DOCSLIB.ORG

The Beheading of John the Baptist in the First Three Centuries: Memory, Violence, And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Beheading of John the Baptist in the First Three Centuries: Memory, Violence, And View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by St Mary's University Open Research Archive The Beheading of John the Baptist in the First Three Centuries: Memory, Violence, and Reception Thesis submitted in accordance with the requirements of Liverpool Hope University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy: Nathan L. Shedd Centre for the Social Scientific Study of the Bible Institute of Theology St. Mary’s University (Twickenham, London) 01 August 2019 1 ABSTRACT St. Mary’s University Nathan L. Shedd “The Beheading of John the Baptist in the First Three Centuries: Memory, Violence, and Reception” This study focuses on the reception of John the Baptist’s beheading in the first three centuries. The primary question that drives this investigation is: What impact did John’s beheading have on its reception during this time period? To answer this question, the study breaks into five chapters. Chapter one reviews previous scholarship on John’s death and asks how the question of reception compares to other scholarly efforts. This review shows that scholars have largely overlooked this question. Chapter two asks how historians might conceptualize and approach reception history. I argue that social memory theory offers helpful theoretical and analytical frameworks in this regard. Specifically, traditions of bodily violence become sites of contestation in commemorative activity. Those who harness a violent past in identity formation often transform the degrading potential of bodily mutilation so that the symbolically freighted violence is not debilitating to present needs. Chapter three traces the symbolic potential of beheading in John’s general context. I argue that beheading constituted a degrading form of bodily violence that not only emasculated the victim, but also interrupted proper burial and reincorporation in life in the hereafter. Chapters four and five proceed to ask how early recipients of John’s beheading engage this social script. Chapter four argues that Mark contests the degrading potential of John’s beheading. Although Mark acknowledges the degrading social script of beheading, he brings it into tension with other elements that cast John and Herod respectively as positive and negative figures: (i) the moral corruption of the Herodian court as those whose “will” is opposed to God’s will; (ii) the emasculation of Antipas and the masculinity of John the Baptist; (iii) the keying of John’s beheading to Jesus’ crucifixion; (iv) the portrayal of Herod as entertaining the ludicrous notion of a beheaded man’s resurrection (or the depiction of Herod as paranoid because of John’s improper burial). Chapter five argues that the contest over John’s degrading death takes anti-Jewish turns. Particularly salient in this respect are Justin Martyr’s Dialogue with Trypho and Origen’s Commentary on Matthew. Both authors redeploy the tradition so that Herod Antipas’ actions against the prophet become symbols for contemporary Jewish action. Justin and Origen activate the negative characterization of Antipas, making Antipas’ moral coloration emblematic of “the Jews.” In so doing, they perpetuate an image of “the Jews” as killers of God’s prophets. What impact, therefore, did John’s beheading have on its early reception history? In light of these commemorative maneuvers underlying the tradition’s history, this study argues that the impact of John’s death is characterized by a dangerous synchroneity. On the one hand, John’s beheading was a salient image that early recipients harnessed and contested in their works of self-definition. On the other hand, as part of the work of identity formation, the tradition developed in anti-Jewish directions. In this respect, the memory of John’s beheading became “violent.” Word Count: 98,703 2 DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY I declare the following to be true: 1. This thesis and the work to which it refers are the results of my own efforts. 2. This thesis has not been previously submitted for an award of this University or any other institution. 3. The content of this thesis is legally allowable under copyright legislation. Signed: .................................................................................. Print Name: .................... Nathan L. Shedd .......................... Date: ............................... 01 Aug. 2019 ............................... 3 CONTENTS ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................. 1 DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY .................................................................................. 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................... 6 ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................................. 8 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 9 FOCUS, INQUIRY, AND ARGUMENT ............................................................................. 9 STRUCTURE .................................................................................................................... 14 CHAPTER ONE: PREVIOUS SCHOLARSHIP ON THE BEHEADING OF JOHN THE BAPTIST ...................................................................................................................... 20 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 20 1. THE QUESTION OF FUNCTION ................................................................................. 22 1.1. Anti-Herodian Interpretations of John’s Death......................................................... 24 1.2. John’s Death Anticipates Jesus’ Death ..................................................................... 28 1.2.1. References to Parallels between John’s and Jesus’ Deaths .............................. 28 1.2.2. References to John as the Forerunner of Jesus ................................................. 30 1.3. John’s Death as a Demarcating Event ...................................................................... 31 2. THE QUESTION OF “HISTORICAL ACCURACY” ................................................... 33 2.1. Appeals to Cultural Traditions .................................................................................. 