Zoltán Nagy Ans Rietstra

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Zoltán Nagy Ans Rietstra Pearls in Policing Pearls in Policing 2010 Secretariat Nassauplein 33 2585 ED The Hague The Netherlands Tel. + 31 (0)70 311 8686 Fax + 31 (0)70 311 8687 Navigating [email protected] www.pearlsinpolicing.com 978-90-814974-2-8 isbn The Way Ahead Pearls in Policing 2010 Navigating the Way Ahead About this Book agencies that it is necessary to actively engage in international cooperation to develop effective strategies to It is widely recognised by Commissioners and Chief Executive Officers of law enforcement organisations and best position law enforcement in the future. The need for law enforcement executives from around the world to jointly identify risks, threats and opportunities as well as research new ideas and realities for policing led to the launch of the Pearls in Policing initiative in 2007. Under the responsibility of the Curatorium International Police Leadership, the Dutch based Pearls in Policing Secretariat had sole charge of the organization of the Pearls in Policing conferences in The Hague in 2007, 2008 and 2009. However, in 2010, the Australian Federal Police hosted the fourth Pearls in Policing conference in Sydney, Australia. This publication is a record of the events and discussions that took place at the 2010 conference. The 2010 Pearls in Policing conference report is a joint publication between the Australian Federal Police and the Pearls in Policing Secretariat. December 2010 Contents Foreword 6 Working Group: New Media 50 Tony W. Negus APM, Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police Presentation by Andrew Scipione, Commissioner of the New South Wales Police 56 Executive Summary 10 Working Group: Organizational Change Presentation by Kevin L. Perkins, Assistant Director, Federal Bureau of Investigations 14 Pearls in Policing: an overview Feedback 62 What is it? Conference delegates: Establishing the initiative Peter Ng (Commissioner of the Singapore Police Force) History of the conferences Rod Knecht (Senior Deputy Commissioner of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police) How does it work? Michel de Smedt (Head of Investigations International Criminal Court) Mal Hyde (Commissioner of the South Australia Police) 20 Pearls in Policing: Sydney 2010 ‘Peace, Police and Justice – Navigating the Way Ahead’ 20 Observers: Keynote address by The Honourable Brendan O’Connor MP, Minister for Home Affairs Philip Moss (Integrity Commissioner, Australian Commission for Law Enforcement Integrity) Trust and Legitimacy Prof. Sohail Inayatullah (University of the Sunshine Coast, Australia) 24 International Pearl Fishers Action Learning Group input 70 Academic input Charting the Course of Change Discussion Conference outcomes 70 Booklet Closing Remarks 72 Ruud Bik, Chief Constable of The Netherlands Police Agency (KLPD) and President of the Curatorium International Pearl Fishers Action Learning Group International Police Leadership Overview ‘Questioning the Future: the six pillars of futures studies’ Delegates and Contributors 78 Article by Prof. Sohail Inayatullah IALG Reflections Legitimacy and Public Trust: Academic Perspective 34 Prof. Willy Bruggeman (Benelux University) Prof. Hugo Frühling (University of Chile) Prof. Christopher Stone (Harvard University) Prof. Pieter Tops (Police Academy of The Netherlands) Working Group: International Cooperation 44 Presentation by Prof. Jurgen Stock, Vice President of the Bundeskriminalamt Boston, United States 42° 22’ 40” North 71° 3’ 34” West 2 pearls in policing 2010 navigating the way ahead 3 Foreword 4 pearls in policing 2010 navigating the way ahead 5 Warshaw, Poland 52° 14’ 55” North 21° 0’ 35” East International Pearl Fishers Action Learning Group (IALG) vigorously, and in the spirit of close camaraderie, as an was able to recalibrate for many of us the foundation stones international enforcement community, in our attempts of policing and the derivative sources of legitimacy and trust to achieve practical and meaningful outcomes. from which we draw our authority. Another example is the progress made in moving the working topic of ‘international And for those that joined us in the opening phase of the Foreword cooperation’ from a simple mapping exercise to its next conference on a June Sunday morning by participating iteration of improving the functionality of collaborative efforts in a yachting regatta on Sydney Harbour, I am certain between jurisdictions. many delegates will regard it Australian Federal Police Commissioner, as one of the highlights of the “We recalibrate the foundation Tony W. Negus APM A recurrent theme throughout three days. The opportunity to the course of the conference was stones of policing and the informally network with police the increasing recognition of the derivative sources of legitimacy commissioners from around the role social media plays in our world in a scenic setting was a chosen profession. This theme and trust from which once-in-a-lifetime experience emerged in almost all discussions we draw our authority.” enjoyed by all. and in fact was so prevalent that it is no surprise it was selected as On behalf of the Curatorium International Police Leadership and Australian Federal It was an honour and a privilege for the Australian Federal to deliver a professional and productive conference to look forward to the presentation of their research work on Police, I proudly present and commend the conference Police to host the Pearls in Policing annual