DOCSLIB.ORG

La Liste Ci-Dessous Est Composée De 3 Parties Obligatoires. Pour La 4E Partie : Les Régions, Nous Demandons Aux Étudiants Et Étudiantes De Choisir 2 Blocs Régionaux

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
La Liste Ci-Dessous Est Composée De 3 Parties Obligatoires. Pour La 4E Partie : Les Régions, Nous Demandons Aux Étudiants Et Étudiantes De Choisir 2 Blocs Régionaux NB : La liste ci-dessous est composée de 3 parties obligatoires. Pour la 4e partie : Les Régions, nous demandons aux étudiants et étudiantes de choisir 2 blocs régionaux. Pour les régions qui ne sont pas présentes mais qui vous intéressent, il est possible d’ajouter un sous-bloc. Merci de consulter les responsables du champ pour le faire. Liste mise à jour le 3 mai 2021 *les liens DOI et autres renvoient vers la version en ligne des articles ou des ouvrages, accessibles avec le proxy de la bibliothèque de l’UdeM configuré. *Les titres qui n’ont pas de liens hypertextes sont disponibles en version numérisée dans la dropbox de Politique comparée Bibliographie Politique comparée – 2021 I. Les grandes traditions de recherche I.1. Les fondateurs De Tocqueville, Alexis. De la démocratie en Amérique, 1835. http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1522/cla.toa.dem1 ———. L’Ancien régime et la Révolution (Livre 1), 1856. http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1522/cla.toa.anc Durkheim, Émile. Les règles de la méthode sociologique, 1894. http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1522/cla.due.reg1 Marx, Karl. Le 18 Brumaire de Louis Bonaparte, 1852. http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1522/030145289 ———. Le Capital. Vol. 1, 1867. http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1522/cla.mak.cap2 Weber, Max. “Chapitre 1 : Les concepts fondamentaux de la sociologie,” dans Économie et Société, Vol. 1, Paris : Plon, 1922, 1e édition. ———. “Chapitre 3: Les types de domination.” Dans Économie et Société, Vol. 1, 1922. ———. Le Savant et Le Politique, 1919. http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1522/cla.wem.sav ———. L’éthique protestante et l’esprit du capitalisme, 1904. http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1522/cla.wem.eth I.2. Les moments clés Dahl, Robert A. “The Behavioral Approach in Political Science: Epitaph for a Monument to a Successful Protest.” American Political Science Research 55, 1961: 763–72. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1952525 Laitin, David, Ira Katznelson et Helen Milner. “Comparative Politics: The State of the Subdiscipline.” Political Science: State of the Discipline, Washington, W. W. Norton & Company, 2002: 630–59. Macridis, Roy, et Richard Cox. “Research in Comparative Politics.” American Political Science Research 47, no. 3, 1953: 641–57. https://doi.org/10.2307/1952898 Merriam, Charles E. “The Present State of the Study of Politics.” American Political Science Research 15, no. 2, 1921 : 173–85. https://doi.org/10.2307/1944081 Skocpol, Theda, et Peter Evans. “Bringing the State Back In: Strategies of Analysis in Current Research.” Dans Bringing the State Back In, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1985. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511628283.002 I.3. Les courants théoriques Almond, Gabriel. “Comparative Political Systems” 18, no. 3, 1956: 391–409. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2127255 Almond, Gabriel, et Sidney Verba. “Chapitre 1.” dans The Civic Culture Revisited. Boston, Little, Brown, 1980. Accessible ici : https://archive.org/details/civicculturerevi00almo#maincontent (Créer un compte gratuit) Anderson, Benedict. “Introduction.” dans L’imaginaire national. Réflexions sur l’origine et l’essor du nationalisme, Paris, La Découverte, 1983 : 15-21. https://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.01609 ———. “Les origines de la conscience nationale.” Dans L’imaginaire national. Réflexions sur l’origine et l’essor du nationalisme, Paris, La Découverte, 1983 : 49-58. https://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.01609 ———. “Racines Culturelles.” Dans L’imaginaire national. Réflexions sur l’origine et l’essor du nationalisme, Paris, LA découverte, 1983 : 