DOCSLIB.ORG

Habitats Regulation Assessment Screening Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Habitats Regulation Assessment Screening Report Eastleigh Borough Council Issues and Options Eastleigh Borough Local Plan Habitat Regulations Assessment Screening Report November 2015 Table of Contents 1 Introduction ..................................................................................... 5 1.1 Legislation ...................................................................................................................... 5 1.2 This Report ..................................................................................................................... 5 2 Methodology .................................................................................... 7 2.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 7 2.2 A Proportionate Assessment .......................................................................................... 7 2.3 The Process of HRA ....................................................................................................... 8 2.4 Evidence gathering ......................................................................................................... 9 Physical scope of the HRA ............................................................................................................ 10 2.5 Task 1: Likely Significant Effects (Screening) ............................................................... 11 Other plans and projects ................................................................................................................ 11 3 Pathways of impact and screening .............................................. 13 3.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 13 3.2 Disturbance .................................................................................................................. 13 Mechanical erosion ........................................................................................................................ 13 Disturbance of Birds by Human Activity ......................................................................................... 14 Sensitivity of waterfowl ................................................................................................................... 15 Noise and Vibration on other Wildlife ............................................................................................. 17 3.3 Air Quality ..................................................................................................................... 19 Local air pollution ........................................................................................................................... 20 3.4 Water quality ................................................................................................................. 21 3.5 Water resources ........................................................................................................... 23 3.6 Coastal squeeze ........................................................................................................... 24 3.7 Land outside European site boundaries ........................................................................ 25 3.8 Non-native species ....................................................................................................... 26 4 Solent European Sites .................................................................. 27 4.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 27 Solent Maritime SAC ...................................................................................................................... 27 Solent and Southampton Water SPA and Ramsar ........................................................................ 27 4.2 Reasons for Designation............................................................................................... 27 Solent Maritime SAC ...................................................................................................................... 27 Conservation Objectives ................................................................................................................ 28 Solent and Southampton Water SPA and Ramsar ........................................................................ 29 Conservation Objectives ................................................................................................................ 30 4.3 Historical Trends and Current Pressures ...................................................................... 32 Solent Maritime SAC ...................................................................................................................... 32 Solent and Southampton Water SPA and Ramsar ........................................................................ 33 4.4 Likely Significant Effects ............................................................................................... 34 Disturbance/recreation ................................................................................................................... 34 Air quality ....................................................................................................................................... 35 Option assessment table................................................................................................................ 36 4.5 Other Plans and Projects (In Combination) ................................................................... 39 Recreational pressure .................................................................................................................... 39 Air quality ....................................................................................................................................... 39 4.6 Conclusion .................................................................................................................... 40 5 River Itchen SAC ........................................................................... 41 5.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 41 5.2 Reasons for Designation............................................................................................... 41 Conservation Objectives ................................................................................................................ 41 5.3 Historic Trends and Current Pressures ......................................................................... 42 5.4 Likely Significant Effects ............................................................................................... 