Cincinnati Board of Park Commissioners Board Meeting Agenda April 15, 2021 9:00 AM 950 Eden Park Drive Cincinnati, OH 45202

Order of Business

I. Call to Order

A. Acknowledgement of Public Comments B. Approval of March 18, 2021 Meeting Minutes*

II. Election of Park Board Officers*

III. Quarterly Police Report

IV. New Business

A. Dunore Park Survey Results Discussion* Rocky Merz, Division Manager B. Division of Planning & Design Items 1) MEMI Revised Management Agreement* Steven Schuckman, Division Manager 2) Lot 28 Design Services* Steven Schuckman, Division Manager 3) Smale River’s Edge* Cindy France, Principal Architect C. Contracts and Agreements for Approval* Mary Unterreiner, Executive Assistant D. In-Kind Contributions* Craig Sherman, CFO E. Presentations: 1) Volunteer Program Christyl Johnson-Roberts, Vol. Coordinator 2) Krohn Conservatory Mark House, Krohn Manager

V. Old Business

A. Director Goals* Kara Kish, Director

VI. Staff Comments

VII. Commissioner Comments

VIII. Next Regular Meeting Date: May 20, 2021

IX. Adjournment

*Board Action Requested BOARD OF PARK COMMISSIONERS March 18, 2021 CALL TO ORDER

A meeting of the Cincinnati Board of Park Commissioners was held on this day remotely by video conference. Commissioners present: President Brad Lindner, Vice President Jim Goetz, Commissioner Susan Castellini, Commissioner Linda Lee Thomas, and Commissioner Molly North. President Lindner called the meeting to order at 9:02 A.M. Attendance was confirmed by roll call.

Acknowledgement of Public Comments

President Lindner announced there were no public comments submitted for this meeting.

Approval of Meeting Minutes: February 18, 2021; February 22, 2021 (Special); March 4, 2021 (Special)

Commissioner Castellini motioned to approve the meeting minutes from February 18th, February 22nd, and March 4th. Commissioner Thomas seconded. The motion passed by unanimous roll call vote.

Update from Cincinnati Police Department

Captain Dennis Swingley provided an update on recent police activity in French Park and Mt. Airy Forest. Captain Swingley explained on March 3rd, gunshots were reported in French Park and an individual reported witnessing someone carrying a rifle in the park. An extensive search was conducted and officers stopped patrons from entering the park. He explained it was a determined to be a misperception; the individual was carrying a large stick and the noise was from nearby construction. He explained CPD has been patrolling the park daily in the weeks since the incident to ensure safety. Captain Swingley presented an update for Mt. Airy Forest, reporting Year-to-Date (YTD) calls for service as 104, mostly for small theft.

Commissioner Thomas asked how the YTD calls have increased from the previous year. Captain Swingley explained calls to the parks in general are increasing now that the weather is improving and COVID-19 vaccinations are increasing.

Commissioner Castellini asked for an update on Twin Lakes in Eden Park. Jenny Mobley provided an overview of communications with CPD Assistant Chief Lisa Davis to address noise complaints in the area. Ms. Mobley explained CPD plans to patrol the area in vehicles and possible need for police detail has been discussed. She indicated new speed bumps and increased seasonal staff will hopefully improve speeding and noise levels. There was discussion regarding CPD’s awareness of complaints and noise in the area and Parks’ preparedness for the Spring season.

EXECUTIVE SESSION

1 President Lindner announced the plan to move into Executive Session. He explained the public livestream would be discontinued for the session and would continue when the public meeting reconvenes for the purposes of continuing the regular meeting agenda.

President Lindner motioned to enter into Executive Session pursuant to ORC Section 121.22(G) to consider the employment and discipline of a public employee. Commissioner Castellini seconded. The motion passed by unanimous roll call vote.

The Board entered Executive Session at 9:15 A.M.

The Board entered back into public meeting at 9:55 A.M.

Vice President Goetz motioned to place Y. Laketa Cole on unpaid leave status and authorize Director Kish to initiate disciplinary action related to Ms. Cole. Commissioner Castellini seconded. The motion passed by unanimous roll call vote.

OLD BUSINESS

FY 2022 City Funds Recommended Budget

Director Kish thanked the Board for the budget feedback provided at the previous meeting. She pointed out major modifications made to the budget since the first reading. She explained the budget is reflective of City Funds only and is directly in line with the targets provided by the City. Ms. Kish presented the budget of $20,919,946 and explained $9,582,000 is from the General Fund 050. She explained the 8% reduction exercise has been modified to reflect a reduction in Position Vacancy Allowances.

Commissioner North acknowledged the All Positions Summary report provided and noted modifications could help formulate more of an understanding staffing opportunities. President Lindner agreed the summary was helpful and acknowledged there are opportunities for refinement.

Vice President Goetz commented on the elimination of 28 Full Time Equivalent (FTE) positions since FY19, and that there are only 3 PVAs to “cushion” the budget this fiscal year. This point and implications for future budget reductions was discussed.

Vice President Goetz motioned to accept the budget recommendation as presented. Commissioner North seconded. The motion passed by unanimous roll call vote.

NEW BUSINESS

Parks Foundation Grant: Smale Riverfront Park Design

Director Kish presented an opportunity to complete the design of Smale Riverfront Park. She noted the Cincinnati Parks Foundation has been raising funds since 2019 for the completion of the park. She presented the staff recommendation to approve application and acceptance of a Foundation grant for up to $500k to procure design services to produce construction documents.

2

Commissioner Castellini asked if the request was specifically for Lot 23 and if it included Lot 28. Director Kish answered the completion of Smale Riverfront Park includes Lot 28 and the funding could potentially include design services for it.

Vice President Goetz commented on the great opportunity being offered by the Foundation to cover up front design costs for Lot 23 and Lot 28 if funds remain available and the Park Board is still supportive of completing Smale Riverfront Park.

Commissioner Thomas expressed her support and appreciation for the funding opportunity. She reiterated her understanding the grant would be for design work for Lot 23 and Lot 28, assuming there will be sufficient funds for both and further funding may be needed for Lot 28. President Lindner commented Director Kish should get more clarification, Lot 23 design work would be priority and remaining funds could be used toward Lot 28.

Vice President Goetz motioned for the Park Board to show its appreciation to the Cincinnati Parks Foundation for their continued work in fundraising for the completion of Smale, and that the Park Board request funding for up to $500k for design work to prepare for the completion of the park when funds are available. Commissioner Castellini seconded. The motion passed by unanimous roll call vote.

Contracts over $50k: Stump Grinding Contract

Crystal Courtney explained the three-year stump grinding contract needs to be renewed so tree stumps can be ground after removal to allow for new plantings. She presented the staff recommendation to approve the presented contract and expense of annual forestry funds from Fund 792 to cover the cost of right-of-way stump grinding, city-wide.

Commissioner Thomas asked if the 924 trees removed per year was high and if trees are replanted. Ms. Courtney answered the annual total is based on a 5-year average and trees are replanted.

Commissioner Castellini motioned to approve the staff recommendation. Commissioner Thomas seconded. The motion passed by unanimous roll call vote.

Burnet Woods Invasives Management Update

Crystal Courtney presented updates on the invasive species management project with Mad Scientist in Burnet Woods. She thanked new Conservation Technician, Drew Goebel for oversight of this contract and initiative. Ms. Courtney presented an overview of the program and insight into the invasives management plan over next four years. She described priority areas, invasive species removal work to date, timeline of work, and the budget.

Commissioner Castellini asked about mudslide concerns in hilly areas that have been cleared of invasives. Ms. Courtney explained since the areas are not very steep, slippage is not a concern and the area will be reseeded when the weather is warmer to prevent future movement. She expressed the importance of ongoing maintenance of these sites, continued replanting, and reseeding.

3 Replanting and ongoing management of the newly cleared areas was discussed as well as treatment of lesser celandine. Volunteer assistance from Preserve Burnet Woods (PBW) was discussed as well as future goals of training volunteers in land management.

Commissioner North asked how parks are prioritized for invasive species management and what the overall vision is for invasives management. Ms. Courtney explained prioritization is based on existing partnerships with volunteers because Parks does not have the staff to target invasives management system-wide. She explained land management plans have been created for areas with strong existing volunteer groups as a model for the rest of the Parks system.

Vice President Goetz commented on the transformation of Burnet Woods and commended PBW and staff on the creation of this partnership model.

The role of the Parks Foundation in invasives management was discussed. Ms. Courtney described the commitment of the Foundation to conservation, including a $25k grant for invasive species management in Mt. Airy through a partnership with Groundwork Ohio River Valley. She also explained a partnership with the Foundation and PBW, will provide 250 volunteers to be trained, certified, and insured for pesticide invasive species management application.

President Lindner commended Ms. Courtney and staff on the thorough plan and management of invasive species removal. Commissioner Castellini also commended Ms. Courtney.

Volunteer recognition was discussed. Commissioner Thomas suggested recognizing volunteers at a future meeting for this work. President Lindner suggested continuing the bi-monthly volunteer recognition at Park Board meetings.

Urban Tree Canopy Analysis Update

Matt DiBona presented an update on the urban tree canopy analysis used for analytics in Urban Forestry and throughout the Parks system as well as an overview of tree inventory. He described the current status of the UTC analysis, explaining imagery is being reviewed but quantitative analysis is not yet available. Further, the deliverable from Applied Geographics should be available in the fall. Mr. DiBona explained the contract includes the entire county and is being maximized by funding from MSD.

Mr. DiBona showed comparisons between free online data and the accuracy and detail of the UTC data. He provided an overview of LiDAR technology. He presented the iTree analysis for Parks’ tree inventory, which generates the benefits for trees within any setting.

Commissioner North commented on the impact of development to tree canopy and asked if the data can be used to determine the cost of development on the tree canopy so Parks can position itself for resources. Mr. DiBona described the ways Parks is analyzing tree canopy trends related to development and zoning. There was further discussion regarding measuring and recuperating value of trees impacted by development as well as considerations for species selection for replanting.

4 Commissioner Thomas expressed excitement for the public availability of the data and iTree dashboard. She asked if there was an incentive for developers to replace tree canopy. Mr. DiBona answered there are deterrents. Ms. Courtney explained MSD is working on an impervious surface fee which could include tree canopy as mitigation for impervious surfaces. There was discussion regarding opportunities to include tree regulations in zoning codes and educating developers and City Council on the benefits of tree canopy, as well as the ability to update data moving forward.

Vice President Goetz commended staff on this work and asked for future updates so the Park Board can advocate on behalf of Parks staff. Commissioner North commented on the opportunity to also prohibit the planting of invasives such as bamboo in the city. President Lindner expressed support and the positive impact on quality of life this work accomplishes. Mr. DiBona commented on the ability for Parks to complete this in-house. There was further discussion regarding the need to protect and identify mature trees because they cannot be replanted at maximum value.

Director Kish commented positively on the Park Board’s investment in this software and the passion and talent of the Natural Resources team.

Mt. Airy Forest Plan Community Engagement

Steve Schuckman presented an overview of the community engagement process staff have participated in with the Mt. Airy community. He explained Mt. Airy wanted to incorporate ideas and improvement recommendations for Mt. Airy Forest in their new neighborhood plan preparation, and a survey was developed and established a working group to represent park and community interests and stakeholders. He described representation on the community group, content and outcomes of two community engagement sessions, and survey results.

Director Kish expressed excitement for Parks’ participation in this plan with the community and City Planning Department to explore how parks can be improved and commented on the Planning Department’s future plans to create plans for other neighborhoods. Mr. Schuckman emphasized Parks is working with Planning to be at the table for development of the 10 neighborhood plans.

Commissioner Thomas commented on the mutual benefit of Parks and the community to engage in this process to focus community needs and utilize them to improve the parks through these neighborhood plans in partnership with the neighborhoods and Planning.

The Mt. Airy Forest survey was discussed. Mr. Schuckman commented 99% of respondents expressed interest in volunteering at Mt. Airy Forest. Commissioner Thomas commented the demographics of respondents was not representative of the park users and future plans should focus more on gathering diverse feedback. Mr. Schuckman agreed and suggested methods for achieving this. Vice President Goetz echoed the need to consider the source of the data and not focus solely on the survey feedback when determining recommendations for the park.

Commissioner North commented Parks should not wait for a new master plan to address long sought-after improvements, including trails. She suggested trails may be an opportunity for federal stimulus funding. Mr. Schuckman agreed trail improvements could happen sooner and emphasized the asset Mt. Airy to walkers and hikers.

5

Director Kish introduced Daniel Traicoff, Director of Mt. Airy Community Urban Redevelopment Enterprise (CURE). Mr. Traicoff provided background on the neighborhood plan in development, emphasizing many Mt. Airy residents do not regularly visit Mt. Airy Forest despite the prevalence of its footprint. He commented on safety perception of the park, neighborhood property value, and Parks staff’s assistance in the planning process. He acknowledged the need to improve accuracy of survey demographics and commented on desired improvements including electricity and improving connection to Hawaiin Terrace apartments. He thanked the Park Board and staff for their involvement.

The involvement of the Mt. Airy Forest Advisory Council was discussed. Vice President Goetz commented on the great resource community groups involved in this discussion provide. President Lindner thanked Mr. Traicoff.

Approval & Advice Requirements Discussion

Director Kish recommended tabling this discussion item, as it is not time sensitive. President Lindner tabled the item until the next regular Park Board meeting.

STAFF COMMENTS

Kelly Piller, Communications and Visual Designer, presented staff updates on Explore Nature! summer camps, flood response, and April events. Ms. Piller announced Explore Nature! summer camp registration went live on February 27th and nearly sold out within the first 48 hours. She expressed gratitude to the Parks Foundation for the Stevenson Sisters Scholarship, which provided free registration for 40 campers. She commented 55 spots remain for the camps for kids 3.5-14 years old which take place June 14th to August 6th at $75-125 per camper. Director Kish explained this year’s camps are designed to be COVID safe again and discussions are occurring for enhancing camps next year. Ms. Piller emphasized safety requirements are being met and overall, registrants did not show hesitancy regarding safety of camps. Commissioner Thomas asked if reduced capacity of summer camps would continue this year and Ms. Piller confirmed.

Regarding the recent flooding of the Ohio River, Ms. Piller expressed appreciation for the Riverfront and East District teams for their extensive preparation of the area and thorough cleaning response after the waters receded.

Ms. Piller announced April is the official start of the season and the majority of park restrooms start opening April 1st through 15th. She explained staff are planning volunteer events and tree plantings in conjunction with Earth Day on April 22nd Arbor Day on April 30th, including a partnered volunteer event with the Parks Foundation and LifeCenter to plant 40 trees in Mt. Echo to honor Parks’ 40th year as a Tree City USA community. Ms. Piller described plans to honor volunteers for volunteer appreciation month in April and acknowledged the Park Board’s interest in reestablishing volunteer recognition at Board meetings. She explained volunteer events can be found at Cincinnatiparks.com.

6

COMMISSIONER COMMENTS

There was discussion regarding the possibility for Parks to benefit from federal stimulus funding received by the City through the American Rescue Plan Act. Director Kish asked for direction on communicating with the Mayor’s Office to speak to the value of an investment in Parks as the City is deliberating on best utilization of funds. She asked for Board feedback on engaging with the Mayor’s office regarding available funding projects to be considered, and demonstrating support for projects that have an impact on park property.

President Lindner was supportive of contributing ideas for utilization of stimulus funding and informing the Mayor’s Office of potential projects. He suggested prioritizing capital needs and new transformational projects.

Commissioner Castellini asked if the City knows the amount it will be receiving. Commissioner North answered, $291 million. Ms. North referenced the possibility a portion must be committed in the first 12 months after receipt. The implications for project timelines as a result of these guidelines were discussed. Director Kish expressed the guidance is still unclear but Parks has been asked to provide ideas for projects that are not necessarily shovel ready, implying there could be an extended timeline, but presuming expense of funds in a timely manner. She cited the Infrastructure Study which could be used as a tool to determine potential projects for investment.

Commissioner North provided feedback to Director Kish on a one-page draft document highlighting ideas for a $30 million investment in Parks. She suggested proposing priorities within the $20 million suggested for capital needs, as well as clarifying the difference between funding priorities and additional ideas, and stating projects rather than problems. Director Kish noted this feedback. The “Spark the Parks” vision was discussed.

Vice President Goetz commented on the best approach for communicating funding priorities to the Mayor’s Office. He recommended collaboration through meeting instead of just a formal letter.

Commissioner Thomas provided feedback on the one-page draft document, suggesting simplification and presenting the priorities within broader areas of focus, such as “rehabilitation” and “enhancement.”

Director Kish discussed methods of initiating the conversation with the Mayor’s office. President Lindner suggested sending a letter stating general areas of focus and stating Parks’ ability to utilize the Infrastructure Study to identify specific funding opportunities, and express interest in a collaborative meeting as a next step.

Commissioner Castellini asked if a portion of the federal funding would be committed to the City’s deficit. Commissioner North explained her understanding is about a $20 million portion would. She expressed investing stimulus dollars in parks would be valuable to the community, but funding will still be competitive.

7 Vice President Goetz emphasized the need to move quickly and submit a full proposal for stimulating the parks as opposed to a “piecemeal” approach. Director Kish suggested sending an email correspondence to the Mayor’s Office with high level priorities, with reference to the Infrastructure Study, and a request to meet. President Lindner and Commissioner Thomas expressed the strength of having data to support the requests. Ms. Thomas reiterated the need to communicate the value of investing in Parks and to collaborate in a meeting with the Mayor’s Office, not just in writing. The community benefits of Parks receiving federal stimulus funding were discussed.

Vice President Goetz commented MEMI is interested in constructing a permanent stage on Lot 23 and requested drawings for those plans. Steve Schuckman confirmed he could provide those to the Board. Mr. Goetz explained a property in Mt. Adams adjacent to Tom Jones Commons is for sale and a group of citizens is interested in purchasing the space and donating to Parks. He explained staff have been in communication with the citizen group.

Mr. Goetz asked about the reopening plan for Krohn. Jenny Mobley explained Krohn will reopen with reservations for an extended Butterfly Show, May 8th through Labor Day. She explained staff are considering extended hours to maximize daily attendance while reducing capacity. Mr. Goetz asked the purpose of delaying the opening until May 8th and Ms. Mobley explained further preparation is needed for the Butterfly show installation and a Spring show is not currently installed in the exhibit space.

Commissioner Castellini commented on the positive and informative meeting. Director Kish expressed plans to continue to include informative staff presentations on the agenda.

Commissioner North suggested discussing the status of projects at an upcoming meeting, as well as having an overview of upcoming projects for consideration.

ADJOURNMENT

Commissioner Castellini motioned to adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 12:40 P.M.

ATTEST:

______PRESIDENT

______DIRECTOR

8 BOARD OF PARK COMMISSIONERS Date: April 15, 2021

Brad Lindner To: Board of Park Commissioners President James Goetz From: Rocky Merz, Division Manager Vice President Susan F. Castellini Subject: Dunore Dog Park Engagement Feedback & Next Steps Linda Lee Thomas

Molly North Background

At the January 21, 2021 regular Park Board meeting, as a follow-up to a community led presentation at the February 28, 2020 meeting, the Board asked staff to further engage with the community regarding installation of a dog park at Dunore Park. The engagement effort generated a significant amount of interest and feedback within the surrounding community. Throughout, staff sought to keep the process as transparent Kara S. Kish and inclusive as possible. Director Jenny Mobley Engagement Efforts Deputy Director

Crystal Courtney Given the pandemic environment, an electronic survey was the primary, Division Manager though not the only, means of collecting feedback. The survey was shared Rocky Merz widely and open from February 12 through March 31. Specifically, it was Division Manager distributed twice to an e-mail list of community stakeholders in the Clifton Steven L. Schuckman area including the surrounding community councils, anyone who had Division Manager previously contacted Cincinnati Parks about the proposal and other civic Craig Sherman groups such as BPAC and Preserve Burnet Woods. Physical signs were Division Manager placed at the park with instructions on how to complete the survey. It was also shared on Nextdoor Clifton and the Cincinnati Parks website. These individuals and organizations were encouraged to share with their respective contact lists.

As always, individuals were invited to send feedback via e-mail to the [email protected] account. All of these responses and survey results were compiled and sent to the Park Board, the various individuals and stakeholders and posted on the website and Nextdoor Clifton. Staff 950 Eden Park Drive also met onsite with area residents, at their request, to hear feedback and Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 Phone (513) 352-2604 answer questions. Fax (513) 352-4096 www.cincinnatiparks.com #cincyparks

9 Results

These efforts produced a substantial amount of feedback and interest. Overall, 850 survey responses were received over the 6-week period from more than 25 zip codes, the vast majority of which were from the 45220 Clifton area. This generated 1,384 individual comments (Usage- 523, Interest-449, Benefit-178, Concern-234). A total of 21 e-mails were also received during the survey period (Attachment B). We are not aware of any complaints from anyone wishing to express their feedback who was unable to do so.

For comparison, last year a very similar approach was used to collect feedback over several months about the closure of Burnet Woods Drive including a survey, stakeholder notification and signage at the park. This effort generated a total of 235 responses.

The results pointed to strong feelings both for and against constructing a dog park at Dunore Park. This split was demonstrated in the written comments as well as the response data with an overall 55% “for” / 45% “against” split. Further, those living close to the park were mostly opposed, while those living further away were most often supportive.

Additionally, on April 5 the Clifton Town Meeting (CTM) met and adopted a resolution acknowledging the survey results, opposing construction of a dog park at Dunore, expressing interest in a dog park serving Clifton and requesting Cincinnati Parks explore alternate dog park locations (not taking away existing greenspace) and work with CTM to gather feedback on potential sites (Attachment C).

Through these engagement efforts, we have also received correspondence from the Burnet Woods Advisory Council (opposing a dog park in Burnet) as well as the Mt. Storm/Dunore/Bowdle Park Advisory Council (sympathizing with those opposed to a Dunore dog park). (See Attached)

Next Steps

The feedback, comments and engagement to date have provided value in terms of better understanding where the surrounding community stands. Collectively, the data supports additional engagement to identify and further vet potential sites.

Staff would like to work with the community councils and park advisory councils serving this area to finalize a list of potential sites located within an existing park or at other viable locations. Parks would vet sites identified for technical viability (size, topography etc.). These organizations include:

• Clifton Town Meeting • Corryville Community Council • CUF Community Council (Clifton Heights, University Heights and Fairview) • Burnet Woods Advisory Council (BPAC) • Mt. Storm/Dunore/Bowdle Park Advisory Council

After an agreeable list of viable sites is determined, staff would conduct another round of engagement with the surrounding community to receive feedback on these locations. The goal would be to identify a site(s) suitable for a dog park in the surrounding Clifton area, both from a

10 technical as well as a community standpoint. After this round of community feedback, Staff will bring the results and findings to the Park Board for consideration.

Recommendations

Staff respectfully requests the Board allow Parks Staff to work with Clifton area community Councils and Park Advisory Councils to identify and gather additional community feedback about installing a dog park to serve the community. Once complete, staff will report the findings to the Park Board.

Attachment A—Dunore Dog Park Engagement Survey Results Attachment B—Dunore Dog Park E-mail Feedback Attachment C—Clifton Town Meeting April 5, 2021 Dog Park Resolution Attachment D—Burnet Woods Advisory Council Resolution Attachment E—Mt. Storm/Dunore/Bowdle Park Advisory Council E-mail

11 Attachment A

Dunore Park Feedback Dunore Park Feedback

Q1 Where do you live in relation to Dunore Park? Q2 What is the zip code of your residence?

Answered: 850 Skipped: 1 Answered: 839 Skipped: 12

Within one # RESPONSES DATE block 1 45202 4/1/2021 8:04 AM

2 45220 3/31/2021 11:47 PM

Less than a 10 3 45220 3/31/2021 11:30 PM minute walk 4 45220 3/31/2021 10:47 PM

5 45220 3/31/2021 10:30 PM

More than a 10 6 45220 3/31/2021 10:05 PM minute walk 7 45220 3/31/2021 9:37 PM

8 45232 3/31/2021 9:24 PM 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 9 45229 3/31/2021 9:17 PM

10 45220 3/31/2021 9:15 PM ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES 11 45220 3/31/2021 8:27 PM Within one block 26.59% 226 12 45220 3/31/2021 8:01 PM Less than a 10 minute walk 43.29% 368 13 45229 3/31/2021 4:23 PM More than a 10 minute walk 30.12% 256 14 45220 3/31/2021 4:21 PM TOTAL 850 15 45220 3/31/2021 4:10 PM

16 45220 3/31/2021 4:01 PM

17 45220 3/31/2021 3:24 PM

18 45220 3/31/2021 2:12 PM

19 45220 3/31/2021 1:43 PM

20 45223 3/31/2021 1:41 PM

21 45220 3/31/2021 12:08 PM

22 45219 3/31/2021 11:19 AM

23 45219 3/31/2021 10:16 AM

24 45220 3/31/2021 9:47 AM

25 45220 3/31/2021 9:31 AM

26 45241 3/31/2021 7:08 AM

27 45220 3/30/2021 7:29 PM

28 45220 3/30/2021 7:26 PM

29 45227 3/30/2021 7:25 PM

30 45220 3/30/2021 7:10 PM

31 45220 3/30/2021 5:25 PM

32 45220 3/30/2021 5:15 PM

33 45220 3/30/2021 4:17 PM

1 / 1 1 / 23

12 Attachment A

Dunore Park Feedback Dunore Park Feedback

72 45220 3/28/2021 10:45 AM 34 45232 3/30/2021 3:20 PM 73 45220 3/28/2021 8:43 AM 35 45220 3/30/2021 2:35 PM 74 45220 3/28/2021 7:25 AM 36 45220 3/30/2021 1:52 PM 75 45220 3/27/2021 10:53 PM 37 45220 3/30/2021 12:00 PM 76 45220 3/27/2021 10:49 PM 38 45220 3/30/2021 11:33 AM 77 45220 3/27/2021 8:46 PM 39 45220 3/30/2021 11:19 AM 78 45220 3/27/2021 8:12 PM 40 45220 3/30/2021 11:16 AM 79 45223 3/27/2021 7:48 PM 41 45317 3/30/2021 11:09 AM 80 45220 3/27/2021 7:43 PM 42 45220 3/30/2021 10:37 AM 81 45220 3/27/2021 6:34 PM 43 45220 3/30/2021 10:13 AM 82 45229 3/27/2021 4:05 PM 44 45223 3/30/2021 9:58 AM 83 45219 3/27/2021 1:50 PM 45 45220 3/30/2021 9:58 AM 84 45220 3/27/2021 1:39 PM 46 45220 3/30/2021 9:55 AM 85 45220 3/27/2021 1:35 PM 47 45220 3/30/2021 9:16 AM 86 45220 3/27/2021 1:15 PM 48 45223 3/30/2021 7:48 AM 87 45220 3/27/2021 1:00 PM 49 45223 3/30/2021 7:46 AM 88 45220 3/27/2021 12:45 PM 50 45220 3/29/2021 9:37 PM 89 45220 3/27/2021 11:30 AM 51 45220 3/29/2021 6:24 PM 90 45220 3/27/2021 9:52 AM 52 45220 3/29/2021 4:47 PM 91 45219 3/27/2021 9:43 AM 53 45220 3/29/2021 4:32 PM 92 45202 3/27/2021 9:29 AM 54 45220 3/29/2021 4:30 PM 93 45219 3/27/2021 9:25 AM 55 45220 3/29/2021 3:42 PM 94 45229 3/27/2021 9:25 AM 56 45220 3/29/2021 3:41 PM 95 45220 3/27/2021 9:21 AM 57 45220 3/29/2021 3:37 PM 96 45229 3/27/2021 7:16 AM 58 45223 3/29/2021 2:32 PM 97 45220 3/26/2021 10:47 PM 59 45223 3/29/2021 1:35 PM 98 45220 3/26/2021 10:33 PM 60 45220 3/29/2021 1:32 PM 99 45220 3/26/2021 10:29 PM 61 45220 3/29/2021 12:09 AM 100 45219 3/26/2021 10:20 PM 62 45220 3/28/2021 11:52 PM 101 45238 3/26/2021 10:11 PM 63 45220 3/28/2021 8:43 PM 102 45220 3/26/2021 10:02 PM 64 45223 3/28/2021 8:09 PM 103 45220 3/26/2021 9:57 PM 65 45223 3/28/2021 7:03 PM 104 45220 3/26/2021 9:57 PM 66 45220 3/28/2021 5:44 PM 105 45213 3/26/2021 9:56 PM 67 4522” 3/28/2021 3:22 PM 106 45236 3/26/2021 9:54 PM 68 45220 3/28/2021 3:11 PM 107 45202 3/26/2021 9:54 PM 69 45220 3/28/2021 12:43 PM 108 45236 3/26/2021 9:53 PM 70 45220 3/28/2021 12:10 PM 109 45219 3/26/2021 7:59 PM 71 45220 3/28/2021 11:46 AM

2 / 23 3 / 23

13 Attachment A

Dunore Park Feedback Dunore Park Feedback

110 45220 3/26/2021 1:25 PM 148 45220 3/20/2021 5:25 PM

111 45220 3/26/2021 11:34 AM 149 45220 3/20/2021 3:47 PM

112 45220 3/26/2021 11:25 AM 150 45220 3/17/2021 6:14 PM

113 45220 3/26/2021 9:20 AM 151 T45220 3/17/2021 12:51 PM

114 45220 3/26/2021 7:43 AM 152 45220 3/17/2021 12:41 PM

115 45220 3/25/2021 8:22 PM 153 45220 3/17/2021 9:02 AM

116 45220 3/25/2021 7:10 PM 154 45220 3/16/2021 5:34 PM

117 45220 3/25/2021 6:46 PM 155 45220 3/16/2021 10:48 AM

118 45220 3/25/2021 6:17 PM 156 45225 3/16/2021 9:47 AM

119 45220 3/25/2021 5:46 PM 157 41011 3/15/2021 5:50 PM

120 45220 3/25/2021 5:38 PM 158 45213 3/15/2021 5:23 PM

121 45220 3/25/2021 5:04 PM 159 45212 3/15/2021 4:48 PM

122 45220 3/25/2021 4:42 PM 160 45220 3/15/2021 4:45 PM

123 45220 3/25/2021 2:43 PM 161 45232 3/15/2021 4:34 PM

124 45220 3/25/2021 1:53 PM 162 45219 3/15/2021 4:30 PM

125 45220 3/25/2021 1:13 PM 163 45202 3/15/2021 4:24 PM

126 45220 3/25/2021 12:46 PM 164 45202 3/15/2021 4:19 PM

127 45220 3/25/2021 12:27 PM 165 45220 3/15/2021 4:15 PM

128 45238 3/25/2021 11:56 AM 166 45220 3/15/2021 4:12 PM

129 45220 3/25/2021 11:53 AM 167 45205 3/15/2021 3:56 PM

130 45220 3/25/2021 11:13 AM 168 45223 3/15/2021 3:54 PM

131 45220 3/25/2021 11:13 AM 169 45223 3/15/2021 3:53 PM

132 45220 3/25/2021 9:28 AM 170 45220 3/15/2021 3:17 PM

133 45220 3/25/2021 8:07 AM 171 45220 3/15/2021 1:58 PM

134 45220 3/25/2021 8:04 AM 172 45220 3/15/2021 10:44 AM

135 45220 3/25/2021 7:58 AM 173 45220 3/15/2021 9:43 AM

136 45229 3/25/2021 7:06 AM 174 45220 3/15/2021 9:12 AM

137 45220 3/24/2021 10:47 PM 175 45220-1430 3/14/2021 11:19 PM

138 45220 3/24/2021 7:40 PM 176 45220 3/14/2021 7:48 AM

139 45220 3/24/2021 7:36 PM 177 45220 3/14/2021 7:48 AM

140 45220 3/24/2021 7:36 PM 178 45223 3/14/2021 12:49 AM

141 45220 3/24/2021 1:59 PM 179 45220 3/14/2021 12:00 AM

142 45223 3/23/2021 12:47 PM 180 45220 3/13/2021 6:50 PM

143 45220 3/22/2021 5:00 PM 181 45220 3/13/2021 6:45 PM

144 45220 3/22/2021 4:54 PM 182 45220 3/13/2021 6:09 PM

145 45220 3/22/2021 12:48 PM 183 45220 3/13/2021 6:08 PM

146 45220 3/22/2021 9:08 AM 184 45220 3/13/2021 5:24 PM

147 45220 3/21/2021 12:36 PM 185 45220 3/13/2021 11:11 AM

4 / 23 5 / 23

14 Attachment A

Dunore Park Feedback Dunore Park Feedback

186 45220 3/13/2021 8:21 AM 224 45220 3/7/2021 6:47 PM

187 45220 3/13/2021 12:37 AM 225 45220 3/7/2021 6:46 PM

188 45220 3/12/2021 10:38 AM 226 45220 3/7/2021 6:41 PM

189 45220 3/11/2021 2:29 PM 227 45220 3/7/2021 6:33 PM

190 45220 3/10/2021 8:05 PM 228 45220 3/7/2021 5:32 PM

191 45220 3/10/2021 6:40 PM 229 45220 3/7/2021 4:58 PM

192 45220 3/10/2021 5:31 PM 230 45220 3/7/2021 4:50 PM

193 45230 3/10/2021 2:10 PM 231 45220 3/7/2021 4:45 PM

194 45220 3/10/2021 2:04 PM 232 45220 3/7/2021 3:20 PM

195 45220 3/10/2021 1:41 PM 233 45220 3/7/2021 3:00 PM

196 45224 3/10/2021 1:12 PM 234 45220 3/7/2021 2:51 PM

197 45220 3/10/2021 12:52 PM 235 45220 3/7/2021 12:35 PM

198 45220 3/10/2021 9:08 AM 236 45220 3/7/2021 12:33 PM

199 45220 3/10/2021 8:53 AM 237 45229 3/7/2021 12:05 PM

200 45220 3/9/2021 4:56 PM 238 45220 3/7/2021 11:51 AM

201 45223 3/9/2021 4:15 PM 239 45220 3/7/2021 10:33 AM

202 45220 3/9/2021 2:50 PM 240 45220 3/7/2021 8:20 AM

203 45220 3/9/2021 1:28 PM 241 45220 3/7/2021 8:14 AM

204 45220 3/9/2021 11:26 AM 242 45220 3/6/2021 8:22 PM

205 45220 3/9/2021 6:41 AM 243 45220 3/6/2021 7:58 PM

206 45220 3/8/2021 9:33 PM 244 45220 3/6/2021 7:17 PM

207 45220 3/8/2021 6:46 PM 245 45220 3/6/2021 6:21 PM

208 45220 3/8/2021 6:10 PM 246 45220 3/6/2021 5:49 PM

209 45220 3/8/2021 5:15 PM 247 45220 3/6/2021 5:36 PM

210 45220 3/8/2021 4:09 PM 248 45220 3/6/2021 5:30 PM

211 45220 3/8/2021 4:02 PM 249 45220 3/6/2021 4:29 PM

212 45220 3/8/2021 1:19 PM 250 45220 3/6/2021 4:27 PM

213 45211 3/8/2021 12:58 PM 251 45220 3/6/2021 3:50 PM

214 45220 3/8/2021 12:27 PM 252 45220 3/6/2021 3:50 PM

215 45220 3/8/2021 11:55 AM 253 45220 3/6/2021 2:55 PM

216 45220 3/8/2021 7:30 AM 254 45220 3/6/2021 2:53 PM

217 45220 3/8/2021 3:11 AM 255 46220 3/6/2021 2:49 PM

218 45220 3/7/2021 10:05 PM 256 45220 3/6/2021 2:30 PM

219 45220 3/7/2021 9:15 PM 257 45220 3/6/2021 2:28 PM

220 45220 3/7/2021 9:10 PM 258 45220 3/6/2021 2:23 PM

221 45220 3/7/2021 8:42 PM 259 45220 3/6/2021 2:21 PM

222 45220 3/7/2021 7:19 PM 260 45220 3/6/2021 2:17 PM

223 45220 3/7/2021 7:08 PM 261 45220 3/6/2021 2:16 PM

6 / 23 7 / 23

15 Attachment A

Dunore Park Feedback Dunore Park Feedback

262 45220 3/6/2021 1:39 PM 300 45219 3/2/2021 11:10 AM

263 45220 3/6/2021 1:31 PM 301 45220 3/2/2021 11:08 AM

264 45220 3/6/2021 1:17 PM 302 45220-1616 3/2/2021 11:02 AM

265 45220 3/6/2021 12:32 PM 303 45220 3/2/2021 11:00 AM

266 45220 3/6/2021 10:16 AM 304 45220 3/2/2021 10:55 AM

267 45220 3/6/2021 10:13 AM 305 45220 3/2/2021 10:49 AM

268 45220 3/6/2021 10:09 AM 306 45220 3/1/2021 9:46 PM

269 55230 3/6/2021 9:56 AM 307 45220 3/1/2021 8:36 PM

270 45220 3/5/2021 10:13 PM 308 45220 3/1/2021 4:32 PM

271 45220 3/5/2021 6:36 PM 309 45251 3/1/2021 4:28 PM

272 45220 3/5/2021 6:09 PM 310 45220 3/1/2021 4:26 PM

273 45220 3/5/2021 5:35 PM 311 45227 3/1/2021 4:09 PM

274 45220 3/5/2021 5:18 PM 312 45220 3/1/2021 2:39 PM

275 45220 3/5/2021 4:57 PM 313 45220 2/28/2021 6:29 PM

276 45220-1434 3/5/2021 2:10 PM 314 45220 2/28/2021 2:30 PM

277 45220 3/5/2021 11:16 AM 315 45220 2/28/2021 2:22 PM

278 45030 3/4/2021 11:16 PM 316 45220 2/27/2021 9:30 PM

279 45220 3/4/2021 3:08 PM 317 45220 2/27/2021 3:35 PM

280 45220 3/4/2021 2:54 PM 318 45220 2/27/2021 2:58 PM

281 45220 3/4/2021 2:33 PM 319 45220 2/25/2021 8:41 PM

282 45220 3/3/2021 6:30 PM 320 45220 2/25/2021 8:37 PM

283 45220 3/3/2021 4:40 PM 321 45220 2/25/2021 10:44 AM

284 45220 3/3/2021 8:53 AM 322 45220 2/25/2021 9:32 AM

285 45220 3/3/2021 8:13 AM 323 45220 2/24/2021 11:15 PM

286 45220 3/3/2021 7:52 AM 324 45220 2/24/2021 6:06 PM

287 45220 3/2/2021 11:07 PM 325 45220 2/24/2021 5:16 PM

288 45220 3/2/2021 8:09 PM 326 45220 2/24/2021 5:02 PM

289 45220 3/2/2021 7:06 PM 327 45220 2/24/2021 2:38 PM

290 45220 3/2/2021 5:59 PM 328 45220 2/24/2021 2:26 PM

291 45220 3/2/2021 1:48 PM 329 45212 2/24/2021 11:07 AM

292 45219 3/2/2021 1:34 PM 330 45220 2/24/2021 11:02 AM

293 45220 3/2/2021 1:00 PM 331 45220 2/24/2021 10:54 AM

294 45220 3/2/2021 12:05 PM 332 45223 2/24/2021 10:09 AM

295 45232 3/2/2021 11:54 AM 333 45213 2/24/2021 9:58 AM

296 45219 3/2/2021 11:43 AM 334 45212 2/24/2021 9:08 AM

297 45223 3/2/2021 11:27 AM 335 45220 2/24/2021 9:02 AM

298 45220 3/2/2021 11:21 AM 336 45220 2/24/2021 8:49 AM

299 45220 3/2/2021 11:17 AM 337 45220 2/24/2021 8:41 AM

8 / 23 9 / 23

16 Attachment A

Dunore Park Feedback Dunore Park Feedback

338 45220 2/24/2021 8:23 AM 376 45220 2/17/2021 6:06 PM

339 45220 2/24/2021 8:03 AM 377 45220 2/17/2021 5:40 PM

340 45220 2/24/2021 7:44 AM 378 45220 2/17/2021 4:53 PM

341 45220 2/24/2021 7:42 AM 379 45220 2/17/2021 4:30 PM

342 45208 2/23/2021 8:18 AM 380 45220 2/17/2021 3:40 PM

343 45220 2/22/2021 12:48 PM 381 45220 2/17/2021 11:24 AM

344 45219 2/22/2021 12:07 PM 382 45220 2/17/2021 11:09 AM

345 45220 2/22/2021 8:25 AM 383 45220 2/17/2021 10:59 AM

346 45220 2/21/2021 6:19 PM 384 45220 2/17/2021 9:33 AM

347 45220 2/21/2021 5:33 PM 385 45220 2/17/2021 9:03 AM

348 45220 2/21/2021 4:36 PM 386 45220 2/17/2021 8:15 AM

349 45220 2/21/2021 3:21 PM 387 45220 2/17/2021 7:21 AM

350 45220 2/21/2021 1:27 PM 388 45220 2/17/2021 7:15 AM

351 45220 2/21/2021 12:51 PM 389 45220 2/17/2021 6:03 AM

352 45218 2/21/2021 10:04 AM 390 45220 2/17/2021 4:09 AM

353 45220 2/21/2021 9:23 AM 391 45211 2/17/2021 12:28 AM

354 45219 2/20/2021 9:21 PM 392 45220 2/16/2021 11:54 PM

355 45220 2/20/2021 7:14 PM 393 45220 2/16/2021 9:41 PM

356 45220 2/20/2021 4:55 AM 394 45220 2/16/2021 9:36 PM

357 45220 2/19/2021 8:41 PM 395 45220 2/16/2021 9:32 PM

358 45220 2/19/2021 8:16 PM 396 45229 2/16/2021 9:22 PM

359 45220 2/19/2021 7:55 PM 397 45220 2/16/2021 9:18 PM

360 45220 2/19/2021 4:02 PM 398 45220 2/16/2021 7:42 PM

361 45220 2/19/2021 3:35 PM 399 45220 2/16/2021 6:09 PM

362 45220 2/19/2021 2:01 PM 400 45220 2/16/2021 5:55 PM

363 45206 2/19/2021 1:16 PM 401 45220 2/16/2021 5:37 PM

364 45202 2/19/2021 7:17 AM 402 45220 2/16/2021 5:36 PM

365 45202 2/19/2021 7:15 AM 403 45219 2/16/2021 5:29 PM

366 45223 2/18/2021 9:27 PM 404 45220 2/16/2021 4:47 PM

367 45220 2/18/2021 7:02 PM 405 45220 2/16/2021 4:46 PM

368 45220 2/18/2021 1:33 PM 406 45220 2/16/2021 4:12 PM

369 45220 2/18/2021 7:37 AM 407 45220 2/16/2021 3:56 PM

370 45220 2/18/2021 7:34 AM 408 45220 2/16/2021 3:49 PM

371 45220 2/18/2021 12:45 AM 409 45220 2/16/2021 3:19 PM

372 45220 2/18/2021 12:06 AM 410 425220 2/16/2021 3:17 PM

373 45111 2/17/2021 8:57 PM 411 45220 2/16/2021 3:13 PM

374 45220 2/17/2021 8:18 PM 412 45220 2/16/2021 3:01 PM

375 45220 2/17/2021 6:08 PM 413 45204 2/16/2021 2:57 PM

10 / 23 11 / 23

17 Attachment A

Dunore Park Feedback Dunore Park Feedback

414 452:0 2/16/2021 2:50 PM 452 45220 2/15/2021 10:44 PM

415 45220 2/16/2021 2:03 PM 453 45220 2/15/2021 10:43 PM

416 45225 2/16/2021 1:59 PM 454 45220 2/15/2021 10:37 PM

417 45220 2/16/2021 1:22 PM 455 45220 2/15/2021 10:18 PM

418 45220 2/16/2021 12:51 PM 456 45223 2/15/2021 10:08 PM

419 45220 2/16/2021 12:48 PM 457 45220 2/15/2021 9:49 PM

420 45220 2/16/2021 12:08 PM 458 45220 2/15/2021 9:45 PM

421 45220 2/16/2021 12:06 PM 459 45220 2/15/2021 9:41 PM

422 45202 2/16/2021 11:04 AM 460 45220 2/15/2021 9:25 PM

423 45220 2/16/2021 11:00 AM 461 45220 2/15/2021 9:21 PM

424 45220 2/16/2021 10:58 AM 462 45220 2/15/2021 9:18 PM

425 45220 2/16/2021 10:53 AM 463 45220 2/15/2021 8:57 PM

426 45223 2/16/2021 10:35 AM 464 45220 2/15/2021 8:42 PM

427 45220 2/16/2021 10:34 AM 465 45220 2/15/2021 8:32 PM

428 45220 2/16/2021 10:33 AM 466 45223 2/15/2021 8:24 PM

429 45220 2/16/2021 10:07 AM 467 45220 2/15/2021 8:08 PM

430 45220 2/16/2021 10:01 AM 468 45220 2/15/2021 7:59 PM

431 45220 2/16/2021 9:51 AM 469 45223 2/15/2021 7:58 PM

432 45220 2/16/2021 9:51 AM 470 45220 2/15/2021 7:51 PM

433 45220 2/16/2021 9:40 AM 471 45220 2/15/2021 7:50 PM

434 45220 2/16/2021 9:35 AM 472 45214 2/15/2021 7:49 PM

435 45217 2/16/2021 9:26 AM 473 45220 2/15/2021 7:46 PM

436 45220 2/16/2021 9:09 AM 474 45220 2/15/2021 7:41 PM

437 45220 2/16/2021 9:04 AM 475 45220 2/15/2021 7:39 PM

438 45220 2/16/2021 8:54 AM 476 45220 2/15/2021 7:39 PM

439 45220 2/16/2021 8:51 AM 477 45220 2/15/2021 7:36 PM

440 45220 2/16/2021 8:47 AM 478 45220 2/15/2021 7:29 PM

441 45220 2/16/2021 8:10 AM 479 45220 2/15/2021 7:27 PM

442 45220 2/16/2021 8:07 AM 480 45247 2/15/2021 7:24 PM

443 45205 2/16/2021 7:43 AM 481 45220 2/15/2021 7:13 PM

444 45220 2/16/2021 5:45 AM 482 45220 2/15/2021 7:06 PM

445 45220-1430 2/16/2021 4:52 AM 483 45220 2/15/2021 7:04 PM

446 45231 2/16/2021 12:17 AM 484 45220 2/15/2021 7:03 PM

447 45220 2/15/2021 11:32 PM 485 45219 2/15/2021 7:01 PM

448 45220 2/15/2021 11:10 PM 486 45220 2/15/2021 7:01 PM

449 45220 2/15/2021 11:05 PM 487 45220 2/15/2021 6:57 PM

450 45220 2/15/2021 10:55 PM 488 45220 2/15/2021 6:55 PM

451 45220 2/15/2021 10:46 PM 489 45220 2/15/2021 6:47 PM

12 / 23 13 / 23

18 Attachment A

Dunore Park Feedback Dunore Park Feedback

490 45220 2/15/2021 6:44 PM 528 45220 2/15/2021 4:06 PM

491 45229 2/15/2021 6:34 PM 529 45220 2/15/2021 2:43 PM

492 45220 2/15/2021 6:34 PM 530 45215 2/15/2021 2:31 PM

493 45220 2/15/2021 6:34 PM 531 45220 2/15/2021 2:31 PM

494 45220 2/15/2021 6:29 PM 532 45220 2/15/2021 2:28 PM

495 45220 2/15/2021 6:29 PM 533 45220 2/15/2021 2:27 PM

496 45220 2/15/2021 6:18 PM 534 45202 2/15/2021 1:27 PM

497 45220 2/15/2021 6:17 PM 535 45220 2/15/2021 12:54 PM

498 45220 2/15/2021 6:08 PM 536 45223 2/15/2021 12:27 PM

499 45220 2/15/2021 6:05 PM 537 45223 2/15/2021 12:11 PM

500 45220 2/15/2021 6:03 PM 538 45214 2/15/2021 12:10 PM

501 45220 2/15/2021 6:01 PM 539 45229 2/15/2021 12:00 PM

502 45220 2/15/2021 5:57 PM 540 45220 2/15/2021 11:58 AM

503 45220 2/15/2021 5:50 PM 541 45220 2/15/2021 11:55 AM

504 45220 2/15/2021 5:45 PM 542 45220 2/15/2021 11:28 AM

505 45220 2/15/2021 5:45 PM 543 45220 2/15/2021 11:04 AM

506 45220 2/15/2021 5:42 PM 544 45223 2/15/2021 10:43 AM

507 45220 2/15/2021 5:42 PM 545 45229 2/15/2021 10:30 AM

508 45220 2/15/2021 5:41 PM 546 45220 2/15/2021 10:25 AM

509 45223 2/15/2021 5:39 PM 547 45223 2/15/2021 10:18 AM

510 45220 2/15/2021 5:33 PM 548 45223 2/15/2021 10:14 AM

511 45220 2/15/2021 5:32 PM 549 45220 2/15/2021 10:08 AM

512 45220 2/15/2021 5:32 PM 550 45220 2/15/2021 10:05 AM

513 45220 2/15/2021 5:26 PM 551 45220 2/15/2021 9:34 AM

514 45220 2/15/2021 5:26 PM 552 45223 2/15/2021 9:30 AM

515 45220 2/15/2021 5:26 PM 553 45220-1616 2/15/2021 9:28 AM

516 45220 2/15/2021 5:24 PM 554 45220 2/15/2021 9:21 AM

517 45220 2/15/2021 5:22 PM 555 45220 2/15/2021 9:01 AM

518 45220 2/15/2021 5:21 PM 556 45220 2/15/2021 8:57 AM

519 45220 2/15/2021 5:21 PM 557 45223 2/15/2021 8:57 AM

520 45220-1534 2/15/2021 5:19 PM 558 45220 2/15/2021 8:31 AM

521 45220 2/15/2021 5:19 PM 559 45223 2/15/2021 8:29 AM

522 45220 2/15/2021 5:19 PM 560 45223 2/15/2021 8:28 AM

523 45220 2/15/2021 5:18 PM 561 45223 2/15/2021 8:08 AM

524 45220 2/15/2021 5:15 PM 562 45223 2/15/2021 7:41 AM

525 45220 2/15/2021 5:10 PM 563 45220 2/15/2021 7:37 AM

526 45239 2/15/2021 4:57 PM 564 45223 2/15/2021 7:12 AM

527 45238 2/15/2021 4:20 PM 565 45223 2/15/2021 7:06 AM

14 / 23 15 / 23

19 Attachment A

Dunore Park Feedback Dunore Park Feedback

566 45223 2/15/2021 5:37 AM 604 90048 2/14/2021 3:21 PM

567 45223 2/15/2021 5:11 AM 605 45220 2/14/2021 2:42 PM

568 45220 2/15/2021 1:29 AM 606 45220 2/14/2021 2:40 PM

569 45220 2/15/2021 12:53 AM 607 46220 2/14/2021 2:37 PM

570 45220 2/15/2021 12:03 AM 608 45223 2/14/2021 2:18 PM

571 45220 2/15/2021 12:01 AM 609 45229 2/14/2021 2:01 PM

572 45220 2/14/2021 11:38 PM 610 45220 2/14/2021 1:43 PM

573 45223 2/14/2021 11:38 PM 611 45220 2/14/2021 1:42 PM

574 45220 2/14/2021 11:33 PM 612 45220 2/14/2021 1:35 PM

575 45220 2/14/2021 11:24 PM 613 45220 2/14/2021 1:08 PM

576 45223 2/14/2021 11:19 PM 614 45223 2/14/2021 12:55 PM

577 45220 2/14/2021 11:08 PM 615 45220 2/14/2021 12:55 PM

578 45223 2/14/2021 11:05 PM 616 45220 2/14/2021 12:45 PM

579 45220 2/14/2021 11:03 PM 617 45220 2/14/2021 12:35 PM

580 45220 2/14/2021 10:22 PM 618 45223 2/14/2021 12:34 PM

581 45220 2/14/2021 9:40 PM 619 45223 2/14/2021 12:29 PM

582 45223 2/14/2021 9:33 PM 620 45223 2/14/2021 12:27 PM

583 45223 2/14/2021 9:30 PM 621 45220 2/14/2021 12:27 PM

584 45223 2/14/2021 9:17 PM 622 45220 2/14/2021 12:13 PM

585 45223 2/14/2021 8:59 PM 623 45220 2/14/2021 12:03 PM

586 45223 2/14/2021 8:38 PM 624 45220 2/14/2021 11:59 AM

587 45202 2/14/2021 8:00 PM 625 45220 2/14/2021 11:57 AM

588 45220 2/14/2021 7:43 PM 626 45220 2/14/2021 11:54 AM

589 45220 2/14/2021 7:27 PM 627 45220 2/14/2021 11:52 AM

590 45220 2/14/2021 7:13 PM 628 45220 2/14/2021 11:27 AM

591 45220 2/14/2021 6:42 PM 629 45220 2/14/2021 11:25 AM

592 45223 2/14/2021 6:21 PM 630 45220 2/14/2021 11:20 AM

593 45223 2/14/2021 6:17 PM 631 45220 2/14/2021 11:05 AM

594 45220 2/14/2021 5:51 PM 632 45220 2/14/2021 11:03 AM

595 45220 2/14/2021 5:47 PM 633 45220 2/14/2021 10:50 AM

596 45220 2/14/2021 5:38 PM 634 45220 2/14/2021 10:49 AM

597 45202 2/14/2021 5:01 PM 635 45220 2/14/2021 10:45 AM

598 45220 2/14/2021 4:58 PM 636 45223 2/14/2021 10:38 AM

599 45220 2/14/2021 4:55 PM 637 45220 2/14/2021 10:30 AM

600 45220 2/14/2021 4:49 PM 638 45220 2/14/2021 10:29 AM

601 45220-1526 2/14/2021 4:26 PM 639 45212 2/14/2021 10:18 AM

602 45219 2/14/2021 4:01 PM 640 45223 2/14/2021 10:15 AM

603 45220 2/14/2021 3:23 PM 641 45223 2/14/2021 10:13 AM

16 / 23 17 / 23

20 Attachment A

Dunore Park Feedback Dunore Park Feedback

642 45220 2/14/2021 9:50 AM 680 45220 2/13/2021 11:50 PM

643 45220 2/14/2021 9:40 AM 681 45220 2/13/2021 11:44 PM

644 45220 2/14/2021 9:04 AM 682 45220 2/13/2021 11:39 PM

645 45220 2/14/2021 8:52 AM 683 45220 2/13/2021 11:12 PM

646 45229 2/14/2021 8:52 AM 684 45220 2/13/2021 11:08 PM

647 45220 2/14/2021 8:51 AM 685 45223 2/13/2021 11:05 PM

648 45220 2/14/2021 8:47 AM 686 45223 2/13/2021 11:02 PM

649 45220 2/14/2021 8:44 AM 687 45223 2/13/2021 11:00 PM

650 45220 2/14/2021 8:33 AM 688 45220 2/13/2021 10:51 PM

651 45220 2/14/2021 8:18 AM 689 45220 2/13/2021 10:45 PM

652 45223 2/14/2021 8:05 AM 690 45220 2/13/2021 10:43 PM

653 45223 2/14/2021 7:59 AM 691 45220 2/13/2021 10:30 PM

654 45223 2/14/2021 7:58 AM 692 45220 2/13/2021 10:26 PM

655 45220 2/14/2021 7:57 AM 693 45220 2/13/2021 10:24 PM

656 45223 2/14/2021 7:55 AM 694 45220 2/13/2021 10:17 PM

657 45220 2/14/2021 7:49 AM 695 45220 2/13/2021 10:17 PM

658 45202 2/14/2021 7:35 AM 696 45220 2/13/2021 10:13 PM

659 45220 2/14/2021 7:32 AM 697 45220 2/13/2021 10:10 PM

660 45220 2/14/2021 7:18 AM 698 45220 2/13/2021 10:09 PM

661 45220 2/14/2021 7:16 AM 699 45220 2/13/2021 10:04 PM

662 45220 2/14/2021 7:12 AM 700 45220 2/13/2021 10:03 PM

663 45220 2/14/2021 6:15 AM 701 45220 2/13/2021 10:03 PM

664 45220 2/14/2021 6:06 AM 702 45220 2/13/2021 9:58 PM

665 45220 2/14/2021 5:40 AM 703 45220 2/13/2021 9:57 PM

666 45223 2/14/2021 5:13 AM 704 45220 2/13/2021 9:57 PM

667 45220 2/14/2021 5:06 AM 705 45216 2/13/2021 9:56 PM

668 45220 2/14/2021 5:04 AM 706 45220 2/13/2021 9:54 PM

669 45220 2/14/2021 3:44 AM 707 45223 2/13/2021 9:52 PM

670 45220 2/14/2021 3:33 AM 708 45220 2/13/2021 9:51 PM

671 45220 2/14/2021 3:06 AM 709 45223 2/13/2021 9:28 PM

672 45223 2/14/2021 3:05 AM 710 45220 2/13/2021 9:24 PM

673 45220 2/14/2021 2:59 AM 711 45220 2/13/2021 9:14 PM

674 45220 2/14/2021 2:36 AM 712 45220 2/13/2021 9:14 PM

675 45220 2/14/2021 1:56 AM 713 45223 2/13/2021 9:09 PM

676 45219 2/14/2021 1:50 AM 714 45220 2/13/2021 9:08 PM

677 45220 2/14/2021 12:46 AM 715 45220 2/13/2021 9:05 PM

678 45220 2/14/2021 12:35 AM 716 45220 2/13/2021 8:58 PM

679 45220 2/14/2021 12:22 AM 717 45220 2/13/2021 8:57 PM

18 / 23 19 / 23

21 Attachment A

Dunore Park Feedback Dunore Park Feedback

718 45220 2/13/2021 8:53 PM 756 4522 2/13/2021 4:57 PM

719 45220 2/13/2021 8:51 PM 757 45220 2/13/2021 4:07 PM

720 45220 2/13/2021 8:44 PM 758 45220 2/13/2021 3:46 PM

721 45220 2/13/2021 8:42 PM 759 45220 2/13/2021 3:45 PM

722 45220 2/13/2021 8:42 PM 760 45220 2/13/2021 3:44 PM

723 45220 2/13/2021 8:41 PM 761 45220 2/13/2021 3:43 PM

724 45220 2/13/2021 8:40 PM 762 45220 2/13/2021 3:37 PM

725 45220 2/13/2021 8:38 PM 763 45220 2/13/2021 3:37 PM

726 45220 2/13/2021 8:36 PM 764 45219 2/13/2021 2:59 PM

727 45238 2/13/2021 8:32 PM 765 45220 2/13/2021 2:54 PM

728 45220 2/13/2021 8:31 PM 766 45220 2/13/2021 2:30 PM

729 45220 2/13/2021 8:28 PM 767 45220 2/13/2021 2:29 PM

730 45220 2/13/2021 8:20 PM 768 45220 2/13/2021 2:28 PM

731 45220 2/13/2021 8:20 PM 769 45220 2/13/2021 2:11 PM

732 45220 2/13/2021 8:19 PM 770 45225 2/13/2021 2:10 PM

733 45220 2/13/2021 8:18 PM 771 45220 2/13/2021 1:55 PM

734 45220 2/13/2021 8:18 PM 772 45220 2/13/2021 1:48 PM

735 45220 2/13/2021 8:15 PM 773 45220 2/13/2021 1:35 PM

736 45220 2/13/2021 8:14 PM 774 45220 2/13/2021 1:31 PM

737 45220 2/13/2021 8:10 PM 775 45220 2/13/2021 1:24 PM

738 45220 2/13/2021 8:10 PM 776 45220 2/13/2021 1:17 PM

739 45220 2/13/2021 8:09 PM 777 45220 2/13/2021 1:11 PM

740 45220 2/13/2021 8:08 PM 778 45206 2/13/2021 1:06 PM

741 45220 2/13/2021 8:06 PM 779 45220 2/13/2021 12:58 PM

742 45220 2/13/2021 8:04 PM 780 45220 2/13/2021 12:53 PM

743 45220 2/13/2021 7:56 PM 781 45219 2/13/2021 12:45 PM

744 45206 2/13/2021 7:54 PM 782 45220 2/13/2021 12:41 PM

745 45220 2/13/2021 7:37 PM 783 45220 2/13/2021 12:28 PM

746 45220 2/13/2021 7:35 PM 784 45220 2/13/2021 12:26 PM

747 45220 2/13/2021 7:33 PM 785 45220 2/13/2021 12:11 PM

748 45220 2/13/2021 6:50 PM 786 45220 2/13/2021 12:09 PM

749 45220 2/13/2021 6:24 PM 787 45220 2/13/2021 12:02 PM

750 45229 2/13/2021 6:12 PM 788 45220 2/13/2021 11:57 AM

751 45220 2/13/2021 6:12 PM 789 45220 2/13/2021 11:56 AM

752 45220 2/13/2021 5:55 PM 790 45220 2/13/2021 11:40 AM

753 45220 2/13/2021 5:45 PM 791 45220 2/13/2021 11:18 AM

754 45220 2/13/2021 5:44 PM 792 45220 2/13/2021 10:18 AM

755 45219 2/13/2021 4:58 PM 793 45220 2/13/2021 9:48 AM

20 / 23 21 / 23

22 Attachment A

Dunore Park Feedback Dunore Park Feedback

794 45220 2/13/2021 9:30 AM 832 45220 2/12/2021 6:04 PM

795 45220 2/13/2021 9:12 AM 833 45220 2/12/2021 5:43 PM

796 45220 2/13/2021 8:52 AM 834 45220 2/12/2021 5:23 PM

797 45220 2/13/2021 8:23 AM 835 45220 2/12/2021 5:22 PM

798 45220 2/13/2021 8:20 AM 836 41015 2/12/2021 5:20 PM

799 45220 2/13/2021 8:10 AM 837 45220 2/12/2021 5:10 PM

800 45220 2/13/2021 7:35 AM 838 45220 2/12/2021 5:02 PM

801 45220 2/13/2021 7:17 AM 839 45231 2/1/2021 4:40 PM

802 45220 2/13/2021 5:38 AM

803 45220 2/13/2021 12:13 AM

804 45220 2/13/2021 12:12 AM

805 45220 2/12/2021 11:51 PM

806 45220 2/12/2021 10:56 PM

807 45220 2/12/2021 10:05 PM

808 45220 2/12/2021 10:01 PM

809 45220 2/12/2021 10:00 PM

810 45220 2/12/2021 9:50 PM

811 45220 2/12/2021 9:24 PM

812 45220 2/12/2021 9:22 PM

813 45220 2/12/2021 9:17 PM

814 45220 2/12/2021 9:11 PM

815 45220 2/12/2021 9:02 PM

816 45219 2/12/2021 8:45 PM

817 45220 2/12/2021 8:41 PM

818 45220 2/12/2021 8:22 PM

819 45220 2/12/2021 8:18 PM

820 45220 2/12/2021 7:54 PM

821 45232 2/12/2021 7:48 PM

822 45220 2/12/2021 7:03 PM

823 45220 2/12/2021 6:47 PM

824 45220 2/12/2021 6:44 PM

825 45220 2/12/2021 6:41 PM

826 45220 2/12/2021 6:39 PM

827 45220 2/12/2021 6:39 PM

828 45220 2/12/2021 6:37 PM

829 45220 2/12/2021 6:35 PM

830 45220 2/12/2021 6:25 PM

831 45220-1616 2/12/2021 6:20 PM

22 / 23 23 / 23

23 Attachment A

Dunore Park Feedback Dunore Park Feedback

18 If there were a dog park in Dunore Park, I would probably use it at least 4 times a week. 3/30/2021 5:15 PM Q3 Would you use a dog park in Dunore Park? 19 It’s right down the street from me. My dog is not a fan of traffic. Great opportunity to meet 3/30/2021 4:17 PM neighbors.

