DOCSLIB.ORG

Spatial Variability of Streambed Vertical Hydraulic Conductivity and Its Relation to Distinctive Stream Morphologies in the Beiluo River, Shaanxi Province, China

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Spatial Variability of Streambed Vertical Hydraulic Conductivity and Its Relation to Distinctive Stream Morphologies in the Beiluo River, Shaanxi Province, China Hydrogeology Journal (2015) 23: 1617–1626 DOI 10.1007/s10040-015-1288-4 Spatial variability of streambed vertical hydraulic conductivity and its relation to distinctive stream morphologies in the Beiluo River, Shaanxi Province, China Weiwei Jiang & Jinxi Song & Junlong Zhang & Yuanyuan Wang & Nan Zhang & Xinhua Zhang & Yongqing Long & Jiaxuan Li & Xiaogang Yang Abstract Streambed vertical hydraulic conductivity (Kv) sediments are significantly different on each side of the is a key parameter in the analysis of interactions between channel. The erosional and depositional forms are one of streams and aquifers, and of stream ecosystems. However, the driving dynamics for the distribution of streambed knowledge of the streambed hydraulic conductivity grain size that trigger the differences in the distribution of associated with different stream morphologies is relatively the Kv. scarce. An in-situ standpipe permeameter test method was used to determine the spatial variability in streambed Kv Keywords Geomorphology . Streambed vertical hydraulic measured along 18.5 km of stream reach in the Beiluo conductivity . Erosion and deposition . Groundwater/ River, Shaanxi Province, China. The 59 total measure- surface-water relations . China ments were conducted at four test sites in three different stream morphologies: straight channel, anabranching channels and a nearby meander bend. There was great Introduction spatial variability in Kv among the four test sites and three K distribution patterns can be determined: (1) higher K v v Accurate estimation of streambed hydraulic conductivity values appear on the erosional bank in contrast to lower K fi K values on the depositional bank at the two sites near ( ) is of signi cance in the analysis of the magnitude and v extent of water exchange and contaminant transfer meander bends; (2) the Kv distribution in straight channels shows that the higher K values occur in the center of the between groundwater and surface water, and is even v important in dealing with a number of geotechnical channel; (3) the Kv values are generally highest on the branch with more alluvial forms in the anabranching problems involving the management of groundwater and surface water (Cardenas et al. 2004; Chen et al. 2008; channels. Moreover, grain-size analysis results illustrate K that the average grain-size distributions of streambed Song et al. 2009; Sebok et al. 2014). Streambed can be measured through a variety of approaches and techniques which have been discussed by Landon et al. (2001) and Received: 15 December 2014 /Accepted: 19 June 2015 Published online: 14 July 2015 Kalbus et al. (2006). It should be taken into account, however, that each method has its own limitation because * Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015 of measurement scale and field conditions (Kalbus et al. 2006; Min et al. 2013). It is known that the streambed W. Jiang I J. Song I J. Zhang I Y. Wang I Y. Long I J. Li I X. Yang vertical hydraulic conductivity (Kv) always varies spatial- College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, ly; some studies have revealed that the Kv has large Northwest University, Xi’an, 710027, China variations along a river transect (perpendicular to the river J. Song ()) flow direction; Chen 2005; Min et al. 2013). Streambed State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Kv is spatially variable in a river and the occurrence of the Loess Plateau, largest Kv is in the center of the stream channel (Genereux Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, CAS & MWR, Yangling, et al. 2008). Landon et al. (2001) and Chen (2005) 712100, China K e-mail: [email protected] reported that v variation could occur on a scale as small as 3 m. In addition, even over a short distance (less than N. Zhang K Yellow River Institute of Hydraulic Research, Zhengzhou, hundreds of meters), the v can change appreciably (Chen 450003, China 2004; Genereux et al. 2008). Moreover, hydraulic con- ductivity decreases with increasing depth according to the X. Zhang State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River study results of Song et al. (2010) and Min et al. (2013). Engineering, The channel morphologic features are important factors Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610065, China in the analysis of the hydraulic relationship between 1618 streams and aquifers (Cardenas et al. 2004; Käser et al. is relatively scarce. In the present study, the study focuses 2009; Sebok et al. 2014). Hyporheic interaction is on an investigation of spatial variability in streambed Kv controlled by variable pressure heads in the streambed spanning 18.5 