DOCSLIB.ORG

Atalogue of Wood Waste Classifications in the UNECE Region

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Atalogue of Wood Waste Classifications in the UNECE Region ECE/TIM/EFC/WP.2/2021/Inf.5 04 March 2021 Economic Commission for Europe Food and Agriculture Organization Committee on Forests and the Forest Industry European Forestry Commission Joint ECE/FAO Working Party on Forest Statistics, Economics and Management Forty-second session Geneva, 22-24 March 2021 Item 4 of the provisional agenda Forests and the Circular Economy AGENDA ITEM 4 DRAFT Catalogue of wood waste classifications in the UNECE Region DRAFT 1 MARCH 2021 UNEDITED VERSION Disclaimer This document is a draft prepared by the joint UNECE/FAO Forestry and Timber Section, based on desk research and inputs from national experts. Member States are invited to review the content and to reflect on the latest state of regulations and practice in their countries. ECE/TIM/EFC/WP.2/2021/Inf.5 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of tables ............................................................................................................................................................ 3 List of abbreviations ................................................................................................................................................ 4 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................ 7 Background ......................................................................................................................................................... 7 Methodology ...................................................................................................................................................... 8 The international context ....................................................................................................................................... 9 Global Classifications .......................................................................................................................................... 9 European Union Classifications ........................................................................................................................ 14 European Union Directives and Regulations .................................................................................................... 18 Sectoral classifications ...................................................................................................................................... 20 National classifications .......................................................................................................................................... 23 Albania .............................................................................................................................................................. 23 Andorra ............................................................................................................................................................. 24 Armenia ............................................................................................................................................................ 25 Austria............................................................................................................................................................... 26 Azerbaijan ......................................................................................................................................................... 30 Belarus .............................................................................................................................................................. 31 Belgium ............................................................................................................................................................. 32 Bosnia and Herzegovina ................................................................................................................................... 33 Bulgaria ............................................................................................................................................................. 35 Canada .............................................................................................................................................................. 36 Croatia .............................................................................................................................................................. 38 Cyprus ............................................................................................................................................................... 39 CzechIa .............................................................................................................................................................. 40 Denmark ........................................................................................................................................................... 41 Estonia .............................................................................................................................................................. 42 Finland .............................................................................................................................................................. 43 France ............................................................................................................................................................... 45 Georgia ............................................................................................................................................................. 48 Germany ........................................................................................................................................................... 49 Greece............................................................................................................................................................... 52 Hungary ............................................................................................................................................................ 