DOCSLIB.ORG

Ipa Adriatic Cross-Border Cooperation Programme

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ipa Adriatic Cross-Border Cooperation Programme Ref. Ares(2014)1692459 - 23/05/2014 4 EN ANNEX I IPA ADRIATIC CROSS-BORDER COOPERATION PROGRAMME 2007CB 16 IPO 001 IPA ADRIATIC CROSS-BORDER COOPERATION PROGRAMME – Version as of 22/05/2014 TABLE OF CONTENT LIST OF ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................................. 4 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 5 1-1- Summary of the Programme preparation ............................................................................... 5 1-2- The New Cooperation Framework ......................................................................................... 8 1-3- Programme Area .................................................................................................................... 8 1-4- Official Language ................................................................................................................. 12 2- ANALYSIS (TERRITORIAL, SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC CONTEXT OF THE PROGRAMME AREA) ................................................................................................................................................... 13 2-1- Preface ................................................................................................................................. 13 2-2- Territorial, social and economic context ............................................................................... 13 2-2-1- Territory ....................................................................................................................... 13 2-2-2- Environment ................................................................................................................ 17 2-2-3- Population .................................................................................................................... 19 2-2-4- Migratory flows ............................................................................................................ 20 2-2-5- Economy ...................................................................................................................... 22 2-2-6- Labour market ............................................................................................................. 24 2-2-7- Trade ........................................................................................................................... 25 2-2-8- Tourism ........................................................................................................................ 26 2-2-9- Infrastructures and accessibility .................................................................................. 28 2-2-10- Research and innovation ............................................................................................. 29 2-2-11- Governance and capacity building .............................................................................. 31 2-3- Swot analysis ....................................................................................................................... 33 2-4- Previous Experience of Cooperation in the Adriatic Area in ................................................ 38 3- PRINCIPAL FINDINGS OF EX-ANTE EVALUATION AND STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ...................................................................................................................................... 42 3-1- Ex-Ante Evaluation Synthesis .............................................................................................. 42 3-2- SEA Synthesis ..................................................................................................................... 44 4- PROGRAMME STRATEGY ......................................................................................................... 48 4-1- Strategy formulation process and identification of the objectives of the programme .......... 48 4-2- The principles adopted by the programme as a basis of the strategy ................................. 49 4-3- Programme Goal .................................................................................................................. 50 4-4- Priorities and Specific Objectives ......................................................................................... 53 4-5- Application of EU Principles ................................................................................................. 57 4-5-1- Promotion of sustainable development ....................................................................... 57 4-5-2- Promotion of equal opportunities and non-discrimination ........................................... 58 4-5-3- The competition rules .................................................................................................. 58 4-6- Compliance with other Policies and Programmes ............................................................... 58 4-6-1- Description of interventions within the Adriatic Cross-Border Cooperation Area. ....... 58 4-6-2- Programme coherence with strategies and ongoing Programmes ............................. 59 4-7- Types and characteristics of projects ................................................................................... 63 5- INTERVENTION PRIORITIES ...................................................................................................... 66 5-1- Priority 1 – Economic, social and institutional cooperation .................................................. 66 5-1-1- Measure 1.1 – Research and Innovation ................................................................... 66 5-1-2- Measure 1.2 – Financial Support for innovative SMEs ............................................... 67 5-1-3- Measure 1.3 – Social, Labour and Health Networks ................................................... 67 5-1-4- Measure 1.4 – Institutional Cooperation ..................................................................... 68 5-2- Priority 2 – Natural and Cultural Resources and Risk Prevention ....................................... 69 2 IPA ADRIATIC CROSS-BORDER COOPERATION PROGRAMME – Version as of 22/05/2014 5-2-1- Measure 2.1 – Protection and Enhancement of the Marine and Coastal Environment 69 5-2-2- Measure 2.2 – Natural and Cultural Resource Management and Prevention of Natural and Technological Risks ............................................................................................................... 70 5-2-3- Measure 2.3 – Energy Saving and Renewable Energy Resources ............................ 70 5-2-4- Measure 2.4 – Sustainable Tourism ............................................................................ 