DOCSLIB.ORG

Scoping Report December 2019 UE0338 SEA- Soton LP Scoping 2 191217

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL Scoping Report December 2019 Sustainability Appraisal and Strategic Environmental Assessment for the Southampton City Vision Local Plan Scoping Report Client: Southampton City Council Report No.: UE0338 SEA- Soton LP Scoping_2_191217 Author: Proofed: Approved: Giulia Civello BSc(Hons) MSc PIEMA Nick Pincombe BA(Hons) MSc CEnv Nick Pincombe BA(Hons) MSc CEnv Michael Williams BSc(Hons) MSc MIEMA MCIEEM MIEMA MCIEEM Revision No.: Status/Comment: Date: 0 Draft for comment 15 October 2019 1 Final draft 18 November 2019 2 Final 17 December 2019 SA/SEA for the Southampton City Vision Local Plan: Scoping Report December 2019 UE0338 SEA- Soton LP Scoping_2_191217 This page is intentionally blank. SA/SEA for the Southampton City Vision Local Plan: Scoping Report December 2019 UE0338 SEA- Soton LP Scoping_2_191217 Contents 0 Non-Technical Summary i 0.1 What is Sustainability Appraisal? i 0.2 What is the Southampton City Vision Local Plan? i 0.3 Purpose and Content of the Scoping Report i 0.4 Presenting the Scoping Information ii 0.5 Key Sustainability Issues iii 0.6 The Sustainability Appraisal Framework vii 0.7 Consultation Arrangements viii 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Purpose of this Document 1 1.2 The Southampton City Vision Local Plan 1 1.3 The Study Area 2 1.4 Sub-regional Context 4 1.5 Sustainable Development 4 2 Methodology 7 2.1 Integrated Sustainability Appraisal 7 2.2 Stages of Sustainability Appraisal 8 2.3 Approach to the Assessment 8 2.4 Limitations to the Assessment 11 3 Presenting the Scoping Information 13 3.1 Receptor Themes 13 3.2 Policy, Plan and Programme Review 14 3.3 Baseline Data Collation 15 3.4 Key Sustainability Issues 15 4 Key Sustainability Issues 17 4.1 Introduction 17 4.2 Accessibility and Transport 17 4.3 Air Quality 17 4.4 Biodiversity and Geodiversity 18 SA/SEA for the Southampton City Vision Local Plan: Scoping Report December 2019 UE0338 SEA- Soton LP Scoping_2_191217 4.5 Climate Change 18 4.6 Economic Factors 19 4.7 Green Infrastructure & Ecosystem Services 19 4.8 Health 20 4.9 Historic Environment 20 4.10 Housing 21 4.11 Landscape and Townscape 21 4.12 Material Assets 21 4.13 Population and Quality of Life 22 4.14 Soil 22 4.15 Water 23 5 The SA Framework 25 5.1 Purpose of the SA Framework 25 5.2 SA Objectives 25 6 Consultation on the Scoping Report 27 6.1 Purpose of Consultation 27 6.2 Consultation Arrangements 27 Appendix I: Annex 1 of the SEA Directive A Appendix II: Example Detailed Assessment Matrix C Appendix III: Review of Policies, Plans and Programmes E Appendix IV: Review of Current Environmental and Socio-economic Conditions Affecting Southampton G Appendix V: Sustainability Appraisal Framework I Appendix VI: Site Assessment Buffer Distances K SA/SEA for the Southampton City Vision Local Plan: Scoping Report December 2019 UE0338 SEA- Soton LP Scoping_2_191217 List of Tables and Figures Table 0.1: Themes ii Table 0.2: Key sustainability issues iii Table 0.3: SA Objectives viii Table 2.1: SA stages and those addressed in this report 8 Table 2.2: Significance matrix 11 Table 3.1: Receptor themes 13 Table 5.1: SA Objectives 25 Figure 1.1: Southampton City Boundary and Wards 3 Figure 1.2: The five guiding principles of the UK Sustainable Development Strategy 5 SA/SEA for the Southampton City Vision Local Plan: Scoping Report December 2019 UE0338 SEA- Soton LP Scoping_2_191217 This page is intentionally blank. SA/SEA for the Southampton City Vision Local Plan: Scoping Report Non-Technical Summary December 2019 UE0338 SEA- Soton LP Scoping_2_191217 0.2.2 The Southampton City Vision Local Plan will cover the whole of Southampton Currently the development plan for Southampton 0 Non-Technical Summary and, once adopted, will supersede current planning documents including: City Centre Action Plan (adopted 2015); 0.1 What is Sustainability Appraisal? Core Strategy including the changes from the Core Strategy Partial Review (adopted 2015); and 0.1.1 A Sustainability Appraisal (SA) is being carried out alongside preparation of the Southampton City Vision Local Plan. ‘Saved’ policies in the Local Plan Review (amended 2015). 