DOCSLIB.ORG

Governance Review Report.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Governance Review Report.Pdf Committee: Date: Resource Allocation Sub-Committee 18 September 2020 Policy & Resources Committee 24 September 2020 Subject: Public Governance Review Report of: For Decision Town Clerk Summary In September 2019, the Policy and Resources Committee proposed the undertaking of a comprehensive Governance Review of the City Corporation. This proposal, endorsed by the Court of Common Council, recognised that because of the unique and historic nature of the City Corporation it requires good governance to ensure it functions effectively and to the highest possible standards. The Committee was conscious that some potentially contentious issues needed to be addressed and that some radical changes may need to be considered. It was, therefore, agreed that the review should be undertaken independently and Robert Rodgers, The Lord Lisvane, was appointed to conduct the Review, due to his significant expertise and experience. He was encouraged to take a comprehensive and critical “warts and all” look at the totality of the Corporation’s arrangements, without fear or favour, and he has now submitted his findings (attached at Appendix 1). Lord Lisvane’s independent report is detailed and contains more than 90 specific recommendations, together with wider commentary and analysis. These recommendations are far reaching and wide ranging; it is now for Members to consider how far they are appropriate and which should be taken forward. The recommendations are not all contingent upon each other and thus do not represent a “single package”: Members will have the option to consider which recommendations (and to what extent) are implemented, and timescales for this. It will be important to go through the Review in a structured and methodical way in the coming period, with Members afforded sufficient time to read and consider the content and implications. This paper, therefore, seeks Members’ consideration as to a proposed approach for deliberating and reviewing these proposals, rather than on the specific content of the Governance Review (which will be debated in the coming period). It will also be of the utmost importance to ensure that the process moving forward provides adequately for all Members of the Court to continue to have the opportunity to input and comment on the Review. It should be noted that the Governance Review was also asked to take into consideration, various other reviews into aspects of the Corporation’s activities (such as education, support for the financial and professional services sector, and its internal structures). Recommendations It is recommended that:- • Lord Lisvane’s Governance Review report be received; • consideration be given to the next phase of the process, including wider Member consultation, as set out at paragraphs 8-18 of this report, with the Resource Allocation Sub-Committee being asked to go through the report in detail; and, • formal thanks be placed on record to Lord Lisvane for his efforts in conducting the Review. Main Report Background 1. At its meeting on 14 March 2019, the Policy and Resources Committee agreed to a fundamental review (FR) of the allocation of the City of London Corporation’s resources being undertaken. The purpose of the review was to ascertain how resources are currently being allocated against our Corporate Plan priorities and to ensure that:- • spending was being undertaken in accordance with agreed priorities; • the City Corporation’s financial plans were sustainable in the medium term; • action was being taken to mitigate any risks which might be associated with Government’s desire for public bodies to focus on need and its plans to change current funding mechanisms to reflect this; and • the City Corporation remains fit for purpose in the wake of, amongst other things, Government’s forthcoming spending review, fair funding review, reforms to business rate retention and a police formula funding review. 2. The nature of the organisation’s funding and service provision is diverse and good governance is essential to ensure that it is functioning effectively and remains fit for purpose. Supporting its governance structures incurs a significant part of the Corporation’s expenditure. Furthermore, any changes proposed through the Fundamental Review were likely to have implications for governance. Therefore, a number of Members suggested that a review of governance arrangements should be undertaken in parallel with the FR. 3. There was also a range of wider activity underway which played into the same piece, looking at how the City Corporation might improve the efficiency, diversity, and outcomes of its work across various areas. Its support for the competitiveness agenda, of increasing importance in the current context to support the UK’s financial and professional services industries, was also an area where focus could be sharpened and where changes to governance might improve the efficacy of the organisation’s activities. 