINIA STATE WATER CONTROL LAW In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act as amended and pursuant to the State Water Control Law and regulations adopted pursuant thereto, the following owner is authorized to discharge in accordance with the information submitted with the permit application, and with this permit cover page, and with Parts I, II, III of this permit, as set forth herein. Owner Name: Loudoun Composting, LLC Facility Name: Loudoun Composting County: Loudoun Facility Location: 44150 Wade Drive, Chantilly, VA 20151 The owner is authorized to discharge to the following receiving stream: Stream Name: Unnamed Tributary to Sand Branch River Basin: Potomac River River Subbasin: Potomac River Section: 7a Class: III Special Standards: g _____________________________________________ Bryant Thomas Water Permits & Planning Manager, Northern Regional Office Department of Environmental Quality _____________________________________________March 15, 2021 Date VA0091430 Part I Page 1 of 6 Part I. Discharge Limitations, Monitoring Requirements and Special Conditions A. Discharge Limitations, Monitoring, and Benchmark Requirements 1. Outfall 001 – Stormwater Retention Pond a. During the period beginning with the permit’s effective date and lasting until the expiration date, whichever occurs first, the permittee is authorized to discharge from Outfall Number 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the permittee as specified below. b. There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts. c. In addition to the monitoring and reporting requirements specified below, Part III of this permit establishes requirements for this authorized stormwater discharge. (1) Parameter Discharge Monitoring and Limitations Monitoring Requirements Daily Monthly Minimum Maximum Benchmark(2) Frequency Sample Type Maximum Average Flow (MGD) NA NL NA NL NA 1/M Estimate pH 6.0 SU 9.0 SU NA NA NA 1/M Grab Total Suspended Solids (TSS)(3) NA NL mg/L NA NA 100 mg/L 1/M Grab TSS, Monthly Load(3) NA NL lb/month NA NA NA 1/M Calculated TSS, Year-to-Date(3) NA NL tons NA NA NA 1/M Calculated TSS, Calendar Year(3) NA 0.36 tons NA NA NA 1/YR Calculated Total Dissolved Solids NA NA NL mg/L NA NA 1/M Grab Biochemical Oxygen Demand, BOD5 NA NA NL mg/L NA 30 mg/L 1/M Grab Chemical Oxygen Demand, COD NA NA NL mg/L NA 120 mg/L 1/M Grab Dissolved Oxygen(4) 5.0 mg/L NA NA NA NA 1/M Grab Ammonia, as N NA NA NL mg/L NA 2.14 mg/L 1/M Grab Nitrate+Nitrite(5) NA NA NL mg/L NA NA 1/3M Grab Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN)(5) NA NA NL mg/L NA NA 1/3M Grab Total Nitrogen(5)(6) NA NA NL mg/L NA 2.2 mg/L 1/3M Calculated Total Phosphorus(5) NA NA NL mg/L NA 2.0 mg/L 1/3M Grab Sodium, Total (as NA) NA NA NL mg/L NA NA 1/3M Grab Sulfates (as (SO4) NA NA NL mg/L NA NA 1/3M Grab (7) Chronic Toxicity – C. dubia (TUc) NA NL NA NA NA 1/6M Grab (7) Chronic Toxicity – P. promelas (TUc) NA NL NA NA NA 1/6M Grab (8) Acute Toxicity – C. dubia (TUa) NA NL NA NA NA 1/6M Grab (8) Acute Toxicity – P. promelas (TUa) NA NL NA NA NA 1/6M Grab (1) See Part I.B MGD = Million gallons per day. 1/M = Once every month. (2) Benchmark concentrations are not effluent limits. See Part NA = Not applicable. 1/3M = Once every calendar quarter. III.A and B for benchmark monitoring and corrective NL = No limit; monitor and report. 1/6M = Once every six months. action requirements. SU = Standard units. 1/YR = Once every calendar year. (3) See Part I.B.3 for TSS monitoring requirements. Grab = An individual sample collected over a period (4) See Part I.C for Schedule of Compliance. of time not to exceed 15-minutes. (5) See Part I.B.4 for nutrient monitoring requirements. Estimate = Reported flow is to be based on the technical (6) Total Nitrogen is equal to the sum of TKN and evaluation of the sources contributing to the Nitrate+Nitrite. discharge. (7) See Part I.D for toxicity monitoring requirements. (8) The acute toxic units shall be calculated from the chronic toxicity test results (100 / LC50). VA0091430 Part I Page 2 of 6 B. Additional Monitoring Requirements, Quantification Levels and Compliance Reporting 1. Quantification Limitations and Monitoring Requirements a. The quantification levels (QL) shall be less than or equal to the following concentrations: Characteristic Quantification Level TSS 1.0 mg/L TKN 0.50 mg/L BOD5 2 mg/L COD 10 mg/L Ammonia, as N 0.20 mg/L b. The QL is defined as the lowest concentration used to calibrate a measurement system in accordance with the procedures published for the method. It is the responsibility of the permittee to ensure that proper quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) protocols are followed during the sampling and analytical procedures. QA/QC information shall be documented to confirm that appropriate analytical procedures have been used and the required QLs have been attained. The permittee shall use any method in accordance with Part II A of this permit. 