DOCSLIB.ORG

Individual Perspectives of the California Landscape

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Individual Perspectives of the California Landscape INDIVIDUAL PERSPECTIVES OF THE CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of California State Polytechnic University, Pomona In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Landscape Architecture By Cristina M. Plemel 2020 SIGNATURE PAGE PROJECT: INDIVIDUAL PERSPECTIVES OF THE CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE AUTHOR: Cristina M. Plemel DATE SUBMITTED: Spring 2020 Department of Landscape Architecture Andrew Wilcox Project Committee Chair Professor and Department Chair Philip Pregill Project Committee Member Professor of Landscape Architecture Jared Pierce Project Committee Member Forest Landscape Architect Tahoe National Forest ii ABSTRACT This study took research participants on scenic hikes throughout California to understand landscape preferences utilizing participant photography. There were 8 hikes total and 16 participants. The hikes took place at the following locations: Abbott’s Lagoon in Point Reyes National Seashore, Vivian Creek Trail in the San Gorgonio Wilderness, Strawberry Peak and Mount Baden-Powell in the Angeles National Forest, Mosaic Canyon in Death Valley National Park, Abalone Cove Shoreline Park in Palos Verdes, the South Coast Botanic Garden in Palos Verdes, Loch Lomond in Santa Cruz County, and Mount San Jacinto State Park. Participants were given a disposable camera on each hike and asked to photograph the landscape. After the hikes, film was developed, and participants were emailed digital copies of their photographs and asked to explain why each photo was taken. The literature review has two sections. Part one has a focus on plant communities found in California, while part 2 has a focus on landscape preferences, perception, and scenic beauty of landscape. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS SIGNATURE PAGE .............................................................................................................. ii ABSTRACT ......................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................... vi CHAPTER 1: Introduction ................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Overview ............................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Goals and Objectives ............................................................................................... 2 1.3 Background .............................................................................................................. 3 CHAPTER 2: Research Methods ......................................................................................... 6 2.1 Methods .................................................................................................................. 6 2.2 Participant Photography .......................................................................................... 6 2.3 Journal Entries and Photo Response Forms ............................................................. 6 CHAPTER 3: Procedures ..................................................................................................... 7 3.1 Procedures .............................................................................................................. 7 CHAPTER 4: Literature Review Part 1: Landscape Preference, Landscape Assessment, and Scenery ....................................................................................................................... 9 4.1 Introduction and Historical Background .................................................................. 9 4.2 Importance of Landscape Preference Studies for Landscape Architecture ........... 10 4.3 Factors Affecting Landscape Preference ................................................................ 11 4.4 The Need for a Different Method .......................................................................... 12 4.5 Experiences in the Landscape ................................................................................ 12 4.6 Visual Quality Assessment ..................................................................................... 13 4.7 Conclusion ............................................................................................................. 14 CHAPTER 5: Literature Review Part 2: California Plant Communities .............................. 15 5.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 15 5.2 Climate .................................................................................................................. 17 5.4 Coastal Redwood Forest ........................................................................................ 21 5.5 Coastal Mixed Evergreen ....................................................................................... 22 5.6 Riparian Forest ...................................................................................................... 22 5.7 Interior grassland .................................................................................................. 22 iv 5.8 Vernal pools ........................................................................................................... 22 5.9 Foothill woodland .................................................................................................. 24 5.10 Chaparral ............................................................................................................. 24 5.11 Mountain Vegetation .......................................................................................... 25 5.12 The Desert ........................................................................................................... 27 CHAPTER 6: Results ......................................................................................................... 29 6.1 Hike 1: Point Reyes National Seashore .................................................................. 29 6.2 Hike 2: Sacred Cove, Palos Verdes ......................................................................... 31 6.4 Hike 4: Strawberry Peak ........................................................................................ 35 6.5 Hike 5: Mount Baden Powell ................................................................................. 