DOCSLIB.ORG

Shaping the Eighteenth-Century Criminal Trial: a View from the Ryder Sources John H

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Shaping the Eighteenth-Century Criminal Trial: a View from the Ryder Sources John H The University of Chicago Law Review VOLUME 50 NUMBER 1 WINTER 1983 © 1983 by The University of Chicago Shaping the Eighteenth-Century Criminal Trial: A View from the Ryder Sources John H. Langbeint t Max Pam Professor of American and Foreign Law, University of Chicago. I wish to express my gratitude for the labors of the late K.L. Perrin, the transcriber of the Ryder shorthand sources, who died as I was completing this article. His transcripts made the sources accessible for scholarship. He arranged for the deposit of his personal carbon copies of the transcripts at the University of Chicago Law Library, and over the years from 1975 through 1981.he answered many questions. I deeply regret that I was una- ble to have the benefit of his advice on the text of this article. I also wish to acknowledge the kindness of the Earl of Harrowby in authorizing Mr. Perrin's deposit of the transcripts at Chicago. John Beattie (Toronto) and John Styles (Bath) supplied references that greatly facili- tated my work in the public records. Douglas Hay (Warwick), who first cited the Ryder assize diary in published scholarship, shared his notes with me. Malvin Zirker (Indiana) helped with the sources and literature for Henry Fielding. John Baker (Cambridge), James Cockburn (Maryland), Charles Gray (Chicago), Thomas Green (Michigan), R.H. Hehnholz (Chicago), Joanna Innes (Oxford), Mark Kishlansky (Chicago), A.W.B. Simpson (Kent), and Geoffrey Stone (Chicago) commented on a prepublication draft. Judith Rose (J.D. Chicago 1982) helped locate the illustrations, and she constructed the calendar infra note 29. A num- ber of particular references are acknowledged in the footnotes. Research of this sort is not cheap to conduct, especially from across the Atlantic; I am grateful to Dean Gerhard Casper and the University of Chicago Law School for the financial support that has made the work possible. I wish to direct readers' attention to the three endnotes that appear at the conclusion of this article dealing with (1) the modernization and Americanization of spelling, punctuation, and so forth; (2) the conventions followed by the shorthand transcriber in preparing his transcripts; and (3) acknowledgements for the illustrations reproduced in the article. I am grateful to the editors of the Review for allowing deviations from their customary citation practices in order to facilitate the use of historical sources. The University of Chicago Law Review [50:1 Some of the most fundamental attributes of modern Anglo- American criminal procedure for cases of serious crime emerged in England during the eighteenth century: the law of evidence, the adversary system, the privilege against self-incrimination, and the main ground rules for the relationship of judge and jury.' In trying to understand the great developments of this period, legal histori- ans have been bedeviled by source problems that to some extent must always remain insoluble. The present article is based primar- ily upon a pair of novel historical sources: the notebooks of Sir Dudley Ryder, who served as an Old Bailey trial judge in the 1750s; and a series of pamphlet accounts of Old Bailey trials that we verify by comparing them with the Ryder notes. Our main theme is the influence of the pretrial process upon the development of the rules of trial. The Ryder-period sources give us a window on the institutions and procedures that were be- ing employed to investigate crimes and to gather evidence for these trials. In some respects the ramshackle prosecutorial system of mid-century London worked remarkably well, but it had grievous shortcomings. The concern grew that the system encouraged false witnesses, who found it all too easy to bring about the condemna- tion of innocent men. We think that the relatively sudden rise of the law of evidence and of adversary trial procedure was, at least in part, a response. Part I of this article is devoted to the description and compar- ison of the main sources. Discrepancies between the judge's notes and the pamphlets are identified and analyzed in the light of the different purposes for which the two sources were produced. Part II examines what the sources tell us about the composition of the bench and the allocation of functions within the nominally colle- gial trial judiciary of the Old Bailey. Part III looks at the offenses charged and the outcomes in the cases in our sample. Part IV is devoted to the pretrial procedure of detection and binding over for prosecution, with particular attention to the work of Henry Field- ing, the novelist, and his brother John as principal magistrates for Middlesex in the period just before and during Dudley Ryder's tenure in judicial office. In Part V, we describe the crown witness system, upon which the Middlesex magistracy placed great reli- I I have discussed these points in Langbein, The Criminal Trial before the Lawyers, 45 U. Cm. L. Rav. 263 (1978) [hereafter cited as Article 1]. On the adversary system and the appearance of lawyers, see id. at 282-83, 307-16; on the law of evidence, see id. at 300-06; on the want of the privilege against self-incrimination, see id. at 283-84; and on jury composi- tion and jury control, see id. at 272-300. 