Appendix a Appendix E

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Appendix a Appendix E Appendix A Pla Appendix E Environmental Baseline Table E1 provides a summary of the issues scoped into and out of the LFRMS SEA at the scoping stage. For the issues that were scoped in, the environmental baseline for these issues is provided in this Appendix. Hampshire LFRMS SEA Environmental Report Appendix E 1 Table E-1 Summary of Issues Scoped into and out of the Hampshire LFRMS SEA Receptor/Topic Scope and Justification Scoped out Scoped In Population and Population and properties Actions arising from the LFRMS will affect the Human Health at risk from flooding population and properties within flood risk areas Quality of life/social Quality of life is affected by flooding; more socially deprivation deprived communities are likely to be more significantly affected by the impact of flooding Employment Level of flood risk could have a significant effect on existing industry and employment. Noise The LFRMS will not have a significant effect on noise. The effects of any local flood risk management activities on noise would be considered further at project EIA stage. Tourism and recreation of Actions arising from the LFRMS could affect important national and regional tourist, recreational and amenity resources and could importance present opportunities to deliver recreational benefits. Material Assets Infrastructure Actions arising from the LFRMS have the potential to affect key transport routes within the study area. Biodiversity, International nature An HRA will be undertaken separately, the results Basic data collection on internationally designated sites Flora and Fauna conservation sites (e.g. of which have been incorporated into the SEA for the HRA will be included in the SEA to avoid SAC, SPA, Ramsar site) and Environmental Report. duplication. The SEA, HRA and LFRMS will be known supporting sites integrated processes and the SEA and HRA will be able to influence the development of the LFRMS. National nature Actions arising from the LFRMS could have direct or conservation sites (e.g. indirect effects on the features of nationally designated National Nature Reserves sites. The SEA will focus on those sites potentially (NNRs), Sites of Special affected (positively or negatively) by current or future Scientific Interest (SSSIs) flooding. The LFRMS has the potential to contribute to achieving favourable condition status of a SSSI. SEA of Hampshire LFRMS Appendix E 2 Receptor/Topic Scope and Justification Scoped out Scoped In Local nature conservation Locally designated sites of nature conservation sites (e.g. Local Nature importance may be affected (positively or negatively) Reserves (LNR)s, Sites of by current or future flooding. Where data is made Importance for Nature available on these sites they will be included. Conservation (SINCs) and RSPB Reserves) Nationally and regionally Detailed information on BAP species and habitats important habitats and should be considered at the EIA stage. species (UK and local Biodiversity Action Plan, BAP) Key habitat areas Flooding could potentially change the nature of habitats and therefore needs to be taken into account Soil, Geology Soils LFRMS measures could alter the extent or duration of and flooding and therefore have implications for soil Geomorphology quality. Impacts on soil quality could subsequently affect other environmental receptors that fall under other SEA topics, such as Biodiversity, Water (water quality) and Population and Human Health. Designated earth heritage LFRMS measures could have direct impacts on sites (e.g. geological SSSIs) designated geological sites by changes in flooding or erosion or sedimentation. SEA of Hampshire LFRMS Appendix E 3 Receptor/Topic Scope and Justification Scoped out Scoped In Geology The LFRMS will not have a significant effect on geology. The interactions between flood risk and erosion management and geology would be considered further at project EIA stage. Water resource issues linked to geology will be considered as part of the Water receptor where relevant. Geomorphology is considered under the sub-criteria of SEA objective 6: ‘ Minimise adverse effects on water hydromorphology and natural processes .’ Contaminated land Changes in water management could result in improved protection for areas of known contaminated land or landfill sites, or could negatively affect these sites, by flooding or erosion, which may cause pollution of water bodies and designated conservation sites. Land Use and Land use Strategic LFRM measures could be affected by, and Land have direct or indirect effects on, land use. Management Water Water quality LFRM measures could have direct and indirect effects on surface and groundwater quality Water Framework Although the LFRMS could have direct and The SEA objectives will incorporate the basic Directive indirect effects on water resources (surface and requirements of the WFD in their underlying ground) this SEA does not have the scope for a assessment criteria. See also ‘inter-relationships’ at the detailed WFD Assessment, which may need to be end of this table undertaken separately, depending on the findings of the SEA. Flood Risk Strategy and measures should mitigate flood risk Water resources Water resource issues linked to local geology (e.g. groundwater levels) will be considered where relevant. Overall water resources also need to be considered. SEA of Hampshire LFRMS Appendix E 4 Receptor/Topic Scope and Justification Scoped out Scoped In Catchment Sensitive Strategic LFRM measures provide opportunities to link Farming (CSF) with CSF initiatives to protect water bodies and the environment. Air and Climate Air quality The chemical of predominant concern for all Air Quality Management Areas in Hampshire is nitrogen dioxide, which