![Visit of the World Bank Review Mission to Karnataka - Informative Notes on Bijapur Drought Prone Area Project [DPAP] - September 1979 - 149.377 B5](http://data.docslib.org/img/87295b40cbeddd9edaf7a23c461c580e-1.webp)
THE WORLD BANK GROUP ARCHIVES
PUBLIC DISCLOSURE AUTHORIZED
Folder Title: Visit of the World Bank Review Mission to Karnataka - Informative Notes on Bijapur Drought Prone Area Project [DPAP] - September 1979 - 149.377 B5
Folder ID: 891081
Project ID: P009692
Dates: 09/01/1979 - 09/01/1979
Fonds: Records of the South Asia Regional Vice Presidency
ISAD Reference Code: WB IBRD/IDA SAR
Digitized: 11/8/2018
To cite materials from this archival folder, please follow the following format: [Descriptive name of item], [Folder Title], Folder ID [Folder ID], World Bank Group Archives, Washington, D.C., United States.
The records in this folder were created or received by The World Bank in the course of its business.
The records that were created by the staff of The World Bank are subject to the Bank's copyright.
Please refer to http://www.worldbank.org/terms-of-use-earchives for full copyright terms of use and disclaimers.
M THE WORLD BANK Washington, D.C.
@ International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / International Development Association or The World Bank 1818 H Street NW Washington DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000 Internet: www.worldbank.org A1998-012 Other*: 125 140088B vqisft of the Worid Bank Review Mission to Karnataka - Informnative Notes on Bijapur Drought Prone Area ProJect [OPAPI -September 1979 - 149.377 B5 Iflh
CL 0~0E u
z
00
I 7. .
I-5 Wfficers present at the meting held. at 4,00 PM on 11.9.1979 at Bangalore with the World 'Ban Mission to review the Programmes of Bijapur DPAP.
1. R. Anandakris hm , IAS, Development Commissioner, Bangalore. 2., Mani Narayanaswamil S Commissioner for Specia Boonomi Programmess 'Bangalore. 3* Dr*E.PuitasvamaiaIh Dire-etor. DPAP9 Bangalore 4. V.K,K.Sarea ~ZY Director, Apecial Eonomic Programmes, Bangalore.
Depuy Devaepmnt Commissioner & Depaty Secetary to Government, R.D. & C.Department, Bangalore.
6. S*V,,Ranganiath, USB, Doputy Socretary to Governmntj AgrculureDepartmentg
7* Brahm Dutt, Deputy Secretary to Government, Plamning Department,$ Bangalore. 8. V.P. Naib, fmg'ing Director, Karnataka Land Army Corporationg Bang alare. 9.9 Dr *K, aap, Ia I Dept xmk Commdisioner, Bijapur District. 10. B.X*Bhattacharya, Director of Horticulture, Bangalore.
11 H.V*Putta Naik, Addl.Director of Agriculture(0), Bangalore.
12. B. 9. Rampur 9 Joiht Director of Agriculture(SC) Bang alore*
13. 14 jayara J, Director of, Pisheries, Bang alore. /2
14. p,-Ry.J#ttyt conservator ofFws# 'Belgaux*
Depu. Consevator Of Pbrests(Eq)
16, Dr.V.S..Teshis Anim Husandry & VetyServ:Lcesf
r7. Shantasmu COMBOlt IASP proec00t Diretr DPP
is. VsYasudeax4n Re .
D*V*10,pmgn&Offict, E BA.R.* C Bagalr* 1 . N4ay*raj Ra, DeptrBeay Ditob govrnmte~ .BaLgalore.
Aasitan Vierocryto.) enm indut res&CtearCO, .t Bang alarb.
Foo & Foe Departmet, under 8*cretaxy to GoVerMnt.
Bangalore. BIJAPUR, tP.LA.P.
1. Narrative Report on DPAP 7 Bijapur (1975--1979)
2. Obsiervationd of IDA Review mission -13 taken. (October 1978) and action IDA R eview 3. Note on obs erv ations of Mission regarding m.I.Works- justification for taking up 14 -19 additional works.*
4. Note on Jagjeevani CAD - Pilot 20 24 Project*
Annex - A - Statement of financial 25 achievements ,.
B - Statement of Physical2 Annex - . 6 achievements. NARRATIVE REPORT OF D.P.A.P. BIJAPUR (WB.A. FOR THE PERIOD Em nF MR,, 1979 J1ANUARY 1975 TO THE
INTRODUCTION: six districts in the Bijapur District is one of the of the Drought Prone country selected for the implementation The basic objectives Area Programme- with World Bank Assistance, stabilise production from of the DPAP are;(eto increase and
(b) to reduce the severity agriculture and related activities the ecological of the impact of drought and (c) to restore since January 1975 balance. The programme has been in operation of June 1980. The sectors and will -be continued till the end soil conservation, included in the programme are minor irrigation, dryland farming, soil survey, pasture development, afforestation, horticulture, sericulture, sheep development, dairy development, to small and marginal farmers fisheries and monetary assistance
and agricultural labourers in the farm of subsidy.
Government For the purpose of executing the programme, Development Authority under the has set up the Drought Prone Area Bijapur, with the imple- Chairmanship of the Deputy Commissioner, as members, and with the menting officers and some non-officials 1979-80 this - Secretary. However, in project Director as Member A District Rural Develop- set up has undergone slight modification. and it has been made responsible ment Society has been registered Economic Programmes, for the implementation of all the Special
including UPAP., 6 5 Period is Rs.1,3 3, 0 lakhs The outlay provided for the Project of Rs.536,28 lakhs. As against including a price contingency provision of Ria-.581.58 lakh has been the Project Outlay, an expendkture and the outlay proposed foi incurred upto the end of 1978-79
It Is anticipated that the year 1979-80 is R.339.62 lakhs upto a total expenditure of Rs.921.20 lakhs will be incurred terminal period. The the end of 1979-BO or at least by the since inception sector-wise allocations and expenditure incurred given at annex.. A. and the outlay proposed for 1979-80 are
PRGAM IMLMNA I
construction of minor irrigation t. MINOR_ RRIGATION: The work of to Karnataka Land Army Corporation. tanks and barrages is entrusted river near Anaga- Out of the 9 works, the barrage across Ghataprabha are completed and wadi and tank works of Bijjargi and Mukarthihal the total outlay, an amount other 6 works are in progress. Out of end of March 1979. The of Rs.138.54 lakhs has been spent till the
total employment generated is 6,79,252 mandays.
