DOCSLIB.ORG

Using Lies: Holocaust Denial and the British Far-Right 1943-2001

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

THE UNIVERSITY OF WINCHESTER Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences Using Lies: Holocaust Denial by the British Far Right 1942-2001 Mark James Hobbs Doctor of Philosophy May 2014 This Thesis has been completed as a requirement for a postgraduate research degree of the University of Winchester The word count is: 103,105 THE UNIVERSITY OF WINCHESTER ABSTRACT OF THESIS Using Lies: Holocaust Denial by the British Far Right 1942-2001 Mark James Hobbs Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences Doctor of Philosophy June 2013 This thesis provides a detailed and nuanced analysis of how Holocaust denial was absorbed into British far-right thought and how it was disseminated by different individuals and groups found within that political composition. Drawing on the work of historians and academics who have examined Holocaust denial, I explore both the internal and externalising use of denial within British far right parties and movements and how it served as a ‘history’ for the far right. A ‘history’ which allowed the far-right to make sense of a changing world; serving its ideological belief that a worldwide Jewish conspiracy controlled the past and present. By empirical examination of different publications of far right individuals and groups over a period of nearly sixty years I highlight that while the presentation of denial, and sites of attack on the Holocaust, evolved and changed, the basic sentiments of denial remained fixed. In doing so, the thesis supports the findings of other historians who have studied denial and demonstrated how it is an ideologically driven and mendacious reconstruction of the past. Yet in supporting these findings the thesis questions why - when Holocaust denial has been demonstrated as a false history - Holocaust denial has been presented as such a threat to the historical understanding and memory of the Holocaust by historians and academics. This thesis suggests that new approaches and debates over understanding and studying Holocaust denial are needed. By tracing the progression of denial, in a specific movement, since the end of the Holocaust new, insights are gained by understanding how denial supports the individual ideologies of the groups which propagate it. As such, this thesis makes a timely contribution to both existing knowledge of Holocaust denial and of place of Holocaust denial in academic discourses. 1 Contents 2 Graphs in Thesis 3 Abbreviations 4 Declaration and Copyright Statement 5 Acknowledgements 6 Introduction: Finding Clio, Postmodernism, History and Holocaust denial 7 Part One: Initial Far Right Responses to the Nazi Persecution of the Jews 51 Chapter One: Holocaust Denial in Embryo, Alexander Ratcliffe and Britain 1942-45 52 Chapter Two: Arnold Spenser Leese and the British Far-Right after the Holocaust 96 Part Two: Building Holocaust Denial in the Far Right 139 Chapter Three: Colin Jordan, the Revolutionary Far-Right: the Presentation and Persistence of Holocaust Denial 140 Chapter Four: John Tyndall, Holocaust Denial in the National Front and BNP 182 Part Three: Fighting the Present Using the Past 214 Chapter Five: Understanding David Irving: Holocaust Denial, Far-Right Ideology, History and Society. 215 Conclusion: Clio in Chains: the British Far Right and The (Ab)Use of History 248 Bibliography 262 Appendix One: A Diagram demonstrating the connections between the main figures of the British far right. 280 Appendix Two: An Example of Arnold Leese’s Gothic Ripples. 281 Appendix Three: An example of how Colin Jordan’s National Socialist Movement presented ‘the Hitler was right’ message to the public 282 Appendix Four: Colin Jordan’s ‘Election special’ in Gothic Ripples. 283 2 Graphs in Thesis The graphs below indicate the responses and year of those responses to The British Institute for Public Opinion’s commissioned survey on feeling towards the Jews in society. Fig. 1: Results for 1939 73 Fig. 2: Results for 1940 74 Fig. 3: Results for 1942 74 Fig. 4: Results for 1943 76 Fig. 5: Years combined 76 The graph below indicates the responses given to the following question: Do you think the persecution of Jews in German is an obstacle to good understanding between Britain and Germany? Fig 6: 1938 German persecution of Jews 77 3 Abbreviations ANP American Nazi Party BFF British Freedom Fighters BM British Movement BNP British National Party BPP British Peoples Party BUF British Union of Fascists GBM Greater Britain Movement IFL Imperial Fascist League JHR Journal of Historical Review LEL League of Empire Loyalist NF National Front NNF New National Front NS National Socialist League NSM National Socialist Movement NWM National Workers Movement RPS Racial Preservation Society SPL Scottish Protestant League UM Union Movement WDL White Defence League WUNS World