Wollaton East and Lenton Abbey, Item No: Wollaton West

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Wollaton East and Lenton Abbey, Item No: Wollaton West WARDS: WOLLATON EAST AND LENTON ABBEY, ITEM NO: WOLLATON WEST WOLLATON AND LENTON ABBEY AREA COMMITTEE 9 MARCH 2006 REPORT OF CHIEF RISK OFFICER NOTTINGHAM CITY COUNCIL RESIDENTS SURVEY 2005 - IMPLICATIONS FOR WOLLATON AND LENTON ABBEY AREA COMMITTEE 1.0 SUMMARY 1.1 The report highlights the key Area 7 results of the 2 nd Market and Opinion Research International (MORI) Nottingham Resident Survey undertaken in October/November 2005. It provides robust data that reflects the perceptions of Area 7 residents on key quality of life, anti social behaviour and corporate satisfaction indicators/figures 2.0 RECOMMENDATIONS IT IS RECOMMENDED that the Committee: − Note the Area 7 findings − Note that Council Departments will analyse the data presented by Mori and integrate them into their service planning processes for 2006/2007 − Note that information from the survey is to be used to develop the Community Plan. 3 BACKGROUND INFORMATION 3.1 In October/November 2005 MORI undertook Nottingham’s 2 nd Residents survey. The Council worked in partnership with One Nottingham who wished to engage city residents as part of the safer and stronger communities’ strand of Neighbourhood Renewal, focussing on local communities’ quality of life. In total 2,033 City residents took part of these 207 are Area 7 residents. 3.2 It is worth noting that the survey dealt with residents’ perceptions at the time the survey was conducted rather than facts . Residents’ perceptions, therefore, may not accurately represent the level and quality of services that are currently provided in Area 7 and Nottingham as a whole. One of the challenges will be to link these perceptions with other data that is available, for example, performance indicators or other measurements of service quality. 4 AREA 7 KEY FINDINGS 4.1 The following table provides comparative data for Area 7 on 2004, 2005 and Nottingham as whole (2005) data 2004 2005 +/ - Nottm Signft Whole Chng Satisfaction with the way the Council runs things 36% 49% +13 54% Y % Who are satisfied with their local area as a place to live 71% 80% +9 68% N % Who are not satisfied with their local area as a place to live 12% 11% -1 19% N % Who feel their neighbourhood has got better in the last 2 - 6% - 13% n/a years % Who feel their neighbourhood has got worse in the last 2 - 38% - 36% n/a years % Who are satisfied with Nottingham as whole as a place to 59% 65% +6 70% N live % Who are not satisfied with Nottingham as whole as a place 21% 12% -9 16% Y to live Feel safe in the city centre in the day 76% 91% +15 89% Y Feel safe in the city centre after dark 30% 26% -4 32% N Feel safe in the local neighbourhood in the day 94% 95% +1 90% N Feel safe in the local neighbourhood after dark 60% 60% - 46% n/a Sense of belonging to local neighb ourhood 66% 76% +10 Y Sense of belonging to Nottingham City 72% 70% -2 78% N % Who agree that people from different ethnic backgrounds 72% 77% +5 70% N that get on well together % Who agree that their area is a place where people respect 75% 79% +4 69% N ethnic differences % Who say that by working together local residents can 54% 46% -8 55% N influence decisions affecting their local area % Who agree that they can personally influence decisions 21% 28% +7 52% N affecting their neighbourhood % Who feel noisy neighbours or loud parties are a very/fairly 16% 4% -12 17% Y problem in their local neighbourhood % Who feel teenagers hanging around on the streets are a 37% 25% -12 43% Y very/fairly problem in their local neighbourhood % Who feel vandalism, graffiti and other deliberate damage to 39% 22% -17 42% Y property or vehicles is a very/fairly problem in their local neighbourhood % Who feel people being attacked because of their skin 10% 4% -6 14% Y colour, ethnic origins or religion is a very/fairly problem in their local neighbourhood % Who feel people using or dealing drugs is a very/fairly 17% 11% -6 37% N problem in their local neighbourhood % Who feel people being drunk and rowdy in public places is a 20% 6% -14 28% Y very/fairly problem in their local neighbourhood % Who feel people sleeping rough on the streets or in other 6% 3% -3 11% N public places is a problem in their local neighbourhood % Who feel rubbish and litter lying around is a very/fairly 36% 22% -14 49% Y problem in their local neighbourhood % Who feel abandoned or burnt out cars are a very/fairly 12% 5% -7 18% Y problem in their local neighbourhood % Who feel people are being attacked because of their - 2% - 9% n/a disability is a problem in their local neighbourhood % Who feel people being attacked because of their sexual 4% 2% -2 8% Y orientation is a very/fairly problem in their local neighbourhood 4.2 Positive Aspects of life in Area 7 4.3 