23-47. https://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.01609 Bourdieu, Pierre. Raisons Pratiques. Sur la théorie de l’action, Paris, Le Seuil, 1994. Accessible via la banq : https://banq.pretnumerique.ca/resources/575733d7dde6b2d458f3ab92 Carrol, Susan J., Linda M.G. Zerilli, et Ada Finifter. “Feminist Challenges to Political Science.” Political Science: The State of the Discipline, Washington, American Political Science Association, 1993, 55–76. Escobar, Arturo. Encountering Development. The Making and Un-Making of the Third World. Princeton University Press, 1996. https://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.31025 Elster, Jon. “Interpretation and Rational Choice.” Rationality and Society 21, no. 1, 2009: 5– 33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043463108099347 Foucault, Michel. La naissance de la biopolitique. Cours au Collège de France (1978-1979), Paris, Le Seuil/Gallimard, 2004. Hall, Peter A. et Taylor Rosemary. “La science politique et les trois néo-institutionnalismes.” Revue française de science politique 47, no. 3–4, 1997 1996: 469–96. https://doi.org/10.3406/rfsp.1997.395192 Moore, Barrington Jr. “Partie 3.” Dans Les origines sociales de la dictature et de la démocratie, Paris, La Découverte,1983 [1966] Polanyi, Karl. “Chapitre 3, 4, 5, 10, 11, 19 et 21.” Dans La grande transformation. Aux origines économiques et politiques de notre temps, Paris, Gallimard, 1983 [1944]. Disponible ici : https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.46560/page/n241/mode/2up Putnam, Robert D., Raffaella Y. Nanetti et Robert Leonardi. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1993. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=79069&lang=fr&site=eh ost-live Saïd, Edward. W. L’orientalisme. Paris, Le Seuil, 2005 [1979]. Disponible ici : https://archive.org/details/orientalism_by_edward_w_said/mode/2up Uday, Chandra. “The Case for a Postcolonial Approach to the Study of Politics.” New Political Science 35, no. 3 (2013): 479–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/07393148.2013.813700 II. La comparaison comme méthode Brady, Henry E. et David Collier. Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. Lanham, Rowman et Littlefield, 2010. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/umontreal-ebooks/detail.action?docID=662323 King, Gary, Robert Keohane et Sydney Verba. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1994. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/umontreal-ebooks/detail.action?docID=496205 Kuhn, Thomas. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1962. https://archive.org/details/ThomasS.KuhnTheStructureOfScientificRevolutions/page/n2/mode /2up II.1. Stratégies comparatives Alexander, George et Andrew Bennett. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MIT Press, 2005. Accessible ici: https://archive.org/details/alexander_l_george_andrew_bennett_case_studies_and_theory_dev elopment_in_the_social_sciences/mode/2up Collier, David et Gerardo L. Munck. “Symposium on Critical Juncture and Historical Legacies.” Qualitative and Multi-Method Research, 15 no. 1, 2017: 1–48. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3036008 Gazibo, Mamoudou. “Les méthodes de la comparaison.” Dans Traité de Politique Comparée, Dirigé par Jean-Michel De Waele & Michel Hastings, Bruxelles, Larcier, 2018 : 17– 52. Geertz, Clifford. “Thick Description: Toward an Interpretative Theory of Culture.” Dans Interpretation of Cultures, 3–30. New York, Basic Books, 1973. Gerber, Alan S., Donald P. Green et Edward H. Kaplan. “The Illusion of Learning From Observational Research.” In Problems and Methods in the Study of Politics, Edited by Ian Shapiro, Rogers Smith et Tarek Massoud, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2004: 251-73. Hall, Peter A. “Aligning Ontology and Methodology in Comparative Politics.” Dans Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, Edited by Mahoney, James and Dietriech Rueschemeyer, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003: 373-404. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803963.012 Kholi, Atul, et al. “The Role of Theory in Comparative Politics: A Symposium.” World Politics 48, no. 1, 1995: 1–49. https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.1995.0002 Lijphart, Arendt. “The Comparable-Case Strategy in Comparative Research.” Dans Comparative Politics in the Post-Behavioral Era, Dirigé par Louis-J Cantori et Andrew H. Jr. Ziegler, Boulder, Lynne Rienner, 1988 : 54-71. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F001041407500800203 Przeworski, Adam et Henry Teune. “Chapitre 1 et 2.” Dans The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York, Wiley, 1970. https://doi.org/10.2307/1958372 Sartori, Giovanni. “Bien Comparer, Mal Comparer” Revue internationale de politique comparée, vol. 1, n°1, 1994, p. 19-36. Schatz, Edward. “What Kind(s) of Ethnography Does Political Science Need?” Dans Political Ethnography: What Immersion Contributes to the Study of Power, Dirigé par Edward Schatz, 303–18. Chicago, Chicago University Press, 2009. (version électronique en commande à la bibliothèque) Skocpol, Theda et Margaret Sommers. “The Uses of Comparative History in Macrosocial Inquiry.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 22, no. 2 (Avril), 1980: 174–97. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173834 Tilly, Charles. “Chapitre 4 et 8.” Dans Big Structures, Large Processes, Huge Comparisons. New York, Russell Sage Foundation, 1984. II.2. La preuve en politique comparée Beck, Nathaniel. “Is Causal-Process Observation an Oxymoron?” Political Analysis 14, no. 3, 2006: 347–52. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25791860 Brady, Henry E. “What Is Causality.” Dans Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology, Dirigé Par Janet M. Box-Steffensmeier, Henry E. Brady et David Collier, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2008: 217-70. https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286546.001.0001/oxford hb-9780199286546-e-10 Braumoeller, Bear F. et Gary Goertz. “The Methodology of Necessary Conditions.” American Journal of Political Science, no. 44, 2000: 844–58. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2669285?sid=primo&origin=crossref&seq=1#metadata_info_tab
Load more

Recommended publications
  • John J. Mearsheimer: an Offensive Realist Between Geopolitics and Power
    John J. Mearsheimer: an offensive realist between geopolitics and power Peter Toft Department of Political Science, University of Copenhagen, Østerfarimagsgade 5, DK 1019 Copenhagen K, Denmark. E-mail: [email protected] With a number of controversial publications behind him and not least his book, The Tragedy of Great Power Politics, John J. Mearsheimer has firmly established himself as one of the leading contributors to the realist tradition in the study of international relations since Kenneth Waltz’s Theory of International Politics. Mearsheimer’s main innovation is his theory of ‘offensive realism’ that seeks to re-formulate Kenneth Waltz’s structural realist theory to explain from a struc- tural point of departure the sheer amount of international aggression, which may be hard to reconcile with Waltz’s more defensive realism. In this article, I focus on whether Mearsheimer succeeds in this endeavour. I argue that, despite certain weaknesses, Mearsheimer’s theoretical and empirical work represents an important addition to Waltz’s theory. Mearsheimer’s workis remarkablyclear and consistent and provides compelling answers to why, tragically, aggressive state strategies are a rational answer to life in the international system. Furthermore, Mearsheimer makes important additions to structural alliance theory and offers new important insights into the role of power and geography in world politics. Journal of International Relations and Development (2005) 8, 381–408. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jird.1800065 Keywords: great power politics; international security; John J. Mearsheimer; offensive realism; realism; security studies Introduction Dangerous security competition will inevitably re-emerge in post-Cold War Europe and Asia.1 International institutions cannot produce peace.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Science