Area Development Master 2. COMMAND AREA DEVELOPMENT: The Command of each command area. Plans have to be prepared for the development at Jaga:livani, The Master Plan in respect of 8 irrigation works Bijjargi, Gundwan site No.I, Mukariihal, Bommanahalli, Advihulagubal, 4ean and barrage work across the river Ghataprabha at Anagawadi have
financing banks for the preparation completed and sent to the concerned in respect df barrage work of the bankable schemes. The Master Plan Director of Agriculture at Kadinvi is under preparation with the Deputy to .ake up the Command and the Executive Engineer. It is proposed of Area Development of Jaolivani Tank on a pilot project basis out
Drought Prone Area Programme funds. -3-
3. SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION: and an (i) 50IL SURVEY: The soil survey work is completed area of 3.62 lakh hectares has been survey-d with an expenditure of Rs.7,19 lakhs. Witb this, the soil surey werk of the entire b een dis tric t is now comsplete as th e remdininq aean h as alr eady surveyed by other Government Agencies. Steps are being taken to consolidae the reports prepared by the different agencies.
(ii) SOIL CONSERVATION: In the D'PAP Bijapur, two Deputy
Directors of Agriculture (Soil Conservation), are in position, one in.-oharge of Bijapur Division and the other in-chlarge of
Bagalkot Division and they are looking after soil conservation 0 7 1 5 1 works. The area bunded so far in the district is 43, . hec- tares. Six farm ponds have also been taken up and completed.
The expenditure incurred on these two items of programme is
Rs.167.11 lakhs and the employment generated is about 12,80,000 mand ays.
(iii) DRYLAND FARMING: Of the 14 water sheds selected in this district for integrated area development, 3 watersheds, namely
Managuli, Hungund and Badami have been selected for dryland farming programme. Two more watersheds, one in Sindgi Taluk and
one in Indi taluk are being taken up for dryland farming during
1979-80. The area covered under dryland farming programme in all
the selected water sheds is 30,956 hectares. 978 plot demonstrations,
both large and small scale have been taken up. 56 training visits
of the farmers were organised and 4,080 farmers have been trained
under dryland technology. The amount spent so far is Rs.8.54 lakhs.
(iv) AFFORESTATION AND PASTURE DEVELOPMENT: The achievements
under different items of forestry programme are as given below: SA. Advancedt Planting Maints- No .. - .------
1. Area under sal plantation Hect. 1665.16 1716.66 299.00 2. Eatt. of village W00d lct* Hect. 583.40 246.40 204.00 1. Wind breaks Km. 146.00 146.00 20,00 4. Tres planting In conjunction with pasture. Hqct. 769.O 769.00 681 .0 + 150.00 (Encl.CPT)
S. Puts pastur-e -Het. 2642.56 988.00 1175.00- , + liT5.00 ( enclosure) 6. Eatt. of Gras Seed multi- plication farm. Hect. Irri- gation. 34.15 34.75 34.73 Dry 30.75 30.75 38.75 Stylos 12.00 12.00 12.00 a ------e --
The expenditure incurred so faran all the items of forestry
programme is Re.122.37. lakha and the employment genvrated is about 20,74,000 mandays.
(V) DAIRY DEVELOPMENT: It was envisaged to organie and esta-
blish 80 primary dairy co-operatives during the entire project period,
of which 63 societies have been organised so far. Other itams of
dairy development programnes are supply of cattle feed, hen.th coverage
and artificial insemination service and extension education under
dairy farming. One apear head team for dairy development programme
has bden sanctioned. It is planned to have a second spearhead team
for the southern part of the district with BIgalkot as headquarters.
So far 852 milch animals have been purchased and given to the membeze
of the primary dairy co-operative soc4eties by sanctioning credit
to the tune of 12.00 lakhs. Two chilling plants of the capacity of
4,000 litrea each, one at Bijapur and one at BagalkOt have been
established. It is pvopaed #* establish a silk chilli" - 5
Th- processing plant with a Capacity of 20,00F Litres at Bijpur. plans and estimates are under study.
Societies (vi) SHEEP DEVELOPMENT: Of the 21 sheep growers Co-operative sovieties (with 100 hectares pasture plots) to be drgrised, so far 15 have been registered and 13 axe actually functioning. One spearhead team for sheep development is sanctioned and it is in position. Attem-
cb19ts , three 4-hett. pts were made to establish ten 1; tuz private plots, two 6-hect.plots, one 3-hect. plot and one -- hect,
pasture plt, 74 cross bred rams have 4een distributed. Breeding
of fit Corrisdale Deccani Cross-bred rams has been taken up at the
Ram Muldiplication Centres, Suttatti, as a part of Sheep development an amount of programme. Under the Animal Husbandry Sector, so far
R8.46.51 lakhs has been spent and employment generated is about
1 66,000 mandays.
(vii. )FISHERIES DEVELOPMENT: The following programmes have been
taken up under Fisheries Development:-
1) Extension of Bhutnal Fish Farm and Constvuction of staff quartersu
2) 8 Fish Rearing Ponds are completed;
3) A fish seed production farm at Narayanapur has been taken up. 39 bzeeding ponds, 100 breeding cisterm ponds, 60 hatching ponds, 100 nursery ponds, have been constructed. 200 rearing ponds are under construction.
4) 3 Taluk level nurseries at Bijapur, Jamkhandi and Badami are completed and one at Mungund is in progress.
An amount of Rs,70.22 lakhs has been spent on the above programmes
and the employment generated is about 2,93,000 mandays, -6-
viii) SERICULTURE: One de onstration-cuii-seed farm has bLel
establish at Haveli near Bagalkot. As against tht targe- of supplying 16,000 bundles df mulb:y cuttings, so faf 17,73G
bundles have been supplied to cover an area of 327 -MY:es ard
303 farmers have been trained so far in imberry planttions
and rearing of silk worm. Establishment of one-aqre farm of
mulberry has been taken up in the lands of 327 beneficiories.
A sum, of Rs.6,01 lakhs has been spent so far under the sr-
culture sector and the direct employment generated is about
6,7O mandays.
ix) HORTICULTURE: The following two schemes are taken up uncder
the Horticulture Sector.
1. Promotion of fruit cultivation
2. Establishment of nurseries
The progress in raising and distribution of fruit plants
is as given below:
Raising Distribution
I. Ber 3,33,545 3,08,294
2. Mango 75,000 62,915
3. Coconut 31,000 28,500
4. Sapota 35,500 30,769
5. Jackfruits 26,920 26,920
6. Lime 2,000
7. Pomagrenate 4,551
The total amount of Rs.1.2.33 lakhs is spent and the employment
generated is about t3,000.mandays. -7
x) MIXED ORCHARDS: 29flacres has been brought under mixed orchards as against the target of 200 acreas
xi) CREDIT: A Banking plan has been pr epred for advarcing credit undar various sectoral programmes. The total outlay unc'::r
Credit advance is of the order of Rs.36706 lakhs. The crdit oriented sectoral programmes and the total credit required drg the project period is given below:
51. Name of the Development Credit require- Credit actually No. Sector ment during the advanced since project period inception of
(Rp, in lakha) (Rs. in lak!hs)
1. Minor Irrigation (CAD) 112.15
2. Sheep Development 113,00 -
3., Dryland farming 7.50 7.50
4. Dairy Development 191.40 12.08
5. Sericulture 22,80 0,20
6. Horticulture 15.00 C.26
Fisheries Development 16.75 0.32 7. ------Total: a6T,06 20.36
xii) SUPERVISION AND CONTROL: Taluk Level watershed planning and
management committees have been formed for all the 11 taluks of the
district by Government to review the work done by the various imple-
menting officers under the Chairmanship of the Assistant Commissioner
of the concerned sub-division.