71 5-3- Priority 3 –Accessibility and Networks ................................................................................. 71 5-3-1- Measure 3.1 – Physical Infrastructure ......................................................................... 72 5-3-2- Measure 3.2 - Sustainable Mobility Systems ............................................................. 72 5-3-3- Measure 3.3 – Communication Networks ................................................................... 72 5-4- Priority 4 – Technical Assistance ......................................................................................... 73 5-4-1- Measure 4.1 - Administration and Implementation ...................................................... 73 5-4-2- Measure 4.2 – Information, Publicity and Evaluation .................................................. 73 5-5- Quantified Targets and Indicators ........................................................................................ 74 Priority 1 – Economic, social and institutional cooperation .......................................................... 76 5-5-1- Priority 2 – Natural and Cultural Resources and Risk Prevention .............................. 77 5-5-2- Priority 3 –Accessibility and Networks......................................................................... 78 5-5-3- Priority 4 – Technical Assistance ................................................................................ 79 6- FINANCIAL PROVISIONS ........................................................................................................... 80 6-1- Programme Budget and rate of Assistance ......................................................................... 80 6-2- Allocation of Funds ............................................................................................................... 82 7- IMPLEMENTING PROVISIONS FOR THE OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME ............................. 83 7-1- Programme Management .................................................................................................... 83 7-1-1- Joint Monitoring Committee ......................................................................................... 83 7-1-2- Joint Steering Committee ............................................................................................ 85 7-1-3- Managing Authority...................................................................................................... 85 7-1-4- Joint Technical Secretariat .......................................................................................... 86 7-1-5- The Office of the First Level Control ............................................................................ 87 7-1-6- The System of Decentralized Monitoring .................................................................... 87 7-1-7- Certifying Authority .....................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Impact of Bear-Vehicle Collisions on Slovenian-Croatian Brown Bear Population and Its Expansion Into the Alps
    IMPACT OF BEAR-VEHICLE COLLISIONS ON SLOVENIAN- CROATIAN BROWN BEAR POPULATION AND ITS EXPANSION INTO THE ALPS Action A.4: Impact of bear-vehicle collisions on brown bear population, determination of black spots and preparation of action plan of mitigation measures July, 2015 Project title and number: LIFE DINALP BEAR (LIFE13 NAT/SI/000550) Title of the report: Impact of bear-vehicle collisions on Slovenian-Croatian brown bear population and its expansion into the Alps Name of beneficiary: University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical faculty Department of forestry and renewable forest resources, Wildlife Ecology Research Group Večna pot 83, 1000 Ljubljana Responsible person: Klemen JERINA, University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty Authors: Tina LIČINA, University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty Miha KROFEL, University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty Slaven RELJIĆ, University of Zagreb, Veterinary Faculty Đuro HUBER, University of Zagreb, Veterinary Faculty Marko JONOZOVIČ, Slovenia Forest Service Matija STERGAR, Slovenia Forest Service Klemen JERINA, University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty Key words: brown bear, Ursus arctos, mortality, vehicle collisions, Slovenia, Croatia Place and date: Ljubljana, July 2015 - II - KAZALO 1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 1 2 MATERIAL AND METHODS OF WORK ..................................................................................... 3 2.1. Data on detected bear removal .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Telecom Policy Across the Former Yugoslavia: Incentives, Challenges, and Lessons Learned by Laura Hosman and Philip N
    JOURNAL OF INFORMATION POLICY 4 (2014): 67-104. TELECOM POLICY ACROSS THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA: INCENTIVES, CHALLENGES, AND LESSONS LEARNED BY LAURA HOSMAN AND PHILIP N. HOWARD† What is the recipe for good information policy? Hosman and Howard address this in an emerging economy context through case studies of six states that arose following the dissolution of the former Yugoslavia. These new nations pursued differing information policy paths that led to diverse outcomes. The authors find, in general, conventional positive outcomes supporting policies for privatization, liberalization, and competition; but at the same time discover many counterintuitive outcomes based on each country’s unique circumstances. General rules are good, but in specific cases alternative paths can also lead to success. INTRODUCTION Telecommunications policy has come to occupy an important position in the strategies of governments in emerging countries for promoting socio-economic growth. Economists have long acknowledged the significance of the telecommunications sector in its own right as a contributor to economic growth, and its multiplying effect for other sectors of the economy. Political scientists, sociologists, computer scientists, engineers, and development scholars all now have perspectives on how ICTs (information and communication technologies) can contribute to overall development and growth. Governments in developing countries recognize that ICT-oriented initiatives can be promoted through policy, but questions remain as to effective methods for doing so, particularly on a nationwide level. Some governments choose telecommunications policies that hinder technology diffusion, while others choose policies that appear to do a good job at encouraging technology diffusion and reaping subsequent economic rewards. The question of what makes for good policy has become a key issue area for academics and international organizations alike, with various recommendations emerging from numerous macro-level studies aimed at addressing this issue.