42 Air quality ....................................................................................................................................... 43 Options assessment table .............................................................................................................. 45 5.5 Other Plans and Projects (In Combination) ................................................................... 49 Air quality ....................................................................................................................................... 49 5.6 Conclusion .................................................................................................................... 50 6 Emer Bog SAC ............................................................................... 51 6.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 51 6.2 Reasons for Designation............................................................................................... 51 Conservation Objectives ................................................................................................................ 51 6.3 Historic Trends and Current Pressures ......................................................................... 51 6.4 Likely Significant Effects ............................................................................................... 52 6.5 Other Plans and Projects (In Combination) ................................................................... 52 6.6 Conclusion .................................................................................................................... 52 7 Mottisfont Bats SAC ...................................................................... 53 7.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 53 7.2 Reasons for Designation............................................................................................... 53 Conservation Objectives ................................................................................................................ 53 7.3 Historic Trends and Current Pressures ......................................................................... 53 7.4 Likely Significant Effects ............................................................................................... 54 7.5 Other Plans and Projects (In Combination) ................................................................... 54 7.6 Conclusion .................................................................................................................... 54 8 New Forest SAC, SPA and Ramsar site ....................................... 55 8.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2018-09-14 RHMC Marine Director and Harbour Master's Report and Current Issues
    HAMPSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL Report Committee: River Hamble Harbour Management Committee Date: 24 June 2021 Title: Marine Director and Harbour Master's Report and Current Issues Report From: Director of Culture, Communities and Business Services Contact name: Jason Scott Tel: 01489 576387 Email: [email protected] Purpose of this Report 1. The purpose of this report is to record formally RHHA patrol operations and inform the Duty Holder of significant events and trends having a bearing on the Marine Safety Management System. Recommendation 2. It is recommended that the River Hamble Harbour Management Committee supports the contents of this report to the Harbour Board. Executive Summary 3. This report summarises the incidents and events which have taken place in the Harbour and addresses any issues currently under consideration by the Harbour Master. Contextual Information Patrols 4. The Harbour has been patrolled by the Duty Harbour Master at various times between 0700 and 2230 daily. Mooring and pontoon checks have been conducted daily throughout the period. Issues 6. 6 Monthly Audit by the Designated Person of the Marine Safety Management System – The MSMS was audited by the RHHA Designated Person on 18 May. As part of our drive for continuous improvement, a number of new initiatives will be pursued to ensure that River Users are informed better of trends in the River and also, in so doing, reminded of the Bye Laws. The Designated Person has affirmed continued compliance with the Port Marine Safety Code. 7. Annual Trinity House Audit – An officer of Trinity House conducted an annual light inspection on 22 March to confirm compliance with the River Hamble Harbour Authority’s status as a Local Lighthouse Authority.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Water Resources Management Plan 2019 Annex 14: SEA Main Report
    Draft Water Resources Management Plan 2019 Annex 14: SEA Main Report Appendix A: Consultee responses to the scoping report and amendments made as a consequence November 30, 2017 Version 1 Appendix A Statement of Response Southern Water issued its Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Scoping Report for its Draft Water Resources Management Plan 2019 for public consultation from 28th April 2017 to 2nd June 2017. Comments on the SEA Scoping Report were received from the following organisations: Natural England Environment Agency Historic England Howard Taylor, Upstream Dry Fly Sussex Wildlife Trust The Test & Itchen Association Ltd Wessex Chalk Stream Rivers Trust Forestry Commission England Hampshire and Isle of Wight Wildlife Trust Longdown Management Limited Amanda Barker-Mill C. H. Layman These comments are set out in Table 1 together with Southern Water’s response as to how it intends to take account of them in developing the SEA of the Draft Water Resources Management Plan. Table 1 Draft Water Resources Management Plan: SEA Scoping Report – responses to comments received How comments have been addressed in the Ref Consultee Comment Draft Water Resources Management Plan Environmental Report Plans programmes or policies I recommend you add the following to your list of plans programmes or policies: National. - Defra strategy for the environment creating a great place for These policies, plans and programmes have Natural living. been included in the SEA Environmental Report 1 England - The national conservation strategy conservation-21 and considered in the assessment of potential effects of the WRMP. - The 5 point plan to salmon conservation in the UK National Nature Reserve Management Plans (though you may not be able to, or need to, list all of these, please just reference them as a source of information for assessment of any relevant options).