Union of National Socialists 4 Declaration No portion of the work referred to in this Thesis has been submitted in support of an application for another degree or qualification of this or any other university or other institute of learning. I confirm that this Thesis is entirely my own work. Copyright in text of this Thesis rests with the author. Copies (by any process) either in full, or of extracts, may be made only in accordance with the instructions given by the author. Details may be obtained from the RKE office University of Winchester. This page must form part of any such copies made. Further copies (by any process) of copies made in accordance with such instructions may not be made without the permission (in writing) of the author. Where issues of intellectual property arise, these should be addressed in accordance with the University of Winchester’s Intellectual Property Policy and an appropriate comment defining ownership should be included immediately following the Declaration and Copyright statements listed above. 5 Acknowledgements The completion of this thesis has been made possible with the guidance, assistance and support of a number of individuals and institutions. I must first and foremost thank my supervisor, Professor Tom Lawson, who offered immense help and guided me through what has been intense and challenging subject matter and given me many invaluable insights into the Holocaust historiography and the philosophy of history. My second supervisor, Dr Mark Allen, has provided invaluable help and guidance and provided many important insights into the contexts in which this thesis resides. Furthermore I owe a great deal of thanks to, Dr Colin Haydon and Dr James Jordan, for their helpful comments and feedback. I am also indebted to the University of Winchester for both their three-year scholarship and the support of administrative and academic staff, without which this undertaking would have been impossible. I am also grateful to many individuals outside of the University of Winchester which have offered encouragement and provided valuable advice: my upgrade examiner Dr Gavin Shaffer; Dr Graham Macklin who has given me many helpful insights into British far-right movements. I must also thank other individual professionals, who have provided support, interest or influenced my thoughts in various different academic settings: Professor Cathie Carmichael, Professor Dan Stone, Professor David Cesarani, Dr Olaf Jensen, Dr Paul Behrens, Professor Debórah Dwark, Professor Robert Eaglestone, Professor Omar Bartov and Dr Kasia Person. I would also like to thank the Strassler Centre for Holocaust and Genocide studies for allowing me to present at their second international graduate conference and to Royal Holloway University for their two week residential scholarship. These academic forums provided an excellent environment for academic discussion and allowed me to meet a wide range of academics and students from different disciplines who influenced my thinking. I would also like to thank a number of intuitions which have assisted me on the course of my research: the British Library and Collingdale Centre, Wiener library, National Archives, Mass Observation Archive, University of East Anglia, Senate House Library and the Holocaust Education Trust. Finally, on a personal note, I must thank a number of people who have provided invaluable friendship and company throughout my research. In no particular order my deepest thanks to, Victoria James, Kate Tremain, Clare Harding, George Dickson, Jamie Jaques, Lauren Jaques, Rebecca Lofts, Lorraine Chandler, Holly Bessell, Dan Bessell, Vita Kauzonalite, Mike Innes, Nicola Allen, Emma Brothwood, David Williams, Emily Stiles, and Kara Critchell. Thank you to my family, my sister Susie and my parents, Ann and Nigel, for all their love, guidance and support throughout my life. Thank you to my Uncle John and late Aunt Lorraine Kemp who always provided love support and took care of me as if I were their own. My last words go to Craig Frost, whose love and support brings me immeasurable happiness - thank you, my love. 6 Introduction: Finding Clio, Postmodernism, History and Holocaust denial The study of Holocaust denial has been marked by a tendency to examine it as one cohesive and collective movement. It is clear that Holocaust deniers are united in their desire to mendaciously rewrite history. This desire stems from a need to provide epistemological support to underpin the ideological assumptions of different extremist groups. This reformulation of the past has, as Stern agues, become an international phenomenon: Holocaust denial, in fact, may be the single most potent ideological force tying together a variety of extremists from around the globe—including old Nazis, neo- Nazis,
Recommended publications
  • Celebrities As Political Representatives: Explaining the Exchangeability of Celebrity Capital in the Political Field