0.1.2 Local Planning Authorities such as Southampton City Council use SA 0.3 Purpose and Content of the Scoping Report to assess plans against a set of sustainability objectives developed in consultation with local stakeholders and communities. This 0.3.1 The purpose of this SA Scoping Report is to: assessment helps the Council to identify the relative environmental, social and economic performance of possible strategic, policy and Identify other policies, plans, programmes, and sustainability site options, and to evaluate which of these may be more objectives of relevance to the Southampton City Vision Local sustainable. Plan (see Appendix III); Collect baseline information about the environmental, social 0.1.3 SA is a statutory process incorporating the requirements of the and economic conditions in the City, and how these might European Union Strategic Environmental Assessment Directive. change in the future (see Appendix IV); Identify sustainability issues and challenges which could affect 0.2 What is the Southampton City Vision Local Plan? or be addressed by the Southampton City Vision Local Plan (see Section 4 and Appendix IV); 0.2.1 The Southampton City Vision Local Plan will set the planning strategy for Southampton and address emerging housing and Develop the “Sustainability Appraisal Framework” which will employment needs for a period of 24 years – 2016 to 2040, with a form the basis for assessment of the Southampton City Vision view to 2050 and how the City should continue to develop. Local Plan (Section 5); and Consult on the scope and method of the SA (Section 6). i SA/SEA for the Southampton City Vision Local Plan: Scoping Report Non-Technical Summary December 2019 UE0338 SEA- Soton LP Scoping_2_191217 0.4 Presenting the Scoping Information Theme Datasets Schools capacity 0.4.1 The policy and plan review, baseline data, and sustainability issues Green are presented through a series of themes to enable the reader to Green infrastructure assets infrastructure and Accessibility to semi-natural or open space easily locate the SA information representing their specific areas of ecosystems Ecosystems services interest – see Table 0.1. services Health indicators Table 0.1: Themes Healthcare inequalities Health Theme Datasets Participation in sports and fitness activities Transportation infrastructure Accessibility and Air quality Car ownership, commuting and modal share transportation Historic development of the City Traffic flows Historic Designated and non-designated sites and areas Air pollution sources environment Archaeological assets Air quality Air quality hotspots Heritage at risk Air quality management Housing stock, type, tenures and completions Habitats Students Biodiversity and Species Housing House prices and affordability geodiversity Nature conservation designations Vacancy rates Geological features Homelessness Greenhouse gas emissions: sources & trends Landscape and townscape character Energy consumption Landscape Climate change New Forest National Park Effects of climate change Minerals Climate change adaptation Waste and recycling Economic sectors Material assets Renewable energy and district energy Business demography Infrastructure delivery Economic factors Employment sectors Previously developed land Land supply Population and Population size, structure, density and growth Education and skills ii SA/SEA for the Southampton City Vision Local Plan: Scoping Report Non-Technical Summary December 2019 UE0338 SEA- Soton LP Scoping_2_191217 Theme Datasets Key sustainability issues quality of life Age and ethnicity greenhouse gas emissions in the City. Migration and community patterns . The scale of development proposed, together with anticipated growth Indices of Multiple Deprivation in the demand for travel from existing communities, will place further Unemployment demand on already stretched transport networks. Traffic management measures will be required to ensure that the existing network is used Crime effectively. Soil resource Soil . Development located close to the M27 motorway has the potential to Soil quality encourage car use and further increase congestion in the area. Watercourses . A potential doubling of throughput by 2035 for the Port of Water resources Southampton is anticipated with the associated increase in the volume Water Water quality of vehicles (including heavy-goods vehicles) and passengers, further Flood risk contributing to congestion, delay and air pollution. Coastal defence . People living in deprived areas close to the City centre or on the edge of the City can experience higher levels of pollution as many are close to busy roads. These people have low levels of car ownership and 0.5 Key Sustainability Issues therefore rely on accessible and affordable public transport. Air quality 0.5.1 Table 0.2 summarises the key sustainability issues which have been . Air quality is a significant issue in Southampton with elevated levels of identified for the City. pollutants due mainly to road transport emissions, especially heavy goods vehicles. Table 0.2: Key sustainability issues . Increased traffic flows generated by the site allocations could add to Key sustainability issues overall emissions and pollutants associated with transport, especially Accessibility and transportation around City centre road networks. Increases in traffic flows may also undermine efforts to improve air . Many key roads and junctions
Recommended publications
  • Draft Water Resources Management Plan 2019 Annex 14: SEA Main Report