53 Iceland .............................................................................................................................................................. 54 Ireland ............................................................................................................................................................... 55 Israel ................................................................................................................................................................. 57 Italy ................................................................................................................................................................... 58 ECE/TIM/EFC/WP.2/2021/Inf.5 Kazakhstan ........................................................................................................................................................ 59 Kyrgyzstan ......................................................................................................................................................... 60 Latvia ................................................................................................................................................................ 61 Liechtenstein .................................................................................................................................................... 62 Lithuania ........................................................................................................................................................... 63 Luxembourg ...................................................................................................................................................... 64 Malta ................................................................................................................................................................. 66 Monaco ............................................................................................................................................................. 67 Montenegro ...................................................................................................................................................... 68 Netherlands ...................................................................................................................................................... 69 North Macedonia .............................................................................................................................................. 71 Norway ............................................................................................................................................................. 72 Poland ............................................................................................................................................................... 73 Portugal ............................................................................................................................................................ 75 Republic of Moldova ......................................................................................................................................... 76 Romania ............................................................................................................................................................ 77 Russian Federation ..........................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Spyridon Sfetas the Founding of the Slavo-Macedonian Popular
    Spyridon Sfetas Autonomist Movements of the Slavophones in 1944: The Attitude of the Communist Party of Greece and the Protection of the Greek-Yugoslav Border The founding of the Slavo-Macedonian Popular Liberation Front (SNOF) in Kastoria in October 1943 and in Fiorina the following November was a result of two factors: the general negotiations between Tito’s envoy in Yugoslav and Greek Macedonia, Svetozar Vukma- nović-Tempo, the military leaders of the Greek Popular Liberation Army (ELAS), and the political leaders of the Communist Party of Greece (KKE) in July and August 1943 to co-ordinate the resistance movements1; and the more specific discussions between Leonidas Stringos and the political delegate of the GHQ of Yugoslav Macedonia, Cvetko Uzunovski in late August or early September 1943 near Yan- nitsa12. The Yugoslavs’ immediate purpose in founding SNOF was to in­ culcate a Slavo-Macedonian national consciousness in the Slavophones of Greek Macedonia and to enlist the Slavophones of Greek Macedonia into the resistance movement in Yugoslav Macedonia; while their indirect aim was to promote Yugoslavia’s views on the Macedonian Question3. The KKE had recognised the Slavophones as a “Slavo- 1. See T.-A. Papapanagiotou, L ’Effort pour la création du grand quartier général balca- nique et la coopération balcanique, Juin-Septembre 1943 (unpublished postgraduate disser­ tation, Sorbonne, 1991); there is a copy in the library of the Institute for Balkan Studies, Thessaloniki. 2. See S. Vukmanović-Tempo, Revolucija Koja teče, vol. 3, Zagreb 1982, p. 114. In a postwar report to the Central Committee of the KKE on SNOF’s activities, Stringos had this to say about the meeting: “Abas requested that our sections work together against the Germans and that we make things a little easier for their sections that were obliged, because of the operations, to cross over into Greek territory frequently; and they also offered to help with the work among the Slavo-Macedonians, who were still being influenced by the komitadjif’.
    [Show full text]
  • The Truth About Greek Occupied Macedonia