The statement showvng the year-wise, sector-wise physical targets
and achievements from 1974-75 to 1978-79 is enclosed at Annex - B. MISIO JBWRDBN REVIEW TPRN _ EA1:RJCT - RET-TO ~OU1H DaU-PRGN (OC oBE 1978) Bi jaur and Acto 02 os--ratio onD EAP ------on DPA? - Ch.ekliOt of observatione -A---- A- -Ynen
Observat'i"on5 - --
appraisal report, it 1 Iniflheorarginael viabes tahrooea tOi 1ae 2 ir: igatinao 2or.I ta kr ks Dhe r , g tanks are not ecorlOricai t oi m a e s w a s p r po O s d 5 dp r a i s l e t i dh eiz o 6~s 1 -fi : i# f a e u p t o Ma r c ,9 f i t s Wi l l b e c o - e s e t h a t b e n n aod it i o t o t h -0tos u me rit e t isa k e n10o u pI t o s order un tod s w9 oworks, rk s w e tna epit a n sben cutr u eback n t t o t ini li s e f enraedf rp as dairyinlg. tnwrsdr;g17-9 w e h l b e mnrc pr~gae aotiiie 8 ch zpce-'fl&c b wh c th a r e being n d ank pojl d prhe tank e . tl a e u 6e f es o evaluation shows anhle the addntioispl nalduol more .v ofr e ntili n r .ap O It th oial esti- n being comple e wihi ortano-s a re and in each case to prsent. r Oeaeray case basis Attemptsi wilbe be cns to opomica mates.h e a n d b e with reference oj e cgt e t w r is the cost and beneits e d a n d t h e p r B b f r th a I b e r e vi e w orks to thepresen~t Worl miso aculyvst c n ot i d a ta io na on ev alution ~~~after the we, f-a r h oeo 3t., a 0 saib le -p. e w,me ou d Pes e henefi catb n takenth e ccmp,-Leted tanks. s b b asd i page 14 a]lso. e cost b n i f i es otf p o e d hic c mp nent a e co om l ke th a ea ir i- th -6valuto- 2. LLroject Attempts arebenmaefrvlutg taa a pilot Project ee Arasirogramme is the individual project.Cs Pouo-ht Prone and the ma bedfficult. invative comniOfents lysis for every sche agencies And cont-.ifls several know as to of 4pcaie is essential to H~owever, the help Banga- quantitative evidence At 1prebent o Mngent, econmicall-y viable. lik Ind~ren Institute ollege of which cevmpofl~nts are the area irri- Stf on beefits like lore and Administrativ ha bensoght. The no data is available changb of cropping 1H dEZ'abad, a number of years, India, Maaeent, Bngalore gated ovc2 and yields. As such Institute of crolping intens~ity, detailed Indianl of the Dairy pro- pattern, on the am evaluatio Colee sl ouJ-d focus initially to deter- conducted instative Staff evaluation project componlents gramrflae and the Ad agera analYSiC_ of individual viable and detcrminre As curnl oenduting ,economic5all eill be Hyderabad, mine if they are employment. It for providing their potential Action taken ------bsr- -i ------data needs to be to -idjtr exactly what a)r ta&c collected to draw p ink to analyse tcata so rlectd compoot r has also ben made as to (a.) whethCXr A recommendation Qliretp, co)n4usO wether t he India to entrust the for laro ca lye r b a to the Government of ltabee viab e or () in respect of MI. modifiad to becoe pcanica-ly cost bonefit analysis ne The guidele on cost- Consultants. they shoArd be dopyed. works of Biapur to hethr provided by the New Delhi enfit methodolo wu be suggested to take the of the World Ban ae fice like IIM or Agricultural istan of orgnisations etc. niverst-4es for analysing the data hs y nou 3 . stKrp ,g,1 ment:n y pncur Hffort s be made to encourage farmers to raging two societi-- t t ant onc-i8rs hod eanthes on private and communal development on the o n aet1979-8 land'as the apabii ty of these specis to seed very an attempt i en in seasonl, to multiply tneir relativeO uipalatabili~ty encourage private farmers cose to thie ground ease with which seed f growth bhasy and the grass seeds. te e for a rapid increase of be collecte hld pronis insti- c t is also suggested to angeland improem ht. programme by guaranteeing tute a seed miplication quality graded seed. mers a- firm price for
10 hotare ateblcs have 9 i~htont of above, 2 societies Ha. As mentioned be tt establishment of 100 e devloph" It is frward to take uppst~ to large coma own, bu a mpatical approach of these ment on their pature blckE is ovement as the effect ale ongin land from DnPA B our ultimate ep societies has been to pro- assistance locks and oQmitant is that iupdiv and societies feed for a few privileged aim ddvalopments on de heavily Eiubsidse 'should take up pastr and the cost of fencing upply of s c,'L shcep scieties be little their own; with only ree D'AP. aremembers inordinatly hih and there appears to guidnc oming from alo and technical ncin the farmer land available. it is This require conk orno more government more broadly based lie-stok uggested to crganise in this direction hs of the succss- extension work co-operatites by muaing the experience already bean started. ul dairy co-operatives as a guide. Observations Acintae
5. Dairyo--g p- at-ivesa strongly that It is noted that dairy deeopment has had moe We agree and feel. equally 3n jaur impact on 2armez' income than any other component o it is absolutely neeUseary to Programme with sho8tate the project and as such there is need for strengthe Dairy Devalopment grawme . Evon thnugia mi- k pr dduc- ing the dai-+y rL-:pr t services and sugge ete d to bring .Level Fro all dairy activ:|tie under DPAP in the State to the tion in Bj is m w the fluslh seasoll we respective Statc Dairy Develop,.ent Corporations so envisaged, jet, during the arket:the milk and thus that the cororatins could provi-e nec-esaary service were unable to put a limit on the and infrastruetvre support to handle the expected were constrained to rural Dairy Centre increase ir milk sales. inflow of milk into the from the Co-operative ietiee, Thus an the one hand, the co-opeativ soieties and individual farmers suffered because of this restriction and on the thar han, thel RDC was forced to sepaate milk incurring a 0 heavy luss. If the linkage is eetablished with the neighbouring districts or with the State Level net work, we can acept and msrket the entire milk. -In 1979-80 flush season, we hope to establish link w ith the newly e stablished Dampo dairy plant at ' A-5*rjgi in Jam!kh-andi Taluk an~d w-th th,. priposed mil'r pou der plant at Hi2bli -Dhairwar which sevsoth-.er DEAF ar-eas in Dharwad, Belgaum, Bellary,et o. also. T-ie following is the annual estimated oapacity of Dempo plant and the HubIi-Dharar 1lant which is proposed to be established. --- - 0------
850 1 Whole Milk pode 600 20 2 Skimmed Milk powde 450150 3 Inf ant f ood 180- 4 Weaning food 500 5 Maltex 2000 6 Butter & Ghee
