Recent Changes in Solar Irradiance in Antarctica*

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Recent Changes in Solar Irradiance in Antarctica* 2078 JOURNAL OF CLIMATE VOLUME 10 Recent Changes in Solar Irradiance in Antarctica* G. STANHILL AND S. COHEN Institute of Soils and Water, ARO, Bet Dagan, Israel (Manuscript received 13 May 1996, in ®nal form 8 January 1997) ABSTRACT A signi®cant decrease in the annual sums of global irradiance reaching the surface in Antarctica, averaging 20.28 W m22 yr21, was derived from an analysis of all complete years of measurement available from 12 pyranometer stations, 10 of which were on the coast. The decrease was greater than could be attributed to the nonhomogeneous nature of the database, the estimated errors of measurement, or changes in the amount of cloud cover. The smaller database of radiation balance measurements available showed no statistically signi®cant change. Possible causes of these results are discussed, as is the implication that the recent surface warming in Antarctica is not due to radiative forcing. 1. Introduction welling longwave radiation from the atmosphere L↓ should result in a more positive net radiation balance The importance of surface warming in Antarctica ex- at polar surfaces Q . However, an analysis of long-term tends beyond its signi®cance for the continent's fragile * series of Q* measurements from the Arctic showed that ecosystems because of the many important, complex, a small decrease has occurred; this was attributed to the and interacting feedback mechanisms linking the sur- accompanying much larger and statistically highly sig- faces of the polar regions with the global climate system ni®cant decrease in shortwave global irradiance K↓ that (Kellog 1975). was observed (Stanhill 1995). Analysis of surface temperature records from 15 coast- The seasonal and spatial distribution of this decrease, al stations in Antarctica (Jacka and Budd 1992) has as well as its magnitude, suggested that its cause was shown that a rapid and widespread warming took place the Arctic hazeÐtrapped incursions of polluted air 21, between 1959 and 1988, which averaged 0.0288Cyr reaching the Arctic from the industrial regions of the three times the mean rate observed for the earth as a Northern Hemisphere (Stonehouse 1986, Sturges 1991). whole during the same period (Jones and Briffa 1992). Reductions in K↓ caused by the Arctic haze could, by Other studies showing rapid surface warming in Antarc- balancing the increase in L↓, explain the absence of tica this century have been published by Jones (1990), surface warming in the Arctic that has been noted in a Limpert (1974), Raper et al. (1984), Sansum (1989), number of studies of climate change (Kelley et al. 1982; Braeten and Dresckhoff (1992), and King (1994). In con- Kukla and Robinson 1981; Lamb 1982; Tsuchiya 1991; trast, analysis of the South Pole records shows no increase Jaworowski et al. 1992; Jones and Briffa 1992; Kahl et in surface temperature (Hana 1989; Dutton et al. 1991). al. 1993; Walsh 1993). Enhanced warming due to increased concentrations The contrast between surface heating in the North of CO and other radiatively active gases in the atmo- 2 and South Polar regions is also evident in an analysis sphere, predicted for the polar regions 100 yr ago (Ar- of the radiosonde records taken from 1958 to 1992 (An- rhenius 1896), has recently been con®rmed for Antarc- gell 1994). tica by simulation studies using general circulation mod- As the concentration of pollutants and aerosols in els in the equilibrium but not in the transient mode Antarctica is much lower than that in the Arctic (Hansen (Houghton et al. 1992). et al. 1988; Heintzenberg 1989; Kane 1994; Radianov Surface warming caused by an increase in the down- 1994), changes in global irradiance in the South Polar regions should be correspondingly smaller. By contrast, the much higher rates of surface warming reported from * Agricultural Research Organization Contribution Number 1885-E. Antarctica, if caused by radiative forcing, should be re¯ected in an increase in the surface radiation balance. This paper presents a summary of irradiance mea- Corresponding author address: Dr. Gerald Stanhill, Institute of Soils and Water, Agricultural Research Organization, Bet Dagan surements made in Antarctica during the last 40 yr and 50-250, Israel. analyzes the changes found in light of the above hy- E-mail: [email protected] potheses. q1997 American Meteorological Society Unauthenticated | Downloaded 09/23/21 01:12 PM UTC AUGUST 1997 STANHILL AND COHEN 2079 FIG. 1. Positions of measurement sites in Antarctica. The isometric view is orientated as if light source were situated at the base of the map; the true viewpoint looking southward is 1358E. Reproduced from AntarcticaÐA Topographic Database [BAS (Misc) 7 sheet map] by permission of director, British Antarctic Survey. 