is associated with traffic emissions. LFRMS strategy and measures will not be affected by or have a significant effect on air quality. Climatic factors LFRMS has the potential to enhance resilience to climate change, through reducing flood risk or environmental enhancement measures. Opportunities to improve climate change adaptation will be explored in the SEA. The Historic Historic Landscape LFRMS measures could potentially affect the character Environment Character of the historic landscape and also directly affect statutory and non-statutory historic buildings and archaeological features. Impacts on historic landscape will be considered within the SEA. Scheduled Monuments LFRMS measures could potentially affect Scheduled Monuments. Direct impact could result from the development or enhancement of defences. The impact on the setting of Scheduled Monuments should also be considered. Indirect impacts may be caused by flooding, although the significance of the effect will differ depending on the nature of the monument. Registered Parks and LFRMS measures may affect the physical attributes, Gardens character and setting of Registered Parks and Gardens. The SEA will only consider those sites within or bordering the study area. SEA of Hampshire LFRMS Appendix E 5 Receptor/Topic Scope and Justification Scoped out Scoped In Listed Buildings LFRMS measures may directly affect Listed Buildings or indirectly affect views and setting. Conservation Areas LFRMS measures may affect the character and setting of Conservation Areas. Other known and Non-designated sites and HER sites of national unknown features of importance, which may be particularly vulnerable or archaeological and/or that may offer opportunities for mitigation or heritage interest conservation. Clusters of sites that aren’t individually of national importance but are cumulatively important will also be considered. It is not practicable to determine the effects of the LFRMS measures on every known feature of heritage interest and therefore the SEA will not consider non- designated sites of local or regional importance. The effects on these features would be considered further at project EIA stage. The effects of local flood risk management on as yet unidentified heritage resources will be considered at project level assessment . Landscape and Designated landscapes Country Parks and Green Belts have been scoped The SEA will address impacts of the LFRMS measures Visual Amenity out of further assessment. on the AONBs, National Parks and county landscape character assessments, as appropriate. Assessment of impacts on landscape will help to guide and influence the choice of strategy and LFRMS measures. Wider countryside The SEA will address the impacts of the LFRMS on the wider countryside of Hampshire not covered by designation. It will make use of landscape character assessments for Hampshire and for the AONBs and National Parks to assess impacts. SEA of Hampshire LFRMS Appendix E 6 Receptor/Topic Scope and Justification Scoped out Scoped In Inter- e.g. Water quality and Inter-relationships will be included where relevant i.e., where LFRMS measures give rise to the potential for relationship biodiversity; Land Use secondary or cumulative impacts. The WFD has been considered as an ‘inter-relationship’ between the SEA between the change and landscape; topics, as compliance with the WFD is influenced by impacts to ecology, water quality and above factors Quality of life and hydromorphology recreation/biodiversity SEA of Hampshire LFRMS Appendix E 7 Hampshire LFRMS SEA: Environmental Report 1.1 Introduction The data collected to characterise the baseline environment of Hampshire has been derived from numerous secondary sources which are referenced as footnotes in this report. No new investigations or surveys have been undertaken.
Recommended publications
  • Draft Water Resources Management Plan 2019 Annex 14: SEA Main Report
    Draft Water Resources Management Plan 2019 Annex 14: SEA Main Report Appendix A: Consultee responses to the scoping report and amendments made as a consequence November 30, 2017 Version 1 Appendix A Statement of Response Southern Water issued its Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Scoping Report for its Draft Water Resources Management Plan 2019 for public consultation from 28th April 2017 to 2nd June 2017. Comments on the SEA Scoping Report were received from the following organisations: Natural England Environment Agency Historic England Howard Taylor, Upstream Dry Fly Sussex Wildlife Trust The Test & Itchen Association Ltd Wessex Chalk Stream Rivers Trust Forestry Commission England Hampshire and Isle of Wight Wildlife Trust Longdown Management Limited Amanda Barker-Mill C. H. Layman These comments are set out in Table 1 together with Southern Water’s response as to how it intends to take account of them in developing the SEA of the Draft Water Resources Management Plan. Table 1 Draft Water Resources Management Plan: SEA Scoping Report – responses to comments received How comments have been addressed in the Ref Consultee Comment Draft Water Resources Management Plan Environmental Report Plans programmes or policies I recommend you add the following to your list of plans programmes or policies: National. - Defra strategy for the environment creating a great place for These policies, plans and programmes have Natural living. been included in the SEA Environmental Report 1 England - The national conservation strategy conservation-21 and considered in the assessment of potential effects of the WRMP. - The 5 point plan to salmon conservation in the UK National Nature Reserve Management Plans (though you may not be able to, or need to, list all of these, please just reference them as a source of information for assessment of any relevant options).