graded bund S eial graned The Stations are afvs-in an plges -O a gr ot- btands, There nd Research Iund i acqisrinre stance to help in Universit. us in e and moisture h a ntifi t i soil ne i m i in farmer's fields. It The progress of acquiring C vseniaCn to have more co-operation progres, These wi b y fr tr o exeri- os'aln suggested Dryeerch Universities mental basis at t-ina'ally with lAR and Sta* e Agicultural t IdenAiR ad adapt farm tools suitable for stationdistributedon and if theysubsided are foud rates.efti Wtsoil nd oistr 00n yn be soi an mo s nsertrovation a l d farming and to encourae trOUh the ex- such suitable fal tension system. that the sudaen wi tificatonelt Ss 4emos0 to wud give farming si y for te dry farming itabe practies ue d It m t iQ-aL6ony. up the ntro- a setba t th dprogramme.ina the form4 of~ frot ie imprsive a that subsidy is given is urged to will ducio o tiscopoen$i working under DPA Th a VLWs programme integrate the DP2etninactivities8ice in thos in the training fortightly (a) State Exteno S be involved with the tEhe &V system of the- oapteed Mttez' Specialists conu'oted by Su.bjecttaluke forthwith, of tra4iing for concerned cluster increc se the frequecey t s period I{b)extenion wke subidis to farmers participating ()re so that they do not in dryla'd den flstrati subsidies etc. come to relJy onl such 8Command Area Development: made As you now, one of the major factors delaying The World Bank Appraisal Mission has delaying comllettn of tanks in Maharashtra is a categorical statement that expenditure on the lack of institioaal finance. To overcome communal works down to the farmer's fields from this, v:3 agrce to GOMs proposal to finance budgetary ratbmr than institutional sources for communal worl clown to the farmer 's fields from command area development would be eligible for budgetar rather than institutional sources so- IDA disbursement as in the case of Maharashtra. that CAD is completed at the same time as the It is presmed that this would apply as well to reservoir. -This is in line with discussions command area develpment in other tates whexe with C on the Maharashtra Major Irrigation lack of imphtn*iaf&1 finance is a major bottle- Troject. Such expenditures would be eligible neck in implementing command area development for IDA 4isbursement. works. It has been decided to takep C.A.D. of one tank out of budgetary resoures, Tis would be a pilot project and with tis we hope to convince the banks about the economic viability of lending for such programmes, 9. Increase in cost of Fasture Bstablishment: It is obskrved that the three-fold increase Regarding the increased cgst of pasture in cost of pasture establishment in Bijapur is establishment in Bijapur, te D tional Forest very contly rnd suggested to investigate the Officer, Bagalkot has explained that earlier the reasons for cuch increase. fencing posts reqaired for barbed wire fencing work were obtained from other dikricts and this resulted in the high cost of fencing which was primarily responsible for the increased cost ot pasture development. Ili cost of raising one hetare of pure pasture has now be en reduced to t 598/- (t 480/- for pre-planting operations and b 118/- for planting operatione). ------Observations Action taken ------
10. M-ster T data in- Regarding the Macter Plan for agajivani The . ohux the benefit to identify the returns from Irrigation tank and the revisea data received sufficient command of Jagjvani thereoi, it i. observed that the benefit data specific crops for the Irrigation tank. If the I.D.A. CCUl- let US is. insuf-ficJlent to identify the retiurns f:!om know t'ho additional inforuiation, we would be speci.'i4c crops and to calculate th!F econom-_2 to sEnd the same, However, we are rato of return for the ta-ak ana sggested the happy Sta11 College Xcoromist,and analyse the requesting the Adai-istrative project to -collect study ncessary data to estimate the e~coomic return whio la at presezt conducting a general in Dijapur to the in-vaetmnt and to send the results of Of aroght Prone Areas Programe to conduct a dtailed cost benefit theDistrict theana~yss.analysis for the Jagjivani ir-rigation tank as a part of. their study and we hope that this study would meet the requirfemants of the I.D.A.
11. Barrcage-owum-lit_ schdmes.: irriga- Regarding two barrage-cum-lift schemes, Rgarding the two barrage-oum-lift information required by I.D.A it is stated that such schemes were not included tion schemes, the the I.D.A. requires any in the project description and as such these two has been forwarded. If would be sent. schemes have aw to be examined by the World Bank further details, the same before finarcing.
12. Audit Karnataka, has Audited accounts in accordance with section The Accountant General, be en reque5-ed to take up the audit 3.03 of the Project Agreement to be sent. already early. REGARDING NOTE ON THE OBSERVATIDNS OF THE IDA REVIEW M1SSION MINOR IRRIGA- M.I.WORKS - JU5TIFICATION FOR TAKING UP ADDITION TION WORKS UhDER DPAP, BIJAPUR.
Mission after In the report prepared by the World Bank Review regarding Irri- their visit to India in October 1978, some comments
put, the observations of the gation Tanks have been made. Briefly
Review Mission are:
costs are 50% - 300% above a) Most tanks are uneconomical (b) to be commensurately appraisal estimates and benefite are unlikely of the minor irriga- higher (c) the number of beneficiaries for each with tion tanks has been small, averaging perhaps 50 beneficiaries, (d) the slow pace of an investment of sum of R9.50,000 per beneficiary, return of this component. CAl works have further reduced the economic
to record With specific reference to Bijapur, we would like
oug reactions to these observations:
(a) ABOUT TANKS BEING UNECONOMICAL:
not The basis for making this rather general observation has
been spelled out in detail. If the basis is (b) and (c) mentioned In above - these points will be discussed in the following paragraphs. mentioned that Annex-5 page 4, para 16 of the Appraisal report, it is
"the construction of tanks would be subject to State Irrigation
the World Bank that Department norms". We would like to assure
before taking up a tank work the plans and estimates are scrutinised
is taken up only if it by experts at different stages and the work
comes within the norms laid down.
