Can Italy's Neo-Fascist Change His Stripes? Gianfranco Fini Rose to Prominence As a Champion of Mussolini

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Can Italy's Neo-Fascist Change His Stripes? Gianfranco Fini Rose to Prominence As a Champion of Mussolini Can Italy's Neo-Fascist Change His Stripes? Gianfranco Fini rose to prominence as a champion of Mussolini. Now he's moved to the center, and in so doing has become the country's most responsible right-wing politician. Frederika Randall December 16, 2009 | This article appeared in the December 21, 2009 edition of The Nation. Rome It was a lazy Sunday afternoon. In downtown Milan, Silvio Berlusconi had just finished whipping up the crowds at a party rally. Suddenly a man (later identified as a 42-year-old electronics expert in psychiatric care for at least a decade) lunged at the premier and hit him in the face with a souvenir miniature of the Milan cathedral. Minutes later, photos of Berlusconi's bloodied nose and jaw were zinging round the globe. His nose broken, lip split and two teeth fractured, the prime minister was expected to remain in the hospital at least a couple of days. From what we know, this was the kind of random attack that can happen to a politician anywhere, anytime. But opinion about Berlusconi is so polarized and so tense--even within his own party--that his supporters immediately blamed a "climate of violence" stirred up by the opposition. In truth, the hate talk today comes largely from the Berlusconi camp. For example: the premier himself recently threatened to "strangle" the authors of TV and literary fictions about the Mafia for giving Italy (and himself) a bad name. It was "a bad day for Italy," declared lower house speaker Gianfranco Fini, urging "all political forces to form a common front so that Italy does not relive its years of violence." Gianfranco Fini is one of those enigmas that make Italian politics inscrutable to all but Italians. Fifty-seven years old, a youthful militant and later party chief of the neo-Fascist Italian Social Movement (MSI), he used to be known for statements like "Mussolini was the greatest statesman of the century." That was in 1994. In 1995 he led a historic party congress that rebranded the MSI as the "post-Fascist" National Alliance (AN) and declared that the anti- Fascists had been "essential in bringing Italy back the democratic values Fascism had violated." It was quite an about-face, but then the 1990s were a time when just about all Italian politicians were repudiating something. The end of the cold war had abruptly snuffed out the raison d'être not only of the anti-Communist cold warriors who had long ruled Italy--the Christian Democrats and the Socialists--but also that of the Italian Communist Party. As the old parties withered, Berlusconi patched together a new kind of power, based on his money, his control of the media and his alliances with two previously unpresentable right-wing factions: the racist and xenophobic Northern League and the neo-Fascists. For a long time, no one to the left of Berlusconi took Fini seriously. On a visit to Israel in 2003, during Berlusconi's second government, Fini declared that the Fascist racial laws had been an "absolute evil of the twentieth century." The comment was dismissed as opportunism by Italians on both left and right, although inside his own party, a faction led by Alessandra Mussolini (granddaughter of the dictator) was incensed enough to found a breakaway right- wing movement. Fast-forward to the April 2008 elections, won by Berlusconi. Just weeks earlier, Fini had folded AN into the big man's just-minted People of Liberty party. As the effective party No. 2, Fini became president of the Chamber of Deputies, one of the highest national offices. Over the next year and a half, as Berlusconi--mired in sex scandals, an acrimonious and very expensive divorce settlement and even accusations of Mafia collusion--has abandoned all pretense he is governing Italy rather than simply protecting himself and his business interests, Fini has rather astonishingly emerged as the most farsighted and democratic-minded right-wing politician in Italy. It's as if the office he holds has rubbed off some of its weight and gravity on him--a weight and gravity sorely lacking in Berlusconi and his anti-immigrant Northern League allies. It helps to understand that Italy has never had a real conservative party. The all-powerful