DOCSLIB.ORG

Lrt) (Studi Kasus: Stasiun Lrt Jakabaring Kota Palembang)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lrt) (Studi Kasus: Stasiun Lrt Jakabaring Kota Palembang) SKRIPSI ANALISIS KEBUTUHAN PARK AND RIDE PADA STASIUN LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT (LRT) (STUDI KASUS: STASIUN LRT JAKABARING KOTA PALEMBANG) RAHAYU INTANTI 03011181419042 JURUSAN TEKNIK SIPIL DAN PERENCANAAN FAKULTAS TEKNIK UNIVERSITAS SRIWIJAYA 2019 KATA PENGANTAR Dengan mengucapkan puji syukur kehadirat Allah SWT karena berkat rahmat dan karunia-Nya penulis dapat menyelesaikan penyusunan laporan Tugas Akhir yang berjudul “Analisis Kebutuhan Park and Ride pada Stasiun Light Rail Transit (LRT) (Studi Kasus : Stasiun LRT Jakabaring Kota Palembang)” dengan baik. Dalam penyusunan laporan ini, penulis juga telah mendapat banyak bantuan dari berbagai pihak. Untuk itu dalam kesempatan ini, Penulis ingin menyampaikan ucapan terima kasih kepada : 1. Kedua orang tua dan saudara yang selalu mendoakan, memberi dukungan semangat dan materil kepada penulis. 2. Ir. H. Helmi Haki, M.T. selaku Ketua Jurusan Teknik Sipil Fakultas Teknik Universitas Sriwijaya. 3. Dr. Melawaty Agustien, S.Si., M.T. dan Aztri Yuli Kurnia, S.T., M.T. selaku dosen Pembimbing Tugas Akhir. 4. Monika Stevi Carolin, Rembun Wangi dan M. Rafiq Wahiputra yang setia menemani dan membantu dari awal perkuliahan hingga selesai. 5. Group Discussion yaitu Gracia, Nelvi, Indah, Nurrahman, Agus, Husein dan Harasa yang selalu memberi dukungan dalam hal perkuliahan maupun diluar. 6. Teman – teman seperjuangan bimbingan Tugas Akhir yaitu Nelvi, Husein, Rembun dan Nurma. 7. Teman – teman Teknik Sipil angkatan 2014 yang telah membantu dan berkerjasama selama perkuliahan. Penulis menyadari bahwa dalam penyusunan laporan ini tidak lepas dari kesalahan dan kekurangan, karena itu penulis mengharapkan saran serta kritik yang sifatnya membangun guna memperbaiki isi dari laporan ini. Akhir kata penulis berharap semoga penulisan laporan ini dapat bermanfaat bagi para pembaca sekalian. Terima kasih. Indralaya, Juli 2019 Rahayu Intanti viii Universitas Sriwijaya DAFTAR ISI Halaman HALAMAN JUDUL .................................................................................................... ABSTRAK ................................................................................................................. i HALAMAN PENGESAHAN ................................................................................... ii HALAMAN PERSETUJUAN ................................................................................. iii HALAMAN KETERANGAN SELESAI REVISI ...................................................iv HALAMAN PERNYATAAN INTEGRITAS ............................................................... v HALAMAN PERSETUJUAN PUBLIKASI ................................................................ vi RIWAYAT HIDUP ......................................................................................................vii KATA PENGANTAR............................................................................................ viii DAFTAR ISI ............................................................................................................ ix DAFTAR GAMBAR ................................................................................................. x DAFTAR TABEL .................................................................................................... xi DAFTAR LAMPIRAN .......................................................................................... xiii BAB 1 PENDAHULUAN ........................................................................................ 1 1.1. Latar Belakang .................................................................................................. 1 1.2. Rumusan Masalah ............................................................................................. 3 1.3. Tujuan Penelitian .............................................................................................. 3 1.4. Ruang Lingkup Penelitian ................................................................................ 3 1.5. Sistematika Penulisan ....................................................................................... 4 BAB 2 TINJAUAN PUSTAKA ............................................................................... 6 2.1. Penelitian Terdahulu ........................................................................................ 