19831 Eighteenth-Century Criminal Trial ance, and its bearing on the rise of the law of evidence. In Part VI we discuss the reward system and the celebrated scandal that brought it into disrepute. Part VII is devoted to the trial caseloads and Part VIII to trial procedure and the advent of the adversary system. I. SOURCES Criminal law reporting in the modern sense is basically a nine- teenth-century tradition, and one that reflects the radically altered state of affairs of the lawyer-dominated nineteenth-century trial. For most of the eighteenth century, when lawyers for prosecution and defense were rather peripheral figures, lawyers' literature was not much produced. Five years ago in an article in this journal, I undertook to identify and explain some of the procedural develop- ments of the period from the mid-1670s to the mid-1730s. I based this work mainly on a little-known set of pamphlet sources that contain "probably the best accounts we shall ever have of what transpired in ordinary English criminal courts before the later eighteenth century."s These pamphlets, the Old Bailey Sessions Papers (hereafter OBSP),' chronicle the trials that took place at the sittings ("sessions") of the Old Bailey. The Old Bailey was the trial court for cases of serious crime (felony) committed in the city of London and the adjacent county of Middlesex.' The court sat ' See Wigmore, A General Survey of the History of the Rules of Evidence, in 2 SELEcT ESSAYS IN ANGLO-AmmcAN LEGAL HISTORY 691, 694-96 (Ass'n of Am. Law Schools ed. 1908). 3 Article I, supra note 1, at 271. 4 The proper title as it appears during the Ryder period (with appropriate variations in dates, sessions, pamphlet numbers, and the names of mayors) is, for example, The Proceed- ings on the King's Commissions of the Peace, Oyer and Terminer, and Gaol Delivery for the City of London; and also the Gaol Delivery for the County of Middlesex, Held at Jus- tice-Hall in the Old-Bailey, on Wednesday the 23rd, Thursday the 24th, Friday the 25th, Saturday the 26th, and Monday the 28th of October, in the 27th Year of His Majesty's Reign; Number'VIII for the Year 1754: Being the Eighth Sessions in the Mayoralty of the Right Hon. Thomas Rawlinson, Esq., Lord-Mayor of the City of London (London 1754) [hereafter cited by month and year as OBSP]. For discussion of London mayoral years as dating conventions, see infra text accompanying note 28. 6 A few other courts had nominal capital jurisdiction overlapping the Old Bailey's venue, but this was of no importance. The House of Lords could try peers, and King's Bench could (but virtually never did) try felons "at the bar." The High Court of Admiralty convened "Admiralty sessions" for felonies arising on the high seas and navigable waters. These cases were tried in London by London juries presided over by royal court judges proceeding in accordance with ordinary common law criminal procedure, so that the prac- tice resembled a special sitting of the Old Bailey. During the Ryder years (1754-1756), Ad- miralty handled only a few criminal cases, all of them genuinely maritime and arising well away from London. See Public Record Office, London [hereafter cited as PRO] HCA (High The University of Chicago Law Review [50:1 eight times a year. The OBSP report the outcomes of every trial held in each ses- sions, and they contain supposedly verbatim narratives for most of the trials. Although the OBSP can be immensely revealing, they have shortcomings that considerably impair their usefulness and reliability as a legal historical source. The OBSP were an early spe- cies of periodical journalism, purveying a diet of true-life crime stories for the interest and amusement of a nonlawyer readership. They were sold on the streets of London within days of the trials they reported. In the mid-1750s, the period that we shall be em- phasizing in the present article, the price was four pence a pam- phlet. The OBSP were not meant to serve as legal precedents, al- though we shall see that the legal system of the 1750s found a few uses for them. (Well after our period, however, the OBSP changed character and title. The series became a true law reporter that con- tinued until World War I.) Although the OBSP purport to present verbatim accounts of most of the trials held at each sessions, these narratives have suf- fered much deletion and compression.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • DATES of TRIALS Until October 1775, and Again from December 1816
    DATES OF TRIALS Until October 1775, and again from December 1816, the printed Proceedings provide both the start and the end dates of each sessions. Until the 1750s, both the Gentleman’s and (especially) the London Magazine scrupulously noted the end dates of sessions, dates of subsequent Recorder’s Reports, and days of execution. From December 1775 to October 1816, I have derived the end dates of each sessions from newspaper accounts of the trials. Trials at the Old Bailey usually began on a Wednesday. And, of course, no trials were held on Sundays. ***** NAMES & ALIASES I have silently corrected obvious misspellings in the Proceedings (as will be apparent to users who hyper-link through to the trial account at the OBPO), particularly where those misspellings are confirmed in supporting documents. I have also regularized spellings where there may be inconsistencies at different appearances points in the OBPO. In instances where I have made a more radical change in the convict’s name, I have provided a documentary reference to justify the more marked discrepancy between the name used here and that which appears in the Proceedings. ***** AGE The printed Proceedings almost invariably provide the age of each Old Bailey convict from December 1790 onwards. From 1791 onwards, the Home Office’s “Criminal Registers” for London and Middlesex (HO 26) do so as well. However, no volumes in this series exist for 1799 and 1800, and those for 1828-33 inclusive (HO 26/35-39) omit the ages of the convicts. I have not comprehensively compared the ages reported in HO 26 with those given in the Proceedings, and it is not impossible that there are discrepancies between the two.