Christian Democrats, who governed from 1945 to 1992, talked of social "solidarity," rewarded their voters with fiscally irresponsible favors and didn't give a hoot about market forces, or law and order for that matter. "After the experience of Fascism, Italy, like Germany, excluded the right," says historian Sergio Luzzatto, "and even today the word 'right wing' remains taboo. While the French have no problem being de droite, nobody in Italy has the courage to say they're di destra." Although Berlusconi seemed to be a neoliberal when he came to power, he proved to be interested in only one market: the commercial TV he monopolized. Now Italy's economy is floundering, with small businesses going belly up, 2 million jobless and no prospects at all for the young (up to 50 percent of young people are unemployed in some regions, and university graduates are fleeing the country). While across Europe governments are pouring funds into research, universities and the knowledge economy, and into green and sustainable growth, Italy is doing nothing. Berlusconi, at the mercy of his Northern League allies, has passed more blame-the-victim bills to make life miserable for immigrants than measures to prop up the economy. Fini, meanwhile, has understood that immigrants not only make an economic contribution as workers and as business owners but that if they could vote, many of them might vote for a man much like himself. While the Northern League rails against blacks and Muslims, he has proposed that immigrants be allowed to vote in local elections, that children of legal immigrants born in Italy get citizenship and that the waiting period for adult citizenship be shortened. While Berlusconi has shamelessly chased Vatican backing with bills to make artificial life- support mandatory and to obstruct in vitro fertilization and the "morning after" pill, Fini has criticized such measures "based on ethical-religious dogmas," in his words, because they conflict with "the secular nature of our institutions." His think tank, Fondazione Farefuturo, has made the separation of church and state one of its leitmotifs, arguing that it is essential in a multicultural society like twenty-first-century Italy. Fini has also has repeatedly defended the judiciary branch whenever Berlusconi has attacked "Communist judges"--as he did in a highly embarrassing rant at the European Popular Party congress in Bonn on December 10. According to Paul Ginsborg, the pre-eminent historian of contemporary Italy, Fini represents an alternative right wing, "more respectful of democratic structures and more open on matters like immigration.... And to put it in a nutshell, you might say it's almost more important for Italy to have a decent right wing than a decent left." Recently--virtually alone in his party--Fini has begun to hint out loud that Emperor Berlusconi has no clothes. Not long ago, conversing with a judge on the podium at a conference before a microphone both thought was switched off, Fini was heard to say: "He doesn't know the difference between leadership and absolute monarchy...he thinks popular consensus...gives him a sort of immunity from any other kind of control. I told him in private, remember, they cut off the head of [Louis XVI], so take it easy." When various outraged exponents of the People of Liberty called for Fini to resign, he pointed out that his private comments were no different from what he has been saying about Berlusconi in public. It's true. But the question--as Stalin once asked of the Pope--is, How many divisions does Fini command? At present, his backing looks too thin to hope to wrest control of the party from Berlusconi. The prime minister's decline is likely to be "long and poisonous," predicted another Italian historian, Miguel Gotor. It's not that opposition is lacking: an amazing 3 million Italians came out to vote in the recent primary elections for the center-left Democratic Party, and in early December, hundreds of thousands participated in a "No-B Day" demonstration in Rome organized on Facebook by unaffiliated young people. But as long as the political opposition remains divided by genuine disagreements and sectarian disputes, it simply can't channel the widespread disapproval of the government. Unhappy is the country that has need of heroes, says the tormented Galileo in Brecht's drama. Certainly, no country in Western Europe is more unhappy these days than Italy. .
