DOCSLIB.ORG

Bear Country Neighborhood Fire Plan 2015 Salmon River Fire Safe Council

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bear Country Neighborhood Fire Plan 2015 Salmon River Fire Safe Council Bear Country Neighborhood Fire Plan 2015 Salmon River Fire Safe Council Aerial view of the Bear Country Neighborhood looking up Negro Creek toward Godfrey and Harris Ranches with the South Fork Salmon River below. Photo by Scott Harding/LightHawk, April 2015. Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1 Purpose ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 1 What is a Neighborhood Fire Plan? ......................................................................................................................................1 Need for Neighborhood Fire Plans ........................................................................................................................................1 Reasons to Group These Neighborhoods Into One Plan ..............................................................................................1 Goals .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Relationship to the Salmon River CWPP ........................................................................................................................ 2 Planning Methodology/Process ........................................................................................................................................ 2 Characteristics of the Bear Country Neighborhood .................................................................. 3 Geographic Setting .................................................................................................................................................................. 3 Climate ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Topography, Slope, Elevation, and Aspect .................................................................................................................... 6 Forest Stand and Vegetation Conditions ....................................................................................................................... 6 Fire Environments & Fire History .................................................................................................................................... 7 Historical Fire Environment ....................................................................................................................................................8 Suppression Era (Present) Fire Environment ..................................................................................................................9 Desired Fire Environment ...................................................................................................................................................... 10 Values at Risk .......................................................................................................................................................................... 10 Emergency Wildfire Response Resources ................................................................................................................... 11 Structure Ignitability ............................................................................................................................................................ 11 Godfrey Ranch Neighborhood ............................................................................................... 12 Background ..............................................................................................................................................................................12 Godfrey Ranch Fire History ............................................................................................................................................... 12 Available Emergency Resources & Logistics .............................................................................................................. 13 Access Routes ............................................................................................................................................................................... 13 Communication ........................................................................................................................................................................... 15 Areas of Increased Consideration ................................................................................................................................... 15 High Value Areas ........................................................................................................................................................................ 16 Emergency Access & Egress Routes ................................................................................................................................... 16 Safety Priority Areas ................................................................................................................................................................. 16 Desired Future Conditions ................................................................................................................................................. 16 Treatment Prioritization .................................................................................................................................................... 17 Emergency Response, Safety Zones, Procedures, & Evacuation ........................................................................ 17 Infrastructure .......................................................................................................................................................................... 18 Risks & Mitigations ............................................................................................................................................................... 18 Risk .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 19 Mitigation ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 19 Risk .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 20 Mitigation ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 20 Recommendations ................................................................................................................................................................ 21 Black Bear Ranch Neighborhood ............................................................................................ 22 Background ..............................................................................................................................................................................22 Fire History ..............................................................................................................................................................................22 Available Emergency Resources & Logistics .............................................................................................................. 23 Access Routes ............................................................................................................................................................................... 23 Engine Fill Sites ........................................................................................................................................................................... 24 Communication ........................................................................................................................................................................... 24 Areas of Increased Consideration ................................................................................................................................... 24 High Value Areas ........................................................................................................................................................................ 25 Emergency Access & Egress Routes ................................................................................................................................... 25 Safety Priority Areas ................................................................................................................................................................. 25 Desired Future Conditions ................................................................................................................................................. 25 Treatment Prioritization .................................................................................................................................................... 26 Emergency Response, Safety Zones, Procedures, & Evacuation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • It's Hip to Unzip Open Land Communes and Their Neighbours