    [Show full text]
  • Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation Sincs Hampshire.Pdf
    Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINCs) within Hampshire © Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre No part of this documentHBIC may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recoding or otherwise without the prior permission of the Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre Central Grid SINC Ref District SINC Name Ref. SINC Criteria Area (ha) BD0001 Basingstoke & Deane Straits Copse, St. Mary Bourne SU38905040 1A 2.14 BD0002 Basingstoke & Deane Lee's Wood SU39005080 1A 1.99 BD0003 Basingstoke & Deane Great Wallop Hill Copse SU39005200 1A/1B 21.07 BD0004 Basingstoke & Deane Hackwood Copse SU39504950 1A 11.74 BD0005 Basingstoke & Deane Stokehill Farm Down SU39605130 2A 4.02 BD0006 Basingstoke & Deane Juniper Rough SU39605289 2D 1.16 BD0007 Basingstoke & Deane Leafy Grove Copse SU39685080 1A 1.83 BD0008 Basingstoke & Deane Trinley Wood SU39804900 1A 6.58 BD0009 Basingstoke & Deane East Woodhay Down SU39806040 2A 29.57 BD0010 Basingstoke & Deane Ten Acre Brow (East) SU39965580 1A 0.55 BD0011 Basingstoke & Deane Berries Copse SU40106240 1A 2.93 BD0012 Basingstoke & Deane Sidley Wood North SU40305590 1A 3.63 BD0013 Basingstoke & Deane The Oaks Grassland SU40405920 2A 1.12 BD0014 Basingstoke & Deane Sidley Wood South SU40505520 1B 1.87 BD0015 Basingstoke & Deane West Of Codley Copse SU40505680 2D/6A 0.68 BD0016 Basingstoke & Deane Hitchen Copse SU40505850 1A 13.91 BD0017 Basingstoke & Deane Pilot Hill: Field To The South-East SU40505900 2A/6A 4.62
    [Show full text]
  • Jul to Dec 2013
    Butterfly Conservation Hampshire and Isle of Wight Branch Page 1 of 33 Butterfly Conservation Hampshire and Saving butterflies, moths and our environment Isle of Wight Branch HOME ABOUT » EVENTS » CONSERVATION » SPECIES » SIGHTINGS » PUBLICATIONS » LINKS » ISLE OF WIGHT » MEMBERS » Wednesday 31st July Judith Frank reports from Byway stretch between Stockbridge and Broughton (SU337354) where the following observations were made: Holly Blue (2 "didn't settle long enough for me to be sure but seemed most likely to be hollies."), Peacock (1), Meadow Brown (2), Large White (9), Ringlet (9), Brimstone (1), Comma (2), Green-veined White (4), Gatekeeper (5). "On a day of only fleeting sunshine, I was interested to see what there might be on a section of byway through farmland not particularly managed for butterflies. A large patch of brambles yielded the most colour with the commas, gatekeepers and blues.". Speckled Wood Comma NT Owen reports from Roe Inclosure, Linwood (SU200086) where the following observations were made: Large White (2), Large Skipper (1), Gatekeeper (3), Small Skipper (1), Silver-washed Fritillary (4 "Including one Valezina form female"). Silver-washed Fritillary f. valezina Steve Benstead reports from Brading Down (SZ596867) where the following observations were made: Chalkhill Blue (5), Painted Lady (1), Clouded Yellow (1). "Overcast but warm". Gary palmer reports from barton common (SZ249931) where the following observations were made: Large White (2), Small White (3), Marbled White (3), Meadow Brown (20), Gatekeeper (35), Small Copper (1), Common Blue (1), vapourer moth (1 Larval "using poplar sapling"), peppered moth (1 Larval "using alder buckthorn"), buff tip moth (49 Larval "using mature sallow").