2. Measurements of global irradiance and diation Balance Data (The World Network), published radiation balance since 1964 by the Voeikov Main Geophysical Obser- Continuous measurements of irradiance in Antarctica vatory in St. Petersburg, Russia. made with calibrated thermoelectric pyranometers and The position of these measurement sites is shown in pyrradiometers started in 1956, with preparations for Fig. 1; their coordinates, together with details of the the International Geophysical Year 1957±58. Since then, periods for which data are available, are presented in 203 yearly global irradiance values have been published Table 1, along with the mean annual totals of K↓, their for 12 sites by various authorities, either directly or coef®cients of variation (standard error as a fraction of through the monthly bulletin Solar Radiation and Ra- mean), and their fractions of extraterrestrial irradiance. TABLE 1. Global irradiance measurements in Antarctica. Mean annual values Period of K↓ CV Data a 22 b c Site Coordinates measurement (GJ m ) FE (%) sources South Pole, United States 908009S 08009 2800 m 1957±92 (2) 4.061 0.73 Ð A Vostok, Russia 788279S 1068529E 3488 m 1958±87 (18) 4.765 0.82 3.5 B Scott, New Zealand 778519S 1668459E 16 m 1957±94 (36) 3.455 0.59 6.1 C Halley, United Kingdom 758319S 268459W 29 m 1956±82 (22) 3.491 0.58 3.0 AD Novolazerevskaya, Russia 708469S 118509E 98 m 1964±87 (24) 4.027 0.63 4.3 B Sanae, South Africa 708399S 28219W 56 m 1975±85 (7) 4.563 0.72 9.9 E Neumayer, Germany 708379S 88229E 1982±94 (11) 3.707 0.58 6.4 F Syowa, Japan 698009S 398359E 21 m 1966±94 (28) 4.026 0.66 4.0 G Mawson, Australia 678369S 628539E 15 m 1975±78 (2) 3.946 0.60 Ð H Mirny, Russia 668339S 938009E 39 m 1956±87 (27) 4.334 0.64 5.6 BI Casey, Australia 668179S 1108329E 15 m 1974±76 (3) 3.606 0.53 Ð H Faraday, United Kingdom 658159S648169W 11 m 1963±82 (20) 3.153 0.46 5.8 D a Figure in brackets is the number of complete years. b FE is the fraction of the extraterrestrial. c AÐWMO (1960); Dutton et al. (1989); Climate Monitoring and Diagnostics Laboratory NOAA; E. G. Dutton (1994, personal communication. BÐMonthly bulletins; Solar Radiation and Radiation Balance Data (The World Network); Voeikov Main Geophysical Observatory, St. Petersburg, Russia. CÐThompson and McDonald (1962); National Institute of Water and Atmosphere Research, Wellington, New Zealand; S. Nichol (1994, personal communication); S. Nichol (1996, personal communication). DÐWMO (1960), Gardiner and Shanklin (1989). EÐWeather Bureau, Pretoria, South Africa; M. Laing (1994, personal communication). FÐSchmidt and Konig-Langlo (1994); Alfred-Wegener-Institute fuÈr Polar und Meeresforschung, Bremerhaven, Germany; G. Konig-Langlo (1995, personal communication). GÐJARE Data Reports (Meteorology), National Institute for Polar Research, Tokyo, Japan; Japan Meteorological Agency, Tokyo, Japan; M. Saiki (1996, personal communication). HÐBureau of Meteorology, Melbourne, Australia; N. A. Streten (1994, personal communication). IÐRusin (1964). Unauthenticated | Downloaded 09/23/21 01:12 PM UTC 2080 JOURNAL OF CLIMATE VOLUME 10 TABLE 2. Radiation balance measurements in Antarctica. Mean annual values Period of Q* CV Data a b 22 c d Site measurement (GJ m ) QE (%) source Vostok, Russia 1966±87 (4) 20.076 20.016 Ð B Halley, United Kingdom 1959±82 (21) 20.303 20.09 24.7 D Novolazerevskaya, Russia 1964±87 (21) 1.177 0.29 10.9 B Neumayer, Germany 1983±94 (11) 20.189 20.05 50.5 F Mirny, Russia 1957±84 (6) 20.201 20.04 Ð B Faraday, United Kingdom 1963±82 (20) 20.151 20.05 71.1 D a Site coordinates as in Table 1. b Bracketed ®gures are the numbers of complete years. c Here, QE is the fraction of global irradiance. d For data sources, see Table 1. The references to data sources tabulated in nearly all over a 1-yr period is similar to the accuracy of daily cases give details of the pyranometers and pyrradiome- values, largely because of the limiting accuracy of cal- ters used, as well as their exposure and calibration. In- ibration possible with pyranometers suitable for contin- formation on instrument exposure at the three Russian uous measurements in the ®eld (WMO 1983). stations is given on pages 91±92 of supplement II, 1968 The accuracy of radiation balance measurements is of the monthly bulletin Solar Radiation and Radiation less than that of global irradiance (Halldin and Lindroth Balance Data (The World Network) cited above. 