    “It’s Hip to Unzip”: Open Land Communes and Their Neighbours in Northern California, 1966-1979 by John Stuart Miller B.A., The University of British Columbia, 2013 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE AND POSTDOCTORAL STUDIES (History) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) December 2016 © John Stuart Miller, 2016 Abstract This essay considers the histories of two countercultural, back-to-the-land communes located in northern California: Siskiyou County’s Black Bear Ranch and Sonoma County’s Morning Star Ranch. Both of these communes were highly influenced by the concept of Open Land, according to which anyone may freely live in a given space, particularly those individuals rejected or alienated by urban modernity. I examine the ways in which these communes related to and were shaped by their rural neighbours, as well as the local state, asserting the importance of the surrounding community in effecting events at each commune. I argue that positive relations with neighbours determined the continued viability of these communes, and that these positive relations in turn required a compromise of original founding principles including Open Land. I further uncover the changing perceptions rural people held of hippie communards, and contextualize the back-to-the-land ideal within broader American traditions of frontier settlement and reinvention. !ii Preface This thesis is entirely the original, unpublished, and independent work of the author, John
    [Show full text]
  • Interview J. Berman Commune (PDF)
    Interview with Jonathan Berman, Director of COMMUNE How did you get the idea for the film and was there something specific that inspired you? I grew up on Long Island in the 1960’s around that environment. You know just being a kid growing up around the 60’s and 70’s; this environment of the counterculture was always in the air, even in suburbia – maybe especially in suburbia. As I became a teenager I started to get into the music of Jimmy Hendrix and all that, playing keyboards and in rock bands. So I always had that warm feeling towards that whole world as an alternative to us and the bland world of suburban Long Island life. I was always intrigued by that and then was a Deadhead and into various counterculture ideas. The politics attracted me, and so when I was searching for my next project, I met this eccentric producer and was telling him about my film I was planning about barbequing in the Carolinas and he, being a New York no-nonsense eccentric: “I just don’t like that idea” and I said, “Well, what do you like?” because when you find, a co- producer, it is a good thing, and he said, “Well I like things that are off the grid” which literally means off the electric grid, that is alternative culture on the fringe. So that idea of things very much resonated with me, the idea of things being “off the grid.” How did you come into contact with the people of Black Bear Ranch? Well after that night, I did some reading and came across a book on the 60’s communes literally called “The Sixties Communes” by Tim Miller, a professor and read a few pages on Black Bear Ranch and said to myself, “this is it.” I saw Black Bear as the epicenter of all the benevolent anarchy and theatricality and counter culture ideas that speak to me.
    [Show full text]
  • Drop City and the Utopian Communes
    University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law 2015 Punishment: Drop City and the Utopian Communes Paul H. Robinson University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School Sarah M. Robinson Independent Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminology Commons, Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons, Law Enforcement and Corrections Commons, Peace and Conflict Studies Commons, Public Law and Legal Theory Commons, Public Policy Commons, Social Control, Law, Crime, and Deviance Commons, and the Social Policy Commons Repository Citation Robinson, Paul H. and Robinson, Sarah M., "Punishment: Drop City and the Utopian Communes" (2015). Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law. 1148. https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship/1148 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law by an authorized administrator of Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PIRATES, PRISONERS, AND LEPERS LESSONS FROM LIFE OUTSIDE THE LAW Paul H. Robinson and Sarah M. Robinson Potomac Books An imprint of the University of Nebraska Press CONTENTS List of Illustrations ix Acknowledgments x~ PART 1. HUMAN RULES 1. What Is Our Nature? What Does Government Do for Us and to Us? 3 2. Cooperation: Lepers and Pirates 11 3· Punishment: Drop City and the Utopian Communes 32 4· Justice: 1850s San Francisco and the California Gold Rush 51 5· Injustice: The Batavia Shipwreck and the Attica Uprising 81 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter 15/07 DIGITAL EDITION Nr
    ISSN 1610-2606 ISSN 1610-2606 newsletter 15/07 DIGITAL EDITION Nr. 212 - September 2007 Michael J. Fox Christopher Lloyd LASER HOTLINE - Inh. Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Wolfram Hannemann, MBKS - Talstr. 3 - 70825 K o r n t a l Fon: 0711-832188 - Fax: 0711-8380518 - E-Mail: [email protected] - Web: www.laserhotline.de Newsletter 15/07 (Nr. 212) September 2007 editorial Hallo Laserdisc- und DVD-Fans, schen und japanischen DVDs Aus- Nach den in diesem Jahr bereits liebe Filmfreunde! schau halten, dann dürfen Sie sich absolvierten Filmfestivals Es gibt Tage, da wünscht man sich, schon auf die Ausgaben 213 und ”Widescreen Weekend” (Bradford), mit mindestens fünf Armen und 214 freuen. Diese werden wir so ”Bollywood and Beyond” (Stutt- mehr als nur zwei Hirnhälften ge- bald wie möglich publizieren. Lei- gart) und ”Fantasy Filmfest” (Stutt- boren zu sein. Denn das würde die der erfordert das Einpflegen neuer gart) steht am ersten Oktober- tägliche Arbeit sicherlich wesent- Titel in unsere Datenbank gerade wochenende das vierte Highlight lich einfacher machen. Als enthu- bei deutschen DVDs sehr viel mehr am Festivalhimmel an. Nunmehr siastischer Filmfanatiker vermutet Zeit als bei Übersee-Releases. Und bereits zum dritten Mal lädt die man natürlich schon lange, dass Sie können sich kaum vorstellen, Schauburg in Karlsruhe zum irgendwo auf der Welt in einem was sich seit Beginn unserer Som- ”Todd-AO Filmfestival” in die ba- kleinen, total unauffälligen Labor merpause alles angesammelt hat! dische Hauptstadt ein. Das diesjäh- inmitten einer Wüstenlandschaft Man merkt deutlich, dass wir uns rige Programm wurde gerade eben bereits mit genmanipulierten Men- bereits auf das Herbst- und Winter- offiziell verkündet und das wollen schen experimentiert wird, die ge- geschäft zubewegen.
