In partnership with the community, we enrich lives by providing meaningful experiences through programs, parks, and facilities

PARK DISTRICT OF OAK PARK Regular Park Board Meeting Hedges Administrative Center 218 Madison Street, Oak Park, Illinois 60302 Thursday, August 22, 2019, 7:30pm

AGENDA

I. Call to Order/Roll Call

II. Approval of Agenda

III. Visitor/Public Comment Each person is limited to three minutes. The Board may set a limit on the total amount of time allocated to public comments.

IV. Consent Agenda A. Cash and Investment Summary* B. Warrants and Bills* C. Minutes* D. Disposal Ordinance 2019-08-01*

V. Staff Reports A. Executive Director’s Report* B. Updates and Information* C. Revenue/Expense Status Reports*

VI. Old Business A. Administration and Finance Committee 1. PDOP Community Survey Results* 2. Strategic Plan Progress Report**

B. Recreation and Facility Program Committee – None

C. Parks and Planning Committee 1. Rehm Tennis Court Contract Approval**

VII. New Business 1. FOCON Discussion of Blue Line Stop Name Change 2. Parameters Bond Ordinance 2019-09-01* 3. Dole Building Automation System* 4. Elected Officials BBQ Update

VIII. Closed Session

IX. Commissioners’ Comments Commissioner Porreca Commissioner Worley-Hood Commissioner Wick Commissioner Wollmuth President Lentz

X. Continue Meeting to the September 5, 2019, Committee of the Whole Meeting

*Indicates information attached **Indicates information to be provided at or prior to the meeting.

The Park District of Oak Park welcomes the opportunity to assist residents and visitors with disabilities. If you need special accommodations for this meeting, please call (708) 725-2000 or via email at [email protected].

Agenda Comments

Thursday, August 22, 2019

I. Roll Call

II. Approval of Agenda (Voice Vote) No additions to the Agenda are anticipated at this time.

III. Visitor/Public Comment

IV. Consent Agenda (Roll Call Vote) – Commissioner Porreca Commissioner Porreca – Motion of the Board for approval of the Consent Agenda, which includes the Cash and Investment Summary and Warrants and Bills for the month of July 2019; approval of minutes from the Committee of the Whole Meeting, July 11, 2019, the Annual Board Retreat, July 16, 2019, and the Regular Board Meeting, July 18, 2019; approval of Closed Session Minutes, July 11, 2019; approval of Disposal Ordinance 2019-08-01.

V. Staff Reports A. Executive Director’s Report* B. Updates and Information* C. Revenue/Expense Status Report*

VI. Old Business A. Administration and Finance Committee: Commissioner Porreca 1. PDOP Community Survey Results* (Roll Call Vote) Commissioner Porreca: I move that the Park Board Commissioners accept the 2019 PDOP Community Survey Results.

2. Strategic Plan Update* (Roll Call Vote) Commissioner Porreca: The Board will be updated on the Strategic Plan.

B. Recreation and Facility Program Committee: None

C. Parks and Planning Committee: Commissioner Wick 1. Rehm Tennis Court Contract Approval** (Roll Call Vote) Commissioner Wick: Information will be brought to the Board prior to or at the meeting.

VII. New Business 1. FOPCON Discussion of Blue Line Stop Name Change 2. Parameters Bond Refunding Ordinance 2019-09-01* 3. Dole Building Automation System* 4. Elected Officials BBQ Update

VIII. Commissioners’ Comments Commissioner Porreca Commissioner Worley-Hood Commissioner Wick Commissioner Wollmuth President Lentz

IX. Closed Session

X. Continue Meeting to the September 5, 2019, Committee of the Whole Meeting

IV. A

CASH AND INVESTMENT SUMMARY- July 2019

Community Jul-19 Jun-19 Bank IPDLAF CD's PMA - SSD IMET TOTAL TOTAL

General Fund 10 - Corporate (93,298) 7,507 893,700 5,639,126 (4,026,405) 2,420,629 1,950,949

Special Revenue Funds 15 - IMRF (885,861) 1,603 - - 1,243,918 359,660 310,153 16 - Liability (678,159) 8,965 - - 990,429 321,235 260,296 17 - Audit (54,615) 237 - - 65,181 10,804 8,995 20 - Recreation 1,898,983 4,979 800,000 1,410,919 1,968,579 6,083,460 5,770,287 21 - Museum (197,711) 1,220 - 133,871 242,075 179,455 170,467 22 - Special Recreation (1,383,620) 17,121 - - 1,529,833 163,334 49,866 25 - Special Facilities 381,875 3,288 - 1,040,000 593,203 2,018,366 1,939,406 85 - Cheney Mansion 250,004 462 - - 52,326 302,792 286,445

Capital Funds 70 - Capital Projects 1,120,627 78,051 500,000 80,000 1,775,984 3,554,662 4,050,494 70 - 2011 Bond ------70 - 2012 Bond ------70- 2013 Bond ------Total Cash Available to District 358,225 123,432 2,193,700 8,303,916 4,435,123 15,414,396 14,797,356 Distribution %: 2.32% 0.80% 14.23% 53.87% 28.77% 100.00% 100.00%

Other Funds 50- Health Insurance Fund 224,514 345 - - 350,799 575,658 570,737 x - Memorial Trust 14,881 - - - 118,049 132,931 132,900 xx - Working Cash 207,870 - - - - 207,870 207,870

Total Cash Across All Funds 805,490 123,777 2,193,700 8,303,916 4,903,972 16,330,855 15,708,864 Park District of Oak Park Cash Status Report As of July 31, 2019

Operating Accounts Community Bank 0.15% $ 822,240 iPrime Liquid Money Market 2.55% $ 7,518,752 Citibank 1.35% $ 785,164 Illinois Metropolitan Investment Fund 1.39% $ 5,078,935 * Illinois Park District Liquid Asset Fund Account 0.73% $ 123,777 $ 14,328,868

Operating Investment Accounts CFG Community Bank 2.39% due 08/21/19 $ 244,000 First Internet Bank of Indiana 2.38% due 08/21/19 $ 244,000 Bank of China 2.38% due 08/28/19 $ 244,000 ServisFirst Bank 2.76% due 12/03/19 $ 243,200 Northeast Community Bank 2.78% due 12/13/19 $ 243,000 Pacific Western Bank 2.52% due 05/14/20 $ 243,800 Rockford B&TC 2.39% due 05/28/20 $ 244,000 Western Alliance Bank/Torrey Pines Bank 2.43% due 05/28/20 $ 244,000 SonaBank 2.49% due 07/13/20 $ 243,700

Working Solvency $ 16,522,568

2018 Solvency $ 15,372,712

2013 Bond Accounts Illinois Metropolitan Investment Fund 2013 Bond 0.96% $ 116,273 **

2013 Bond Solvency $ 116,273

*Includes $226,903.62 of non-spendable funds **Includes $116,272.82 of non-spendable funds Total Solvency 2016 2017 2018 2019 January $ 9,058,410 January $ 8,222,701 January $ 10,807,839 January $ 12,224,500 February $ 9,857,240 February $ 9,835,012 February $ 12,096,547 February $ 13,705,194 March $ 12,895,634 March $ 13,158,403 March $ 14,639,398 March $ 17,043,761 April $ 12,487,132 April $ 12,871,778 April $ 14,673,906 April $ 17,003,585 May $ 12,583,438 May $ 12,722,619 May $ 15,142,968 May $ 16,993,252 June $ 11,459,618 June $ 11,558,746 June $ 13,586,366 June $ 16,008,032 July $ 10,747,178 July $ 11,974,154 July $ 15,372,712 July $ 16,522,568 August $ 12,556,293 August $ 11,839,784 August $ 16,194,723 August September $ 12,059,760 September $ 12,775,498 September $ 15,392,249 September October $ 11,588,440 October $ 12,059,760 October $ 15,094,766 October November $ 11,310,934 November $ 11,719,974 November $ 14,662,671 November December $ 10,580,165 December $ 10,116,988 December $ 12,708,567 December

Solvency

$18,000,000 $16,000,000 $14,000,000 2016 $12,000,000 2017 $10,000,000 2018 $8,000,000 2019 $6,000,000 $4,000,000

00 IV. B

Park District of Oak Park Voucher List for the Month of July Presented to the Board of Commissioners At their Meeting on August 22, 2019