    [Show full text]
  • Action Plan for the Implementation of the Mitigation Measures for Reducing Road Mortality of Brown Bear in Slovenia
    ACTION PLAN FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MITIGATION MEASURES FOR REDUCING ROAD MORTALITY OF BROWN BEAR IN SLOVENIA Action A.4: Impact of bear-vehicle collisions on brown bear population, determination of black spots and preparation of action plan of mitigation measures June, 2015 Title of the report: Action plan for the implementation of mitigation measures for reducing road mortality of brown bear in Slovenia Title of the project: LIFE DINALP BEAR: Life 13 NAT /SI/000550: Population level management and conservation of brown bears in northern Dinaric Mountains and the Alps Contract no.: Slovenia Forest Service, 152/2014 ERICo Velenje, P 28-09-14 Name of beneficiary: ERICo Velenje, Ecological Research & Industrial Cooperation Ltd. University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical faculty, Department of forestry and renewable forest resources Responsible person: Samar Al Sayegh Petkovšek, ERICo Ltd. Authors: Samar Al Sayegh Petkovšek, ERICo Ltd. Boštjan Pokorny, ERICo Ltd. Zoran Pavšek, ERICo Ltd. Klemen Jerina, University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty Miha Krofel, University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty Tina Ličina, University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty Head of Department: Boštjan Pokorny, Ph.D. Velenje, 30 June 2015 ERICo d.o.o. Director: Marko MAVEC, M. Sc. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION……… ....................................................................................................................... 5 2 TRAFFIC RELATED BEAR MORTALITY IN SLOVENIA ...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Karstology in Motorway Construction on Classical Karst
    Geografski vestnik 84-1, 2012, 77–86 Articles ARTICLES KARSTOLOGY IN MOTORWAY CONSTRUCTION ON CLASSICAL KARST AUTHORS Martin Knez, Tadej Slabe Scientific Research Centre of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Karst Research Institute, Titov trg 2 , SI – 6230 Postojna, Slovenia knez@zrc -sazu.si, slabe@zrc -sazu.si UDC: 551.44:625.7/.8(497.472) COBISS: 1.02 ABSTRACT Karstology in motorway construction on Classical Karst One of the major ongoing projects in Slovenia was to link the country with modern motorways. Almost half of Slovenia is karst and more than half of its supply of water comes from karst aquifers. Slovenia is the home of the Classical Karst region – Kras. Karstologists have been involved in planning and construction of motorways. We have acquired a great deal of information about surface karst phenomena and the epikarst, and where excavation work has cut deeper in the surface and in tunnels, about the vadose zone and the paleokarst. Development of the karst usually left important traces, above all in the numerous old caves. More than 350 new caves have been opened. During the planning we tried to avoid important karst phe - nomena as are collapse dolines, large dolines, caves and karst walls and by impermeable construction of a roadway we tried to prevent the pollution flowing from it into underground waters. During the construction works we researched newly discovered karst features and tried to preserve as many as possible. KEY WORDS motorway construction, karstological monitoring, karst, karst cave, Classical Karst (Kras), Slovenia IZVLEČEK Krasoslovje in gradnja avtocest na matičnem Krasu Eden večjih projektov, ki potekajo v Sloveniji, je povezati državo s sodobnimi avtocestami.