    [Show full text]
  • Salmon River Community Wildfire Protection Plan October 30, 2007 Final
    SALMON RIVER COMMUNITY WILDFIRE PROTECTION PLAN OCTOBER 30, 2007 FINAL PREFACE “The most important aspect of hazardous fuels reduction is reducing the threat to local communities. When it comes to reducing threat, we need to protect communities and help the communities to help themselves through changing the landscape from high risk to low risk. We'll accomplish that by working closely with communities on major projects.” USDA Forest Service Chief, Dale Bosworth From his “Statement on the 2000 National Fire Plan” The Salmon River Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) has developed a prioritized list of projects to focus and guide implementing landowners, organizations and funders. A key product of this Plan is the development of wildfire safety zones to reduce citizen and firefighter risks from future large wildfires. This project list consists of structure protection needs, prevention measures, pre-treatment and shaded fuelbreak construction to protect life and property in towns, residential areas, emergency access areas, and private/public interface areas. Other activities, such as adequate accessible water systems, plantation thinning, underburning, and natural fire management will be recommended. This Plan will also make recommendations that homeowners and communities can take to reduce the ignitability of structures throughout the Salmon River Watershed. The Plan will contain a Suppression Response plan and updating of the Residential Risk Assessment for Structures, Improvements and Wildfire readiness. The Salmon River Fire Safe Council (FSC) is sponsoring the development of this project. Cooperators on the FSC include community members, the U.S. Forest Service, California Department of Forestry, other managing agencies, the Karuk Tribe, the Salmon River Volunteer Fire and Rescue (SRFR), the Orleans/Somes Bar Fire Safe Council, and the Salmon River Restoration Council (SRRC).
    [Show full text]
  • Klamath River Restoration and Community Protection CFLRP Proposal (The Klamath Proposal) Is Located in the Klamath River Basin
    Klamath River Restoration and Community Protection. Page 1 Executive Summary: Klamath River Restoration and Community Protection Dominant forest type(s): Mixed Conifer, some True Fir Total acreage of the landscape: 202,000 acres Total acreage to receive treatment: 115,294 acres Total number of NEPA ready acres: 97,290 acres Total number of acres in NEPA process: 19,996 acres Description of the most significant restoration needs and actions on the landscape: Strategic ecosystem restoration to increase resiliency and adapt to changing climate: Reduce fuels, protect property and water quality for people, restore and protect habitat for ESA listed species such as northern spotted owls and salmon, and control invasive species. Description of the highest priority desired outcomes of the project at the end of the 10 year period: The acres of high-intensity stand replacing fire will be reduced. Private lands and high priority natural and social resources are protected. Fire suppression, risk to fire fighters, and prescribed fire costs will be reduced. The rate of noxious weed spread will be reduced. Description of the most significant utilization opportunities linked to this project: Both sawlog and biomass products will support local industry infrastructure, and retain and create jobs that will allow future vegetation management projects to proceed. Name of the National Forest, collaborative groups, and other major partner categories involved in project development: Project development occurred through NEPA and the Healthy Forest Restoration Act involving the Klamath NF, Fire Safe and Watershed Councils from the Salmon River, Happy Camp, and Mid-Klamath River area, Siskiyou County, and the Karuk Tribe.