conference in the delegates in Sydney, Australia. the assignment topic for the 2010/11 Pearl Fishers. We all report to you. It is the product of dedicated personnel further discussion. from within the AFP, supported by the Pearls in Policing Many delegates I have spoken to have commented this topic at the 2011 conference in The Hague to stimulate 2010. Especially in the context of the conference being Secretariat, which have done a truly remarkable job in its inception and for the Australian Federal Police (AFP) on the richness and quality of the presentations and held outside of The Netherlands for the first time since It would be remiss of me not to mention two other Pearls collating and summarising the outcomes of our broad to be entrusted to pioneer discussions of the conference. in Policing disciplines which both played instrumental ranging discourse, including capturing police leadership this concept, and a privilege I do not intend to cover those ‘pearls’ obtained from personalised interviews with in the context of, the AFP not “We did not shy away from in detail in this foreword the Pearls Academics and the Pearls Observers. This just playing a key role in the however I should note we roles in the success of the 2010 conference, and they were some of the most fundamental year we experimented with a smaller, but much more represents an accurate account of the conference conduct of this important event, did not shy away from some conference delegates. I am confident it not only questions and challenges focused, academic conference which turned out to be a conduct, but contains wonderfully unique pearls of but also being able to showcase of the most fundamental huge success. Our academics, selected for their subject insight and wisdom from each of the delegates. the beauty of Australia to the facing police in contemporary questions and challenges matter expertise, were of an exemplary quality and were Pearls in Policing delegates. facing police in contemporary society.” able to emulsify with the IALG to bring outstanding society. Challenging the very value to that group’s presentation. Similarly, this year It was certainly with some foundations of police legitimacy we introduced independent observers to the conference trepidation that the AFP took on the task of planning and trust; critically examining the dynamics of effectively whose insightful commentaries brought a ‘real world’ managing strategic organizational change; and evolving reality check to our sometimes esoteric deliberations. conference. The standards set by the Dutch organizers a model for improved international enforcement for this prestigious event at the end of the 2009 over the last three years established a high benchmark cooperation, to mention just a few, are daunting I was enormously impressed by the collective intellect for us to match. Fortunately, we were able to draw on endeavours in their complexity and size of task alone. and wisdom which gathered together in Sydney to the experiences of the past and, despite the tyranny debate such issues. Moreover, I was delighted in of distance, the Australian and Dutch teams worked I can point to many tangible outcomes that we achieved in the willingness of delegates to engage honestly and together exceptionally well over the course of 12 months this short, but intense, conference. For example, the 2009/10 6 pearls in policing 2010 navigating the way ahead 7 Executive Summary The Hague, The Netherlands 52° 5’ 7” North 4° 18’ 43” East Discussions at this year’s conference have essentially explore opportunities for enhancing police legitimacy and public trust, taking defined next year’s conference which will be held in • Pearls in Policing conference is into consideration the dark side of police The Hague, The Netherlands from 18 to 22 June 2011. “Charting the Course of Change”. organizations, accountability, mutual The theme of the fifth Executive Summary understanding between law enforcement At next year’s conference delegates will consider the executives and politicians and the focus on research work of two working groups as well as the public concerns
Recommended publications
  • Phase 3 Report on Implementing the Oecd Anti-Bribery Convention in Luxembourg
    PHASE 3 REPORT ON IMPLEMENTING THE OECD ANTI-BRIBERY CONVEN TION IN LUXEMBOURG June 2011 This Phase 3 Report on Luxembourg by the OECD Working Group on Bribery evaluates and makes recommendations on Luxembourg’s implementation of the OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions and the 2009 Recommendation of the Council for Further Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions. It was adopted by the Working Group on 23 June 2011. This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................. 5 A. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 7 1. The on-site visit ................................................................................................................................. 7 2. Structure of the report ....................................................................................................................... 8 3. Economic situation ............................................................................................................................ 8 4. Bribery of foreign public officials
    [Show full text]
  • Board of ACC Chair Annual Report