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Core Strategy Appendix I
    SA of Winchester’s Local Plan Part 1- Joint Core Strategy Appendix I Appendix I: Statement on Compliance with the SEA Directive & Regulations I.1 An outline of the contents, main objectives of the plan and relationship with other relevant plans: Section 1 of this SA Report sets out the contents and main objectives of the Core Strategy. The relationship with other relevant plans is summarised in Section 3 and Appendix IV of this report. I.2 The relevant aspects of the current state of the environment and the likely evolution thereof without implementation of the plan: Section 3 of this SA Report summarises the relevant baseline conditions for sustainability (including the state of relevant environmental aspects) in the District. Appendix III sets out this information in more detail. The likely evolution of current conditions (‘trends’) is detailed in Appendix III where available. I.3 The environmental characteristics of areas likely to be significantly affected: Where relevant and available, information regarding particular areas has been included in Appendix III. I.4 Any existing environmental problems which are relevant to the plan including, in particular, those relating to any areas of a particular environmental importance: Section 3 of this SA Report summarises existing sustainability problems (including environmental problems) for Winchester City Council’s District area. I.5 The environmental protection objectives relevant to the plan and the way those objectives and any environmental considerations have been taken into account during its preparation: Appendix IV of this SA Report provides the summary of objectives for sustainability in the Winchester area (including environmental objectives), and the implications of these objectives for the LDF.
    [Show full text]
  • South Hampshire Green Infrastructure Strategy (2017 - 2034)
    South Hampshire Green Infrastructure Strategy (2017 - 2034) Adopted March 2017 (Updated July 2018) South Hampshire Green Infrastructure Strategy 2017 - 2034 Contents Figure i: South Hampshire part of the PUSH Sub-Region: ......................................................................... 1 1. Introduction...................................................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Background and Purpose of the South Hampshire Green Infrastructure Strategy ........................... 2 1.2 The Benefits of a Green Infrastructure Approach ......................................................................... 5 2. Drivers for a strategic GI approach ................................................................................................... 12 2.1 National Planning Policy ........................................................................................................... 12 2.2 25 Year Environment Plan ........................................................................................................ 14 2.3 PUSH Spatial Position Statement 2016 ...................................................................................... 14 2.4 Solent, New Forest and River Itchen European Protected Sites ................................................... 17 2.5 Protected Landscapes .............................................................................................................. 19 3. A GI Strategy for South Hampshire ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hollins-2010
    WILDLIFE DIARY AND NEWS FOR DEC 27 - JAN 2 (WEEK 52 OF 2010) Highlights Red-throated Divers moving along the coast in exceptional numbers Shags have begun nesting and Cormorants are in breeding plumage There are more Bitterns at more sites in southern England than usual On Dec 31 a herd of maybe 100 Bewick's Swans blazed a trail across the Sussex skies from Worthing to Rye Bay - it must have been an impressive sight and sound but left no clue as to its origin or destination The White Tailed Sea Eagle which disappeared near Southampton Water on Dec 12 may well have re-appeared on Jan 1 in the Hordle (New Milton) area The Great Bustard first seen in the Portland/Weymouth area from Dec 23 to 27 has re-appeared in the Avon valley/Christchurch Harbour area from Dec 30 to Jan 1 Christmas entertainment by escaped birds was in the form of a singing Budgie on the Isle of Wight and a Golden Eagle in Sussex The Raven night roost in Dorset had 147 birds on Dec 31 and Dorset also has a single winter Dipper near Dorchester Two sightings of Lesser Spotted Woodpeckers in Hampshire show they are not extinct in the county and four reports of Great Spotted Woodpeckers drumming since Dec 14 shows they think spring has come - also showing that Tawny Owls are not yet extinct within the Havant builtup area was a sighting in a Netherfield Close garden BIRDS Red-throated Diver: From Dec 25 to Jan 1 very large numbers have been moving along the south coast (sometimes east, sometimes west).