Park District of Oak Park FY 2019 AP ACCOUNT DISTRIBUTION BY ACCOUNT OPEN & PAID VOUCHERS CHECK DATES 07/01/2019 TO 07/31/2019 PAY DATES 07/01/2019 TO 07/31/2019 BOTH ACCRUALS AND NON ACCRUALS CHECK RUN 0 TO 2147483647 VOUCHER PO CHECK PAY DATE/ NUMBER VENDOR NUMBER NUMBER CHECK DATE AMOUNT 10 CORPORATE FUND 10-00-14-00040 ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE 33648 HUNTINGBK HUNTINGTON BANK 507434 07/14/2019 75.00 33709 HUNTINGBK HUNTINGTON BANK 507434 07/14/2019 8.31 33709 HUNTINGBK HUNTINGTON BANK 507434 07/14/2019 8.69 33709 HUNTINGBK HUNTINGTON BANK 507434 07/14/2019 8.93 33806 PNC PNC BANK 507482 07/14/2019 4,933.74 5,034.67 10-00-21-20109 IMRF WITHHOLDING 32890 IMRF ILL MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND 28809 07/05/2019 42,690.17 42,690.17 10-00-21-20111 HEALTH INSURANCE SECTION 125 E 33214 PDRMA PDRMA 911 07/12/2019 11,355.48 11,355.48 10-00-21-20114 UNION DUES 33300 SEIU SEIU LOCAL 73 28995 07/26/2019 214.20 33300 SEIU SEIU LOCAL 73 28995 07/26/2019 214.20 428.40 10-00-21-20117 AFLAC SECTION 125 33085 AFLAC AFLAC ATTN: REMITTANCE PROCESSING 28829 07/12/2019 281.52 33296 AFLAC AFLAC ATTN: REMITTANCE PROCESSING 28950 07/26/2019 281.52 563.04 10-00-21-20118 AFLAC 33085 AFLAC AFLAC ATTN: REMITTANCE PROCESSING 28829 07/12/2019 94.78 33296 AFLAC AFLAC ATTN: REMITTANCE PROCESSING 28950 07/26/2019 94.78 189.56 10-00-21-20119 I LIFE 33299 NCPERS NCPERS GROUP LIFE INSURANCE 28982 07/26/2019 22.00 33299 NCPERS NCPERS GROUP LIFE INSURANCE 28982 07/26/2019 22.00 44.00 10-00-21-20120 ICMA WITHHELD 33087 ICMA ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 28856 07/12/2019 1,463.10 33298 ICMA ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 28969 07/26/2019 1,472.98 2,936.08 10-00-21-20131 ICMA ROTH IRA WITHHELD 33087 ICMA ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 28856 07/12/2019 251.82 33298 ICMA ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 28969 07/26/2019 251.82 503.64 10-00-21-20132 BRIGHT START PROGRAM 33086 BRIGHTSTA BRIGHT START COLLEGE SAVINGS PROGRAM28837 07/12/2019 100.00 33297 BRIGHTSTA BRIGHT START COLLEGE SAVINGS PROGRAM28957 07/26/2019 100.00 200.00 10-00-45-14505 MISCELLANEOUS INCOME 33807 PNC PNC BANK 07/14/2019 -49.34 33807 PNC PNC BANK 07/14/2019 -19.99 -69.33 10-00-52-00200 LEGAL COUNSEL phughes 08/14/2019 3:23:45PM Page 1 of 30 ap122r04 Park District of Oak Park FY 2019 AP ACCOUNT DISTRIBUTION BY ACCOUNT OPEN & PAID VOUCHERS CHECK DATES 07/01/2019 TO 07/31/2019 PAY DATES 07/01/2019 TO 07/31/2019 BOTH ACCRUALS AND NON ACCRUALS CHECK RUN 0 TO 2147483647 VOUCHER PO CHECK PAY DATE/ NUMBER VENDOR NUMBER NUMBER CHECK DATE AMOUNT 10-00-52-00200 LEGAL COUNSEL E 33198 HOLLAND HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP 20190232 908 07/12/2019 9,684.31 9,684.31 10-00-52-00202 LEGAL PUBLICATIONS 33294 WEDNES WEDNESDAY JOURNAL 20190975 28945 07/19/2019 84.00 84.00 10-00-52-00203 OFFICE EQUIPMENT SERVICE 33702 PITNEY PITNEY BOWES GLOBAL FINANCIAL SERVICES 507480 07/14/2019 238.68 238.68 10-00-52-00204 COMPUTER (IT) SERVICE 33551 ADOBE ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC 507355 07/14/2019 31.85 33551 ADOBE ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC 507355 07/14/2019 424.95 33563 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 12.99 33573 AMERIEAG AMERICAN EAGLE COM SVANACO 507368 07/14/2019 500.00 33574 ARCHIVE ARCHIVE SOCIAL, INC. 507370 07/14/2019 199.00 33581 BASECAMP BASECAMP-37 SIGNALS LTD 507377 07/14/2019 250.00 33608 DROPBOX DROPBOX INC. 507403 07/14/2019 450.00 33621 FLEETMAT FLEETMATICS USA LLC 507414 07/14/2019 1,187.00 33690 ONSTRAT ON STRATEGY 507470 07/14/2019 300.00 33736 SURVEYGIZ SURVEY GIZMO 507511 07/14/2019 6,600.00 9,955.79 10-00-52-00208 COPYING AND PRINTING- INTERNAL 33324 DELAGE DE LAGE LANDEN PUBLIC FINANCE20190147 28962 07/26/2019 1,955.31 1,955.31 10-00-52-00299 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES - OTHER 33212 PAYCOM PAYCOM PAYROLL, LLC 20190461 28871 07/12/2019 4,317.47 33223 TIAABANK TIAA BANK 20190075 28881 07/12/2019 1,555.09 33254 FLEX FLEXIBLE BENEFIT SERVICE CORP. 20190191 28909 07/19/2019 145.00 33364 PICKENS PICKENS-KANE BUSINESS SERVICES20190087 28988 07/26/2019 22.00 33398 PAYCOM PAYCOM PAYROLL, LLC 20190461 28987 07/26/2019 3,937.47 9,977.03 10-00-52-00650 BANK SERVICE CHARGE 33703 PLUNG PLUG N PAY 507481 07/14/2019 371.40 371.40 10-00-53-00300 OFFICE EXPENSE 33568 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 9.59 33626 GARVEY'S GARVEY'S OFFICE PRODUCTS 507419 07/14/2019 299.04 33650 IMPACT IMPACT NETWORKING LLC 507437 07/14/2019 1,238.00 33651 IMPACT IMPACT NETWORKING LLC 507437 07/14/2019 1,728.44 3,275.07 10-00-53-00405 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 32876 CDW CDW GOVERNMENT, INC. 20190434 28795 07/05/2019 881.81 32877 CDW CDW GOVERNMENT, INC. 20190433 28795 07/05/2019 219.46 33563 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 5.12 33565 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 32.07 33565 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 1,478.90 33565 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 9.98 33565 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 18.76 phughes 08/14/2019 3:23:45PM Page 2 of 30 ap122r04 Park District of Oak Park FY 2019 AP ACCOUNT DISTRIBUTION BY ACCOUNT OPEN & PAID VOUCHERS CHECK DATES 07/01/2019 TO 07/31/2019 PAY DATES 07/01/2019 TO 07/31/2019 BOTH ACCRUALS AND NON ACCRUALS CHECK RUN 0 TO 2147483647 VOUCHER PO CHECK PAY DATE/ NUMBER VENDOR NUMBER NUMBER CHECK DATE AMOUNT 10-00-53-00405 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 33565 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 7.99 33565 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 144.98 33565 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 47.50 33565 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 919.96 33577 ATLASPHON ATLAS PHONES.COM 507373 07/14/2019 371.28 33668 MEMORY4 MEMORY 4 LESS 507454 07/14/2019 1,497.07 33751 UPS THE UPS STORE 507518 07/14/2019 45.07 33751 UPS THE UPS STORE 507518 07/14/2019 6.90 5,686.85 10-00-56-00605 CONFERENCE AND TRAINING 33698 PERDIEM PERDIEM 507477 07/14/2019 12.85 33698 PERDIEM PERDIEM 507477 07/14/2019 24.28 33698 PERDIEM PERDIEM 507477 07/14/2019 21.23 33698 PERDIEM PERDIEM 507477 07/14/2019 18.81 33698 PERDIEM PERDIEM 507477 07/14/2019 14.64 33730 SPOTHERO SPOT HERO 507504 07/14/2019 17.00 33730 SPOTHERO SPOT HERO 507504 07/14/2019 18.00 126.81 10-00-56-00610 DUES AND SUBSCRIPTIONS 33351 LORMAN LORMAN EDUCATION SERVICES 20191004 28976 07/26/2019 349.50 33361 OPRFRC ROTARY CLUB OF OPRF 20191014 28994 07/26/2019 1,200.00 33649 IGOV IGOV 507435 07/14/2019 75.00 1,624.50 10-00-56-00620 ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE 33704 POTB POTBELLYS 507483 07/14/2019 290.00 290.00 10-00-56-00621 DIRECTOR EXPENSE 33663 LIFGUA LIFEGUARD STORE, INC. 507449 07/14/2019 -104.85 33694 PARKING PARKING 507473 07/14/2019 2.00 33694 PARKING PARKING 507473 07/14/2019 1.85 33694 PARKING PARKING 507473 07/14/2019 2.10 33694 PARKING PARKING 507473 07/14/2019 2.35 -96.55 10-00-56-00622 BOARD EXPENSE 33210 OAKPKLIB OAK PARK PUBLIC LIBRARY 20190918 28866 07/12/2019 76.55 76.55 10-00-56-00655 RECRUITMENT 33616 FACEBOOK FACEBOOK 507410 07/14/2019 40.00 33652 INDEED INDEED.COM 507438 07/14/2019 96.35 33653 IPRA ILLINOIS PARKS & RECREATION ASSOCIATION 507436 07/14/2019 265.00 33704 POTB POTBELLYS 507483 07/14/2019 63.60 464.95 10-00-58-00820 TELECOMMUNICATIONS 33249 COMCAST COMCAST 20190091 28903 07/19/2019 6,428.93 33677 MOZY MOZYPRO 507461 07/14/2019 11.95 33757 VERI VERIZON WIRELESS 507529 07/14/2019 2,138.40 8,579.28 phughes 08/14/2019 3:23:45PM Page 3 of 30 ap122r04 Park District of Oak Park FY 2019 AP ACCOUNT DISTRIBUTION BY ACCOUNT OPEN & PAID VOUCHERS CHECK DATES 07/01/2019 TO 07/31/2019 PAY DATES 07/01/2019 TO 07/31/2019 BOTH ACCRUALS AND NON ACCRUALS CHECK RUN 0 TO 2147483647 VOUCHER PO CHECK PAY DATE/ NUMBER VENDOR NUMBER NUMBER CHECK DATE AMOUNT 10-35-52-00260 PROPERTY REPAIR 33389 YOUNA YOUNA MECHANICAL INC 20190999 29011 07/26/2019 230.00 33390 YOUNA YOUNA MECHANICAL INC 20190999 29011 07/26/2019 1,242.36 33393 YOUNA YOUNA MECHANICAL INC 20190947 29011 07/26/2019 575.00 2,047.36 10-35-52-00275 CUSTODIAL SERVICES 33191 CRYSTAL CRYSTAL MGMT & MAINTENANCE SERVICES20190896 CORP28847 07/12/2019 410.00 33323 CRYSTAL CRYSTAL MGMT & MAINTENANCE SERVICES20190953 CORP28961 07/26/2019 480.00 890.00 10-35-52-00299 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES - OTHER 33554 ALADEC ALARM DETECTION SYSTEMS, INC. 507358 07/14/2019 242.37 33711 RENTOKIL ANDERSON PEST SOLUTIONS 507369 07/14/2019 128.00 370.37 10-35-52-00415 EQUIPMENT - RENTAL 33654 JACKS JACK'S RENTAL INC. 507439 07/14/2019 540.00 540.00 10-35-53-00301 UNIFORMS 33268 M&MSPORTS M&M SPORTS SCENE INC. 20190963 28920 07/19/2019 565.15 565.15 10-35-53-00311 SUPPLIES- CLEANING & HOUSEHOLD 33606 DOLL DOLLARTREE 507401 07/14/2019 5.00 5.00 10-35-53-00313 SUPPLIES - BUILDING MATERIALS 33590 CARHOR CARLIN HORTICULTURAL 507386 07/14/2019 226.59 226.59 10-35-53-00320 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 33571 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 83.82 33571 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 57.54 33571 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 51.99 193.35 10-35-53-00330 ANIMAL CARE 33566 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 41.97 33566 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 72.11 114.08 10-35-53-11100 GIFT SHOP 33260 HAPE HAPE INC. 20190964 28914 07/19/2019 198.00 33579 BAKERTAY BAKER & TAYLOR, INC 507375 07/14/2019 20.71 33579 BAKERTAY BAKER & TAYLOR, INC 507375 07/14/2019 263.15 33580 BALL BALL SEED COMPANY 507376 07/14/2019 70.18 33622 FOLKMAN FOLKMANIS INC. 507415 07/14/2019 241.07 33629 GERMANIA GERMANIA SEED CO 507422 07/14/2019 14.80 33629 GERMANIA GERMANIA SEED CO 507422 07/14/2019 26.54 33643 HAPE HAPE INC. 507431 07/14/2019 198.00 33683 PENNY THE PENNY MEN 507476 07/14/2019 275.50 1,307.95 10-35-53-11105 CONSERVATORY SPECIAL EVENTS 32885 FOPCON FRIENDS OF THE OAK PARK CONSERVATORY20190881 28803 07/05/2019 2,175.00 phughes 08/14/2019 3:23:45PM Page 4 of 30 ap122r04 Park District of Oak Park FY 2019 AP ACCOUNT DISTRIBUTION BY ACCOUNT OPEN & PAID VOUCHERS CHECK DATES 07/01/2019 TO 07/31/2019 PAY DATES 07/01/2019 TO 07/31/2019 BOTH ACCRUALS AND NON ACCRUALS CHECK RUN 0 TO 2147483647 VOUCHER PO CHECK PAY DATE/ NUMBER VENDOR NUMBER NUMBER CHECK DATE AMOUNT 10-35-53-11105 CONSERVATORY SPECIAL EVENTS 33656 JEWELS JEWEL - OSCO 507441 07/14/2019 19.52 33701 PETESFR PETE'S FRESH MARKET ROOSEVELT CORP 507479 07/14/2019 42.77 2,237.29 10-35-56-00600 EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION 33587 BUONA BUONA BEEF 507383 07/14/2019 115.95 33686 OAKBAKE OAK PARK BAKERY 507466 07/14/2019 16.05 132.00 10-35-56-00610 DUES AND SUBSCRIPTIONS 33676 MORTON THE MORTON ARBORETUM 507516 07/14/2019 145.00 145.00 10-35-56-00615 EMPLOYEE TRAVEL REIMBURSEMENT 33256 GENTRY KENT GENTRY 28911 07/19/2019 29.93 33634 GOOGLE GOOGLE 507427 07/14/2019 59.99 89.92 10-35-56-11100 GIFT SHOP - SALES TAX 32889 ILLDEP ILLINOIS DEPT. OF REVENUE 28807 07/05/2019 115.00 115.00 10-35-58-00800 ELECTRICITY 33399 COMED COMED 20190328 28960 07/26/2019 1,145.51 1,145.51 10-35-58-00810 NATURAL GAS 33283 NICOTRAN NICOR GAS TRANSPORTATION BILL20190239 PAYMENT28937 CE 07/19/2019 656.53 656.53 10-35-58-00830 WATER 33768 VILLWAT VILLAGE OF OAK PARK-WATER WATER/SEWER 507532 07/14/2019 345.75 345.75 10-50-52-00260 PROPERTY REPAIR E 32870 ALLTYPES ALL TYPES ELEVATORS, INC. 20190871 903 07/05/2019 310.00 E 33172 ALLTYPES ALL TYPES ELEVATORS, INC. 20190909 906 07/12/2019 211.00 E 33173 ALLTYPES ALL TYPES ELEVATORS, INC. 20190909 906 07/12/2019 891.00 33222 STEFL TIM STEFL INC. 20190907 28879 07/12/2019 170.82 33237 SERVPRO SERVPRO OF OAK PARK RIVER FOREST20190962 28894 07/16/2019 2,250.00 E 33309 ALLTYPES ALL TYPES ELEVATORS, INC. 20190941 916 07/26/2019 160.00 E 33310 ALLTYPES ALL TYPES ELEVATORS, INC. 20190996 916 07/26/2019 160.00 E 33311 ALLTYPES ALL TYPES ELEVATORS, INC. 20190996 916 07/26/2019 160.00 33369 SERVPRO SERVPRO OF OAK PARK RIVER FOREST20190962 28996 07/26/2019 2,267.78 33375 STEFL TIM STEFL INC. 20190948 28999 07/26/2019 381.00 33376 STEFL TIM STEFL INC. 20190948 28999 07/26/2019 698.71 33382 TWINSUP TWIN SUPPLIES LTD 20190946 29004 07/26/2019 300.00 33386 VILLFIN VILLAGE OF OAK PARK FINANCE 20190949 29009 07/26/2019 43.00 33388 VISTEEN VISTEEN PLUMBING INC. 20190942 29010 07/26/2019 737.50 33392 YOUNA YOUNA MECHANICAL INC 20190947 29011 07/26/2019 632.50 33394 YOUNA YOUNA MECHANICAL INC 20190947 29011 07/26/2019 172.50 33395 YOUNA YOUNA MECHANICAL INC 20190947 29011 07/26/2019 235.00 33555 ALADEC ALARM DETECTION SYSTEMS, INC. 507358 07/14/2019 239.04 33556 ALADEC ALARM DETECTION SYSTEMS, INC. 507358 07/14/2019 855.84 33557 ALADEC ALARM DETECTION SYSTEMS, INC. 507358 07/14/2019 1,400.64 phughes 08/14/2019 3:23:45PM Page 5 of 30 ap122r04 Park District of Oak Park FY 2019 AP ACCOUNT DISTRIBUTION BY ACCOUNT OPEN & PAID VOUCHERS CHECK DATES 07/01/2019 TO 07/31/2019 PAY DATES 07/01/2019 TO 07/31/2019 BOTH ACCRUALS AND NON ACCRUALS CHECK RUN 0 TO 2147483647 VOUCHER PO CHECK PAY DATE/ NUMBER VENDOR NUMBER NUMBER CHECK DATE AMOUNT 10-50-52-00260 PROPERTY REPAIR 33558 ALADEC ALARM DETECTION SYSTEMS, INC. 507358 07/14/2019 1,497.00 33728 SOUTH SOUTH SIDE CONTROL SUPPLY CO. 507502 07/14/2019 110.32 33728 SOUTH SOUTH SIDE CONTROL SUPPLY CO. 507502 07/14/2019 241.79 14,125.44 10-50-52-00265 FLEET SERVICE 33387 VILFLE VILLAGE OF OAK PARK FLEET 20190417 29008 07/26/2019 3,171.73 3,171.73 10-50-52-00275 CUSTODIAL SERVICES 33191 CRYSTAL CRYSTAL MGMT & MAINTENANCE SERVICES20190896 CORP28847 07/12/2019 4,895.00 4,895.00 10-50-52-00280 SCAVENGER SERVICE 32908 WASTE WASTE MANAGEMENT CO. 20190870 28827 07/05/2019 1,681.71 33228 WESTCOOK WEST COOK COUNTY SOLID WASTE20190914 AGENCY28890 07/12/2019 2,301.07 3,982.78 10-50-52-00285 PORTABLE RESTROOMS 33721 SERV SERVICE SANITATION INC. 507497 07/14/2019 825.00 825.00 10-50-52-00286 SPORTS FIELD IMPROVEMENTS 33225 VANENTER VAN'S ENTERPRISES LTD 20190908 28884 07/12/2019 1,675.00 1,675.00 10-50-52-00415 EQUIPMENT - RENTAL 32892 JACKS JACK'S RENTAL INC. 20190862 28810 07/05/2019 529.20 33215 RUSSO RUSSO POWER EQUIPMENT 20190913 28875 07/12/2019 200.00 33654 JACKS JACK'S RENTAL INC. 507439 07/14/2019 211.70 940.90 10-50-53-00301 UNIFORMS 33178 ARAMARK ARAMARK UNIFORMS 20190906 28834 07/12/2019 21.97 33227 WAREHOUS WAREHOUSE DIRECT OFFICE 20190915 28889 07/12/2019 149.40 33750 ULINE ULINE INC 507525 07/14/2019 96.43 267.80 10-50-53-00310 SUPPLIES-PARKS 32899 PULSE PULSE DESIGN INC. 20190569 28817 07/05/2019 2,451.66 32904 ULINE ULINE INC 20190868 28824 07/05/2019 569.02 33284 R&RLAND R&R LANDSCAPE SUPPLY 20190965 28938 07/19/2019 589.00 33285 RUSSO RUSSO POWER EQUIPMENT 20190931 28940 07/19/2019 180.81 33286 RUSSO RUSSO POWER EQUIPMENT 20190931 28940 07/19/2019 143.61 33319 BOZEMAN SUSAN KAY BOZEMAN 20190995 28956 07/26/2019 256.00 33359 NICE NICE RINK STO-COTE PRODUECTS INC 20191000 28983 07/26/2019 2,866.89 33569 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 -45.24 33571 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 76.08 33571 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 41.16 33571 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 22.70 33571 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 53.88 33607 DRESSEL DRESSEL'S ACE HARDWARE 507402 07/14/2019 3.49 33632 GOOD GOOD EARTH GREENHOUSE, LLC 507425 07/14/2019 14.98 33640 GRAINGER GRAINGER, INC. 507429 07/14/2019 390.02 33646 HOME HOME DEPOT 507433 07/14/2019 36.31 phughes 08/14/2019 3:23:45PM Page 6 of 30 ap122r04 Park District of Oak Park FY 2019 AP ACCOUNT DISTRIBUTION BY ACCOUNT OPEN & PAID VOUCHERS CHECK DATES 07/01/2019 TO 07/31/2019 PAY DATES 07/01/2019 TO 07/31/2019 BOTH ACCRUALS AND NON ACCRUALS CHECK RUN 0 TO 2147483647 VOUCHER PO CHECK PAY DATE/ NUMBER VENDOR NUMBER NUMBER CHECK DATE AMOUNT 10-50-53-00310 SUPPLIES-PARKS 33646 HOME HOME DEPOT 507433 07/14/2019 25.92 33646 HOME HOME DEPOT 507433 07/14/2019 63.52 33646 HOME HOME DEPOT 507433 07/14/2019 61.92 33669 MENARDS MENARD'S 507455 07/14/2019 10.48 33669 MENARDS MENARD'S 507455 07/14/2019 215.14 33689 OLEARYS O'LEARY'S CONTRACTORS EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY507469 07/14/2019 45.92 33689 OLEARYS O'LEARY'S CONTRACTORS EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY507469 07/14/2019 350.00 33714 RUSSO RUSSO POWER EQUIPMENT 507490 07/14/2019 67.35 33732 SPRINK SPRINKLER WAREHOUSE 507506 07/14/2019 431.86 8,922.48 10-50-53-00311 SUPPLIES- CLEANING & HOUSEHOLD 33383 ULINE ULINE INC 20190951 29005 07/26/2019 3,359.55 33563 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 128.71 33563 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 351.32 33646 HOME HOME DEPOT 507433 07/14/2019 46.00 33720 SCHAU SCHAUER'S HARDWARE 507496 07/14/2019 23.97 33720 SCHAU SCHAUER'S HARDWARE 507496 07/14/2019 20.69 3,930.24 10-50-53-00313 SUPPLIES - BUILDING MATERIALS 33345 GRAINGER GRAINGER, INC. 20190950 28967 07/26/2019 482.40 33563 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 34.20 33563 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 53.37 33563 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 92.06 33563 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 46.50 33563 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 44.98 33563 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 89.34 33566 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 16.64 33566 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 64.98 33570 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 74.93 33575 ARROW ARROW LOCKSMITH SERVICE 507371 07/14/2019 11.00 33575 ARROW ARROW LOCKSMITH SERVICE 507371 07/14/2019 13.20 33607 DRESSEL DRESSEL'S ACE HARDWARE 507402 07/14/2019 7.50 33627 GEM GEM ELECTRIC SUPPLY, INC. 507420 07/14/2019 56.10 33627 GEM GEM ELECTRIC SUPPLY, INC. 507420 07/14/2019 85.70 33639 GRAINGER GRAINGER, INC. 507429 07/14/2019 99.94 33646 HOME HOME DEPOT 507433 07/14/2019 19.33 33646 HOME HOME DEPOT 507433 07/14/2019 31.36 33646 HOME HOME DEPOT 507433 07/14/2019 38.95 33646 HOME HOME DEPOT 507433 07/14/2019 35.67 33646 HOME HOME DEPOT 507433 07/14/2019 145.96 33712 RESTROOMD RESTROOM DIRECT 507488 07/14/2019 194.10 33719 SCHAU SCHAUER'S HARDWARE 507496 07/14/2019 22.17 33719 SCHAU SCHAUER'S HARDWARE 507496 07/14/2019 7.19 33719 SCHAU SCHAUER'S HARDWARE 507496 07/14/2019 7.50 33720 SCHAU SCHAUER'S HARDWARE 507496 07/14/2019 33.26 33720 SCHAU SCHAUER'S HARDWARE 507496 07/14/2019 21.49 33720 SCHAU SCHAUER'S HARDWARE 507496 07/14/2019 20.41 phughes 08/14/2019 3:23:45PM Page 7 of 30 ap122r04 Park District of Oak Park FY 2019 AP ACCOUNT DISTRIBUTION BY ACCOUNT OPEN & PAID VOUCHERS CHECK DATES 07/01/2019 TO 07/31/2019 PAY DATES 07/01/2019 TO 07/31/2019 BOTH ACCRUALS AND NON ACCRUALS CHECK RUN 0 TO 2147483647 VOUCHER PO CHECK PAY DATE/ NUMBER VENDOR NUMBER NUMBER CHECK DATE AMOUNT 10-50-53-00313 SUPPLIES - BUILDING MATERIALS 33723 SHERWIN SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO. 507499 07/14/2019 57.92 33723 SHERWIN SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO. 507499 07/14/2019 144.80 33728 SOUTH SOUTH SIDE CONTROL SUPPLY CO. 507502 07/14/2019 27.58 2,080.53 10-50-53-00410 EQUIPMENT 32882 DOTY DOTY & SONS CONCRETE PRODUCT 20190861 28800 07/05/2019 2,446.00 32895 NUTOYS NUTOYS LEISURE PRODUCTS 20190866 28814 07/05/2019 1,112.00 32901 RUSSO RUSSO POWER EQUIPMENT 20190873 28819 07/05/2019 309.99 33571 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 164.80 33654 JACKS JACK'S RENTAL INC. 507439 07/14/2019 58.65 33719 SCHAU SCHAUER'S HARDWARE 507496 07/14/2019 15.97 33719 SCHAU SCHAUER'S HARDWARE 507496 07/14/2019 16.37 33720 SCHAU SCHAUER'S HARDWARE 507496 07/14/2019 12.13 4,135.91 10-50-56-00600 EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION 33657 JIMMYJ JIMMY JOHNS 507442 07/14/2019 423.80 423.80 10-50-56-00605 CONFERENCE AND TRAINING 33685 110% 110%ONLINE.NET 507350 07/14/2019 329.00 329.00 10-50-58-00800 ELECTRICITY 32878 COMED COMED 20190328 28796 07/05/2019 187.78 32880 COMED COMED 20190145 28798 07/05/2019 67.32 33184 COMED COMED 20190211 28840 07/12/2019 34.02 33186 COMED COMED 20190143 28842 07/12/2019 80.44 33187 COMED COMED 20190142 28843 07/12/2019 115.34 33189 COMED COMED 20190234 28845 07/12/2019 806.87 33190 COMEDELI COMED DELIVERY SERVICES 20190144 28846 07/12/2019 187.98 33199 HUDSON HUDSON ENERGY - IL 20190146 28855 07/12/2019 290.81 33399 COMED COMED 20190328 28960 07/26/2019 4,173.79 5,944.35 10-50-58-00810 NATURAL GAS 33271 NICOR NICOR GAS 20190212 28925 07/19/2019 49.42 33272 NICOR NICOR GAS 20190225 28926 07/19/2019 120.91 33273 NICOR NICOR GAS 20190226 28928 07/19/2019 40.65 33277 NICOR NICOR GAS 20190227 28932 07/19/2019 122.98 33278 NICOR NICOR GAS 20190213 28933 07/19/2019 38.09 33279 NICOR NICOR GAS 20190228 28934 07/19/2019 40.11 33281 NICOR NICOR GAS 20190538 28927 07/19/2019 45.33 457.49 10-50-58-00820 TELECOMMUNICATIONS 33595 COMCAST COMCAST 507392 07/14/2019 106.85 106.85 10-50-58-00830 WATER 33769 VILLWAT VILLAGE OF OAK PARK-WATER WATER/SEWER 507532 07/14/2019 10.00 33770 VILLWAT VILLAGE OF OAK PARK-WATER WATER/SEWER 507532 07/14/2019 10.00 33771 VILLWAT VILLAGE OF OAK PARK-WATER WATER/SEWER 507532 07/14/2019 10.00 phughes 08/14/2019 3:23:45PM Page 8 of 30 ap122r04 Park District of Oak Park FY 2019 AP ACCOUNT DISTRIBUTION BY ACCOUNT OPEN & PAID VOUCHERS CHECK DATES 07/01/2019 TO 07/31/2019 PAY DATES 07/01/2019 TO 07/31/2019 BOTH ACCRUALS AND NON ACCRUALS CHECK RUN 0 TO 2147483647 VOUCHER PO CHECK PAY DATE/ NUMBER VENDOR NUMBER NUMBER CHECK DATE AMOUNT 10-50-58-00830 WATER 33772 VILLWAT VILLAGE OF OAK PARK-WATER WATER/SEWER 507532 07/14/2019 10.00 33773 VILLWAT VILLAGE OF OAK PARK-WATER WATER/SEWER 507532 07/14/2019 10.00 33774 VILLWAT VILLAGE OF OAK PARK-WATER WATER/SEWER 507532 07/14/2019 10.00 33775 VILLWAT VILLAGE OF OAK PARK-WATER WATER/SEWER 507532 07/14/2019 15.00 33776 VILLWAT VILLAGE OF OAK PARK-WATER WATER/SEWER 507532 07/14/2019 15.00 33777 VILLWAT VILLAGE OF OAK PARK-WATER WATER/SEWER 507532 07/14/2019 19.52 33778 VILLWAT VILLAGE OF OAK PARK-WATER WATER/SEWER 507532 07/14/2019 24.52 33779 VILLWAT VILLAGE OF OAK PARK-WATER WATER/SEWER 507532 07/14/2019 24.52 33780 VILLWAT VILLAGE OF OAK PARK-WATER WATER/SEWER 507532 07/14/2019 24.52 33781 VILLWAT VILLAGE OF OAK PARK-WATER WATER/SEWER 507532 07/14/2019 30.00 33782 VILLWAT VILLAGE OF OAK PARK-WATER WATER/SEWER 507532 07/14/2019 39.50 33783 VILLWAT VILLAGE OF OAK PARK-WATER WATER/SEWER 507532 07/14/2019 39.50 33784 VILLWAT VILLAGE OF OAK PARK-WATER WATER/SEWER 507532 07/14/2019 49.50 33785 VILLWAT VILLAGE OF OAK PARK-WATER WATER/SEWER 507532 07/14/2019 51.75 33786 VILLWAT VILLAGE OF OAK PARK-WATER WATER/SEWER 507532 07/14/2019 51.75 33787 VILLWAT VILLAGE OF OAK PARK-WATER WATER/SEWER 507532 07/14/2019 51.75 33788 VILLWAT VILLAGE OF OAK PARK-WATER WATER/SEWER 507532 07/14/2019 72.12 33789 VILLWAT VILLAGE OF OAK PARK-WATER WATER/SEWER 507532 07/14/2019 76.25 33790 VILLWAT VILLAGE OF OAK PARK-WATER WATER/SEWER 507532 07/14/2019 76.25 33791 VILLWAT VILLAGE OF OAK PARK-WATER WATER/SEWER 507532 07/14/2019 76.25 33792 VILLWAT VILLAGE OF OAK PARK-WATER WATER/SEWER 507532 07/14/2019 88.50 33793 VILLWAT VILLAGE OF OAK PARK-WATER WATER/SEWER 507532 07/14/2019 88.50 33794 VILLWAT VILLAGE OF OAK PARK-WATER WATER/SEWER 507532 07/14/2019 125.25 33795 VILLWAT VILLAGE OF OAK PARK-WATER WATER/SEWER 507532 07/14/2019 149.75 33796 VILLWAT VILLAGE OF OAK PARK-WATER WATER/SEWER 507532 07/14/2019 162.00 33797 VILLWAT VILLAGE OF OAK PARK-WATER WATER/SEWER 507532 07/14/2019 169.25 33798 VILLWAT VILLAGE OF OAK PARK-WATER WATER/SEWER 507532 07/14/2019 211.00 33799 VILLWAT VILLAGE OF OAK PARK-WATER WATER/SEWER 507532 07/14/2019 243.48 2,035.43 FUND 10 TOTAL 185,546.27 16 LIABILITY 16-00-52-00514 EMPLOYEE SCREENINGS 32891 ILLSTA ILLINOIS STATE POLICE DIV. OF ADMINISTRA20190880 28808 07/05/2019 1,210.00 32896 OCCUPHEAL OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS20190874 OF ILL, P.C.28815 07/05/2019 127.00 33211 OCCUPHEAL OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS20190928 OF ILL, P.C.28868 07/12/2019 116.50 33315 AMERMED AMERICAN MEDICAL REVIEW 20190994 28953 07/26/2019 1,827.00 33347 ILLSTA ILLINOIS STATE POLICE DIV. OF ADMINISTRA20191005 28970 07/26/2019 90.00 33625 GARREFFA ANTHONY J. GARREFFA O.D. 507418 07/14/2019 132.00 33705 PROTECT PROTECT YOUTH SPORTS PRIORITY RESEARCH507484 07/14/2019 821.85 33705 PROTECT PROTECT YOUTH SPORTS PRIORITY RESEARCH507484 07/14/2019 2,747.40 7,071.75 16-00-53-00350 RISK CARE MANAGEMENT 33245 AT&TAED AT&T MOBILITY 20190096 28899 07/19/2019 317.00 33571 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 87.43 33571 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 26.46 33571 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 48.35 33734 STAPLES STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE DEPT. DET 236507508 07/14/2019 199.98 phughes 08/14/2019 3:23:45PM Page 9 of 30 ap122r04 Park District of Oak Park FY 2019 AP ACCOUNT DISTRIBUTION BY ACCOUNT OPEN & PAID VOUCHERS CHECK DATES 07/01/2019 TO 07/31/2019 PAY DATES 07/01/2019 TO 07/31/2019 BOTH ACCRUALS AND NON ACCRUALS CHECK RUN 0 TO 2147483647 VOUCHER PO CHECK PAY DATE/ NUMBER VENDOR NUMBER NUMBER CHECK DATE AMOUNT 679.22 FUND 16 TOTAL 7,750.97 17 AUDIT 17-00-52-00299 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES - OTHER 33264 LAUT LAUTERBACH & AMEN, LLP 20190974 28918 07/19/2019 2,000.00 2,000.00 FUND 17 TOTAL 2,000.00 20 RECREATION 20-00-21-20135 REFUNDS DUE 32917 RECTEMP Elizabeth Austin 28802 07/05/2019 500.00 32918 RECTEMP Tiffany Hanna 28823 07/05/2019 7.00 32919 RECTEMP Lauren Mungari 28812 07/05/2019 500.00 33233 RECTEMP Robin Wilson 28874 07/12/2019 606.00 33234 RECTEMP Saria Lofton 28877 07/12/2019 71.00 33235 RECTEMP Elizabeth Norton 28849 07/12/2019 10.00 33236 RECTEMP Virgil Richardson 28886 07/12/2019 100.00 33238 RECTEMP Cecily Byrne 28901 07/19/2019 66.00 33239 RECTEMP Elizabeth Lockhart 28908 07/19/2019 200.00 33240 RECTEMP Rashai Jackson 28939 07/19/2019 55.00 33301 RECTEMP Rani Morris 28991 07/26/2019 259.00 33302 RECTEMP Aleksa Danko 28951 07/26/2019 880.00 33303 RECTEMP Jaime Lewis 28972 07/26/2019 45.00 33304 RECTEMP Tonya Trachuk 29002 07/26/2019 45.00 33305 RECTEMP Sherri Garrett 28997 07/26/2019 340.00 3,684.00 20-00-52-00265 FLEET SERVICE 33293 VILFLE VILLAGE OF OAK PARK FLEET 20190416 28944 07/19/2019 237.07 237.07 20-00-53-00399 SUPPLIES - OTHER 33564 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 77.96 77.96 20-00-56-00610 DUES AND SUBSCRIPTIONS 33177 AMBROSE MICHAEL AMBROSE 20190899 28832 07/12/2019 4,092.00 4,092.00 20-00-56-00615 EMPLOYEE TRAVEL REIMBURSEMENT 33203 LANDAU AILEEN LANDAU 28862 07/12/2019 32.60 33203 LANDAU AILEEN LANDAU 28862 07/12/2019 7.25 E 33205 LOSZACH MIKE LOSZACH 909 07/12/2019 37.87 E 33206 MCCARTHY MAUREEN MCCARTHY 910 07/12/2019 44.45 33263 KANEB BRIDGET KANE 28917 07/19/2019 13.40 33266 MARTINEZ PILAR MARTINEZ 28921 07/19/2019 87.41 33352 MARTINEZ PILAR MARTINEZ 28978 07/26/2019 37.64 260.62 20-00-56-09999 NON-RESIDENT FEE EXPENSE 33588 CANVAS CANVAS ON THE CHEAP 507384 07/14/2019 303.40 33682 MONARCH MONARCH WATCH 507459 07/14/2019 40.95 33761 WALMART WALMART STORES, INC. 507537 07/14/2019 79.63 phughes 08/14/2019 3:23:45PM Page 10 of 30 ap122r04 Park District of Oak Park FY 2019 AP ACCOUNT DISTRIBUTION BY ACCOUNT OPEN & PAID VOUCHERS CHECK DATES 07/01/2019 TO 07/31/2019 PAY DATES 07/01/2019 TO 07/31/2019 BOTH ACCRUALS AND NON ACCRUALS CHECK RUN 0 TO 2147483647 VOUCHER PO CHECK PAY DATE/ NUMBER VENDOR NUMBER NUMBER CHECK DATE AMOUNT 20-00-56-09999 NON-RESIDENT FEE EXPENSE 33761 WALMART WALMART STORES, INC. 507537 07/14/2019 -14.96 33761 WALMART WALMART STORES, INC. 507537 07/14/2019 44.91 453.93 20-00-58-00820 TELECOMMUNICATIONS 33246 CALLONE CALLONE 20190077 28900 07/19/2019 2,034.87 2,034.87 20-05-52-00209 Copying and Printing - External 33255 FORPRI FOREST PRINTING CO. INC. 20190256 28910 07/19/2019 2,426.94 33306 ABCBUS ABC PRINTING COMPANY 20190253 28948 07/26/2019 532.18 33307 ABCBUS ABC PRINTING COMPANY 20191016 28948 07/26/2019 654.40 33322 CLYDE CLYDE PRINTING COMPANY 20190016 28959 07/26/2019 539.58 33385 USPS USPS-POSTMASTER 20190255 29007 07/26/2019 3,873.60 33589 CAPSULE CAPSULCRM.COM ZESTIA 507385 07/14/2019 36.00 8,062.70 20-05-52-00221 Brochure E 33247 CHICLAND CHICAGOLAND CIRCULATION SERVICES,20190221 INC913 07/19/2019 4,500.00 33269 MORRIS NANCY J. MORRIS N2 STUDIOS 20190017 28923 07/19/2019 4,500.00 33748 UBERFLIP UBERFLIP 507523 07/14/2019 19.95 33756 VECTOR VECTORSTOCK 507528 07/14/2019 30.00 9,049.95 20-05-56-00222 Marketing 33209 M&MSPORTS M&M SPORTS SCENE INC. 20190802 28864 07/12/2019 120.05 33572 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 36.37 33572 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 16.68 33572 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 26.60 33572 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 5.98 33572 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 40.02 33572 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 48.48 33572 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 40.00 33583 BIRTHDAYB BIRTHDAY IN A BOX 507379 07/14/2019 24.62 33599 COSTCO COSTCO 507393 07/14/2019 264.75 33604 DISPLAYS DISPLAYS2GO 507398 07/14/2019 127.00 33617 FACEBOOK FACEBOOK 507410 07/14/2019 391.48 33635 GOOGLE GOOGLE 507427 07/14/2019 236.32 33691 OTCBRANDS OTC BRANDS INC 507471 07/14/2019 14.18 33691 OTCBRANDS OTC BRANDS INC 507471 07/14/2019 137.45 33696 PARKING PARKING 507473 07/14/2019 2.00 33724 SIGNEXP SIGN EXPRESS 507500 07/14/2019 211.00 33725 SIGNEXP SIGN EXPRESS 507500 07/14/2019 110.00 33726 SIGNEXP SIGN EXPRESS 507500 07/14/2019 210.00 33747 TRT TRT BANNERS, LLC 507522 07/14/2019 53.52 33747 TRT TRT BANNERS, LLC 507522 07/14/2019 116.04 33747 TRT TRT BANNERS, LLC 507522 07/14/2019 227.16 33747 TRT TRT BANNERS, LLC 507522 07/14/2019 36.54 33747 TRT TRT BANNERS, LLC 507522 07/14/2019 269.90 33747 TRT TRT BANNERS, LLC 507522 07/14/2019 338.69 3,104.83 phughes 08/14/2019 3:23:45PM Page 11 of 30 ap122r04 Park District of Oak Park FY 2019 AP ACCOUNT DISTRIBUTION BY ACCOUNT OPEN & PAID VOUCHERS CHECK DATES 07/01/2019 TO 07/31/2019 PAY DATES 07/01/2019 TO 07/31/2019 BOTH ACCRUALS AND NON ACCRUALS CHECK RUN 0 TO 2147483647 VOUCHER PO CHECK PAY DATE/ NUMBER VENDOR NUMBER NUMBER CHECK DATE AMOUNT 20-05-56-00225 Advertising 32887 GARCLU GARDEN CLUB OF OAK PARK RIVER20190800 FOREST-H.28804 07/05/2019 150.00 150.00 20-05-56-00605 Conference and Training 33696 PARKING PARKING 507473 07/14/2019 11.00 11.00 20-05-56-00610 Dues and Subscriptions 32893 JERRY MICHELLE JERRY 28811 07/05/2019 5.51 5.51 20-25-52-13050 FITNESS EXERCISE 33662 LESMILLS LES MILLS UNITED STATES TRADING INC. 507448 07/14/2019 209.00 209.00 20-25-53-13050 FITNESS EXERCISE 33567 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 79.95 33567 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 66.92 33567 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 29.98 33567 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 79.95 33567 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 133.95 390.75 20-26-52-13750 YOUTH SPORTS LEAGUES 33360 OAKPARK OAK PARK DISTRICT 97 20191010 28984 07/26/2019 5,758.00 5,758.00 20-26-52-13780 YOUTH SPORTS AND FITNESS 33360 OAKPARK OAK PARK DISTRICT 97 20191010 28984 07/26/2019 2,438.60 2,438.60 20-26-52-13860 YOUTH SPORTS DAY CAMPS 33397 YOUTH YOUTH ELITE SOCCER, LLC 20190956 29012 07/26/2019 750.00 33546 CHICBWS CHICAGO BULLS/WHITE SOX TRAIN TRAINING507389 A 07/14/2019 600.00 33547 KANECOUT KANE COUNTY COUGARS 507443 07/14/2019 325.00 33593 CHGOSKY CHICAGO SKY 507391 07/14/2019 1,125.00 2,800.00 20-26-52-13870 YOUTH SPORTS CLINICS 32883 EASTAVE EAST AVE LACROSSE LLC 20190859 28801 07/05/2019 27,402.00 33183 CHIWHITE CHICAGO WHITE SOX LTD 20190897 28839 07/12/2019 6,362.30 33194 FINDLAY MURRAY FINDLAY 20190898 28852 07/12/2019 8,400.00 33295 WINDYNIN WINDY CITY NINJAS-ELMHURST LLC20190961 28946 07/19/2019 700.00 42,864.30 20-26-53-13860 YOUTH SPORTS DAY CAMPS 33570 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 61.96 33570 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 11.53 33570 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 166.81 33570 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 152.87 33570 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 64.99 33570 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 180.40 33570 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 35.99 33570 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 139.98 33570 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 119.83 33762 WALMART WALMART STORES, INC. 507537 07/14/2019 81.96 phughes 08/14/2019 3:23:45PM Page 12 of 30 ap122r04 Park District of Oak Park FY 2019 AP ACCOUNT DISTRIBUTION BY ACCOUNT OPEN & PAID VOUCHERS CHECK DATES 07/01/2019 TO 07/31/2019 PAY DATES 07/01/2019 TO 07/31/2019 BOTH ACCRUALS AND NON ACCRUALS CHECK RUN 0 TO 2147483647 VOUCHER PO CHECK PAY DATE/ NUMBER VENDOR NUMBER NUMBER CHECK DATE AMOUNT 20-26-53-13860 YOUTH SPORTS DAY CAMPS 33762 WALMART WALMART STORES, INC. 507537 07/14/2019 59.72 1,076.04 20-27-52-13585 ADULT SPORTS PROGRAMS 33295 WINDYNIN WINDY CITY NINJAS-ELMHURST LLC20190961 28946 07/19/2019 500.00 33360 OAKPARK OAK PARK DISTRICT 97 20191010 28984 07/26/2019 1,286.00 1,786.00 20-27-52-13640 ADULT SOFTBALL LEAGUES 33204 LIHOSIT DOUGLAS GERARD LIHOSIT 20190924 28863 07/12/2019 152.50 33350 LIHOSIT DOUGLAS GERARD LIHOSIT 20190991 28975 07/26/2019 91.50 33367 RIDGE MICHAEL RIDGE 20190976 28992 07/26/2019 213.50 33368 RIGITANO RAY RIGITANO 20190977 28993 07/26/2019 152.50 33378 TENCA PHIL TENCATE 20191021 29001 07/26/2019 457.50 1,067.50 20-27-52-13660 ADULT SOCCER LEAGUES 33171 AFUWAPE OLUWASEYI AFUWAPE 20190921 28830 07/12/2019 480.00 33192 ESBALIH BOUCHAIB ESSALIH 20190923 28850 07/12/2019 400.00 33200 JAKUPOVIC JASMIN JAKUPOVIC 20190922 28857 07/12/2019 240.00 33207 MELENDEZ ELMER MELENDEZ 20190919 28865 07/12/2019 160.00 33232 ZEIN MARWAN ZEIN 20190920 28893 07/12/2019 1,120.00 33366 QUI QUICKSCORES.COM 20191019 28990 07/26/2019 35.00 2,435.00 20-27-53-13640 ADULT SOFTBALL LEAGUES 33216 SANT SANTO SPORT STORE 20190927 28876 07/12/2019 1,651.30 33242 ALTON RICHARD H.T. ALTON 20190960 28896 07/19/2019 425.00 33262 JACKSONM MARLON JACKSON 20190958 28916 07/19/2019 425.00 33267 MILLERMI MICHELLE R. MILLER 20190959 28922 07/19/2019 260.00 33356 MCELWAIN SEAN C. MCELWAIN 20190981 28981 07/26/2019 260.00 33373 STEINM JOHN STEINMETZ 20190980 28973 07/26/2019 425.00 3,446.30 20-27-53-13660 ADULT SOCCER LEAGUES 33202 KOYIAS CHARLES THOMAS KOYIAS 20190926 28861 07/12/2019 250.00 33250 COUNTER COUNTER COFFEE LLC 20190955 28904 07/19/2019 250.00 33251 DROBOT VOLODYMYR V. DROBOT 20190957 28907 07/19/2019 250.00 33325 DICKENS BROOKE DICKENS 20191018 28963 07/26/2019 250.00 1,000.00 20-29-52-13290 TEEN CAMPS 33326 FIRSTSTUD FIRST STUDENT, INC 20190990 28964 07/26/2019 201.40 33341 FIRSTSTUD FIRST STUDENT, INC 20190985 28965 07/26/2019 117.80 319.20 20-29-53-13280 TEEN CLASSES 33715 SAFESIT SAFE SITTER, INC 507491 07/14/2019 759.00 759.00 20-29-53-13290 TEEN CAMPS 33591 CARNIVAL CARNIVAL GROCERY 507387 07/14/2019 2.39 33656 JEWELS JEWEL - OSCO 507441 07/14/2019 3.34 33656 JEWELS JEWEL - OSCO 507441 07/14/2019 16.95 33656 JEWELS JEWEL - OSCO 507441 07/14/2019 22.23 phughes 08/14/2019 3:23:45PM Page 13 of 30 ap122r04 Park District of Oak Park FY 2019 AP ACCOUNT DISTRIBUTION BY ACCOUNT OPEN & PAID VOUCHERS CHECK DATES 07/01/2019 TO 07/31/2019 PAY DATES 07/01/2019 TO 07/31/2019 BOTH ACCRUALS AND NON ACCRUALS CHECK RUN 0 TO 2147483647 VOUCHER PO CHECK PAY DATE/ NUMBER VENDOR NUMBER NUMBER CHECK DATE AMOUNT 20-29-53-13290 TEEN CAMPS 33656 JEWELS JEWEL - OSCO 507441 07/14/2019 34.43 33680 MUSECONT MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY 507463 07/14/2019 45.00 33692 PARCI PARTY CITY 507474 07/14/2019 14.00 33740 TARGET TARGET STORES, INC 507514 07/14/2019 53.69 33743 TONYSFINE TONYS FINER FOODS 507519 07/14/2019 41.93 33759 WALG WALGREENS CO. 507534 07/14/2019 2.99 33765 WHOL WHOLE FOODS STORE 507540 07/14/2019 2.89 239.84 20-51-53-00300 OFFICE EXPENSE 33673 MODITY MODITY INC. 507458 07/14/2019 372.00 33688 OFFDEP OFFICE DEPOT 507468 07/14/2019 45.82 33734 STAPLES STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE DEPT. DET 236507508 07/14/2019 55.15 472.97 20-51-53-00301 UNIFORMS 33659 LANDS LANDS END BUSINESS 507445 07/14/2019 525.97 525.97 20-51-56-00615 EMPLOYEE TRAVEL REIMBURSEMENT 33261 HARTZOG CATRINNIA HARTZOG 28915 07/19/2019 44.05 44.05 20-61-52-12010 COMMUNITY SPECIAL EVENTS 32911 HELGESON LANCE O. HELGESON 20190892 28805 07/05/2019 1,000.00 32912 BENITEZ DAVID BENITEZ 20190893 28792 07/05/2019 1,000.00 32913 BLACKJACK BLACKJACK PRODUCTIONS INC.20190894 28793 07/05/2019 1,000.00 32916 BURKEK KAITLYN BURKE 20190901 28794 07/05/2019 1,000.00 33578 A-Z A-Z ENTERTAINMENT LTD 507374 07/14/2019 406.00 33738 SWAN SWANK MOTION PICTURES, INC. 507512 07/14/2019 463.00 4,869.00 20-61-52-12030 COMMUNITY DAY CAMPS 33182 BBKY BUDDHA BELLY KIDS YOGA 20190916 28836 07/12/2019 200.00 33197 HOFFMMAN MICHELE HOFFMAN 20190917 28854 07/12/2019 300.00 33327 FIRSTSTUD FIRST STUDENT, INC 20190989 28964 07/26/2019 180.50 33329 FIRSTSTUD FIRST STUDENT, INC 20190989 28964 07/26/2019 152.00 33330 FIRSTSTUD FIRST STUDENT, INC 20190988 28964 07/26/2019 114.00 33331 FIRSTSTUD FIRST STUDENT, INC 20190988 28964 07/26/2019 114.00 33332 FIRSTSTUD FIRST STUDENT, INC 20190988 28964 07/26/2019 114.00 33333 FIRSTSTUD FIRST STUDENT, INC 20190988 28964 07/26/2019 114.00 33336 FIRSTSTUD FIRST STUDENT, INC 20190983 28964 07/26/2019 114.00 33337 FIRSTSTUD FIRST STUDENT, INC 20190983 28964 07/26/2019 114.00 33338 FIRSTSTUD FIRST STUDENT, INC 20190983 28964 07/26/2019 114.00 33339 FIRSTSTUD FIRST STUDENT, INC 20190984 28965 07/26/2019 205.96 33340 FIRSTSTUD FIRST STUDENT, INC 20190984 28965 07/26/2019 193.04 33342 FIRSTSTUD FIRST STUDENT, INC 20190985 28965 07/26/2019 133.00 33594 CHICCHIL CHICAGO CHILDRENS MUSEUM 507390 07/14/2019 336.00 33594 CHICCHIL CHICAGO CHILDRENS MUSEUM 507390 07/14/2019 200.00 33602 DINASO DAVID A. DINASO 507396 07/14/2019 300.00 33615 ENCHANT ENCHANTED CASTLE 507409 07/14/2019 373.39 33618 FIELD THE FIELD MUSEUM 507411 07/14/2019 65.00 phughes 08/14/2019 3:23:45PM Page 14 of 30 ap122r04 Park District of Oak Park FY 2019 AP ACCOUNT DISTRIBUTION BY ACCOUNT OPEN & PAID VOUCHERS CHECK DATES 07/01/2019 TO 07/31/2019 PAY DATES 07/01/2019 TO 07/31/2019 BOTH ACCRUALS AND NON ACCRUALS CHECK RUN 0 TO 2147483647 VOUCHER PO CHECK PAY DATE/ NUMBER VENDOR NUMBER NUMBER CHECK DATE AMOUNT 20-61-52-12030 COMMUNITY DAY CAMPS 33618 FIELD THE FIELD MUSEUM 507411 07/14/2019 26.76 33619 FIREZONE FIREZONE-GLENVIEW, LLC FIREZONE 507412 07/14/2019 532.00 33661 LEGO LEGOLAND DISCOVERY CTR 507447 07/14/2019 493.50 33666 MAIN MAIN EVENT ENTERTAINMENT, LP 507452 07/14/2019 492.57 33679 MUS MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND INDUSTRY 507464 07/14/2019 468.00 33707 PUTT THE PUTTING EDGE 507517 07/14/2019 607.50 33717 SANTASVIL SANTAS VILLAGE 507493 07/14/2019 217.36 33722 SHED SHED AQUARIUM JOHN G. SHEDD AQUARIUM 507498 07/14/2019 526.50 33727 SKYZONE SKY ZONE 507501 07/14/2019 322.50 7,123.58 20-61-52-12050 ACTIVE ADULTS PROGRAMS 33585 BRISTOLRE BRISTOL RENAISSANCE 507381 07/14/2019 199.50 33664 LINCOLNPK LINCOLN PARK ZOO 507450 07/14/2019 30.00 33693 PARKFOX PARK FOX VALLEY 507472 07/14/2019 234.00 33758 VOLO VOLO AUTO MUSEUM 507533 07/14/2019 44.00 33758 VOLO VOLO AUTO MUSEUM 507533 07/14/2019 122.00 33758 VOLO VOLO AUTO MUSEUM 507533 07/14/2019 11.00 640.50 20-61-52-12340 SPECIAL INTEREST PROGRAMS 32872 ANIM ANIMAL CARE LEAGUE 20190875 28790 07/05/2019 850.00 850.00 20-61-52-12360 NATURE AND ADVENTURE CAMPS 33265 LEO ADRIAN LEO 28919 07/19/2019 20.00 33334 FIRSTSTUD FIRST STUDENT, INC 20191015 28964 07/26/2019 200.64 33335 FIRSTSTUD FIRST STUDENT, INC 20191015 28964 07/26/2019 228.00 33343 FIRSTSTUD FIRST STUDENT, INC 20190982 28965 07/26/2019 209.00 33550 ADLER ADLER PLANETARIUM 507354 07/14/2019 348.00 33586 BROO BROOKFIELD ZOO 507382 07/14/2019 472.00 33610 DUPAGE DUPAGE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM 507405 07/14/2019 25.00 33610 DUPAGE DUPAGE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM 507405 07/14/2019 60.00 33623 FORESTCCI FOREST PRESERVES OF COOK COUNTY ILL 507416 07/14/2019 290.38 33679 MUS MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND INDUSTRY 507464 07/14/2019 438.00 33710 RECREAT RECREATIONAL EQUIPMENT INC 507487 07/14/2019 1,200.00 33718 SARAHS SARAH'S PONY RIDES 507494 07/14/2019 1,400.00 33744 TOWERHILL TOWER HILL STABLES 507520 07/14/2019 1,630.00 6,521.02 20-61-53-12000 FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT RACE 33576 ASHWORTH ASHWORTH ASSOC MFG ASHWORTH AWARDS507372 07/14/2019 567.00 567.00 20-61-53-12010 COMMUNITY SPECIAL EVENTS 33564 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 27.99 33564 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 99.88 127.87 20-61-53-12030 COMMUNITY DAY CAMPS 33570 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 115.60 33570 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 7.39 33570 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 118.30 phughes 08/14/2019 3:23:45PM Page 15 of 30 ap122r04 Park District of Oak Park FY 2019 AP ACCOUNT DISTRIBUTION BY ACCOUNT OPEN & PAID VOUCHERS CHECK DATES 07/01/2019 TO 07/31/2019 PAY DATES 07/01/2019 TO 07/31/2019 BOTH ACCRUALS AND NON ACCRUALS CHECK RUN 0 TO 2147483647 VOUCHER PO CHECK PAY DATE/ NUMBER VENDOR NUMBER NUMBER CHECK DATE AMOUNT 20-61-53-12030 COMMUNITY DAY CAMPS 33570 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 12.96 33591 CARNIVAL CARNIVAL GROCERY 507387 07/14/2019 8.60 33599 COSTCO COSTCO 507393 07/14/2019 787.89 33601 CVS CVS PHARMACY 507395 07/14/2019 9.99 33603 DINI DINICO'S PIZZA 507397 07/14/2019 35.47 33605 DOLL DOLLARTREE 507401 07/14/2019 1.10 33605 DOLL DOLLARTREE 507401 07/14/2019 14.00 33606 DOLL DOLLARTREE 507401 07/14/2019 4.00 33606 DOLL DOLLARTREE 507401 07/14/2019 6.00 33606 DOLL DOLLARTREE 507401 07/14/2019 6.00 33606 DOLL DOLLARTREE 507401 07/14/2019 37.00 33606 DOLL DOLLARTREE 507401 07/14/2019 9.00 33606 DOLL DOLLARTREE 507401 07/14/2019 3.00 33606 DOLL DOLLARTREE 507401 07/14/2019 8.00 33609 DUNKIN DUNKIN DONUTS 507404 07/14/2019 29.97 33609 DUNKIN DUNKIN DONUTS 507404 07/14/2019 41.98 33615 ENCHANT ENCHANTED CASTLE 507409 07/14/2019 114.51 33655 JEWELS JEWEL - OSCO 507441 07/14/2019 42.04 33655 JEWELS JEWEL - OSCO 507441 07/14/2019 18.98 33655 JEWELS JEWEL - OSCO 507441 07/14/2019 19.58 33655 JEWELS JEWEL - OSCO 507441 07/14/2019 -12.00 33655 JEWELS JEWEL - OSCO 507441 07/14/2019 11.74 33655 JEWELS JEWEL - OSCO 507441 07/14/2019 -12.00 33655 JEWELS JEWEL - OSCO 507441 07/14/2019 12.26 33656 JEWELS JEWEL - OSCO 507441 07/14/2019 12.10 33656 JEWELS JEWEL - OSCO 507441 07/14/2019 34.68 33656 JEWELS JEWEL - OSCO 507441 07/14/2019 42.85 33656 JEWELS JEWEL - OSCO 507441 07/14/2019 6.04 33669 MENARDS MENARD'S 507455 07/14/2019 23.98 33679 MUS MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND INDUSTRY 507464 07/14/2019 760.00 33701 PETESFR PETE'S FRESH MARKET ROOSEVELT CORP 507479 07/14/2019 4.99 33701 PETESFR PETE'S FRESH MARKET ROOSEVELT CORP 507479 07/14/2019 17.04 33713 ROSATIS ROSATI'S PIZZA 507489 07/14/2019 23.56 33716 SALER SALERNO'S PIZZA 507492 07/14/2019 67.90 33717 SANTASVIL SANTAS VILLAGE 507493 07/14/2019 3.83 33717 SANTASVIL SANTAS VILLAGE 507493 07/14/2019 10.39 33727 SKYZONE SKY ZONE 507501 07/14/2019 417.50 33729 SPIZZICO SPIZZICO 507503 07/14/2019 80.82 33733 S&SW S&S WORLDWIDE 507507 07/14/2019 56.99 33739 TARGET TARGET STORES, INC 507514 07/14/2019 251.56 33739 TARGET TARGET STORES, INC 507514 07/14/2019 -9.49 33739 TARGET TARGET STORES, INC 507514 07/14/2019 82.37 33739 TARGET TARGET STORES, INC 507514 07/14/2019 13.57 33739 TARGET TARGET STORES, INC 507514 07/14/2019 19.99 33739 TARGET TARGET STORES, INC 507514 07/14/2019 27.14 33739 TARGET TARGET STORES, INC 507514 07/14/2019 12.72 33740 TARGET TARGET STORES, INC 507514 07/14/2019 30.96 33740 TARGET TARGET STORES, INC 507514 07/14/2019 137.81 phughes 08/14/2019 3:23:45PM Page 16 of 30 ap122r04 Park District of Oak Park FY 2019 AP ACCOUNT DISTRIBUTION BY ACCOUNT OPEN & PAID VOUCHERS CHECK DATES 07/01/2019 TO 07/31/2019 PAY DATES 07/01/2019 TO 07/31/2019 BOTH ACCRUALS AND NON ACCRUALS CHECK RUN 0 TO 2147483647 VOUCHER PO CHECK PAY DATE/ NUMBER VENDOR NUMBER NUMBER CHECK DATE AMOUNT 20-61-53-12030 COMMUNITY DAY CAMPS 33740 TARGET TARGET STORES, INC 507514 07/14/2019 3.98 33740 TARGET TARGET STORES, INC 507514 07/14/2019 3.06 33740 TARGET TARGET STORES, INC 507514 07/14/2019 48.31 33740 TARGET TARGET STORES, INC 507514 07/14/2019 19.80 33740 TARGET TARGET STORES, INC 507514 07/14/2019 39.18 33740 TARGET TARGET STORES, INC 507514 07/14/2019 42.94 33740 TARGET TARGET STORES, INC 507514 07/14/2019 7.70 33759 WALG WALGREENS CO. 507534 07/14/2019 12.49 33759 WALG WALGREENS CO. 507534 07/14/2019 5.27 33760 WALMART WALMART STORES, INC. 507537 07/14/2019 317.82 33760 WALMART WALMART STORES, INC. 507537 07/14/2019 38.38 33760 WALMART WALMART STORES, INC. 507537 07/14/2019 90.55 33760 WALMART WALMART STORES, INC. 507537 07/14/2019 256.83 33760 WALMART WALMART STORES, INC. 507537 07/14/2019 5.82 33760 WALMART WALMART STORES, INC. 507537 07/14/2019 14.94 33762 WALMART WALMART STORES, INC. 507537 07/14/2019 14.38 33762 WALMART WALMART STORES, INC. 507537 07/14/2019 19.62 33762 WALMART WALMART STORES, INC. 507537 07/14/2019 33.51 33762 WALMART WALMART STORES, INC. 507537 07/14/2019 5.82 33762 WALMART WALMART STORES, INC. 507537 07/14/2019 43.93 33762 WALMART WALMART STORES, INC. 507537 07/14/2019 19.97 4,624.96 20-61-53-12040 AFTERSCHOOL PROGRAMS 33606 DOLL DOLLARTREE 507401 07/14/2019 19.00 33628 GEPE GEPPETTO'S RESTAURANT 507421 07/14/2019 55.96 33655 JEWELS JEWEL - OSCO 507441 07/14/2019 18.38 33655 JEWELS JEWEL - OSCO 507441 07/14/2019 13.98 33692 PARCI PARTY CITY 507474 07/14/2019 38.97 33701 PETESFR PETE'S FRESH MARKET ROOSEVELT CORP 507479 07/14/2019 6.51 33701 PETESFR PETE'S FRESH MARKET ROOSEVELT CORP 507479 07/14/2019 9.57 33716 SALER SALERNO'S PIZZA 507492 07/14/2019 66.30 33716 SALER SALERNO'S PIZZA 507492 07/14/2019 82.78 33716 SALER SALERNO'S PIZZA 507492 07/14/2019 62.90 33716 SALER SALERNO'S PIZZA 507492 07/14/2019 50.85 33739 TARGET TARGET STORES, INC 507514 07/14/2019 22.13 33739 TARGET TARGET STORES, INC 507514 07/14/2019 37.96 33760 WALMART WALMART STORES, INC. 507537 07/14/2019 80.65 33762 WALMART WALMART STORES, INC. 507537 07/14/2019 14.71 580.65 20-61-53-12050 ACTIVE ADULTS PROGRAMS 33636 GORDON GORDON FOOD SERVICES 507428 07/14/2019 23.97 33656 JEWELS JEWEL - OSCO 507441 07/14/2019 28.11 33745 TRADER TRADER JOES 507521 07/14/2019 11.98 33745 TRADER TRADER JOES 507521 07/14/2019 96.27 160.33 20-61-53-12340 SPECIAL INTEREST PROGRAMS 32915 WINDCITY WINDY CITY LINEN, LLC 20190891 28828 07/05/2019 212.68 phughes 08/14/2019 3:23:45PM Page 17 of 30 ap122r04 Park District of Oak Park FY 2019 AP ACCOUNT DISTRIBUTION BY ACCOUNT OPEN & PAID VOUCHERS CHECK DATES 07/01/2019 TO 07/31/2019 PAY DATES 07/01/2019 TO 07/31/2019 BOTH ACCRUALS AND NON ACCRUALS CHECK RUN 0 TO 2147483647 VOUCHER PO CHECK PAY DATE/ NUMBER VENDOR NUMBER NUMBER CHECK DATE AMOUNT 212.68 20-61-53-12360 NATURE AND ADVENTURE CAMPS 33570 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 14.99 33570 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 77.20 33570 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 16.48 33570 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 24.91 33570 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 33.49 33570 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 25.98 33570 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 45.99 33570 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 5.49 33570 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 240.99 33606 DOLL DOLLARTREE 507401 07/14/2019 25.00 33606 DOLL DOLLARTREE 507401 07/14/2019 5.50 33620 FIVE FIVE BELOW 507413 07/14/2019 36.00 33647 HOME HOME DEPOT 507433 07/14/2019 199.52 33671 MICH MICHAELS STORE 507457 07/14/2019 54.44 33688 OFFDEP OFFICE DEPOT 507468 07/14/2019 76.91 33740 TARGET TARGET STORES, INC 507514 07/14/2019 21.93 33740 TARGET TARGET STORES, INC 507514 07/14/2019 28.16 33762 WALMART WALMART STORES, INC. 507537 07/14/2019 76.48 33762 WALMART WALMART STORES, INC. 507537 07/14/2019 70.56 33762 WALMART WALMART STORES, INC. 507537 07/14/2019 99.34 33762 WALMART WALMART STORES, INC. 507537 07/14/2019 45.90 33762 WALMART WALMART STORES, INC. 507537 07/14/2019 122.75 1,348.01 20-62-52-12390 SCAW WORKSHOP 33193 EVERYBOD GUY NATHAN DILLON 20190904 28851 07/12/2019 5,545.40 33320 CHESS FAMBRO MANAGEMENT LLC 20190978 28958 07/26/2019 198.00 33349 KANT GARY KANTOR MAGIC OF GARY KANTOR20190973 28974 07/26/2019 322.00 33365 POWERUP TAMASIN SARAH FORD 20191008 28989 07/26/2019 8,186.00 14,251.40 20-62-52-12610 DANCE PROGRAMS E 33290 TULLY CATHERINE TULLY 20190930 914 07/19/2019 577.96 577.96 20-62-53-12390 SCAW WORKSHOP 33244 ARREOLA ALICE ARREOLA 28898 07/19/2019 9.41 33252 DAN CASSANDRA DAN 28905 07/19/2019 13.47 33259 GRIMM HATTIE GRIMM 28913 07/19/2019 30.79 33346 GRIMM HATTIE GRIMM 28968 07/26/2019 19.90 33564 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 10.98 33564 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 9.99 33564 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 125.56 33564 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 8.21 33564 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 5.99 33564 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 55.96 33564 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 50.83 33564 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 59.15 33564 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 32.99 phughes 08/14/2019 3:23:45PM Page 18 of 30 ap122r04 Park District of Oak Park FY 2019 AP ACCOUNT DISTRIBUTION BY ACCOUNT OPEN & PAID VOUCHERS CHECK DATES 07/01/2019 TO 07/31/2019 PAY DATES 07/01/2019 TO 07/31/2019 BOTH ACCRUALS AND NON ACCRUALS CHECK RUN 0 TO 2147483647 VOUCHER PO CHECK PAY DATE/ NUMBER VENDOR NUMBER NUMBER CHECK DATE AMOUNT 20-62-53-12390 SCAW WORKSHOP 33564 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 78.76 33572 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 138.25 33572 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 94.45 33584 BLICK BLICK ART MATERIALS 507380 07/14/2019 34.55 33605 DOLL DOLLARTREE 507401 07/14/2019 7.00 33605 DOLL DOLLARTREE 507401 07/14/2019 34.18 33605 DOLL DOLLARTREE 507401 07/14/2019 5.00 33605 DOLL DOLLARTREE 507401 07/14/2019 9.00 33605 DOLL DOLLARTREE 507401 07/14/2019 9.00 33605 DOLL DOLLARTREE 507401 07/14/2019 17.00 33605 DOLL DOLLARTREE 507401 07/14/2019 3.00 33606 DOLL DOLLARTREE 507401 07/14/2019 49.30 33606 DOLL DOLLARTREE 507401 07/14/2019 4.00 33606 DOLL DOLLARTREE 507401 07/14/2019 36.00 33606 DOLL DOLLARTREE 507401 07/14/2019 12.00 33633 GOODWILL GOODWILL 507426 07/14/2019 37.78 33655 JEWELS JEWEL - OSCO 507441 07/14/2019 12.90 33671 MICH MICHAELS STORE 507457 07/14/2019 28.65 33671 MICH MICHAELS STORE 507457 07/14/2019 4.99 33688 OFFDEP OFFICE DEPOT 507468 07/14/2019 32.99 33692 PARCI PARTY CITY 507474 07/14/2019 114.04 33697 PEAPOD PEAPOD 507475 07/14/2019 112.37 33697 PEAPOD PEAPOD 507475 07/14/2019 119.58 33697 PEAPOD PEAPOD 507475 07/14/2019 149.13 33701 PETESFR PETE'S FRESH MARKET ROOSEVELT CORP 507479 07/14/2019 29.40 33701 PETESFR PETE'S FRESH MARKET ROOSEVELT CORP 507479 07/14/2019 12.44 33701 PETESFR PETE'S FRESH MARKET ROOSEVELT CORP 507479 07/14/2019 30.21 33701 PETESFR PETE'S FRESH MARKET ROOSEVELT CORP 507479 07/14/2019 104.16 33739 TARGET TARGET STORES, INC 507514 07/14/2019 60.96 33739 TARGET TARGET STORES, INC 507514 07/14/2019 19.19 33740 TARGET TARGET STORES, INC 507514 07/14/2019 10.58 33760 WALMART WALMART STORES, INC. 507537 07/14/2019 101.19 33760 WALMART WALMART STORES, INC. 507537 07/14/2019 16.11 33760 WALMART WALMART STORES, INC. 507537 07/14/2019 31.15 1,992.54 20-62-53-12450 CERAMICS 33592 CERAM CERAMIC SUPPLY CHICAGO 507388 07/14/2019 934.24 33759 WALG WALGREENS CO. 507534 07/14/2019 21.98 956.22 20-62-53-12610 DANCE PROGRAMS 33553 AIRTRAK AIRTRACK US 507357 07/14/2019 624.75 624.75 20-62-53-12620 CIRCUS ARTS 33567 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 198.95 33567 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 119.00 33567 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 10.90 33567 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 11.83 phughes 08/14/2019 3:23:45PM Page 19 of 30 ap122r04 Park District of Oak Park FY 2019 AP ACCOUNT DISTRIBUTION BY ACCOUNT OPEN & PAID VOUCHERS CHECK DATES 07/01/2019 TO 07/31/2019 PAY DATES 07/01/2019 TO 07/31/2019 BOTH ACCRUALS AND NON ACCRUALS CHECK RUN 0 TO 2147483647 VOUCHER PO CHECK PAY DATE/ NUMBER VENDOR NUMBER NUMBER CHECK DATE AMOUNT 20-62-53-12620 CIRCUS ARTS 33567 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 50.97 33567 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 17.99 33601 CVS CVS PHARMACY 507395 07/14/2019 5.18 33601 CVS CVS PHARMACY 507395 07/14/2019 12.48 33601 CVS CVS PHARMACY 507395 07/14/2019 3.89 33605 DOLL DOLLARTREE 507401 07/14/2019 4.00 33605 DOLL DOLLARTREE 507401 07/14/2019 4.00 33605 DOLL DOLLARTREE 507401 07/14/2019 6.00 33605 DOLL DOLLARTREE 507401 07/14/2019 21.00 33701 PETESFR PETE'S FRESH MARKET ROOSEVELT CORP 507479 07/14/2019 10.36 33759 WALG WALGREENS CO. 507534 07/14/2019 7.98 33766 WINDNINJA WINDY CITY NINJAS, LLC 507541 07/14/2019 425.00 909.53 20-63-52-12700 PRESCHOOL 33179 BARA KAREN BARA 28859 07/12/2019 8.00 8.00 20-63-53-12700 PRESCHOOL 33696 PARKING PARKING 507473 07/14/2019 2.00 33708 QUILLPROD QUILL PRODUCTS 507486 07/14/2019 51.99 33733 S&SW S&S WORLDWIDE 507507 07/14/2019 56.99 33760 WALMART WALMART STORES, INC. 507537 07/14/2019 14.94 33760 WALMART WALMART STORES, INC. 507537 07/14/2019 4.00 129.92 20-63-53-12740 EARLY CHILDHOOD CLASSES 33226 VANHORN MELANIE VAN HORN 28885 07/12/2019 38.78 33605 DOLL DOLLARTREE 507401 07/14/2019 9.00 33605 DOLL DOLLARTREE 507401 07/14/2019 10.00 33636 GORDON GORDON FOOD SERVICES 507428 07/14/2019 7.99 33716 SALER SALERNO'S PIZZA 507492 07/14/2019 43.70 109.47 FUND 20 TOTAL 146,042.35 21 MUSEUM 21-00-52-00260 PROPERTY REPAIR 33559 ALADEC ALARM DETECTION SYSTEMS, INC. 507358 07/14/2019 127.86 127.86 21-00-58-00800 ELECTRICITY 33399 COMED COMED 20190328 28960 07/26/2019 518.75 518.75 21-00-58-00810 NATURAL GAS 33275 NICOR NICOR GAS 20190237 28930 07/19/2019 136.82 136.82 21-00-58-00830 WATER 33800 VILLWAT VILLAGE OF OAK PARK-WATER WATER/SEWER 507532 07/14/2019 27.25 27.25 21-00-58-00840 PH SECURITY MONITORING 32903 SMG SMG SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC. 20190867 28821 07/05/2019 92.70 phughes 08/14/2019 3:23:45PM Page 20 of 30 ap122r04 Park District of Oak Park FY 2019 AP ACCOUNT DISTRIBUTION BY ACCOUNT OPEN & PAID VOUCHERS CHECK DATES 07/01/2019 TO 07/31/2019 PAY DATES 07/01/2019 TO 07/31/2019 BOTH ACCRUALS AND NON ACCRUALS CHECK RUN 0 TO 2147483647 VOUCHER PO CHECK PAY DATE/ NUMBER VENDOR NUMBER NUMBER CHECK DATE AMOUNT 92.70 FUND 21 TOTAL 903.38 25 REVENUE FACILITIES 25-00-56-00605 Conference and Training 33318 AQUA AQUA PURE ENTERPRISES, INC 20190969 28955 07/26/2019 926.25 926.25 25-00-56-00615 EMPLOYEE TRAVEL REIMBURSEMENT 33695 PARKING PARKING 507473 07/14/2019 12.00 12.00 25-00-58-00820 TELECOMMUNICATIONS 33596 COMCAST COMCAST 507392 07/14/2019 111.85 33597 COMCAST COMCAST 507392 07/14/2019 111.85 223.70 25-19-52-00259 GUARD TRAINING & EVALUATION 33613 ELLIS J. ELLIS & ASSOCIATES, INC. 507408 07/14/2019 925.00 33614 ELLIS J. ELLIS & ASSOCIATES, INC. 507408 07/14/2019 4,545.00 33614 ELLIS J. ELLIS & ASSOCIATES, INC. 507408 07/14/2019 7,285.00 12,755.00 25-19-52-11600 LEARN TO SWIM 33357 M&MSPORTS M&M SPORTS SCENE INC. 20190993 28977 07/26/2019 240.40 240.40 25-19-53-00301 UNIFORMS 33358 M&MSPORTS M&M SPORTS SCENE INC. 20190987 28977 07/26/2019 519.50 33663 LIFGUA LIFEGUARD STORE, INC. 507449 07/14/2019 85.91 33663 LIFGUA LIFEGUARD STORE, INC. 507449 07/14/2019 75.00 33663 LIFGUA LIFEGUARD STORE, INC. 507449 07/14/2019 500.00 1,180.41 25-19-53-00318 GUARD EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES 33568 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 25.99 33568 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 24.99 33568 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 25.14 33663 LIFGUA LIFEGUARD STORE, INC. 507449 07/14/2019 57.62 33742 UPS THE UPS STORE 507518 07/14/2019 12.49 33763 WATSAF WATER SAFETY PRODUCTS, INC. 507538 07/14/2019 190.45 336.68 25-19-53-00400 EQUIPMENT - OFFICE 33568 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 33.99 33568 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 29.35 63.34 25-19-53-11600 LEARN TO SWIM 33663 LIFGUA LIFEGUARD STORE, INC. 507449 07/14/2019 239.75 239.75 25-19-53-11620 AQUATICS SPECIAL EVENTS 33568 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 6.36 33568 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 22.36 33624 FUNEXPR FUN EXPRESS 507417 07/14/2019 33.15 33701 PETESFR PETE'S FRESH MARKET ROOSEVELT CORP 507479 07/14/2019 39.91 phughes 08/14/2019 3:23:45PM Page 21 of 30 ap122r04 Park District of Oak Park FY 2019 AP ACCOUNT DISTRIBUTION BY ACCOUNT OPEN & PAID VOUCHERS CHECK DATES 07/01/2019 TO 07/31/2019 PAY DATES 07/01/2019 TO 07/31/2019 BOTH ACCRUALS AND NON ACCRUALS CHECK RUN 0 TO 2147483647 VOUCHER PO CHECK PAY DATE/ NUMBER VENDOR NUMBER NUMBER CHECK DATE AMOUNT 25-19-53-11620 AQUATICS SPECIAL EVENTS 33701 PETESFR PETE'S FRESH MARKET ROOSEVELT CORP 507479 07/14/2019 68.61 170.39 25-20-52-11950 LEARN TO SKATE 33611 DUPAGEUSF DUPAGE FSC.ORG 507406 07/14/2019 80.00 33660 LEARNTO LEARN TO SKATE USA 507446 07/14/2019 39.25 119.25 25-20-53-00301 UNIFORMS 33208 M&MSPORTS M&M SPORTS SCENE INC. 20190900 28864 07/12/2019 356.35 356.35 25-20-53-00320 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 33568 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 26.40 26.40 25-20-53-11950 LEARN TO SKATE 33564 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 156.38 33568 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 27.97 33660 LEARNTO LEARN TO SKATE USA 507446 07/14/2019 39.25 33706 PSA PSA FIGURE SKATING 507485 07/14/2019 70.00 293.60 25-20-53-11960 YOUTH HOCKEY 33609 DUNKIN DUNKIN DONUTS 507404 07/14/2019 86.93 86.93 25-20-53-11970 ADULT HOCKEY 33213 QUI QUICKSCORES.COM 20190878 28873 07/12/2019 42.00 42.00 25-20-53-11980 RINK SPECIAL EVENTS 33568 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 7.99 33600 CUZZOS CUZZOS PIZZA 507394 07/14/2019 100.00 33600 CUZZOS CUZZOS PIZZA 507394 07/14/2019 109.30 33624 FUNEXPR FUN EXPRESS 507417 07/14/2019 424.35 641.64 25-20-53-11990 RINK CAMP 33201 KIEFERE ELIZABETH KIEFER 28860 07/12/2019 168.09 33568 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 76.95 33568 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 11.89 33568 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 16.99 33568 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 8.96 33568 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 17.29 33568 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 14.17 33599 COSTCO COSTCO 507393 07/14/2019 338.37 33599 COSTCO COSTCO 507393 07/14/2019 284.01 33675 MORTON THE MORTON ARBORETUM 507516 07/14/2019 376.00 33687 ODYSSEE ODYSSEY FUN WORLD 507467 07/14/2019 696.00 33722 SHED SHED AQUARIUM JOHN G. SHEDD AQUARIUM 507498 07/14/2019 740.85 33739 TARGET TARGET STORES, INC 507514 07/14/2019 163.09 2,912.66 25-24-53-00315 SUPPLIES- PRO SHOP 33612 ELITE ELITE SPORTSWEAR, L.P. 507407 07/14/2019 179.00 phughes 08/14/2019 3:23:45PM Page 22 of 30 ap122r04 Park District of Oak Park FY 2019 AP ACCOUNT DISTRIBUTION BY ACCOUNT OPEN & PAID VOUCHERS CHECK DATES 07/01/2019 TO 07/31/2019 PAY DATES 07/01/2019 TO 07/31/2019 BOTH ACCRUALS AND NON ACCRUALS CHECK RUN 0 TO 2147483647 VOUCHER PO CHECK PAY DATE/ NUMBER VENDOR NUMBER NUMBER CHECK DATE AMOUNT 25-24-53-00315 SUPPLIES- PRO SHOP 33612 ELITE ELITE SPORTSWEAR, L.P. 507407 07/14/2019 -119.90 59.10 25-24-53-00425 GYMNASTICS EQUIPMENT 33658 KENMISSYR KENMISSYR, LLC 507444 07/14/2019 179.90 179.90 25-24-53-11250 PRESCHOOL GYMNASTICS CLASSES 33601 CVS CVS PHARMACY 507395 07/14/2019 9.98 9.98 25-24-53-11275 Gymnastics GI Joe 33655 JEWELS JEWEL - OSCO 507441 07/14/2019 85.98 85.98 25-24-53-11360 GYMNASTICS CENTER PROGRAMS 33665 M&MSPORTS M&M SPORTS SCENE INC. 507451 07/14/2019 260.00 260.00 25-24-56-00050 BOOSTER CLUB EXPENSE 33655 JEWELS JEWEL - OSCO 507441 07/14/2019 85.98 33665 M&MSPORTS M&M SPORTS SCENE INC. 507451 07/14/2019 312.10 33746 TRT TRT BANNERS, LLC 507522 07/14/2019 30.14 428.22 25-24-56-00605 CONFERENCE AND TRAINING 33752 USA USA GYMNASTICS 507526 07/14/2019 15.00 33753 USA USA GYMNASTICS 507526 07/14/2019 15.00 33754 USA USA GYMNASTICS 507526 07/14/2019 65.00 95.00 25-24-56-00610 DUES AND SUBSCRIPTIONS 33755 USECA USECA 507527 07/14/2019 420.00 420.00 25-24-56-00615 EMPLOYEE TRAVEL REIMBURSEMENT 32902 SEKKI SARAH SEKKI 28820 07/05/2019 21.23 33248 CHMIEL TANYA CHMIELEWSKI 28902 07/19/2019 27.26 33253 DISCH DARIA DISCH 28906 07/19/2019 8.00 56.49 25-24-56-00675 SALES TAX 32889 ILLDEP ILLINOIS DEPT. OF REVENUE 28807 07/05/2019 41.00 41.00 25-50-52-00261 PROPERTY REPAIR - POOL 33176 ANDLOCK ANDERSON LOCK 20190885 28833 07/12/2019 173.25 33317 AQUA AQUA PURE ENTERPRISES, INC 20190971 28955 07/26/2019 776.28 33370 SPANNUTH SPANNUTH BOILER COMPANY 20190970 28998 07/26/2019 920.00 33371 SPANNUTH SPANNUTH BOILER COMPANY 20190970 28998 07/26/2019 442.00 33372 SPANNUTH SPANNUTH BOILER COMPANY 20190970 28998 07/26/2019 1,008.00 33374 STEFL TIM STEFL INC. 20190948 28999 07/26/2019 127.00 3,446.53 25-50-52-00262 PROPERTY REPAIR - RINK 32888 HOH H-O-H CHEMICALS, INC. 20190848 28806 07/05/2019 275.00 33176 ANDLOCK ANDERSON LOCK 20190885 28833 07/12/2019 173.25 phughes 08/14/2019 3:23:45PM Page 23 of 30 ap122r04 Park District of Oak Park FY 2019 AP ACCOUNT DISTRIBUTION BY ACCOUNT OPEN & PAID VOUCHERS CHECK DATES 07/01/2019 TO 07/31/2019 PAY DATES 07/01/2019 TO 07/31/2019 BOTH ACCRUALS AND NON ACCRUALS CHECK RUN 0 TO 2147483647 VOUCHER PO CHECK PAY DATE/ NUMBER VENDOR NUMBER NUMBER CHECK DATE AMOUNT 25-50-52-00262 PROPERTY REPAIR - RINK 33270 NELSONFI NELSON FIRE PROTECTION 20190935 28924 07/19/2019 932.40 33379 TRANE TRANE PARTS CENTER 20190972 29003 07/26/2019 810.00 33380 TRANE TRANE PARTS CENTER 20190972 29003 07/26/2019 488.00 33667 MCMASTER MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO. 507453 07/14/2019 56.55 2,735.20 25-50-52-00263 PROPERTY REPAIR - GRC 33391 YOUNA YOUNA MECHANICAL INC 20190947 29011 07/26/2019 1,002.50 1,002.50 25-50-52-00267 FLEET SERVICE - RINK 33293 VILFLE VILLAGE OF OAK PARK FLEET 20190416 28944 07/19/2019 55.23 55.23 25-50-52-00296 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES- OTHER - GRC 32906 VILLFIN VILLAGE OF OAK PARK FINANCE 20190849 28825 07/05/2019 43.00 43.00 25-50-52-00300 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES- OTHER-POOL 33289 STEFL TIM STEFL INC. 20190936 28942 07/19/2019 190.50 190.50 25-50-52-00301 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES- OTHER - RINK 32881 CRYSTAL CRYSTAL MGMT & MAINTENANCE SERVICES20190241 CORP28799 07/05/2019 2,495.00 33289 STEFL TIM STEFL INC. 20190936 28942 07/19/2019 190.50 33308 AEREX AEREX PEST CONTROL INC. 20190966 28949 07/26/2019 103.00 33560 ALADEC ALARM DETECTION SYSTEMS, INC. 507358 07/14/2019 499.05 33674 MOOD MOOD MEDIA NO AMERICA HOLDINGS CP 507460 07/14/2019 26.95 33674 MOOD MOOD MEDIA NO AMERICA HOLDINGS CP 507460 07/14/2019 26.95 3,341.45 25-50-52-00412 RINK EQUIPMENT-MAINTENANCE 33751 UPS THE UPS STORE 507518 07/14/2019 20.76 20.76 25-50-52-00416 POOL EQUIPMENT RENTAL 33670 MIBOXMOV MI BOX MOVING & MOBILE STORAGE 507456 07/14/2019 109.00 109.00 25-50-52-00843 ALARM SERVICES - GRC 33561 ALADEC ALARM DETECTION SYSTEMS, INC. 507358 07/14/2019 314.40 314.40 25-50-53-00312 SUPPLIES-CLEANING & HOUSEHOLD - POO 33220 SEAWAY SEAWAY SUPPLY COMPANY 20190886 28878 07/12/2019 285.60 33288 SEAWAY SEAWAY SUPPLY COMPANY 20190929 28941 07/19/2019 190.40 33647 HOME HOME DEPOT 507433 07/14/2019 38.95 514.95 25-50-53-00314 SUPPLIES- BUILDING MATERIALS - POOL 33291 ULINE ULINE INC 20190934 28943 07/19/2019 307.74 33575 ARROW ARROW LOCKSMITH SERVICE 507371 07/14/2019 158.75 33630 GLOBAL GLOBAL INDUST/ EQUIPMENT COMPANY 507423 07/14/2019 220.49 33641 HALOGEN HALOGEN SUPPLY COMPANY INC 507430 07/14/2019 265.60 33647 HOME HOME DEPOT 507433 07/14/2019 597.00 33647 HOME HOME DEPOT 507433 07/14/2019 36.46 phughes 08/14/2019 3:23:45PM Page 24 of 30 ap122r04 Park District of Oak Park FY 2019 AP ACCOUNT DISTRIBUTION BY ACCOUNT OPEN & PAID VOUCHERS CHECK DATES 07/01/2019 TO 07/31/2019 PAY DATES 07/01/2019 TO 07/31/2019 BOTH ACCRUALS AND NON ACCRUALS CHECK RUN 0 TO 2147483647 VOUCHER PO CHECK PAY DATE/ NUMBER VENDOR NUMBER NUMBER CHECK DATE AMOUNT 25-50-53-00314 SUPPLIES- BUILDING MATERIALS - POOL 33647 HOME HOME DEPOT 507433 07/14/2019 69.92 33669 MENARDS MENARD'S 507455 07/14/2019 45.02 33719 SCHAU SCHAUER'S HARDWARE 507496 07/14/2019 34.15 33723 SHERWIN SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO. 507499 07/14/2019 232.00 1,967.13 25-50-53-00315 SUPPLIES - CLEANING&HOUSEHOLD - RIN 33669 MENARDS MENARD'S 507455 07/14/2019 34.62 34.62 25-50-53-00316 SUPPLIES - BUILDING MATERIALS - RIN 33195 GRAINGER GRAINGER, INC. 20190883 28853 07/12/2019 557.62 33568 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 25.59 583.21 25-50-53-00318 SUPPLIES- BUILDING MATERIALS - GRC 33258 GRAINGER GRAINGER, INC. 20190932 28912 07/19/2019 59.64 33647 HOME HOME DEPOT 507433 07/14/2019 96.02 33719 SCHAU SCHAUER'S HARDWARE 507496 07/14/2019 12.59 168.25 25-50-53-00319 MISC SUPPLIES - DOG PARKS 33672 MODITY MODITY INC. 507458 07/14/2019 398.00 398.00 25-50-53-00335 FUELS AND LUBRICANTS 33647 HOME HOME DEPOT 507433 07/14/2019 49.97 49.97 25-50-53-00340 CHEMICALS, DRUGS, AND LABS 33243 AQUA AQUA PURE ENTERPRISES, INC 20190419 28897 07/19/2019 5,969.47 33642 HALOGEN HALOGEN SUPPLY COMPANY INC 507430 07/14/2019 217.80 33642 HALOGEN HALOGEN SUPPLY COMPANY INC 507430 07/14/2019 1,137.30 7,324.57 25-50-53-00501 EQUIPMENT-OTHER - POOL 33196 GRAINGER GRAINGER, INC. 20190884 28853 07/12/2019 157.60 33229 WHITE WHITEWATER WEST INDUSTRIES 20190903 28891 07/12/2019 299.18 33230 WHITE WHITEWATER WEST INDUSTRIES 20190574 28891 07/12/2019 1,431.10 33257 GRAINGER GRAINGER, INC. 20190933 28912 07/19/2019 362.18 2,250.06 25-50-58-00801 REHM ELECTRICITY 32879 COMED COMED 20190149 28797 07/05/2019 3,707.95 3,707.95 25-50-58-00802 RIDGELAND ELECTRICITY 32900 REALGY REALGY LLC 20190150 28818 07/05/2019 9,925.87 9,925.87 25-50-58-00803 GYMNASTICS ELECTRICITY 33185 COMED COMED 20190233 28841 07/12/2019 1,752.02 1,752.02 25-50-58-00811 REHM NATURAL GAS 33282 NICOTRAN NICOR GAS TRANSPORTATION BILL20190215 PAYMENT28936 CE 07/19/2019 673.55 673.55 phughes 08/14/2019 3:23:45PM Page 25 of 30 ap122r04 Park District of Oak Park FY 2019 AP ACCOUNT DISTRIBUTION BY ACCOUNT OPEN & PAID VOUCHERS CHECK DATES 07/01/2019 TO 07/31/2019 PAY DATES 07/01/2019 TO 07/31/2019 BOTH ACCRUALS AND NON ACCRUALS CHECK RUN 0 TO 2147483647 VOUCHER PO CHECK PAY DATE/ NUMBER VENDOR NUMBER NUMBER CHECK DATE AMOUNT 25-50-58-00813 GYMNASTICS NATURAL GAS 33276 NICOR NICOR GAS 20190238 28931 07/19/2019 142.60 142.60 25-50-58-00831 REHM WATER 33801 VILLWAT VILLAGE OF OAK PARK-WATER WATER/SEWER 507532 07/14/2019 1,080.75 33802 VILLWAT VILLAGE OF OAK PARK-WATER WATER/SEWER 507532 07/14/2019 1,117.50 2,198.25 25-50-58-00832 RIDGELAND WATER 33803 VILLWAT VILLAGE OF OAK PARK-WATER WATER/SEWER 507532 07/14/2019 1,183.75 1,183.75 25-50-58-00833 GYMNASTICS WATER 32907 WASTE WASTE MANAGEMENT CO. 20190616 28826 07/05/2019 138.14 33804 VILLWAT VILLAGE OF OAK PARK-WATER WATER/SEWER 507532 07/14/2019 137.50 275.64 25-57-52-00410 CONCESSION EQUIPMENT REPAIR 33377 TEMPERAT TEMPERATURE ENGINEERING, INC20190954 29000 07/26/2019 749.82 749.82 25-57-53-00317 CONCESSION SUPPLIES 32871 ALPHABAK ALPHA BAKING COMPANY INC. 20190846 28789 07/05/2019 149.70 33174 ALPHABAK ALPHA BAKING COMPANY INC. 20190879 28831 07/12/2019 103.50 33175 ALPHABAK ALPHA BAKING COMPANY INC. 20190888 28831 07/12/2019 61.98 33224 ULINE ULINE INC 20190887 28882 07/12/2019 167.99 33312 ALPHABAK ALPHA BAKING COMPANY INC. 20190968 28952 07/26/2019 106.56 33313 ALPHABAK ALPHA BAKING COMPANY INC. 20190968 28952 07/26/2019 158.52 33548 A-A A-A RENTAL CENTER, INC. 507352 07/14/2019 86.40 33568 AMAZ AMAZON.COM 507367 07/14/2019 42.49 33598 COSTCO COSTCO 507393 07/14/2019 263.78 33598 COSTCO COSTCO 507393 07/14/2019 358.81 33598 COSTCO COSTCO 507393 07/14/2019 -15.69 33598 COSTCO COSTCO 507393 07/14/2019 725.10 33598 COSTCO COSTCO 507393 07/14/2019 442.68 33598 COSTCO COSTCO 507393 07/14/2019 396.24 33631 GOLD GOLD MEDAL PRODUCTS 507424 07/14/2019 557.20 33631 GOLD GOLD MEDAL PRODUCTS 507424 07/14/2019 3,736.44 33638 GORDON GORDON FOOD SERVICES 507428 07/14/2019 114.83 33638 GORDON GORDON FOOD SERVICES 507428 07/14/2019 139.84 33638 GORDON GORDON FOOD SERVICES 507428 07/14/2019 123.63 33684 NEMCO NEMCO FOOD EQUIPMENT, LTC 507465 07/14/2019 32.44 33700 PETESFR PETE'S FRESH MARKET ROOSEVELT CORP 507479 07/14/2019 24.24 33700 PETESFR PETE'S FRESH MARKET ROOSEVELT CORP 507479 07/14/2019 16.24 33700 PETESFR PETE'S FRESH MARKET ROOSEVELT CORP 507479 07/14/2019 17.81 33700 PETESFR PETE'S FRESH MARKET ROOSEVELT CORP 507479 07/14/2019 30.77 33700 PETESFR PETE'S FRESH MARKET ROOSEVELT CORP 507479 07/14/2019 21.28 33735 STATEFOOD STATE FOOD SAFETY.COM 507509 07/14/2019 736.00 33735 STATEFOOD STATE FOOD SAFETY.COM 507509 07/14/2019 74.00 33735 STATEFOOD STATE FOOD SAFETY.COM 507509 07/14/2019 124.00 33735 STATEFOOD STATE FOOD SAFETY.COM 507509 07/14/2019 -168.00 33764 WEBSTAUR THE WEBSTAURANT STORE INC 507539 07/14/2019 168.86 phughes 08/14/2019 3:23:45PM Page 26 of 30 ap122r04 Park District of Oak Park FY 2019 AP ACCOUNT DISTRIBUTION BY ACCOUNT OPEN & PAID VOUCHERS CHECK DATES 07/01/2019 TO 07/31/2019 PAY DATES 07/01/2019 TO 07/31/2019 BOTH ACCRUALS AND NON ACCRUALS CHECK RUN 0 TO 2147483647 VOUCHER PO CHECK PAY DATE/ NUMBER VENDOR NUMBER NUMBER CHECK DATE AMOUNT 25-57-53-00317 CONCESSION SUPPLIES 33764 WEBSTAUR THE WEBSTAURANT STORE INC 507539 07/14/2019 197.15 8,994.79 25-57-56-00675 SALES TAX 32889 ILLDEP ILLINOIS DEPT. OF REVENUE 28807 07/05/2019 1,920.00 1,920.00 FUND 25 TOTAL 78,335.99 50 INSURANCE FUND 50-00-21-20112 LIFE INSURANCE 125 K E 33214 PDRMA PDRMA 911 07/12/2019 933.26 933.26 50-00-55-00550 HEALTH INSURANCE - PPO E 33214 PDRMA PDRMA 911 07/12/2019 156.60 E 33214 PDRMA PDRMA 911 07/12/2019 43,262.12 43,418.72 50-00-55-00551 HEALTH INSURANCE - HMO E 33214 PDRMA PDRMA 911 07/12/2019 17,051.57 17,051.57 50-00-55-00552 LIFE INSURANCE E 33214 PDRMA PDRMA 911 07/12/2019 508.47 508.47 50-00-55-00553 DENTAL INSURANCE E 33214 PDRMA PDRMA 911 07/12/2019 3,093.27 3,093.27 50-00-55-00554 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM E 33214 PDRMA PDRMA 911 07/12/2019 191.40 191.40 50-00-55-00556 HEALTH INSURANCE - RETIREES E 32898 PDRMA PDRMA 20190007 904 07/05/2019 1,080.75 1,080.75 50-00-55-00557 VISION INSURANCE E 33214 PDRMA PDRMA 911 07/12/2019 939.78 939.78 50-00-56-00600 EMPLOYEE WELLNESS PROGRAM 33681 360CHGOEC 360 CHICAGO ECOM 507351 07/14/2019 66.00 66.00 FUND 50 TOTAL 67,283.22 70 CAPITAL PROJECTS 70-00-72-00960 PROPERTY ACQUISITION 32873 AGI APPLIED GEOSCIENCE 20190864 28791 07/05/2019 3,730.00 3,730.00 70-00-72-70330 PROPERTY REPAIRS AND REHAB 33221 STEFL TIM STEFL INC. 20190911 28879 07/12/2019 629.65 33231 XSYSCOM XSYSCOM COMMUNICATIONS 20190905 28892 07/12/2019 200.00 33344 GLASSDES GLASS DESIGN, INC. 2019101128966 07/26/2019 12,024.00 33354 MBK MBK DESIGN, INC. 20190937 28979 07/26/2019 11,458.40 phughes 08/14/2019 3:23:45PM Page 27 of 30 ap122r04 Park District of Oak Park FY 2019 AP ACCOUNT DISTRIBUTION BY ACCOUNT OPEN & PAID VOUCHERS CHECK DATES 07/01/2019 TO 07/31/2019 PAY DATES 07/01/2019 TO 07/31/2019 BOTH ACCRUALS AND NON ACCRUALS CHECK RUN 0 TO 2147483647 VOUCHER PO CHECK PAY DATE/ NUMBER VENDOR NUMBER NUMBER CHECK DATE AMOUNT 70-00-72-70330 PROPERTY REPAIRS AND REHAB 33355 MCDONTIM TIM MCDONALD 20190997 28980 07/26/2019 195.00 33363 PAINTERS PAINTERS USA , INC 20191012 28986 07/26/2019 13,125.00 33396 YOUNA YOUNA MECHANICAL INC 20190947 29011 07/26/2019 287.50 33549 ABT ABT ELECTRONICS 507353 07/14/2019 659.00 33552 AIRFILTER AIR FILTERS CO 507356 07/14/2019 308.76 33644 HOME HOME DEPOT 507433 07/14/2019 50.14 33644 HOME HOME DEPOT 507433 07/14/2019 25.92 33644 HOME HOME DEPOT 507433 07/14/2019 109.82 33678 MUNCHS MUNCH'S SUPPLY CO., INC. 507462 07/14/2019 128.16 33720 SCHAU SCHAUER'S HARDWARE 507496 07/14/2019 8.98 33720 SCHAU SCHAUER'S HARDWARE 507496 07/14/2019 48.49 33720 SCHAU SCHAUER'S HARDWARE 507496 07/14/2019 50.81 33723 SHERWIN SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO. 507499 07/14/2019 31.66 33723 SHERWIN SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO. 507499 07/14/2019 82.65 33723 SHERWIN SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO. 507499 07/14/2019 174.70 33723 SHERWIN SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO. 507499 07/14/2019 197.68 33723 SHERWIN SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO. 507499 07/14/2019 257.35 33723 SHERWIN SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO. 507499 07/14/2019 494.35 33723 SHERWIN SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO. 507499 07/14/2019 82.65 33723 SHERWIN SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO. 507499 07/14/2019 140.51 33723 SHERWIN SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO. 507499 07/14/2019 330.22 33728 SOUTH SOUTH SIDE CONTROL SUPPLY CO. 507502 07/14/2019 35.81 33737 SUPPLYHOU SUPPLY HOUSE.COM 507510 07/14/2019 92.45 33749 UHAUL U-HAUL 507524 07/14/2019 36.55 33767 WINDYWILD WINDY CITY WILDLIFE 507542 07/14/2019 175.00 41,441.21 70-00-72-70420 SURVEYS - STUDIES 33316 AQITY AQITY RESEARCH & INSIGNTS, INC. 20190357 28954 07/26/2019 9,233.33 9,233.33 70-12-72-70200 BARRIE BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS 33353 MBK MBK DESIGN, INC. 20190937 28979 07/26/2019 4,599.37 33645 HOME HOME DEPOT 507433 07/14/2019 30.44 4,629.81 70-12-72-70250 BARRIE PARK IMPROVEMENTS 32894 MULTIPLE MULTIPLE CONCRETE ACCESSORIES20190865 CORP 28813 07/05/2019 4,413.75 E 33217 SCHAEF SCHAEFGES BROTHERS, INC. 20190895 912 07/12/2019 40,332.42 E 33218 SCHAEF SCHAEFGES BROTHERS, INC. 20190895 912 07/12/2019 47,372.12 E 33219 SCHAEF SCHAEFGES BROTHERS, INC. 20190895 912 07/12/2019 11,752.35 103,870.64 70-13-72-70150 CARROLL MASTER PLAN IMPROVEMENTS 32897 PASSIVE PASSIVE HOUSE INSTITUTE US 20190863 28816 07/05/2019 2,691.00 33362 ORBIS ORBIS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC20190938 28985 07/26/2019 26,000.00 33384 UNITEDANA UNITED ANALYTICAL SERVICES,20190943 INC. 29006 07/26/2019 1,340.00 30,031.00 70-17-72-70250 STEVENSON PARK IMPROVEMENTS E 33314 ALTA ALTAMANU, INC. 20190939 917 07/26/2019 8,699.80 8,699.80 phughes 08/14/2019 3:23:45PM Page 28 of 30 ap122r04 Park District of Oak Park FY 2019 AP ACCOUNT DISTRIBUTION BY ACCOUNT OPEN & PAID VOUCHERS CHECK DATES 07/01/2019 TO 07/31/2019 PAY DATES 07/01/2019 TO 07/31/2019 BOTH ACCRUALS AND NON ACCRUALS CHECK RUN 0 TO 2147483647 VOUCHER PO CHECK PAY DATE/ NUMBER VENDOR NUMBER NUMBER CHECK DATE AMOUNT 70-35-72-70150 CONSERVATORY MASTER PLAN IMPROVEMEN 33348 INNOLAND INNOVATION LANDSCAPE, INC. 20190944 28971 07/26/2019 3,309.08 3,309.08 FUND 70 TOTAL 204,944.87 85 CHENEY MANSION 85-00-52-00260 PROPERTY REPAIR 33562 ALADEC ALARM DETECTION SYSTEMS, INC. 507358 07/14/2019 370.05 33741 TAYLOE TAYLOE GLASS CO. 507515 07/14/2019 84.00 454.05 85-00-52-00275 CUSTODIAL SERVICES 33241 AEREX AEREX PEST CONTROL INC. 20190137 28895 07/19/2019 61.00 E 33292 UNIFIRST UNIFIRST CORPORATION 20190138 915 07/19/2019 75.54 136.54 85-00-52-00299 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES - OTHER 33731 SPOTIFY SPOTIFY 507505 07/14/2019 9.99 9.99 85-00-52-11185 CHENEY ADULT PROGRAMS E 32910 ZEEMAN TERRY ZEEMAN 20190882 905 07/05/2019 200.00 32914 STAR STARSHIP CATERING 20190890 28822 07/05/2019 352.50 552.50 85-00-53-00313 SUPPLIES - BUILDING MATERIALS 33719 SCHAU SCHAUER'S HARDWARE 507496 07/14/2019 2.24 33720 SCHAU SCHAUER'S HARDWARE 507496 07/14/2019 16.16 18.40 85-00-53-11185 CHENEY ADULT PROGRAMS 33582 BINNYS BINNYS BEVERAGE 507378 07/14/2019 109.46 33582 BINNYS BINNYS BEVERAGE 507378 07/14/2019 153.92 33699 PETESFR PETE'S FRESH MARKET ROOSEVELT CORP 507479 07/14/2019 17.76 33699 PETESFR PETE'S FRESH MARKET ROOSEVELT CORP 507479 07/14/2019 36.43 33699 PETESFR PETE'S FRESH MARKET ROOSEVELT CORP 507479 07/14/2019 114.97 432.54 85-00-56-00605 CONFERENCE AND TRAINING 33699 PETESFR PETE'S FRESH MARKET ROOSEVELT CORP 507479 07/14/2019 12.97 12.97 85-00-58-00800 ELECTRICITY 33188 COMED COMED 20190210 28844 07/12/2019 43.44 33399 COMED COMED 20190328 28960 07/26/2019 1,289.35 1,332.79 85-00-58-00810 NATURAL GAS 33274 NICOR NICOR GAS 20190235 28929 07/19/2019 142.06 33280 NICOR NICOR GAS 20190214 28935 07/19/2019 25.40 167.46 85-00-58-00830 WATER 33805 VILLWAT VILLAGE OF OAK PARK-WATER WATER/SEWER 507532 07/14/2019 365.25 365.25 FUND 85 TOTAL 3,482.49 phughes 08/14/2019 3:23:45PM Page 29 of 30 ap122r04 Park District of Oak Park FY 2019 AP ACCOUNT DISTRIBUTION BY ACCOUNT OPEN & PAID VOUCHERS CHECK DATES 07/01/2019 TO 07/31/2019 PAY DATES 07/01/2019 TO 07/31/2019 BOTH ACCRUALS AND NON ACCRUALS CHECK RUN 0 TO 2147483647 VOUCHER PO CHECK PAY DATE/ NUMBER VENDOR NUMBER NUMBER CHECK DATE AMOUNT 99 MEMORIAL TRUST 99-20-53-00320 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 33181 BRON BRONZE MEMORIAL COMPANY 20190910 28838 07/12/2019 450.17 450.17 FUND 99 TOTAL 450.17

