Sedimentology, Stratigraphy, and U-Pb Detrital Zircon Geochronology of the Mesoproterozoic Husky Creek Formation, Coppermine River Group, Nunavut, Canada

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sedimentology, Stratigraphy, and U-Pb Detrital Zircon Geochronology of the Mesoproterozoic Husky Creek Formation, Coppermine River Group, Nunavut, Canada Sedimentology, stratigraphy, and U-Pb detrital zircon geochronology of the Mesoproterozoic Husky Creek Formation, Coppermine River Group, Nunavut, Canada. By Robert David Meek A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science (MSc) in Geology The Faculty of Graduate Studies Laurentian University Sudbury, Ontario, Canada ©Robert Meek, 2020 THESIS DEFENCE COMMITTEE/COMITÉ DE SOUTENANCE DE THÈSE Laurentian Université/Université Laurentienne Faculty of Graduate Studies/Faculté des études supérieures Title of Thesis Titre de la thèse Sedimentology, stratigraphy, and U-Pb detrital zircon geochronology of the Mesoproterozoic Husky Creek Formation, Coppermine River Group, Nunavut, Canada. Name of Candidate Nom du candidat Meek, Robert Degree Diplôme Master of Science Department/Program Date of Defence Département/Programme Geology Date de la soutenance January 08, 2019 APPROVED/APPROUVÉ Thesis Examiners/Examinateurs de thèse: Dr. Alessandro Ielpi (Supervisor/Directeur de thèse) Dr. Robert H. Rainbird (Co-Supervisor/Co-directeur de thèse) Dr. William J. Davis (Co-Supervisor/Co-directeur de thèse) Approved for the Faculty of Graduate Studies Approuvé pour la Faculté des études supérieures Dr. David Lesbarrères Monsieur David Lesbarrères Dr. Janok Bhattacharya Dean, Faculty of Graduate Studies (External Examiner/Examinateur externe) Doyen, Faculté des études supérieures ACCESSIBILITY CLAUSE AND PERMISSION TO USE I, Robert Meek, hereby grant to Laurentian University and/or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or for the duration of my copyright ownership. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also reserve the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report. I further agree that permission for copying of this thesis in any manner, in whole or in part, for scholarly purposes may be granted by the professor or professors who supervised my thesis work or, in their absence, by the Head of the Department in which my thesis work was done. It is understood that any copying or publication or use of this thesis or parts thereof for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. It is also understood that this copy is being made available in this form by the authority of the copyright owner solely for the purpose of private study and research and may not be copied or reproduced except as permitted by the copyright laws without written authority from the copyright owner. ii Abstract The Husky Creek Formation (part of the Coppermine River Group, western Nunavut, Canada) is a <1.23-billion-year-old siliciclastic sedimentary unit that represents the uppermost portion of the Sequence A stratigraphic subdivision – a package of Proterozoic volcanic and sedimentary rocks correlative across the Canadian Arctic. Sedimentologic indicators suggest a continental, temperate to arid depositional environment for the Husky Creek Formation, which included fluvial channel belts and floodplains subject to local aeolian winnowing. U-Pb detrital- zircon geochronology resolved derivation from rocks related to the Mackenzie Igneous Event, or recycling from older sediments such as the Hornby Bay Group. The Husky Creek Formation was deposited in the waning stages of the Mackenzie Igneous Event, in a restricted basin that was carved atop an extensive mafic volcanic plateau. A dominantly west-northwestward palaeoflow suggests that sediment transport from the core of the Laurentian craton was not significantly disrupted by crustal doming related to large-igneous-province emplacement. Keywords Mesoproterozoic, Coppermine River Group, Sequence A, Mackenzie Igneous Event, U-Pb detrital zircon geochronology. iii Co-Authorship Statement Multiple collaborators, listed as co-authors, contributed to the work presented in this manuscript. Scientific guidance, supervision, financial support, sample collection, and assistance with laboratory analysis was provided by these co-authors. Dr. Alessandro Ielpi supervised this MSc project. Chapter 2 is co-authored with Dr. Alessandro Ielpi (Laurentian University) and Dr. Rob Rainbird (Geological Survey of Canada). Fieldwork and sample collection were completed by the candidate under the supervision of both co-authors. The manuscript was completed by the candidate with guidance from Dr. Ielpi and Dr. Rainbird. Chapter 3 is co-authored by Dr. Alessandro Ielpi (Laurentian University), Dr. Rob Rainbird (Geological Survey of Canada), and Dr. William Davis (Geological Survey of Canada). Fieldwork and sample collection was completed by the candidate under the supervision of Dr. Ielpi and Dr. Rainbird. Sample preparation (crushing, milling, heavy mineral separation, Franz magnetic separation, and puck mounting) was conducted