6 2.2. Light Rail Transit (LRT) ..................................................................................8 2.3. Feasibility Study Light Rail Transit (LRT) Provinsi Sumatera Selatan ........... 9 2.4. Studi Kelayakan LRT Provinsi Sumatra Selatan ........................................... 10 2.5. Stated Preference Survey ............................................................................... 11 2.5.1. Choice Modelling atau Choice Experiment ................................................... 13 2.5.2. Metode Pengambilan Sampel ......................................................................... 14 2.6. Model Discreate Choice (Pemilihan Diskrif) ................................................ 15 2.7. Model Logit Biner ......................................................................................... 16 ix BAB 3 METODOLOGI PENELITIAN .................................................................... 17 3.1. Tahapan Penelitian ............................................................................................ 17 3.2. Latar Belakang .................................................................................................. 18 3.3. Identifikasi Masalah .......................................................................................... 18 3.4. Tujuan Penelitian .............................................................................................. 18 3.5. Pengumpulan Data ............................................................................................ 18 3.5.1. Data Primer ...................................................................................................... 18 3.5.2. Data Sekunder .................................................................................................. 21 3.6. Desain kuesioner wawancara stated preference (SP) ....................................... 21 3.6.1. Persepsi Pengguna Sepeda Motor Terhadap Rencana Park and Ride ............. 21 3.7. Pengolahan Data ............................................................................................... 22 3.8. Analisis Hasil .................................................................................................... 24 3.9. Kesimpulan dan Saran ...................................................................................... 24 BAB 4 ANALISIS DAN PEMBAHASAN .............................................................. 25 4.1. Hasil Pengumpulan Data .................................................................................. 25 4.2. Pengolahan Data ............................................................................................... 26 4.2.1. Statistik Deskriptif Karakteristik Sosial Ekonomi dan Perjalanan ................... 26 4.2.2. Model Pemilihan Menggunakan Park and Ride untuk Pengguna Motor ......... 35 4.2.3. Model Pemilihan Menggunakan Park and Ride untuk Pengguna Mobil ......... 39 4.3. Analisis Sensitivitas Model .............................................................................. 44 4.3.1. Analisis Sensitivitas Terhadap Biaya Perjalanan .............................................. 44 4.3.2. Analisis Sensitivitas Terhadap Waktu Tempuh ................................................ 46 BAB 5 PENUTUP..................................................................................................... 49 5.1. Kesimpulan ...................................................................................................... 49 5.1. Saran ................................................................................................................ 50 DAFTAR PUSTAKA ............................................................................................... 51 LAMPIRAN .............................................................................................................. 52 x DAFTAR GAMBAR Gambar 3.1. Bagan Alur Penelitian ...................................................................... 17 Gambar 3.2. Peta Lokasi Penelitian ....................................................................... 19 Gambar 3.3. Bagan alur Pengolahan Data ............................................................. 23 Gambar 4.1. Persentase jumlah responden berdasarkan usia ................................. 27 Gambar 4.2. Persentase jumlah responden pengguna moda transportasi berdasarkan jenis kelamin ................................................................ 27 Gambar 4.3. Persentase jumlah responden pengguna moda transportasi berdasarkan jenis pekerjaan ............................................................. 