km of stream reach in the Beiluo River, sediments and its environmental conditions (Koch et al. Shaanxi Province, China. An in-situ field standpipe 2011). Stream morphologies create the pressure variations, permeameter was utilized to collect 59 total measurements including meanders (Nowinski et al. 2011), cobbles using 4 test sites in 3 stream morphologies (one in the (Edwardson et al. 2003), bedforms (Bardini et al. 2013), straight stream channel, one in anabranching channels and riffles and pools (Käser et al. 2009), and beaver dams two near distinctive meander bends). All sediment (Genereux et al. 2008). The across-stream gradient can be samples were collected after the Kv tests and they were induced by flow along meander bends, which is enhanced used for grain-size analysis. by the natural alignment of large stream K along the The objectives of this study were to (1) investigate direction of maximum gradient (Cardenas et al. 2004). spatial variability in streambed hydraulic conductivity (2) Compared to homogeneous bedform, small-scale perme- determine the links between this variability and stream ability heterogeneity produces more irregular flow patterns morphologies, bedforms and water depth, and (3) analyze (Bardini et al. 2013). Downwelling and upwelling flow the relationship between the distribution of vertical paths can be caused by bedform and sinuosity at small hydraulic conductivity and the sediment grain size. scale (1–100 m), and width and depth of bedrock at large scale (km; Malard et al. 2002). For a pool–riffle sequence, exchange between channel and hyporheic water can induce rapid downwelling at the head of riffles and varies Study area upwelling in riffle tails (Edwardson et al. 2003). Furthermore, regional groundwater-flow attributes are The field study was conducted in the Beiluo River, which predominately controlled by stream geomorphology such is one of the tributaries of the Weihe River, and is a as channel gradient, sinuosity, width/depth ratio, stream- meandering stream located in Shaanxi Province, China. bed hydraulic conductivity and so on (Larkin and Sharp The river system has a feather-like distribution with a total 1992). It has been reported that either bankfull cross- length of 680.3 km, and the total area of the Beiluo River sectional area or bankfull width are significant for all peak Basin is approximately 26.9 km2. It covers two Chinese discharges (Lawlor 2004). High hydraulic conductivity topographic regions, the Loess Plateau and the Guanzhong produces saturated subsurface flow (Irvine et al. 2012). Basin. Its flow is from northwest to southeast and empties The interaction of streams and aquifers can be enhanced into the Weihe River. The study area is located in a by growth of meander length and reduced by decrease in continental monsoon climate area and has a mean annual river sinuosity (Boano et al. 2006). Due to the transport of precipitation of 541.7 mm and a mean temperature of fine materials, the hydraulic conductivity of shallow 13.2 °C. Seasonal variations in precipitation are distinctive alluvial aquifers under condition of sinuosity-driven and non-uniform. The majority of floods occur from July hyporheic flow is dynamic (Nowinski et al. 2011). to October. The river system has a stream gradient of 1.98 A meandering stream is one of the important sedimen- ‰ and the average stream flow is 14.99 m3/s. This area is tological forms that connects regional aquifers and streams in the transition region between the Loess Plateau and the (Dong et al. 2012). Sebok et al. (2014) demonstrated that Guanzhong Basin. The streambed sediment is alluvial there are more variable streambed features in the meander loess sandy clay and sand-gravel stratum of Pliocene and bend than in the straight section. The existence of several Holocene Epoch. Meandering channel morphologies orders of magnitude in range of streambed anisotropy occur because of the change from an erosional regime to values has been observed close to stream banks (Sebok a depositional regime. et al. 2013). The water exchange in the main channel can The Beiluo River is an important local river that move into slower pools by anabranch diversions, and provides water supplies for agricultural activities and promotes the exchange process into the subsurface (Koch human consumption (Zhang et al. 2007). However, et al. 2011). A combined study of the Kv and erosion and because of a long history of wastewater drainage and deposition processes of streambed sediments has been platform runoff from nearby rapidly developed petroleum conducted by Genereux et al. (2008) and Levy et al. industries, the natural environmental systems have been (2011). Bardini et al. (2013) showed that the bedform is an affected. In this process, the Beiluo River has received important hydrologic factor impacting hyporheic water contaminants and has been influenced by the input of a exchange. The streambed and point bars influence the large amount of organic matter and heavy metals (Shi process of water exchange and solute transport between et al. 2008). Furthermore, the annual average amount of streams and surrounding groundwater systems (Dong runoff for the Beiluo River has markedly decreased, et al. 2012). Those previous studies suggested that there especially from spring to autumn, during the period from are many influences on hydraulic conductivity including 1964 to 2008 (Dong et al. 2014). Therefore, determination stream morphology and geomorphology attributes, river- of the hydraulic conductivity of the Beiluo River’s bed forms, erosion and deposition process, and the riverbed is essential for estimating the water discharge riverbed sediments.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Intermittent Rivers and Ephemeral Streams
