DOCSLIB.ORG

11.3 Cultural/Paleontological Resource Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
11.3 Cultural/Paleontological Resource Assessment CULTURAL RESOURCES STUDY FOR THE AZUSA BUSINESS CENTER PROJECT AZUSA, CALIFORNIA APNs 8617-001-029 and 8900-763-710 Lead Agency: City of Azusa 213 East Foothill Boulevard Azusa, California 91702 Preparer: Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. 14010 Poway Road, Suite A Poway, California 92064 ___________________ Signature Project Proponent: Azusa Todd, LLC 11777 San Vicente Boulevard, Suite 780 Los Angeles, California 90049 August 11, 2017; Revised January 9, 2018 Cultural Resources Study for the Azusa Business Center Project __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Archaeological Database Information Authors: Brian F. Smith and Andrew J. Garrison Consulting Firm: Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. 14010 Poway Road, Suite A Poway, California 92064 (858) 484-0915 Client/Project Proponent: Azusa Todd, LLC 11777 San Vicente Boulevard, Suite 780 Los Angeles, California 90049 Report Date: August 11, 2017; Revised January 9, 2018 Report Title: Cultural Resources Study for the Azusa Business Center Project, Azusa, California (APNs 8617-001-029 and 8900-763-710) Type of Study: Phase I Cultural Resources Survey New Site(s): None Updated Site(s): None USGS Quadrangle: Azusa, California (7.5 minute) Acreage: 23.268 acres Key Words: Archaeological survey; negative; no impacts to cultural resources. i Cultural Resources Study for the Azusa Business Center Project __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Table of Contents Section Description Page MANAGEMENT SUMMARY/ABSTRACT ........................................................................ iv 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................1.0–1 1.1 Project Description ............................................................................................1.0–1 1.2 Environmental Setting ......................................................................................1.0–1 1.3 Cultural Setting .................................................................................................1.0–6 1.3.1 Prehistoric Period ....................................................................................1.0–6 1.3.2 Historic Period .........................................................................................1.0–11 1.4 Results of the Archaeological Records Search .................................................1.0–13 1.5 Applicable Regulations .....................................................................................1.0–19 1.5.1 California Environmental Quality Act .....................................................1.0–20 1.5.2 City of Azusa Historic Preservation Ordinance ......................................1.0–22 2.0 RESEARCH DESIGN .............................................................................................2.0–1 3.0 FIELD SURVEY .....................................................................................................3.0–1 3.1 Survey Methods ................................................................................................3.0–1 3.2 Results ...............................................................................................................3.0–1 4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS .........................................................................................4.0–1 5.0 LIST OF PREPARERS AND ORGANIZATIONS CONTACTED .......................5.0–1 6.0 REFERENCES CITED ............................................................................................6.0–1 List of Appendices Appendix A – Resumes of Key Personnel Appendix B – Archaeological Records Search Results* Appendix C – NAHC Sacred Lands File Search Results* *Deleted for public review and bound separately in the Confidential Appendix ii Cultural Resources Study for the Azusa Business Center Project __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ List of Figures Figure Description Page Figure 1.1–1 General Location Map ...................................................................................1.0–3 Figure 1.1–2 Project Location Map (USGS) ......................................................................1.0–4 Figure 1.1–3 Project Development Map .............................................................................1.0–5 List of Plates Plate Description Page Plate 3.2–1 Overview of the project