    [Show full text]
  • D-Day Marshalling and Embarkation Areas
    SECOND WORLD WAR - D-Day Marshalling and Embarkation Areas 1. Operation Overlord From April 1944, the east-coast, the south and west coastal areas of England and parts of south Wales were divided into a number of concentration areas known as Marshalling Areas (MAs). One or more MAs served an Embarkation Area (EA). Preliminary planning as regards to the layout of each area had been worked out the previous year, such as exercise 'Harlequin' – carried out within the Sussex District and Central Sussex Sub- District during August and September 1943. By mid-March 1944, the Overlord Marshalling & Concentration Area plans were being finalised, this was called the 'Sausage Plan' on account of the shape given to the MA boundaries when identified on a map. Command Responsibilities Eastern Command was required to provide concentration areas for all troops passing through Tilbury and London Docks. This included an infantry division plus accumulated residues totalling 104,000 troops. Felixstowe and Tilbury Docks were each to be allocated one reinforcement holding unit of 1,600 troops and one reinforcement group of three units of 4,800 troops within the concentration area. Southern Command's primary responsibility was to provide concentration areas for US Forces by direct arrangement with SOS ETOUSA. This was in addition to two British armoured brigades located in the Bournemouth /Poole Area, and 21 Army Group. One reinforcement holding unit was also required to be accommodated in each of the Portsmouth and Southampton MAs. British Airborne Forces required tented accommodation for 800 (all ranks) at certain airfields within the command from which the forces would operate.
    [Show full text]
  • Gazetteer.Doc Revised from 10/03/02
    Save No. 91 Printed 10/03/02 10:33 AM Gazetteer.doc Revised From 10/03/02 Gazetteer compiled by E J Wiseman Abbots Ann SU 3243 Bighton Lane Watercress Beds SU 5933 Abbotstone Down SU 5836 Bishop's Dyke SU 3405 Acres Down SU 2709 Bishopstoke SU 4619 Alice Holt Forest SU 8042 Bishops Sutton Watercress Beds SU 6031 Allbrook SU 4521 Bisterne SU 1400 Allington Lane Gravel Pit SU 4717 Bitterne (Southampton) SU 4413 Alresford Watercress Beds SU 5833 Bitterne Park (Southampton) SU 4414 Alresford Pond SU 5933 Black Bush SU 2515 Amberwood Inclosure SU 2013 Blackbushe Airfield SU 8059 Amery Farm Estate (Alton) SU 7240 Black Dam (Basingstoke) SU 6552 Ampfield SU 4023 Black Gutter Bottom SU 2016 Andover Airfield SU 3245 Blackmoor SU 7733 Anton valley SU 3740 Blackmoor Golf Course SU 7734 Arlebury Lake SU 5732 Black Point (Hayling Island) SZ 7599 Ashlett Creek SU 4603 Blashford Lakes SU 1507 Ashlett Mill Pond SU 4603 Blendworth SU 7113 Ashley Farm (Stockbridge) SU 3730 Bordon SU 8035 Ashley Manor (Stockbridge) SU 3830 Bossington SU 3331 Ashley Walk SU 2014 Botley Wood SU 5410 Ashley Warren SU 4956 Bourley Reservoir SU 8250 Ashmansworth SU 4157 Boveridge SU 0714 Ashurst SU 3310 Braishfield SU 3725 Ash Vale Gravel Pit SU 8853 Brambridge SU 4622 Avington SU 5332 Bramley Camp SU 6559 Avon Castle SU 1303 Bramshaw Wood SU 2516 Avon Causeway SZ 1497 Bramshill (Warren Heath) SU 7759 Avon Tyrrell SZ 1499 Bramshill Common SU 7562 Backley Plain SU 2106 Bramshill Police College Lake SU 7560 Baddesley Common SU 3921 Bramshill Rubbish Tip SU 7561 Badnam Creek (River
    [Show full text]
  • Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation Sincs Hampshire.Pdf
    Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINCs) within Hampshire © Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre No part of this documentHBIC may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recoding or otherwise without the prior permission of the Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre Central Grid SINC Ref District SINC Name Ref. SINC Criteria Area (ha) BD0001 Basingstoke & Deane Straits Copse, St. Mary Bourne SU38905040 1A 2.14 BD0002 Basingstoke & Deane Lee's Wood SU39005080 1A 1.99 BD0003 Basingstoke & Deane Great Wallop Hill Copse SU39005200 1A/1B 21.07 BD0004 Basingstoke & Deane Hackwood Copse SU39504950 1A 11.74 BD0005 Basingstoke & Deane Stokehill Farm Down SU39605130 2A 4.02 BD0006 Basingstoke & Deane