    TheTruth about Greek Occupied Macedonia By Hristo Andonovski & Risto Stefov (Translated from Macedonian to English and edited by Risto Stefov) The Truth about Greek Occupied Macedonia Published by: Risto Stefov Publications rstefov@hotmail.com Toronto, Canada All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system without written consent from the author, except for the inclusion of brief and documented quotations in a review. Copyright 2017 by Hristo Andonovski & Risto Stefov e-book edition January 7, 2017 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface................................................................................................6 CHAPTER ONE – Struggle for our own School and Church .......8 1. Macedonian texts written with Greek letters .................................9 2. Educators and renaissance men from Southern Macedonia.........15 3. Kukush – Flag bearer of the educational struggle........................21 4. The movement in Meglen Region................................................33 5. Cultural enlightenment movement in Western Macedonia..........38 6. Macedonian and Bulgarian interests collide ................................41 CHAPTER TWO - Armed National Resistance ..........................47 1. The Negush Uprising ...................................................................47 2. Temporary Macedonian government ...........................................49
    [Show full text]
  • Macedonians and the Greek Civil War
    Macedonians and the Greek Civil War By By Naum Peiov (Translated from Macedonian to English and edited by Risto Stefov) Macedonians and the Greek Civil War Published by: Risto Stefov Publications rstefov@hotmail.com Toronto, Canada Originally published in Macedonian in June 1968 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system without written consent from the author, except for the inclusion of brief and documented quotations in a review. Copyright 2015 by Naum Peiov & Risto Stefov e-book edition November 16, 2015 2 INDEX Foreword ............................................................................................4 PART ONE – The Greek Civil War 1945 – 1949 - Introduction ......8 CHAPTER ONE – Unilateral Civil War .........................................21 CHAPTER TWO - Restoration of the monarchy ............................52 CHAPTER THREE – ESTABLISHING A DEMOCRATIC GOVERNMENT..............................................................................72 CHAPTER FOUR - Withdrawal of the Democratic Army .............81 PART TWO - Macedonians in the Greek Civil War .......................91 CHAPTER FIVE – Systematic persecution of the Macedonian people ...............................................................................................91 CHAPTER SIX - RESISTANCE TO NEW PRESSURE .............127 CHAPTER SEVEN - RELATIONS BETWEEN NOF AND THE CPG................................................................................................136
    [Show full text]
  • Dlstats Release 0.5.0
    dlstats Release 0.5.0 January 03, 2016 Contents 1 Resume 1 2 Contents: 3 2.1 What is a dlstats?.............................................3 2.2 API....................................................3 2.3 Commands................................................4 2.4 Configuration...............................................9 2.5 Database.................................................9 2.6 MongoDB Schemas........................................... 12 2.7 Sources Referential............................................ 37 3 Indices and tables 49 i ii CHAPTER 1 Resume Version 0.5.0 Mise à jour January 03, 2016 Licence BSD ? Repository https://github.com/Widukind/dlstats Tickets https://github.com/Widukind/dlstats/issues Doc http://widukind-dlstats.readthedocs.org/en/latest/ 1 dlstats, Release 0.5.0 2 Chapter 1. Resume CHAPTER 2 Contents: 2.1 What is a dlstats? This python module retrieves times series from the major statistical offices (Eurostat, World Bank, european statistical officesdots) and records those series in a pyMongo database. MongoDB allows to download the data using a REST interface. Widukind provides a graphical client, and a set of functions for Matlab, R, Excel and pandas. 2.2 API 2.2.1 Fetchers Commons Fetcher DlstatsCollection Providers Categories Datasets Series Changed in version 0.3.0: Remove Inherit DlstatsCollection CodeDict 2.2.2 dlstats.fetchers.BEA 2.2.3 dlstats.fetchers.bis dlstats.fetchers.bis.extract_zip_file() dlstats.fetchers.bis.csv_dict() dlstats.fetchers.bis.local_read_csv() 3 dlstats, Release 0.5.0 2.2.4 All Fetchers dlstats.fetchers.ecb dlstats.fetchers.esri dlstats.fetchers.eurostat dlstats.fetchers.IMF dlstats.fetchers.oecd dlstats.fetchers.world_bank 2.3 Commands 2.3.1 Environment Les variables d’environnement peuvent être utilisés pour définir la valeur des options de la ligne de commande.
    [Show full text]
  • Dodecanese Campaign from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
    Create account Log in Article Talk Read Edit View history Dodecanese Campaign From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The Dodecanese Campaign of World War II was an attempt by Allied forces, mostly Navigation Dodecanese Campaign British, to capture the Italian-held Dodecanese islands in the Aegean Sea following the Part of the Mediterranean and Middle East theatre of Main page surrender of Italy in September 1943, and use them as bases against the German- World War II Contents controlled Balkans. The Allied effort failed, with the whole of the Dodecanese falling to Featured content the Germans within two months, and the Allies suffering heavy losses in men and Current events ships.[3] The operations in the Dodecanese, lasting from 8 September to 22 November Random article 1943, resulted in one of the last major German victories in the war.[4] Donate to Wikipedia Contents 1 Background Interaction 2 Initial Allied and German moves — The Fall of Rhodes Help 3 Battle of Kos About Wikipedia 4 Battle of Leros Community portal 5 Naval operations Recent changes 6 Aftermath Map of the Dodecanese Islands (in dark blue) Contact Wikipedia 7 In popular culture Date September 8 – November 22, 1943 8 References Location Dodecanese Islands, Aegean Sea Toolbox 9 Sources 10 External links Result German victory What links here Territorial German occupation of the Dodecanese Related changes changes Background [edit] Upload file Belligerents Special pages Further information: Military history of Greece during World War United Kingdom Germany Permanent link II and Mediterranean and Middle East theatre of World War II Kingdom of Italy Republican State of Page information South Africa Italy The Dodecanese island group lies in the south-eastern Aegean Sea, and had been Data item Greece under Italian occupation since the Italo-Turkish War.