Answered: 846 Skipped: 5 20 We want to have an off-leash area for our dog to socialize, and for us to hang out with other 3/30/2021 3:20 PM dog owners.

21 I have a dog, but this is a TERRIBLE location because it will displace the uses that families 3/30/2021 2:35 PM and kids have now. Plus, is there a budget to keep it maintained?

Yes 22 The residents and citizens deserve a clean and enjoyable place. A dog park will not allow for 3/30/2021 1:52 PM this

23 Would love to have a dog park closer to home for my dog to go play at 3/30/2021 11:19 AM

24 Proximity to home 3/30/2021 11:16 AM

No 25 It would be great to have a safe space for dogs to get exercise close to home 3/30/2021 10:37 AM

26 I live in an apt and so don't have a fenced backyard. Having a place for my dog to run and play 3/30/2021 10:13 AM would be nice.

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 27 Within walking distance 3/30/2021 9:58 AM

28 Accessible, close, underutilized, perfect spot for a dog park! 3/30/2021 9:55 AM ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES 29 I have a dog, and have always hoped there would be a dog park in Clifton, but do not feel that 3/30/2021 9:16 AM Yes 46.45% 393 Dunore Park is the place for a dog park...Have Burnet Woods or Mt. Storm Park been considered for a dog park? There is much more area in both those parks for a separate area for No 53.55% 453 a dog park. The Otto Armleger dog park has two areas for use that are rotated to maintain the grass etc. Dunore Park is not big enough for that, Dog behavior can be unpredictable, and the TOTAL 846 more space the better.

30 Because we desperately need a dog park in Clifton and northside 3/30/2021 7:46 AM # LEAVE REASONING WHY HERE IF YOU SO CHOOSE. DATE 31 It would allow dogs to run free and socialize with other dogs. 3/29/2021 9:37 PM 1 There are no nearby dog parks and this park is very, very under-utizlized 3/31/2021 11:30 PM 32 There are no fenced off areas near me to let my pup roam free. I would also love to be able to 3/29/2021 4:30 PM 2 My dogs are walked frequently through the park on leash and I deem that good enough. 3/31/2021 10:47 PM socialize her with other neighborhood dogs

3 It is dangerous- dogs accidentally get let out, not on a leash and it is a heavy traffic area- not 3/31/2021 10:30 PM 33 A walkable dog park would be amazing. 3/29/2021 3:41 PM safe. Also there would prove to be lots more noise because of all the neighborhood dogs. 34 There are no walkable places to socialize our dogs, and having a designated dog-park is much 3/29/2021 3:37 PM 4 Prefer dog parks with adequate space for dogs to run. Dunore park is not sized properly for 3/31/2021 10:05 PM safer than any other alternative to dog-socialization. adequate off leash run. 35 Dog parks are the only safe area to introduce dogs off leash as most trainers and animal 3/29/2021 2:32 PM 5 It will be the closest one to me 3/31/2021 9:24 PM behaviorist suggest

6 Is great to have a place to let the dog off leash and run in a safe way. 3/31/2021 9:17 PM 36 Uh, no dogs. But am a CAT lover. ᜗ 3/29/2021 1:35 PM

7 I don’t want my dogs around potentially aggressive dogs. I prefer the park as it is. 3/31/2021 9:15 PM 37 WE DON'T HAVE A DOG. For those who have a dog, you should use your own yard. If you 3/28/2021 11:52 PM don't have a yard, you shouldn't have a dog! 8 no dog 3/31/2021 4:23 PM 38 Closest dog park and favorite places to hang out in Gaslight district. 3/28/2021 8:09 PM 9 there are no dog parks nearby. 3/31/2021 1:41 PM 39 Close to northside ! 3/28/2021 7:03 PM 10 My dogs dit do well with other dogs 3/31/2021 11:19 AM 40 I don’t have a dog 3/28/2021 5:44 PM 11 We’re in the gas light district several days a week, and it would be very convenient. 3/31/2021 10:16 AM 41 It would be the closest one to my house 3/28/2021 3:22 PM 12 Too busy a street 3/31/2021 9:47 AM 42 The park hosts families, discussion groups, meditators. It’s an active park not well situated to 3/28/2021 3:11 PM 13 do not have a dog 3/31/2021 9:31 AM be a dog park.

14 NO! WE LIVE YARDS AWAY FROM THE PARK AND WE DO NOT WANT TO HEAR 3/30/2021 7:26 PM 43 Not good for dogs really 3/28/2021 12:43 PM BARKING DOGS ALL DAY!! ABSOLUTELY NOT! 44 For my dog to exercise and play offleash 3/28/2021 12:10 PM 15 Spend a lot of time in that area and I feel it would disrupt the community 3/30/2021 7:25 PM 45 I have a dog and have wanted a dog park near where I live for him to play and run around. My 3/28/2021 8:43 AM 16 Dog lover who has always wished for a dog park in my neighborhood! 3/30/2021 7:10 PM back yard is not very large and this dog park would give him more space to run.

17 The next closest dog park is a long way away. 3/30/2021 5:25 PM 46 The dog parks I’ve visited with my dog always seem to attract large dogs and it’s unknown 3/28/2021 7:25 AM

1 / 19 2 / 19

24 Attachment A

Dunore Park Feedback Dunore Park Feedback

whether dogs there have been properly vaccinated. With as many college students as there 71 I don't own a dog. 3/26/2021 11:25 AM are in Clifton with little regard for the care of their dog (much less picking up after it), I can see this one as I’ve seen others, become a haven for dirty, smelly dogs. The beautiful park would 72 I think there are problems with putting a dog park so close to Ludlow. Even with a double gate, 3/26/2021 9:20 AM become a fenced in mud pit and eye sore. dogs can get out and they would be so close to a busy road which is not safe for them. I've also seen many dog parks turn into mud pits which isnt really helpful for anyone. 47 It's going to be mayhem 3/27/2021 10:53 PM 73 I have two dogs and have struggled to find one in the area. 3/26/2021 7:43 AM 48 Disease, dog fights, uncleanliness of both dogs and people it brings in. The park isn’t kept 3/27/2021 10:49 PM clean to begin with. 74 The city needs more places where dogs can be off leash 3/25/2021 8:22 PM

49 If it were there, I would take my dog to the dog park. 3/27/2021 8:46 PM 75 I eat lunch and picnic there with family and pets ON LEASH. 3/25/2021 5:46 PM

50 My dog does not like fences. 3/27/2021 8:12 PM 76 I have a small dog, I walk him. 3/25/2021 5:04 PM

51 I'm a dog trainer by profession. I know too much. Not a fan of them. 3/27/2021 7:48 PM 77 I probably would if it were built but I am not convinced that is the best location for a dog park in 3/25/2021 4:42 PM Clifton as I believe it will become a dusty, muddy, littered blight in what is a charming small 52 I have been going to Dunore park since I was a baby. Dunore is a wonderful place to climb 3/27/2021 7:43 PM island pocket park. trees and for kids to play on the playground or just walk around and peacefully enjoy. Adding a Dog park would be a hassle and it would go unused. I suggest finding a better place since 78 Residents nearby don’t want it! 3/25/2021 2:43 PM Dunore already is being used for better things. 79 Close and convenient, love the area - plus, it would be a great opportunity for pets to play with 3/25/2021 1:53 PM 53 I never seem to get the time to drive to another area that has a dog park and it would be really 3/27/2021 6:34 PM their neighborhood friends. great to have one in the neighborhoods that I can walk my dogs to. 80 My dog is terrified of big dogs 3/25/2021 12:46 PM

54 No dog 3/27/2021 1:39 PM 81 It would be the only dog park within walking distance of our house. This would be an awesome, 3/25/2021 12:27 PM 55 There are no other convenient locations for taking my pets to a dog park. It would be much 3/27/2021 1:15 PM close location to socialize with other dogs and meet new neighbors. better than the people who already go and dont have their dogs on a leash; having a dog park 82 I wish I could - I would love to have a dog park located close to me. 3/25/2021 11:56 AM here would provide a safe designated area for neighborhood dogs. Additionally, it is hard to find dog parks that have designated spaces for small dogs. If you would like a model, consider 83 I don't have a dog 3/25/2021 11:13 AM Louisville’s dog run association. Being able to have a safe space for my dogs in my neighborhood would also offer a place to socialize with my neighbors and would result in 84 No dog 3/25/2021 9:28 AM significant satisfaction and ownership of our spaces. 85 I prefer to have a designated area for dog socialization rather than leashed walks in parks. 3/25/2021 8:07 AM 56 Don't take my dog to dog parks 3/27/2021 12:45 PM 86 Dog parks provide the best environment for dog socialization and exercise. 3/25/2021 8:04 AM 57 I would go with my friends who have dogs and hang out. 3/27/2021 11:30 AM 87 It would be the closest dog park to my home 3/25/2021 7:06 AM 58 It works as a great family park and I’m we have a dog but do not want a dog park we want a 3/27/2021 9:52 AM 88 This should be left as a green space for everyone. 3/24/2021 10:47 PM family park 89 Yes, I have a dog and would love a close outlet for him to play safely. 3/24/2021 7:40 PM 59 Friends and family that live near by with their dogs. 3/27/2021 9:29 AM 90 We would love a place to let our dog run free so close to home. 3/24/2021 7:36 PM 60 Don't have a dog. 3/27/2021 9:25 AM 91 I do no know the people and/or the dogs who would be using the park, their actions are 3/24/2021 1:59 PM 61 We currently drive to Washington Park to take our dog to the dog park. I would love having one 3/26/2021 10:47 PM unpredictable. I include my dogs in this as well. Therefore I would be uncomfortable allowing in our neighborhood. my dog to run off leash with other dogs. 62 I live close by. 3/26/2021 10:29 PM 92 The closest dog park to me is Washington Park and it is always busy. I would visit Dunore as 3/23/2021 12:47 PM 63 Convenience for a place to let my dog run and socialize. 3/26/2021 10:20 PM a Northside resident because it is much closer.

64 Before purchasing or house in Covedale we lived in the Ludlow area, and continue to visit often 3/26/2021 10:11 PM 93 Very close to my home. 3/22/2021 5:00 PM with our dog. 94 I live very close and would walk my dog there. 3/22/2021 4:54 PM 65 We have a dog 3/26/2021 9:57 PM 95 Its near my place. I love this neighborhood, my neighbors and their dogs. 3/22/2021 12:48 PM 66 Meet friends with dogs etc 3/26/2021 9:57 PM 96 As sympathetic as I am to the desires of dog owners (and am one myself), I would find it 3/22/2021 9:08 AM 67 Great location 3/26/2021 9:56 PM inconsiderate as a public nuisance to those who live nearby. My neighbors living near Dunore Park, who use it for recreation (exercise, child play, quiet reading or meditation, etc.) would 68 Friends in the area and beautiful place to go for walks with the dogs! 3/26/2021 9:54 PM certainly be annoyed by incessant barking and litter. Experience in other City dog parks would lead one to expect deterioration of the ground, and the attendant public expense of cleaning, 69 I live at Stetson Square and there are no fenced open spaces for my dog to run or play. Dunore 3/26/2021 7:59 PM repairing and maintaining a facility which serves only dog owners. would be the closest dog park and we would frequent it often; nearly daily without having to drive 10+ minutes each day. We could even walk to this dog park and my dog can run instead 97 Use the park daily. Every time we are at the park there are dogs and people. It would be great 3/21/2021 12:36 PM of staying in lease like he does at Burnett Woods. We go to the other local dog parks and like for the community. Not slot of houses close so perfect location. Traffic speeds down Ludlow. some of them, but it’s such an inconvenience we can’t go every day. Dunore would change my It’s very dangerous walking dogs on sidewalks here. dogs quality of life and health significantly. 98 We walk here to play with our kids and if there was a dog park, we would bring the dogs. 3/20/2021 5:25 PM 70 Dog 3/26/2021 11:34 AM 99 Not safe for small, gentle dogs 3/17/2021 12:51 PM

3 / 19 4 / 19

25 Attachment A

Dunore Park Feedback Dunore Park Feedback

100 Unsafe for gentle, small dog 3/17/2021 12:41 PM grandchildren live.

101 It is an underutilized space and would be more vibrant and valuable to the community as a dog 3/17/2021 9:02 AM 127 Innaproriaye 3/10/2021 12:52 PM park. 128 Children safety and concern about cleanliness after poop 3/10/2021 9:08 AM 102 There are no other dog parks in the area and there isn't much going on there anyway. 3/16/2021 9:47 AM 129 I do not have a dog, but even if I did, I would not use it. 3/10/2021 8:53 AM 103 Friends who live nearby with dogs 3/15/2021 5:50 PM 130 Lovely little park for my toddlers. 3/9/2021 4:15 PM 104 I have many friends in the Clifton area who would join me 3/15/2021 4:48 PM 131 No because I don’t have dogs as pets. I am a dog lover though . 3/9/2021 2:50 PM 105 dont have a dog 3/15/2021 4:45 PM 132 I don't have a dog- but if I did... I would definitely use it. I support this idea! 3/9/2021 11:26 AM 106 My dog doesn’t get along well with other dogs. 3/15/2021 4:34 PM 133 childrens playground is more important 3/8/2021 9:33 PM 107 Close to my home, we enjoy going to different dog parks around the city. 3/15/2021 4:24 PM 134 It’s too close to major traffic for dog safety and it’d eliminate necessary green space 3/8/2021 6:46 PM 108 It is a beautiful small park enjoyed by everyone on Clifton. The fencing nessessary to make a 3/15/2021 4:12 PM 135 I do not have a dog. 3/8/2021 6:10 PM dog park would, in my opinion, ruin the natural beauty of the park. 136 I have three dogs, and would occasionally like a closer dog park, but I don't believe this is a 3/8/2021 5:15 PM 109 There is easy access to the park, parking available and there is a large open space already 3/15/2021 3:56 PM good location for a dog park. available, my dog loves to run. 137 I don't want a dog park near my home. 3/8/2021 4:09 PM 110 Wonderful way to have dogs socialize! 3/15/2021 1:58 PM 138 This is a very nice area with restaurants that i can get food from, and it would be great if i 3/8/2021 12:58 PM 111 As a long time dog trainer walks are better for all involved. Dog parks are an excuse for owners 3/15/2021 9:43 AM could take my dog to enjoy the trip as well! to get out of walking. Too often they impose human sentiments believing the dogs “want” to run free. Dogs want to be with their families. A dog park is no replacement for a good long walk 139 I walk my dogs around the park daily and it would be a good way for them to get unrestricted 3/8/2021 7:30 AM interaction with other dogs. 112 Concerned about irresponsible people with dogs not suitable for socializing - health and 3/15/2021 9:12 AM temperament. Anticipate park will be a muddy, dirty mess. 140 We have a very social dog. Our family takes regular walks in the neighborhood and to the 3/7/2021 10:05 PM playground. It would be nice to have a space for him to socialize. 113 Don’t currently own a dog 3/14/2021 11:19 PM 141 To allow my dog a larger area to run around and get some exercise 3/7/2021 9:15 PM 114 We currently travel to Armletter or White Water Parks to allow our dog to run and interact with 3/14/2021 7:48 AM other dogs without a leash. It would be another neighborhood bonding stop for CLIFTON. 142 Respect to neighbors 3/7/2021 8:42 PM

115 We currently have to go to Armleder to let our dog off leash. Unless we sneak and use the 3/14/2021 7:48 AM 143 It would be awesome to have a dog park in this area where so many people walk their dogs, 3/7/2021 7:08 PM women’s club, which I’m sure they do not appreciate. I think this would be a great way for mine included. neighborhood folks to interact. 144 I don’t trust that other people take appropriate precautions with their dogs, such as avoiding 3/7/2021 6:46 PM 116 People abandon dogs at dog parks; turf gets ruined; would like our neighborhood park to be 3/14/2021 12:00 AM bringing aggressive dogs and behavior training. enjoyed primarily by neighbors. And just walking by a peaceful green space is just one way to define “enjoyment.” 145 Because I have a dog. And dog parks are amazing. It is a great use of space. I love animals. 3/7/2021 6:41 PM

117 We have a dog but I am worried about other dogs being aggressive with her and other owners 3/13/2021 6:50 PM 146 Dogs don’t need parks 3/7/2021 6:33 PM not taking responsibility for their pets. 147 Do not like dog parks because of aggressive dogs and non responsible dog owners 3/7/2021 5:32 PM 118 A small park here, perhaps using Washington Park as a model, perhaps a bit smaller would be 3/13/2021 6:45 PM perfect. A place for some off leash time and to gather with friends. I walk to Dunore with a dog 148 I would be very enthusiastic to have such a convenient place for our young and sociable dog 3/7/2021 4:58 PM about 4 times a week currently. I would go more if this option presented itself. I’ve noticed to run and play with other dogs. more personal and neighborly pedestrian and dog walking in 2020 and would welcome an 149 Too close to major traffic to feel safe 3/7/2021 4:50 PM amenity like this. 150 A) Don't want it B )My dog doesn't play well with others 3/7/2021 4:45 PM 119 Give dogs exercise off -leash in a responsible way. 3/13/2021 6:09 PM 151 I do not own a dog nor do I think that this is a good location for a fenced in dog park. Many dog 3/7/2021 3:20 PM 120 Our dog is older. 3/13/2021 11:11 AM owners in Clifton walk their dogs there but use a leash. Why ruin the location for the rest of the 121 Prefer to walk my dogs 3/13/2021 8:21 AM Community just so dogs can run off leash?

122 It will become an eyesore and I don't want dogs barking all the time that close to my home. 3/11/2021 2:29 PM 152 Too small - it would be like the Washington Park dog park which my dog found just puzzling 3/7/2021 12:35 PM because there wasn't room to run. 123 We have a dog who loves to socialize with other dogs, and wants to have a good space to run. 3/10/2021 8:05 PM The next nearest dog park is quite a ways away, and we would love a walkable option. 153 Closest to my home. Unless you put in a dog park at Seasongood Park or the Mitchell 3/7/2021 12:05 PM Triangle. 124 I have a dog and love dogs, but I am concerned about a dog park becoming a mud pit and that 3/10/2021 6:40 PM owners will not be responsible about cleaning up after their dogs. I am also worried about the 154 We don’t have a dog. 3/7/2021 11:51 AM smell as our home is on Dunore Road and about 150 yards from the proposed site. 155 This park is already nearly unusable due to the high speed traffic on Ludlow. The proximity of 3/7/2021 10:33 AM 125 Because I love dogs and my dog loves dogs. We want to hangout with all the Cincinnati dogs! 3/10/2021 2:10 PM the park to the street feels unsafe and unsuitable for high volume use. This added to the lack of parking in the area makes it not a place I would like to see increase its traffic. 126 It would be the closest dog park to where i live. And it's right near where my children and 3/10/2021 1:12 PM 156 No dogs 3/7/2021 8:20 AM

5 / 19 6 / 19

26 Attachment A

Dunore Park Feedback Dunore Park Feedback

184 Proximity 3/2/2021 11:07 PM 157 No dogs in household 3/7/2021 8:14 AM 185 We have a dog who likes going to dog parks. It would be close and convenient so I’m sure we 3/2/2021 7:06 PM 158 I do have a dog. 3/6/2021 5:49 PM would use it if it ends up being there. 159 Regularly go by Dunore on dog walks 3/6/2021 5:36 PM 186 Planning to get a dog by summer, would love to have a dog park in walking distance!! 3/2/2021 5:59 PM 160 Don’t currently have a dog. 3/6/2021 5:30 PM 187 I love to socialize and be a part of the community and so do my dogs so we would definitely 3/2/2021 1:48 PM 161 Destroys the natural beauty of a green space. 3/6/2021 4:27 PM use the park.

162 A dog park would not be an appropriate use of the 3 acre park. It would make the park 3/6/2021 3:50 PM 188 There are no other dog parks or off leash areas within a reasonable distance from my home. I 3/2/2021 1:00 PM unusable for anyone other than dog owners. This issue has been reviewed by the Park service don’t have private outdoor space previously confirming the answer which is no to a dog park!!! 189 I have a dog and live within walking distance, so would enjoy a dog park. 3/2/2021 12:05 PM 163 I have small children who love the park to run and play, we don't have dogs. I am afraid of 3/6/2021 2:49 PM 190 I have to travel very far to find an off-leash park 3/2/2021 11:54 AM unsafe dogs near my kids. 191 I don't have a dog yet. 3/2/2021 11:21 AM 164 I prefer to walk our dog on a leash 3/6/2021 2:28 PM 192 I do not own a dog. 3/2/2021 11:17 AM 165 My daughter and her friends use the park almost daily. 3/6/2021 2:23 PM 193 It would be easy to walk to the park. 3/2/2021 11:10 AM 166 I’m getting a dog and it would be a great place to meet, socialize, and build a stronger bond 3/6/2021 2:21 PM with the people in my community. 194 I don't have a dog. 3/2/2021 11:08 AM

167 A dog park is a great neighborhood benefit and it’s a convenient location for me to bring my 3/6/2021 2:16 PM 195 I have an old dog that I would take to the park more often if there was one closer. 3/2/2021 11:00 AM new puppy. 196 There is nowhere in Clifton that our dog can run around without a leash. It would be wonderful 3/2/2021 10:55 AM 168 Would love an off-leash area in Clifton 3/6/2021 1:39 PM to have something close so we wouldn’t have to drive to let our dog run around.

169 As someone who has had to drive to other parks along with other Clifton friends it would be 3/6/2021 1:31 PM 197 Having a dog park that is walkable to our home would be a wonderful asset and amenity to us 3/2/2021 10:49 AM wonderful to walk to a park in my neighborhood and spend time with my fellow dog lovers. It as well as the rest of our dog friendly people in the neighborhood. would be especially positive coming from the quarantine we have all suffered regarding neighborhood bonding. It would also be nice to have a place to sit with friends and not worry 198 We live close and would like a dog park close by. 3/1/2021 9:46 PM about the dogs and automobile traffic. 199 I visit my girlfriend and she lives a block away. We both have dogs and it would be amazing if 3/1/2021 4:28 PM 170 Because it is close to my house and neighbors with dogs and would be a great community 3/6/2021 1:17 PM we didn’t have to drive 15-30 minutes away to go to a dog park. builder. 200 I live right around the corner from it 3/1/2021 4:26 PM 171 I don't have a dog 3/6/2021 10:09 AM 201 Why would anyone put a dog park next to Clifton Ave? God forbid a dog gets loose and bolts 3/1/2021 4:09 PM 172 In front of cemetery, not a good place. 3/6/2021 9:56 AM into heavy traffic. You want that blood on your hands?

173 I don’t own a dog. 3/5/2021 10:13 PM 202 I would financially support and participate in expanding the park with more amenities for 2/28/2021 6:29 PM children. 174 I don’t have a dog 3/5/2021 6:36 PM 203 We don't have a dog 2/28/2021 2:22 PM 175 it will be loud and there will be traffic and constant barking. 3/5/2021 5:35 PM 204 Don't have dog 2/27/2021 2:58 PM 176 I don't have a dog 3/5/2021 5:18 PM 205 Dogs already go there and its roo small for a dog park 2/25/2021 8:37 PM 177 Too close to a main street. 3/5/2021 11:16 AM 206 The closest dog park is in Westwood we’re down by Lunken and there are a lot of dogs in this 2/25/2021 10:44 AM 178 Traffic 3/4/2021 2:54 PM neighborhood most of the people know each other and we have discussed having a needing a dog park in Clifton 179 Have family with dogs. But I have kids who use the park. Would want the kids to be able to 3/3/2021 6:30 PM still safely use it 207 Prefer to keep my dog safe from other dogs. 2/25/2021 9:32 AM

180 I would love to go to Dunore Park with my dog. I would enjoy parking along the business 3/3/2021 4:40 PM 208 Dunore park is a small roadside greenspace, not suitable for a dog park. 2/24/2021 11:15 PM district, doing some shopping, then heading off with my dog to the park. 209 Dog parks tend to be loud and dirty. I have two dogs and never take them to dog parks 2/24/2021 5:16 PM 181 We have 2 dogs and on the advice of the Cincinnati Police Department having a dog is one of 3/3/2021 8:53 AM because research shows the vast majority of dogs do not like them the best security systems you can have for your home not to mention the love and companionship they provide. There are days when Im just to tired to give them the 2 mile walk 210 Don't have a dog. When I did, I used my own fenced yard or walked it. I have no use or need 2/24/2021 2:38 PM they deserve . I often drive to various dog parks in the city and it's a great way for my dogs to for a dog park and resent those that don't live within 5 houses of this park for wanting it in our play with other dogs and get the socialization and exercise they need. I also think dog people backyard. enjoy each other's company and this would give me the opportunity to become better 211 I prefer the open space without fences for everyone to run and play. 2/24/2021 2:26 PM acquainted with my neighbors. 212 Better spot for dog park in bigger park area around the corner. 2/24/2021 10:54 AM 182 All of the other dog parks are such a far drive. 3/3/2021 8:13 AM 213 Would be the closest dog park to my house. 2/24/2021 10:09 AM 183 My dogs would love more social time. 3/3/2021 7:52 AM 214 There are plenty of other parks I can take my dog to. I wouldn't want the beautiful park outside 2/24/2021 9:32 AM

7 / 19 8 / 19

27 Attachment A

Dunore Park Feedback Dunore Park Feedback

of our community to have a fenced area. the dog parks near where I live and I’m always looking to bring them to a new environment.

215 It would look awful. It is a nice green space and a fence would make it look not appealing. 2/24/2021 9:08 AM 245 I don’t have a dog. 2/16/2021 9:41 PM

216 I walk my dog, or arrange play dates. 2/24/2021 8:23 AM 246 Don’t want a dog park ruining the pretty green space of Dunore Park. The park further down 2/16/2021 9:36 PM Ludlow would be a much better choice for a dog park, if I wanted a dog park on Ludlow, which I 217 Do not have a dog 2/24/2021 7:42 AM don’t.

218 It would be a great location, close without having to go downtown. 2/22/2021 12:07 PM 247 In general not comfortable with having my dog mingle with other dogs. 2/16/2021 9:32 PM

219 Want Dundee Park to remain the same 2/22/2021 8:25 AM 248 I love taking my dog to the dog park at Otto Amleder but don't often because of the drive 2/16/2021 9:22 PM

220 We walk our dog to this park daily because it is a great place to sniff and explore on the leash. 2/21/2021 6:19 PM 249 Close to my house where my dog can play. 2/16/2021 6:09 PM There are no other dog parks in Clifton and this would be a nice addition to the neighborhood. 250 It’s a very small area and Ludlow is a busy street. Also the choice should be up to the people 2/16/2021 5:55 PM 221 Our dog at this time, has a big back yard that we are fortunate to have. 2/21/2021 5:33 PM that live right across from it. It could be very loud and people don’t pick up the dog poop. I 222 It's wonderful to have a dog park in the area! 2/21/2021 4:36 PM have 4 dogs,

223 I think it would be great to have a dog park in the neighborhood. Driving out to Lunken or 2/21/2021 3:21 PM 251 The nearby residents don’t want this. 2/16/2021 5:37 PM downtown to Fido, etc. is kind of a pain in comparison to having one located right in the 252 I don't currently have a dog. 2/16/2021 5:36 PM neighborhood. 253 There are currently no dog parks within walking distance of our house. A 15 minute walk is a 2/16/2021 5:29 PM 224 My dog has a fenced backyard that isn’t large enough for him to run to his desire. I think 2/21/2021 1:27 PM perfect primer for a great session at the dog park, and a 15 minute walk home is a great cool- having a dog park so close would be nice for him to run off leash and get some exercise. down. This would be a welcomed amenity to a City park with an impact well beyond folks 225 As a dog owner, I feel dog parks are unsafe for myself and my pet. I was once bitten by a dog 2/21/2021 10:04 AM within a 10 minute walk. at a dog park in Cincinnati. The owner took off before I could get any information and I had to 254 I don't really care for the idea of dog parks, especially small ones: dogs are often engaged by 2/16/2021 4:46 PM get a tetanus shot because it broke skin. You cannot guarantee that everyone who brings their other dogs in unwanted ways and people get less exercise because they're standing or sitting dog to the park is a responsible pet owner and it is a huge liability. around rather than walking their pets. And Clifton is a beautiful neighborhood in which to walk 226 I have to drive to every dog park. One closely would be great. 2/20/2021 7:14 PM one's dog... Bottom line: MORE walking, LESS parking.

227 No dog 2/19/2021 7:55 PM 255 not currently a dog owner 2/16/2021 4:12 PM

228 It's a maybe. 2/19/2021 4:02 PM 256 I don’t like dogs. 2/16/2021 3:49 PM

229 We live directly across the street from Dunore and have a pretty small backyard. We would 2/19/2021 2:01 PM 257 No dog 2/16/2021 2:57 PM love to bring our dog over to make friends and play! 258 Park that is not used a lot and space for dogs to run around would be nice 2/16/2021 2:50 PM

230 Any where I can go and let my dog run would be nice. We live in a high rise so he is always on 2/19/2021 1:16 PM 259 While I don't have a dog, I would if my apartment allowed, and I would love to visit a park 2/16/2021 2:03 PM a leash and we have no back yard. where I know there will be dogs around. I don't currently visit Dunore Park, but I would if it were 231 There's usually no one in the park when I bring my dog. He loves running around freely. 2/19/2021 7:17 AM a dog park.

232 They are gross and muddy; or worse. 2/19/2021 7:15 AM 260 I live nearby in Camp Washington and I work in the gaslight district of Clifton. It would be a 2/16/2021 1:59 PM wonderful addition to the neighborhood. 233 We do not have a dog. Also we have young kids and would like to keep the dogs away from 2/18/2021 7:02 PM that particular park since it is the closest park to our house. 261 I have a dog 2/16/2021 12:51 PM

234 We don't have a dog. 2/18/2021 1:33 PM 262 I use that area several times a week to go for walks with my toddler and she loves to run 2/16/2021 12:48 PM around in that park. The open space is the only space we have to run within walking distance 235 I don’t have/know/want a dog. 2/18/2021 12:45 AM of our house

236 It’s a social opportunity for dog and owner. 2/17/2021 8:57 PM 263 I walk my dogs on sidewalk and have a spacious fenced in yard. Dog parks are gross with lots 2/16/2021 12:08 PM of poop and mud. Plus, I do not support the Dunore location for a Dog Park. 237 I don’t have a dog. 2/17/2021 8:18 PM 264 use park for people 2/16/2021 12:06 PM 238 I take my dogs elsewhere and limit their interactions with other dogs. 2/17/2021 6:08 PM 265 Depends on the dogs that are there. Hopefully they would all be friendly and socialized dogs. 2/16/2021 11:40 AM 239 I don’t have a yard and it would be awesome to meet other dog owners and let my dog get 2/17/2021 6:06 PM People would have to clean up after their dogs exercise! 266 it is better served as a park for humans not a place for dogs to do their business and owners to 2/16/2021 11:06 AM 240 I would also use a dog park in Burnet Woods or Mt. Storm. Not sure why Dunore Is the only 2/17/2021 4:30 PM leave it there for all of us to smell . park being proposed since Dunore dog park is fraught with conflict. Can we vote on an option of parks? 267 Many people do not watch their dogs at the dog park. Many people bring dogs that are not 2/16/2021 10:58 AM licensed or vaccinated 241 Convenience 2/17/2021 11:24 AM 268 We use the playground and there is no room for a dog park 2/16/2021 10:53 AM 242 So my dog can exercise off-leash 2/17/2021 7:21 AM 269 It’s close to where I live. 2/16/2021 10:35 AM 243 I don't have a dog. 2/17/2021 7:15 AM 270 I have lived in my Ludlow Avenue home for 40 years. I have used Dunore Park playground with 2/16/2021 10:34 AM 244 I go to school in Clifton therefore I wouldn’t mind bringing my dogs to the park. I’m not a fan of 2/17/2021 12:28 AM

9 / 19 10 / 19

28 Attachment A

Dunore Park Feedback Dunore Park Feedback

my 3 sons and now with my 4 grandsons. I love that little park. Please do not destroy the 301 Dont have a dog 2/15/2021 7:29 PM trees. Please preserve the benches and tables as well as the playground. I love dogs but do not currently have one. 302 No dog. 2/15/2021 7:27 PM

271 I am on the fence. If "I don't really care" were an option, I would put that. I would DEFINITELY 2/16/2021 10:07 AM 303 I wouldn't feel my dog would be safe in such a small park. And no, we do not take her to the 2/15/2021 7:13 PM like to see planting of trees to replace those that keep getting removed. dog park in Washington Park because it's too small and the fences are too short.

272 I have a high energy golden retriever who would love a dog park. 2/16/2021 10:01 AM 304 I like to walk through our various pocket parks as well as Burnet Woods & Mt. Storm Let your 2/15/2021 7:06 PM dogs run in your yard plus take them for walks or visit various dog parks throughout the city. 273 We have a sweet dog who loves to play, and our backyard is not fully fenced, so a dog park 2/16/2021 9:51 AM We all need more exercise. would be a welcome addition to Clifton! 305 This is a nice space for children to play. I would not want to see it mixed with dogs off leash. 2/15/2021 7:04 PM 274 I do not have a dog. 2/16/2021 9:35 AM 306 My dog gets frightened of itchy dogs. 2/15/2021 7:03 PM 275 It's close to where I live 2/16/2021 9:26 AM 307 have a dog but do not like most dog parks. 2/15/2021 7:01 PM 276 While I don't live close to denote park- a fog park in this location would be a good idea given all 2/16/2021 9:09 AM the multi family dwellings in the area. Also- I think it would be easier to maintain there vs 308 A park provides an opportunity for dogs to meet other dogs. 2/15/2021 6:57 PM Burnet Woods and would keep BW more undeveloped for other wildlife. I probably would not 309 I have 2 dogs.... would love a dog park in Clifton 2/15/2021 6:55 PM use it bc of distance from my home. 310 I don't have a dog. 2/15/2021 6:47 PM 277 My current dog doesn’t enjoy dog parks, but my old dog loved them. 2/16/2021 9:04 AM 311 I don’t have a dog. 2/15/2021 6:44 PM 278 Nice to let our dog run full speed and socialize 2/16/2021 8:54 AM 312 Don’t own a dog 2/15/2021 6:34 PM 279 I don’t own a dog 2/16/2021 8:10 AM 313 Don’t have a dog 2/15/2021 6:29 PM 280 Not easy access for me Close to busy Ludlow traffic 2/16/2021 5:45 AM 314 I already frequently walk my dog to Dunore park. As a 50+lb dog, he needs to run and places 2/15/2021 6:18 PM 281 Have dog. 2/16/2021 4:52 AM to do so, without having to worry about traffic, are rare.

282 Do not own dog. 2/15/2021 11:32 PM 315 It is convenient to our house and we would be able to exercise our "grand dog" there when we 2/15/2021 6:17 PM 283 They asked us to take survey 2/15/2021 10:46 PM care for him.

284 My dogs are Clifton residents, too, and they deserve a place to stretch their legs and freely 2/15/2021 10:44 PM 316 There are no other off-leash dog parks nearby. This is a great and necessary idea. 2/15/2021 6:08 PM socialize. 317 No dog. 2/15/2021 6:05 PM

285 We have 2 dogs and would love to have a dog park within walking distance to our home. 2/15/2021 10:37 PM 318 The surrounding traffic will be an unsafe environment if any dogs get loose. It is not worth the 2/15/2021 6:03 PM 286 We have a yard, and our dogs are not a good fit with a dog park. 2/15/2021 10:18 PM risk, so I would not use this park with my dog.

287 We share our dog with our in-laws so do not walk him often. 2/15/2021 9:49 PM 319 I don't want to smell the wafting essence of urine & feces on the hot, humid summer nights. If 2/15/2021 6:01 PM you've ever been to a dog park, you know that there is always an 'off' smell, no matter how 288 I would never take my dog to a dog park, you never know what type of dogs may be 2/15/2021 9:45 PM much people clean up the poop. The trash cans get full and start to percolate… encountered. 320 Don't own a dog. 2/15/2021 5:57 PM 289 Too far for me. 2/15/2021 9:25 PM 321 Dunore Park has a higher rate of pedestrian traffic than dog traffic. Mt Storm Park has the 2/15/2021 5:50 PM 290 I have a dog. 2/15/2021 8:57 PM acreage to secure an area for a dog park.

291 too small. used by small children now. 2/15/2021 8:42 PM 322 My dogs have died 2/15/2021 5:45 PM

292 I would use it if my dog liked it, got along with other dogs. 2/15/2021 8:32 PM 323 No Dog 2/15/2021 5:45 PM

293 We use this park for large group games because it is the perfect size and shape for a game of 2/15/2021 8:24 PM 324 Be very good for the dogs to be off leash 2/15/2021 5:42 PM tag football or soccer. There isn't another useful place for this in walking distance. It's just the right size. I wouldn't want a dog park to take away from it's usefulness for this kind of big 325 Unhealthy interactions, dog is a poop eater 2/15/2021 5:26 PM gathering. 326 I am a bit concerned of the noise (dunore is right behind my house) but ultimately I think it 2/15/2021 5:26 PM 294 Dog parts are great! Dogs love them, dog owners love them! 2/15/2021 7:59 PM would be a nice, easy place for dogs and people to socialize

295 No dog. 2/15/2021 7:51 PM 327 I don’t have a dog. 2/15/2021 5:26 PM

296 I currently don’t have a dog. 2/15/2021 7:49 PM 328 There are so few places to take a dog in our area, i think a dog park would be well used. It 2/15/2021 5:24 PM would also create another space for community gathering. I've seen some dog parks charge an 297 We have two really big dogs and it might not be big enough. Plus we like walking our dogs. 2/15/2021 7:41 PM annual fee to get access to help maintain them, and I'd be willing to do that.

298 I have a dog but I am not interested in being around other people’s dogs. 2/15/2021 7:39 PM 329 No other dog parks close to Clifton. Closest ones to Clifton are downtown, but not convenient 2/15/2021 5:21 PM when you have to drive and pay for parking. 299 I don’t have a dog. 2/15/2021 7:39 PM 330 Dog Parks create a climate for dog fights. Most people control their dogs but, a significant 2/15/2021 5:21 PM 300 Not a big enough space. Burnett woods seems like a better fit .... 2/15/2021 7:36 PM number don't. The police don't monitor the activity.

11 / 19 12 / 19

29 Attachment A

Dunore Park Feedback Dunore Park Feedback

331 I do not have a dog. 2/15/2021 5:19 PM parking in this residential area and other things that come with a dog park- noise, garbage and poop. 332 The nearby residents are not supporting this initiative. 2/15/2021 5:19 PM 359 Not fair to the people who live along the park to add people, cars, and noise to their front 2/15/2021 8:31 AM 333 Our little dog doesn't like other dogs; hasn't been acclimated to others in a free setting like a 2/15/2021 5:19 PM yards. dog park. 360 I don't have a dog, but hopefully soon! 2/15/2021 8:28 AM 334 Just got a puppy. But when she’s bigger it would be nice to have a place in walking distance to 2/15/2021 5:18 PM make friends! 361 We walk out dog daily but she loves those moments she gets to run off leash 2/15/2021 8:08 AM

335 No dogs at home. 2/15/2021 5:15 PM 362 Seeking a safe and social place for my family and dog. 2/15/2021 7:06 AM

336 Currently don't have a dog; if we do get one (something that we are considering in the next 2/15/2021 5:10 PM 363 no dog 2/15/2021 5:37 AM couple years) we would potentially use a dog park at Dunore 364 No dog. 2/15/2021 12:03 AM 337 I don’t have a dog. 2/15/2021 4:06 PM 365 I use the park. But I don't have a dog. 2/15/2021 12:01 AM 338 Love dog parks 2/15/2021 2:31 PM 366 I don’t like dog parks - people are often irresponsible with their dogs in them. 2/14/2021 11:38 PM 339 Don't own a dog and strongly oppose a dog park in Dunore! 2/15/2021 2:28 PM 367 Close to where I live 2/14/2021 11:38 PM 340 No need 2/15/2021 2:27 PM 368 It would be the closest park for our two dogs 2/14/2021 11:33 PM 341 Close to where my family lives 2/15/2021 1:27 PM 369 Depends on size and whether dog park interferes with other use 2/14/2021 11:24 PM 342 Great space. Close to home 2/15/2021 12:54 PM 370 Convenient, and as my kids get older, would allow for them to play nearby (on the play 2/14/2021 11:03 PM 343 Don’t have a dog 2/15/2021 12:11 PM equipment or freely in the field space) while I let the dog run/play too. (Currently they are too young to be unsupervised.) 344 Not sure at this point since it's not that close to my house. 2/15/2021 12:10 PM 371 Prefer to walk my dogs, 2/14/2021 10:22 PM 345 I do not know of any close by dog park.... 2/15/2021 12:00 PM 372 We need a dog park in the area! 2/14/2021 9:30 PM 346 It would be really nice to not have to drive to get to a dog park and our australian shepherd 2/15/2021 11:58 AM would get more chances to run. 373 Maybe...but that wasn’t an option. I’m always looking for safe , clean , places to exercise and 2/14/2021 9:17 PM socialize my pup. 347 Too many irresponsible dog owners use dog parks. 2/15/2021 11:55 AM 374 On nice days, the walk would be great exercise for both of us! 2/14/2021 8:59 PM 348 I don't have a dog 2/15/2021 11:28 AM 375 No dog(s) 2/14/2021 8:38 PM 349 Very poor location choice . Dunore is the only green space in that area and children play there 2/15/2021 11:04 AM frequently. It is not a good location and the “proposers”know it because there was a big 376 They are all different. Need to find out what makes the one cool…if it is. 2/14/2021 8:00 PM argument about it in “NextDoor “ for weeks. The neighbors there already stated they don’t want a dog park in their front yards and I totally empathize seeing the dog poop I frequently have to 377 It would be the closest dog park to Clifton 2/14/2021 7:27 PM clean from my own front yard likely from the dog owners that now propose an open dog park in 378 Nice to have a place close for dogs to be off leash 2/14/2021 7:13 PM Dunore. Why not at the Clifton park in Ludlow. Perfect location and out of sight to the neighborhood. Why taking your dogs to people’s front yards to do their thing is ok?. Dogs in 379 I don’t believe in dog parks 2/14/2021 6:42 PM Dunore can’t even run. Is a small space and it will be totally unhealthy for nearby playing kids. Horrendous choice when there is already a park in Ludlow 380 I enjoy the activity of actually walking my dog. Also, I do not trust other people to adequately 2/14/2021 6:21 PM docialize their dog prior to using a dog park. 350 I would. Our yard is very small without enough room for our dogs to get adequate excercise. 2/15/2021 10:43 AM 381 Currently no dog parks nearby and it would be great to have a safe place to walk and play with 2/14/2021 6:17 PM 351 It's closer than others. 2/15/2021 10:30 AM the dogs not on cement.

352 My dog does not get along well with other dogs 2/15/2021 10:14 AM 382 I live on Dunore road. I won't use the dog park. I walk my dog. Many owners let their 2/14/2021 5:47 PM aggressive dogs go and ruin it for everyone. A few don't clean up and it's a muddy mess 353 Don't have a dog! 2/15/2021 10:05 AM usually. People promising to clean isn't the same as rules with $ set aside to do it.

354 But I have small dogs and fear it would be overrun with big dogs. Perhaps it could be 2/15/2021 9:34 AM 383 Older dog; attacked once by a dog not on leash while were walking on sidewalk; so she is 2/14/2021 5:38 PM something like even hours =dogs over 20lbs 2pm,4pm etc and odd hours dogs under 20 lbs scared of other dogs she doesn't know 3pm,5pm etc 384 No dog 2/14/2021 4:49 PM 355 No dog parks in the area 2/15/2021 9:30 AM 385 No dog 2/14/2021 4:26 PM 356 Too far from business district. 2/15/2021 9:28 AM 386 No dog 2/14/2021 4:01 PM 357 Even though we have a dog, I would not want a dog park. I think a fenced in area would detract 2/15/2021 9:01 AM form its beauty. 387 Very close to my home and walkable whereas other dog parks are not. 2/14/2021 2:40 PM

358 No. I’ve seen too many bad things come from dog parks. Dog fights, parasite spread and 2/15/2021 8:57 AM 388 We have a dog 2/14/2021 2:37 PM owners that are less than responsible with their dogs. The only park I would consider going to would be one that has a membership. That way owner info and medical status of the dog are 389 It is closer than other dog parks. 2/14/2021 2:18 PM known going in as opposed to just taking your chances. I also am concerned about lack of

13 / 19 14 / 19

30 Attachment A

Dunore Park Feedback Dunore Park Feedback

390 its close to north avondale 2/14/2021 2:01 PM 418 would be the closest one besides mt airy 2/14/2021 8:05 AM 391 My dogs don’t go to parks 2/14/2021 1:43 PM 419 This location is much closer to my home than the park we currently visit. 2/14/2021 7:59 AM 392 I have a large lot in Clifton so my dogs are free to run around frequently. I fully support the use 2/14/2021 1:08 PM 420 It’s much closer than anything else in the area 2/14/2021 7:58 AM of Dunore for dogs who aren't so fortunate. 421 Our dog can then run freely off the leash. 2/14/2021 7:57 AM 393 I would not use a dog park because they are unsanitary and lead to incidents between dogs. 2/14/2021 12:55 PM 422 This would be a quick trip to get to the park. This would enclosed So no chance of dog’s 2/14/2021 7:35 AM 394 For a dog park I would use the large one on Westwood Northern Blvd; any dog park in Dunore 2/14/2021 12:45 PM getting out Park would either make most of the park unusable for area residents or would be too small 423 I don’t have a dog 2/14/2021 6:15 AM 395 We live in Northside. I know our neighbours have tried to get a dog park in Northside to no 2/14/2021 12:34 PM avail, so currently we have to drive to Mt Airy or Washington Park to take our dog to an off 424 Ample space (if fenced area is big enough to accommodate the number of dogs I’d anticipate 2/14/2021 5:40 AM leash dog park. It would be amazing to have one just up the hill and much closer. will use it). Close proximity.

396 I'd love to have a local dog park. And please know, if you build one, I'd be more inclined to 2/14/2021 12:29 PM 425 Not all users of dog parks keep their dog under control. I will not put my dog in danger. 2/14/2021 5:04 AM shop up there, get coffee, grab ice cream with my kids, shop at the local store, get take-out. 426 There are so many apartment dwellers with pet dogs in Clifton that do not have yards. We 2/14/2021 3:33 AM 397 Close to our home 2/14/2021 12:27 PM need a proper place to let the dogs off leash! I Walk by this park regularly and I feel there is plenty of room to have a playground for the children and events and dog park. 398 Dangerous location because of traffic. Terrible for nearby residents. Disrespectful for the 2/14/2021 12:27 PM cemetery. 427 I don’t have any dogs 2/14/2021 3:06 AM

399 It's a perfect, narrow space for a fenced in dog park. Many Clifton residents have dogs. Great 2/14/2021 12:13 PM 428 I would love to walk to a safe place to let me dog run and chat with neighbors. 2/14/2021 2:59 AM idea! 429 My day revolves around getting my pup enough activity. As it stands, the closest dog park is 2/14/2021 2:36 AM 400 So many clifton residents have dogs and no outlet for socializing them. This park is rarely 2/14/2021 12:03 PM fifteen minutes away. We would be at a closer dog park OFTEN. used and seems a great use of the park space. 430 It would be the only dog park in my neighborhood. 2/14/2021 1:56 AM 401 Prefer walking my dog freely (with extendable leash) in open parks (Burnet Woods, all 2/14/2021 11:59 AM throughout Clifton) and without destroying the natural spaces of our community. I walk my dog 431 I have a dog and this would be, by far, the closest dog park. I would love to be able to walk my 2/14/2021 1:50 AM thru Dunore multiple times EACH DAY and it works just fine "as is" for dog exercise and dog to a dog park, which I’ll be able to do here. This location will allow me to meet other dog interacting with others. I suspect upkeep on a dog park would be a challenge -- it's already hard owners in the area to arrange dog play dates and such. I also love the location in regards to to have the one non-fixed trash can receptacle properly emptied and is now overflowing with other events, so I could take a dog to the dog park before an event and he could attend without dog bags. acting like a crazy maniac!