36 6.6 Hike 6: Mosaic Canyon .......................................................................................... 37 6.7 Hike 7: South Coast Botanic Garden ...................................................................... 38 6.8 Hike 8: Loch Lomond ............................................................................................. 39 6.10 Responses Overall ............................................................................................... 43 CHAPTER 7: Discussion .................................................................................................... 45 CHAPTER 8: Conclusion ................................................................................................... 48 8.1 Conclusion ............................................................................................................. 48 8.2 Limitations ............................................................................................................. 49 8.4 Recommendations for Future Research ................................................................ 50 REFERENCES .................................................................................................................... 51 APPENDIX A ..................................................................................................................... 59 APPENDIX B ..................................................................................................................... 61 v LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Tiburon Mariposa Lily ....................................................................................... 15 Figure 2 A Generalized Geologic Map of California ......................................................... 16 Figure 3 Incredible landforms on the Northern California Coast. .................................... 18 Figure 4 Guadalupe-Nipomo Dunes north of Santa Barbara ........................................... 19 Figure 5 Northern Coastal Scrub and Prairie vegetation in Salt Point State Park. ........... 20 Figure 6 Chaparral in the Angeles National Forest .......................................................... 25 Figure 7 Anza Borrego State Park .................................................................................... 28 vi CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1.1 Overview This study took research participants on a series of trips throughout California to get their own unique perspective of the California landscape. Landscape Architects who work for both the forest service and the national park service work with the perspectives of the park visitor when it comes to scenery. For them, it is very important to consider the perspective of the visitor as it influences the decisions made regarding protection of scenery. Protecting visual landscape quality is also crucial for environmental management and policy (Daniel, 2001). Scenery is one of the main reasons why most visitors come to national parks and forests; national park surveys found that 90 percent of visitors listed scenery as extremely important to protect and preserve (Kulesza et al. 2013). Attempts to assess the landscape in the past
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Messinian Vegetation and Climate of the Intermontane Florina-Ptolemais
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/848747; this version posted November 25, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. 1 Messinian vegetation and climate of the intermontane Florina-Ptolemais-Servia Basin, 2 NW Greece inferred from palaeobotanical data: How well do plant fossils reflect past 3 environments? 4 5 Johannes M. Bouchal1*, Tuncay H. Güner2, Dimitrios Velitzelos3, Evangelos Velitzelos3, 6 Thomas Denk1 7 8 1Swedish Museum of Natural History, Department of Palaeobiology, Box 50007, 10405 9 Stockholm, Sweden 10 2Faculty of Forestry, Department of Forest Botany, Istanbul University Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul, 11 Turkey 12 3National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Faculty of Geology and Geoenvironment, 13 Section of Historical Geology and Palaeontology, Greece 14 15 16 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/848747; this version posted November 25, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. 17 The late Miocene is marked by pronounced environmental changes and the appearance of 18 strong temperature and precipitation seasonality. Although environmental heterogeneity is to 19 be expected during this time, it is challenging to reconstruct palaeoenvironments using plant 20 fossils. We investigated leaves and dispersed spores/pollen from 6.4–6 Ma strata in the 21 intermontane Florina-Ptolemais-Servia Basin (FPS) of NW Greece.
    [Show full text]
  • Download-To-Own and Online Rental) and Then to Subscription Television And, Finally, a Screening on Broadcast Television
    Exporting Canadian Feature Films in Global Markets TRENDS, OPPORTUNITIES AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS MARIA DE ROSA | MARILYN BURGESS COMMUNICATIONS MDR (A DIVISION OF NORIBCO INC.) APRIL 2017 PRODUCED WITH THE ASSISTANCE OF 1 EXPORTING CANADIAN FEATURE FILMS IN GLOBAL MARKETS Acknowledgements This study was commissioned by the Canadian Media Producers Association (CMPA), in partnership with the Association québécoise de la production médiatique (AQPM), the Cana- da Media Fund (CMF), and Telefilm Canada. The following report solely reflects the views of the authors. Findings, conclusions or recom- mendations expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the funders of this report, who are in no way bound by any recommendations con- tained herein. 2 EXPORTING CANADIAN FEATURE FILMS IN GLOBAL MARKETS Executive Summary Goals of the Study The goals of this study were three-fold: 1. To identify key trends in international sales of feature films generally and Canadian independent feature films specifically; 2. To provide intelligence on challenges and opportunities to increase foreign sales; 3. To identify policies, programs and initiatives to support foreign sales in other jurisdic- tions and make recommendations to ensure that Canadian initiatives are competitive. For the purpose of this study, Canadian film exports were defined as sales of rights. These included pre-sales, sold in advance of the completion of films and often used to finance pro- duction, and sales of rights to completed feature films. In other jurisdictions foreign sales are being measured in a number of ways, including the number of box office admissions, box of- fice revenues, and sales of rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Netflix-Focus-Group-Analysis.Pdf