    [Show full text]
  • Online Appendices Here
    APPENDIX A: EFFECTIVE NUMBER OF PARTIES BY COUNTRY AND YEAR The effec've number of par'es equals the reciprocal of the sum of the squared propor'on of the vote received by each party with independent candidates each treated as separate par'es. Effective Number Country Year of Electoral Parties Antigua and Barbuda 1994 2.05 Antigua and Barbuda 1999 2.09 Antigua and Barbuda 2004 2.07 Antigua and Barbuda 2009 2.07 Argentina 1991 3.98 Argentina 1993 3.57 Argentina 1995 3.61 Argentina 1997 3.65 Argentina 1999 3.28 Argentina 2001 6.08 Argentina 2003 5.39 Argentina 2005 6.38 Australia 1990 3.37 Australia 1993 2.90 Australia 1996 3.20 Australia 1998 3.46 Australia 2001 3.43 Australia 2004 3.18 Australia 2007 3.03 Australia 2010 3.83 Austria 1990 3.16 Austria 1994 3.87 Austria 1995 3.59 Austria 1999 3.82 Austria 2002 3.02 Austria 2006 3.71 Austria 2008 4.83 Bahamas 1992 1.98 Bahamas 1997 1.97 Bahamas 2002 2.28 Bahamas 2007 2.13 Barbados 1991 2.28 Barbados 1994 2.52 Barbados 1999 1.84 Barbados 2003 1.98 Effective Number Country Year of Electoral Parties Barbados 2008 2.00 Belgium 1991 9.81 Belgium 1995 9.46 Belgium 1999 10.27 Belgium 2003 8.84 Belgium 2007 9.04 Belgium 2010 10.04 Belize 1993 2.00 Belize 1998 1.96 Belize 2003 2.04 Belize 2008 2.03 Botswana 1994 2.34 Botswana 1999 2.44 Botswana 2004 2.74 Botswana 2009 2.71 Brazil 1990 9.80 Brazil 1994 8.52 Brazil 1998 8.14 Brazil 2002 9.28 Brazil 2006 10.62 Brazil 2010 11.21 Bulgaria 1991 4.18 Bulgaria 1994 3.85 Bulgaria 1997 3.00 Bulgaria 2001 3.94 Bulgaria 2005 5.80 Bulgaria 2009 4.40 Canada 1993
    [Show full text]
  • Spyridon Sfetas Autonomist Movements of the Slavophones in 1944
    Spyridon Sfetas Autonomist Movements of the Slavophones in 1944: The Attitude of the Communist Party of Greece and the Protection of the Greek-Yugoslav Border The founding of the Slavo-Macedonian Popular Liberation Front (SNOF) in Kastoria in October 1943 and in Florina the following November was a result of two factors: the general negotiations between Tito's envoy in Yugoslav and Greek Macedonia, Svetozar Vukmanovic-Tempo, the military leaders of the Greek Popular Liberation Army (ELAS), and the political leaders of the Communist Party of Greece (KKE) in July and August 1943 to co-ordinate the resistance movements1; and the more specific discussions between Leonidas Stringos and the political delegate of the GHQ of Yugoslav Macedonia, Cvetko Uzunovski in late August or early September 1943 near Yannitsa2. The Yugoslavs’ immediate purpose in founding SNOF was to inculcate a Slavo-Macedonian national consciousness in the Slavophones of Greek Macedonia and to enlist the Slavophones of Greek Macedonia into the resistance movement in Yugoslav Macedonia; while their indirect aim was to promote Yugoslavia's views on the Macedonian Question3. The KKE had recognised the Slavophones as a “SlavoMacedonian nation” since 1934, in accordance with the relevant decision by the Comintern, and since 1935 had been demanding full equality for the minorities within the Greek state; and it now acquiesced to the founding of SNOF in the belief that this would draw into the resistance those Slavophones who had been led astray by Bulgarian Fascist propaganda4. However, 1. See T.-A. Papapanagiotou, L’ Effort pourla creation dugland quartiergendral balcanique et la cooperation balcanique, Juin-Septembre 1943 (unpublished postgraduate dissertation, Sorbonne, 1991); there is a copy in the library of the Institute for Balkan Studies, Thessaloniki.