GRAND TOTAL 696,739.71

phughes 08/14/2019 3:23:45PM Page 30 of 30 ap122r04

Corporate Fund $ 185,546.27 IMRF Fund $ - Liability Fund $ 7,750.97 Audit Fund $ 2,000.00 Recreation Fund $ 146,042.35 Museum Fund $ 903.38 Special Recreation Fund $ - Revenue Facilities $ 78,335.99 Insurance Fund $ 67,283.22 Capital Projects $ 204,944.87 Cheney Mansion Fund $ 3,482.49 Memorial Trust $ 450.17 Grand Total $ 696,739.71

To the Executive Director,

The Payment of the above listed accounts has been approved by the Board of Commissioners at their meeting held August 22, 2019 And you are hereby authorized to pay them from the appropriate funds.

______(Treasurer) (Secretary)

Commissioner

IV.C V.C

Park District of Oak Park Committee of the Whole Hedges Administrative Center Oak Park, Illinois Thursday, July 11, 2019

Minutes

The meeting was called to order at 7:30pm.

I. Roll Call Present: Commissioners Porreca, Wick, Wollmuth, Worley-Hood and President Lentz.

Park District Staff present: Jan Arnold, Executive Director; Kyle Cratty, Director of Finance; Chris Lindgren, Superintendent of Parks and Planning; and Karen Gruszka, Executive Assistant.

Others Present: Joan Fiscella, League of Women Voters and Igor Studenkov, Wednesday Journal Reporter.

II. Public Comment - None

III. Recreation and Facility Program Committee - None

IV. Parks and Planning Committee A. CIP Update/Park Projects 2020-2024 The Board will be brought the CIP for 2020-2024 at their Annual Board Retreat scheduled for Tuesday, July 16, at Cheney Mansion for discussion and consideration. This will come before the Board at the July Regular Board Meeting under the regular agenda.

B. Pleasant Home Driveway Update The Board was reminded that the Pleasant Home driveway was noted as needing improvement during their facilities assessment. The PDOP went out to bid on Wednesday, June 26, and bids will be opened on July 12. The lowest responsible bidder will be brought to the Board for approval at the July 18, Regular Board Meeting. This will come before the Board at the July Regular Board Meeting under the regular agenda.

V. Administration and Finance Committee A. Budget Timeline and Guidelines Update The Board was reminded that the budget guideline will be brought to the Board at their annual Board Retreat. In the budget guidelines discussion, the following will be discussed: TIF discussion – 2019 Tax Levy, and Debt Refinancing. This will come before the Board on the Consent agenda at the July Regular Board Meeting.

B. Copier Contract Update The Board was informed the current copier contract expires September 30. Staff are working on a new agreement that will be brought to the Board in August. This will come before the Board at the August Regular Board Meeting under the regular agenda.

1

C. OSLAD Grant Authorization The Rehm Park master plan was accepted in December 2016. The revised plan includes: a picnic pavilion, a restroom, an updated playground, and renovated tennis courts. There is $400,000 in the CIP for the improvement. The Board discussed the games going in near the pavilion and confirmed that the OSLAD amount should the Park District receive it, will be a matching grant for $400,000. This will come before the Board at the July Regular Board Meeting under the consent agenda.

D. LWCF Grant Authorization The Board was reminded that in the 2014-2023 master plan that was accepted in 2013, properties were identified for acquisition to serve the residents and the Park District set aside funds in the CIP to use for such improvements. The Land and Water Conservation Fund will cover 50% of the cost of a property acquisition that will remain as open land for recreational benefit. The Board confirmed that going for this grant would not affect the OSLAD application, then discussion took place on how to proceed with the application. This will come before the Board at the July Regular Board Meeting under the consent agenda.

E. Quarterly Performance Review Greg Stopka, Manager of Strategy & Innovation, ran through an MPower overview for the 2nd quarter, including: progress, communication, performance, resources, transparency, and allocation as well as comparisons to 2018. The Board was informed how the real-time data was used to address the concerns of the pool pass sales not meeting budget due to the weather and decreased pass sales. The Board discussed the ability of the public using the information and were informed of all the information was available on our website. No Board action is needed on this item.

F. Committee Name Revisions The Board was reminded of the three PDOP committees: the Park District Citizen Committee, the Greening Advisory Committee and the Senior Advisory Committee. The GAC helps implement the PDOP’s Environmental Policy, the Pest Management Policy, and sustainability. Task force groups were formed to implement these areas. As sustainability has taken such a large role, the recommendation had come forward to be called the Environmental Sustainability Advisory Committee. The SAC was established in 2010, with the mission to provide guidance for senior programs, goals and objectives; but meetings were suspended in 2015, due to low participation. With the addition of the OPRF Senior Citizens’ Center and the acquisition of Dole Center, there is a recommendation to reestablish and rename the committee the Active Adult Advisory Committee. This will come before the Board at the July Regular Board Meeting under the consent agenda.

G. Dole Lease – Oak Park Society of Model Engineers After meetings with the Oak Park Society of Model Engineers and discussion with the society, staff looked at their membership levels, community open houses, and community involvement. In the new agreement, those areas are addressed. Based on their square footage and being in the basement, they are being charged 50% the rate of the library. The terms of the lease are for 18 months, allowing the society time to bring up their membership numbers. This will come before the Board at the July Regular Board Meeting under the consent agenda.

H. MOU Oak Park Mental Health Board The Board was informed that the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) sets forth the terms between the PDOP and Oak Park Mental Health Board to collaborate funding for a Community Recreation Center for the benefit of our residents. Once funding, location, and amenities are approved, an IGA will be created. This will come before the Board at the July Regular Board Meeting under the consent agenda. 2

I. Rehm Tennis Court Update The PDOP will go out to bid for the updating of the Rehm tennis courts at the end of July and they will be brought forward to the Board for consideration and approval at the August 22, Regular Board Meeting. The tennis courts will be updated as recreational courts and a 4’ high wall will be built on the east and west sides of the courts with the back walls remaining 12’ high. It was stated that a Board member had played on courts with this type of fencing and it worked well. This will come before the Board at the July Regular Board Meeting under the consent agenda.

VI. New Business

VII. Closed Session At 8:30pm Commissioner Worley-Hood moved and Commissioner Wick seconded that the Park Board of Commissioners convene into closed session for the discussion of the performance of a specific employee of the Park District and to discuss the purchase or lease of real property for the use of the District. The motion passed with a roll call vote of 5:0.

At 9:07pm a motion was made by Commissioner Wick and seconded by Commissioner Worley-Hood to adjourn the Closed Session. The motion passed a voice vote of 5:0.

VIII. Adjournment At 9:07p.m. a voice vote was taken to adjourn the Committee of the Whole. Motion carried in a voice vote.

______Secretary President Board of Park Commissioners Board of Park Commissioners

August 22, 2019 ______August 22, 2019 ______Date Date

3

Park District of Oak Park Annual Park Board Retreat Hedges Administrative Center 218 Madison Street, Oak Park, Illinois Thursday, July 16, 2019

Minutes

I. Call to Order The meeting was called to order at 2:01pm.

II. Roll Call Present: Commissioners Porreca, Wick, Wollmuth, Worley-Hood, and President Lentz.

Park District Staff Present: Jan Arnold, Executive Director; Kyle Cratty, Director of Finance; and Karen Gruszka, Executive Assistant.

Others Present: None.

III. 2020 Budget Guidance The Board discussed the budget guidelines including CPI, the tax levy, freezing fees of programs, scholarships, the TIF EAV, minimum wage increases, debt refinancing, and the budget timeline. The Board discussed being good stewards of money and showing the community we are hearing their concerns and then discussed the different ways that could be shown. This will be brought to the Board for approval at the July Regular Board Meeting.

IV. 2020-2024 Capital Improvement Plan The Board was apprised of the CIP for 2020-2024 including: the major sources of the CIP’s revenue, the CIP revenue projections, plan improvement by park, and parks planned for possible future OSLAD grant matching funds. Discussion took place on improvements, costs, and the timings of renovations planned. This will be brought to the Board for approval at the July Regular Board Meeting.

V. Executive Director’s Evaluation Tool The history of the current evaluation form used for the Executive Director’s evaluation was told to the Board and a new Executive Director’s evaluation form was presented for their consideration. Discussion included: smart goals, direction, expectations, scoring, a 360 degree evaluation, and the conversations it would bring to the evaluation. The Board will continue to consider and continue to discuss the evaluation form.

VI. New Business – None

VII . Adjourn At 5:11pm the meeting adjourned.

______Secretary President Board of Park Commissioners Board of Park Commissioners

August 22, 2019 August 22, 2019 ___ Date Date

1

Park District of Oak Park Regular Board Meeting Hedges Administrative Center 218 Madison Street, Oak Park, Illinois Thursday, July 18, 2019 at 7:30pm

Minutes

The meeting was called to order at 7:30pm.

I. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Porreca, Wick, Wollmuth and President Lentz. Commissioner Worley-Hood was absent.

Park District Staff present: Jan Arnold, Executive Director; Chris Lindgren, Parks and Planning; Kayla Knazze, Fellow; and Karen Gruszka, Executive Assistant.

Others Present: None.

II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA A motion was made to approve the agenda. The motion was passed by a voice vote.

III. VISITOR/PUBLIC COMMENTS – None

IV. CONSENT AGENDA A motion was made by Commissioner Porreca and seconded by Commissioner Wick to approve the Consent Agenda, which includes the approval of Cash and Investment Summary and Warrants and Bills for the month of June 2019; approval of minutes from the Continued Regular Board Meeting, June 6, 2019, Committee of the Whole Meeting, June 6, 2019, and the Regular Board Meeting, June 20, 2019; approval of OSLAD Grant Authorization; approval of LWCF and OSLAD Grant Authorizations; approval of Committee Name Revisions; and approval of Dole Lease – Oak Park Society of Model Engineers. The motion passed with a roll call vote of 4:0.

V. STAFF REPORTS A. Director’s Report Jan Arnold, Executive Director, informed the Board that tonight is movies in Park and the movie showing is The Sandlot; tonight is also neighborhood nights which is being held at Taylor Park; Carroll demo work has begun and staff are working with the contractors to ensure the building is enclosed by winter and we are working with D97 on use of Lincoln space until the building is ready to move into; at Stevenson, fencing is planned to go up at the end of the month and the old playground is being taken by Playground Around The World similar to Euclid’s and Maple’s playgrounds; and the 2019 Community Survey results will be brought to the Board at the August 22, Regular Board Meeting.

B. Division Managers’ Reports (Updates & Information) – Written Report Included in Board Packet.

C. Revenue/Expense Status Report – No questions asked.

VI. OLD BUSINESS A. Recreation and Facility Program Committee – None

1

B. Parks and Planning Committee 1. CIP 2020-2024* Commissioner Wick moved and Commissioner Porreca seconded that the Park Board of Commissioners approve the 2020-2024 Capital Improvement Plan. Executive Director Arnold reminded the Board of the CIP that had been presented to them at the their Annual Board Retreat, that it is reviewed annually, and that the CIP funding comes from property taxes and from the 2005 referendum, along with transfers from both Recreation and Special Facilities. She also reminded the Board that the debt service is abated each year. The Board discussed the different parks and upcoming plans and timelines for renovations along with OSLAD grant applications. The motion passed with a roll call vote of 4:0.

2. Pleasant Home Driveway Replacement* Commissioner Wick moved and Commissioner Wollmuth seconded to give Executive Director Arnold the authority to sign a contract with J. Andersen, Inc., Riverside, IL, in an amount not to exceed $60,000. This project was identified during conversations with the PH Restoration Committee. Annually, funds are allocated in the budget to make necessary repairs as needed. $70,000 was budgeted for the driveway and the entrance stairs. J Andersen, Inc. was the low responsible bidder. The price will be negotiated not to exceed $60,000 for the project. The Board discussed the timeline and other bids. The motion passed with a roll call vote of 4:0.