    Netflix What College Students Tell Us Regarding Their Attitudes Towards Netflix: A Focus Group Report Annenberg School for Communication & Journalism University of Southern California Methods and Introduction Netflix is an online instant streaming service that also provides a mail DVD service. Founded in 1997 by Marc Randolph and Reed Hastings, the company has grown as one of the largest global entertainment distribution services. Netflix now partners with many consumer electronics companies to offer streaming services on various Internet-connected devices, such as tablets and smartphones, and has recently introduced their own exclusive content. The objective of the Netflix focus group was to find Netflix’s overall reputation and performance from the perspective of college students. The focus group method was chosen in order to better gauge how college-aged customers felt about Netflix. The open-ended exploration of focus group research allowed us to explore student’s thoughts about Netflix through both positive and negative perspectives. Students from the University of Southern California (USC) were invited to discuss their opinions, comments and suggestions regarding the service. The focus group offered an up-close look at the participants’ experiences, attitudes, behaviors and language in relation to Netflix. Convenience sampling was used to gain participants. This allowed us to conduct our focus group in a timely matter for our clients. The casual setting of the focus group helped urge the participants to be completely honest and forthcoming with their responses. The focus group method gave access to a large number of participants at one time. One focus group with nine USC students was conducted.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear and Cytoplasmic DNA Sequence Data Further Illuminate the Genetic Composition of Leyland Cypresses
    J. AMER.SOC.HORT.SCI. 139(5):558–566. 2014. Nuclear and Cytoplasmic DNA Sequence Data Further Illuminate the Genetic Composition of Leyland Cypresses Yi-Xuan Kou1 MOE Key Laboratory of Bio-Resources and Eco-Environment, College of Life Science, Sichuan University, 29 Wangjiang Road, Chengdu 610064, China Hui-Ying Shang1 State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-Ecosystem, School of Life Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China Kang-Shan Mao2 MOE Key Laboratory of Bio-Resources and Eco-Environment, College of Life Science, Sichuan University, 29 Wangjiang Road, Chengdu 610064, China Zhong-Hu Li College of Life Sciences, Northwest University, Xi’an 710069, China Keith Rushforth The Shippen, Ashill, Cullompton, Devon, EX15 3NL, U.K. Robert P. Adams Biology Department, Baylor University, P.O. Box 97388, Waco, TX 76798 ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. alaska cypress, Callitropsis nootkatensis, Hesperocyparis macrocarpa, ·Hesperotropsis leylandii, hybridization, internal transcribed spacer, ITS, leafy, monterey cypress, molecular identification, needly ABSTRACT. Leyland cypress [·Hesperotropsis leylandii (A.B. Jacks. & Dallim.) Garland & G. Moore, Cupressaceae] is a well-known horticultural evergreen conifer in the United Kingdom, United States, Australia, New Zealand, and other countries. As demonstrated by previous studies, this taxon is a hybrid between alaska (nootka) cypress [Callitropsis nootkatensis (D. Don) Oerst. ex D.P. Little] and monterey cypress [Hesperocyparis macrocarpa (Hartw. ex Gordon) Bartel]. However, the genetic background of leyland cypress cultivars is unclear. Are they F1 or F2 hybrids or backcrosses? In this study, six individuals that represent major leyland cypress cultivars and two individuals each of its two putative parental species were collected, and three nuclear DNA regions (internal transcribed spacer, leafy and needly), three mitochondrial (mt) DNA regions (coxI, atpA, and rps3), and two chloroplast (cp) DNA regions (matKand rbcL) were sequenced and analyzed.
    [Show full text]
  • Media Release Dreamworks Studios, Participant Media
    MEDIA RELEASE DREAMWORKS STUDIOS, PARTICIPANT MEDIA, RELIANCE ENTERTAINMENT AND ENTERTAINMENT ONE FORM AMBLIN PARTNERS, A NEW FILM, TELEVISION AND DIGITAL CONTENT CREATION COMPANY Steven Spielberg Also an Investor in Amblin Partners Mumbai, December 17, 2015: Steven Spielberg, Principal Partner, DreamWorks Studios, Jeff Skoll, Chairman, Participant Media, Anil Ambani, Chairman, Reliance Group and Darren Throop, President and Chief Executive Officer, Entertainment One (eOne) announced today the formation of Amblin Partners, a new film, television and digital content creation company. The new company will create content using the Amblin, DreamWorks Pictures and Participant brands and leverage their power and broad awareness to tell stories that appeal to a wide range of audiences. Participant Media will remain a separate company that continues to independently develop, produce and finance projects with socially relevant themes. Amblin Partners will be led by CEO Michael Wright and President and COO Jeff Small. In addition, Amblin Television will become a division of Amblin Partners and continues to be run by co- presidents Justin Falvey and Darryl Frank, who maintain their longtime leadership roles. They join Producer Kristie Macosko Krieger and President of Production Holly Bario on the film side, to complete Amblin Partners’ senior management team. David Linde, Chief Executive Officer of Participant Media, and Participant’s narrative feature team, led by Executive Vice President Jonathan King, will work closely with Amblin Partners to develop and produce specific content for the new venture in addition to exploring opportunities for co-productions and other content. In making the announcement about Amblin Partners, Mr. Spielberg said, “We are thrilled to partner with Jeff Skoll, Participant Media, and to continue our prolific relationship.