    Draft Water Resources Management Plan 2019 Annex 14: SEA Main Report

    Draft Water Resources Management Plan 2019 Annex 14: SEA Main Report Appendix A: Consultee responses to the scoping report and amendments made as a consequence November 30, 2017 Version 1 Appendix A Statement of Response Southern Water issued its Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Scoping Report for its Draft Water Resources Management Plan 2019 for public consultation from 28th April 2017 to 2nd June 2017. Comments on the SEA Scoping Report were received from the following organisations: Natural England Environment Agency Historic England Howard Taylor, Upstream Dry Fly Sussex Wildlife Trust The Test & Itchen Association Ltd Wessex Chalk Stream Rivers Trust Forestry Commission England Hampshire and Isle of Wight Wildlife Trust Longdown Management Limited Amanda Barker-Mill C. H. Layman These comments are set out in Table 1 together with Southern Water’s response as to how it intends to take account of them in developing the SEA of the Draft Water Resources Management Plan. Table 1 Draft Water Resources Management Plan: SEA Scoping Report – responses to comments received How comments have been addressed in the Ref Consultee Comment Draft Water Resources Management Plan Environmental Report Plans programmes or policies I recommend you add the following to your list of plans programmes or policies: National. - Defra strategy for the environment creating a great place for These policies, plans and programmes have Natural living. been included in the SEA Environmental Report 1 England - The national conservation strategy conservation-21 and considered in the assessment of potential effects of the WRMP. - The 5 point plan to salmon conservation in the UK National Nature Reserve Management Plans (though you may not be able to, or need to, list all of these, please just reference them as a source of information for assessment of any relevant options).
  • Solent Connectivity May 2020

    Solent Connectivity May 2020

    Solent Connectivity May 2020 Continuous Modular Strategic Planning Page | 1 Page | 2 Table of Contents 1.0 Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................................... 6 2.0 The Solent CMSP Study ................................................................................................................................... 10 2.1 Scope and Geography....................................................................................................................... 10 2.2 Fit with wider rail industry strategy ................................................................................................. 11 2.3 Governance and process .................................................................................................................. 12 3.0 Context and Strategic Questions ............................................................................................................ 15 3.1 Strategic Questions .......................................................................................................................... 15 3.2 Economic context ............................................................................................................................. 16 3.3 Travel patterns and changes over time ............................................................................................ 18 3.4 Dual-city region aspirations and city to city connectivity ................................................................
  • Peat Database Results Hampshire