402 There are no close dog parks. However, I would prefer a dog park in a location such as Burnet 2/14/2021 11:27 AM 432 So close and it would be fun! 2/14/2021 12:35 AM Woods over Dunore Park, because Dunore Park is right next to a busy road. 433 Dunore Park is not the place for a dedicated dog park. 2/14/2021 12:22 AM 403 Don't own a dog. 2/14/2021 11:25 AM 434 A dog park is not necessary at Dunore Park. 2/13/2021 11:50 PM 404 I would like that option for my dogs. 2/14/2021 11:05 AM 435 No longer a dog owner 2/13/2021 11:44 PM 405 There are no off-leash parks anywhere near Clifton! 2/14/2021 11:03 AM 436 I have no dog. 2/13/2021 11:39 PM 406 or my many friends who have dogs. 2/14/2021 10:49 AM 437 Would be closest fenced dog park to northside 2/13/2021 11:05 PM 407 Because we have no legal spot in our neighborhood to allow our dogs to roam. 2/14/2021 10:30 AM 438 I don’t have a dog! 2/13/2021 11:02 PM 408 We walk our dog daily. Although we live a nearly 2 miles from this park, we would use it often. 2/14/2021 10:29 AM 439 I have no dog 2/13/2021 10:45 PM 409 It would be a great alternative to Armleder dog park, which is farther away from me. 2/14/2021 10:18 AM 440 I would if I have a dog again ! 2/13/2021 10:43 PM 410 Would be very close to home, and our dog loves dog parks! 2/14/2021 10:15 AM 441 Not big enough to support enough space for meaningful play between dogs 2/13/2021 10:17 PM 411 Too small. 2/14/2021 10:13 AM 442 We don’t have a dog. 2/13/2021 10:17 PM 412 I have dogs, but one is too old. In general, my dog trainer thinks dog parks (especially small 2/14/2021 9:50 AM 443 I have a small dog and don't trust other dogs off leash. 2/13/2021 10:13 PM ones and it gout a lot of room to run and spread out) aren’t great for larger dogs, like mine. 444 Dog parks are prone to dusease and dangerous when most do not understand K9 behavior 2/13/2021 10:04 PM 413 Because the nearby residents don’t support it. I think there’s large grassy areas of Burnet 2/14/2021 8:52 AM Woods that would be idea. 445 Close by. Can walk there. We take my granddaughter there for the play ground and it would be 2/13/2021 9:57 PM awesome to have a dog park also for the dog 414 More off lease opportunities for my 4 dogs. 2/14/2021 8:52 AM 446 It would be the only dog park within walking distance 2/13/2021 9:52 PM 415 Distance 2/14/2021 8:47 AM 447 I would prefer a dog park in burnet Woods. This park is for kids. 2/13/2021 9:51 PM 416 Too small. Too many dog fights are likely to ensue because of a lack of room to keep them 2/14/2021 8:44 AM apart 448 I live in Northside and have two dogs. This would be a perfect location for me to walk my dogs 2/13/2021 9:28 PM to or a short drive so they could play and socialize. 417 People can't be trusted to properly train their dogs. I won't take the chance my dogs won't be 2/14/2021 8:18 AM attacked. 449 My dog is too old for a dog park 2/13/2021 9:14 PM

15 / 19 16 / 19

31 Attachment A

Dunore Park Feedback Dunore Park Feedback

478 No dog; have 2 small children who are afraid of dogs. 2/13/2021 3:44 PM 450 It’s a short drive from my house in Northside and I’m frequently in Clifton. 2/13/2021 9:09 PM 479 No other dog parks nearby 2/13/2021 3:43 PM 451 I own a dog. 2/13/2021 8:58 PM 480 Would be able to walk to dog park which is very desirable for most dog owners! 2/13/2021 2:11 PM 452 I don’t have a dog. 2/13/2021 8:57 PM 481 It would be close. Hopefully it would have a small dog area. 2/13/2021 2:10 PM 453 Good place for dogs. 2/13/2021 8:53 PM 482 Close to home. 2/13/2021 1:55 PM 454 My dog doesn’t like dog parks 2/13/2021 8:51 PM 483 It is a great way to socialize my dog, and meet other dog lovers. 2/13/2021 1:48 PM 455 No dog 2/13/2021 8:41 PM 484 It would be great for the neighborhood and community to have a dog park in Clifton. 2/13/2021 1:35 PM 456 No dog 2/13/2021 8:38 PM 485 My dog is a pit mix and if someone's designer dog started a fight, my dog would kill it 2/13/2021 1:31 PM 457 No dog at this time 2/13/2021 8:36 PM 486 It would be a great place to take our dog to run around off leash. Other dog parks are too far 2/13/2021 1:17 PM 458 Don’t have a dog 2/13/2021 8:32 PM away to walk, which makes it more of an event rather than a quick trip. Dunore seems largely 459 I don't have a dog. But especially if it's a dog park, I will avoid it. On the otherhand I'm not 2/13/2021 8:31 PM underutilized currently, but it is in a fairly central location in Clifton. opposed to it. 487 No dog 2/13/2021 1:06 PM

460 But I’d rather see ones at 1) my storm and 2)Burnett woods. 2/13/2021 8:28 PM 488 Do not currently have dog. Had small dog and found dog parks /dogs and owners/ very 2/13/2021 12:58 PM 461 It’s so small, there’s no way there is enough room for more than 2 or 3 dogs to play safely. 2/13/2021 8:20 PM uncomfortable

462 We have a fenced in backyard and an old dog, but would use it if we had a younger dog 2/13/2021 8:18 PM 489 A dog park would be a great asset to Clifton. There isn’t one within walking distance of this 2/13/2021 12:53 PM large neighborhood with lots of dogs. I know many of my neighbors have also wanted a dog 463 I don’t have a dog- but if I did I would! 2/13/2021 8:18 PM park in the area of years.

464 I don’t have a dog. 2/13/2021 8:14 PM 490 I don't own a dog 2/13/2021 12:45 PM

465 My dogs don’t like other dogs. I would probably use it if I had a friendlier dog. 2/13/2021 8:10 PM 491 I am currently driving 20-25 minutes to give my dogs the free running exercise they need. How 2/13/2021 12:02 PM wonderful it would be to walk to a dog park! Think if the fossil fuel savings. 466 It's within walking distance and I wouldn't have to drive elsewhere! 2/13/2021 8:10 PM 492 I have a dog. This dog park would be closer to where I live. 2/13/2021 11:57 AM 467 I don’t have a dog and I’m allergic to dogs. Would be less likely to visit the park with my son if 2/13/2021 8:06 PM there were a dog park there. 493 I have three dogs and would love to get them more playtime and socialization. In addition, it 2/13/2021 11:40 AM would be a good way to meet my neighbors. 468 While I don’t have a dog this park is perfectly suited to include a dog park. It would be a good 2/13/2021 8:04 PM amenity for Clifton and not take up useful space in other parks like burnet Woods or Mount 494 We do not own any dogs 2/13/2021 11:18 AM storm. 495 Do not have a dog 2/13/2021 10:36 AM 469 I lived for years at 801 Dunore Road, 45220, and took my children and grandchildren to that 2/13/2021 7:54 PM park frequently. It is too small for a dog park but us used by families. PLEASE do not add a 496 I am frequently at Dunore Park playing at the playground and the surrounding green space with 2/13/2021 10:18 AM dog park. Once they are on the car, they can e as I’ll go to big dog parks. Thank you. my son. We meet neighbors there, explore the trees, enjoy the space. During the summer months we are there 3-4 times a week. During winter less so but we continue to use the space. 470 No, it would need too much unattractive infrastructure. 2/13/2021 7:35 PM A dog park would irrevocably alter the space.

471 I do not take my dogs to dog parks. 2/13/2021 7:33 PM 497 This park is the only nearby outdoor play space for MANY children. Dogs already visit the park 2/13/2021 9:48 AM with owners and have plenty of room to run and play. The fact that there is no fenced area 472 I’d like part of it to be for small dogs only. 2/13/2021 5:55 PM forces owners to properly supervise their dogs.

473 I disagree with the concept. It's too close to Ludlow for safety and noise issues(frequent sirens 2/13/2021 5:45 PM 498 I have a dog and dog parks are breeding grounds for parasites and they smell bad. Too many 2/13/2021 8:52 AM & in the spring, summer, fall even more frequent motircycles)for the dogs. That area is a travel dogs barking is annoying. route for deer. Additionally, that park is an urban green space. There's more to it than a children's playground. Families play football there, frisbee, have picnics, read books, walk in 499 Having a dog, I would always choose to walk the dog on the street or enjoy a stroll at Burnet 2/13/2021 7:17 AM the leaves and the grass. There are AT LEAST a dozen designated dog parks in the Cincinnati Woods, Mt Storm, and the greenspace at Dunore. This is what we have done for a number of area; why must we destroy a small jewel of nature for a handful of people who don't want to years. drive to an already established dog park. I won't use it and will think long and hard before voting for any future park levies. 500 Don’t use dog parks 2/13/2021 5:38 AM

474 No dog but like dog parks as a neighborhood asset 2/13/2021 4:58 PM 501 Using the playground now 2/12/2021 11:51 PM

475 I don’t have a dog. 2/13/2021 4:07 PM 502 I have a dog and it would be convenient. 2/12/2021 10:56 PM

476 I have a dog, but don't want one there 2/13/2021 3:46 PM 503 This would be great for my family and our dog. Otherwise we have to drive to a dog park. 2/12/2021 10:05 PM

477 We don't have a dog. And we've seen the dog parks around the city - erosion issues, noisy, 2/13/2021 3:45 PM 504 Dog parks build community 2/12/2021 10:01 PM eyesore at best. I also do not think Dunore Park is the best location - do w real siting study to 505 It's within walking distance and I would use it nearly everyday. 2/12/2021 9:50 PM find the best option. Why not Spring Grove along the Mill Creek park? Or where the credit union was along Central Parkway? 506 Nuisance to neighborhood 2/12/2021 9:24 PM

17 / 19 18 / 19

32 Attachment A

Dunore Park Feedback Dunore Park Feedback

507 Dirty, disease filled places. Scar on the neighborhood and poor use of Park funds. 2/12/2021 9:11 PM 508 no dog 2/12/2021 9:02 PM Q4 I would describe my interest in constructing a dog park at Dunore Park 509 A dog park would be an absolute misuse of space and an eyesore to those driving/walking 2/12/2021 8:41 PM around Ludlow/Old Ludlow. There are so many beautiful routes to walk around the Gaslight with as: a pet. There’s no need to sully a great Clifton park for the whims of dog owners who aren’t willing to walk with their dogs. Answered: 850 Skipped: 1

510 We use the park to run play and explore. My child is afraid of dogs and will have to pass many 2/12/2021 8:22 PM dogs to get to her bus stop. The park is I’ll sized for a dog park. There are 20 kids in the Strongly immediate surrounding area, for which space to play ball is much more needed than a dog support park.

511 I live across the street from Dunore Park and have a dog. I would not use a dog park as I feel 2/12/2021 8:18 PM Somewhat it would endanger my child, 15 months, from using the playground and my dog , 10, due to support undisciplined dogs and owners

512 Too close to a busy street 2/12/2021 7:54 PM Have not yet 513 This would be an excellent place for a dog park with safe, good parking options 2/12/2021 7:48 PM formed an...

514 The nearby residents don’t want this to be a dog park. There are other Parks properties that 2/12/2021 7:03 PM are better suited and that would not Impact homeowners. Somewhat disagree 515 I have two dogs and have to drive to get to any dog park, this would be convenient and a good 2/12/2021 6:47 PM addition to Clifton. Strongly 516 A dog park would have a significant impact on the neighbors of Dunore, as well as the change 2/12/2021 6:35 PM disagree the dynamic of the park. I think this is a not a good idea and those pushing this agenda have repeatedly ignored the feedback from the people who live in the area. 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 517 Constructing a dog park in Clifton (Dunore or other location like Mt. Storm) shows that we are a 2/12/2021 6:25 PM neighborhood on the move. Clifton is a neighborhood of active people - runners and dog walkers. Having a space where dogs can be off leash allows our community to get closer to ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES one another. Strongly support 41.65% 354 518 I loved the community building that occurred when the pop up puppy party was at Ludlow 2/12/2021 6:04 PM Plaza across from Graeter’s. And since the Westwood dog park opened I have been going Somewhat support 10.12% 86 there. I wish we had similar in Clifton. Have not yet formed an opinion 5.18% 44 519 Yes, if it's kept clean, well managed, has water, and isn't too crowded. 2/12/2021 5:48 PM 5.76% 49 520 It’s walkable, manageable and in a great, visible location to be a community asset. Would be 2/12/2021 5:43 PM Somewhat disagree used by a lot of people while not distracting from the character or function of the park or play 37.29% 317 equipment but can actually enhance it. Strongly disagree

521 My yard is impossible to fence in so a local dog park would be great. I take mine to 2/12/2021 5:23 PM TOTAL 850 Washington Park now.

522 Would provide a safe place for dogs to exercise in the urban setting of Clifton. 2/12/2021 5:22 PM # LEAVE REASONING WHY HERE IF YOU SO CHOOSE. DATE

523 My cat would be scared there with all those dogs around. 2/1/2021 4:40 PM 1 Dirty, smelly, won't be maintained, will bring unwanted additional traffic to neighborhood and will 3/31/2021 11:47 PM increase congestion on Ludlow.

2 As a resident of the neighborhood I want to support our dog owners and make this an even 3/31/2021 11:30 PM more desirable place to live

3 Makes park inaccessible or useable for non dog owners including children who live in the 3/31/2021 10:47 PM neighborhood. There is no clear proposal for keeping dog park clean and it will result in mud everywhere.

4 It is not safe for the dogs with the high traffic. It would also be very noisy with lots of barking 3/31/2021 10:30 PM from dogs close to the park. This also would take away a play area for young adults.

5 Unless substantially funded and robustly maintained (e.g. Washington park) a dog park will be 3/31/2021 10:05 PM an eyesore to the neighborhood green space along one of the most prominent boulevards in Clifton. The park is not large enough to support rotating fields, which means the only viable solution results in installation of an artificial turf surface. A chain link or (more expensive) aluminum rail fence will be obtrusive to the park and the user experience. Dunore park is located within a distinctly residential neighborhood, largely zoned SF-6 in the immediate

19 / 19 1 / 21

33 Attachment A

Dunore Park Feedback Dunore Park Feedback

surroundings. The noise and vehicular and pedestrian congestion will negatively impact the community in Northside surrounding property owners. The site is not conducive to traffic access, parking, or increased circulation. City-wide attractions do not belong in the middle of residential neighborhoods. 26 Dogs need free exercise, too. 3/29/2021 1:35 PM

6 I would love to have a dog park closer to my house 3/31/2021 9:24 PM 27 this park is used for children and walking course new playset just installed this is a residential 3/29/2021 1:32 PM neighborhood and across from a cemetery - 7 I like the open space of the park. The dog park would take over the space and make it a less 3/31/2021 9:15 PM friendly space for people who are wary of being around dogs 28 THIS IS A DISGUSTING IDEA. When my children were young, they regularly played in this 3/28/2021 11:52 PM park. Many neighborhood children still do. Fencing off a portion of this small park for dogs to 8 Not a good location - too many people would be coming into the residential area. 3/31/2021 4:23 PM use as a toilet is an insult to children.

9 It would ruin the park and be an offense to the Jewish Cemetery. 3/31/2021 4:21 PM 29 My wife and I used to take our 2 boys to play at the park. I wouldn't want to lose any of that 3/28/2021 8:43 PM park. 10 Too close to Ludlow road. Way too many cars use the road as a thorough fare at speeds above 3/31/2021 4:01 PM the posted speed limit. It would be a safety concern even with a fence. The park is too small 30 We take our dog to Mt Storm for walks a lot and would love to be able to let our dog run 3/28/2021 8:09 PM to section off an area. Already limited green space for the general neighborhood. A dog park is around. too specialized towards one population. Dogs are already allowed at the park 31 I’ve seen pictures of what happens to other dog parks in this city; keep it verdant and focused 3/28/2021 3:11 PM 11 I can see pros and cons 3/31/2021 11:19 AM on people.

12 Park too small for multiple uses and a dog park 3/31/2021 9:47 AM 32 It would make that spot unusable for picnics 3/28/2021 12:43 PM

13 This is a bad idea. Cars speed up and down Ludlow Avenue daily. The smell coming into my 3/30/2021 7:29 PM 33 We have so many dog owners and dog lovers in the community that I know would love a dog 3/28/2021 8:43 AM house/homes would be horrible. There are lots of children on street and dogs running away park with our neighborhood which would allow them to play with each other. Also many Clifton from that park would create a dangerous situation. Whose going to pick up the feces on a daily homes do not have a lot of yard space for dogs to exercise and this park would give Clifton bases? residents that option for them to have a place for their dogs to safely run around and exercise.

14 TERRIBLE TERRIBLE IDEA!! WHAT IS THE POINT??? PEOPLE CAN TAKE THEIR DOGS 3/30/2021 7:26 PM 34 It's a quiet community and a quiet park. It should remain that way. It's right next to a cemetery. 3/27/2021 10:53 PM ELSEWHERE 35 Vocal minority wants something that is already provided at multiple parks around the city. 3/27/2021 10:49 PM 15 In my neighborhood, there are no dog parks within walking distance. This would be the first 3/30/2021 5:15 PM Burnet woods has far more space to give up for something like this. one. Once of the great things about Clifton is it's walkability. This would add another walkable amenity. Also, since the pandemic, I have noticed that many more people have gotten dogs in 36 I think the space is too small, and too close to a busy road with no crosswalk. There is much 3/27/2021 8:46 PM Clifton. It would be a great place for dog owners in the neighborhood to socialize. more open and somewhat secluded space in Burnt Woods.

16 It's a perfect spot. 3/30/2021 3:20 PM 37 We don’t need obstruction in the pocket park. 3/27/2021 8:12 PM

17 See above. Not every green space needs to be "something." Right now it is used for picnics, 3/30/2021 2:35 PM 38 We have plenty of dog parks in the Cincinnati area. This location is not ideal due to proximity 3/27/2021 7:48 PM pickup soccer, baseball and tag football, and by kids just being kids. The parking/traffic of a busy road. I'd hate to see a lovely park that anyone can enjoy "go to the dogs". If I lived situation if it becomes a "destination" will be terrible. I also think it's disrespectful to the near/across from the park, I would not appreciate it being there. cemetery right near it. And, I have extremely serious concerns that it will be maintained, kept 39 Dogs and everyone can use the park as it is. Dogs are supposed to be on leash, but rarely 3/27/2021 1:39 PM clean, etc. NO NO NO! enforced. Creating a dog park only benefits a small part of the community. A better solution 18 Why would the city budget $2,000,000 on a dog park? Certainly there are more pressing & 3/30/2021 1:52 PM would be leaving the park as is, no fence, but allowing dogs off leash. That way it would mainly important funding issues. be well trained dogs and those with fears of dogs would be less concerned.

19 This neighborhood does not have one, and a lot of people have dogs in this area. 3/30/2021 11:19 AM 40 The green space is pretty as is and fencing would be an eyesore. 3/27/2021 1:35 PM

20 Dogs need a place to safely be off leash 3/30/2021 11:16 AM 41 It is much better to have a designated space for dogs than just open space for occasional use. 3/27/2021 1:15 PM As it stands now, this space is hardly ever used. 21 Dunore Park is a GREEN gateway into the Clifton/Gaslight area. It is beautiful as it is now. It is 3/30/2021 9:16 AM used by many residents, dog owners, families, etc. It is not "underutilized".The street that 42 park is small and is already used by residents for the playground and as green space. Also 3/27/2021 12:45 PM borders the north side of the park by the cemetery is a quiet and peaceful walk vs the louder, dog parks often destroy the natural turf. Ludlow Avenue side with heavy traffic and drivers who often exceed the speed limit. Adding 43 Dogs need a space too and to socialize 3/27/2021 11:30 AM lots of traffic and cars for the dog park would DIMINISH the entire park and cemetery area....I do not feel the dog park would have a positive impact for area businesses and property 44 Smell, noise, traffic 3/27/2021 9:52 AM owners. People go to a dog park with their dog/dogs, and don't usually frequent businesses in the same trip....A dog park would not make Dunore Park safer. Asking people if they are willing 45 Want to enjoy with friends and family 3/27/2021 9:29 AM to maintain a dog park is not really viable. People can express an interest and then not follow 46 It would completely ruin the entire essence of Dunore Park 3/27/2021 9:21 AM through or move...Many people are not even willing to pick up their dog waste and carry it home or put it in a trash can. There are so few cans maintained by the city in the Clifton Area, 47 Because I am a dog owner 3/26/2021 10:47 PM that can be utilized by dog walkers... 48 See above 3/26/2021 10:20 PM 22 very few dog parks in the area, so it would be great to have one close to home! 3/30/2021 7:48 AM 49 There's currently no other dog park available within the vicinity, yet there are a lot of dog 3/26/2021 10:11 PM 23 Much better as a park, used by children and dogs already and would create too much traffic if 3/29/2021 4:47 PM owners. a dog park 50 See above. 3/26/2021 7:59 PM 24 Same reasoning as above. Accessible dog park 3/29/2021 3:41 PM 51 Prefer to see children and human activity. 3/26/2021 1:25 PM 25 This would be a dog park within walking distance from my home and a large dog owning 3/29/2021 2:32 PM

2 / 21 3 / 21

34 Attachment A

Dunore Park Feedback Dunore Park Feedback

52 Cars drive fast in the area. 3/26/2021 11:34 AM 74 Park is rarely used so this would be a good way for more people to use the public park. 3/22/2021 4:54 PM

53 Having a local dog park in Clifton would improve the quality of life in the neighborhood. 3/26/2021 11:25 AM 75 As sympathetic as I am to the desires of dog owners (and am one myself), I would find it 3/22/2021 9:08 AM 54 I have two dogs, but I just don't think this is a best space for a dog park. I agree that the 3/26/2021 9:20 AM inconsiderate as a public nuisance to those who live nearby. My neighbors living near Dunore space is underutilized, but would much prefer enhancing the green space to be something Park, who use it for recreation (exercise, child play, quiet reading or meditation, etc.) would EVERYONE can enjoy. certainly be annoyed by incessant barking and litter. Experience in other City dog parks would lead one to expect deterioration of the ground, and the attendant public expense of cleaning, 55 My dogs would be way happier to be able to run free in a fenced in area. I would be super 3/26/2021 7:43 AM repairing and maintaining a facility which serves only dog owners. happy if this dog park had one side for big dogs and one for small dogs. Also I know some people already walk their dogs off a leash because we don’t have a dog park yet but some 76 Same as above 3/21/2021 12:36 PM community members have been scared to see free dogs. 77 Would be nice to have a bigger park for kids as well. Possibly for older kids. 3/20/2021 5:25 PM

56 This would erase most of what is the only large greenspace left in Dunore — a space enjoyed 3/25/2021 6:46 PM 78 It is a residential area. Parking on the street on Ludlow has already been limited by the newer 3/17/2021 6:14 PM by countless families in the area. Moreover, it is highly dangerous for any dogs that would get rules. Also, dogs barking would be a daily nuisance and take away from the atmosphere of the out of the park and run toward Ludlow, where cars often travel at very high speeds in front of park, not to mention disrupt the daily routines of people who live close by. Plus dog park areas the park. And, btw, there is no money to maintain it! A trifecta of reasons not to do this. are not nice looking so it would also take away from a park atmosphere.

57 It would disrupt the appearance and peaceful nature of the park. I believe it could potentially 3/25/2021 6:17 PM 79 Greatly interferes with family and kids. Noisy, smelly, erosion. Key guideline for dog parks is to 3/17/2021 12:51 PM become an eyesore. site them AWAY from residential areas.

58 It's a neighborhood FAMILY park - not a dog park. We need more picnic benches from people 3/25/2021 5:46 PM 80 Takes space from kids and families, Noisy, dirty, traffic issues, 3/17/2021 12:41 PM in the neighborhood. Not attract outsiders to fill the park with dog shit. 81 Dog parks bring together community members in a meaningful way. 3/17/2021 9:02 AM 59 This isa neighborhood park, there are small children playing, there isn't enough parking. 3/25/2021 5:04 PM 82 I want to take my dog there. 3/16/2021 9:47 AM 60 I also have empathy for the homeowners immediately surrounding the park who will be 3/25/2021 4:42 PM confronted by the traffic, noise, litter and smells if the park is not meticulously maintained 83 The more the better. Dogs and their humans need more places to socialize. 3/15/2021 5:50 PM (which none of the smaller parks are these days because of constrained budgets) 84 doesnt seem large enough spsce for dogs to exercise, especially if crowded. On the other 3/15/2021 4:45 PM 61 Residents nearby don’t want it! 3/25/2021 2:43 PM hand, dogs need space too and where else is there?

62 Filth, noise, ugliness. 3/25/2021 1:13 PM 85 This is a good space for a dog park, it looks as though it was made for that very reason. 3/15/2021 3:56 PM

63 Lack of funds for keeping up present parks. 3/25/2021 12:46 PM 86 They will destroy it and face it that's not what it was built for. You people know that. Some 3/15/2021 10:44 AM dogs in that area are as big as horses . Some people can not control there dogs. 64 Anecdotally, Clifton appears to have a high rate of dog ownership and many could walk to the 3/25/2021 12:27 PM Dunore dog park rather than having to drive 4 -5 miles to the next closest ones. It appears 87 It’s not meant for the dogs. It’s for people who don’t want to walk their dogs 3/15/2021 9:43 AM there is plenty of room for a good sized dog park while still maintaining the existing "people- park". 88 We enjoy the park as is, walk dogs on leash. Ludlow is already too busy and people drive too 3/15/2021 9:12 AM fast. We don’t need to draw more people to the park area contributing to this 65 Dog parks are great - community building, exercise, etc. 3/25/2021 11:56 AM 89 Further improve the neighborhood of Clifton and provide more options for the central 3/14/2021 7:48 AM 66 Doesn’t affect our household, although I think dogs should have more places to run than 3/25/2021 9:28 AM neighborhoods for their dogs to play. currently exist. 90 It is a highly residential area and would devalue surrounding property. The neighborhood really 3/13/2021 6:50 PM 67 I walk by the park regularly. No one is ever there. This is an unused parks area. A dog park 3/25/2021 8:07 AM can’t take that. I strongly disagree with a dog park. Dog park at Armletter works well. A dog would bring people to the park (which I think is the goal, right?) park in a residential area in Clifton that devalues property is not helpful during these economic times. 68 I utilized all the green space at the park when my son was young, and I feel all the young 3/25/2021 7:58 AM children that live around me should have that ability as well. People will not keep the dog park 91 Bad space. Record of poor maintenance/sanitation at other dog parks. Smell. Trash. 3/13/2021 11:11 AM clean,it will be noisy, and risky to the children who will be in the area 92 Eye sore, traffic issues, too small, not equipped for additional people and dogs 3/12/2021 10:38 AM 69 Many reasons. Clifton has too few parks. The space is too small for a dog park. 3/24/2021 10:47 PM 93 I don't want a dog park near my home 3/11/2021 2:29 PM 70 I have a young family and would love to be able to take my dog somewhere to play safely. I 3/24/2021 7:40 PM also think it would be great as a community building asset to better know some of the people 94 My concerns were stated above. I believe many dog owners are well intentioned about their 3/10/2021 6:40 PM in the neighborhood. desire for a dog park, but that, like most dog parks, the reality will be much different than what the supporters have in their mind. Dunore is getting great use in its current format. Let's not 71 The park servers a valuable neighborhood need - it provides calm, clean green space for all 3/24/2021 1:59 PM ruin that. who want to take advantage of it. It does not need to be fenced in and torn up to create a dog park. 95 Property value lowered traffic mess out of neighborhood traffic 3/10/2021 5:31 PM

72 I've seen a lot of dogs off leash in the Dunore Park during my commute to the UC campus and 3/23/2021 12:47 PM 96 You can never have too many dog parks. 3/10/2021 2:10 PM it would be much safer to have a designated area for dogs, owners and children. I also think 97 Would tear up the grass and bring crowds of people to my street, loud 3/10/2021 2:04 PM that it would be great to have a water feature in the dog park if it was possible. It doesn't have to be a fountain (like Washington Park), but a well/hose (like Otto Armleader) would be 98 convenience and Waffle would love it. 3/10/2021 1:12 PM beneficial to reduce heat exhaustion in the summer. 99 Too small. Too near residences. Parkng limit 3/10/2021 12:52 PM 73 I walk by there every day and the park is rarely used. This would give a lot of neighbors a 3/22/2021 5:00 PM place to meet with their dogs in a central location. 100 Safety concern of children 3/10/2021 9:08 AM

4 / 21 5 / 21

35 Attachment A

Dunore Park Feedback Dunore Park Feedback

101 It's just not the right area for a dog park and the park area is too small. A fence around it would 3/10/2021 8:53 AM 118 I live on Ludlow and can see Dunore from my front door. I do not want to hear dogs barking all 3/7/2021 6:46 PM look terrible. It would bring congestion into this residential area. it is right in front of a cemetery day. Also, I take my young children to the park and we enjoy the open green space. and may cause disruption during funerals. 119 Dog parks are awesome. People that oppose dog parks are probably unhappy people. Most of 3/7/2021 6:41 PM 102 I am in the unique position of having lived next door to an unofficial dog park: an empty lot 3/9/2021 4:56 PM the anti - dog park statements are false. (due to the demolition of a house) which the owner unofficially donated to our very nice historic neighborhood for use as a dog park. Due to antiquated zoning laws in our small Illinois city and 120 Dogs don’t need parks 3/7/2021 6:33 PM to the very deep pockets of this neighbor, we could not legally fight this unbelievable intrusion 121 High traffic from outside Clifton and noise that will decrease property value 3/7/2021 5:32 PM into our privacy. A dog park at Dunore Park would not be nearly as intrusive as the one we had to endure, but it has some similar issues. 1) Parking: It is incorrect to assume that only 122 Wrong location for traffic control 3/7/2021 4:50 PM neighbors will use the dog park and that they will mostly walk there. People will drive to get there, even if they only live half a mile away--I saw this happen all the time. The lack of 123 Very unsightly. Messy. Prefer Park be used by Families and Children. 3/7/2021 4:45 PM parking alone is reason enough to kill this project. 2) Noise: People don't just go to dog parks 124 I am most against a fence being constructed on this site and obscuring or interrupting the view 3/7/2021 3:20 PM to sip coffee and talk to other dog owners in a leisurely way; some take their dogs to the park of this area. It works well as it is a well used community open space. for exercise before or after work and then they loudly call their dogs when they need to leave. This can happen early in the morning and late at night. Of course, dogs also bark at each 125 Park is used by community for picnics, playing catch and soccer, walking on leash dogs, and 3/7/2021 12:35 PM other. 3) Dog waste: Not all people will pick up after their dogs. We lived in an similarly genteel enjoying the playground for young children. There is inadequate parking. It would be ugly. neighborhood before--people were irresponsible there and they will be irresponsible here. I do Dunore Park is a green space in a residential neighborhood. Too close to a very busy street if not dislike dogs, but I feel that people who get pets should be able to care for them properly dogs get loose. Danger of loose dogs to pedestrians with and without dogs who are passing by. without imposing on others. That means if people want big dogs who need space to run, they should have a place to exercise them. It is not their neighbors' obligation to provide that place. 126 It’s a very small green space and a dog park would take away some of the little green space 3/7/2021 12:33 PM Dog parks need to be far enough from residences that they don't create a nuisance for people that is there. who bought their homes not knowing that their privacy and their ability to park by their houses 127 Would draw neighbors to the park to make it more used. Would get more city service such as 3/7/2021 11:51 AM might be compromised. trash pickup (The current trash bin is frequently overflowing with dog poop bags). Lots of dogs 103 I would like to see a dog park in Clifton, just not in this location. I feel the fence and worn out 3/9/2021 2:50 PM are currently off leash at this park and it’s not safe for little kids at the playground. grass would be unsightly. 128 For the same reasons I wouldn’t take my dogs to the park in this location, I wouldn’t 3/7/2021 10:33 AM 104 The physical areas available seem sufficient that there is NO NEED for additional public space 3/9/2021 1:28 PM recommend others to do so. This street needs serious infrastructure work to sustain more to be isolated for more limited use for fewer residents/citizens pedestrian use.

105 There are a lot of people with dogs. It would be good for the community. 3/9/2021 11:26 AM 129 Loss of community space. Poor parking near busy road. Likely deterioration of conditions, 3/7/2021 8:20 AM mud, trash, required fencing. 106 not compatible with playground 3/8/2021 9:33 PM 130 Greenspace will be destroyed (mudd), people won't pick up after their dogs (they don't now 3/7/2021 8:14 AM 107 See above 3/8/2021 6:46 PM walking them), too busy of a street (Ludlow).

108 So many Clifton residents have dogs and Dunore park is often empty. Why not use the space 3/8/2021 6:10 PM 131 None available nearby, but other park space is available in the neighborhood. 3/6/2021 5:30 PM for our neighborhood dogs to be off leash! 132 I love to see dogs on our walks but we use the park for family soccer games, picnics, tree 3/6/2021 3:50 PM 109 I believe a dog park would completely strip this area of vegetation, causing erosion and leaving 3/8/2021 5:15 PM climbing and playground play. I have seen some nice dog parks, but they are usually wooded an unsitely area despite efforts to maintain it. It's also borders an thoroughfare where many or utilize AstroTurf (Washington Park) because the dogs are hard on the landscape. To fence cars travel throughout the day. Animals which get loose may be at great risk. off this beautiful open space and destroy the field with heavy paw traffic and urine would be a shame. A community garden, naturescape playground or outdoor exercise equipment would 110 I don't want more barking dogs near my home. 3/8/2021 4:09 PM suite the space better.

111 A dog park in Clifton would be an asset. Having lived within 2 blocks of Dunore and having 3/8/2021 4:02 PM 133 InCorrect use of taxpayer money to pay for pet /owners privileges! In 1997 the park board was 3/6/2021 3:50 PM young children I personally experienced the value of the green space and play sets (need an paying $8750 each year for Mutt mitts. Only available in upscale parks.Would the Park service update) in this location. If a dog park did not eliminate the green space where children play also pay for baby diapers? This is a biased survey. The word” why “is highly inappropriate catch and run and fly kites, then I could be strongly in favor. Challenging the participant who does not agree with the dog park construction.

112 I understand somewhat why the immediate local residents are against this park, but I think it 3/8/2021 1:19 PM 134 This site is not suitable and appropriate for a dog park based on the objective measures and 3/6/2021 2:55 PM would be a great utilization of a park that is entirely underutilized (and can only really be used requirement of determining if a dog park should be constructed at a specific site. in a certain number of ways given its slope). Think parking and noise concerns are real, but somewhat over-exaggerated. Would be useful for a number of students who live nearby, many 135 The park is good as is. A dog park here will disrupt a green space that’s important to this 3/6/2021 2:53 PM of whom have dogs in small apartments, and lack a good place to let their dogs get out. If not neighborhood. a dog park, would also support a community garden, arboretum or other use than a small swing set and sloped grass. 136 See above comments. I have kids who use the park and no dogs. 3/6/2021 2:49 PM

113 Noise, safety, smell 3/8/2021 12:27 PM 137 Dunore Park is a beautiful greenspace in a residential neighborhood. A dogpark would be an 3/6/2021 2:28 PM eyesore that would make poor use of our very limited green places. 114 I would definitely utilize the park since the closest park I currently visit is fifteen minutes away. 3/8/2021 7:30 AM 138 It would ruin a neighborhood park that children use 3/6/2021 2:23 PM 115 See above 3/7/2021 10:05 PM 139 See above. It’s more than about having a place for your dog to run around. It’s about being 3/6/2021 2:21 PM 116 There is no large area close by to play with my dog off-leash. This area would allow for games 3/7/2021 9:15 PM friendly with your neighbors. of fetch. 140 Limited parking, no cross walks or lights to control traffic, how would it be maintained? 3/6/2021 2:17 PM 117 Eyesore for nearby residents 3/7/2021 8:42 PM 141 I can’t think of a community that more needs or deserves this aspect to be present. I also 3/6/2021 1:31 PM

6 / 21 7 / 21

36 Attachment A

Dunore Park Feedback Dunore Park Feedback

believe it is important so so as to have a healthy way to socialize our dogs (especially young best place for one. I know of many families that live close to Dunore (with and without dogs) puppies) so we create a safer dog community in Clifton. The walks through the business that are not in favor of a dog park so close to their house. We have a dog and she barks at district will be full of more dogs that know each other and encounters will be safer and more other people and dogs that walk past on Ludlow. I think she will bark even more with all the appealing even for non dog owners. dogs and people she sees. The excessive barking at the park will disrupt the peace people enjoy in their homes and while using the park. I know many families who live around Dunore 142 I think we need a walkable area for people/families with dogs to have an off leash location. 3/6/2021 1:17 PM park go there to utilize he playground and play ball in the large open space that you can’t find 143 Eyesore 3/6/2021 12:32 PM in most yards around here. I think a different park not on a busy road so close to houses would be better. I also think the fencing would take away the beauty of the park. We love just cutting 144 It will limit the access to children and residents and make it unpleasent (odor and destroyed 3/6/2021 10:16 AM through the open grass with our family and it is a nice open green space in our neighborhood. surface) for human use. The current model of shared use works fine for everybody. 159 It would bring liveliness and love to a wonderful neighborhood 3/2/2021 1:48 PM 145 I do not support building a dog park at Dunore Park for several reasons. My family and I have 3/6/2021 10:09 AM used the park almost daily for the last 12 years. We love it. It is our backyard. I am concerned 160 Clifton does not currently have a dog park. It seems that our neighborhood would benefit from 3/2/2021 12:05 PM about the increased traffic, lack of parking and safety issues that a dog park would create. one and we have a lot of spaces that could become home to a dog park, like Dunore Park or There is not enough parking, lighting, bathrooms, trash receptacles to accommodate a dog Burnet Woods. park. The park has no barrier onto Ludlow so I am concerned about the safety of dogs off 161 I am a dog park fan 3/2/2021 11:54 AM leash who may potentially run into traffic. In addition, I'm concerned about the safety of children at the park who may encounter a dog off leash. I love dogs and support the 162 There isn't another place to let dogs off leash that we are able to walk to easily. 3/2/2021 11:10 AM importance of dog parks. I recommend creating a dog park at a park with more land and parking. 163 Lots of my friends have dogs. 3/2/2021 11:08 AM

146 That stretch of land is small and I’m concerned about the children who do play on the 3/5/2021 10:13 PM 164 It would be a good place to build a park 3/2/2021 11:00 AM playground. Since the dogs would be unleashed, it is possible for many instances of dogs 165 Clifton has so many dogs, it would be a much welcome addition to the community. My house 3/2/2021 10:55 AM running out of the fenced area and attacking the children on the playground. Also, there is actually overlooks the park, and we would love to have that addition. There is so much space enough poop on the sidewalks and in the grass throughout the Ludlow, Lafayette, McAlpin and in that park that is unused. We see dogs down there all the time, anyway. just the overall Clifton area as a whole without a dog park; the prospect of a dog park at Dunore Park would lead to more dog poop everywhere from the already lazy Clifton residents, 166 I would like to see other locations explored. 3/1/2021 8:36 PM not to mention the non-Clifton residents who don’t care for the neighborhood who will ultimately be attracted to the park. In my experience, dog parks are just there for owners to drop their 167 I think it’s a good spot for one because there isn’t one around that area. There’s an apartment 3/1/2021 4:28 PM dogs off and laze about on their phones not watching their dogs. This type of behavior does complex that allows dogs right near that area so it would be nice for those people’s dogs to be not belong in a children’s park and playground area where there will be a surge in incidents of able to exercise without driving far. the dogs of negligent owners attacking children. Finally, people have allergies to dogs, and 168 Not only would it be dangerous to have a dog park next to an extremely busy road, the limited 3/1/2021 4:09 PM especially in this climate of school closures, that park is the only area for some children to size would contribute to the spread of canine disease. The space is not large enough for a play and release their energy, so they deserve to do so without worrying about having an healthy park. allergic reaction or being attacked by dogs. 169 Why not use underutilized/off hours parking lots around the city for dog parks instead of 3/1/2021 2:39 PM 147 I don’t want dogs that close to a children’s play area with swings etc. 3/5/2021 6:36 PM mudding up lovely green space? What about the parking lot off Howell Ave? (BONUS: close to 148 it is loud and will disrupt the peace in this area. 3/5/2021 5:35 PM Howell Ave. Pet Hospital and the pet store next door.) Take up some of that concrete (ugly and bad for the environment) and resurface it with something dog-friendly/environmentally friendly. 149 Many of the nearby residents are opposed and their reasons are valid 3/5/2021 5:18 PM 170 I’m afraid of dogs. 2/28/2021 2:30 PM 150 Park is too small an area and too may kids play in the park. Burnet Woods is a much better 3/5/2021 2:10 PM park and has better parking, way more space and areas that can be isolated from kids and 171 The place would be really messy and ruin a place that we like to play. 2/28/2021 2:22 PM hikers. I would support/pay to see this happen. 172 Dunore Park is too small for a dog park. Dunore is a nice, calm, small green space on a busy 2/27/2021 9:30 PM 151 Too close to a main street. Would not be attractive to have fencing so close to the street and 3/5/2021 11:16 AM thoroughfare; this plan would ruin it. take away from the natural looking park that is already there. 173 Super fun as long as it doesn't impede on kids playground. But great for dogs 2/27/2021 2:58 PM 152 Too dangerous unless / until better traffic (speed) control on Ludlow. 3/4/2021 2:54 PM 174 Ruining a beautiful green space due to selfish dog owners. I am a dog owner, there is no need 2/25/2021 9:32 AM 153 We should have a dog park. It's a sociable place and I love talking with other dog owners. 3/3/2021 4:40 PM to ruin the park.

154 There are now only a few city trash cans on the streets of Clifton and many dog walkers drop 3/3/2021 8:53 AM 175 Even without amenities this park is heavily utilized. A dog park would be unsightly and disturb 2/24/2021 11:15 PM their poop bags on the sidewalks because there are no cans. I believe there would be less dog the peace. walkers because people will take advantage of the dog park. Having a dog park in a 176 Smell, noise of barking dogs, those that don't clean up after their dog. I have dog poop in my 2/24/2021 2:38 PM community will set the tone of how the dog park will be operated. We often had well attended garbage can on garbage day. My can sits out and is in the sun. Take your dog poop home with PUPP parties on Clifton Avenue and everyone was respectful to each other. I have no problem you. Don't just think it is ok to put it in anyones garbage can. AND DON'T LEAVE IT IN THE telling someone to pick up their dog's poo if it happens in my neighborhood. From the PARK OR EVEN THE DOG PARK. attendance that the PUPP parties brought I think it would be well attended and appreciated 177 I like to think, what would Rocky Merz do and frankly he probably wouldn’t care either way. 2/24/2021 2:26 PM 155 Having a closer dog park would be nice! 3/3/2021 8:13 AM 178 poor spot for dog park, next to a busy street, will cause litter. 2/24/2021 11:07 AM 156 Just worry about state of finances of our governments and if this is the best use of funds at 3/3/2021 7:52 AM this time. 179 Not th best place - too much traffic and could pose a threat to the safety of the dogs. 2/24/2021 10:54 AM

157 Good use for an underused small park 3/2/2021 11:07 PM 180 Would love more parks near Northside that would allow myself to connect with my community 2/24/2021 10:09 AM and let my dogs run free. 158 Although I like the idea of a dog park in the neighborhood, I am not sure Dunore Park is the 3/2/2021 7:06 PM

8 / 21 9 / 21

37 Attachment A

Dunore Park Feedback Dunore Park Feedback

181 Keeping the natural area outside our community is in everyone's best interest including the 2/24/2021 9:32 AM 205 I would also support a dog park if it was placed in Burnett Woods. Having a dog park there 2/18/2021 12:06 AM dogs and dog owners that already enjoy the park. would really help with safety by attracting visitors!!

182 It would look awful, and take up valuable green space. 2/24/2021 9:08 AM 206 I’d go just to watch the pooches play. 2/17/2021 8:57 PM

183 It is a nice park to bring my daughter to. 2/24/2021 8:49 AM 207 Not needed. We are not a community of high-rise apartment buildings with no green space. 2/17/2021 8:18 PM There are lots of places to walk your dog and exercise your animal. 184 The neighborhood park was a significant selling point for us when we bought the house a 2/24/2021 8:41 AM couple of years ago. My wife and I have a 7 month old daughter and are very excited about the 208 I like the green space and dogs can already be taken around there - provided owners pick up 2/17/2021 6:08 PM ability to take her to the clean green space at the bottom of the street and to have the chance after them. to spread out in a large grass area in the middle of a dense neighborhood. We also love the beautiful green space, trees, lush grass, and the natural habitat for our squirrels and birds 209 Why does everyone want to destroy this beautiful, peaceful park in Clifton? When our children 2/17/2021 5:40 PM along a busy corridor like Ludlow. We are concerned that a dog park will compromise all of this. were old enough to walk to Dunore Park without us to swing on the swings, was a rite of passage that proved to them and to us that they were becoming responsible children. We 185 It's in a spot that would be an eyesore for Clifton. Very messy. Should be tucked away 2/24/2021 8:23 AM talked about safely crossing the street and how long they could stay at the Park. Today, my somewhere. husband and I take walks around Dunore Park and Bowdle Park for exercise and to enjoy the peaceful environment of our Parks. With the cemetery on one side and Dunore on the other, 186 Cause too much traffic and parking on street for residents would become sparse 2/24/2021 8:03 AM where else in Clifton can you find such a serene area. Please do not let the minority change 187 We have problems with loitering and men hanging out in their cars and I feel like this will only 2/24/2021 7:42 AM this for the benefit of dogs. add to the problem 210 Busy street. I don’t want a dog to get out and get hit by a car 2/17/2021 4:53 PM

188 Safe recreation area for dogs in a neighborhood that doesn't have a lot of open areas for dogs 2/23/2021 8:18 AM 211 I say I strongly support it because no matter what, I would attend a dog park but in fairness to 2/17/2021 4:30 PM to run off leash. the whole community I don’t think one dog park is the same as the next. Compare Westwood, 189 Only place close-by where there kids can play (jungle gym, etc...) 2/22/2021 12:48 PM for example, to auto armleder. What type of dog park are you proposing here? I think we need to know more 190 I don’t know enough and feel the residents there should have a strong say. 2/21/2021 5:33 PM 212 This beautiful small neighborhood park should not be taken, even partially, for the purpose of a 2/17/2021 3:40 PM 191 Helps to enhance our community & quality of life! 2/21/2021 4:36 PM fenced dog park! Such a dog park will ruin the beauty of the park and the open space and create a nuisance area which will be ugly and not usable for any other purpose. We do not 192 No real dog park close by in Clifton. 2/21/2021 3:21 PM favor this construction even if it is privately funded and maintained!

193 I’m a former resident of this neighborhood with many friends who still live on the streets 2/21/2021 10:04 AM 213 Would benefit from a park in the Clifton area? Would prefer use of Burnett Woods instead of 2/17/2021 9:03 AM adjacent to Dunore. We had a dog when we lived in Clifton and loved the vibrant dog walking Dunore Park as Dunore is already a small park that is heavily utilized by families. scene — we miss it quite a bit! We would even frequently walk our dog to Dunore and we still visit with our friends and children. It makes me sad to think that this lovely, quiet spot in the 214 No other dog park w/in walking distance. 2/17/2021 7:21 AM city might be turned into a busy, rowdy mess by a few entitled people who will bring increased traffic and leave dog poop all over the rest of the park. 215 Small area. Existing playground. Mature trees might be removed. Major street to cross to 2/16/2021 9:41 PM access potential dog park. 194 Dog parks are very poorly maintained, a health hazard to children, noisy, and dangerous for 2/20/2021 4:55 AM dogs. We also need the green space. There is an effort to replant the trees lost over the last 216 Great space that will be ruined. Small dog parks always attract too many undesirables or 2/16/2021 9:36 PM 10 years. irresponsible dog owners.

195 Traffic and noise and garbage. 2/19/2021 8:16 PM 217 There are a lot of dogs i nthe neighborhood and people already use the park for playing fetch, 2/16/2021 9:32 PM etc. I'd feel better knowing that the dogs couldn't risk getting onto Ludlow. We have seen 196 Intrudes on current peaceful park. I walk past there frequently. Not looking forward to walking 2/19/2021 7:55 PM multiple dogs killed on Ludlow since we moved here and it's so tragic. Anything to keep them past a dog park. safer would be good.

197 My dog is small and not very friendly with other dogs. It would be nice to have if my dog loved 2/19/2021 4:02 PM 218 I would like to know the details about the size and specific location of the dog park within 2/16/2021 7:42 PM to run and associate with other dogs, but that is not the case. Dunore Park

198 Need places for dogs to run and play safely. 2/19/2021 1:16 PM 219 Hard on the people who live there. 2/16/2021 5:55 PM

199 The park itself is beautiful being so open. I would feel like the aesthetic of the opened area will 2/19/2021 7:17 AM 220 The nearby residents don’t want this. 2/16/2021 5:37 PM be ruined by fencing by breaking the natural look the park gives off. 221 I find dog parks to be wonderful assets for dog owners in a community and the Clifton area 2/16/2021 5:36 PM 200 Seems like a lot of additional expense for a segment of the population that is already allowed 2/19/2021 7:15 AM seems sorely lacking. access to the park. or the inverse is fencing off a segment of the park excludes the population without dogs. 222 There are no dog parks in any of the uptown neighborhoods despite it being one of the most 2/16/2021 5:29 PM densely populated areas in our city. This is a great location. 201 Not enough space 2/18/2021 9:27 PM 223 Hesitant due to speed of traffic trying to access the park. There would need to be a light with a 2/16/2021 4:47 PM 202 My opinion depends on how the park is designed and how well it is maintained. If it's well- 2/18/2021 1:33 PM crosswalk added at Morrison. Of all the parks in the zip code, this and Bowdie are the most separated from the rest of the park and if it is consistently, properly cleaned, I would support it. urban with least impacted natural habitat/no wooded areas or trails. Community has expressed If parks department fails to maintain it, I would be strongly opposed. a desire for the amenity and having some dog agility equipment in the park would be fun for everyone (could offer training classes to help pay for the maintenance). 203 It is currently a park for children and we use it daily for that purpose. 2/18/2021 7:34 AM 224 The park would feel cramped with a dog park squeezed into the far end...and I certainly 2/16/2021 4:46 PM 204 My grand person and I have used the play area for many years. Don’t know how a dog park 2/18/2021 12:45 AM wouldn't want to see it put in the middle portions running into the west end since that's the only might hinder that area. place for frisbee, field games, etc.

10 / 21 11 / 21

38 Attachment A

Dunore Park Feedback Dunore Park Feedback

225 Having a nearby place to socialize DOGS and also socialize NEIGHBORS would help Clifton 2/16/2021 4:12 PM 250 If it would get used and people would take care of it I’m all for it. There isn’t a dog park close 2/15/2021 9:25 PM continue to grow as a neighborhood! to Clifton. I think this one would be small and therefore more for the people than the dogs.

226 I believe a dog park next to a busy street is asking for injuries to the dogs. And interfere with 2/16/2021 3:49 PM 251 Clifton has is a great walking community, including our dogs, and a dog park to let the dogs run 2/15/2021 9:21 PM families using the park. together and neighbors to chat with each other is a natural fit.

227 It's small area used by parents and kids and dog park would be dirt eyesore and filled with dog 2/16/2021 3:13 PM 252 I need to read about pros and cons. 2/15/2021 8:57 PM waste. 253 parking. litter. 2/15/2021 8:42 PM 228 There's not really a spot in the Gaslight District to take a dog, and especially not one where it's 2/16/2021 2:03 PM okay to let them off a leash. 254 My sense is that families nearby strong oppose it. 2/15/2021 8:32 PM

229 Dogs are great! And Clifton has many. Also, the nearest dog park otherwise is Fido Field which 2/16/2021 1:59 PM 255 In my experience, dog parks mixed into parks with recreational uses cause huge problems. 2/15/2021 8:24 PM is great but often very busy and parking is tough around there. Owners get to chatting and lose track of what their dog is doing, they fail to clean up their poop. They let their dog off the leash. Dog parks should be in dedicated locations not mixed in 230 I would like to leave it as an open park for kids to enjoy. 2/16/2021 12:48 PM with other recreational uses. I understand that some in Clifton would like a dog park, but this is the wrong location. How about building a dedicated dog park in the site of the former police 231 It’s a small green space for families and children to enjoy play. My own children spent many 2/16/2021 12:08 PM station? hours there with playing when little. We met for play dates with other children there. Sweet little safe park for kiddos. 256 Noise of their barking, and clean-up issues. 2/15/2021 7:51 PM

232 keep park for children and human game activities, picnic dog owner history of imposing on 2/16/2021 12:06 PM 257 I support the families on and near Dunore who would be negatively effected by a dog park 2/15/2021 7:50 PM people. dog clean up, uncontrolled parking and sense of entitlement 258 There are lots of dog owners in Clifton and a dog park would be a great selling point for Clifton 2/15/2021 7:49 PM 233 Would be nice to have a space for my dog to run close to house 2/16/2021 11:40 AM as neighborhood!

234 The area already breeds unsavory individuals. I believe a dog leak would increase this. 2/16/2021 10:58 AM 259 I don't think it is a good idea to have it near the playground. I don't think it is a good idea to 2/15/2021 7:46 PM have it so close to a busy street... the cars go very fast up and down Ludlow. It would be right 235 We use the playground and there is no room for a dog park. The neighborhood does not want a 2/16/2021 10:53 AM next to a cemetery, seems rather disrespectful and inconsiderate. Residents across from the dog park in this inconvenient location. park don't want it there, I think that should be taken into consideration, seems like it could 236 We need a new dog park. So many dogs don’t have access to let their dogs run free. 2/16/2021 10:35 AM lower the desirability of owning a home next to it

237 I think it would be nice to have a dog park in Clifton area. I think Mt. Storm or Burnet Woods 2/16/2021 10:34 AM 260 It’s just not necessary and the space is just to small for a fog park. It would look really ugly 2/15/2021 7:41 PM would be a better location. We have many dog owners who do not pick up after their dogs in there. both Dunore and Bowdle Parks as well as along the sidewalks. I do not believe Dunore Park is 261 This is a terrible idea because it’s a poor location. Kids play there, families gather there and 2/15/2021 7:39 PM underutilized. That should not be a reason for picking it as a dog park location. use the playground and people relax or exercise there. Also people visiting the cemetery 238 I have friends on Denore who do not support the dog park (traffic concerns) which gives me 2/16/2021 9:51 AM should not be subjected to the noise of barking dogs. A dog park would destroy this peaceful pause to fully supporting the idea ... area.

239 Annoying traffic & noise would hurt neighborhood. 2/16/2021 9:40 AM 262 Get more people to use the park. 2/15/2021 7:29 PM

240 I understand that the circumstances may be different for the Dunore Park dog park, but 2/16/2021 9:35 AM 263 We need a dog park in Clifton. 2/15/2021 7:27 PM generally I find that dog parks are not appropriately maintained. I also find that there are 264 The park is way too small to ensure safety to children and dogs. There are already several 2/15/2021 7:13 PM constant disagreements regarding the appropriate amount of control of the dogs using the park. options for dog parks nearby (some of which are already overburdened and don't keep up with 241 It’s too loud and trafficked for a residential area. 2/16/2021 9:04 AM the maintenance of the facilities)

242 Depends on size and location of fenced area. Should not be whole park "island." Just western 2/16/2021 4:52 AM 265 Walk your pets. Visit the many dog parks throughout the city. Good exercise for you and your 2/15/2021 7:06 PM area. Fence should be decorative, not chain link. Hedge around outside of fence. pets.