,While commenting on the proposal of Government of India the Mission.has commented' regarding the revision of appraisal targets, from that it would be more prudent to utilise funds generated 1s - anti- in order to expand more profitable programmes being cut back and therefore In all drought prone areas vities such as dairying. low precipitation, but the uncertain in Bijapur it is not only the is a pro3lem. For example, and untimely nature of raina which because - goig to be a complete failure the 1979-80 Khaif sean is it the months of June and July when the rainfall did ot cme in would September is expected but that was needed. infall in Auguet, of the areas. The utility and benefit not be of any use to the kharif desirable this - they introduce that rrigation tanks is basically enable the farmers to switch ement of flexibility which would a with confidence. For example, from one crop season to another willshow that overa.period of drive through the ld.Mysrer areas have been constructed. During ecads, at every feasible place, tanks may not fill up but in subsequent years of poor rainfall the tanks suffered in that than make good the set-back years the farmer- can more
dry year.
benefits accuring from It must also be pointed out that the The visible and permanent nature. tank construction are of a more animal husbandry sector is important, dairy development scheme in the or a in adverse conditions, a cow but it may be pointed out that thifg the sense that it is the first buffaloe is the first victim in works is investment on minor irrigation to be sold, In comparison, an an asset which cannot be easily a permanent investment and creates
allienatsd.
are considerable though The social benefits of a tank work for Fodder production is a case they are not easy to quantify. where rainfall, it is the villages consideration. In years of poor the manage to supply fodder through lands are irrigated by tanks which in places, the dairy animals also. Thus lean season and thus sustain where irrigation tanks are feasible, if tank construction is taken up and the farmtrs are helped 'to take up dairying and to grow horti- culture trees, a real and tangible solution to their problems can be found. If this can be done within nazms which are considered economi- cal, then we believe, the case for taking up irrigation tanks would be justified. In the subsequent paragraphs, -it will be shown that costs of constructing irrigation tanks is not &OO% higher then the appraisal estimates and that the investment is much less than Rs.50,00O
per beneficiary.
(b) COSTS OF IRRIGATION TANKS IS 50% 3_00 HIGHER THAN APPRAISAL "ESTIMATES
At the outset, we would like to state that the upper limit
contained in this statement is extremely high. We would like to point out that the figures used to work out the per hectare cost in
the appraisal report were unrealistic and hence the entire cost norm
has become unrealistic. Secondly, the figures given in the Appraisal
report were worked out in the years 1973-74 and since then there has
been a considerable increase in the schedule of rates. It is for
this reason that a provision for price contingency to the tune of 69%
has been made in the Appraisal report (page-16, Para4.51 and 4.52)
Inspite of the price hike, tank works have been completed and will be
completed at a maximum of 70% higher cost than the appraisal report
cost norm and the original estimate.
This is shown in the table that follows.
.... contd..... - iT
(as per Appra'sal Table 'howing estimated expenditure for Bijapur DPAP X.I ,Works report) and Actual expenditure ( exclud ing 'CAD). Actual 51. Command Cost per- No. M.I.Works -are(HA) mitted as coT per Appl. lakhs ince- Xep0-t of ase ( Ann,5 EupSee ------Table-10 ------
40.90 44. 00 7.8% 1. Jigjeevani 974 351 14.74 22. 0,i 2. Mukartihal 21.42 30,50 LT% 3undwan 510 4.11 4.89 048% 4. Bijjargi 98 400 16. E0 21.00 5, r, 5, Advihulagbal 24.15 35 ,.00 6 % 6. Katral 575 24.89 39.00 64% 7. Bomanahalli 583 1j72 578Z 24.00 -
NOTES ON THE TABLE
are proposed lift irrigation A. The works at sl.No.(B) and (9) shown are only foc th8 schemes and the expenditure figures the cost of barragq*bonstruction. Even after the inclusion cf the works will be cost of installation of L.I. equipment, appraisal report no.:-ms. completed well within the Appraisal Report norms, B. It may be pointed out that -in the for land acquisition. a sum of Rs.510 per Ha. is included only the LAn, offioec has been Actual compensation as decided by 2 per in the range of Rs.1 0O - 1600 per acre (Rs.300-R.,4000 of land acquisition has been Hta,) This increase in cost increase in the cost of exetu.tion partly responsible for the of these works.
.. ITH AN INVESTMENT OF SUM OF (c) THE NUMHER OF BENEFICIARIES 15 SMLL 4 Rs.50, 000 PER BENEFICIARY
is not applicable to the works This is a generalisation which for three works are rtadily available taken- uFI in Bijapur. Figures
and are'reproduced below; cs ko.of bEne- Total ; of .erag t No. Name of tank fficiaries work (plud- per Ptefi:i . ing ) -
1. Jqgjeevani 223 (LEC- 99 Rs,44 laki Rs.19,730 (R C-124 5 1 2. Mukartihal 107 (-L3C- 59 Rs.22 lckh5 Ps.2c, (RBC-38 lakhs Rs.,22,101 3. Gundwan 138 Rs.30.50
These statistics will show that the cost p[r beneficiary is w Further we would below the Rs.50,000 figure quoted by the Mission. and like to point out that this is only the initial investment
levied on the beneficiaries expenditure. Betterment contribution is of contribution as per the Karnataka Irrigation (Levy Betterment per bane- and Water Rate) Act, 1957. So if the exact expenditure from him a, beter ficiary has to be calculated, the amount recoverable ment contribution should be deducted.
(d) THE SLOW PACE OF CAD WORKb HiVE FURTHER REDgED I THE. _NO RATE OF RETURN OF THIS COMPONENT
we admit This is one observation which is extremely relevant and However we that we have been slow in this rather important sphere. up the CAD works are happy to report th-t -it has been decided to take
of one tank entirely out of budgetary sources as a pilot project. banks have We are also happy to report that in case of -two tanks-, the
plans ere under agreed to take up loaning for CAIl and their banking
scrutiny by the A.R.D.C. Once the pilot project is successfully
and economics completed, we are confident of proving the utility
of CAD to the banking institutions.