    [Show full text]
  • The Old Bailey and the Recorder of London: a Brief History
    From our Patron, Simon Callow Last year I received the exceptional honour of the Freedom of the City of London. Since boyhood I have been haunted by the City, its history, its imagery, its traditions. One of the most vital of those traditions is the City's association with music. Since at least 1350, The Worshipful Company of Musicians has proudly celebrated the noble art. I vividly remember a City of London Festival when I was a youth, in which The Yeoman of the Guards was performed with full son et lumière effects at the Tower of London, and Sir William Walton was specially commissioned to write a splendid piece for the City – A Song for the Lord Mayor's Table. Since then the Barbican Concert Hall has opened, and the London Symphony Orchestra has become resident orchestra. Music is everywhere in the City, as it should be. So when last year's Lord Mayor and Lady Mayoress, Roger and Clare Gifford, asked me become a Patron of their new charity, the City Music Foundation, I said yes straight away - not only because of the ancient association of the City with music, but because it looks so keenly to the future. Its raison d'être is to help young musicians at that critical difficult early point in their careers, right at the beginning, after their training, when they attempt to launch themselves into the world. The Foundation nurtures, encourages, and supports them at a vulnerable moment in their lives. I know very well what that feels like - young actors face exactly the same problems; sometimes really gifted, exceptional artists fall by the wayside.
    [Show full text]
  • Implications of Abrogating the Role of the Aldermen As Justices of the Peace
    Committee: Date: 2 December 2016 Courts Sub (Policy and Resources) Committee Subject: Public The City of London and the Magistracy Report of: For Information Remembrancer Report Author: Paul Double Introductory Note 1. The paper annexed responds to a request that a report on the constitutional background to the City‘s relationship with the Magistracy be submitted to this subcommittee. This background is primarily referable to the Aldermen although non Aldermanic magistrates are now in the main responsible for summary justice in the City‘s Magistrates‘ Courts. Experience with the botched exercise of reforming the office of Lord Chancellor demonstrated (if demonstration were needed) that making changes to a constitutional settlement of centuries standing without a detailed analysis of the landscape is likely to be a cause of difficulty. That is not to say, of course, that change should not be entertained; as is well known, the City has only survived by a process of canny evolution and its evolving relationship with the administration of justice is a good example of this process at work. 2. For completeness the paper includes reference to the significant change to the position of Aldermen as magistrates introduced by the Access to Justice Act 1999, and the subsequent Act of Common Council by which the mandatory linkage to the magistracy was ended. It does not, however, deal with the aspect of that Act which related to the position of Lord Mayor as Chief Magistrate. The 1999 Act broke the link between the office of Chief Magistrate and Bench Chairman in the City, a link which had been mistakenly introduced by the Justices of the Peace Act 1968.