1992); the WMO guide previously cited suggests a 50% It can be seen from Fig. 1 that all but two of the greater uncertainty in the precision of measurements of measurement sites were situated on the coast between Q* made with pyrradiometers compared with the cor- 668W and 1678E. The two inland sites at which K↓ was responding classes of pyranometers used to measure K↓. measured were Amundson±Scott at the South Pole, at The irradiance measurements available for Antarctica an elevation of 2800 m, and Vostok, 3488 m above mean do not form a homogeneous dataset; rather, they rep- sea level near the Pole of Inaccessibility of the contig- resent a collection of individual measurement series us- uous continent.
Recommended publications
  • Office of Polar Programs
    DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF SURFACE TRAVERSE CAPABILITIES IN ANTARCTICA COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION DRAFT (15 January 2004) FINAL (30 August 2004) National Science Foundation 4201 Wilson Boulevard Arlington, Virginia 22230 DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF SURFACE TRAVERSE CAPABILITIES IN ANTARCTICA FINAL COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Purpose.......................................................................................................................................1-1 1.2 Comprehensive Environmental Evaluation (CEE) Process .......................................................1-1 1.3 Document Organization .............................................................................................................1-2 2.0 BACKGROUND OF SURFACE TRAVERSES IN ANTARCTICA..................................2-1 2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................2-1 2.2 Re-supply Traverses...................................................................................................................2-1 2.3 Scientific Traverses and Surface-Based Surveys .......................................................................2-5 3.0 ALTERNATIVES ....................................................................................................................3-1
    [Show full text]
  • Amazing Antarctica – Lesson 6
    Year 8 GEOGRAPHY – Ecosystems – Amazing Antarctica – Lesson 6 Title: Ecosystems – Amazing Antarctica TASK 1: write down the following WOW words. As you go through the information, write the definition for each word (you might find some of the definitions as you work through the booklet). • Precipitation = • Albedo = • Ice sheet = • Glaciers = • Food chain = TASK 2: where is Antarctica? Use the following sentence starters and complete them to explain where Antarctica is located around the world. • Antarctica is located at the _________________ pole. • Antarctica is a country/continent/city. • Nearby countries include ______________________. • The oceans that surround Antarctica are __________________________. TASK 3: watch the video and write down facts about Antarctica https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X3uT89xoKuc Antarctica TASK 4: what is the climate like in Antarctica? Read through the information below and answer the questions in red. Climate of Antarctica Antarctica can be called a desert because of its low levels of precipitation, which is mainly snow. In coastal regions, about 200 mm can fall annually. In mountainous regions and on the East Antarctica plateau, the amount is less than 50 mm annually. Evaporation is not as high as other desert regions because it is so cold, so the snow gradually builds up year after year. There are also strong winds, with recordings of up to 200 mph being made. Antarctica's seasons are opposite to the seasons that we're familiar with in the UK. Antarctic summers happen at the same time as UK winters. This is because Antarctica is in the Southern Hemisphere, which faces the Sun during our winter time.