is with this background, that a proposal has been moved
with the Government of India that in the case of Bijapur, part of the of some new savings should be diverted for taking up the construction -19 -
eze as minor irrigation works. The works proposed to be taken up
follows:
Nauetimtd Ligf iaiL 1.e Cost pL c
-
- R.3, 42 5 1. Kavalgi hr 10.79 315 Ha. 2 ayl5.57 110 Ha. Rs 5, C63 - 3. Aagi Barrrage) 17.81 512 Ha. fis.3,4-(
4. Arjungi '30.00 532 ha. Rs.5f640 6 ,20 5 5~. &othe 2.50 40 Ha. Rs. R 5, 840 Todalbagi 22.77 390 Ha
by the of ficars The detailW- plane and etimates are being examined at the most 50% of the Irrigation Department. The cost per Ha. is of Rs.4,200 per Ha. higher than the Appraisal Report cat norms Report (Annex-5 - Table-10) Considering the fact that the Appraisal
cost norms were formulated in 1973-74, it is felt that the uxpenditura out that envisaged is on the rensonable aide. It may also be pointed
the proposed irrgati on works are s-tuatEd in the moat backward
pockets of the drought prone Bijapur district -ind therefore the both coitruction of those works would bcY of immense help to the farmers
from the economic and-moral point of view. It may also be mentioned
that after detailed survey a list of viable minor irrigation projects
in Bijapur is being compiled. If for any reason, any of the six be fresh works proposed, cannot be taken up, DPAP Bijapu= should
it comes within permitted to take up an alternative work provided
the State Government Irrigation norms. ni Tank sn a Hotregardingcommand Area Devel-pmentogiv Pilot TPro;ectb'Lss clearly and specifically 1. In the Appraisal Report, the IDA has of the Irrigration mentioned that the Command Area Development TIDM s should go hand- tanks taken up under the ,orld Bank aidd tanks. in hand with the actual construction of the
set up to 2. In order to make this possiole a Commi.ttee was for the C m'riand draw up CAD Master Plans. The task of financing in cors ltation Area Development was assigned to different banks fact that the command area with them and ARDC. Inspite of the and circulated to the development plans have been prepared have not yet come forward to comcerned bank branches, the banks by the take up actual loaning. The bankable schemes prepared of two tanks, Syndicate Bank to take up Commandr Area i)evelopment to be under namely, Jagjivani and Gundwan are now reported
scrutiny by the ARDC :which is the refinancing agency.
3. Alarmed by this slow progress on the Command. Area Development the 'tate and front, the DADA, Bijapur took up the matter with be Central Governments and requested that hD-DA Bijaput should of atleast permitted to take up the Command Area Development various one tank work, on a pilot project basis so that the work would come to problems faced in the implementation of this cost the fore, such a pilot project would also .show the actual
of command area development. We felt that the pilot project
woi2ld also be a concrete case for the scrutiny by the commercial
banks who could then be persuaded to take up lending for command
area development.
Contd.... during its vis t 4. In the meanwhile, the IDA Review Mission to India in Se! tember 'october 1978 also categorically stated that if the command area d velopment expenditure could be met out of budgetary sources, such expenditure would reimbursable by the World 13ank.
t nt t 5. It is learnt that the Uentral G vern ent has
decided to permit W'1P, 3ijapur, to take up command area
development cf one tank work on pilot project basis. It ha
been de.cided to take ur the command area dev lb mbnt ot the Jagjivani tnk. In this tank, the .construction of bund
has been completed and the canals are nearing completion and
that is why this tank haj been preferred to some of the other
tanks, which are still under construction. This tank has a
command of 974 Hectares. It is proposed to get the command
area development work of Jagjivani tank carried out through the
Karnataka Land Army Corporation. The K. L.\. C. was asked to
work out the details of the likely cost end they have reported
that they would be able to execute the work with an approximate
cost of Ps. 916/- per hectare. it may be noted that in the
estimates for the tank, provision has been made for command
area develo Ment at a cost of "s. 1750/- per hectare and in the
command area development aster -lan report, at the rate of
1520'- oer hectare. The KTLAC has expressed the view tiat
it would not be necessary to line the water courses with stone
lining as the section of the water courses will be small. Hence,
it is proposed to provide ;rass turfing to wat-r couIrses, They have further pointed out t'iat, roughly only 50 A of the total
irrigable area will need levelling as th- remaining land is
Contd.., 2P -d
comanand ar'ea, are of a almost flat. Further, the soils in the from 15 cus to shallow and medium type with soil depth raing exposure of the 45 cms. Drastic levellinm may result in thri rul&1 out. undecomposed horizon of the soil and is, therefore, propar distriu'ion Minor levelling would be done to facilitpte if irri ;atiOn of water and rest would be left to the agency cost of water which is the b st lev ller. The detils of the Karnataka comand area development have been worked out by the
Land Army Corporation and they are as follows:
I. EARTH NT0RK:
S Item Total Rate Total Cost per No. length hectare
1. Water course 0.18 Sq. ,. section with 9.2.00 grass turfing 38620-H per M. 77240.00 7T.34 Field drains open 323464 '-.3.00 59124.00 59.96 with 0.604 section qnty 3 per cum 17708A 3. Graded bunds 127559 ".1.90 169434.0 171.84 section 0.72 Mletres per cum Sq. cq. -,nty. 89176M 4. Outlet work 18 Nos. s%.400 each 720:. 00 7.30 Total 317.44
II. MASQNRY RK
Si. items Total Rate Total Cost per he- No* tes length cost otare ap rox. 1. Drops on water courses 161 Nos. .150/- 24150.00 24-49 each 2. Drops on field 123 Nos. '.150/- 18450.00 18.71 drains each 3. Division boxes 31 Nos. "3. 350/- 10850.00 11.00 each 4. Cr:ssing of water 17 Nos. ?i. 750/- 12750.00 12,93 coursez each 5. Outlets for 510 Nos. s. 100/- 51000.00 51.72 graded hunds each Total: 118.85
Contd.. III- LAND, L"V"LING: A6 aescribed earlier, drastic land levelling is not to be d-sne in cases like jagievani whtere the soil mantle is thin. 'Hence, it is estimated that a tractor and dozer unit should
work for 12 hours I H $0/- per hour on an average per hectare to level the area and make it fit for irrigation.
50% area proposed to be levelled: 487 Hect. @ P. 600/- Ha. = 2,92,200 = 296.34
Hence, the cost of developing the com rand area at Jagjeevani on hectare basis would be as follows:
1. Earth work Ps. 317.44 -2 Masonery Ps. 118.85 3. Land Levelling Ps. 296.34
s. 732.63 4, 'kIgineering contingencies and work cha'rge establish- ment - 25/6. 183.15 ~?915.78 Say "s. 916.00 per hectare.
This cost of Ps. 916.00 per hectare compares favourably th the estimated cost of command area development as provided
for in the World 3ank Appraisal Report. In that report, at
Annexure-5, T'able 13, it is estimated that the cost of command
area developmgent per hectare would come to R. 1500/- with the f.cll6wing break-up:
a) Land watercourses (with soil cement) P, 370.00/Ha. b) Field channels P. 25900/i e) Land levelling -. 500.00/" d) Water storage tank unit 4. 50.00/" 0) Egineering - 15? /,. 180.00/W f) Coitingency . 150.00/' Rs. 1500t00/. ------eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee Hence the cost of command area development of the entire irrigible area under the daggeevani tank would come to . 8,92,184.00 Say s 8,92,000.00.