    [Show full text]
  • Habitats Regulations Assessment Screening Report, 2010
    New Forest National Park Authority Park Management Plan HRA Habitat Regulations Assessment January 2010 New Forest National Park Authority New Forest National Park Authority – Park Management Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment Revision Schedule Park Management Plan – HRA Report January 2010 Rev Date Details Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by 01 07/10/2009 HRA Report Dr Graeme Down Dr James Riley Dr James Riley Ecologist Principal Ecologist Principal Ecologist 02 18/12/09 Updated HRA Dr Graeme Down Dr James Riley Dr James Riley Report Ecologist Principal Ecologist Principal Ecologist 03 25/01/10 Final HRA Dr Graeme Down Dr James Riley Dr James Riley Report Ecologist Principal Ecologist Principal Ecologist Scott Wilson Scott House Alencon Link This document has been prepared in accordance with the scope of Scott Wilson's appointment with its client and is subject to the terms of that appointment. Scott Wilson Basingstoke accepts no liability for any use of this document other than for the purposes for which it Hampshire was prepared and provided. Any advice, opinions, or recommendations within this document should be read and relied upon only in the context of the document as a RG21 7PP whole. The contents of this document do not provide legal or tax advice or opinion. © Scott Wilson Ltd 2009 Tel 01256 310200 Fax 01256 310201 New Forest National Park Authority – Park Management Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment Table of Contents 1 Introduction ...................................................................................... 1
    [Show full text]
  • Habitats Regulation Assessment Screening Report
    Eastleigh Borough Council Issues and Options Eastleigh Borough Local Plan Habitat Regulations Assessment Screening Report November 2015 Table of Contents 1 Introduction ..................................................................................... 5 1.1 Legislation ...................................................................................................................... 5 1.2 This Report ..................................................................................................................... 5 2 Methodology .................................................................................... 7 2.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 7 2.2 A Proportionate Assessment .......................................................................................... 7 2.3 The Process of HRA ....................................................................................................... 8 2.4 Evidence gathering ......................................................................................................... 9 Physical scope of the HRA ............................................................................................................ 10 2.5 Task 1: Likely Significant Effects (Screening) ............................................................... 11 Other plans and projects ................................................................................................................ 11 3 Pathways
    [Show full text]
  • Annex 9: SEA Environmental Report Appendices
    Draft Drought Plan 2022 Annex 9: SEA Environmental Report Appendices Annex 9: SEA Environmental Report Appendices Appendices A to C March 2021 1 Draft Drought Plan 2022 Annex 9: SEA Environmental Report Appendices Appendix A Consultee Responses to the Scoping Report and Amendments Made as a Consequence Southern Water issued updated SEA scoping information to statutory bodies on 02 February 2021. Comments on the SEA scoping information were received from the following organisations: Natural England Environment Agency Historic England These comments are set out in Table A1 together with Southern Water’s response as to how it has taken them into account in developing the SEA of the Draft Drought Plan 2022. 2 Draft Drought Plan 2022 Annex 9: SEA Environmental Report Appendices Table A1 Draft Drought Plan: SEA scoping information - responses to comments received Ref. Consultee Comment How comment to be addressed in the Draft Drought Plan Environmental Report 1.1 Natural England General points Noted. Consultation format The European Commission Directive 2001/42/EC “on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment” is known as the ‘SEA Directive’. It requires “an environmental assessment is carried out of certain plans and programmes which are likely to have significant effects on the environment” (EC, 2001; Article 1). The provision is explicitly applied to plans made for “water management”. The SEA scoping is a statutory part of the consultation process and consultation with Natural England is required under Regulation 12 (5). The SEA scoping report is not a full report but a series of short appendices and an overarching letter with reference back to other information based on the existing SEA scope of the plan published in 2018 and 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2009 Southampton Natural History Society Annual Report 2009
    Southampton Natural History Society ANNUAL REPORT 2009 SOUTHAMPTON NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY ANNUAL REPORT 2009 CONTENTS Page Chris Packham 2 Membership Secretary’s Report 2 Field Meetings 3 Indoor Meetings 8 Brambles of Shedfield and ickhamW Commons by David Allen 9 Mad March Hares — and More by Anthea Jones 10 British Birds and Urban Noise by Dave Hubble 11 The Fantastic, Charismatic Slow-worm: A Very Special Reptile by Darren Naish 14 The Vegetative Key to the British Flora (John Poland & Eric J. Clement) by John Poland Weather Records 2009 19 A Note on the Role of the Recording Officer 23 Members’ Records for 2009 25 Mycota 25 Flora 28 Fauna 32 Society website: http://sotonnhs.org/ Cover: Holly Blue on Potentilla Photograph & Design: Mike Creighton Founded 1907 - 1 - Chris Packham 2009 saw club President Chris Packham become better known to thousands of people in the UK when he took over presenting the BBC wildlife show Spring Watch. Chris’s profound wildlife knowledge and nerdy facts, coupled with his quirky sense of humour proved to be a perfect match to co-host Kate Humble, a fact agreed by the producers as Chris continued to present Autumn Watch and the one-off special Snow Watch later in the year. Chris’s great enthusiasm for all wildlife, from reintroduced Great Bustards to the minutest bug, was evident on every show, as were the antics of show stealers Scratchy and Itchy, Chris’s two poodles. Viewers were even invited to guess what to Chris’s most precious item was. Those of us who attended the Testwood Lake workshops already knew it was a regurgitated kingfisher pellet that he’d collected as a young teenager! We would like to congratulate Chris on his success and look forward to seeing more of him this spring.