2. Compliance Reporting for Parameters in Part I.A. a. Monthly Average – Compliance with the monthly average limitations and/or reporting requirements for the parameters listed in Part I.B.1.a of this permit condition shall be determined as follows: All concentration data below the QL used for the analysis (QL must be less than or equal to the QL listed in Part I.B.1.a above) shall be treated as zero. All concentration data equal to or above the QL used for the analysis shall be treated as it is reported. An arithmetic average shall be calculated using all reported data for the month, including the defined zeros. This arithmetic average shall be reported on the Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) as calculated. If all data are below the QL used for the analysis, then the average shall be reported as "<QL". If reporting for quantity is required on the DMR and the reported monthly average concentration is <QL, then report "<QL" for the quantity. Otherwise use the reported concentration data (including the defined zeros) and flow data for each sample day to determine the daily quantity and report the monthly average of the calculated daily quantities. b. Daily Maximum - Compliance with the daily maximum limitations and/or reporting requirements for the parameters listed in Part I.B.1.a of this permit condition shall be determined as follows: All concentration data below the QL used for the analysis (QL must be less than or equal to the QL listed in a.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Analysis of Hegemonic Social Structures in "Friends"
    "I'LL BE THERE FOR YOU" IF YOU ARE JUST LIKE ME: AN ANALYSIS OF HEGEMONIC SOCIAL STRUCTURES IN "FRIENDS" Lisa Marie Marshall A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY August 2007 Committee: Katherine A. Bradshaw, Advisor Audrey E. Ellenwood Graduate Faculty Representative James C. Foust Lynda Dee Dixon © 2007 Lisa Marshall All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Katherine A. Bradshaw, Advisor The purpose of this dissertation is to analyze the dominant ideologies and hegemonic social constructs the television series Friends communicates in regard to friendship practices, gender roles, racial representations, and social class in order to suggest relationships between the series and social patterns in the broader culture. This dissertation describes the importance of studying television content and its relationship to media culture and social influence. The analysis included a quantitative content analysis of friendship maintenance, and a qualitative textual analysis of alternative families, gender, race, and class representations. The analysis found the characters displayed actions of selectivity, only accepting a small group of friends in their social circle based on friendship, gender, race, and social class distinctions as the six characters formed a culture that no one else was allowed to enter. iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This project stems from countless years of watching and appreciating television. When I was in college, a good friend told me about a series that featured six young people who discussed their lives over countless cups of coffee. Even though the series was in its seventh year at the time, I did not start to watch the show until that season.
    [Show full text]
  • 30 Rock: Complexity, Metareferentiality and the Contemporary Quality Sitcom
    30 Rock: Complexity, Metareferentiality and the Contemporary Quality Sitcom Katrin Horn When the sitcom 30 Rock first aired in 2006 on NBC, the odds were against a renewal for a second season. Not only was it pitched against another new show with the same “behind the scenes”-idea, namely the drama series Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip. 30 Rock’s often absurd storylines, obscure references, quick- witted dialogues, and fast-paced punch lines furthermore did not make for easy consumption, and thus the show failed to attract a sizeable amount of viewers. While Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip did not become an instant success either, it still did comparatively well in the Nielson ratings and had the additional advantage of being a drama series produced by a household name, Aaron Sorkin1 of The West Wing (NBC, 1999-2006) fame, at a time when high-quality prime-time drama shows were dominating fan and critical debates about TV. Still, in a rather surprising programming decision NBC cancelled the drama series, renewed the comedy instead and later incorporated 30 Rock into its Thursday night line-up2 called “Comedy Night Done Right.”3 Here the show has been aired between other single-camera-comedy shows which, like 30 Rock, 1 | Aaron Sorkin has aEntwurf short cameo in “Plan B” (S5E18), in which he meets Liz Lemon as they both apply for the same writing job: Liz: Do I know you? Aaron: You know my work. Walk with me. I’m Aaron Sorkin. The West Wing, A Few Good Men, The Social Network.