    [Show full text]
  • Educator's Guide
    SOUTH POLE Amundsen’s Route Scott’s Route Roald Amundsen EDUCATOR’S GUIDE amnh.org/education/race Robert Falcon Scott INSIDE: • Suggestions to Help You Come Prepared • Essential Questions for Student Inquiry • Strategies for Teaching in the Exhibition • Map of the Exhibition • Online Resources for the Classroom • Correlation to Standards • Glossary ESSENTIAL QUESTIONS Who would be fi rst to set foot at the South Pole, Norwegian explorer Roald Amundsen or British Naval offi cer Robert Falcon Scott? Tracing their heroic journeys, this exhibition portrays the harsh environment and scientifi c importance of the last continent to be explored. Use the Essential Questions below to connect the exhibition’s themes to your curriculum. What do explorers need to survive during What is Antarctica? Antarctica is Earth’s southernmost continent. About the size of the polar expeditions? United States and Mexico combined, it’s almost entirely covered Exploring Antarc- by a thick ice sheet that gives it the highest average elevation of tica involved great any continent. This ice sheet contains 90% of the world’s land ice, danger and un- which represents 70% of its fresh water. Antarctica is the coldest imaginable physical place on Earth, and an encircling polar ocean current keeps it hardship. Hazards that way. Winds blowing out of the continent’s core can reach included snow over 320 kilometers per hour (200 mph), making it the windiest. blindness, malnu- Since most of Antarctica receives no precipitation at all, it’s also trition, frostbite, the driest place on Earth. Its landforms include high plateaus and crevasses, and active volcanoes.
    [Show full text]
  • A NEWS BULLETIN Published Quarterly by the NEW ZEALAND ANTARCTIC SOCIETY (INC)
    A NEWS BULLETIN published quarterly by the NEW ZEALAND ANTARCTIC SOCIETY (INC) An English-born Post Office technician, Robin Hodgson, wearing a borrowed kilt, plays his pipes to huskies on the sea ice below Scott Base. So far he has had a cool response to his music from his New Zealand colleagues, and a noisy reception f r o m a l l 2 0 h u s k i e s . , „ _ . Antarctic Division photo Registered at Post Ollice Headquarters. Wellington. New Zealand, as a magazine. II '1.7 ^ I -!^I*"JTr -.*><\\>! »7^7 mm SOUTH GEORGIA, SOUTH SANDWICH Is- . C I R C L E / SOUTH ORKNEY Is x \ /o Orcadas arg Sanae s a Noydiazarevskaya ussr FALKLAND Is /6Signyl.uK , .60"W / SOUTH AMERICA tf Borga / S A A - S O U T H « A WEDDELL SHETLAND^fU / I s / Halley Bav3 MINING MAU0 LAN0 ENOERBY J /SEA uk'/COATS Ld / LAND T> ANTARCTIC ••?l\W Dr^hnaya^^General Belgrano arg / V ^ M a w s o n \ MAC ROBERTSON LAND\ '■ aust \ /PENINSULA' *\4- (see map betowi jrV^ Sobldl ARG 90-w {■ — Siple USA j. Amundsen-Scott / queen MARY LAND {Mirny ELLSWORTH" LAND 1, 1 1 °Vostok ussr MARIE BYRD L LAND WILKES LAND ouiiiv_. , ROSS|NZJ Y/lnda^Z / SEA I#V/VICTORIA .TERRE , **•»./ LAND \ /"AOELIE-V Leningradskaya .V USSR,-'' \ --- — -"'BALLENYIj ANTARCTIC PENINSULA 1 Tenitnte Matianzo arg 2 Esptrarua arg 3 Almirarrta Brown arc 4PttrtlAHG 5 Otcipcion arg 6 Vtcecomodoro Marambio arg * ANTARCTICA 7 Arturo Prat chile 8 Bernardo O'Higgins chile 1000 Miles 9 Prasid«fTtB Frei chile s 1000 Kilometres 10 Stonington I.