    Intermittent Rivers and Ephemeral Streams: A Unique Biome With Important Contributions to Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services Ross Vander Vorste, University of Wisconsin La Crosse, La Crosse, WI, United States Romain Sarremejane, School of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, United Kingdom Thibault Datry, IRSTEA, UR-Riverly, Centre de Lyon-Villeurbanne, Villeurbanne, France © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. What Are Intermittent Rivers and Ephemeral Streams? 1 Hydrologically Diverse and Globally Abundant 1 Three-in-One: IRES Contribute to Lotic, Lentic, and Terrestrial Dynamics 2 Biogeochemical Dynamics in Intermittent Rivers and Ephemeral Streams 3 Biodiversity in Intermittent Rivers and Ephemeral Streams 4 From Microbes to Elephants, IRES Support High Biodiversity 4 Strategies for Persistence in IRES 6 Organization of Metacommunities Within IRES 6 Management of Intermittent Rivers and Ephemeral Streams 7 Ecosystem Services Provided by IRES 7 Protection and Management of IRES 7 Future of IRES and Global Change 7 Summary 8 References 9 Abstract The majority of flowing waterbodies throughout the world can be considered intermittent rivers or ephemeral streams (IRES) because at some point in time and space they stop flowing or dry. Despite their global abundance, less is known about this biome compared to perennial—permanently flowing—rivers. However, a recent surge in research has dramatically improved our understanding of how IRES function and what types of biodiversity and ecosystem services they support. A cycle of terrestrial-aquatic habitat conditions caused by the periodic drying and rewetting creates a high temporal dynamic in the biogeochemistry, biodiversity, and ecosystem services of IRES. Vast amounts of accumulated sediment, organic matter and organisms can be transported from IRES downstream to larger rivers or lakes, contributing to the global C cycle.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia Water Quality
    GEORGIA SURFACE WATER AND GROUNDWATER QUALITY MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT STRATEGY Okefenokee Swamp, Georgia PHOTO: Kathy Methier Georgia Department of Natural Resources Environmental Protection Division Watershed Protection Branch 2 Martin Luther King Jr. Drive Suite 1152, East Tower Atlanta, GA 30334 GEORGIA SURFACE WATER AND GROUND WATER QUALITY MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT STRATEGY 2015 Update PREFACE The Georgia Environmental Protection Division (GAEPD) of the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) developed this document entitled “Georgia Surface Water and Groundwater Quality Monitoring and Assessment Strategy”. As a part of the State’s Water Quality Management Program, this report focuses on the GAEPD’s water quality monitoring efforts to address key elements identified by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) monitoring strategy guidance entitled “Elements of a State Monitoring and Assessment Program, March 2003”. This report updates the State’s water quality monitoring strategy as required by the USEPA’s regulations addressing water management plans of the Clean Water Act, Section 106(e)(1). Georgia Department of Natural Resources Environmental Protection Division Watershed Protection Branch 2 Martin Luther King Jr. Drive Suite 1152, East Tower Atlanta, GA 30334 GEORGIA SURFACE WATER AND GROUND WATER QUALITY MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT STRATEGY 2015 Update TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS .............................................................................................. 1 INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • THE WATER QUALITY of the LITTLE COLORADO RIVER WATERSHED Fiscal Year 2007