34 2.2. Appeals to Contentious Details ................................................................................. 37 2.3. Summary ................................................................................................................... 42 3. THE QUESTION OF CHRONOLOGY .......................................................................... 43 3.1. Standard Proposals of the Date of John’s Death ....................................................... 44 3.2. Alternative Proposals of the Date of John’s Death .................................................. 46 CONCLUSION: A NEGLECTED FOURTH QUESTION ................................................ 49 CHAPTER TWO: A HEURISTIC FRAMEWORK FOR RECEPTION: MEMORY AND VIOLENCE................................................................................................................... 51 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 51 1. SOCIAL MEMORY THEORY ....................................................................................... 51 1.1. Maurice Halbwachs and His Legacy ........................................................................ 52 1.2. The Emergence of Social Memory Theory in New Testament Studies.................... 57 1.3. The Significance of Social Memory Theory for Reception History ......................... 62 2. A HEURISTIC FRAMEWORK: THE SOCIAL REMEMBERING OF VIOLENCE ... 64 2.1. Visible and Invisible Violence .................................................................................. 64 2.2. Violence and Identity ............................................................................................... 67 2.3. Interpretive Keying .................................................................................................. 71 2.4. Selective Remembering and the Violence of Memory ............................................ 74 2.5. Memory Contestation and Bodily Mutilation .......................................................... 78 CONCLUSION .................................................................................................................... 82 CHAPTER THREE: CULTURES OF BEHEADING IN THE ANCIENT WORLD .... 85 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 85 1. THE SEVERED HEAD: A FAMILIAR SOCIAL SCRIPT ........................................... 88 4 1.1. Beheadings in Jewish Literature .............................................................................. 88 1.2. Beheadings in Greco-Roman Literature .................................................................. 91 1.3. Clarification ............................................................................................................. 93 2. THE SOCIAL SCRIPT OF BEHEADING .................................................................... 96 2.1. Degradation of the Victim ....................................................................................... 98 2.1.1. Degradation of the Victim into the Afterlife
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Outlaw: Wilderness and Exile in Old and Middle
    THE ‘BESTLI’ OUTLAW: WILDERNESS AND EXILE IN OLD AND MIDDLE ENGLISH LITERATURE A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Sarah Michelle Haughey August 2011 © 2011 Sarah Michelle Haughey THE ‘BESTLI’ OUTLAW: WILDERNESS AND EXILE IN OLD AND MIDDLE ENGLISH LITERATURE Sarah Michelle Haughey, Ph. D. Cornell University 2011 This dissertation, The ‘Bestli’ Outlaw: Wilderness and Exile in Old and Middle English Literature explores the reasons for the survival of the beast-like outlaw, a transgressive figure who highlights tensions in normative definitions of human and natural, which came to represent both the fears and the desires of a people in a state of constant negotiation with the land they inhabited. Although the outlaw’s shelter in the wilderness changed dramatically from the dense and menacing forests of Anglo-Saxon England to the bright, known, and mapped greenwood of the late outlaw romances and ballads, the outlaw remained strongly animalistic, other, and liminal, in strong contrast to premodern notions of what it meant to be human and civilized. I argue that outlaw narratives become particularly popular and poignant at moments of national political and ecological crisis—as they did during the Viking attacks of the Anglo-Saxon period, the epoch of intense natural change following the Norman Conquest, and the beginning of the market revolution at the end of the Middle Ages. Figures like the Anglo-Saxon resistance fighter Hereward, the exiled Marcher lord Fulk Fitz Waryn, and the brutal yet courtly Gamelyn and Robin Hood, represent a lost England imagined as pristine and forested.
    [Show full text]
  • Bruce Chilton
    Mary Magdalene Bruce Chilton AN IMAGE BOOK PUBLISHED BY DOUBLEDAY Published in the United States by Doubleday, an imprint of the The Doubleday Broadway Publishing Group, a division of Random House, Inc., New York. www.doubleday.com ISBN-10: 0385513186 ISBN-13: 978-0385513180 PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 1 3 5 7 9 10 8 6 4 2 To the Memory of Rose Miller Prologue MARGUERITE IS anyone there? Is there anyone there?“ Marguerite called out loudly. “Yes, right beside you,” I replied, trying to reassure her. People who are dying sometimes wonder whether they are still alive and with people they know. As their priest, I have heard this question a number of times during visits with terminally ill patients. But Marguerite repeated her question despite my response: She wasn’t calling to me at all, and it took me a moment to realize that. I had found Marguerite in bed, on oxygen, and far from her normal, alert self. She was one of my favorites among the congregation of the small Episcopalian church that I serve in Barrytown, New York. She proved to be the best critic of sermons I have ever met. A formidable professional, she had been a social worker in Manhattan and possessed a passion for children’s rights that did not wane with her retirement. After she passed the age of ninety, congestive heart failure gradually sapped life from her. She couldn’t travel to church any longer, but we made it a point to meet at her home late in the afternoon once or twice a month to talk politics, gardening, and religion, drink gin and tonics, and pray together.