4. This view was supported by the Policy and Resources Committee, as well as its Resource Allocation Sub-Committee (which had been identified as the “reference sub-committee” for considering the Governance Review matters in the first instance). It was noted that it had been almost nine years since the last comprehensive review of the City Corporation’s governance arrangements was undertaken and, since that time, the number of bodies forming part of the decision making structure had increased to approximately 130 committees, sub- committees and working parties, excluding some of the bi-lateral committee meetings. 5. In reaching their conclusion, Members were of the view that radical changes would need to be considered and that hard choices might need to be made. The difficulties associated with undertaking the review internally were acknowledged and it was, therefore, agreed that any review should be undertaken independently. 6. The Town Clerk was asked to look at the possibility of engaging a suitable individual and, following this process, your Committee supported the appointment of The Lord Lisvane KCB DL (Robert Rogers), as an independent person to undertake the review. 7. The evolution of the Fundamental Review, together with other discrete areas of Review (such as the Tomlinson Review into the City’s education provision, or the Fraser Review into the City’s work in support of competitiveness and the financial and professional services sector), have presented additional areas of consideration which result in implications for the Corporation’s governance. Their recommendations have, therefore, been incorporated so far as possible within Lord Lisvane’s Review. Proposal / Timetable 8. Having started work on the Review in 2020 (and, notwithstanding the complications added by the COVID-19 outbreak), Lord Lisvane has now submitted his report for Members’ consideration. 9. As the responsible body for the co-ordination of the City Corporation’s governance, as well as the originators of the Governance Review, the report is now presented to the Policy and Resources Committee for consideration as to how it wishes to take it forward. 10. The report is some 147 pages long and contains more than 90 recommendations. It would, therefore, be impractical to seek to consider the report in a single sitting: quite aside from the question of volume, it is inevitable that there will be various options to explore in some cases, or implications to consider when coming to a view as to the implementation of specific proposals. 11. The various recommendations are, in many cases, not contingent upon each other and it will be for Members to determine which (and to what extent) they wish to accept and implement. There may be some recommendations that could be adopted relatively swiftly, whilst others would either require or benefit from a longer-term implementation. 12. Members will also need to consider the proposals with reference to the context of the Review. As noted within the Review itself, the City Corporation is a highly complex non-party political organisation, active or involved across a diverse range of areas, and with a considerable role in London-wide government. It would be unreasonable, therefore, to expect that every nuance or implication of particular relationships or activities has been made available to Lord Lisvane within the time period of the Review to date. The expertise of Members and others in these areas will, therefore, be of importance in considering the implementation of proposals. 13. Members will, therefore, need time to absorb and consider the various items and deliberate in a structured and thorough fashion. 14. It is, therefore, suggested that the Resource Allocation Sub-Committee, having previously been identified as the reference sub-committee for the Governance Review, be asked to go through the report over the course of a series of meetings in the first instance and consider whether to accept specific recommendations, as well as their implementation. That Sub-Committee has frequent meetings scheduled over the coming period as follows, which will allow several opportunities for the content to be considered and scrutinised: • Wednesday 7 October • Thursday 22 October • Thursday 5 November • Friday 20 November • Thursday 10 December 15. The Sub-Committee will make recommendations thereon to the Policy and Resources Committee which, in turn, would consider the various recommendations and submit formal proposals to the Court of Common Council. 16. The Governance Review will affect all aspects of the City Corporation’s governance and all Members as a consequence.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Applications Decided by Delegated Powers Between 01/03/2019 and 31/03/2019 Total Count of Applications: 214 ADAM Application