    THE WATER QUALITY OF THE LITTLE COLORADO RIVER WATERSHED Fiscal Year 2007 Prepared by the Surface Water Section March 2009 Publication Number OFR 09-11 LCR REPORT FY 2007 THE WATER QUALITY OF THE LITTLE COLORADO RIVER WATERSHED Fiscal Year 2007 By The Monitoring and Assessments Units Edited by Jason Jones and Meghan Smart Arizona Department of Environmental Quality ADEQ Water Quality Division Surface Water Section Monitoring Unit, Standards & Assessment Unit 1110 West Washington St. Phoenix, Arizona 85007-2935 ii LCR REPORT FY 2007 THANKS: Field Assistance: Anel Avila, Justin Bern, Aiko Condon, Kurt Ehrenburg, Karyn Hanson, Lee Johnson, Jason Jones, Lin Lawson, Sam Rector, Patti Spindler, Meghan Smart, and John Woods. Report Review: Kurt Ehrenburg, Lin Lawson, and Patti Spindler. Report Cover: From left to right: EMAP team including ADEQ, AZGF, and USGS; Rainbow over the Round Valley in the White Mountains; Measuring Tape, and Clear Creek located east of Payson. iii LCR REPORT FY 2007 ABBREVIATIONS Abbreviation Name Abbreviation Name ALKCACO3 Total Alkalinity SO4-T Sulfate Total ALKPHEN Phenolphthalein Alkalinity SPCOND Specific Conductivity Arizona Department of Suspended Sediment AQEQ Environmental Quality SSC Concentration AS-D Arsenic Dissolved su Standard pH Units AS-T Arsenic Total TDS Total Dissolved Solids Arizona Game and Fish AZGF Department TEMP-AIR Air Temperature Arizona Pollutant Discharge TEMP- AZPDES Elimination System WATER Water Temperature BA-D Barium Dissolved TKN Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen B-T Boron Total TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load CA-T Calcium Total USGS U.S. Geological Survey CFS Cubic Feet per Second ZN-D Zinc Dissolved CO3 Carbonate ZN-T Zinc Total CU-TRACE Copper Trace Metal CWA Clean Water Act DO-MGL Dissolved Oxygen in mg/l DO- PERCENT Dissolved Oxygen in Percent E.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrological, Environmental and Taxonomical Heterogeneity During the Transition from Drying to Flowing Conditions in a Mediterranean Intermittent River
    biology Article Hydrological, Environmental and Taxonomical Heterogeneity during the Transition from Drying to Flowing Conditions in a Mediterranean Intermittent River Andy Banegas-Medina 1,2,*, Isis-Yelena Montes 1,2 , Ourania Tzoraki 3 , Luc Brendonck 4,5 , Tom Pinceel 4,6, Gustavo Diaz 1 , Pedro Arriagada 7, Jose-Luis Arumi 8 , Pablo Pedreros 1 and Ricardo Figueroa 1 1 Centre of Environmental Sciences EULA-Chile and CHRIAM Water Research Centre, Department of Aquatic Systems, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Universidad de Concepción, P.O. Box 160-C Concepción, Chile; [email protected] (I.-Y.M.); [email protected] (G.D.); [email protected] (P.P.); rfi[email protected] (R.F.) 2 Laboratory of Biology, Department of Sciences, Danlí Technological Campus, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Honduras, Panamerican Highway km 95, 13201 Danlí, Honduras 3 Marine Sciences Department, School of Environment, University of the Aegean, University Hill, 81100 Mytilene, Lesvos, Greece; [email protected] 4 Laboratory of Animal Ecology, Global Change and Sustainable Development, KU Leuven, Ch. Deberiotstraat 32, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; [email protected] (L.B.); [email protected] (T.P.) 5 Water Research Group, Unit for Environmental Sciences and Management, North-West University, Private Bag X6001, 2520 Potchefstroom, South Africa 6 Centre for Environmental Management, University of the Free State, P.O. Box 339, 9300 Bloemfontein, South Africa Citation: Banegas-Medina, A.; 7 Centre of Environmental Sciences EULA-Chile and CHRIAM Water Research Centre, Department of Montes, I.-Y.; Tzoraki, O.; Brendonck, Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Universidad de Concepción, L.; Pinceel, T.; Diaz, G.; Arriagada, P.; P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • September 2, 2021
    September 2, 2021 Via www.regulations.gov The Honorable Michael Regan The Honorable Jaime A. Pinkham Administrator Acting Assistant Secretary of the Army for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Civil Works 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Department of the Army Washington, DC 20460 108 Army Pentagon Washington, DC 20310 Mr. John Goodin Director Mr. Vance F. Stewart III Office of Wetlands, Oceans and Watersheds Acting Principal Deputy U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of the Assistant Secretary of the 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Army for Civil Works Washington, DC 20460 Department of the Army 108 Army Pentagon Washington, DC 20310 Re: Request for Recommendations on Defining “Waters of the United States” Docket No. EPA-HQ-OW-2021-03281 Dear Administrator Regan, Acting Assistant Secretary Pinkham, Mr. Goodin, and Mr. Stewart: Together, our 85 organizations write to ask you to take two steps to protect critical wetlands, streams, and other waters that we and our millions of members rely on for swimming, fishing, boating, drinking water, and our livelihoods. First, we urge the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (“Corps”) (together, the “Agencies”) to promptly restore and implement the regulatory framework in effect prior to the so-called Navigable Waters Protection Rule (“NWPR”). Second, we urge the Agencies to promulgate a new definition of “waters of the United States” that is rooted in science, consistent with Supreme Court precedent, and faithful to the objective of the Clean Water Act.