C. Administration and Finance Committee 1. Budget Guidelines and Timeline Commissioner Porreca moved and Commissioner Wollmuth seconded that the Park Board of Commissioner approve the Budget Guidelines and Timeline. Executive Director Arnold reminded the Board of the discussion at their retreat and that staff are recommending the tax levy be fully captured for the CPI and expired Madison and Downtown TIFs, the freezing of program fees through 2021, the expansion of the scholarship program for afterschool and day camp participants, the capturing of only CPI in 2020; minimum wage increases, along with breakdowns of budgetary items. The motion passed with a roll call vote of 4:0.

2. MOU Oak Park Mental Health Guidelines* Commissioner Porreca moved and Commissioner Wollmuth seconded that the Park Board of Commissioners approve the Memorandum of Understanding with the Oak Park Mental Health Board. Executive Director reminded the Board that the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) sets forth the terms between the Oak Park Mental Health Board and the Park District of Oak Park (PDOP) on the collaborative funding and usage of a Community Recreation Center for our residents. Once the project location, amenities, and funding is approved, an IGA will be created. The motion passed with a roll call vote of 4:0.

VII. NEW BUSINESS 1. IGOV The Board discussed the four items that were broken down at the last IGOV meeting: Environment and Sustainability, Infrastructure and Transportation, Innovation and Inclusion, and Public Safety in each organization and how each entity approached the subjects with equity in mind. Discussion took place on all the achievements with the leadership role that the PDOP has taken with environmental and sustainability, our infrastructure, innovation and public safety. The Board was reminded that the PDOP had created an Equity Committee to internally look at these areas. The Board agreed that IGOV is a great collaboration and will continue to work with the other entities involved. No motion needs to be taken on this item.

VIII. COMMISSIONERS’ COMMENTS  Commissioner Wollmuth – Attended the Parks Foundation Board meeting, and stated they have a nice energy going for the CRC project. He also attended the AYSO meeting and met with their leadership 2

afterwards, and stated they were very complimentary of the fields and of Travis, the sports field manager, and the work being done. He mentioned that the Falcon tournament is going on this weekend at a lot of our ball parks, and to stop by and support it if you can, and then thanked everyone for the good discussion at the Board Retreat this week.  Commissioner Porreca – Attended the WSSRA meeting where they are still in transition from Bob Foster’s retirement and are moving positions around as they look forward. She sent kudos to the staff for the work they did and brought to the Board Retreat. She also attended the Barrie pickleball courts opening. Everyone was very excited for it and the Rush fencing looked great.  Commissioner Wick – Attended FOPCON’s meeting and met with the new Executive Director Judy and had a nice discussion with her. He mentioned that they will be coming forward to the Board with a resolution to change the EL stop’s name by the Oak Park Conservatory. They are currently working with the CTA on that.  Commissioner Worley-Hood – Absent.  Commissioner Lentz – Mentioned she had received three wonderful letters from the community complimenting our parks this week. Thanks to everyone for all their work this summer. She also wanted to thank the Board for their participation at the Board Retreat; stating there were a lot of good discussion. She also attended the picklball court opening and stated it was very good!

IX. CLOSED SESSION – None

X. ADJOURN At 8:16pm the Regular Board meeting was adjourned. The motion passed with a voice vote.

______Secretary President Board of Park Commissioners Board of Park Commissioners

August 22, 2019 _____ August 22, 2019______

3

IV.D PARK DISTRICT OF OAK PARK

ORDINANCE NO. __2019-8-01______

AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING DISPOSAL OF PERSONAL PROPERTY OWNED BY THE PARK DISTRICT OF OAK PARK

WHEREAS, in the opinion of the Park District of Oak Park, it is no longer necessary, useful, or in the best interests of the Park District to retain ownership of the personal property described in this Ordinance; and

WHEREAS, it has been determined by the President and the Board of Commissioners of the Park District of Oak Park to dispose of said personal property in the manner described in this Ordinance;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the President and Board of Commissioners of the Park District of Oak Park, Cook County and State of Illinois, as follows:

Section 1. Recitals. The foregoing recitals are hereby incorporated into this Ordinance as findings of the President and Board of Commissioners.

Section 2. Disposal of Surplus Property. The President and Board of Commissioners find that the personal property described in Exhibit A attached to this Ordinance and by this reference incorporated into this Ordinance (the “Surplus Property”) is no longer necessary or useful to the Park District, and thus the Executive Director of the Park District is hereby authorized to direct the sale or disposal of the Surplus Property in the manner most appropriate to the Park District. The Surplus Property shall be sold or disposed of in “as is” condition.

Section 3. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval, and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.

PASSED this __22nd___ day of August, 2019.

AYES: NAYS: ABSENT:

APPROVED this _22nd___ day of August, 2019.

By: ______Sandy Lentz, Park Board President

ATTEST:

______Chris Wollmuth, Secretary (See Other Side) EXHIBIT A

DESCRIPTION OF SURPLUS PROPERTY

- 6 miniature (child size) trains that do not fit on the Rehm tracks

- 2 - V.A, In partnership with the community, we enrich lives by providing meaningful experiences through programs, parks, and facilities.

Executive Director’s Report From the desk of Jan Arnold Friday, August 16, 2019

1. Upcoming Board Meetings – The August Regular Board Meeting is scheduled for Thursday, August 22, 2019, beginning at 7:30pm. The September Committee of the Whole Meeting is scheduled for Thursday, September 5, 2019, beginning at 7:30pm. The September Regular Board Meeting is scheduled for Thursday, September 19, 2019, beginning at 7:30pm. All meetings are being held at the Hedges Administrative Center unless otherwise noted. At the end of my report are some events you may consider stopping by.

2. Ellis Audit – Ellis conducted the second surprise audit of the year on our pools. Staff once again scored an “Exceeds” across the board.

3. Concerts in the Parks – Concerts in the parks began Sunday evening, June 9, at 5:30pm; the final concert will be this Sunday, August 18. Zero waste volunteers have been recruited from GAC members. The season has had only one cancellation due to weather and has been very successful.

4. OSLAD Grants – Staff were excited to learn that $23M for OSLAD funding was included in the 2019 Illinois State Budget. Staff submitted two OSLAD grant applications.

5. Pop-up Bike – The pop-up bike was introduced during the carnival at Mills Park during Day In Our Village where it was well received. The actual scheduled first day was Monday, June 10, where many children engaged with staff in activities. Currently, the bike goes to two parks a day and has engaged roughly 20 children at each scheduled visit. The pop-up bike will run through August 23.

6. Community Survey – Staff held the kick-off meeting for the 2019 Community Survey. We reviewed goals of the survey and discussed potential questions to our residents. The first draft for the PDOP to review was completed in mid-March. Distribution for the survey began Tuesday, April 23, with over 600 surveys being completed. Results will be presented to the Board in August.

7. Registration Software – The Park Board approved a contract with Amilia to provide the Park District with a new registration software system. We began a business assessment of the Park District with Amilia representatives and are excited to bring this improved platform to our residents. Amilia will be at the PDOP the week of August 19, to train staff.

8. Carroll Center – Tom Basset-Dilley Architects (Architect/CM). The Park District will assume the role of General Contractor on this project. Site fencing was put up on July 16, and demolition of the existing building’s interior started on July 17. The playground was removed on July 23, and exterior site demolition has been completed. Interior work has begun to prep for insulation and Passive House specified components. The new building foundation work started August 8, and will continue throughout August. The geothermal contractor is expected to start on site next week.

9. Dole Center – Arts programs will begin in October in the basement. An open house has been scheduled for Friday, October 11, at 6pm.

10. Barrie Center Building Improvements – The PDOP has budgeted $115,000 for the building improvements scheduled at Barrie. These items were identified in the building assessments done in 2016. The PDOP went out to bid for flooring replacements on February 13, and bids were received on February 28. A contract was awarded to Johnson Flooring and construction started on March 23. The flooring was completed on Friday, March 29. Staff is currently adding an ADA bottle fill water fountain and interior ADA accessible entrance into the classroom. The kitchen renovation is taking place this weekend. Also, the installation of a new air sourced heat pump to replace the AC condenser is completed, this was a recommendation of the GAC.

11. Barrie Reservoir Pickleball – Due to the high demand of pickleball in our community, the PDOP has installed six new dedicated pickleball courts on top of the Barrie reservoir. The courts are now open to the community and receiving lots of play by that active group. Also, the basketball courts were improved with new surfacing and painting. A wind screen was installed with Rush Hospital sponsoring the cost. A ceremony opening the pickleball courts took place Tuesday, July 16, at 9:00am at the courts.

12. Stevenson Park Improvements – Altamanu (Landscape Architect). The Park District has received notification of a $400,000 OSLAD grant for this project. Drawings and specifications were finalized on May 28. The project went out to bid on May 29, with bids received on June 14. A contract was approved at the June 20, Regular Board Meeting with Hacienda Landscaping. Site fencing and tree protection has been completed. Kids Around the World came with 35 volunteers on July 31, to remove the playground which will be donated to another country in need. The remaining site demo was completed this week and the contractor is starting on the new ramp excavation. Concrete foundations for the ramp walls are expected to take place over the next two weeks.

13. Pleasant Home Driveway – The driveway at Pleasant Home is in need of replacement and the PH Historic Preservation Committee has worked with the Park District to put together bid specs that went out to bid on June 26, with bids received on July 12. The Park Board approved a contract with J Andersen Construction at the July Regular Board Meeting. This work is expected to take place in the fall after the wedding season is completed.

14. Rehm Trains – The popular Rehm Trains are running on Tuesday and Thursdays 6-8pm; Wednesdays and Fridays 10am-12pm; and Saturday and Sundays 11am-1pm. The trains will be open through August 24.

15. NRPA Conference – The NRPA Conference is taking place September 24-26, 2019. The conference is being held in Baltimore, Maryland this year. David and Sandy will be attending along with a few key staff.

August Calendar of Events

 August 17 – Walk with a Doc – Lindberg Park from 9-10A  August 17 – Discovery Garden Exploration Time – Oak Park Conservatory 10:30A-12:30P  August 18 – Concerts In The Park – Scoville Park from 5:30P-7P  August 21 – Discovery Garden Exploration Time – Oak Park Conservatory 10:30A-12:30P  August 22 – Regular Park Board Meeting – Hedges Administrative Center 7:30P  August 24 – Discovery Garden Exploration Time – Oak Park Conservatory 10:30A-12:30P  August 28 – Discovery Garden Exploration Time – Oak Park Conservatory 10:30A-12:30P  August 28 – Parks & Conversation – Taylor Park from 6:30-8P  August 29 – Telescope Night – Fox Park from 9-10P  August 31 – Discovery Garden Exploration Time – Oak Park Conservatory 10:30A-12:30P

V.B

August 2019

ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCE

Kyle Cratty, Director of Finance  The 2020 budget process has begun with staff meetings to discuss budget goals. Financial review meetings are set for the last two weeks in August. Board approval of the 2020 Budget is expected in November.  Amilia, the District’s new Recreation Software provider, will be on site the week of August 19, to provide first-round training to Park District staff. Work with Amilia to refine the setup continues and staff are excited about the upcoming change.  Staff are out in the parks completing the review for the 2019 Parks Report Card, results will be presented to the Board in December.

Diane Stanke, Director of Marketing and Customer Service  Two OSLAD grant applications were prepared and submitted to IDNR for land acquisition and park development.  C & M staff participated in a work session with Greg Stopka to identify and discuss marketing challenges. These challenges will then be taken to the innovation committee for discussion, research, and recommendations.  Dan Schaffer and Diane Stanke are organizing a citizen marketing committee as part of the strategic plan, to gather feedback and ideas regarding PDOP marketing efforts.  Joe Kreml, from the VOP, has begun shooting video at PDOP programs and facilities for the 2020 Gold Medal application.  The community survey results and recommendations will be presented to the Park Board in August.

Melissa Martinez, Communications and Marketing Manager  A FLW, Youth Sports Leagues, and Fitness EDDM postcard was sent to 5,000 households in the 60304 zip code on August 3. The goal is to promote our soccer and basketball leagues, the FLW race, and our $45 per month fitness offering.  The Q3 ’19 Adult postcard was sent to all Oak Park residents on August 3. The goal is to drive awareness of our adult programming, reinforcing the messaging that we are “Not just for kids”. These postcards also help compliment our brochure as we continue working on changing that perception and showing all the programs for adults as well.  The C&M team has been working on a comprehensive marketing campaign for the Frank Lloyd Wright Races that includes: 8x3 banners, postcards, stanchions, t-shirts, email blasts, and social posts. Postcards were distributed to all Fleet Feet stores in the Chicago-land area.  A non-resident rink promotional postcard was sent to 5,000 households in the Brookfield area promoting our rink passes, skating, and hockey lessons. The goal is to reach out to non-residents in surrounding suburbs that do not have a rink, with a discount, enticing them to try our ice programming. The goal long-term is that they see us as their home rink.  The finalization of a new Active Adult/Senior Living booklet is being worked on to distribute to all senior centers, within our facilities, and the library which will include new programs that were merged from the Senior Center. This will be distributed the week of August 12. Michelle Jerry, Sponsorship Coordinator  2019 Sponsorships & Advertising have surpassed 2019 projections! $78,880 was projected and we are at $79,465 and growing.  The PDOP held a ribbon-cutting event at the Barrie pickleball courts, recognizing Rush OP Hospital’s generous windscreens contribution to the beautiful new courts.  Shriners Children’s Hospital held a Beach Ball Day at Ridgeland Common Pool, highlighting resources available at their hospital.  Advertising commitments include: AYSO renewed for another 4-year advertising commitment, Oak Park School of Music recently signed on for a 4-year advertising commitment, and Downtown Oak Park renewed for a 1-year advertising commitment.  Sponsorship commitments include: Back-To-School Family Fit Fest, Meridian Health Plan signed on as an on-site sponsor, Rush Oak Park Hospital is the presenting sponsor for this event and Culver’s and GoGo SqueeZ have donated products to hand out during the event.

Scott Sekulich, Customer Service Manager  Here are our current July scholarship statistics compared to July of 2018. Total Programs & Family Passes June Total Households Members Year Purchased Redeemed Registered Registered 2018 90 $7,297.77 43 74 2019 109 $6,587.08 51 94

 Total Scholarships YTD are $54,400.21 versus $52,274.45 in 2018.  Our first meet and greet at the new building Eleven33 was held on July 24. Seven new registration accounts were created for residents who were excited about what the Park District has to offer.  41 Dog Park Permits were purchased in July, of which thirteen were new households for the Park District.

Paula Bickel, Director of Human Resources  The month of July was a break from training for CPR and 1st Aid. Trainings will begin again in August.  Ten new staff went through new hire orientation.

PARKS AND PLANNING

Chris Lindgren, Superintendent of Parks and Planning  Staff have prepared and painted soccer fields for the upcoming season.  Athletic fields are being aerated to keep them in good condition.  The tree ring maintenance crew have been busy edging trees at Field, Lindberg, and Scoville Park.  All baseball fields have had weeds removed around the backstop fencing and player bench area.  Staff have set and installed five memorial plaques.  Staff assisted contractor with site prep for Carroll construction.

HISTORIC PROPERTIES

Susan Crane, Cheney Mansion and Special Events Special Events  Diversity of events at Cheney continued in July with weddings, grad parties, a quinceanera, and a memorial service.  Outdoor Yoga every Thursday continues to be popular.

 Open Tour days continue on M, W, F from 11-2pm, through August. In July, we had approximately 30 visitors.  We continue to book private events and parties. Currently, we are over 90% to budget in revenue for rentals and programs through July.

Cheney Mansion  Concerts in the Park continue to be strong with only one cancellation due to weather so far. Crowds have been good and enthusiastic. We have one more concert on August 18, for the summer.  Our July movie was The Sandlot and had our largest crowd for the summer so far at about 300 patrons!

Patti Staley, Director of Horticulture  The Conservatory has welcomed 4,811 visitors the month of July, averaging 155 visitors a day.  The Conservatory and FOPCON hosted a Chamber of Commerce After Hours open house on July 9, with a great turnout. For many, it was their first time to the Conservatory.  Cheney Mansion vegetable garden volunteers donated over 60 hours of their time during the month of July. Produce is being harvested weekly and donated to the food pantry.  Conservatory staff redesigned and implemented new landscaping at the Dole Center to include a butterfly garden in the center walkway surrounding the artwork by Oak Park Library teens.

RECREATION AND FACILITIES

Bill Hamilton, Superintendent of Special Facilities Rink and Pool  Lifeguards had their second audit of the summer and received an Overall Exceeds.  Through August 13, the pools have had 92,260 visitors.  Summer 2019, Ridgeland was home to over 100 campers a day from 7am-6pm, with a total of 1,562 registrations.  Staff is preparing for the rink shut down on August 16. The shutdown will last until September 3. The ice will be melted, surface cleaned, and new ice installed with fresh paint, lines and logos. Additional work in the rink will include equipment maintenance, locker room painting, and general deep cleaning of all areas.

Jamie Lapke, Program and & Operations Manager - Gymnastics  The annual summer sleepover was held at the GRC. Any child six years and above was invited to attend the sleepover. 53 children arrived at the GRC at 7:30pm and were picked up the next morning at 8:30am.  The second four week summer gymnastics session started.  The Farmer’s Market Team Tumbling Exhibition & Parents Booster Club Bake Sale was held. Coaches Keith, Demarco, and Alek ran the tumbling exhibition from 9:30-11:30am with 20 team gymnasts participating.  Gymnastics fall priority registration began for residents that were enrolled in a summer class.

Mike Loszach, Program Manager School Age/Teens  The Clubhouse afterschool program will start on Wednesday, August 28. Enrollment has increased again this year with 294 kids currently enrolled in the program.  Teen summer camp enrollment has done very well, surpassing 2018 enrollment by over 16%.

Early Childhood  Playschool/Preschool/Pre-Kindergarten parent open houses are scheduled for August 28, and August 29, with school starting on Tuesday, September 3.  Our early childhood camps are winding down. These camps saw an enrollment increase of over 20% in 2019.

Nature/Adventure Programming  Our campers have been having a lot of fun at outdoor adventure camps where they have enjoyed recent sailing and rock climbing field trips!  Campers enjoyed different outdoor experiments and laboratory tests at our curious minds camps enjoying lesson plans geared around different scientific disciplines like physics, chemistry, and biology.

Arts, Special Interest & Active Adults  Our Active Adults enjoyed a new trip to the Bristol Renaissance Faire where they got to experience a year 1,574 themed village festival day.  The SCAW Session 2 showcase took place the week of July 29, where our campers got to show off what they’ve worked on the last four weeks to their families.

Chad Drufke, Recreation Program Manager Fitness/Circus/Dance/FLW  The Fitness in the Parks program was successful again this year with 65 participants, all of whom had very positive feedback on their experience. The program finishes on August 15, with Yoga at Cheney Mansion.  Circus Camp concludes their Bonus Weeks next week with one final showcase for the summer. Fall programming includes additional options for our Mini Circus based on community feedback following our spring session.  Fall registration for Dance is strong at this point, with another month until classes start. We expect revenue to continue to trend positively in line with the prior year. The Dance performance team will be preparing for showcases in the fall and winter at Cheney Mansion events.

Youth Sports  We are in the home stretch of summer camps; with a couple weeks left, we are on pace to meet or exceed all in-house youth sports participation/revenue (Rookies, Veterans, MVP, Sports-Extended, Tennis, Volleyball and Basketball).  Basketball and soccer league registration opened up for fall and winter sessions.  Fit Fest will take place on August 17, at Maple Park.  Financially, we are still trending in the right direction through July 2019, grossing 518k vs a budget of 395k. Compared to last year at this point, actual revenue was 475k.

Adult Sports/Martial Arts  The fall adult softball and soccer leagues begin the week of August 11. We have a total of 25 soccer teams and 28 softball teams participating this season.  With fall registration only a week in, we already have 14 participants enrolled for fall pickleball programming. The program has had a successful year.  The summer martial arts programs are winding down in August. The fall martial arts programming will start in September. Currently we have had a total of 1,059 participants in martial arts programming this year. At the same point last year we had 967 participants.

V.C

Memo

To: Kassie Porreca, Chair, Administration and Finance Committee Board of Park Commissioners

From: Illiana De La Rosa, Finance Manager Kyle Cratty, Director of Finance

Cc: Jan Arnold, Executive Director

Date: August 14, 2019

Re: July 2019 Revenue Expense Report

Statement Attached with this memo are the June Revenue and Expense reports. The two reports are the Revenue Expense Report by Fund as well as the Summarized Revenue Expense Report. The Revenue Expense Report by Fund provides detail by revenue or expense type by fund. The Summarized Revenue Expense Report includes a snapshot by area of overall revenues and expenses. The Health Insurance Fund is a non-operating internal service fund and to better reflect this difference it is split into a separate section on each report.

The July Revenue Expense Reports highlights include:

Summarized Revenue Expense Report  Adult Athletics doing well with strong revenue in adult sports and volleyball leagues through July.  Teen programs performing better than the prior year-to-date with solid camp enrollments.  Pool revenue is down due to lower pool pass sales given cooler weather earlier in the season but warmer weather in July closed the gap compared to the last year.  Rink revenue is down compared to prior year-to-date due to lower youth hockey enrollment and rink rentals but rink camp revenue is up 21% over last year.

Revenue and Expense Report - by Fund  Second round of Tax receipts received in July and will continue into August, normalizing by year-end.  Fees and charges are down due to the lower number of wedding bookings at Cheney Mansion as well as the loss of some rink rentals to make room for programs. Thus, rink program revenue is up.  Intergovernmental revenue is up compared to budget due to a TIF Rebate in early May and receipt of a partial OSLAD Grant in late June.

Year-Long Highlights  The Facilities budget was consolidated into the Parks and Planning department. This allocation will produce higher revenue and expenses throughout the year for Parks and Planning as compared to previous years.  The Dog Park budget was consolidated into the Special Facilities Maintenance budget, minimal revenue is anticipated due to elimination of the Dog Park fee for residents.

Park District of Oak Park 218 Madison Street ▪ Oak Park, Illinois 60302 ▪ ph: (708) 725-2000 ▪ fx: (708) 383-5702 ▪ www.pdop.org July 2019 Revenue and Expense Report - by Fund Operating Funds Special Capital Cheney Corporate IMRF Liability Audit Recreation Museum Special Rec July Total Budget YTD Actual YTD Prior YTD Facilities Projects Mansion

Taxes $ 831,862 $ 71,523 $ 73,155 $ 3,809 $ 755,460 $ 9,892 $ 111,051 -$ $ - -$ $ 1,856,751 $ 6, 750,733 $ 6,861,525 $ 7,620,370 Fees and Charges $ 16,144 -$ -$ -$ $ - -$ -$ $ 195,497 $ - $ 28,748 $ 240,389 $ 1, 531,910 $ 1,394,168 $ 1,553,045 Intergovernmental $ - -$ -$ -$ $ - -$ -$ -$ $ 25,266 -$ $ 25,266 $ 113,891 $ 408,058 $ 269,302 Miscellaneous Income $ 29,087 -$ $ 335 -$ $ 3,776 -$ -$ $ 1,566 $ - -$ $ 34,763 $ 174,705 $ 313,493 $ 269,331 Sponsorship & Donations $ 246 -$ -$ -$ $ 9,305 -$ -$ -$ $ - -$ $ 9,551 $ 48,431 $ 9 9,906 $ 68,701 Other Financing Sources $ - -$ -$ -$ $ - -$ $ 2,417 -$ $ 161,455 -$ $ 163,872 $ 1, 147,102 $ 1,147,102 $ 1,249,882 Program Revenue $ 1,210 -$ -$ -$ $ 105,543 -$ -$ $ 304,624 $ - $ 635 $ 412,011 $ 4, 579,919 $ 4,835,990 $ 4,616,720 Total Revenue $ 878,548 $ 71,523 $ 73,490 $ 3,809 $ 874,083 $ 9,892 $ 113,468 $ 501,686 $ 186,721 $ 29,383 $ 2,742,603 $ 14,346,692 $ 15,060,242 $ 15,647,351

Wages $ 205,929 -$ $ 4,800 -$ $ 266,549 -$ -$ $ 283,160 $ - $ 7,648 $ 768,086 $ 4, 111,256 $ 3,820,134 $ 3,708,276 Contractual Services $ 72,390 -$ $ 7,072 $ 2,000 $ 120,813 $ 128 -$ $ 31,669 $ - $ 1,261 $ 235,332 $ 1, 727,933 $ 1,576,679 $ 1,534,253 Materials and Supplies $ 32,948 -$ $ 679 -$ $ 20,432 -$ -$ $ 29,231 $ - $ 451 $ 83,741 $ 566,913 $ 486,738 $ 557,950 Benefits $ 57,482 $ 22,016 -$ -$ $ - -$ -$ -$ $ - -$ $ 79,498 $ 495,634 $ 495,404 $ 480,992 Miscellaneous Expense $ 3,721 -$ -$ -$ $ 14,355 -$ -$ $ 3,295 $ - $ 13 $ 21,384 $ 234,841 $ 202,969 $ 183,392 Debt Service $ - -$ -$ -$ $ - -$ -$ -$ $ - -$ $ - $ 379,322 $ 379,372 $ 388,559 Utilities $ 19,271 -$ -$ -$ $ 2,035 $ 776 -$ $ 19,403 $ - $ 1,866 $ 43,350 $ 301,723 $ 293,214 $ 289,334 Other Financing Uses $ 35,211 $ - -$ -$ $ 141,313 -$ -$ $ 55,846 $ - $ 2,098 $ 234,468 $ 1, 641,277 $ 1,641,277 $ 1,726,992 Capital Projects $ - -$ -$ -$ $ - -$ -$ -$ $ 657,287 -$ $ 657,287 $ 1, 012,500 $ 1,069,476 $ 613,990 Total Expense $ 426,952 $ 22,016 $ 12,551 $ 2,000 $ 565,496 $ 903 $ - $ 422,604 $ 657,287 $ 13,337 $ 2,123,145 $ 10,471,398 $ 9,965,262 $ 9,483,737

Net $ 451,596 $ 49,507 $ 60,939 $ 1,809 $ 308,588 $ 8,988 $ 113,468 $ 79,083 $ (470,566) $ 16,047 $ 619,458 $ 3,875,293 $ 5,094,980 $ 6,163,614

Non- Operating Funds Health July Total Budget YTD Actual YTD Prior YTD Insurance Taxes $ - -$ -$ -$ $ - Fees and Charges $ 11,518 $ 11,518 $ 87,729 $ 79,850 $ 77,077 Intergovernmental $ - -$ -$ -$ $ - Miscellaneous Income $ - -$ -$ -$ $ - Sponsorship & Donations $ - -$ -$ -$ $ - Other Financing Sources $ 70,596 $ 70,596 $ 494,176 $ 494,175 $ 477,110 Program Revenue $ - -$ -$ -$ $ - Total Revenue $ 82,114 $ 82,114 $ 581,905 $ 574,025 $ 554,188

Wages $ - -$ -$ -$ $ - Contractual Services $ - -$ -$ -$ $ - Materials and Supplies $ - -$ -$ -$ $ - Benefits $ 77,410 $ 77,410 $ 597,870 $ 476,625 $ 504,797 Miscellaneous Expense $ 66 $ 66 -$ $ 432 $ 992 Debt Service $ - -$ -$ -$ $ - Utilities $ - -$ -$ -$ $ - Other Financing Uses $ - -$ -$ -$ $ - Capital Projects $ - -$ -$ -$ $ - Total Expense $ 77,476 $ 77,476 $ 597,870 $ 477,057 $ 505,789

Net $ 4,638 $ 4,638 $ (15,965) $ 96,968 $ 48,399 July 2019 Summarized Rev Exp Report

July-19 Budget YTD Actual YTD Prior YTD Operating Funds

Corporate Fund 100000 Administration Revenue $885,970 $3,203,641 $3,388,345 $3,326,369 Expense $200,055 $1,296,308 $1,267,967 $1,205,400 Net $685,915 $1,907,333 $2,120,378 $2,120,969

10++35 Conservatory Revenue $6,502 $53,470 $71,296 $67,226 Expense $26,594 $195,334 $174,210 $165,071 Net ($20,092) ($141,864) ($102,914) ($97,846)

100050 Parks and Planning (as of 2019, consolidated Facilities budget) Revenue $11,342 $119,994 $99,230 $145,647 Expense $200,302 $1,393,193 $1,291,235 $1,202,671 Net ($188,961) ($1,273,199) ($1,192,005) ($1,057,024)

Total Corporate Revenue $903,814 $3,377,105 $3,558,871 $3,539,242 Expense $426,952 $2,884,835 $2,733,412 $2,573,142 Net $476,862 $492,270 $825,459 $966,100

IMRF Fund 150000 Revenue $71,523 $260,248 $264,310 $384,264 Expense $22,016 $194,359 $170,226 $197,735 Net $49,507 $65,888 $94,084 $186,530

Liability Fund 160000 Revenue $73,490 $265,827 $272,146 $289,170 Expense $12,551 $196,357 $64,167 $189,108 Net $60,939 $69,471 $207,979 $100,063

Audit Fund 170000 Revenue $3,809 $13,841 $14,075 $15,524 Expense $2,000 $16,500 $16,900 $16,450 Net $1,809 ($2,659) ($2,825) ($926)

Recreation Fund 200000 Administration Revenues $759,241 $2,745,546 $2,841,888 $3,431,244 Expense $202,343 $1,745,036 $1,780,745 $1,672,818 Net $556,898 $1,000,510 $1,061,143 $1,758,426

Page 1 July 2019 Summarized Rev Exp Report

July-19 Budget YTD Actual YTD Prior YTD 200005 Communications Revenue $9,300 $37,631 $62,260 $47,883 Expense $40,500 $308,174 $283,684 $274,321 Net ($31,200) ($270,543) ($221,424) ($226,438)

20++51 Customer Service Revenues $0 $0 $0 $0 Expense $31,117 $222,857 $217,015 $208,193 Net ($31,117) ($222,857) ($217,015) ($208,193)

201025 Fitness Revenue $12,824 $175,913 $196,099 $192,799 Expense $8,462 $114,648 $107,020 $107,662 Net $4,362 $61,265 $89,078 $85,137

201026 Youth Athletics Revenue $42,306 $642,974 $705,379 $649,911 Expense $86,824 $247,073 $191,798 $175,290 Net ($44,519) $395,901 $513,581 $474,622

201027 Adult Athletics Revenue $8,882 $128,018 $143,918 $128,214 Expense $12,565 $48,551 $51,228 $43,070 Net ($3,683) $79,468 $92,691 $85,144

201029 Teen Revenue $7,551 $72,023 $81,383 $70,840 Expense $6,825 $27,649 $16,507 $21,828 Net $726 $44,374 $64,876 $49,012

201061 Community Programs Revenue $31,259 $1,203,322 $1,226,245 $1,105,618 Expense $113,220 $454,807 $416,047 $398,593 Net ($81,961) $748,514 $810,198 $707,025

201062 Fine Arts Revenue $348 $454,815 $446,883 $462,636 Expense $61,469 $188,228 $146,324 $185,478 Net ($61,122) $266,586 $300,559 $277,158

Page 2 July 2019 Summarized Rev Exp Report

July-19 Budget YTD Actual YTD Prior YTD 201063 Early Childhood Revenue $2,373 $294,917 $285,777 $275,341 Expense $2,170 $165,371 $144,824 $140,981 Net $203 $129,546 $140,953 $134,360

Total Recreation Revenue $874,083 $5,755,159 $5,989,832 $6,364,486 Expense $565,496 $3,522,394 $3,355,193 $3,228,234 Net $308,588 $2,232,765 $2,634,640 $3,136,252

Museum Fund 210000 Revenue $9,892 $35,944 $36,554 $40,970 Expense $903 $28,681 $24,174 $28,378 Net $8,988 $7,264 $12,380 $12,592

Special Recreation Fund 220000 Revenue $113,468 $420,661 $427,301 $458,284 Expense $0 $385,381 $374,915 $347,915 Net $113,468 $35,280 $52,386 $110,369

Special Facilites Fund 250000 Administration Revenue $0 $0 $0 $0 Expense $69,385 $473,559 $459,572 $706,667 Net ($69,385) ($473,559) ($459,572) ($706,667)

2519++ Pools Revenue 143,368 914,737 816,331 $889,414 Expense 134,663 267,520 275,305 $236,036 Net $8,705 $647,216 $541,026 $653,378

2520++ Rink Revenue $140,043 $1,057,102 $1,118,885 $1,132,581 Expense $56,879 $312,791 $303,078 $300,220 Net $83,165 $744,311 $815,807 $832,361

Page 3 July 2019 Summarized Rev Exp Report

July-19 Budget YTD Actual YTD Prior YTD 2524++ Gymnastics Revenue $186,831 $827,563 $865,852 $880,202 Expense $54,944 $514,923 $505,244 $439,443 Net $131,887 $312,640 $360,607 $440,759

2550++ Maintenance (as of 2019, consolidated Dog Park budget) Revenue $390 $1,560 $2,730 $16,629 Expense $78,950 $516,305 $457,627 $466,091 Net ($78,560) ($514,745) ($454,897) ($454,321)

2557++ Concessions Revenue $31,054 $72,276 $65,693 $65,139 Expense $27,783 $47,426 $53,289 $41,482 Net $3,271 $24,850 $12,404 $23,657

Total Special Facilities Revenue $501,686 $2,873,238 $2,869,491 $2,983,965 Expense $422,604 $2,132,524 $2,054,115 $2,189,940 Net $79,083 $740,714 $815,375 $794,025

Capital Projects Fund 700000 Revenue $161,455 $1,130,185 $1,422,091 $1,334,953 Expense $657,287 $1,012,500 $1,069,476 $613,990 Net ($495,832) $117,685 $352,615 $720,963

Cheney Mansion Fund 850000 Revenue $29,383 $214,483 $205,570 $236,492 Expense $13,337 $97,868 $102,683 $98,846 Net $16,047 $116,616 $102,887 $137,646

Non-Operating Funds

Health Insurance Fund 500000 Revenue $82,114 $581,905 $574,025 $554,188 Expense $77,476 $597,870 $477,057 $505,789 Net $4,638 ($15,965) $96,968 $48,399

Page 4 VI.A.1

Memo To: Commissioner Wick, Chair, Administration and Finance Committee Board of Commissioners

From: Jan Arnold, Executive Director

Date: August 13, 2019

Re: 2019 Community Survey Findings

Statement

The Park District conducts a community-wide survey every five years. The survey is conducted by a third party firm that uses a random sample to help gain the community opinion of the Park District’s program and facilities. The last survey was completed in 2014, as part of the 2015-2024 Comprehensive Master Plan.

Discussion

At the February 22, 2019, Regular Park Board Meeting, the Board approved a contract with Jeff Andreasen from aQuity Research and Insights of Evanston, Illinois, in an amount not to exceed $27,700 for a new Community Survey. Staff worked with Jeff on key information to be gathered and the final survey went out to the community from April 23 – June 29.

The survey resulted in 618 random responses from Oak Park residents. Jeff was very surprised of the high ratings received by the District. A total of 92% of residents used the parks in the last year, which continues to be far above other communities. Additionally, residents identified the brochure as their main source of obtaining information about the Park District. Findings indicated that the District does need to continue to communicate about our scholarship offerings. Overall, very positive results.

Conclusion

Jeff Andreasen from Aquity Research and Insights, will be in attendance at the August 22, Regular Board Meeting to present the results of the 2019 Community Survey to the Board for the acceptance of the attached results.

Attachment: 2019 Community Survey Results

Park District of Oak Park 218 Madison Street ▪ Oak Park, Illinois 60302 ▪ ph: (708) 725-2000 ▪ fx: (708) 383-5702 ▪ www.pdop.org COMMUNITY SURVEY FOR THE PARK DISTRICT OF OAK PARK

AUGUST 2019 aQity Research & Insights Evanston, IL

1 Table of Contents

SECTION PAGE Methods 3 Sample Demographics 4 Executive Summary 6 Detailed Findings: I. Overall Opinions the Park District of Oak Park (PDOP) 19 II. PDOP Park and Facility Usage 36 III. Levels of Interest/Unmet Needs Among Indoor Recreational Facilities 46 IV. PDOP Program and Event Participation 54 V. Opinions Regarding Potential PDOP Recreation Center 63 VI. PDOP Communications 79 VII. Final Comments/Suggestions 85 APPENDICES: 90 Survey Topline 91

2 Methods

Research Methods

➢ These findings are based on a random sample of n=618 households within the PDOP boundaries. ➢ Data collection was between April 23 through June 29, 2019. The survey was sent by USPS to a sample of households within the District boundaries; follow-up reminder postcards were also sent to the non-respondents to encourage their participation. Both mailings include options to complete the survey by mail, online, or phone.

MAILED PHONE ONLINE QUESTIONAIRE INTERVIEW n= 506 112 0

➢ For those completing the online survey, the average survey length was approximately 15 minutes. ➢ This respondent sample was weighted to align with updated US Census data for Oak Park (by region, gender, age, and race/ethnicity). Note that after weighting by these demographics, our sample is slightly under-representative of:

 Renters (31% of survey respondents, vs. 38% from Census data);  Households without children (61% of survey respondents, vs. 68% from Census data).

This may represent some overlap (e.g., renters without children). A large number of mailed survey and postcard reminders were returned as undeliverable to multifamily units (apartments and condos), so vacancies or tenant mobility likely explain the lower response rate from these residences.

➢ Assuming no sample bias, the margin of error is +/- 3.9% (at the 95% confidence level) *.

* In addition to sampling error, question wording, respondent error, and practical difficulties in conducting surveys may introduce error or bias in any opinion poll. 3 Sample Demographics

Methods: Sample Demographics (weighted to reflect US Census data for Oak Park)

Gender* Length of Residence in Area Household Income

Male 48% < 5 yrs. 25% <$50,000 12%

Female 51% 5-14 yrs. 29% $50,000 - $74,999 11%

Prefer to self-describe 1% 15-24 yrs. 18% $75,000 - $99,999 16%

25-34 12% $100,000 - $149,999 20%

Age* 35+ yrs. 16% $150,000 - $199,999 16%

<35 20% Mean (years) 16.9 $200,000+ 25%

35-44 21% (refused) 20%

45-54 22%

55-64 19% Ethnicity* Own/Rent Status 65+ 18% White 75% Own current residence 69%

Mean (years) 50 Hispanic 6% Rent current residence 31%

Asian 4%

Black/African American 18% Children in Household Type of Residence Other 3% Yes 39% Apartment 20% No 61% Condo 11%

Townhouse 5%

Single-family house 64%

*Weighted to 2017 Census data. 4 Sample Demographics

Methods: Regional Distribution of Survey Respondents (n=618)

Far North Regions* Far North 22% North-Central 20 Central 17 South-Central 16 North- Far South 25 Central

Central

South- Central

*Weighted to 2017 Census data. Far South

5 Executive Summary: Key Findings

6 Executive Summary

Overall Opinions: Park District of Oak Park

Respondents Hold the ➢ On a zero through ten rating scale, the PDOP receives a very positive average score < pg. 20 > PDOP In Very High of 8.2. It has a better than 20:1 favorable-to-unfavorable ratings ratio. Esteem ▪ Just over half of Oak Park residents (51%) give the highest esteem ratings to the District (scores of 9+). Another 26% are very positive, and 13% are somewhat positive.

▪ By comparison, only 4% are dissatisfied with the District overall, and 6% are neutral (no strong opinion either way).

▪ The highest ratings tend to come from younger adults (under age 45) and the < pg. 21 > newest Oak Park residents (moved here within the past 5 years). Both white and African American residents give higher than average scores.

▪ Lower than average scores (albeit still very positive, averaging 7.1 or higher on a 0-10 scale) come from older adults (ages 55+), Asian American households, and lower income residents (under $50K).

▪ These ratings are consistent by region and among homeowners vs. renters.

➢ These PDOP ratings are significantly higher than comparable benchmarks among < pg. 22 > parks and recreation agencies statewide, and among the districts in the immediate vicinity of Oak Park.

➢ Among other local agencies servicing Oak Park residents, only the Public Library < pg. 20 > receives higher ratings than the PDOP. Its average rating of 9.1 (on the zero through ten scale) is one of the highest that aQity Research has ever seen.

▪ The Village, local school districts, and Oak Park Township all receive positive ratings as well (between 7.1 and 7.5 on average), though roughly half of the respondents are unfamiliar with the Township and local school districts. 7 Executive Summary

Overall Opinions: PDOP Strengths

A Majority Cite Both ➢ When asked what they like most about the PDOP and what represents its < pp. 23- PDOP Programs and Its strengths, the most frequent open-ended responses are: 26 > Parks/Facilities as Strengths ▪ Its programs and events, cited by 63% of those responding. Most often, they value the variety of offerings, as well as youth programming in particular.

▪ Its parks and facilities (a close second at 58%), especially with the overall maintenance and upkeep of these properties.

➢ Among those offering responses, nearly one in five (18%) feel the Park District staff and overall administration are positives, usually seen as professional, helpful, communicating well, and offering innovative and new programming/activities.

Three-Fifths Offer ➢ Dislikes concerning the PDOP are more varied. The most frequent include: < pp. 27- Weaknesses or 32 > Improvements for the ▪ Overall staff and/or management issues (39%), usually general spending and PDOP anti-tax concerns (e.g., keep taxes low, cut waste, consolidate) and/or spending on recent improvements. Other feedback is more scattered, including more/better outreach (8%), improved program and facility staff (6%), and better organization at specific PDOP facilities or activities (6%).

▪ Accessibility issues rank second (29%), with most citing difficulties registering for programs (e.g., slots fill up too quickly, confusing online portal) or the need for expanded hours and scheduling at specific facilities (RCRC, GRC).

▪ Added/Improved programming (17%), with about equal numbers seeking more options for adult and youth activities.

▪ Additional facilities (20%), mostly an indoor pool (10% overall).

▪ Seventeen percent volunteer that PDOP fees are the biggest negative. 8 Executive Summary

Overall Opinions: Overall PDOP Value

Respondents Feel the ➢ On average, residents believe that about 8% of their property taxes go to the < pg. 33 > District Represents a PDOP, higher than the District’s actual share of 4.6%. Very Good Value Overall ➢ When informed that the PDOP’s share is 4.6% of property taxes, and considering < pg. 34 > the programs, parks, facilities and services that the District provides, residents rate the overall value as “very good” (8.0 average score on a 0-10 scale).

▪ This is far higher than benchmark value ratings for parks agencies statewide < pg. 35 > (from 2013) and from nearby communities, most of which average in the 6.5 to 6.7 range.

➢ The District receives its highest value scores from younger and newer residents, < pg. 34 > women, those in the far South region, and white residents.

➢ While some give lower value ratings, it is important to note that no segment feels the PDOP represents a poor value. All groups give average ratings of 6.7 or higher (with the lowest value coming from non-PDOP users/visitors).

▪ Others offering lower value scores include men, North-Central residents, older adults (ages 55+), lower income households, and non-white respondents. All give average value ratings of 7.4 or higher (still considered “good”).