    [Show full text]
  • Station Sharing in Antarctica
    IP 94 Agenda Item: ATCM 7, ATCM 10, ATCM 11, ATCM 14, CEP 5, CEP 6b, CEP 9 Presented by: ASOC Original: English Station Sharing in Antarctica 1 IP 94 Station Sharing in Antarctica Information Paper Submitted by ASOC to the XXIX ATCM (CEP Agenda Items 5, 6 and 9, ATCM Agenda Items 7, 10, 11 and 14) I. Introduction and overview As of 2005 there were at least 45 permanent stations in the Antarctic being operated by 18 countries, of which 37 were used as year-round stations.i Although there are a few examples of states sharing scientific facilities (see Appendix 1), for the most part the practice of individual states building and operating their own facilities, under their own flags, persists. This seems to be rooted in the idea that in order to become a full Antarctic Treaty Consultative Party (ATCP), one has to build a station to show seriousness of scientific purpose, although formally the ATCPs have clarified that this is not the case. The scientific mission and international scientific cooperation is nominally at the heart of the ATS,ii and through SCAR the region has a long-established scientific coordination body. It therefore seems surprising that half a century after the adoption of this remarkable Antarctic regime, we still see no truly international stations. The ‘national sovereign approach’ continues to be the principal driver of new stations. Because new stations are likely to involve relatively large impacts in areas that most likely to be near pristine, ASOC submits that this approach should be changed. In considering environmental impact analyses of proposed new station construction, the Committee on Environmental Protection (CEP) presently does not have a mandate to take into account opportunities for sharing facilities (as an alternative that would reduce impacts).
    [Show full text]
  • Antarctic Primer
    Antarctic Primer By Nigel Sitwell, Tom Ritchie & Gary Miller By Nigel Sitwell, Tom Ritchie & Gary Miller Designed by: Olivia Young, Aurora Expeditions October 2018 Cover image © I.Tortosa Morgan Suite 12, Level 2 35 Buckingham Street Surry Hills, Sydney NSW 2010, Australia To anyone who goes to the Antarctic, there is a tremendous appeal, an unparalleled combination of grandeur, beauty, vastness, loneliness, and malevolence —all of which sound terribly melodramatic — but which truly convey the actual feeling of Antarctica. Where else in the world are all of these descriptions really true? —Captain T.L.M. Sunter, ‘The Antarctic Century Newsletter ANTARCTIC PRIMER 2018 | 3 CONTENTS I. CONSERVING ANTARCTICA Guidance for Visitors to the Antarctic Antarctica’s Historic Heritage South Georgia Biosecurity II. THE PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT Antarctica The Southern Ocean The Continent Climate Atmospheric Phenomena The Ozone Hole Climate Change Sea Ice The Antarctic Ice Cap Icebergs A Short Glossary of Ice Terms III. THE BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT Life in Antarctica Adapting to the Cold The Kingdom of Krill IV. THE WILDLIFE Antarctic Squids Antarctic Fishes Antarctic Birds Antarctic Seals Antarctic Whales 4 AURORA EXPEDITIONS | Pioneering expedition travel to the heart of nature. CONTENTS V. EXPLORERS AND SCIENTISTS The Exploration of Antarctica The Antarctic Treaty VI. PLACES YOU MAY VISIT South Shetland Islands Antarctic Peninsula Weddell Sea South Orkney Islands South Georgia The Falkland Islands South Sandwich Islands The Historic Ross Sea Sector Commonwealth Bay VII. FURTHER READING VIII. WILDLIFE CHECKLISTS ANTARCTIC PRIMER 2018 | 5 Adélie penguins in the Antarctic Peninsula I. CONSERVING ANTARCTICA Antarctica is the largest wilderness area on earth, a place that must be preserved in its present, virtually pristine state.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (Pdf, 236
    Science in the Snow Appendix 1 SCAR Members Full members (31) (Associate Membership) Full Membership Argentina 3 February 1958 Australia 3 February 1958 Belgium 3 February 1958 Chile 3 February 1958 France 3 February 1958 Japan 3 February 1958 New Zealand 3 February 1958 Norway 3 February 1958 Russia (assumed representation of USSR) 3 February 1958 South Africa 3 February 1958 United Kingdom 3 February 1958 United States of America 3 February 1958 Germany (formerly DDR and BRD individually) 22 May 1978 Poland 22 May 1978 India 1 October 1984 Brazil 1 October 1984 China 23 June 1986 Sweden (24 March 1987) 12 September 1988 Italy (19 May 1987) 12 September 1988 Uruguay (29 July 1987) 12 September 1988 Spain (15 January 1987) 23 July 1990 The Netherlands (20 May 