    [Show full text]
  • WATER QUALITY in GEORGIA 2016-2017 (2018 Integrated 305B/303D Report)
    WATER QUALITY IN GEORGIA 2016-2017 (2018 Integrated 305b/303d Report) WATER QUALITY IN GEORGIA Georgia Department of Natural Resources Environmental Protection Division WATER QUALITY IN GEORGIA 2016-2017 (2018 Integrated 305b/303d Report) Preface This report was prepared by the Georgia Environmental Protection Division (EPD), Department of Natural Resources, as required by Section 305(b) of Public Law 92-500 (the Clean Water Act) and as a public information document. It represents a synoptic extraction of the EPD files and, in certain cases, information has been presented in summary form from those files. The reader is therefore advised to use this condensed information with the knowledge that it is a summary document and more detailed information may be available in EPD files. This report covers a two-year period, January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2017. Comments or questions related to the content of this report are invited and should be addressed to: Environmental Protection Division Georgia Department of Natural Resources Watershed Protection Branch 2 Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive, SE Suite 1162 East Tower Atlanta, Georgia 30334 WATER QUALITY IN GEORGIA This page is intentionally blank. WATER QUALITY IN GEORGIA CHAPTER 1 Watershed Protection in Georgia The GAEPD is a comprehensive environmental agency Executive Summary responsible for environmental protection, management, regulation, permitting, and Purpose This report, Water Quality in Georgia, enforcement in Georgia. The GAEPD has for 2016-20172016-2017, was prepared by the many years aggressively sought most available Georgia Environmental Protection Division program delegations from the USEPA in order to (EPD) of the Department of Natural Resources achieve and maintain a coordinated, integrated (DNR).
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the Effects of Pollution and Water Scarcity on the Stream Biota of an Intermittent Mediterranean Basin
    Received: 19 October 2017 Revised: 21 December 2017 Accepted: 2 January 2018 DOI: 10.1002/rra.3254 REVIEW PAPER A review of the effects of pollution and water scarcity on the stream biota of an intermittent Mediterranean basin Ioannis Karaouzas | Christos Theodoropoulos | Leonidas Vardakas | Eleni Kalogianni | Nikolaos Th. Skoulikidis Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, Institute of Marine Biological Resources and Inland Abstract Waters, Anavyssos, Greece This review presents the main results of a 10‐year research study conducted in a Mediterranean Correspondence intermittent basin (Evrotas River). By assembling the main outcomes of past and ongoing research Ioannis Karaouzas, Hellenic Centre for Marine projects, this study provides an overview of multiple stressor effects, with emphasis on water scar- Research, Institute of Marine Biological city, focusing on hydro‐biogeochemical processes, as well as on spatial and temporal variations in Resources and Inland Waters, 46.7 km Athens‐ Sounio Ave., Anavyssos 19013, Greece. benthic macroinvertebrates and fish fauna. The major impact in the basin has been the over‐exploi- Email: [email protected] tation of surface and groundwater resources, which, in combination with droughts, has resulted in the recurrent artificial desiccation of large parts of the hydrological network. The response to Funding information intermittency of the macroinvertebrate fauna is characterized by high resilience through various Sixth Framework Programme, Grant/Award drought‐resistant evolutionary mechanisms, with assemblages recovering successfully after Number: LIFE05 ENV/GR/000245; Seventh Framework Programme, Grant/Award Num- recurrent droughts. However, when pollution is evident in combination with drought, effects on bers: FP7/2007‐2011, No. 603629; benthic species richness, abundance, and assemblage structure can be severe.
