DOCSLIB.ORG

IDMP Main Document (Final Report)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
IDMP Main Document (Final Report) MINISTRY OF ELECTRICITY, DAMS, IRRIGATION & WATER RESOURCES (MEDIWR) THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH SUDAN PROJECT FOR IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN (IDMP) IN THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH SUDAN FINAL REPORT (MAIN) DECEMBER 2015 JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY (JICA) SANYU CONSULTANTS INC. ORIENTAL CONSULTANTS GLOBAL CO., LTD. KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH SUDAN MINISTRY OF ELECTRICITY, DAMS, IRRIGATION & WATER RESOURCES WATER SECTOR IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN (FINAL REPORT) MAIN DOCUMENT NOVEMBER 2015 RSS, MEDIWR, Water Sector, Irrigation Development Master Plan (IDMP) THE PROJECT FOR IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN IN THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH SUDAN (RSS) LOCATION MAP (LM) LM-i Location Map Map of the Republic of South Sudan Location Map: Adopted from African Development Bank LM-i/1 RSS, MEDIWR, Water Sector, Irrigation Development Master Plan (IDMP) FOREWORD ii RSS, MEDIWR, Water Sector, Irrigation Development Master Plan (IDMP) FOREWORD One of the mandates of the Ministry of Electricity, Dams, Irrigation and Water Resources (MEDIWR) of the Republic of South Sudan (RSS) involves facilitation of the development, operation & management of water infrastructure for irrigated agriculture and other productive uses of the sector. This includes crop, livestock, forestry and fisheries subsectors, which are the subject of the Comprehensive Agriculture Master Plan (CAMP). The Irrigation Development Master Plan (IDMP) is “a comprehensive programmatic approach to address policy, institutional, capacity development and infrastructure issues and requirements of the agriculture sector in relation to water resources across the country, without jeopardising the needs of other sectors or stakeholders”. The IDMP is a road map to address existing challenges & making use of available opportunities in a strategic manner through: (1) setting up of guidelines and establishment of information network and (2) mobilisation of resources for investment & recurrent costs pertaining to human resources and institutions; carrying out of outreach & extension services; development, operation, maintenance & management of water control and delivery facilities at farms and other production projects. The IDMP therefore, describes the proposed nine (9) programmes, with their identified components, projects & activities pertaining to irrigation development. This is in order to translate the established strategic approaches into actual actions, ranging from small-scale to large-scale schemes and projects with cost, location & planning horizon in a prioritised manner. The rationale being that currently irrigated agriculture is practiced only on less than 5% of the cultivated land, which is contrary to the fact that natural conditions of the country are characterised by a diverse range of geographical regions, with annual rainfall ranging from less than 500 to 1500 mm. Floods & droughts occur, threatening national food & nutrition security. Hence, fluctuation in production is significant due to the unstable climate that causes large inter-annual and annual variations in precipitation, leading to either dry spells or droughts. Scarcities of water are pronounced due to lack of storage facilities, irrespective of the fact that there are substantial water resources; yet the country experiences water shortages because they are unevenly distributed across the territory; and vary annually & seasonally. On the other hand, when peak of rainfall coincide with high river inflows, extensive flooding occurs downstream due to river spills, local rainfall & flatness of the land over vast areas. Thus the dual problem of dry spells & floods causes hazards to agricultural activities. Under those conditions, irrigation planning and development become crucial, in order