    Celebrities As Political Representatives: Explaining the Exchangeability of Celebrity Capital in the Political Field

    Celebrities as Political Representatives: Explaining the Exchangeability of Celebrity Capital in the Political Field Ellen Watts Royal Holloway, University of London Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Politics 2018 Declaration I, Ellen Watts, hereby declare that this thesis and the work presented in it is entirely my own. Where I have consulted the work of others, this is always clearly stated. Ellen Watts September 17, 2018. 2 Abstract The ability of celebrities to become influential political actors is evident (Marsh et al., 2010; Street 2004; 2012, West and Orman, 2003; Wheeler, 2013); the process enabling this is not. While Driessens’ (2013) concept of celebrity capital provides a starting point, it remains unclear how celebrity capital is exchanged for political capital. Returning to Street’s (2004) argument that celebrities claim to speak for others provides an opportunity to address this. In this thesis I argue successful exchange is contingent on acceptance of such claims, and contribute an original model for understanding this process. I explore the implicit interconnections between Saward’s (2010) theory of representative claims, and Bourdieu’s (1991) work on political capital and the political field. On this basis, I argue celebrity capital has greater explanatory power in political contexts when fused with Saward’s theory of representative claims. Three qualitative case studies provide demonstrations of this process at work. Contributing to work on how celebrities are evaluated within political and cultural hierarchies (Inthorn and Street, 2011; Marshall, 2014; Mendick et al., 2018; Ribke, 2015; Skeggs and Wood, 2011), I ask which key factors influence this process.
  • The Rise of Populism in Europe Can Be Traced Through Online Behaviour...”

    The Rise of Populism in Europe Can Be Traced Through Online Behaviour...”

    “The rise of populism in Europe can be traced through online behaviour...” THE NEW FACE OF DIGITAL POPULISM Jamie Bartlett Jonathan Birdwell Mark Littler Demos is a think-tank focused on power and politics. Our unique approach challenges the traditional, 'ivory tower' model of policymaking by giving a voice to people and communities. We work together with the groups and individuals who are the focus of our research, including them in citizens’ juries, deliberative workshops, focus groups and ethnographic research. Through our high quality and socially responsible research, Demos has established itself as the leading independent think-tank in British politics. In 2011, our work is focused on five programmes: Family and Society; Public Services and Welfare; Violence and Extremism; Public Interest and Political Economy. We also have two political research programmes: the Progressive Conservatism Project and Open Left, investigating the future of the centre-Right and centre-Left. Our work is driven by the goal of a society populated by free, capable, secure and powerful citizens. Find out more at www.demos.co.uk. THE NEW FACE OF DIGITAL POPULISM Jamie Bartlett Jonathan Birdwell Mark Littler First published in 2011 © Demos. Some rights reserved Magdalen House, 136 Tooley Street London, SE1 2TU, UK ISBN 978-1-906693-86-2 Copy edited by Susannah Wight Series design by modernactivity Typeset by modernactivity Set in Gotham Rounded and Baskerville 10 Open access. Some rights reserved. As the publisher of this work, Demos wants to encourage the circulation of our work as widely as possible while retaining the copyright. We therefore have an open access policy which enables anyone to access our content online without charge.
  • 2.3 Holocaust Denial