    [Show full text]
  • River Ecosystem Conceptual Models and Non-Perennial Rivers: a Critical Review
    Received: 6 March 2020 Revised: 16 June 2020 Accepted: 29 June 2020 DOI: 10.1002/wat2.1473 ADVANCED REVIEW River ecosystem conceptual models and non-perennial rivers: A critical review Daniel C. Allen1 | Thibault Datry2 | Kate S. Boersma3 | Michael T. Bogan4 | Andrew J. Boulton5 | Daniel Bruno6 | Michelle H. Busch7 | Katie H. Costigan8 | Walter K. Dodds9 | Ken M. Fritz10 | Sarah E. Godsey11 | Jeremy B. Jones12 | Tatiana Kaletova13 | Stephanie K. Kampf14 | Meryl C. Mims15 | Thomas M. Neeson16 | Julian D. Olden17,18 | Amandine V. Pastor19 | N. LeRoy Poff20,21 | Benjamin L. Ruddell22 | Albert Ruhi23 | Gabriel Singer24 | Paolo Vezza25 | Adam S. Ward26 | Margaret Zimmer27 1Department of Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 2INRAE, UR-RIVERLY, Centre de Lyon-Villeurbanne, Villeurbanne, CEDEX France 3Department of Biology, University of San Diego, San Diego, California 4School of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 5School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia 6Department of Biodiversity and Restoration, Pyrenean Institute of Ecology (IPE-CSIC), Zaragoza, Spain 7Department of Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 8School of Geosciences, University of Louisiana, Lafayette, Louisiana 9Division of Biology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 10Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio 11Department of Geosciences, Idaho State University, Pocatello, Idaho 12Institute
    [Show full text]
  • Implications for Clean Water Act Implementation
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Protecting and Restoring our Nation’s Waters: The Effects of Science, Law, and Policy on Clean Water Act Jurisdiction with a focus on the Arid West A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Environmental Science and Engineering by Forrest Brown Vanderbilt 2013 © Copyright by Forrest Brown Vanderbilt 2013 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Protecting and Restoring our Nation’s Waters: The Effects of Science, Law, and Policy on Clean Water Act Jurisdiction with a focus on the Arid West by Forrest Brown Vanderbilt Doctor of Environmental Science and Engineering University of California, Los Angeles, 2013 Professor Richard F. Ambrose, Chair Since its initial passage in 1972, the Clean Water Act has attempted to restore and protect our Nation’s waters. The definition of ‘our Nation’s waters’ has undergone periodic debate and scrutiny as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and the Supreme Court have defined and redefined the standards for determining CWA jurisdiction. The Supreme Court’s most recent set of standards, including the “significant nexus” test, appear to both increase the uncertainty in what is regulated and increase the burden of proof for determining CWA jurisdiction. The Arid West was singled out in the most recent EPA and Corps joint jurisdictional guidance as a problematic area. Focusing on the Arid West, my dissertation evaluates the CWA jurisdiction process from three perspectives: law, policy, and ii science, and explores an understanding of the past, present, and potential future path of CWA jurisdiction.
    [Show full text]
  • April 15, 2019 Via Regulations.Gov Federal Rulemaking Portal U.S. Environmental Protection Agency EPA Docket Center Office of W
    April 15, 2019 via Regulations.gov federal rulemaking portal U.S. Environmental Protection Agency EPA Docket Center Office of Water Docket Mail Code 28221T 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, D.C. 20460 Re: Revised Definition of “Waters of the United States;” Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OW- 2018-0149; Comments of Sierra Club, Puget Soundkeeper Alliance, Idaho Conservation League, Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen’s Associations, Institute for Fisheries Resources, Tucson Audubon Society, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (“NAACP”), and Southeast Alaska Conservation Council To U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Dep’t of the Army, Corps of Engineers: These comments in opposition to the Revised Definition of Waters of the United States, 84 Fed. Reg. 4154 (Feb. 14, 2019) (“Dirty Water Rule” or “proposed rule”), are submitted by Earthjustice on behalf of the Sierra Club, Puget Soundkeeper Alliance, the Idaho Conservation League, Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen’s Associations, Institute for Fisheries Resources, Tucson Audubon Society, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (“NAACP”), and Southeast Alaska Conservation Council (collectively “Clean Water Groups”).1 We rely on clean water for drinking, to irrigate crops, for swimming and fishing, and as habitat for wildlife. Wetlands and other waters also reduce flooding and filter pollution. Since 1972, the Clean Water Act, one of our earliest and most important environmental laws, has helped restore and protect our Nation’s waters. The Clean Water Groups are opposed to the Dirty Water Rule as contrary to law, contrary to science, and contrary to the overwhelming evidence in the record that this rule will leave America’s waters unprotected from pollution, and subject to destruction and degradation.