243 Not enough dog parks near my area 2/16/2021 12:17 AM 266 This needs to be kept a place for kids to play and run. I see other people using this open green 2/15/2021 7:04 PM space for soccer and football. 244 Need to see proposal details. Size, elevation views, initial costs, ongoing costs, expected use, 2/15/2021 11:32 PM any displaced current uses. 267 Too small an area 2/15/2021 7:01 PM

245 I visit the cemetery family member buried there. Don’t like idea of lots of parked cars. 2/15/2021 10:46 PM 268 I hate the idea of losing open green space in Clifton. 2/15/2021 6:47 PM

246 We visit dog parks all over Cincinnati, but must drive there. That’s not in the spirit of walkable, 2/15/2021 10:44 PM 269 I have not seen a plan. Open to having a place where dogs can run off-leash, but need to 2/15/2021 6:44 PM sustainable Clifton. I would help maintain and improve a Clifton dog park. I would use it every understand the trade-offs day. 270 I’ve been to engagement sessions and there are people strongly opposed to this. This isn’t 2/15/2021 6:34 PM 247 I walk by that park almost every day and in the cemetery nearby. It feels like it would be 2/15/2021 10:43 PM enough of a benefit to alienate these neighbors disrespectful to help the dog park right now at the cemetery and also disruptive for the many 271 I would like to see designated off leash areas so people do not take their dogs off leash in 2/15/2021 6:29 PM people who walk by the park. Keeping that as a green space would be a gift to Us all. open areas like Burnet Woods

248 I would not use it for my dogs, and I don't go to it in general. 2/15/2021 10:18 PM 272 See comments for last question. Also, I do not notice this area of the park being used much, 2/15/2021 6:18 PM 249 I think the park is too close to residences and it would be unfair to subject them to the possible 2/15/2021 9:45 PM other than by dog walkers. noise. 273 High number of Dog owners in Clifton. No dog parks nearby. 2/15/2021 6:08 PM

12 / 21 13 / 21

39 Attachment A

Dunore Park Feedback Dunore Park Feedback

274 The surrounding traffic will be an unsafe environment if any dogs get loose. It is not worth the 2/15/2021 6:03 PM 298 Small space for dogs to even run. Location just in the “face” of residents and children’s 2/15/2021 11:04 AM risk, so I would not use this park with my dog. In contrast, having a dog park within Burnett playground already there. Very unhealthy. There’s a park in Clifton ( Ludlow) perfect to create a woods could be an ideal location. “ poop park” which is what the proposers are looking for. A dog park for real cannot fit in Dunore. Only the “ poop” will fit. Very imposing to nearby residents. Neighborhood there already 275 Ludlow Avenue is a very busy street, what happens when a dog gets loose and runs into the 2/15/2021 6:01 PM expressed their disagreement in NextDoor. street? The small Old Ludlow cut-away does not have enough adequate parking. I feel sorry for anyone who actually lives on Dunore as the little quaint street will be bombarded with unwanted 299 It is a relatively small space. The immediate neighbors must be considered. 2/15/2021 10:43 AM traffic. When I had dogs, I would take them over to the Doris Day dog park over in Mt. Airy Forest off Westwood Northern Blvd., and it is only a 15 minute drive. 300 No dog parks near me. 2/15/2021 10:30 AM

276 See above. 2/15/2021 5:50 PM 301 Dunore park is a very nice place for my children and the children in the neighborhood to play. 2/15/2021 10:08 AM Adding a dog park area will just bring noise and potentially dangerous dog interactions to a 277 Find an area in Burnet Woods 2/15/2021 5:45 PM park used by children. Also, I know there would be more dog waste throughout the park that would make the whole park unpleasant to visit. Finally, Dunore is a small park meant to be 278 Any real discussion about a dog park should include the possibility of multiple locations. Last 2/15/2021 5:42 PM used most by the local neighborhood, and a dog park would start bringing people from a wider year's discussion clearly demonstrated that the residents immediately adjacent to Dunore are area. This will cause more crowding, noise, parking congestion, and wear and tear on the park. vehemently opposed to that location. I am not sure why the Park Board continues to completely miss the basic rules of Community Engagement. Clifton deserves better! 302 Huge benefits to the neighborhood. 2/15/2021 10:05 AM

279 My hesitation is people not picking up after their dogs. 2/15/2021 5:41 PM 303 I think the pit in burnet woods would be better. Room for large and small dog areas 2/15/2021 9:34 AM

280 The space is too small, the surrounding property owners would be negatively impacted and are 2/15/2021 5:32 PM 304 See previous answer. Also I have concerns about the playground and dog area together. This 2/15/2021 8:57 AM opposed, dog parks can be unsightly and require a great deal of maintenance, and there are park is not very large at all. other, better ways to increase use of Dunore Park such as putting better playground equipment in and increasing plantings. 305 Pedestrian, especially children safety. Appearance 2/15/2021 7:37 AM

281 There are so few places to take a dog in our area, i think a dog park would be well used. It 2/15/2021 5:24 PM 306 To make other non-dog parks safer and recreation more pleasant for my family. 2/15/2021 7:06 AM would also create another space for community gathering. I've seen some dog parks charge an 307 Too close to tons of traffic on Ludlow. There's got to be quieter locations. I also see lots of 2/15/2021 5:37 AM annual fee to get access to help maintain them, and I'd be willing to do that. parents with their kids using this park.

282 No dog park within walking distance of Clifton. 2/15/2021 5:21 PM 308 The nearest neighbors are against it. 2/15/2021 12:03 AM

283 See 3 above. 2/15/2021 5:21 PM 309 I haven't seen a map as to the footprint of the dog park on the overall park. 2/15/2021 12:01 AM

284 I do not have a personal interest. I think dog parks in general, are an amenity for neighbors 2/15/2021 5:19 PM 310 It’s small, and unnecessary. I do t think the city keeps up the ones we have and it will make 2/14/2021 11:38 PM who are dog owners. I would like to see more information, pro and con, on the specifics for this that small area look junky. dog park. 311 IMO, having lived in Gaslight Clifton for 5.5 years now, Dunore is the best spot for a modest 2/14/2021 11:03 PM 285 Where are your alternative locations to consider in Clifton?? This is not a well thought out 2/15/2021 5:19 PM but well designed dog park. Mt. Storm is not central enough; Burnet Woods should be left to survey. the birds and hikers (so to speak). Putting a modest dog run/park at Dunore will not interfere 286 I think dogs need to be able to run and play freely. There is nothing in our neighborhood that 2/15/2021 5:19 PM with anything else. allows this safely and lawfully. 312 Too close to residences. There is already an issue with trash being left in the park—am very 2/14/2021 10:22 PM 287 Many friends in the neighborhood have dogs and Dunore is a convenient place for some of 2/15/2021 5:15 PM concerned about increase in traffic, trash and dog poop. I’d like to see park funds go toward them to walk. improving the play area for CHILDREN and add more picnic tables (currently one table)

288 I am concerned that Dunore area residents strongly oppose the establishment of a dog park. I 2/15/2021 5:10 PM 313 Park is intended for children and families 2/14/2021 9:40 PM also am concerned about the upkeep and maintenance that a dog park would require. 314 I’d love a closer dog park, but I’m not familiar with all the ideas/plans for this location. 2/14/2021 9:17 PM

289 Clifton is already a very dog friendly neighborhood; not worth the expense. 2/15/2021 2:43 PM 315 Just no. 2/14/2021 8:38 PM

290 This is a small urban park that is well used by children and others. It is a rare oasis in the city 2/15/2021 2:28 PM 316 see in concerns section below 2/14/2021 6:42 PM and not well suited for dogs. 317 This is a rather affluent area. Properties already have large lots and do not need a dog park. It 2/14/2021 6:21 PM 291 Better as green space. Cost of upkeep? Will the budget Allie not just the initial build but also 2/15/2021 2:27 PM also has the potential to diminish property values in the area. ongoing maintenance. Where will parking be? How will it affect neighbors? 318 No one wants a dog park in their backyard. No one wants their park to have a dog park. Only a 2/14/2021 5:47 PM 292 No dog parks close to this area and many dog owners. It’s a great way to meet neighbors and 2/15/2021 1:27 PM few want it. Most don't know this movement is happening and if they suddenly find a dog park build community. in Dunore Park will be upset and angry about it. The whole thing coming up again seems like 293 Convenience 2/15/2021 12:54 PM the same sneaky attempt by a few to get what they want. I'm suspicious about this coming up after the new tiny playground was updated. This is hardly what families thought was going to 294 Is it safe for the dogs? Any traffic? 2/15/2021 12:11 PM be done at Dunore park when talk was of replacing the playground equipment.

295 I don't live that close unless I drive to it. I can walk my dog there in good weather but it's a 2/15/2021 12:10 PM 319 too small of an area 2/14/2021 5:38 PM long walk. 320 I lived on Dunore for more than 10 years, until six months ago. There is strong opposition from 2/14/2021 5:01 PM 296 People and their dogs are treated as one of the family...need to run and play 2/15/2021 12:00 PM my former neighbors, and I believe they should be listened to.

297 Would seriously harm the neighborhood's aesthetics and ambiance. 2/15/2021 11:55 AM 321 More activity there would keep out thugs and drugs 2/14/2021 4:49 PM

14 / 21 15 / 21

40 Attachment A

Dunore Park Feedback Dunore Park Feedback

322 Limits park use by others and will be a noise issue. I believe the park is too small for a dog 2/14/2021 4:26 PM park. 346 Nearby residents don’t support it 2/14/2021 8:52 AM

323 Although it would not interfere with the playground area, children do use the entire part. 2/14/2021 2:42 PM 347 Currently there isn't a dog park conveniently located to my house. 2/14/2021 8:52 AM

324 There are many dog owners in Clifton who would use this park. There is room for a park AND 2/14/2021 2:40 PM 348 It's a peaceful park with kids playing. I don't want to hear dogs barking or people yelling at their 2/14/2021 8:18 AM the playground that is currently there. The green space already exists and would require dogs. minimal landscaping. There is also room for parking. 349 there needs to be more spaces where dogs can run off leash 2/14/2021 8:05 AM

325 Because we have a dog 2/14/2021 2:37 PM 350 This location is much closer to my home. 2/14/2021 7:59 AM

326 Much better locations elsewhere in Clifton - Burnet Woods, Mt. Storm, soccer fields next to Mt 2/14/2021 1:42 PM 351 expense and maintenance too high. Parks should be for people. 2/14/2021 7:55 AM Storm 352 The closest dog park to me is Washington park. 2/14/2021 7:35 AM 327 Kids and families play there. Neighbors are against it. Respect the neighbors. Why is this even 2/14/2021 1:35 PM an issue? Stop purposefully pissing off your friends and neighbors. 353 I think it would destroy the appeal of the Park, make it noisy and messy, attract too much car 2/14/2021 7:32 AM traffic. 328 I would support it with a clearly posted warning about the city's lack of liability for dogs biting 2/14/2021 1:08 PM one another, so "use at your own risk" 354 Most interested in a dog park of significant size so dogs can run without being crammed 2/14/2021 5:40 AM together. 329 I am a homeowner within one block of the park, which already is ill- maintained sanitation wise, 2/14/2021 12:55 PM even without a dog park. Constant liquor bottles, beer cans, and overflowing trash cans are a 355 Many dog owners do not clean up after their dog. 2/14/2021 5:04 AM common sight. If sanitation cannot be kept up under its current use, adding sanitation issues would be unwise. Additionally, there are already traffic and pedestrian issues (and incidents) at 356 I don’t want dogs that close to my yard! 2/14/2021 3:06 AM Morrison and Ludlow. Adding cars and pedestrians into the mix, again, when the current issues 357 This would literally be a life-changing alteration for myself, my dog, and the abundant dog 2/14/2021 2:36 AM have not been addressed is counter-intuitive. I chose to buy a home in this area because while owners in the Clifton/Northside neighborhoods! it has a few amenities it is mostly away from the busy-ness of downtown and busy-ness of the university. As a homeowner I would prefer to keep the park a calm, clean family area for 358 It would diminish the value of having this green oasis on a rather busy stretch of 2/14/2021 12:22 AM residents, with any changes being guided by those that are homeowners that live closest to road/neighborhood. If the Park Board were to want to spruce up the picnic tables that would be the park. OK. Otherwise, please leave it alone.

330 see comment above 2/14/2021 12:45 PM 359 Some dog owners do not clean up after their dogs. 2/13/2021 11:50 PM

331 Need to see a series of conceptual drawings otherwise everyone visualizes their own idea. 2/14/2021 12:35 PM 360 Detracts from the peaceful green space in the neighborhood. Non-residence will come and 2/13/2021 11:44 PM bring an influx of non residents. 332 I'd love to have something more local, able to chat with local neighbors, etc. 2/14/2021 12:29 PM 361 I’d like to see the plan before forming an opinion. 2/13/2021 11:39 PM 333 Terrible location for safety, noise, etc. Also, displaces the current uses of the park. This is the 2/14/2021 12:27 PM only park nearby for kids to play pickup games, swing, and for older folks to lie on a blanket, 362 Too small. Too near people’s houses. The grass is already used by families. 2/13/2021 11:12 PM watch birds, etc. Who is going to keep it up? Disastrous idea. Finally, Bowdle Park would be better if you had to have one because we could call it BowWowdle Park. Drop this terrible idea! 363 Too much traffic, too close to homes, unattractive, and pointless. Dogs don’t like dog parks 2/13/2021 11:08 PM and Dunore park is tiny. It’s just a dumb idea. 334 We need this and much of the park space is un-used. 2/14/2021 12:13 PM 364 I see neighborhood residents using non dog park areas as dog parks all the time. Off leash 2/13/2021 11:02 PM 335 I’ve had dogs for years and would love to have a designated place for them to enjoy. They are 2/14/2021 12:03 PM dogs in the woods and on walks. Clearly we need a place that is safe for dogs to run off leash! as much a part of the diversity of clifton as its human residents! 365 The space is beautiful and open. A dog park will be neither. Dog owners can use it now as is. 2/13/2021 10:51 PM 336 As stated above. 2/14/2021 11:59 AM And it's a residential area. Put up an ugly fence and let dogs tear up the grass in some area of Mt Storm or Burnet Woods where others wouldn't be excluded and disturbed. In Burnet or Mt 337 The playground is for very young children. My kids are 6 and 8 and We often use the wide 2/14/2021 11:54 AM Storm, the area could be more protected and less visible. A dog park will not enhance the look open green space for throwing balls and playing tag. I don’t want to lose that. or appeal of Ludlow. Please preserve Clifton's beautiful green spaces. They are a large part of 338 I like the green space for the children to enjoy. Older children use the entire park for tag, ball 2/14/2021 11:52 AM what makes Clifton livable. tossing, soccer, hide and seek, frisbee, etc. 366 Dunore is a lovely little park that’s a real asset for those of us who have tiny yards. I’ve taken 2/13/2021 10:45 PM 339 It would be nice to have a local dog park as it would build community, entertain dog owners 2/14/2021 11:27 AM my grandkids there for years and also just enjoy having that nice green space nearby. I am and others alike, and reduce driving to further parks. tired of dog owners assuming that everyone should accommodate their pets.

340 I'd prefer the whole of this park stay available to kids and families and dog walkers and folks 2/14/2021 11:25 AM 367 People who live very close seem to be against it. 2/13/2021 10:24 PM out for a stroll, etc. 368 We need to maintain our green spaces. Also, a dog park belongs somewhere large. The 2/13/2021 10:17 PM 341 see above. 2/14/2021 10:49 AM Washington park one is so crowded and would probably be the same size as dunore. It just doesn’t make sense 342 I think it should be a playground for kids. 2/14/2021 10:45 AM 369 I took my daughter to Dunore nearly every day when she was young. I'm not sure I would have 2/13/2021 10:13 PM 343 I think all communities benefit from having a dog park where animals can safely play and 2/14/2021 10:18 AM been comfortable doing so with a dog park there. residents can meet and talk. 370 I think that Ludlow Ave is a corridor into the Clifton business area and green space should be 2/13/2021 10:10 PM 344 Always see dogs being walked in this park, seems like a good use of the space. 2/14/2021 10:15 AM enhanced, not a fenced dog park. Busy street could startle dogs, leading to accidents that cause injury to dogs, pedestrians, drivers. Dogs and small children nearby do not mix. No 345 Great use of an under utilized park! We have a dog and would love to have a park in our 2/14/2021 9:04 AM water to the park. Overflowing trash cans at times and there is not a dog park there presently. neighborhood to take him to...we take him to other dog parks. Love the idea!!

16 / 21 17 / 21

41 Attachment A

Dunore Park Feedback Dunore Park Feedback

371 Fencing that beautiful park in would be an eyesore. And just look at the overflowing garbage 2/13/2021 10:09 PM dog parks in Cincinnati are either very expensive per square foot (Washington Park, Westwood can in the park now- if that can’t be addressed, how would a dog park be kept clean Town Hall) or very, very poorly maintained (Doris Day Dog PArk off Westwood Northern Blvd)

372 Not a benefit to the neighborhood. Dangerous for dogs. 2/13/2021 10:04 PM 400 Would rather see the playground improved than a dog park installed. No interest in having the 2/13/2021 3:44 PM additional noise, traffic, and other nuisances related to a dog park so close to my house. 373 I live close by, do not want the added traffic, cars, noise. 2/13/2021 9:54 PM 401 The space is too small, dog parks are unsightly and I question whether Parks will properly 2/13/2021 3:37 PM 374 This should stay the way it is. This will create a parking problem. 2/13/2021 9:51 PM maintain it, and there are other opportunities to increase use of Dunore Park (such as by putting in better playground equipment) that should be done before putting in a new feature. 375 Think dog parks are great but would want to know/be involved in some of the details about 2/13/2021 9:14 PM exact size and location of this within denore park 402 Would rather have the green space for humans! 2/13/2021 2:54 PM

376 The playground is already so small, my children rely on the open space to run and play. 2/13/2021 9:05 PM 403 Too much park space would be lost. 2/13/2021 2:29 PM

377 The park is beautiful and open in its current state and a fenced area may detract from its 2/13/2021 8:51 PM 404 I would be able to get my dog to the dog park much more frequently. 2/13/2021 2:11 PM beauty. Why not have a dog park in Burnet Woods instead? 405 Can walk to it 2/13/2021 1:55 PM 378 I like it like it is. 2/13/2021 8:42 PM 406 I live across the street from Dunore Park, selfishly, this would be the most convenient dog 2/13/2021 1:48 PM 379 Good amenity for the neighborhood 2/13/2021 8:41 PM park option for me. Additionally, the park is largely unused. While children do play on the equipment, and there are occasional “picnickers”, they are only occasional. Much of the green 380 It’ a good spot for a dog park 2/13/2021 8:38 PM space is largely unused. I think a dog park would be a great addition. 381 Wish there was one when I had a dog 2/13/2021 8:36 PM 407 It is a green space. Besides the little playground there is a space where people picnic, throw 2/13/2021 1:31 PM 382 Would be great for Clifton dog owners to have a dog park! 2/13/2021 8:32 PM frisbees, toss baseball or footballs. This is NOT the place for a dog park. This group of people in Clifton are so used to getting what they want, when they want it. This is not a necessity. 383 First I've heard of it. 2/13/2021 8:31 PM There are parks they can drive to. I'll bet the rich people up by Mt Storm wood not tolerate a dog park in their (much bigger) park. 384 But I’d rather see ones at 1) my storm and 2)Burnett woods. 2/13/2021 8:28 PM 408 My dog likes to play with other dogs, but there aren’t places near by for him to do that. It would 2/13/2021 1:17 PM 385 It’s just too small 2/13/2021 8:20 PM be nice to be able to meet other people who have dogs while our pups are playing. 386 I would rather see funds fo towards restoring garbage cans and landscaping to the park that 2/13/2021 8:20 PM 409 there are plenty of dog parks no need for another one in such a small green space 2/13/2021 1:11 PM make it more pleasant to visit. 410 Makes green space of park unavailable to non-dog owners 2/13/2021 1:06 PM 387 Good use of space. Would also like to see the playground built up and fenced in. 2/13/2021 8:18 PM 411 Children’s playground. Need pls space for children to feel safe and some dog owners do not 2/13/2021 12:58 PM 388 I see so many people walking dogs, it would be nice to see people build a community with 2/13/2021 8:18 PM respect boundaries ( ‘my dog is friendly—- must be You that is the problem’). other dog owners. Also to see all the pups around. I love taking my small kids to the park and often feel a tad nervous because we are usually the only ones there- I would feel safer with 412 A dog park would be well utilized by many residents and add much value to the neighborhood. 2/13/2021 12:53 PM more people. 413 The park is for young children, not for defecating dogs. 2/13/2021 12:09 PM 389 Not only would I not use it, I know the residents on Denore do not support a dog park in this 2/13/2021 8:06 PM location, and I support the residents. 414 This would foster relationships within the community. It could be a place to promote 2/13/2021 12:02 PM responsible practices like picking up after pets. It could be a place to promote other 390 As I said previously it’s the best suited park to handle this type of amenity Without disruption. 2/13/2021 8:04 PM neighborhood events and groups, like CTM, and CBA.

391 See above. I lived there for years, so I understand the pros and cons. 2/13/2021 7:54 PM 415 Dunore Park has ample space. 2/13/2021 11:57 AM

392 A dog park alienates young children from playing safely, or at all. Even if it is fenced. 2/13/2021 7:35 PM 416 Increased noise and traffic. 2/13/2021 11:18 AM

393 I know that some people find dog parks very beneficial. However I don’t know if such a thing 2/13/2021 7:33 PM 417 My children like to play in the park and I would like it to remain a safe place for kids to play 2/13/2021 10:36 AM would be an advantage in Dunore Park. The dog parks I’ve seen (with the exception of the one without too many cars clogging the space and making it less safe for kids due to increased downtown) are ugly, attract people from outside the neighborhood, and are loud. traffic

394 Noise , Litter, Traffic, Unsupervised dogs, Destruction of a beautiful park, a better location is 2/13/2021 6:24 PM 418 The playground and surrounding green space is a wonderful asset to the community. The 2/13/2021 10:18 AM Burnett Woods, the families most impacted — do not want a dog park at Dunore smell, destroyed grass, increased cars and congestion that a dog park would bring are all negative changes. We should be investing in the park for our human residents who regularly 395 Please see above comment. And, this is definitely not an underutilized park nor is it unsafe. It 2/13/2021 5:45 PM use the space. will not be an attractive amenity--in fact, it will destroy a beautiful green space--and it's too far from the business district to provide a positive impact. 419 As a nearby resident I do not want the increased gathering, street parking, noise, or refuse 2/13/2021 9:48 AM involved in proposed dog park. As a parent whose young child regularly uses Dunore, it is the 396 I am concerned that green space in a small plot park would be made even smaller for children 2/13/2021 4:57 PM only green space a kid can run around in- not just the playground area, the whole park is used to play. for exploration, discovery , and imaginative play. The assertion that the park is “underused” is 397 Kids use the park! 2/13/2021 4:07 PM a motivated distortion. It is not underused. It is under equipped, but that should be fixed by improving play equipment, not taking away play space. 398 I'm worried about the lack of community support for it and the disruption to the park as it is. I 2/13/2021 3:46 PM do not think we should be re-engaging the community in this project right now 420 In addition to the reasons listed later in this survey, I live on Dunore and use both the 2/13/2021 9:30 AM playground AND the greenspace frequently with my two young children. Many other people use 399 Dunore Park is used by the increasing number of families moving into the area. The 2/13/2021 3:45 PM the entire park as well and this has increased over the past year. Since the pandemic started, playground is small. But the play area is decent size for families to play. As stated above the going to this park and other parks in the area have been one of the few activities I feel are safe

18 / 21 19 / 21

42 Attachment A

Dunore Park Feedback Dunore Park Feedback

for my children and enable us to abide by CDC guidelines. As a long-time resident of Clifton 439 Residents who live near Dunore Park are very unhappy about the idea, and I don't blame them 2/12/2021 7:54 PM and a tax-paying property owner who lives immediately by the park, It is extremely discouraging to see that the Parks Department is considering turning a pleasant greenspace 440 Nearby property owners don’t want this. 2/12/2021 7:03 PM increasingly used by all types of people into a dog park that would overtake much of the park. I also disagree with the introduction to this survey stating, "A dog park would physically fit on 441 I have two dogs and have to drive to get to any dog park, this would be convenient and a good 2/12/2021 6:47 PM site without interfering with the small playground there." I have never seen a professional plan, addition to Clifton. designed by someone with the appropriate credentials, showing how a dog park would actually 442 There is a shortage of off leash options in the Clifton area. 2/12/2021 6:37 PM fit in to Dunore Park. If the Parks Department is seriously considering investing money in the park, I would suggest instead that we focus on improved playground equipment for children, 443 See above. 2/12/2021 6:35 PM replacing trees that have died, and increasing plantings in the park. These are efforts for which I would donate money and help fundraise. 444 I feel Clifton's parks have been forgotten and I adore them. Something needs to happen to 2/12/2021 6:25 PM improve these parks and a dog park is the best first step. 421 We would lose the open green space that my family and neighbors use frequently. 2/13/2021 9:12 AM 445 The best place for a dog park is in burnet wood. In the valley 2/12/2021 6:20 PM 422 Bad location. Too close to a residential area. 2/13/2021 8:52 AM 446 The site could house a dog park like Westwood or Washington Park in one small area while 2/12/2021 6:04 PM 423 Take a look at the overflowing trash can that never gets emptied. In warmer weather it stinks 2/13/2021 8:23 AM still allowing for the playground and the open area. The area is visible from Ludlow area and to high heaven. Can the Park Board guarantee dog waste pick up? highly trafficked so no one would feel isolated and worried about being at the dog park. Both Westwood and Washington Park are in super busy areas or along streets so dig ow era feel the 424 A smelly, noisy blight on a family park. 2/13/2021 8:20 AM presence of eyes on them.

425 A dog park does not belong in a residential area such as the area around Dunore Park. 2/13/2021 8:10 AM 447 Loss of peaceful green environment for adjacent property owners is a legitimate concern to be 2/12/2021 5:48 PM 426 I think they are unsanitary and a noise hazard. That park is used by humans, and near human 2/13/2021 7:35 AM factored into the decision, housing. I would suggest the now soccer field across from Mt. Storm, already partly fenced 448 There are a lot of dogs in Clifton. The Pop up dog park they had on the plaza was very well 2/12/2021 5:23 PM and with parking, and rarely used. attended and was a community builder.

427 Very close to residences in a neighborhood built on community. With Ludlow Ave becoming 2/13/2021 7:17 AM 449 That park is very underutilized and provides space sufficient for a fenced dog park without 2/12/2021 5:22 PM busier and busier (working with the Ciry on a "calming" solution, we need a green space respite precluding others to use the remainder of the park. instead of a messy, possibly noisy, dog park at the Dunore location. Please help us preserve this precious green space, and do think about improving the very out of date playgound instead.

428 The park is not big enough - and it would become unslightly because people wouldn’t clean up 2/13/2021 5:38 AM after their dogs

429 Good addition to the neighborhood and use of underutilized space. 2/12/2021 10:56 PM

430 A dog park within walking distance would be great for my family and our dog. 2/12/2021 10:05 PM

431 Better parks would raise desirability of my neighborhood and improve my quality of life. 2/12/2021 10:01 PM

432 We bought a home here because of the walkability of this wonderful neighborhood. A dog park 2/12/2021 9:50 PM is lacking and would be a great amenity in this wonderful urban neighborhood.

433 Noisy. Unclean. Abuse of green space. No neighborhood support other than few activists. The 2/12/2021 9:24 PM park is not underutilized.

434 It will create a disruptive traffic situation for our neighborhood, and attract unwanted visitors to 2/12/2021 9:17 PM our neighborhood. It will cause a noise nuisance to the property owners around the park, and will cost millions of dollars.

435 Dirty, disease filled places. Scar on the neighborhood and poor use of Park funds. 2/12/2021 9:11 PM

436 Too small an area to allow a good plan- double fence, running room, small and large dog areas, 2/12/2021 9:02 PM etc. Would require more frequent refuse pick-up, something that doesn't happen enough already. Garbage can by playground is often overflowing.

437 Dunore park is a wonderful green-space that is a crown jewel of Ludlow Ave. It accentuates the 2/12/2021 8:41 PM stunning, well-kept properties around that part of the Gaslight district. The sanctity of Old Ludlow and the Jewish cemetery is ultimate to the neighborhood’s preservation and aesthetic.

438 I live across the street from Dunore Park and have both a dog and a young son. We depend on 2/12/2021 8:18 PM the playground and open grassy space in Dunore park for gross motor activity and playing with both as our hilly property has no yard and the only other option is to play in the street. I look out the window at the grassy section of this park. Dog parks, as proven by others in the area, become dust and trash havens. Open space is needed for soccer and TBall and tag. A dog part would lower my property value, become an eyesore for the neighborhood, add incredible noise and traffic to an area flanked by a cemetery, and disturb the one safe place we have to play.

20 / 21 21 / 21

43 Attachment A

Dunore Park Feedback Dunore Park Feedback

8 I SEE NO BENEFIT TO THIS PARK!!! 3/30/2021 1:52 PM Q5 The primary benefits I see in constructing a dog park at Dunore are: 9NONE 3/30/2021 9:16 AM (Check all that apply) 10 I CAN'T BELIEVE THIS ISSUE IS STILL BEING DEBATED. When this issue was first raised, 3/28/2021 11:52 PM the response was almost totally opposed by the neighborhood. The people behind this proposal Answered: 651 Skipped: 200 are tone deaf and have no respect for the wishes of their neighbors. deaf and 11 None. It doesn’t beautify. It will only poop-ify. 3/27/2021 10:49 PM

Improved 12 None. 3/27/2021 7:48 PM safety throu... 13 A big & small dog park section would also be beneficial. 3/26/2021 10:29 PM

14 Local dog owners can meet, which is a significant source of socialization for me, especially 3/26/2021 7:59 PM It adds an since COVID. attractive... 15 Happiness and desire to stay in the neighborhood 3/26/2021 7:43 AM

It provides a 16 It's underutilized because of only one picnic bench?pin picnic benches!!!!! 3/25/2021 5:46 PM safe... 17 None 3/25/2021 1:13 PM

It enhances an 18 None 3/25/2021 12:46 PM underutilize... 19 People meet each other - community building 3/25/2021 11:56 AM

20 Builds a sense of community 3/24/2021 7:36 PM The positive impact it wi... 21 Speeding a problem coming down Ludlow. It’s not safe walking on side walks to exercise dogs. 3/21/2021 12:36 PM

22 The park is NOT underutilized! Even trees are beneficial! 3/17/2021 12:41 PM Other (please 23 Who are u pandering to 3/15/2021 10:44 AM specify) 24 None 3/14/2021 11:19 PM 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 25 It will many dogs happy 3/14/2021 7:48 AM

26 No benefits 3/13/2021 6:50 PM ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES 27 It would make my family more committed to Clifton. 3/13/2021 6:45 PM Improved safety through attracting park visitors 26.57% 173 28 None! 3/13/2021 11:11 AM 60.83% 396 It adds an attractive amenity for area residents and visitors to enjoy 29 None 3/11/2021 2:29 PM

It provides a safe environment for dogs and owners to enjoy 70.81% 461 30 No positive 3/10/2021 5:31 PM

It enhances an underutilized park 56.53% 368 31 It brings community members together. 3/10/2021 1:12 PM 32 NoneD 3/10/2021 12:52 PM The positive impact it will have for area businesses and property owners 27.50% 179 33 Coz i still see lot of Dog litter 3/10/2021 9:08 AM Other (please specify) 27.34% 178 34 None. The park is already attractive, it doesn't need this. 3/10/2021 8:53 AM Total Respondents: 651 35 I see no positive benefit for a dog park w/in Dunore 3/9/2021 1:28 PM

# OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY) DATE 36 not one 3/8/2021 9:33 PM 1 I do not think the dog park offers any positive benefit 3/31/2021 10:47 PM 37 I don't believe any the statements are entirely true. 3/8/2021 5:15 PM

2 None of the above- this park is not underutilized!! 3/31/2021 10:30 PM 38 None. We don't need a dog here. 3/8/2021 4:09 PM

3 I don’t support the dog park at Dunore. The Parks Board should put their budgeted money to 3/31/2021 9:15 PM 39 Promotes community 3/8/2021 4:02 PM upkeep and repairs at existing parks 40 Meeting neighbors building community 3/7/2021 10:05 PM 4 No benfits 3/30/2021 7:29 PM 41 None 3/7/2021 8:42 PM 5None 3/30/2021 7:26 PM 42 None 3/7/2021 5:32 PM 6None 3/30/2021 7:25 PM 43 None 3/7/2021 4:50 PM 7 None. This survey question is a "push-poll." 3/30/2021 2:35 PM

1 / 6 2 / 6

44 Attachment A

Dunore Park Feedback Dunore Park Feedback

44 None! 3/7/2021 4:45 PM 78 Can you describe if the amenity would be attractive? Beauty is a visual attribute and you are 2/17/2021 4:30 PM 45 I don't see any benefit. Only to some owners of some dogs. 3/7/2021 3:20 PM not showing a picture. But since I think dogs are beautiful I went with yes. Also, you were saying “the positive impact it will have four area businesses.” Is this factual? If so can you cite 46 none. It's a bad idea. 3/7/2021 12:35 PM those facts for interested parties?

47 Don't see any benefits 3/7/2021 8:14 AM 79 No positive impact. 2/16/2021 9:41 PM

48 No benefits 3/6/2021 4:29 PM 80 None 2/16/2021 9:36 PM

49 No benefit 3/6/2021 4:27 PM 81 Giving people more ways to connect in the neighborhood is good. 2/16/2021 9:32 PM

50 None of The above are correct or true 3/6/2021 3:50 PM 82 There’s no proximity to the businesses so why pretend that this is a boon for them ? 2/16/2021 5:37 PM

51 None 3/6/2021 2:23 PM 83 Promoting and supporting dog ownership creates health and wellness benefits for 2/16/2021 5:29 PM communities. 52 There is no benefit to having a dog park at Dunore Park. 3/6/2021 10:09 AM 84 None: I'm afraid I just don't discern any benefits. 2/16/2021 4:46 PM 53 I see no benefit. 3/6/2021 9:56 AM 85 None and I feel it will damage property values. It will be worse than having a drive thru in 2/16/2021 3:49 PM 54 i don’t want one. 3/5/2021 5:35 PM Clifton 55 I don't agree with any of the items above 3/5/2021 2:10 PM 86 Would rather see park utilized better to benefit adults and kids 2/16/2021 3:13 PM 56 I don't agree with any of the above. 3/5/2021 11:16 AM 87 N/a 2/16/2021 12:48 PM 57 I don't see a benefit 3/4/2021 3:08 PM 88 Dog Park makes more sense in Burnet Woods. Bigger and more centrally located. 2/16/2021 12:08 PM 58 I think it leads to exercise as people will walk to the park. 3/3/2021 4:40 PM 89 i do not see ANY reason home owners need to supplement pets 2/16/2021 12:06 PM 59 I drive by that park several times a day and the only people I see there are people with their 3/3/2021 8:53 AM 90 none of the above 2/16/2021 11:06 AM dogs who are breaking the law by having them off leash 91 No Benefits -- traffic and noise would hurt neighborhood. 2/16/2021 9:40 AM 60 Dunore Park is on a busy street so it’s doesn’t always feel very safe for kids to run and play 3/2/2021 12:05 PM soccer there. A fenced in dog park would provide some safety from the busy street. 92 Having more people and parked vehicles in the area may help calm the traffic on Ludlow 2/16/2021 8:54 AM

61 Nope 3/2/2021 11:02 AM 93 I don’t see these as benefits. 2/15/2021 10:43 PM

62 Clifton is a very "walkable" neighborhood and having a dog park here would add to that 3/2/2021 10:49 AM 94 Ludlow is too wide there. One lane would suffice. More green space. 2/15/2021 9:25 PM "walkability." 95 I see zero positives. All I see would be dog poop interfering with my family's use of the park. 2/15/2021 8:24 PM 63 Oppose it in this location 3/1/2021 8:36 PM 96 the questions in this survey are very skewed. I used to work in marketing research. This 2/15/2021 7:46 PM 64 This is an extremely biased question. 3/1/2021 4:09 PM survey is not well constructed

65 The park is NOT underutilized. A dog park would make it overutilized. 2/25/2021 9:32 AM 97 It’s a terrible idea 2/15/2021 7:39 PM

66 I am not sure there is a true benefit. Some believe these parks to be safe for dogs. The park is 2/24/2021 11:15 PM 98 Selfish motivation 2/15/2021 7:06 PM safe on a main road and directly adjacent to the residences. Anyone who lives by the park knows it is not underutilized. This will have no impact on buisneses that are over 1/2 mile 99 I do not see a benefit. 2/15/2021 7:04 PM away and will negatively affect property owners in the immediate area. 100 Yes 2/15/2021 7:03 PM 67 no benefit whatsoever. 2/24/2021 2:38 PM 101 Clifton residents need a dog park, just not here. 2/15/2021 6:03 PM 68 Not sure I see a benefit for anyone other than dog owners. Now what would be great there 2/24/2021 2:26 PM 102 It will consolidate the dogs in one area, rather than throughout the neighborhood 2/15/2021 5:57 PM would a Pub. Used to work at one in Hartwell that would be perfect there. Great cooks and staff! 103 I don't see any benefits 2/15/2021 5:32 PM

69 no benefit. 2/24/2021 10:54 AM 104 None 2/15/2021 5:21 PM

70 See 2/24/2021 9:32 AM 105 None of the above 2/15/2021 5:19 PM

71 Shows that we care about dogs! 2/21/2021 4:36 PM 106 There are no benefits! Detracts from the neighborhood! 2/15/2021 2:28 PM

72 None 2/20/2021 4:55 AM 107 I see a negative not positive impact 2/15/2021 2:27 PM

73 Not a positive. 2/19/2021 8:16 PM 108 Would be the closest dog park to me. 2/15/2021 12:27 PM

74 There is not another dog park close by. 2/19/2021 4:02 PM 109 None 2/15/2021 11:04 AM

75 the park does not exclude dogs in anyway. 2/19/2021 7:17 AM 110 Creates community 2/15/2021 10:30 AM

76 No benefits to residents. 2/17/2021 8:18 PM 111 Three are no benefits, only detriments. 2/15/2021 10:08 AM 77 None 2/17/2021 5:40 PM

3 / 6 4 / 6

45 Attachment A

Dunore Park Feedback Dunore Park Feedback

112 No impact on business district 2/15/2021 9:21 AM 147 I don’t agree with these 2/13/2021 6:24 PM

113 No advantages. 2/15/2021 8:57 AM 148 None 2/13/2021 4:07 PM

114 I don't see any primary benefits. 2/15/2021 5:37 AM 149 This survey seems very pro-dog park - not well balanced 2/13/2021 3:45 PM

115 I don’t agree that the park is underutilized or that a dog park adds value 2/14/2021 10:22 PM 150 I don't see any benefits. 2/13/2021 3:37 PM

116 None. 2/14/2021 8:38 PM 151 None 2/13/2021 2:54 PM

117 I do not want this dog Park. While it may increase utilization, the fencing would be an eye-sore 2/14/2021 6:21 PM 152 I see no benefit to property or people 2/13/2021 2:30 PM

118 Responding to the question of helping to fund or maintain the dog park - I don’t know what 2/14/2021 6:17 PM 153 None of these are valid reasons 2/13/2021 1:31 PM either entails so don’t want to offer help that I can’t give but I’ll sign my name so you can keep me informed. 154 Only benefits a small number or residents who can't let their dogs run in their yards 2/13/2021 1:06 PM

119 I don't see the benefit. 2/14/2021 5:47 PM 155 There is no benefit to this proposed horror story. I am vehemently opposed. 2/13/2021 12:09 PM

120 See no upside 2/14/2021 5:38 PM 156 See above 2/13/2021 12:02 PM

121 none of the above 2/14/2021 4:55 PM 157 The park seems to get quite a bit of use right now, from picnickers and families with young 2/13/2021 11:18 AM children especially. I see no reason to change. 122 I see no benefit 2/14/2021 4:26 PM 158 There are no positive impacts to constructing a dog park. This question is skewed towards 2/13/2021 10:18 AM 123 Safe place for dogs to play that does not interfere with people space 2/14/2021 3:23 PM supporters and the resulting statistics will be artificially heightened.

124 It’s ridiculous and the immediate neighbors do not want it. 2/14/2021 1:35 PM 159 None 2/13/2021 8:20 AM

125 this would be counter-productive 2/14/2021 12:45 PM 160 No positive impact whatsoever 2/13/2021 8:10 AM

126 I can't think of a single positive. 2/14/2021 12:27 PM 161 Wealthy pet owners get a free service for their filthy animals. 2/13/2021 7:35 AM

127 Negative impact. This park is used frequently by all ages of children. 2/14/2021 11:52 AM 162 I see no reason to construct a dog park at Dunore. 2/13/2021 7:17 AM

128 Reduce driving to further dog parks. 2/14/2021 11:27 AM 163 Builds community 2/12/2021 10:56 PM

129 None! 2/14/2021 10:13 AM 164 None, it will disrupt the lives of residents that live close by and disrupt the people that visit 2/12/2021 9:22 PM their loved ones at the cemetery. 130 Seems like a reasonable amenity for the neighborhood, especially for smaller dogs. 2/14/2021 9:50 AM 165 There are no benefits except to lazy, selfish people. 2/12/2021 9:11 PM 131 1) Do we need improved safety? That's hardly a hot spot for crime. 2) it's a residential area, I 2/14/2021 8:18 AM don't want to attract MORE people. 3) dogs parks are not necessarily safe when people don't 166 NONE 2/12/2021 8:41 PM control their pets. 4) The park is NOT underutilized. I live across the street and there are people using it all the time. 167 Non of the above are legit positives. This will have zero impact on the business district which 2/12/2021 8:22 PM is a 15 minute walk away, unless people are driving to our tiny park from across the city. 132 none of the above 2/14/2021 7:49 AM Which would a residential street.

133 None of the above 2/14/2021 7:32 AM 168 I see no positives 2/12/2021 8:18 PM

134 No benefits. 2/14/2021 5:04 AM 169 none--Dunore is not a good choice 2/12/2021 7:54 PM

135 Would create a space for socially distanced community engagement 2/14/2021 2:36 AM 170 Don’t impose this on the nearby property owners! 2/12/2021 7:03 PM

136 Increases connection and sense of community! 2/14/2021 12:35 AM 171 No point 2/12/2021 6:39 PM

137 I don't see any positive to it except to the dog owners who want to shift responsibilty for the 2/14/2021 12:22 AM 172 This is not a good idea, please stop pushing this agenda. 2/12/2021 6:35 PM care of their pet on to the public at large. 173 No benefits, too far from business district 2/12/2021 6:20 PM 138 No benefit! 2/13/2021 11:50 PM 174 It will be something positive for Clifton. It must be a quality built area without mud that is 2/12/2021 6:04 PM 139 NONE! 2/13/2021 10:51 PM attractive and makes neighbors proud.

140 NONE 2/13/2021 10:10 PM 175 Probably only really benefits some dogs and dog owners. 2/12/2021 5:48 PM

141 Nothing lositive about this 2/13/2021 10:04 PM 176 Great community builder. 2/12/2021 5:43 PM

142 I don't see any, really. 2/13/2021 8:42 PM 177 Allows dogs to run and play which they can’t do on a leash. 2/12/2021 5:23 PM

143 Not obvious to me, but maybe having a dog park in a neighborhood is important. 2/13/2021 8:31 PM 178 Would provide a community gathering space for neighbors who own and love dogs 2/12/2021 5:22 PM 144 Avoiding figuring out how to build dog parks in mt storm and Burnett woods 2/13/2021 8:28 PM

145 Absolutely none. 2/13/2021 7:54 PM

146 Zero benefit. 2/13/2021 7:35 PM

5 / 6 6 / 6

46 Attachment A

Dunore Park Feedback Dunore Park Feedback

7 Spending $2,000,000 on a dog park? 3/30/2021 1:52 PM Q6 The main concerns I have about the construction of a dog park at 8None 3/30/2021 11:33 AM Dunore are: (Check all that apply) 9 unsightly fenced in area, that will probably turn into a mudpie with now grass 3/30/2021 9:16 AM 10 it is across from a cemetery and in a residential neighborhood that could benefit from a 3/29/2021 1:32 PM Answered: 693 Skipped: 158 pedestrian park for children playin ball and picnics

11 disease 3/28/2021 11:52 PM

Lack of parking 12 Possibly irresponsible owners not picking up after their pet 3/28/2021 12:10 PM 13 It will become an ugly fenced-in mud pit snd people will quickly lose interest. 3/28/2021 7:25 AM Pedestrian safety 14 Park is already poorly maintained; what would adding more responsibility do? 3/27/2021 10:49 PM 15 Dunore Park is not underutilized. Many people just love to took at the park as they walk by, 3/27/2021 8:46 PM Noise especially not in the spring. 16 High traffic area, speeding cars. Far too often, people with dog aggressive dogs insist on 3/27/2021 7:48 PM taking them to dog parks as some sort of "cure". See it all the time, it does not work and other Litter dogs are jeopardized.

17 Everything about this dog park is a concern of mine. No dog park. 3/27/2021 7:43 PM Smell 18 Ugly fencing 3/27/2021 1:39 PM

19 None. 3/27/2021 11:30 AM Reduced greenspace 20 It is directly adjacent to a cemetery. This would be immensely disrespectful. 3/27/2021 9:21 AM

Other (please 21 I think a dog park is a great idea! 3/27/2021 7:16 AM specify) 22 Ugliness of such a "park" 3/26/2021 10:33 PM

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 23 None 3/26/2021 10:20 PM

24 Impact to immediate neighbors 3/26/2021 11:25 AM

ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES 25 Dog safety (too close to a very busy street), tearing up the grass, 3/26/2021 9:20 AM

Lack of parking 40.84% 283 26 A side for small dogs and a side for big dogs. 3/26/2021 7:43 AM

Pedestrian safety 37.66% 261 27 potential disturbance to nearby homes 3/25/2021 6:17 PM 28 Why us? Stupid stupid idea! 3/25/2021 5:46 PM Noise 40.40% 280 29 The neighbors don’t want it. 3/25/2021 5:38 PM Litter 62.48% 433 30 destruction of the property, safety of other park users. 3/25/2021 5:04 PM Smell 45.02% 312 31 attracting people from other neighborhoods who will feel no compulsion to respect and maintain 3/25/2021 4:42 PM Reduced greenspace 55.99% 388 an attractive park 32 Residents nearby don’t want it 3/25/2021 2:43 PM Other (please specify) 33.77% 234 Total Respondents: 693 33 Don’t believe the dog park will look good or be well maintained. 3/25/2021 1:13 PM 34 Maintenance/erosion of ground within the dog park space. 3/25/2021 12:27 PM

# OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY) DATE 35 Too many pitbulls in this city. Degrades adjacent property. 3/25/2021 11:53 AM

1 Dunore Park is a terrible location for a dog park. 3/31/2021 11:47 PM 36 N\A 3/25/2021 11:13 AM

2 All of the above 3/31/2021 10:47 PM 37 We have asked for a light/crosswalk across Ludlow and this would be another reason to install. 3/22/2021 5:00 PM

3 Eyesore 3/31/2021 10:05 PM 38 We need a light to cross Ludlow. We have been asking for a crosswalk here anyway! 3/22/2021 4:54 PM

4 Dogs, Dangerous high speed vehicles, Danger to the Cincinnati State students parking near 3/30/2021 7:29 PM 39 Public expense to maintain, and degradation of environment 3/22/2021 9:08 AM the dog park. 40 None 3/20/2021 5:25 PM 5 Concern for people that don’t want a dog park 3/30/2021 4:17 PM 41 Reduced play space 3/17/2021 12:51 PM 6 See above. 3/30/2021 2:35 PM

1 / 9 2 / 9

47 Attachment A

Dunore Park Feedback Dunore Park Feedback

42 We’ve been trying to replant trees and expand play area 3/17/2021 12:41 PM 76 Terrible idea. 3/6/2021 9:56 AM 43 None 3/16/2021 9:47 AM 77 Safety of children 3/5/2021 10:13 PM 44 Pedestrian and dogs safety crossing street. 3/15/2021 4:34 PM 78 Too close to children’s play area 3/5/2021 6:36 PM 45 The rich people who walk the animals with out a leash. Its not under used 3/15/2021 10:44 AM 79 there are other parks that would benefit better for a dog park 3/5/2021 2:10 PM 46 Dogs feel secure and happy when sharing time with their family. The dog park provides neither 3/15/2021 9:43 AM 80 would be a distraction as one drives by so I also see a safety issue for drivers 3/5/2021 11:16 AM 47 Could draw too many people to a small park 3/14/2021 11:19 PM 81 Don’t want to reduce safe useable space for kids. Playground area should be enhanced at the 3/3/2021 6:30 PM 48 More abandoned dogs 3/14/2021 12:00 AM same time and fenced off from open access areas for dogs.

49 It is also near the Jewish cemetery and I feel it makes the area less peaceful and accessible 3/13/2021 6:50 PM 82 I suppose at all dog parks, someone needs to deal with cleaning up garbage and putting out 3/3/2021 4:40 PM for funerals as well. dog poop bags. Also, there are owners who don't clean up after dogs so someone must.

50 People won’t take care of it. Will turn beautiful green space into a public nuisance/eyesore. 3/13/2021 11:11 AM 83 Some residents will be disappointed because they've been enjoying their own private park for 3/3/2021 8:53 AM years ~ but they don't own it 51 People who are opposed are being misled by a former Superintendent of Parks about the size 3/13/2021 8:21 AM and scope of the project and is leading the group in fighting the plan 84 Use of funds 3/3/2021 7:52 AM

52 I don't want a dog park near my home 3/11/2021 2:29 PM 85 None 3/2/2021 11:07 PM

53 Children afraid of dogs running in their green space and mine I walk past the park am I going to 3/10/2021 5:31 PM 86 Safety concerns for dogs due to proximity to a busy thoroughfare 3/2/2021 11:17 AM be attacked by large dog 40 yrs here I have invisible fence to protect my dogs plus’s backyard 87 Property owners adjacent do not want it 3/2/2021 11:02 AM I’m one block awAy I do not want this nor need it 88 This is not a safe or healthful plan for DOGS. It might be nice for humans, but it is a bad idea 3/1/2021 4:09 PM 54 It may be disruptive to funerals at the cemetery in ack of it. 3/10/2021 8:53 AM for dogs. 55 Dunore Park is an attractive gateway up Ludlow Ave. into our business district. A chain link 3/9/2021 2:50 PM 89 I disagree this park is underutilized. The trees and grass enhance the health of the 3/1/2021 2:39 PM fence and worn out grass would be ugly. Find a different location. Mt Storm? More out of sight. environment. Walking/driving by it enhances personal peace of mind/mental health. 56 Reducing free space. Safety for the dogs. 3/8/2021 5:15 PM 90 none 2/27/2021 3:35 PM 57 I don't want a dog park next to my home! 3/8/2021 4:09 PM 91 Dog parks are unattractive and would be right on the main gateway into clifton and in a 2/24/2021 11:15 PM 58 Ludlow is an extremely busy street. It is unsafe for dogs 3/7/2021 7:19 PM residential area.

59 None. The reasons listed above are false. 3/7/2021 6:41 PM 92 Grass in dog park will disappear due to animals. Water for dogs in summer. Who is going to 2/24/2021 2:38 PM pay for city to install that or even empty the trash can full of dog poop? 60 Other dog parks turn to mud most of the year 3/7/2021 4:50 PM 93 Loss of local habitat. 2/24/2021 8:41 AM 61 Prefer to not have to worry about my Grand children's safety around a loss of dogs. And prefer 3/7/2021 4:45 PM to not have to worry about piles of poop that might not be picked up by owners. 94 will remove a space for neighborhood kids 2/22/2021 12:48 PM

62 A fence being constructed in open community park space that diminishes the visual esthetics 3/7/2021 3:20 PM 95 Improper use of the dog park 2/21/2021 4:36 PM of our community. 96 No concerns 2/21/2021 9:23 AM 63 Danger of off leash dogs. 3/7/2021 12:35 PM 97 Safety: of children and dogs. And dog park would be downwind of playground. 2/20/2021 4:55 AM 64 Safety for users to cross Ludlow near the park. 3/7/2021 12:05 PM 98 Cost 2/19/2021 8:41 PM 65 Distracted driving while going past 3/7/2021 8:14 AM 99 A cross walk is definitely in order closer to the park. Ludlow can be extremely unsafe to cross 2/19/2021 2:01 PM 66 The sweet jewish cemetery that rests on the hill is a peaceful place that would be greatly 3/6/2021 3:50 PM 100 Think of the TREES 2/19/2021 7:17 AM impacted by this decision 101 Tree and plant loss through compaction and soil ph changes. 2/19/2021 7:15 AM 67 Unfair imposition to local residents 3/6/2021 3:50 PM 102 Impact on play area 2/18/2021 9:27 PM 68 Cost is also too high for how few would benefit from it. 3/6/2021 2:55 PM 103 Safety and comfort of young children playing on the playground 2/18/2021 1:33 PM 69 Dogs near children 3/6/2021 2:49 PM 104 Traffic speeding on Ludlow 2/17/2021 6:06 PM 70 Aesthetics: dogparks are not attractive additions to a neighborhood 3/6/2021 2:28 PM 105 Dogs getting hit by cars 2/17/2021 4:53 PM 71 Loosing a park that is convenient to the neighborhood 3/6/2021 2:23 PM 106 I currently use Fido Field and there is a heavy volunteer commitment to make sure that park is 2/17/2021 9:03 AM 72 I don’t see any downside except cost considerations 3/6/2021 1:17 PM maintained. We would need that comittment for this park to be clean and well kept. 73 reducing access for children 3/6/2021 10:16 AM 107 Close to busy road - if dogs jump fence it coukd be dangerous 2/17/2021 7:21 AM 74 None it’s all in your mind. 3/6/2021 10:13 AM 108 Would not want it to affect people's comfort in using the playground. 2/16/2021 9:32 PM 75 Safety of dogs and Ludlow traffic. Safety of other people in relations to the dogs. 3/6/2021 10:09 AM

3 / 9 4 / 9

48 Attachment A

Dunore Park Feedback Dunore Park Feedback

109 The nearby residents don’t want this 2/16/2021 5:37 PM 143 a lot of kids are afraid of dogs 2/15/2021 2:43 PM 110 Maintenance and upkeep not being met; no rules enforcement. 2/16/2021 4:47 PM 144 dog owners don't clean up after their pets now - why would they do so if it was a dog park? 2/15/2021 2:28 PM 111 Dog safety. I would only take my dog if there weren’t other dogs. 2/16/2021 3:56 PM 145 Negative impact on appearance. 2/15/2021 11:55 AM 112 Dog Safety. Making sure it is properly built so dogs cannot escape and possibly run into traffic. 2/16/2021 1:59 PM 146 Impacts to visitors of Jewish Cemetery and appropriateness of proximity 2/15/2021 11:28 AM 113 potential for dogs to escape near a very busy, high speed road 2/16/2021 1:22 PM 147 Unhealthy to children and even dogs. Not enough space 2/15/2021 11:04 AM 114 2017 park budget spent $8,628.00 on MUTT MITTS. this is corrupt use of tax payer funds. fair 2/16/2021 12:06 PM 148 Parks are already challenged to take care of what they have. Upcoming budget and 2/15/2021 9:28 AM would be to supply baby diapers! better to have trainings for dog owners to teach their dogs to foreseeable budgets will be challenging. No needs to add additional amenities, particularly a poop in THEIR yards. why should others pay for the pet of irresponsible entitled! dog park which requires EVEN MORE maintenance. Pretending that volunteers would take 115 Poorly socialized dogs and owners that are not responsible or respectful of others 2/16/2021 11:40 AM care of it is naive. Volunteers cannot do daily tasks but only projects

116 all of the above and more 2/16/2021 11:06 AM 149 Appearance from Ludlow 2/15/2021 7:37 AM

117 already in use by families 2/16/2021 10:53 AM 150 This survey is biased. 2/15/2021 12:53 AM

118 Discourteous dog owners ruining the park for others 2/16/2021 10:34 AM 151 No money for maintenance or construction. 2/15/2021 12:03 AM

119 Safety. Cars are often speeding along that stretch of Ludlow Avenue. 2/16/2021 9:00 AM 152 It is a wonderful space for contemplation and reflecting on the historic cemetery directly across 2/15/2021 12:01 AM Old Ludlow. In my experience, dog parks can be quite disruptive to those seeking solitude and 120 No real concerns. The listed concerns can be mitigated with design 2/16/2021 8:54 AM quiet. Despite Ludlow Avenue being so close, Dunore Park is remarkably peaceful. One more comment. This survey seems less interested in collecting opinions about a dog park than it 121 What would the space look like? 2/15/2021 11:32 PM does encouraging people to support it. It feels like the Park Board has already made up its 122 Disruption to peace on my daily walk. 2/15/2021 10:43 PM mind.