Respondents across the City where asked what where the positive aspects about life in Nottingham, the following table provides the top 5 aspects for Area 7 residents: 1 Shops 47% 2 Transport 30% 3= Quiet Area 23% 3= Health Centres 23% 5 Appearance 22% 4.4 Priorities for improving life in Area 7 4.5 Respondents across the City where asked what should the priorities be for improving life in Nottingham, the following table provides the top 5 aspects for Area 7 residents: 1 Safety/Crime 50% 2 Affordable homes 33% 3 Better schools 30% 4 Reducing litter 22% 5 Better Recycling 20% 4.7 When looking at perceived Anti Social Behaviour; Area 7 residents were consistently the lowest Area across the City saying that individual ASB issues were a problem. Crime or anti -social Lowest scoring area (and Highest scoring area (and behaviour % saying is a problem) % saying is a problem) Noisy neighbours or loud Area 7 (4%) Area 8 (26%) parties Teenagers hanging around Area 7 (25%) Area 2 (54%) street Vandalism or graffiti Area 7 (22%) Area 8 (47%) People being attacked for Area 7 (4%) Areas 4 (24%) their skin colour/ethnic origin People using or dealing in Area 7 (11%) Area 6 (53%) drugs People being drunk or Area 7 (6%) Area 8 (47%) rowdy People sleeping rough on Area 7 (3%) Areas 4 (23%) the streets Rubbish or litter lying Area 7 (22%) Area 8 (65%) around Abandoned or burnt out Area 7 (5%) Area 1 (26%) cars People being attacked Area 7 (2%) Area 4 (14%) because of their disability People being attacked Area 7 (2%) Area 8 (13%) because of their sexual orientation 5.0 FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS None 6.0 LEGAL IMPLICATIONS None. 7 EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES IMPLICATIONS The consideration of residents feed back in the planning and delivering of services will ensure that the council meets the needs of all its residents. 10 List of background papers other than published works or those disclosing confidential or exempt information Area Performance Monitoring file. 11 Published documents referred to in compiling this report None. Tony McGovern Chief Risk Officer The Guildhall South Sherwood Street Nottingham NG1 4BT Telephone number: 0115-915-4225 Email address: [email protected] Contact Officers Shahid Sharif Service Manager Customer & Information Services Telephone number: 9154549 Email address: [email protected] WARDS AFFECTED: ALL OVERVIEW AND SCRUTINY COMMITTEE 16 FEBRUARY 2006 REPORT OF CHIEF RISK OFFICER NOTTINGHAM CITY COUNCIL RESIDENTS SURVEY 2005 1.0 SUMMARY 1.1 The report highlights the key citywide results of the 2 nd Market and Opinion Research International (Mori) Resident Survey undertaken in October/November 2005. It provides robust data down to Area level that reflects the perceptions of city residents on key quality of life, corporate and service satisfaction measures and access to services. 2.0 MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION 2.1 The committee is asked to: − Receive the Key Findings report − Note the progress made on satisfaction percentage figures across the council − Note that Departments will analyse the data presented by Mori and integrate them into their service planning processes for 2006/2007 − Note that information from the survey is to be used to develop the Community Plan. − Request that area co-ordinators and appropriate council officers take a report of the findings to each Area Committee to consider the issues of concern identified for each Area. 3 BACKGROUND INFORMATION 3.1 Nottingham City Council, like other local authorities has a statutory obligation to undertake a Best Value Performance Indicator (BVPI) General Satisfaction Survey every 3 years; the last survey was undertaken in 2003. To allow for the annual tracking of satisfaction figures and quality of life indicators Mori were commissioned in 2004 to undertake a “Gap Year” Residents surveys 3.2 In October/November 2005 2,033 City residents took part in a “Gap Year” survey. The Council worked in partnership with One Nottingham who wished to engage city residents as part of the safer and stronger communities strand of Neighbourhood Renewal, focussing on local communities quality of life. 3.3 A separate report will be produced by Mori for One Nottingham and made available to Nottingham City Council it will examine the findings in greater detail with respect to the six most deprived wards in the City (i.e. St Anns, Aspley, Bulwell, Arboretum, Bridge and Bestwood), Neighbourhood Renewal Fund (NRF) Super Output Areas and the main Black Minority Ethnic (BME) categories. 3.4 The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM) recently published a report ‘Improving Delivery of Mainstream Services in Deprived Areas – the role of community involvement’; this report demonstrated the importance of involving the community in all stages of service provision and improvement.