    [Show full text]
  • Macedonians in Greece Risto Stefov
    Macedonians in Greece 1939 – 1949 By Risto Stefov Macedonians in Greece 1939 - 1949 Published by: Risto Stefov Publications rstefov@hotmail.com Toronto, Canada All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system without written consent from the author, except for the inclusion of brief and documented quotations in a review. Copyright 2009 by Risto Stefov e-book edition 2 PREFACE Very little has been written about the Macedonians in Greece and their involvement in World War II and in the Greek Civil War. Macedonians who live in Greece to this day are afraid to speak of their terrible ordeals for fear of repercussions from the Greek authorities or because it is simply too painful for them to remember. To this day it is taboo in Greece to speak of the Greek Civil War. The Macedonians in Greece it seems have been ignored by all sides. Yugoslavia has ignored them because it did not want to ruin its good relations with Greece. Greece on the other hand, to this day claims that Macedonians simply do not exist and wants no part of them. Bulgaria, even though it has a large Macedonian immigrant population from Greece, has yet to recognize the Macedonian people as a distinct ethnic group. So in reality no one really cares about the Macedonians in Greece and as a result very little to nothing has been written about them. “Indeed, the Macedonians in Greece are hardly ever mentioned in scholarly literature and have been virtually forgotten as a people and as a national minority.” (Andrew Rossos) This is most unfortunate not only because the Macedonian contribution to the struggle against Fascism and Nazism has been completely omitted, but because the Macedonian people themselves living in Greece despite their contributions, have been completely ignored as if they didn’t exist.
    [Show full text]
  • Vladimir Burtsev and the Russian Revolutionary Emigration: Surveillance of Foreign Political Refugees in London, 1891-1905
    Vladimir Burtsev and the Russian revolutionary emigration: surveillance of foreign political refugees in London, 1891-1905. Henderson, Robert The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without the prior written consent of the author For additional information about this publication click this link. http://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/jspui/handle/123456789/1461 Information about this research object was correct at the time of download; we occasionally make corrections to records, please therefore check the published record when citing. For more information contact scholarlycommunications@qmul.ac.uk Vladimir Burtsev and the Russian Revolutionary Emigration: Surveillance of Foreign Political Refugees in London, 1891-1905. Robert Henderson Queen Mary, University of London PhD Thesis September 2008 I Declaration I hereby declare that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Signed: ýý` Date: .. .... ............ (Robert Henderson) 2 Abstract The thesis describes the early life in emigration of the Russian revolutionary, historian journalist (17/29 and radical Vladimir L'vovich Burtsev November 1862 - 21 August 1942). Particular emphasis is placed on the nature and extent of the police surveillance of Burtsev and the emigre community in Europe during the period. The relationship between the Criminal Investigation Department of London's Metropolitan Police and their Russian counterparts in Europe - the Zagranichnaia in detail. agentura, ('Foreign Agency') - is examined Burtsev's biography has great contemporary relevance, unfolding, as it does, in an atmosphere of increasing anxiety in Britain (both governmental and non-official) about growing numbers of foreign anarchists, terrorists, and `aliens' in general (which would lead, in due course, to the passing of the 1905 Aliens Act) and the increasingly interventionist police methods of the era.