    [Show full text]
  • Villes (Les) Moyennes Face À La Tertiarisation De L'économie
    UNIVERSITE PAUL CEZANNE AIX MARSEILLE III FACULTE ECONOMIE APPLIQUEE CERGAM-GREFI (EA-4225) LES VILLES MOYENNES FACE À LA TERTIARISATION DE L’ECONOMIE Recherche menée pour le PUCA Programme Lieux, flux, réseaux dans la ville des services Ministère de l’Ecologie, de l’Energie, du Développement Durable et de l’Aménagement du Territoire Direction Générale de l’Aménagement, du Logement et de la Nature MAPA F 06.29 (06 00 435) du 20 octobre 2006 Pierre-Yves LEO & Jean PHILIPPE, Responsables scientifiques, CERGAM-GREFI, université Paul Cézanne Aix Marseille III Metka STARE, Centre for International Relations, Faculty of Social Sciences, Ljubljana. Marie-Christine MONNOYER, IAE, université Toulouse 1. José A. CAMACHO BALLESTA, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresa, Universidad de Granada. José Luis NAVARRO ESPIGARES, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresa, Universidad de Granada. Octobre 2008 1 SOMMAIRE page 1 - PROBLEMATIQUE DU DEVELOPPEMENT DES VILLES MOYENNES 3 1.1 – Le concept de ville moyenne 4 1.2 – La tertiairisation de l’économie et les services aux entreprises 7 2.3 – Le concept de motricité des activités économiques 12 2 – LES VILLES MOYENNES DANS LE SYSTÈME URBAIN FRANÇAIS 18 2.1 – Poids économique des villes moyennes 18 2.2 – Services aux entreprises et hautes qualifications, un problème spécifique 20 2.3 – Typologie selon les activités économiques 22 2.4 – Bénéficier d’une décentralisation tertiaire ? 25 2.5 – Les moteurs économiques des villes moyennes 28 Conclusion 34 3 – LES CAS D’AVIGNON, GRENADE, LJUBLJANA ET TARBES
    [Show full text]
  • Andrej Mohar, Dark-Sky Slovenia, [email protected]
    Light Pollution: Why we cannot solve it? Andrej Mohar, Dark-Sky Slovenia, [email protected] Workshop on Light Pollution 2020 Prague, videoconference, May 14, 2020 Zaplana, one of the darkest places in Slovenia ... … with low clouds … Credit: Javor Kac Milky way at Grand Canyon Lights of Phoenix - 285 km A panorama from Porezen mountain, 1630m, almost darkest place in Slovenia Ljubljana ------- Italy ------ Health problems. It is necessary to sleep in total darkness. New hotel Aurora, Mali Lošinj, Croatia 3000 A simulation using 8 % annual growth 2500 Never ending 2500 % increase in next 40 years ? increase of light pollution! 2000 1500 Expected light pollution increase in EU? 1000 EU target of C02 8 % annual growth 500 emissions? was measured in Slovenia 1990-2005 0 2008 2011 2014 2017 2020 2023 2026 2029 2032 2035 2038 2041 2044 2047 2050 Light Pollution is so simple to solve like: 1+1 = ? But Climate change is extremelly difficult problem, practicaly impossible to solve, 1000-times more difficult than light pollution: And what environmentalists and governments do? They put all energy and money into climate change, despite that they are not able to solve super simple light pollution! At least 90% reduction of light pollution is possible in such way that people could not notice any change of light levels Why do we always fail? Maribor Slovenia has THE world‘s strongest light pollution law adopted in 2007 – it is not effective because it is still too soft Because of law, LP decreased in 2006 -2012 (ULOR 0 % helped) Since 2012 LP increases again because of EN 13201 and white 4000K LED Ljubljana, BTC (commercial center) as seen from Šmarna gora hill How much light do we send into Universe / per capita? Source: VIIRS Satellite 2019 Slovakia, Germany: Slovenia, Radiance Hungary: per person: Radiance per 42 person: units 63 units Czechia: Poland: Radiance per person: Radiance per person: 66units 83 units Matajur mountain, 1400m, border Slovenia - Italy Why are highways in Slovenia illuminated? Highway in Germany CIE DIV 4 member (20+ years?) Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitat Suitability Modelling for Red Deer (Cervus Elaphus L.) in South-Central Slovenia with Classification Trees
    Debeljak, M., Dzeroski, S., Jerina, K., Kobler, A., and Adamic, M. (2001). Habitat suitability modelling for red deer (Cervus elaphus L.) in South-central Slovenia with classification trees. Ecological Modelling 138: 321-330. Keywords: 8SI/Cervus elaphus/classification/classification tree/deer/distribution/geographic information system/GIS/habitat/habitat model/habitat suitability/home range/Malme/management/ model/models/population dynamics/red deer/Slovenia/spatial/spatial distribution Abstract: We study and assess the potential habitats of a population of red deer in South-central Slovenia. Using existing data on the deer population spatial distribution and size, as well as data on the landscape and ecological properties (GIS) of the area inhabited by this population, we develop a habitat suitability model by automated data analysis using machine learning of classification trees. We assume that the recorded observations of deer approximate the actual spatial distribution of the deer population reasonably well. The habitat suitability models for individual animals have the form of classification trees. The induced trees are interpreted by domain experts and a generic model is proposed. The generic habitat suitability models can help determine potential unoccupied habitats for the red deer population and develop guidelines for managing the development of the red deer population and its influence on the environment. Ecological Modelling 138 (2001) 321–330 www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolmodel Habitat suitability modelling for red deer (Cer6us elaphus L.) in South-central Slovenia with classification trees Marko Debeljak a,*, Sasˇo Dzˇeroski b, Klemen Jerina a, Andrej Kobler c, Miha Adamicˇ a a Uni6ersity of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty, Forestry Department, Vezˇna pot 83, 1000 Ljubljana, Slo6enia b Jozˇef Stefan Institute, Jamo6a 39, 1000 Ljubljana, Slo6enia c Slo6enian Forestry Institute, Vezˇna pot 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slo6enia Abstract We study and assess the potential habitats of a population of red deer in South-central Slovenia.