Juniper Rough SU39605289 2D 1.16 BD0007 Basingstoke & Deane Leafy Grove Copse SU39685080 1A 1.83 BD0008 Basingstoke & Deane Trinley Wood SU39804900 1A 6.58 BD0009 Basingstoke & Deane East Woodhay Down SU39806040 2A 29.57 BD0010 Basingstoke & Deane Ten Acre Brow (East) SU39965580 1A 0.55 BD0011 Basingstoke & Deane Berries Copse SU40106240 1A 2.93 BD0012 Basingstoke & Deane Sidley Wood North SU40305590 1A 3.63 BD0013 Basingstoke & Deane The Oaks Grassland SU40405920 2A 1.12 BD0014 Basingstoke & Deane Sidley Wood South SU40505520 1B 1.87 BD0015 Basingstoke & Deane West Of Codley Copse SU40505680 2D/6A 0.68 BD0016 Basingstoke & Deane Hitchen Copse SU40505850 1A 13.91 BD0017 Basingstoke & Deane Pilot Hill: Field To The South-East SU40505900 2A/6A 4.62
    [Show full text]
  • HBIC Annual Monitoring Report 2018
    Monitoring Change in Priority Habitats, Priority Species and Designated Areas For Local Development Framework Annual Monitoring Reports 2018/19 (including breakdown by district) Basingstoke and Deane Eastleigh Fareham Gosport Havant Portsmouth Winchester Produced by Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre December 2019 Sharing information about Hampshire's wildlife The Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre Partnership includes local authorities, government agencies, wildlife charities and biological recording groups. Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre 2 Contents 1 Biodiversity Monitoring in Hampshire ................................................................................... 4 2 Priority habitats ....................................................................................................................... 7 3 Nature Conservation Designations ....................................................................................... 12 4 Priority habitats within Designated Sites .............................................................................. 13 5 Condition of Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs)....................................................... 14 7. SINCs in Positive Management (SD 160) - Not reported on for 2018-19 .......................... 19 8 Changes in Notable Species Status over the period 2009 - 2019 ....................................... 20 09 Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council .......................................................................... 28 10 Eastleigh Borough
    [Show full text]
  • BITTERNE AFTER the ROMANS. DOMESDAY Book Is Usually
    148 : HAMPSHIRE FIELD CLUB BITTERNE AFTER THE ROMANS. By O. G. S". CRAWFORD, B.A., F.S.A. OMESDAY Book is usually regarded as a measure of antiquity, conferring the hall-mark of authentic age upon such places D as are there mentioned. Bitterne is not mentioned by this name in Domesday, but the history of the manor can be traced back to before Domesday. In the year 1045 King "Edward the Confessor gave land at Stanham to the monastery of St. Peter and Paul at Winchester, that is to say, to the Cathedral. The bounds of this land are given ; their identification is not at all easy, but one thing is quite certain, namely, that they include a portion- of South Stoneham ; for an earlier grant of land (in 932).to-the new Minster at Winchester can be identified by the bounds with part of North Stoneham. We must therefore exclude all the land included in that earlier grant from the present one (of 1045). We may also exclude all manors known to exist at the time of Domesday, for it is highly improbable that any such would be included in the grant of a manor made only 41 years previously. That cuts out the manors of Allington, Woolston, Shirley and Chilworth. Unfor- tunately the exact extent of these manors is unknown, but the possible extent of the Stoneham grant is to some extent defined. The bounds begin at Swaythlihg well, which must have been somewhere near Swaythling. The " old Itchen " and the " new river " (niwan ea) are then mentioned, and then, after a number of unidentifiable bound-marks (loam-pits, Wadda's stoc, white stone) we come to " wic hythe." This last must mean the hithe or quay of the old Saxon town of Southampton, whose alternative names were Homwic and Horn- or Ham-tun.