    [Show full text]
  • Devonian Plant Fossils a Window Into the Past
    EPPC 2018 Sponsors Academic Partners PROGRAM & ABSTRACTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Scientific Committee: Zhe-kun Zhou Angelica Feurdean Jenny McElwain, Chair Tao Su Walter Finsinger Fraser Mitchell Lutz Kunzmann Graciela Gil Romera Paddy Orr Lisa Boucher Lyudmila Shumilovskikh Geoffrey Clayton Elizabeth Wheeler Walter Finsinger Matthew Parkes Evelyn Kustatscher Eniko Magyari Colin Kelleher Niall W. Paterson Konstantinos Panagiotopoulos Benjamin Bomfleur Benjamin Dietre Convenors: Matthew Pound Fabienne Marret-Davies Marco Vecoli Ulrich Salzmann Havandanda Ombashi Charles Wellman Wolfram M. Kürschner Jiri Kvacek Reed Wicander Heather Pardoe Ruth Stockey Hartmut Jäger Christopher Cleal Dieter Uhl Ellen Stolle Jiri Kvacek Maria Barbacka José Bienvenido Diez Ferrer Borja Cascales-Miñana Hans Kerp Friðgeir Grímsson José B. Diez Patricia Ryberg Christa-Charlotte Hofmann Xin Wang Dimitrios Velitzelos Reinhard Zetter Charilaos Yiotis Peta Hayes Jean Nicolas Haas Joseph D. White Fraser Mitchell Benjamin Dietre Jennifer C. McElwain Jenny McElwain Marie-José Gaillard Paul Kenrick Furong Li Christine Strullu-Derrien Graphic and Website Design: Ralph Fyfe Chris Berry Peter Lang Irina Delusina Margaret E. Collinson Tiiu Koff Andrew C. Scott Linnean Society Award Selection Panel: Elena Severova Barry Lomax Wuu Kuang Soh Carla J. Harper Phillip Jardine Eamon haughey Michael Krings Daniela Festi Amanda Porter Gar Rothwell Keith Bennett Kamila Kwasniewska Cindy V. Looy William Fletcher Claire M. Belcher Alistair Seddon Conference Organization: Jonathan P. Wilson
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution, Status, and Origin of Water Pipits Breeding in California ’
    The Condor89:788-797 0 The CooperOrnithological Society 1987 DISTRIBUTION, STATUS, AND ORIGIN OF WATER PIPITS BREEDING IN CALIFORNIA ’ JON H. MILLER 1034 ShattuckAvenue, Berkeley, CA 94707 MICHAEL T. GREEN Department of Biology, Universityof North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27514 Abstract. We investigatedthe racial identity, distribution, and abundanceof WaterPipits (Anthusspinoletta) breeding in the mountainsof California.This commonnesting species of alpinetundra was not knownto breedin Californiauntil the 1970s;a reviewof historical evidencesuggests recent colonization. Mensural and plumagecomparisons show California populationsto be A. s. alticola, the breedingrace of the Rocky Mountains. This is of biogeographicalinterest, because the abundantwintering and migratorypipit of California is A. s. pacificus,while alticola normally occurshundreds of miles to the east.Water Pipits currentlynest in mesicalpine vegetation throughout much of the southernand centralSierra Nevada.Breeding densities are highestand mostuniform in the southernmostpart of this range.The only known breedingpopulation in California outsideof the Sierra Nevada occurson San Gorgonio Mountain in southernCalifornia. We hypothesizethat the previous absenceor rarity of breeding Water Pipits in the Sierra Nevada may be attributable to the most recentpaleoclimatic xerothermic period, the Hypsithermal(ca. 5,000 to 2,900 years BP), whichimuoverished many alnine biotasof arctic-oldcordilleran affinitv. Climate and habitat differencesmay prevenipa$cus from breedingin California, and geographicbarriers may have hindered colonization by alticola. The occurrenceand timing of the present colonizationmay be fortuitous.Alternatively, it is possiblethat prior colonizationof Great Basinranges by alticola facilitatedeventual dispersal to the SierraNevada. Key words: Water Pipit; Anthus spinoletta;Sierra Nevada;historical status; colonization; biogeography;alpine. INTRODUCTION and Montana (Verbeek 1970; Miller and Green, The Water Pipit (Anthus spinoletta) is a principal pers.