    [Show full text]
  • The 6Os Communes Messianic Communities) Bus at Bellows Falls) Vermont
    The 6os Communes Messianic Communities) bus at Bellows Falls) Vermont. Photograph by Timothy Miller. TIMOTHY MILLER The 60s Communes Hippies and Beyond Syracuse UniversityPress Copyright © 1999 by Syracuse UniversityPress, Syracuse, New York 13244-5160 AllRights Reserved First Edition 1999 02 03 04 05 06 6 5 4 3 2 The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard forInformation Sciences-Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANS I z39.48-1984.@ LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOG ING -IN-PUBLICATI ON DATA Miller, Timothy, 1944- The 6os communes : hippies and beyond/ Timothy Miller. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-8156-2811-0 (cloth: alk. paper) ISBN 0-8156-0601-x (pbk.: alk. paper) I. Communal living-United States. 2. United States-Social conditions- 1960-1980. I. Title. II. Title: Sixties communes. III. Title: Hippies and beyond. HQ97I.M55 1999 307.77'4'0973-dc21 99-37768 Manufactured in the United States of America For Michael) Gretchen) andJeffre y TIMOTHY MILLER is professor of religious studies at the University of Kansas. Among his previous publica­ tions is The Quest forUt opia in Twentieth-CenturyAm erica: 1900-1960) the first of three volumes on communal life to be published by Syracuse UniversityPress. Contents Acknowledgments IX Introduction xm I. Set and Setting: The Roots of the 196os-Era Communes I 2. The New Communes Emerge: 1960-1965 17 3. Communes Begin to Spread: 1965-1967 41 4. Out of the Haight and Back to the Land: Countercultural Communes after the Summer of Love 67 5. Searching for a Common Center: Religious and Spiritual Communes 92 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning for the Coop's Future
    06-11/09 p 01-06 11/9/06 8:01 PM Page 1 OFFICIAL NEWSLETTER OF THE PARK SLOPE FOOD COOP Established 1973 Volume AA, Number 23 November 9, 2006 A Discussion: Planning Gloves Are Off for the Coop’s Future at Fourth Annual General Coordinator Joe Holtz shares his thoughts Peace Fair By Ann Pappert By Hayley Gorenberg azette: As you’re no We need to get as an you sing until was criticized for being terror- doubt aware, with the many members as “ peace becomes the istic. Beneath her soft purple Gopening of Fairway possible to embrace C noise of the planet?” cap and graying dreadlocks, and the expected opening of the idea that the challenged Sonia Sanchez, she punctuated her recitation Whole Foods in the next year Coop is about mak- who lectured, bellowed, and with choruses of “Where are or two, there has been a lot of ing the best food as sang to kick off the keynote discussion among our mem- affordable as possi- ceremonies of Brooklyn Par- bers about the long-term ble to those who ents for Peace’s Fourth Annu- future of the Coop. Who has can least afford it— al Peace Fair by performing the responsibility for long- even if they them- her work, “A Poem for Peace.” term planning at the Coop? selves don’t need to Author, poet and Granny Joe: The seven General worry about price. Peace Brigade activist Coordinators usually have Do they know that Sanchez joined Medea Ben- three meetings a week and their participation jamin, co-founder of Code long-term planning is part of helps make this a Pink and Global Exchange, to these meetings.
    [Show full text]
  • Expertise and Disbelief
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2015 Expertise and Disbelief: Post-1945 American Attitudes Toward the Authority of Knowledge Terry Wagner Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Wagner, Terry, "Expertise and Disbelief: Post-1945 American Attitudes Toward the Authority of Knowledge" (2015). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 1976. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/1976 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. EXPERTISE AND DISBELIEF: POST-1945 AMERICAN ATTITUDES TOWARD THE AUTHORITY OF KNOWLEDGE A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of History by Terry Wagner B.A., Rice University, 2002 M.A., Louisiana State University, 2010 August 2015 “The thunder and lightning strike us, And then we’re shocked to see the likeness Between us and the things we’ve hated for a long, long time.” The Godz “Dirty Windows” 1973 ii Acknowledgements The historians and graduate students at Louisiana State University have been, for me, a genuine community. My graduate advisor, David Culbert, told me the first time I met him that, if I came to LSU and worked with him, I would research and write about my own interests.
    [Show full text]
  • Time in De-Tension: Some Northern California Experiments in Open Land Sarah A
    Fig. 4-1 time in de-tension: Some Northern California Experiments in Open Land Sarah A. Lewison In October1968, Lou Gottlieb, owner of 31 acres north of San Francis- co went before his local Board of Supervisors to offer his property to the people of Sonoma County “as an experiment in living.” In his presenta- tion, Gottlieb elaborated on the advantages of “Land Access To Which Is Denied No One.” He argued that free access to land would reduce the problem of human conflict, by eliminating “the territorial imperative,” and asked Supervisors to support a study to decide conditions of the county’s acceptance of the land. Continuing, Gottlieb described “a new town that would be designed by the people who live in it and marked by folk archi- tecture.”1 Failing to convince the County of the benefits of this bequest, in spring of the next year, Gottlieb transferred the property directly to God through a legitimate deed signed at the Sonoma County Recorder’s office. This delirious episode in ideological philanthropy is documented in Home Free Home, Ramon Bayaron Sender’s online book about two 60s open land communes2 - Morningstar and Wheeler’s Ranch3. Through interviews and anecdotes, former residents describe a period of time without social or economic rules or boundaries. Their experience at these “open-door” communes carried such impact that, over 30 years later, com- mune members maintain ties through a list-serve that provides a stream of conversation on present day concerns: politics, spirituality, healthcare and open land.4 Their accounts of self-organized rural life meet and exceed the stereotypes of Northern California hippie culture preserved by period pho- tojournalism: long-hair, ‘free’ sex, hallucinogens, hedonism and hepatitis.