    [Show full text]
  • Hollins 2000
    WILDLIFE HIGHLIGHTS – 2000 WEEK 52 DEC 25 – 31 BIRDS: SUN 31 DEC It sounds as if Jason Crook was caught out in the appalling wind and rain that set in this afternoon and looks set to spoil many a birder’s New Year outing tomorrow – nevertheless Jason reports that he had a good but brief view of an adult or third winter Ring Billed Gull from the steps leading onto Budds Mound above the sewage outfall – possibly, though he does not suggest it, the same bird that was often seen from Broadmarsh slipway in I think two winters ending in March 1999. From the mound Jason saw the hybrid Ferruginous duck still on Budds Farm pools and a new comer – a first winter male Scaup – and out on the harbour the female Eider. At Farlington Marshes he saw a first winter Kittiwake (is this what Ian Thirlwell saw the other day?) and tells us that three (not four) Avocet have recently been seen on the lake. Among the usual good selection of info on the SOS website I see this evening that the first 16 Fulmar have arrived back at their nesting cliffs between Ovingdean and Saltdean immediately east of Brighton and that a Crane flew north east over Hastings – both reports from Dec 30. Weather driven arrivals in Sussex yesterday included up to seven Whooper Swans in the River Cuckmere valley (just west of Beachy Head) and two Bewick’s plus a Glaucous Gull at Rye where there are now 4 Bitterns and where four redhead Smew and 30+ Whitefront Geese were seen on Dec 29 (the single Waxwing is still in the Winchelsea area and a Green Winged Teal has been seen at the Pevensey Levels).
    [Show full text]
  • Jul to Dec 2010
    Butterfly Conservation Hampshire and Isle of Wight Branch Page 1 of 37 Butterfly Conservation Hampshire and Saving butterflies, moths and our environment Isle of Wight Branch HOME ABOUT US EVENTS CONSERVATION HANTS & IOW SPECIES SIGHTINGS PUBLICATIONS Saturday 31st July Hilary Higgins reports from Compton Undercliff (SZ370849) where the following observations were made: Jersey tiger moth (1). "Photo available if required (via mobile phone)". Tim Hampton reports from east Petersfield (SU762232) where the following observations were made: Silver-washed Fritillary (1 "never previously recorded in this very small suburban garden"). Friday 30th July Mike Wildish reports from Shipton Bellinger (SU 235 455) where the following observations were made: Common Blue (9), Small Copper (1), Small White (14), Green-veined White (1), Large White (1), Brimstone (3), Gatekeeper (2), Meadow Brown (9), Speckled Wood (1), Red Admiral (1), Comma (4). Mike Wildish reports from Bedlam (SU 245 465) where the following observations were made: Common Blue (6), Brown Argus (1), Meadow Brown (12), Gatekeeper (3), Small Heath (3), Large White (2), Dark Green Fritillary (1). "With Mervyn Grist". Peter Hunt reports from Clamerkin NT,isle of Wight (SZ4190) where the following observations were made: Common Blue (10), Gatekeeper (20), Large White (3), Marbled White (2), Meadow Brown (20), Purple Hairstreak (2), Peacock (1), Small Copper (1), Small Heath (1), Small Skipper (1). Purple Hairstreak Steve Graham of the Yorks and Lancs branch of BC writes: "I have been visiting my in-laws in Hampshire (Holybourne SU 731 406) and took the opportunity to take my Moth trap down with me. Always great to see some of the 'southern' species whilst visiting." Steve has sent in a list of over 40 species of moth including Waved Black, Scarce Footman and Dingy Footman.
    [Show full text]