    [Show full text]
  • Supporting Information
    Supporting Information Mao et al. 10.1073/pnas.1114319109 SI Text BEAST Analyses. In addition to a BEAST analysis that used uniform Selection of Fossil Taxa and Their Phylogenetic Positions. The in- prior distributions for all calibrations (run 1; 144-taxon dataset, tegration of fossil calibrations is the most critical step in molecular calibrations as in Table S4), we performed eight additional dating (1, 2). We only used the fossil taxa with ovulate cones that analyses to explore factors affecting estimates of divergence could be assigned unambiguously to the extant groups (Table S4). time (Fig. S3). The exact phylogenetic position of fossils used to calibrate the First, to test the effect of calibration point P, which is close to molecular clocks was determined using the total-evidence analy- the root node and is the only functional hard maximum constraint ses (following refs. 3−5). Cordaixylon iowensis was not included in in BEAST runs using uniform priors, we carried out three runs the analyses because its assignment to the crown Acrogymno- with calibrations A through O (Table S4), and calibration P set to spermae already is supported by previous cladistic analyses (also [306.2, 351.7] (run 2), [306.2, 336.5] (run 3), and [306.2, 321.4] using the total-evidence approach) (6). Two data matrices were (run 4). The age estimates obtained in runs 2, 3, and 4 largely compiled. Matrix A comprised Ginkgo biloba, 12 living repre- overlapped with those from run 1 (Fig. S3). Second, we carried out two runs with different subsets of sentatives from each conifer family, and three fossils taxa related fi to Pinaceae and Araucariaceae (16 taxa in total; Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Release
    Investor Relations PRESS RELEASE No. RI020 Grupo Televisa to Nominate Jon Feltheimer, CEO of Lionsgate, to its Board of Directors MEXICO CITY, April 16, 2015 - Grupo Televisa, S.A.B. (“Televisa”; NYSE:TV; BMV:TLEVISA CPO) announced today that Jon Feltheimer, Chief Executive Officer of Lionsgate, will be nominated for election to the Board of Directors at Televisa's Shareholders’ Meeting on April 29. Mr. Feltheimer is a highly experienced and regarded professional in the entertainment industry. “Jon has achieved a strong track record of success and value creation in the entertainment field. As Chief Executive Officer of Lionsgate, he has transformed that company into a leader in the film and television businesses and an industry innovator. His deep expertise, perspective and relationships will be incredibly valuable to Televisa and our shareholders," said Emilio Azcárraga, Televisa’s President and CEO. During his 30-year entertainment industry career, Mr. Feltheimer has held leadership positions at Lionsgate, Sony Pictures Entertainment and New World Entertainment, and he has been responsible for tens of thousands of hours of television programming and hundreds of films, including the global blockbuster Hunger Games franchise, the launch of the Divergent franchise, Academy Award winners Crash, Monster’s Ball and Precious and acclaimed television series including Mad Men, Orange is the New Black and Weeds. Mr. Feltheimer was named Chief Executive Officer of Lionsgate in March 2000. During his 15-year tenure as CEO, Lionsgate has grown from its independent studio roots into a leading next generation global content leader with a reputation for innovation. The Company's market capitalization has grown from $80 million in 2000 to over $4 billion today, and its revenue has increased more than 15 times over.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Resources Report
    HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES SURVEY REPORT MCDONALD LEARNING CENTER EAST PROJECT Big Bear City Area San Bernardino County, California For Submittal to: County of San Bernardino 385 North Arrowhead Avenue San Bernardino, CA 92415 Prepared for: McDonald Learning Center P.O. Box 150 Big Bear Lake, CA 92315 Prepared by: CRM TECH 1016 East Cooley Drive, Suite A/B Colton, CA 92324 Bai “Tom” Tang, Principal Investigator Michael Hogan, Principal Investigator April 23, 2019 CRM TECH Contract No. 3458 Title: Historical/Archaeological Resources Survey Report: McDonald Learning Center East Project, Big Bear City Area, San Bernardino County, California Author(s): Bai “Tom” Tang, Principal Investigator/Historian Ben Kerridge, Archaeologist/Report Writer Daniel Ballester, Archaeologist/Field Director Nina Gallardo, Archaeologist/Native American Liaison Consulting Firm: CRM TECH 1016 East Cooley Drive, Suite A/B Colton, CA 92324 (909) 824-6400 Date: April 23, 2019 For Submittal to: County of San Bernardino 385 North Arrowhead Avenue San Bernardino, CA 92415 (909) 387-8311 Prepared for: Lisa Burtner McDonald Learning Center P.O. Box 150 Big Bear Lake, CA 92315 (909) 709-4041 USGS Quadrangle: Moonridge, Calif., 7.5’ quadrangle (Section 19, T2N R2E, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian) Project Size: Approximately 0.75 acre Keywords: Big Bear Valley, San Bernardino Mountains; Phase I historical/ archaeological resources survey; a portion of Assessor’s Parcel Number 0315-421-02; no “historical resources” found MANAGEMENT SUMMARY In March and April 2019, CRM TECH performed a cultural resources study on approximately 0.75 acre of undeveloped land in the San Bernardino Mountains and to the southeast of the unincorporated community of Big Bear City, San Bernardino County, California.