Recommended publications
  • Councillor Annual Report 2015-16
    Councillor Annual Report 2015-16 Name: Cllr Sam Webster I was first elected in April 2013 to represent the Wollaton East and Lenton Abbey Ward and re-elected in May 2015. The ward includes University Park and Jubilee Campus. I have a work background in the apprenticeships and skills sector. As well as representing my ward I have additional responsibilities as Portfolio Holder for Education, Employment and Skills. I am a Nottingham City Council appointed Director of: Futures Advice, Skills and Employment Scape Group Blueprint Regeneration I am also a Director of Nottingham Credit Union elected by members. I am joint Chair of the Nottingham City Children’s Partnership Board I also sit on the following committees, boards and governing bodies: Executive Board Corporate Parenting Board, Appointments and Conditions of Service Committee Wollaton and Lenton Abbey Area Committee N2 Employment and Skills Board Nottingham Education Trust Nottingham High School Special Interest Group of Municipal Authorities (SIGOMA) Standing Committee for Religious Education (SACRE) Learning Disabilities Partnership Board School Admissions Forum 4. Ward Work and Achievements I and my fellow ward councillor, Sally Longford, hold regular surgeries to allow residents to meet with us and raise issues, concerns and cases. Surgeries take place on the 2nd Tuesday of every month at Sheila Roper Community Centre in Lenton Abbey (6pm – 7pm) and 4th Saturday of every month at Wollaton Park Community Centre on Harrow Road (11am-12pm). We have also held surgeries at University Park and we both sit on the Student Issues group along with representatives of the Student Unions. We try to be as accessible as possible and use social media to engage and interact with residents as well as more traditional communication by telephone, email and post.
