Relations Bet\A/Een the Sultanates of Malwa and Gujarat Master Of
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Relations Bet\A/een the Sultanates of Malwa and Gujarat DISSERTATION SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE C Master of Philosophy IN HISTORY By FAIZA SIMIN Under the Supervision of Mr. Iqtidar Alam Khan CENTRE OF /\DVAMCED STUDY Departmant of History Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh 1982 as 3 * MNi vi.Ro DS322 It is to certify that Miss Fai2» Sljniii*8 M.Phil, dissertation "Relations Between th» Sultanates of Malwa and Gu.1arat" is based on her original research and it is ready for submission for the a\iard of M.Phil, degree. (IQTIDAII KUM KHUI) Reader, Deoartonent of History, AMU, Aligarh. 20.5.1982 £1 Ji J Jiii ACKNOyLeOGCMCMTS 1 ITROOUCTION 2 1. Thfl Coininon Boundary of tha Kingdona of Gujarat and Maltuat 1407-1526 19 A • Map of the Boundariaa of Halvua and Gujarat (1407-U83). B * Map of tha Boundariaa of Maluia and Gujarat (1484-1513) C - Map of the Boundariaa of Maluia and Gujarat (1514-1526) 2. Natra of frequant conflicto batu/een Gujarat and Mai'uta) An aaaeaanant of tha oontaaiporary clalMa and eharactarlzatlona* 44 ?• Role of 2iaai"dar« in tha mutual ralationa of Gujarat anci Malwa 63 A - Map of the zamindaria of Gujarat and Maltua 4, The role of ule«a and waehaikh in Mflwa - Gujarat ralatlono SB SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 102 BIBLIOGRAPHY 111 1 i£JSii£^iiJfi£il!JIJiI It la ny plaaaant duty to Bnptmna my gratitude toiuarda thoaa froM u/hon I have rscelvad help and moral encouragnaant in turlting thia diaaertatlon. My sense of obligation tou/ards my si^arvisor, Hr.Iqtidar Alam Khan, is beyond any expression, My parents have been a constant source of inspiration and moral support. I am especially grateful to my grandfather for taking the trouble of procuring books for me from the Maulana Azad Library, I am extremely thankful to my esteemed teacher, Profaasor Irfan Habib, for hia unfailing help and to Or(Mlss) Shireen Mooawi and Or(Mrs,) Puahpa Prasad for thair raady support. All ny reaaaroh colleaguea and friends have asaisted me in innumerable luays in the course ef my urark and though I feel aiukiuard in naming them indiwi- dually, I am moat deeply grateful to each one of them, Mr, Zahoor A,Khan, nr.Faiz Habib, and Mr.Aftab Aziz have very kindly draum the maps, I have received much help from the stafj of the Seminar Library, Department of History, and the staff of Maulana Azad Library(manu«cript division), Mr, S.A,A, Rizvi haa typed the dissertation with care and accuracy, I am thankful to all of than. /« * * May, 1982 ''^*^« S^"^" IltII££iiCIJ£N_ The disintegration of the Delhi Sultanate under the Tughlaq dynaaty brought in ita tuake a number of regional potuera. Such ivara tha origins of the regional kingdoMS that roae-up in tha adjacent, but geographically demarcated* territories of Malufa and Gujarat. Thia aituation had a long hiatorical tradition going as far back aa the 4th century B,C, t A atrong, central authority, based in the Plains of Northern India, and having the capacity to hold together vast territories, mould alao rule over both these regions - but only so long as it could subdue the turbulent chieftaina in these territories. The Mauryan Capire (400 B.C. - 165 B.C.) uues perhaps (1) the first pouter to achieve this position. A sinilar position obtained under the Guptas (395 A.O. • 470 A.D.)^?>. — The only instance luhen e regionel power, not hauing at its disposal the vast reaouroes of northern India, sinultanaously controlled both (1) For Hauryan hold over Gujarat and Halwa, aee M.S. Coamiiaaa- riet, A History of Gularat. vol. I, Bombay, 1938,pp.XXy, XXVI. The edicts of Ashoka, found at Girnar and Sopara, are cited by him in thia connexion. (2) Cf. the ooina of Samudra Gupta and tha Girnar Inscription of Skanda Gupta, dated 456 A.O., and inciaed on Asokan rock edict (n.3. Commissariat^ op.clt.. p. XUII)} 3os«ph Schwartjtberg, A Historical Atlas of South Asia. Chicago Ik London, 1978, Plate XIV, 1, p. 145. Gujarat and Maltua is of tha Kahatr^ja during tha 2nd century (1) A»D, an axoaptlon only proving the rule that, in tha abaanoa of a atrong eentral pouiar, Gujarat and Haliua had the tendency to allp under the control of independent authoritiea whieh itfould be confined to their natural boundaries. As a matter of fact, for the major part of the period intervening bettuean tha fall of tha Gupta Cisplra and the establiahnent of the Delhi Sultanate there flaouriahed in Haluia and Gujarat a number of regional