are from the southeast corner, facing northwest .......3.0–2 Plate 3.2–2 Overview of the project area from the southern boundary, facing north .........3.0–2 Plate 3.2–3 View inside a steel-framed shade structure, facing east ..................................3.0–3 Plate 3.2–4 Obstructed ground visibility in and around a semi-permanent steel-framed structure ............................................................................................................3.0–3 Plate 3.2–5 Man-made slope located along the northeastern project boundary, looking north .................................................................................................................3.0–4 Plate 3.2–6 Man-made slope located along the southwestern boundary, looking east .......3.0–5 Plate 3.2–7 Overview of the water retention basins from the southwest property corner, looking north ....................................................................................................3.0–5 List of Tables Table Description Page Table 1.4–1 Archaeological Sites Located Within One Mile of the Azusa Business Center Project ..................................................................................................1.0–14 Table 1.4–2 Previous Studies Conducted Within One Mile of the Azusa Business Center Project ..................................................................................................1.0–15 iii Cultural Resources Study for the Azusa Business Center Project __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ MANAGEMENT SUMMARY/ABSTRACT In response to a request from the project applicant, a cultural resources study was conducted by Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. (BFSA) for the proposed Azusa Business Center Project located in the western portion of the city of Azusa, Los Angeles County, California. The 23.268-acre project includes Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APNs) 8617-001-029 and 8900-763- 710, which is currently the location of the Colorama Wholesale Nursery, and historically included the American Cyanamid & Chemical Corporation (ACC) Owl-4X Plant for the manufacturing of cyanogen chloride (tear gas), and former ACC Gypsum Impoundment Area for the disposal of calcium sulfate (gypsum) slurry. The project is located at 1025 North Todd Avenue, bound on the east by North Todd Avenue, on the north by West Sierra Madre Avenue, and on the west by the San Gabriel River. The location is further described as being within the former Rancho Azusa de Dalton Land Grant, Township 1 North, Range 10 West (projected) on the USGS Azusa, California topographic quadrangle. The project proposes to redevelop the existing Colorama Wholesale Nursery property to construct seven large industrial buildings, as well as associated parking, landscaping, and infrastructure improvements. The project’s two site plan options both involve an estimated total building area of 463,436 square feet divided among the seven buildings, with each building ranging in size from 28,576 square feet to 161,231 square feet. Site access would be provided via two stop-controlled driveways at Todd Avenue. The purpose of this investigation was to locate and record any cultural resources present within the project and subsequently evaluate any resources as part of the City of Azusa’s environmental review process conducted in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City’s Historic Preservation Ordinance criteria (Ord. No. 00-012, § 2, 10-16- 00). The cultural resources investigation included the review of an archaeological records search performed at the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) at California State University, Fullerton (CSU Fullerton) in order to assess previous archaeological studies and identify any previously recorded archaeological sites within the Area of Potential Effect (APE) or in the immediate vicinity. In addition, a Sacred Lands File (SLF) search was also requested from the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). A review of the records search provided by the SCCIC indicated that no previously recorded resources are located within the subject property, while eight resources have been recorded within a one-mile radius of the APE. Property research indicates that the property has undergone extensive ground disturbance since first being utilized for industrial purposes around 1918. The SLF search failed to indicate the presence of Native American cultural resources within, or in the vicinity of, the APE. A list of Native American contacts was provided by the NAHC, and in accordance with their recommendations, BFSA contacted all Native American consultants listed to inform the tribes about the nature of the project. During the archaeological field survey, no cultural resources were identified within the APE. The entire property has been graded and developed. Visibility of the natural ground surface iv Cultural Resources Study for the Azusa Business Center Project __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Historical Resources Survey for the San Diego Fire-Rescue Air Operations Hangar Project (WBS #B-15012.02.02)