to stabilize availability of water; and effectively utilize & manage efficiently water resources for agricultural production & productivity. This is also to enhance food and nutrition security, resilience and contribute to meeting of the national needs and goals. With this background, the Government of RSS (GRSS) presented a request in November 2011 to the Government of Japan (GOJ) for the formulation of IDMP on the basis of technical cooperation. The Ministry and Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) then agreed on the contents and process of the project for the formulation of IDMP in April 2012. Given the fact that achieving the agricultural development objectives in all its facets requires provision and management of water to a greater extent, IDMP is therefore formulated in close collaboration with the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Cooperatives and Rural Development (MAFCRD); the Ministry of Livestock and Fisheries Industries (MLFI), other development partners and other government stakeholders. In line with CAMP, IDMP will continuously provide information on hydrometeorology, topography, land use and other engineering aspects pertaining to water control and delivery infrastructure of specific crop, fish farming, forestry and livestock schemes’/projects’ sites. The information network system establishment programme will ensure standardized nation- wide monitoring and forecasting of water resources occurrence and other related data. This will continuously inform water users and managers in taking informed decisions, e.g. in relation to early warning systems in case of droughts, floods and other climate variability scenarios. Thus, making “support to agricultural production and productivity, an ultimate goal in the assessment and management of water resources in South Sudan”, without jeopardising the needs of other sectors and stakeholders. FW-ii/1 Foreword The overall goal of IDMP therefore, is “to achieve sustainable irrigated agriculture and other productive uses thereby improving food security and resilience, reduce poverty and contribute to economic growth and sustainable development”. In fact, it has been concluded that irrespective of terrain, soil type, source of water and weather conditions, irrigation should be introduced and practiced using different models and techniques in order to: (1) address the inevitable climate and seasonal changes; (2) ensure food and nutrition security through selecting of specific crops for growing in certain seasons and areas; and (3) diversify and scale up crop production and stimulate agribusinesses and agro-industries. Indeed, IDMP process, as a project, commenced in September 2012 and finalised in September 2015. The 3-year working period covered intensive tasks in three phases, commencing with: Situational analysis of the water sector and the irrigation subsector in phase one (1); followed by different types of assessments and related formulation processes in phase tow (2); and concluded with preparation of a number of implementation guidelines, arrangements and plans in phase three (3). It has now achieved its three main objectives, i.e. (i) enabling the GRSS carryout studies and examines irrigation potential across the country, (ii) strengthening of the capacities of South Sudanese counterpart personnel through its formulation, and (iii) production of IDMP framework and its guiding documents. I wish at this juncture, on behalf of GRSS, to thank the Government and people of Japan for their prompt response and invaluable support towards the formulation of IDMP. Also, I would like to thank the other development partners, state governments, county authorities and the communities for responding positively towards embracing the initiative and immensely contributing in data collection; and during reviews and consultation processes. I am especially grateful to the South Sudanese members of the IDMP Task Team for the hard work and for leading the process tirelessly in collaboration with JICA as well as the international, regional and national consultants. My appreciation