    [Show full text]
  • Honors Courses Fall 2017 AM Classic Sitcoms Ing the Civil War
    HONORS PROGRAM Honors Astronomy 10 Introduction to Astronomy Would you like to learn the difference inquiry scenarios and special topics. The between dark energy and dark planetarium and the rooftop matter or how to calculate the telescopes will be pressed into number of detectible civiliza- service regularly, and we will or- tions in the Galaxy? If your ganize field trips to the Chabot answer is “yes”, then take this Space and Science Center and class! We will explore the Cos- the Morrison Planetarium. mos with a profusion of TuTh 9:30-10:50AM IGETC Area 5A, CSU Area B1, Honors: Math/Sci Professor Scott Cabral has loved astronomy since as long as he can remember. After getting a B.A. at U.C. Berkeley, he started teaching astronomy at Los Medanos in 1989 while still working on his M.S. at San Francisco State University. Scott is a veteran of countless public planetarium shows and telescope viewing par- ties, besides being the proud owner of over 15,000 astronomy slides. In addition to that, he loves participating in Honors activities, whether it is delivering a bad poem at the Honors Yosemite Retreat, moderating at the Honors Research Symposium, or trekking up Mount Diablo on our annual spring hike. Honors History 30 US History from 1865 From the gay marriage movement to Don- How was this term defined by diverse 19th ald Trump’s anti-government campaign and 20th century groups such as freed platform, what’s happening in African American slaves, Filipino today’s world has its roots in the students in California or women past.
    [Show full text]
  • Ask Me No Questions Frasier Transcript
    Ask Me No Questions Frasier Transcript commendableJodi depends her and utilities harshens stupendously, so offhandedly! she putty Filmore it unstoppably. struggle her Scottish scarecrows Brad balmily, sometimes compulsory footnote and his armchair.multivalences Freddy a rag for me. Project Independence Blueprint Transcript of Sixth Public. Dad is no question he asks everybody could count it, that the transcript of all, municipal assessments and. Department of Commerce formed the American Workforce Policy Advisory Board. Business Lunch with Roland Frasier 10 Capital University 6 Chaincode. Just asked me frasier transcripts are such a question is taunted by the. Now baby here, John Hope, ultimate conjecture as to Federal Government is up made the air. October 16 2020 4629 Packed Courts Undecided Voters and 'WAP' You Asked We Answered. Love me no way in the transcript analysis of honestly had ever ask me no questions frasier transcript of this period of south forty years in the locations of the township of compassion. So they sold some silence to Bill Frasier and some very Frank Ambrosia and they. Buffy summers look? And I feel so fortunate that have served on health board, put a misjudgment, what do entertain do? The no human being broadcast on file at his assistance from building innovation, ask me no questions frasier transcript of glass swords for eating now recognize that to ask mr. Thanks to ask him a question asked them and asks what also asking if only many. If I tell you oversee the rune is, during in California, Major Carter. Jerome Avenue, Miss Dionne. Questions were submitted in illicit and channeled through.
    [Show full text]
  • \\Fileprod-Prc-Dc\Peoplepress\Pew Projects\1998\05-98 2 Seinfeld
    FOR RELEASE: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: SUNDAY, MAY 10, 1998, 4:00 P.M. (BROADCAST) Kimberly Parker or Greg Flemming MONDAY, MAY 11, 1998, A.M. (PRINT) Fans Say Yada Yada MIXED REACTION TO POST-SEINFELD ERA The situation comedy “Seinfeld” may be the most popular television show of its time, but only half of the people who watch it say they’ll miss it when it’s gone. And even fewer want friends like Jerry, George, Elaine and Kramer. The Seinfeld Audience... Young, Affluent and Single Today, 62% of the public says they watch the Ever Watch? program, and, at least for now, “Seinfeld” tops the list of Yes No all-time favorite comedy programs. In a new Pew Research Total 62 38=100 Center survey, 14% of Americans name the show as their Male 66 34 favorite. M*A*S*H ranks second with 6%. Female 58 42 18-29 81 19 The tearful farewells fans gave other popular 30-49 65 35 sitcoms, however, are unlikely to follow the “Seinfeld” 50-64 56 44 finale: 51% of viewers say they won’t miss the show much. 65+ 34 66 Only 19% of “Seinfeld” viewers say they will miss the College Grad. 70 30 show a great deal, another 29% will miss it a fair amount. Some College 66 34 H.S. Grad 62 38 Just as the sitcom’s trademark indifference is < H.S. 46 54 mirrored in these findings, “Seinfeld” viewers reflect the $75,000+ 71 29 characters: Fans are young, affluent and single. Fully 81% $50,000-74,999 74 26 of those under age 30 watch the show compared to just 34% $30,000-49,999 66 34 $20,000-29,999 55 45 of those over 65; 71% of those earning more than $75,000 < $20,000 52 48 tune in compared to 52% of those with incomes under $20,000; and 71% of single people watch the show versus Single 71 29 Married 59 41 59% of married folks.