    Peat Database Results Hampshire

    Baker's Rithe, Hampshire Record ID 29 Authors Year Allen, M. and Gardiner, J. 2000 Location description Deposit location SU 6926 1041 Deposit description Deposit stratigraphy Preserved timbers (oak and yew) on peat ledge. One oak stump in situ. Peat layer 0.15-0.26 m deep [thick?]. Associated artefacts Early work Sample method Depth of deposit 14C ages available -1 m OD Yes Notes 14C details ID 12 Laboratory code R-24993/2 Sample location Depth of sample Dated sample description [-1 m OD] Oak stump Age (uncal) Age (cal) Delta 13C 3735 ± 60 BP 2310-1950 cal. BC Notes Stump BB Bibliographic reference Allen, M. and Gardiner, J. 2000 'Our changing coast; a survey of the intertidal archaeology of Langstone Harbour, Hampshire', Hampshire CBA Research Report 12.4 Coastal peat resource database (Hazell, 2008) Page 1 of 86 Bury Farm (Bury Marshes), Hampshire Record ID 641 Authors Year Long, A., Scaife, R. and Edwards, R. 2000 Location description Deposit location SU 3820 1140 Deposit description Deposit stratigraphy Associated artefacts Early work Sample method Depth of deposit 14C ages available Yes Notes 14C details ID 491 Laboratory code Beta-93195 Sample location Depth of sample Dated sample description SU 3820 1140 -0.16 to -0.11 m OD Transgressive contact. Age (uncal) Age (cal) Delta 13C 3080 ± 60 BP 3394-3083 cal. BP Notes Dark brown humified peat with some turfa. Bibliographic reference Long, A., Scaife, R. and Edwards, R. 2000 'Stratigraphic architecture, relative sea-level, and models of estuary development in southern England: new data from Southampton Water' in ' and estuarine environments: sedimentology, geomorphology and geoarchaeology', (ed.s) Pye, K.
  • Gazetteer.Doc Revised from 10/03/02

    Gazetteer.Doc Revised from 10/03/02

    Save No. 91 Printed 10/03/02 10:33 AM Gazetteer.doc Revised From 10/03/02 Gazetteer compiled by E J Wiseman Abbots Ann SU 3243 Bighton Lane Watercress Beds SU 5933 Abbotstone Down SU 5836 Bishop's Dyke SU 3405 Acres Down SU 2709 Bishopstoke SU 4619 Alice Holt Forest SU 8042 Bishops Sutton Watercress Beds SU 6031 Allbrook SU 4521 Bisterne SU 1400 Allington Lane Gravel Pit SU 4717 Bitterne (Southampton) SU 4413 Alresford Watercress Beds SU 5833 Bitterne Park (Southampton) SU 4414 Alresford Pond SU 5933 Black Bush SU 2515 Amberwood Inclosure SU 2013 Blackbushe Airfield SU 8059 Amery Farm Estate (Alton) SU 7240 Black Dam (Basingstoke) SU 6552 Ampfield SU 4023 Black Gutter Bottom SU 2016 Andover Airfield SU 3245 Blackmoor SU 7733 Anton valley SU 3740 Blackmoor Golf Course SU 7734 Arlebury Lake SU 5732 Black Point (Hayling Island) SZ 7599 Ashlett Creek SU 4603 Blashford Lakes SU 1507 Ashlett Mill Pond SU 4603 Blendworth SU 7113 Ashley Farm (Stockbridge) SU 3730 Bordon SU 8035 Ashley Manor (Stockbridge) SU 3830 Bossington SU 3331 Ashley Walk SU 2014 Botley Wood SU 5410 Ashley Warren SU 4956 Bourley Reservoir SU 8250 Ashmansworth SU 4157 Boveridge SU 0714 Ashurst SU 3310 Braishfield SU 3725 Ash Vale Gravel Pit SU 8853 Brambridge SU 4622 Avington SU 5332 Bramley Camp SU 6559 Avon Castle SU 1303 Bramshaw Wood SU 2516 Avon Causeway SZ 1497 Bramshill (Warren Heath) SU 7759 Avon Tyrrell SZ 1499 Bramshill Common SU 7562 Backley Plain SU 2106 Bramshill Police College Lake SU 7560 Baddesley Common SU 3921 Bramshill Rubbish Tip SU 7561 Badnam Creek (River
  • (Public) 17/09/2013, 17.00