    2.3 Holocaust Denial

    nm u Ottawa L'Universite eanadienne Canada's university mn FACULTE DES ETUDES SUPERIEURES 1=^1 FACULTY OF GRADUATE AND ET POSTOCTORALES U Ottawa POSDOCTORAL STUDIES L'Universite eanadienne Canada's university Johny-Angel Butera AUTEUR DE LA THESE / AUTHOR OF THESIS M.A. (Criminology) GRADE/DEGREE Department of Criminology FACULTE, ECOLE, DEPARTEMENT / FACULTY, SCHOOL, DEPARTMENT Genocide Denial on the Internet: The Cases of Armenia and Rwanda TITRE DE LA THESE / TITLE OF THESIS Maritza Felices-Luna DIRECTEUR (DIRECTRICE) DE LA THESE / THESIS SUPERVISOR CO-DIRECTEUR (CO-DIRECTRICE) DE LA THESE /THESIS CO-SUPERVISOR Daniel dos Santos Valerie Steeves Gary W. Slater Le Doyen de la Faculte des etudes superieures et postdoctorales / Dean of the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies GENOCIDE DENIAL ON THE INTERNET: THE CASES OF ARMENIA AND RWANDA Johny-Angel Butera Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the MA degree in Criminology Department of Criminology Faculty of Social Sciences University of Ottawa © Johny-Angel Butera, Ottawa, Canada, 2010 Library and Archives Bibliotheque et 1*1 Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre r&terence ISBN: 978-0-494-73798-9 Our file Notre r6f6rence ISBN: 978-0-494-73798-9 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license
  • Name of Registered Political Party Or Independent Total

    Name of Registered Political Party Or Independent Total

    Final Results 2016 GLA ELECTIONS ELECTION OF THE LONDON ASSEMBLY MEMBERS Declaration of Results of Poll I hereby give notice as Greater London Returning Officer at the election of the London Wide Assembly Members held on 5th May 2016 that the number of votes recorded at the election is as follows: - Name of Registered Political Party or Independent Total Votes Animal Welfare Party 25810 Britain First - Putting British people first 39071 British National Party 15833 Caroline Pidgeon's London Liberal Democrats 165580 Christian Peoples Alliance 27172 Conservative Party 764230 Green Party - "vote Green on orange" 207959 Labour Party 1054801 Respect (George Galloway) 41324 The House Party - Homes for Londoners 11055 UK Independence Party (UKIP) 171069 Women's Equality Party 91772 Total number of good votes 2615676 The number of ballot papers rejected was as follows:- (a) Unmarked 18842 (b) Uncertain 1127 (c) Voting for too many 9613 (d) Writing identifying voter 145 (e) Want of official mark 6 Total 29733 And I do hereby declare that on the basis of the total number of London votes cast for each party and number of constituency seats they have gained, the eleven London Member seats have been allocated and filled as follows. Seat Number Name of Registered Political Party or Independent 1 Green Party - "vote Green on orange" 2 UK Independence Party (UKIP) 3 Caroline Pidgeon's London Liberal Democrats 4 Conservative Party 5 Conservative Party 6 Labour Party 7 Green Party - "vote Green on orange" 8 Labour Party 9 Conservative Party 10 Labour Party
  • American Jewish Year Book

    American Jewish Year Book

    AMERICAN JEWISH YEAR BOOK A Record of Events iind Trends in American and World Jewish Life 1979 AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE AND JEWISH PUBLICATION SOCIETY OF AMERICA The 1979 AMERICAN JEWISH YEAR BOOK, the seventy-ninth in the series, continues to offer a unique chronicle of developments in areas of concern to Jews throughout the world. The present volume features Professor Charles Liebman s "Leadership and Decision-making in a Jewish Federation." This in- depth study of the New York Fed- eration of Jewish Philanthropies provides important insights into the changing outlook of American Jews, and the impact this is having on Jewish communal priorities. Another feature is Professor Leon Shapiro's "Soviet Jewry Since the Death of Stalin," an authoritative overview of Jewish life in the So- viet Union during the past twenty- five years. Particularly noteworthy is Professor Shapiro's emphasis on religious life and cultural endeavors. The review of developments in the United States includes Milton Ellerin's "Intergroup Relations"; George Gruen's "The United States, Israel and the Middle East"; and Geraldine Rosenfield's "The Jewish Community Responds to (Continued on back flap) $15. American Jewish Year Book American Jewish Year Book 1 VOLUME 79 Prepared by THE AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE Editors MORRIS FINE MILTON HIMMELFARB Associate Editor DAVID SINGER THE AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE NEW YORK THE JEWISH PUBLICATION SOCIETY OF AMERICA PHILADELPHIA COPYRIGHT, 1978 BY THE AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE AND THE JEWISH PUBLICATION SOCIETY OF AMERICA All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form without permission in writing from the publisher: except by a reviewer who may quote brief passages in a review to be printed in a magazine or newspaper.
  • Using Diaries to Understand the Final Solution in Poland