    [Show full text]
  • Paul & the Pharisee Conspiracy FREE DOWNLOAD VERSION
    DOWNLOAD SAMPLE CHAPTERS 1 & 2 ONLY CHRISTIANITY & ST PAUL: THE ANTICHRIST PART 1 PAUL & THE PHARISEE CONSPIRACY AGAINST JESUS CHRISTIANITY & ST PAUL: THE ANTICHRIST PART 1 Paul & the Pharisee Conspiracy Against Jesus by Syed M. S. Nasser CHRISTIANITY & ST PAUL: THE ANTICHRIST PART 1 Paul & the Pharisee Conspiracy Against Jesus By Syed M. S. Nasser Copyright © 2016 Syed M. S. Nasser All Rights Reserved ISBN 978-1-5272-0531-4 All rights reserved. This book was published by Utopia International Ltd. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any means without written permission except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles, reviews or for educational purposes. This includes reprints, excerpts, photocopying, recording, or any future means of reproduction. Published in the United Kingdom by Utopia International Ltd www.jesusorpaul.com @SyedMSNasser #PhariseeConspiracy www.facebook.com/SyedMSNasser [email protected] To join the conversation, use the hash-tag #PhariseeConspiracy or visit www.jesusorpaul.com to join Syed Nasser’s mailing list Front image is by Nicolas-Bernard Lepicie in 1767 of Paul’s conversion on the Road to Damascus (public domain). THIS SERIES While this book is primarily about the why of Paul’s corruptions, later books address the how, as well as examining the corruptions wrought in the Old Testament. Divine providence ensured that the footsteps of these historical actors survived, such that a seeker of truth can discern how history always played out as God foretold. Thus, history marches on and our task is to show in broad terms how this happened, and how it will play out in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Religion and the Church in Geoffrey of Monmouth
    Chapter 14 Religion and the Church in Geoffrey of Monmouth Barry Lewis Few authors inspire as many conflicting interpretations as Geoffrey of Monmouth. On one proposition, however, something close to a consen- sus reigns: Geoffrey of Monmouth wrote history in a manner that shows re- markable indifference toward religion and the institutional church. Antonia Gransden, in her fundamental survey of medieval English historical writing, says that “the tone of his work is predominantly secular” and even that he “abandoned the Christian intention of historical writing” and “had no moral, edificatory purpose”, while J.S.P. Tatlock, author of what is still the fullest study of Geoffrey, speaks of a “highly intelligent, rational and worldly personality” who shows “almost no interest in monachism … nor in miracles”, nor indeed in “religion, theology, saints, popes, even ecclesiastics in general”.1 Yet, even if these claims reflect a widely shared view, it is nonetheless startling that they should be made about a writer who lived in the first half of the 12th century. Some commentators find Geoffrey’s work so divergent from the norms of ear- lier medieval historiography that they are reluctant to treat him as a historian at all. Gransden flatly describes him as “a romance writer masquerading as an historian”.2 More cautiously, Matilda Bruckner names Geoffrey among those Latin historians who paved the way for romance by writing a secular-minded form of history “tending to pull away from the religious model (derived from Augustine and Orosius) that had viewed human history largely within the scheme of salvation”.3 This Christian tradition of historiography, against which Geoffrey of Monmouth is said to have rebelled, had its origins in late antiquity in the works of Eusebius, Augustine, and Orosius.