    [Show full text]
  • Manhood in the Age of Aquarius | Book Index
    Manhood in the Age of Aquarius Index Tim Hodgdon Index N.B.: The locators in this index refer to chapter number and paragraph number, separated by a period. When a locator points to the preface or introduction, it will take the form of pref. 8 or intro. 22. Locators pointing to endnotes consist of chapter number and endnote number, separated by n or nn. When counting paragraphs in the text, block quotations are counted as part of the paragraph. If a paragraph resumes after a block quotation, it, too, is counted as part of a single paragraph, even if the block includes indented paragraphs. Epigraphs and headings are not counted. Acid. See LSD Alpert, Richard, intro. 2, 2.45 Amazing Dope Tales, 4n1 America Needs Indians (Stuart Brand), 2.23 Anarchism, intro. 10. See also Counterculture; Diggers Anderson, Chester, 2.22 Artists' Liberation Front, 1.2, 1.10 Astral Continental Congress. See The Caravan Attachment theory, 5.53, 5n65 Bailey, Beth, pref. 9, 3.15, 4.62 Bargar, Peter, 5.47, 5.48 Bates, Albert, 5n18, 6.82 Becker, Howard, 4n16 Bederman, Gail, 2.19 Beinfield, Harriet, 3.46 Berg, Judy. See Goldhaft, Judy Berg, Peter, 1n57, 2.12–13, 3.7, 3.18–19 © 2007 Columbia University Press www.gutenberg-e.org/hodgdon 1 of 21 Manhood in the Age of Aquarius Index Tim Hodgdon Diggers, co-founder of, 1.9–10 Diggers, countercultural politics of, 1.33 and free stores, concept of, 1.42–45 guerrilla theater, critique of, 1.8–9 and life-actor, concept of, intro.
    [Show full text]
  • Uncommon GROUND Exhibitions and Programs Exploring Self-Sufficiency, Community and Visions of Utopia SUMMER 2011
    516 ARTS & The Alvarado Urban Farm present unCOMMON GROUND exhibitions and programs exploring self-sufficiency, community and visions of utopia SUMMER 2011 exhibitions: AcRoss The GReat DiviDe • WoRlds outsiDe ThiS one JUNE 4 – AUGUST 27 opening reception: Saturday, June 4, 6–8pm • 516 ARTS, Downtown Albuquerque 516 ARTS www.516arts.org Nonprofit Org 516 Central Avenue SW PROGRAM PARTNERS: U.S. POSTAGE Albuquerque, NM 87102 P A I D 516 ARTS FUSION Theatre Company t. 505-242-1445 Albuquerque, NM open Tue – Sat, 12-5pm Permit No. Alvarado Urban Farm The Guild Cinema 749 Basement Films Harwood Art Center The Box Performance Space Littleglobe Center for Contemporary Art Re-Source Downtown Action Team ABOVE: Roberta Price, Making Adobes, Reality Construction Company, on mesa near Arroyo Hondo, NM, June 1969; LEFT: N55, Spaceframe Vehicle; RIGHT: Jay Nelson, The Golden Gate 1, photo by Jack Halloway EVENTS more info: www.516ARts.ORG PANEL DISCUSSION SAT, JUNE 4, 2pm 516 ARTS presents THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE COUNTERCULTURE: The Role of Women & the Place of Architecture Join artists, curators and guest scholars for a panel discussion in conjunction with the exhibitions opening the same evening at 516 ARTS (6-8pm). Panelists will discuss the eclectic architectural styles developed by commune members of the 1960s and 70s, and the often-misunderstood status of women in these rural communes. Some of the panelists will share personal experiences of the communal lifestyle of that era at Libre and Red Rockers, communities in the Huerfano Valley of Southern Colorado, where they lived close to the earth to fulfill basic human needs, raise families, educate children and design and build their own homes.
    [Show full text]