Introduction 1 Influence, Image, and the Movement of Time
Notes Introduction 1. Oxford English Dictionary. 2. Ibid. 3. Ibid. 4. W.J.T. Mitchell, Iconology: Image, Text, Ideology (University of Chicago Press, 1986), p. 9. 1 Influence, Image, and the Movement of Time 1. Jonathan Lethem, ‘The Ecstasy of Influence: A Plagiarism’, Harper’s Magazine, February 2007, 59– 71. 2. Elizabeth Petrino, ‘Allusion, Echo, and Literary Influence in Emily Dickinson’, The Emily Dickinson Journal, 19:1 (2010), 80– 102 (p. 80). 3. Ibid. 4. Andrew Elfenbein, ‘On the Discrimination of Influences’, Modern Language Quarterly, 69:4 (2008), 481– 507 (p. 486). 5. Katherine Haake, ‘Against Reading’, in Can it Really Be Taught? Resisting Lore in Creative Writing Pedagogy (Portsmouth: Boynton/Cook, 2007), 14– 27 (p. 21). 6. Joseph Bristow, Effeminate England: Homoerotic Writing after 1885 (Buckingham: Open University Press, 1995), p. 175. 7. Alan Sinfield, ‘Culture, Consensus and Difference: Angus Wilson to Alan Hollinghurst’, in British Culture of the Postwar: An Introduction to Literature and Society, 1945– 1999, ed. Alistair Davies and Alan Sinfield (London: Routledge, 2000), pp. 83– 102 (pp. 95– 6). And to this list I would add: a refinement of Christopher Isherwood, a judgement of Robert Mapplethorpe, and a cultiva- tion of Harold Acton. 8. Bristow, Effeminate England, pp. 174– 5. Taking into account Hollinghurst’s recurrent fascination with Henry James’s ‘The Aspern Papers’ (1888) and ‘The Death of the Lion’ (1894), this image of a forbidding textual archive seems especially relevant, and it is, indeed, the challenges of influence pre- sented by these Jamesian archives to which I will turn in later chapters. 9.
[Show full text]