pouiars that u^ere resistant of integration under a central potuar. During thia period several minor dynasties, notably, the Vakatakas, the Hunas, the later Guptas and tha early Kalschuris} the Paramaraa, the GurJara«43ratiharas, the Rashtrakutas, tha Chavadas (also called Chalukyas or Solankis) and the Vaghelas, etc, separately held these rich and fertile (2) plains under their sovereignty* Alauddin Khalji conquered Gujarat in 1298-99 A.D. (3) (4) (698 M.H.) and than Maluia in 1304-5 A,D. (704 A.H.) and (1) M.S. Commiasariat, op«cit..pp. XXXII-XX-XXXW. Refers to Chastana*s coins and Rudraaan 1st*a rock edict inscription of Girnar near Dunagarh, dated 150 A.O, (2) For details regarding all these local dynasties, see M.S. Cotiifflissariat.op.cit..PP.IV.VI.XXXWIII-XXXIX. IXXVII-IXXlXi also J.K.Farbss.^as Mala. OUP ,Vol.I,pp.252,257-8; V.i.Mishra The Gurlara-Pratiharas and Their Times.Nem Delhi, 1966 ^p ,52| 3oseph Schtu8rtzberg,jB£.jg|J^.,Plates XlV,liios.I-Zn,pp.l45-47. (3) Yahya airhindi.Tarikh-i Mubarak Shahi.Bibliotheca Indkea Series,Calcutta,1931,P.76|Nizamuddin Ahmad.Tabagat-J Akbari. Nswal Kishors ed.. 1S7 5.\/ol.l.pp.69-70;Firishta.Tarikh-i\ Firishta.Namal Kishors sd.,1884,Vol,X,p.l03.Also Commissariat op.cit.P.2iSC WisgaCThs Rjss of Muslim Power in Gu.1arat.iared p,63)is of the viauf that although Gujarat was eonqusrsd in>. 1298-89 AO. it was not attachsd to the Delhi Sultanate untlA 1305 A.O. \ (4) See Niiamuddin Ahmad, OP.cit.. p.72j Firishta, op.cit. .P . 115t' annexed both the regions to the Delhi SuUanate . Henceforth, Gujarat and nalua practically remained a part of the Delhi Sultanate till the end of the 14th cent. A. D. The beginning of the 15th century aatu the collapae of the Tughlaq dynasty under the impact of Timur'e invasion and Governors of provinces like Gujarat, flaltua, 3aunpur, (1) Bengal, etc., proclaimed their ind^sendence. Though thess regional kingdoms lusraj^roducts of anarchy, and harboured Mutual tensions and conflicts, they continued to exist, with varying fortunes, dotun to the end of the 15th century, Gujarat became independent in 1407-8 A.D, (810 H.H.) uihen its last Tuglaq Governor, Zefar Khan, ta|f:ing advantage of Timur'e invasion, assumsd the sovereign title of Muzaffar (2) Shah I. Thia dynaety ruled over Gujarat from 1407<»8 A,D. to 1572-73 (810 A.M.- 980 A.M.). It luas abolishsd only aftsr (3) Akbar finally annex ad Gujarat to ths Mughal Empire. P. (4) f.n, of prev. contd.f Rushbrook Williams, An Empire Builder of Sixteenth Century. Delhi,1916,p.10. All of these concur on 1304-5 AD ae the data of the annexation of flalwa. But Yahya SirhindKop.cit.. PP ,77-78) placee the event in 1300 AD (700 AH), (1) (2) Baburnama.Bombay.1890.0.189: Nizamuddin Ahmad.ap.cit..Vol. III,p.448;Sh8ikh Abdul Haque Muhaddis Dehalvi.op .cit..p.26t Firishta.op.oi.t..vol.II.p.181t Sikender bin Manjhu, Wlrat-i Sikanderi.Barode. 1961,p.21. (3) 'ibul Fazl, Akbar name. Bibliotheca Indiea Series, Calcutta, 1878,VoI,n,pp.368-72; Nizamuddin Ahmad.OP.cit.. p.444. similarly ths kingdom of Maltus waa eatabllahed In 1404-5 A.O. (807 A,H,) by Dilauar Khan Ghori luho had been appointed Gowarnor of the roglon by the last Tughlaq ruler. (1) Sultan fluhammad Shah. With the replacement of tha Ghori dynasty by the Kha|ji8 in 1436-9 A,D. (842 A.H.), «ah«ud Khaljl (2) I seized pouier in Naliua sftet poisoning Ghaznl Khan. Ths Kings of this dynasty ruled Maluja till 1531-32 (937 A.H,), Subsequently (3) Maliua uuas annaxad by Bahadur Shah of Gujarat, Zn this dissertation lue havs aimed a rsvleun of the long history of interaction bstu>een the kingdoms of nalwa and Gujarat during tha period from 1407 A.O. to 1526 M.O, Whils our study of the yoars 1407 - 1498 M.O. is in the nature of a background, a more detailed treatment of the evidence for the period 1498 A.O. - 1526 A.O. has been attempted. The study has been undertaken in the hope that it mould, on the one hand, give fresh insights into tha nature and causes of struggle and discard betwaen the tu<o states in question during the 15th and first querter of ths 16th centuries. On ths (1) Nizamuddin Ahmad, p.533; Sheikh Abdul Haque Huhaddia Dehlavi, p.26{ Firisbka, P.234. (2) aMikli Shihab Hekim^ Wa*a»ir-i Piahmud Shaht. Delhi, 1968, PP.33-5| Nizamuddin AhRiad,p.461) ririshts,p . 190. (3) Nizamuddin Ahmad, pp. 501-2; Firishta, p«2t7t Sikander bin Manjhu, qp.c^it., pp. 277-8. b other hand, It aight prowlds us uuith an analogy for tha kind of •oolo-politioal conflict* and compromiaaa that luers devedoping in Northern and Central India aa a vuhola, on the eve of Babur'e invaaion.