    Historical Resources Survey for the San Diego Fire-Rescue Air Operations Hangar Project (WBS #B-15012.02.02) Prepared for City of San Diego Submitted to Platt/Whitelaw Architects, Inc. 4034 30th Street San Diego, CA 92104 Contact: Mr. Thomas Brothers Prepared by RECON Environmental, Inc. 1927 Fifth Avenue San Diego, CA 92101 P 619.308.9333 RECON Number 9078 December 16, 2019 Carmen Zepeda-Herman, M.A., Project Archaeologist Historical Resources Survey ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCE REPORT FORM I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION Phase II of the San Diego’s Fire-Rescue Air Operations (AirOps) Facility Project (proposed project) would design and construct permanent helicopter hangars and support facilities at Montgomery-Gibbs Executive Airport. The project area is located in the northeastern corner of the airport in the Kearny Mesa community of the city of San Diego, California (Figure 1). The project area is within an unsectioned portion of the Mission San Diego landgrant on the U.S. Geological Survey 7.5-minute La Jolla quadrangle (Figure 2). Figure 3 shows the project location on a City 800’ map. The project area consists of a 6.5-acre site located adjacent to the Air Traffic Control Tower between the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) lease area, the Runway Object Free Area, and the Runway Protection Zone for the northwest approach to Runway 5/23 (Figure 4). Entry to the project area is via an asphalt road accessed from a security gate located off Ponderosa Avenue. AirOps is a 24/7 365-day operating facility with no hangar space at Montgomery Field. A feasibility study concluded that 30,000 square feet of hangar space is required to meet future needs of the AirOps fleet.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 3.9 Archaeological and Paleontological Resources
    SECTION 3.9 ARCHAEOLOGICAL/PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES 3.9 ARCHAEOLOGICAL/PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES 3.9.1 INTRODUCTION This section examines the potential impacts to arctlaeological and paleontological resources, including Native American cultural resources, that may result from the Proposed Project, and is based on the Archaeological and Paleontolog~caI Resources Technical Report prepKred by DLIDEK (May 2009). As further explained below, any potential impacts to archaeological and paleontological resources would be mitigated to a level below significant. The technical report relied upon for pro-par afion of this section is included in Appendix 3.9 of tl~s ELR. 3.9.2 METHODOLOGY 3.9.2.1 Archaeological Resources An occchaeological records search of data maintained at the South Coastal Archaeological Information Center ("SCIAC") was requested on April 16, 2009, ai~d SCIAC completed the records search on April 21, 2009. The records search, which included the review of relevant archaeological report and site record databases, extended to all areas within 0.25 mile of tlie Project site. (Please see AppenctKx A of the technica~ report, located in Appendix 3.9, for a list of the reports and records identified during the records search.) 3.9.2.2 Paleontological Resources The paleontologicai resource investigation relied on the foliowing documents: Geology of the San Diego Metropolitan Area, California (Kennedy and Petorson, 1975); Geotechnical Input for Environmental Impact Report (Southloa~d Geotechnical Consultants (SGC), 2009; see Appendix 3.4); and Paleontological Resources, County of San Diego (Demhr~ and Walsh, 1993). 3.9.2.3 Native American Cultural Resources In order to assess the potential impacts to Native American cnfturaI resources, a letter (dated ApriI 15, 2009) was sent to the Native American Heritage Corm~ssion ("NAHC") requesti~lg: (i) fl~at a Sacred Lands F~Ie search be conducted for the Project site and neighboring vicirdty; and (ti) that a list of local tribal contacts be provided.