    [Show full text]
  • Lublin Studies in Modern Languages and Literature
    Lublin Studies in Modern Languages and Literature VOL. 43 No 2 (2019) ii e-ISSN: 2450-4580 Publisher: Maria Curie-Skłodowska University Lublin, Poland Maria Curie-Skłodowska University Press MCSU Library building, 3rd floor ul. Idziego Radziszewskiego 11, 20-031 Lublin, Poland phone: (081) 537 53 04 e-mail: [email protected] www.wydawnictwo.umcs.lublin.pl Editorial Board Editor-in-Chief Jolanta Knieja, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Lublin, Poland Deputy Editors-in-Chief Jarosław Krajka, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Lublin, Poland Anna Maziarczyk, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Lublin, Poland Statistical Editor Tomasz Krajka, Lublin University of Technology, Poland International Advisory Board Anikó Ádám, Pázmány Péter Catholic University, Hungary Monika Adamczyk-Garbowska, Maria Curie-Sklodowska University, Poland Ruba Fahmi Bataineh, Yarmouk University, Jordan Alejandro Curado, University of Extramadura, Spain Saadiyah Darus, National University of Malaysia, Malaysia Janusz Golec, Maria Curie-Sklodowska University, Poland Margot Heinemann, Leipzig University, Germany Christophe Ippolito, Georgia Institute of Technology, United States of America Vita Kalnberzina, University of Riga, Latvia Henryk Kardela, Maria Curie-Sklodowska University, Poland Ferit Kilickaya, Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Turkey Laure Lévêque, University of Toulon, France Heinz-Helmut Lüger, University of Koblenz-Landau, Germany Peter Schnyder, University of Upper Alsace, France Alain Vuillemin, Artois University, France v Indexing Peer Review Process 1. Each article is reviewed by two independent reviewers not affiliated to the place of work of the author of the article or the publisher. 2. For publications in foreign languages, at least one reviewer’s affiliation should be in a different country than the country of the author of the article.
    [Show full text]
  • Sheriffs' & Recorder's Fund
    SHERIFFS’ & RECORDER’S FUND Annual Report 2018-2019 The Fund was established by the Sheriffs of the City of London in 1808 The Sheriffs’ & Recorder’s Fund In 1808 the two Sheriffs of the City of London set up a fund to help prisoners living in appalling conditions in Newgate, and their families. In 1931 the Fund merged with the fund set up by the Recorder to assist offenders released on probation. The Sheriffs’ & Recorder’s Fund still plays a vital part in preventing re-offending. In prison today: • The prison population has risen by 77% in the last 30 years. England & Wales has the highest imprisonment rate in Western Europe. • Assault rates among children in custody average 228 assaults a month. • 43% of prisons received a negative rating from inspectors in 2017-18 for purposeful activity work. In many prisons work remains mundane, repetitive and rarely linked to resettlement objectives. • 54% of those entering prison were assessed as having literacy skills expected of an 11-year-old (general population: 15%). • The number of women in prison has doubled since 1993. On release: • On release prisoners receive £46 – a sum unchanged since 1997 (with inflation, the equivalent today is £82.34). • 50% of respondents to a 2016 YouGov survey said they would not consider employing an offender or ex-offender • 48% of adults are reconvicted within one year of release (64% of those serving sentences of less than 12 months). Working in an office in the Old Bailey provided by the Corporation of London, the Fund gives small grants to ex-prisoners and their families in Greater London to buy essentials: clothes for a job interview, a training course, tools of trade, household equipment.
    [Show full text]
  • Judicial Encounters with Quakers 1660 1688*
    Judicial Encounters with Quakers 1660 1688* URING the reigns of Charles II and James II many Quakers were subjected to the rigours of the penal D laws against dissenters and Catholics. As a result, they often looked to the members of the common law judiciary for redress. Unfortunately the "twelve men in scarlet" who manned the courts of King's Bench, Common Pleas and Exchequer were not considered by contemporary observers to be independent arbiters of the law, but rather, were seen as civil servants of the Crown, "stewards of royal power charged with implementing the royal will".2 They had indeed been long utilized by the Crown for political and administrative, as well as legal purposes, and had been discredited by their decisions favouring the royal prerogative in the last years of Charles I's "personal" rule.3 Likewise, by 1688 they had again, for the same reason, found themselves discredited in the eyes of the victorious opposition.4 Although Whig accusations of judicial subservience to the Stuart kings appear influenced far more by partisan politics than by legal appreciation^ the judges throughout most of the reigns of Charles II and James II did hold their patents "during the king's pleasure" and dismissals 1 In this article quotations from manuscripts have been modernized in spelling, punctuation and capitalization. Old Style dating has been retained. The term "dissenter" means one who attended a religious conventicle as denned by the Conventicle Act (16 Car. II, 0.4). > J. S. Cockburn, History of English assizes, 1558-1714 (Cambridge, 1972), p. 6.