123 Traffic on that street is not great -- too much speeding. Unsafe. 2/15/2021 10:18 PM 153 Size of park, preferably want one closer to northside 2/14/2021 9:30 PM

124 I’d remove a lane from Ludlow. 2/15/2021 9:25 PM 154 Safety of the dogs being so close to a busy road 2/14/2021 9:17 PM

125 Well there still be space for families to be in the swings and run around? If no, I’m less 2/15/2021 8:57 PM 155 disengaged dog owners / small dog safety 2/14/2021 6:42 PM enthusiastic. 156 Neighborhood safety 2/14/2021 6:21 PM 126 If you think that the citizens of Clifton are going to fund and maintain the dog park, just think 2/15/2021 7:46 PM 157 Bringing more people from other areas to our neighborhood. Loitering. People sleeping in 2/14/2021 5:47 PM back to Clifton Market. A dog park should not be a community project !!!!!!!! vehicles. 127 The fence would be too high and I don’t think it would be attractive. Plus kids in the 2/15/2021 7:41 PM 158 I understand the neighbors don’t want it. 2/14/2021 1:43 PM neighborhood use the space for football and other outdoor games. 159 Strong resistance from adjacent neighbors 2/14/2021 1:42 PM 128 It would be an eyesore 2/15/2021 7:39 PM 160 The homeowners closest to Dunore Park do not want it. Respect them. Why piss off your 2/14/2021 1:35 PM 129 Reduced space for kids to run and play. 2/15/2021 7:04 PM friends & neighbors over a dog park? 130 Too small an area 2/15/2021 7:01 PM 161 park is quite small and heavily used, for activities like kids playing ball. Any dog park would 2/14/2021 12:45 PM 131 Ugly in a visible are that is a main thoroughfare that should be kept beautiful like it is 2/15/2021 6:47 PM infringe on the space available for other uses

132 Neighbors do not want it 2/15/2021 6:34 PM 162 There is no litter or smell at other local dog parks? 2/14/2021 12:29 PM

133 None of the problems described above are real problems. 2/15/2021 6:08 PM 163 It will add yet another hazard as I traverse the park area to get to the Gaslight area. The area 2/14/2021 11:59 AM across Ludlow from the park is poorly kept (leaves, snow, ice). So adding a "new attraction" 134 dog safety in this park right next to a fast busy street 2/15/2021 6:03 PM with cars will just make Clifton overall "less walkable" -- taking it in the wrong direction.

135 Restricts those of us who do not have dogs when there are already adequate nearby dog 2/15/2021 6:01 PM 164 Dunore Park is for children to play and swing. 2/14/2021 11:46 AM parks. I see people already using the park, all of the time! There are a lot of small houses clustered up Morrison and why should they have to put up with the noise & smell. Sorry, why 165 Unclaimed poop. 2/14/2021 11:25 AM don't you put it down by Bowdle Park? 166 None of the above 2/14/2021 10:15 AM 136 What’s wrong with “underutilized” space? 2/15/2021 5:45 PM 167 Leave it for the kids! 2/14/2021 10:13 AM 137 Not picking up after dogs 2/15/2021 5:41 PM 168 It seems like the surrounding residents have serious concerns, especially about who would 2/14/2021 9:50 AM 138 Dog safety, i.e. enforcement of the rules for dogs who are vicious, etc 2/15/2021 5:26 PM ensure it stays clean. There is often a lot of dog poo on the sidewalks of Clifton and if people don’t pick up after their dogs in other peoples’ yards and sidewalks, will they at a dog park? 139 The playground is there - can we make that better? 2/15/2021 5:26 PM How often will trash be removed and by whom?

140 I do not have sufficient information to have a concern. 2/15/2021 5:19 PM 169 Nearby Residents don’t want it 2/14/2021 8:52 AM

141 Complete disregard for nearby residents 2/15/2021 5:19 PM 170 Irresponsible dog owners 2/14/2021 8:52 AM

142 I need more information: size of dog run, diagram, type of fence, rules for use.. 2/15/2021 4:06 PM 171 I don’t think it is a big enough space 2/14/2021 8:44 AM

5 / 9 6 / 9

49 Attachment A

Dunore Park Feedback Dunore Park Feedback

205 If Dunore became a dog park, it would stop being kid-friendly. 2/13/2021 1:24 PM 172 1) Do we need improved safety? That's hardly a hot spot for crime. 2) it's a residential area, I 2/14/2021 8:18 AM don't want to attract MORE people. 3) dogs parks are not necessarily safe when people don't 206 None. There is parking on both sides of the street between the park and the cemetery. There 2/13/2021 1:17 PM control their pets. 4) The park is NOT underutilized. I live across the street and there are are already sidewalks in the area. A dog park could make it safer because people that drive people using it all the time. would slow down to turn or park which would slow traffic. The noice from the dog park would not be any louder than the cars and sirens coming from Ludlow. If there is a trash can on site 173 cost of maintenance 2/14/2021 7:55 AM that is regularly emptied people would use it and not litter. Again, if the trash is regularly 174 Na 2/14/2021 7:35 AM emptied there should be no smell. The dog park likely wouldn’t take up the entire park so there would still be lots of green space. 175 Please keep all the current trees 2/14/2021 6:06 AM 207 Intrusion on playground safety. 2/13/2021 12:58 PM 176 None other than I will not use the park if the fenced area is too small. It is critically important 2/14/2021 5:40 AM that dogs have a long area to run. Like at Fido Field. 208 Lack of water supply. 2/13/2021 12:26 PM

177 Necessary upkeep and maintenance 2/14/2021 12:46 AM 209 Dog biting, excrement and increased traffic. 2/13/2021 12:09 PM

178 Fencing and other vertical obstructions, both physical and visual. 2/14/2021 12:22 AM 210 Concern for area residents. I would not feel comfortable utilizing the playground with so many 2/13/2021 10:18 AM off leash dogs and distracted owners. 179 People who don’t always clean up after their dogs 2/13/2021 11:39 PM 211 This is not an enhancement of an underused park. It is an elbowing out of the current function 2/13/2021 9:48 AM 180 Dogs actually don’t like dog parks! 2/13/2021 11:08 PM of the park, which needs to be better served rather than sidelined. It’s a reduction of already underserved and under resourced green space for children to safely move around in. 181 Not sure what the parking situation is 2/13/2021 11:02 PM 212 extremely detrimental impact to closest residents (on Dunore); safety for children using the 2/13/2021 9:30 AM 182 Ugly fencing, fewer places for children, special interest eating up beautiful, open, public space. 2/13/2021 10:51 PM park (playground and greenspace); increased animal waste; possible negative impact to property values for those on Dunore; proximity to high volume of traffic on Ludlow; long term 183 Expense of construction and ongoing maintenance 2/13/2021 10:45 PM maintenance unlikely; aesthetics of dog park 184 Too close to a major road. I worry about dogs getting loose. 2/13/2021 10:24 PM 213 Turns into a mud pit. 2/13/2021 8:23 AM 185 Car safety if dog escapes 2/13/2021 10:17 PM 214 Plans underway for significant road calming on Ludlow Avenue including bike lanes and loss of 2/13/2021 8:10 AM 186 Safety of others using the park 2/13/2021 10:13 PM parking.

187 Dog fights are dangerous. Dogs get killed in dog parks snd injured. No regulation in 2/13/2021 10:04 PM 215 The principle. Clifton already has to accommodate too many pets with their waste. 2/13/2021 7:35 AM vaccination. 216 Will miss the neighborhood 2/12/2021 11:51 PM 188 Also what if there is a funeral at the cemetery- this does happen on a regular basis. 2/13/2021 9:54 PM 217 There needs to be a crosswalk for pedestrians to Dunore, regardless of any park changes. 2/12/2021 10:56 PM 189 Safety as it relates to dogs on a busy street such as ludlow 2/13/2021 9:52 PM 218 My kids use the park daily, and they are afraid of some dogs. 2/12/2021 9:22 PM 190 Would like to have enough lawn/Green space left over for people to play soccer/sports in the 2/13/2021 9:14 PM 219 Ugly 2/12/2021 9:11 PM park 220 Not enough room for quality dog park plus play area and room for families to play ball, etc. 2/12/2021 9:02 PM 191 My family would prefer to use the space for children to play. A dog park will only reduce our 2/13/2021 9:05 PM play space in an already lacking park for families. I would much rather see expanded play 221 Lowered pet safety and less flexibility for the use of the green-space be in the future 2/12/2021 8:41 PM equipment or keeping space natural and open. 222 I visit this park daily and must drive or walk past it to leave my no outlet street. I will literally 2/12/2021 8:22 PM 192 Maintenance budgets need to be included in the long-term proposal. 2/13/2021 8:31 PM have to move if a dog park is placed there due to my daughters phobia of dogs.

193 Funds that should be spent on general park upkeep 2/13/2021 8:20 PM 223 Safety, more people driving and coming to the neighborhood that I don’t know (we have 2/12/2021 8:18 PM surprisingly high crime on this street) 194 That the racist neighbors will call the police on Africa Americans using the dog park. 2/13/2021 8:04 PM 224 safety of dogs 2/12/2021 7:54 PM 195 All of above plus more. Good dogs can bite good children. 2/13/2021 7:54 PM 225 None 2/12/2021 7:48 PM 196 That it would be ugly - a big fence around a lot of mulch. 2/13/2021 7:33 PM 226 The property owners don’t want this. Pay attention! 2/12/2021 7:03 PM 197 None 2/13/2021 6:50 PM 227 Adjacent neighbors do not want it 2/12/2021 6:41 PM 198 A better site is available 2/13/2021 6:24 PM 228 Disrespect to visitors of Jewish Cemetery. 2/12/2021 6:39 PM 199 Ludlow is too noisy for the dogs. 2/13/2021 5:45 PM 229 The imposition of the will of a small group of activists over the objections of the people who 2/12/2021 6:35 PM 200 Loss of a green space for the neighbors and kids. 2/13/2021 4:07 PM actually live nearby. 201 Erosion. Reductionl of children/family play areas. 2/13/2021 3:45 PM 230 Immediate Neighbors do not want it 2/12/2021 6:20 PM 202 My kids don't like dogs but want to use the playground. 2/13/2021 3:44 PM 231 I am not concerned. None of these issues seem present at Westwood or Washington Park. 2/12/2021 6:04 PM 203 Dog safety, resident safety, child safety 2/13/2021 2:30 PM 232 None. 2/12/2021 5:43 PM 204 I don’t have any concerns. 2/13/2021 1:48 PM 233 No concern 2/12/2021 5:22 PM

7 / 9 8 / 9

50 Attachment A

Dunore Park Feedback Dunore Park Feedback

234 Rude dog owners 2/12/2021 5:10 PM Q7 Would you help fund the construction of the dog park?

Answered: 836 Skipped: 15

Yes

No

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES

Yes 21.29% 178

No 78.71% 658 TOTAL 836

9 / 9 1 / 1

51 Attachment A

Dunore Park Feedback

Q8 Would you be willing to help maintain the dog park?

Answered: 831 Skipped: 20

Yes

No

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES

Yes 20.10% 167

No 79.90% 664 TOTAL 831

1 / 1

52 Attachment B

Fwd: [External Email] Re: Dunore Dog Park Engagement Survey [External Email] proposed dog park at Dunore Park in Clifton Merz, Rocky Sat 2/13/2021 11:11 AM To: Schuckman, Steven ; Kish, Kara ; Unterreiner, Mary Alice Palmer Sending some feedback. Mary thought you might keep these so they can be sent to the CPB in an organized way. Sat 2/27/2021 9:30 PM

Thank you, To: Parks, Cincy Rocky External Email Communication

Begin forwarded message:

From: Maura Gill Dear Commissioners, Date: February 13, 2021 at 9:53:56 AM EST As a resident on Dunore Road I strongly oppose the suggestion that a dog park be constructed in To: "Merz, Rocky" Subject: [External Email] Re: Dunore Dog Park Engagement Survey Dunore Park. There are several reasons why this is a poor idea: 1. The open space at the park is frequently used by families and dog owners to play ball, throw frisbees, exercise dogs, and just enjoy the green space

External Email Communication 2. The park system is having difficulty finding money to repair what is currently in our parks; now is not the time to add to the infrastructure Rocky, 3. The space is too small to build an adequate, two-gated dog park with benches, water, trash cans, Thanks for sharing. Disheartening after the conversation last year regarding the viability for a dog park with facts - guidance from engineers and what needs to be true (running water being an important one!) not being available or extremely expensive to install at Dunore. Additionally etc. saddening to see the Park Board (not the Foundation) sending out a survey that solicits funds from private citizens in favor of an initiative that has 4. There is no water supply at the park currently; an expensive connector to the main under a street not yet been approved. Obviously they are learning that it’s ok from their City Council members arrested this summer. would have to be built I’ll follow with more specific details regarding the case I shared at Clifton Town Meeting. Nearby neighbors support the idea of a dog park in Clifton, 5. Residents of Dunore are not in favor of the dog park, including the dog owners with a proper unbiased siting study of true viability - soil, community, traffic, water, etc. 6. Improvements to the park that would be welcomed include better maintenance of trees, improved I look forward to continued engagement on this issue plantings, enlarged playground, and more frequent trash pick up from the one, often overflowing,

Maura McVey trash can.

Dunore resident Work with the residents of the area to improve our park to better welcome children, families, and their On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 4:51 PM Merz, Rocky wrote: pets. Partner with us! Hello,

As you may be aware, a group of area residents have approached the Cincinna. Park Board with a proposal to build a dog park (a fenced area for off- leash dogs), for Dunore Park, the park along Ludlow Avenue just west of Morrison Avenue. A dog park would physically fit on the site without Cordially, interfering with the small playground. As a next step in assessing the proposal, the Park Board is seeking feedback from park users and stakeholders Alice Palmer through this brief survey: hps://www.surveymonkey.com/r/MXPRQJ5

Please take a moment to fill out the survey and feel to share with other individuals or groups you are involved with who may have an interest.

The survey will remain open unl March 31st.

Thank you,

Rocky Merz | Communications, Engagement & Volunteers, Division Manager

Cincinnati Park Board | 950 Eden Park Drive| Cincinnati, OH | 513.357.2619 www.cincinnatiparks.com

Better Lives Better Community Come Join Us! #CincyParks

-- Maura Gill

53 Attachment B

[External Email] Dunore Dog Park proposal [External Email] Dunore Dog Park - Opoposed

Mitchell, Pama Wilson Palmer Sun 2/28/2021 4:16 PM Sun 2/28/2021 9:44 PM To: Parks, Cincy To: Parks, Cincy External Email Communication External Email Communication To the Board Members:

I have lived on Dunore Road since 1996 and have enjoyed the park for all these years. While Dear Park Board Commissioners, many people bring their dogs to/through the park, they are leashed and for the most part their I am one of the majority of people in the CliŌon area opposed to turning Dunore Park into Dog Park. Families owners clean up after them. regularly use the open grass area of the park to kick soccer balls, throw footballs and Frisbees, put blankets on the grass to watch their toddlers tumble around, fly kites and many other acı viı es. And, of course there are already way too many dog walkers spreading their poop around where these same children play. I have personally However, the single trash barrel in the park (filled mostly by “poop bags”) is not emptied until witnessed some yahoo who looked like a Nazi let his aı ack dog maul the swing seats in the children’s play area. it’s overflowing. We call or email the Parks Department and eventually someone cleans up. It is well known the Park Board does not have the money to maintain the parks they now have. You won’t even We who live nearby are horrified at how messy an entire “dog park” would be for our empty the trash can in the park. The grass cuı ers come very regularly. Perhaps you could save a few dollars if neighborhood. That is my chief, and strong, objection to the placement of it in our small park. you let the grass grow a few more days before cuı ng. It is oı en re-mowed before it needs it. It is very disconcerı ng to hear of your plans to build a marina for rich people and dog parks for 20 people while I’m sure you’ve heard other objections from my neighbors. We have a lot of children under ignoring the thousands of people all over Cincinnaı that love and depend on the green spaces and woods of your 12 on our street, and several under 3. Every one of those families (and others from nearby many fine parks. Please stop selling out to ı ny special interest groups and focus on supporı ng the real fans of streets) uses the park. The parents universally oppose adding a dog park to the space. The Cincinnaı Parks. extra noise, traffic, waste and “drama” (dogs that get into fights, for instance) would be Thank you, dreadful. Wilson Palmer,

Finally, I don’t see how the Parks Department can commit to supporting such a venture given the restrictions on its current and likely future budget. Maintenance alone – already a problem in our parks, as you know – would be expensive. Doing a halfway job with it would mean a blight on our city that would reflect poorly on the parks system. After all, our parks are some of the best features of Cincinnati. I think the emphasis should be on maintenance and small upgrades and enhancements of these spaces – including Dunore Park, where we’d love to see a few equipment and planting improvements.

But please, NOT a dog park!

Thank you very much,

Pama Mitchell

Pama Mitchell Associate Professor, Emerita University of CincinnaƟ

CincinnaƟ OH 45220

54 Attachment B

[External Email] Proposal for Dog Park in Dunore Park [External Email] Dunore Park Shawn Baird Sumir Khurma Thu 3/4/2021 3:48 PM Thu 3/4/2021 10:19 AM To: Parks, Cincy External Email Communication To: Parks, Cincy

External Email Communication Hello and thank you for taking the time to read this email. My name is Shawn Baird, and I’ve been privileged to live in Clifton for over 20 years.

I am writing on the behalf of residents on Dunore Rd., and many other people on neighboring streets, to express our strong and March 4, 2021 organized opposition to this proposal.

Dunore Park is, at it’s heart, a peaceful urban green space. Alongside it’s picturesque companionship to the historic Jewish Cemetery, it Dear Parks Staff and Board, also serves as a buffer from the haste of Ludlow Avenue. It is a quiet respite, in the true spirit of what a city park should provide. For decades, it has been a beloved place where children learned how to swing, kick a soccer ball, or just run around free to look for pretty I am writing to express my concerns over the proposed dog park in Dunore Park. My name is Sumir Baird and I have flowers and cool bugs. More than ever during this pandemic, it’s been a place where people are able to gather safely, spending time with been a resident of Clifton for the past 14 years. My family and I have lived on Howell Avenue, Morrison Avenue, and friends and loved ones, and can enjoy a few hours away from their burdens. Far from underutilized, the park is cherished and loved by now live on Dunore Road (4years). My husband and I have been taking our three children to Dunore Park since they many, and is welcoming to all: individuals, families, passers by, and yes, many a dog who has excitedly chased after a stick or a tennis ball. were babies. Even now as they are older, they still use the play structure and the green space for soccer and football, but also for collecting leaves, sticks, and looking for bugs. Dunore Park has always been a peaceful park for families with It is our view that the addition of a dog run would ruin the park. A substantial portion of Dunore’s open green space would surely be co- children of all ages, for folks that like to walk their dogs, and for anyone who walks by that wants to take a rest. Putting opted and reworked in order to support a project of this nature. The large area required for the enclosure itself would trade lovely grass a dog park in Dunore Park would destroy that space, especially for my family and other families who have moved to for either a muddy mess, a dusty plume, or at best, a dull synthetic surface. The space necessary for large gatherings and bathroom Dunore Road and the neighboring streets to have a quiet, safe place for their kids to grow up. facilities will further expand the footprint. Old Ludlow, which provides a safe side street on which to casually stroll or ride a bike, would This last year has been a tough one for many. The pandemic forced folks to appreciate the things around them that they quickly be taken over by parking competition and a dangerous increase in traffic. The noise of barking will be a constant nuisance to may not have before, including the many parks in Cincinnati. We have seen many more people spending time in Dunore neighbors, and the trash overflowing with dog waste would quite simply be a blight. Park because they are able to properly distance. We have seen individuals hang their own hammocks in the trees and read all afternoon, and as always there are families with kids that come to spend time there. More than ever right now, it A dog park would also permanently and severely disrupt the Jewish cemetery, a sacred place where mourners gather to pay final is important for people to have access to open green spaces to go to with their families and friends. These spaces were respects, and where loved ones visit to remember those dear to them. We fear that this peace would be forever shattered by the loud created by Cincinnati Parks to improve the quality of life for citizens. Dunore Park has become a place that our family activity of dogs, and the bustle of people continuously arriving and exiting the busy area. Even if every household and entity were united and many others cherish and we would be heartbroken to see it destroyed by the addition of a dog park. A dog park in our desire for a dog park here, none of us would have the right to disturb those grounds in such a way. would destroy the quality of life for residents that live near the park by creating more noise, more trash, parking issues Looming large in addition, is the enormous financial burden of this proposal. Would it be worth it, the cost to level the natural slope of on the street, and safety concerns for the dogs and for children that will be playing in the park. I am asking you to please the park, or the cost to run adequate plumbing, drainage, and other necessary infrastructure? Is it worth allocating the resources of an preserve the green space at Dunore Park. already strained budget to perpetually handle increased trash and waste, and to otherwise maintain the enclosure…simply to provide a play area for pets? In our view it is most certainly not. It is also our view that any compromises made to lessen costs or spatial impact, Thank you for your time, would in fact result in the worst of all worlds; a fenced-off neglected pit. Sumir Baird It is for these reasons and numerous others, that homeowners on Dunore Rd. and many property owners in the surrounding neighborhoods are vehemently opposed to any such plan in Dunore Park. If there is to be a dog park in Clifton, it needs to happen from i*OFWFSZXBMLXJUIOBUVSFPOFSFDFJWFTGBSNPSFUIBOIFTFFLTw+PIO.VJS an open, community based effort. It must seek to find a harmonious solution based upon diverse input, outreach and understanding. This effort is not that.

While we all love Dunore as it is, we of course would like to make it better. As a group, we have developed lovedunorepark.com, and are actively putting together plans for independently funded improvements such as tree planting, landscaping, and modern play equipment. Our goal as stewards of the park is to ensure that current and future generations will always be able to take a moment to rest in the fresh grass beneath the shade of it’s old sycamore trees, and to enjoy it’s quiet beauty on a sunny spring afternoon.

It is in this spirit of love for Dunore that we ask you to join us in our conclusion that a dog park is simply a bad fit for this location, and that any such plans to fundamentally alter the character of the park should be rejected. We humbly thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,

Shawn Baird and the residents of Dunore Rd.

lovedunorepark.com

55 Attachment B

[External Email] Dunmore Park Dog Park [External Email] Opposing dog park at Dunore Park

Alexis Amsterdam Fri 3/5/2021 11:28 AM Sat 3/6/2021 11:29 AM To: Parks, Cincy To: Parks, Cincy

External Email Communication External Email Communication

To whom it may concern, Dear Cincinnati Parks Board, I am writing to voice my opposition to the dog park proposed for Dunmore Park. I have never understood why one would have a dog park that most of it borders a major street in the Clifton area. We live a short walk from the park and have two dogs. I would NEVER use the park. We have taken our dogs to Doris Day Dog Park which has minimum frontage on a busy street. I have not used the dog park at Washington Park as I feel it is an area for I’m writing to oppose the proposal for the creation of a dog park at Dunore Park in Clifton. I live those live in apartments/condos in the area to use since they have minimal green space in the area. I think it around the corner from the park on Morrison Place and my family has used the park as an extension would be a distraction to drivers on the stretch on Ludlow as they drive by, causing safety issues, also a distraction to dogs. Why not do something at Mt Storm? of our backyard for 12 years. It is a small, beautiful green space and it is not suitable for a dog park. Dunore Park is a fully residential area and serves families, small children and leashed dogs. There is not Happy to discuss further. adequate parking or space to accommodate the increased human and car traffic. The noise, smell, Sincerely, litter, traffic and safety issues will be a burden to our quiet neighborhood. I encourage the park board to consider an alternate location for a dog park in Clifton. Mary Pat Lienhart Thank you for your support in keeping Dunore Park the beautiful, safe, quiet green space that it Cincinnati, OH 45220 currently is.

Alexis Amsterdam

Alexis Amsterdam, MPH

Clinical Research Coordinator

Division of General and Community Pediatrics

Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center

56 Attachment B

[External Email] Dunore Park plans [External Email] Pro Dog Park at dunore Nancy Sun 3/7/2021 4:05 PM Clark, Eric To: Parks, Cincy Sun 3/7/2021 6:44 PM

External Email Communication To: Parks, Cincy External Email Communication Dear sir or Madam: As a resident of Clifton, I have been aware of the discussion and plans for locating a dog park in Dunore Park. I urge you not to continue with this proposal. Dunore is a small, narrow park used most often by young families and single dog owners walking their leashed dogs. It has a small, limited playground. Our children and grandchildren have enjoyed using the equipment and have loved I know most of the emails you get about new things and ideas are negative. So, I just want to be a voice being able to run the length of the park in their young childhoods. It gives children a sense of freedom and empowerment in a very of positive support for the dog park at Dunore. It’s a great idea. The park is underutilized, there is plenty safe grassy area. A dog park would monopolize this green space. Burnet Woods is also in this neighborhood and contains large, flat, green spaces that are much better suited to a dog park. Please consider relocating any future dog park in Clifton to Burnet Woods and of parking, and it makes the neighborhood more dog friendly and allows new people to meet - which is not small, hilly Dunore Park. essential in a city. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Nancy Fluharty Eric Clark Cincinnati, OH 45220

57 Attachment B

[External Email] Proposed dog park in Dunore Park [External Email] Dunore Park proposed for a dog park

Giles Dillingham Carol Wright Mon 3/8/2021 8:36 AM Mon 3/8/2021 12:14 PM To: Parks, Cincy To: Parks, Cincy External Email Communication External Email Communication

Hello! I want to make some comments about the proposed dog park. We live a couple of blocks away on Morrison Avenue and use Dunore Park frequently. We are strongly opposed to installing a dog park. We Carol Wright feel it would be an eyesore that would detract greatly from the neighborhood's beauty. Green space is so precious. Clifton Do not put a dog park in Dunore Park! We feel that the best 'upgrade' to Dunore Park would be a crosswalk on Ludlow. Accessing Dunore Park One does not belong in a residential area. is difficult and dangerous as traffic on Ludlow is very fast. Families (and older people like my wife and I) It is a challenge to cross Ludlow Ave at Morrison Ave as it is, more cars will make it even more always feel like we're taking our lives in our hands when we cross the street to get to the park! It's hazardous. especially painful to watch parents with small children or strollers trying to get across. As a elder, I walk that area almost daily, as do parents with strollers and small children. We LOVE Cincinna. 's parks, and feel that you do a GREAT job enhancing our city. Thank you so much. Many generations of children have used that park area to swing as little ones, play football, throw Please feel free to reach out if you'd like more comments or informaon. frisbees, or climb trees, as youngsters, take their own children to where they played in years past. Greenspace needs to stay green. Respecully, No dog park in Dunore Park‼ Sent from my iPad Giles Dillingham

Cincinna, OH 45220

58 Attachment B

[External Email] Dog Park at Dunore Park [External Email] Dunore Dog Park

Daniel Deering Wendy Deering Mon 3/8/2021 3:00 PM Tue 3/9/2021 3:28 PM To: Parks, Cincy To: Parks, Cincy

External Email Communication External Email Communication

To Whom It May Concern: To Whom It May Concern,

I am writing to express my opposition to creating an off leash dog park at Dunore Park. I am a home I am writing to share my thoughts about the proposed off leash dog park at Dunore Park in Clifton. I owner within one block of the proposed dog park and I have been paying property tax in Clifton for have lived on Manor Hill Drive, a block away from Dunore Park, over 25 years. I do not want to see Dunore Park destroyed by off leash dogs contained in an unsightly for over 25 years. I have lived in Clifton for 40 years. I have always thought Clifton should have a dog fence. Presently it is a beautiful open green park enjoyed by individuals, families, dogs on leashes and park. I don’t think Dunore Park is the right location though. How about an area surrounding neighborhoods. It is a gateway into our community. more tucked away and quiet? Mt. Storm perhaps?

I fear that a fenced in dog park will only distract from the natural beauty that presently exists and it Dunore Park is a green and peaceful gateway up Ludlow Avenue and into our business district. I don’t would quickly become an eyesore, as many soft scape dog parks that are heavily utilized have want to see an ugly chain link fence, torn up grass and loud barking dogs in such a prominent become. and lovely green space that is currently enjoyed by all Cliftonites.

Please do NOT allow a fenced in, off leashed dog park to be constructed and ruin a beautiful green Thank you for your time and consideration. space that already brings joy and utility to our entire community and city. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely,

Sincerely, Wendy Neal Deering

Dan Deering Cincinnati, Ohio 45220 Home Owner

Cincinnati, Ohio 45220

59 Attachment B

[External Email] Dunore Park [External Email] Dunore Dog Park

Dave Allen Wed 3/10/2021 9:35 AM Wed 3/10/2021 4:16 PM To: Parks, Cincy To: Parks, Cincy External Email Communication External Email Communication

Please do not make Dunore Park into a dog park. This is not the right use for this space in this neighborhood. Hello Park Board,

I would actually like to speak to someone in more detail about this. If someone would like to call me, I can be I live in Clifton on Manor Hill. A dog park at Dunore would be an asset for me and many others. You reached on my cell. constantly see people walking their dogs in Clifton. A lot more people than you ever see utilizing Dunore Park as it is now. I often walk my dogs down Ludlow, around Dunore and back up Ludlow. I seldom see Dunore Park being used. When I do it is usually a parent with a kid or two using the playground. I have a few times seen people using the grassy area but not very much at all. What I have often seen are people parking in the back secluded area and staying in their cars. It may be innocent or maybe not. I have a feeling more people using the park would cut down on that.

A dog park at Dunore would bring more people to the area. I now take my dogs to Washington Parks Dog Park. A couple days ago a mom and dad came in with their daughter. They all stayed in the dog park for a little while then the mom took the daughter to the playground while the dad stayed with the dog. I’m sure that would happen at Dunore. When we had a warm day a week or so ago there were over 50 people using that dog park. Once in a while a barking dog will show up but most of the time it is fairly quiet.

One thing I don’t like about Washington Park Dog Park is its layout. It is hard to keep an eye on your dog because dogs can go into areas that you can’t see them unless you follow them constantly. I have two Boston Terriers so it is hard to follow two. I would recommend a dog park that is open so you can view all of it no matter where you are.

I understand the neighbors concern to a point. Unfortunately public land is for the public not just the people living in the area. Some of the neighbors arguments are stretching reality. One is that the park is sloped. So why did they put a picture of a very flat Dunore Park on their flyer? That the feces would not be picked up, dry, turn into feces dust and blow in the air. Really? The complaint about traffic control. One objective of having a dog park there is better traffic control: crosswalks, perhaps a traffic light or two, more people and cars at the park may slow drivers down. You can’t consider just how it is now, some of the things they complain about would be fixed by the construction of a dog park.

As you can tell I’m definitely for the dog park at Dunore. I love Clifton and feel a dog park would only be an asset.

Dave Allen

60 Attachment B

[External Email] Dunore Park - no dog park but alternative site suggestion Fw: [External Email] Dunore Park Joyce Steiner Sun 3/14/2021 3:25 PM Schuckman, Steven To: Parks, Cincy Mon 3/15/2021 11:00 AM External Email Communication To: Kish, Kara Cc: Unterreiner, Mary Hello, Parks Board.

2 attachments (15 MB) First, we love our Cincinna. Parks! Thank you especially for all that you have done during the last 12 months. Like many families, we have been to a number of Cincinna Parks over the last year. Saved us on many levels. So thank you! Preserve Dunore Park MM March 2020.pptx; Dog Park Examples 2021-03 update.docx;

Second, I am wring regarding a proposal for a dog park at Dunore Park.

1. We have a dog and would NOT use a Dunore Park dog park – I am concerned about other dogs being aggressive with our senior dog. From: Laura Hils 2. A fenced dog park in a residenal area would devalue properes nearby. Also, as this road/park is a gateway to the Sent: Monday, March 15, 2021 10:45 AM neighborhood it potenally has a negave economic impact to property values and the community overall. In these financial mes, it is too much of a risk. To: Hood, MaƩhew Cc: Schuckman, Steven ; Mobley, Jenny ; Merz, Rocky

4. I would recommend the Parks Board look at the land across from Spring Grove cemetery. There are soccer fields, a Subject: Re: [External Email] Dunore Park baseball diamond, playground area, trail head. Adding a dog park there would help provide for those in Clion, Northside and other areas that have asked for a dog park. Good morning,

5. Using the land across from Spring Grove cemetery, which is not heavily residenal, would create a similar use dog park as is in the Oo Amleder park area – which is near Hyde Park, Mt. Lookout, etc. And that dog park is very successful. I hope that you all had a nice weekend. We are looking forward to the meeting on Wednesday at 1:30. In addition to myself, Donna Thie, Sumir Baird, and Marcia McLaughlin will be attending. We all live on 6. Keeping Dunore Park well-maintained and the playground area clean and in good repair is important. Having a few well- maintained picnic tables and benches are also a good idea so folks can come to sit outside. Regular trash-pick up and Dunore and/or Crooked Stone. Should we meet at the park across from the entrance to Dunore Rd? curb clean-up. As background for some of our concerns, I'm attaching two documents: 7. People do use the park. When my children were smaller, we used the playground regularly. It is a park where teens have gathered to be outside during Covid-19. I have seen the park be used for smaller children running outside, frisbee golf, reading outside, swinging on the swings, older adults sing on a bench, etc. Let’s encourage a warm and inving 1) A presentation that Dunore/Crooked Stone residents gave to Clifton Town Meeting on March 2, atmosphere so Dunore Park is used and enjoyed by many people. 2020. Some of the information about community engagement is outdated now that Cincinnati Parks

has started the community engagement process, but the presentation otherwise provides an overview In conclusion, I am NOT in favor of a dog park in Dunore Park. But feel it is important to provide ideas for another site to the Park Board. The area across from Spring Grove Cemetery seems to be a viable opon for your consideraon. of the issue from our perspective.

Thank you, 2) A working/draft document that compares several area dog parks (and Dunore Park) against

Joyce Steiner suggested criteria for dog parks. The first page of the document explains the process of developing this document given that it is obviously not a formal study. Because there is not a specific Cincinna, OH 45220 proposal/plan for Dunore Park, some of the information is tentative. For example, I believe that the tentative cost of a dog park in Dunore Park (including an integrated plan for infrastructure and other improvements) was based on statements the Park Board made about the cost of the dog park in Washington Park.

Please let me know if you have any trouble opening these documents, or if you have any questions.

Thanks again for your time.

Laura

61 Attachment B

Attachment to "Dunore Park" - 3/15 - 11:00 A.M. Attachment to "Dunore Park" - 3/15 - 11:00 A.M. Dog Park Examples Discussion Points - DRAFT Dunore Park is not a good site for a dog park - Draft

• Good Design Washington Park Mt Airy Dog Park Westwood Town “Proposed” Dunore Dunore Park Residents are not saying we’re against Dog Parks. Elements of a Dog Dog Park (Doris Day Dog Hall Mini Dog Park Dog Park – existing Park Park) conditions • Dunore Park is not the right location for a Clifton dog park. Flat Terrain Flat Sloped Flat Sloped Plenty of Shade Yes Yes Yes 50% tree loss in 10 years • What are the Guidelines & Best Practices in Cincinnati/other areas? Artificial Surfaces Artificial Grass, mud Artificial Current is grass o Who is the community? Community Need? Goals & Objective? Size – reco ½ acre Medium Large Small Proposed varies 3000 min (21780 sf) 3000 sf to 10000 sf o Best Practices? Community Criteria? Community Siting Study? Fenced areas – Single – all dogs Two – small / large Single – all dogs Current - no ƒ i.e. if Northside and Norwood are included in pro count, their big/small dogs Aggressive/all potential sites should be included in siting study. Lighting High Medium High Gas Light – low o Preliminary plans including preliminary cost for all siting options. Drainage – Yes No Yes None available on frequent surface major erosion site o Alignment with community input cleanings o Select THE right option and location Drinking Water Yes Yes Yes No o Detailed Plans including cost At entry Inside Outside fence Bathrooms Yes Yes Yes No o etc Residential Condo/apartments, No Some homes Across small access impact (noise, across large street. across avenues street • Without access to agreed to objective process/criteria, we took a rough odor, traffic) Residential No impact on No No impact on Proposed parking assessment of Cincinnati area dog parks referenced in the evolving discussion: impact (access) access to access to area & entrance on Washington Park Dog Park Mt Airy Dog Park (Doris Day) residences residences only access road to Westwood Town Hall Dog Park Dunore Park (an option, not the answer) 30 homes. Proximity to Theaters, Music No Flanked by +0.5 mile to Clifton business Hall, 1-2 blocks to business, CRC, business district. +1.0 • Design Elements taken from pro & con disucssions, google searches, Ann Arbor OTR school, library, mile to Northside Dog Park Guidelines restaurants Near playground Close. Not adjacent No Close. Not Close use. adjacent use. • Big Points why Dunore Park is not a good site Traffic control Block has all 4 Separate entrance Triangle block has No traffic control at 2 o intersections w/ that serves dog park all 3 intersections entrances on single No traffic control at Dunore Park. traffic lights. only. R-turn only w/ traffic lights. access street to park o Old Ludlow is the only access to over 30 houses 20-25 mph in/out. 35 mph 20-25 mph & residence. 35 mph o Lacking costly infrastructure: area lighting, water, drainage Maintenance High Volunteers. Poor Just opened in the Volunteer. o Sloped terrain leading to major erosion or costly drainage (mud pits, tunnels, Fall 2019 – tbc. CoC: 2 week mows. feces along fence, Added 1/2 person Annual mulch. o Too close to residences. Additional noise is cumulative, not canceling. bags tied to fence). to maintain. Weekly garbage o High pitch noises from children at playground and all-day sirens can Annual mulch. (insufficient) excite dogs Cost – initial High Medium ~ $5 million for Integrated plan - Part of Washington (a lot of fencing) triangle - CRC/ roughly $2 million. Park renovation TownHall update, Does not include • Iff Clifton wants a Clifton Community Dog Park, then set up an objective siting play, dog park traffic control. study with clear criteria. Annual Cost High ? ? Roughly $25,000

62 Attachment B

Attachment to "Dunore Park" - 3/15 - 11:00 A.M. Attachment to "Dunore Park" - 3/15 - 11:00 A.M. A Few “Referenced” Dog Parks - - Draft Washington Park Dog Park

Dunore Park is not a good site for a dog park • Single fenced area Mt Airy Dog Park (Doris Day Dog Park) • Flat. Constructed surfaces. • Shade, lighting, available water, bathrooms • 2 fenced areas (small / all, aggressive, others) • Cost to install? Cost to maintain? • Sloped area, “grass” areas • Shade, lighting, available water, bathrooms • Well maintained • Cost to install? Cost to maintain?

• Major erosion across all areas • Perimeter of fence both sides of fence: mud, tunnels, dog feces, major erosion • Waste management: full cans, bags tied to fence

63 Attachment B

Attachment to "Dunore Park" - 3/15 - 11:00 A.M. Attachment to "Dunore Park" - 3/15 - 11:00 A.M.

Westwood Town Hall Dog Park Health & Safety - - Draft

• Part of integrated design (CRC/Town Hall Dogs’ Health & Safety reno, Playscape, Dog Park, greenspace • Dog Vaccinations • In the center of business district • Heavy Ludlow traffic especially during rush hour which also is busiest time for Dog Parks (restaurants, businesses, elementary school, o Vehicles (cars, trucks, motorcycles) library, etc) o Bus Stop at Dunore Park corner • 3000 sf, single fenced area • Pedestrians and bicycles on Old Ludlow and Ludlow Aves • Flat. Constructed surfaces. Washable • Increases traffic on Old Ludlow • Shade, lighting, available water, bathrooms • High pitch noises often excites dogs: • Cost to install - $5M. Cost to maintain - ? o Emergency vehicle sirens: fire, police, ambulance o Children’s high pitch voices often irritates/excites dogs • Well maintained - tbc/ brand new • Shade • Concern - too small as weather warms up • Water (not currently available) • Small fence is not protecting trees and grass • Lighting (typically more than Gas Light levels) area - erosion • Solid waste & urine management o Bags often tied to fence after trash can full so animals don’t tear into bags • Mud & dust • Common canine diseases: o Parainfluenza — Transmitted by nasal secretions. ... o Bordetella — Transmitted by nasal secretions. ... o Lyme disease — Transmitted by ticks. ... o Leptospirosis — Picked up from water contaminated by infected urine. ... o Giardia — Picked up by drinking contaminated water.

People’s Health & Safety • Increased Dust – aggravate respiratory illness • “Dogs are a major reservoir for zoonotic infections. Dogs transmit several viral and bacterial diseases to humans. Zoonotic diseases can be transmitted to human by infected saliva, aerosols, contaminated urine or feces and direct contact with the dog.” • Need sufficient buffer between children play area and dog park • Many children are afraid of dogs • Extra dogs in the rest of Dunore Park: o coming and going to Dog Park o too crowded inside fenced area so owners with dogs walk outside fenced area o aggressive dogs being “asked” to leave • Typically urine (marking spots) and feces along perimeter of fence on outside • Pedestrian sidewalk traffic on Ludlow Ave: o Barking dogs o “Grass” strip between fence and sidewalk on Old Ludlow becomes mud pit encroaching onto sidewalk – very slippery. Same at Mt Airy Dog Park.

Dunore Park is not a good site for a dog park

64 Attachment B

Attachment to "Dunore Park" - 3/15 - 11:00 A.M. Attachment to "Dunore Park" - 3/15 - 11:00 A.M. Misrepresentation of Public Support

• Started with P.U.P.P. attendees and Next Door survey • NextDoor represents at most 30% of Clifton homes • Survey included surrounding communities (Northside, CUF, Spring Grove, etc.) • Meetings with parks officials, Clifton Business Association, and other Preserve Dunore Park “partners” without engaging with any local neighbors • Lack of proper engagement with public prior to Parks engagement • Conflicting messaging: • Will only be people walking to the park, but need parking • Will only be Clifton residents, but engaging Northside and other nearby communities

Attachment to "Dunore Park" - 3/15 - 11:00 A.M. Attachment to "Dunore Park" - 3/15 - 11:00 A.M. This requests CTM’s active, neutral engagement in the discussion regarding a Dog Park in Clifton, specifically at Dunore Park

Current efforts have demonstrated: Long Term • Misrepresentation of public support and lack of appropriate public engagement for proposed location Vision & • Lack of long term vision and planning for proposed Planning park location, keeping city criteria in mind • Lack of planning for long-term funding and maintenance Aerial View of Dunore Park • Dismissal of valid concerns regarding health, safety, and environment from the neighboring community

65 Attachment B

Attachment to "Dunore Park" - 3/15 - 11:00 A.M. Attachment to "Dunore Park" - 3/15 - 11:00 A.M. Long Term Vision and Planning for Dunore Park

• Currently targeted for families with young children • 3-3.5 acre playground and greenspace • Playground with benches • Small play structure with 2 regular swings and 2 infant swings • Small climbing/slide structure targeted for children under 3 years old • Woodchip/mulch surface with log perimeter Examples from • Open Field with Picnic Table • 8 mature trees removed this last winter with no replanting Other Parks • No running water • No grilling area Mt. Airy Dog Park • Approximately ½ mile from Clifton Business District • Access road to no outlet streets: Old Ludlow, Dunore Rd. and Crooked Stone Rd. (~30 homes)

Attachment to "Dunore Park" - 3/15 - 11:00 A.M. Attachment to "Dunore Park" - 3/15 - 11:00 A.M. Cincinnati Parks Criteria for Dog Parks Examples from Mt. Airy Park • Written by John Osterman in January 2020 • Recommendations: • Minimum of 2 Acre site to provide adequate space • Dog Parks are extremely popular. Mt Airy park was expanded due to popularity, Armleder Park is 10+ acres, with 4 acre rotations in use. Washington Park and Westwood both include hard surfaces • Due to noise and traffic concerns, sites should not be selected that are not adjacent to residences • 4-6 foot fencing, running water for dogs and people, trash cans with lids, parking, shade, benches/tables, appropriate surfaces and ongoing plan for maintenance Waste bags tied to fencing • See handout or link for more information Trash near picnic areas Overflowing trash bins

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1SsYo3JWCE-dUJYSzI3WklWelhwOWJYUVhyUW80UzBYYzBZ/view

66 Attachment B

Attachment to "Dunore Park" - 3/15 - 11:00 A.M. Attachment to "Dunore Park" - 3/15 - 11:00 A.M.

Planning for Long Term Funding • 3 Requests for a Dog Park in Clifton, including in Dunore, in Neighborhood Project Suggestion Process for 2016 • Minimum $150,000 start up costs plus $22,000 yearly maintenance (requires endowment) • Dunore Park deemed unsuitable by Parks Staff Sample FY experts: “Dunore is a relatively small • Currently not on Park Foundation nor City Priorities greenspace and adding additional play • City turned down ideas for a Dog Park in Dunore Park in 2016 and 2016 NPS equipment or a dog run is not advisable. Also, 2020 as a part of the Community Budge Request/Neighborhood there are no funds to create a dog park at Project Suggestions (CBR/NPS) processes: Dunore... As well as funding being available for • 7 requests in 2020, 3 specific to Dunore. All rejected Response maintenance of additional dog parks.” • All requests had similar responses from the • Building a new Dog Park as a priority over Department maintaining/improving current parks demonstrates priorities of Clifton and City https://www.cincinnati-oh.gov/finance/assets/File/Attachment%203- %20NPS%20Summary%20(1).pdf https://www.cincinnati-oh.gov/finance/assets/File/NPS%20MergedDoc%20FY20-21.pdf

Attachment to "Dunore Park" - 3/15 - 11:00 A.M. Attachment to "Dunore Park" - 3/15 - 11:00 A.M. Sample FY 2020 NPS Response

• 7 Similar requests for a Dog Park in Clifton in 2020 Neighborhood Project Concerns of Neighbors Suggestion Process • 3 requests were specific to Dunore Park • Dunore Park deemed unsuitable by Parks Staff experts due to “size, use, and topography of the site” • All 7 requests had similar responses Residents of Directly Surrounding Streets from the Department

67 Attachment B

Attachment to "Dunore Park" - 3/15 - 11:00 A.M. [External Email] Public Comment for Dog Park Proposal in Dunore Park Laura Hils Sample of Concerns to be Tue 3/30/2021 4:02 PM To: Parks, Cincy Addressed: Cc: Kish, Kara

• Safety: 2 attachments (2 MB) • Proximity to Ludlow Ave Letter Regarding Dunore Park.pdf; Dunore Park Drawing.pdf; • Traffic speeds on Ludlow and impact of forthcoming calming project • Increased traffic on Old Ludlow • Street crossings across Ludlow and Old Ludlow External Email Communication • Access to homes via Old Ludlow • Parking for residents, park users and cemetery visitors • Safety for children using playground and open field for play Please find attached my letter concerning the dog park proposal in Dunore Park, as well as a • Health & Environment drawing/note from my son on the same topic. Please let me know if you have any difficulty opening • Trash – current weekly pickup insufficient for current usage of park • Maintenance by volunteer corps will be insufficient the attachments. • Smell from waste • Noise pollution of dogs in park Thank you, • Percentage of park going to use as Dog Park • Surfacing used in dog park – health and drainage of grass & soil • Aesthetics of park and fencing – no buffer from homes sightlines Laura Hils

Attachment to "Dunore Park" - 3/15 - 11:00 A.M.

What CTM Must Do

1. Remain Neutral and Fact-Based a) If someone claims an organization has endorsed something, fact check with those organizations and parties b) Ensure facts are represented accurately 2. Demand an open & transparent dialogue, listening to the needs & concerns of both sides 3. Facilitate neighborhood engagement by using CTM communication vehicles to increase awareness 4. Encourage the honest, transparent, fact-based discussions via your other connections to boards, Clifton residents, and those of the surrounding communities 5. Respect, hear, and reflect in communications the views of those who will be most directly impacted

68 Attachment B

Attachment to "Public Comment for Dog Park Proposal in Dunore Park" - 3/30 - 4:02 P.M. Attachment to "Public Comment for Dog Park Proposal in Dunore Park" - 3/30 - 4:02 P.M.

69 Attachment B

Dunore Dog Park Feedback Phone Calls

Date Name Message/Feedback Summary 3/19/2021 John Ryan Feels Dunore is wrong park for a dog park.

Opposed to dog park in Dunore. Feels it will destroy grass 3/30/2021 Irene Moore and is unfair to have dedicated space exclusive to one use.

70 Attachment C

Resolution on Dog Park in Dunore Park For Consideration April 5, 2021 Board Meeting

Whereas in early 2020, the Cincinnati Parks Board of Commissioners and Clifton Town Meeting (CTM) had separate meetings to consider a proposed dog park in Dunore Park; and

Whereas, with the pandemic, this proposal went dormant for a year until January 2021 when in a Cincinnati Parks Board of Commissioners board meeting it was raised again. In February 2021, Cincinnati Parks distributed a survey to gather input into the Dunore Park dog park proposal, a survey that was open for input until March 31, 2021. There were 850 people who responded including 222 people living within 1 block of the park. In the April Cincinnati Parks Board of Commissioners meeting they will consider further action on the proposed dog park in Dunore Park; and

Whereas, the survey conducted by the Cincinnati Parks did not ask whether a dog park in/or around Clifton was desired, but rather whether there was interest for a dog park in a specific location at Dunore Park; and

Whereas the Clifton Town Meeting Parks Committee received the survey results on Thursday, April 1 in the afternoon and held community forum that evening to consider the survey results and gather community input. Cincinnati Parks Commissioner Jim Goetz attended that meeting; and

Whereas, survey results concluded that constructing a dog park in Dunore Park is polarizing: total interest in constructing a dog park was slightly more in favor with 54.6% strongly or somewhat in favor and 45.1% strongly or somewhat against in total. Within 1 block that is 27.9% in favor and 72.1% against, within <10 minute walk, 56.6% in favor and 43.4% against and >10 minute walk 80.7% in favor and 19.3% against; and

Whereas, 46.45% of total respondents said they would use it and 53.55% said they would not use it; 62.2% of those >1 block would use it and 37.8% said they would not; 49.3% <10 minute walk indicated they would use it and 50.7% said they would not; within a block 24% said they would use it and 75.8% said they would not; and

Whereas benefits were seen as a community gathering space, improved safety, using an “underutilized space”; the concerns were loss of greenspace, increased noise, lack of parking, increased litter/smell with a dog park that would need to be maintained; and

Whereas 21.2% of people said they would be willing to help fund the construction of a dog park in Dunore Park while 78.7% said they would not; 20.1% said they would be willing to help maintain it while 79.9% indicated they would not be willing to help maintain it; and

Whereas, there is significant community discussion about alternative sites that would not take away greenspace and where it would be easier to maintain.

Resolved, that the Clifton Town Meeting Board of Trustees does not support the construction of a dog park at Dunore Park given how polarizing this location is and with the potential for other locations without the downsides of loss of greenspace and;

71 Attachment C

Resolved, that the Clifton Town Meeting Board of Trustees believes there is interest in a dog park in and around Clifton that would not replace greenspace and is well maintained.

Resolved, that the Clifton Town Meeting Board of Trustees requests that the Cincinnati Parks explore several alternative locations for a dog park that do not take away greenspace, and partner with CTM on a community engagement process to gather feedback on those potential sites.

72 Attachment D

Burnet Woods Park Advisory Council Resolution on Dog Park Concept in Burnet Woods April 7, 2021

Whereas a proposal to create a dog park in Dunore Park (Clifton) has been put before the Park Board both in early 2020 and again now, in 2021; and

Whereas community discussion of creating a dog park in Clifton or Clifton-near has extended to boundaries beyond Dunore Park, to include Burnet Woods Park; and

Whereas in the Clifton Town Meeting Parks Committee Meeting of April 1, 2021, Park Board Vice President Jim Goetz said that locations in Burnet Woods Park were scoped for a potential dog park; and

Whereas in the Burnet Woods Park Advisory Council Meeting of April 7, 2021, members in attendance unanimously agreed that a dog park in Burnet Woods was not desirable.

Resolved, that the Burnet Woods Park Advisory Council is not in favor of the construction of a dog park in Burnet Woods, and respectfully requests that the Cincinnati Park Board remove Burnet Woods Park from its list of considered locations for a dog park.

______Lisa Haglund, 2021 Chair Burnet Woods Park Advisory Council

73 Attachment E [External Email] Dunore Park

Larry Holt Wed 4/7/2021 10:23 AM To: Parks, Cincy ; Merz, Rocky Cc: Kish, Kara ; Bob Rack Mary Jo Vesper Margaret Reich External Email Communication

Greengs R ocky,

We write to advise that the Mt. Storm PAC is sympathec with the vie ws of those opposing the proposed dog park since it appears to be inconsistent with the mission/vision statement (below) our PAC developed for Dunore Park.

I hope this is helpful.

Larry Holt Representav e of the Mt. Storm Advisory Council

Dunore Park Mission: To promote maintenance and improvements to enhance Dunore Park as a natural, family-friendly, and child-safe space for residents and as an ar acv e urban greenspace and visual respite for everyone. Proposed Acvies: 1. Connue t o advocate for improved playground equipment. 2. Connue t o advocate for new tree planng t o replace those recently removed. 3. Request addional c ontribuons t o the spring bulb display inia ted by daffodil donaons fr om Clion Community Fund. 4. Support and strengthen trash removal pracces. 5. Consider an ar acv e fence along the Ludlow boundary to increase child safety.

Thanks!

74

BOARD OF PARK

COMMISSIONERS Date: April 15, 2021

Brad Lindner To: Board of Park Commissioners President

James Goetz From: Kara Kish, Director Vice President

Susan F. Castellini Subject: Park Operation & Management Agreement for Lot 23 at Smale

Linda Lee Thomas Riverfront Park

Molly North

Background

The design of the extension of Smale Riverfront Park on to Lot 23 was undertaken in conjunction with Music and Event Management, Inc. (MEMI),

a subsidiary of the Cincinnati Symphony Orchestra, and The Banks design team in anticipation of MEMI hosting musical performances and events in

the park. On August 20, 2020, the City, County and MEMI entered into an Kara S. Kish Entertainment Venue Development Agreement (Venue Development Director Agreement), which was previously approved by the Board. Under the terms Jenny Mobley of that agreement, the City was to subsequently develop a management Deputy Director agreement with MEMI, with a number of the material conditions of Crystal Courtney management agreement specified in the Venue Development Agreement, Division Manager such as revenue sharing, calendaring, and MEMI paying for the operating Rocky Merz costs of Lot 23 up to a certain amount. MEMI also agreed to contribute Division Manager $1,450,000 to the Lot 23 park as part of the Venue Development Steven L. Schuckman Agreement. The City has been negotiating this agreement for management Division Manager and revenue sharing for Lot 23 and the agreement has now been finalized. Craig Sherman The Board is being asked to approve this agreement. Division Manager

Description

The agreement recognizes that the site is a public park open to the public

but at times the performance lawn will be restricted to ticket holders for concerts and special events. A series of conditions govern how and when

the space can be used for events, the responsibilities of both parties, scheduling and revenue sharing, and review and approval requirements.

MEMI will be the exclusive manager of the space. The agreement calls for 950 Eden Park Drive MEMI's production and management of concerts and events in which they Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 Phone (513) 352-2604 cover all expenses and retain 90% of the profits with 10% going to Parks. Fax (513) 352-4096 If events result in a loss, they absorb that loss. For Park Board events, 90% www.cincinnatiparks.com #cincyparks of profits goes to Parks and 10% to MEMI (if MEMI does not manage the event or if it is a fundraising event, then 100% of the net revenues are

75

retained by Parks). Third Party events split profits evenly between Parks and MEMI.

Basic park maintenance and capital replacement costs have been predetermined and are depicted in the agreement. MEMI will pay these costs. There are provisions to look at actual costs and then "true-up" payments in which case funds may be due back to MEMI if actual costs are less than estimated in the agreement. Other key provisions are as follows:

• Scheduling - MEMI can place holds on dates for events. At 100 days prior to "hold dates" if the event is not confirmed, the date becomes free for other events. Parks and MEMI are to collaborate on reserving and setting dates. The intent is to have at least one weekend day per month free of scheduled/ticketed events. The concert season is generally May 1st to October 1st and MEMI intends to host up to 15 Bengals events per year.

• Revenue/Payments/Fees - Parks is to provide standard maintenance of the space on non-event days and for the first five years of the agreement the payment to Parks is $132,565. In year five, projected annual payments are $139,191. Actual costs will be tracked, and payments adjusted as necessary with caps based on the CPI. MEMI will pay the City admissions tax. They will not have to pay the assessment fee at the Banks if they obtain approval from the Banks property owners.

• Term - Ends on the earliest of (i) MEMI or its affiliate conveying the neighboring venue, (ii) the neighboring venue is no longer commercially useable, or (iii) 40 years.

• Other Provisions - Concerts and events have an 11:00 ending time (and upon receipt of the necessary approvals, in some cases midnight). After concerts/events MEMI has 24 hours to clean up and restore the site. They are also responsible for all stage maintenance. The stage will be open to free public use when it is not being used for concerts/events.

• Default/Remedies - If a default occurs and it is not remedied within the periods specified in the agreement, then the non-defaulting party has the right to terminate the agreement. Parks also has rights to terminate if insolvency proceedings are commenced against MEMI or its affiliates. The foregoing are the only reasons the agreement can be terminated. If there is a change in law or policy that materially limits MEMI’s use of Lot 23, then the amount MEMI pays for capital and operations is reduced on a pro rata basis.