also goes to the states, local governments, communities, and stakeholders; the other development partners, the private sector; and civil society, for their appropriate and various contributions. Their efforts made it possible for IDMP to reflect the whole country's wishes and aspirations. I acknowledge with appreciation the due diligent guidance from colleagues, national ministers and counterparts; the state ministers through the Inter- Ministerial Steering Committee, and the Technical Committee (TC) led by the undersecretaries, and JICA representatives in South Sudan for their close supervision and administration of the process. I trust that the well demonstrated participation by all the stakeholders will continue to be maintained at all critical stages, including planning; decision-making; resources mobilisation; execution; and monitoring and evaluation, to ensure the realisation of the projected outcomes. This is a great achievement and we are proud of the collective efforts exerted; hence each and every one of us remains an important stakeholder whose participation and contribution count to keep up the momentum. The implementation of the IDMP will enable us overcome the food and nutrition insecurity situation in our beloved nation, achieve reduction of poverty and promote development and prosperity among our citizens. It will also enhance resilience against seasonal and annual variability in water occurrence as a result on climate change that usually leads to crops failure. Jemma Nunu Kumba (MP) Minister Ministry of Electricity, Dams, Irrigation and Water Resources The Republic of South Sudan FW-ii/2 RSS, MEDIWR, Water Sector, Irrigation Development Master Plan (IDMP) ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ss 9303 Ee Kapoeta North Cou
    SOUTH SUDAN Kapoeta North County reference map SUDAN Pibor JONGLEI ETHIOPIA CAR DRC KENYA UGANDA EASTERN EQUATORIA Kenyi Lafon Kapoeta East Akitukomoi Kangitabok Lomokori Kapoeta North Ngigalingatun Kangibun Kalopedet Lokidangoai Nomogonjet Nawitapal Mogos Chokagiling Lorutuk Lokoges Nakwa Owetiani Nawabei Natatur Kamaliato Kanyowokol Karibungura Lokale Nagira Belengtobok Tuliabok Lokorechoke Kadapangolol Akoribok Nakwaparich Kalobeliang Wana Kachinga Lomus Lotiakara Pucwa Lopetet Nawao Lokorilam Naduket Tingayta Lodomei Kibak Nakatiti International boundary Nakapangiteng Napusiret Napulak State boundary Loriwo County boundary Kochoto Naminitotit Parpar Undetermined boundary Napusireit Nakwamoru Abyei region Kotak Kasotongor Napochorege Katiakin Nawayareng Riwoto Lokorumor Country capital Nangoletire Lokualem Lumeyen Logerain Lomidila Takankim Lobei Administrative centre/County capital Lokwamor Nacukut Naronyi Nakoret Lotiekar Namukeris Principal town Napotit Naoyatir Nakore Napureit Secondary town Lokwamiro Narubui Barach Lolepon Lotiri Paima Village Loregai Narongyet Lochuloit Kabuni Primary road Kudule Locheler Napusiria Napotpot Secondary road Nacholobo Tertiary road Budi Idong Main river Kapoeta South 0 5 10 km The administrative boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. Final boundary between the Republic of Sudan and the Republic of South Sudan has not yet been determined. Final status of Abyei area is not yet determined. Created: March 2020 | Code: SS-9303 | Sources: OCHA, SSNBS | Feedback: [email protected] | unocha.org/south-sudan | reliefweb.int/country/ssd | southsudan.humanitarianresponse.info .
    [Show full text]
  • Education in Emergencies, Food Security and Livelihoods And