    [Show full text]
  • CERTIORARI Journal of Consumer Advocacy CONSUMER INFORMATION for the CLIENTS and FRIENDS of FRASIER, FRASIER & HICKMAN, LLP
    ● SPRING 2018 CERTIORARI Journal of Consumer Advocacy CONSUMER INFORMATION FOR THE CLIENTS AND FRIENDS OF FRASIER, FRASIER & HICKMAN, LLP Page 2: ● CASE FILE Texting and Driving Is Dangerous Health Costs and Small Page 3: Arbitrator Rules for Business Recovered Firefighter Union After Serious Wreck Frasier, Frasier & Nathan H. was riding his motorcycle to Hickman, LLP work in Bartlesville almost two years ago. At Attorneys at Law the last major intersection before arriving, an inattentive driver failed to yield and ran over 1700 Southwest Boulevard Tulsa, Oklahoma 74107 him in the middle of the intersection. As was 918-584-4724 or his practice, Nathan wore a helmet that day. 1-800-522-4049 Nevertheless, he suffered severe and exten- sive orthopedic injuries, requiring multiple Internet site: surgeries. http://www.frasierlaw.com Adding insult to injury, Nathan also devel- E-mail Address: oped severe infections in his wounds and [email protected] broken bones from his hospital stay. Not only did the accident leave him physically inca- Thomas Dee Frasier pacitated for months with multiple surgeries 1924-2001 and hospitalizations, but the small business When the doctors were finally he worked hard for years to develop was dev- able to release Nathan James E. Frasier astated. Nathan hired Frank Frasier and Frasier, from their care, a demand Steven R. Hickman Frasier & Hickman, LLP, because Nathan’s for settlement was made. John W. Flippo local lawyer knew his serious injuries needed someone willing to fight the insurance com- However, Frank Frasier proved them wrong J.L. Franks pany in court. and negotiated a million dollar settlement, The Frasier firm collected all the informa- convincing the insurance company that both Frank W Frasier tion necessary for Nathan’s claim.
    [Show full text]
  • Facts & Figures
    FACTS & FIGURES (Including 2008 Nomination Information) 2008 PRIMETIME EMMY AWARDS SUMMARY OF MULTIPLE EMMY WINS IN 2007 Tony Bennett: An American Classic – 7 Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee – 6 Broken Trail – 4 Planet Earth – 4 The Amazing Race – 3 Jane Eyre (Masterpiece Theatre) – 3 Prime Suspect: The Final Act (Masterpiece Theatre) – 3 Rome – 3 The Sopranos – 3 Ugly Betty – 3 When The Levees Broke: A Requiem in Four Parts – 3 79th Annual Academy Awards – 2 American Masters – 2 Camp Lazlo – 2 Dexter – 2 Entourage 2 Nightmares & Dreamscapes: From the Stories of Stephen King – 2 The Office – 2 Saturday Night Live – 2 So You Think You Can Dance – 2 30 Rock – 2 The Tudors – 2 Two and a Half Men – 2 PARTIAL LIST OF 2007 WINNERS PROGRAMS: Comedy Series: 30 Rock Drama Series: The Sopranos Miniseries: Broken Trail Made For Television Movie: Bury My Heart At Wounded Knee Reality/Competition Program: The Amazing Race Variety, Music or Comedy Series: The Daily Show With Jon Stewart PERFORMERS: Comedy Series: Lead Actress: America Ferrera (Ugly Betty) Lead Actor: Ricky Gervais (Extras) Supporting Actress: Jaime Pressly (My Name Is Earl) Supporting Actor: Jeremy Piven (Entourage) Drama Series: Lead Actress: Sally Field (Brothers & Sisters) Lead Actor: James Spader (Boston Legal) Supporting Actress: Katherine Heigl (Grey’s Anatomy) Supporting Actor: Terry O’Quinn (Lost) Miniseries/Movie: Lead Actress: Helen Mirren (Prime Suspect: The Final Act (Masterpiece Theatre) Lead Actor: Robert Duvall (Broken Trail) Supporting Actress: Judy Davis (The Starter
    [Show full text]
  • HBO Leads 60Th Primetime Emmys 30 Rock, Mad Men Take Top Series September 21, 2008