    [Show full text]
  • Wollaton and Lenton Abbey Area Committee - 3Rd September 2012
    WOLLATON AND LENTON ABBEY AREA COMMITTEE - 3RD SEPTEMBER 2012 Title of paper: Wollaton Park Hall Playground Director(s)/ ANDREW VAUGHAN Wards affected: Corporate Director(s): WOLLATON EAST AND LENTON ABBEY AND WOLLATON WEST Report author(s) and Lylse-Anne Renwick, Neighbourhood Development Officer contact details: Tel: 0115 – 8764488 Email: [email protected] Other colleagues who John Marsh: Central Locality Manager have provided input: Tel: Email: [email protected] Relevant Council Plan Strategic Priority: (you must mark X in the relevant boxes below) World Class Nottingham x Work in Nottingham x Safer Nottingham x Neighbourhood Nottingham x Family Nottingham x Healthy Nottingham x Leading Nottingham x Summary of issues (including benefits to citizens/service users): This report requests the support of the committee to fund the initial stage of the development of Wollaton Park Hall Playground at a cost of £35,000. Wollaton Park served a multiplicity of users, being a local facility for nearby communities, a city-wide destination park for all Nottingham residents and a visitor attraction. Recommendation(s): 1 Wollaton West Committee approves the sum of £35,000 for the initial stage of the development of Wollaton Park Hall Playground. The contribution will allow Parks & Open Spaces Team to start the design process and also help to secure additional grants funds. 1. BACKGROUND 1.1 Wollaton Park Hall Playground is situated in the Wollaton West Ward and is strongly supported by Wollaton citizens. There is also substantial evidence which indicates high levels of use from citizens of other wards, e.g. Sherwood, Bulwell Forest, Bestwood, Mapperley, Radford & Park to name a few.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 8 [PDF]
    Chapter Eight: Accessibility Priorities for Greater Nottingham Accessibility Strategy 2006/7 – 2010/11 147 148 Accessibility Strategy 2006/7 – 2010/11 Introduction 8.1. Following on from the Strategic Accessibility Assessment in Chapter 7, this chapter sets out the accessibility priorities for Greater Nottingham and explains why specific issues, groups and areas have been selected for action over the Plan period, with more detailed local accessibility analysis presented for the Local Accessibility Action plans proposed for early action from 2006/7. Accessibility priorities – initial scoping 8.2. An initial scoping of the likely accessibility priorities for the Plan area was presented in the Framework Accessibility Strategy which drew upon the opportunities identified from the wider national and local policy context set out in Chapters 3 and 4 and the partnership working described in Chapter 6. This provided a broad picture of the accessibility issues facing Greater Nottingham and where future resources and action should be concentrated over the Plan period in terms of key origins, destinations and networks: 8.3. Origins: Access requirements need to be considered for key population groups across Greater Nottingham, with a particular focus on those without access to a car, plus all those living within specific communities which have been prioritised by the authorities as being in particular need. Accessibility origins are set out in Table 8.1. 8.4. Destinations: Consideration was also given to the location of core services. The priority destinations set out in Table 8.2 include new employment land sites, district centres as defined in the Local Plans, other local centres and major shopping locations and other key destinations determined by developments taking place over the Plan period as set out in the programme in Annex D.
    [Show full text]
  • Parent Handbook
    Parent Handbook www.becketonline.co.uk Headteacher: James McGeachie Message from the Head Your choice of The Becket School for your child is one of the most important decisions that you will make. The transfer to secondary education represents a major step in the life of each young person. Whether you are joining The Becket community for the first time or you have already seen a child join the school you will want to share with your child the sense of excitement, anticipation and optimism which comes with this new beginning. This Handbook is intended to help you to support your child as he or she begins this next stage, to work with the school in enabling your 2 child to develop and grow within this community and to build along with your child a real sense of identity with The Becket School. Concern for the individual child is at the heart of As a Catholic school we recognise the equal The Becket School as we seek to develop the value of each individual student and we aim unique talents of each student in the traditions to work with you to provide the best possible of the Catholic faith. The move to a secondary opportunity for your child. school can be daunting; at The Becket School there is always someone to turn to for help. In the interests of your child we welcome your commitment to working in co-operation with We are a well ordered community, with a happy the staff, which will help to encourage a healthy learning environment, and our code of conduct and successful partnership between home and and our rules are all designed to promote school over the coming years.