    D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 5 Needs Assessment Report Education in Emergencies, Food Security, Livelihoods & Protection Fangak County, Jonglei State, South Sudan Finn Church Aid By Finn Church Aid South Sudan Country Program P.O. Box 432, Juba Nabari Area, Bilpham Road, Juba, South Sudan www.finnchurchaid.fi In conjunction with Ideal Capacity Development Consulting Limited P.O Box 54497-00200, Kenbanco House, Moi Avenue, Nairobi, Kenya [email protected], [email protected] www.idealcapacitydevelopment.org 30th November to 10th December 2015 i Table of Contents ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................................... VI EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................... VII 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 FOOD SECURITY AND LIVELIHOOD, EDUCATION AND PROTECTION CONTEXT IN SOUTH SUDAN ............................... 1 1.2 ABOUT FIN CHURCH AID (FCA) ....................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 HUMANITARIAN CONTEXT IN FANGAK COUNTY .................................................................................................. 2 1.4 PURPOSE, OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE OF ASSESSMENT ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Training of the Upper Nile
    THE TRAINING OF THE UPPER NILE I PUBLISHED BY PITMAN WATER SUPPLY PROBLEMS AND DEVELOPMENTS By W. H. MAXWELL, A.M.Inst.C.E., Chartered Civil Engineer, Formerly Borough and Waterworks Engineer, Tunbridge Wells Corporation. In demy 8vo, cloth gilt, 337 pp., illustrated. 25s. net. WATERWORKS FOR URBAN AND RURAL DISTRICTS By HBNB-T C. ADAMS, M.Inst.C.E., M.I.M.E., F.S.I. In demy 8vo, 246 pp.* with 111 illustrations and 3 folding plates. 15s. net. RIVER WORK CONSTRUCTIONAL DETAILS By H. C. H. SHENTON, F.S.E., M.Inat.M. and Cy. E., F.R.San.I., F.R.San.E., and F. E. H. SHBNTON, M.S.E. In demy 8vo, cloth gilt, 146 pp. 12s. 6d. net. HYDRAULICS FOR ENGINEERS By ROBERT W. ANGUS, B.A.SC, M.E. In demy 8vo, cloth gilt, 336 pp. 12s. 6d. net. REINFORCED CONCRETE ARCH DESIGN By G. P. MANNING, M.Eng., A.M.Inst.C.E. In demy 8vo, cloth gilt, 200 pp. 18s. 6d. net. Sir Isaac Pitman & Sons, Ltd. Parker St. Kingsway, London, W.C.2 THE TRAINING OF THE UPPER NILE BY F. NEWHOUSE B.Sc, F .C.G.I., M.INST.C.E. Late Inspector-General of Egyptian Irrigation in the Sudan PUBLISHED IN OOLLABOBATION WITH THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS LONDON SIR ISAAC PITMAN & SONS, LTD. 1939 SIR ISAAC PITMAN & SONS, LTD. PITMAN HOUSE, PARKER STREET, KINGSWAY, LONDON, W.C.2 THE PITMAN PRESS, BATH PITMAN HOUSE, LITTLE COLLINS STREET, MELBOURNE ASSOCIATED COMPANIES PITMAN PUBLISHING CORPORATION 2 WEST 45TH STREET, NEW YORK 2O5 WEST MONROE STREET, CHICAGO SIR ISAAC PITMAN & SONS (CANADA), LTD.
    [Show full text]
  • The Criminalization of South Sudan's Gold Sector
    The Criminalization of South Sudan’s Gold Sector Kleptocratic Networks and the Gold Trade in Kapoeta By the Enough Project April 2020* A Precious Resource in an Arid Land Within the area historically known as the state of Eastern Equatoria, Kapoeta is a semi-arid rangeland of clay soil dotted with short, thorny shrubs and other vegetation.1 Precious resources lie below this desolate landscape. Eastern Equatoria, along with the region historically known as Central Equatoria, contains some of the most important and best-known sites for artisanal and small-scale gold mining (ASM). Some estimates put the number of miners at 60,000 working at 80 different locations in the area, including Nanaknak, Lauro (Didinga Hills), Napotpot, and Namurnyang. Locals primarily use traditional mining techniques, panning for gold from seasonal streams in various villages. The work provides miners’ families resources to support their basic needs.2 Kapoeta’s increasingly coveted gold resources are being smuggled across the border into Kenya with the active complicity of local and national governments. This smuggling network, which involves international mining interests, has contributed to increased militarization.3 Armed actors and corrupt networks are fueling low-intensity conflicts over land, particularly over the ownership of mining sites, and causing the militarization of gold mining in the area. Poor oversight and conflicts over the control of resources between the Kapoeta government and the national government in Juba enrich opportunistic actors both inside and outside South Sudan. Inefficient regulation and poor gold outflows have helped make ASM an ideal target for capture by those who seek to finance armed groups, perpetrate violence, exploit mining communities, and exacerbate divisions.