    Using Diaries to Understand the Final Solution in Poland

    Miranda Walston Witnessing Extermination: Using Diaries to Understand the Final Solution in Poland Honours Thesis By: Miranda Walston Supervisor: Dr. Lauren Rossi 1 Miranda Walston Introduction The Holocaust spanned multiple years and states, occurring in both German-occupied countries and those of their collaborators. But in no one state were the actions of the Holocaust felt more intensely than in Poland. It was in Poland that the Nazis constructed and ran their four death camps– Treblinka, Sobibor, Chelmno, and Belzec – and created combination camps that both concentrated people for labour, and exterminated them – Auschwitz and Majdanek.1 Chelmno was the first of the death camps, established in 1941, while Treblinka, Sobibor, and Belzec were created during Operation Reinhard in 1942.2 In Poland, the Nazis concentrated many of the Jews from countries they had conquered during the war. As the major killing centers of the “Final Solution” were located within Poland, when did people in Poland become aware of the level of death and destruction perpetrated by the Nazi regime? While scholars have attributed dates to the “Final Solution,” predominantly starting in 1942, when did the people of Poland notice the shift in the treatment of Jews from relocation towards physical elimination using gas chambers? Or did they remain unaware of such events? To answer these questions, I have researched the writings of various people who were in Poland at the time of the “Final Solution.” I am specifically addressing the information found in diaries and memoirs. Given language barriers, this thesis will focus only on diaries and memoirs that were written in English or later translated and published in English.3 This thesis addresses twenty diaries and memoirs from people who were living in Poland at the time of the “Final Solution.” Most of these diaries (fifteen of twenty) were written by members of the intelligentsia.
  • Internal Brakes the British Extreme Right (Pdf

    Internal Brakes the British Extreme Right (Pdf

    FEBRUARY 2019 The Internal Brakes on Violent Escalation The British extreme right in the 1990s ANNEX B Joel Busher, Coventry University Donald Holbrook, University College London Graham Macklin, Oslo University This report is the second empirical case study, produced out of The Internal Brakes on Violent Escalation: A Descriptive Typology programme, funded by CREST. You can read the other two case studies; The Trans-national and British Islamist Extremist Groups and The Animal Liberation Movement, plus the full report at: https://crestresearch.ac.uk/news/internal- brakes-violent-escalation-a-descriptive-typology/ To find out more information about this programme, and to see other outputs from the team, visit the CREST website at: www.crestresearch.ac.uk/projects/internal-brakes-violent-escalation/ About CREST The Centre for Research and Evidence on Security Threats (CREST) is a national hub for understanding, countering and mitigating security threats. It is an independent centre, commissioned by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and funded in part by the UK security and intelligence agencies (ESRC Award: ES/N009614/1). www.crestresearch.ac.uk ©2019 CREST Creative Commons 4.0 BY-NC-SA licence. www.crestresearch.ac.uk/copyright TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................5 2. INTERNAL BRAKES ON VIOLENCE WITHIN THE BRITISH EXTREME RIGHT .................10 2.1 BRAKE 1: STRATEGIC LOGIC .......................................................................................................................................10
  • The Port Securityscape an Ethnography