28 Gambar 4.4. Jumlah responden pengguna moda transportasi berdasarkan pendapatan perbulan ......................................................................... 29 Gambar 4.5. Persentase jumlah responden berdasarkan daerah asal responden .... 30 Gambar 4.6. Persentase jumlah responden berdasarkan lokasi tujuan responden . 32 Gambar 4.7. Persentase jumlah responden pengguna kendaraan berdasarkan maksud perjalanan ............................................................................ 33 Gambar 4.8. Persentase jumlah responden pengguna kendaraan berdasarkan biaya perjalanan ............................................................................... 34 Gambar 4.9. Persentase jumlah responden
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CONTRACT AGREEMENT MRT Blue Line Extension Project Hua
    Contract Agreement CA-1 CONTRACT AGREEMENT MRT Blue Line Extension Project Hua Lamphong - Bang Khae and Bang Sue - Tha Phra Sections Contract 4: Elevated Civil Works Tha Phra - Lak Song Section This Contract is made at the Mass Rapid Transit Authority of Thailand, 175 Rama IX Road, Huay Khwang, Bangkok 10320 on 17 day of February B.E. 2554 (A.O. 2011) between: (1) MASS RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY OF THAILAND by Mr.Ronnachit Yaemsaard, the MRTA Acting Governor, with office located at 175 Rama IX Road, Huay Khwang, Bangkok 10320, hereinafter referred to as the "MRTA" or the "Employer", as the case may be, of the one part and ; (2) SINO-THAI ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED a company registered and existing under the laws of Thailand, with head office located at 27th floor, Sino-Thai Tower, 32/59-60, Sukhumvit 21 Road , Klang Toey Nua Sub-District, Wattana District, Bangkok, 10110, Thailand by Mr. Vallop Rungkijvorasathien authorized to sign and bind the company, hereinafter referred to as the "Contractor" of the other part. WHEREAS the Employer is desirous that certain Works should be executed by the Contractor, viz, the construction of Elevated Structure at Tha Phra - Lak Song Section with precast segment box girder viaduct of approximately 10.5 km. in length, elevated approximately 17 meters above existing ground, transition structure, with the construction of 7 elevated stations, architectural works and building services within the stations, and the intermodal transfer facilities (ITF), Depot, Operation and Control Center (OCC), Park & Ride Buildings and other works as defined in the Contract, and has accepted a Tender by the Contractor for execution and completion of such Works and the remedying of any defects therein.
    [Show full text]
  • ESCAP PPP Case Study #1
    Public-Private Partnerships Case Study #1 Traffic Demand Risk: The case of Bangkok’s Skytrain (BTS) by Mathieu Verougstraete and Isabelle Enders (March 2014) The following case study examines the issue of traffic demand risk and sheds light on how the problem of inaccurate ridership forecasts can impact a PPP project by using the example of the Bangkok SkyTrain. TRAFFIC DEMAND RISK FIGURE 1 : ACTUAL/FORECAST TRAFFIC Even though literature is rich about theory and practice of traffic forecasting, insufficient attention has been paid to the predicted accuracy of traffic forecasting models and the consequences of occurring errors. Emperical studies suggest however that traffic forecasts in the transport sector are characterized by large errors and considerable optimism bias.1 This statement goes in line with the review conducted on PPP projects financed by the European Investment Bank which states that major issues in road projects BANGKOK BTS: CASE SUMMARY occurred because of traffic performance has been overestimated. Findings disclose that Bangkok covers about 606 square miles 1/2 of toll road projects failed to meet their and is densely populated. By 1990 it was early-year forecasts; often by some margin renowned for its chronic traffic congestion, 2 (errors of 50% - 70%). and over the subsequent decade vehicle ESCAP supports govern- ownership more than doubled. Heavy traffic ments in Asia-Pacific in This pattern of forecasting error and volume which is caused by bus, car and implementing measures systematic optimism-bias is even more motorbike journeys was making Bangkok to efficiently involve marked in the case of toll roads compared the private sector in one of the worst cities in the world in terms infrastructure develop- to toll-free road as illustrated in figure 1, of congestion and air pollution caused by which compares two samples of international ment.