    [Show full text]
  • SOUTH SUDAN - Reference Map
    SOUTH SUDAN - Reference Map Kebkabiya El Fashir Abyad Bara Umm Dam El Kawa Ermil Nahl Doka Umm Bel Sennar Tawila Dirra Umm El Hilla Iyal Es Suki El Hawata Keddada Mahbub El Obeid Rabak Jebel Shangil Tobay Wad Banda Dud Singa Gallabat Wada`ah Umm Rawaba En Nahud El Rahad Higar Galegu El Jebelein Kas Taweisha S U D A N El Abbasiya Nyala Dilling Kortala Dangur El Odaiya Geigar Sharafa Delami Ed Damazin Rashad Renk e l El Barun Ed Da`ein i El Lagowa Abu Jibaiha Edd El Fursan N Babanusa e Heiban t Abu Abu i Bau Guba Ragag h Matariq Kulshabi Bikori Gabra W El Muglad Kadugli Kologi Keili Mumallah Umm Ulu Buram Keilak Talodi Barbit Wadega Belfodiyo Qardud Kaka Paloich Tungaru Junguls Asosa Radom Riangnom Sumeih El Melemm Oriny Kodok Mendi Boing Bambesi Hofrat Naam Fagwir Aboke en Nahas Malakal Nejo Abyei UPPER NILE Daga Bentiu Gimbi Bai War-awar Fangak Malwal Post Kafia Pan Nyal Mayom Kingi Malualkon Abwong Wang Kai Fagwir Kan Sobat Banyjiel Gidami Sadi Aweil Wun Rog Yubdo Gossinga UNITY Gumbiel Nasser NORTHERN Gogrial Nyerol Malek Thul Raga BAHR Akop Leer Mogogh Biel Bure Metu Wun Gambela EL GHAZAL WARRAP Ayod Waat Abay Gore Kwajok Shwai Adok Atiedo Warrap Fathai Faddoi Jonglei Canal Tor Deim Zubeir Madeir E T H I O P I A Bisellia Bir Di Duk Fadiat Akobo WESTERN Wau Gech`a Lol Mbili Duk Kongettit Les Trois BAHR Wakela Atum Faiwil Tepi Riviêres EL GHAZAL Tonj Shambe Peper Pochalla LAKES Kongor C E N T R A L Bo River Post Rafili Giamciar Teferi Rumbek Lau Akelo Palwal Jonglei JONGLEI Pibor A F R I C A N Ubori Akot Pibor Yirol Kantiere R E P U
    [Show full text]
  • South Sudan - Crisis Fact Sheet #2, Fiscal Year (Fy) 2019 December 7, 2018
    SOUTH SUDAN - CRISIS FACT SHEET #2, FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2019 DECEMBER 7, 2018 NUMBERS AT USAID/OFDA1 FUNDING HIGHLIGHTS A GLANCE BY SECTOR IN FY 2018 Relief actor records at least 150 GBV cases in Bentiu during a 12-day period 5% 7% 20% UN records two aid worker deaths, 60 7 million 7% Estimated People in South humanitarian access incidents in October 10% Sudan Requiring Humanitarian USAID/FFP partner reaches 2.3 million Assistance 19% 2018 Humanitarian Response Plan – people with assistance in October December 2017 15% 17% HUMANITARIAN FUNDING Logistics Support & Relief Commodities (20%) Water, Sanitation & Hygiene (19%) FOR THE SOUTH SUDAN RESPONSE 6.1 million Health (17%) Nutrition (15%) USAID/OFDA $135,187,409 Estimated People in Need of Protection (10%) Food Assistance in South Sudan Agriculture & Food Security (7%) USAID/FFP $402,253,743 IPC Technical Working Group – Humanitarian Coordination & Info Management (7%) September 2018 Shelter & Settlements (5%) 3 State/PRM $91,553,826 USAID/FFP2 FUNDING $628,994,9784 2 million BY MODALITY IN FY 2018 1% TOTAL USG HUMANITARIAN FUNDING FOR THE SOUTH SUDAN CRISIS IN FY 2018 Estimated IDPs in 84% 9% 5% South Sudan OCHA – November 8, 2018 U.S. In-Kind Food Aid (84%) 1% $3,760,121,951 Local & Regional Food Procurement (9%) TOTAL USG HUMANITARIAN FUNDING FOR THE Complementary Services (5%) SOUTH SUDAN RESPONSE IN FY 2014–2018, Cash Transfers for Food (1%) INCLUDING FUNDING FOR SOUTH SUDANESE Food Vouchers (1%) REFUGEES IN NEIGHBORING COUNTRIES 194,900 Estimated Individuals Seeking Refuge at UNMISS Bases KEY DEVELOPMENTS UNMISS – November 15, 2018 During a 12-day period in late November, non-governmental organization (NGO) Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) recorded at least 150 gender-based violence (GBV) cases in Unity State’s Bentiu town, representing a significant increase from the approximately 2.2 million 100 GBV cases that MSF recorded in Bentiu between January and October.