    Applications decided by Delegated Powers between 01/03/2019 and 31/03/2019 Total Count of Applications: 214 ADAM Application Registered Applicant Name Proposal Location Days taken 8 Week Decision Decision Date Number to decision target Achieved? 19/00078/MJR 21/01/2019 C/O Agent DISCHARGE OF CONDITION 7 CROMWELL HOUSE, 1-3 39 True Full 01/03/2019 (CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT FITZALAN PLACE, Discharge SCHEME) OF 18/00666/MJR ADAMSDOWN, CARDIFF, of Condition CF24 0ED Application Registered Applicant Name Proposal Location Days taken 8 Week Decision Decision Date Number to decision target Achieved? 18/02864/MNR 10/12/2018 Barua CHANGE OF USE TO 4 BED HOUSE 17 BERTRAM STREET, 84 False Permission 04/03/2019 IN MULTIPLE OCCUPATION (CLASS ADAMSDOWN, CARDIFF, be granted C4) CF24 1NX 19/00170/MNR 29/01/2019 ALDI Stores Ltd. NEW ADDITIONAL EXTERNAL PLANT UNIT 3A, CITY LINK, 44 True Permission 14/03/2019 AND ASSOCIATED PLANT NEWPORT ROAD, be granted ENCLOSURE REQUIRED BY ADAMSDOWN, CARDIFF, INTERNAL REFURBISHMENT OF THE CF24 1PQ ALDI FOODSTORE 18/02834/MNR 14/12/2018 Kutkut ERECTION OF DWELLING REAR OF 262 NEWPORT 91 False Planning 15/03/2019 ROAD, ADAMSDOWN, Permission CARDIFF, CF24 1RS be refused 18/02835/MNR 12/12/2018 Abid Amin TWO STOREY EXTENSION 71 STACEY ROAD, 97 False Permission 19/03/2019 ADAMSDOWN, CARDIFF, be granted CF24 1DT 18/03046/MNR 14/01/2019 United Welsh CONSTRUCTION OF AN EXTERNAL ADAMS COURT, NORTH 70 False Permission 25/03/2019 LIFT SHAFT AND ASSOCIATED LUTON PLACE, be granted WORKS ADAMSDOWN, CARDIFF, CF24 0NA BUTE Application
    [Show full text]
  • DATES of TRIALS Until October 1775, and Again from December 1816
    DATES OF TRIALS Until October 1775, and again from December 1816, the printed Proceedings provide both the start and the end dates of each sessions. Until the 1750s, both the Gentleman’s and (especially) the London Magazine scrupulously noted the end dates of sessions, dates of subsequent Recorder’s Reports, and days of execution. From December 1775 to October 1816, I have derived the end dates of each sessions from newspaper accounts of the trials. Trials at the Old Bailey usually began on a Wednesday. And, of course, no trials were held on Sundays. ***** NAMES & ALIASES I have silently corrected obvious misspellings in the Proceedings (as will be apparent to users who hyper-link through to the trial account at the OBPO), particularly where those misspellings are confirmed in supporting documents. I have also regularized spellings where there may be inconsistencies at different appearances points in the OBPO. In instances where I have made a more radical change in the convict’s name, I have provided a documentary reference to justify the more marked discrepancy between the name used here and that which appears in the Proceedings. ***** AGE The printed Proceedings almost invariably provide the age of each Old Bailey convict from December 1790 onwards. From 1791 onwards, the Home Office’s “Criminal Registers” for London and Middlesex (HO 26) do so as well. However, no volumes in this series exist for 1799 and 1800, and those for 1828-33 inclusive (HO 26/35-39) omit the ages of the convicts. I have not comprehensively compared the ages reported in HO 26 with those given in the Proceedings, and it is not impossible that there are discrepancies between the two.
    [Show full text]
  • South East Wales Transport Model Mode-Destination Model Estimation
    EUROPE South East Wales Transport Model Mode-destination model estimation James Fox, Bhanu Patruni For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR1927z2 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif., and Cambridge, UK © Copyright 2018 Welsh Government R® is a registered trademark. RAND Europe is a not-for-profit organisation whose mission is to help improve policy and decision making through research and analysis. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from the Welsh Government. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org www.rand.org/randeurope Preface This report has been produced for Llywodraeth Cymru / the Welsh Government. It documents the development of travel demand models for the South East Wales transport model. Mode-destinations models have been estimated for eight home-based tour purposes and for non-home-based tours and detours. While the primary audience for the document is the Welsh Government, it may be of wider interest for transport researchers and transport planners involved in transport demand forecasting and strategic planning. RAND Europe is an independent not-for-profit policy research organisation that serves the public interest by improving policymaking and informing public debate. Our clients are European governments, institutions and companies with a need for rigorous, impartial, multidisciplinary analysis. This report has been peer-reviewed in accordance with RAND’s quality assurance standards (see http://www.rand.org/about/standards/) and therefore may be represented as a RAND Europe product.