    [Show full text]
  • Skripsi Yunda
    CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 General Overview of Research Object 1.1.1 Light Rail Transit Figure 1.1 LRT Source : www.kabar3.com The Palembang Light Rail Transit (Palembang LRT) is an operational light rail transit system in Palembang, Indonesia which connects Sultan Mahmud Badaruddin II International Airport and Jakabaring Sports City. Starting construction in 2015, the project was built to facilitate the 2018 Asian Games and was completed in mid-2018, just a few months before the event. Costing Rp 10.9 trillion for construction, the system is the first operational light rail transit system in Indonesia, and utilizes trains made by local manufacturer PT.INKA. The system's only line has a total of 13 stations (6 operational). As Palembang was to host the 2018 Asian Games, the project was pushed to be completed before the event began. Groundbreaking for the project occurred on 1 November 2015, with state-owned company Waskita Karya being appointed as the primary contractor following the issuance of Presidential Regulation 116 of 2015 on Acceleration of Railway Train Operation in South Sumatera Province. The contract, which was signed in February 2017, was initially valued at Rp 12.5 trillion. Construction was scheduled for completion in February 2018, with commercial service beginning in May 2018. However, the completion date was moved to June 2018 with operations beginning in July, only one month before the Asian Games. A test run was done on 22 May 2018 and was inaugurated by President Joko Widodo on 15 July 2018. Operations for the LRT started on 1 August, several days before the Jakarta LRT began running, making it the first operational LRT system in the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Impact of Railway Project A
    SOCIAL IMPACT OF RAILWAY PROJECT A CASE STUDY OF MASS RAPID TRANSIT (MRT) JAKARTA, INDONESIA DAMPAK SOSIAL PROYEK KERETA API STUDI KASUS MASS RAPID TRANSIT (MRT) JAKARTA, INDONESIA Listifadah Research and Development Land Transportation-Ministry of Transportation Jl. Medan Merdeka Timur No. 5 Jakarta Pusat 10110 email: [email protected] Diterima: 11 November 2014, Revisi 1: 1 Desember 2014, Revisi 2: 10 Desember 2014, Disetujui: 19 Desember 2014 ABSTRACT Jakarta MRT system had been planned since the 1980’s. Many constraints such as political, finan- cial, as well as bureaucratic make the project delayed for a long time. When the plan scheduled to be implemented in a couple years ago, some protests arise. Communities and some interest group against. The fears of income decline and loss of livelihood become their main concerns which in- duce protests before the project really started. Based on this experience, this paper tries to reveal social impacts of transport development in case MRT Jakarta. Now the project construction is being carried out. Social impact as well as the project construction continues. This study investigate how social impact of railway project was happened. Literatures and documents analysis was used to analyze this study. The result of the study were the MRT Jakarta project inevitably have negative and positive impacts both for society and environment. But with the start of the project after a long delay, it gives hope to the community for better transportation. It is a positive impact before the project was completed. Community engagement in a meeting or discusssion should more be em- phasized in the process in order to minimize the conflicts of interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Thailand MRTA Initial System Project (Blue Line) I–V
    Thailand MRTA Initial System Project (Blue Line) I–V External Evaluator: Hiroyasu Otsu, Graduate School of Kyoto University Field Survey: August 2007 – March 2008 1. Project Profile and Japan’s ODA Loan Myミャンマーanmar ラオスLaos Thailandタイ Banバンコクgkok ◎ カンボジアCambodia プロジェクトサイトProject Site Map of the project area Bangkok Subway (MRT Blue Line) 1.1 Background Accompanying the rapid economic development in Bangkok starting in the 1990s, regular traffic congestion and the associated air pollution became evident in the urban area. The Thai government drew up the Bangkok Mass Transit Master Plan (produced by the Office of the Commission for the Management of Road Traffic (OCMRT) and hereinafter referred to as the “master plan”) in 1995 based on the 7th National Economic and Social Development Plan (1992–1996) for the purpose