    [Show full text]
  • INSPIRIT FANTASY PARK, Pazin
    InsPIrIt FANTASY ParK, Pazin LOCATIon The Project is located in the largest Croatian peninsula, Istria, close to the small village of Lindar, 3 kilometers from the town of Pazin, the administrative center of Istria County. The location of the Project is a former military training site 454 Pazin meters above sea level, 30 kilometers from the Adriatic coast to its east and west, 50 kilometers from Pula airport and seaport in Rijeka as well. Lindar can be accessed by the motorway known as „Istrian Y“, connected to the highway, that further connects this region with other parts of the Croatia, Slovenia and Central Europe, so therefore over 3 million inhabitants within a radius of 200 km gravitate to this area. The Project holder is the City of Pazin and its implementation is supported by Istria County and the Ministry of Tourism, which has financed most of the required documentation. ProJect descrIPtIon Inspirit Fantasy Park is a new, unique and very atractive tourist project which includes construction of a theme amusement park on the area of approximately 10 hectares, owned by the Republic of Croatia. The projected facilities of the park are based on the stories of Istrian, Slavic and European mythology. The Project aims to create a place where visitors play with mythical creatures, and the Park, by use of modern technology, should be designed as an interactive world where legends mix with dream and reality, in which every visitor will have a sense of adventure in a magical environment. Beside entertainment the Park has multiple roles including a scientific and educational dimension.
    [Show full text]
  • Istria Estate & Country Club, Marlera Golf
    <<< back to the Table of Contents IsTRIa esTaTe & CoUnTRy ClUb, Marlera golf PRoJeCT desCRIPTIon The Istria Estate & Country Club in Croatia provides a unique investment opportunity with the possibility to participate in a premier high-end integrated golf and real estate development, with direct access to the sea and in a truly fascinating natural environment. The current master plan for the overall envisioned development stretching over 126 hectares of land is to include: t fve star luxury hotel with 170 rooms, extensive spa & Medulin Ližnjan Marlera wellness facilities, conference facilities, restaurants, bars, and a casino, t 114 residential units: 87 apartments with two or three bedrooms and 27 luxury villas, t 18+9 hole golf course and amenities. The golf course architect Graham Cooke & Associates from Canada has originally designed the golf course for the 1SPKFDU XIJMF#VMM4UPDLXFMM"MMFO B4BO'SBODJTDPCBTFE design frm was responsible for designing Marlera’s facility include the suitability of the site for the resort development, architecture including clubhouse. GTC has also partnered its excellent location and accessibility, the favorable up with Mark Hamlin of the SE Group, responsible for building permits obtained, the freehold residential landscape architecture, environmental and land planning. ownership options and the owner’s development track Among others, the unique selling points of the project record. oWneRsHIP sTRUCTURe GTC Group, headquartered in Poland, is a leading developer in Central and Eastern Europe. The company has a diverse experience in real estate development projects within the ofce, residential and commercial sectors, having played a major role in several large-scale projects. .BSMFSB(PMG-%-UE/PWB*TUSB*EFBVT-UEBSFUIFFOUJUJFTUIBUPXOUIFMBOEXIFSFUIF*TUSJB&TUBUF$PVOUSZ$MVCJTUPCF developed.