    A 364547 Political Science: THE STATE OF -THEDISCIPLINE Ira Katznelson and Helen V. Milner, editors Columbia University W. W. Norton & Company American Political Science Association NEW YORK | LONDON WASHINGTON, D.C. CONTENTS Ira Katznelson and Helen V. Milner Preface and Acknowledgments xiii Ira Katznelson and Helen V. Milner American Political Science: The Discipline's State and the State of the Discipline 1 The State in an Era of Globalization Margaret Levi The State of the Study of the State 3 3 Miles Kahler The State of the State in World Politics 56 Atul Kohli State, Society, and Development 84 Jeffry Frieden and Lisa L. Martin International Political Economy: Global and Domestic Interactions 118 I ]ames E. Alt Comparative Political Economy: Credibility, Accountability, and Institutions 147 ]ames D. Morrow International Conflict: Assessing the Democratic Peace and Offense-Defense Theory 172 Stephen M. Walt The Enduring Relevance of the Realist Tradition 197 Democracy, Justice, and Their Institutions Ian Shapiro The State of Democratic Theory 235 vi | CONTENTS Jeremy Waldron Justice 266 Romand Coles Pluralization and Radical Democracy: Recent Developments in Critical Theory and Postmodernism 286 Gerald Gamm and ]ohn Huber Legislatures as Political Institutions: Beyond the Contemporary Congress 313 Barbara Geddes The Great Transformation in the Study of Politics in Developing Countries 342 Kathleen Thelen The Political Economy of Business and Labor in the Developed Democracies 371 Citizenship, Identity, and Political Participation Seyla Benhabib Political Theory and Political Membership in a Changing World 404 Kay Lehman Schlozman Citizen Participation in America: What Do We Know? Why Do We Care? 433 Nancy Burns - Gender: Public Opinion and Political Action 462 Michael C.
    [Show full text]
  • Rewriting the Epic of America
    One Rewriting the Epic of America IRA KATZNELSON “Is the traditional distinction between international relations and domes- tic politics dead?” Peter Gourevitch inquired at the start of his seminal 1978 article, “The Second Image Reversed.” His diagnosis—“perhaps”—was mo- tivated by the observation that while “we all understand that international politics and domestic structures affect each other,” the terms of trade across the domestic and international relations divide had been uneven: “reason- ing from international system to domestic structure” had been downplayed. Gourevitch’s review of the literature demonstrated that long-standing efforts by international relations scholars to trace the domestic roots of foreign pol- icy to the interplay of group interests, class dynamics, or national goals1 had not been matched by scholarship analyzing how domestic “structure itself derives from the exigencies of the international system.”2 Gourevitch counseled scholars to turn their attention to the international system as a cause as well as a consequence of domestic politics. He also cautioned that this reversal of the causal arrow must recognize that interna- tional forces exert pressures rather than determine outcomes. “The interna- tional system, be it in an economic or politico-military form, is underdeter- mining. The environment may exert strong pulls but short of actual occupation, some leeway in the response to that environment remains.”3 A decade later, Robert Putnam turned to two-level games to transcend the question as to “whether
    [Show full text]
  • Ira Katznelson | Mershon Center for International Security Studies | the Ohio State University
    Ira Katznelson | Mershon Center for International Security Studies | The Ohio State University The Ohio State www.osu.edu Help Campus map Find people Webmail University home > events > may 2010 > ira katznelson September Ira Katznelson October "Shaded by Fear: The New Deal and its Legacies" November December Wednesday, May 5, 2010 3:30 p.m. Ira Katznelson January Ruggles Professor of Mershon Center for International Security Studies Political Science and February 1501 Neil Ave., Columbus, OH 43201 History Columbia University March See a streaming video of this event. This streaming video requires April RealPlayer. If you do not have RealPlayer, you can download it free. May Ira Katznelson is Ruggles Professor of Political Science and History at Events Archive Columbia University. He is an Americanist whose work has straddled comparative politics and political theory, as well a political and social history. His most recent books are Liberal