9 Executive Summary

Overall Opinions: PDOP Park and Facility Usage

Nine in Ten (92%) ➢ A majority report that at least one household member recently visited Scoville Park < pp. 37- Report Using or Visiting (59%) or the Oak Park Conservatory (52%) in the past year. 38 > a PDOP Park or Facility in the Past Year ▪ Both locations draw largely from all subgroups, though Scoville Park users are more likely to include condo owners, Asian American and Hispanic households.

▪ By comparison, the Oak Park Conservatory draws disproportionately from the Far South region, as well as among homeowners and those with children.

➢ The next tier of top PDOP park and facility destinations include:

▪ Rehm Park (44%) and Rehm Pool (37%), especially among Asian and Hispanic households, and Far South residents;

▪ Austin Gardens (42%), with higher than average usage among white households, lower income residents, and those in the North-Central area;

▪ Ridgeland Common Rec Complex (39%) and Pool (31%), especially among Far North residents, Hispanic households, and those with children.

➢ The remaining parks and facilities are all mentioned by fewer residents, with the top destinations being Taylor Park (33%) and Fox Park (31%).

➢ Of the facilities mentioned, Scoville Park appears to draw evenly from all parts of < pg. 39 > Oak Park. All other PDOP facilities tend to attract visitors from specific regions more than average.

10 Executive Summary

Overall Opinions: Satisfaction with PDOP Parks, Facilities

The Vast Majority of ➢ Among recent visitors to District parks and facilities, a majority (56%+) are < pg. 41 > PDOP Park and Facility completely satisfied with the overall experience at these destinations along with Users are Very Satisfied the upkeep, safety, accessibility, and staff service. With These Properties ➢ Consistently, these attributes receive average satisfaction scores of 8.3 or higher (on a 0-10 scale). Overall safety receives the highest satisfaction overall, with 62% “completely satisfied” (and only 2% “dissatisfied”).

▪ In a separate question, a few residents (n=7) express safety concerns and/or < pp. 43 > lack of patrols at Scoville Park. This appears to be the only PDOP location that generates perceived safety issues.

➢ Even those giving lower than average ratings still express strong satisfaction with < pp. 42 > PDOP parks and facilities on these attributes. No segment gives an average rating lower than a 7.2 overall (still very positive).

➢ Among the relatively few who express dissatisfaction with specific parks or facilities, < pp. 43- the top concerns include: 44 >

▪ Ridgeland Common Rec Complex (mostly complaints about limited parking; additional comments are very scattered);

▪ Rehm Pool (better maintenance, improved/more bathrooms, too busy/needs a longer season);

▪ Austin Gardens (better maintenance, fix the fence, better/more events);

▪ Gymnastics and Rec Center (not enough parking);

▪ Barrie Park (flooding issues, more updates/cleanup). 11 Executive Summary

Overall Opinions: Reasons for Non-Usage, And Opinions of PDOP Programs/Events

Non-Users of PDOP ➢ The relatively few non-users/non-visitors to local parks and facilities (n=37 overall) < pg. 45 > Parks and Facilities most often attribute their non-usage to not having children in the household (n=15) Usually Find Them Less or simply having a busy lifestyle and not enough leisure time (n=13). Relevant (e.g., among “Empty Nesters”) ➢ Another n=8 are unaware of what the PDOP has to offer, and as many (n=8) are simply not interested or not very active. Only two residents cite the PDOP fees or costs as a reason for non-usage.

PDOP Programs and ➢ A majority of residents report attending PDOP events in the past year (65%, most < pg. 55 > Events Receive Equally often summer concerts and Day In Our Village) and/or participate in its programs Strong Satisfaction (55%, usually youth-related activities). Scores as the Parks and Facilities ➢ On average, they give the programs an average 8.4 satisfaction rating, and an 8.5 to < pg. 56 > PDOP special events (both considered very positive). At least half are completely satisfied with both programs and events; no more than 2% are dissatisfied.

▪ The few offering suggestions or concerns usually cite specific events (n=17), < pg. 58 > usually movie nights, summer concerts, or Days in our Village. This feedback is very scattered (e.g., more movies, more music diversity, more parking, etc.).

▪ Nearly as many (n=16) express concerns about program instructors or staff, especially for youth activities (more consistency, more professional, etc.)

▪ Ten residents are unhappy with program registration, mostly the portal and activities filling up too quickly. Only n=5 are unhappy with program costs/fees.

➢ Residents are most likely to seek additional active adult programming, especially for < pp. 58- ages 55+ (a variety of sports/athletics/fitness programs) as well as for those ages 61> 30-44 (a mix of sports and fitness along with specific interest programs/courses). 12 Executive Summary

Overall Opinions: Indoor Facility Needs Assessment

Close to Half of ➢ Overall, 46% are interested in a fitness center, and 43% express a need or interest < pp. 47- Residents Express a in an indoor pool. Both appeal to younger adults and households with children. 49> Need or Interest in a Fitness Center, Indoor ▪ The highest income households are especially interested in an indoor pool, as Pool, and Indoor Track are Asian American residents and those in the Far North and Far South regions. ▪ One in three (33%) express similar interest in an indoor pool with lap lanes, especially older residents (ages 45 to 64) and higher income adults.

➢ An indoor track is of interest to 39% overall, particularly among older residents (ages 55-64) and African American households.

➢ About one in five (22%) are interested in or seek gym space (especially younger adults, those with children, African American households, and high income residents).

▪ The other indoor amenities tested (pickleball court, warm water therapy pool) are in less demand overall.

➢ When determining current availability/accessibility to these amenities, the demand < pg. 51 > for a fitness center, indoor pool, and indoor track represent the biggest “gaps”. These are on the cusp of being considered “high priority” unmet needs.

▪ Among those interested in these features, a relatively small number feel these needs are currently being met currently (36% or less). This means that at least 64% feel there is a gap to fill.

➢ When asked which one indoor amenity should represent a top priority for the PDOP, < pp. 52- about equal numbers select an indoor open pool (27%) or a fitness center (26%). 53> In this context, an indoor track is deemed less important (13%), followed closely by gym space (10%). 13 Executive Summary

Overall Opinions: Potential Community Recreation Center

By a Roughly 4:1 Margin, ➢ Overall, 80% feel that a rec center that includes gym space, a fitness center, and < pg. 64 > Residents Feel A Rec an indoor pool (including open swim, lap lanes, and warm water therapy pool) is Center Is Needed in Oak needed in the community. Park, and Support Its Construction Without a ▪ Half of these residents (41%) feel this way strongly. Tax Increase ➢ When informed that this facility will be available not only to all Oak Park households, but will provide free open gym space for middle school and high school children in a safe after-school environment, nearly the same percentage (82%) feel this represents a need.

▪ Those who strongly feel this way increases to 52% upon hearing this statement.

➢ Finally, when asked if they support or oppose the construction of a new < pg. 65 > community rec center knowing that the capital expense would be covered by grants and private donations, 85% express support (41% strongly), with only 15% opposed.

▪ A majority of all subgroups express support for this proposal.

▪ Lower levels of support tend to come from the oldest residents (ages 55+), long-term Oak Park residents (35+ years), those without children, and lower income households.

➢ Overall, those who most strongly support this proposal tend to be women, those age 35 to 54, and the highest income residents.

➢ The key group will be the not strong supporters, who tend to include men, townhouse dwellers, and white residents. 14 Executive Summary

Overall Opinions: Reasons for Community Rec Center Support/Opposition

Supporters Most Often ➢ Among supporters, nearly half (47%) say a new rec center will provide the < pp. 67- Feel This Facility Will community with the year-round indoor fitness and pool facilities that Oak Park 70 > Address an Unmet Need currently lacks. in the Community ➢ One in four (24%) specifically cite the need for a facility that offers after-school programs for older children, and another 14% favor that this facility will provide options for all Oak Park residents (including lower income families, seniors, etc.).

➢ Other top reasons for supporting this facility include:

▪ Providing the public indoor pool that the community currently lacks (12%); ▪ A more affordable option to residents than existing fitness facilities (11%); ▪ Improved quality of life and making Oak Park more attractive to current and potential residents (9%).

➢ While ten percent support this plan because the funding does not require a property tax increase, another 4% express skepticism that taxes will not go up somehow.

The Few Opponents ➢ Overall, 61% feel that the area already has enough fitness options available < pp. 71- Mostly Feel That a Rec (private health clubs, school facilities, neighboring communities, etc.), and that the 74 > Center is Unnecessary, new facility does not represent a need. and/or Suspect That Property Taxes Will Still ▪ Similarly, 24% feel there are bigger priorities elsewhere (e.g., maintaining existing PDOP parks and facilities, addressing other local community needs Go Up To Pay For It with property tax dollars, etc.).

➢ One in three (34%) opponents are dubious as to whether property taxes will eventually go up. Another 13% are concerned that user fees will go up (or be too high) to cover the ongoing maintenance cost of the new facility.

15 Executive Summary

Overall Opinions: Rec Center Priorities and Donations

An Indoor Pool ➢ Among those interested in indoor pool facilities (57% overall), an open swim area < pp. 77- Represents the Biggest and lap lanes represent the top priorities (65% and 63%, respectively). A warm 78 > Need water therapy pool is a priority among 31%.

▪ Households with children, Hispanic and Asian American residents, apartment dwellers, and high income households voice the strongest support for an indoor pool.

➢ A fitness facility ranks a close second in terms of priorities (51%), especially among lower- to middle-income residents.

➢ Forty-four percent include an indoor track as a top priority. These feature is especially important to older residents, townhouse dwellers, and those in the middle income ranges ($50K-$99.9K).

➢ One third (33%) feel a gym should be a priority, especially middle age adults (ages 45-54).

While Most Support the ➢ Overall, 61% say they are likely to donate to help raise funds for the rec center’s < pp. 75- Rec Center, Only the construction costs, but only 21% are “very likely” to do so. 76 > “Strong” Supporters Appear Willing to Donate ➢ Among the “strong” supporters, nearly half (44%) are “very likely” to donate. Toward Its Construction ▪ This likelihood drops off sharply among the not strong supporters (only 7% of whom are “very likely” to donate).

▪ In fact, nearly half of the not strong supporters (45%) are unwilling to donate toward the construction costs. 16 Executive Summary

Overall Opinions: District Communications and Final Comments

The Printed Program ➢ More than two-thirds (69%) go to the District program guide when seeking Park < pp. 80- Guide is By Far The Most District information (especially residents ages 35-44). It tends to be the preferred 83 > Widely Used and source of information among women, Hispanic households, and homeowners. Preferred Source of PDOP Information ➢ The PDOP website is mentioned far less often at 37%. In fact, residents are more likely to get District information from the Village’s FYI Newsletter (58%).

▪ The PDOP website tends to be used more often by women and by Asian American residents.

▪ The FYI Newsletter is cited most often by oldest and longest term Oak Park residents. Renters are more likely to prefer the FYI newsletter more often (26%) than homeowners (16%).

➢ Exterior banners on PDOP facility fencing are cited about as often (36%) as the District website (and mostly among the youngest and newest Oak Park residents).

➢ Other District information sources include:

▪ E-newsletters (21%, especially among women, Hispanic and African American residents);

▪ Postcards (19%, primarily newer residents and condo owners);

▪ PDOP social media (16%, almost exclusively by recent PDOP visitors/users).

➢ Roughly two in five residents (39%) are familiar with the District’s Scholarship < pg. 84 > program. Awareness is highest among PDOP users, homeowners, and the highest income residents. The vast majority of renters, lower income residents, and non- users are unfamiliar. 17 Executive Summary

Overall Opinions: Final Comments

Roughly One in Three ➢ Most often, these concern: < pg. 86- Respondents Offered 89 > Final Comments or ▪ Complete satisfaction with the District (33%) -- e.g., “keep doing what you’re Suggestions for the doing”; PDOP ▪ Improved and/or expanded programming (19%) for a variety of groups (working adults, seniors, teens, residents who have mobility challenges, etc.);

▪ More or better facilities (13%), with many echoing the need for a rec center and/or indoor pool specifically.

➢ The remaining suggestions were more scattered and covered feedback provided earlier in the survey (e.g., coordinate more with other groups/agencies, expanded access/hours to facilities, improved website and registration portal, etc.).

18 I. Overall Opinions of the Park District of Oak Park (PDOP)

19 Overall Esteem Ratings for PDOP

Oak Park residents hold the PDOP in very high esteem, with a majority giving the highest approval ratings (on a 0-10 scale).

➢ Nine in ten respondents (90%) gave positive esteem ratings overall for the PDOP, vs. only 4% who are dissatisfied (a nearly 23:1 favorable-to-unfavorable ratio). The remaining 6% gave neutral scores (no strong opinions either way).

 The PDOP is also very well known, with only 5% unable to offer an opinion due to unfamiliarity.

➢ Only the Oak Park Public Library receives higher ratings, with 74% holding it in the highest regard. The remaining local agencies tested receive lower (albeit still positive) ratings between 7.1 and 7.5, on average.

 Residents are least familiar with the local school districts, and the Township. Avg. (mean) % NA/ Overall 0-10 Esteem Ratings for Local Agencies 0-10 Unfamiliar Rating

Park District of Oak 4% 6% 13% 26% 51% 8.2 5% Park

Village of Oak Park 11% 11% 26% 30% 22% 7.1 5%

Oak Park Elementary 7% 7% 26% 28% 32% 7.5 41% School Dist. 97

Oak Park River Forest 9% 7% 27% 27% 30% 7.4 46% High School

Oak Park Public Library 7% 17% 74% 9.1 5%

Oak Park Township 7% 14% 19% 25% 35% 7.5 55%

% Negative (0-4) % Neutral (5) % Somewhat Positive (6-7) % Very Positive (8) % Highest Regard (9-10)

Q2. Please rate your overall opinion of each agency below. If you are not familiar enough to give a rating, just select “Unfamiliar”. (0=completely dislike, 5=neutral, 10=highest regard) 20 NOTE: %s under 3% are not reported. Overall Esteem Ratings for PDOP

The PDOP receives its strongest ratings from younger and newer Oak Park residents, along with those reporting higher household incomes.

➢ Older and less affluent households tend to give lower scores, though these ratings are still very positive (7.1 or higher). ➢ While the sample size is small, Asian households give lower esteem ratings not only to the PDOP, but also to the school districts and the Township.

Differences by Subgroups: Overall Esteem Ratings

Overall Avg. Lower Esteem Higher Esteem Rating (0-10)

- Ages 55-64 (7.9), 65+ (7.7) - Ages 18-34 (8.9), 35-44 (8.5) Park District of Oak - Lived in OP 35+ yrs. (7.7) - Lived in OP <5 yrs. (8.7) 8.2 Park - Asian households (7.1) - White (8.3) and African American HHs (8.3) - HH income <$50K (7.3) - HH income $150K-$199K (8.7) - Ages 65+ (6.8) - Ages 35-44 (7.4) - Lived in OP 15+ yrs. (6.8) - Lived in OP <5 yrs. (7.8) Village of Oak Park 7.1 - Non-PD users (6.5) - PD users (7.2) - Single family homes (6.9) - Townhouse dwellers (7.8) - Asian households (7.3) - Hispanic households (8.3) Elementary School 7.5 - HH income <$50K (6.5) - HH income $150K-$199K (8.3) District 97 - Non-PD users (5.9) - PD users (7.7) Oak Park River Forest - Asian households (6.6) - African American (7.7) and Hispanic 7.4 High School households (7.6) - Ages 55-64 (8.8), 65+ (8.90) - Ages 45-54 (9.3) Oak Park Public Library 9.1 - Lived in OP 35+ yrs. (8.8) - HH income $150K-$199K (9.5) - HH income <$50K (8.6) - Lived in OP <5 yrs. (9.4) - Men (7.1) - Women (7.9) - Ages 18-34 (7.2) - Ages 65+ (7.8) - Lived in OP 5-14 yrs. (7.0) - Lived in OP 35+ yrs. (7.9) Oak Park Township 7.4 - HH income <$50K (7.0), $50K- - HH income $100K-$149.9K (8.0) $74.9K (6.8) - Far South region (8.0) - North-Central region (6.9) - African American and Hispanic households - Asian households (6.5) (7.8) 21 Overall Esteem Ratings for PDOP

The PDOP’s strong esteem ratings are significantly higher across all relevant benchmarks.

➢ The District’s average rating of 8.2 is at least a full point higher than the average scores for park agencies statewide, and in the immediate area (regardless of whether the Chicago Park District is included).

➢ This difference is attributed to the PDOP’s very high numbers at the “top” of the 0-10 scale, with just over half (52%) giving ratings of 9 or 10 (compared to no more than 36% across the other benchmarks).

PDOP Esteem Compared to Other Park Agency Benchmarks

Avg. (mean) Rating: 8.2 7.2 7.1 6.9

27% 34% 36% Highest Regard (9-10) 51% 67% Very Positive (8) 90% 76% 18% 72% 15% Favorable 19% Somewhat Positive (6-7) 22% Neutral (5) 23% 26% 21% Negative Esteem (0-4)

13% 15% 31% 17% 6% 11% 4% 9% 3% PDOP Statewide Local Agencies Local Agencies (2019) Benchmark WITHOUT Chicago WITH Chicago (2013) (2013) (2013)

Q2. Please rate your overall opinion of the Park District on a 0-10 scale (0=completely dislike, 5=neutral, 10=highest regard).

* The 2013 Local Agency Benchmarks include suburban agencies in Berwyn, Cicero, Elmwood Park, Forest Park, Maywood, Melrose Park, North Riverside, River Forest, River Grove, Riverside. Separate local benchmarks are reported above with and without the Chicago Park District ratings included. 22 Park District of Oak Park Strengths

Most residents offer something they like best about the PDOP, with nearly two thirds citing District programs. Parks and facilities are a close second.

➢ More specifically, respondents value the variety of programs and events that District provides, especially youth programs.

➢ The parks and facilities are most often recognized as being kept in good shape and well maintained. One in ten respondents value the number and variety of parks, and as many cite the pools among the positives for the PDOP.

➢ About one in five residents value the District staff and administration (helpful, communicates well, good program ideas).

Top Strengths (open-ended)

Programs/Events (NET) 63% Number/Variety of programs/events 29% Pleased with activities/programs 11% Feedback on Park District of Oak Good programs for all ages 9% Park Strengths? Youth Programs (NET) 19% Parks/Facilities (NET) 58% n = 517 Well-maintained (overall) 29% No Feedback/ Good park(s) in general 10% Not Familiar , Variety/number of parks nearby 10% 15% Pleased with pool(s) 10% Good facilities (general) 5% Offered Good equipment at parks 4% Nothing I Feedback, Admin/Staff/MGMT (NET) 18% Like/ No 84% Positives, 1% Friendly, professional, helpful staff 5% Good communications 4% Innovation/new parks/programs 4% Costs/fees (NET) 9% Reasonable/affordable, good value 7% Access/availability (NET) 6% Facilities/Parks are easily accessible 4%

Q3. What do you like most about the Park District of Oak Park, or what does it do well? (top multiple open-ended responses) 23 Park District of Oak Park Strengths

Sample Verbatims: PDOP Strengths

Programs/Events (63%):

“A variety of programs for a variety of people.” “Great programs. Very good and varied course offerings.” “Diversity of programs/ depth of programming.” “I like that it has a variety of programs that range from arts and crafts, to sports. It covers all areas of interests that families have.” “Great variety of programs for all ages.” “I like that you offer a variety of programming. You focus on individual growths/interests and family ones too.” “Lots of activities for children and families.” “Lots of programs kids and adults like. Variety of programs.” “PDOP offers a wide range of activities across demographic groups. I believe that PDOP is the premier governmental body in our community.” “Offers a great deal of activities and opportunities for all members of the community.” “PDOP provides programs for every lifestyle, age, and season. They are inclusive of all types of residents. I also like the investment they make in their infrastructure and ensure their facilities are top notch.” “A wide variety of programs for kids to choose from! Good prices and nice facilities.” “Class offerings for kids is impressive.” “I love the kids programming. Everything we have tried has been high quality, super fun and developmentally appropriate. The staff is highly trained and we haven’t tried anything we don’t like.”

Parks (29%):

“Great parks in a variety of neighborhoods.” “Love all the parks throughout Oak Park.” “Maintaining a beautiful park system.” “Parks are nice and plentiful.” “The number of well-maintained and unique parks throughout the village.” “There are plentiful parks and they are extremely well kept and very nice.” “I like the number of parks distributed throughout the community.” “Many different nearby parks. A lot of variety.” “It maintains the parks very well, walks cleared when it snows, tends to the trees, cuts the grass. Offers a variety of sized parks and experiences for every age group such as tennis courts, play equipment, seating if you just want to sit and enjoy nature. Introduces new things, like the senior citizen exercise equipment on Randolph. No matter where you live, you can walk to a park.” “Maintains several parks throughout the Village, offering variety among them--some have sports fields, some have playgrounds, and some have just beautiful nature.”

24 Park District of Oak Park Strengths

Sample Verbatims: PDOP Strengths (cont’d)

Facilities (21%):

“I like the multitude of high level of facilities that it makes available to the public. PDOP constantly keeps the facilities operating at a high level and proactively makes capital improvements.” “Nice facilities, good maintenance, good variety of facilities for all ages, friendly staff.” “Multiple parks and pools. Wide range of class offerings.” “The availability of 2 public pools.” “Ridgeland swimming pool for lap swim in the summer. Most certainly the BEST offering from the Park District for me.” “Multiple swimming pools available over the summer.” “The outdoor pools and pool programming: swim lessons for kids and multiple lap times for adults.” “Two 50-meter outdoor pools! Ridgeland and Rehm are a big part of what keeps me here paying these taxes (I know the park district isn't the tax hog!) Also, my husband is grateful for the additional pickleball courts. I appreciate your care not to increase taxes.” “The community centers are located well in each neighborhood.” “Great facilities, including the parks and GRC.” “It maintains its green space and buildings quite well. It provides room not just for team sports, but also for all age sports. The tennis courts are particularly valuable for all age recreation. The conservatory and Cheney Mansion are beautiful. We're really excited that the Park District has taken ownership of the Dole Learning Center and will do very much needed maintenance/update of the Center. We love that PDOP will work closely with the Library.”

Administrators/Staff/Management (14%):

“Employees are all very professional, responsive and friendly.” “The classes are well organized and the personnel is always nice and professional.” “The offerings are quite good and I find staff to be responsive and helpful when I have a question. I receive good service when interacting with the Village. I also consider the programs to be good value for the money.” “The park district staff are very nice and professional.” “Very friendly staff.” “I appreciate the quarterly catalogue and the variety of options available for adults without children.” “I most like the Park District's breath of programming and communication about the programming. The parks are spectacular.” “Keeps people updated on park events and locations, with friendly reminders on best practices.” “The park district communicates very well when there is a change to a program. My experience with swim lessons was so great, especially for changes due to weather.” “Notifies the community of what is going on and programming available on a quarterly basis making it super easy to get involved.”

25 Park District of Oak Park Strengths

Sample Verbatims: PDOP Strengths (cont’d)

Costs/Fees (9%):

“Great affordable programming.” “I love how they work with organizations to help fund capitol improvements of parks and facilities that benefit all organizations and bring down the cost for the park district (aka my taxes).” “Interesting programs at affordable cost; what more can I ask really.” “I’m grateful for the diversity in programs offered and their affordability.” “Provides low cost exercise and other classes for seniors.” “I consider the programs to be good value for the money.” “There is such a variety of things to get involved with and many things are free or very affordable.” “Lots of free programming.”

Access/Availability (6%):

“I love how many parks there are- one in walking distance wherever you live. They are well-maintained and the layout and landscaping are very appealing.” “Accessible programming for ppl of all ages and abilities. As a working parent, it is very important to have reliable, safe, engaging programming for my children during the summer, especially. Our parks are beautiful and accessible. Proximity to parks and quality of the schools were the primary reasons for us to choose Oak Park, 17 years ago, when we decided to settle our family here.” “Providing accessibility to all residents. Large variety of programs and camps. High quality, well maintained parks.” “There are a lot of parks which is nice because one is close to pretty much everyone.” “There is at least one nice park very close by no matter where you live.”

26 Park District of Oak Park Weaknesses

Note that only 60% could offer a negative or dislike for the PDOP. Those who do offer a range of issues or concerns.

➢ Most often, 39% of these respondents express concerns Top Weaknesses/Improvement Opportunities about District spending and/or property taxes in general. (open-ended) The rest offer less frequent concerns (e.g., need for better communication/information, better service, etc.). Management/Staff (NET) 39% ➢ About one in three express accessibility issues, mostly Concerns about waste/tax $ 15% related to programming (difficulty with registration, limited Better communication/Info 8% or inconvenient scheduling, etc.). More experienced/better staff service 6%

➢ On a related note, 23% offer suggestions for improved Not well managed, poorly organized 6% programming, especially expanded youth programs and/or Access/availability (NET) 29% added fitness opportunities. Program registration issues 11% ➢ Those most concerned about PDOP facilities (20%) most Class scheduling 10% often cite the need for year round/indoor pool options. Poor availability (lack of open spots) 7% ➢ Slightly fewer express concerns about PDOP fees or costs (17%), or the parks in general (14%). Programs/events (NET) 23% More/better adult & senior programs 6%

Youth programs (NET) 10% Weaknesses/Improvements Sought From Park District of Oak Park More/better youth programs 3% Facilities (NET) 20%

n = 375 Pools (NET) 10% No response/NA Costs/fees (NET) 17% 29% Program fees too high 10%

Offer better discounts 4% Offered Nothing I Dislike Feedback Parks/playgrounds (NET) 14% At All 60% 11% Poorly maintained parks 4% Not enough open/green space 3%

Q4. What do you dislike most about the Park District of Oak Park, or what could it do better? Please be specific.(top multiple open-ended responses) 27 Park District of Oak Park Weaknesses

Sample Verbatims: PDOP Weaknesses

Management/Staff (39%):

“I don't like to see them spend money for the sake of spending/wasting taxpayer's money. For example, the new logo, rebranding of vehicles, new park signage is not a wise use of taxpayer's money.” “Expensive - taxes overall are far too high.” “I like the idea of consolidating agencies within Oak Park. We are being priced out of the area with real estate tax levies.” “I'd like to see more efforts to save money and reduce the tax burden.” “Seems like we are paying for a lot of buildings and expensive updates.” “Spends way too much tax payer money.” “Taxes are my #1 issue. I would like to see us focus on shaving down some of the bells and whistles - retain what's best. Bureaucracy costs money and it becomes entrenched and only grows. Find ways to cut it down so that we can get our property taxes under control and continue to attract good young people to our community.” “I think in the attempts to keep the parks fresh and current, there may be some overspending/unnecessary improvements.” “Better communication of park events and activities.” “I was not so much aware about the park district - living here now for one year. Thus may be make more advertisement about the facilities, especially when new people move into Oak Park.” “More specific outreach to underrepresented groups and minorities.” “Online system and communication relating to classes feels very antiquated.” “Counselors and their supervisors don’t do enough to take care of facilities used over the summer ... classrooms always a wreck after summer sports camps.” “Staffing of programs could be better. We attended summer camp (Adventure Week) and it was poorly staffed along with the pee-wee soccer. Teachers were more interested in chatting among themselves and not the kids.” “When my kids were young, there was a director for each park. These directors took pride in “their” Park, much like a principal of a school. It was nice for the kids to have someone that they knew around all of the time. Now it just seems to be staffed by part time employees who don’t have any interest in the park or the kids.” “Managing/training/coaching volunteer coaches, particularly for ice hockey & basketball.” “Programs are sometimes hit or miss. We’ve had great programs for the kids, but also very disorganized sports or cooking camps.” “The concession stand at Rehm - ungodly long lines, very inefficient. Need a new system.” “The planning and management of "recreational" facilities like Ridgeland Common and the GRC. The GRC is wildly over-priced, unfriendly, and very elitist.” “With the abundance of offerings, some aren't executed as well as others.” “Their distribution of their magazine which end up either being recycled or landfill, I live in a multi unit condo. Dozens of these magazines lay outside for weeks until I take the initiative and gather them up for recycling.”

28 Park District of Oak Park Weaknesses

Sample Verbatims: PDOP Weaknesses (cont’d)

Access/Availability (29%):

“Certain classes can be extremely difficult to sign up for.” “Continuity and consistency seem to be a struggle for the District. Signing up for classes or activities is one challenge, varying between programs that can be accessed only in person with an agent, vs. others only accessed via an on line system and vs. those that give you the choice, but with very clunky software.” “I find the enrollment system difficult to use and outdated. I'm glad my kids are old enough that I no longer have to sign up for summer camps!” “I think online registration is still kind of a pain, it's frustrating when certain programs don't fill up enough and get cancelled and I think, for youth sports, the weather notification/makeup game/practice situation is terrible and inconsistent.” “Its website is somewhat difficult to use for registering for programs/outings.” “Online portal is difficult to navigate and use to select and pay for activities.” “Registration is too competitive.” “Registration website is terrible and difficult to use.” “The registration site is very complex (lots of visual clutter), and I would not want to navigate it on my phone.” “The registration system for camps can be very frustrating and anxiety provoking.” “Accommodate more folks on waitlists. Cancel fewer programs.” “Could offer additional quantity of classes for some of the more popular classes... particularly kids summer camps. They often fill up quickly and the waiting list doesn't pan out.” “I wish PDOP could offer more working mom friendly hours for programming.” “I wish there were more fitness options closer to where we live in SE Oak Park.” “Some buildings are in use during the day and ordinary people cannot access them.” “There are very few activities for pre-school aged children that are available on weekends or weekday evenings. This makes it nearly impossible for families with working parents to participate. The registration process also leaves a lot to be desired. When registering for gymnastics, it's almost impossible to register online and actually get a spot. I had to resort to driving to the GRC and registering in person.” “Caters mostly to the northside residents of Oak Park, Park District classes and seasonal activities are more limited/held in fewer convenient locations.” “I dislike that it is so hard to get into the gymnastics classes because it fills so quickly. The main thing I dislike though is that the GRC preschool playtime open gym times are not convenient. It should be the weekends times during the school year and the weekday times during the summer. This would make most sense for parents.” “Adult programming especially with regards to work out classes. For example I wanted to take the TRX class [at GRC] but it was only offered during the day and during the week when most people work.” “The RCRC schedule is wonky... it seems you'd repeat things twice a week so someone could find a class they like and attend more than once a week.” “The class times are not always suitable for working parents. Specifically gymnastic classes.” “More open pool time in the summer at Ridgeland. Opens late and closes early in the season.”

29 Park District of Oak Park Weaknesses

Sample Verbatims: PDOP Weaknesses (cont’d)

Programs/Events (23%):

“I wish there were more adult options.” “More diverse maker type community classes for adults (most are seniors and kids).” “Not enough program days/times that are geared towards working adults.” “Programming for new residents to meet others. Adult professionals that do not have a lot of time but would like to meet other adults.” “I don’t dislike anything, but what is there for me after my children grow up? Would love more adult programs, more park events.” “It would be nice to have more adult programming that isn't necessarily for seniors.” “Set up mostly for kids and families with kids.” “There are not enough interesting programs for adults, other than sports/exercise. And the sports that the Park District offers are not as worthwhile or challenging as programs that other entities offer.” “Have more senior or adult programs.” “I don't see much for me as an adult in their programing. I don't swim, or skateboard.” “Don't really relate to the classes that much anymore. Need classes appropriate for seniors 55-70 . E.g.:, Yoga.” “I think it could do a whole lot better programing for seniors.” “The Active Adults programs seems to be limited this year, with somewhat mediocre day trips.” “Provide more extensive and broader programs for seniors. For example, compared with other park districts, its trips for seniors are rather parochial and uninteresting.” “Kids activities are usually the same day, so is difficult to pick more than one for them.” “Programs for young children are primarily during the day on weekdays. Full-time working parents want to take their young children to classes on the weekend.” “Could have more variety of things to do for kids of different ages.” “More classes for early childhood and more availability of times.” “I'm not sure. What I see missing in our village is an opportunity for children to enter sports at a later age. If a child did not get started at a very early age but wants to start a sport for fun later, there doesn't seem to be an entry.”

30 Park District of Oak Park Weaknesses

Sample Verbatims: PDOP Weaknesses (cont’d)

Facilities (20%):

“Could use more modern facilities in order to hold more classes.” “Maintenance and upkeep of buildings should be more timely. It is unpleasant trying to exercise at Dole Library building when the HVAC system is so out of sync with need.” “The quality and care of sports fields is abysmal. You go to any other park district in Chicagoland and you find well manicured fields and baseball diamonds that are cared for daily. The park does little to nothing to care for fields and continues to use the amount of use as a red herring instead of actually putting forth effort to care for them. The youth leagues that play on them invest far more time, without making our tax dollars disappear, taking care of fields.” “I think we need a facility that allows kids to play ball sports indoors during the winter. I wish we had more basketball courts for kids to play freely for more hours a day.” “It would be great if there were more dedicated spaces for fitness, or a facility that offered studios, track, or workout machines/free weights.” “Pool locker rooms could be cleaner, pools could be more welcoming to tweens, and it would be nice if there was a park district workout facility/gym and a welcoming community center with ping pong tables, etc.” “No indoor swimming facilities. Expanding ownership of property but not materially expanding recreational activity.” “Better pool hours. Wish the Ridgeland renovation had considered a dome so the pool could be used year round. Would be good for park district and high school to pool resources to build a year round pool for students and the community.” “Indoor pool and a fitness center would be amazing.” “Love to see some bigger ideas come to light like year round pool and/or community center.” “Dislike the amount of tax dollars, no coordination with the schools, I would like a full blown rec center with exercise equipment, a pool (that could be a partnership with the high school) personal trainers, group classes.” “While the district responds to community needs, it also lacks leadership to do what is best or convince the community to see the longer term benefits of certain projects. The failure to make the Ridgeland Common pool a year round pool to me showed a complete lack of park district leadership that caved to a vocal minority of Oak Parkers.”

31 Park District of Oak Park Weaknesses

Sample Verbatims: PDOP Weaknesses (cont’d)

Costs/Fees (17%):

“The price of programming is higher than in other neighboring communities, and that is sometimes a hardship or a deterrent to involvement for us.” “Cost of programming.” “Pool fees are a little on the high side compared to nearby park districts.” “Prices for classes are high, sometimes higher than private companies that have other advantages.” “The fees for many programs are cost-prohibitive. At more than $15 per game or practice for my kids to play soccer (in addition to property taxes), I'd rather just have them play pick-up games. We've also found the cost/benefit of park district swim lessons wasn't worth it.” “Some other classes are expensive. For example, the kids summer camps are significantly higher than surrounding communities.” “The cost of classes, programming and pool passes is outrageous considering the amount of money we pay in property taxes every year.” “Make summer programs more affordable and accessible for African American children.” “Need to provide means-tested fees for low income families to encourage a broader range of participation.” “Prices are too high for seniors. Should have a senior discount.” “Too expensive! Residents should have lower prices to use the facilities since we already contribute in our taxes.”

Parks/Playgrounds (14%):

“Pick up garbage in parks more frequently.” “There is too much concrete in all the parks--it's sad; why did the weeping willows get removed? Scoville Park used to be lush, with lots of shade, where is the GREEN space?” “Terrible maintenance of flowers, trees and grass. Control weeds.” “The upkeep of some of the parks, specifically Taylor Park is dreadfully lacking. The weeds have taken over. The pickle ball court lines would be easer to see if they were in color instead of black.” “The way the park is maintained. Too many weeds Not a large variety of trees, not mowing enough. The park is unattractive feel it brings down the value of my home.” “The weeds in the lawns REALLY NEED ATTENTION. Occasionally the trash cans overflow and smell bad. The homeless are a real issue in Scoville Park.” “I wish Oak Park had more open space.” “I would say fight for keeping those spaces open and calming. I'm not happy with all the high rise buildings popping up, especially around the park areas. Those are little islands to get away from that city feel but it seems like that appeal is losing. We need more green spaces, less concrete and glass.” “We'd like to see more natural, native elements in the parks.” “Wish there were more green space in the village.”

32 PDOP Value (Relative to Property Tax Share)

Oak Park residents generally have a good idea of the PDOP’s share of their property taxes.

➢ One in four (27%) estimated almost exactly that the Districts share of property taxes is between 4% and 5%. It’s actual share is 4.6%.

➢ Nearly half (48%) think it is higher than 5%, and one in four believe it is lower than 4%. As a result, the average (mean) estimate is 8.1%, but the median (midpoint) estimate is very close to reality at 5%.

Estimated Percent of Property Taxes Going to the PDOP

19%

28%

27% Correct Estimate= 4.6% of Property Taxes Over 10% 6%-10% 4% to 5% (correct) 26% 3% or Less

Mean (Average) Estimate: 8.1% Median (Midpoint) Estimate: 5%

Q5. What percent of your property taxes do you think goes to the Park District of Oak Park? Please do not check your tax bill or anything else – we’re simply interested in your best estimate. 33 PDOP Value (Relative to Property Tax Share)

When informed that the PDOP represents 4.6% of one’s property taxes, residents feel that this represents a very good value for all that the District provides.

➢ On a 0-10 value scale, the PDOP receives an Significant Differences: Value of Property Taxes to PDOP average rating of 8.0, which translates into a very good value overall.

➢ As with the overall esteem ratings, younger and newer residents, along with those Most • Lived in OP <5 yrs. (8.6) reporting the highest incomes, tend to rate the Value PDOP’s value strongest relative to it’s share of • Ages 35-44 (8.5), 45-54 (8.3) property taxes. • Women (8.4) • Far South (8.4)  Similarly, women, those in the Far South • HH income $50K-$74.9K (8.4), region, and recent users/visitors of PDOP 200K+ (8.4) parks and properties give the District • White households (8.2) higher value scores. • PDOP Users (8.1) ➢ Lower ratings tend to come from men, older and long-term residents, lower income households, and ethnic minorities. However, OVERALL AVERAGE = 8.0 the ratings from these groups are still relatively strong (7.3 or higher on average, representing a “good” value overall). • North-Central (7.8) • Men (7.7) ➢ The only segment that feels the value is only • Ages 55-64 (7.7), 65+ (7.6) “slightly good” are the relatively few non-users • Non-white households (7.5) of PDOP parks and facilities (6.7 average value • HH income <$50K (7.4) rating). • Lived in OP 35+ yrs. (7.5) Least • Non-PDOP users (6.7) Value

Q24. About 4.6% of your property taxes go to the Park District of Oak Park. Thinking about the programs, parks, facilities, and services that the Park District provides, please rate the overall value that it represents to you given its share of property taxes. (0-10 scale) 34 PDOP Value (Relative to Property Tax Share)

The PDOP’s value ratings far exceed those given for other parks agencies.

➢ At least twice as many Oak Park residents feel their parks agency represents an excellent value (51%) compared to any of the statewide or neighboring agency benchmarks.

➢ Note that only 6% of PDOP households feel the District represents a “poor” value, well below comparable sentiments for other agencies in the aggregated benchmarks.

Perceived Value of PDOP Relative to Property Tax Share

Avg. (mean) Rating: 8.0 6.7 6.6 6.5

10% 22% Excellent (9-10) Q24. About 4.6% of your 26% property taxes goes to the 51% 27% Park District of Oak Park. 65% 16% Great Value (8) Thinking about the 86% 70% 18% Positive 78% programs, parks, facilities, Good Value (6-7) and services that the Park Value 27% 26% District provides, please 19% 41% rate the overall value that Average Value (5) it represents to you given 18% 16% 14% its share of property taxes. 13% Poor Value (0-4) 8% 16% 17% 6% 9% PDOP Statewide Local Agencies Local Agencies (2019) Benchmark WITHOUT Chicago WITH Chicago (2013) (2013) (2013)

* The 2013 Local Agency Benchmarks include suburban agencies in Berwyn, Cicero, Elmwood Park, Forest Park, Maywood, Melrose Park, North Riverside, River Forest, River Grove, Riverside. Separate local benchmarks are reported above with and without the Chicago Park District ratings included. The 2013 Statewide benchmark referenced a 2% share of property taxes. 35 II. PDOP Park and Facility Usage

36 PDOP Park/Facility Usage

Most households report that they have used or visited at least one PDOP park or facility in the past year.

➢ Scoville Park and the Conservatory are cited most often, by just over half of all respondents. The next “tier” of widely used parks and facilities include Rehm Park and Pool, Austin Gardens, and Ridgeland Common Rec Complex (with slightly lower visits to the Ridgeland Common Pool).

% % All Visited or Used Facility/Park in Past Reporting Respondents 12 Months (n=567) (n=618) Scoville Park 62% 59% Oak Park Conservatory 55% 52% Rehm Park 47% 44% Austin Gardens 46% 42% Used or Visited a PDOP Park or Ridgeland Common Recreation Complex 42% 39% Facility in Past 12 Months? Rehm Pool 40% 37% Taylor Park 36% 33% Fox Park 34% 31% Ridgeland Common Pool 34% 31% n = 567 Longfellow Park 32% 29% Maple Park 32% 29% Barrie Park 31% 28% No 8% Lindberg Park 29% 26% Yes Cheney Mansion 29% 26% 92% Gymnastics & Recreation Center 28% 25% Euclid Square Park 27% 24% Mills Park 26% 23% Pleasant Home 24% 21% Field Park 24% 21% Other PDOP parks/facilities (<17% each, most often: Carroll Park; Paul Hruby Ice Arena; Andersen Park; Austin Gardens Environmental Center; Fox Center; Stevenson Park)

Q7. Below is a list of Park District of Oak Park facilities and parks. Please read through the entire list and indicate which one(s) you or others in 37 your household have used or visited in the past 12 months. PDOP Park/Facility Usage

Residents between the ages of 35 to 54, and households with children, tend to report visiting almost all of the top PDOP parks and facilities.

➢ Hispanic and Asian households also tend to be frequent users across multiple destinations. Older residents are more likely to go to the Cheney Mansion, and (perhaps) Scoville Park and Austin Gardens (no meaningful difference by age, meaning older residents visit about as often as younger adults).