6. For the actual eution of the command area development t is proposed to follow the procedure laid down belw:
k) The plans and estimates for the command area development of each outlet would be prepared by the KIAC and technically sanctioned by the competent officer in that Organisation. The
DPAP Authorities would then sanction the work administratively, Only after studying the expenditure for command area development in the first two outlets, sanction would be given for continuing command area development in the other outlets.
ii) The work will be executed by the KLAO keeping in view the principles and objectives of the D' AP and wherever possible
human labour wo ld be employed. The use of mechanical machines,
if they cause a stabstantial reduction in the cost, would be permitted with the prior approval of the D-'AP.
iii) In the matter of land levelling and construction of graded bunds, the KLAC should employ technical hands and should satisfy the DThAP authorities that they possess the necessary expertise to carry out this work. In the event of their
failure to do so, arrangements sho-ld be made by the Government
to land a few hands to the Karnataka Land Army Corporation for technical guidance of the land levelling/land shaping
component of the command area development. ANNE X-A L 1979-60. expenditure, outlay for the year tl for the V Plan period, year-wise Statmant ahowing the totaL og ay5 (Ps. in lakhs).
-- .-Total - -- f Outleyfor 1-9 7 B r th. yo .--- Total. f ut l 19575-76 1976-7 1977-7 1918.9 14. Sector. Period. --- ...... ------
35 .2 8, 138 ,54 10 0 , 21 I.ri gati on . 3- - - 30 ,59 40 .18 32 .49 7320 1.Min or 48.70 39.26 175,30* 15.06 24.60 40.49 2. Soil Conration. 265.42 Dryland Farming. 30.00 13.50 21.11 122.37 31.84 31.46 24,46 3. Afforestatofn, 1856 2.44 2.22 12.33 8.00 Aoret ti.77 . 11.17 1.33 2.46 3.80 4, 25.00 16.86 23.57 70,22 1,75 14.45 13.59 . Fisheries. 104.7 46.51 90,94 9,51 12.64 13.17 96.66 2.48 .71 Animal Husbndry* 5.04 6. 1.27 1.72 6.01 .41.16 186 Se ultur, 2.93 8.37 3,25 7. 1,47 2,93 2.28 2,46 inulturP. 4.814. 0.13 22 6. Administration.*e .21.119 1.31 1.9 1221 9, District Core Fund. 50.00 -0.62 10. Uncommitted outlay .536.2B \ --- (pr ice contingency). ------132 - 4-- 4------.----4-. - 363Y.5052.59114.90 1 . ---5 Total. lakhs. will be limited to RP.339.62 * Expenditure in 1979-80 survey. ' Includes Rs.7.19 lakhs spent on soil
nk. AMX --- and achievements under DpAP (ith Wd1-d Bank $ttoeit showing the year-wise pyal target AsistSance) from 19?175 to Ma 1979 S--1.= =- - -= = " V Plan 19 74- ,T1 13'70194 7 Target Achen Target Achieve- N.Sectors/Elements T agets Ta 7gef -ce v- 8 9 14 5 6
' i argi (Comamand Area Dev Dlenta WoA has no,, 13'-7ad3 9n- yet been taken up) Ii. Soil Conservatton:. 20 12116.35 80000 Ha 1373 137 74000 40200 A) Contou Pu'nding A2ag0 240 Farm Ponds 3200TnsadBrrg350 H0s,) . to8. - 304 C) Soil SurveY 1760000 Ha. III.Dryland Farmin i) Large scale 01 11 302 2 demonstration 150 Nos .C ii) Small size demon- .4 6 4 4 stration. 1200 NOS. -160 10 20 2 14 131 01 iii) T raining Visits 100 iv) Area brought under20 00 60 6,06959 dryfarming pract-4,.es.30000 Ha. -0020 IV* orsr cD!%e -eyt' I forestat-, n 129oOO i. malf ntAin vHa 1417.66 1417,66 170.00 170.00 129.00 17C'100 Plnt, - 1417.66 1417,66 170.00 Mant. - - 1417,466 14111,66 [ Contd..,,,; A nnex-P....Contd,. Cuamulative Total Sotr/1eet 1977-78 1978-79 Secor/ElmetsTargT A0-c-hicv0- ,Target Ac- e ve T arget Ahee Ment ment men--t 1 2 10 11 12 13 14 11
I. a) Tanks and Barrage 69 c6oam, workspg are in progress at difforrlb stages. ii. Soil cognse-ation: 42266.41 A) Contour Bunding 16COO 14519.68 18000 10228,68 58713 1 18 6 B Farm Ponds 30 5 19 3 C Soil Survey 362000 -
III. Dryland Farmir,
demon tion 30 30 30 30 110 98 240 240 240 880 880 ii) Small Size demon. 240 73 56 iii) Training Visits 20 12 20 20 brough~t underII iv) Area 28000 30958 dryfarming practices 6000 8161 14000 142( IV. Forestry & Pasture Devt. A. Afforest atin- 148.50 148.50 1899 18F6116 i. Small plantation , 84. 1716.66 129.00 129.00 - - 116,,66 170.00 170,00 299.OC 299.00 1880.66 1716.66
Contd.., _- 4_6_ 12
ii. Wood Lots 5004Ha0 090.00 90.00 iv.W4d2.4s 42.0 114.00140 42.40 116L.011401J0 p4-4 4; 40 ot.- 42.40 42 -I -- Ad.vinb~ak . 70,00 70.00 56,00 56. 00 20.00 20-4 00 2(.00 P2 .. 2 70,00 70,00 ti*00 Main'w,
B3. Pas ture Dvelo e.00 2100 10000 1. T re e Plantin in 2000 Hect,16 1006 0 2.0 230 161.00 323.00 323.002S.(' 28;0 c onjuc tion wit Adv.- 161.00 paant 1r.. .-61.00 161100
Advr Psue 00. 240.52 240.52 927.00 927.00 330.00 330.00 - 1175,00 1175,.00 - 240.52 240,52 997 g27.0o -- 240.52 240.52
ation farm 400 Ha. -- 18.80 1 8 60 24.70 24.70