Recommended publications
  • Talking Turkey in Europe: Towards a Differentiated Communication Strategy
    December 2008 13 English There is no EU-wide debate on EU-Turkey rela- Series tions, but rather a set of overlapping yet distinct European debates reflecting the different actors, interests and ideas across the European mosaic. Talking Turkey II unpacks this complex reality by TALKING TURKEY analysing the positions of national stakeholders IN EUROPE: across the EU, the reactions of Turkish stakehol- ders to these EU debates, as well as the influen- TOWARDS A DIFFERENTIATED ce of the US in shaping European debates on Turkey. The underlying aim of this research is to COMMUNICATION STRATEGY develop an EU Communication Strategy for Tur- key. Based upon the findings of this project, a edited by Nathalie Tocci Communication Strategy ought to be differen- tiated and dynamic. It must also engage in a ge- nuine two-way communication with its interlo- cutors. It is only by Talking Turkey and making such talk a two-way street that Turkey’s Europe- Talking Turkey II an course may be strengthened in the long-term. IAI-TEPAV Project Quaderni IAI ISTITUTO AFFARI INTERNAZIONALI Istituto Affari Internazionali 00186 Roma - Via Angelo Brunetti, 9 Tel. 39-6-3224360 Fax 39-6-3224363 http://www.iai.it - e-mail: [email protected] Per ordini: [email protected] December 2008 13 English Series IAI TALKING TURKEY IN EUROPE: TOWARDS A DIFFERENTIATED COMMUNICATION STRATEGY edited by Nathalie Tocci Talking Turkey II IAI-TEPAV Project Quaderni IAI ISTITUTO AFFARI INTERNAZIONALI This project and publication has been made possible with the generous support of the Union of Chambers and Commodity Exchanges of Turkey, (TOBB), the Open Society Institute Assistance Foundation - Turkey (OSIAF- Turkey), the Compagnia di San Paolo and The German Marshall Fund of the United States (GMF-US).
    [Show full text]
  • Movimento Sociale Italiano, Alleanza Nazionale, Popolo Delle Libertà: Do Neofascismo Ao Pós-Fascismo Em Itália**
    Riccardo Marchi* Análise Social, vol. XLVI (201), 2011, 697-717 Movimento Sociale Italiano, Alleanza Nazionale, Popolo delle Libertà: do neofascismo ao pós-fascismo em Itália** Este artigo apresenta a evolução da extrema-direita italiana no segundo pós-guerra, focando o seu principal partido político. Os objectos de análise são o Movimento Sociale Italiano (1946-1995), o seu sucessor Alleanza Nazionale (1995-2009) e as suas derradeiras estratégias originadas pela fusão com o partido de Silvio Berlusconi (2009). A descrição do percurso histórico do partido é acompanhada pela análise das modificações da sua cultura política. O objectivo assenta na explicação de como e porquê um dos partidos anti-sistema, com maior longevidade no panorama político italiano, abandonou o seu radicalismo e aceitou os valores demoliberais. Palavras-chave: Itália; direita; extrema-direita; neofascismo. Italian Social Movement, National Alliance, People of Free- dom: from neo-fascism to post-fascism in Italy This article discusses the evolution of the Italian extreme right after the Second World War, with an emphasis on its leading political party, the Movimento Sociale Italiano (Italian Social Movement), its successor, Alleanza Nazionale (National Alliance — 1995-2009), and the latest strategies arising from its merger with the party of Silvio Berlusconi (2009). An outline of the Party’s history is coupled with an analysis of the changes in its political culture. We seek to account for how and why an anti-establishment party — the longest-lived party in Italian politics — renounced its radicalism in favor of popular liberalism values. Keywords: Italy; the right; extreme right; neo-fascism. INTRODUÇÃO O politólogo Piero Ignazi (2009), pioneiro nos estudos científicos sobre a extrema-direita italiana, periodizou os mais de sessenta anos de presença dos neofascistas na política italiana através de três macro-períodos: um primeiro protagonizado pelo Movimento Sociale Italiano (MSI), desde 1946 * ICS, Universidade de Lisboa, Av.