    BOARD OF THE AUSTRALIAN CRIME COMMISSION Chair Annual Report 2012–13 BOARD OF THE CRIME COMMISSION AUSTRALIAN BREAKING THE CHAIR AnnuAl RepoRt 2012–13 BUSINESS OF SERIOUS AND ORGANISED CRIME © Commonwealth of Australia 2013 About this report This report by the Chair of the Australian Crime Commission (ACC) Board documents the operations of the ACC for 2012–13, as required by the Australian Crime Commission Act 2002 (ACC Act). The Board does not have its own staff or budget so there are no financial statements to report. This report is presented to the Commonwealth Minister for Justice and appropriate ministers of each participating state and territory. The separate annual report by the ACC Chief Executive Officer (CEO) fulfils the requirements of government agencies under the Financial Management and Accountability Act 1997 and the Requirements for Annual Reports issued by the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet. It includes information about the ACC’s progress against Portfolio Budget Statement performance indicators as well as details about the agency’s structure, staffing and audited financial statements. It is available at <www.crimecommission.gov.au>. By producing separate reports, the Chair and the CEO are able to directly address requirements of the respective legislation. ACC contact details For enquires about this annual report and general information requests, please contact the: Manager, Stakeholder Engagement, Communication and Media Australian Crime Commission (ACC) GPO Box 1936 Tel: (02) 6243 6843 Fax: (02) 6243 6687 Email: <[email protected]> This report and more information about the ACC is available at <www.crimecommission.gov.au>. © Commonwealth of Australia 2013 All material in this publication is provided under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en> licence.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement by Roman Quaedvlieg Apm Chief
    STATEMENT BY ROMAN QUAEDVLIEG APM CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AUSTRALIAN CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION SERVICE Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Legislation Committee 20 October 2014 ___________________________________________________________________ Chair, Senators, it is a privilege to appear before you as Chief Executive Officer of the Australian Customs and Border Protection Service for the first time. Since assuming the role of Deputy Chief Executive Office Border Enforcement last year, I have had the opportunity to travel broadly across the Service’s operations and observe the passion and dedication of our officers to the critical tasks they perform in securing Australia’s sovereignty, and contributing to our nation’s prosperity. A major priority for me, working with Secretary Pezzullo, is the integration of border protection services within the Department of Immigration and Border Protection, and the establishment of the Australian Border Force as announced by the Minister for Immigration and Border Protection earlier this year in May. Implementation of counter terrorism measures 1 I would now like to update the Committee on Customs and Border Protection’s activities in the counter-terrorism area and our ongoing reform milestones. The Committee will be aware of the Government’s announcement of $154 million in additional funding to boost our counter-terrorism capacity. The measures will assist us as we seek to identify and stop Australians who seek to travel overseas to participate in terrorist activities, and to assist authorities in managing those seeking to return to Australia from foreign conflicts. Engagement with the Islamic community has been a priority for the Service and for me personally. I have met on a several occasions with Islamic community leaders in Sydney and Melbourne and our Regional Commanders across the country are continuing the process of sharing information and responding to concerns.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Involvement in Refugee Resettlement Has Proved Itself to Be Effective in the Past
    ILLUSTRATING THE NAURU FILES 31ST JULY - 11TH AUGUST 2018 | FORTYFIVEDOWNSTAIRS | MELBOURNE All We Can’t See Julian Burnside In August 2016 The Guardian published The Nauru Files, leaked incident reports In the middle of 2016, The Guardian Australia published young children try to kill themselves or engage in self- The Nauru Files: more than 2000 incident reports harm, and are denied decent medical care because recording things that had happened in Australia’s Children are a very Nauru does not have a sophisticated medical system. refugee gulag on Nauru. The incident reports – made important part of offshore When an application is brought in the Federal Court of written by staff in Australia’s detention by people directly or indirectly employed by the Australia to have those children brought to Australia Australian government - contained reports of assaults, detention. More than half for proper mental health treatment, Mr Dutton pays sexual abuse, self-harm and child abuse. They gave of the Nauru files concern lawyers to oppose the application. centre on Nauru between 2013 and 2015. an insight into the living conditions endured by And all this is hidden from us, because we can’t asylum seekers held by the Australian government. mistreatment of children. go there to see what is happening and in any event Unsurprisingly, they painted a picture of routine Australia makes sure that visas are only available dysfunction and cruelty. to people it likes. In 2015 the Federal Parliament A few key facts: Nauru is an island republic in Children are a very important part of offshore passed the Australian Border Force Act.