PDOP Parks/Facilities Recently Visited (n=618; all respondents) Mentioned most often by: Scoville Park 59% Lived in OP 15-24 yrs. (75%); Asian (71%) and Hispanic HHs (64%); condo owners (77%) Oak Park Conservatory 52% Ages 35-44 (66%); HH with children (64%); white HHs (58%); homeowners (60%) Rehm Park 44% Ages 35-44 (63%); HH with children (69%); Asian (66%) and Hispanic HHs (61%); homeowners (56%) Austin Gardens 42% White HHs (47%); lower HH income $75K-$99.9K (57%)

Ridgeland Common Rec Complex 39% Ages 35-44 (43%), 45-54 (55%); HH with children (53%); Hispanic HHs. (60%); homeowners (47%) Rehm Pool 37% Ages 35-44 (57%), 45-54 (64%); Hispanic (60%) and Asian (53%) households; homeowners (47%) Taylor Park 33% Ages 35-44 (43%), 45-54 (39%); HH with children (42%); Asian HHs (44%); homeowners (40%) Fox Park 31% Ages 35-44 (50%), 45-64 (41%); HH with children (57%); In OP <5 yrs. (38%); Hispanic (47%) and Asian HHs (43%) Ridgeland Common Pool 31% Ages 35-44 (45%), 45-54 (57%); HH with children (50%) homeowners (38%)

Longfellow Park 29% Ages 35-44 (51%), 45-54 (36%); HH with children (54%); In OP <25 yrs. (34%); Asian HHs (43%); homeowners (36%) Maple Park 29% Ages 35-44 (46%); HH with children (45%); Hispanic (37%) and White HHs (31%); homeowners (36%) Barrie Park 28% Ages 35-44 (50%), 45-54 (34%); HH with children (49%); Hispanic HHs (42%); homeowners (39%)

Lindberg Park 26% Ages 45-54 (49%); HH with children (37%); Lived in OP 5-24 yrs. (36%); Asian HHs (44%); homeowners (32%) Cheney Mansion 26% Ages 65+ (34%)

Gymnastics & Rec Center 25% Ages 35-44 (58%); HH with children (48%); lived in OP 5-24 yrs. (22%); white households (28%); homeowners (32%)

Euclid Square Park 24% Ages 35-44 (35%); HH with children (34%); Hispanic HHs (40%); homeowners (31%) Mills Park 23% No meaningful differences – used equally across all demographic subgroups

Q7. Which of these parks and facilities have you or other household members used or visited in the past 12 months? 38 NOTE: All others below 21% are not shown. PDOP Park/Facility Usage

Scoville Park, Austin Gardens, and Cheney Mansion tend to draw about evenly across all Oak Park neighborhoods. Visits to other parks and facilities are more localized.

➢ This is especially true of Euclid Square Park and Maple Park, which draw primarily from Far South households. Similarly, about half of those going to Taylor Park or Lindberg Park live in the Far North region.

Far North N-Central Central S-Central Far South (=100%) Region (overall row %): (22%) (20%) (17%) (16%) (25%) Scoville Park 21% 22 17 16 24 = 100%

Oak Park Conservatory 19% 13 12 21 35 = 100%

Rehm Park 19% 9 9 19 44 = 100%

Austin Gardens 19% 25 19 16 21 = 100%

Ridgeland Common Rec Complex 28% 15 12 18 27 = 100%

Rehm Pool 22% 10 9 21 38 = 100% Taylor Park 50% 20 7 10 13 = 100%

Fox Park 18% 6 14 27 35 = 100%

Ridgeland Common Pool 30% 13 10 22 25 = 100%

Longfellow Park 16% 8 12 31 33 = 100%

Maple Park 12% 5 8 18 57 = 100%

Barrie Park 18% 4 5 23 50 = 100%

Lindberg Park 49% 15 9 10 17 = 100%

Cheney Mansion 21% 26 20 12 21 =100%

Gymnastics & Recreation Center 28% 12 8 20 32 =100%

Euclid Square Park 13% 4 4 15 64 =100%

Mills Park 12% 16 28 15 29 =100% 39 Higher than average response by region PDOP Park/Facility Usage

In terms of frequency of visits or usage, the top destinations are Ridgeland Common Rec Complex, Rehm Park/Pool, and the Conservatory.

➢ All are cited with about equal frequency as the park or facility their household uses most often.

➢ Note that while more households said they had visited Scoville Park in the past year (see page 38), it ranks just below these top three destinations in terms of “frequency” of visits (meaning Scoville Park is simply used more sporadically).

Top Responses: Most Frequently Visited PDOP Parks/Facilities (n=539 recent park/facility users)

Oak Park Conservatory 13%

Rehm Pool 8% 14% Total Rehm Park/Pool Rehm Park 6%

Ridgeland Common Recreation Complex 8%

Ridgeland Common Pool 5% 16% Total Ridgeland Common Rec Complex/Pool

Paul Hruby Ice Arena 3%

Scoville Park 8%

Taylor Park 6%

Gymnastics & Recreation Center 5%

Longfellow Park 4%

Austin Gardens 4%

Lindberg Park 3%

Barrie Park 3%

Q8. Which park or facility have you used most often? NOTE: Responses under 3% are not shown. 40 PDOP Park/Facility Satisfaction

Recent users of PDOP parks and facilities are extremely satisfied across all attributes.

➢ A clear majority (at least 56%) are completely satisfied with the parks and facilities their household has visited in terms of the overall experience, the physical conditions, safety, accessibility and service from PDOP staff.

➢ Safety receives the highest scores, and no more than 4% express dissatisfaction with any attribute.

➢ Note that many of these average ratings are higher than the District’s overall average esteem score of 8.2. This means that its parks and facilities are even more highly regarded than the agency in general.

Satisfaction with PDOP Parks and Facilities Avg. (mean) (n=579 recent users/visitors who responded) 0-10 Rating

Overall experience 4% 10% 25% 60% 8.6

Cleanliness, maintenance, and upkeep 15% 23% 58% 8.5

Overall safety 4% 10% 23% 62% 8.7

Overall access (parking, paths, entrances) 4%3% 13% 18% 62% 8.5

Service Provided by Park District Staff 3%5% 14% 22% 56% 8.3

% Dissatisfied (0-4) % Neutral (5) % Somewhat Satisfied (6-7) % Very Satisfied (8) % Completely Satisfied (9-10)

Q9. Thinking about those parks and facilities you recently visited, please rate your satisfaction with the following (on a 0 to 10 scale). NOTE: Responses under 3% are not shown above. 41 PDOP Park/Facility Satisfaction

No subgroup is unhappy with the parks and facilities.

➢ While lower ratings tend to come from older/long-term residents, those without children, and lower income households, no segment gives a lower rating than 7.2 for any attribute (still very positive).

 This rating of 7.2 comes from lower income households when rating accessibility at local parks or facilities

Differences by Subgroups: Satisfaction with PDOP Parks/Facilities

Overall Avg. Lower Satisfaction Higher Satisfaction Rating (0-10)

- Men (8.5) - Women (8.8) - Ages 55-64 (8.2), 65+ (8.4) - Under age 35 (9.0), 35-44 (8.9) Overall experience 8.6 - Lived in OP 15-34 yrs. (8.4), 35+ yrs. (8.3) - Lived in OP <5 yrs. (9.1) - HH income <$50K (7.7) - HH income $50K-$74.9K (9.1), $150K- $199.9K (8.9) Cleanliness, - Ages 55-64 (8.1) - Under age 35 (9.1), 35-44 (8.8) maintenance and 8.5 - Lived in OP 15-24 yrs. (8.2), 35+ yrs. (8.2) - Lived in OP <5 yrs. (9.0) upkeep - Single family houses (8.4) - Condo residents (9.1)

- No children in HH (8.6) - Children in HH (8.9) - Ages 55-64 (8.3) - Under age 35 (9.1), 35-44 (8.9) Overall safety 8.7 - 35+ yrs. in OP (8.3) - <5 yrs. in OP (9.2) - HH income <$50K (8.0) - HH Income $50K-$74.9K (9.1), $150K+ (8.9) - Ages 55-64 (8.2), 65+ (8.1) - Under age 35 (9.1) Overall access - Lived in OP 35+ yrs. (8.1) - Lived in OP <5 yrs. (9.0) (parking, paths, 8.5 - Asian households (7.7) - White households (8.6) entrances) - HH income <$50K (7.2) - HH income $50K-$74.9K (9.1)

- Men (8.1) - Women (8.6) - Ages 45+ (8.1) - Under age 35 (8.9), 35-44 (8.7) Service provided by 8.3 - Lived in OP 15-24 yrs. (8.1), 35+ yrs. (7.8) - Lived in OP <5 yrs. (8.9) Park District staff - HH income <50K (7.6) - HH income $75K-$99.9K (8.6), 150K-$199.9K (8.8)

42 PDOP Park/Facility Comments

A few specific parks and facilities received negative feedback from recent users or visitors.

➢ The Ridgeland Common Rec Complex was cited most often, with limited parking being the biggest issue by far. All other comments were very scattered (less frequency). ➢ Those expressing dissatisfaction with Rehm Pool tend to mention the level of maintenance and the bathroom facilities most often. ➢ Scoville Park is the only property that registers safety concerns, followed by general maintenance issues. ➢ Better maintenance is the top concern among those unhappy with Austin Gardens, followed by a few issues regarding event-related concerns.

Reasons for Dissatisfaction with Parks or Facilities (top responses, unweighted n of cases)

Top Responses • Lack of nearby parking (n=10) Ridgeland Common • Dissatisfied with staff (inexperienced, impolite (n=2) Recreation Complex n=19 • Not well maintained/ outdated (n=2) • Too busy, lack of availability, longer hours (n=2) • Needs better access from the parking lot to the sidewalk (n=2)

Top Responses Rehm Pool n=13 • Not well maintained (n=5) • Improve/ add bathrooms (n=4) • Too busy/ lack of availability, longer season (n=3) • Lack of parking (n=1)

Scoville Park Top Responses n=13 • Not safe/ growing homeless population/ needs more patrolling (n=7) • Poorly maintained (n=4) • Playground complaints (more robust, better maintenance) (n=2)

Top Responses Poorly maintained/ in disrepair (fix fence) (n=4) Austin Gardens • n=11 • Events-related complaints (mosquitos/ needs washroom/ more senior activities/ more accessible –closes for plays/ no religious services in park) (n=5)

Q10. If you are dissatisfied with any Park District of Oak Park facility or park, which one(s) and why? (open-ended, multiple responses) 43 PDOP Park/Facility Comments

The remaining parks and facilities registering dissatisfaction are cited less often.

➢ Flooding is a concern at Barrie Park, along with perceptions of improved maintenance in general (also cited by a few for Taylor and Lindberg Parks).

Reasons for Dissatisfaction with Parks or Facilities, cont’d (top responses, unweighted n of cases)

Top Responses • Not enough parking (open up permit perking to facility users) Gymnastics & Recreation n=8 (n=7) Center

Top Responses • Fix drainage system/ park consistently floods (n=5) Barrie Park n=8 • Park needs updating/ more maintenance (more fountains/ garbage cans) (n=5) • Update the playground equipment (n=2)

Top Responses Taylor Park n=7 • Grass too long/ weeds (n=3) • Messy bathrooms (n=1) • Tennis courts get too crowded (n=1) • More playground equipment for older kids (n=1)

Lindberg Park n=6 Top Responses • Poorly maintained/ dirty (n=5)

Q10. If you are dissatisfied with any Park District of Oak Park facility or park, which one(s) and why? (open-ended, multiple responses) 44 Non-Usage of Park District’s Parks/Facilities

The 5% who identify as non-users/non-visitors of PDOP parks or facilities usually report not having children or free time as barriers.

➢ Over half (n=17 of 32) said not having children under 18, meaning they perceive the parks as being relevant only to children or younger families. This impression represents an opportunity for the PDOP to address.

➢ About as many (n=143) said they’re simply to busy, and similarly n=8 are not interested in parks or recreation in general.

➢ Note that n=7 non-users said they remain unfamiliar with what the PDOP offers.

➢ Only four respondents said their non-usage is due to the costs or fees at PDOP facilities (not much of a barrier).

Top Reasons (n of cases): Not Using PDOP Parks/Facilities in Past Year (n=32)

Do not have children or children are grown n=17

Too busy/ don't have time 14

Unaware/ unfamiliar with the Park District's offerings 7

Just Not Interested (e.g., not very active) 5

Location issues, lack of transportation 4

Use other facilities for recreation/activities 4

Cost/Fees are too high 4

No facilities/activities offered for my age group 3

Poor health, mobility issues 1

Q11. (IF NO PDOP PARK/FACILITY USED OR VISITED): Why haven't you used/visited a PDOP facility or park recently? (multiple responses) 45 III. Levels of Interest and Unmet Needs Among Indoor Recreational Facilities

46 Need/Interest in Indoor Facilities

Among the indoor facilities tested, just under half of PDOP households express a need, interest, or current usage of a fitness center or indoor pool.

➢ These two options represented the highest level of interest or demand. The next two amenities of interest were an indoor track (39% are interested/express a need) or indoor lap pool (33%).

➢ The remaining indoor facilities are of interest to about one in five respondents – gym space (22%) and a warm water therapy pool (20%) – or fewer (pickleball courts at 11%).

➢ Note that one in four respondents feel “none” of these amenities are of interest or needed.

Indoor Recreational Facilities of Interest/Need Among Residents (% “Yes”) (n=618)

Fitness Center 46%

Indoor pool* 43%

Indoor running or walking track 39%

Indoor pool for lap swimming 33%

Gym space for basketball, volleyball, etc. 22%

Warm water therapy pool 20%

Indoor pickleball courts 11%

No answer/None of the above 23%

Q12. Below, please indicate if you or any household member uses or has a need or interest in the following indoor recreational facilities. * For recreation, swimming lessons, open play, etc. 47 Need/Interest in Indoor Facilities

Residents with children clearly value both an indoor open pool, fitness center, and gym space more than average. Older adults are more interested in a lap pool and/or indoor track.

➢ Note that interest tends to generally be stronger among the highest income respondents, with the exception of a fitness center (which garners stronger response from those reporting incomes between $50,000 and $100,000).

Overall (n=618) Most Likely to Express Interest/Need/Use

- HH with children (54%, vs. 41% of those without) - Ages 35-44 (53%), 45-54 (60%) Fitness Center 46% - Lived in OP 5-14 yrs. (52%) - HH income $50K-$74.9K (61%), $75K-$99.9K (58%)

- Women (48%, vs. 38% of men) - HH with children (66%, vs. 28% of those without) - Ages 35-44 (62%) - Lived in OP 5-14 yrs. (51%) Indoor Pool * 43% - Far-North (52%) and Far-South (49%) residents - Asian households (61%) - HH income $100K-$149.9K (52%), $150K-$199.9K (56%), $200K+ (52%) - Single family houses (47%)

- Ages 55-64 (47%) - Lived in OP 25-34 yrs. (51%) - HH income $150K-$199.9K (42%), $200k+ (43%) Indoor Running or Walking Track 39% - African American households (55%) - Far-North region (47%) - Single family homes (43%)

- Ages 45-54 (37%), 55-64 (41%) - South-Central region (45%) Indoor Pool for Lap Swimming 33% - HH income $150K+ (39%) - Asian (43%) and Hispanic (41%) households

- HH with children (33%, vs. 15% of those without) - Under age 35 (30%), 35-44 (32%) Gym space 22% - Lived in OP 5-14 yrs. (31%) - HH income $150K-$199.9K (33%), $200K+ (28%) - African American households (35%)

* For recreation, swimming lessons, open play, etc. 48 Need/Interest in Indoor Facilities

Interest/Need for Indoor facilities (cont’d)

➢ Half of the lowest income households (47%) feel that none of these amenities are of interest or need.

➢ Both the youngest and oldest adults also tended to feel this way more than average.

Overall Most Likely to Express Interest/Need/Use (n=618)

- No children in HH (24%) Warm Water Therapy Pool 20% - Ages 44-64 (30%), 65+ (26%) - Lived in OP 35+ yrs. (34%)

- Women (16%, vs. 6% of men) Indoor Pickleball Courts 11% - HH income $50K-$74.9K (19%)

- No children in HH (30%, vs. 13% of those with children) None Are Priorities 23% - Under age 35 (34%) and ages 65+ (33%) - HH income under $50K (47%)

49 Perceived “Gaps” in Indoor Facilities

Relatively few respondents feel that the indoor facilities in highest demand are currently available in the community.

➢ Roughly a third (36%) of those interested or needing fitness centers feel that this need is mostly/completely being met already. This means that 64% perceive a “gap” (including 40% saying their need is not met at all or very well).

➢ The other top amenities (indoor open pool and lap lanes, and an indoor track) are considered even bigger gaps, with roughly half saying these needs are not being met at all currently – either by the park district or other providers.

Q. Have a Need/Interest/Use a(n): 64% Not being 36% Mostly/Completely met/neutral being met Yes, Fitness No, 46% n=283 Center 54% 28% 12% 24% 21% 15%

81% 19%

No, Yes, Indoor 57% 43% n=255 43% 18% 20% 12% 7% Pool *

87% 13%

No, Yes, Indoor 61% 39% n=249 Track 54% 19% 14% 7% 6%

76% 24% Yes, Indoor Pool 33% for Lap No, n=211 48% 12% 16% 11% 13% Swimming 67%

* For recreation, swimming Not at all (1) Not Very (2) Average/Neutral (3) Mostly (4) Completely (5) lessons, open play, etc. Q12. Below, please indicate (yes/no) if you or any household member uses or has a need or interest in the following indoor recreational facilities. Q13. (IF YES, FOR EACH): On a scale from 1 to 5, please select how well each of those needs or interests are being met – whether they are 50 provided by the Park District of Oak Park or any other source. Perceived “Gaps” in Indoor Facilities

Similarly, at least 71% of those interested in gym courts, therapy pools, or indoor pickleball do not feel these facilities are at least somewhat available.

➢ Nearly half (43%) of those who are interested in gym courts feel their needs are not being met very well if at all. This feeling is even more prevalent among those interested in using a warm water therapy pool and/or pickleball courts (which register lower levels of demand overall).

Q. Have a Need/Interest/Use a(n): 71% Not being 29% Mostly/Completely met/neutral being met Yes, 22% Gym No, n=106 23% 20% 28% 20% 9% Space 78%

25% 75% Yes, Warm Water No, 20% n=135 Therapy Pool 80% 56% 9% 10% 12% 13%

Yes, 88% 12% 11%

Pickleball No, n=65 Courts 65% 15% 8% 7% 5% 89%

Not at all (1) Not Very (2) Average/Neutral (3) Mostly (4) Completely (5)

Q12. Below, please indicate (yes/no) if you or any household member uses or has a need or interest in the following indoor recreational facilities. Q13. (IF YES, FOR EACH): On a scale from 1 to 5, please select how well each of those needs or interests are being met – whether they are 51 provided by the Park District of Oak Park or any other source. Top Indoor Priority

When respondents are asked to identify the one indoor facility that represents a top priority for the PDOP, they divide between an indoor open pool and a fitness center.

➢ However, those interested in any indoor water facility – open pool, lap lanes, therapy pool – the combined responses register four out of ten respondents (41%).

➢ After a pool and fitness center, an indoor track and gym space rank further down.

➢ Note that in this question, only 8% feel that none of these amenities represent a priority for the District (meaning most were able to identify at least one need).

Top Priority: Most Important Indoor Facility/Amenity For PDOP To Provide/Add/Improve (n=618)

Indoor pool* 27%

Fitness center 26%

Indoor track 13%

Gym space 10% 41% Pool-Related Priority Indoor pool for lap swimming 9%

Warm water therapy pool 5%

Indoor pickleball courts 2%

None/No answer 8%

Q13. Of those indoor recreation facilities, which one do you think should be a top priority for the Park District of Oak Park to provide? 52 * For recreation, swimming lessons, open play, etc. Top Indoor Priority

Women and households with children are most interested in an indoor open pool as a top priority, while middle-age residents tend to favor a fitness center.

➢ Note that the youngest and newer Oak Park residents tend to be divided between wanting gym space, or citing none of these improvements as a top priority. Conversely, the oldest adults are more likely to seek a warm water therapy pool.

➢ Others who do not identify anything as a priority tend to include those without children, renters, and residents in the Central or North-Central parts of the village. African Americans also feel this way more than average.

Differences by Subgroups: Top Indoor Priority

Overall Most Likely to Express Interest/Need/Use

- Women (34%, vs. 21% of men) - Ages 35-44 (42%), 45-54 (36%) Indoor Pool * 27% - HH with children (41%, vs. 18% of those without) - Asian households (50%) - Single family houses (29%) Fitness Center 26% - Ages 55-64 (36%) - White households (16%) Indoor Running or Walking Track 13% - Current PDOP user (14%, vs. 6% of non-users) - Under age 35 (18%) Gym Space 10% - Lived in OP <5 yrs. (19%)

Indoor Pool for Lap Swimming 9% - Ages 55-64 (18%)

- Ages 55+ (10%) Warm Water Therapy Pool 5% - HH without children (8%, vs. 1% of those with) Indoor Pickleball Courts 1%

- Under age 35 (18%); Lived in OP 5-14 yrs. (12%) - HH without children (11%, vs. 2% of those with) - Non-PDOP users (35%, vs. 5% of users) No Answer/None Are Priorities tennis 7% - African American households (21%) - Renters (16%) and apartment dwellers (20%) - North-Central (17%) and Central (14%) regions

* For recreation, swimming lessons, open play, etc. 53 IV. PDOP Program and Event Participation

54 PDOP Program/Event Participation

Nearly two-thirds of respondents report attending a PDOP event in the past year (usually summer concerts), and over half have participated in District programs.

➢ Note that the program participation Participation in PDOP Programs/Events is more heavily concentrated on (n=618; all respondents) youth activities (sports, summer Programs 55% camp, gymnastics, arts programs). Youth Sports 22% ➢ The top adult programs are Summer Camp 16% wellness-related at 12% overall, Gymnastics 15% followed closely by adult arts Youth arts, music, dance 13% programming at 11%. Wellness (group exercise, yoga, tai chi) 12% Adult arts, music, dance 11% ➢ One in four respondents (25%) report no program or event Early childhood 8% participation from their household. Adult Sports 8% These tend to be: Ice Programs (hockey, figure skating) 8% Youth special interest (cooking, STEM) 6% ▪ Households without children Adult special interest (cooking, gardening) 6% (33% report no participation); Active Adult programs (ages 55+) ▪ The oldest (35% of ages 65+) 5% and youngest adults (36% of Events 65% those under 35); Summer Concerts 40% ▪ Central region (38%); Day in Our Village Carnival 32% ▪ Renters (37%), especially Movies in the Park 24% apartment dwellers (44%); Fall Fest 21% ▪ Lower income households (46% of those earning under Frank Lloyd Wright Races 16% $50K, and 36% of those Winter Fest 8% making $50K-$99K). Egg Hunt 8% KidsFest 7% None 25%

Q20. Please indicate if you or any household member (or visiting guest) has participated in any of the following Park District of Oak Park programs or events below in the past 12 months. 55 PDOP Programs and Special Events

Among those familiar with PDOP programs and events, virtually all are at least somewhat satisfied with each.

➢ As with the parks and facilities ratings, at least half are extremely satisfied, and virtually no one express dissatisfaction.

Satisfaction with PDOP Programs and Events Avg. (mean) (Programs n=343, Events n=404) 0-10 Rating

Satisfaction with PDOP Programs 3% 13% 29% 53% 8.4

Satisfaction with PDOP Events 3% 14% 29% 53% 8.5

% Dissatisfied (0-4) % Neutral (5) % Slightly Satisfied (6-7) % Very Satisfied (8) % Completely Satisfied (9-10)

Q21. How would you rate your overall satisfaction with the Park District of Oak Park programs/ events you have recently participated in? (NOTE: %s under 3% are not shown) 56 PDOP Programs and Special Events

No one is unhappy with the PDOP programs and events.

➢ The lowest average rating given by any subgroup is a 7.6, which is still considered very positive on a 0-10 scale.

➢ Consistent with earlier esteem and satisfaction trends, younger adults and those reporting mid- to upper incomes tend to be the most satisfied. Older residents, households without children, and lower-income adults tend to give less positive scores.

Differences by Subgroups: Satisfaction with PDOP Parks/Facilities

Overall Avg. Lower Satisfaction Higher Satisfaction Rating (0-10)

- Ages 65+ (8.1) - Ages 35-44 (8.6) - Non-Central residents, both north - Central residents (9.0) PDOP Programs Overall 8.4 and south (8.3) - HH income $75K-$99K (8.8) - HH income <$50K (7.6)

- No children in HH (8.3) - Ages 35-44 (8.8) - Ages 55-64 (8.3), 65+ (8.1) - HH with children (8.6) PDOP Events Overall 8.5 - Lived in OP 35+ yrs. (8.1) - Lived in OP <5 yrs. (8.8) - Asian HHs (7.6) - White HHs (8.6) - HH income <$50K (7.6) - HH income $50K+ (8.6)

Q21. How would you rate your overall satisfaction with the Park District of Oak Park programs/ events you have recently participated in? (NOTE: %s under 3% are not shown) 57 PDOP Program Comments

Relatively few offer complaints regarding District programs or events.

➢ The top concerns are for PDOP events, many of which come from respondents who want to see elements of these events expanded (e.g., more movie nights, more diverse music at summer concerts, broader food options). ➢ Program instructors receive a few criticisms across a variety of programs, mostly around inconsistency, level of experience, politeness, etc. ➢ Note that relatively few express concerns about program or event fees.

Reasons for Dissatisfaction with Programs or Events (top responses, unweighted n of cases)

Top Responses • Movie nights (n=4) [more often (n=2); bigger screens; start Event complaints n=17 too late] • Summer concerts (n=3) [more diverse (n=2); too loud] • Days in our Village (n=3) (lacking) • Too crowded, general (n=3) (long lines; not enough parking) • More food vendors (n=2) Issues with instructors (inconsistent, n=16 inexperienced, impolite, etc.) Top Responses • Youth programming (n=9) [gymnastics (n=2); hockey (n=1); ice skating (n=1); T-ball (n=1); drawing (n=1)] Program complaints (inefficient • Adult fitness (n=5) [swim (n=2); yoga (n=1); registration process, class n=10 Top Responses scheduling, cancellations) • Incorrect program designation for age groups/ false advertising (n=4) • Confusing/ frustrating registration process (3) • Inconvenient class scheduling/ hours (n=2) Lack of programming n=9 • Cancellations (n=1) Top Responses • More senior programs (n=4) • More adult programs (n=2) • More tween/ teen programs Cost complaints n=5 Top Responses (n=2) • Summer camps (n=2) • Programs, general (n=2)

Q22. If you are dissatisfied with any program(s) or event(s), indicate which one(s) and why. (open-ended, multiple responses) 58 PDOP Program Suggestions by Age Group

Suggested program ideas for younger youth tends to center around more athletics and preschool or before-/after-school activities. More developmental and educational programming, along with arts activities, are also cited for younger school-age children.

Early Childhood Programs Youth programs (ages 5-12)

Preschool/Before and After School NET 14 8

Open gym (3), Basketball (3), Sports/athletics/fitness NET 13 Swimming (3) 11 Swimming (3)

Programs NET 11 4

Scheduling/more options 7 0

More variety of classes 2 3

Outdoor Programs NET 4 1

Developmental/education NET 2 11 STEM classes (4)

Art/Music NET 1 10 Dance (4), Music lessons (4)

Q23. Are there any specific program(s) or event(s) that you’d like the Park District of Oak Park to offer? If so, list them below. (most frequent open-ended responses) 59 PDOP Program Suggestions by Age Group

For older children, sports and athletics again dominate the suggestions for additional programming. Suggestions for added educational and before- /after-school activities diminish for older children.

Teen programs (ages 13-18) Young adult programs 19-29

Open gym (3), 9 Kickball (3), Sports/athletics/fitness NET 12 General fitness (3) Volleyball (3)

Foreign language 4 Developmental/Education NET 10 learning (5)

Before and After School Programs 8 0

More variety of programs 3 0

Outdoor Programs NET 0 2

Q23. Are there any specific program(s) or event(s) that you’d like the Park District of Oak Park to offer? If so, list them below. (most frequent open-ended responses) 60 PDOP Program Suggestions by Age Group

Added adult programming of interest focuses on more sports and fitness options, especially among older adults. Note that specific special interests (usually language classes, cultural activities) are often cited as well.

Adult programs (ages 30-44) Adult programs (ages 45-54) Active adult (ages 55+)

Softball (4), Swimming (9), Sports/athletics/fitness Volleyball (6), Fitness 23 Programs (4), 15 Basketball (2), 39 Fitness Classes NET Yoga/Pilates (3) General Sports (2) (8), Yoga (6)

Foreign Language (3), Cultural Activities (3), Special Interests NET 14 Foreign Language (2), 14 10 Cultural Activities (2) Cultural Activities (3) Foreign Language (2)

General arts/ crafts 4 2 1

Better scheduling Better variety of Programs NET 10 overall (3) 3 15 classes (8)

More special events 6 2 3

Art/Music NET 5 Dance (4) 1 1

Q23. Are there any specific program(s) or event(s) that you’d like the Park District of Oak Park to offer? If so, list them below. (most frequent open-ended responses) 61 PDOP Program Suggestions by Age Group

A few comments for added programming were offered which were not age- specific.

Other programs or special events

Special events (more in general) 12

Swim (classes, lap lanes, water aerobics) 4

Education/arts programs (in general) 4

Fitness programs 3

Tennis/Racquet sports 3

Cultural activities 3

General arts/ crafts 3

Foreign language programs 2

Programs/Events Better overall communications 2 Sports/Fitness Special Interests Group trips 2 Other

Q23. Are there any specific program(s) or event(s) that you’d like the Park District of Oak Park to offer? If so, list them below. (most frequent open-ended responses) 62 V. Opinions Regarding Potential PDOP Recreation Center

63 Perceived Need and Support for Rec Center

At least four in five respondents feel that a community rec center is needed in Oak Park, and support its construction via grants and donations.

➢ When first described, 41% feel this facility represents a “significant need” in the community. This opinion increases to 54% when informed that it would in part provide after-school gym use and activities for middle-/high-school children.

➢ When informed that the facility will be funded with grants and donations (and not with a tax increase), respondents are in support by more than a 5:1 margin (though much of this support is “not strong” at 44%, vs. 41% “strong”).

The PDOP is considering the construction of a Lower Need: Higher Need: community recreation Center featuring 20% 80% gymnasium space, a fitness center, an indoor walking/jogging track, and an indoor pool which includes a water play area, lanes for lap 8% 12% 39% 41% swimming, and a warm water therapy pool. In general, would you say that this type of facility represents: Lower Need: Higher Need: 18% 82%

While this facility would provide recreational opportunities for all Oak Park residents, it will 7% 11% 28% 54% also provide middle- and high-school students with free open gym and activities in a safe place after school. Knowing this, would you say that Not at All a Need Not Much of a Need this facility represents: Somewhat of a Need Significant Need in the Community

To pay for the construction of a new community Total Oppose: Total Support: recreation center, the Park District will seek 15% 85% grants and private donations as part of a fund- raising campaign (instead of seeking a property tax increase). How much do you support or oppose building a community recreation center 5% 10% 44% 41% as described earlier? Strongly Oppose Oppose Support Strongly Support 64 Sense of Need: PDOP Rec Center Concept

As age increases, the perceived need for an indoor rec center decreases.

➢ Similarly, the sense of need decreases along with household income (greater need among more affluent residents, less need among lower income households).

➢ Note that roughly one in four men, non-children households, ages 55+, and long-term Oak Park residents feel an rec center is not necessary across both arguments tested.

Statements/Descriptions Not Much/Not At All A Somewhat of a Need Significant Need Regarding Proposed Rec Center Need in the Community

20% Overall 39% Overall 41% Overall The PDOP is considering the construction - Men (25%) - Ages 45-54 (45%) - Women (46%) of a community recreation Center - No children in HH (26%) - Lived in OP <5 yrs. (48%) - HH with children (50%) featuring gymnasium space, a fitness - PDOP non-users (41%) - Central (44%) and Far South - PDOP users (43%) center, an indoor walking/jogging track, - Under age 35 (30%), 55 to 64 regions (43%) - Ages 35-44 (48%) and an indoor pool which includes a water (24%), 65+ (27%) - White households (42%) - Central (44%) and Far play area, lanes for lap swimming, and a - Lived in OP 35+ yrs. (27%) - Townhouse dwellers (62%) South regions (43%) warm water therapy pool. In general, - North-Central (31%) - HH income $150K-$199.9K - HH income $50K-$74..9K would you say that this type of facility - Condo residents (31%) (56%) (53%), $75K-$99.9K represents: - Renters (26%) (48%), $200K+ (52%) - HH income <$50K (55%) 18% Overall 28% Overall 54% Overall While this facility would provide - Men (24%) recreational opportunities for all Oak Park - Women (60%) - No children in HH (24%) residents, it will also provide middle- and - HH with children (69%) - Non-PDOP users (38%) - Children in HH (32%) high-school students with free open gym - PDOP users (55%) - Ages 55+ (27%) - Hispanic (35%) and white and activities in a safe place after school. - Ages 35-54 (64%) - Lived in OP 35+ yrs. (26%) residents (31%) Knowing this, would you say that this - Lived in OP <5 yrs. (62%) - North-Central residents (25%) facility represents: - HH income $200K+ (67%) - HH income <$50K (40%)

65 Overall Support for Proposed Rec Center

A plurality (44%) say they support this proposed rec center “not strongly”, with nearly as many registering as “strong” supporters.

➢ Consistent with early findings, younger households with children, those with the highest incomes, and women tend to be the strongest supporters.

➢ Men are more likely to be “not strong” supporters, along with white residents overall.

➢ While a majority support the concept (strongly or not strongly) based on this description (68% or more across all subgroups), the opposition tends to be stronger than average among lower income households, both the youngest and oldest residents, those without children, and African American households.

Strongly Oppose + Support/Oppose Rec Center Not Strongly Support Strongly Support Oppose

15% Overall 44% Overall 41% Overall

To pay for the construction of a new community recreation center, the Park - No children in HH (18%) District will seek grants and private - Non-PDOP users (25%) - HH with children (50%) donations as part of a fund-raising - Under age 35 (24%), 65+ - Men (48%) - Women (45%) campaign (instead of seeking a property (23%) - White households (48%) - Ages 35-44 (56%), 45-54 tax increase). How much do you support - Lived in OP 35+ yrs. (19%) - Townhouse dwellers (63%) (50%) or oppose building a community - African American - HH income $200K+ (50%) recreation center as described earlier? households (20%) - HH income <$50K (32%)

66 PDOP Park/Facility Usage

Supporters of a recreation center most often cite the community-wide need for this facility, with one in four especially wanting it for teen activities.

➢ Other reasons for support target specific reasons or themes, such as health equity across all segments of the community (14%), and the need to promote healthy activities and behaviors (14%).

➢ About one in ten (11%) recognize that a PDOP facility will likely be less expensive than other fitness options nearby.

Why do you SUPPORT this proposed Recreation Center? (n=492)

Addresses a community need (general rec/fitness, year-round/ indoor 47% facilities)

Increases safe after-school options for middle- /high- schoolers 24%

Will offer options for ALL Oak Park residents (e.g., seniors, low-income 14% families, marginalized communities)

Supports healthy lifestyle choices for the community 14%

Addresses specific need for indoor pool 12%

Less expensive/more accessible than private gyms/workout facilities 11%

Support the proposed means of funding 10%

Increases the sense of community/ quality of life for OP residents (and 9% potential residents)

Support but skeptical over funding/no tax increase 4%

Confident PDOP will build and maintain a successful Rec Center 1%

17. Why do you support this proposed recreation center? Please be as specific as possible. (most frequent open-ended responses) 67 PDOP Park/Facility Usage

Sample Verbatims: Support for Rec Center

Addresses a community need (general rec/fitness, year-round/ indoor facilities) (47%):

“All of the facilities listed are exactly what I want. I have to join 3-4 different gyms/programs to meet my needs for exercise (yoga center, park district classes, YMCA membership and park district lap swim in the summer). It’s too expensive!!! I look at other towns and am jealous of the amazing faculties they have for swimming.” “The fact that this facility does not exist is really a gaping hole in my estimation. It would serve a public need that is not met at all now that the option of using the Concordia pool has been unavailable for years, it has the potential to serve residents of all ages, and is sorely needed by the student swimmers in the area.” “Because Oak Park/Chicago has 9 months of the year that are NOT summer!!!! It is great to have parks and outdoor pools, but for the majority of the year, our climate does not support us using those outdoor options. Indoor facilities offer a healthy option for children and adults alike to stay active year round.” “I feel this is a basic facility that a village with a park district should have. There should be a hub for the park district where one could go for classes, recreation, sign up. Rural communities with a much smaller tax base manage to have this, and I found it surprising that Oak Park didn’t have a community center.” “An indoor rec center is important to provide indoor activities for kids and adults of all ages to stay active during our long, cold winters and rainy days. Stay healthy and out of trouble.” “I think a facility such as this is necessary for youth, seniors and residents with mobility issues who still want/need some form of recreational activity in an unintimidating environment.” “An indoor recreational center is absolutely necessary. During our long winter months walking or running is almost impossible.” “Because I feel it meets a need in the community, because I can see how my family would benefit from and use the facility, and how it would support the families of Oak Park.” “Not only would this recreation center provide residents with the activities that are lacking in Oak Park, especially in the Fall, Winter and Spring, but it would be a common space for residents to come together. “ “Oak park needs a place for year round use. It will be a great, single place to play and gather.” “The community needs a place that can be used year round and that will provide fitness services for all ages. Having an indoor pool would be a big improvement for our town.” “The overall goals/purpose of the facility would fill a need and it would be nice if it didn't impact property taxes.” “Our residents of all ages need this...our families, our teens, our seniors, would all benefit from the ability to have this facility in our community. I think for the property taxes we pay we deserve to have this in the community and would make our community more attractive to renters and homeowners, it would be wonderful to have this happen.” “People of Oak Park often have to go to other communities for this purpose. Forest Park has a nice new facility, many people in Oak Park use the River Forest Community Center frequently. Both youth and adult sports programs are always short on space or looking to other communities for a place to play.”

68 PDOP Park/Facility Usage

Sample Verbatims: Support for Rec Center (cont’d)

Increases safe after-school options for middle- /high- schoolers (24%):

“A center with a combination of facilities is a great idea: it is very practical. I particularly like the fact that it would be open to middle and high school students.” “I firmly believe that the neighborhood should provide activities for the kids.” “I think kids and the community could always use more free or low-cost spaces to spend their free time, especially if it's not going to come out of increased property taxes.” “We need more places for our teens to play and relax with supervision by caring adults.” “I would like a facility that I could personally enjoy utilizing, and we desperately need a place and activities for teens after school to alleviate some of the burden on the library.” “Teens need a safe space during after school hours to keep them safe and out of trouble.” “Providing teenagers with healthy activities is good for them and good for the community; good preventative health for them and positive alternatives to unhealthy or risky temptations that could harm them and the community.” “Kids always need a place to go after school. I support it if there are private funds to build it.” “A safe place for older kids to go after school would satisfy a definite need in this community.” “Having a safe place and activities for kids is important to keep them from finding other alternative activities.” “High school and middle school students need an indoor space for recreation and socialization.” “Important for mid/high schoolers to have a safe place where they can hangout after school (plus the need for an additional pool).” “It seems like a good idea for young teens, pre-teens to have safe places for after-school fitness activities.” “It would be a great addition to the village, and a much needed safe space for young people.” “Provide a chance for the younger generation to engage in a positive activity!” “Particularly the argument that middle and high school youth would have less expensive options, and options for individual free play not constrained by needing to only be in team sports.” “Recreational spaces for kids should be a priority, particularly outside of school hours.” “Students need a place to go after school for positive programs. Inter-generational opportunities are important, too, especially to promote equality.”

69 PDOP Park/Facility Usage

Sample Verbatims: Support for Rec Center (cont’d)

Will offer options for ALL Oak Park residents (e.g., seniors, low-income families, marginalized communities) (14%):

“Although it's nice to have access to corporate fitness clubs such as FFC and other private fitness spaces, It would be nice to have a space that is for the public and community at large. I think an indoor pool space would be lovely and well serve the community including those who desire to take lessons or swim laps year round. Also, it would be nice to have a space that would welcome students and give them a space and outlet during the cold weather months.” “Despite a number of private, for-profit fitness centers in Oak Park, there isn't a general, affordable and modern facility accessible to a broad population.” “Gym and fitness center options are far too expensive. A dedicated community space that has these options would be a huge addition to the community and of great help to families and residents who can't afford other fitness center options. Very highly support this proposal.” “I support it only if it is affordable for all Oak Parkers.” “I think it would be beneficial for the community. If the fitness facilities were better I think more people would use them. Community/recreation centers provide and foster a strong sense of community which is very positive.” “If done properly, it should give residents an opportunity to maintain a healthy lifestyle, engage with other community members, and allow the entire family to enjoy the space together all at a reasonable price.”

Supports healthy lifestyle choices for the community (14%):

“I would like it to be easier for Oak Park residents of all incomes to be physically active.” “Wider access to affordable fitness programs can result n a healthier populace , leading to lower health care costs and heightened productivity.” “Provide safe place for children. To fight obesity in children and adults. Health and social benefits for senior citizens.” “Physical activity is important for overall heath from youth to senior years. The earlier a person is exposed & engaged in recreational activities it'll encourage them to maintain a healthy lifestyle in their later years.” “It would give residents an opportunity to participate in physical activity, which would have health benefits.” “It will benefit the health and safety of the entire community.” “Fitness equals a healthy and happy community. Swimming and other recreational activities promote wellbeing and a sense of community. We need a facility here in Oak Park! “Indoor facilities, especially for winter are needed and can greatly improve the health of the community.” “Health and wellness facilities are very important to the overall well being of the community.” “Child obesity is a public health crisis - getting kids off their screens and engaged in healthy activity is big need.”

70 PDOP Park/Facility Usage

Among the relatively few opponents, most simply feel that a rec center is not needed (61%) and/or that other priorities should be addressed (24%).

➢ Note that 34% of opponents are skeptical about taxes with a new facility (34%), and others cite concerns about high user fees in general (6%) or to cover the ongoing maintenance of a new facility (13%).

Why do you OPPOSE this proposed Recreation Center? (n=78)

No need for a recreation center, there are enough facilities already exist 61%

Concerned about potential tax increase, taxes are high enough already 34%

Other priorities need to be addressed first; money is better spent elsewhere 24%

Expecting high fees to cover operating costs (maintenance, staffing, etc.) 13% without a tax increase

Other concerns about high user fees (membership, passes, classes, etc.) 6%

Concerned about location/footprint 5%

Don't trust PD to manage it (customer experience, etc.) 4%

Desire for a cultural center 1%

Worried about usage by non-OP residents 1%

17. Why do you oppose this proposed recreation center? Please be as specific as possible. (most frequent open-ended responses) 71 PDOP Park/Facility Usage

Sample Verbatims: Opposition to Rec Center

No need for a recreation center, there are enough facilities already exist (61%):

“Duplicates other facilities around! Keep up your current facilities! Anyway Forest Park has a new Rec Center!.” “I don't believe there is a great need for this sort of facility in Oak Park. We live in a 5 square mile village, there are no shortage of gyms, yoga studios, spin studios, etc. We have a YMCA as well as the FFC and are near several other "full-service" gyms. We have ample basketball, soccer, baseball, and tennis courts/fields. There are marked crosswalks at virtually every intersection. My only hesitation is that there are certainly a portion of our residents who can't afford to frequent these places who may benefit from access through the park district. However, I would need to see some sort of proof that these are the citizens who would be served by this complex, as I very much doubt that they are.” “Don't think it is needed. Improve the parks instead.” “What's the need? We have a gym center and the Stevenson Center. Not sure what need you are trying to meet.” “I don't see myself or my family using it. There are existing options available.” “I feel there are other comparable facilities in the area already providing these services.” “Duplicates services provided by YMCA and high school. Doesn't the gymnastic center have a gymnasium for children?” “I have a feeling we have some under-utilized facilities already. E.g., Dole doesn't seem to be used as much as it could. Maybe some adult classes moved there to free up space for youths. I DON'T think one facility where seniors, adults, teens and youths all would be invited is a very good idea. At least, explore and present the other options.” “Oak Park has enough facilities and swimming pools. The Park district does not need to get suckered into helping build another pool for the High School!” “I just don't think it's needed. If there is a need for safe after-school activities, let the schools provide it and/or use existing Park District facilities. There's an indoor pool and gym at the YMCA. Most middle to upper class Oak Parkers already belong to a fitness club. Why duplicate what already exists? Even if you don't need to increase our taxes, you may destabilize tax-paying private providers. Why duplicate what they're already offering? If you want to provide recreational opportunities for those who can't afford private clubs, why not subsidize memberships?” “I would be opposed because it is a duplication of services already provided in the community. The YMCA provides these services, as well as the high school & Fenwick has a pool, and we have the gymnastics center. Do not duplicate services! Continue what you are doing and do it well!” “It sounds like a solution looking for a problem. There are many outlets for working out and other activities in the area.” “There isn't a clear need.” “This is a town with more than enough facilities.” “This is not a core government service and is excessive. In addition, this facility would directly complete with private section facilities which offer the same thing.”