    [Show full text]
  • G.Perna - Il Giornale – 22-03-08
    G.Perna - Il Giornale – 22-03-08 Un po' di passato e tanto presente Farefuturo Il tratto comune dei think tank che ho visitato è che per arrivarci ci sono sempre degli scaloni da salire. Quello della Fondazione Farefuturo - che fa capo ad An ed è presieduta da Gianfranco Fini - è la tipica rampa spaccapolpacci degli edifici del ’500. Sorto alla fine XVI secolo, Palazzo Serlupi Crescenzi in via del Seminario è nel cuore della Roma politica. Di spalle ha la Camera, cento metri più in là il Senato. Dirimpetto, Palazzo San Macuto, sede delle Commissioni parlamentari bicamerali che in un glorioso passato indagarono inutilmente sui grandi misteri, da Moro a Sindona, e che oggi sono declassate a occuparsi dei rifiuti napoletani con lo stesso risultato: zero. Al piano nobile c’è il think tank. Mentre mi inerpico, scende una leggiadra fanciulla che mi sfiora e prosegue la corsa. Ho la tentazione di invertire la rotta, ma continuo a salire ligio all’appuntamento. L’anticamera della Fondazione è un bel biglietto da visita. Un’ampia sala dalla quale si intravedono saloni con alti soffitti. C’è una reception da Grand Hotel col bureau in cui si affaccendano, tra scartoffie e telefoni, un paio di ragazze. Chiedo di Diletta Cherra, la pr del think tank. «È scesa un momento», mi dicono. Dunque, era lei. Nell’attesa, senza dare nell’occhio, faccio un giro e ripasso mentalmente quello che già so di Farefuturo. La Fondazione, di fresco conio, è in rodaggio. È nata nel maggio 2007 col patrocinio e la presenza di José Aznar, l’ex premier spagnolo di centrodestra, che ne ha una simile a Madrid, la Faes.
    [Show full text]
  • Defense Retrenchment in Europe
    Defense Retrenchment in Europe: The Advantages of a Collaborative Response to Relative Decline and Economic Crisis Presented to the Department of Government in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree with honors of Bachelor of Arts Harvard College March 2013 2 3 Table of Contents List of Acronyms and Abbreviations……………………………………………….4 Introduction………………………………………………………………………..6 Research Question A Brief History of the European Economic and Financial Crisis The Importance of Studying State Response to Crisis in the Defense Sector Outline of the Content and Argument Chapter 1. Literature Review……………………………………………………...18 Overview Retrenchment Theory Power Transition Theory Collective Action Theory Chapter 2. Theory and Methodology……………………………………………...41 Theory Methodology Chapter 3. Case Studies of Britain and France…………………………………….64 Overview Britain, France, and the Eurozone Crisis Reconsidering Global Ambition: French and British Defense and the Eurozone Crisis Discussion Chapter 4. Case Studies of Germany and Italy…………………………………...107 Overview Germany, Italy, and the Eurozone Crisis Germany and Italy: Two Sides of the Same Coin? Discussion Chapter 5. Discussion……………………………………………………………154 Overview The Trappings of Defense: ―Sticky‖ Planning, Policy Options, and Domestic Retrenchment Multiple Levels of Cooperation: The Industry Driving Factor Governments, the Defense Industry, and Collaborative Retrenchment Conclusion………………………………………………………………………170 Evaluating the Model of Collective Action and State Retrenchment Future Directions
    [Show full text]
  • Talking Turkey in Europe: Towards a Differentiated Communication Strategy
    December 2008 13 English There is no EU-wide debate on EU-Turkey rela- Series tions, but rather a set of overlapping yet distinct European debates reflecting the different actors, interests and ideas across the European mosaic. Talking Turkey II unpacks this complex reality by TALKING TURKEY analysing the positions of national stakeholders IN EUROPE: across the EU, the reactions of Turkish stakehol- ders to these EU debates, as well as the influen- TOWARDS A DIFFERENTIATED ce of the US in shaping European debates on Turkey. The underlying aim of this research is to COMMUNICATION STRATEGY develop an EU Communication Strategy for Tur- key. Based upon the findings of this project, a edited by Nathalie Tocci Communication Strategy ought to be differen- tiated and dynamic. It must also engage in a ge- nuine two-way communication with its interlo- cutors. It is only by Talking Turkey and making such talk a two-way street that Turkey’s Europe- Talking Turkey II an course may be strengthened in the long-term. IAI-TEPAV Project Quaderni IAI ISTITUTO AFFARI INTERNAZIONALI Istituto Affari Internazionali 00186 Roma - Via Angelo Brunetti, 9 Tel. 39-6-3224360 Fax 39-6-3224363 http://www.iai.it - e-mail: [email protected] Per ordini: [email protected] December 2008 13 English Series IAI TALKING TURKEY IN EUROPE: TOWARDS A DIFFERENTIATED COMMUNICATION STRATEGY edited by Nathalie Tocci Talking Turkey II IAI-TEPAV Project Quaderni IAI ISTITUTO AFFARI INTERNAZIONALI This project and publication has been made possible with the generous support of the Union of Chambers and Commodity Exchanges of Turkey, (TOBB), the Open Society Institute Assistance Foundation - Turkey (OSIAF- Turkey), the Compagnia di San Paolo and The German Marshall Fund of the United States (GMF-US).