in Dr. Davis’ laboratory. Analytical techniques (backscatter electron imaging, cathode luminescence, and sensitive high-resolution ion microprobe analysis) were executed in Dr. Davis’ laboratory with the assistance of the candidate. Dr. Davis also contributed to writing a subsection of the “methods”. The first draft was written by the candidate with scientific guidance from all three co-authors. All three co- authors edited subsequent drafts of the manuscript and provided scientific input. iv Acknowledgements I would like to first and foremost thank Dr. Alessandro Ielpi for providing me with the opportunity to work on such a fantastic project. Your expertise, guidance, friendship, and patience throughout this project has made my M.Sc. experience a truly excellent one. Thank you to my co-supervisor, Dr. Rob Rainbird, for your encouragement, helpful suggestions, and insightful comments. Thank you to co-author Dr. William Davis for your geochronology expertise and edits. Thank you to Tom Pestaj and Nicole Rayner from the Geological Survey of Canada for assistance during analytical work on the SHRIMP. Thank you to all the faculty and staff at the Harquail School of Earth Sciences. Thank you to Willard Desjardin and Elliot Wehrle for help with sample preparation. Thank you to everyone on the 2017 Coppermine expedition, especially the river guides: Jessica Harris, Chris Harris, Dylan Rollo and John McAlpine, for keeping my samples and myself afloat. I would also like to thank my fellow graduate students, including lab mates: Natasha Cyples, Lorraine Lebeau, Mollie Patzke, and Sophie Michel, for their friendship, support, and advice. Thank you to a colleague and great friend Keaton Strongman for great times and endless geology discussions. Last but certainly not least, I would like to thank my parents, David and Dorina Meek, for their continual support and encouragement. v Table of Contents Abstract ........................................................................................................................................................ iii Co-Authorship Statement ............................................................................................................................. iv Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................... v List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................. viii List of Figures .............................................................................................................................................. ix List of Appendices ........................................................................................................................................ x Chapter 1 ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction to the thesis ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Statement of purpose ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Goals and research questions ......................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Structure of thesis ........................................................................................................................... 3 1.4 Statement of responsibilities ........................................................................................................... 4 1.5 Statement of original contributions ................................................................................................. 4 1.6 References ....................................................................................................................................... 5 Chapter 2 ....................................................................................................................................................... 6 Sedimentology and Stratigraphy of the Mesoproterozoic Husky Creek Formation, Lower Coppermine River region, Nunavut ............................................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Synoptic Taxonomy of Major Fossil Groups
    APPENDIX Synoptic Taxonomy of Major Fossil Groups Important fossil taxa are listed down to the lowest practical taxonomic level; in most cases, this will be the ordinal or subordinallevel. Abbreviated stratigraphic units in parentheses (e.g., UCamb-Ree) indicate maximum range known for the group; units followed by question marks are isolated occurrences followed generally by an interval with no known representatives. Taxa with ranges to "Ree" are extant. Data are extracted principally from Harland et al. (1967), Moore et al. (1956 et seq.), Sepkoski (1982), Romer (1966), Colbert (1980), Moy-Thomas and Miles (1971), Taylor (1981), and Brasier (1980). KINGDOM MONERA Class Ciliata (cont.) Order Spirotrichia (Tintinnida) (UOrd-Rec) DIVISION CYANOPHYTA ?Class [mertae sedis Order Chitinozoa (Proterozoic?, LOrd-UDev) Class Cyanophyceae Class Actinopoda Order Chroococcales (Archean-Rec) Subclass Radiolaria Order Nostocales (Archean-Ree) Order Polycystina Order Spongiostromales (Archean-Ree) Suborder Spumellaria (MCamb-Rec) Order Stigonematales (LDev-Rec) Suborder Nasselaria (Dev-Ree) Three minor orders KINGDOM ANIMALIA KINGDOM PROTISTA PHYLUM PORIFERA PHYLUM PROTOZOA Class Hexactinellida Order Amphidiscophora (Miss-Ree) Class Rhizopodea Order Hexactinosida (MTrias-Rec) Order Foraminiferida* Order Lyssacinosida (LCamb-Rec) Suborder Allogromiina (UCamb-Ree) Order Lychniscosida (UTrias-Rec) Suborder Textulariina (LCamb-Ree) Class Demospongia Suborder Fusulinina (Ord-Perm) Order Monaxonida (MCamb-Ree) Suborder Miliolina (Sil-Ree) Order Lithistida