    [Show full text]
  • The Irish Contribution to Americas Independence
    THE IRISH CONTRIBUTION TO A M E R I C A ’ S I N D E P E N D E N C E The Irish Co nt rib ut io n t o ’ Am e rica s Inde pe nde nce By THOMA S HOB B S MAGINNISS, JR . P UB LISHED B Y DOIRE PUBLISHING COMPANY P H IL A D E LP H I A 19 13 1 1 THE IRE B LISHING Co . Copyright, 9 3, by DO PU , Philadelphia, PRESS OF WM F . FEL . L CO . PREFACE It becomes nations as well as individuals not to think of them s lves mor h Sel e i hl than th ou ht but to think sob rl . e g y ey g , e y f exaggerat ion de tracts from their characte r without adding to their power; but a greater and more dangerous fault is an habitual de eciation of their real resources and a consequent ” want o se geh ance — DKI f lj . GO N . NE of the faults chargeable against the Irish people , and particularly Americans of Irish de f scent , is that they are ignorant o the achieve m of I i 18 ents their race n the past . ITh s probably due to the fact that the people of Ireland have for generations been taught to believe that everything respectable has come from England and that the English are a superior race . m Indeed , an attempt has been made to i pres s the same on f theory the minds o Americans , and perhaps the most - pernicious falsehood promulgated by pro English writers , who exert a subtle influence in spreading the gospel of “ ” - Anglo Saxon superiority, is that America owes her liberty, her benevolent government , and even her pros “ ” “ — pe rity t o her English forefathers and Anglo Saxon n bloo d .
    [Show full text]
  • Video-Recorded Decapitations - a Seemingly Perfect Terrorist Tactic That Did Not Spread Martin Harrow DIIS Working Paper 2011:08 WORKING PAPER
    DIIS working paper DIIS WORKING PAPER 2011:08 Video-recorded Decapitations - A seemingly perfect terrorist tactic that did not spread Martin Harrow DIIS Working Paper 2011:08 WORKING PAPER 1 DIIS WORKING PAPER 2011:08 MARTIN HARROW MSC, PhD, Consulting Analyst at DIIS [email protected] DIIS Working Papers make available DIIS researchers’ and DIIS project partners’ work in progress towards proper publishing. They may include important documentation which is not necessarily published elsewhere. DIIS Working Papers are published under the responsibility of the author alone. DIIS Working Papers should not be quoted without the express permission of the author. DIIS WORKING PAPER 2011:08 © Copenhagen 2011 Danish Institute for International Studies, DIIS Strandgade 56, DK-1401 Copenhagen, Denmark Ph: +45 32 69 87 87 Fax: +45 32 69 87 00 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.diis.dk Cover Design: Carsten Schiøler Layout: Ellen-Marie Bentsen Printed in Denmark by Vesterkopi AS ISBN: 978-87-7605-449-6 Price: DKK 25.00 (VAT included) DIIS publications can be downloaded free of charge from www.diis.dk 2 DIIS WORKING PAPER 2011:08 CONTENTS Abstract 4 Introduction 5 Decapitation as a weapon 5 Video-recorded decapitations 2002-2009 8 The reproductive dynamics of terrorist tactics 11 The accessibility of video-recorded decapitations as a tactic 12 Effectiveness of terrorism – impacting two different audiences 14 Why not video-recorded decapitations? 18 Iraq 18 Afghanistan 19 The West 20 Conclusion 21 List of References 23 DIIS WORKING PAPER 2011:08 ABSTracT Video-recorded decapitations have an enormous impact, they are cheap and easy, and they allow the terrorists to exploit the potential of the Internet.
    [Show full text]
  • Welsh Church
    (S.R. 0-- O. and S.I. Revised to December 31,1948) ---------~ ~--"------- WELSH CHURCH 1. Charter of Incorporation. 2. Burial Grounds (Commencemen~ 1 of Enactment). p. 220. 1. Charter of Incorporation ORDER IN COUNCIl, APPROVING DRAFT CHARTER UNDER SECTION 13 (2) OF THE WELSH CHURCH ACT, 1914 (4 & 5 GEO. 5. c. 91) INCORPORATING THE REPRESENTA­ TIVE BODY OF THE CHURCH IN WALES. 1919 No. 564 At the Court at Buckingham Palace, the 15th day of April, 1919. PRESENT, The King's Most Excellent Majesty in Gouncil. :\Vhereas there was this day read at the Board a Report of a Cmnmittee of the Lord.. of His Majesty's Most Honourable Privy C.ouncil, dated the 9th day of April, 1919, in the words following, VIZ.:- " Your Majesty having been pleased, by Your Order of the 10th day of February, 1919, to refer unto this Committee the humble Petition of The Right Reverend the Lord Bishop of St. Asaph, The Right Reverend the Lord Bishop of St. David's, 'rhe Right Reverend the Lord Bishop of Bangor, The Right Reverend the Lord Bishop of Llandaff, The Right Honourable Sir John Eldon Bankes, The Right Honourable Sir J ames Richard Atkin, Sir Owen Philipps, G.C.M.G., M.P., and The Honourable Sir John Sankey, G.B.E., praying that Your Majesty would be pleased, in exercise of Your Royal Preroga- 1,ive and of the power in that behalf contained in Section 13 (2) of the Welsh Church Act, 1914, to grant a Charter of Incorpora­ tion to the persons mentioned in the Second Schedule to the said Petition, and their successors, being the Representative Body of the Church in Wales under the provisions of the said Ad: "1'he Lords of the Committee, in obedience to Your Majesty's said Order of Reference, have taken the said Petition into consideration, and do this day agree humbly to report, as their opinion, to Your Majesty, that a Charter may be grant~~ by Your Majesty in terms of the Draft hereunto annexed.