    (Public) 17/09/2013, 17.00

    Public Document Pack CABINET DOCUMENTS FOR THE MEMBERS ROOM Tuesday, 17th September, 2013 at 5.00 pm MEMBERS ROOM DOCUMENTS ATTACHED TO THE LISTED REPORTS Contacts Cabinet Administrator Judy Cordell Tel: 023 8083 2766 Email: [email protected] MEMBERS ROOM DOCUMENTS 14 HAMPSHIRE MINERALS AND WASTE PLAN: ADOPTION Inspectors’ report into the Hampshire Minerals and Waste Plan (2013). Saved policies of the Minerals and Waste Local Plan (1998). Minerals and Waste Core Strategy (2007). Minerals and Waste Plan for adoption (2013). Inspector’s ‘Main Modifications’. Inspector’s ‘Additional Modifications’. Hampshire County Council’s Cabinet report. List of Southampton sites in background document potentially suitable for waste management facilities. Summary of consultation responses (2013). Monday, 9 September HEAD OF LEGAL , HR AND DEMOCRATIC SERVICES 2013 Agenda Item 14 Report to Hampshire County Council, Portsmouth City Council, Southampton City Council, New Forest National Park Authority and South Downs National Park Authority by Andrew S Freeman, BSc(Hons) DipTP DipEM FRTPI FCIHT MIEnvSc an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government rd Date : 23 May 2013 PLANNING AND COMPULSORY PURCHASE ACT 2004 (AS AMENDED) SECTION 20 REPORT ON THE EXAMINATION INTO THE HAMPSHIRE MINERALS AND WASTE PLAN LOCAL PLAN Document submitted for examination on 29 February 2012 Examination hearings held between 6 to 8 June 2012, 11 to 15 June 2012 and 13 to 14 March 2013 File Ref: PINS/Q1770/429/7 ABBREVIATIONS USED
  • Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation Sincs Hampshire.Pdf

    Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation Sincs Hampshire.Pdf

    Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINCs) within Hampshire © Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre No part of this documentHBIC may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recoding or otherwise without the prior permission of the Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre Central Grid SINC Ref District SINC Name Ref. SINC Criteria Area (ha) BD0001 Basingstoke & Deane Straits Copse, St. Mary Bourne SU38905040 1A 2.14 BD0002 Basingstoke & Deane Lee's Wood SU39005080 1A 1.99 BD0003 Basingstoke & Deane Great Wallop Hill Copse SU39005200 1A/1B 21.07 BD0004 Basingstoke & Deane Hackwood Copse SU39504950 1A 11.74 BD0005 Basingstoke & Deane Stokehill Farm Down SU39605130 2A 4.02 BD0006 Basingstoke & Deane Juniper Rough SU39605289 2D 1.16 BD0007 Basingstoke & Deane Leafy Grove Copse SU39685080 1A 1.83 BD0008 Basingstoke & Deane Trinley Wood SU39804900 1A 6.58 BD0009 Basingstoke & Deane East Woodhay Down SU39806040 2A 29.57 BD0010 Basingstoke & Deane Ten Acre Brow (East) SU39965580 1A 0.55 BD0011 Basingstoke & Deane Berries Copse SU40106240 1A 2.93 BD0012 Basingstoke & Deane Sidley Wood North SU40305590 1A 3.63 BD0013 Basingstoke & Deane The Oaks Grassland SU40405920 2A 1.12 BD0014 Basingstoke & Deane Sidley Wood South SU40505520 1B 1.87 BD0015 Basingstoke & Deane West Of Codley Copse SU40505680 2D/6A 0.68 BD0016 Basingstoke & Deane Hitchen Copse SU40505850 1A 13.91 BD0017 Basingstoke & Deane Pilot Hill: Field To The South-East SU40505900 2A/6A 4.62
  • HBIC Annual Monitoring Report 2018