• Rights of First Negotiation, Last Refusal - For five years after the expiration of the term (Offer Period), prior to entering into negotiations with a third-party, Parks must first negotiate with MEMI for a 120-day period. If the parties are unable to reach an agreement during that period, only then may Parks negotiate with a third-party. If Parks receives an offer from a third-party during the Offer Period, MEMI has the right to try to match that offer.

Findings

The agreement covers the maintenance, operation and funding of Lot 23 and represents a formal collaboration between the Park Board and MEMI. It will enable both parties to successfully operate this extension of Smale Riverfront Park.

Recommendation

Staff respectfully requests the Board approve the presented Operation & Management Agreement for Lot 23 at Smale.

Attachment A—Park Operation & Management Agreement (The Banks Lot 23)

76 Attachment A

PARK OPERATION AND MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT management of the Eastern Park Lot, the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall supersede (The Banks Lot 23) and control.

G. Under the Development Agreement, the City, the County, and the Venue THIS PARK OPERATION AND MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) Developer agreed that the City and the Venue Developer, or an Affiliate of the Venue Developer, is made and entered into on the Effective Date (as defined on the signature page hereof) by and would enter into an agreement for the management and operation of the Eastern Park Lot, and between the City of Cincinnati, an Ohio municipal corporation, the address of which is 801 upon the election of the City and Venue Developer, the Southern Park Lot. Plum Street, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 (the “City”) and Music and Event Management, Inc., an Ohio nonprofit corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of Cincinnati Symphony Orchestra, the H. Venue Developer desires to assign its rights and obligations for the management address of which is 409 Broadway Street, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 (“ ”) MEMI . and operation of the Eastern Park Lot under the Development Agreement to its Affiliate, MEMI, and MEMI desires to assume such rights and obligations. RECITALS I. Pursuant to Section 8.2 of the Development Agreement, the Venue Developer A. The Board of County Commissioners of Hamilton County, Ohio, a political may assign its rights or delegate its obligations under the Development Agreement, in whole or subdivision of the State of Ohio (the “County”), previously subdivided Lot 23, as the same is numbered and delineated on the recorded plat thereof, of record in Plat Book ___, Pages ____, in part, without the consent of the City and the County and upon five (5) days prior written notice to the City and the County, to one or more of its Affiliates. Recorder’s Office, Hamilton County, Ohio (“Lot 23”), into a ground lot referred to as the “Lot ”, and an air lot referred to as the “ ”, and will transfer the 23 Ground Lot Eastern Park Lot J. The Venue Developer notified the City and the County by written notice more Eastern Park Lot to the City in accordance with the Development Agreement (as defined below). than five (5) days prior to the Effective Date, of its intent to assign all of its rights and obligations under Section 3.3.6 of the Development Agreement with respect to the operation and B. The County previously subdivided Lot 27, as the same is numbered and delineated on the recorded plat thereof, of record in Plat Book ___, Pages ____, Recorder’s management of the Eastern Park Lot to MEMI. Office, Hamilton County, Ohio (“ ”), into a ground lot referred to as the “ Lot 27 Lot 27 Ground K. Immediately prior to entering into this Agreement, under the Assignment and Lot”, and an air lot referred as the “Indoor Venue Lot”, and will transfer the Indoor Venue Lot Assumption Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit D, the Venue Developer assigned all of its to Riverbank Real Estate Holding, LLC, an Ohio limited liability company and an affiliate of rights and obligations under Section 3.3.6 of the Development Agreement with respect to the MEMI (“ ”), in accordance with the Development Agreement. Venue Developer operation and management of the Eastern Park Lot to MEMI. C. The County currently owns a fee simple interest in Lot 28, as the same is L. As an inducement to the parties under the Development Agreement to undertake numbered and delineated on the record plat thereof, of record in Plat Book ___, Pages ___, the development of the Eastern Park Lot, the City and MEMI desire to enter into this Agreement Recorder’s Office, Hamilton County, Ohio (“ ”; Lot 28 with an air lot to be subdivided at a later pursuant to which MEMI will manage and operate the Eastern Park Lot. date and conveyed to the City in accordance with the Development Agreement, referred to as the “Southern Park Lot”, together with the Eastern Park Lot, the “Park Lots”). M. Execution of this Agreement was authorized by City Council by Ordinance No. 451-2019, duly passed on November 20, 2019 and by the Park Board (as defined below) on D. The City will own a fee simple interest in the Park Lots in accordance with the [_____], 2021. Development Agreement, as depicted on Exhibit A and with the Eastern Park Lot described on Exhibit B. AGREEMENT

E. Venue Developer will own a fee simple interest in the Indoor Venue Lot in NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of accordance with the Development Agreement, as depicted on Exhibit A and described on which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows: Exhibit C. 1. DEFINITIONS. As used hereinafter, the following terms shall have the following F. The City, the County, and Venue Developer entered into a certain Entertainment definitions: Venue Development Agreement dated August 20, 2020 (the “Development Agreement”), for the development of the Eastern Park Lot, as well as other real property. Capitalized terms used but “Base Park” means the hardscape and landscape to be developed and constructed within not defined in this Agreement shall have the meanings set out in the Development Agreement. the Eastern Park Lot in accordance with the Development Agreement, which may but not In the event there is any conflict between the terms and conditions of this Agreement and the necessarily include the following elements, as elected and determined applicable under terms and conditions of the Development Agreement with respect to the operation and the Development Agreement and the Specific Declaration: (i) waterproofing

{00332247-2} 1 {00332247-2} 2 Park Operation and Management Agreement (The Banks Lot 23) Park Operation and Management Agreement (The Banks Lot 23) 9813868.9 9813868.9

77 Attachment A

underlayment (including sidewalls); (ii) lightweight soil fill; (iii) irrigation; (iv) steps and utilities, event-related equipment rental, and similar expenses, but excluding any capital railings; (v) hardscape walking surfaces; (vi) planters; (vii) furnishings including costs related to the Private Improvements. benches, trash receptacles and bollards; (viii) electric service and transformer for the Base Park; (ix) transformer service for City Sponsored Event Days and MEMI Events; “Event Revenues” means revenues generated in connection with the production, (x) light poles & bases; (xi) water service; (xii) drainage structures, inlets and drains; operation and management of events held within the Eastern Park Lot, and as and if (xiii) perimeter guard rails along Mehring Way; (xiv) railings at Race Street applicable, the Southern Park Lot, including, but not limited to, manifested ticket sales, extension/plaza; (xv) shade trees (3” to 4” caliper); (xvi) natural and artificial turf; (xvii) non-manifested ticket sales that are sold on an event-by-event basis, rebates, net food and elevator headhouse and related elements; and (xviii) any granite pavers and stone beverage revenues, facility rental fees, box office fees, net parking revenues, net cladding, all as more fully described and specified in the Trade Contract TC-09 merchandise revenues, sponsorship revenues (exclusive of any related to the semi- pertaining to the Eastern Park Lot between and among the City, the County, and permanent stage), and similar revenues. For the avoidance of doubt, any funds donated to Universal Contracting Company, provided that (a) any costs in excess of $6,855,000 Parks related to the Eastern Park Lot do not constitute Event Revenues. (which amount includes the contribution from Venue Developer under the Development Agreement) are subject to future appropriation and in the event that the costs for the Base “Indoor Venue” means an indoor entertainment venue with a stage and capacity of Park are in excess of the current appropriation, to the extent the City is legally able to approximately 4,500 people, exclusive of necessary staff, constructed within the Indoor obligate itself to do so, the City shall initiate the procedural requirements and take all Venue Lot. appropriate steps with respect to such additional funding; and (b) the waterproofing “ ” underlayment (including sidewalls) related to the Park Podiums, the steps and hardscape Legal Requirements means all applicable laws, statutes, ordinances, rules, regulations walking surfaces, and the light foundations are Public Party Costs (as defined in the and requirements of governmental authorities, including, but not limited to, zoning and Cooperation Agreement). land use laws, building codes and the Americans with Disabilities Act. “ ” “Bengals Team Use Days” means up to 15 days each calendar year that the Eastern Park MEMI Event means any Performance Event or other programmed event held on the (collectively, the “ ” Lot may be used by the Cincinnati Bengals. Eastern Park Lot, that is produced by MEMI MEMI Events ). “ ” “Cincinnati Bengals” means Cincinnati Bengals, Inc., an Ohio corporation. MEMI Event Day means any day on which a Performance Event or other programmed event is held on and within the Eastern Park Lot, which event is produced, “City Sponsored Event Day” means any day on which a Performance Event or other financed, operated and managed by MEMI in accordance with this Agreement, including programmed event is held on and within the Eastern Park Lot and as and if applicable, without limitation, the Bengals Team Use Days (collectively, the “MEMI Event Days”). the Southern Park Lot, which event is produced, financed, operated and managed by the “ ” City (collectively, the “City Sponsored Event Days”); provided, however, that MEMI Net Losses means, with respect to each event held within the Eastern Park Lot, and as shall operate and manage all concessions for the Eastern Park Lot on all such days and and if applicable, the Southern Park Lot, the amount by which the Event Expenses that the City may elect for MEMI to manage and operate such events on such days on its directly related to such event exceed the Event Revenues generated by such event. behalf. For the avoidance of doubt, if MEMI manages and operates an event on a City “Net Revenues” means the Event Revenues generated by an event held within the Sponsored Event Day at the City’s election, then such day shall still be deemed to be a Eastern Park Lot, and as and if applicable, the Southern Park Lot, less Event Expenses City Sponsored Event Day. directly related to such event. “Consumer Price Index” means the Consumer Price Index, All Urban Consumers, “Other Event Day” means any day on which a Performance Event or other programmed United States, All Items (1982 – 1984 = 100), as published by the Bureau of Labor event is held on and within the Eastern Park Lot, and, as and if applicable, the Southern Statistics of the United States Department of Labor, or its successor, or if such index (or Park Lot, which event is scheduled and coordinated by MEMI and is produced, operated its successor) is not available, such other index as the City and the Venue Developer may and managed by MEMI in collaboration with a third-party sponsor (collectively, the agree most closely resembles such index. “Other Event Days”). “Event Expenses” means direct expenses incurred in connection with the production, “Outdoor Venue” means the Eastern Park Lot designed in accordance with the operation and management of events held within the Eastern Park Lot, and as and if Development Agreement and the Specific Declaration to accommodate a semi-permanent applicable, the Southern Park Lot, including, but not limited to, costs of talent, event stage and other necessary elements to facilitate outdoor entertainment events, which staff, stagehands, advertising, catering, security, police, ticket takers, ushers, event MEMI anticipates will have a capacity to accommodate approximately 8,000 individuals, liability insurance, maintenance, cleaning, box office management, prorated event along with necessary supporting infrastructure, as generally depicted in Exhibit E, within

{00332247-2} 3 {00332247-2} 4 Park Operation and Management Agreement (The Banks Lot 23) Park Operation and Management Agreement (The Banks Lot 23) 9813868.9 9813868.9

78 Attachment A

the site plan attached as Exhibit A, all of which shall be constructed and operated in (i) General Maintenance. Subject to MEMI’s payment of the MEMI compliance with the requirements set forth in the Development Agreement and the Funds (defined below), and the City’s annual appropriation, the City shall Specific Declaration. maintain the general physical condition of the Eastern Park Lot, and once developed, the Southern Park Lot, in a manner consistent with the City’s “Parks” as used herein, means collectively, the City Parks Department, in coordination maintenance of Smale Riverfront Park, in order to provide a safe and with the Cincinnati Board of Park Commissioners (the “Park Board”). clean environment for visitors. The City, through Parks, will perform all ordinary maintenance with respect to the general physical condition of “Park Improvements” means all improvements now or hereafter located within the the Park Lots (as each is developed and subject to annual appropriation Eastern Park Lot, and, as and if applicable, the Southern Park Lot. and MEMI’s payment of the MEMI Funds), including trees, grass, plantings, lighting, etc. consistent with the maintenance provided by the “ ” Performance Event means any show, concert, festival, recital, play, musical or City, through Parks, on adjoining Smale Riverfront Park properties. The activity (collectively, “ ”). theatrical performance, or similar Performance Events City, through Parks, will coordinate such maintenance activities with MEMI on MEMI Event Days and Other Event Days but shall have no “Smale Park Level of Finish Elements” as used herein means only as funding may other operational responsibilities for the Eastern Park Lot on MEMI permit, that level of finish in design and implementation, comparable to the prior phases Event Days and Other Event Days. of Smale Riverfront Park, which may include, but may not be limited to, granite pavers throughout pedestrian areas, sandstone and/or granite facing on horizontal and vertical (ii) Base Park Maintenance. Subject to the City’s annual appropriation and surfaces of seating areas, granite stone cladding on all exterior vertical garage surfaces MEMI’s payment of the MEMI Funds, the City shall maintain the visible within the Park Lots and along City streets, brushed aluminum railings along Park hardscape and landscape within the Park Lots (once developed), Lot perimeters, brushed aluminum pergolas, elevator headhouses with glass features including the Base Park, consistent with the City’s maintenance of Smale comparable to other prior phases of Smale Riverfront Park as generally described in the Riverfront Park and will not make any material changes to the hardscape Development Agreement. and landscape, including the Base Park, constructed in accordance with the designs approved under the Development Agreement that would 2. TERM. negatively impact MEMI’s operation of the Outdoor Venue or MEMI’s (A) The term of this Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date (the ability to hold MEMI Events on the Eastern Park Lot. “Commencement Date”) and shall terminate on the earlier of (i) the date that is (iii) Capital Repair. Subject to MEMI’s payment of the MEMI Funds, the 40 years after the Effective Date (the “40-Year Termination Date”) or (ii) the terms and conditions of which are set forth in Section 3(D) herein, and first date after the Commencement Date that (a) MEMI, or its permitted the City’s annual appropriation, the City through Parks, shall be successors or assigns hereunder, is not the fee simple owner of the Indoor Venue responsible for performing routine capital repair and replacement of the Lot or, (b) at any time after the construction of the Indoor Venue is completed, if Park Lots, as each is developed. MEMI or its permitted successors or assigns hereunder, remains the fee simple owner of the Indoor Venue Lot but there is not a commercially useable indoor (iv) Restoration Following Performance Event. MEMI will restore the entertainment venue comparable to the Indoor Venue in existence on the Indoor Eastern Park Lot no later than 24 hours after each MEMI Event Day and Venue Lot, unless sooner terminated by a mutual written agreement among the Other Event Day to its pre-event physical condition, less normal wear and (the “ parties hereto or as otherwise expressly provided for herein Expiration tear, provided that in the event of damage to the Eastern Park Lot that ”) (the “ ”) Date Term . cannot be repaired in 24 hours, MEMI shall provide Parks notice of such damage and diligently repair such damage no later than 30 days after the (B) Notwithstanding any language to the contrary in this Agreement, the rights and damage was incurred. In the event such damage is not repaired by MEMI, obligations of the City and MEMI pursuant to this Agreement are subject to the then Parks may invoice MEMI for the costs to restore the Eastern Park satisfaction of the General Contingencies specified in Section 3.1.1 of the Lot to its pre-event condition (such as costs related to grease spills, Development Agreement. confetti, tape, stickers, zip ties, chalk drawings, staking and/or driving in 3. DUTIES AND OBLIGATIONS. the lawn). Parks will restore the Eastern Park Lot no later than 24 hours after each City Sponsored Event Day to its pre-event physical condition, (A) Maintenance and Repairs. less normal wear and tear, provided that in the event of damage to the Eastern Park Lot that cannot be repaired in 24 hours, City shall provide

{00332247-2} 5 {00332247-2} 6 Park Operation and Management Agreement (The Banks Lot 23) Park Operation and Management Agreement (The Banks Lot 23) 9813868.9 9813868.9

79 Attachment A

MEMI notice of such damage and diligently repair such damage no later (d) Limit on MEMI Event Days. MEMI and Parks shall mutually than 30 days after the damage was incurred. agree in writing on a cap on the number of MEMI Event Days (in addition to the Bengals Team Use Days) during the Primary (v) Maintenance of Semi-Permanent Stage. MEMI is solely responsible Season, or some other limitation (by way of example only and not for any and all maintenance and maintenance costs related to the semi- by limitation, at least one Saturday each month shall be free from permanent stage. any MEMI Events), subject to mutual waiver by MEMI and Parks (the “Number of MEMI Event Days”). As of the Effective Date, (B) Event Management. Except with respect to certain City Sponsored Event Days, the parties agree that at least one weekend day (specifically, either MEMI shall be the exclusive manager and operator of any and all entertainment Saturday or Sunday) each calendar month shall be free from any and programming, including Performance Events, within the Eastern Park Lot. MEMI Event Days and Other Event Days, unless the parties agree Management and operation of the Eastern Park Lot on MEMI Event Days shall be in writing to waive such requirement for a particular month from at the sole cost and expense of MEMI. The Public Parties shall have no liability time to time, in which case such open weekend day shall be for any expenses or any losses incurred in connection with the management and reallocated to a future month, no later than six (6) months from operation of any MEMI Event Days or Other Event Days. The City shall such original month, as determined by the parties in writing. coordinate the scheduling of all City Sponsored Event Days with MEMI. At the City’s option, the City may elect to manage, produce and operate the Eastern Park (e) Management Fee. Except for as described in Section 3(C)(ii) Lot on all City Sponsored Event Days. below, no other management fee will be charged by MEMI to the City for such Performance Event management services with (C) Performance Events. respect to the Eastern Park Lot.

(i) Management of Programming, Production and Scheduling. Except (f) Parks’ Use of Indoor Venue. MEMI, or its affiliate, shall allow with respect to certain City Sponsored Event Days and subject to the Parks to use the Indoor Venue rent-free, with only reimbursement calendaring provisions described below, MEMI shall be the exclusive to MEMI, or its affiliate, for MEMI’s, or its affiliate’s, expenses, management entity for all Performance Events on the Eastern Park Lot. for up to four times in any calendar year with such dates subject to MEMI will schedule with the City, through Parks, Performance Events at MEMI’s, or its affiliate’s, approval; provided that such use by the Eastern Park Lot subject to the following terms and conditions: Parks shall be non-assignable, for Parks’ purposes only, and shall not be competitive with MEMI’s, or its affiliate’s, business. On (a) MEMI Event Days Primary Season. May 1 through October 1 the days that there are no events in the Eastern Park Lot, the of each calendar year is the primary season for the scheduling of Outdoor Venue, including the semi-permanent stage, will be open MEMI Event Days (the “ ”). Notwithstanding the Primary Season to the public as part of the public park on the Eastern Park Lot and foregoing, MEMI Event Days may be scheduled and held on dates MEMI will keep the Outdoor Venue reasonably free from not during the Primary Season. equipment and other items on such days.

(b) Parks “First Hold”. Parks may provide MEMI notice of any (g) Annual Calendar and Management Review. No later than desired dates for its activities as far in advance as desired; such October 31 each year following the Effective Date, MEMI and dates shall be given “first hold” status by MEMI, with the Parks will meet to discuss (i) the scheduling of events over the understanding that until confirmed by Parks, “hold dates” may be prior year, (ii) MEMI’s performance as manager pursuant to this rescheduled and potentially replaced by more financially lucrative Agreement, and (iii) potential improvements to each of the MEMI Event Days, after discussion and agreement of Parks, which foregoing for the upcoming year. approval will be not unreasonably withheld or delayed. (h) Rose Garden Events. MEMI acknowledges that Parks, through a . MEMI shall notify Parks of any “hold date” (c) MEMI “First Hold” third-party, holds outdoor wedding ceremonies in the Rose Garden for any potential MEMI Event Day not less than 100 days in at Smale Riverfront Park (the “Rose Garden Events”). MEMI advance of such date; if such date is not confirmed as the chosen acknowledges and agrees that if a MEMI Event and a Rose Garden date within 100 days in advance, such MEMI Event Day shall be Event occur on the same day, MEMI will collaborate with Parks released from a “first hold” status. and make reasonable efforts to minimize the sound emitting from

{00332247-2} 7 {00332247-2} 8 Park Operation and Management Agreement (The Banks Lot 23) Park Operation and Management Agreement (The Banks Lot 23) 9813868.9 9813868.9

80 Attachment A

the Eastern Park Lot from sound checks and set up of a Standard Rates are inconsistent with the City’s standard rates, the performance during a Rose Garden Event. Standard Rates shall supersede and control.

(i) Timing of Events. Subject to all Legal Requirements, MEMI and (d) Reconciliation of Net Revenues. MEMI and City, through Parks, the City agree that all amplified sound occurring in the Eastern shall make reasonable efforts to reconcile and settle the sharing of Park Lot pursuant to this Agreement will end no later than 11:00 the Net Revenues for each applicable Performance Event or other PM, provided that in certain circumstances, upon receipt of the programmed event, including making any necessary payments to necessary City approvals, amplified sound will end no later than the other party in connection with such settlement and providing midnight. The City and Park Board acknowledge and agree that supporting documentation necessary to verify the settlement and MEMI’s use of the Eastern Park Lot may extend beyond the Park the Net Revenues for such period (collectively, the “Settlement”), Board’s normal hours of operation of the Eastern Park Lot. within ten (10) business days following such event; provided, however, that such Settlement shall be completed at a minimum (ii) Net Revenues. MEMI and the City shall share Net Revenues from the within thirty (30) calendar days following such event. MEMI and operation and management of the Eastern Park Lot as follows: the City shall provide each other with access to all books and records necessary to verify Net Revenues and shall submit annual (a) MEMI Event Days. For all MEMI Event Days, which shall reports documenting all Net Revenues (including those not include the Bengals Team Use Days, Net Revenues shall be split as captured in the monthly reports) no later than July 30 each year follows: 90% to MEMI and 10% to the City. MEMI shall have the regarding the same. right to share its portion of such Net Revenues with respect to the Bengals Team Use Days with the Cincinnati Bengals. MEMI will (D) Operations and Capital Replacement Funds. absorb any Net Loss from a MEMI Event Day and the City shall not be at risk for any Net Loss. (i) Initial MEMI Funds. At the beginning of each of the first five fiscal years of the Term of this Agreement (with the first fiscal year beginning (b) City Sponsored Event Days. For all City Sponsored Event Days on the Effective Date and ending on the first June 30th after the Effective that MEMI manages and operates, Net Revenues shall be split as Date and the first five fiscal years of this Agreement being the “Initial follows: 10% to MEMI and 90% to the City; provided, however, if Term”), MEMI agrees to pay $132,565 (such amount is equal to the (1) MEMI is not required to provide any staffing or other support average annual capital and operation expenses expected to be incurred by in connection with a City Sponsored Event Day, City shall retain Parks for the Eastern Park Lot during the Initial Term) to the City (the 100% of the Net Revenues or (2) a City Sponsored Event Day is a “Initial MEMI Funds”). Of the Initial MEMI Funds, $43,838 is equal to fundraising event for Parks, then MEMI will only be reimbursed the projected average annual capital and infrastructure replacement its actual costs and will not receive 10% of the Net Revenues from reserve and capital repair expenses (the “Initial Capital Funds”) and such City Sponsored Event Day. The City will absorb any Net $88,727 is equal to the projected average annual operating expenses (the Loss from a City Sponsored Event Day, and MEMI shall not be at “Initial Operating Expense Funds”) for the Initial Term. At the end of risk for any Net Loss. the third fiscal year of the Initial Term, if the Initial Operating Expense Funds paid by MEMI for such three fiscal year period exceed the actual (c) Other Event Days. For all Other Event Days and all other operating expenses incurred by Parks for the Eastern Park Lot during Performance Events or other programmed events where MEMI such period, then MEMI shall be refunded the difference between the permits a third party to produce such event, Net Revenues shall be Initial Operating Expense Funds paid and such actual operating expenses split as follows: 50% to MEMI and 50% to City. MEMI and City under the true-up calculation and payment provided in Section 3(D)(v). shall mutually develop and agree to standard rates for such At the end of the Initial Term, if the Initial Operating Expense Funds paid programming based on the nature of the third party (e.g., for-profit by MEMI for the fourth and fifth fiscal years of the Initial Term exceed or non-profit) and the event, which may be updated from time to the actual operating expenses incurred by Parks for the Eastern Park Lot time by mutual written agreement between the parties (the during such period, then MEMI shall be refunded the difference between “Standard Rates”). The parties will be equitable in applying such the Initial Operating Expense Funds paid and such actual operating rates and will comply with all Legal Requirements. In the event the expenses under the true-up calculation and payment provided in Section 3(D)(v). At the end of the Initial Term, if the Initial Capital Funds paid

{00332247-2} 9 {00332247-2} 10 Park Operation and Management Agreement (The Banks Lot 23) Park Operation and Management Agreement (The Banks Lot 23) 9813868.9 9813868.9

81 Attachment A

during the Initial Term exceed the actual capital repairs and capital capital expenses exceed the actual capital repairs and capital and reserve amounts for the Eastern Park Lot over the Initial Term, then infrastructure replacement reserve amounts necessary for the Eastern MEMI shall be refunded the difference between the Initial Capital Funds Park Lot, then MEMI shall be refunded the difference in accordance with paid for the Initial Term and the actual repairs incurred and the necessary the true-up calculation and payment provided in Section 3(D)(v). The capital and infrastructure replacement reserve, in accordance with the Initial MEMI Funds and the Subsequent MEMI Funds shall each be true-up calculation and payment provided in Section 3(D)(v). referred to herein as the “the MEMI Funds”.

(ii) Subsequent MEMI Funds. Immediately prior to each subsequent five- (iii) Payment of the MEMI Funds. MEMI agrees to submit the MEMI year period during the term of this Agreement (the “Determination Funds to the City for the purpose of funding Parks’ operating and capital Date”), Parks will prepare a new projection of the annual capital expenses (including a capital and infrastructure replacement reserve) with expenses, including capital and infrastructure replacement reserve, and respect to the Eastern Park Lot no later than July 1 each year for the fiscal operating expenses expected to be incurred by Parks for the Eastern Park year commencing on such July 1, which shall be allocated solely for the Lot for each fiscal year during such five-year period (each, the capital repair and maintenance of the Eastern Park Lot including but not “Projected Amount”, and collectively, the “Projected Amounts”). The limited to, the natural and artificial turf and those elements necessary to Projected Amounts shall be based upon Parks’ actual capital and sustain the production of Performance Events on the Eastern Park Lot. operating expenses for the prior five-year period (including a revised The MEMI Funds for the first year of operations of the Eastern Park Lot projected capital and infrastructure replacement reserve based upon any shall be prorated based upon the Completion of construction of each Park revisions to the useful life of the improvements to the Eastern Park Lot) Lot and the partial year. The MEMI Funds for the last year of operations for the Eastern Park Lot; provided, however, that each Projected Amount of the Eastern Park Lot shall be prorated based upon the partial year. shall be capped at the Projected Amount for the immediately preceding MEMI and the City, through Parks, shall collaborate with each other fiscal year increased by the percentage increase in the Consumer Price regarding the prioritization and allocation of the MEMI Funds for capital Index for the 12-month period immediately prior to the Determination repair and maintenance of the Eastern Park Lot. Date, with MEMI and City agreeing that the Projected Amount for fiscal- year five of this Agreement shall be $139,191 (the “Base Amount”), (iv) Change in Use of Eastern Park Lot. which shall serve as the initial Projected Amount in applying this provision. For purposes of clarity and avoidance of doubt, the Projected (a) Change in Law or Policy. Notwithstanding anything to the Amount for the first fiscal year following the initial Determination Date contrary in this Section 3(D), to the extent any change in Legal shall be capped at the Base Amount increased by the percentage increase Requirements or government policy materially limits or impairs in the Consumer Price Index for the 12-month period immediately prior MEMI’s use of the Eastern Park Lot as permitted under this to the Determination Date (the “Initial Projected Amount”) and the Agreement, by way of an example, an ordinance limiting the immediately subsequent Projected Amount shall be the Initial Projected scheduling, timing, or amount of Performance Events at the Amount increased by the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Outdoor Venue, MEMI’s liability for capital and operating Index for the 12-month period immediately prior to the Determination expenses incurred by the City for the Eastern Park Lot under this Date. The Projected Amounts shall be subject to MEMI’s review and Section 3(D) shall be reduced on a pro-rata basis taking into approval, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. account MEMI’s reduced ability to use the Eastern Park Lot in At the beginning of each fiscal year of such subsequent five-year period, proportion to the Number of MEMI Event Days, including any MEMI agrees to pay to the City the Projected Amount applicable to such additional events agreed to by Parks and MEMI. fiscal year for such period (the “Subsequent MEMI Funds”). Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the portion of the Subsequent MEMI (b) Eastern Park Lot Unavailable for Use. Notwithstanding Funds attributable to operating expenses paid for a given fiscal year anything to the contrary in this Section 3(D), in the event the exceed the actual operating expenses incurred by Parks for the Eastern Eastern Park Lot is unavailable for any period of time and that Park Lot during such year, then MEMI shall be refunded the difference unavailability prevents MEMI from holding a MEMI Event, except between the Subsequent MEMI Funds attributable to operating expenses as otherwise permitted in this Agreement, MEMI shall not be paid and such actual operating expenses under the true-up calculation and liable under this Section 3(D) for capital and operating expenses payment provided in Section 3(D)(v). At the end of each five fiscal year incurred by the City for the Eastern Park Lot during such period ’s liability under this term, if Subsequent MEMI Funds paid during such five year period for and MEMI Section 3(D) shall be reduced

{00332247-2} 11 {00332247-2} 12 Park Operation and Management Agreement (The Banks Lot 23) Park Operation and Management Agreement (The Banks Lot 23) 9813868.9 9813868.9

82 Attachment A

proportionally, provided, however, in the event that the Improvements, as revised because of any changes to the projected unavailability of the Eastern Park Lot is caused by an act or life-cycle of the Capital Improvements. Within thirty (30) days omission of MEMI, MEMI is still liable for all payments under this after each applicable Determination Date, MEMI and the City shall Section 3(D). calculate, reconcile, and settle the difference between the amount of the MEMI Funds allocated to the Capital Improvements (v) True-Up; Right to Audit and Inspection. (“Capital Payments”), including (x) if the MEMI Funds received with respect to Capital Improvement repairs exceeded the actual (a) Operating Expenses True-Up. Within thirty (30) days after (1) cost of such repairs (the “Repair True-Up”) and (y) any revisions the completion of the third fiscal year of the Initial Term, (2) the to the replacement reserve for the Capital Improvement because of completion of the Initial Term, and (3) the completion of each changes to the projected life-cycle of the Capital Improvements; fiscal year thereafter each ending on June 30th or the termination provided that, if the life-cycle of a Capital Improvement is less of this Agreement, as the case may be, the City and MEMI shall than the expected life-cycle of such Capital Improvement at the take the followings actions: (i) the City shall provide MEMI with a time of installation, MEMI shall be liable to the City for an amount detailed reconciliation report setting forth its actual operating proportional to the reduced life-cycle of such Capital expenses incurred with respect to the Eastern Park Lot for such Improvement, based upon the portion of the Capital Payments fiscal year(s) (and in the event that the City’s records of operating attributable to such Capital Improvement, or, if the life-cycle of the expenses relate to all of Smale Riverfront Park, such amounts will a Capital Improvement is greater than the expected life-cycle of be prorated based upon the amount of square footage of the such Capital Improvement at the time of installation, the City shall Eastern Park Lot relative to all of Smale Riverfront Park); and (ii) refund to MEMI for the portion of the Capital Payment attributable MEMI and the City shall cooperate in good faith to calculate and to the proportional amount of the increased life-cycle of such reconcile the difference, if any, between (x) the amount of the Capital Improvement (the “Reserve True-Up”). The City, through MEMI Funds actually paid by MEMI to the City for operating Parks, will pay promptly (within ten (10) business days following expenses for such fiscal year(s) (“Operating Amounts Paid”); the Determination Date) to MEMI an amount equal to the Repair and (y) the City’s actual operating expenses with respect to the True-Up, if any is owing for such period. The party liable to the Eastern Park Lot for such fiscal year(s) (“Operating Amounts other party for the Reserve True-Up shall promptly pay to the Owed”) (the “Operating True-Up Amount”). In the event the owed party (within ten (10) business days following the Operating Amounts Paid exceed the Operating Amounts Owed, the Determination Date) an amount equal to the Reserve True-Up in City, through Parks, shall promptly pay (within ten (10) business immediately available funds. In the event that the City, through days following each mutual determination of the Operating True- Parks, does not have sufficient MEMI Funds on hand at the time of Up Amount) an amount equal to the Operating True-Up Amount to installation of the replacement Capital Improvement to pay for MEMI in immediately available funds (the “Operating Annual such replacement, then the City, through Parks, may request that True-Up”), subject to Section 3(D)(v)(b) below. MEMI pay within 10 business days after the request, the portion of the future Reserve True-Up necessary to replace the Capital (b) Capital Repairs and Reserve True-Up. Notwithstanding Section Improvement and such Reserve True-Up will be correspondingly 3(D)(v)(a), the Operating Annual True-Up shall not include any reduced. Notwithstanding the foregoing, while MEMI agrees to be amount paid by the City, through Parks, related to repairs and liable for actual capital costs associated with a reduced life-cycle in replacement reserves for the capital and infrastructure the Capital Improvements, MEMI shall not be liable for the City’s (collectively, the “ improvements in the Eastern Park Lot Capital actual capital repair costs for the Capital Improvements that exceed ”). On each Determination Date, Improvements MEMI and the the City’s estimated repair costs for the Capital Improvements for City shall calculate, reconcile and settle the difference between (1) the Eastern Park Lot as provided in each of its pro-forma the repairs of the Capital Improvements projected to be paid by the statements. In the event that this Agreement is terminated in the City, through Parks, for such five year term and the projected middle of a life-cycle of the Capital Improvements, within thirty replacement reserve for the Capital Improvements and (2) the (30) days after such termination, the City and MEMI shall apply actual costs of the repairs of the Capital Improvements for such this provision in the same manner taking into account such reduced five year term paid by the City, through Parks, for the Eastern Park period. Lot and the projected replacement reserve for the Capital

{00332247-2} 13 {00332247-2} 14 Park Operation and Management Agreement (The Banks Lot 23) Park Operation and Management Agreement (The Banks Lot 23) 9813868.9 9813868.9

83 Attachment A

(c) Right to Audit and Inspection. MEMI maintains the right to City with copies of fully-executed contracts with third parties so that the City can inspect and audit the City’s books, records, and receipts pertaining determine whether the requirements set forth herein have been satisfied. At the to the Eastern Park Lot, including the City’s capital and operating end of the Term, MEMI shall, upon the City’s request, assign to the City all of expenses thereof. Upon MEMI’s reasonable request, the City shall MEMI’s interests under such contracts or any one or more of them as designated provide MEMI with access to its books and records and copies of by the City. If the City elects not to assume any one or more of such contracts, receipts necessary for MEMI to exercise its rights of audit and MEMI shall be solely responsible for terminating such contracts, including inspection under this provision, provided that in no event is the without limitation paying any and all termination fees or penalties associated City obligated to retain such records beyond the applicable City therewith. Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, MEMI record retention policy. shall not have the authority to enter into any contract in the name of, or to exercise any right or make any decision on behalf of, the City. (E) Liquor Permit and Concessions. MEMI shall apply for, or engage a third party to apply for, a liquor permit for alcohol service and consumption within the area (I) Reporting Requirements. MEMI shall collect, maintain, and furnish to the City of the Outdoor Venue on MEMI Event Days, City Sponsored Event Days, Other from time to time such other accounting, financial, business, administrative, Event Days, and other days. MEMI, or its affiliate or agent, will operate all operational and other reports, records, statements and information as may be alcohol and food concessions on the Eastern Park Lot for such days. MEMI shall requested by the City pertaining to MEMI or the Eastern Park Lot, including ensure that such alcohol service and concessions are managed in accordance with without limitation bank statements, loan statements, income tax returns, and such all Legal Requirements. other reports and information as may be required for compliance with programs and projects funded by the City, Hamilton County, the State of Ohio, or any (F) Admissions Taxes. MEMI shall collect and remit to the City Treasurer the federal agency (all reports, records, statements and other information furnished by Admissions Tax. For the avoidance of doubt, nothing in this Agreement shall be MEMI under this Agreement being referred to herein collectively as “Records deemed to limit MEMI’s obligations or the City’s rights pursuant to Cincinnati and Reports”). All Records and Reports compiled by MEMI and furnished to Municipal Code Chapter 309. the City shall be in such reasonable form as the City may from time to time require. During the Term, MEMI shall permit the City and its designees and (G) Central Riverfront Park Assessment. MEMI shall not be required to pay the auditors to have access to and to inspect and audit MEMI’s Records and Reports. Assessment (as defined in the General Declaration as such declaration is defined If the City’s inspection or audit reveals a material discrepancy with information in the Development Agreement). MEMI or its affiliate and the County (pursuant previously provided by MEMI, MEMI shall reimburse the City for the City’s to the Development Agreement) shall collect the signatures of all Banks Property reasonable out-of-pocket costs associated with such inspection or audit, and the Owners (as defined in the General Declaration) to the necessary amendment of parties shall work cooperatively to resolve such discrepancy. the General Declaration to effectuate such change. Until such time that the General Declaration is amended in accordance with this Section 3(G), MEMI (J) Reporting of Accidents and Other Significant Occurrences. MEMI shall keep acknowledges and agrees that it will pay the Assessment (as defined in the the City informed as soon as practicable upon discovery of all reported accidents General Declaration). and other significant, unanticipated occurrences at or otherwise affecting the Eastern Park Lot that involve public health or safety issues or that could lead to (H) Third Party Contracts. MEMI shall have authority to enter into contracts with negative publicity. MEMI shall notify Parks as soon as discovered but no later third parties for all labor, materials and services required in connection with the than 24 hours of robberies, assaults and other criminal activity. For all incidents management and operation of MEMI Event Days, Other Event Days and any City for which a police report is filed, MEMI shall promptly obtain a copy of the Sponsored Event Days that Parks engages MEMI to manage. Each such contract police report and promptly provide a copy of it to Parks. entered into by MEMI shall (i) be either in the name of MEMI or its designee as agent for MEMI, (ii) require all contractors to provide evidence of sufficient (K) City’s Right to Inspect. The City shall have the right to inspect the Eastern Park insurance (e.g., worker’s compensation, employer’s liability covering all persons Lot from time to time for any proper purpose. performing work, and commercial general liability insurance in an amount not less than Three Million Dollars ($3,000,000) per occurrence, combined single (L) Name of Park. MEMI shall refer to the Eastern Park Lot by such name as limit, or such other requirements as may be specified by the City, naming the City designated by the City through Parks in writing; provided, however, that if the as an additional insured), (iii) provide that such contract shall be assignable to the City has not designated a name for the Eastern Park Lot in writing, MEMI may City, and (iv) provide that all contractors are subject to the applicable terms and refer to the Eastern Park Lot as it may reasonably determine, from time to time. conditions of this Agreement. Upon the City’s request, MEMI shall provide the

{00332247-2} 15 {00332247-2} 16 Park Operation and Management Agreement (The Banks Lot 23) Park Operation and Management Agreement (The Banks Lot 23) 9813868.9 9813868.9

84 Attachment A

(M) No Interference with Parking Facilities. In performing its obligations under appropriate provided that all such signs are professionally prepared, comply with this Agreement, MEMI shall take reasonable measures not to interfere with the all Legal Requirements, and comply with all guidelines established by Parks for operation of the parking facilities within the Lot 23 Ground Lot. such signage. MEMI shall, at its expense, keep all signs in good condition and repair. (N) Southern Park Lot. MEMI and the City may elect to add the Southern Park Lot to this Agreement upon its development and upon mutually agreeable terms and (C) No Liens. If any mechanics’ lien or other similar lien is filed against the Eastern conditions. Park Lot as a result of labor or material furnished at MEMI’s request, MEMI shall cause the lien to be released or bonded off within thirty (30) days following the (O) Real Property Taxes. As of the Effective Date, the parties do not anticipate any filing of such lien. real property taxes accruing on the Eastern Park Lot. In the event that the Eastern Park Lot becomes taxable under applicable law, the parties will collaborate to 5. INSURANCE; INDEMNITY. ensure any real property taxes accruing on the Eastern Park Lot are shared equitably between the parties. (A) Insurance. Throughout the Term, MEMI shall maintain the following insurance:

(P) Security. MEMI shall work with the City and other applicable parties (including (i) special peril (formerly known as “all-risk”) full replacement cost the County and third-party event permittees) to develop reasonable and insurance on the Park Improvements, naming the City and MEMI as their appropriate protocols and requirements for the provision of security personnel for interests may appear; MEMI Event Days and Other Event Days, such protocols and requirements to ultimately be determined by MEMI in its reasonable but sole discretion, and (ii) property insurance on any and all personal property of MEMI from time update such protocols and requirements from time to time, as necessary. MEMI to time located at the Eastern Park Lot in the amount of the MI shall oversee implementation of and compliance with such security protocols and replacement cost thereof; requirements. Notwithstanding the foregoing, permit holders shall be responsible for providing the security required by taking out such permit. (iii) Commercial General Liability insurance covering claims for bodily injury, personal injury or death, and property damage occurring at the 4. ALTERATIONS; SIGNS; NO LIENS. Eastern Park Lot in an amount not less than Three Million Dollars ($3,000,000) per occurrence, combined single limit, or such additional (A) Alterations. During the Term, MEMI shall not make any material alterations, amounts as the City or its insurance advisor may determine from time to additions or other changes to the Eastern Park Lot. MEMI shall have the right to time to be commercially reasonable, naming the City as an additional make temporary minor and cosmetic-type alterations to the Eastern Park Lot insured; and without having to obtain the City’s prior consent, provided that such modification does not permanently alter the Eastern Park Lot (in which case, the City’s prior (iv) workers compensation insurance as required by law. written consent is required). Notwithstanding the foregoing, MEMI may make ’s insurance policies shall (i) be written in standard alterations to the semi-permanent stage without having to obtain the City’s prior (B) Policy Requirements. MEMI consent, so long as MEMI does not change the location of the stage, the footprint form by insurance companies authorized to do business in Ohio and having an of the stage, or replace the stage (in each such case, the City’s prior written A.M. Best rating of A VII or better, (ii) provide that they may not be canceled or consent is required). All alterations made by MEMI shall be made in a good and modified without at least thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City, and (iii) workmanlike manner, in compliance with all Legal Requirements, shall not be primary and non-contributory with respect to insurance maintained by the City. diminish the value of the Eastern Park Lot, and shall be consistent with the Prior to the Commencement Date, and annually thereafter, MEMI shall provide quality, design, functionality, and aesthetic appeal of the Eastern Park Lot. If the City with a certificate of insurance evidencing the insurance required to be MEMI installs any trade fixtures, ordinary fixtures or equipment that serve the maintained by MEMI hereunder. Eastern Park Lot, not including the semi-permanent stage, MEMI shall not (C) Waiver of Subrogation. MEMI hereby waives all claims and rights of recovery, thereafter remove the same and shall surrender the same to the City at the end of and on behalf of MEMI’s insurers, rights of subrogation, against the City, its the Term. employees, agents, contractors and subcontractors with respect to any and all (B) Signs. MEMI shall be permitted to erect such directional, informational, damage to or loss of property that is covered or that would ordinarily be covered advertising and other signs within the Eastern Park Lot as MEMI deems by the insurance required under this Agreement to be maintained by MEMI, even if such loss or damage arises from the negligence of the City, its employees,

{00332247-2} 17 {00332247-2} 18 Park Operation and Management Agreement (The Banks Lot 23) Park Operation and Management Agreement (The Banks Lot 23) 9813868.9 9813868.9

85 Attachment A

agents, contractors or subcontractors; it being the agreement of the parties that Party. The foregoing notwithstanding, if the failure creates a dangerous MEMI shall at all times protect itself against such loss or damage by maintaining condition or otherwise constitutes an emergency as determined by the adequate insurance. MEMI shall cause its property insurance policies to include a Non-Defaulting Party, an event of default shall be deemed to have waiver of subrogation provision consistent with the foregoing waiver. occurred if the Defaulting Party fails to take corrective action immediately upon discovering such dangerous condition or emergency. (D) Indemnity. (ii) The commencement of levy, execution or attachment proceedings against The City assumes no responsibility for any acts, errors or omissions of MEMI or MEMI, any principal (which shall be defined as any individual or entity any employee, agent, representative or any other person acting or purporting to having an ownership interest in MEMI of more than 25%) or partner of act for or on behalf of MEMI. MEMI shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, MEMI, or any of the assets of MEMI, or the application for or its employees, agents, contractors and subcontractors (“City Indemnified appointment of a liquidator, receiver, custodian, sequester, conservator, Parties”) harmless from and against all costs (including without limitation legal trustee, or other similar judicial officer; or the insolvency in the costs), losses, claims, demands, actions, suits, judgments, claims for relief, bankruptcy or equity sense, of MEMI or any principal or partner of damages and liability suffered or incurred by or asserted against the City MEMI; or the assignment for the benefit of creditors, or the admission in. Indemnified Parties or any one or more of them as a result of or arising from the writing of an inability to pay debts generally as they become due, or the acts of MEMI, its agents, employees, licensees, invitees, contractors, ordering of the winding-up or liquidation of the affairs of MEMI or any subcontractors or anyone else acting at the request of MEMI in connection with principal or partner of MEMI; or the commencement of a case by or MEMI’s activities at or with respect to the Eastern Park Lot or in connection against MEMI or any principal or partner of MEMI under any with any breach by MEMI under this Agreement; excluding, however, any of the insolvency, bankruptcy, creditor adjustment, debtor rehabilitation or foregoing caused by the negligence or willful misconduct of the City similar laws, state or federal, or the determination by any of them to Indemnified Parties. request relief under any insolvency, bankruptcy, creditor adjustment, debtor rehabilitation or similar proceeding, state or federal, including, 6. CASUALTY; EMINENT DOMAIN. If the Park Improvements are damaged or without limitation, the consent by any of them to the appointment of or destroyed by fire or other casualty, the parties’ respective rights and obligations with taking possession by a receiver, liquidator, assignee, trustee, custodian, respect to the restoration of the Park Improvements shall be as set forth in the sequester or similar official for it or for any of its respective property or Development Agreement and/or herein. If any portion of the Eastern Park Lot is taken by assets (unless, in the case of involuntary proceedings, the same shall be exercise of eminent domain (federal, state or local) that would material frustrate the dismissed within ninety (90) days after institution). purposes of this Agreement or otherwise impair any party from substantially fulfilling its duties or obligations hereunder, this Agreement shall terminate immediately. (B) Remedies. Upon the occurrence of an event of default that continues beyond the applicable notice and cure period (if any) provided for in Section 7(A) above, the 7. DEFAULT; REMEDIES. Non-Defaulting Party shall be entitled to (i) terminate this Agreement by giving the Defaulting Party written notice thereof, (ii) take such actions in the way of (A) Default. Each of the following shall constitute an event of default under this “self-help” as the Non-Defaulting Party determines to be reasonably necessary or Agreement: appropriate to cure or lessen the impact of such default, all at the expense of the Defaulting Party, and (iii) exercise any and all other rights and remedies under (i) If MEMI or the City fails to perform or observe any of the covenants, this Agreement or available at law or in equity, including without limitation terms or conditions contained in this Agreement (the “Defaulting pursuing an action for specific performance; all such rights and remedies being Party”), and such failure continues for longer than thirty (30) days after cumulative. The Defaulting Party shall be liable for all costs and damages, the Defaulting Party receives written notice thereof from the other party including without limitation reasonable attorney’s fees, suffered or incurred by (the “Non-Defaulting Party”); provided, however, that if such failure is the Non-Defaulting Party as a result of a default of the Defaulting Party under this not reasonably susceptible of being cured within such thirty (30) day Agreement or the Non-Defaulting Party’s enforcement or termination of this period, an event of default shall not be deemed to have occurred if the Agreement. The Defaulting Party shall pay all such costs and damages within Defaulting Party commences to cure such failure within such thirty (30) thirty (30) days after receiving documentation from the Non-Defaulting Party of day period and thereafter diligently pursues such cure to completion and, the amount due. The failure of the Non-Defaulting Party to insist upon the strict in fact, cures such failure within ninety (90) days after the Defaulting performance of any covenant or duty or to pursue any remedy under this Party receives written notice of the default from the Non-Defaulting Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of the breach of such covenant or of such

{00332247-2} 19 {00332247-2} 20 Park Operation and Management Agreement (The Banks Lot 23) Park Operation and Management Agreement (The Banks Lot 23) 9813868.9 9813868.9

86 Attachment A

remedy. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall limit or prejudice the right of notice of acceptance executed by MEMI; provided, however, that MEMI a party to prove for and obtain as damages incident to a termination of this is not required to accept any non-financial terms or conditions contained Agreement in any bankruptcy, reorganization or other court proceedings, the in any Material Terms that cannot be fulfilled by MEMI as readily as by maximum amount allowed by any statute or rule of law in effect when such any other person (e.g., an agreement conditioned upon the services of a damages are to be proved. particular individual or the supply of a product exclusively under the control of such third-party offeror). 8. RIGHTS OF FIRST NEGOTIATION AND LAST REFUSAL. (ii) If, by the expiration of the Exercise Period, MEMI has not accepted the (A) Rights of First Negotiation. ROLR Offer, and provided that the City has complied with all of the provisions of this Section, at any time following the expiration of the (i) In the event this Agreement terminates pursuant to Section 2(A)(i), Exercise Period, the City may consummate the Transaction with the third during the period beginning on the 40-Year Termination Date and ending party identified in the applicable Offer Notice, on material terms that are on the date five (5) years immediately after the 40-Year Termination the same or more favorable to the City as the Material Terms set forth in Date (the "ROFN Period"), the City and/or Parks shall not, directly or the Offer Notice, as determined by the City in its sole discretion. If the indirectly, enter into negotiations or consummate any transaction relating City does not ultimately consummate the Transaction contained in the to the sale, lease, transfer, disposition, or transaction of similar nature or Offer Notice, the terms and conditions of this Section will apply to any the management and/or operation of the Eastern Park Lot (a future proposed Transaction and the City shall not enter into any “Transaction”) with any person other than MEMI except in compliance Transaction with any third party during the ROLR Period without with the terms and conditions of this Section 8. affording MEMI the right of last refusal on the terms and conditions of this Section. (ii) During the ROFN Period, prior to entering into any negotiations relating to a Transaction with any third party, the City shall engage in exclusive (iii) For the avoidance of doubt, the terms and conditions of this Section 8(B) good faith negotiations with MEMI to reach agreement on the terms and apply to each Third-Party Offer received by the City during the ROLR conditions for such Transaction for a period of one hundred and twenty Period. (120) days ("ROFN Rights") (the “Negotiation Period”). If the parties are unable to reach agreement by the end of the Negotiation Period, then 9. ASSIGNMENT. MEMI acknowledges that the City is entering into this Agreement the City may enter into negotiations with any third party relating to a because of the City’s confidence that MEMI has the financial backing, business Transaction. For the avoidance of doubt, MEMI’s ROFN rights are null experience and community support that are necessary to properly operate the Eastern and void upon the end of the first and only Negotiation Period. Park Lot in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement throughout the entire Term. MEMI acknowledges that the City shall not be expected to consent to a proposed (B) Right of Last Refusal (Matching Right). If, during the ROFN Period and after assignment by MEMI of its interests under this Agreement to any person or entity in satisfying the requirements set forth under Section 8(A)(ii), the City receives a whom the City does not have similar confidence. Any attempt by MEMI to assign or bona fide written offer for a Transaction with a third party that the City desires to otherwise transfer its interests under this Agreement to a third party without the City’s accept (each, a "Third-Party Offer"), the City shall no later than ten (10) prior written consent shall be null and void and shall, at the option of the City, constitute business days following receipt of the Third-Party Offer, notify MEMI in writing a default of MEMI under this Agreement. The foregoing notwithstanding, if MEMI (the "Offer Notice") of the identity of all proposed parties to such Transaction assigns its interests under this Agreement (i) to an affiliate or (ii) to a surviving entity in a and the material financial and other terms and conditions of such Third-Party merger involving MEMI or to a purchaser of all or substantially all of MEMI’s assets or Offer (the "Material Terms"). Each Offer Notice constitutes an offer made by the ownership interests, such assignment shall not constitute a prohibited assignment for City to enter into an agreement with MEMI on substantially the same Material purposes of this section; provided, however, that in the case of an assignment in Terms as such Third-Party Offer (the "ROLR Offer"). The period beginning on connection with the foregoing (ii), such assignment shall be subject to the City’s advance the 40-Year Termination Date and ending on the date five (5) years immediately written approval, which shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed. As after the 40-Year Termination Date shall also be defined as the “ROLR Period.” used in the preceding sentence, an “affiliate” of MEMI means an entity that controls, or is controlled by, or is under common control with, MEMI. For purposes hereof “control” (i) At any time before the expiration of the twenty (20) calendar day period shall mean the power, exercisable jointly or severally, to manage and direct the business following MEMI's receipt of the Offer Notice (the "Exercise Period"), and affairs of a party through the ownership of more than fifty percent (50%) of MEMI may accept the ROLR Offer by delivery to the City of written membership or partnership interests, corporate stock and/or voting rights. MEMI shall

{00332247-2} 21 {00332247-2} 22 Park Operation and Management Agreement (The Banks Lot 23) Park Operation and Management Agreement (The Banks Lot 23) 9813868.9 9813868.9

87 Attachment A

not assign its interests under this Agreement pursuant to the preceding three sentences If MEMI sends a notice to the City alleging that the City is in breach of this Agreement, without giving the City at least five (5) days prior written notice thereof. No assignment MEMI shall simultaneously send a copy of such notice by U.S. certified mail to: City by MEMI of its rights or obligations under this Agreement to a third party shall relieve Solicitor, City of Cincinnati, 801 Plum Street, Room 214, Cincinnati, OH 45202. MEMI from any liability to the City under this Agreement unless the parties hereto enter into a novation releasing MEMI of its obligations under this Agreement. 12. GENERAL PROVISIONS.