    [Show full text]
  • 801 Bishop of Llandaff
    ROUTE: LLWYBR: 801 Bishop of Llandaff School (Llanishen/Lisvane/Rhiwbina) CONTRACTOR: CONTRACTWR: New Adventure Travel FFÔN: TEL: 02920 442 040 Sept 2018 Amser Codi Amcangyfrifedig Disgrifiad o'r Safle Pick-Up Time Stop Description 07.15 Ty Glas Road 07.19 Station Road 07.25 Heol y Delyn 07.27 Mill Road 07.29 Cherry Orchard Drive 07.32 Excaliber Drive 07.35 Thornhill Road 07.38 Heol Llanishen Fach 07.40 Rhiwbina Hill CARDIFF CAERDYDD 07.45 Pantmawr Road 07.50 Park Road 08.15 Bishop of Llandaff (Llantrisant Road) Michaelston-y-Fedw Glan-y-Llyn 15.10 Dept. Bishop of Llandaff (Llantrisant Road) Gwaelod- y-Garth Junction 29 O R W A Y Ty Rhiw Taff’s Lisvane & Well Thornhill Soar Junction 30 A Thornhill M E Castleton Taffs Well Lisvane Pentyrch Tongwynlais Llanishen Pantmawr Lisvane Morganstown Reservoir Llanishen Pontprennau Junction 32 GLEN RHOSYN R E Rhiwbina Llanishen Creigiau Reservoir Pentwyn Rhyd-y-penau V Coryton H E H Hollybush Maes Mawr Estate Whitchurch St. Mellons Birchgrove Ty- Coryton Rhiwbina AV Y Direct to O GO AV ST Trowbridge Cyncoed Llanrumney School E St. Mellons Radyr Radyr Birchgrove Heath High R Heath Low Lake Level C Level Whitchurch Heath Llandaff for Whitchurch Llandaff North Llanedeyrn Roath E Junction 33 Park Lake Trowbridge Gabalfa Mawr Danescourt Interchange O Roath Y O C Park L Danescourt Rumney NE W ROAD N Gabalfa Mynachdy D P Pen-y-lan Wentloog Maindy Pentrebane Fairwater Fairwater Llandaff Pengam Cathays St. Bride’s- Blackweir super-Ely Roath O Pontcanna St. Fagans WA R Cathays Waungron Park Pengam Scale of Map Graddfa’r Map OA Green Cathays 0 1/ 1/ 3/ 1 Park Level Tremorfa Crossin L Kilometr 0 25 50 75 1 Level Crossin Minton Adamsdown Court D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Old Bailey and the Recorder of London: a Brief History
    From our Patron, Simon Callow Last year I received the exceptional honour of the Freedom of the City of London. Since boyhood I have been haunted by the City, its history, its imagery, its traditions. One of the most vital of those traditions is the City's association with music. Since at least 1350, The Worshipful Company of Musicians has proudly celebrated the noble art. I vividly remember a City of London Festival when I was a youth, in which The Yeoman of the Guards was performed with full son et lumière effects at the Tower of London, and Sir William Walton was specially commissioned to write a splendid piece for the City – A Song for the Lord Mayor's Table. Since then the Barbican Concert Hall has opened, and the London Symphony Orchestra has become resident orchestra. Music is everywhere in the City, as it should be. So when last year's Lord Mayor and Lady Mayoress, Roger and Clare Gifford, asked me become a Patron of their new charity, the City Music Foundation, I said yes straight away - not only because of the ancient association of the City with music, but because it looks so keenly to the future. Its raison d'être is to help young musicians at that critical difficult early point in their careers, right at the beginning, after their training, when they attempt to launch themselves into the world. The Foundation nurtures, encourages, and supports them at a vulnerable moment in their lives. I know very well what that feels like - young actors face exactly the same problems; sometimes really gifted, exceptional artists fall by the wayside.