    [Show full text]
  • Saxon Charters and Landscape Evolution in the South-Central Hampshire Basin
    ProcHampsh Field Club ArchaeolSoc 50, 1994, 103-25 SAXON CHARTERS AND LANDSCAPE EVOLUTION IN THE SOUTH-CENTRAL HAMPSHIRE BASIN By CHRISTOPHER K CURRIE ABSTRACT THE CHARTER EVIDENCE Landscape study of the South Central Hampshire Basin north of Methodology Southampton has identified evidence for organised land use, based on diverse agricultural, pastoral and woodland land uses in the The methods used to eludicate the bounds of the Saxon period. Combined study of the topographic, cartographiccharter s discussed below are based on a long­ and charter evidence has revealed that the basis for settlement standing knowledge of the areas under patterns had largely developed by the tenth century. Highly consideration. This was combined with organised common pasturing is identified within gated areas as topographical information given on the earliest being the origin of English commons in the later historic period.Ordnanc e Survey map (one inch, 1810 edition, Evidence for possible river engineering is discussed. sheet XI), particularly with regard to the parish Charter evidence suggests that this developed landscape, boundaries shown thereon. In some cases this was underwent reorganisation in the Late Saxon period, with ecclesiastical bodies at Winchester being the major beneficiaries.supporte d by knowledge of earlier documents. It Although dealing with a small geographical area, this study is accepted that much of the boundaries of these raises implications for the nation-wide study of the origin of estates will be conjectural. Where the boundary land-use traditions and settlement in England. appears to follow close to the earliest known parish boundary, it has been assumed this is the course of die charter bounds, unless there is good INTRODUCTION reason to think otherwise.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Action Plan for Test Valley May 2008 the Summary Local Biodiversity Action Plan for Test Valley May 2008
    B IODIVERSITY A CTION P LAN SUMMARY for Test Valley The Summary Local Biodiversity Action Plan for Test Valley May 2008 The Summary Local Biodiversity Action Plan for Test Valley May 2008 Contents Page 1. Introduction 1.1 We all have an obligation to protect and enhance the variety of life, or ‘biodiversity’, including local wildlife and natural habitats. There are national and international 1. Introduction 2 policies and initiatives which seek to ensure that our biodiversity is maintained for future generations - there is also public support for efforts to protect the animals What is Biodiversity? 2 and wildflowers we live alongside because they enhance our quality of life. Biodiversity and Test Valley 3 Biodiversity across the Borough 3 1.2 This is a summary of the Local Biodiversity Action Plan (hereafter referred to as the Human Influences 3 BAP) for Test Valley. The full version of the BAP is a detailed action plan, available on Looking Towards the Future 4 the Council’s website, and is a working document that provides a framework for the Biodiversity Action Planning 4 maintenance and enhancement of the biodiversity of the Borough by a broad partnership. Partnership Working For Biodiversity 4 Integrating Biodiversity into Local Decision Making 4 1.3 The BAP has been published by the Council and was written in conjunction with the Landscape Character Assessment and Community Landscape Project 4 Hampshire & Isle of Wight Wildlife Trust through consultation with several relevant agencies, authorities, non-governmental organisations, special interest groups and 2. Preparing the BAP for Test Valley 5 individuals. The BAP also has the support of the Environment Group representing the Borough’s Local Strategic Partnership, a group of stakeholders with a special remit for Biodiversity Objectives for Test Valley 5 developing environmental activities as part of the Borough’s Community Strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring Change in Priority Habitats, Priority Species and Designated Areas