    The Port Securityscape an Ethnography

    The port securityscape an ethnography by Yarin Eski Thesis submitted in fulfilment for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Social and Political Sciences University of Glasgow Scottish Centre for Crime and Justice Research 63 Gibson Street Glasgow G12 8LR Scotland Prof Fergus McNeill (first supervisor) Prof Simon Mackenzie (second supervisor) Dr Nicole Bourque (internal examiner) Prof Ian Loader (external examiner) Abstract 9/11 changed the face of maritime transport that is responsible for moving 80% of everything we consume. Ports are vital hubs in that maritime transport and any disruption there instantly affects global trade. To protect the global supply chain from crime and terrorism, both must be disrupted locally in the port by port police and security officers that are responsible for port security at operational level. Public and critical criminological attention to these key security actors, however, is virtually non-existent. This thesis therefore explores how their occupational realities and identities are (re)established in two major European ports, by providing an ethnographic account. To do so, the thesis builds on multi-sited ethnographic fieldwork in the ports of Rotterdam and Hamburg between 2011 and 2012, during which everyday policing and security work has been documented, followed by a thematic analysis. The key argument runs thus: the port is a local space for the global trade, which is underappreciated and underestimated by the public, and has its police and security professionals in place both aboard and on shore who protect and defend that vital trade site. The aggressive commercialist governmentality that goes on behind that vital global trade is unwillingly yielded to by these guardians but not without any bottom-up resistance.
  • Iain Sinclair and the Psychogeography of the Split City

    Iain Sinclair and the Psychogeography of the Split City

    ORBIT-OnlineRepository ofBirkbeckInstitutionalTheses Enabling Open Access to Birkbeck’s Research Degree output Iain Sinclair and the psychogeography of the split city https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/40164/ Version: Full Version Citation: Downing, Henderson (2015) Iain Sinclair and the psychogeog- raphy of the split city. [Thesis] (Unpublished) c 2020 The Author(s) All material available through ORBIT is protected by intellectual property law, including copy- right law. Any use made of the contents should comply with the relevant law. Deposit Guide Contact: email 1 IAIN SINCLAIR AND THE PSYCHOGEOGRAPHY OF THE SPLIT CITY Henderson Downing Birkbeck, University of London PhD 2015 2 I, Henderson Downing, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. 3 Abstract Iain Sinclair’s London is a labyrinthine city split by multiple forces deliriously replicated in the complexity and contradiction of his own hybrid texts. Sinclair played an integral role in the ‘psychogeographical turn’ of the 1990s, imaginatively mapping the secret histories and occulted alignments of urban space in a series of works that drift between the subject of topography and the topic of subjectivity. In the wake of Sinclair’s continued association with the spatial and textual practices from which such speculative theses derive, the trajectory of this variant psychogeography appears to swerve away from the revolutionary impulses of its initial formation within the radical milieu of the Lettrist International and Situationist International in 1950s Paris towards a more literary phenomenon. From this perspective, the return of psychogeography has been equated with a loss of political ambition within fin de millennium literature.
  • Parkes Body (New).Qxd

    Parkes Body (New).Qxd

    2003-2004 The Parkes Institute Annual Report Contents 2 Report of the Head of the Parkes Institute, Dr Sarah Pearce 4 Outreach 4 AHRB Parkes Centre for the Study of Jewish/non-Jewish Relations 5 Conferences, lectures and seminars in the Parkes Institute 6 Income 7 Postgraduate Studies in Jewish History and Culture 8 Reports by Members of the Parkes Institute 15 Parkes Library report by Jenny Ruthven, Parkes Librarian 15 Special Collections report by Dr Chris Woolgar, Head of Special Collections, the Hartley Library, University of Southampton 18 Publications and papers by members of the Parkes Institute 23 Members of the Management Committee of the Parkes Institute 24 Members of the Board of Studies of the Parkes Institute 24 Fellows of the Parkes Institute 24 Honorary Fellows of the Parkes Institute The ParkesAnn Instituteual Repor Annt ual2003-2004 Report | 1 The Parkes Institute | The University of Southampon The length of this report is testimony to this year's remarkable range of developments and activities connected to the Parkes Library and Special Collections archive for the study of Jewish/non-Jewish Relations. It has been a spectacular year of building for the future, with the completion of new housing for the library and archive, the arrival of new colleagues to lead research in new fields, and the appointment of our first administrator in the Parkes Institute. We are delighted to announce that in June 2004 the University’s Hartley Library opened the doors of its new Special Collections accommodation, in which the Parkes Library and related archives are housed, to its first readers.
  • TURNING the PAGE on HATE Huge Quantities Of