    [Show full text]
  • Graig Road, Lisvane, Cardiff, Cf14 0Uf
    SPRINGMEADOW, GRAIG ROAD, LISVANE, CARDIFF, CF14 0UF SPRINGMEADOW, GRAIG ROAD, LISVANE, CARDIFF, CF14 0UF A BEAUTIFULLY APPOINTED PROPERTY WITH THE MOST OUTSTANDING FAR REACHING VIEWS OVER CARDIFF AND BEYOND. EXTENSIVE, ADAPTABLE ACCOMMODATION WITHIN SPRINGMEADOW & INCLUDING A DETACHED TWO BEDROOM BUNGALOW & STABLE BLOCK SET WITHIN GARDENS & GROUNDS OF ABOUT 7.5 ACRE. Cardiff City Centre 6.3 miles M4 (J30) 4 miles Accommodation and amenities: Springmeadow Central atrium • Four reception rooms • Kitchen and breakfast room • Master bedroom suite with dressing room and en suite bathroom • Four further bedrooms, three en suite • Lower ground floor indoor heated swimming pool and sauna Two bedroom apartment • Kitchen-living-dining room • Bathroom Springmeadow Bungalow Open-plan kitchen-living-dining room • Two double bedrooms • Shower room • Cloakroom • Garden 12 Bay stable block • Extensive parking and garaging Gardens and grounds, in total about 7.5 acres Chartered Surveyors, Auctioneers and Estate Agents 55 High Street, Cowbridge, Vale Of Glamorgan, CF71 7AE Tel: 01446 773500 Email: [email protected] www.wattsandmorgan.co.uk www.wattsandmorgan.co.uk SITUATION Lisvane is a highly respected community about 5 miles north of Cardiff City centre. It retains its own identity and a village feel, with a village shop, Primary School, three pubs and a Parish Church. It has long been regarded as one of Cardiff's foremost residential areas. ABOUT THE PROPERTY In an exceptional, commanding location, 'Springmeadow' occupies an enviable position with panoramic views over Cardiff, onto the Bristol Channel and the North Somerset coastline. With 3 storey accommodation of about 9500 square feet, it has, to the heart of this family home, a most impressive central atrium with floating gallery over and fine, 180-degree views from over the surrounding area towards Cardiff and the Bristol Channel.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Planning and Environment : Development Control
    Cardiff Council : Strategic Planning And Environment : Development Control Applications Decided between 09/01/2017 and 13/01/2017 Application No. Date Applicant Type Address Proposal Decision Date: Decision: Statutory Class: BUTETOWN SC/16/00018/MJR22/12/2016 Nathaniel Lichfield SCR LAND AT DUMBALLS ROAD, SCREENING OPINION - 11/01/2017 Response Sent Other Consent & Partners BUTETOWN, CARDIFF UP TO 109 DWELLINGS Types 16/02730/MJR 16/11/2016 Associated British OUT LAND ADJACENT TO COMMERCIAL 12/01/2017 Permission be Major - Ports LONGSHIPS ROAD AND DEVELOPMENT (B2 granted Industry/Storage/Dis COMPASS ROAD, CARDIFF AND B8 USE CLASSES) tribution BAY, CF10 4RP 16/02656/MJR 03/11/2016 Morse LBC THE COAL EXCHANGE REPLACEMENT 13/01/2017 Permission be Listed Buildings LIMITED, THE COAL DECORATIVE CEILING granted EXCHANGE, MOUNT AND ASSOCIATED STUART SQUARE, CHANDELIERS IN BUTETOWN, CARDIFF, CF10 PLACE OF EXISTING 5EB FALSE CEILING CAERAU 16/02801/MNR 23/11/2016 Vale of Glamorgan RFO CAERAU ELY (AFC) REQUEST FOR 12/01/2017 Raise No Other Consent Council FOOTBALL CLUB, CWRT YR OBSERVATIONS - Objection Types ALA PLAYING FIELDS, CWRT EXTENSION TO THE YR ALA, CARDIFF EXISTING CLUB HOUSE WITH SHOWER FACILITIES, A NEW SEATED STAND FOR 150 PEOPLE AND A NEW TRAINING PITCH (60M X 40M) CANTON A/16/00221/MNR 05/12/2016 Lovell Partnerships ADV ADJACENT TO 635-637, ADVERTISING/MARKET 12/01/2017 Permission be Advertisements Ltd COWBRIDGE ROAD EAST, ING SIGNAGE TO BE granted CANTON, CARDIFF BONDED TO EXISTING TIMBER HOARDING A/16/00226/MNR 08/12/2016 Futurama ADV WESSEX NISSAN, HADFIELD INSTALLATION OF 09/01/2017 Permission be Advertisements ROAD, LECKWITH, CARDIFF, NISSAN CORPORATE granted CF11 8AQ SIGNAGE Page No.