    [Show full text]
  • Conflict and Crisis in South Sudan's Equatoria
    SPECIAL REPORT NO. 493 | APRIL 2021 UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF PEACE www.usip.org Conflict and Crisis in South Sudan’s Equatoria By Alan Boswell Contents Introduction ...................................3 Descent into War ..........................4 Key Actors and Interests ............ 9 Conclusion and Recommendations ...................... 16 Thomas Cirillo, leader of the Equatoria-based National Salvation Front militia, addresses the media in Rome on November 2, 2019. (Photo by Andrew Medichini/AP) Summary • In 2016, South Sudan’s war expand- Equatorians—a collection of diverse South Sudan’s transitional period. ed explosively into the country’s minority ethnic groups—are fighting • On a national level, conflict resolu- southern region, Equatoria, trig- for more autonomy, local or regional, tion should pursue shared sover- gering a major refugee crisis. Even and a remedy to what is perceived eignty among South Sudan’s con- after the 2018 peace deal, parts of as (primarily) Dinka hegemony. stituencies and regions, beyond Equatoria continue to be active hot • Equatorian elites lack the external power sharing among elites. To spots for national conflict. support to viably pursue their ob- resolve underlying grievances, the • The war in Equatoria does not fit jectives through violence. The gov- political process should be expand- neatly into the simplified narratives ernment in Juba, meanwhile, lacks ed to include consultations with of South Sudan’s war as a power the capacity and local legitimacy to local community leaders. The con- struggle for the center; nor will it be definitively stamp out the rebellion. stitutional reform process of South addressed by peacebuilding strate- Both sides should pursue a nego- Sudan’s current transitional period gies built off those precepts.
    [Show full text]
  • Total Returns to South Sudan Post CPA to June 2009
    IOM Tracking of Spontaneous Returns Project Total Returns to South Sudan Post CPA to June 2009 Table of Contents Acknowledgements..................................................................................................................................... 2 Summary..................................................................................................................................................... 3 1. Background....................................................................................................................................... 4 2. Objectives ......................................................................................................................................... 4 3. Methodology..................................................................................................................................... 5 3.1. En-route Tracking............................................................................................................................. 5 3.2. Area of Return Tracking................................................................................................................... 6 4. Capacity Building of SSRRC and VRRC......................................................................................... 6 5. Total Estimated Number of Returns ................................................................................................. 8 6. Analysis of Area of Return - Cumulative Data, February 2007 to June 2009................................ 10 6.1. Total