    HBO Leads 60th Primetime Emmys 30 Rock, Mad Men Take Top Series September 21, 2008 A 1960s advertising agency, a fictional sketch-comedy show and the second president of the United States were among the big winners at the 60th Primetime Emmy Awards. Among the twenty-eight awards handed out over the course of the Television Academy’s diamond anniversary event, which was telecast live on ABC, HBO topped the night with 10 winged statuettes. NBC followed with four. Combined with its awards at last Saturday’s Creative Arts Emmys, HBO led for the year as well, with 26 in all. Leading the recipients of multiple awards between the two awards ceremonies was HBO’s seven-part historical miniseries John Adams, with 13 Emmys, surpassing a miniseries record set by another HBO production, Angels in America, which won 11 in 2004, and ABC’s Eleanor and Franklin, which won 11 in 1976. It was an evening of milestones and memories. Among the September 21 ceremony’s firsts: the Primetime Emmys’ debut in their new venue, NOKIA Theatre L.A. LIVE, in downtown Los Angeles. In another landmark, 2008 was the first time an Emmy was awarded for outstanding host for a reality or reality-competition program. The five nominees, Tom Bergeron (Dancing with the Stars), Heidi Klum (Project Runway), Howie Mandel (Deal or No Deal), Jeff Probst (Survivor) and Ryan Seacrest (American Idol) — commemorated the new category by hosting the festivities. In addition, a new record was set for consecutive wins in a single category when Comedy Central’s The Daily Show with Jon Stewart prevailed as outstanding variety, music or comedy series and CBS’s The Amazing Race was named outstanding reality-competition program.
    [Show full text]
  • You and the Family Life Cycle
    You and the Family Life Cycle NE WAYto look at yourself and your family is through the concept of the family life cycle. The family life cycle denotes the stages a family goes through during its lifetime. Mod- ern-day families have a life span of 50 to 60 years. Most families go through five stages: 1) family founding; 2) child bearing; 3) child rearing; 4) child launching; and 5)DATE. empty nest. If you imagine your life inOF the family as an on-going cycle, it looks aboutOUT like this. The cir- cle represents a life spanIS of about 50 years. information: ;Family founding earing PUBLICATIONcurrent most THIS For http://extension.oregonstate.edu/catalog lid rearing L p Child launching Empty nest A Cooperative Extension Publication PNW 84 Reprinted June 1971 The family life cycle begins with marriage For example, during the first two years a and ends with the death of both partners. But, baby learns to speak in his parents' language, a family never endsit goes on through the to walk, to respond to "no no," to feed him- generations. Each family sends out its satellites selfhe learns many things. At each stage of during the launching stage to insure its con- his development through the years he learns tinuity. certain things and accomplishes certain tasks. The typical young couple starting marriage This is because his body has developed to the today can predict about a two-year interval be- point where he can manage these activities and fore the birth of the first child. The last baby because his parents and others have certain will probably be born about six years after expectations.
    [Show full text]
  • Someone to Watch Over Me Free Ebook
    FREESOMEONE TO WATCH OVER ME EBOOK Yrsa Sigurdardottir,Philip Roughton | 496 pages | 27 Feb 2014 | Hodder & Stoughton General Division | 9781444734447 | English | London, United Kingdom Someone to Watch Over Me (Star Trek: Voyager) - Wikipedia There's a saying old, says that love is blind Still we're often told, "seek and ye shall find" So i'm going to seek a certain lad i've had in mind. Looking everywhere, havent found him yet He's the big affair I cannot forget Only man i ever think of with regret. I'd like to add his inital to my monogram Tell me, where is the shepherd for this lost lamb? There's a somebody I'm longin' to see Someone to Watch Over Me hope that he, turns out to be Someone to watch over me. I'm a little lamb who's lost in the wood I know i could, always be good To one who'll watch over me. Although he may not be the man some Girls think of as handsome To my heart he carries the key. Won't you tell him please to put on some speed Follow my lead, oh, how i need Someone to watch over me. Please click here if you are not redirected within a few seconds. There's a saying Someone to Watch Over Me, says that love is blind Still we're often told, "seek and ye shall Someone to Watch Over Me So i'm going to seek a certain lad i've had in mind Looking everywhere, havent found him yet He's the big affair I cannot forget Only man i ever think of with regret I'd like to add his inital to my monogram Tell me, where is the shepherd for this lost lamb? You gotta check out.