    [Show full text]
  • The Poor in England Steven King Is Reader in History at Contribution to the Historiography of Poverty, Combining As It Oxford Brookes University
    king&t jkt 6/2/03 2:57 PM Page 1 Alannah Tomkins is Lecturer in History at ‘Each chapter is fluently written and deeply immersed in the University of Keele. primary sources. The work as a whole makes an original The poor in England Steven King is Reader in History at contribution to the historiography of poverty, combining as it Oxford Brookes University. does a high degree of scholarship with intellectual innovation.’ The poor Professor Anne Borsay, University of Wales, Swansea This fascinating collection of studies investigates English poverty in England between 1700 and 1850 and the ways in which the poor made ends meet. The phrase ‘economy of makeshifts’ has often been used to summarise the patchy, disparate and sometimes failing 1700–1850 strategies of the poor for material survival. Incomes or benefits derived through the ‘economy’ ranged from wages supported by under-employment via petty crime through to charity; however, An economy of makeshifts until now, discussions of this array of makeshifts usually fall short of answering vital questions about how and when the poor secured access to them. This book represents the single most significant attempt in print to supply the English ‘economy of makeshifts’ with a solid, empirical basis and to advance the concept of makeshifts from a vague but convenient label to a more precise yet inclusive definition. 1700–1850 Individual chapters written by some of the leading, emerging historians of welfare examine how advantages gained from access to common land, mobilisation of kinship support, crime, and other marginal resources could prop up struggling households.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Serjeant the Queen Has Appointed His Honour Judge
    LIVERY April 2015 BRIEFING From the Chairman of the Livery Committee. Common Serjeant The service is no longer held on Lady The Queen has appointed His Honour Day, but usually two weeks before Dear Clerk, Judge Richard Marks QC to be the Good Friday - hence next year 11 Common Serjeant of London on the March 2016; and always preceded Herewith the latest edition of the advice of the Lord Chancellor. He the night before by the Lord Mayor’s bi-monthly Livery Briefing, for onward will be based at the Central Criminal Dinner for Masters. distribution to your livery, please. Court (The Old Bailey) and took up post with effect from 9 March. 33rd annual Inter Livery Bridge The content draws heavily on the Judge Marks succeeds His Honour Competition News pages at the Livery Committee Judge Nicholas Hilliard QC, recently 60 Team Pairs attended this year’s website, where you can find details appointed the Recorder of London. event on 2 March at Drapers’ Hall, and links to a host of livery related In addition to duties as the second representing 41 different Companies. information. If you wish to post any senior judge at the Old Bailey, the item on the site (please aim for Common Serjeant oversees the The highest overall placed Champion between 50-150 words), please email elections at Common Hall. Judge Pair were Mark Nichols and Roy me at [email protected] Marks is a member of the Cooks’ Griggs of the City Solicitors’ Company, Company. who were presented with their trophy Please may I also draw your attention by the Lady Mayoress.
    [Show full text]
  • Nineteenth Century Legal Treatises Procedural Law Fiche Listing
    Nineteenth Century Legal Treatises Procedural Law Fiche Listing Bigelow, Melville Madison, 1846-1921. Maddock, Henry, d. 1824. A treatise on the law of estoppel : and its A treatise on the principles and practice of the application in practice. High Court of Chancery : under the following heads, Boston : Little, Brown. 1886 I. Common law jurisdiction of the chancellor. II. Equity Equity jurisdiction of the chancellor. III. Statutory lvii, 765 p. ; 24 cm.; US-92-1; 4th ed. jurisdiction of the chancellor. IV. Specially delegated Fiche: 20805-20813 jurisdiction of the chancellor. London : W. Clarke and Sons. 1815 Bigelow, Melville Madison, 1846-1921. Equity A treatise on the law of estoppel : and its 2 v. ; 23 cm.; UK-92-4. application in practice. Fiche: 29122-29135 Boston : Little, Brown. 1876 Equity Will, John Shiress, 1840-1910. lxviii, 603 p. ; 24 cm.; US-92-2; 2nd ed. The practice of the referees' courts, in Parliament : Fiche: 20814-20821 in regard to engineering details, efficiency of works, and estimates, and water and gas bills : with a chapter Bigelow, Melville Madison, 1846-1921. on claims to compensation. A treatise on the law of estoppel : and its London : Stevens and Sons. 1866 application in practice. Practice & Procedure Boston : Little, Brown. 1882 xxi, 340 p. ; 23 cm.; UK-90-1. Equity Fiche: 33727-33730 lxxxiii, 675 p. ; 24 cm.; US-92-3; 3rd ed. Fiche: 20822-20829 Glyn, Lewis E. (Lewis Edmund), 1849-1919. The jurisdiction and practice of the Mayor's Court O'Conor, Charles, 1804-1884. : together with appendices of forms, rules, and Heath-Ingersoll arbitration : decision and award of statutes specially relating to the court.--2nd ed.