Beginnings: Making a Republic for the Moderns (with Andreas Kalyvas, 2008), and When Affirmative Action Was White: An Untold History of Racial Inequality in Twentieth- Century America (2005). He is currently completing Fear Itself, a book dealing with American democracy from the New Deal to the Cold War, and Liberal Reason, a collection of his essays on the character of modern social knowledge. Katznelson has co-edited Working Class Formation: Nineteenth Century Patterns in Western Europe and North America (with Aristide Zolberg, 1986), Paths of Emancipation: Jews, States, and Citizenship (with Pierre Birnbaum, 1995), Shaped by War and Trade: International Influences on American Political Development (with Martin Shefter, 2002), Political Science: The State of the Discipline, Centennial Edition (with Helen Milner, 2002), and Preferences and Situations: Points of Intersection Between Historical and Rational Choice Institutionalism (with Barry Weingast, 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • American Political Science Association
    A MERICAN P OLITICAL S CIENCE ASSOCIATION Assessing (In)Security after the Arab Spring John Gledhill, guest editor, April Longley Alley, Brian McQuinn, and Mohammad Ayatollahi Tabaar Misconceptions and Realities of the 2011 Tunisian Election Moez Habadou and Nawel Amrouche Political Science & Politics Katrina Seven Years On PSO CTOBER 2013, V OLUME 46, N UMBER 4 Christine L. Day American Political Science Association Make plans to attend the 2014 APSA Teaching & Learning Conference The 2014 APSA Teaching & Learning Conference theme is “Teaching Inclusively: Inte- grating Multiple Approaches into the Curriculum.” In this unique meeting, APSA strives to promote the greater understanding of cutting- edge approaches, techniques, and methodologies for the political science classroom. Using a working group format, the conference includes plenaries, tracks, and work- shops on topics such as: t Civic Engagement t Integrating Technology in the t Conflict and Conflict Resolution Classroom t Core Curriculum/General t Internationalizing the Curriculum Education t Teaching and Learning at Community t Curricular and Program Assessment Colleges t Distance Learning t Professional Development t Diversity, Inclusiveness, and Equality t Simulations and Role Play t Graduate Education: Teaching and t Teaching Political Theory and Theories Advising Graduate Students t Teaching Research Methods www.apsanet.org/teachingconference 1527 New Hampshire Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20036 | 202.483.2512 | www.apsanet.org ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • APSA Contributors AS of NOVEMBER 10, 2014
    APSA Contributors AS OF NOVEMBER 10, 2014 This list celebrates the generous contributions of our members in Jacobson Paul Allen Beck giving to one or more of the following programs from 1996 through 2014: APSA awards, programs, the Congressional Fellowship Pro- Cynthia McClintock John F. Bibby gram, and the Centennial Campaign. APSA thanks these donors for Ruth P. Morgan Amy B. Bridges ensuring that the benefi ts of membership and the infl uence of the Norman J. Ornstein Michael A. Brintnall profession will extend far into the future. APSA will update and print T.J. Pempel David S. Broder this list annually in the January issue of PS. Dianne M. Pinderhughes Charles S. Bullock III Jewel L. Prestage Margaret Cawley CENTENNIAL CIRCLE Offi ce of the President Lucian W. Pye Philip E. Converse ($25,000+) Policy Studies Organization J. Austin Ranney William J. Daniels Walter E. Beach Robert D. Putnam Ben F. Reeves Christopher J. Deering Doris A. Graber Ronald J Schmidt, Sr. Paul J. Rich Jorge I. Dominguez Pendleton Herring Smith College David B. Robertson Marion E. Doro Chun-tu Hsueh Endowment Janet D. Steiger for International Scholars Catherine E. Rudder Melvin J. Dubnick and Huang Hsing Kay Lehman Schlozman Eastern Michigan University Foundation FOUNDER’S CIRCLE ($5,000+) Eric J. Scott Leon D. Epstein Arend Lijphart Tony Affi gne J. Merrill Shanks Kathleen A. Frankovic Elinor Ostrom Barbara B. Bardes Lee Sigelman John Armando Garcia Beryl A. Radin Lucius J. Barker Howard J. Silver George J. Graham Leo A. Shifrin Robert H. Bates William O. Slayman Virginia H.