    [Show full text]
  • Interesting to Know November 2020
    November 2020 Chaplains visit people in their place of work to offer friendship and to listen. Their support is unconditional, non-judgemental, independent and confidential. Interesting to Know.......... The man who revolutionised public transport in Nottingham is to retire. Mark Fowels joined Nottingham City Transport in 1994 and took over as MD in 2001 and following a successful bid, also assumed the role of the Chairman of the Arrow Consortium which re-introduced trams to Nottingham in 2004. Flexible workspace provider Cuba has opened a second venue in Nottingham. The latest is on King Street providing office space, co-working space with hot desks, designated desks, meeting rooms and an in-house barista over four floors. Work to maintain and enhance the look of Trent Bridge – one of the key gateways to the city – has been completed. Nottingham’s Business Improvement District has secured a new five year term. It has received backing from the businesses of the city to continue its work over the next five years from 2021-2025. More city centre living opportunities. Part of the conference facilities of the St James Hotel in the city centre are to be converted into 14 apartments. Vertu Motors has added to its portfolio in Nottingham with the acquisition of the Kia Nottingham dealership in Old Basford from Sandicliffe. The transaction will bring the number of outlets operated by the Group in Nottingham to nine. The new Broadmarsh Car Park development is on course to open in the spring or summer next year. Last month BioCity, the pioneering life science incubator and business collective, supported by education charity Ignite! brought together ninety students from five local secondary schools, to celebrate the legacy of the celebrated Nottingham mathematician, Ada Lovelace, to inspire young women into STEM careers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Changing Meanings of the 1930S Cinema in Nottingham
    FROM MODERNITY TO MEMORIAL: The Changing Meanings of the 1930s Cinema in Nottingham By Sarah Stubbings, BA, MA. Thesis submitted to the University of Nottingham for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, August 2003 c1INGy G2ýPF 1sinr Uß CONTENTS Abstract Acknowledgements ii Introduction 1 PART ONE: CONTEMPORARY REPORTING OF THE 1930S CINEMA 1. Contested Space, Leisure and Consumption: The 1929 36 Reconstruction of the Market Place and its Impact on Cinema and the City 2. Luxury in Suburbia: The Modern, Feminised Cinemas of 73 the 1930s 3. Selling Cinema: How Advertisements and Promotional 108 Features Helped to Formulate the 1930s Cinema Discourse 4. Concerns Over Cinema: Perceptions of the Moral and 144 Physical Danger of Going to the Pictures PART TWO: RETROSPECTIVECOVERAGE OF THE 1930S CINEMA 5. The Post-war Fate of the 1930s Cinemas: Cinema Closures - 173 The 1950s and 1960s 6. Modernity and Modernisation: Cinema's Attempted 204 Transformation in the 1950s and 1960s 7. The Continued Presence of the Past: Popular Memory of 231 Cinema-going in the 'Golden Age' 8. Preserving the Past, Changing the Present? Cinema 260 Conservation: Its Context and Meanings Conclusion 292 Bibliography 298 ABSTRACT This work examines local press reporting of the 1930s cinema from 1930 up to the present day. By focusing on one particular city, Nottingham, I formulate an analysis of the place that cinema has occupied in the city's history. Utilising the local press as the primary source enables me to situate the discourses on the cinema building and the practice of cinema-going within the broader socio-cultural contexts and history of the city.
    [Show full text]
  • Nottingham Crime and Drugs Partnership Respect for Nottingham Survey 2016
    Nottingham Crime and Drugs Partnership Respect for Nottingham Survey 2016 2016 Respect for Nottingham Survey 2016 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This report was prepared for Nottingham Crime & Drugs Partnership in February 2017. Our thanks are given to Philip Broxholme for his help and support in conducting this research. Authors: Dr Steve Wisher, Kate Marshall, and Gillian Roberts Information by Design Main point of contact: [email protected] Final Report – February 2017 Head Office Information by Design Newlands Science Park Inglemire Lane HULL HU6 7TQ Telephone: 01482 467467 Fax: 01482 467468 Email: [email protected] www.ibyd.com 1 | P a g e C o n t e n t s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................................ 4 1 BACKGROUND AND METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................. 6 BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................................................................... 6 METHODOLOGY AND SAMPLING ............................................................................................................................................. 6 Sampling Frame and Sample Size .............................................................................................................................. 6 Weighting ..................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wollaton East & Lenton Abbey