1987) 23 July 1990 Korea, Republic of (18 December 1987) 23 July 1990 Finland (1 July 1988) 23 July 1990 Ecuador (12 September 1988) 15 June 1992 Canada (5 September 1994) 27 July 1998 Peru (14 April 1987) 22 July 2002 Switzerland (16 June 1987) 4 October 2004 Bulgaria (5 March 1995) 17 July 2006 Ukraine (5 September 1994) 17 July 2006 Malaysia (4 October 2004) 14 July 2008 Associate Members (12) Pakistan 15 June 1992 Denmark 17 July 2006 Portugal 17 July 2006 Romania 14 July 2008 261 Appendices Monaco 9 August 2010 Venezuela 23 July 2012 Czech Republic 1 September 2014 Iran 1 September 2014 Austria 29 August 2016 Colombia (rejoined) 29 August 2016 Thailand 29 August 2016 Turkey 29 August 2016 Former Associate Members (2) Colombia 23 July 1990 withdrew 3 July 1995 Estonia 15 June
    [Show full text]
  • Balloons up and Away
    Published during the austral summer at McMurdo Station, Antarctica, for the United States Antarctic Program December 21, 2003 Home away Balloons up and away from Dome By Kris Kuenning TRACER Sun staff As steel and plywood panels continue to go up at the new takes flight Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station building, this season’s By Brien Barnett residents are living out the transi- Sun staff tion from old Dome to new sta- Inside TRACER mission tion. control, Patrick “JoJo” Boyle With the summer crew set- sits in the six-foot square tling into the first two occupied office listening to music and sections of the new station, there watching computer monitors is some nostalgia for Dome life, for incoming data and mes- but the large new dining facility, sages. with windows overlooking the Every now and then Boyle ceremonial South Pole, has won points to the monitor where a a lot of hearts over already. string of bright red pixels “I don’t miss the old galley suddenly appear, indicating a one bit,” said cargo technician recent high-energy cosmic Scot Jackson, “and I really ray event. The tone of his thought I would.” voice shows excitement. Head chef “Cookie” Jon “Oooh, that’s a big Emanuel is enjoying the new event… That’s an iron event facilities, too, but is feeling the for sure … There’s another pangs of the transition when it one.” comes to getting supplies up to Behind him, in the office the second floor kitchen. Despite at McMurdo Station’s Crary the limiting size and aging facil- Laboratory is a map of ities of the old kitchen, the food Antarctica with a semicircle stores were always in easy reach of sticky notes stuck to it.
    [Show full text]
  • The Summer Surface Energy Budget of the Ice-Free Area of Northern James Ross Island and Its Impact on the Ground Thermal Regime
    atmosphere Article The Summer Surface Energy Budget of the Ice-Free Area of Northern James Ross Island and Its Impact on the Ground Thermal Regime Klára Ambrožová * , Filip Hrbáˇcek and Kamil Láska Department of Geography, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kotláˇrská 267/2, 602 00 Brno, Czech Republic; fi[email protected] (F.H.); [email protected] (K.L.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 26 July 2020; Accepted: 15 August 2020; Published: 18 August 2020 Abstract: Despite the key role of the surface energy budget in the global climate system, such investigations are rare in Antarctica. In this study, the surface energy budget measurements from the largest ice-free area on northern James Ross Island, in Antarctica, were obtained. The components of net radiation were measured by a net radiometer, while sensible heat flux was measured by a sonic anemometer and ground heat flux by heat flux plates. The surface energy budget was compared with the rest of the Antarctic Peninsula Region and selected places in the Arctic and the impact of surface energy budget components on the ground thermal regime was examined. Mean net radiation on 2 James Ross Island during January–March 2018 reached 102.5 W m− . The main surface energy budget 2 component was the latent heat flux, while the sensible heat flux values were only 0.4 W m− lower. Mean ground heat flux was only 0.4 Wm-2, however, it was negative in 47% of January–March 2018, while it was positive in the rest of the time. The ground thermal regime was affected by surface energy budget components to a depth of 50 cm.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate of Antarctica 1 Climate of Antarctica