    [Show full text]
  • Adam L. Porter
    January 2014 Adam L. Porter Department of Religion 1120 West Lafayette Avenue Illinois College Jacksonville, IL 62650 1101 West College Avenue 269-767-8373 Jacksonville, IL 62650 [email protected] Voice: 919-245-3429 www2.ic.edu/aporter Fax: 919-245-3480 Education: Ph.D., Religious Studies, Duke University May 1999 Major Field: Judaic Studies Minor Fields: Old Testament, Art and Art History Master of Theological Studies, Harvard Divinity School May 1993 Concentration in Western Traditions Bachelor of Arts, Oberlin College May 1988 Major: Economics, Minor: Religion Dean of the Faculty, July 2014 - present Overseeing search and hiring of faculty Assessing faculty performance Associate Academic Dean, July 2013-June, 2014. Leading the team writing Illinois College’s HLC re-accreditation assurance argument Overseeing search and hiring of non-tenure track faculty, as well as meeting with them to discuss their performance Coordinate efforts to improve student retention, serve on college’s Early Intervention Group, student academic advising and progress monitoring Coordinate selecting and brining major speakers to campus as part of Convocation program Special projects and troubleshooting as assigned by the Dean of the College Teaching Experience: Professor, Illinois College, fall 2012-present Associate Professor, Illinois College, fall 2006-spring 2012 Assistant Professor, Illinois College, fall 2000-spring 2006 Courses Taught Abrahamic Religions (fall 2002, 2003, spring 2005, 2006, 2007, 2009, 2010, 2012, 2013) Ancient Near Eastern Religions (fall 2003, 2005) Art and Archaeology of the Ancient Mediterranean (spring 2003, fall 2004, 2006) Biblical Greek (AY 2004-05, AY 2008-09, AY 2010-11, spring 2012, fall 2012, spring 2013) BreakAway: Ancient Greece (spring 2008, 2010) BreakAway: Jews, Christians, and Muslims in Medieval Spain (spring 2003) BreakAway: Italy (May 2012) BreakAway: London (May 2013) BreakAway: Morocco (January 2008) BreakAway: Peru, Past and Present - Inca Trail (Spring 2009) Curriculum Vitæ A.
    [Show full text]
  • Holy Week Handout
    Holy Week Study and Traditions Palm Sunday — Triumphal Entry After spending the Sabbath in Bethany with Mary, Martha, and Lazarus, Jesus journeyed up the hill to Bethphage where His disciples obtained a donkey, so He could enter Jerusalem “riding upon an ass” - fulfillment of Zechariah’s prophecy and indication that He would come in peace. Believers spread their garments before him and waved palm branches, shouting “Hosanna to the Son of David, Hosanna in the highest.” * Read Matthew 21: 1-11 and Luke 19: 35-38 * Watch the Triumphal Entry lds.org/bible-videos * Create an Easter Tree — Cut some branches to bloom inside, put them in a large vase and decorate your Easter Tree with ribbons, egg ornaments (most craft stores have some before spring) and small images of the Savior’s life. You can find lots of art images on the web to print and cut at home. Monday — Second Cleansing of the Temple This was three years from the first cleansing when Jesus referred to the temple as “My Father’s house.” The last week of His life, He described the temple as, “My house.” Then He healed the blind and lame, and blighted the fig tree - symbolic of Christ’s detest for hypocrisy and proof that He had power over life and death. Then He returned to Bethany. * Read Matthew 21: 12-16, Mark 11:17, and Matthew 21: 17-22 * Watch Cleansing of the Temple * Easter Walk — Go on a nature treasure hunt for items that represent parts of the Easter story. Read or talk about the Easter story and find the following: - Something thorny or sharp to represent the crown of thorns
    [Show full text]
  • Jesus Is the Christ Son of God August 23, 2020