    [Show full text]
  • Template for RECON Letter
    An Employee-Owned Company June 24, 2016 Ms. Rikkie Ren Creative Design Associates 17528 E. Rowland Street, 2nd Floor City of Industry, CA 91748 Reference: Archaeological Survey for the Loma Alta Residence (RECON Number 7804) Dear Ms. Ren: This letter is to document the archaeological survey for the Loma Alta Residence (project) in the city of Oceanside, California. The archaeological survey was undertaken to fulfill City of Oceanside’s responsibilities under the California Environmental Quality Act. A qualified RECON archaeologist surveyed the project property on June 15, 2016 to identify, evaluate, and record any observable surface cultural resources. No prehistoric or historic cultural resources were observed during the survey of the property. 1.0 Introduction The project site is located in the city of Oceanside, east of Interstate 5 and north of State Route 78 (Figure 1). The project site consists of 4.13 acres (Assessor’s Parcel Number 149-010-2800) in Section 24 of Township 11 South, Range 5 West of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5-minute topographic map, San Luis Rey quadrangle (Figure 2). The project site is composed of undeveloped land consisting of disturbed and ornamental vegetation and is surrounded by single-family residential development to the north, south, east, and west (Figure 3). The project proposes the construction of 10 single-family dwelling units on a previously undeveloped 4.13- acre parcel. 2.0 Environmental Setting 2.1 Physical Setting The project site is currently vacant. Residential fencing bounds most of the property, with a segment of chain-link fencing along Loma Alta Drive.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX B Cultural Resources Impact Table and Cultural Resources Evaluation Report
    APPENDIX B Cultural Resources Impact Table and Cultural Resources Evaluation Report The following provides a list of project components resulting in potential impacts to historical and archaeological resources. This list is adopted from Table 4.0-1, Pipeline ID in Archaeolgocial Site Vicinities, as presented in the Cultural Resources Evaluation. Cultural Resources Impact Table Presence of Recorded Presence of Undisturbed or Site within Recorded Site Disturbed/ Partially Sub-Basin DESCRIPTOR 100’ within 500’ Site Number Developed Disturbed B01 B01070.00-B01071.00 x SDI-5779 x B01 B01111.A0-B01111.B0 x SDI-5785H x B01 B01076.00-B01079.00 x SDI-5787H x B01 B01074.00-B01075.00 x SDI-5787H x B01 B01070.00-B01071.00 x SDI-5787H x B01 B01108.00-B01109.00 x SDI-5787H x B01 B01118.00-B01119.00 x SDI-5792 x B01 B01017.00-B01018.00 x SDI-5792 x B01 B01111.A0-B01111.B0 x SDI-5792 x B01 B01016.00-B01017.00 x SDI-5792 x B01 B01015.00-B01016.00 x SDI-5792 x B01 B01076.00-B01079.00 x SDI-5792 x B01 B01074.00-B01075.00 x SDI-5792 x B01 B01118.00-B01119.00 x SDI-5792 x B01 B01070.00-B01071.00 x SDI-5792 x B01 B01117.00-B01118.00 x SDI-5792 x B01 B01031.E0-B01031.F0 x SDI-5792 x B01 B01108.00-B01109.00 x SDI-5792 x B01 B01037.00-B01038.00 x SDI-5792 x B01 B01036.00-B01037.00 x SDI-5792 x B01 B01035.00-B01036.00 x SDI-5792 x B01 B01034.00-B01035.00 x SDI-5792 x B01 B01032.00-B01033.00 x SDI-5792 x B01 B01028.00-B01030.00 x SDI-5792 x B01 B01013.00-B01014.00 x SDI-5792 x B01 B01011.00-B01013.00 x SDI-5792 x B01 B01009.00-B01010.00 x SDI-5792 x B01 B01113.B0-B01113.C0
    [Show full text]
  • EIS-0386-DEIS-02-2007.Pdf
    Draft WWEC PEIS September 2007 DOCUMENT CONTENTS VOLUME I Executive Summary Chapter 1: Why Are Federal Agencies Proposing to Designate Energy Corridors in the West? Chapter 2: What Are the Alternatives Evaluated in This PEIS? Chapter 3: What Are the Potential Environmental Consequences of Corridor Designation and Land Use Plan Amendment? Chapter 4: How Are Cumulative Impacts Evaluated? Chapter 5: What Unavoidable Adverse Impacts Might Be Caused by Corridor Designation and Land Use Plan Amendment? Chapter 6: The Relationship between Local Short-Term Uses of the Environment and Long-Term Productivity Chapter 7: What Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitment of Resources Would Be Involved with Implementation of the Alternatives? Chapter 8: List of Preparers Chapter 9: References Chapter 10: Glossary VOLUME II Appendix A: Proposed Land Use Plan Amendments Appendix B: Summary of Public Scoping Comments for the Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement, Designation of Energy Corridors on Federal Land in the 11 Western States (DOE/FS-0386) Appendix C: Tribal Consultation Appendix D: Federal and State Regulatory Requirements Potentially Applicable When Designating Energy Corridors Appendix E: Energy Transport Technologies and Hypothetical Energy Transport Projects Appendix F: Section 368 Corridor Parameters Appendix G: Sensitive Resource Areas That Would Be Intersected by Proposed West-wide Energy Corridors Appendix H: Geographic Information System Data Appendix I: Summary of WWEC PEIS Webcasts for Corridor Review and Revision, 6/19/06 to 4/24/07