    Monitoring Change in Priority Habitats, Priority Species and Designated Areas For Local Development Framework Annual Monitoring Reports 2018/19 (including breakdown by district) Basingstoke and Deane Eastleigh Fareham Gosport Havant Portsmouth Winchester Produced by Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre December 2019 Sharing information about Hampshire's wildlife The Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre Partnership includes local authorities, government agencies, wildlife charities and biological recording groups. Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre 2 Contents 1 Biodiversity Monitoring in Hampshire ................................................................................... 4 2 Priority habitats ....................................................................................................................... 7 3 Nature Conservation Designations ....................................................................................... 12 4 Priority habitats within Designated Sites .............................................................................. 13 5 Condition of Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs)....................................................... 14 7. SINCs in Positive Management (SD 160) - Not reported on for 2018-19 .......................... 19 8 Changes in Notable Species Status over the period 2009 - 2019 ....................................... 20 09 Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council .......................................................................... 28 10 Eastleigh Borough
    [Show full text]
  • North Solent Shoreline Management Plan
    North Solent Shoreline Management Plan 4 THE PROPOSED PLAN 4.1 Plan for Balanced Sustainability The SMP is built upon seeking to achieve balanced sustainability, i.e. it considers people, nature, historic and economic realities. The preferred policies proposed for the present-day provide a high degree of compliance with objectives to protect existing communities against flooding and erosion. The proposed long-term policies promote greater sustainability for parts of the shoreline where natural process and evolution provide a practical means of managing the shoreline. However, the protection of the significant assets present along sections of the shoreline remains a strong focus for the long- term sustainability of the economy and communities of this area. The rationale behind the preferred plan is explained in the following sections of text, which consider the SMP area as a whole. Details of the preferred policies for individual locations to achieve this Plan are provided by the individual Policy Unit statements in Chapter 5. 4.2 Predicted Implications of the Preferred Plan Direct comparison is made below between the preferred plan/policies and a scenario of No Active Intervention. This scenario considers that there is no expenditure on maintaining or improving defences and that defences will therefore fail at a time dependent upon their engineering design or residual life. This approach defines the benefits of implementing the proposed plan, as it highlights what would be lost under No Active Intervention against what would be gained if the preferred policy was implemented. Where No Active Intervention is the preferred policy then obviously this methodology is not required.
    [Show full text]
  • Jul to Dec 2013
    Butterfly Conservation Hampshire and Isle of Wight Branch Page 1 of 33 Butterfly Conservation Hampshire and Saving butterflies, moths and our environment Isle of Wight Branch HOME ABOUT » EVENTS » CONSERVATION » SPECIES » SIGHTINGS » PUBLICATIONS » LINKS » ISLE OF WIGHT » MEMBERS » Wednesday 31st July Judith Frank reports from Byway stretch between Stockbridge and Broughton (SU337354) where the following observations were made: Holly Blue (2 "didn't settle long enough for me to be sure but seemed most likely to be hollies."), Peacock (1), Meadow Brown (2), Large White (9), Ringlet (9), Brimstone (1), Comma (2), Green-veined White (4), Gatekeeper (5). "On a day of only fleeting sunshine, I was interested to see what there might be on a section of byway through farmland not particularly managed for butterflies. A large patch of brambles yielded the most colour with the commas, gatekeepers and blues.". Speckled Wood Comma NT Owen reports from Roe Inclosure, Linwood (SU200086) where the following observations were made: Large White (2), Large Skipper (1), Gatekeeper (3), Small Skipper (1), Silver-washed Fritillary (4 "Including one Valezina form female"). Silver-washed Fritillary f. valezina Steve Benstead reports from Brading Down (SZ596867) where the following observations were made: Chalkhill Blue (5), Painted Lady (1), Clouded Yellow (1). "Overcast but warm". Gary palmer reports from barton common (SZ249931) where the following observations were made: Large White (2), Small White (3), Marbled White (3), Meadow Brown (20), Gatekeeper (35), Small Copper (1), Common Blue (1), vapourer moth (1 Larval "using poplar sapling"), peppered moth (1 Larval "using alder buckthorn"), buff tip moth (49 Larval "using mature sallow").
    [Show full text]