    [Show full text]
  • Humanitarian Response Plan South Sudan
    HUMANITARIAN HUMANITARIAN PROGRAMME CYCLE 2021 RESPONSE PLAN ISSUED MARCH 2021 SOUTH SUDAN 01 About This document is consolidated by OCHA on behalf of the Humanitarian Country Team and partners. The Humanitarian Response Plan is a presentation of the coordinated, strategic response devised by humanitarian agencies in order to meet the acute needs of people affected by the crisis. It is based on, and responds to, evidence of needs described in the Humanitarian Needs Overview. Manyo Renk Renk SUDAN Kaka Melut Melut Maban Fashoda Riangnhom Bunj Oriny UPPER NILE Abyei region Pariang Panyikang Malakal Abiemnhom Tonga Malakal Baliet Aweil East Abiemnom Rubkona Aweil North Guit Baliet Dajo Gok-Machar War-Awar Twic Mayom Atar 2 Longochuk Bentiu Guit Mayom Old Fangak Aweil West Turalei Canal/Pigi Gogrial East Fangak Aweil Gogrial Luakpiny/Nasir Maiwut Aweil West UNITY Yomding Raja NORTHERN South Gogrial Koch Nyirol Nasir Maiwut Raja BAHR EL Bar Mayen Koch Ulang Kuajok WARRAP Leer Lunyaker Ayod GHAAL Tonj North Mayendit Ayod Aweil Centre Waat Mayendit Leer Uror Warrap Romic ETHIOPIA Yuai Tonj East WESTERN BAHR Nyal Duk Fadiat Akobo Wau Maper JONGLEI CENTRAL EL GHAAL Panyijiar Duk Akobo Kuajiena Rumbek North AFRICAN Wau Tonj Pochalla Jur River Cueibet REPUBLIC Tonj Rumbek Kongor Pochala South Cueibet Centre Yirol East Twic East Rumbek Adior Pibor Rumbek East Nagero Wullu Akot Yirol Bor South Tambura Yirol West Nagero LAKES Awerial Pibor Bor Boma Wulu Mvolo Awerial Mvolo Tambura Terekeka Kapoeta International boundary WESTERN Terekeka North Mundri
    [Show full text]
  • Map of South Sudan
    UNITED NATIONS SOUTH SUDAN Geospatial 25°E 30°E 35°E Nyala Ed Renk Damazin Al-Fula Ed Da'ein Kadugli SUDAN Umm Barbit Kaka Paloich Ba 10°N h Junguls r Kodok Āsosa 10°N a Radom l-A Riangnom UPPER NILEBoing rab Abyei Fagwir Malakal Mayom Bentiu Abwong ^! War-Awar Daga Post Malek Kan S Wang ob Wun Rog Fangak at o Gossinga NORTHERN Aweil Kai Kigille Gogrial Nasser Raga BAHR-EL-GHAZAL WARRAP Gumbiel f a r a Waat Leer Z Kuacjok Akop Fathai z e Gambēla Adok r Madeir h UNITY a B Duk Fadiat Deim Zubeir Bisellia Bir Di Akobo WESTERN Wau ETHIOPIA Tonj Atum W JONGLEI BAHR-EL-GHAZAL Wakela h i te LAKES N Kongor CENTRAL Rafili ile Peper Bo River Post Jonglei Pibor Akelo Rumbek mo Akot Yirol Ukwaa O AFRICAN P i Lol b o Bor r Towot REPUBLIC Khogali Pap Boli Malek Mvolo Lowelli Jerbar ^! National capital Obo Tambura Amadi WESTERN Terakeka Administrative capital Li Yubu Lanya EASTERN Town, village EQUATORIAMadreggi o Airport Ezo EQUATORIA 5°N Maridi International boundary ^! Juba Lafon Kapoeta 5°N Undetermined boundary Yambio CENTRAL State (wilayah) boundary EQUATORIA Torit Abyei region Nagishot DEMOCRATIC Roue L. Turkana Main road (L. Rudolf) Railway REPUBLIC OF THE Kajo Yei Opari Lofusa 0 100 200km Keji KENYA o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 0 50 100mi CONGO o e The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations.
    [Show full text]
  • LC SS 706 A1 EEQ 20130301.Pdf