of developing a mass transit network and also for developing a network of ordinary roads and expressways to achieve steady economic growth, together with resolving the above-mentioned traffic congestion and air pollution. Furthermore, the development of the mass transit network proposed in the master plan is also specified in the subsequent 8th National Economic and Social Development Plan (1997–2000), and it is positioned as an extremely important national project in Thailand. The plan for the Bangkok mass transit system, part of the master plan, involves the construction of five lines that will radiate out and join the Bangkok Metropolitan Area (BMA) with the Bangkok Metropolitan Region (BMR)1 together with creating a network 1 The Bangkok Metropolitan Region includes Bangkok, which is a special administrative area, and the surrounding five provinces of Samut Prakan, Pathum Thani, Samut Sakhon, Nakhon Pathom, and Nonthaburi.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Policies in Transport Sector of Vietnam And
    MINISTRY OF TRANSPORT TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENT AND STRATEGY INSTITUTE URBAN PUBLIC TRANSPORT SYSTEM IN VIETNAM Presenter: Le Thi Thanh Nhan (MSc) Energy Efficiency in Emerging Economies Training Week for Southest Asia Jakarta, 16 to 20 July, 2018 Vietnam at a glance Population: 93.5 million people Urban population: 32.3 million people Urbanization rate: 34.5% Urban contribution: 70 - 75% of the GDP Vietnam at a glance • There are 788 urban areas in the whole Viet Nam, including 02 special urban areas (Ha Noi, HCMC) Several figures: 2.9 million automobiles 46 million motorbikes 492 motorbike/1000 population • The competitive index of Vietnam transport infrastructures ranked the 67th of the 138 countries in 2015-2016 period • The urbanization process growths very fast (3.4% per year) resulting in higher and higher traffic demands, and a boom of individual vehicles (i.e. cars, motorbikes) in large urban areas, and severe status of traffic congestion Urban Public Transport in Vietnam Conventional bus BRT Metro River bus Urban Public Transport in Vietnam Conventional bus 61/63 provinces have public bus system with total passenger transported: more than 1 billion/year Structure of bus routes in cities in 2015 Urban Public Transport in Vietnam River bus Operating in Ho Chi Minh City with 01 route 10,8km Metros Under construction in 02 cities are Ha Noi and Ho Chi Minh City MRT system in Hanoi Hanoi: ( Decision 1259/2011/QD-TTg) 8 metro lines with 318 km Line 2A and 3: under construction Line 2A: 13.1 km elevated, 12 stations Line 3: 12.5 km (8.5 km elevated, 4 km underground, 12 stations MRT system in HCMC HCMC: (Decision 568/2013/QD-TTg) 08 metro lines (1, 2, 3a, 3b, 4, 4b, 5, 6) 03 tram lines/1 monorail line (T) 01 elevated rail line (E) MRT Line 1, 2, 5: Under construction BRT system in Hanoi .
    [Show full text]
  • Bangkok MRT Red Line (Thailand)
    mageba – Project information Bangkok MRT Red Line (Thailand) Project description mageba scope Highlights & Facts The MRT (Mass Rapid Transit) red line in In 2015, mageba manufactured more than Bangkok is part of the MRT master plan 5’000 RESTON®SPHERICAL bearings. The mageba products: for the Bangkok metropolitan region. With installation schedule runs from 2015 to Type: RESTON®SPHERICAL a total length of 26.3 km, the red line is 2017. bearings of type KA, KE planned to run from Bang Sue to Rangsit The bearings are designated of types KF, and KF and Bang Sue Stations, bringing passengers KE or KA, depending on their ability to Features: With ROBO®SLIDE to the north. high-grade sliding accommodate sliding movements. material The construction project is part of the As the bearings are installed in this Installation: 2015–2017 infrastructure investment programs led by high-dynamic stressed railway bridge, Strcuture: the Thai Government. the requirements in terms of assuring City: Bangkok Moreover, the master plan comprises a zero friction for smooth transmission of Country: Thailand 26.4 km long line to the north (North Line) horizontal forces had to be fulfilled. Type: Mass transit system and 14.6 km long line to the west (West A further peculiarity features the precast- Owner: Ministry of Transport Line) providing a fully elevated rail system. segement structure that makes great State Railway of Thailand demands on the type of connection to be Designer: Team Consulting used. Engineering and Management Company NorCiv Engineering Co., Ltd The MRT red line is located in Bangkok, the RESTON®SPHERICAL bearings packed and ready for metropolitan region of Thailand delivery Load testing of the RESTON®SPHERICAL bearings Thailand Bangkok Cambodia © 2016 Google Switzerland www.mageba.ch 2016.08 CH-EN ©mageba mageba sa - Solistrasse 68 - 8180 Bülach - Switzerland - T +41 44 872 40 50 - [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Jakarta Definition of Analysis Area: Special Capital Region of Jakarta (DKI Jakarta)