    [Show full text]
  • United States District Court
    Case 2:16-cv-03869-DOC-PLA Document 209 Filed 09/23/18 Page 1 of 152 Page ID #:26702 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 SOUTHERN DIVISION 9 10 WISHTOYO FOUNDATION ET AL., Case No.: CV 16-3869-DOC (PLAx) 11 Plaintiffs, ORDER RE: MOTIONS IN LIMINE 12 [93] [94] [108] [109] [111] [113] [114] 13 vs. [117]; ORDER DENYING WITHOUT 14 PREJUDICE CONDITIONAL MOTION FOR JOINDER AND 15 UNITED WATER CONSERVATION MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE 16 DISTRICT, TO JOIN [163] [164]; ORDER DENYING AS MOOT RENEWED 17 Defendant. MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY 18 INJUNCTION [201]; AND 19 FINDINGS OF FACT AND 20 CONCLUSIONS OF LAW [176] 21 HOLDING THAT PLAINTIFFS ARE 22 ENTITLED TO DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF ON THEIR 23 CLAIM FOR TAKE OF SOUTHERN 24 CALIFORNIA STEELHEAD, BUT NOT ON THEIR CLAIM FOR TAKE 25 OF SOUTHWESTERN WILLOW 26 FLYCATCHER 27 28 1 Case 2:16-cv-03869-DOC-PLA Document 209 Filed 09/23/18 Page 2 of 152 Page ID #:26703 1 I. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 3 2 II. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND ............................................................................ 8 3 III. MOTIONS IN LIMINE ............................................................................................ 11 4 IV. FINDINGS OF FACT .............................................................................................. 13 5 A. United Operates the Vern Freeman Diversion Dam (“VFD”) on the Santa Clara River, Built in 1988–91 with Federal Funds ............................. 14 6 B. VFD Sits on a Migration Corridor for Southern California Steelhead, 7 Listed As Endangered by the National Marine Fisheries Service in 1997 ............................................................................................................... 19 8 1. Multiple Federal Agencies, With United’s Participation, 9 Consulted Regarding VFD’s Impact on Steelhead ...........................
    [Show full text]
  • Significance of Ephemeral and Intermittent Streams in the Arid and Semi-Arid American Southwest
    The Ecological and Hydrological Significance of Ephemeral and Intermittent Streams in the Arid and Semi-arid American Southwest R E S E A R C H A N D D E V E L O P M E N T EPA/600/R-08/134 ARS/233046 November 2008 www.epa.gov The Ecological and Hydrological Significance of Ephemeral and Intermittent Streams in the Arid and Semi-arid American Southwest by Lainie R. Levick, David C. Goodrich, Mariano Hernandez USDA-ARS Southwest Watershed Research Center Tucson, Arizona Julia Fonseca Pima County Office of Conservation Science and Environmental Policy Tucson, Arizona Darius J. Semmens USGS – Rocky Mountain Geographic Science Center Denver, Colorado Juliet Stromberg, Melanie Tluczek Arizona State University Tempe, Arizona Robert A. Leidy, Melissa Scianni USEPA, Office of Water, Region IX San Francisco, California D. Phillip Guertin University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona William G. Kepner USEPA, ORD, NERL Las Vegas, Nevada The information in this report has been funded wholly by the United States Environmental Protection Agency under an interagency assistance agreement (DW12922094) to the USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Southwest Watershed Research Center. It has been subjected to both agencies peer and administrative review processes and has been approved for publication. Although this work was reviewed by EPA and approved for publication, it may not necessarily reflect official Agency policy. Mention of trade names and commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development i Washington, DC 20460 5765leb08 Acknowledgements We gratefully acknowledge the following people for their valuable comments and review that significantly improved the quality, value, and accuracy of this document: Dave Bertelsen (University of Arizona Herbarium), Trevor Hare (Sky Island Alliance), Jim Leenhouts (USGS), Kathleen Lohse (University of Arizona), Waite Osterkamp (USGS), Sam Rector (Arizona Department of Environmental Quality), Phil Rosen (University of Arizona), Marty Tuegel (U.S.
    [Show full text]