    Jesus is the Christ Son of God August 23, 2020 Our Savior’s Way Lutheran Church Pastor Tyson Labuhn Grace, mercy, and peace to you from God our Father and the Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ. Amen. In our Gospel reading for today, Jesus continues to lead His disciples into Gentile territory. This time to Caesarea Philippi, located southwest of Mount Hermon. Caesarea Philippi was a city that had been rebuilt by Philip the Tetrarch, son of Herod the Great. With its temples and shrines to various gods, He had renamed this city after himself. And it represented the wealth and power of the Roman Empire in that region. And so, when Jesus came into the region of Caesarea Philippi, He asks His disciples, “Who do people say that that Son of Man is?” (v.13) He wanted to know from His disciples, what others had to say about Him. He had displayed power from on high when He healed and fed many people. He had been declared to be the Son of God by several including His own disciples especially after He walked on the water. And yet, Jesus wanted His disciples to listen to what people were saying about Him. They answered Him, “Some say John the Baptist, others say Elijah, and others Jeremiah or one of the prophets.” (v.14) All of these were highly regarded among the Jews, but then again even in this extremely Gentile area, at most Jesus was considered to be no more than a great prophet. Curious then as to what His disciples believed and were saying about Him, Jesus asked them, “But who do you say that I am?”(v.15) This might be a good question for us as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Thoughts on the Crucifixion Edward A
    The Linacre Quarterly Volume 55 | Number 2 Article 16 May 1988 Why Did He Die in Three Hours?: Thoughts on the Crucifixion Edward A. Brucker Follow this and additional works at: http://epublications.marquette.edu/lnq Recommended Citation Brucker, Edward A. (1988) "Why Did He Die in Three Hours?: Thoughts on the Crucifixion," The Linacre Quarterly: Vol. 55: No. 2, Article 16. Available at: http://epublications.marquette.edu/lnq/vol55/iss2/16 Why Did He Die in Three Hours? Thoughts on the Crucifixion Edward A. Brucker, M.D. Doctor Brucker has served as director of laboratories at several hospitals and has, for the past 18 years, been a deputy medical examiner for Pima County in Arizona. He has studied and given lectures on the Shroud of Turinfor the past 27 years. Many problems exist with our understanding of crucifixion looking backward approximately 2,000 years. We know Constantine abolished crucifixions about 337 A. D. so that there is no known personal experience since that time of individuals reporting on crucifixions. Two events which add to our knowledge, however, and give us some insight as to how crucifixion was performed and what happened to the individual would be the Shroud of Turin which is probably the most important, and secondly, in 1968 in a Jewish cemetery - Givat ha M ivtar - in which the bones of a crucified individual, Johanaham, were identified with the nail being transfixed through the ankle bone and with scrape marks being identified on the radius bone. Other than these two events, we are limited to what the ancient historians and writers had to say about crucifixion.
    [Show full text]
  • H.B. Hackett, "Alleged Anachronism in Acts 5: 36
    1848.] Litlny. From Ba'albek to the sea its direct course is nearest 55 geographical miles. It flows at first along the alluvial valley; then breaks through the southern I!purs of Lebanon by a de~p chasm for about 20 miles, much of the way over a rocky bed and with a rushing and foaming stream; and at last flows to the sea with many windings through a broad low tract of meadow land. If now for this 20 milea mcham, we assume an average fall in the mile of 100 feet, or'20oo feet in all, (which Is a very large allowance, greater indeed than the rate of descent at the Little Falls of the Mohawk,) there yet remain. of the elevation Ilt Ba'albek (8;29 English feet) no less than 1729 feet to be distributed along the rest of the course, or 85 geographical miles. This gives an average fall of very nearly 50 feet in a mile, in a course mostly along alluvial vallies. This result, therefore, goet strongly to confirm that found above in the case of the Orontes; and both together would seem to afford decisive proof, that the reported elevation of the BIlU'a must be greatly exaggerated. Let us hope that public attention may be called to the varioaa points referred to in Ihis paper; and that those who have it in their power, will speedily cause these questions to be put at rest forever. ARTICLE II. ALLEGED ANACHRONISM IN ACTS 5: 36 IN RELATION TO Tmt SEDITION OF THEUDAS. TraDlialad fi'om the German loy H.
    [Show full text]