    pp p ! ! p ! p (! ! !( 32°0'0"E 33°0'0"E 34°0'0"E 35°0'0"E Gwalla Awan KolnyangAluk Katanich Titong Munini Beru ! R . K Wowa ang en Logoda N Rigl Chilimun N " " 0 0 p' Bor South County ' 0 Pibor County Lowelli Katchikan River Bellel Kichepo 0 ° Maktiweng J O N G L E I ° 6 Kaigo 6 Lochiret R. Naro Kenamuke Swamp R Ngechele . S Neria u p Kanopir Natibok Kabalatigo i r i ( B Moru Kimod a Rongada h r Yebisak e g l- n Tombi J o e b b l Shogle e a l) Buka h C . Gwojo-Adung Kassangor R Baro ! E T H I O P I A Moru Kerri KURON Kuron Gigging p Bojo-Ajut Gemmaiza ! Karn Ethi Kerkeng Moru Ethi Nakadocwa Poko Wani Terekeka County Kobowen Swamp Borichadi Bokuna Poko Kassengo Selemani Pagar Nabwel Wani Mika Chabong Tukara C E N T R A L p River Nakua p Kenyi E Q U A T O R I A Moru Angbin Mukajo Gali Owiyabong Kursomba Lotimor Bulu Koli Kalaruz Awakot Katima Waha ! Akitukomoi River Gera Tumu Nanyangachor Nyabongi Napalap ! Namoropus Natilup Swamp ) it Wanyang Kangitabok Lomokori le Eyata Moru Kolinyagkopil il ! Terakeka ri Lozut Lomongole t iti o (! S L Magara p R. ( n Umm Gura Mwanyakapin a p y l Abuilingakine Lomareng Plateau a Dogora R Ngigalingatun k o . L Jelli L o p Rambo Djie Navi . Lokodopotok Nyaginei Kangeleng p R Biyara Nai A o Kworijik Kangibun Lomuleye Katirima t o Simsima Badigeru Swamp River Lokuja Losagam k Musha Lukwatuk Pass Doinyoro East p o p l Balala Legeri Buboli Kalopedet Pongo River Lokorowa Watha Peth Hills Bume E A S T E R N E Q U A T O R I A Lokidangoai Nawitapal Lopokori Lokomarukest Kolobeleng Yakara Dogatwan Nomogonjet Kagethi ! Mogos Bala Pool Lapon County Lotakawa Kanyabu Moru Ethi Donyiro West Donyiro Cliff Kedowa Kothokan a l l i Chokagiling t Karakamuge o Mangalla Bwoda L Mediket Kaliapus Nyangatom !( .
    [Show full text]
  • SUDAN Administrative Map December 2011
    SUDAN Administrative Map December 2011 Faris IQLIT Ezbet Dush Ezbet Maks el-Qibli Ibrim DARAW KOM OMBO Al Hawwari Al-Kufrah Nagel-Gulab ASWAN At Tallab 24°N EGYPT 23°N R E LIBYA Halaib D S 22°N SUDAN ADMINISTRATED BY EGYPT Wadi Halfa E A b 'i Di d a i d a W 21°N 20°N Kho r A bu Sun t ut a RED SEA a b r A r o Porth Sudan NORTH Abu Hamad K Dongola Suakin ur Qirwid m i A ad 19°N W Bauda Karima Rauai Taris Tok ar e il Ehna N r e iv R RIVER NILE Ri ver Nile Desert De Bayouda Barbar Odwan 18°N Ed Debba K El Baraq Mib h o r Adara Wa B a r d a i Hashmet Atbara ka E Karora l Atateb Zalat Al Ma' M Idd Rakhami u Abu Tabari g a Balak d a Mahmimet m Ed Damer Barqa Gereis Mebaa Qawz Dar Al Humr Togar El Hosh Al Mahmia Alghiena Qalat Garatit Hishkib Afchewa Seilit Hasta Maya Diferaya Agra 17°N Anker alik M El Ishab El Hosh di El Madkurab Wa Mariet Umm Hishan Qalat Kwolala Shendi Nakfa a r a b t Maket A r a W w a o d H i i A d w a a Abdullah Islandti W b Kirteit m Afabet a NORTH DARFUR d CHAD a Zalat Wad Tandub ug M l E i W 16°N d Halhal Jimal Wad Bilal a a d W i A l H Aroma ERITREA Keren KHARTOUM a w a KASSALA d KHARTOUM Hagaz G Sebderat Bahia a Akordat s h Shegeg Karo Kassala Furawiya Wakhaim Surgi Bamina New Halfa Muzbat El Masid a m a g Barentu Kornoi u Malha Haikota F di Teseney Tina Um Baru El Mieiliq 15°N Wa Khashm El Girba Abu Quta Abu Ushar Tandubayah Miski Meheiriba EL GEZIRA Sigiba Rufa'ah Anka El Hasahisa Girgira NORTH KORDOFAN Ana Bagi Baashim/tina Dankud Lukka Kaidaba Falankei Abdel Shakur Um Sidir Wad Medani Sodiri Shuwak Badime Kulbus
    [Show full text]