    HBIC Annual Monitoring Report 2018

    Monitoring Change in Priority Habitats, Priority Species and Designated Areas For Local Development Framework Annual Monitoring Reports 2018/19 (including breakdown by district) Basingstoke and Deane Eastleigh Fareham Gosport Havant Portsmouth Winchester Produced by Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre December 2019 Sharing information about Hampshire's wildlife The Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre Partnership includes local authorities, government agencies, wildlife charities and biological recording groups. Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre 2 Contents 1 Biodiversity Monitoring in Hampshire ................................................................................... 4 2 Priority habitats ....................................................................................................................... 7 3 Nature Conservation Designations ....................................................................................... 12 4 Priority habitats within Designated Sites .............................................................................. 13 5 Condition of Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs)....................................................... 14 7. SINCs in Positive Management (SD 160) - Not reported on for 2018-19 .......................... 19 8 Changes in Notable Species Status over the period 2009 - 2019 ....................................... 20 09 Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council .......................................................................... 28 10 Eastleigh Borough
  • Biodiversity Action Plan for Test Valley May 2008 the Summary Local Biodiversity Action Plan for Test Valley May 2008

    Biodiversity Action Plan for Test Valley May 2008 the Summary Local Biodiversity Action Plan for Test Valley May 2008

    B IODIVERSITY A CTION P LAN SUMMARY for Test Valley The Summary Local Biodiversity Action Plan for Test Valley May 2008 The Summary Local Biodiversity Action Plan for Test Valley May 2008 Contents Page 1. Introduction 1.1 We all have an obligation to protect and enhance the variety of life, or ‘biodiversity’, including local wildlife and natural habitats. There are national and international 1. Introduction 2 policies and initiatives which seek to ensure that our biodiversity is maintained for future generations - there is also public support for efforts to protect the animals What is Biodiversity? 2 and wildflowers we live alongside because they enhance our quality of life. Biodiversity and Test Valley 3 Biodiversity across the Borough 3 1.2 This is a summary of the Local Biodiversity Action Plan (hereafter referred to as the Human Influences 3 BAP) for Test Valley. The full version of the BAP is a detailed action plan, available on Looking Towards the Future 4 the Council’s website, and is a working document that provides a framework for the Biodiversity Action Planning 4 maintenance and enhancement of the biodiversity of the Borough by a broad partnership. Partnership Working For Biodiversity 4 Integrating Biodiversity into Local Decision Making 4 1.3 The BAP has been published by the Council and was written in conjunction with the Landscape Character Assessment and Community Landscape Project 4 Hampshire & Isle of Wight Wildlife Trust through consultation with several relevant agencies, authorities, non-governmental organisations, special interest groups and 2. Preparing the BAP for Test Valley 5 individuals. The BAP also has the support of the Environment Group representing the Borough’s Local Strategic Partnership, a group of stakeholders with a special remit for Biodiversity Objectives for Test Valley 5 developing environmental activities as part of the Borough’s Community Strategy.
  • Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council Landscape, Biodiversity

    Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council Landscape, Biodiversity

    Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council Landscape, Biodiversity and Trees Supplementary Planning Document July 2018 DRAFT for Economic Planning and Housing Committee 1 Landscape, Biodiversity and Trees SPD – DRAFT for EPH 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 4 Purpose of this Supplementary Planning Document .............................................. 4 What types of development does this Supplementary Planning Document apply to? ......................................................................................................................... 5 Professional sources of advice .............................................................................. 5 2. Policy context ................................................................................................................. 6 Links to Green Infrastructure Strategy ................................................................... 7 3. Landscape ...................................................................................................................... 9 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 9 Policy context ........................................................................................................ 9 Overview of how to create a strong landscape structure ...................................... 10 STAGE ONE: Understanding a site - Survey of the site and its surroundings
  • 59 EDITORIAL. VOL. XVIII, Pt. 2, of the Proceedings Will Be Published In