    Wollaton East & Lenton Abbey Area Committee Ward Performance Report July to September 2013 Neighbourhood Development Officer Pauline Dorey Unofficial June 2013 Data Introduction • The WELA ward has a growing diverse community in Lenton Abbey with 74% white British and 6% other white some of whom have English as another language and others of mixed heritage, Black British and Caribbean and Asian origin. The 2012 Insight and 2010 ONS statistics are slightly skewed by the transient student population mainly studying at University of Nottingham. • Wollaton Park estate has a hidden community of disabled children, young people and older adults and due to caring responsibilities have pockets of fuel poverty. • In the top 10% nationally of SOA’s for Crime and Disorder and Income Deprivation affecting children. However reported crime figures have generally fallen across the ward compared to the previous year. • Wollaton Park estate have seen a growing number of HMO’s and are experiencing increasing problems with their landlords. • Ongoing car parking and traffic issues across the Ward Wollaton East and Lenton Abbey - Ward Priorities Theme Priorities Key Actions Outcome Lead SAFER To reduce antisocial Co-ordinate work of NAT Problem Solving Locality behaviour Neighbourhood Services, meetings resolving actions Management To improve Community Protection, Police and identifying hotspots awareness of & NCH. NCH Environmentals Fencing community NCH Domestic Violence Produce DV and other evaluation underway issues amongst support services Info packs Further materials added in partners for partners Locality July Management, Organise DV training for Training delivered to partners and volunteers Locality partners and volunteers in Management Action Planning at NAT July meetings.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Recommendations on the Future Electoral Arrangements for the City of Nottingham
    Final recommendations on the future electoral arrangements for the City of Nottingham Report to the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions May 2000 LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND This report sets out the Commission’s final recommendations on the electoral arrangements for the City of Nottingham. Members of the Commission are: Professor Malcolm Grant (Chairman) Professor Michael Clarke CBE (Deputy Chairman) Peter Brokenshire Kru Desai Pamela Gordon Robin Gray Robert Hughes CBE Barbara Stephens (Chief Executive) © Crown Copyright 2000 Applications for reproduction should be made to: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Copyright Unit. The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by the Local Government Commission for England with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 03114G. This report is printed on recycled paper. Report no: 300 ii LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CONTENTS page LETTER TO THE SECRETARY OF STATE v SUMMARY vii 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 CURRENT ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS 3 3 DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS 7 4 RESPONSES TO CONSULTATION 9 5 ANALYSIS AND FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS 11 6 NEXT STEPS 27 APPENDICES A Final Recommendations for Nottingham: Detailed Mapping 29 B Draft Recommendations for Nottingham 31 A large map illustrating the proposed ward boundaries for Nottingham is inserted inside the back cover of the report. LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND iii iv LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND Local Government Commission for England 16 May 2000 Dear Secretary of State On 18 May 1999 the Commission began a periodic electoral review of the City of Nottingham under the Local Government Act 1992.
    [Show full text]
  • Homes in Nottingham: Decent Homes Impact Study