    [Show full text]
  • The Attached List Shows Those Planning Applications Received by the Council During the Stated Week. These Applications Can Be I
    CARDIFF COUNTY COUNCIL PLANNING APPLICATIONS RECEIVED DURING WEEK ENDING 11TH OCTOBER 2018 The attached list shows those planning applications received by the Council during the stated week. These applications can be inspected during normal working hours at the address below: PLANNING, TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT COUNTY HALL CARDIFF CF10 4UW Any enquiries or representations should be addressed to the CHIEF STRATEGIC PLANNING, HIGHWAYS, TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION OFFICER at the above address. In view of the provisions of the Local Government (Access to Information) Act 1985, such representations will normally be available for public inspection. Future Planning Committee Dates are as follows: 17 October 2018 21 November 2018 19 December 2018 23 January 2019 13 February 2019 20 March 2019 17 April 2019 15 May 2019 19 June 2019 17 July 2019 14 August 2019 Total Count of Applications: 46 BUTETOWN 18/02297/MNR Full Planning Permission Expected Decision Level: DEL Received: 03/10/2018 Ward: BUTETOWN Case Officer: Clare Beaney Applicant: Mr Fisher Cardiff Council, Education Service, Room 422, County Hall Agents: Cardiff Council, County Hall, Altantic Wharf, Cardiff, , CF104UW Proposal: THE TEMPORARY PLANNING CONSENT HAS EXPIRED, THEREFORE NEEDS TO EXTEND THE RETENTION PERIOD FOR THE EXISTING DEMOUNTABLE At: ST MARY THE VIRGIN PRIMARY SCHOOL, 5 NORTH CHURCH STREET, BUTETOWN, CARDIFF, CF10 5HB CAERAU 18/02317/MNR Discharge of Condition(s) Expected Decision Level: DEL Received: 01/10/2018 Ward: CAERAU Case Officer: Jo Evans Applicant: Mr Jones Archdiocese
    [Show full text]
  • Implications of Abrogating the Role of the Aldermen As Justices of the Peace
    Committee: Date: 2 December 2016 Courts Sub (Policy and Resources) Committee Subject: Public The City of London and the Magistracy Report of: For Information Remembrancer Report Author: Paul Double Introductory Note 1. The paper annexed responds to a request that a report on the constitutional background to the City‘s relationship with the Magistracy be submitted to this subcommittee. This background is primarily referable to the Aldermen although non Aldermanic magistrates are now in the main responsible for summary justice in the City‘s Magistrates‘ Courts. Experience with the botched exercise of reforming the office of Lord Chancellor demonstrated (if demonstration were needed) that making changes to a constitutional settlement of centuries standing without a detailed analysis of the landscape is likely to be a cause of difficulty. That is not to say, of course, that change should not be entertained; as is well known, the City has only survived by a process of canny evolution and its evolving relationship with the administration of justice is a good example of this process at work. 2. For completeness the paper includes reference to the significant change to the position of Aldermen as magistrates introduced by the Access to Justice Act 1999, and the subsequent Act of Common Council by which the mandatory linkage to the magistracy was ended. It does not, however, deal with the aspect of that Act which related to the position of Lord Mayor as Chief Magistrate. The 1999 Act broke the link between the office of Chief Magistrate and Bench Chairman in the City, a link which had been mistakenly introduced by the Justices of the Peace Act 1968.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Publishing Select Committee Legal Advice
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by White Rose Research Online JOURNAL OF LAW AND SOCIETY doi 10.1111/jols.12153, APRIL 2019 ISSN: 0263-323X, pp. 1±29 Tacticians, Stewards, and Professionals: The Politics of Publishing Select Committee Legal Advice Ben Yong,* Greg Davies,** and Cristina Leston-Bandeira*** At Westminster, there are increasing pressures on select committees to publish in-house legal advice. We suggest that examining the process of deciding to publish provides useful insights into the provision, reception, and use of legal advice, and the dynamics of select com- mittees generally. We argue that the autonomy of select committees to decide what use they make of evidence and advice they receive is, in practice, constrained by the intra-institutional dynamics and practices of select committees. Committee actors ± parliamentarians, clerks, and parliamentary lawyers ± each have overlapping, sometimes competing, roles. Most of the time, these roles and the responsibilities they encom- pass coincide, but the prospect of publication reveals clear tensions between the different actors. This is the politics of publication: the tactical approach of politicians is in tension with the stewardship of clerks and the professional norms of parliamentary lawyers. We suggest this tension will only increase in the near future. * Law School, University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX, England [email protected] ** Wales Governance Centre, School of Law and Politics, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3AX, Wales [email protected] *** School of Politics and International Relations, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, England [email protected] We would like to thank the three anonymous referees and one parliamentary lawyer for their comments on an earlier draft of this article.