    [Show full text]
  • Talking Turkey in Europe: Towards a Differentiated Communication Strategy
    December 2008 13 English There is no EU-wide debate on EU-Turkey rela- Series tions, but rather a set of overlapping yet distinct European debates reflecting the different actors, interests and ideas across the European mosaic. Talking Turkey II unpacks this complex reality by TALKING TURKEY analysing the positions of national stakeholders IN EUROPE: across the EU, the reactions of Turkish stakehol- ders to these EU debates, as well as the influen- TOWARDS A DIFFERENTIATED ce of the US in shaping European debates on Turkey. The underlying aim of this research is to COMMUNICATION STRATEGY develop an EU Communication Strategy for Tur- key. Based upon the findings of this project, a edited by Nathalie Tocci Communication Strategy ought to be differen- tiated and dynamic. It must also engage in a ge- nuine two-way communication with its interlo- cutors. It is only by Talking Turkey and making such talk a two-way street that Turkey’s Europe- Talking Turkey II an course may be strengthened in the long-term. IAI-TEPAV Project Quaderni IAI ISTITUTO AFFARI INTERNAZIONALI Istituto Affari Internazionali 00186 Roma - Via Angelo Brunetti, 9 Tel. 39-6-3224360 Fax 39-6-3224363 http://www.iai.it - e-mail: [email protected] Per ordini: [email protected] December 2008 13 English Series IAI TALKING TURKEY IN EUROPE: TOWARDS A DIFFERENTIATED COMMUNICATION STRATEGY edited by Nathalie Tocci Talking Turkey II IAI-TEPAV Project Quaderni IAI ISTITUTO AFFARI INTERNAZIONALI This project and publication has been made possible with the generous support of the Union of Chambers and Commodity Exchanges of Turkey, (TOBB), the Open Society Institute Assistance Foundation - Turkey (OSIAF- Turkey), the Compagnia di San Paolo and The German Marshall Fund of the United States (GMF-US).
    [Show full text]
  • Intra-Party Politics and Party System Factional Conflict, Cooperation and Fission Within Italian Parties
    UNIVERSITA` DEGLI STUDI DI MILANO Graduate School in Social and Political Sciences Dipartimento di Studi Sociali e Politici Dottorato di ricerca in Studi Politici, ciclo XXIV Tesi di dottorato Intra-party Politics and Party System Factional Conflict, Cooperation and Fission within Italian Parties Settore Scientifico-Disciplinare: SPS/04 Autore: Andrea Ceron Tutor: Prof. Luigi Curini Coordinatore del dottorato: Prof. Marco Giuliani ANNO ACCADEMICO 2010-2011 ii Tutor: Prof. Luigi Curini University of Milan Doctoral Committee Prof. Kenneth Benoit London School of Economics (LSE) Prof. Thomas Konig¨ Mannheim Centre for European Social Research (MZES) Prof. Paolo Martelli University of Milan iii iv Acknowledgements First and foremost I offer my deepest gratitude to my supervisor, Prof. Luigi Curini, who supported me with his expertise throughout my dissertation. I would like to sincerely thank him for his guidance, carried out with patience and respect. He has always been there to discuss any major concern and to help me solving any trouble I faced during the work. His hints and suggestions leaded me to constantly improve my research. Despite his many commitments, prof. Curini has always found a way to supervise my work with accuracy, even when we were several time zones away from each other. Far from any rhetoric, I have really much appreciated his helpfulness. I am also grateful to some other people who gave me suggestions about how to improve the present work. In particular, I would like to thank Prof. Paolo Martelli who devoted time to revising one chapter of the present work, giving me useful ideas to clarify some aspects of the dissertation before writing the final handout.
    [Show full text]