    Deloitte City Mobility Index 2020 Analysis area Analysis area: 661.5 km2 | Population: 10,770,487 (2017) | Population density: 16,270/km2 Jakarta Definition of analysis area: Special Capital Region of Jakarta (DKI Jakarta) TOP PERFORMER MOBILITY ANALYSIS GLOBAL LEADER KEY MOBILITY STATISTICS CONTENDER EMERGING ASPIRING Public transport options* Commuter rail, light rail including metro, bus, ferry Congestion Monthly public transport pass Public transport reliability NA Transport safety Performance GDP per capita and resilience Integrated mobility US$17,124 (2019) Modal diversity Principal transport authorities Transport Agency within the provincial government of DKI Jakarta Vision and strategy Investment JOURNEY MODAL SPLIT Innovation PRIVATE CAR PUBLIC TRANSPORT Vision and Regulatory environment leadership 88% 10% Environmental sustainability initiatives Public transport density WALKING BICYCLE Transport affordability 1% 0% Air quality Service and Customer satisfaction inclusion Accessibility OTHER: 1% *Regulated, licensed, subsidised, and monitored by principal transport authorities. FUTURE OF MOBILITY CAPABILITY Jakarta FoM global leader Significant Passive environment, Proactive environment, Proactive environment, work to do a number of barriers some barriers few barriers STRENGTHS CHALLENGES • Many alternative modes of transport: motorcycle taxis (ojek), • Vehicle numbers expanding at faster rate than road capacity, mini buses (angkot), and auto rickshaws (bajaj) causing persistent congestion • Created the Greater Jakarta Transport Authority
    [Show full text]
  • Research and Development Agency, Ministry of Transportation
    JTTRI INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION STRATEGIC ROLE OF RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT AGENCIES MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION MID TERM NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2020-2024 MINISTRY OF TRANSPORT’S FOCUSES SMART SAFETY AND INTEGRATION COMPETITION INCLUSIVITY SUSTAINABILITY TECHNOLOGY SECURE To reach the maximal Transport should Technology Inclusivity is The balancing Safety and between Security become utilization, the be the stimulant development to important to economy the main goals of infrastructure should of national ensure the best decrease the competition transport economic development, transport system. be integrated with services and equity and the services and sosiologic environment. public transport gap operation 3 RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT AGENCY’S FOCUSES COLLABORATION WITH JAPAN 2019: Research and Development Agency- Civil Aviation Bureau MLIT Japan: “Joint Research in the field of Public Private Partership for Indonesian Airport Infrastructure Development” 2020: a. Research and Development Agency-Civil Aviation Bureau MLIT Japan: “ Joint Research in the field of Smart Airport Design Arrangement for Airports in the New Capital City of Indonesia” b. Research and Development Agency-Chiba University: “Joint Research in the field of Anti Bird Strike Radar Development for Airports” More Collaboration Opportunities: 1. Expert Sharing; 2. Joint research in the field of Land Transport, Railways, Logistics, and Multimode Transport; 3. Research Publication; 4 4. Transport Technology Development. GREATER
    [Show full text]
  • Bangkok Mass Rapid Transit South Purple Line Project