    [Show full text]
  • Bald Cypress & Dawn Redwood
    Bald Cypress & Dawn Redwood: Deciduous Conifers and Newcomers to the Urban Landscape By: Dan Petters University of Minnesota Department of Forest Resources Urban Forestry Outreach Research and Extension Lab and Nursery February, 2020 Many Minnesotans are already familiar with one type of deciduous conifer: our native tamarack (Larix laricina). Those deciduous conifers are fairly unique and relatively uncommon. They have both needle-like leaves and seeds contained in some sort of cone, but also drop their needles annually with the changing seasons. Tamaracks are often found growing in bogs or other acidic, lowland or wet sites, as well as many upland sites, and have clustered tufts of soft needles that turn yellow and are shed annually. Though, aside from our native, a couple other deciduous conifers of the Cupressaceae family have begun to make an appearance in urban and garden landscapes over the last several decades: dawn redwood (Metasequoia glyptostroboides) and bald cypress (Taxodium distichum). Dawn redwood bark and form -- John Ruter, A couple of factors have made the introduction of these two species University of Georgia, possible. Dawn redwood was thought to be extinct until the 1940s, but the Bugwood.org discovery of some isolated pockets in China made the distribution of seeds and introduction of the tree possible worldwide. Bald cypress is native to much of the southeastern US, growing in a variety of sites including standing water. Historically, this tree would not have been able to survive the harshest winters this far north, but the warming Minnesota climate over the last several decades has allowed bald cypress to succeed in a variety of plantings.
    [Show full text]
  • Cleanup a Service-Learning Guide
    CleanUP A Service-Learning Guide Written by Cathryn Berger Kaye, M.A. Sponsored by Participant Media In partnership with Ocean Conservancy A program of EarthEcho International www.earthecho.org Copyright © 2010 by Cathryn Berger Kaye, M.A. Published by EarthEcho International Special Thanks and Appreciation to Free Spirit Publishing for permissions to use excerpts from their books for this publication. www.freespirit.com Page 2 Service + Learning = Service-Learning and page 11 Stage 5 adapted from A Kids’ Guide to Climate Change & Global Warming: How to Take Action! by Cathryn Berger Kaye, M.A., © 2009. Used with permission of Free Spirit Publishing Inc., Minneapolis, MN: 800-735-7323; www.freespirit.com. All rights reserved. Pages 15, 17, and 19 adapted from The Complete Guide to Service Learning: Proven, Practical Ways to Engage Students in Civic Responsibility, Academic Curriculum, & Social Action (Revised & Updated Second Edition) by Cathryn Berger Kaye, M.A., © 2010. Used with permission of Free Spirit Publishing Inc., Minneapolis, MN: 800-735-7323; www.freespirit.com. All rights reserved. Pages 1, 7, and 12-13 adapted from Going Blue: A Teen Guide to Saving Our Oceans & Waterways by Cathryn Berger Kaye, M.A., © 2010. Used with permission of Free Spirit Publishing Inc., Minneapolis, MN: 800-735-7323; www.freespirit.com. All rights reserved. All rights reserved under International and Pan-American Copyright Conventions. Unless otherwise noted, no part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, or otherwise, without express written permission of the publisher, except for brief quotations or critical reviews.
    [Show full text]