    [Show full text]
  • ACCEPTED VERSION Greg Taylor
    ACCEPTED VERSION Greg Taylor The grand jury of South Australia The American Journal of Legal History, 2001; 45(4):468-516 Copyright 2001 Temple University This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in The American Journal of Legal History following peer review. The version of record Greg Taylor, The grand jury of South Australia, The American Journal of Legal History, 2001; 45(4):468-516 is available online at: https://doi.org/10.2307/3185314. PERMISSIONS https://academic.oup.com/ajlh/pages/author_self_archiving_policy Accepted Manuscript The accepted manuscript is defined here as the final draft author manuscript, as accepted for publication by a journal, including modifications based on referees’ suggestions, before it has undergone copyediting and proof correction. Authors may upload their accepted manuscript PDF to an institutional and/or centrally organized repository, provided that public availability is delayed until 24 months after first online publication in the journal. When uploading an accepted manuscript to a repository, authors should include the following acknowledgment as well as a link to the version of record. This will guarantee that the version of record is readily available to those accessing the article from public repositories, and means that the article is more likely to be cited correctly. This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in [insert journal title] following peer review. The version of record [insert complete citation information here] is available online at: xxxxxxx [insert URL that the author will receive upon publication here]. 2 November 2017 http://hdl.handle.net/2440/109282 THE GRAND JURY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA* 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Asset Sub (Finance) Committee
    Public Document Pack Corporate Asset Sub (Finance) Committee Date: WEDNESDAY, 26 MARCH 2014 Time: 1.45 pm Venue: COMMITTEE ROOMS, 2ND FLOOR, WEST WING, GU ILDHALL Members: Roger Chadwick (Chairman) Jeremy Mayhew (Deputy Chairman) Deputy Douglas Barrow Randall Anderson Mark Boleat Deputy Michael Cassidy Brian Harris Alastair Moss Deputy Dr Giles Shilson Enquiries: Katie Odling tel. no.: 020 7332 3414 [email protected] Lunch will be served for Members in the Guildhall Club at 1pm John Barradell Town Clerk and Chief Executive AGENDA Part 1 - Public Agenda 1. APOLOGIES 2. MEMBERS' DECLARATION S UNDER THE CODE OF CONDUCT IN RESPECT O F ITEMS ON THE AGENDA 3. MINUTES To agree the public minutes and summary of the meeting held on 12 December 2012. For Decision (Pages 1 - 4) 4. THE GOVERNMENT'S TRA NSPARENCY AGENDA - IMPLICATIONS FOR THE COLC Report of the City Surveyor. For Information (Pages 5 - 10) 5. CENTRAL CRIMINAL COU RT BUSINESS PLAN 201 4-17 Report of the Secondary. For Decision (Pages 11 - 32) 6. QUESTIONS ON MATTERS RELATING TO THE WORK OF THE SUB - COMMITTEE 7. ANY OTHER BUSINESS T HAT THE CHAIRMAN CON SIDERS URGENT 8. EXCLUSION OF THE PUB LIC MOTION - That under Section 100(A) of the Local Government Act 1972, the public be excluded from the meeting for the following items on the grounds that they involve the likely disclosure of exempt information as defined in Part I of the Schedule 12A of the Local Government Act. Part 2 - Non -Public Agenda 9. NON -PUBLIC MINUTES To agree the non-public minutes of the meeting held on 12 December 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • 02154 CH01 FINAL.Pdf
    © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTIONFPONOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC. NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION. 02154_CH01_FINAL.indd 2 1/27/12 5:40:43 PM © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION Introduction to Criminal CHAPTER Investigation© Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones &
    [Show full text]