    [Show full text]
  • FOI-771 Documents
    (FOI-771) 001 • ,, Au;tr:t!lun Govern men! ••. i .... Australian ~:':1,r f:.jzf )::',.. '• FairWorl< .,9, i? ,'..'"' lkpartmcnt of lmmigrnlhm BORDER FORCE OMBUDSMAN ·•' and llord,·r PnM~lion TASKFORCE CADENA JOINT AGENCY AGREEMENT Foundation agreement for the formation of a taskforce for the conduct of multi­ agency operations targeting visa fraud, illegal work and the exploitation of foreign workers Department of Immigration and Border Protection Australian Border Farce Fair Work Ombudsman Released under the Freedom of Information Act by the Fair Work Ombudsman Version 3.0 (FOI-771) 002 Purpose 1. The purpose of this Joint Agency Agreement (JAA) is to ensure that all parties involved in Taskforce Cadena have a clear understanding of the objectives and key deliverables of the Taskforce and the general principles governing its operation. Parties 2. This Joint Agency Agreement (Agreement) is made between the following parties: • Department of Immigration and Border Protection (DIBP); • Australian Border Force (ABF); and • Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) Background 3. The incidence of fraud and exploitation involving foreign workers in Australia is well"known to DIBP and FWO. A range of integrity and investigative initiatives have been actively progressed across these agencies through ongoing campaigns, enquiries, investigations and field operations. 4. Targeting and disrupting entities which seek to commit visa fraud and exploit foreign workers is a priority of DIBP. FWO and other regulatory agencies. 5. Taskforce Cadena will initially focus on the collective information holdings of DIBP, FWO, the Australian Federal Police (AFP). and other agencies. Further action will be considered and linked to broader coordinated activity across government to address the matters related to illegal work and the exploitation of foreign workers.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Safecom News and Updates Saturday, 31 March 2018
    Project SafeCom News and Updates Saturday, 31 March 2018 Support us by making periodic donations: https://www.safecom.org.au/donate.htm 1. Paul Syvret: Our nation has a black and shrivelled soul 2. Defiance, resistance: The front lines of California’s war against the Trump administration 3. Climate change soon to cause mass movement, World Bank warns 4. Ross Gittins: Cheating at cricket just one of the unthinkable things Aussies do now 5. Malcolm Turnbull encourages Aung San Suu Kyi to resettle Rohingya 6. The Saturday Paper: Dutton uses visas as second criminal sentence 7. Indrika Ratwatte: 'I am old. I only wanted a small life. I have no hope left' 8. Immigration warns child abuse redress for temporary visa holders a 'significant' cost 9. 'New dose of cruelty': up to 7,000 asylum seekers to lose income support 10a. Cuts on 1 April will leave asylum seekers homeless, advocates warn 10b. Cuts leave asylum seekers in Australia at risk of destitution, say advocates 11. Dutton claims granting visa to au pair at airport in public interest 12. Peter Dutton looks to help 'persecuted' white South African farmers 13. New York Times: Australian Official Calls for Emergency Visas for White South African Farmers 14. South Africa demands Peter Dutton retract 'offensive' statement on white farmer plight 15. Dutton should prioritise refugees on Nauru, not white South Africans, UNHCR says 17. Indian Commonwealth Games 'imposters' detained at Brisbane airport 18. UN official visiting Nauru detention centre concerned about 'shocking' mental health situation 19. A letter from Manus Island to be read on Palm Sunday 20.