    [Show full text]
  • Sheriffs' & Recorder's Fund
    SHERIFFS’ & RECORDER’S FUND Annual Report 2018-2019 The Fund was established by the Sheriffs of the City of London in 1808 The Sheriffs’ & Recorder’s Fund In 1808 the two Sheriffs of the City of London set up a fund to help prisoners living in appalling conditions in Newgate, and their families. In 1931 the Fund merged with the fund set up by the Recorder to assist offenders released on probation. The Sheriffs’ & Recorder’s Fund still plays a vital part in preventing re-offending. In prison today: • The prison population has risen by 77% in the last 30 years. England & Wales has the highest imprisonment rate in Western Europe. • Assault rates among children in custody average 228 assaults a month. • 43% of prisons received a negative rating from inspectors in 2017-18 for purposeful activity work. In many prisons work remains mundane, repetitive and rarely linked to resettlement objectives. • 54% of those entering prison were assessed as having literacy skills expected of an 11-year-old (general population: 15%). • The number of women in prison has doubled since 1993. On release: • On release prisoners receive £46 – a sum unchanged since 1997 (with inflation, the equivalent today is £82.34). • 50% of respondents to a 2016 YouGov survey said they would not consider employing an offender or ex-offender • 48% of adults are reconvicted within one year of release (64% of those serving sentences of less than 12 months). Working in an office in the Old Bailey provided by the Corporation of London, the Fund gives small grants to ex-prisoners and their families in Greater London to buy essentials: clothes for a job interview, a training course, tools of trade, household equipment.
    [Show full text]
  • Judicial Encounters with Quakers 1660 1688*
    Judicial Encounters with Quakers 1660 1688* URING the reigns of Charles II and James II many Quakers were subjected to the rigours of the penal D laws against dissenters and Catholics. As a result, they often looked to the members of the common law judiciary for redress. Unfortunately the "twelve men in scarlet" who manned the courts of King's Bench, Common Pleas and Exchequer were not considered by contemporary observers to be independent arbiters of the law, but rather, were seen as civil servants of the Crown, "stewards of royal power charged with implementing the royal will".2 They had indeed been long utilized by the Crown for political and administrative, as well as legal purposes, and had been discredited by their decisions favouring the royal prerogative in the last years of Charles I's "personal" rule.3 Likewise, by 1688 they had again, for the same reason, found themselves discredited in the eyes of the victorious opposition.4 Although Whig accusations of judicial subservience to the Stuart kings appear influenced far more by partisan politics than by legal appreciation^ the judges throughout most of the reigns of Charles II and James II did hold their patents "during the king's pleasure" and dismissals 1 In this article quotations from manuscripts have been modernized in spelling, punctuation and capitalization. Old Style dating has been retained. The term "dissenter" means one who attended a religious conventicle as denned by the Conventicle Act (16 Car. II, 0.4). > J. S. Cockburn, History of English assizes, 1558-1714 (Cambridge, 1972), p. 6.
    [Show full text]