    Climate of Antarctica 1 Climate of Antarctica The climate of Antarctica is the coldest on the whole of Earth. Antarctica has the lowest naturally occurring temperature ever recorded on the surface on Earth: −89.2°C (−128.6°F) at Vostok Station. Satellites have recorded even lower temperatures, down to -93.2°C(-135.8°F). It is also extremely dry (technically a desert), averaging 166mm (6.5in) of precipitation per year. On most parts of the continent the snow rarely melts and is eventually compressed to Surface temperature of Antarctica in winter and become the glacial ice that makes up the ice sheet. Weather fronts summer from the European Centre for rarely penetrate far into the continent. Most of Antarctica has an ice Medium-Range Weather Forecasts cap climate (Köppen EF) with very cold, generally extremely dry weather. Temperature The lowest reliably measured temperature of a continuously occupied station on Earth of −89.2 °C (−128.6 °F) was on 21 July 1983 at Vostok Station.[1] For comparison, this is 10.7 °C (19.3 °F) colder than subliming dry ice (at sea level pressure). The altitude of the location is 3,900 meters (12,800 feet). The lowest recorded temperature of any location on Earth surface was −93.2 °C (−135.8 °F) at 81.8°S 59.3°E [2], which is on an unnamed Antarctic plateau between Dome A and Dome F, on August 10, 2010. The temperature was deduced from radiance measured by the Landsat 8 satellite, and discovered during a National Snow and Ice Data Center review of stored data in December, 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Support Activities
    Support activities Air operations Field reduced the ceiling and visibility to zero. The Deep Freeze 71 plane landed in a blizzard and swerved off the run- way. The 68 passengers and 12 crewmen were not seriously injured, but the aircraft was damaged be- DAVID B. ELDRIDGE, JR. yond economical repair. This early season storm lasted for 3 days and de- Commander, U.S. Navy layed the opening of Hallett and Brockton Stations Commanding Officer until October 10 and 11. Hallett Stations skiway Antarctic Development Squadron Six served as an emergency airfield until early December, when excessive meltwater closed the skiway. Brockton, a three-man station on the Ross Ice Shelf, provided Antarctic Development Squadron Six (VXE-6) weather information to McMurdo Station. cmpleted its 16th consecutive season of logistic sup- The first flight to Byrd Station in almost 9 months port for the U.S. Antarctic Research Program on was made on October 14 with 21 relief personnel and March 8, 1971, when the last LC-130 Hercules re- 2.6 short tons of supplies. turned to the Naval Air Station at Quonset Point, For the next 7 days, VXE-6 concentrated on mov- Rhode Island. ing people, equipment, and supplies from Christ- Despite the loss of two aircraft-an LC-130 Her- church to McMurdo Station. Then, with the New cules and a C-121 Super Constellation-all require- Zealand backlog out of the way, intracontinental ments placed on the squadron were met. Air opera- operation resumed on October 20 with an attempted tions for Deep Freeze 71 totaled more than 6,800 medical evacuation flight to Pole Station.
    [Show full text]
  • Past, Present and Future Climate of Antarctica
    International Journal of Geosciences, 2013, 4, 959-977 http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ijg.2013.46089 Published Online August 2013 (http://www.scirp.org/journal/ijg) Past, Present and Future Climate of Antarctica Alvarinho J. Luis Earth System Science Organization, National Centre for Antarctic and Ocean Research, Ministry of Earth Sciences, Goa, India Email: [email protected] Received May 27, 2013; revised June 29, 2013; accepted July 6, 2013 Copyright © 2013 Alvarinho J. Luis. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. ABSTRACT Anthropogenic warming of near-surface atmosphere in the last 50 years is dominant over the west Antarctic Peninsula. Ozone depletion has led to partly cooling of the stratosphere. The positive polarity of the Southern Hemisphere Annular Mode (SAM) index and its enhancement over the past 50 years have intensified the westerlies over the Southern Ocean, and induced warming of Antarctic Peninsula. Dictated by local ocean-atmosphere processes and remote forcing, the Antarctic sea ice extent is increasing, contrary to climate model predictions for the 21st century, and this increase has strong regional and seasonal signatures. Models incorporating doubling of present day CO2 predict warming of the Ant- arctic sea ice zone, a reduction in sea ice cover, and warming of the Antarctic Plateau, accompanied by increased snowfall. Keywords: Component Antarctic Climate; Discovery; Sea Ice; Glaciers; Southern Hemisphere Annular Mode; Antarctic Warming 1. Introduction with a repository of more than 70% of the Earth’s fresh- water in the form of ice sheet.
    [Show full text]