    [Show full text]
  • Iakovos D. Michailidis in the Fall of 1944, the Germans and Their Allies Left the Balkan Peninsula, After Their Defeat in the Ma
    Iakovos D. Michailidis Fragile Balance: Greek-Yugoslav relations in the period 1944-1946 In the fall of 1944, the Germans and their allies left the Balkan Peninsula, after their defeat in the majority of the war fronts. For the Balkan peoples, especially those who had fought against the Axis, the future appeared more promising than the present. Expectations had rightfully risen high. However, there were still several unsolved issues. The war had opened wounds that were hard to heal, while the political, social and ideological divisions of the recent past threatened to under­ mine the precarious peace. For two of the victors, the Greeks and the Yugoslavs, the post-war period seemed full of challenges. Internal problems, like the issue of the German collaborators during the occupation, the emergence of new political powers, mostly communist, in the battlefields, and the pursuit of a balance in an international environment that was totally different from that of the mid-war years, created the conditions for the enfor­ cement of political and social regimes that differed significantly from those of the recent past. This paper aims to describe the adventure of the diplomatic and political relations between Greece and Yugoslavia from their liberation, in late 1944, to the summer of 1946. After two stormy and controver­ sial years of tension, when moments of improvement alternated with moments of tension, the relations between the two countries entered a “freezing” stage again for the period 1946-1949. I will support that during that critical period 1944-1946, new players emerged, that af­ fected and were affected by the diplomatic climate in the relations of the two countries.
    [Show full text]
  • NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES on AVERAGE ESTABLISHMENT SIZE ACROSS SECTORS and COUNTRIESY Pedro Bento Diego Restuccia Working Paper
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES ON AVERAGE ESTABLISHMENT SIZE ACROSS SECTORS AND COUNTRIESY Pedro Bento Diego Restuccia Working Paper 24968 http://www.nber.org/papers/w24968 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 August 2018 For helpful comments we thank the editor, two anonymous referees, Alvaro Garcia Marin, and seminar participants at the National University of Singapore and the University of Texas at Austin, as well as participants at the Workshop for Productivity Dynamics, Firm Growth and Factor Reallocation at the Banco Central de Chile, the CEPR-EIEF Conference on Firm Dynamics and Economic Growth at the Banco d'Italia, and at the RIDGE Workshop on Macroeconomics and Development in Buenos Aires. All errors are our own. Restuccia gratefully acknowledges the support from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada and the Canada Research Chairs program.The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer- reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications. © 2018 by Pedro Bento and Diego Restuccia. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. On Average Establishment Size across Sectors and Countriesy Pedro Bento and Diego Restuccia NBER Working Paper No. 24968 August 2018, Revised August 2019 JEL No. E02,E1,O1,O4 ABSTRACT We construct a new dataset for the average employment size of establishments across sectors and countries from hundreds of sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Macedonians in Greece Risto Stefov
    Macedonians in Greece 1939 – 1949 By Risto Stefov Macedonians in Greece 1939 - 1949 Published by: Risto Stefov Publications rstefov@hotmail.com Toronto, Canada All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system without written consent from the author, except for the inclusion of brief and documented quotations in a review. Copyright 2009 by Risto Stefov e-book edition 2 PREFACE Very little has been written about the Macedonians in Greece and their involvement in World War II and in the Greek Civil War. Macedonians who live in Greece to this day are afraid to speak of their terrible ordeals for fear of repercussions from the Greek authorities or because it is simply too painful for them to remember. To this day it is taboo in Greece to speak of the Greek Civil War. The Macedonians in Greece it seems have been ignored by all sides. Yugoslavia has ignored them because it did not want to ruin its good relations with Greece. Greece on the other hand, to this day claims that Macedonians simply do not exist and wants no part of them. Bulgaria, even though it has a large Macedonian immigrant population from Greece, has yet to recognize the Macedonian people as a distinct ethnic group. So in reality no one really cares about the Macedonians in Greece and as a result very little to nothing has been written about them. “Indeed, the Macedonians in Greece are hardly ever mentioned in scholarly literature and have been virtually forgotten as a people and as a national minority.” (Andrew Rossos) This is most unfortunate not only because the Macedonian contribution to the struggle against Fascism and Nazism has been completely omitted, but because the Macedonian people themselves living in Greece despite their contributions, have been completely ignored as if they didn’t exist.
    [Show full text]