    [Show full text]
  • Stratiform Chromite Deposit Model
    Stratiform Chromite Deposit Model Chapter E of Mineral Deposit Models for Resource Assessment Scientific Investigations Report 2010–5070–E U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey COVER: Photograph showing outcropping of the Bushveld LG6 chromitite seam. Photograph courtesy of Klaus J. Schulz, U.S. Geological Survey. Stratiform Chromite Deposit Model By Ruth F. Schulte, Ryan D. Taylor, Nadine M. Piatak, and Robert R. Seal II Chapter E of Mineral Deposit Model for Resource Assessment Scientific Investigations Report 2010–5070–E U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2012 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Schulte, R.F., Taylor, R.D., Piatak, N.M., and Seal, R.R., II, 2012, Stratiform chromite deposit model, chap. E of Mineral deposit models for resource assessment: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Back Matter (PDF)
    Index Abborrtjarn Tuff Member 83-7, 89-90 Kalahari craton volcanics, and stratabound copper- Abel Erasmus volcanics 323 silver-gold mineralization 347-54 Abitibigreenstone belt 293 Kuroko-style patterns 91 absarokite 246 metamorphic 83,244-5, 454, 528 accreted collage terrain 147, 148, 162, 163 metasomatic 62, 284 accretion 9, 147, 149, 162, 216, 381,541 ocean floor 75 of Glennie Domain 151 permeability channel controlled 349, 352, 354 subduction-related 550 phyllic 330 to crust base 388 post-eruption 519 to N. American continent 468 post-magmatic 356, 357 accretionary wedge 447 Skellefte ore-bearing rocks 71 Achill Island 491 postmetamorphic 330 acid extrusive unit, Kalahari craton 347, 348 potassic 330 acmite 222 premetamorphic 330 actinolite 118, 234, 356, 426, 427, 428,490, 515 propylitic 234, 330 actinolite-hornblende 330 seafloor 290 Adlavik Intrusive Suite 204 seawater 105, 356, 380 adularia 25 secondary 62, 66, 339 African Shield 313 spilitic 528 Africa, southern syndepositional 244 major tectonic provinces and subprovinces 328 synmetamorphic 330 tectonic framework 347 synvolcanic 87, 91,244-5 agglomerate 95, 187, 204, 213,215,221,242, 329, alteration pipes 71,105 438 alumina content 277 Aillik Group 201-9, 241 Amadeus Basin 386 Aillik Group, upper, felsic volcanism 201-9 Amazonian craton 275 petrochemistry 204--8 Amer Lake Zone 167 plutonic rocks 204 Amisk Group 151,168, 185, 186 regional setting 201 volcanics 187 supracrustal rocks 201-4 Am]tsoq gneisses 18 air fall deposits 169, 244 amphibole 97,221,329, 330, 356, 398, 466,
    [Show full text]
  • Shale and Pyrite Re-Os Ages from the Hornby Bay and Amundsen Basins Provide New Chronological Markers for Mesoproterozoic Strati
    Earth and Planetary Science Letters 548 (2020) 116492 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Earth and Planetary Science Letters www.elsevier.com/locate/epsl Shale and pyrite Re-Os ages from the Hornby Bay and Amundsen basins provide new chronological markers for Mesoproterozoic stratigraphic successions of northern Canada ∗ R.H. Rainbird a, , A.D. Rooney b, R.A. Creaser c, T. Skulski a a Geological Survey of Canada, Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa, ON K1A 0E8, Canada b Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA c Dept. of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, 1-26 ESB, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E3, Canada a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: Here we present Re-Os geochronological data from two carbonaceous shale units from the Hornby Bay Received 7 April 2020 and Amundsen basins that provide important chronological markers for Mesoproterozoic stratigraphic Received in revised form 10 July 2020 successions within northern Canada. Shale from the basal Escape Rapids Formation yields a robust Accepted 16 July 2020 depositional age of 1067.3 ± 13.5 Ma for the lowermost Shaler Supergroup of Amundsen basin with Available online 5 August 2020 187 188 a remarkably unradiogenic initial Os/ Os value (0.15), implying that it derived from weathering of Editor: A. Yin juvenile source material, such as basalt. Sedimentological features, indicative of large basin conditions, Keywords: suggest deposition within an extensive epeiric sea that was intermittently mixed with waters from an Mesoproterozoic exterior ocean. This age, and the 720 Ma age of the uppermost Shaler Supergroup, constrain deposition stratigraphy of the ∼4 km-thick succession to a period of approximately 350 myr, recording sedimentation through a Re-Os geochronology complete supercontinent cycle - amalgamation through to break-up of Rodinia.