    59 EDITORIAL. VOL. XVIII, Pt. 2, of the Proceedings Will Be Published In

    PAPERS AND PROCEEDINGS " 59 EDITORIAL. OL. XVIII, Pt. 2, of the Proceedings will be published in July, 1953. It is hoped that this volume, which will include Vreviews of books received since 1950, notes of Field Meetings, and a list of those periodicals on the H.F.C. exchange list, will bring the Proceedings up to date, e.g., up to the end of 1952. Material intended for publication should be sent to the Hon. Editor, 10 The Close, Winchester. CORRESPONDENCE. THE STEAM PLOUGH IN HAMPSHIRE. Mr. Frank Warren writes concerning Mr. FusselFs article (Vol. XVII, p. 286) : " Richard Stratton of Broad Hinton, and Salthrop, Wiltshire (who lies buried in Winchester Cemetery), bought in 1859 the first Fowler steam plough for use on his farms. His son, James Stratton, came to farm Chilcombe, Winchester, in 1866 and introduced steam ploughing to Hampshire." CORRECTION. In the article on Hampshire Drawings in the Bodleian Library, Oxford, published in the Hampshire' Field Club Proceedings, Vol. XVII, page 139, the reference to the manuscript album should be " Western MSS. 17,507." PAPERS AND PROCEEDINGS 71 SUBJECT SECRETARIES' REPORTS. BIOLOGICAL SECTION. Weather 1951. " Deplorable" seems to be the only suitable adjective to describe the meteorological setting of the year 1951. Only once in the whole year, on July 2nd, did the temperature reach 80°, and on 18th, 20th and 28th of that month 79°. The highest shade temperatures in any other months were 75'5° on April 25th, 75° on September 6th, 74° on two days in June, the 5th and 21st, and on August 1st.
  • Monitoring Change in Priority Habitats, Priority Species and Designated Areas

    Monitoring Change in Priority Habitats, Priority Species and Designated Areas

    Monitoring Change in Priority Habitats, Priority Species and Designated Areas For Local Development Framework Annual Monitoring Reports 2018/19 (including breakdown by district) Basingstoke and Deane Eastleigh Fareham Gosport Havant Portsmouth Winchester Produced by Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre December 2019 Sharing information about Hampshire's wildlife The Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre Partnership includes local authorities, government agencies, wildlife charities and biological recording groups. Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre 2 Contents 1 Biodiversity Monitoring in Hampshire ................................................................................... 4 2 Priority habitats ....................................................................................................................... 7 3 Nature Conservation Designations ....................................................................................... 12 4 Priority habitats within Designated Sites .............................................................................. 13 5 Condition of Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs)....................................................... 14 7. SINCs in Positive Management (SD 160) - Not reported on for 2018-19 .......................... 19 8 Changes in Notable Species Status over the period 2009 - 2019 ....................................... 20 09 Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council .......................................................................... 28 10 Eastleigh Borough
  • North Solent Shoreline Management Plan

    North Solent Shoreline Management Plan

    North Solent Shoreline Management Plan 4 THE PROPOSED PLAN 4.1 Plan for Balanced Sustainability The SMP is built upon seeking to achieve balanced sustainability, i.e. it considers people, nature, historic and economic realities. The preferred policies proposed for the present-day provide a high degree of compliance with objectives to protect existing communities against flooding and erosion. The proposed long-term policies promote greater sustainability for parts of the shoreline where natural process and evolution provide a practical means of managing the shoreline. However, the protection of the significant assets present along sections of the shoreline remains a strong focus for the long- term sustainability of the economy and communities of this area. The rationale behind the preferred plan is explained in the following sections of text, which consider the SMP area as a whole. Details of the preferred policies for individual locations to achieve this Plan are provided by the individual Policy Unit statements in Chapter 5. 4.2 Predicted Implications of the Preferred Plan Direct comparison is made below between the preferred plan/policies and a scenario of No Active Intervention. This scenario considers that there is no expenditure on maintaining or improving defences and that defences will therefore fail at a time dependent upon their engineering design or residual life. This approach defines the benefits of implementing the proposed plan, as it highlights what would be lost under No Active Intervention against what would be gained if the preferred policy was implemented. Where No Active Intervention is the preferred policy then obviously this methodology is not required.