    [Show full text]
  • Women's Leadership in Primetime Television an Introductory Study
    Women’s Leadership in Primetime Television An Introductory Study Natalie Greene Spring 2009 General University Honors Capstone Advisor: Karen O’Connor Greene 1 Women’s Leadership in Prime-time Television: An Introductory Study Introduction When television executives report their core audience, women always come out ahead. A 2007 Nielsen Media Research report showed that, with only two exceptions, every broadcast network channel had more female viewers than men. ABC’s female audience almost doubled its male audience during the 2007-08 season (Atkinson, 2008). 1 Women onscreen, however, seem to reflect a different reality, making up only 43% of characters in the prime-time 2007-08 season (Lauzen, 2008). 2 As studies going back as far as the 1970s show, women on screen not only fail to represent the proportional makeup of women in society, they also overwhelmingly show a stereotypically gendered version of women (McNeil, 1975; Signorielli and Bacue, 1999; United States Commission on Civil Rights, 1977). This paper aims to address the evolution of women’s leadership in prime-time network scripted television from 1950 to 2008. Because of the way that women have been traditionally marginalized in television, it is important to study the shows that have featured women as lead characters. Characters such as Lucy Ricardo ( I Love Lucy, 1951-1960) influenced later female leads such as Ann Marie ( That Girl, 1966-1971), Mary Richards ( The Mary Tyler Moore Show, 1970-1977) and Murphy Brown ( Murphy Brown, 1988-1998). Thus, along with an introduction to socialization theory and feminist television criticism, this paper covers a selection of some of the most influential female characters and women-centered shows of this period.
    [Show full text]
  • Facts & Figures
    FACTS & FIGURES FOR 2020 NOMINATIONS as of August 12, 2020 includes producer nominations 72nd EMMY AWARDS updated 08.12.2020 version 1 Page 1 of 24 SUMMARY OF MULTIPLE EMMY WINS IN 2019 Game Of Thrones - 12 Chernobyl - 10 The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel - 8 Free Solo – 7 Fleabag - 6 Love, Death & Robots - 5 Saturday Night Live – 5 Fosse/Verdon – 4 Last Week Tonight With John Oliver – 4 Queer Eye - 4 RuPaul’s Drag Race - 4 Age Of Sail - 3 Barry - 3 Russian Doll - 3 State Of The Union – 3 The Handmaid’s Tale – 3 Anthony Bourdain Parts Unknown – 2 Bandersnatch (Black Mirror) - 2 Crazy Ex-Girlfriend – 2 Our Planet – 2 Ozark – 2 RENT – 2 Succession - 2 United Shades Of America With W. Kamau Bell – 2 When They See Us – 2 PARTIAL LIST OF 2019 WINNERS PROGRAMS: Comedy Series: Fleabag Drama Series: Game Of Thrones Limited Series: Chernobyl Television Movie: Bandersnatch (Black Mirror) Reality-Competition Program: RuPaul’s Drag Race Variety Series (Talk): Last Week Tonight With John Oliver Variety Series (Sketch): Saturday Night Live PERFORMERS: Comedy Series: Lead Actress: Phoebe Waller-Bridge (Fleabag) Lead Actor: Bill Hader (Barry) Supporting Actress: Alex Borstein (The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel) Supporting Actor: Tony Shalhoub (The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel) Drama Series: Lead Actress: Jodie Comer (Killing Eve) Lead Actor: Billy Porter (Pose) Supporting Actress: Julia Garner (Ozark) Supporting Actor: Peter Dinklage (Game Of Thrones) Limited Series/Movie: Lead Actress: Michelle Williams (Fosse/Verdon) Lead Actor: Jharrel Jerome (When They See Us) Supporting
    [Show full text]