72 PDOP Park/Facility Usage

Sample Verbatims: Opposition to Rec Center (cont’d)

Concerned about potential tax increase, taxes are high enough already (34%):

“A community center would be an asset to the Village; however, our taxes are already too high and used for too many families from outside the Village. Children in the community already have school facilities to use for recreational purposes. And, unless you can guarantee that facilities would only be used to the benefit of Oak Park residents, we would not support building new facilities.” “Property taxes are out of control. I've spoken to folks with high incomes ($200K + a year) who wanted to move to Oak Park and then picked other communities because of our outrageous taxes. We need to do something to bring these down to keep our community healthy in the long run.” “As a senior citizen on a limited/fixed income, the idea of an increase in property taxes to pay for this recreation is frightening. As much as I value such a project, if having to help pay for it would jeopardize my ability to afford to remain in my own home, I would have serious reservations about it.” “As my tax bill for my home is close to $25,000 per year (5 fold increase over time) and I cannot think of another facility that the community needs. Many people in the USA grow up without a swimming pool for the students. Cover the Ridgeland Pool if there is a need for a pool for the high school.” “If it could be built without raising taxes I would support it - I just don't trust it could happen without raising already oppressive taxes.” “It is not needed. Eventually some costs will have tax implications. The PD is doing a great job with the existing facilities so don't mess up by adding an unneeded one. It will take a potentially taxable property off the tax rolls.” “Our taxes are insane and to waste residents hard earned money for frivolous ideas like this is offensive.” “Our taxes are too high now! All facilities need to be manned, maintained and periodically upgraded. There are private companies ready, willing and able to provide these kinds of facilities if they didn't have to compete against publicly subsidized facilities.” “Property taxes in Oak Park are so high that I must scrape the bottom of my fixed income bucket to pay them. It is doubtful that I will be able to stay in my Oak Park home much longer because the taxes are so high. I am generally opposed to ANYTHING that will increase property taxes.” “There’s already the Y, private gyms and similar resources in the community this would be duplicative of. Long term financial stability and upkeep would fall as an additional tax burden on Homeowners who already have high taxes. “The racial achievement gap in education needs to be the highest investment priority in the Village. Regardless of how construction is funded, ongoing maintenance and operations will undoubtedly be funded by property tax. Any tax increases will force more low income families and families of color out of Oak Park. So, PDOP funds would be better spent as the have been spent, on the ongoing and continuous improvement of programs and facilities.”

73 PDOP Park/Facility Usage

Sample Verbatims: Opposition to Rec Center (cont’d)

Other priorities need to be addressed first; money is better spent elsewhere (24%):

“I think the Village has plenty of facilities for park and fitness activities. Even with private donations, a new facility is not needed and will use up valuable space and resources. Any additional funds should be used towards maintaining current facilities.” “Money would be better spent maintaining existing facilities.” “The high school should be upgraded first.” “This community has GOT to rein in expenses. No matter what the taxes have got to brought under control and we have to live within our means by separating needs and wants. I will be forces out of my home soon if the taxes continue on the same trajectory as they have been.” “PDOP is far too focused on erecting facilities. You're stockpiling reserves to build your next fantasy project instead of minimizing the fees you charge for children's sports programs and camps and/or should further minimize the collective tax burden.” “Creating such a facility reduces the extremely limited park land availability for nature appreciation. Too much stress is placed on structured activity and too little on self-directed activities, especially for over-scheduled children.”

Expecting high fees to cover operating costs (maintenance, staffing, etc.) without a tax increase (13%):

“Financial burden on the community both to build and to maintain.” “The facility may (possibly) be built without local tax support, but it can not operate without local tax support. Maintaining and maximizing use of current facilities is preferable.” “Unless it was totally 100% paid for outside of taxpayer dollars (including ongoing maintenance, etc.), I don't feel the need would justify it.” “Will always have an impact on taxes; even if it could be built totally off the tax rolls, it would need to be staffed and have supervisors all of whom would be on the tax system; how many hours open? utility costs, etc. would be paid for by taxes. Oak Park has the highest tax burden in the county -- of course that's not the PD's fault, but the burden for older folk is still there.” “With what we pay in taxes the programs and pool passes should be cheaper for residents and more costly for non-residents. There has never been a big enough difference to justify all the taxes we pay. The outdoor pool(s) are almost impossible to swim laps in, but for the few times we can the cost of the pool pass makes it a bad investment. I expect the same will be true of this new center.” “How would facilities maintenance be paid? Usage fees could be very high. Likely the location where it would be built would take property off the property tax rolls.”

74 Willingness to Donate to Build Rec Center

Three in five said they are willing to donate to help cover the rec center’s construction costs, though much of this intention is “soft”.

➢ Twice as many (40%) are only “somewhat” likely to donate as those “very” likely to do so (21%).

➢ Willingness to donate is strongest among those who can most afford to do so, namely higher income households and homeowners. Residents in the Central part of Oak Park also tend to be willing to contribute.

➢ Those without children in the household are least likely to donate, along with lower income adults and apartment/condo residents.

Willingness to Donate to Raise Funds for New Rec Center (n=614)

Not at All Likely, 20% Not Very Likely, 19% Somewhat Likely, 40% Very Likely, 21%

Especially: - Under age 35 (29%) or - No children in HH (23%) - Ages 35-44 (53%) - Ages 45-54 (32%) 55+ (27%) - HH income $50K-$74.9K - HH with children (51%) - Lived in OP 5-24 yrs. (27%) - Lived in OP 35+ yrs. (26%); $100K-$149.9K (23%), - HH income $150K-$199.9K (50%), - HH income $200K+ (28%) (28%) $150K-$199.9K (27%) $200K+ (55%) - Far-N (27%) and Central - No children in HH (25%) - Hispanic HHs (40%) - Homeowners (45%) regions (25%) - HH income <$50K (45%) - S-Central (25%) and Far South - Central (43%), S-Central (44%), - N-Central region (31%) regions (24%) and Far South regions (46%) - Apartment (26%) and condo dwellers (27%)

18. How likely is it that you/your household would donate to this fund-raising campaign for a new community recreation center? 75 Willingness to Donate to Build Rec Center

Even among the “strong” supporters of the described rec center, much of the willingness to donate is “soft”.

➢ Many of the “not strong” supporters (45%) are unlikely to contribute to help pay for the construction of this facility.

Rec Center Supporters and Opponents: Willingness to Donate to Raise Funds for Construction (n=614)

Overall 20% 19% 40% 21%

Strongly Support (41%) 4% 8% 44% 44%

Support (44%) 16% 29% 48% 7%

Oppose (10%) 67% 28% 5%

Strongly Oppose (5%) 100%

Not at All Likely Not Very Likely Somewhat Likely Very Likely

18. How likely is it that you/your household would donate to this fund-raising campaign for a new community recreation center? 76 Top Priorities: Rec Center Amenities

When asked which indoor amenities in the rec center description are most important, at least half again cite the indoor pool (especially an open swim area and lap lanes) along with a fitness center.

➢ In this context, an indoor track was also identified by 44% as a priority.

[IF POOL IS MENTIONED] Top Pool Features/Priorities (n=329) Top Amenities for Proposed Indoor Rec Center (n=575 responding) Open Play Area 65%

Indoor Pool 57% Lap Lanes 63%

Warm Water Therapy 31% Pool Fitness Center 51%

Indoor Walking/Jogging Track 44%

Gymnasium 33%

19. Which of these amenities or features do you consider to be priorities for a new community recreation center (regardless of your support or opposition)? 77 Top Priorities: Rec Center Amenities

There are clear priority differences by age and certain socio-economic characteristics.

➢ Some form of indoor water facility is a priority among those with children, apartment dwellers, and mid- to high-income households. But specific pool features have different levels of appeal to specific segments:

 Older adults seek a lap pool and/or warm water therapy pool, whereas the open pool is a top priority among younger/newer residents, those with children, and African American households.  The apartment and townhouse residents are drawn more to lap lanes and a warm water therapy pool.

➢ Younger residents with mid-range incomes continue to place top priority on a fitness center, while an indoor track appeals most to older/long-term residents. Gym space tends to be a top choice among middle-age and higher income adults.

Differences by Subgroups: Priorities for Rec Center Amenities

Rec Center Pool Most Interested/Highest Priority Most Interested/Highest Priority Amenities Amenities

- Children in HH (67%) - Under age 55 (74%) - Ages 35-44 (63%), 45-54 (66%) - Women (71%, vs. 57% of men) Indoor Pool - Hispanic (78%) and Asian (79%) HHs (57% Overall) Open Play - Children in HH (75%) - Apartment dwellers (66%) Area (65%) - Lived in OP <5 yrs. (70%), 5-14 yrs. - HH Income $100K-$149.9K (66%), $200K+ (65%) (81%) - African American HHs (78%) - Under age 35 (59%), 45-54 (55%) Fitness Center - Central region (62%) - Ages 55-64 (78%) (51%) - HH income $50K-$74.9K (66%), $75K-$99.9K (62%) Lap Lanes - Lived in OP 25-34 yrs. (82%) (63%) - N-Central region (74%) Indoor - Ages 45-54 (50%), 65+ (54%) - Townhouse dwellers (89%) Walking/ - Lived in OP 5-14 yrs. (51%), 35+ yrs. (49%) Jogging Track - Townhouse dwellers (63%) - Ages 55-64 (36%), 65+ (56%) Warm Water (44%) - HH income $75K-$99.9K (66%) - No children in HH (43%) Therapy Pool - African American HHs (65%) - Ages 45-54 (48%) (31%) Gymnasium - Apartment dwellers (44%) - Lived in OP 5-24 yrs. (41%) (33%) - HH income $75K-$99.9K (37%), $150K-$199.9K (50%)

19. Which of these amenities or features do you consider to be priorities for a new community recreation center (regardless of your support or opposition)? 78 VI. PDOP Communications

79 PDOP Information Sources

When seeking information about PDOP events, programs or facilities, the printed program guide is the top source, followed closely by the Village newsletter.

➢ With the exception of non-PDOP visitors or users, a Most Used Current Sources for Park majority of all segments refer to the program guide to District Information (n=618) get Park District information. This is especially true among those with children and adults age 35-44. Park District Program Guide 69% ➢ The Village FYI Newsletter is most often used by older Village of Oak Park adults (ages 55+) and long-term residents (lived in Oak FYI Newsletter 58% Park 35+ years). Park District website 37% ➢ The PDOP website ranks third overall and is especially Exterior fence banners used by women (43%, vs. 30% of men), residents 36% aged 35-54, and Asian households. at PD locations Word of mouth from 31% ➢ Nearly as many (36%) cite the District’s fence friends/family banners as a source of information (especially the Local newspaper (print, online) newest/youngest Oak Park residents). 25%

➢ The next top PDOP channels cited are: Oak Park Public Library 23%

 District E-newsletters (especially among women, Park District E-newsletters 21% PD users, Hispanic and African American households); Park District postcards 19%

PD social media (Facebook,  Postcards (mostly newest residents less than 5 16% years in Oak Park, condo dwellers); Instagram, etc.) Call PDOP customer service 4%  Social Media (almost exclusively PD users). PDOP Sources

Other 1% Other sources

Q25. Please select the ways in which you learn about the Park District of Oak Park and its programs, parks, facilities, or services. (multiple responses) 80 PDOP Information Sources

When asked for their most preferred PDOP information source, the program guide is clearly the “go-to” option.

Preferred Source for Park District ➢ The Program Guide is especially the top choice among: Information (n=600)  Women (49%, vs. 37% of men);  Hispanic households (64%);  Homeowners (49%). Park District Program Guide 43% ➢ Those relying most on the Village FYI newsletter tend to Village of Oak Park represent a completely different profile, namely: 19%  Men (24%, vs. 15% of women) FYI Newsletter  Both the youngest (25% of those under 35) and oldest Park District 13% residents (24% of those 55-64, and 29% of those website 65+);  Long-term residents, 35+ years in OP (31%); Park District E-newsletters 7%  African American households (24%);  Renters (26%, vs. 16% of homeowners), and PD social media (Facebook, 6% apartment dwellers (31%); Instagram, etc.)  Those without children (25%). Local newspaper (print, online) 3% ➢ The PDOP website tends to be most preferred by:  Ages 35-54 (10%) and those with children (11%);  HHs earning $150K-$199.9K (12%). Oak Park Public Library 3%

➢ Those favoring social media tend to represent a similar Exterior fence banners 2% profile as those favoring the website: at PD locations  Children in the HH (18%); Word of mouth from  Ages 45-54 (21%); 2% friends/family PDOP Sources  HH incomes of $150K+ (20%). Other sources PD postcards 2%

Q26. Which of those is your most preferred source when learning about the Park District of Oak Park? (single response) 81 PDOP Information Sources

Preferred PDOP Information Channels (cont’d)

➢ While the remaining communications channels are cited less often, each appeals slightly more to very specific groups in the community.

➢ Older residents tend to be among those most likely to cite preferring local newspapers (11% of those age 65+, vs. 3% overall) or the Public Library (5% of those age 55+, vs. 0% of those under age 45) when seeking PDOP information.

➢ Outdoor fence banners tend to be preferred most by renters (6%, vs. 1% of homeowners) and those in condos (11%, vs. 2% overall).

➢ Lower income residents are slightly more inclined to most prefer getting PDOP information from:

 Word of mouth (mentioned by 10% of those earning under $50K, vs. 2% overall);  PDOP postcards (5% of those earning $50K-$74.9K, vs. 1% overall).

Q26. Which of those is your most preferred source when learning about the Park District of Oak Park? (single response) 82 Preferred PDOP Communication Channels

The previous findings identified how respondents seek information about the PDOP. The survey also tested how they want the PDOP to reach out to them.

➢ Most (60%) prefer getting emails from the district. These respondents reflect the profiles of those who are the most avid PDOP users and participants (ages 35-54, with children).

➢ One in three adults prefer getting information via USPS, especially nearly half of the older and long-term village residents, and those without children.

➢ Eight percent prefer text messaging, including small percentages of younger adults and African Americans.

Preferred Outreach from PDOP (n=598)

Most often: - Ages 35-44 (73%), 45-54 (65%) - HH with children (71%, vs. 52% of those Email, 60% Most often: without) Postal mail, - Ages 55-64 (38%), 65+ (49%) - Current PDOP users/visitors (62%) 32% - HH without children (38%) - Lived <15 yrs. in OP (65%) - Lived in OP 25-34 yrs. (50%), 35+ yrs. - S-Central (62%) and Far South areas (65%) (41%) - White residents (64%) - HH income $75K-$99.9K (68%), $200K+ (72%) Phone call, 1% Text Message, 7% Most often: Most often: - Non-PDOP users (15%, vs. 0% of users) - Ages 18-34 (13%, vs. 4% of those 65+) - African American households (6%) - Central region (16%) - Renters (4%) and apartment dwellers (5%, vs. 0% of homeowners) - African American households (14%) - HH income <75K (6%) 83 Q34. What is the preferred way for the Park District to communicate events or updates to you? Awareness of PDOP Scholarship Program

Three in five are unaware of the District’s needs-based scholarship and discount program for low-income residents.

➢ Those most familiar report the highest incomes and tend to be homeowners, along with more “regular” Park District users (women, ages 35-54, those with children).

➢ Ironically, awareness is much lower among the types of residents who would qualify for these discounts, namely lower income households. Continued education opportunities also exist more with non-PDOP users, the newest residents and renters, men, and those without children (low awareness).

Awareness of PDOP’s Scholarship Program (n=615)

Least Aware: Most Aware: - Men (69% “no”) No, Unaware Yes, Aware - Women (45% “yes”) - HH without children (72%) 61% 39% - HH with children (55%) - Non-PDOP users (87%) - PDOP users (41%) - Under age 35 (71%) - Ages 35-54 (46%) - Lived in OP <5 yrs. (69%) - South-Central (54%) and Far North regions (43%) - North-Central (73%) and Central (73%) regions - Homeowners (45%), single family houses (48%) - Renters (76%) - HH income $150K-$199.9K (44%), $200K+ (53%) - Apartment (80%) and condo dwellers (74%) - HH income <$50K (73%), $50K-$74.9K (85%), $75K-$99K (69%)

Q6. Are you aware of the Park District’s scholarship program, which provides financial assistance to low income residents/families of all ages to make Park District of Oak Park programs and facilities available to all? 84 VII. Final Comments/Suggestions

85 Final Comments and Suggestions

About one-third offered final comments at the end of the survey, most often suggestions that the PDOP keep doing what it’s doing (no changes sought).

➢ The most frequently cited suggestions echo previous survey comments, namely:

 Expanded and/or improved programming for working adults, seniors, teens, and those with mobility issues (19%);  Improved/new facilities including support for a potential Rec Center and the need for an indoor pool (13%);  Stronger promotion and information about the District, its events, etc. (8%);  More coordination with local agencies, organization and private business, e.g. eliminating redundant offerings, partnering with schools to bring the community an indoor pool facility (7%).

Most Frequent Comments/Suggestions (multiple open-ended responses) Have Additional Comments/Feedback? More/Better programs 19%

n = 211 More/Better facilities 13%

Promote Events/Improve Awareness 8% Yes/Gave Response More coordination with local agencies/orgs 7% 35% Better/easier access to parks (locations/hours) 7%

No Response Improve website UX (registration, navigation) 6% 65% Better maintenance/upkeep of parks 5%

Manage budget better/lower goals 5%

Policy Enforcement/Safety/Staff 4%

Satisfied/No suggestions 33%

Q27. Finally, do you have any comments or suggestions on what the Park District of Oak Park can improve or do differently to serve your 86 household better? (most frequent open-ended responses) Final Comments and Suggestions

Sample Verbatims: Final Comments

More/Better programs (19%):

“I don't know how to use the park district right now. I'm too young for senior activities but pay for a gym to get the flexibility we need to workout (including swimming) around our work and school schedules.” “Offer more classes for early childhood and offer more fitness classes in the early AM time for working adults.” “More imaginative programs for seniors.” “It would be great if teens had opportunities to apply for summer jobs in person and/or there are training and volunteer programs to offer teens a way to get ready to work. Would love to see "ready to work" programs. AND, hire 15 year-olds.” “Provide more programs for those with mobility issues.”

More/Better facilities (13%):

“Upgrade fitness equipment, mats etc. consistently throughout the Village, provide more classes/alternate locations in the south/central part of the Village.” “I'm proud of our parks. We need to provide a facility for our rising teens and tweens to play ball inside during the winter. This is a service not only for our children, but also for children in our neighboring communities.” “Not sure if this pertains to the PDOP, but we've been frustrated with the state of disrepair in the Dole Library building. The wheelchair accessible button doesn't work, the elevator was broken for a long time, and the heat is often overwhelming during transitional seasons.” “Keep up the great work and please convince the village to build the recreational center to benefit the community and students with an indoor enclosed pool and fitness center to allow affordable access to fitness and healthy lifestyles.” “I’m super excited about the possibility for a new center with the above mentioned facilities without raising it taxes- if that were the case, I wouldn’t want it. I think it will take a good program to excellent!”

Promote events/Improve awareness (8%)

“Do more marketing to get your programs better known in the community.” “I still don't know about half of the things the Park District has. I only see stuff in passing and really don't know what there is to offer. Many things I see at Ridgeland Common but I can't get there that frequently. I would like to see more things around me.” “Maybe just more detailed info on events, maybe online. Since we are new to the area, we aren't totally sure what happens at some.” “More specific and targeted information being sent, more info available at events like Farmers Markets, etc.” “The communication could be better. I didn't know about the Park District's punch card program until a friend told me. Also, I didn't get an email notifying me when Polar Bear passes were available. I'm not sure if there's a regular e-newsletter, but I'd like one.”

87 Final Comments and Suggestions

Sample Verbatims: Final Comments (cont’d)

More coordination with local agencies/organizations/private businesses (7%)

“All agencies should work together instead of separately.” “Collaborate with OPRF to get an indoor pool. Keep up the good work. I am proud of my park district!” “Cooperate with tax saving strategies to consolidate with other agencies.” “Figure out how to partner with school district to meet needs of the community me schools (indoor pool).” “Please work with the schools and village (and sports leagues) to be more efficient.”

Better/Easier access to parks (locations/hours) (7%):

“Haven't been able to utilize park district much because activities were not accessible for disabled family member.” “Longer season for lap swim at Ridgeland. Those of us who do not drive and live in central OP cannot access Rehm. It doesn't have the public transportation that Ridgeland has!” “Make the ecology center in Austin Gardens more accessible.” “Maybe “trial” classes, or classes on Sunday.” “I would need classes in the evenings and weekends, and I would need them to be affordable.”

Improve website (UX, registration, navigation) (6%)

“I find the website can be difficult in terms of finding something specific, that I 'know' is there, I just can't find it in the website or the search engine.” “I now prefer to receive the seasonal paper PDOP program ONLY because it is very difficult to search programs online. If there would be an online tool that allowed to make selections based on age, day of the week, etc. I would definitely prefer not to receive a paper brochure because of environmental concerns.” “Improve PDOP site navigation; improve calendar without sending it via email.” “Invest into the stability and mobile device-friendly features of your online services.” “Website for registering needs to be improved. It takes four of five times of negotiating the website before a registration takes. Also, registration online has to occur several days before the class, so this results in in person registration. This doesn't make a lot of sense.”

88 Final Comments and Suggestions

Sample Verbatims: Final Comments (cont’d)

Better maintenance/upkeep of parks (5%):

“Snow plowing side walks would be wonderful. It's my understanding Forest Park has found a way.” “Those banners on the fences are really unsightly. The parks are generally attractive spaces and the banners really detract from that.” “Provide and maintain recycling waste bins in more locations in each park and facility.” “Set garbage cans AWAY from park benches! They STINK!” “Check on the parks.” “The budget should contain enough to maintain the parks.”

Manage budget more effectively/lower goals (5%):

“Be more careful with how you spend.” “Continue to do what you do well! Forget about adding a rec center and running the risk of extending yourself too far as well as raising the cost of everything either through taxes and fees.” “Hold down administrative and marketing costs.” “I'd be in favor of scaling back on the amount of events as a cost cutting measure.” “Just use the tax money wisely and make it count.’ “Spend my taxes wisely. Don't find ways to spend the entire budget so your following budget stays the same.”

Policy Enforcement/Safety/Staff (4%):

“Please enforce your dogs on a leash policy, this actually goes for the whole of Oak Park.” “Enforce dog leash ordinance. Create a task force to pick up after dogs. Enforce all dog ordinances.” “Support safe bike paths in Oak ark and surrounding suburbs.” “Greater presence of park district employees at the parks. This is not a safety concern, but just have someone around overseeing things, showing an interest in the neighborhood kids and organizing spur of the moment activities. That’s what it was like for my children. It’s not like that for my grandchildren.” “Could training better to the personal and insist to be polite when somebody ask questions. If they do not know the answer look out for manager.”

89 Appendices: Topline Summary

90 Topline Report

91 Topline Report

92 Topline Report

93 Topline Report

94 Topline Report

95 Topline Report

96 Topline Report

97 VI.C.1

Memo To: David Wick, Vice President, Buildings and Grounds Committee Board of Park Commissioners

From: Chris Lindgren, Superintendent of Park & Planning

Date: August 14, 2019

Re: Rehm Park Tennis Court Renovations

Statement Acquired in 1913, Rehm Park was originally called “South Park” but was subsequently renamed after Colonel Arthur D. Rehm, a member of the Park District’s first Board of Commissioners and its second Board President. The original park was designed by Jens Jensen, although little of Jensen’s design remains.

A site master plan for Rehm Park was completed in 2008 by Thompson Dyke and Associates. Master plan improvements started in 2011 with a total of $250,000 allocated for improvements. Improvements included a revised play train foundation and track, a new train storage tunnel, playground surfacing, walkways, fencing and landscaping.

Discussion Staff engaged in SMP Group Design Associates, LLC to develop the drawings and specifications for the tennis court renovations. The scope of work includes the demolition of the two northern courts that currently house the Gaga Pit which will be relocated to the west side of the park. The northern courts will be replaced with sod. The southern two courts will be replaced and slightly widened to allow for more room between the courts. Lastly the fencing will be replaced with lower heights on the sides of the courts to maintain sightlines of the park. The 2019 CIP has allocated $175,000 for the project.

A legal notice and a Request for Bids was put in the Wednesday Journal on July 26, with bids due on August 15. The work is scheduled to take place in Fall of 2019 with final completion in November of 2019. To date, there are 17 registrations to download plans from the website.

Conclusion The Parks & Planning Committee will bring information prior to or to the Board Meeting.

Park District of Oak Park 218 Madison Street ▪ Oak Park, Illinois 60302 ▪ ph: (708) 725-2000 ▪ fx: (708) 383-5702 ▪ www.pdop.org VII.2

Memo To: Kassie Porreca, Chair, Administration and Finance Committee Board of Park Commissioners

From: Kyle Cratty, Director of Finance

Cc: Jan Arnold, Executive Director

Date: August 16, 2019

Re: Parameters Bond Refunding Ordinance 2019-09-01

Statement The Park District of Oak Park issued $30 million in alternative revenue source debt in 2011, 2012, and 2013. This debt was issued to construct the Gymnastics and Recreation Center and redevelop both the Ridgeland Common Recreation Center and the 218 Madison Street location. Currently the District has $22,915,000 in outstanding debt.

Discussion When a bond issue is sold to the market, traditionally a call date or a date in which you can refinance your debt is included in that bond issue. This allows municipal governments including Park Districts to potentially find some interest savings if the market allows. This is the year in which the call dates on the 2011 bonds are triggered.

PMA Financial, the District’s Financial Advisor, reviewed current market conditions and believes the District can save approximately $875,000 or 9.87% net of fees by refunding the 2011 bonds. To begin the process of refunding the Park Board of Commissioners must approve a Parameters Bond Refunding Ordinance that sets forth the terms under which staff and the District’s financial advisors must follow when refunding the bonds. This includes the minimum amount of savings, 5%, the District must receive to sell the new bonds. If approved, staff anticipates selling the new bonds in September.

Staff anticipates bringing additional ordinances in 2020 to refund both the 2012 and 2013 bonds as there are some savings opportunities in those years as well.

Recommendation Staff recommends the Board approve the Parameters Bond Refunding Ordinance 2019-09-01.

Park District of Oak Park 218 Madison Street ▪ Oak Park, Illinois 60302 ▪ ph: (708) 725-2000 ▪ fx: (708) 383-5702 ▪ www.pdop.org EXTRACT OF MINUTES of a regular public meeting of the Board of Park Commissioners of the Park District of Oak Park, Cook County, Illinois, held in the John L. Hedges Administration Building, 218 Madison Street, Oak Park, Illinois, in said Park District at 7:30 o’clock P.M., on the 5th day of September, 2019.

* * * The meeting was called to order by the President, and upon the roll being called, Sandy

Lentz, the President, and the following Park Commissioners were physically present at said location:______

______

______

In accordance with the rules heretofore adopted by the Board of Park Commissioners, no

Park Commissioner was permitted to attend the meeting by video or audio conference.

The following Park Commissioners were absent and did not participate in the meeting in any manner or to any extent whatsoever: ______

The President announced that the next item for consideration was the issuance of not to exceed $9,100,000 alternate bonds to be issued by the District to refund certain outstanding alternate bonds of the District, and that the Board of Park Commissioners would consider the adoption of an ordinance providing for the issue of said bonds, the pledge of certain revenues to the payment of principal and interest on said bonds and the levy of a direct annual tax sufficient to pay such principal and interest if the pledged revenues are insufficient to make such payment. The

President then explained that the ordinance sets forth the parameters for the issuance of said bonds and sale thereof by designated officials of the District and summarized the pertinent terms of said parameters, including the specific parameters governing the manner of sale, length of maturity, rates of interest, purchase price and tax levy for said bonds.

VII.2a Paramaters Refunding Ordinance 19-8-1 [2274447 Whereupon Commissioner______presented and the Secretary read by title an ordinance as follows, a copy of which was provided to each Park Commissioner prior to said meeting and to everyone in attendance at said meeting who requested a copy:

-2-

ORDINANCE NO. 2019-08-01

AN ORDINANCE providing for the issue of not to exceed $9,100,000 General Obligation Refunding Park Bonds (Alternate Revenue Source), Series 2019, of the Park District of Oak Park, Cook County, Illinois, for the purpose of refunding certain outstanding alternate bonds of said Park District, providing for the pledge of certain revenues to the payment of principal and interest on said bonds and the levy of a direct annual tax sufficient to pay such principal and interest if the pledged revenues are insufficient to make such payment and authorizing the sale of said bonds to the purchaser thereof.

* * *

WHEREAS, the Park District of Oak Park, Cook County, Illinois (the “District”), is a duly organized and existing park district created under the provisions of the laws of the State of Illinois, and is now operating under the provisions of the Park District Code of the State of Illinois, and all laws amendatory thereof and supplementary thereto (the “Park Code”); and

WHEREAS, the District has outstanding its General Obligation Park Bonds (Alternate

Revenue Source), Series 2011, dated November 9, 2011 (the “Prior Bonds”), due on December 15 of the years and in the amounts and bearing interest as follows:

YEAR OF PRINCIPAL RATE OF MATURITY AMOUNT INTEREST

2029 $2,690,000 4.000% 2031 4,020,000 4.000% 2033 2,155,000 4.125%

WHEREAS, the District has irrevocably set aside funds sufficient to pay the interest due on the Prior Bonds on December 15, 2019; and

WHEREAS, the Board of Park Commissioners of the District (the “Board”) has determined that it is necessary and desirable to refund all or a portion of the outstanding Prior Bonds (said

Prior Bonds to be refunded being referred to herein as the “Refunded Bonds”) in order to realize debt service savings for the District (the “Refunding”); and

WHEREAS, the Refunded Bonds shall be fully described in the Escrow Agreement (as hereinafter defined) and are presently outstanding and unpaid and are binding and subsisting legal obligations of the District; and

WHEREAS, the cost of the Refunding will not exceed $9,100,000, and there are insufficient funds on hand and lawfully available to pay such costs; and

WHEREAS, the Refunding constitutes a lawful corporate purpose within the meaning of the

Local Government Debt Reform Act of the State of Illinois, as amended (the “Debt Reform Act”); and

WHEREAS, the Board has further determined that in order to refund the Refunded Bonds, it is advisable, necessary and in the best interests of the District to borrow not to exceed $9,100,000 at this time and issue alternate bonds (the “Bonds”), being general obligation bonds payable

(a) together with the District’s Prior Bonds not refunded (the “Remaining 2011 Bonds”), the

District’s outstanding General Obligation Park Bonds (Alternate Revenue Service), Series 2012, dated April 3, 2012, and General Obligation Park Bonds (Alternate Revenue Source), Series 2013, dated March 7, 2013 (collectively, the “Prior Alternate Bonds”), from taxes levied for corporate and recreational purposes (the “Pledged Revenues”), and (b) from the Pledged Taxes, as hereinafter defined; and

WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with Section 15 of the Debt Reform Act, alternate bonds may be issued to refund other alternate bonds without meeting any of the requirements set forth in Section 15 of the Debt Reform Act, except that the term of the refunding bonds shall not be longer than the term of the bonds being refunded and that the debt service payable in any year on the refunding bonds shall not exceed the debt service payable in such year on the bonds being refunding (the “Refunding Conditions”); and

-2- WHEREAS, the Board does hereby determine that the Refunding Conditions can be met and the Bonds may be issued to refund the Refunded Bonds; and

WHEREAS, the Board is now authorized to issue the Bonds in an amount not to exceed

$9,100,000 in accordance with the provisions of the Debt Reform Act for the Refunding, and the

Board hereby determines that it is necessary and desirable that there be issued not to exceed

$9,100,000 of the Bonds so authorized; and

WHEREAS, the bond ordinances that authorized the Prior Alternate Bonds permit the

District to issue from time to time additional obligations payable from the Pledged Revenues, as permitted by law and to determine the lien priority of any such obligations; and

WHEREAS, the Property Tax Extension Limitation Law, as amended (the “Limitation

Law”), imposes certain limitations on the “aggregate extension” of certain property taxes levied by the District, but provides that the definition of “aggregate extension” contained in the

Limitation Law does not include extensions made for any taxing district to pay interest or principal on bonds issued under Section 15 of the Debt Reform Act; and

WHEREAS, the County Clerk of The County of Cook, Illinois (the “County Clerk”), is therefore authorized to extend and collect the Pledged Taxes; and

WHEREAS, in accordance with the terms of the Prior Bonds, the Refunded Bonds may be called for redemption in advance of their maturity, and the Board has further determined that it is necessary and desirable to make such call for redemption of the Refunded Bonds on their earliest practicable call date, and provide for the giving of proper notice to the registered owners of the

Refunded Bonds:

NOW, THEREFORE, Be It Ordained by the Board of Park Commissioners of the Park District of Oak Park, Cook County, Illinois, as follows:

-3- Section 1. Incorporation of Preambles. The Board hereby finds that all of the recitals contained in the preambles to this Ordinance are full, true and correct and does incorporate them into this Ordinance by this reference.

Section 2. Authorization. It is hereby found and determined that the District has been authorized by the Debt Reform Act to borrow the amount of $9,100,000 upon the credit of the

District and as evidence of such indebtedness to issue the Bonds, being general obligation bonds payable from the Pledged Revenues, as provided by the Debt Reform Act, to said amount, the proceeds of the Bonds to be used for the purpose of paying the cost of the Refunding, and it is necessary and for the best interests of the District that there be issued not to exceed $9,100,000 of the Bonds so authorized.

Section 3. Bond Details. There be borrowed on the credit of and for and on behalf of the District an amount not to exceed $9,100,000 for the purpose aforesaid; and that the Bonds shall be issued to said amount and shall be designated “General Obligation Refunding Park Bonds

(Alternate Revenue Source), Series 2019”. The Bonds, if issued, shall be dated such date (not earlier than September 5, 2019, and not later than March 5, 2020) as set forth in the Bond

Notification (as hereinafter defined), and shall also bear the date of authentication, shall be in fully registered form, shall be in denominations of $5,000 each or authorized integral multiples thereof unless otherwise set forth in the Bond Notification (but no single Bond shall represent installments of principal maturing on more than one date), and shall be numbered 1 and upward. The Bonds shall become due and payable serially or be subject to mandatory redemption (subject to prior optional redemption as hereinafter described) on December 15 of each of the years (not later than

2033), in the amounts (not exceeding $2,150,000 per year) and bearing interest at the rates (not exceeding 5.00% per annum) as set forth in the Bond Notification. The Bonds shall bear interest from their date or from the most recent interest payment date to which interest has been paid or

-4- duly provided for, until the principal amount of the Bonds is paid, such interest (computed upon the basis of a 360-day year of twelve 30-day months) being payable semi-annually commencing with the first interest payment date as set forth in the Bond Notification, and on June 15 and

December 15 of each year thereafter to maturity.

Interest on each Bond shall be paid by check or draft of the bond registrar and paying agent

(which shall be a bank or trust company authorized to do business in the State of Illinois) as set forth in the Bond Notification (the “Bond Registrar”), payable upon presentation in lawful money of the United States of America to the person in whose name such Bond is registered at the close of business on the 1st day of the month of the interest payment date. The principal of the Bonds shall be payable in lawful money of the United States of America at the designated office of the

Bond Registrar.

The Bonds shall be signed by the manual or facsimile signatures of the President (the

“President”) and Secretary (the “Secretary”) of the Board, and shall be countersigned by the manual or facsimile signature of the Treasurer of the Board (the “Treasurer”), as they shall determine, and the seal of the District shall be affixed thereto or printed thereon, and in case any officer whose signature shall appear on any Bond shall cease to be such officer before the delivery of such Bond, such signature shall nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all purposes, the same as if such officer had remained in office until delivery. If the Secretary or the Treasurer is unable to perform the duties of his or her respective office, then their duties under this Ordinance shall be performed by the Assistant Secretary or the Assistant Treasurer of the Board, respectively.

All Bonds shall have thereon a certificate of authentication substantially in the form hereinafter set forth duly executed by the Bond Registrar as authenticating agent of the District for the Bonds and showing the date of authentication. No Bond shall be valid or obligatory for any purpose or be entitled to any security or benefit under this Ordinance unless and until such

-5- certificate of authentication shall have been duly executed by the Bond Registrar by manual signature, and such certificate of authentication upon any such Bond shall be conclusive evidence that such Bond has been authenticated and delivered under this Ordinance. The certificate of authentication on any Bond shall be deemed to have been executed by the Bond Registrar if signed by an authorized officer of the Bond Registrar, but it shall not be necessary that the same officer sign the certificate of authentication on all of the Bonds issued hereunder.

Section 4. Registration of Bonds; Persons Treated as Owners. (a) General. The

District shall cause books (the “Bond Register”) for the registration and for the transfer of the

Bonds as provided in this Ordinance to be kept at the principal office of the Bond Registrar, which is hereby constituted and appointed the registrar of the District for the Bonds. The District is authorized to prepare, and the Bond Registrar shall keep custody of, multiple Bond blanks executed by the District for use in the transfer and exchange of Bonds.

Upon surrender for transfer of any Bond at the principal office of the Bond Registrar, duly endorsed by, or accompanied by a written instrument or instruments of transfer in form satisfactory to the Bond Registrar and duly executed by, the registered owner or his or her attorney duly authorized in writing, the District shall execute and the Bond Registrar shall authenticate, date and deliver in the name of the transferee or transferees a new fully registered Bond or Bonds of the same maturity of authorized denominations, for a like aggregate principal amount. Any fully registered Bond or Bonds may be exchanged at said office of the Bond Registrar for a like aggregate principal amount of Bond or Bonds of the same maturity of other authorized denominations. The execution by the District of any fully registered Bond shall constitute full and due authorization of such Bond and the Bond Registrar shall thereby be authorized to authenticate, date and deliver such Bond; provided, however, the principal amount of outstanding Bonds of each

-6- maturity authenticated by the Bond Registrar shall not exceed the authorized principal amount of

Bonds for such maturity less previous retirements.

The Bond Registrar shall not be required to transfer or exchange any Bond during the period beginning at the close of business on the 1st day of the month of any interest payment date on such Bond and ending at the opening of business on such interest payment date, nor to transfer or exchange any Bond after notice calling such Bond for redemption has been mailed, nor during a period of fifteen (15) days next preceding mailing of a notice of redemption of any Bonds.

The person in whose name any Bond shall be registered shall be deemed and regarded as the absolute owner thereof for all purposes, and payment of the principal of or interest on any Bond shall be made only to or upon the order of the registered owner thereof or his or her legal representative. All such payments shall be valid and effectual to satisfy and discharge the liability upon such Bond to the extent of the sum or sums so paid.

No service charge shall be made for any transfer or exchange of Bonds, but the District or the Bond Registrar may require payment of a sum sufficient to cover any tax or other governmental charge that may be imposed in connection with any transfer or exchange of Bonds, except in the case of the issuance of a Bond or Bonds for the unredeemed portion of a Bond surrendered for redemption.

(b) Global Book-Entry System. The Bonds shall be initially issued in the form of a separate single fully registered Bond for each of the maturities of the Bonds determined as described in Section 3 hereof. At the request of the hereinafter-defined Purchaser, upon initial issuance, the ownership of each such Bond shall be registered in the Bond Register in the name of

Cede & Co., or any successor thereto (“Cede”), as nominee of The Depository Trust Company,

New York, New York, and its successors and assigns (“DTC”). In such case, all of the outstanding

Bonds shall be registered in the Bond Register in the name of Cede, as nominee of DTC, except

-7- as hereinafter provided. The President, Secretary, Treasurer, the chief administrative and executive officer and chief financial officer of the District and the Bond Registrar are each authorized to execute and deliver, on behalf of the District, such letters to or agreements with DTC as shall be necessary to effectuate such book-entry system (any such letter or agreement being referred to herein as the “Representation Letter”), which Representation Letter may provide for the payment of principal of or interest on the Bonds by wire transfer.

With respect to Bonds registered in the Bond Register in the name of Cede, as nominee of

DTC, the District and the Bond Registrar shall have no responsibility or obligation to any broker- dealer, bank or other financial institution for which DTC holds Bonds from time to time as securities depository (each such broker-dealer, bank or other financial institution being referred to herein as a “DTC Participant”) or to any person on behalf of whom such a DTC Participant holds an interest in the Bonds. Without limiting the immediately preceding sentence, the District and the Bond Registrar shall have no responsibility or obligation with respect to (i) the accuracy of the records of DTC, Cede or any DTC Participant with respect to any ownership interest in the Bonds,

(ii) the delivery to any DTC Participant or any other person, other than a registered owner of a

Bond as shown in the Bond Register, of any notice with respect to the Bonds, including any notice of redemption, or (iii) the payment to any DTC Participant or any other person, other than a registered owner of a Bond as shown in the Bond Register, of any amount with respect to the principal of or interest on the Bonds. The District and the Bond Registrar may treat and consider the person in whose name each Bond is registered in the Bond Register as the holder and absolute owner of such Bond for the purpose of payment of principal and interest with respect to such Bond, for the purpose of giving notices of redemption and other matters with respect to such Bond, for the purpose of registering transfers with respect to such Bond, and for all other purposes whatsoever. The Bond Registrar shall pay all principal of and interest on the Bonds only to or

-8- upon the order of the respective registered owners of the Bonds, as shown in the Bond Register, or their respective attorneys duly authorized in writing, and all such payments shall be valid and effective to fully satisfy and discharge the District’s obligations with respect to payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. No person other than a registered owner of a Bond as shown in the Bond Register, shall receive a Bond evidencing the obligation of the District to make payments of principal and interest with respect to any Bond.

Upon delivery by DTC to the Bond Registrar of written notice to the effect that DTC has determined to substitute a new nominee in place of Cede, and subject to the provisions in Section 3 hereof with respect to the payment of interest to the registered owners of Bonds at the close of business on the 1st day of the month of the applicable interest payment date, the name “Cede” in this Ordinance shall refer to such new nominee of DTC.