10. SURRENDER. (A) Entire Agreement. This Agreement (including the exhibits hereto) contains the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and (A) Surrender. On the last day of the Term of this Agreement, MEMI shall turn over supersedes any and all prior discussions, negotiations, representations or physical possession of the Eastern Park Lot, including all Park Improvements agreements, written or oral, between them respecting the subject matter hereof. (which shall not include the semi-permanent stage), to the City, in good condition and repair, reasonable wear and tear excepted, and free and clear of all mortgages (B) Amendments. This Agreement may be amended only by a written amendment and other monetary liens. On or before the last day of the Term of this signed by the City and MEMI. Agreement, MEMI shall remove all of MEMI’s personal property, and any property not so removed shall be deemed abandoned. MEMI shall not remove (C) Compliance with Legal Requirements. MEMI is responsible for full compliance any signs, trade fixtures, ordinary fixtures or equipment used in connection with with all applicable Legal Requirements, including the Park Board Rules, a current the Eastern Park Lot unless the City approves of such removal in writing. MEMI copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit F, as may be modified by the Park shall promptly repair any and all damage to the Eastern Park Lot, including the Board from time to time (the “Park Board Rules”), with respect to this Park Improvements, caused by its removal of any items under this paragraph. Agreement, operating the Eastern Park Lot, the MEMI Events, and the Other Event Days. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event there is any conflict (B) Documents to be Delivered to City. At the end of the Term of this Agreement, between the express terms and conditions of this Agreement and the Park Board MEMI shall deliver to the City originals of all books and records, unpaid Rules, the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall supersede and control. invoices, operating manuals, contracts with third parties, warranty information, and all other written materials and documents that are in MEMI’s possession or (D) Trade Secrets. under MEMI’s control and that are reasonably needed in order for there to be a seamless transition with respect to the operation of the Eastern Park Lot. (i) MEMI acknowledges and agrees that all records, documents, drawings, plans, specifications, and other materials in the City’s possession, 11. NOTICES. All notices required to be given to any party under this Agreement shall be including materials submitted by MEMI, are subject to the provisions of in writing and (i) personally delivered, (ii) deposited in the United States mail, first class, the Ohio Public Records Act (Ohio Revised Code Section 149.43). To the postage prepaid, or (iii) delivered by a nationally recognized overnight courier service, to extent that MEMI considers any information provided to the City to be the parties at the following addresses or such other address as either party may specify confidential trade secrets, it shall clearly and prominently mark each and from time to time by notice to the other. Notices shall be deemed given upon receipt. every such page or sheet with “Trade Secret” or “Confidential” as it determines in good faith to be appropriate, provided, however, that the To the City: To MEMI: City has no obligation to make any independent determination of whether the confidential information is protected from disclosure under Ohio law City of Cincinnati Music and Event Management, Inc. or to expend any public resources to protect the confidential information 801 Plum Street 6295 Kellogg Avenue from disclosure under Ohio law. Cincinnati, OH 45202 Cincinnati, OH 45202 Attention: City Manager Attention: Michael C. Smith (ii) If any of the materials submitted by MEMI to the City are clearly and prominently labeled “Trade Secret” or “Confidential” by the City, the With a copy to: With a copy to: City will advise MEMI of public records request applicable to such City of Cincinnati Graydon Head & Ritchey LLP documents and of the City’s intent to release the records to the requestor. 950 Eden Park Drive 312 Walnut Street, Suite 1800 MEMI shall have five (5) business days beginning with the date it Cincinnati, OH 45202 Cincinnati, OH 45202 receives notification to respond to the City by either accommodating the Attention: Director of Parks Attention: Michael A. Hirschfeld, Esq. requestor or pursuing legal remedies to stop the release of requested information. This notification shall relieve the City of any further

{00332247-2} 23 {00332247-2} 24 Park Operation and Management Agreement (The Banks Lot 23) Park Operation and Management Agreement (The Banks Lot 23) 9813868.9 9813868.9

88 Attachment A

obligation under any claim of MEMI or any of its agents or affiliates in include(s) a natural person or any corporation, limited liability company, any jurisdiction in connection with the disclosure of such records. MEMI partnership, trust, or other type of entity validly formed. and its agents and affiliates shall have the right to pursue legal and/or equitable remedies to stop or limit disclosure at their sole expense. (M) Recitals. The recitals on the first page of this Agreement are incorporated herein and made a part of hereof with the same force and effect as if same were herein (iii) The City shall have no duty to defend the rights of Venue Developer or repeated fully and at length. any of its agents or affiliates in any records requested to be disclosed. Under no circumstances will the City be responsible or liable to MEMI or (N) Survival. The rights and obligations of the parties set forth in Section 5, and any any other person for the disclosure of any such labeled materials, whether right or obligation of the parties in this Agreement which, by its nature, should the disclosure is required by law or by court order or occurs through survive termination or expiration of this Agreement, shall survive any such inadvertence, mistake, or negligence on the part of MEMI, except to the termination or expiration of this Agreement. extent such disclosure violates a court order of which MEMI has actual knowledge. (O) Official Capacity. All representations, warranties, covenants, agreements and obligations of the City under this Agreement shall be effective to the extent (E) Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in authorized and permitted by applicable law. None of those representations, accordance with the laws of the City of Cincinnati and the State of Ohio. All warranties, covenants, agreements or obligations shall be deemed to be a actions regarding this Agreement shall be brought in the Hamilton County Court representation, warranty, covenant, agreement or obligation of any present or of Common Pleas, and MEMI agrees that venue in such court is proper. The future member, officer, agent or employee of the City in other than his or her parties hereby waive trial by jury with respect to any and all disputes arising official capacity. No official executing or approving the City’s participation in under this Agreement. this Agreement shall be personally liable under this Agreement.

(F) Binding Effect. This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the (P) Limitation on Liability. Notwithstanding any provision in this Agreement or benefit of and be enforceable by and against the parties and their respective under applicable law, each of the parties agrees in accepting this Agreement that it successors and permitted assigns. shall have no recourse to any members (individuals or entities), officers or employees of Cincinnati Symphony Orchestra, any member (individual or entity) (G) Captions. The captions of the various sections and paragraphs of this Agreement of any committee of Cincinnati Symphony Orchestra, or any member (individual are not part of the context hereof and are only guides to assist in locating such or entity) of the Board of Directors of Cincinnati Symphony Orchestra sections and paragraphs and shall be ignored in construing this Agreement. (collectively, the “Constituent Entities”). Each of the parties further agrees that no Constituent Entity shall have any personal liability for any obligation under (H) Severability. If any part of this Agreement is held to be void, illegal or this Agreement. unenforceable by a court of law, such part shall be deemed severed from this Agreement, and the balance of this Agreement shall remain in full force and (Q) Representation as to Authority. The City and MEMI each represents to the effect. other that it has the power and authority to enter into and perform its obligations under this Agreement without the consent of anyone who is not a party to this (I) No Recording. This Agreement shall not be recorded in the Hamilton County Agreement and that the execution and performance of this Agreement have been Recorder’s office. duly authorized by all necessary actions on the part of the performing party.

(J) Time. Time is of the essence with respect to the performance by the parties of (R) Authority of the Park Board. MEMI acknowledges the legal authority of the their respective obligations under this Agreement. Park Board (under the City’s Charter and Ohio Law) to act with respect to certain matters affecting the Eastern Park Lot and agrees that, in instances under this (K) No Third Party Beneficiaries. The parties hereby agree that no third party Agreement when MEMI is required to obtain the City’s consent, or the City is beneficiary rights are intended to be created by this Agreement. required to take action, such decisions and actions will be made by either the City or the Park Board or both, as determined by the City and/or Park Board on case- (L) Interpretation. The singular of any term, including any defined term, shall by-case basis (and in the event such decision or action is taken by the Park Board, include the plural and the plural of any term shall include the singular. The use of MEMI shall be entitled to rely upon the same, unless the City subsequently any pronoun with respect to gender shall include the determines that the Park Board acted beyond the scope of its authority). MEMI neutral, masculine, feminine and plural. The term “person” or “persons”

{00332247-2} 25 {00332247-2} 26 Park Operation and Management Agreement (The Banks Lot 23) Park Operation and Management Agreement (The Banks Lot 23) 9813868.9 9813868.9

89 Attachment A

shall not be required to independently determine, in any particular instance under City Manager By: this Agreement, whether the City, the Park Board, or both has legal authority to act. Date: Printed name:

(S) Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which Title: is deemed an original, but all of which together are deemed to be one and the same agreement. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in Section 11, a signed Date: copy of this Agreement delivered by facsimile, email, or other means of electronic transmission is deemed to have the same legal effect as delivery of an original signed copy of this Agreement.

(T) Exhibits. The following Exhibits are attached hereto and made a part hereof: Recommended by: Exhibit A – Site Plan Exhibit B – Legal Description of Eastern Park Lot Exhibit C – Legal Description of Indoor Venue Lot Kara Kish, Director Exhibit D – Assignment and Assumption Agreement Cincinnati Park Board Exhibit E – Rendering of Outdoor Venue Exhibit F – Park Board Rules Approved as to Form by:

[Signature Page Follows] Assistant City Solicitor

Certified Date: Fund/Code: Amount: By: Karen Alder, City Finance Director

This Agreement is executed by the parties on the dates indicated below their respective signatures, effective as of ______, 2021 (the “Effective Date”).

CITY OF CINCINNATI MUSIC AND EVENT MANAGEMENT, INC. By: Paula Boggs Muething,

{00332247-2} 27 {00332247-2} 28 Park Operation and Management Agreement (The Banks Lot 23) Park Operation and Management Agreement (The Banks Lot 23) 9813868.9 9813868.9

90

BOARD OF PARK

COMMISSIONERS Date: April 15, 2021

Brad Lindner To: Board of Park Commissioners President

James Goetz From: Steven Schuckman, Division Manager Vice President

Susan F. Castellini Subject: Lot 28 Design Services

Linda Lee Thomas

Molly North Background

The extension of Smale Riverfront Park on to Lot 28 requires the design

services of a Landscape Architect. Previously, Michael McInturf, an Architect retained by the Bengals, came up with some design concepts for

the site. Sasaki Associates, the designers of SRP, also came up with a rough concept, based in part on the McInturf ideas.

Kara S. Kish A Landscape Architect now needs to be retained to develop the design for Director Lot 28 through construction documents. An RFP was prepared and sent to Jenny Mobley the two Landscape Architecture firms with City contracts. The proposals Deputy Director received have been reviewed and the Board is being asked to approve the Crystal Courtney Selection Committee's recommendation. Division Manager

Rocky Merz Description Division Manager

Steven L. Schuckman Both concepts previously created were intended to break down the scale of Division Manager Lot 28 that was originally conceived of as a park extension on top of a raised Craig Sherman podium. In the alternative, the new concept aims to reduce the wall heights Division Manager along Elm Street and Mehring Way which would have resulted from the podium plan. The new approach calls for a landscaped and sloped or

terraced treatment, while also providing for park storage space beneath a smaller raised podium.

To proceed with the design and expedite the process, the City issued an

RFP to the Landscape Architecture firms who already have contracts with the City. Both firms submitted proposals. A selection committee was

established and after reviewing the proposals has made a 950 Eden Park Drive recommendation. Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 Phone (513) 352-2604 Fax (513) 352-4096 Findings www.cincinnatiparks.com #cincyparks Proposals were received from Human Nature and MKSK, both firms that have successfully provided design services previously for Parks. The 91

Selection Committee is recommending MKSK for this project. Their proposed fee is $202,215. Attached is the Committee's report and the proposed scope of services.

Portions of the fee may be funded by dollars remaining from the Cincinnati Parks Foundation’s commitment of up to $500,000 for the design of both Phase 2 of Lot 23 and for Lot 28 (March). The current estimate for design of Phase 2 is $400,000 so approximately half of the cost for Lot 28 design could be covered. The exact design costs for the remaining elements of Phase 2 will not be known until a proposal is received. The Board is therefore being asked to approve up to $202,215 for Lot 28 design, though the amount needed is likely to be around $100,000.

Funding for the construction of Lot 28 is expected to come from private fundraising.

Recommendation

Staff recommends that the Board approve the selection of MKSK and fund design services from Fund 329 up to $202,215.

Attachment A—Selection Committee Report Attachment B—Design Renderings Attachment C—Design Proposal

92 Attachment A

93 Attachment A

94 Attachment A

95 Attachment B

96 Attachment B

FLEXIBLE/PROGRAMABLE EVENT SPACE - BEER/ WINE GARDEN, ETC 503

UPPER TERRACE

RACE STREET LANDING

ELM

DONOR WALL - CURVED FORM TERRACED GARDENS

97 TERRACED GARDEN - PLANTING CHARACTER Attachment B

98 Attachment B

Pedestrian garage access if needed

FLEXIBLE/PROGRAMABLE EVENT SPACE - BEER/ WINE GARDEN, ETC 503

Parks Parks StorageUPPERUPPPPERRRTE TERRACETEERRRARAAACEE Access

RACE STREET LANDING

Parks Access

ELM

DONOR WALL - CURVED FORM TERRACED GARDENS

99 5 DESCRIPTION OF HOW OFFEROR WILL CARRY OUT THE SCOPE OF SERVICES AND ESTIMATED TIME FRAME FOR CARRYING OUT THESE SERVICES Attachment C

PHASE 1: SCHEMATIC DESIGN (2 MONTHS) 1.1 Project Administration and Coordination

Within this initial phase, project administrative functions will » Conduct a scoping meeting with Park Board leadership be initiated, including the Park Board staff and stakeholders and staff refining and confirming the frequency and format of » Review workplan and add any details on process, meetings, confirming the project schedule, and establishing responsibilities, and deliverables by phase of project responsibilities, goals, project milestones and deliverables of the work. Also within this phase, we will gather and review » Agree on protocol to approve deviations from the site information and applicable data and reports. workplan through the process to respond to issues or opportunities that arise Communication » Discuss the invoicing sequence and level of reporting We believe that in addition to experience and creativity, communication is critical to the success of any project, » Establish project management protocol especially an urban riverfront park within a community that » Refine project schedule is passionate about their riverfront. Although we anticipate involvement of several members of our team, our Project » Review of relevant studies, reports, and policies to Manager Jack McGlasson will be the day-to-day point of discuss the results of previous efforts to understand the contact, and the familiar face that engages both the city staff foundation of input, the meaning and lessons learned and the Park Board. Jack will also lead the schedule and » Collect base information, mapping, GIS data, and on-site process from our team internally, acting as the link between observation of existing conditions design and engineering efforts, and the communication and feedback from the Park Board and key stakeholders. We 1.2 Understanding – Existing Conditions Analysis and anticipate weekly conference calls or Zoom meetings with Programming staff for updates to schedule and project status. We also anticipate in-person meetings (as needed) every 2-3 weeks. There’s typically a straightforward method of the inventory and analysis process, but given the importance of this Workplan project and site, the diverse users, and adjacent existing and proposed development, as well as the history and culture of We believe that a comprehensive workplan established at the the riverfront, this project deserves a more robust analysis beginning of the project sets the stage for a more organized of the site and its surroundings. Within this phase, we will and managed process, as well as a better deliverable. We synthesize data collected to analyze existing conditions, typically establish a set of goals and objectives with the define opportunities, and establish a program for the types client early in the project, and further describe what steps and scales of uses, gatherings, and elements that should be need to be taken in order to accomplish those goals and incorporated within the urban riverfront park expansion. objectives. Although goals, objectives, and processes can and do evolve throughout a project, the workplan will serve Physical Conditions Analysis as the cornerstone that keeps the design and engineering » team, client, and stakeholders working together to provide a Assess existing circulation patterns within the holistic and comprehensive vision. surrounding developments, including automobiles, delivery vehicles, transit buses, pedestrians, bicycles, Schedule and scooters

As part of the initial kick-off to the project, our team will » Assess drainage infrastructure and possibilities for work with you to refine and manage a project calendar green infrastructure that will be shared with the entire project team and client » throughout the project. We will indicate milestones, meetings, Assess probable activity during daytime and nighttime and deliverables. In order to achieve this task, we promote on a typical day, during various seasons and for special the use of a dynamic calendar that is graphic in nature and events illustrates which tasks are being performed on a weekly » Assess existing lighting sources basis and who is responsible for those tasks and associated deliverables. » Assess existing and designed surrounding streetscapes, sidewalks, and bicycle routes and facilities

100 25 MKSK | CONSULTANT DESIGN SERVICES OF SMALE PARK LOT 28 5 DESCRIPTION OF HOW OFFEROR WILL CARRY OUT THE SCOPE OF SERVICES AND ESTIMATED TIME FRAME FOR CARRYING OUT THESE SERVICES Attachment C

» Evaluate major pedestrian routes and bikeways near local acceptance. We will work hand-in-hand with our project the site, including planned building entrances onto the engineers B&N to provide input on engineering issues and park, key routes from the parking structure, and various design refinements that will help progress seamlessly into destinations throughout Smale Riverfront Park a final preferred design without losing the important design elements often lost when this level of project collaboration » Discuss access needs for regular maintenance, event does not occur. setup and post-event cleanup, and snow removal We will graphically communicate our concepts through » Consider views to the park from the upper floors of the precedent imagery, plan views, cross-sections, and surrounding buildings three-dimensional study models. Based upon feedback, » Identify cultural, historical, and public art assets of we will prepare a final Schematic Plan and prepare significance and opportunities for integration recommendations for project implementations, including preliminary estimate and phasing as needed. » Review site survey provided by Park Board Concept Design and Placemaking Plan » Analyze solar orientation/shadow patterns and prevailing winds » Placemaking and Activation Study

» Analyze potential events and uses of the site » Green Infrastructure strategies 1.3 Concept Development » Park branding and identity study (building upon established vernacular) Typically, concept plans are visionary with a focus on the long term, but too often these approaches are shelved due to lack » Public Art opportunities of strategy planning for the near and mid-term…and what » Event and multipurpose space study good is that to a site that is poised for intervention today? We regularly approach design and engineering with an action- » Three (3) Concept Design Alternatives oriented methodology that identified prerequisites, priorities, » Coordinate with structural engineer (THP) on limitations phases, roles and responsibilities to scribe a framework for and opportunities for improvements to parking structure both short- and long-term wins. deck During the concept development process, we will continue » Refine preferred concept alternative our exploration and discovery, challenge assumptions, and motivate the design team, Park Board, and stakeholders to » Develop illustrative graphics for preferred concept think both inside and outside of the box. For example, it is alternative, including plan rendering, 3D modeling of site, necessary for the Lot 28 park expansion to function properly and perspective renderings as both open space and civic space…culturally, socially, and ecologically. Relationships between programmed spaces and Schematic Design Plans biomes must be understood and tested through an iterative » Layout and Materials Plan of park, including basic process to ensure the space functions highly at all levels. dimensions, detail keys, and materials identification

As designers we are also highly motivated by the opportunity » Preliminary Grading Plan, including critical spot to extend and promote the identity of Cincinnati’s premier elevations and preliminary design of any ADA accessible urban riverfront, to elevate pragmatics into poetics. It might features be enough to simply have an open space that checks all the practical boxes, but how amazing will it be when visitors and » Preliminary storm drainage and utility systems strategy/ residents realize that Lot 28 is a place…an urban park that narrative elevates the community, serves as a destination and a source » Preliminary design of sustainable stormwater features of inspiration for health and wellness and stewardship of the community, and is a commons for people to interact and » Preliminary Planting Plan enjoy community. » Preliminary Site Lighting Plan Within the Concept Design task of this phase, we will develop » Preliminary details, including sections, elevations and alternatives that respond to feedback provided and collected. enlarged plans as necessary to adequately communicate We will create at least three concept alternatives that design intent demonstrate varying programmatic mixes and project costs. These studies, informed by the preceding analysis, will be » Preliminary Opinion of Probable Construction cost for based upon previous experience, emerging practices, and preferred Schematic Design Plans 101 26 MKSK | CONSULTANT DESIGN SERVICES OF SMALE PARK LOT 28 5 DESCRIPTION OF HOW OFFEROR WILL CARRY OUT THE SCOPE OF SERVICES AND ESTIMATED TIME FRAME FOR CARRYING OUT THESE SERVICES Attachment C

Deliverables for Phase 1: Schematic Design » Tree Pits and Planters

» Project Schedule » Lawn areas and Vegetated Roof Decks

» Project Base Mapping » Bollards, Railings and Light Fixtures

» Project Goals and Objectives » Wayfinding and Placemaking Elements, including integrated naming for donor opportunities » Inventory and Analysis diagrams of existing conditions » Drainage features, including inlets and/or trench drains » Programming Summary 2.3 Prepare a refined overall Design Development package » Branding and Identity Summary This will be based on review comments from Park » Three (3) Concept Design Alternatives Board staff and other stakeholders, and coordinate with » Refined Preferred Concept Design subconsultants, including irrigation/plumbing, electrical/ lighting engineer, and structural engineers, THP, identified in » Illustrative Plans and Renderings the RFP. » Best Practice/Precedent Summary » Prepare updated Site Grading Plan, including critical spot » Schematic Design Package for project coordination, reviews elevations and coordinate with B&N for their preparation and estimating of a preliminary grading and drainage plan, including stormwater runoff modeling » Preliminary Opinion of Probable Construction Cost » Evaluate site lighting alternatives and prepare Phase 2: Design Development (3 Months) preliminary Site Lighting Plan with cut sheets and specifications for recommended fixtures and mounting Following consensus of the Schematic Design and long-term types and coordinate with electrical engineer for their vision, our team will refine and provide further detail for documentation of electrical services all design elements/materials, constructability, structural impacts and requirements, and overall impacts to the project » Evaluate potential site furnishings (including movable budget. Each component of this phase will be developed in tables and chairs, trash and recycling containers, bike a single base model to ensure that coordination is integral racks, and drinking fountains) and prepare a preliminary to the overall design of the project. We will also develop the site furnishing plan and schedule with cut sheets draft outline for the Technical Specifications for review by the and specifications for recommended furnishings and client and the team. equipment

Our team will also provide graphic exhibits during this phase » Prepare preliminary Planting Plan showing trees, shrubs, for the purposes of conveying the overall design intent to the ground covers and seed/sod limits with preliminary Park Board and City leadership. Graphic exhibits may include listing of plant types proposed a combination of illustrative plans, perspective renderings, or » Prepare outline of Technical Specifications digital models. » Update preliminary Opinion of Probable Construction 2.1 Prepare updated and refined Site Layout and Materials Cost per the Design Development refinements Plans » Conduct a Design Development phase review meeting » Indicate material selections and provide samples as with the Park Board to solicit comments and gain requested for decision making consensus on design and engineering direction » Indicate refined sections and details for park features, including coordinated sections through the parking Phase 3: Construction Documentation (3 Months) garage roof deck for planting beds, pavement, and Based on authorization from the Park Board to proceed with special features, including handrails, stairs, terrace walls approved Design Development documents and budget, the and placemaking elements MKSK team will prepare Construction Documents, including 2.2 Prepare updated and refined Site Details sheets for drawings and specifications in a single bid package for the each of the following features: procurement, permitting, and construction of the project. During the Construction Documentation phase, our team » Plaza Pavements will provide services to assist in securing the permits and approvals necessary for the commencement of construction.

102 27 MKSK | CONSULTANT DESIGN SERVICES OF SMALE PARK LOT 28 5 DESCRIPTION OF HOW OFFEROR WILL CARRY OUT THE SCOPE OF SERVICES AND ESTIMATED TIME FRAME FOR CARRYING OUT THESE SERVICES Attachment C

During Phase 3, we propose meeting on a bi-weekly basis Phase 4: Bidding & Construction Admin. (6 Months) via in-person and web-based conference meetings to review progress, provide updates, and discuss any outstanding Contingent on Park Board review and sign-off, project issues that need to be addressed. We also anticipate documents will be submitted to the City for advertising technical review meetings with city officials for review of the for bidding by potential general contractors. Our team will project as needed for permitting and approval. review and amend from City standard documents on the bidding requirements, forms of agreement and conditions of 3.1 Prepare and Finalize Construction Documents the contract for construction. Our team will assist in the pre- » Finalize Site Layout and Materials Plan, including bid meeting, answer contractor questions during bidding, and necessary dimensions, detail keys, material assist in the evaluation of bids and bidder reviews. identification, and construction and general notes 4.1 Bidding Services

» Generate final Grading Plan, including sections and ADA » Assist the Park Board in preparing the Legal accessibility features Advertisement

» Finalize water, sanitary, and storm drainage utility » Attend the pre-bid meeting systems drawing and specifications » Answer technical questions and issue addenda » Generate final design of site lighting and site electrical » elements, including electrical distribution Assist in bid evaluation, bid tabulation and award recommendation » Finalize planting and soils plan, including locations » of plant materials, plant list with genus/species and Review meeting with the Park Board to solicit comment, type of plant, planting details, limits of seed/sod, and coordinate efforts, and secure approval of bidding construction and general notes considerations

» Finalize irrigation design layout plan and requirements 4.2 Construction Observation and Administration for controllers and meters This phase of the project is essential to realizing the vision » Finalize construction level drawings for signage established during the design phases of the project. We will establish a clear line of communication between the » Finalize site construction details, including sections, design team, the contractor, and the client to ensure that elevations and enlarged plans as necessary to design intent, schedule, and budget are understood. We will adequately communicate design intent and construction schedule a pre-construction meeting between the design quality to bidders/contractors team, the Park Board, and the contractor/subcontractors to » Provide a preliminary construction plans to each of the review construction documents and specifications thoroughly utility service providers. Meet with service providers to to address questions, concerns, and potential coordination review the project and discuss any improvements the issues that may arise during the construction of the park. service providers may want to install during construction » Perform a pre-construction meeting with the selected » Finalize Opinion of Probable Construction Costs based on contractor and subcontractors, page turn of the CDs Construction Document drawings » Review and approval of shop drawings and submittals

Deliverables » Perform construction observation, including weekly » Materials for project meetings reports of progress » » 60% Construction Plans for review Perform weekly progress meetings during construction to confirm progress and compliance with construction » 60% Opinion of Probable Cost documents, specifications and schedule

» 60% Preliminary Technical Specifications » Review and approve pay applications

» Bid Quality Construction Documents » Review contractor claims and issue contract modifications accordingly » Final Opinion of Probable Cost » Final site inspection / punch list development » Bid Quality Technical Specifications » Develop and provide as-built plans

» Project close-out 103 28 MKSK | CONSULTANT DESIGN SERVICES OF SMALE PARK LOT 28 Attachment C 6 DESCRIPTION OF COMMITMENT TO THE ECONOMIC INCLUSION AND SUBCONTRACTING PROGRAMS SIMILAR TO THE CITY’S

The Team’s commitment to utilize diverse businesses is ongoing. We actively strive to identify and reach out to local diverse A/Es and consultants to develop working relationships. We have developed strategic approaches and methodologies for achieving each client’s desired diverse business goals. MKSK supports these programs primarily by working with locally based A/E and subject matter specialist firms as consultants on our projects. As part of these relationships, we negotiate for professional services and often provide mentoring to grow the capabilities of their staff. Our business objective is to develop project teams that provide value to the project, client and community. Helping to mentor and grow these local, small, and disadvantaged businesses directly reinforces that objective.

Our efforts extend far beyond program compliance through meeting a specific percentage of contract dollars. When we begin the process of developing a project team, we do an initial evaluation of the technical needs of the project, assess our internal staff availability and experience, and list opportunities where meaningful and measurable services can be provided by other team members, particularly minority-owned, women-owned or small business firms. Whenever possible, we will break down project scopes into smaller units to achieve greater participation.

Our current proposed Team consists of: Kolar Design, Inc., a certified Small Business Enterprise. Kolar will represent 11% of work to be performed. Motz Consulting Engineers, Inc., a certified Women Business Enterprise. Motz Engineers will represent 12% of the work. Megen Construction Company, Inc., a certified Minority Business Enterprise. Megen Construction will represent 6% of the work.

Our commitment to these firms will ensure that each diverse team member has an opportunity to participate in the Design Services of Smale Park Lot 28. During the life of the project, our team will continue its efforts to identify and work with additional diverse businesses whenever new procurement opportunities arise by utilizing the various approaches.

Kolar Design, Motz Consulting Engineer, and Megen Construction Company’s SBE, WBE, and MBE certifications are located in the Forms Section of the submittal.

7 DESCRIPTION OF HOW OFFEROR DETERMINED THEIR FEES AND THE ASSUMPTIONS MADE

Based on the project description in the RFP, our understanding of this specific project, and our experience with similar projects in complexity and scale, we have prepared our fees by outlining the specific tasks in each phase and applying hours to those individual tasks, meetings and deliverables. While we understand the project budget falls between a range of $2-4M as noted in the addendum, we did not prepare our fees based on a percentage of construction, but rather the time and effort anticipated to complete the project. A complete allocation of team hourly resources by task is available on request for your review.

8 HOURLY FEE FOR EACH OF THE FOLLOWING POSITIONS:

POSITION HOURLY FEE POSITION HOURLY FEE MKSK Principal - Andrew Knight $210 Motz Engineering MEP Engineer - Chris Wilson $160 Motz Engineering MEP Engineer - Andrew MKSK Associate Landscape Architect - Kevin Dicke $150 $160 Hemmelgarn MKSK Landscape Architect III / Project Manager - Megen Construction Cost Estimation - Catherine $125 $125 Jack McGlasson Nwankwo MKSK Landscape Architect II - McKenzie Wilhelm $115 MKSK Field Inspector - Jack McGlasson $125 Burgess & Niple Senior Civil Engineer - Steven $212 Kolar Environmental Graphics, Signage & Smith $155 Wayfinding - Kelly Kolar / Nicole Roberts Motz Engineering MEP Engineer - Suzie Murdock $225 Motz Engineering MEP Engineer - Brad Motz $225

104 29 MKSK | CONSULTANT DESIGN SERVICES OF SMALE PARK LOT 28 Attachment C 9 ESTIMATED FEES BROKEN DOWN AS FOLLOWS:

Fees are calculated based on an estimation of the expected time involvement and related production and current hourly rates throughout the duration of the project. Reimbursable Expenses are included in the fee. MKSK has proposed the following fees based on our current understanding of your needs. We look forward to further discussions with you to align our approach and compensation to meet your exact needs, schedule and budget.

PROJECT PHASE FEE TIMEFRAME Schematic Design and Preliminary Cost Estimate $37,055 2 months Design Development and Cost Estimate $60,005 3 months Construction Documentation and Final Cost Estimate $75,815 3 months Bidding / Construction Administration $29,340 6 months TOTAL $202,215 14 months

10 REFERENCES AND CONTACT INFORMATION FOR PRIOR SIMILAR PROJECTS

Summit Park The Summit Park Master Plan led by MKSK was City of Blue Ash created to guide the future development and Brian Kruse, Director, Parks & adaptive re-use of 230 acres of former airport Recreation lands to foster a new “Central Park.” The plan establishes design and development guidelines [email protected] for 130 acres of parkland and a 100-acre tract 513.745.8442 of mixed-use land along the path of the former Blue Ash Airport runway.

Tom Jones Commons Enhancements to Cincinnati’s signature Cincinnati Park Board hilltop park will transform Tom Jones Steve Schuckman, Superintendent Commons into a new destination for activity [email protected] and a primary gateway into Eden Park. MKSK is providing conceptual design through 513.475.9600 construction documentation of the first phase of improvements.

Waterfront Park Phase IV MKSK developed a One Riverfront concept plan Waterfront Development Corporation with the Waterfront Development Corporation Deborah Bilitski, President that builds on the Hargreaves designed [email protected] Waterfront Park to include the development of an additional 22 acres of reclaimed industrial 502.574.3768 riverfront property. The result is a unified and cohesive Riverwalk that connects downtown with surrounding neighborhoods.

105 30 MKSK | CONSULTANT DESIGN SERVICES OF SMALE PARK LOT 28

BOARD OF PARK

COMMISSIONERS Date: April 15, 2021

Brad Lindner President To: Board of Park Commissioners

James Goetz Vice President From: Cindy France, Principal Architect

Susan F. Castellini Subject: Design Services for Smale River Edge Kevin Flynn

Linda Lee Thomas Background

A design solution is desired for the edge of Smale Riverfront Park along

the river between the Roebling Bridge and the western limits of the park, approximately at the foot of Elm Street. The design needs to solve the

erosion and bank stabilization issues while blending seamlessly with the adjacent park. An RFP process has been completed to identify and select

a design firm. The Board is being asked to approve entering into a Kara S. Kish contract with the selected firm to provide schematic design services. Director

Jenny Mobley Description Deputy Director

Crystal Courtney As a result of a Request for Proposals, two consultants who responded Division Manager met qualifications. The selection committee rated both proposals and Rocky Merz found KZF Design, Inc. was the most advantageous to the City. The Division Manager scope of services (attached) includes schematic design services including Steven L. Schuckman a cost estimate. The cost estimate will be utilized by staff and the U.S. Division Manager Army Corps to justify and pursue Federal funding for the project. The total Craig Sherman cost for schematic design services is $99,400. Division Manager

Findings

KZF Design Inc. has put together a highly qualified team which includes

Sasaki, the firm that has done all of the landscape design at Smale Park, and Megen Construction for cost estimating services. The design fee

should come out of 980 162015, a Capital State Grant fund to be used exclusively to address the stabilization of the riverbank west of the bridge.

950 Eden Park Drive Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 Phone (513) 352-2604 Fax (513) 352-4096 www.cincinnatiparks.com #cincyparks 106

Recommendation

Staff respectfully requests the Board approve retaining KZF Design, Inc. to provide schematic design services for this project.

Attachment A—Site Photo Attachment B—Scope of Services & Cost Proposal Attachment C—Award Recommendation

107 Attachment A

108 Attachment B

Scope of Services

PROJECT UNDERSTANDING

The goal of the proposed project will provide a Schematic/Conceptual Design plan and conceptual budget for the stabilization of the riverbank in Smale Riverfront Park for the purpose of aiding in the identification of potential implementation funding sources.

The area of focus is the rivers edge along the southern portion of Smale Riverfront Park between the Roebling Suspension Bridge and the western limits of the park near Elm Street.

The KZF Team consisting of KZF Design – Project Manager/Civil Engineer, Sasaki Associates – Landscape Architect and Designer, Resource International – Surveyor and Geotechnical Engineering, Megen Construction Company – Cost Estimator and Smale Riverfront Park David T Prather – Grant Funding Specialist are excited at the opportunity to continue our collaboration with the Cincinnati Park Board on Smale Riverfront Park.

Since the early 2000’s the KZF Team has worked closely with the City, Park Board, a myriad of design professionals and stakeholders to develop a comprehensive and unique experience at Smale Riverfront Park for the community, city, and region. This phase, like the previous, should be carefully considered to expand the park in a way that achieves the goals and design excellence that characterizes Smale Riverfront Park and improves physical, social, and cultural connections to the Ohio River which was a key reason for Cincinnati’s founding and growth into the City it is today. We have realized Although this project presents many opportunities, perhaps the most important is to physically connect park users in an accessible way to the river’s edge. A connection significant savings due that does not currently exist at Smale Riverfront Park and is scarce along River. There to KZF Design having are opportunities to engineer a green solution into the river’s edge that will bolster most disciplines in- the ecological function of the park and habitat for riverine inhabitants. Some of which might challenge the way we think about a conventional park. The river’s significant house as compared to fluctuation in water levels and swift currents bringing large debris from upstream retaining numerous must be closely considered in designing an edge that will resist erosion, scouring, and undercutting and be a sustainable long-term solution. consultants for architecture, structural, Our team assumes the first phase of work to be 12 weeks long starting at the project kick-off meeting. In preparation for this meeting, the design team will prepare mechanical, electrical, studies, sections, renderings, and presentations completed in the past associated plumbing, lighting and with the design and engineering of the river’s edges at Smale Riverfront Park as well as highlight considerations related to the overall park design, such as the extension interior design. of Race Street/Castellani esplanade, relationship to previous and future phases, and to Roebling Bridge. the KZF team’s nearly 20 years of work along the river have — Dave Prather, Project Manager, afforded our team a unique understanding of the sites history, its opportunities, and Smale Riverfront Park challenges. All of which will be invaluable to the design and engineering, and decision making process.

PROJECT APPROACH

The KZF Team anticipates the below scope in this phase to include the following:

▪ Participate in a kick-off meeting with the City to discuss project goals, aspirations, agree upon a project schedule to achieve the clients project delivery of 9/1/2021

22 109 Attachment B Scope of Services Continued

▪ Attend regular project coordination meetings ▪ Study and development of landscape design to rapidly produce 1-2 design options

▪ One (1) Concept Design Presentation and one (1) review meeting with client to review and select a preferred design option

▪ Slope stability analysis and reporting of existing slope to calibrate shear strength parameters, evaluation green (non-structural) remediation options, and structural solution (including slope stability analysis)

▪ Preferred Design presentation including – Preferred Design Plan Rendering – Necessary Sections to communicated relationship to the park and Ashland KY Riverfront Boat Dock river – SD level landscape documents – Documents include the following – Layout and Materials Plan – Grading Plan – Preliminary Planting Plan – Identifying green infrastructure opportunities – Key site sections and typical details – Preliminary Cost Estimation of the preferred design options – Preliminary conceptual design structural/bank stabilization design – Geotechnical engineering input on Conceptual Design based upon current Geotechnical Data – Utilization of existing survey data for development of concept.

I would recommend ADDITIONAL SERVICES their team to act in The Cincinnati Park Board may require additional services beyond the above Scope of any design capacity, Services, these additional services will be billed on an hourly basis in accordance with the attached Schedule of Personnel Billing Rates or by fee amendment. The following criteria architect items will be considered as additional services: role, or construction ▪ Diagrams to illustrate design intent management role for ▪ 3D model studies any future project the ▪ Perspective renderings Township performs. ▪ Cost estimating beyond what is described above

— Eric Reiners, Director of Public ▪ Technical specifications Works, Deerfield Township ▪ Engaging technical subconsultants ▪ Geotechnical borings located within existing park along the top of the slope failure

▪ Grant funding specialist services ▪ Embankment survey to waters edge ▪ Reimbursable expenses (if necessary)

110 23 Attachment B Scope of Services Continued

ASSUMPTIONS

The scope of this work is focused on preliminary design. Additional design work will be required to further refine and implement the project.

NOT INCLUDED IN SCOPE

This proposal does not include survey, geotechnical studies or environmental studies. These items have already been completed for the current location, however, if relocation is deemed feasible, KZF does recommend these items be completed prior to making a final decision. In addition, the following items are not included:

▪ Hydraulic study, stormwater study, and culvert/sewer design City of Blue Ash Summit Park ▪ Construction administration or inspection ▪ Structural or bridge engineering services ▪ Architecture or building design services ▪ Signage and wayfinding design services and sign plans ▪ Renderings of proposed improvements ▪ Lighting and electrical engineering services ▪ Landscape architecture services ▪ Underwater survey and mapping

SCHEDULE

We anticipate the following schedule by Phase upon receiving notice to proceed from the City of Cincinnati.

Concept/Schematic Design (12 weeks) Start 6/1/2021 Complete 9/1/2021

Smale Riverfront Park

24 111 Attachment B

Cost

ADDITIONAL SERVICES Task Cost ▪ Renderings ▪ Survey Project Management & Engineering (KZF Design) $29,600 ▪ Geotechnical borings ▪ Grant funding specialty ▪ Reimbursable expenses Landscape Design (Sasaki) $48,900

Cost Estimating (Megen Construction - MBE) $7,200

Geotechnical Engineering (Resource International - WBE) $13,700

Total Fees $99,400

If you have any questions, we would be pleased to answer them at your convenience. We look forward to working with you.

Sincerely, KZF Design

Nick Wilkerson PE, PMP Tim Sharp, RA, LEED AP BD+C, Esq. The professionals Project Manager Chief Strategic Officer [email protected] 513.621.6211 of KZF delivered on ▪ their commitments, completing the project Capacity on time and under budget. The excellent All key members of the proposed project team are available and their workloads communication, will allow them to dedicate their time to this contract. cooperation, and KZF has more than 70 additional professional and technical staff available to coordination achieved fulfill project requirements as-needed to meet you project schedule. Our team has sufficient and available staff capacity to provide timely and responsive service. between team members With this strength in number of design professionals, our team has the capability to make this a model manage staff availability given the current workload at the time of any assigned task. Throughout our successful track record of term contracts, this systematic approach of successful project has allowed our team to meet our client’s project time constraints. management, design 12000 and delivery. 10000 8000

— J. Troy Huff, PE, Highway 6000 Available Manhours Management Administrator, ODOT 4000 Utilized Manhours District Nine 2000

0

112 25 Attachment C

113 Attachment C

114 Attachment C

115 Attachment C

116 Attachment C

117 Attachment C

118 Attachment C

119 Attachment C

120 Attachment C

121 Attachment C

122 Attachment C

123 Attachment C

124 Attachment C

125 Attachment C

126

BOARD OF PARK

COMMISSIONERS Date: April 15, 2021

Brad Lindner To: Board of Park Commissioners President

James Goetz From: Mary Unterreiner, Executive Assistant Vice President

Susan F. Castellini Subject: Contracts and Agreements for Approval

Linda Lee Thomas

Molly North Background

The Board has established guidelines for items requiring their review, including contracts over $50,000 or agreements with terms exceeding 12

months.

Contracts over $50k

Kara S. Kish Below are projects budgeted within the capital improvement program Director exceeding $50k, which are ready to proceed:

Jenny Mobley Deputy Director • Rapid Run Play Set - $137,766.13

Crystal Courtney The replacement of the play set in Rapid Run is a FY21 project. Division Manager The existing play set is 22 years old. Work will be carried out under

Rocky Merz the City Master Agreement for play set repair and replacement. Division Manager

Steven L. Schuckman • Administration Building Renovations - $168,351 Division Manager The work includes upgrading the existing restrooms to meet ADA

Craig Sherman guidelines and to carve a conference room out of an oversized Division Manager office space. This was bid through the Multiple Award Contract

(MAC) process and followed Procurement guidelines.

• Mt Airy Retaining Wall - $167,977 The retaining wall adjacent to the service garage is failing and was

noted in poor condition from the Assessment. This was bid through the Multiple Award Contract (MAC) process and followed

Procurement guidelines.

950 Eden Park Drive Greenspace Agreements Exceeding 12 Months Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 Phone (513) 352-2604 Fax (513) 352-4096 The Division of Natural Resources staff are working with the City Law www.cincinnatiparks.com Department, Parks Finance, and the clients described below to update all #cincyparks historic and new Greenspace Program landscape maintenance contracts

to reflect the current city terms and conditions, and extend the life of the

127

contracts to minimize annual administration needs. Key contract terms are described below:

• UC Landscape Maintenance Agreement UC desires to engage the City, through its Greenspace program administered by the Board of Park Commissioners, to perform certain landscape maintenance services at various traffic islands and medians along Martin Luther King Drive (“MLK”), near Vine Street and Jefferson Avenue, and along Clifton Avenue between MLK and West McMillan Street. This Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date when signed by the parties and shall continue in full force and effect for a period of three (3) years, until December 31, 2023. The parties may, by mutual consent, renew this Agreement for two (2) additional 12-month periods, through December 31, 2025. UC shall pay the City $49,299.89, in accordance with the budget mutually agreed upon by the parties. Years 2-5 shall inflate at 2% per year effective January 1st each year.

• Transdev Landscape Maintenance Agreement Transdev desires to engage the City, through its Greenspace program administered by the Board of Park Commissioners, to perform installation and landscape maintenance services at eleven locations along the Streetcar Route in downtown Cincinnati. This Agreement shall commence when signed by the parties and shall continue in full force and effect until August 31, 2021 (the “Term”). The parties may, by mutual consent, renew this Agreement for three additional 12-month periods, through August 31, 2024. Beginning on the effective date of this Agreement for the initial Term hereof, Transdev shall pay the City a Fee of $5,013.51 for the cost of initial installation, five months of maintenance, and a spring cleanup. For each term thereafter, beginning September 1, 2021, the City shall invoice Transdev the Fee of $3,737.08 for the annual maintenance, the fall cleanup, and spring cleanup, payable by Transdev on or before the first day of October of each Term. Years 2-5 shall inflate at 2% per year effective September 1st each year.

• OTR District Management, LLC Liberty Street Landscape Maintenance Agreement OTR District Management (OTRDM) is responsible for maintaining certain landscape areas on Liberty Street from Sycamore Street to Central Parkway under a Maintenance Agreement between OTRDM and the City of Cincinnati (“City Agreement”). OTRDM desires to engage the City, through its Greenspace program administered by the Board of Park Commissioners, to perform landscape maintenance that OTRDM assumed under the City Agreement. This Agreement shall commence when signed by the parties and shall continue in full force and effect until December 31, 2021. This Agreement will automatically renew for three successive 12-month periods, through December 31, 2024, unless earlier terminated as allowed under this Agreement. Beginning on the effective date of this Agreement for the initial term hereof, OTRDM shall pay the City $11,473.68 for 2021 maintenance (approximately 9 months), mowing and a fall cleanup for the first year of the Agreement. The Fee for annual maintenance for the second year of the Agreement (January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2022), if renewed pursuant to Section 2.1 of the Agreement, shall be $16,673.64. The budget for the Services to be rendered during each successive year of the term hereof, excluding the first year and second years, shall be the Fee paid for the immediately preceding year, increased by 2%.

• 3CDC Landscape Maintenance Agreement 3CDC desires to engage the City, through its Greenspace program administered by the Board of Park Commissioners, to perform landscape maintenance around three parking lot areas in the Downtown and Over the Rhine neighborhoods, located at 12th Street and Vine Street, 15th Street and Vine Street, and Liberty Street and Race Street. This128 Agreement shall commence when signed by the parties and shall continue in full force and effect until December 31, 2021. The parties may, by mutual consent, renew this Agreement for three additional 12-month periods, through December 31, 2024. Beginning on the effective date of this Agreement for the initial term hereof (approximately 9 months ending December 31, 2021), 3CDC shall pay the City a Fee of $14,321.55 for 2021 maintenance, the spring cleanup, and fall cleanup for the Service Area, and three seasonal displays for the 12th Street and Vine Street Lot. The Fee for the second year of the Agreement (January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2022), if renewed pursuant to Section 2.1 of the Agreement, shall be $17,566.35 for provision of the Services specified. The budget for the Services to be rendered during each successive year of the term hereof, excluding the first year and second years, shall be the Fee paid for the immediately preceding year, increased by 2%, unless otherwise agreed by the parties in writing.

• Downtown Cincinnati LLC (DCI) Landscape Maintenance Agreement DCI desires to engage the City, through its Greenspace program administered by the Board of Park Commissioners, to perform landscape maintenance at the on-ramp to Interstate 75 located at the intersection of 4th Street and Central Avenue. This Agreement shall commence when signed by the parties and shall continue in full force and effect until December 31, 2021. The parties may, by mutual consent, renew this Agreement for three additional 12-month periods, through December 31, 2024. Beginning on the effective date of this Agreement for the initial term hereof (approximately 9 months ending December 31, 2021), DCI shall pay the City $1,551.17 for 2021 maintenance, the spring cleanup, and fall cleanup for the Service Area. The Fee for the second year of the Agreement (January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2022), if renewed pursuant to Section 2.1 of the Agreement, shall be $1,988.85 for provision of the Services specified. The budget for the Services to be rendered during each successive year of the term hereof, excluding the first year and second years, shall be the Fee paid for the immediately preceding year, increased by 2%, unless otherwise agreed by the parties in writing.

Recommendation

Staff respectfully requests the Board approve the presented contracts and agreements.

Attachment A—Rapid Run Play Set Proposal Attachment B—Administration Building Renovation Proposal Attachment C—Mt. Airy Retaining Wall Proposal

129 Attachment A

130 AGE GROUP: 5-12 RAPID RUN PARK ELEVATED PLAY ACTIVITIES - TOTAL: 1 ELEVATED PLAY ACTIVITIES ACCESIBLE BY TRANSFER: 1 REQ'D 1 ELEVATED PLAY ACTIVITIES ACCESIBLE BY RAMP: 0 REQ'D 0 GROUND LEVEL ACTIVITY TYPE: 9 REQ'D 0 CINCINNATI, OH GROUND LEVEL QUANTITY: 23 REQ'D 0 A 131 Attachment

ACCELERATOR SWING 2014

CSA COMPLIANCE REQUIRES MALLETS NOT BE INSTALLED CONCERTO VIBES 4502

CONCERTO 3-CONGAS CSA COMPLIANCE REQUIRES 4507 MALLETS NOTCONCERTO BE INSTALLED TALL CHIMES 4501 STAINLESS STEEL TOBOGGAN SLIDE WALL 7147465 714816

5' DECK OCCUR CAN INJURIES BURN CONTACT 7145029

TRANSFER 12" CONNECTOR

THE PLAY AREA PLANNING PROCESS. PLANNING AREA PLAY THE

METAL PLAY SURFACES MUST BE ADDRESSED DURING ADDRESSED BE MUST SURFACES PLAY METAL

OF DIRECT SUNLIGHT. THE PROPER LOCATION OF OF LOCATION PROPER THE SUNLIGHT. DIRECT OF

BE PLACED/INSTALLED IN SHADED AREAS, AND OUT AND AREAS, SHADED IN PLACED/INSTALLED BE

7146014 SHOULD TUBES, CRAWL METAL PAINTED OR BARE

SURFACES, SUCH AS STAINLESS STEEL SLIDES AND SLIDES STEEL STAINLESS AS SUCH SURFACES,

FOR PUBLIC PLAYGROUND SAFETY" THAT METAL PLAY METAL THAT SAFETY" PLAYGROUND PUBLIC FOR

POINT "HANDBOOK ITS IN RECOMMENDS COMMISSION SAFETY

INJURIES, THE UNITED STATES CONSUMER PRODUCT PRODUCT CONSUMER STATES UNITED THE INJURIES,

DIRECT SUN. TO AVOID THE RISK OF SUCH BURN BURN SUCH OF RISK THE AVOID TO SUN. DIRECT

WALL IN LOCATED ARE SURFACES PLAY METAL WHEN WARNING: WARNING: 71485159 714816

HOVER NET SENSORY PANEL 4631 TEXTURED TRIANGLE HEXAGON 71471312B TEN SPIN SENSORY PANEL 304 TEXTURED STAR CIRCLE (BELOW DECK) 71471311B

SWG PART GENERATION SWING W/CHAIN FOR 8' TR 2760 NEXUS NAUTILUS 2 360 DEG TOT SEAT 8' 466S012 8' BELT SEAT 2990 W/CHAIN 2840 8' BELT SEAT W/CHAIN 2840

3 1/2" OD ARCH ADD-A-BAY 8' TR GEN SEAT MC (2) 7188522HHX

3 1/2" OD ARCH SWG FRAME ONLY 2 SEATS REQ MC 7188522

To promote safe and proper equipment use THE PLAY COMPONENTS IDENTIFIED IN THIS Playground Equipment Services R0101 _44215487729 by children. Miracle recommends the PLAN ARE IPEMA CERTIFIED. THE USE AND 3460 Oakmeadow Lane PHONE NO: (513) 923-2333 installation of either a Miracle safety sign or LAYOUT OF THESE COMPONENTS CONFORM Cincinnati,OH FAX NO: (513) 923-2444 COMPLIES TO ASTM/CPSC other appropriate safety signage near each TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM F1487. GROUND SPACE: 89'-0" x 67'-0" playsystem's main entry point(s) to inform parents and supervisors of the age AN ENERGY ABSORBING PROTECTIVE SURFACE PROTECTIVE AREA: 85'-6" x 88'-6" appropriateness of the playsystem and IS REQUIRED UNDER & AROUND ALL PLAY DRAWN BY: Scott Hill DATE: 3/9/2021 COMPLIES TO ADA general rules for safe play. SYSTEMS Attachment B

(59;0%;)/"(//!5);     ; #.(/(453!5(0/;7),#)/&;$45300.;$/0;  ; ;#$/;!3+;3;)/")//!5(;;   ; ; ;(/#9;3!/"$;

"01$;0%;803+;#.)/;7),#(/&;$45;00.;$/0;

: $3;1-!/4;!/#;41$"4 :
;!--08!/"$;(/",7#$#

  
 

30104!,;&00#;%03; ;#!94;

%#*12-!5 1!5

'!/+;907;%03;5'$;0110367/(59;50;2705$;5'(4;130*$"5;

##'"'  ' "# $#'!#' '' "## ' '

 ' "&"' # #" %"'

  52'!5,2(!3- 5/,*5$&,5  5 5 5"5 5 54441.&1,+0!.3& !0&+  ,)5 5555
 5

132 Attachment C

133

BOARD OF PARK

COMMISSIONERS Date: April 15, 2021

Brad Lindner To: Board of Park Commissioners President

James Goetz From: Craig Sherman, CFO Vice President

Susan F. Castellini Subject: Acceptance of In-Kind Contributions

Linda Lee Thomas

Molly North Background

Board approval is needed to retain in-kind contributions QTR1 2021.

Description

Staff is requesting approval to accept of the QTR1 2021 in-kind contributions:

Kara S. Kish Director Row Labels Sum of Amount Jenny Mobley Park Supplies $ 1,793.63 Deputy Director Contract Services $ 1,100.00 Crystal Courtney Grand Total $ 2,893.63 Division Manager

Rocky Merz Division Manager Recommendation Steven L. Schuckman Division Manager Staff respectfully requests the Board approve to accept the in-kind Craig Sherman Division Manager contributions in the amount of $2,893.63.

Attachment A—Cincinnati Parks Foundation In-Kind Contributions

950 Eden Park Drive Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 Phone (513) 352-2604 Fax (513) 352-4096 www.cincinnatiparks.com #cincyparks 134

INDIRECT Donations to Cincinnati Park Board 1st Quarter, 2021 Attachment - A Type Date Num Name Memo Account Class Amount Check 03/10/2021 13241 NATORP LANDSCAPE SUPPLY Bur tree Eden Park Ken Casey 5710 · Materials & Supplies-Restr Restricted:Eden Park 163.75 Check 02/08/2021 13219 MKSK Design work for Tom Jones Commons 5740 · Contract Services-Restr Restricted:Eden Park-Commons 600.00 Check 02/24/2021 13222 Burgess & Niple Design review for Tom Jones Commons Inv 953653 5740 · Contract Services-Restr Restricted:Eden Park-Commons 500.00 General Journal 03/21/2021 126 Amazon-Sawyer Point Park Pickle Ball Courts supplies - Cold Packs 5710 · Materials & Supplies-Restr Restricted:Sawyer Park - Pickleball 14.89 General Journal 03/21/2021 126 Amazon-Sawyer Point Park Pickle Ball Courts supplies - First Aid Kit and AA Batteries 5710 · Materials & Supplies-Restr Restricted:Sawyer Park - Pickleball 63.98 Check 03/24/2021 13247 Tri-State Visual transmitter microphone Inv 46052 5710 · Materials & Supplies-Restr Restricted:Sawyer Park - Pickleball 382.00 General Journal 01/21/2021 124 Hats and Gloves for kids hiking at Bettman Nature Center 3610 · Misc Unrestricted:General Operating 55.98 Check 03/24/2021 13245 E C SHAW COMPANY plaque Bedell bench Inv #821627 3710 · Materials & Supplies Unrestricted:General Operating 130.03 Check 03/24/2021 13248 NATORP LANDSCAPE SUPPLY Trees French park, eden park Inv 89463 3710 · Materials & Supplies Unrestricted:General Operating 983.00

135 Ideas for Kara Goals - Updated 4/14/21 Complete by 6/30/21

 Prioritize completion of projects  Identify issues and plan for increased efficiencies with Procurement and DEI to advance projects  Prioritize a strong relationship between the Park Board of Commissioners and the Parks Foundation through direct personal engagement with the Foundation Director and board leadership, including achieving mutual understanding and adopt processes to implement the terms of the existing MOU  Complete hiring process for 2 professional positions in Planning & Design o Senior Architect - open for City transfer o Landscape Architect - open to the public/advertised regionally  Develop succession plans for Director, Senior staff, and other key positions  Board Meetings o Implemented beginning in May . New meeting structure/agenda . New Board action item reports . New monthly packages from Finance and Planning & Design  Engage in process to develop 3 year strategic plan o Mission and Core Values o FY 2022-2024 o Collaborative process with Commissioner representatives and Senior staff  Finalize FY22 Performance Agreement with City Manager (items to be complete by 6/30/22) o Enhance public feedback and community engagement systems o Comprehensive trail signage program - design, location identification, fabrication and installation o Mt. Airy Forest revitalization - mountain bike beginner skills area, arboretum, lodges, parking, accessibility o Parks ReLeaf program - Double amount of trees distributed (1,700 total)  Begin 6 month Executive Coaching  Submit application for Leadership Cincinnati

Complete by 12/31/21

 Complete 3 year strategic plan for Board review/approval  Collaborate with Cincinnati Parks Foundation to consider fundraising initiative for Krohn Conservatory

136

Monthly Reports April 2021

137

BOARD OF PARK

COMMISSIONERS Date: April 15, 2021

Brad Lindner To: Board of Park Commissioners President

James Goetz From: Steven Schuckman, Division Manager Vice President

Susan F. Castellini Subject: Monthly Capital Project Updates

Linda Lee Thomas

Molly North Sawyer Point—Staff is working with a donor on potential improvements to

the tennis courts and converting a number of them to pickleball courts.

Johnston Park—The preliminary design and cost estimate for the park was completed.

Recreational Trail Program Grant—ODNR awarded a $130,000 grant for

construction of a bike/multi-use trail in Bramble Park. Kara S. Kish Director Smale Riverfront Park Extension—The Race Street Terrace was Jenny Mobley completed. The north tree grove was planted, and granite paver installation Deputy Director proceeded, including completion of pavers where the stage will be installed. Crystal Courtney Also, the base materials were installed to receive the artificial turf. The Division Manager project is now expected to be substantially complete by mid-May. Rocky Merz Division Manager Ault Park—Initial site clearing for the portion of the Wasson Way Trail in Steven L. Schuckman Ault Park was done and staff conducted a site walk of the Valley trail with Division Manager APAC members. The purpose was to review stream conditions along the Craig Sherman trail and the potential to pave the trail with stimulus dollars, connecting the Division Manager park to the regional bike/multi-use trail system.

Jones Commons—The shelter was installed, interpretive sign design was completed, and the signs ordered. Lumber for the kiosk was purchased and

sitework continued. A June completion is planned.

Boat Dock—The City Manager and Purchasing reviewed the RFQ for design, construction and operation of a dock and had a series of questions.

Staff provided responses and is waiting for further comments and/or 950 Eden Park Drive approval to send out. Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 Phone (513) 352-2604 Fax (513) 352-4096 SRP River Edge—The RFP process was completed to select an Engineer www.cincinnatiparks.com #cincyparks to design the stabilization of the riverbank west of the Roebling Bridge.

138

Rapid Run Park—Planning and Operations staff met with CRC park managers on site to explore potential efficiencies in operations. Both Parks and CRC maintain parts of Rapid Run with Parks managing most of the area. The potential is for Parks to take on all management while giving CRC grounds management at another park location where both departments have responsibilities.