    [Show full text]
  • EDU Letter Template
    Europol Public Information Management Board Membership September 2017 Chairperson Mr Priit Pärkna Intelligence Management and Investigation Estonian Police and Border Guard Board Member State MB member Department/Agency/Ministry Alternate MB member Department/Agency/Ministry Austria Ms Regine International Police Cooperation - Mr Christian Wandl International Police Cooperation Wieselthaler- Federal Police Ministry of Interior Buchmann Ministry of Interior Belgium Mr Peter De International Police Cooperation - Mr Frederik Van Oost International Police Cooperation - Buysscher Federal Police Federal Police Ministry of Interior Ministry of Interior Bulgaria Mr Valentin International Operational Cooperation Ms Kremena Peneva Head of LB Bulgaria Vasilev Kostov Directorate Platikanova-Nenova Ministry of Interior Croatia Mr Ante Orlović Criminal Police Directorate Mr Dalibor Jurić Sector for Criminal Police Support Cyprus Mr Demetris European Union and International Ms Maria Charalambous European Union and International Demetriou Police Cooperation Directorate Police Cooperation Directorate Czech Republic Ms Šárka International Police Cooperation - Mr Václav Rukner International Police Cooperation - Havránková Police Presidium Police Presidium Ministry of Interior Ministry of Interior Estonia Mr Ivo Kolk Head of Intelligence Management Ms Mirja Virve Estonian Liaison Bureau Bureau Police and Border Guard Board Finland Mr Timo Antero National Police Board Ms Marja Kartila National Police Board Saarinen Ministry of Interior Ministry of Interior
    [Show full text]
  • Participants Pearls in Policing Conference 2013 • Mr. Aalbersberg
    Participants Pearls in Policing Conference 2013 Mr. Aalbersberg (Pieter-Jaap), Chief Constable, Amsterdam Regional Division, The Netherlands Mr. Abu Bakar (Khalid), Inspector General, Royal Malaysia Police, Malaysia Mr. Arunachalam (Su), Deputy Inspector General of Police, CBI, ACB, Chennai, India Mr. Beraia (Irakli), Director of Reforms and Development Agency, Georgia Mr. Blair (William), Chief of Police, Toronto Police Service, Canada Mr. Bouman (Gerard), Commissioner of the National Police of the Netherlands (NPN), The Netherlands Professor Bruggeman (Willy), Professor of Police Science, Benelux University & President of the Belgian Federal Police Board, Belgium (Academic) Ms. Coninsx (Michèle), President, Eurojust Mr. Danino (Yochanan), Commissioner, National Israeli Police, Israel Professor Haberfeld (Maria), Professor and Chair of the John Jay College of Criminal Justice, United States of America (Academic) Mr. Højbjerg (Jens Henrik), Commissioner, Denmark Professor Hoogenboom (Bob), Professor of Forensic Business, Nyenrode University, The Netherlands (Academic) Mr. Humlegård (Odd Reidar), National Commissioner, National Police, Norway Mr. Khoo Boon Hui, former Interpol President Mr. Leijtens (Hans), Commander, Royal Netherlands Marechaussee, The Netherlands Mr. Lewis (Chris), Commissioner, Ontario Provincial Police, Canada Mr. LO Wai-Chung (Stephen), Director of Crime & Security, Hong Kong Police Force, Hong Kong Ms Merckx (Gwen), Chief Constable, Belgian Local Police, Belgium Mr. Nettgen (Romain), Director General, Grand Ducal Police, Luxembourg Mr. Ng (Peter), Commissioner, Singapore Police Force (SPF), Singapore Mr. Pearce (Trevor), Director General, Serious Organised Crime Agency (SOCA), United Kingdom Mr. Pérez (Emile), Head of the International Department, National Police, France Mr. Perkins (Kevin), Deputy Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), United States of America Mr. Prasarnrajkit (Watcharapol), Deputy Commissioner General, Royal Thai Police, Thailand Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Border Force Cancels Plans to Patrol Melbourne CBD As Part of Antisocial Behaviour Operation
    6/24/2018 Australian Border Force cancels plans to patrol Melbourne CBD as part of antisocial behaviour operation Our network Subscribe Log In MENU SUBSCRIBE 0 Advertisement POLITICS FEDERAL Australian Border Force cancels plans to patrol Melbourne CBD as part of antisocial behaviour operation By Nicole Hasham Border Force operation off after protesters take to the streets Updated 28 August 2015 — 6:45pm, first published at 10:48am What powers do Border Force officials have? A A A $10 million splurge to rename Australian Border Force Mark Kenny: Operation Fortitude a case of uniformed insanity An operation involving the Australian Border Force that was to target potential visa fraudsters in the heart of Melbourne has been cancelled following a public backlash. The Abbott government is under pressure to explain why the police-led operation including the ABF involved stopping people for visa checks - a measure independent Tasmanian MP Andrew Wilkie compared to East Germany's Stasi. 01:27 Protesters force Border Force off Melbourne's streets Playing in 5 ... Don't Play Operation Fortitude plan for Australian Border Force to check visas on Mellbourne's streets this weekend called off after flash protests halted city traffic in central Melbourne. (Vision courtesy ABC News24). https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/australian-border-force-to-patrol-melbourne-cbd-as-part-of-antisocial-behaviour-operation-20150828-gj9… 1/10 6/24/2018 Australian Border Force cancels plans to patrol Melbourne CBD as part of antisocial behaviour operation For the first time officers from the federal government's new paramilitary unit were to join transport officials and police to target crime among people "travelling to, from and around the CBD", in a measure dubbed Operation Fortitude.