    [Show full text]
  • Phase I Cultural Resource Survey for the Apollo Assisted Living Facility Project
    PHASE I CULTURAL RESOURCE SURVEY FOR THE APOLLO ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY PROJECT CITY OF ESCONDIDO PHG19-0015 APNs 240-110-54, -55, and -56 Submitted to: City of Escondido 210 North Broadway Escondido, California 92025 Prepared for: NOAA Group 4990 North Harbor Drive, Suite 201 San Diego, California 92106 Prepared by: Andrew J. Garrison and Brian F. Smith Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. 14010 Poway Road, Suite A Poway, California 92064 May 21, 2019 Phase I Cultural Resource Survey for the Apollo Assisted Living Facility Project ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– Archaeological Database Information Authors: Andrew J. Garrison and Brian F. Smith Consulting Firm: Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. 14010 Poway Road, Suite A Poway, California 92064 (858) 484-0915 Report Date: May 21, 2019 Report Title: Phase I Cultural Resource Survey for the Apollo Assisted Living Facility Project, City of Escondido (PHG19-0015; APNs 240- 110-54, -55, and -56) Prepared for: NOAA Group 4990 North Harbor Drive, Suite 201 San Diego, California 92106 Submitted to: City of Escondido 210 North Broadway Escondido, California 92025 Prepared by: Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. 14010 Poway Road, Suite A Poway, California 92064 USGS Quadrangle: Valley Center, California (7.5 minute) Study Area: 3141 East Valley Parkway; APNs 240-110-54, -55, and -56 Key Words: Phase I survey; City of Escondido; negative for archaeological resources; positive for historic structures; 1950s residence identified; historic structure assessment recommended; monitoring recommended. Phase I Cultural Resource Survey for the Apollo Assisted Living Facility Project _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION As required by the City of Escondido, Brian F.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural and Historical Resource Survey Report for the K-8
    CULTURAL AND HISTORICAL RESOURCE SURVEY REPORT for the K-8 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, PARK GRADING AND INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, CITY OF SAN MARCOS, SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: City of San Marcos Public Works 1 Civic Center Drive San Marcos, California 92069 Prepared by: Shelby Gunderman, M.A., RPA Nicholas Hanten, B.S. Sinéad Ní Ghabhláin, Ph.D., RPA ASM Affiliates, Inc 2034 Corte del Nogal Carlsbad, California 92011 June 2012 PN 19140 NATIONAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL DATABASE INFORMATION Author: Shelby Gunderman, M.A., RPA Nicholas Hanten, B.S. Sinéad Ní Ghabhláin, Ph.D., RPA ASM Affiliates, Inc. 2034 Corte del Nogal, Carlsbad, California 92011 (760) 804-5757 Date: June 2012 Report title: Cultural and Historical Resource Survey Report for the K-8 Elementary School, Park Grading And Infrastructure Improvement Project, City Of San Marcos, San Diego County, California Submitted by: ASM Affiliates, Inc. Submitted to: City of San Marcos Public Works, 1 Civic Center Drive, San Marcos, CA 92069 USGS 7.5’ Quadrangle: Rancho Santa Fe Acres: Approximately 50 acres Keywords: City of San Marcos, P-37-014078, P-37-030252, P-37-030379, P-37-030380, P-37-030657, SDI-08720, SDI-09218, SDI-09280, SDI-09281, SDI-09282, SDI-11808, SDI-11809, SDI-12097, SDI-14025, SDI-17896, SDI-17897, SDI-17898, SDI-19473, SDI-19474, SDI-19475, SDI-19524 New Sites: None K-8 Elementary School, Park Grading and Infrastructure Improvement Project i Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page NATIONAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL DATABASE INFORMATION .................... i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................... v 1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................... 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ........................................................................ 1 STUDY METHODS ................................................................................ 2 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetables and Fruits
    NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL LIBRARY ARCHIVED FILE Archived files are provided for reference purposes only. This file was current when produced, but is no longer maintained and may now be outdated. Content may not appear in full or in its original format. All links external to the document have been deactivated. For additional information, see http://pubs.nal.usda.gov. Alternative Farming Systems Information Center of the National Agricultural Library Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture ISSN: 1052-536X Vegetables and Fruits A Guide to Heirloom Varieties and Community-Based Stewardship. Volume 1, Annotated Bibliography Special Reference Briefs Series no. SRB 98-05 Volume 2, Resource Organizations Special Reference Briefs Series no. SRB 98-06 Volume 3, Historical Supplement Special Reference Briefs Series no. SRB 98-07 September 1998 Electronic versions were slightly revised, March 1999 Compiled By: Suzanne P. DeMuth Alternative Farming Systems Information Center, Information Centers Branch National Agricultural Library, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Beltsville, Maryland 20705-2351 A Note About the Electronic Files for Each Volume The publication Vegetables and Fruits: A Guide to Heirloom Varieties and Community-Based Stewardship was published in three printed volumes. The following sections were repeated in each volume: 1) Table of Contents for 3 volumes, 2) Introduction (including Notes and References) to 3 volumes, 3) Acknowledgements, 4) Alternative Farming Systems Information Center overview, and 5) document access instructions. To reduce duplication in the electronic versions, these sections have been extracted and placed in this document. The remainder of each volume is contained in a separate file which includes its respective citations, indices, and table of contents.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological Test Plan for 2677 Brookmead Lane
    ARCHAEOLOGICAL TEST PLAN FOR 2677 BROOKMEAD LANE CITY OF SAN DIEGO PTS No. 630967 Prepared for: City of San Diego Development Services Department 1222 First Avenue, MS 501 San Diego, California 92101 And: James Alcorn, Architect 9736 Claiborne Square La Jolla, California 92037 Prepared by: Andrew J. Garrison, Project Archaeologist and Brian F. Smith, Principal Investigator Signature: __________________ Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. 14010 Poway Road, Suite A Poway, California 92064 July 30, 2019 Archaeological Test Plan for 2677 Brookmead Lane ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– Archaeological Information Page Author: Andrew J. Garrison, M.A. RPA and Brian F. Smith, M.A. Consulting Firm: Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. 14010 Poway Road, Suite A Poway, California 92064 (858) 484-0915 Report Date: July 30, 2019 Report Title: Archaeological Test Plan for 2677 Brookmead Lane, City of San Diego (PTS No. 630967) Prepared for: City of San Diego Development Services Department 1222 First Avenue, MS 501 San Diego, California 92101 And: James Alcorn, Architect 9736 Claiborne Square La Jolla, California 92037 Submitted by: Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. 14010 Poway Road, Suite A Poway, California 92064 Assessor’s Parcel Number: 342-072-06 USGS Quadrangle: Township 15 South, Range 4 West of the Del Mar, California Quadrangle Study Area: 1.28 acre Key Words: Archaeological Test Plan; prehistoric; City of San Diego; USGS Del Mar Quadrangle (7.5 minute); archaeological
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological Research & Data Recovery Program