    [Show full text]
  • Transnational Summary Report on Current
    TRANSNATIONAL SUMMARY REPORT ON CURRENT MOBILITY AND TRANSPORT POLICY IN CE REGIONS Version 11 D.T1.1.1 Nov 2016 Title Transnational summary report on current mobility and transport policy in CE regions Deliverable D.T1.1.1 Authors Domokos Esztergár-Kiss, Tamás Mátrai, Tamás Tettamanti, Dénes Válóczi Contributors Elke Sumper, Peter Medved, Ján Roháč, Andrea Štulajterová, Barbara Cremonini, Guido Calvarese, Simona Sváčková, Petr Šmíd, Robert Sedlák, Martin Nawrath, Katja Karba, Mitja Kolbl, Miklós, Kózel, Botond Kővári, Péter Mándoki, Ferenc Mészáros, Zoltán Nagy, Tamás Soltész, Ádám Török, János Tóth Status Final Reviewed by DA Sinergija Submission 28.11.2016 Page 1 Contents 1. Executive summary ............................................................................. 5 2. Introduction ....................................................................................... 5 3. Synthesis of the regions report ............................................................... 6 4. Industrieviertel (Austria) ...................................................................... 7 4.1. Introduction to the region .......................................................................... 7 4.2. Description of the transport system .............................................................. 9 4.3. Governance structure and legal obligations ................................................... 11 4.4. Visions and goals .................................................................................... 12 5. Cityregion Bruck-Kapfenberg-Leoben
    [Show full text]
  • Transport & Logistics Investment Opportunities in Slovenia
    Transport & Logistics Investment Opportunities in Slovenia Investment in the Wake of Crisis 12 April 2011 Introduction . Developing Slovenia’s transportation and logistics infrastructure as one of the key development priorities . Excellent geographic position . Turning the country into a logistics hub would have multiplying effects on economic activity PwC 2 Stimulating the private sector . In the past the vast majority of Slovenia’s investments in infrastructure has come from the public sector; limited PPP track record . The public sector will continue to play the dominant role . Due to financial constraints more finance will need to come from the private sector . Project finance provides a logical means to deliver key infrastructure projects as it limits pressure on both short-term cash flows and reduces the need to borrow heavily . It will be important to stimulate the interest of the private sector – political commitment, appropriate regulatory framework, fiscal and other incentives Forecast 2011, 2012 net goverment lending/borrowing levels as % of GDP 15.0% 10.0% 5.0% 0.0% -5.0% 2011 -10.0% 2012 -15.0% Italy Israel Malta Spain Korea Japan aiwan Ireland Austria France Cyprus Iceland Greece Finland Norway T Canada Belgium Sweden Portugal Slovenia Australia Denmark Germany Singapore Switzerland Netherlands Luxembourg United States Czech Republic United Kingdom Slovak Republic Hong Kong SAR Source: World Economic Outlook Database, October 2010 edition: IMF PwC 3 Transport infrastructure PwC 4 Motorway network . Highways and accessory structures in Slovenia are managed by DARS, the state-owned Motorway Company of the Republic of Slovenia . Motorway construction in Slovenia is almost completed as the entire network bar some small sections has been completed .
    [Show full text]
  • Management of Brown Bears (Ursus Arctos) in Europe
    Management of Brown Bears (Ursus arctos) in Europe. Sybille A. Klenzendorf Thesis submitted to the faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Masters Of Science in Fisheries and Wildlife Sciences Dr. Michael R. Vaughan, Chairman Dr. Steve L. McMullin Dr. Dean F. Stauffer Dr. Wolfgang Schröder April 22, 1997 Blacksburg, Virginia Keywords: Brown bear, management, damage, Europe. Copyright 1997, Sybille A. Klenzendorf Management of Brown Bears (Ursus arctos) in Europe. Sybille A. Klenzendorf (Abstract) Successful conservation of brown bears (Ursus arctos) in Europe is associated with public acceptance of damages caused by bears. Recent increases in sheep depredation and beehive damage in central Austria resulted in the deaths of two bears there. Since bear numbers are low in most European populations, alternatives to the elimination of problem bears associated with damage incidents must be sought. The events described above led to the formation of the Bear Management Group responsible for designing a management plan for Austria that will outline procedures for dealing with bear damage and conservation strategies. This study provides an overview of the magnitude and seasonal patterns of brown bear damage in Romania, Italy, Slovenia, Norway, Sweden, and Austria. It also illustrates how bears are managed in European countries by comparing different management strategies for dealing with brown bear damage, describing how bear management is organized, determining which organizations are involved, and explaining which duties these fulfill. Bear damage data were obtained from interviews with wildlife managers, hunters, and farmers in Romania, Italy, Slovenia, Norway, Sweden, and Austria, and from official records of their bear management agencies.
    [Show full text]