Stimulus Funding—Staff prepared lists of major capital improvements and potential transformational projects for consideration.

Gateway to Freedom Park—Staff conferred with the City Administration and Freedom Center representatives on the programming and design of this proposed park and the process involved.

Marian Spencer Statue—The inscriptions on the stone seatwall at the Women's Committee Garden that are part of the statue project will be completed in April followed by the installation of the statues. A dedication event is being scheduled in late June.

Capital Improvement Program—Staff worked on numerous projects to advance toward construction. Work entailed design, securing cost proposals, preparing specifications and work orders, taking projects through the procurement process and certification of funds. Specific capital work included the following: • Burnet Woods curb and concrete repair work was completed. • Everybody’s Treehouse repairs were completed. • Staff worked with Purchasing to develop a term masonry contract.

139 PARK BOARD CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS

Fund Number Project Name Orig. Budget Expenditures Encumbrances Remaining Completion Date Comments/ Issues 152015 Lytle Park Improvements $ 2,670,178 $ 257,931 $ 2,412,247 $ - Human Nature $ 60,795 Construction contract to be awarded once additional funds received from Western-Southern and appeals resolved. Prus Construction $ 2,351,453 162016 Yeatman's Cove Walkway Improvements $ 850,000 $ 763,820 $ 86,180 $ 0 concrete repairs $ 28,645 5/21 scheduling work concrete repairs $ 41,476 5/21 scheduling work concrete repairs $ 9,209 7/21 scheduling work

162015 Smale Riverfront Park- State of Ohio Capital Funds $ 500,000 $ 7,500 $ - $ 492,500 Engineering Consultant Services for River Edge $ 99,400 Contract Negotiations after Board Approval Grant money restricted to river edge & match to future Federal funds 172001 Smale Riverfront Park $ 1,500,000 $ 201,433 $ 149,529 $ 1,149,038 Funding for the construction of the Boat Dock. 172010 Ault Park Improvements $ 297,000 $ 285,759 $ 11,241 $ - Forevergreen/ cherry trees $ 1,345 5/21 scheduling work Adleta Concrete $ 4,796 5/21 scheduling work 182000 Park Infrastructure Rehabilitation- FY18 $ 1,666,000 $ 1,323,589 $ 342,411 $ -

182008 Bellevue Park Improvements $ 83,000 $ 60,000 $ - $ 23,000 Step/ Trail Repair $ 23,000 12/21 Masonry Term Contract being developed by Purchasing.

182009 French Park Improvements $ 20,000 $ - $ - $ 20,000 French House- paint exterior $ 20,000 7/21 Work Order is being circulated for signatures. 182010 Mt Airy Forest Improvements $ 80,000 $ 34,388 $ 17,312 $ 28,300 Retaining Wall $ 28,300 7/21 Pending Board Approval, circulate Work Order. Use with $139,677 of fund 202000 182011 System Wide Masonry Improvements $ 120,000 $ - $ - $ 120,000 Stanbery Pillar Repairs 6/21 Masonry Term Contract being developed by Purchasing. French House Wall Repair 6/21 California Shelter Floor Repair 6/21 Alms Drystack Wall 6/21 Eden Park Wall near poolhouse 6/21 Seasongood Square Wall 6/21 Waterfront Pavers 6/21 SRP Pavers 6/21

140 PARK BOARD CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS

182012 Mt Echo Improvements $ 30,000 $ 13,638 $ - $ 16,362

Engineering Services $ 11,500 5/21 putting together a work order Terrace Repair $ 11,362 10/21 Engineering required, use with funds in 212000 182013 Piatt Park Improvements $ 100,000 $ 3,734 $ 16,044 $ 80,223 Lighting $ 13,327 5/21 scheduling work Drinking Fountain Replacement $ 30,000 8/21 investigating Paver Replacement/ Leveling $ 6,450 8/21 scheduling work 182014 Hauck Garden Improvements $ 50,000 $ - $ 30,000 $ 20,000 Hauck House, paint $ 20,000 7/21 circulating work order for signatures Concrete Repairs/ Replacement $ 30,000 4/21 scheduling work 182015 Lytle Park Improvements $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ 50,000 Play Set Replacement $ 50,000 TBD This supplements the Lytle Park Budget 182016 Mt Storm Improvements $ 26,230 $ 19,260 $ 6,970 $ - concrete work $ 6,970 4/21 scheduling work 182017 Drabner Funded Infrastructure Improvements $ 250,000 $ 52,250 $ 7,796 $ 189,954

Sinton Building Roof Repairs $ 20,000 9/21 putting together a work order request, Poor condition per assessment Admin Building Painting $ 30,000 7/21 circulating work order for signatures Bellevue Steps $ 5,000 6/21 Masonry contract work, this supplements project 182008 Mt Echo Comfort Station $ 50,000 6/21 Building Renovation. Requires architectural design services. Inwood Comfort Station $ 40,000 6/21 Building Renovation. Requires architectural design services.

182018 Fleischmann Funded Infrastructure Improvements $ 425,000 $ 301,056 $ 30,461 $ 93,484 Burnet Woods Disc Golf Tees $ 20,000 6/21 Holding for a new concrete term contract for better pricing Administration Building Roof $ 73,484 12/21 1st bids rejected, put together a work order request for this project Inwood Play Set $ 123,390 5/21 work underway (partial funding) 182019 Stanbery Park Pavilion- State of Ohio Capital $ 352,800 $ 305,135 $ 37,326 $ 10,340 Change Order $ 10,340 Additional grading and concrete work Pavilion Construction $ 298,400 - Completed. 192000 Park Infrastructure Rehabilitation- FY19 $ 2,077,001 $ 1,245,659 $ 822,700 $ 8,642 French Park- Replace Sidewalks $ 63,864 5/21 scheduling work, poor condition per assessment Friendship Park- Additional Inclinometers and Borings $ 31,512 5/22 inclinometer install completed/ readings still scheduled Mt Airy Oak Ridge shelter- replace slab $ 16,611 5/21 scheduling work Mt Airy Area 10 ADA Improvements $ 20,432 6/21 Part of ADA plan, scheduling work Mt Airy Area 13 ADA Improvements $ 20,753 6/21 Part of ADA plan, scheduling work Twin Lakes Engineer $ 4,970 5/21 work underway Mt Storm concrete repairs $ 12,878 4/21 schedulig work Burnet Woods concrete work $ 77,295 4/21 scheduling work Gibson House painting consultant $ 4,250 6/21 work underway Swing Set Replacement FY21 project Oak Ridge $ 17,911 6/21 scheduling work Alms playset repairs $ 5,941 5/21 completed Mt Echo play set Replacement $ 91,500 12/20 completed

141 PARK BOARD CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS

Alms curb and concrete repairs $ 43,124 5/21 scheduling work Replace swing sets (Burnet/Drake/French/Glenway/Mayfield/Dunore/ Area 3) $ 94,231 12/20 completed Tom Jones pergola lumber and signage $ 11,690 6/21 scheduling work Kyle Plush Change Order $ 8,642 4/21 Additional grading and concrete work Inwood- repairs to main stair $ 21,448 5/21 scheduling work Mt Airy Treehouse Emergency Repairs- consultant work $ 5,000 5/21 completed Mt Airy Retaining Wall Project special inspections $ 4,500 11/21 scheduling work Blue Spruce Road Special Inspections $ 3,683 5/21 scheduling work Tom Jones Commons special inspections $ 3,742 5/21 work underway 192007 Inwood Park Improvements $ 500,000 $ 225,115 $ 244,885 $ 30,000 Inwood Benches and Pads $ 30,000 7/21 certifying funds Inwood playset, lower park area $ 69,477 5/21 scheduling work Inwood remove concrete table $ 3,613 5/21 scheduling work Inwood-railing install $ 6,923 5/21 scheduling work Inwood access road $ 38,041 5/21 scheduling work Inwood ADA Walks $ 21,315 5/21 schedulig work Inwood asplalt removal at old play set $ 7,750 5/21 scheduling work 202000 Park Infrastructure Rehabilitation $ 2,009,000 $ 528,557 $ 554,905 $ 925,538 Mt Airy Blue Spruce Road restoration $ 374,705 6/21 Work will begin in April, will take about 4 weeks to replace. Mt Airy Bike Trail Parking Diehl Road $ 64,411 5/21 scheduling work Mt Airy Parking Lot Shepard Creek $ 72,922 5/21 scheduling work Mt Airy Retaining Wall Project $ 139,677 7/21 Pending Board Approval, circulate Work Order, funds combined with $28,300 in fund 182010. Req to prevent failure. Tom Jones swingsets and play surfaces $ 42,867 6/21 scheduling work Consuting for Electric Arc Flash Surveys $ 66,955 2/22 certifying funds Trailside Nature Center- replace condensing units/ heat pump $ 42,725 7/21 certifying funds, poor condition per assessment Mt Airy Treehouse Emergency Repairs $ 19,452 3/21 certifying funds. Hauck/Administration/French House Painting $ 156,397 7/21 circulating work order for signatures Alms Park storm structure repair $ 10,000 7/21 putting together a proposal Burnet Woods ADA improvements around new play set $ 20,000 10/21 putting together a scope of work Burnet Woods concrete work around bandstand $ 11,644 9/21 certifying funds Burnet Woods DGI Repair $ 1,850 5/21 certifying funds Administration Building Renovation Work $ 168,351 11/21 Pending Board Approval, circulate Work Order Owls Nest building demo $ 37,666 7/21 Demo awarded to a Contractor. Scheduling Work. Rapid Run barrier for retaining wall $ 9,869 9/21 certifying funds Seasongood Pavilion Roof Replacement $ 50,000 10/21 getting a proposal Mt Echo concrete walk repairs near play set $ 15,000 7/21 getting a proposal Replace Rapid Run Play Set FY 21 project $ 137,766 8/21 Pending Board Approval, a certification request will be submitted. Replace swing set in Rapid Run FY 21 project $ 17,000 8/21 getting a proposal Gibson House Roof and Gutter Repairs $ 20,000 10/21 getting a proposal Staff Reimbursements for FY21 $ 528,557

142 PARK BOARD CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS

202004 Burnet Woods Planetarium Projector $ 39,030 $ - $ 38,550 $ 480

202005 Bramble Park Streambank Restoration $ 129,225 $ - $ - $ 129,225 $ 129,225 RFQ will be issued for Design/ Build 202006 Sawyer Point Park Gateway $ 229,510 $ 111,329 $ 118,181 $ - BN Design Work $ 111,329 $ 118,181 Design work completed. 202008 Smale Riverfront Park Extension $ 6,975,000 $ - $ 6,312,800 $ 662,200

202011 Sawyer Point Fishing Pier $ 773,000 $ 587,000 $ 185,000 $ 1,000 Prus Construction $ 587,000 $ 185,000 7/21 Construction suspended due to high water. Work will commence 6/21. 202005 Bramble Park Streambank Restoration $ 129,225 $ 129,225 Streambank Project Renovation 8/21 RFP package is CM approval for public advertisement

202008 Smale Riverfront Park Extension $ 6,975,000 $ 662,200 5/21 under construction

212000 Park Infrastructure Rehabilitation $ 2,001,000 $ - $ - $ 2,001,000 Comfort Stations General Repairs $ 5,000 Emergency Repairs/ Vandalism $ 15,000 Greenhouse Repairs $ 5,000 Repairs as Needed Roads/ Parking/ Trails/ Steps $ 35,000 Minimal funds needed for repairs Structures $ 5,000 Held for emergency repairs. Playset repairs $ 5,000 Held for emergency repairs. Utilities/ Storm Water Emergency Repairs $ 75,000 Held for emergency repairs. Various Fencing/Benches/ Signage $ 11,000 As needed Rapid Run pond caulking $ 50,000 9/21 reviewing scope. The caulking was noted in poor condition from the assessment Rapid Run Pavilion Gutter Repairs $ 15,000 10/21 getting a proposal Victory Parkway Roof Repairs $ 30,000 10/21 getting a proposal Eden Park ADA improvements at upper overlook picnic $ 20,000 12/21 getting a proposal Eden Park Fulton Steps repair landings $ 20,000 12/21 getting a proposal Drake Park trip hazards $ 15,000 12/21 getting a proposal Maple Ridge Garage Roof Replacement $ 20,000 10/21 getting a proposal Hauck House Roof Repairs $ 20,000 12/21 putting together a scope of work Twin Lakes replace pond pumps $ 50,000 11/21 putting together a work order request Sinton Service Building/ Infrastructure Renovations $ 200,000 12/21 Renovation and code compliance. Architect being retained. Mt Echo Terrace Repairs $ 75,000 10/21 Engineering required, to subsidize 182018 Administration Building retaining wall repair $ 40,000 6/22 masonry term contract work Administration Building Roof $ 10,000 12/21 Use with fund 182018 Rapid Run walk replacement $ 120,000 12/21 putting together a scope of work Gibson House exterior painting and carpentry $ 150,000 10/21 Consultant needs to develop specs for bidding this project Gibson House- exterior painting and carpentry phase 2 $ 100,000 6/22 IWF Pump and motor repairs $ 50,000 6/21 If Required for Summer Season

143 PARK BOARD CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS

Lighting and Electric Repairs $ 22,000 TBD placeholder for any repairs that need to be made per the Arc-Flash assessment ADA Improvements $ 50,000 6/22 Poor condition per assessment Drake/Alms/Fechheimer- replace DF with an ADA fixture $ 24,000 6/22 Poor condition per assessment La Boiteaux- LED lights, road and parkng repair $ 40,000 6/22 Poor condition per assessment Kennedy- ADA walk repairs, stair repairs $ 30,000 6/22 Putting together a proposal, Poor condition per assessment Alms road resurface $ 111,000 12/21 putting together a proposal, Poor condition per assessment Alms resurface play areas $ 48,000 8/21 poor condition per assessment Sinton Building Roof Replacement $ 125,000 9/21 putting together a work order request, Poor condition per assessment Staff Reimbursements for FY 21 $ 355,000 As needed to cover staff costs. Design/ Engineering/ Consulting Services $ 55,000

212006 Parks Operations Center$ 57,750 $ 57,750 KZF Design $ 57,750 certifying funds

144 Cincinnati Park Board Financial Presentation – April 2021

BOARD OF PARK COMMISSIONERS

Brad Lindner - PRESIDENT James Goetz - VICE PRESIDENT Susan F Castellini Molly North Linda Lee Thomas

Kara Kish – DIRECTOR Jenny Mobley – Deputy Director Steven Schuckman - DIVISION MANAGER Rocky Merz - DIVISION MANAGER Crystal Courtney – DIVISION MANAGER Craig Sherman - CFO

950 Eden Park Drive Cincinnati, OH 45202 Phone (513) 352-4080 Fax (513) 352-4096 www.cincinnatiparks.com 145

Table of Contents

YTD BUDGET VS. FUND BALANCES ENDOWMENT YTD REVENUE EXPENSES FUND SUMMARY

146 YTD Budget vs. Expenses As of March 31, 2021

147 FY Year over Year Expense Review As of March 31, 2021

Sum of AMOUNT Column Labels Row Labels 2019 2020 2021 Notes Salaries are driving the decrease - Down 22 050 - General $ 6,875,008 $ 7,865,394 $ 6,636,827 headcount versus 2020 ( 7 FT and 15 PT) 107 - Stormwater $ 601,369 $ 1,494,991 $ 1,257,853 301 - St Const $ 199,006 $ 257,177 $ 143,117 Supplies decrease of $20K and down 1 FTE 302 - Infrastruct $ 1,271,938 $ 1,381,106 $ 1,253,971 318 - Sawyer Pnt $ 729,009 $ 378,958 $ 221,559 Decrease in salary reimbursements 326 - Park Misc Rev $ 358,734 $ 401,952 $ 310,130 327 - W.M. Ampt $ 5,700 $ 13,152 $ 4,850 328 - Groesbeck $ 6,910 $ 5,871 329 - Riverfront Park $ 250,158 $ 492,703 $ 629,174 Increase in salary reimbursements 330 - Park Lodge $ 15,404 $ 15,300 $ 36,746 332 - Krohn $ 622,848 $ 869,904 $ 602,367 428 - Urban Forest $ 82,478 $ 965 $ 5,020 430 - Parks Priv Endo $ 186,421 $ 520,965 $ 463,770 752 - Park PIF $ 87,000 $ 256,500 Infrastructure Study and District 5 Design Services 759 - Cit Transit $ 23,875 792 - Forestry Asm $ 1,198,261 $ 1,403,611 $ 1,541,441 Grand Total $ 12,427,118 $ 15,189,048 $ 13,363,326

148 Fund Balances Account Account Account Account Account Account Balance as of Balance as of Balance as of Balance as of Balance as of Balance as of Fund Name 11/06/2020 12/04/2020 01/07/2021 02/08/2021 03/08/2021 04/06/2021 318 Sawyer Point $ 1,350,919 $ 1,347,342 $ 1,332,665 $ 1,326,090 $ 1,328,104 $ 1,315,060 326 Park Misc Revenue & Special Activity $ 1,262,398 $ 1,246,937 $ 1,209,586 $ 1,192,516 $ 1,186,553 $ 1,118,110 327 WM Ampt Free Concerts $ 44,465 $ 44,465 $ 42,765 $ 42,765 $ 42,765 $ 42,765 328 Groesbeck Endowment $ 145,586 $ 145,586 $ 145,586 $ 145,586 $ 145,586 $ 145,586 329 Cincinnati Riverfront Park $ 3,748,560 $ 3,734,632 $ 3,779,382 $ 3,789,826 $ 3,366,211 $ 3,302,963 330 Park Lodge/Pavilion Deposits $ 1,175,544 $ 1,168,161 $ 1,167,571 $ 1,171,626 $ 1,171,626 $ 1,158,026 332 Krohn Conservatory $ 742,650 $ 715,811 $ 674,833 $ 582,046 $ 540,269 $ 491,313 334 Columbia Parkway Greenway $ 500 $ 500 $ 500 $ 502 $ 502 $ 502 403 Yeatman's Cove Park Trust $ 702,654 $ 702,654 $ 702,654 $ 705,059 $ 705,059 $ 705,059 428 Urban Forestry $ 202,064 $ 202,064 $ 207,114 $ 207,114 $ 207,114 $ 207,184 430 Parks Private Endowment $ 570,469 $ 565,724 $ 485,949 $ 377,963 $ 895,372 $ 835,058 706 Ampt Trust $ 132,897 $ 134,162 $ 134,879 $ 135,336 $ 136,601 $ 137,318 707 Groesbeck Trust $ 42,474 $ 42,551 $ 45,904 $ 46,618 $ 46,618 $ 50,481 708 Schmidlapp Music $ 51,451 $ 51,451 $ 51,453 $ 51,634 $ 51,634 $ 51,641 752 Permanent Capital Improvement $ 2,471,096 $ 2,349,055 $ 2,326,940 $ 2,322,116 $ 2,264,824 $ 2,274,723 792 Forestry Assessment $ 1,495,525 $ 1,306,727 $ 1,045,867 $ 882,558 $ 1,399,484 $ 1,209,782

Account Account Account Account Account Account Balance as of Balance as of Balance as of Balance as of Balance as of Balance as of Account Number 10/31/2020 11/30/2020 12/31/2020 01/31/2021 02/28/2021 03/31/2021 PNC 6022/6081 $ 2,123,287 $ 2,609,413 $ 2,895,832 $ 3,203,575 $ 2,605,625 $ 2,651,653 PNC 4573 $ 3,552,975 $ 3,838,519 $ 3,950,672 $ 3,923,817 $ 3,972,199 $ 4,029,484

149 Endowment Fund Summary

Sep-20 Oct-20 Nov-20 Dec-20 Jan-21 Feb-21 Mar-21 Fund Name Balance Balance Balance Balance Balance Balance Balance Trustee Bettman $ 2,248,360 $ 2,215,564 $ 2,360,234 $ 2,435,611 $ 2,419,497 $ 2,452,298 $ 2,498,695 Drabner $ 1,112,219 $ 1,097,765 $ 1,199,444 $ 1,241,917 $ 1,220,193 $ 1,244,366 $ 1,265,722 Fleischmann $ 767,735 $ 757,845 $ 805,657 $ 834,088 $ 818,760 $ 835,943 $ 850,658 Fleischmann $ 2,614,674 $ 2,581,169 $ 2,818,583 $ 2,920,200 $ 2,869,134 $ 2,934,472 $ 2,987,625 Geier $ 1,646,301 $ 1,625,001 $ 1,776,185 $ 1,839,844 $ 1,813,322 $ 1,851,072 $ 1,883,587 Miles-Edwards $ 3,411,310 $ 3,339,062 $ 3,585,381 $ 3,687,245 $ 3,619,567 $ 3,699,596 $ 3,892,704 Levy $ 32,784 $ 31,706 $ 34,376 $ 35,473 $ 35,209 $ 35,865 $ 37,097 Sub-total $11,833,381 $11,648,112 $12,579,860 $12,994,377 $12,795,682 $13,053,612 $13,416,089

Beneficiary Only Hauck- Sooty Acres $ 529,019 $ 522,190 $ 566,123 $ 586,093 $ 587,097 $ 599,351 $ 611,247 Hauck - Fountain Sq $ 1,652,660 $ 1,631,637 $ 1,611,595 $ 1,668,556 $ 1,671,336 $ 1,706,114 $ 1,739,775 Meyer $ 4,934,622 $ 4,871,859 $ 5,073,885 $ 5,250,126 $ 5,258,642 $ 5,367,509 $ 5,473,036 Sub-total $ 7,116,301 $ 7,025,686 $ 7,251,603 $ 7,504,775 $ 7,517,075 $ 7,672,974 $ 7,824,059

Endowment Total $ 18,949,682 $ 18,673,798 $ 19,831,464 $ 20,499,151 $ 20,312,756 $ 20,726,586 $ 21,240,148

Commissioners' Fund $ 3,612,761 $ 3,552,975 $ 3,838,519 $ 3,950,672 $ 3,923,817 $ 3,972,199 $ 4,029,484

Invested Total $ 22,562,443 $ 22,226,772 $ 23,669,982 $ 24,449,824 $ 24,236,573 $ 24,698,785 $ 25,269,632

150 Revenue

FUND_DESC FY20 FY21 - Event rentals decrease versus 318 - Sawyer Pnt $764,119 $232,673 FY20 – ($1,260,370) 326 - Park Misc Rev $625,845 ($99) 329 - Riverfront Park $814,295 $193,756 - Admission decrease versus 330 - Park Lodge $304,508 $6,759 FY20 – ($486,571) 332 - Krohn $612,807 $134,347 - Programming – ($326,448) 428 - Urban Forest $15,878 $14,990 - Parking decease versus FY20 – 752 - Park PIF $135,410 $176,492 ($339,352) 792 - Forestry Asm $661,739 $724,692 151 Grand Total $3,934,601 $1,483,610 Revenue

FY20 Net Revenue Losses due to COVID19 (March-June) • Krohn Fund 332 and Gift Shop – ($780K) • Riverfront Park Fund 329 – ($142K) • Sawyer Point Fund 318 – ($157K) • Rentals and Explore Nature Fund 326 – ($195K) • Includes refund of ($68K) that occurred in FY21 • Total Net Revenue Loss ($1.27M)

FY21 Net Revenue Losses due to COVID19 (FY21) **FY2021 Revenue versus FY2020 and FY2019 average) • Krohn Fund 332– ($377K) • Butterfly Show Postponed until May 2021 • Riverfront Park Fund 329 – ($457K) • Sawyer Point Fund 318 – ($432K) • Pavilions and Lodges Fund 330 – ($216) • Rentals and Explore Nature Fund 326 – ($532K) • Total Net Revenue Loss ($2.0M) 152

Cincinnati Park Board FY21 Budget versus FY21Expenses Location (Multiple Items)

Row Labels FY 2021 Budget FY2021 Expenses Remaining Budget Admin Overhead $ 130,000 $ 12,023 $ 117,978 Ault Park $ 20,700 $ - $ 20,700 Ault Park - Drackett $ 35,000 $ 2,177 $ 32,823 Avon Woods $ - $ - $ - Bettman $ 16,340 $ 2,000 $ 14,340 Bettman Operating $ 15,000 $ 5,755 $ 9,245 California Woods $ - $ - $ - Carousel Gift Shop $ - $ - $ - City Gard Cent Pky $ 18,978 $ 6,428 $ 12,550 City Gard Fort Wash $ 12,690 $ 9,398 $ 3,292 City Gard Torr Pky $ 5,500 $ - $ 5,500 Comisar Overlook Alms $ 914 $ - $ 914 Dasiy Jones Garden $ 475 $ - $ 475 Diggs Foundation Burnet Woods $ 26,250 $ - $ 26,250 Dornette $ - $ - $ - Dornette - Mt Airy Hiking $ 25,000 $ 1,283 $ 23,718 Drabner $ 30,000 $ - $ 30,000 Eden $ 10,000 $ 5,212 $ 4,788 Fleischmann $ 68,000 $ 42,809 $ 25,191 Fount Sq-Hauck $ 54,000 $ 44,879 $ 9,121 French Park $ - $ - $ - Geier $ 19,953 $ 9,953 $ 10,000 Gift Shop - Krohn $ 40,000 $ - $ 40,000 Greeno $ 15,000 $ 3,388 $ 11,612 Greenspace $ 113,100 $ 12,341 $ 100,759 Jacobs Hyde park Fountain Fund $ 500 $ 1,850 $ (1,350) Kapela $ 0 $ - $ 0 Krohn $ 221,000 $ 79,346 $ 141,654 Krohn Adm $ 0 $ - $ 0 Lazarus $ 1,000 $ - $ 1,000 Lytle Park $ 0 $ 1,744 $ (1,744) Meyer $ 165,643 $ 84,513 $ 81,130 Miles-Edwards $ 238,734 $ 168,854 $ 69,880 Nature Next Door $ 38,500 $ - $ 38,500 Parks Foundation $ 40,000 $ - $ 40,000 PBV Gardens $ 12,000 $ - $ 12,000 Piatt Park $ 105,788 $ 5,581 $ 100,207 Releaf $ - $ - $ - Ruth Wagner / Stewards of Burnet Woods $ 319,072 $ 309,572 $ 9,500 Schriber $ 0 $ - $ 0 Show Sponsors $ 0 $ - $ 0 Sooty Acres $ 47,144 $ 4,506 $ 42,638 Vasey $ 5,700 $ - $ 5,700 Waterfront Parks $ 147,000 $ 32,536 $ 114,464 Wilson Wildflower fund $ 475 $ - $ 475 Smale Riverfront Park $ 43,084 $ 32,718 $ 10,366 Grand Total $ 2,042,540 $ 878,866 $ 1,163,674

153 FY2021 Commissioners Fund Budget Tracking Statement

202-1000 Operations Administration DESCRIPTION FUNDING SOURCE Funding Number LINE 2021 Budget Adjusted Budget 2021 Expense 2021 Encum Total Expense and Encum Variance Travel/Training Admin Overhead (1001) 1001 I2150 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 2, 023 $ 10,000 $ 12,023 $ 12,978 Playground Mulch Miles-Edwards (5160) 5160 I2151 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 18, 156 $ 44 $ 18,200 $ 11,800 Wi-Fi for Nature Centers and Krohn Admin Overheard - Paid out of Fund 473 1001 I2155 $ - $ 122,145 $ 72, 338 $ 49,807 $ 122,145 $ - Liberty Gardens Annual Planting Admin Overheard (1001) 1001 I2157 $ - $ 5,482 0 0 $ - $ 5,482 MT Echo Steps Admin Overhead (1001) 1001 I2153 $ - $ 21,300 0 0 $ - $ 21,300 COROA Design Services Admin Overhead (1001) 1001 I2156 $ 6,500 $ - $ 6,500 $ 6,500 $ - Carousel Payment Admin Overhead (1001) 1001 I2160 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 0 0 $ - $ 100, 000 Total 202 - 1000 $ 155,000 $ 310,427 $ 92,517 $ 66,3 51 $ 158,867 $ 151,560

202-2000 Waterfront Parks DESCRIPTION FUNDING SOURCE LINE 2021 Budget Adjusted Budget 2021 Expense 2021 Encum Total Expense and Encum Variance Sawyer Point P&G Pavilion Waterfront Parks (2082) 2082 I2250 $ 67,000 $ 67,000 $ - $ 19, 407 $ 19,407 $ 47,593 Sawyer -Maint/Supplies Waterfront Parks (2082) 2082 I2251 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ - $ 5, 000 $ 5,000 $ 35,000

$ - Total 202 - 2000 $ 107,000 $ 107,000 $ - $ 2 4,407 $ 24,407 $ 82,593

202-3000 Operations East DESCRIPTION FUNDING SOURCE LINE 2021 Budget Adjusted Budget 2021 Expense 2021 Encum Total Expense and Encum Variance Ault Park Maint/Supplies Ault Park (3007) 3007 I2350 $ 5,700 $ 5,700 0 0 $ - $ 5,700 Plant Material Ault Park (3007) 3007 I2351 $ 0 $ 0 0 0 $ - $ 0 Torr Pkwy Supplies City Gard Torr Pky (3017) 3017 I2352 $ 4,500 $ 4,500 0 0 $ - $ 4,500 Fleischmann Maintenance Fleischmann (3033) 3033 I2353 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 25, 209 $ 12,600 $ 37,809 $ 12,191 Beautification Contractual French Park (3035) 3035 I2354 $ - $ - 0 0 $ - $ - Geier Espionoage Maintenance Geier (3036) 3036 I2355 $ 5,000 $ 14,953 $ 9, 953 $ - $ 9,953 $ 5,000 Hort Supplies Meyer (3159) 3159 I2356 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 0 0 $ - $ 3,000 Hort Supplies Admin (1001) 1001 I2368 $ 14,550 0 0 $ - $ 14,550 Hort Supplies Lazarus (3055) 3055 I2358 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 0 0 $ - $ 1,000 Hort Supplies Comisar Overlook Alms 1061 I2357 $ 914 $ 914 0 0 $ - $ 914 Hort Supplies Jacobs Hyde park Fountain Fund 1063 I2359 $ 500 $ 500 $ 1,747 $ 103 $ 1,850 $ (1,350) Hort Supplies Ault Park - Drackett 3007 I2360 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 0 $ 2,177 $ 2,177 $ 22,823 Total 202 - 3000 $ 95,614 $ 120,117 $ 36,909 $ 14,8 80 $ 51,789 $ 68,328

154 FY2021 Commissioners Fund Budget Tracking Statement

202-3100 Operations Krohn and Warder DESCRIPTION FUNDING SOURCE LINE 2021 Budget Adjusted Budget 2021 Expense 2021 Encum Total Expense and Encum Variance Floral Shows Contingency Geier (3036) 3136 I2371 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 0 0 $ - $ 5,000 Krohn Gift Shop Purchases Krohn (3137) 3137 I2372 $ 150,000 $ 119,999 $ 24, 553 $ 8,374 $ 32,927 $ 87,072 Krohn Gift Shop Sales Tax Krohn (3137) 3137 I2373 $ 21,000 $ 21,000 $ 2, 480 $ - $ 2,480 $ 18,520 Butterfly Support Krohn (3137) 3137 I2381 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 64 $ 10, 608 $ 10,672 $ 39,328 Foral Support Krohn (3137) 3137 I2382 $ 30,001 $ 19,443 $ 13, 823 $ 33,266 $ (3,265) Hort Supplies - Warder Money Meyer (3159) 1036 I2455 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 1, 448 $ 21,186 $ 22,634 $ (2,634) Park Supplies - Warder Money Meyer (1059) 1036 I2158 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 1, 154 $ 18,431 $ 19,585 $ 415 Contractual Labor Kapela (3149) 3149 I2374 $ 0 $ 0 0 0 $ - $ 0 Floral Shows Contingency Meyer (3159) 3159 I2376 $ 9,000 $ 9,000 $ - $ 9, 640 $ 9,640 $ (640) Educational Programs Miles-Edwards (5160) 3168 I2377 $ 0 $ 0 0 0 $ - $ 0 Educational Programs Krohn Adm (3151) 3151 I2378 $ 0 $ 0 0 0 $ - $ 0 Krohn Support Schriber (3173) 3173 I2379 $ 0 $ 0 0 0 $ - $ 0 Floral Shows Show Sponsors (3175) 3175 I2380 $ 0 $ 0 0 0 $ - $ 0 0 0 $ - $ - Total 202 - 3100 $ 275,000 $ 275,000 $ 49,143 $ 82,0 62 $ 131,205 $ 143,795

202-3200 Operations Central DESCRIPTION FUNDING SOURCE LINE 2021 Budget Adjusted Budget 2021 Expense 2021 Encum Total Expense and Encum Variance Beautification Central Pkwy City Gard Cent Pky (3214) 3214 I2390 $ 13,078 $ 13,078 $ - $ 6, 428 $ 6,428 $ 6,650 Lytle Park Hort Supplies Lytle Park (3257) 3257 I2392 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,744 $ - $ 1,744 $ (1,744) Maintenance Contract Piatt Park (3267) 3267 I2393 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 0 0 $ - $ 2,000 Hort Supplies Piatt Park (3267) 3267 I2394 $ 10,500 $ 10,500 $ 2, 786 $ 2,795 $ 5,581 $ 4,919 Sooty Acres Sooty Acres (3276) 3276 I2395 $ 77,144 $ 47,144 $ 3, 652 $ 854 $ 4,506 $ 42,638 Levy Clock Supplies Fleischmann (1033) 1033 I2396 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 0 0 $ - $ 3,000 Operational Support/Hort Supplies Meyer (1059) 1059 I2252 $ 18,500 $ 18,500 $ 5, 828 $ 13,084 $ 18,912 $ (412) Beautification Eden Park Eden (1030) 1030 I2253 $ - $ 5,000 $ - $ 5, 212 $ 5,212 $ (212) Beautification Eden Park Roundabout Eden (1030) 1030 I2254 $ - $ 5,000 0 0 $ - $ 5,000 Total 202 - 3200 $ 124,222 $ 104,222 $ 14,010 $ 28,3 74 $ 42,384 $ 61,838

155 FY2021 Commissioners Fund Budget Tracking Statement

202-4000 Operations West DESCRIPTION FUNDING SOURCE LINE 2021 Budget Adjusted Budget 2021 Expense 2021 Encum Total Expense and Encum Variance Mt Airy Aboretum Hort Supplies Vasey (4080) 4080 I2451 $ 2,850 $ 2,850 0 0 $ - $ 2,850 Hinkle Garden Hort Supplies Meyer (1059) 1059 I3447 $ 3,500 $ 3,500 0 0 $ - $ 3,500 Hort Supplies Greeno (1040) 1040 I3448 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 0 0 $ - $ 5,000 Hort Supplies Wilson Wildflower fund 1062 I3449 $ 475 $ 475 0 0 $ - $ 475 Hort Supplies Dasiy Jones Garden 4032 I3450 $ 475 $ 475 0 0 $ - $ 475 Supplies Diggs Foundation Burnet Woods 1011 I3453 $ 1,750 $ 1,750 0 0 $ - $ 1,750 Mt Storm Project Parks Foundation 1062 I3454 $ - $ 40,000 0 0 $ - $ 40,000 Burnet Woods Lake Mgmt Meyer (1059) 1059 I3452 $ 6,500 $ 6,500 0 0 $ - $ 6,500 Total 202 - 4000 $ 20,550 $ 60,550 $ - $ - $ - $ 60,550

202-5100 Land Management DESCRIPTION FUNDING SOURCE LINE 2021 Budget Adjusted Budget 2021 Expense 2021 Encum Total Expense and Encum Variance Wildflower Seeds & Plants Meyer (5159) 5159 I2550 $ 300 $ 300 $ - $ 515 $ 515 $ (215) Mt Airy Invasive Species Removal Dornette - Mt Airy Hiking 3126 I3455 $ - $ 24,500 0 0 $ - $ 24,500 Trail Improvements Meyer (5159) 5159 I2552 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 1, 019 $ - $ 1,019 $ 3,981 Land Management Supplies Miles-Edwards (5160) 5160 I2553 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 0 0 $ - $ 1,000 Trail Crew Materials Dornette - Mt Airy Hiking 3126 I2556 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 141 $ 1, 141 $ 1,283 $ 23,718 Trail Crew Materials Greeno (1040) 1040 I3158 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 2, 646 $ 743 $ 3,388 $ 6,612 Trail Crew Equipment Miles-Edwards (1060) 1060 I3159 $ 2,500 $ 2,500 $ 1,959 $ - $ 1,959 $ 541 Releaf Program Releaf (5177) 5177 I2554 $ - $ - 0 0 $ - $ - Emergenecy Tree Removal Meyer (5159) 5159 I2555 $ - $ - 0 0 $ - $ - Burnet Wds Ruth Wagner (Burnet Wds -1071) 1071 I3168 $ 250,000 $ 319,072 $ 75,262 $ 234,311 $ 309,572 $ 9,500 Total 202 - 5100 $ 293,800 $ 387,372 $ 81,027 $ 236,710 $ 317,737 $ 69,635

202-5200 Interstate Greenspace DESCRIPTION FUNDING SOURCE LINE 2021 Budget Adjusted Budget 2021 Expense 2021 Encum Total Expense and Encum Variance Hort Supplies Fount Sq-Hauck (3234) 3234 I2391 $ 40,000 $ 54,000 $ 23, 360 $ 21,519 $ 44,879 $ 9,121 Ft. Washington Way Bridge Planters City Gard Fort Wash (3215) 3215 I2398 $ 10,690 $ 10,690 $ - $ 9, 398 $ 9,398 $ 1,292 Hort Supplies Greenspace ('2041) 2041 I2403 $ - $ 20,100 $ - $ 12, 341 $ 12,341 $ 7,759 Total 202 - 5100 $ 50,690 $ 84,790 $ 23,360 $ 43,2 58 $ 66,618 $ 18,172

202-8000 Smale Riverfront Park

DESCRIPTION FUNDING SOURCE LINE 2021 Budget Adjusted Budget 2021 Expense 2021 Encum Total Expense and Encum Variance Hort Supplies Women's Committee- Smale Riverfront 8047 I2401 $ 19,194 $ 19,194 $ 3, 239 $ 5,588 $ 8,828 $ 10,366 Beautification Anniversary Garden Parks Foundation 8047 I2402 $ - $ 23,890 $ 21, 340 $ 2,550 $ 23,890 $ - Gift Shop Purchases Carousel Gift Shop (8013) I2880 0 0 $ - $ - Sales taxes Carousel Gift Shop (8013) I2881 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -

Total 202 - 8000 $ 19,194 $ 43,084 $ 24,579 $ 8,138 $ 32,718 $ 10,366

Total 202 $ 1,141,070 $ 1,492,562 $ 321,544 $ 504,180 $ 825,724 $ 666,838

Overall Total $ 1,662,548 $ 2,042,540 $ 348,376 $ 530,490 $ 878,866 $ 1,1 63,674

156 FY2021 Commissioners Fund Budget Tracking Statement

203-1000 Admin DESCRIPTION FUNDING SOURCE Funding Number LINE 2021 Budget Adjusted Budget 2021 Expense 2021 Encum Total Expense and Encum Variance Travel/Training Admin Overhead (1001) 1001 I3150 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 0 0 $ - $ 5,000 0 0 Total 203-1000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 5,000

203-2000 Financial Services DESCRIPTION FUNDING SOURCE LINE 2021 Budget Adjusted Budget 2021 Expense 2021 Encum Total Expense and Encum Variance Staff Reimbursement Bettman Operating (2009) 2009 I3253 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 755 $ 5,000 $ 5,755 $ 9,245 Staff Reimbursement Ault Park - Drackett 3007 I3254 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 0 0 $ - $ 10,000 Staff Reimbursement PBV Gardens (2066) 2066 I3261 $ 8,500 $ 8,500 0 0 $ - $ 8,500 Staff Reimbursement Piatt Park (2067) 2067 I3262 $ 18,288 $ 18,288 0 0 $ - $ 18,288 Staff Reimbursement Vasey (2080) 2080 I3263 $ 2,850 $ 2,850 0 0 $ - $ 2,850 Staff Reimbursement Gift Shop - Krohn (2037) 2037 I3264 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 0 0 $ - $ 40,000 Staff Reimbursement Greenspace (2041) 2041 I3265 $ 93,000 $ 93,000 0 0 $ - $ 93,000 Staff Reimbursement Fleischmann (1033) 1027 I2161 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ - $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ - Staff Reimbursement City Gard Torr Pky (2017) 2017 I24023 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 0 0 $ - $ 1,000 Staff Reimbursement City Gard Cent Pky (3214) 3214 I24011 $ 5,900 $ 5,900 0 0 $ - $ 5,900 Staff Reimbursement City Gard Fort Wash (3215) 3215 I24022 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 0 0 $ - $ 2,000 IT Software & Equipment Miles-Edwards (2060) 2060 I3271 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 0 0 $ - $ 20,000 Office Supplies Miles-Edwards (1060) 2001 I3250 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 0 0 $ - $ 5,000 Hazardous Waste Removal Meyer (2059) 2059 I3252 $ - $ 8,707 $ - $ 8,707 $ 8,707 $ (0) Total 203-2000 $ 226,538 $ 235,245 $ 755 $ 18,707 $ 19,462 $ 215,783

203-6000 Business Services DESCRIPTION FUNDING SOURCE LINE 2021 Budget Adjusted Budget 2021 Expense 2021 Encum Total Expense and Encum Variance Public Relations/Sponsorships Miles-Edwards (2060) 2060 I3266 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 2,243 $ - $ 2,243 $ 2,757 Marketing/Media Meyer (2059) 2059 I3267 $ 6,500 $ 6,500 $ 12,208 $ - $ 12,208 $ (5,708) Marketing of Inner City Fleischmann (2033) 2033 I3268 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 0 0 $ - $ 5,000 Website & Marketing Miles-Edwards (2060) 2060 I3270 $ 9,100 $ 9,100 $ 3 ,500 $ 5,600 $ 9,100 $ - Volunteer Supplies Miles-Edwards (1060) 1027 I2154 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 0 0 $ - $ 2,000 Operational Support/Volunteer Fleischmann (1033) 1033 I2152 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 0 0 $ - $ 5,000 Volunteer Support Meyer (2059) 2059 I2159 $ 11,000 $ 11,000 0 0 $ - $ 11,000

Total 203-4000 $ 43,600 $ 43,600 $ 17,951 $ 5,600 $ 23,551 $ 20,049

157 FY2021 Commissioners Fund Budget Tracking Statement

203-5000 Plannning & Design DESCRIPTION FUNDING SOURCE LINE 2021 Budget Adjusted Budget 2021 Expense 2021 Encum Total Expense and Encum Variance Park Improvements Piatt Park (1067) 1067 I3153 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 0 0 $ - $ 75,000 General Capital Improvements Waterfront Parks (1082) 1082 I3155 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 8,127 $ 3 $ 8,129 $ 31,871 Benches/Picnic Tables Meyer (2059) 1033 I3161 $ 30,000 $ 21,293 0 0 $ - $ 21,293 Supplies Drabner (1027) 1027 I3169 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 0 0 $ - $ 30,000 Supplies Meyer (2059) 2059 I3170 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 0 0 $ - $ 30,000 Brumm Arbor Replacement Ault Park (3007) 3007 I3171 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 0 0 $ - $ 15,000 Total 203-4000 $ 220,000 $ 211,293 $ 8,127 $ 3 $ 8,129 $ 203,164

203-4000 Nature Education DESCRIPTION FUNDING SOURCE LINE 2021 Budget Adjusted Budget 2021 Expense 2021 Encum Total Expense and Encum Variance Sundry Materials& Supplies Bettman (4009) 4009 I3451 $ 16,340 $ 16,340 $ - $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 14,340 Program Supplies Nature Next Door 4100 I3452 $ 10,000 $ 38,500 0 0 $ - $ 38,500 Materials & Supplies Avon Woods (4008) 4008 I3453 $ - $ - 0 0 $ - $ - Materials & Supplies California Woods (4012) 4012 I3454 $ - $ - 0 0 $ - $ -

Total 203-4000 $ 26,340 $ 54,840 $ - $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 52,840

Total 203 $ 521,478 $ 549,978 $ 26,833 $ 26,310 $ 53,142 $ 496,835

158

BOARD OF PARK

COMMISSIONERS Date: April 15, 2021

Brad Lindner To: Board of Park Commissioners President

James Goetz From: Kara Kish, Director Vice President

Susan F. Castellini Subject: Personnel Actions – April 2021

Linda Lee Thomas

Molly North

Name Title Division Action Rachel Brucato Florist Waterfront Filled a Full-time open position – worked part time

as a Recreation Specialist since 2018

Garrett Dienno Parks/ Natural Promoted to Recreation Resources Parks/Recreation Maintenance Maintenance Crew Leader Kara S. Kish Director Crew Leader from Florist – Started with Parks in 2015 Jenny Mobley Jacob Edwards Urban Forestry Natural Filled a Full-time open Deputy Director Specialist Resources position Crystal Courtney Nick Griggs Florist East Region Filled a Full-time open Division Manager position Rocky Merz Jackson Hamann Florist West Region Filled a Full-time open Division Manager position – worked part time

Steven L. Schuckman as a Recreation Specialist Division Manager since 2020

Craig Sherman Jonathan Hnatiuk Florist Natural Promoted to a Florist from a Division Manager Resources Tree Maintenance Worker– Started with Parks in 2019

Lynn Lorio Florist West Region Filled a Full-time open position

Brittany Stephenson Florist Krohn/Warder Started Full time – worked part time as a Recreation Specialist since 2016

Greg Torres Florist Natural Filled a Full-time open Resources position

950 Eden Park Drive Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 Phone (513) 352-2604 Fax (513) 352-4096 www.cincinnatiparks.com 159 #cincyparks

2021 SPECIAL EVENTS & PROGRAMS Date Description Time Location 4/1-4/30 Storywalk at California Woods anytime California Woods Every Free Hike Fridays - April Edition! 1:00 PM 2:30 PM California Woods Fri. - 4/23 4/15, Habitat Hunt 10:00 AM 11:30 AM California Woods 4/22, & 4/29 4/1 & Contemporary Art Center Thursday Art Play 10:30 AM 11:30 AM Eden Park Twin Lakes 4/8 4/1 - Mom and Me - Thursday Stroller Hikes 10:00 AM 11:00 AM Location Varies Weekly. 5/27 Check www.cincinnatiparks.com for schedule 4/3 Spring Wildflowers 10:30 AM Noon Trailside Nature Center 4/5 Art & Nature Spring Break Mini Camp 12:30 PM 3:00 PM LaBoiteaux Woods Nature Preserve 4/5 Outdoor Survival Spring Break Camp 9:30 AM 12:00 PM Caldwell Nature Center Every Active Adults - Hike Series 2:30 PM 4:00 PM Location Varies. Check Mon. www.cincinnatiparks.com for 4/1 - a weekly location. 5/27 Every Nature Tots 9:30 AM 11:00 AM LaBoiteaux Woods Nature Tues. Preserve 4/6 - 4/27 Every Lunch & Learn with CincyParks Noon 1:00 PM Location Varies. Check Tues. www.cincinnatiparks.com for 4/6 - a weekly location. 5/25

www.cincinnatiparks.com Cincinnati Parks is committed to providing a quality experience at all parks and facilities by providing 160 reasonable accommodations for individuals with disabilities upon request, call 5133572604. Visitors Reasonable accommodationmay upon be recorded request. by Visitors Cincinnati may Park be Boardphotographed, for educational filmed, and promotionalor recorded uses.by the Cincinnati Parks for educational and promotional uses. 2021 SPECIAL EVENTS & PROGRAMS Date Description Time Location Every Library Nature Encounters (in collaboration 10:30 AM 11:30 AM Location Varies. Check Wed. with Cincinnati Public Library) www.cincinnatiparks.com for 4/7 - a weekly location. 5/26 4/17 Wildflower Walk 10:00 AM 11:30 AM LaBoiteaux Woods Nature Preserve 4/17 Green Up Volunteer Day 1:00 PM 3:00 PM LaBoiteaux Woods Nature Preserve 4/17 Northside Greenspace - Invasive Removal 10:00 AM 12:00 PM Parker Woods Projects & Program Events 4/22 Earth Day Wildflower Walk 1:00 PM 3:00 PM Caldwell Nature Preserve 4/17 & Talk to a Naturalist: Learn iNaturalist 1:00 PM 3:00 PM California Woods Nature Preserve 5/1 4/24 GreenUP Volunteer Day 9:00 AM 12:00 PM California Woods Nature Preserve 4/24 Wildflower Walk 1:30 PM 3:00 PM California Woods Nature Preserve 4/24 Alms Park Allies - Invasive Removal Work 9:00 AM 12:00 PM Alms Park Days 4/25 National Audubon Day Bird Bingo Challenge 12:00 PM 2:00 PM Parkers Woods 4/25 Mt. Airy Trail Runners - Trail Work Days 9:00 AM 12:00 PM Mt. Airy Forest 4/27 & Discovery Days - Ecology 9:30 AM 11:30 AM Caldwell Nature Preserve 4/30 1:00 PM 3:00 PM 4/30 - iNaturalist City Nature Challenge All Day All Cincinnati Parks & Great 5/3 Parks of Hamilton County 4/30 iNaturalist BioBlitz - Naturalist Led Hike 10:00 AM California Woods Nature 11:00 AM Preserve 1:00 PM 4/30 iNaturalist BioBlitz - Naturalist Led Hike 12:00 PM 2:00 PM Trailside Nature Center 4/30 iNaturalist BioBlitz - Naturalist Led Hike 9:00 AM 4:00 PM Avon Woods Nature Preserve 5/1 iNaturalist BioBlitz - Naturalist Led Hike 10:00 AM 11:00 AM LaBoiteaux Woods Nature 12:30PM 1:30 PM Preserve

www.cincinnatiparks.com Cincinnati Parks is committed to providing a quality experience at all parks and facilities by providing 161 reasonable accommodations for individuals with disabilities upon request, call 5133572604. Visitors Reasonable accommodationmay upon be recorded request. by Visitors Cincinnati may Park be Boardphotographed, for educational filmed, and promotionalor recorded uses.by the Reasonable accommodationCincinnati upon Parks request. for educational Visitors may and be photographed,promotional uses. filmed, or recorded by the Cincinnati Parks for educational and promotional uses. 2021 SPECIAL EVENTS & PROGRAMS Date Description Time Location 5/1 iNaturalist BioBlitz - Naturalist Led Hike 1:00 PM 3:00 PM Trailside Nature Center 5/2 iNaturalist BioBlitz - Naturalist Led Hike 1:00 PM 3:00 PM Caldwell Nature Center 5/3 iNaturalist BioBlitz - Naturalist Led Hike 10:00 AM 1:00 PM Bettman Nature Preserve 5/8-9/6 Butterflies of Bali at Krohn Conservatory Daily 10:00 AM 5:00 PM Krohn Conservatory Every May Habitat Hunts 10:00 AM 11:30 AM California Woods Nature Preserve Thurs. - 5/27 5/4 & Discovery Days - Fossils 9:30 AM 11:30 AM Caldwell Nature Preserve 5/7 1:00 PM 3:00 PM 5/6 & Contemporary Arts Center Thursdsay Art Play 10:30 AM 11:30 AM Burnet Woods Bandstand 5/13 5/7, Cicada Walks Noon 1:30 PM Trailside Nature Center 5/14, 5/21, & 5/28 5/15 National Kids to Parks Day! (NKTPD) NKTPD: Fossil Fun 10:00 AM 12:00 PM French Park NKTPD: Gardening, Compost, and Worms 10:00 AM 2:00 PM LaBoiteaux Woods Nature Preserve NKTPD: Nature Play & Hike 10:00 AM 2:00 PM California Woods Nature Preserve NKTPD: Insects 11:00 AM 1:00 PM Smale Riverfront Park NKTPD: Cicada Celebration and Hikes 10:30 AM 3:00 PM Trailside Nature Center 5/15 Northside Greenspace - Invasive Removal 10:00 AM 12:00 PM Buttercup Valley Projects & Program Events 5/18 & Discovery Days - Fossils & Rocks 9:30 AM 11:30 AM Caldwell Nature Preserve 5/21 1:00 PM 3:00 PM 5/20 World Bee Day & DIY Bee House Build! 6:00 PM 7:30 PM Bettman Natural Resource Center 5/20 Rockin’ on the Roebling 6:00 PM 10:00 PM Smale Riverfront Park

www.cincinnatiparks.com Cincinnati Parks is committed to providing a quality experience at all parks and facilities by providing 162 reasonable accommodations for individuals with disabilities upon request, call 5133572604. Visitors Reasonable accommodationmay upon be recorded request. by Visitors Cincinnati may Park be Boardphotographed, for educational filmed, and promotionalor recorded uses.by the Reasonable accommodationCincinnati upon Parks request. for educational Visitors may and be photographed,promotional uses. filmed, or recorded by the Cincinnati Parks for educational and promotional uses. 2021 SPECIAL EVENTS & PROGRAMS Date Description Time Location 5/22 Cicada Celebration 10:30 AM Noon Trailside Nature Center 5/24 Music at the Esplanade 5:00 PM 7:00 PM Castellini Esplanade at Smale Riverfront Park 5/27 Rocking’ on the Roebling 6:00 PM 10:00 PM Smale Riverfront Park 5/29 Sawyer Point Summer Concert Series 2:00 PM 10:00 PM Sawyer Point Every Acoustic Lunch at Piatt 11:30 AM 1:30 PM Piatt Park Tues. * Thurs. 6/1 - 8/31 Every Wednesdays n the Woods 6:00 PM 9:00 PM Burnett Woods Wed. 6/2 - 8/11 Every Smale Mind and Body (Embra Yoga) 6:00 PM 7:00 PM Smale Schmidlapp Event Lawn Wed. 6/2 - 9/29 Every Rockin’ on the Roebling 6:00 PM 10:00 PM Smale Schmidlapp Event Lawn Thurs. 5/20 - 9/2 6/4 Picleball Mixer 7:00 PM 9:00 PM Schott Amphitheatre at Sawyer Point 6/5 Music at the Esplanade 5:00 PM 7:00 PM Castellini Esplanade at Smale Riverfront Park 6/17 Summer Music Festival 6:00 PM 10:00 PM Ault Park 6/19 Music at thte Esplanade 5:00 PM 7:00 PM Castellini Esplanade at Smale Riverfront Park 6/26 Pickleball Mixer 6:00 PM 8:00 PM Schott Amphitheatre at Sawyer Point

www.cincinnatiparks.com Cincinnati Parks is committed to providing a quality experience at all parks and facilities by providing 163 reasonable accommodations for individuals with disabilities upon request, call 5133572604. Visitors Reasonable accommodationmay upon be recorded request. by Visitors Cincinnati may Park be Boardphotographed, for educational filmed, and promotionalor recorded uses.by the Reasonable accommodationCincinnati upon Parks request. for educational Visitors may and be photographed,promotional uses. filmed, or recorded by the Cincinnati Parks for educational and promotional uses. 2021 SPECIAL EVENTS & PROGRAMS Virtual Recognitions planned or completed in Details conjunction with any in-person events. 4/22 “Path of Life” at Mt. Echo with LifeCenter 9:30 AM Mt. Echo 6/5 Kyle Plush Pavilion in Stanberry Park Stanbery Park (Invite Forthcoming) 6/27 Marian Spencer Statue in Smale Riverfront 5 PM Anticipated dedication - Park April/May t.b.d Tom Jones Commons in Eden Park with Tom Anticipated completion - Jones and the Parks Foundation June/July t.b.d. Smale Riverfront Park Expansion with the Anticipated completion - City, County, the Banks Partnership, the Parks June/July Foundation, Icon Music Center 10/9 Inwood Park Playground Anticipated completion - July t.b.d. Ezzard Charles Statue in Laurel Park Anticipated dedication - October Hyde Park Square, Mt. Echo and Burnet Virtual Recognitions planned Woods Playground, Stanberry and Marian or completed in conjunction with Spencer any in-person events.

www.cincinnatiparks.com Cincinnati Parks is committed to providing a quality experience at all parks and facilities by providing 164 reasonable accommodations for individuals with disabilities upon request, call 5133572604. Visitors Reasonable accommodationmay upon be recorded request. by Visitors Cincinnati may Park be Boardphotographed, for educational filmed, and promotionalor recorded uses.by the Reasonable accommodationCincinnati upon Parks request. for educational Visitors may and be photographed,promotional uses. filmed, or recorded by the Cincinnati Parks for educational and promotional uses.