    Technical Assistance Report Project Number: 51048-001 Transaction Technical Assistance (TRTA) September 2017 Thailand: Bangkok Mass Rapid Transit South Purple Line Project This document is being disclosed to the public in accordance with ADB's Public Communications Policy 2011. The views expressed herein are those of the and do not necessarily represent those of ADB’s members, Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 14 September 2017) Currency unit – Thai Baht (B) B1.00 = $0.03016 $1.00 = B33.0615 ABBREVIATIONS ADB – Asian Development Bank APA – Alternative Procurement Arrangement GDP – gross domestic product LBL – London interbank offered rate-based loan MRT – mass rapid transit MRTA – Mass Rapid Transit Authority UMIC – upper middle-income country NOTE In this report, "$" refers to US dollars. Vice-President S. Groff, Operations 2 Director General R. Subramaniam, Southeast Asia Department (SERD) Country Director H. Iwasaki, Thailand Resident Mission, SERD Team leader K. Leung, Senior Finance Specialist, SERD Team members A. Alemania, Senior Operations Assistant, SERD L. Attapich, Senior Country Economist, SERD J. Ghimire, Senior Counsel, Office of the General Counsel O. Jetwattana, Senior Project Officer, SERD C. Kladpetch, Associate Project Analyst, SERD E. Lara, Safeguards Officer (Environment), SERD A. Mabale, Associate Project Officer, SERD J. Pedersen, Senior Procurement Specialist, Operations Services and Financial Management Department P. Ramachandran, Senior Environment Specialist, SERD M. Suga, Social Development Specialist, SERD A. Velasquez, Safeguard Specialist (Environment), SERD Peer reviewer M. Roesner, Principal Transport Specialist, South Asia Department In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Transportation Megaprojects
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 10-2014 The Politics of Transportation Megaprojects Patrizia Christa Nobbe Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/370 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] THE POLITICS OF TRANSPORTATION MEGAPROJECTS by PATRIZIA NOBBE A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Political Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York 2014 ii © 2014 PATRIZIA NOBBE All Rights Reserved ii iii This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Political Science in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Professor Christa Altenstetter ______________________ ______________________________________________________ Date Chair of Examining Committee Professor Alyson Cole _______________________ _______________________________________________________ Date Executive Officer Professor Christa Altenstetter Professor Alyson Cole Professor Joe Rollins Professor Joseph Berechman ___________________________________ Supervisory Committee iii iv Abstract "The Politics of Transportation Megaprojects" by Patrizia Nobbe Adviser: Professor Christa Altenstetter Large infrastructure investment decisions, especially for mega-projects defined as costing more than one billion U.S. dollars, are largely based on complex, unclear and non-transparent decision criteria. The project’s specific context and a variety of actors and interests add to the complexity of the decision processes. All projects deviate, to a certain degree from a “rational” decision-making process, are politically motivated and subject to multiple interests.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mass Rapid Transit System in Taipei, Taiwan
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works Publications and Research John Jay College of Criminal Justice 2007 Subways as a Space of Cultural Intimacy: The Mass Rapid Transit System in Taipei, Taiwan Anru Lee John Jay College of Criminal Justice How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/jj_pubs/14 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] Subways as a Space of Cultural Intimacy: The Mass Rapid Transit System in Taipei, Taiwan How to cite: Lee, Anru. (2007). Subways as a space of cultural intimacy: The Mass Rapid Transit system in Taipei, Taiwan. The China Journal, 58, 31-55. In the summer of 2004, Taiwan‟s ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) sent a delegation of junior staff from the Party‟s headquarters and congressional offices to attend a diplomatic workshop in Washington DC. All of the delegates had been born in Taipei during the late 1970s, and had grown up there. They all had a college or Master‟s degree, mainly in social sciences; they were well-versed in Western critical social theories. For many of them, this was the first trip overseas. After the official function, they visited New York City before going back to Taiwan. During the delegation‟s stay in New York, “they grumbled all the way through”, observed their local guide, the DPP‟s spokesperson from the New York office who happened also to be pursuing an advanced degree in urban studies in the United States.
    [Show full text]