    The effects of ‘Secure Warm Modern’ homes in Nottingham: Decent Homes Impact Study Community outcomes Improved Lower carbon neighbourhoods Impact on people emissions Less anxiety / stressImpact on homes Lower fuel costs Fewer burglaries Warmer Secure Better mental Reduced Increased Reduced health and draughts Warm energy fuel wellbeing and noise Modern effi ciency poverty Home as Reduced a social space cardiovascular illness Fewer hazards Less damp and mould More jobs Less respiratory and training illness Fewer falls Fewer aches Better Boost for and accidents and pains physical local economy health and employment Alice Jones Néstor Valero-Silva Dan Lucas The effects of Secure Warm Modern homes in Nottingham: Decent Homes impact study by Alice Jones, Néstor Valero-Silva and Dan Lucas Published in 2016 by Nottingham City Homes Copyright © Nottingham City Homes. All rights reserved of the authors. ISBN: 978-0-9934093-2-5 2 Foreword The Decent Homes Programme (DHP) was introduced by the UK Government in 2000 to address ‘a large backlog of repairs in local authority housing, estimated at £19 billion in 1997’. It aimed at improving the homes of social housing tenants, making them ‘warm, wind-and weather-tight, and with reasonable modern facilities’, based on a defi ned ‘Decent Homes Standard’ (National Audit Offi ce, 2010). Nottingham City Homes (NCH) initiated its £187m Decent Homes Programme in 2008, branded locally as Secure, Warm, Modern (SWM), to improve the 28,300 council-owned properties in the city up to and beyond the Government’s standard. It was widely assumed that making homes secure, warm and modern would result in a number of benefi ts to the lives of individual tenants, and also that a such a large investment would have a signifi cant positive impact on particular neighbourhoods and on the city as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Nottingham City Homes Wollaton and Lenton Abbey
    9 NOTTINGHAM CITY HOMES WOLLATON AND LENTON ABBEY AREA COMMITTEE 14 MAY 2009 REPORT OF PERFORMANCE REVIEW MANAGER COMPANY PERFORMANCE REPORT 1 OCTOBER 2008 TO 31 MARCH 2009 1.0 SUMMARY 1.1 The purpose of this report is to advise Area 7 Committee of selected Company performance information from 1 October 2008 to 31 March 2009. A full report giving complete all performance information from 1 October 2008 to 31 March 2009 is available to members of the Area 7 Committee 2.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 2.1 It is recommended that Area 7 Committee members note and comment upon the information provided in this report. 3.0 BACKGROUND 3.1 Members have requested details on NCH performance in the following specific performance areas; complaints, repairs response times, rent (and rent arrears), void properties and estate condition. 3.2 Members have indicated that in future NCH performance will be discussed at the Area 7 Committee via feedback sessions from the NCH Area 7 Panel. 4.0 SELECTED PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES TO 31 MARCH 2009 4.1 CUSTOMER COMPLAINTS 4.1.1 The number of complaints received – In Month Office 2007/08 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Lenton 81 1 1 1 0 0 1 Southglade 75 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bilborough 192 4 1 5 5 3 3 Clifton 107 2 2 1 2 1 4 St Anns 160 7 4 4 3 5 1 Radford & Hyson Green 112 7 3 1 4 4 4 Bulwell 117 3 1 1 1 1 2 Aspley 157 4 8 4 5 2 3 Bestwood 174 5 7 2 5 8 7 Other – Excluding Housing 1500 520 423 346 233 343 365 Offices City Wide 2,675 553 450 365 258 367 390 4.1.2 The percentage of complaints responded to within 5 working days – In Month Office 2007/08
    [Show full text]
  • Social Need Study 2004
    Social Need in Nottinghamshire 2004 Social Need in Nottinghamshire 2004 CONTENTS Acknowledgements 1 CHAPTER 1 : INTRODUCTION Previous Editions of Social Need in Nottinghamshire 3 The Social Exclusion Unit, Policy Action Team 18 and Better Information 3 Indices of Deprivation 4 Relationship of the Study to the Indices of Deprivation 5 Concepts of Social Need 5 Definition of Areas 6 Useful Web Sites 6 CHAPTER 2 : METHODOLOGY General Approach 7 Selection of Indicators 7 The Definition of Zones 9 Analysis 10 Groups Likely to Experience Social Need 11 CHAPTER 3: RESULTS OF THE STUDY The Extent of Social Need in Nottinghamshire 13 The Distribution of Areas in Social Need 13 Social Need in Nottingham City 13 Social Need in Nottinghamshire County 14 CHAPTER 4 : DESCRIPTION OF INDICATORS 29 CHAPTER 5 : RANKING OF INDICATORS 47 CHAPTER 6 : COMPARISON WITH PREVIOUS STUDIES Introduction and Caveats 149 Changes in Distribution of Social Need between Districts 149 Changes in the Location of Social Need 152 CHAPTER 7 : GROUPS VULNERABLE TO SOCIAL NEED 157 CHAPTER 8 : CONCLUSIONS 175 i Social Need in Nottinghamshire APPENDICES APPENDIX A : ZONES USED IN THE STUDY 177 APPENDIX B : CORRELATION ANALYSIS 187 APPENDIX C : CALCULATION OF THE MEASURE OF SOCIAL NEED Calculation of ‘Z-scores’ 191 Definition of Levels of Social Need 192 APPENDIX D : PROBLEMS OF METHOD Area-Based Approach to Disadvantage 193 Selection of Indicators 194 Limitation of Indicators 195 Definition of Zones 195 The Measure of Social Need 196 APPENDIX E : PROBLEMS OF USING CENSUS DATA
    [Show full text]