In the event that (i) the District determines that DTC is incapable of discharging its responsibilities described herein and in the Representation Letter, (ii) the agreement among the

District, the Bond Registrar and DTC evidenced by the Representation Letter shall be terminated for any reason or (iii) the District determines that it is in the best interests of the beneficial owners of the Bonds that they be able to obtain certificated Bonds, the District shall notify DTC and DTC

Participants of the availability through DTC of certificated Bonds and the Bonds shall no longer be restricted to being registered in the Bond Register in the name of Cede, as nominee of DTC. At that time, the District may determine that the Bonds shall be registered in the name of and deposited with such other depository operating a universal book-entry system, as may be acceptable to the

District, or such depository’s agent or designee, and if the District does not select such alternate universal book-entry system, then the Bonds may be registered in whatever name or names registered owners of Bonds transferring or exchanging Bonds shall designate, in accordance with the provisions of Section 4(a) hereof.

-9- Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Ordinance to the contrary, so long as any

Bond is registered in the name of Cede, as nominee of DTC, all payments with respect to principal of and interest on such Bond and all notices with respect to such Bond shall be made and given, respectively, in the name provided in the Representation Letter.

Section 5. Redemption. (a) Optional Redemption. All or a portion of the Bonds due on and after the date, if any, specified in the Bond Notification shall be subject to redemption prior to maturity at the option of the District from any available funds, as a whole or in part, and if in part in integral multiples of $5,000 in any order of their maturity as determined by the District (less than all of the Bonds of a single maturity to be selected by the Bond Registrar), on the date specified in said Bond Notification (but not later than December 15, 2029), and on any date thereafter, at the redemption price of par plus accrued interest to the date fixed for redemption.

(b) Mandatory Redemption. The Bonds maturing on the date or dates, if any, indicated in the Bond Notification shall be subject to mandatory redemption, in integral multiples of $5,000 selected by lot by the Bond Registrar, at a redemption price of par plus accrued interest to the redemption date, on December 15 of the years, if any, and in the principal amounts, if any, as indicated in the Bond Notification.

On or prior to the 60th day preceding any mandatory redemption date, the Bond Registrar may, and if directed by the Board shall, purchase Bonds required to be retired on such mandatory redemption date. Any such Bonds so purchased shall be cancelled and the principal amount thereof shall be credited against the mandatory redemption required on such next mandatory redemption date.

(c) General. The Bonds shall be redeemed only in the principal amount of $5,000 and integral multiples thereof. The District shall, at least forty-five (45) days prior to any optional redemption date (unless a shorter time period shall be satisfactory to the Bond Registrar) notify

-10- the Bond Registrar of such redemption date and of the principal amount and maturity or maturities of Bonds to be redeemed. For purposes of any redemption of less than all of the outstanding Bonds of a single maturity, the particular Bonds or portions of Bonds to be redeemed shall be selected by lot by the Bond Registrar from the Bonds of such maturity by such method of lottery as the Bond

Registrar shall deem fair and appropriate; provided that such lottery shall provide for the selection for redemption of Bonds or portions thereof so that any $5,000 Bond or $5,000 portion of a Bond shall be as likely to be called for redemption as any other such $5,000 Bond or $5,000 portion.

The Bond Registrar shall make such selection upon the earlier of the irrevocable deposit of funds with an escrow agent sufficient to pay the redemption price of the Bonds to be redeemed or the time of the giving of official notice of redemption.

The Bond Registrar shall promptly notify the District in writing of the Bonds or portions of Bonds selected for redemption and, in the case of any Bond selected for partial redemption, the principal amount thereof to be redeemed.

Section 6. Redemption Procedure. Unless waived by any holder of Bonds to be redeemed, notice of the call for any such redemption shall be given by the Bond Registrar on behalf of the District by mailing the redemption notice by first class mail at least thirty (30) days and not more than sixty (60) days prior to the date fixed for redemption to the registered owner of the Bond or Bonds to be redeemed at the address shown on the Bond Register or at such other address as is furnished in writing by such registered owner to the Bond Registrar.

All notices of redemption shall state:

(1) the redemption date,

(2) the redemption price,

(3) if less than all outstanding Bonds are to be redeemed, the identification (and, in the case of partial redemption, the respective principal amounts) of the Bonds to be redeemed,

-11- (4) that on the redemption date the redemption price will become due and payable upon each such Bond or portion thereof called for redemption, and that interest thereon shall cease to accrue from and after said date,

(5) the place where such Bonds are to be surrendered for payment of the redemption price, which place of payment shall be the principal office of the Bond Registrar, and

(6) such other information then required by custom, practice or industry standard. Prior to any redemption date, the District shall deposit with the Bond Registrar an amount of money sufficient to pay the redemption price of all the Bonds or portions of Bonds which are to be redeemed on that date.

Notice of redemption having been given as aforesaid, and notwithstanding failure to receive such notice, the Bonds or portions of Bonds so to be redeemed shall, on the redemption date, become due and payable at the redemption price therein specified, and from and after such date (unless the District shall default in the payment of the redemption price) such Bonds or portions of Bonds shall cease to bear interest. Upon surrender of such Bonds for redemption in accordance with said notice, such Bonds shall be paid by the Bond Registrar at the redemption price. Installments of interest due on or prior to the redemption date shall be payable as herein provided for payment of interest. Upon surrender for any partial redemption of any Bond, there shall be prepared for the registered holder a new Bond or Bonds of the same maturity in the amount of the unpaid principal.

If any Bond or portion of Bond called for redemption shall not be so paid upon surrender thereof for redemption, the principal shall, until paid, bear interest from the redemption date at the rate borne by the Bond or portion of Bond so called for redemption. All Bonds which have been redeemed shall be cancelled and destroyed by the Bond Registrar and shall not be reissued.

-12- Section 7. Form of Bond. The Bonds shall be in substantially the following form; provided, however, that if the text of the Bond is to be printed in its entirety on the front side of the Bond, then paragraph [2] and the legend, “See Reverse Side for Additional Provisions”, shall be omitted and paragraph [6] and those thereafter, as may be appropriate, shall be inserted immediately after paragraph [1]:

-13- [Form of Bond - Front Side] REGISTERED REGISTERED NO. ______$______UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

STATE OF ILLINOIS

COUNTY OF COOK

PARK DISTRICT OF OAK PARK

GENERAL OBLIGATION REFUNDING PARK BOND (ALTERNATE REVENUE SOURCE), SERIES 2019

See Reverse Side for Additional Provisions

Interest Maturity Dated Rate: ____% Date: December 15, 20__ Date: ______, 2019 CUSIP: 671596 ____

Registered Owner:

Principal Amount:

[1] KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that the Park District of Oak Park, Cook

County, Illinois (the “District”), hereby acknowledges itself to owe and for value received promises to pay to the Registered Owner identified above, or registered assigns as hereinafter provided, on the Maturity Date identified above, the Principal Amount identified above and to pay interest (computed on the basis of a 360-day year of twelve 30-day months) on such Principal

Amount from the date of this Bond or from the most recent interest payment date to which interest has been paid at the Interest Rate per annum set forth above on June 15 and December 15 of each year, commencing December 15, 2019, until said Principal Amount is paid. Principal of this Bond is payable in lawful money of the United States of America at the principal office of

______, ______, ______, as bond registrar and paying agent (the “Bond

Registrar”). Payment of the installments of interest shall be made to the Registered Owner hereof as shown on the registration books of the District maintained by the Bond Registrar at the close of

-14- business on the 1st day of the month of each interest payment date and shall be paid by check or draft of the Bond Registrar, payable upon presentation in lawful money of the United States of

America, mailed to the address of such Registered Owner as it appears on such registration books or at such other address furnished in writing by such Registered Owner to the Bond Registrar.

[2] Reference is hereby made to the further provisions of this Bond set forth on the reverse hereof and such further provisions shall for all purposes have the same effect as if set forth at this place.

[3] It is hereby certified and recited that all conditions, acts and things required by law to exist or to be done precedent to and in the issuance of this Bond did exist, have happened, been done and performed in regular and due form and time as required by law; that the indebtedness of the District, including the issue of Bonds of which this is one, does not exceed any limitation imposed by law; and that provision has been made for the collection of the Pledged Revenues and the Pledged Taxes to pay the interest hereon as it falls due and also to pay and discharge the principal hereof at maturity and upon mandatory redemption prior to maturity.

[4] This Bond shall not be valid or become obligatory for any purpose until the certificate of authentication hereon shall have been signed by the Bond Registrar.

-15- [5] IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said Park District of Oak Park, Cook County, Illinois, by its

Board of Park Commissioners, has caused this Bond to be signed by the manual or duly authorized facsimile signatures of the President and Secretary of said Board of Park Commissioners, and to be countersigned by the manual or duly authorized facsimile signature of the Treasurer thereof, and has caused the seal of the District to be affixed hereto or printed hereon, all as of the Dated

Date identified above.

SPECIMEN President, Board of Park Commissioners

SPECIMEN Secretary, Board of Park Commissioners (SEAL)

Countersigned:

SPECIMEN Treasurer, Board of Park Commissioners

Date of Authentication: ______, 2019

CERTIFICATE Bond Registrar and Paying Agent: OF ______, AUTHENTICATION ______, ______This Bond is one of the Bonds described in the within mentioned ordinance and is one of the General Obligation Refunding Park Bonds (Alternate Revenue Source), Series 2019, of the Park District of Oak Park, Cook County, Illinois.

______, as Bond Registrar

By SPECIMEN Authorized Officer

-16- [Form of Bond - Reverse Side]

PARK DISTRICT OF OAK PARK

COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS

GENERAL OBLIGATION REFUNDING PARK BOND (ALTERNATE REVENUE SOURCE), SERIES 2019 [6] This Bond is one of a series of Bonds issued by the District pursuant to the Local

Government Debt Reform Act of the State of Illinois, as amended (the “Debt Reform Act”), and the Park District Code of the State of Illinois, as amended (the “Park Code”), for the purpose of refunding certain outstanding alternate bonds of the District, and is authorized by an ordinance adopted by the Board of Park Commissioners of the District on the 5th day of September, 2019

(the “Bond Ordinance”), in all respects as provided by law.

[7] The Bonds are payable (a) together with the District’s outstanding [General

Obligation Park Bonds (Alternate Revenue Source), Series 2011, dated November 9, 2011],

General Obligation Park Bonds (Alternate Revenue Service), Series 2012, dated April 13, 2012, and General Obligation Park Bonds (Alternate Revenue Source), Series 2013, dated March 7, 2013

(collectively, the “Prior Alternate Bonds”), from taxes levied for corporate and recreational purposes (the “Pledged Revenues”), and (b) from ad valorem taxes levied upon all of the taxable property in the District without limitation as to rate or amount (the “Pledged Taxes”), all in accordance with the provisions of the Debt Reform Act and the Park Code. For the prompt payment of this Bond, both principal and interest at maturity, the full faith, credit and resources of the District are hereby irrevocably pledged. The Bonds are being issued on a parity with the Prior

Alternate Bonds.

[8] [Mandatory Redemption provisions, as applicable, will be inserted here].

[9] Bonds of the issue of which this Bond is one due on or after December 15, 20___, are subject to redemption prior to maturity at the option of the District as a whole or in part in integral

-17- multiples of $5,000 in any order of their maturity as determined by the District (less than all the

Bonds of a single maturity to be selected by lot by the Bond Registrar), on December 15, 20___, and on any date thereafter, at the redemption price of par plus accrued interest to the redemption date.

[10] [Notice of any such redemption shall be sent by first class mail not less than thirty

(30) days nor more than sixty (60) days prior to the date fixed for redemption to the registered owner of each Bond to be redeemed at the address shown on the registration books of the District maintained by the Bond Registrar or at such other address as is furnished in writing by such registered owner to the Bond Registrar. When so called for redemption, this Bond will cease to bear interest on the specified redemption date, provided funds for redemption are on deposit at the place of payment at that time, and shall not be deemed to be outstanding].

[11] This Bond is transferable by the Registered Owner hereof in person or by his or her attorney duly authorized in writing at the principal office of the Bond Registrar in ______,

______, but only in the manner, subject to the limitations and upon payment of the charges provided in the Bond Ordinance, and upon surrender and cancellation of this Bond. Upon such transfer a new Bond or Bonds of authorized denominations of the same maturity and for the same aggregate principal amount will be issued to the transferee in exchange therefor. [12] The Bonds are issued in fully registered form in the denomination of $5,000 each or authorized integral multiples thereof. This Bond may be exchanged at the principal office of the

Bond Registrar for a like aggregate principal amount of Bonds of the same maturity of other authorized denominations, upon the terms set forth in the Bond Ordinance. The Bond Registrar shall not be required to transfer or exchange any Bond during the period beginning at the close of business on the 1st day of the month of any interest payment date on such Bond and ending at the opening of business on such interest payment date, nor to transfer or exchange any Bond after

-18- notice calling such Bond for redemption has been mailed, nor during a period of fifteen (15) days next preceding mailing of a notice of redemption of any Bonds.

[13] The District and the Bond Registrar may deem and treat the Registered Owner hereof as the absolute owner hereof for the purpose of receiving payment of or on account of principal hereof and interest due hereon and for all other purposes and neither the District nor the Bond

Registrar shall be affected by any notice to the contrary.

(ASSIGNMENT)

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned sells, assigns and transfers unto ______

______(Name and Address of Assignee) the within Bond and does hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint ______

______attorney to transfer the said Bond on the books kept for registration thereof with full power of substitution in the premises.

Dated: ______

Signature guaranteed: ______

NOTICE: The signature to this assignment must correspond with the name of the registered owner as it appears upon the face of the within Bond in every particular, without alteration or enlargement or any change whatever. Section 8. Sale of Bonds. Either the President or Vice President of the Board, together with the Director of Finance of the District (collectively, the “Designated Representatives”), are hereby authorized to proceed not later than the 5th day of March, 2020, without any further authorization or direction from the Board, to sell the Bonds upon the terms as prescribed in this

Ordinance. The Bonds hereby authorized shall be executed as in this Ordinance provided as soon after the delivery of the Bond Notification as may be, and thereupon be deposited with the

-19- Treasurer, and, after authentication thereof by the Bond Registrar, be by the Treasurer delivered to the purchaser thereof (the “Purchaser”), upon receipt of the purchase price therefor, the same being not less than 97.0% of the principal amount of the Bonds (exclusive of original issue discount or original issue premium, if any), plus accrued interest, if any, to date of delivery. The Purchaser shall be one of (a) pursuant to a competitive sale conducted by PMA Securities, LLC, Naperville,

Illinois (“PMA”), the best bidder for the Bonds, (b) in a negotiated underwriting, a bank or financial institution listed in the Dealers & Underwriters or Municipal Derivatives sections of the most recent edition of The Bond Buyer’s Municipal Marketplace, or (c) in a private placement,

(i) a bank or financial institution authorized to do business in the State of Illinois, (ii) a governmental unit as defined in the Debt Reform Act, or (iii) an “accredited investor” as defined in Rule 501 of Regulation D as promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended; provided, however, that the Purchaser as set forth in either (b) or (c) shall be selected only upon receipt by the District of the written recommendation of PMA that the sale of the Bonds on a negotiated or private placement basis to the Purchaser is in the best interests of the District because of (i) the pricing of the Bonds by the Purchaser, (ii) then current market conditions or (iii) the timing of the sale of the Bonds, and further provided, that the Purchaser as set forth in (c) may be selected through the utilization of a placement agent selected by the Designated Representatives after consultation with PMA if the use of such placement agent is determined by the Designated

Representatives to be in the best interests of the District, all as set forth in the Bond Notification.

Prior to the sale of the Bonds, the President, Executive Director or Director of Finance of the District is hereby authorized to approve and execute a commitment for the purchase of a

Municipal Bond Insurance Policy (as hereinafter defined), to further secure the Bonds, as long as the present value of the fee to be paid for the Municipal Bond Insurance Policy (using as a discount rate the expected yield on the Bonds treating the fee paid as interest on the Bonds) is less than the

-20- present value of the interest reasonably expected to be saved on the Bonds over the term of the

Bonds as a result of the Municipal Bond Insurance Policy.

Upon the sale of the Bonds, the Designated Representatives shall prepare a Notification of

Sale of the Bonds, which shall include the pertinent details of sale as provided herein (the “Bond

Notification”). In the Bond Notification, the Designated Representatives shall find and determine that the Refunding Conditions have been met, the Bonds have been sold at such price and bear interest at such rates that either the true interest cost (yield) or the net interest rate received upon the sale of the Bonds does not exceed the maximum rate otherwise authorized by applicable law and that the net present value debt service savings to the District as a result of the issuance of the

Bonds and the refunding of the Refunded Bonds is not less than 5.00% of the principal amount of the Refunded Bonds. The Bond Notification shall be entered into the records of the District and made available to the Board at the next regular meeting thereof; but such action shall be for information purposes only, and the Board shall have no right or authority at such time to approve or reject such sale as evidenced in the Bond Notification.

Upon the sale of the Bonds, as evidenced by the execution and delivery of the Bond

Notification by the Designated Representatives, the President, Secretary, Treasurer, Executive

Director, Director of Finance and any other officers of the District, as shall be appropriate, shall be and are hereby authorized and directed to approve or execute, or both, such documents of sale of the Bonds as may be necessary, including, without limitation, the contract for the sale of the

Bonds between the District and the Purchaser (the “Purchase Contract”). Prior to the execution and delivery of the Purchase Contract, the Designated Representatives shall find and determine that no person holding any office of the District either by election or appointment, is in any manner financially interested directly in his or her own name or indirectly in the name of any other person, association, trust or corporation, in the Purchase Contract.

-21- The use by the District of any Term Sheet relating to the Bonds (the “Term Sheet”), and the use by the Purchaser of any Preliminary Official Statement and any final Official Statement relating to the Bonds (the “Official Statement”), are hereby ratified, approved and authorized; the execution and delivery of the Term Sheet and the Official Statement is hereby authorized; and the officers of the Board are hereby authorized to take any action as may be required on the part of the

District to consummate the transactions contemplated by the Purchase Contract, this Ordinance, the Term Sheet, said Preliminary Official Statement, the Official Statement and the Bonds.

Section 9. Alternate Revenue Source; Appropriation; Additional Obligations; Tax Levy.

For the purpose of providing funds required to pay the interest on the Prior Alternate Bonds and the Bonds promptly when and as the same falls due, and to pay and discharge the principal thereof at maturity, the District covenants and agrees with the purchasers and the owners of the Bonds that the District will deposit the Pledged Revenues into the Bond Fund, as hereinafter defined.

Deposits of Pledged Revenues into the Bond Fund shall be on a parity with deposits of Pledged

Revenues into the bond funds for the Prior Alternate Bonds. The Pledged Revenues have been pledged to the payment of the Prior Alternate Bonds and the provision of not less than an additional

.25 times debt service. The Pledged Revenues are hereby pledged to the payment of the Bonds and the Board covenants and agrees to provide for, appropriate, collect and apply the Pledged

Revenues to the payment of the Bonds and the Prior Alternate Bonds and the provision of not less than an additional .25 times debt service.

The Bonds are being issued on a parity with the Prior Alternate Bonds. The District is authorized to issue from time to time additional bonds payable from the Pledged Revenues as permitted by law and such additional bonds may share ratably and equally in the Pledged Revenues with the Bonds and the Prior Alternate Bonds; provided, however, that no such additional bonds shall be issued except in accordance with the provisions of the Debt Reform Act.

-22- For the purpose of providing additional funds to pay the principal of and interest on the

Bonds, there is hereby levied upon all of the taxable property within the District, in the years for which any of the Bonds are outstanding, a direct annual tax for each of the years while the Bonds or any of them are outstanding, in amounts sufficient for that purpose, and there be and there hereby is levied upon all of the taxable property in the District the following direct annual taxes

(the “Pledged Taxes”):

FOR THE YEAR A TAX SUFFICIENT TO PRODUCE THE SUM OF:

2019 $2,200,000.00 for principal and interest up to and including December 15, 2020 2020 $2,200,000.00 for principal and interest 2021 $2,200,000.00 for principal and interest 2022 $2,200,000.00 for principal and interest 2023 $2,200,000.00 for principal and interest 2024 $2,200,000.00 for principal and interest 2025 $2,200,000.00 for principal and interest 2026 $2,200,000.00 for principal and interest 2027 $2,200,000.00 for principal and interest 2028 $2,200,000.00 for principal and interest 2029 $2,200,000.00 for principal and interest 2030 $2,200,000.00 for principal and interest 2031 $2,200,000.00 for principal and interest 2032 $2,200,000.00 for principal and interest Interest or principal coming due at any time when there are insufficient funds on hand from the Pledged Taxes to pay the same shall be paid promptly when due from current funds on hand in advance of the collection of the Pledged Taxes herein levied; and when the Pledged Taxes shall have been collected, reimbursement shall be made to said funds in the amount so advanced.

The District covenants and agrees with the purchasers and the owners of the Bonds that so long as any of the Bonds remain outstanding, the District will take no action or fail to take any action which in any way would adversely affect the ability of the District to collect the Pledged

Revenues or to levy and collect the Pledged Taxes. The District and its officers will comply with all present and future applicable laws in order to assure that the Pledged Revenues will be available

-23- and that the Pledged Taxes will be levied, extended and collected as provided herein and deposited in the Bond Fund.

To the extent that the taxes levied above exceed the amount necessary to pay debt service on the Bonds as set forth in the Bond Notification, the President, Secretary and Treasurer are hereby authorized to direct the abatement of such taxes to the extent of the excess of such levy in each year over the amount necessary to pay debt service on the Bonds in the following bond year.

Proper notice of such abatement shall be filed with the County Clerk in a timely manner to effect such abatement.

Section 10. Filing of Ordinance and Certificate of Reduction of Taxes. After this

Ordinance becomes effective, a copy hereof, certified by the Secretary, shall be filed with the

County Clerk and the County Clerk shall in and for each of the years required, ascertain the rate percent required to produce the aggregate Pledged Taxes hereinbefore provided to be levied in each of said years; and the County Clerk shall extend the same for collection on the tax books in connection with other taxes levied in said years in and by the District for general corporate purposes of the District; and in said years the Pledged Taxes shall be levied and collected by and for and on behalf of the District in like manner as taxes for general park purposes of the District for said years are levied and collected, and in addition to and in excess of all other taxes.

The President, Secretary and Treasurer be and the same are hereby directed to prepare and file with the County Clerk a Certificate of Reduction of Taxes Heretofore Levied for the Payment of Bonds showing the Refunded Bonds and directing the abatement of the taxes heretofore levied to pay the Refunded Bonds.

Section 11. Abatement of Pledged Taxes. Whenever funds are available to pay any principal of or interest on the Bonds when due, so as to enable the abatement of the Pledged Taxes levied for the same, the Board or the officers of the District acting with proper authority, shall

-24- direct the deposit of such funds into the Bond Fund (hereinafter defined) and shall direct the abatement of the Pledged Taxes by the amount of the Pledged Revenues so deposited, and proper notification of such abatement shall be filed with the County Clerk in a timely manner to effect such abatement. The District pledges to abate the levy for the Bonds only upon full funding of the

Bond Fund in the appropriate levy amount.

Section 12. Bond Fund. There is hereby established a special fund of the District known as the “Alternate Bond and Interest Fund of 2019” (the “Bond Fund”). The Pledged Revenues and the Pledged Taxes shall be set aside as collected and be deposited into the Bond Fund, which is a trust fund established for the purpose of carrying out the covenants, terms and conditions imposed upon the District by this Ordinance. The Bonds are secured by a pledge of all of the moneys on deposit in the Bond Fund, and such pledge is irrevocable until the Bonds have been paid in full or until the obligations of the District are discharged under this Ordinance.

Section 13. Use of Bond Proceeds; Call of the Prior Bonds. Any accrued interest received on the delivery of the Bonds and principal proceeds of the Bonds in the amount set forth in the Bond Notification are hereby appropriated for the purpose of paying first interest due on the

Bonds and are hereby ordered deposited into the Bond Fund. The remaining principal proceeds of the Bonds shall be used to provide for the Refunding and for the payment of costs of issuance and proceeds needed for the Refunding are hereby ordered deposited either (a) with Amalgamated

Bank of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, as paying agent for the Prior Bonds, or (b) in escrow pursuant to an escrow letter agreement to be entered into between the District and an escrow agent to be named in the Bond Notification, which shall be a bank or trust company authorized to do business in the State of Illinois (the “Escrow Agent”), in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit A

(the “Escrow Agreement”) and made a part hereof by this reference, or with such changes therein as shall be approved by the officers of the District executing the Escrow Agreement, such

-25- execution to constitute evidence of the approval of such changes, for the purpose of paying the principal of the Refunded Bonds upon redemption thereof. The Board approves the form, terms and provisions of the Escrow Agreement and directs the President and the Secretary to execute, attest, seal and deliver the Escrow Agreement in the name and on behalf of the District. Amounts in the escrow may be used to purchase Government Securities (as defined in the Escrow

Agreement) to provide for the principal of the Refunded Bonds upon redemption thereof. The

Escrow Agent, PMA and the Purchaser are each hereby authorized to act as agent for the District in the purchase of the Government Securities.

At the time of the issuance of the Bonds, the costs of issuance of the Bonds may be paid by the Purchaser on behalf of the District from the proceeds of the Bonds.

In accordance with the redemption provisions of the ordinance under which the Prior Bonds were issued, the District by the Board hereby makes provision for the payment of and does hereby call (subject only to the delivery of the Bonds) the Refunded Bonds for redemption and payment prior to maturity on their earliest practical redemption date, the same being December 15, 2019, or such later date as set forth in the Bond Notification.

Section 14. Non-Arbitrage and Tax-Exemption. The District hereby covenants that it will not take any action, omit to take any action or permit the taking or omission of any action within its control (including, without limitation, making or permitting any use of the proceeds of the

Bonds) if taking, permitting or omitting to take such action would cause any of the Bonds to be an arbitrage bond or a private activity bond within the meaning of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), or would otherwise cause the interest on the Bonds to be included in the gross income of the recipients thereof for federal income tax purposes. The District acknowledges that, in the event of an examination by the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) of the exemption from federal income taxation for interest paid on the Bonds, under present rules,

-26- the District may be treated as a “taxpayer” in such examination and agrees that it will respond in a commercially reasonable manner to any inquiries from the IRS in connection with such an examination.

The District also agrees and covenants with the purchasers and holders of the Bonds from time to time outstanding that, to the extent possible under Illinois law, it will comply with whatever federal tax law is adopted in the future which applies to the Bonds and affects the tax-exempt status of the Bonds.

The Board hereby authorizes the officials of the District responsible for issuing the Bonds, the same being the President, Secretary and Treasurer, to make such further covenants and certifications regarding the specific use of the proceeds of the Bonds as approved by the Board and as may be necessary to assure that the use thereof will not cause the Bonds to be arbitrage bonds and to assure that the interest on the Bonds will be exempt from federal income taxation. In connection therewith, the District and the Board further agree: (a) through their officers, to make such further specific covenants, representations as shall be truthful, and assurances as may be necessary or advisable; (b) to consult with counsel approving the Bonds and to comply with such advice as may be given; (c) to pay to the United States, as necessary, such sums of money representing required rebates of excess arbitrage profits relating to the Bonds; (d) to file such forms, statements, and supporting documents as may be required and in a timely manner; and (e) if deemed necessary or advisable by their officers, to employ and pay fiscal agents, financial advisors, attorneys, and other persons to assist the District in such compliance.

Section 15. Designation of Issue. The District hereby designates each of the Bonds as a

“qualified tax-exempt obligation” for the purposes and within the meaning of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code.

-27- Section 16. List of Bondholders. The Bond Registrar shall maintain a list of the names and addresses of the holders of all Bonds and upon any transfer shall add the name and address of the new Bondholder and eliminate the name and address of the transferor Bondholder.

Section 17. Duties of Bond Registrar. If requested by the Bond Registrar, the President and Secretary are authorized to execute the Bond Registrar’s standard form of agreement between the District and the Bond Registrar with respect to the obligations and duties of the Bond Registrar hereunder which may include the following:

(a) to act as bond registrar, authenticating agent, paying agent and transfer agent as provided herein;

(b) to maintain a list of Bondholders as set forth herein and to furnish such list to the District upon request, but otherwise to keep such list confidential;

(c) to give notice of redemption of Bonds as provided herein;

(d) to cancel and/or destroy Bonds which have been paid at maturity or upon redemption or submitted for exchange or transfer;

(e) to furnish the District at least annually a certificate with respect to Bonds cancelled and/or destroyed; and

(f) to furnish the District at least annually an audit confirmation of Bonds paid, Bonds outstanding and payments made with respect to interest on the Bonds. Section 18. Continuing Disclosure Undertaking. The President is hereby authorized, empowered and directed to execute and deliver a Continuing Disclosure Undertaking under

Section (b)(5) of Rule 15c2-12 adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Continuing Disclosure Undertaking”), if applicable. When the Continuing Disclosure Undertaking is executed and delivered on behalf of the District as herein provided, the Continuing Disclosure Undertaking will be binding on the

District and the officers, employees and agents of the District, and the officers, employees and agents of the District are hereby authorized, empowered and directed to do all such acts and things

-28- and to execute all such documents as may be necessary to carry out and comply with the provisions of the Continuing Disclosure Undertaking as executed. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Ordinance, the sole remedy for failure to comply with the Continuing Disclosure Undertaking shall be the ability of the beneficial owner of any Bond to seek mandamus or specific performance by court order to cause the District to comply with its obligations under the Continuing Disclosure

Undertaking.

Section 19. Record-Keeping Policy and Post-Issuance Compliance Matters. On

October 20, 2011, the Board adopted a record-keeping policy (the “Policy”) in order to maintain sufficient records to demonstrate compliance with its covenants and expectations to ensure the appropriate federal tax status for the debt obligations of the District, the interest on which is excludable from “gross income” for federal income tax purposes or which enable the District or the holder to receive federal tax benefits, including, but not limited to, qualified tax credit bonds and other specified tax credit bonds. The Board and the District hereby reaffirm the Policy.

Section 20. Municipal Bond Insurance. In the event the payment of principal and interest on the Bonds is insured pursuant to a municipal bond insurance policy (the “Municipal Bond

Insurance Policy”) issued by a bond insurer (the “Bond Insurer”), and as long as such Municipal

Bond Insurance Policy shall be in full force and effect, the District and the Bond Registrar agree to comply with such usual and reasonable provisions regarding presentment and payment of the

Bonds, subrogation of the rights of the Bondholders to the Bond Insurer upon payment of the

Bonds by the Bond Insurer, amendment hereof, or other terms, as approved by the President on advice of counsel, his or her approval to constitute full and complete acceptance by the District of such terms and provisions under authority of this Section.

Section 21. Treatment of Bonds as Debt. The Bonds shall be payable from the Pledged

Revenues and Pledged Taxes and do not and shall not constitute an indebtedness of the District

-29- within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation, unless the Pledged Taxes shall be extended pursuant to the general obligation, full faith and credit promise supporting the Bonds, as set forth in Section 9 hereof, in which case the amount of the Bonds then outstanding shall be included in the computation of indebtedness of the District for purposes of all statutory provisions or limitations until such time as an audit of the District shall show that the Bonds have been paid from the Pledged Revenues for a complete fiscal year, in accordance with the Debt Reform Act.

Section 22. Provisions a Contract. The provisions of this Ordinance shall constitute a contract between the District and the owners of the outstanding Bonds. All covenants relating to the Bonds and the conditions and obligations imposed by Section 15 of the Debt Reform Act are enforceable by any holder of the Bonds affected, any taxpayer of the District and the People of the

State of Illinois acting through the Attorney General or any designee.

Section 23. Severability. If any section, paragraph, clause or provision of this Ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unenforceable for any reason, the invalidity or unenforceability of such section, paragraph, clause or provision shall not affect any of the remaining provisions of this

Ordinance.

[REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

-30- Section 24. Repeal. All ordinances, resolutions or parts thereof in conflict herewith be and the same are hereby repealed and this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect forthwith upon its adoption.

Adopted September 5, 2019.

______President, Board of Park Commissioners

Attest:

______Secretary, Board of Park Commissioners

-31-

EXHIBIT A

FORM OF ESCROW LETTER AGREEMENT

______, 2019

______

Re: Park District of Oak Park, Cook County, Illinois $______General Obligation Refunding Park Bonds (Alternate Revenue Source), Series 2019

Ladies and Gentlemen:

The Park District of Oak Park, Cook County, Illinois (the “District”), by an ordinance adopted by the Board of Park Commissioners of the District (the “Board”) on the 5th day of September, 2019 (as supplemented by a notification of sale of bonds dated September ___, 2019, the “Bond Ordinance”), has authorized the issue and delivery of $______General Obligation Refunding Park Bonds (Alternate Revenue Source), Series 2019, dated ______, 2019 (the “Bonds”). The District has authorized by the Bond Ordinance that proceeds of the Bonds be used to pay and redeem on December 15, 2019 (the “Redemption Date”), $______of the District’s outstanding and unpaid General Obligation Park Bonds (Alternate Revenue Source), Series 2011, dated November 9, 2011, being [all of] the bonds outstanding from an issue in the aggregate principal amount of $9,995,000, fully registered and without coupons, due serially or subject to mandatory redemption on December 15 of the years and in the amounts and bearing interest at the rates per annum as follows:

YEAR OF PRINCIPAL RATE OF MATURITY AMOUNT INTEREST

2029 $2,690,000 4.000% 2031 4,020,000 4.000% 2033 2,155,000 4.125%

(the “Refunded Bonds”).

______, 2019 Page 2

The District hereby deposits with you $______from the proceeds of the Bonds and $______from funds of the District on hand and lawfully available (collectively, the “Deposit”) and you are hereby instructed as follows with respect thereto:

1. [Upon deposit, you are directed to hold the Deposit in an irrevocable trust fund account (the “Trust Account”) for the District to the benefit of the holders of the Refunded Bonds.] [Upon deposit, you are directed to purchase U.S. Treasury Securities [State and Local Government Series Certificates of Indebtedness] in the amount of $______and maturing as described on Exhibit A hereto (the “Securities”). You are further instructed to fund a beginning cash escrow deposit on demand in the amount of $______. The beginning deposit and the Securities are to be held in an irrevocable trust fund account (the “Trust Account”) for the District to the benefit of the holders of the Refunded Bonds.]

2. [You shall hold the Deposit in the Trust Account in cash for the sole and exclusive benefit of the holders of the Refunded Bonds until redemption of the Refunded Bonds on the Redemption Date is made.] [You shall hold the Securities and any interest income or profit derived therefrom and any uninvested cash in the Trust Account for the sole and exclusive benefit of the holders of the Refunded Bonds until redemption of the Refunded Bonds on the Redemption Date is made].

3. You shall promptly collect the principal, interest or profit from the proceeds deposited in the Trust Account and promptly apply the same as necessary to the payment of the Refunded Bonds as herein provided.

4. The District has called the Refunded Bonds for redemption and payment prior to maturity on the Redemption Date. You are hereby directed to provide for and give or cause Amalgamated Bank of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, as paying agent for the Refunded Bonds (the “Prior Paying Agent”), to give timely notice of the call for redemption of the Refunded Bonds. The form and time of the giving of such notice regarding the Refunded Bonds shall be as specified in the ordinance authorizing the issuance of the Refunded Bonds. The District agrees to reimburse you for any actual out-of-pocket expenses incurred in the giving of such notice, but the failure of the District to make such payment shall not in any respect whatsoever relieve you from carrying out any of the duties, terms or provisions of this Agreement.

5. In addition, you are hereby directed to give or cause the Prior Paying Agent to give notice of the call of the Refunded Bonds, on or before the date the notice of such redemption is given to the holders of the Refunded Bonds, to the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (the “MSRB”) through its Electronic Municipal Market Access system for municipal securities disclosure or through any other electronic format or system prescribed by the MSRB for purposes of Rule 15c2-12 adopted by the Securities and

______, 2019 Page 3

Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Information with respect to procedures for submitting notice can be found at https://msrb.org.

6. You shall remit the sum of $______on the Redemption Date to the Prior Paying Agent, such sum being sufficient to pay the principal of and interest on the Refunded Bonds on such date, and such remittance shall fully release and discharge you from any further duty or obligation thereto under this Agreement.

7. You shall make no payment of fees, due or to become due, of the bond registrar and paying agent on the Bonds or the Refunded Bonds. The District shall pay the same as they become due.

8. If at any time it shall appear to you that the funds on deposit in the Trust Account will not be sufficient to pay the principal of and interest on the Refunded Bonds, you shall notify the District not less than five (5) days prior to such payment date and the District shall make up the anticipated deficit from any funds legally available for such purpose so that no default in the making of any such payment will occur.

______, 2019 Page 2

9. Upon final disbursement of funds sufficient to pay the Refunded Bonds as hereinabove provided for, you shall transfer any balance remaining in the Trust Account to the District and thereupon this Agreement shall terminate.

Very truly yours,

PARK DISTRICT OF OAK PARK, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS

By ______President, Board of Park Commissioners

By ______Secretary, Board of Park Commissioners

Accepted this ___ day of ______, 2019.

______

By ______Its ______

Park Commissioner ______moved and Park Commissioner ______seconded the motion that said ordinance as presented and read by title be adopted.

After a full discussion thereof, the President directed that the roll be called for a vote upon the motion to adopt said ordinance.

Upon the roll being called, the following Park Commissioners voted AYE: ______

______

______and the following Park Commissioners voted NAY: ______.

Whereupon the President declared the motion carried and said ordinance adopted, approved and signed the same in open meeting and directed the Secretary to record the same in full in the records of the Board of Park Commissioners of the Park District of Oak Park, Cook

County, Illinois, which was done.

Other business not pertinent to the adoption of said ordinance was duly transacted at said meeting.

Upon motion duly made, seconded and carried, the meeting was adjourned.

______Secretary, Board of Park Commissioners

STATE OF ILLINOIS ) ) SS COUNTY OF COOK )

CERTIFICATION OF ORDINANCE AND MINUTES

I, the undersigned, do hereby certify that I am the duly qualified and acting Secretary of the Board of Park Commissioners of the Park District of Oak Park, Cook County, Illinois (the “Board”), and as such official am the keeper of the records and files of the Board.

I further certify that the foregoing is a full, true and complete transcript of that portion of the minutes of the meeting of the Board held on the 5th day of September, 2019, insofar as the same relates to the adoption of Ordinance No. 2019-08-01 entitled:

AN ORDINANCE providing for the issue of not to exceed $9,100,000 General Obligation Refunding Park Bonds (Alternate Revenue Source), Series 2019, of the Park District of Oak Park, Cook County, Illinois, for the purpose of refunding certain outstanding alternate bonds of said Park District, providing for the pledge of certain revenues to the payment of principal and interest on said bonds and the levy of a direct annual tax sufficient to pay such principal and interest if the pledged revenues are insufficient to make such payment and authorizing the sale of said bonds to the purchaser thereof. a true, correct and complete copy of which said ordinance as adopted at said meeting appears in the foregoing transcript of the minutes of said meeting.

I do further certify that the deliberations of the Board on the adoption of said ordinance were conducted openly, that the vote on the adoption of said ordinance was taken openly, that said meeting was held at a specified time and place convenient to the public, that notice of said meeting was duly given to all of the news media requesting such notice, that an agenda for said meeting was posted at the location where said meeting was held and at the principal office of the Board at least 48 hours in advance of the holding of said meeting, that at least one copy of said agenda was continuously available for public review during the entire 48-hour period preceding said meeting, that a true, correct and complete copy of said agenda as so posted is attached hereto as Exhibit A, that said meeting was called and held in strict compliance with the provisions of the Open Meetings Act of the State of Illinois, as amended, and with the provisions of the Park District Code of the State of Illinois, as amended, and that the Board has complied with all of the provisions of said Act and said Code and with all of the procedural rules of the Board.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto affix my official signature and seal of said Park District, this 5th day of September, 2019.

______Secretary, Board of Park Commissioners (SEAL)

-2-

STATE OF ILLINOIS ) ) SS COUNTY OF COOK )

FILING CERTIFICATE I, the undersigned, do hereby certify that I am the duly qualified and acting County Clerk of Cook County, Illinois, and as such official I do further certify that on the ____ day of

______, 2019, there was filed in my office a duly certified copy of Ordinance No. 2019-

08-01 entitled:

AN ORDINANCE providing for the issue of not to exceed $9,100,000 General Obligation Refunding Park Bonds (Alternate Revenue Source), Series 2019, of the Park District of Oak Park, Cook County, Illinois, for the purpose of refunding certain outstanding alternate bonds of said Park District, providing for the pledge of certain revenues to the payment of principal and interest on said bonds and the levy of a direct annual tax sufficient to pay such principal and interest if the pledged revenues are insufficient to make such payment and authorizing the sale of said bonds to the purchaser thereof. duly adopted by the Board of Park Commissioners of the Park District of Oak Park, Cook County,

Illinois, on the 5th day of September, 2019, and that the same has been deposited in the official files and records of my office.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto affix my official signature and the seal of said County, this ____ day of ______, 2019.

______County Clerk of Cook County, Illinois (SEAL)

VII.3

Memo To: David Wick, Vice President, Parks & Planning Committee Board of Park Commissioners

From: Chris Lindgren, Superintendent of Park & Planning

Date: August 16, 2019

Re: Dole Center HVAC Building Automation System Replacement

Statement Dole Learning Center was built in 1926, and donated to the Village of Oak Park (VOP) in 1939, by Andrew and Mary Dole, who also owned Cheney Mansion. The Village used it as a library branch for several decades and added recreational programming in the late 1970s. Dole Center underwent a major renovation in 2002, which made the building ADA accessible. In addition to the Village, the Oak Park Library and the Park District occupied parts of Dole Center through an intergovernmental agreement and all three entities had contributed to a sinking fund for the utility costs, janitorial services, and maintenance of the building.

The PDOP staff with the assistance of legal counsel, engaged in conversation with VOP over the past twelve months. An agreement was reached to allow the PDOP to purchase the building for $1. Additionally, the PDOP had to agree to abide by the tenants of the Deed and that if the Park District ever wanted to sell the facility, the Village of Oak Park would get right to first refusal

Discussion The Park District has allocated $250,000 in our 2019 CIP for repairs and upgrades to the Dole Center. The existing conditions of the facility was in need of work in multiple areas. Staff have compiled a prioritized list and a schedule for the work needed. Flooring, painting, stairwells, gutters, landscaping, plumbing, and electrical work has already been accomplished.

Staff put together bid specifications and went out to bid on August 7, bids due on August 29. To date, there have been ten firms to download plans and specifications for the project. The budget has $100,000 remaining for miscellaneous repairs.

Recommendation The Parks and Planning Committee will bring the lowest responsive, responsible bidder to the Continued Regular Board Meeting on September 5, 2019.

Park District of Oak Park 218 Madison Street ▪ Oak Park, Illinois 60302 ▪ ph: (708) 725-2000 ▪ fx: (708) 383-5702 ▪ www.pdop.org