    Riverwalk Redevelopment Project Archaeological Research and Data Recovery Program, City of San Diego, California October 2020 Prepared for: SD Riverwalk LLC 4747 Executive Dr, Ste 410 San Diego, CA 92121 Prepared by: James T. Daniels, Jr., M.A., RPA 2034 Corte del Nogal Carlsbad, California 92011 (760) 804-5757 ASM Project Number 29470 Riverwalk Redevelopment Project Archaeological Research and Data Recovery Program, City of San Diego, California Prepared for: SD Riverwalk LLC 4747 Executive Dr, Ste 410 San Diego, CA 92121 Prepared by: James T. Daniels, Jr., M.A., RPA ASM Affiliates, Inc. 2034 Corte del Nogal Carlsbad, California 92011 (760) 804-5757 Type of Study: Data Recovery USGS 7.5-minute La Jolla Quadrangle Keywords: SDI-11767; SDI-12126; SDI-12220; Cosoy Village; Riverwalk; Mission Valley; San Diego River; San Diego; California October 2020 PN 29470 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page ABSTRACT .......................................................................................................... iii 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................. 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................. 1 PROJECT PERSONNEL ................................................................................................ 2 2. CULTURAL BACKGROUND ......................................................................... 3 PREHISTORIC ARCHAEOLOGY ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Arqueología En El Norte De México
    Programa Analítico. Licenciatura en Arqueología. Séptimo Semestre. Arqueología en el Norte de México. Arqueología en el Norte de México. Datos del curso: Nivel: Séptimo semestre, exclusiva del programa. Duración: 64 horas, 16 semanas. Horario: Dos sesiones de dos horas por semana. Créditos: 7 Clave de la materia: TM702Arq Área Curricular: Teórica-Metodológica. Tipo de materia: Obligatoria. Objetivo del curso: Al finalizar el curso el estudiante será capaz de: • Conocerá detalladamente los acervos arqueológicos peculiares de las culturas regionales de cada de las tres subdivisiones principales en el norte de México. • Distinguirá entre diferentes estrategias de subsistencia y sus manifestaciones materiales identificables en el registro arqueológico. • Examinará procesos de migración y aculturación a través de los restos arqueológicos y entenderá su importancia para la formación de entidades culturales dinámicas. • Comprenderá y apreciará la equivalencia de diversas formas de vida independientemente de los niveles técnico-materiales alcanzados. • Desarrollará especial sensibilidad respetuosa ante los grupos no mesoamericanos del Norte de México y podrá apreciar mejor sus excepcionales logros culturales. Disposiciones para hacer más eficiente el proceso de enseñanza – aprendizaje: • Para facilitar el buen desarrollo de las clases, el aula se cerrará quince minutos después de la hora marcada de inicio de clases; posteriormente, no se permitirá el acceso hasta el eventual receso. • No se permite el uso de teléfonos celulares u otros aparatos de radiocomunicación durante las clases. • No ingerir alimentos en el salón de clases. • Las tareas, controles de lectura, ejercicios y otros trabajos escritos se recibirán en la fecha establecida dentro del programa de actividades. Sólo se recibirán los documentos mencionados en una fecha posterior mediante un justificante firmado por el Coordinador de la Licenciatura correspondiente.
    [Show full text]
  • HEP Letterhead Template
    HELIX Environmental Planning, Inc. 7578 El Cajon Boulevard La Mesa, CA 91942 619.462.1515 tel 619.462.0552 fax www.helixepi.com July 10, 2019 SEK-01 Mr. Brent Mitchell Viri Estates, LLC 420 N. Twin Oaks Valley Road, Suite 1209 San Marcos, CA 92079 Subject: Cultural Resources Survey, Sandpiper Villa Residential Care Facility for the Elderly Project Dear Mr. Mitchell: HELIX Environmental Planning, Inc. (HELIX) was contracted to conduct a cultural resources survey for the proposed Sandpiper Villa Residential Care Facility for the Elderly Project (project) located in the City of Oceanside (City). This letter report details the methods and results of the cultural resources study, which included a records search, Sacred Lands File search, Native American outreach, a review of historic maps and aerial photographs, and a field survey. No cultural resources were identified within the project site, but the general area is sensitive for cultural resources, and ground visibility was poor during the field survey. Based on this, monitoring of initial ground-disturbing activities is recommended. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION The 2.02-acre project site is located in the City of Oceanside in northwestern San Diego County, south of State Route (SR) 76 and east of Interstate 5 (Figures 1 and 2, Regional Location and Project Vicinity [USGS Topography], respectively). The project site is located at the northwest corner of Dixie Street and Grace Street in the Dixie Village neighborhood of Oceanside (Figure 3, Project Vicinity [Aerial Photograph]). The project area is in Township 11 South, Range 5 West, Section 24, on the U.S.
    [Show full text]