V. Animal3 THxs a4-A4 V. nialHubanry. aiy pveopen 1contd 1 contd 1 conrtd 1 contd ' lontd . Spear Head Team(Da ) 26 Nos. - 1 contd ii. Est.of Mobile Vety.C inic 2 Nos. 1 1 1 Nos. 1 1 1 contd ii. Est.of A.ICentre . 2 6 4 iv. No.of bulls aided 10 v, Noof sub-Centre started80 15 9 vi. Est.of Dairy Coop. 0. 40 15 40 22 societies, 80 Co-td.. -63E40o .40 243.0 72 :j9 0 - 24 4 9 A,0 4.00 360,40 204.40 114.00-, 146,00 00 146.0 146.00 2.0 .0O 2o 00 20.00 76.0 6.00
5(),() C-DT 76 .0
S5-0,Q0 CPT 50.00 CPT 750.00 CPT .)Y00 CPT 285.00 15 10000 - 00 00 681,00 769.00 769,C) 323..0() 352z,0 S1. 100 68 1. 0 C 738. 00
0 -0 '- 745S , )A 2245.00 I S0098800 2245.0 3i 00 500 E2S 3 .7500 2087.52 9270 0 1745.00 1145.0 215552 C65,60 5.50 s sged ulipi~ 21.25 21,25 ~7~ 1250 12755075 0 02 0.0 (Stylos)12.20 contd Tu,. contd ry) 2 contd 2 contdcontd a di T a T D cntd 1 contd 2 1 contd, ~b.le VetOlinliC 2 1~ontd 2 veil:,Cof e tre 2 1 contd 6 o. 2 d iv . No, buL aidel 2 . J sub-cenit'e statt-ed 25 v on 43 22 6 4 80 Socc Contd.. ~ 660 A --
animala s~' 1 1 eontd 100 566.6 20 ii-o~ f rearin 2 - 0l0 42 2 cQOd2S -2 2 i t f s - l Mii ~k clc ion x. cfiullig plants ,; 94 5 Egith 21 plots 100 a pasture pltS 10 81 --, 10 2, E' 1jh~atr 20 4 3. service centres 20I- ~includin spear-head team(Sheep) 1 4. Ram muti01icatien 1- centre, 31 .DitributiOn of 6 Cross-bred Ra6- U HEcomle-4 with 4comple ted LJlpIEt; Constn.taken 4 with 4 copt wth h c ater of hutanal Take U up with base- water ted with Water with water Expenditure apl work ment for pofld -wtpply up podsF the ponds. .. 2 Qr.2 Qrs.taken -do- 2 -do- , 2. Fisherman Quarters contd... d'- --J;! -)-0+1 S~~~-
d -1 C ~ 55243859 852 . vi c ar.icentS hontd 0000 - v :U boXor calf reari'g c01 i0 22050.6 2 cont1d 2 contd 2 Ccntd 2 ccntd V,.; IL hgc.larJon 2 contd'on- 2 centJ T) Ohle lar:F2
T3.SLILNET-221 15 e isiOt h9p-scieties '13 2r27 10a w1 th t0_ha astur e picts .3 4 - - 27 1 2 Et. 1 10 Hal '4 ha 3 3 ha 7 ha I
1 co ntd Icluding ccntd co nt 1 contd 1 contd 3, Sheep service centres 3 spear-head team (sheep) 4. Ram mUltiplicatiOn! centre 4 fam. - 5. Distribution of Cross-bred I.FIS Hm RIES . Fish - ,. Expenditure of rhutana Farm Rearing ponds. 2 S pill 2 s pill 2 s pill 2 2 s pill 2 works over works 2. Fisherman ruarters over works over over works in progress in progress in. ogre s in prko- gress
Cort d.. knexA ...Coltdo 5. 62
FisH SEED FA T NRAYANAPYR C tntkn spillover 751x1251x Take up uspth base- 1. Pe 1.n BreepondsW(3ize ing' Po .30 the work pwhba- 4W1 ) 3') ment for ponds. 50 57 completed 2. Breeding ponds (03ize201 X101 X pleted 31) 0d- -do- 60 60 3. Matc2ing (Sixe 28 14s'031 )0 -o-do- 10060 - 40 4. Nursery Ponds 40 40 completed 7 400 -o -cm 6. Staff quartes 2 l0ted 7, T aluk Level nurseries 5
-III. sERIcUTE; 1A Est.of demonstration- cum-seed-f arm. 2. Extension of Training to 100 50 10 135 Vhe farmerse 0
3. Est,,Of sericulture farm ..- 100 .50 on pritate lands* 400 VIII.RASN RCRTN F
A. Fruit plants: 60000 5000 5000 15000 15,000 13000 13000
4000 4000 2000 2000 2 apota 25000 1250 1250 C ontd. S2 10 2 3 1 1
FISH SEE FARM AT NARAYANAPUR 32 9 comrleted 1. Ttreeding ponds(Size 751x1251.x3t) 10_100 "t 20txl1txx59 ;2. Breeding pords(Size 0 0 t 3. Matc hing ponds (Size' 20, _NJO x3l leo 100 " 4. Nursery Ponds 40 " 5, Rarig Pnds160, 160 wok n 16o 16o works5 In 20 5. RIarng Pess progress woki n4 work is in 2Z ,19 " 6, p.rogresstertaf qartrs4 pr'ogress 4 in progress complteted -Tlu Lve ureres2 wok~s n2 5 ?.'Taluktr~s and Nr ie 2RE 2 are in pogress VII.SBRIC=_TRFA 1, Estoof demonstration-cum- Istabli seedfarm, shd 2. Wxension of Training 0 516 3125 O .to Farmers. .5 3. Bst.of sericulture farm on 150 46 30 178 40 292 wivate lands. VIII. 1 1, Mango 25000 25000 35500 35500 2. Sapota 15000 15000 13050 13050
contd... 4 5 6 3 .=-=- = - =-=-=- 12
A.Frit Pant (Contd.)-20 3000 3000 2000 214 000 5000 3, Cocorat .10000 8000 8000 1.250 1250 -- 10000 4. Jack n30000 100000 100000 100000 13555 100000 100000 .Per 350000 6. Lime ppotmOgrants
vl.D r.-but fion _of
5324 1000 26120 1. Mango 60000 5000 - 15000 1306 2000 56115 2. Sapota 25000 1250 4000 4772 22142 5000 -3000 5036 2000 3C Goo nut 12170 10000 1210 8000 30000 1250 4, Jack 70110 100000 11800 100000-- 5. Der 350000 13545
6. Lime .... = 7. Pomografats __==-= Contd..... A* AsFruit Plants(Contd.. 31.100, 3Coconut 907000 14100 14100 .51100 .21920 2900 . 4. Jack 7670 7670 - o3-3355% 335 5. Ber -- 00 120000 4. Lime 15000 15000 I. Pomogranats 10000 10000 B. Distribution of fruit Ianst .Mango 25000 18873 1.7000 ?834 .75000 531 2, Sapota 15000 11476 13050 12372 5300 309 3. Coconut 7000 6442 14100 12246 .1122 28500 4. 2I2 Jack 7670 13312 22ID30 26920 5. Ber 120000 178378 48o06 335545. 308294 6. Lime - 15000 15000. - 7. Pomogranat$ 1000
30. = - -~ ~ xA Ax