    [Show full text]
  • Paul F. Hoffman Series
    GEOSCIENCE CANADA Volume 39 2012 77 PAUL F. HOFFMAN SERIES capped by platformal carbonate after la formation locale d’un relief the establishment of a NNW-facing topographique et une prisme des stromatolitic reef complex that formed strates. Ces dernières ont finalement at the same time as reefs in the Little été recouvertes de carbonates de plate- Dal Group of the Mackenzie Moun- forme issus de la mise en place d’un tains, Northwest Territories. Correla- complexe récifal stromatolitique tions between specific formations exposé NNW contigu à la formation within these groups and with equiva- de même âge du groupe Little Dal des lent strata in the Shaler Supergroup on montagnes Ogilvie, en Territoires du Victoria Island are tested with carbon Nord-Ouest. Les corrélations existant isotope chemostratigraphy. The basin- entre des formations spécifiques de forming event that accommodated chacun de ces groupes, sont testées Early Neoproterozoic Basin these strata was restricted to north- grâce à la chimiostratigraphie des iso- Formation in Yukon, western Laurentia (present day coordi- topes du carbone. De ce fait, cet Canada: Implications for nates) and does not represent wide- événement ne correspond pas au large spread rifting of the entire western rifting s’étendant sur l’entière bordure the make-up and break-up margin. Instead we propose that these ouest de la Laurentie et nous pro- of Rodinia strata were accommodated by exten- posons à la place, que ces strates ont sion and localized subsidence associat- été localisées au cours d’un rift avorté ed with the passing of Rodinia over a généré par la mise en place simultanée Francis A.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX PHYSICAL PRINCIPLES MENTIONED in the TEXT Bernoulli's Theorem in a Stream Ofliquid, the Sum of the Elevation Head
    APPENDIX PHYSICAL PRINCIPLES MENTIONED IN THE TEXT Bernoulli's Theorem In a stream ofliquid, the sum of the elevation head, the pressure head, and the velocity head (1) remains constant along any line of flow provided that no work is done by or upon the liquid in the course of its flow and (2) decreases in proportion to the energy lost in viscous flow. Hooke's Law The stress within an elastic solid up to the elastic limit is prop0l1ional to the strain responsible for it. Level of Neutral Buoyancy In the lithosphere, this is the level at which a rising column of magma no longer can rise because below that level the country rock is denser than the magma, and above that level the country rock is less dense than the magma (see Walker, 1989). This level also has been called the level of gravitational stability. Navier-Coulomb Maximum Shear-Stress Theory We do not treat this concept in detail or with mathematics. Those interested in details are referred to Jaeger (1962, p. 75-80). The Navier-Coulomb maximum shear-stress theory states that failure (by shear) of a material occurs when the maximum shear stress equals the shear strength of the material. Compressive shear strength is always greater than tensile shear strength. Because of this, shear caused by compressive stress must be at an angle of less than 45° to the direction of that stress. In any three-dimensional system, there are three principal stresses. If this three-dimensional system is the Eatih's lithosphere, one of the three principal stresses is essentially vertical.
    [Show full text]