    [Show full text]
  • Theda Skocpol
    APSA Presidential Address Voice and Inequality Voice and Inequality: The Transformation of American Civic Democracy By Theda Skocpol Introduction white men now includes a rainbow of persons, and it has just About a century ago, the American Political Science witnessed the first instance of a woman president handing off Association (APSA) was launched at a December 1903 meet- the gavel to a female successor. ing held at Tulane University during the joint conventions of Despite the many changes over the decades, there have the American Economics Association (AEA) and the been important continuities—so many that Goodnow and American Historical Association (AHA).1 That founding was his colleagues would surely recognize us today as inheritors of the culmination of a yearlong process of tapping the opinions the association and disciplinary vision they launched. Now, as of scholars and men of affairs interested—as the original cir- then, organized political science encompasses normative the- cular letter put it—in “the establishment of some representa- ory as well as empirical research. Now, as then, APSA features tive body that can take the scientific lead in all matters of a comparative research, area studies, and a focus on interna- political interest, encouraging research, aiding if possible in tional politics as well as studies of American politics; and our the collection and publication of valuable material and...in membership is international. APSA fosters both pedagogy general advancing the scientific study of politics in the United and research. We nurture ties to neighboring disciplines and States.”2 Did it make more sense, asked the letter, to organize proudly include scholars who started elsewhere in our ranks.
    [Show full text]
  • Seminar in Comparative Politics Political Science 7970
    Seminar in Comparative Politics Political Science 7970 Prof Wm A Clark Spring 2014 213 Stubbs Hall Fridays 9-12 [email protected] 210 Stubbs Course Description This course is a proseminar, i.e., a course designed primarily to provide the student with an introduction to the major concepts, theories, methods, and debates appropriate to the field of comparative politics. As such, and given the rather diverse nature of the field, a wide range of subject areas are confronted through an examination of prominent and representative samples from the relevant bodies of scholarly literature. The field of comparative politics is very rich and varied, both substantively and methodologically. These characteristics represent both a strength and a weakness, especially given the task that the course confronts in seeking a balanced and representative introduction to the field. In constructing the course, then, certain judgments must be made, certain compromises must be accepted, and certain values must be balanced off against others. What the course does claim to do is to provide an introduction to important themes and debates through an examination of prominent works and scholars. Course Requirements [1] In-Class Performance: Students are expected to come to each seminar meeting prepared to discuss the assigned readings. Everyone must be sure to come to class sessions ready to do his or her part in making the session a worthwhile learning environment. Students rely on each other in many important ways, and you have an obligation to your colleagues to pull your weight in the seminar. Needless to say, this role can be played only if you are in attendance and prepared thoroughly.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    CURRICULUM VITAE CHARLES M. CAMERON 305 Robertson Hall 609-258-2757 (office) Princeton University 917-603-1537 (home) Princeton, New Jersey 08544-1013 609-258-5014 (fax) [email protected] EDUCATION Ph.D., Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, May 1988 (Dissertation Adviser: R. Douglas Arnold) M.P.A., Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, May 1981 B.A., Austin College, Sherman, Texas, 1976 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Academic Appointments Professor of Politics and Public Affairs, Department of Politics and Woodrow School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, July 1, 2004-- Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, Columbia University, June 1995- June 30, 2004 (tenured 1997) Associate Professor and Director of M.P.A. Program, School of International and Public Affairs, Columbia University, September 2001-2004 Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Columbia University, July 1989- May 1995 Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, SUNY at Stony Brook, January 1988-June 1989 Lecturer, Department of Political Science, SUNY at Stony Brook, September 1985- December 1987 Preceptor, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University Other Research Assistant, Ford Foundation Grant "Evaluating the Reagan Domestic Program," Richard P. Nathan, Director, Princeton Urban and Regional Research Center, Princeton University, September 1981-June 1982 Policy Analyst,
    [Show full text]
  • Political Science BC3200 American Political Development Fall 2013