    [Show full text]
  • Secondary Victimization Policies & Practices
    EUROPEAN CRIME PREVENTION NETWORK EUCPN Toolbox Series No. 7 Preventing Secondary Victimization policies & practices In the framework of the project ‘‘The development of the observatory function of the European Centre of Expertise on Crime Prevention within the EUCPN’. EUCPN Secretariat, March 2016, Brussels With financial support from the Prevention of and Fight against Crime Programme of the European Union European Commission – Directorate-General Home Affairs Preventing Secondary Victimization Policies & practices Preface The seventh toolbox in the series published by the EUCPN Secretariat focuses on the topic chosen by the Latvian presidency, namely Secondary Victimization. In recent years the Latvian police has taking huge steps in making the police officers aware of the phenomena and providing them with a guideline in how to prevent Secondary Victimization. They wanted to share the knowledge of this experience with the other Member States of the network and see if there were other good practices that they could use. The toolbox is divided into three parts: policy and legislation, a guideline of good and promising practices and examples from practices. All 3 parts of the toolbox are important however the most emphasis is put on the second part. Within this part of the toolbox, the focus is on the different steps of the justice system a victim has to go through. The EUCPN Secretariat made a ‘matrix’ which shows the different steps of the justice system. For each step in the judicial system, we have tried to formulate the most pressing needs of the victims, the EU minimal standards provided through the legislations discussed in part 1 and we have also formulated good practices gathered in the Member States.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Security Files
    Parliamentary Assembly Assemblée parlementaire AS/ENA/SECU (2002) 06 30 January 2003 aenasecu02_06 Urban security files Synthetic files by country prepared by Mr Michel MARCUS (expert) according to the attached questionnaire (see appendix) CONTENTS Albania ............................................................................................................................................................. 3 Andorra ................................................................................................................................4 Armenia ................................................................................................................................5 Austria .................................................................................................................................. 5 Belgium................................................................................................................................. 6 Bulgaria................................................................................................................................8 Cyprus .................................................................................................................................. 9 Czech Republic................................................................................................................... 10 Denmark ............................................................................................................................. 12 Estonia...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ESPON Qol – Quality of Life Measurements and Methodology
    ESPON QoL – Quality of Life Measurements and Methodology Annex 9 to the Final Report Case study: Luxembourg Applied Research Final Report 30th October 2020 Final Report This applied research activity is conducted within the framework of the ESPON 2020 Cooperation Programme. The ESPON EGTC is the Single Beneficiary of the ESPON 2020 Cooperation Programme. The Single Operation within the programme is implemented by the ESPON EGTC and co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund, the EU Member States and the Partner States, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland. This delivery does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the members of the ESPON 2020 Monitoring Committee. Project team Carlo Sessa, Giorgia Galvini, Institute of Studies for the Integration of Systems – ISINNOVA (Italy) Oriol Bioscal, Harold del Castillo, MCRIT (Spain) Herta Tödtling-Schönhofer, Alina Schönhofer, Metis (Austria) Daniel Rauhut, Teemu Makkonen, University of Eastern Finland – UEF (Finland) Maarten Kroesen, TUDelft (Netherlands) Author of the case study Dr Thomas Stumm, EureConsult (Luxembourg) Project Support Team Sabine Stölb LE GOUVERNEMENT DU GRAND-DUCHÉ DE LUXEMBOURG Ministère de l’Énergie et de l’Aménagement du territoire Département de l’aménagement du territoire Janja Pečar REPUBLIKA SLOVENIJA URAD RS ZA MAKROEKONOMSKE ANALIZE IN RAZVOJ Anna Lea Gestsdóttir Byggðastofnun Icelandic Regional Development Institute ESPON EGTC: Project Expert: Sandra Di Biaggio Financial Expert: Caroline Clause Information on ESPON and its projects can be found on www.espon.eu. The web site provides the possibility to download and examine the most recent documents produced by finalised and ongoing ESPON projects. © ESPON, 2020 Printing, reproduction or quotation is authorised provided the source is acknowledged and a copy is forwarded to the ESPON EGTC in Luxembourg.
    [Show full text]