    TURNING the PAGE on HATE Huge Quantities Of

    HOPE NOT HATE BRIEFING: TURNING THE PAGE ON HATE MARCH 2018 WWW.HOPENOTHATE.ORG.UK TURNING THE PAGE ON HATE By the Right Response Team SUMMARY OUR POSITION ■ An investigation by HOPE not hate’s Right ■ While we abhor these books HOPE not hate is Response team has found huge quantities of not saying that people do not have the right extreme hate content being sold by the major to write and publish books we disagree with. book sellers Waterstones, Foyles, WHSmith We are arguing that major mainstream book and Amazon. sellers such as Waterstones, Foyles, Amazon ■ All 4 companies sell the Turner Diaries or WHSmith should not profit from extreme which has inspired numerous violent racists hate content such as this. and terrorists, including the Oklahoma City ■ Our further major concern is that bomber Timothy McVeigh, who killed 168 these extreme books and authors gain people using a truck bomb similar to one respectability by virtue of their publications described in detail in the book. Purchasing being available on the websites of trusted the Turner Diaries at Foyles gets you 48 and mainstream sellers. Foyalty points as part of their loyalty scheme. ■ We accept that Amazon took the step of ■ Waterstones, Foyles and Amazon companies removing three Holocaust denial titles in sell the antisemitic forgery The Protocols of 2017, a move we of course welcome, but the Learned Elders of Zion which has been much more needs to be done. Worryingly described as a “warrant for genocide”. some of the books they removed are ■ Large amounts of extreme Holocaust denial still available via other sellers such as literature is available via these sellers.
  • Transnational Neo-Nazism in the Usa, United Kingdom and Australia

    Transnational Neo-Nazism in the Usa, United Kingdom and Australia

    TRANSNATIONAL NEO-NAZISM IN THE USA, UNITED KINGDOM AND AUSTRALIA PAUL JACKSON February 2020 JACKSON | PROGRAM ON EXTREMISM About the Program on About the Author Extremism Dr Paul Jackson is a historian of twentieth century and contemporary history, and his main teaching The Program on Extremism at George and research interests focus on understanding the Washington University provides impact of radical and extreme ideologies on wider analysis on issues related to violent and societies. Dr. Jackson’s research currently focuses non-violent extremism. The Program on the dynamics of neo-Nazi, and other, extreme spearheads innovative and thoughtful right ideologies, in Britain and Europe in the post- academic inquiry, producing empirical war period. He is also interested in researching the work that strengthens extremism longer history of radical ideologies and cultures in research as a distinct field of study. The Britain too, especially those linked in some way to Program aims to develop pragmatic the extreme right. policy solutions that resonate with Dr. Jackson’s teaching engages with wider themes policymakers, civic leaders, and the related to the history of fascism, genocide, general public. totalitarian politics and revolutionary ideologies. Dr. Jackson teaches modules on the Holocaust, as well as the history of Communism and fascism. Dr. Jackson regularly writes for the magazine Searchlight on issues related to contemporary extreme right politics. He is a co-editor of the Wiley- Blackwell journal Religion Compass: Modern Ideologies and Faith. Dr. Jackson is also the Editor of the Bloomsbury book series A Modern History of Politics and Violence. The views expressed in this paper are solely those of the author, and not necessarily those of the Program on Extremism or the George Washington University.