    Political Science BC3200 American Political Development Fall 2013 Prof. Daniel Kato Office: Lehman 416A Lehman, Phone: (212) 854-6722 Email: [email protected] Office Hours: T: 11-1 or by appointment Class Meeting: MW 11:40-12:55 Course Description: American Political Development (APD) is an emerging subfield within American Politics that focuses on the ways that political culture, ideology, governing structures (executives, legislatures, judiciaries, and subnational governments) and structures of political linkage (political parties and organized interests) shape the development of political conflict and public policy. Rejecting the fragmentation of the field of American Politics into narrow specialties, it links government, politics, policy, culture, and economics in a broad- gauged search for understanding. This course will seek to answer the following questions: Is the United States a liberal country and if so, what are we to make of the persistent occurrence of seemingly illiberal practices such as racism and sexism? What are the constitutive elements that compose the American state and how does the interaction across these elements shape and affect public policy? Are there ways of synthesizing the debates regarding American liberalism and the American state? What might be the future of APD and what are some challenges to APD? Readings will be extensive and challenging, with the goal of providing a strong foundation for further research or application to your particular areas of interest. Please do not hesitate to email me or to come to office hours if you have any questions or comments about the material or issues covered in class. Class Participation: An overview of the readings for the week will be covered at the beginning of each class.
    [Show full text]
  • Theories of International Political Economy Fall 2013
    Duke University Political Science 651 Theories of International Political Economy Fall 2013 Tue 1:25-3:55pm Friedl Building (East campus), Room 216 course website at sakai.duke.edu Prof. Tim Büthe Department of Political Science 140 Science Drive (Gross Hall), Room 219 (919) 660-4365; [email protected] office hours: Wednesdays, 9:45 - 11:00am (SSRI West Café) and by appointment Purpose In this seminar, we will read and examine some of the classics and much of the recent literature on core topics and the current research frontier in IPE. We will scrutinize answers to questions such as: Why do countries open their markets to international trade and why some markets more than others? Why do governments that seek to protect domestic producers sometime use tariffs but at other times non- tariff barriers? Why have most—but not all—countries removed restriction on capital in- and outflows during the last two to three decades? Why do some governments pay their debts, but not others, and with what consequence? What explains the allocation of foreign direct investment and foreign aid? How does economic openness affect economic growth, human development, political rights, gender equality, or the likelihood and severity of anticompetitive behavior? We will also examine more general questions, such as: What is the role of domestic and/or international political institutions in explaining conflict and cooperation in inter- or transnational economic relations? What are the political consequences when the boundaries of markets no longer coincide with the
    [Show full text]
  • Realism and World Politics
    REALISM AND WORLD POLITICS This book contributes to the rethinking of realism through multiple analyses of the keys works of Kenneth Waltz, arguing that a sophisticated appreciation of realism is needed to truly understand World Politics and International Relations. Bringing together a theoretically varied group of leading scholars from both sides of the Atlantic, this book is an outstanding appreciation of the work of realism’s most important theorist since the Second World War, and the persistent themes thrown up by his work over a half-century. The contributors do not engage with Waltz’s work as slavish disciples, but rather as positive critics, recognising its decisive significance in International Relations, while using the process of critical engage- ment to search for new or renewed understandings of unfolding global situations and new insights into long-standing problems of theory-building. The book will be of great interest to students of IR, foreign policy, security studies and politics. Ken Booth is Senior Research Associate in the Department of International Politics, Aberystwyth University, where he was formerly E.H Carr Professor and Head. He is editor of the journal International Relations and author/editor of over 20 books on International Relations and Security Studies. He is a Fellow of the British Academy and Academician of the Academy of Social Sciences. ‘In this fine volume, Ken Booth has brought together leading theorists of international politics to assess the work of Kenneth Waltz. These excellent essays clearly demonstrate how profound and enduring Waltz's influence has been on the study of international politics. I learned much from reading these essays, and I know others will also.’ Prof.
    [Show full text]