DOCSLIB.ORG

Sports Fish and Game Management Plan?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sports Fish and Game Management Plan? SPORTS FISH AND G AME MANAGEMENT PLAN Eastern Fish and Game Council CONTENTS FOREWORD FROM THE CHAIRMAN ........................................................................................................ 1 PART ONE INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 4 A. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 5 B. What is a Sports Fish and Game Management Plan? .......................................................................... 6 C. Who is the Plan for? .................................................................................................................................. 7 D. Structure of the Plan ................................................................................................................................. 7 E. Monitoring Performance and Reporting ................................................................................................ 8 F. Plan Review ................................................................................................................................................ 8 G. Notification ................................................................................................................................................ 8 PART TWO MISSION STATEMENT ............................................................................................................ 9 Mission Statement ................................................................................................................................................. 10 PART THREE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES .............................................................................................. 11 1. Species ....................................................................................................................................................... 12 2. Habitat ....................................................................................................................................................... 30 3. Angler and Hunter Participation ........................................................................................................... 42 4. Public Awareness ..................................................................................................................................... 50 5. Compliance ............................................................................................................................................... 56 6 Licensing ................................................................................................................................................... 60 7. Council ...................................................................................................................................................... 63 8. Planning and Reporting .......................................................................................................................... 66 9. Administration ......................................................................................................................................... 69 2 PART FOUR RESOURCE DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................ 73 1 The Region ............................................................................................................................................... 75 2. Species ....................................................................................................................................................... 77 3. Habitats ..................................................................................................................................................... 80 4. Anglers and Hunters ............................................................................................................................... 95 5. Eastern Fish and Game Council ........................................................................................................... 96 PART FIVE INTERPRETATION AND RELEVANT LEGISLATION.............................................. 97 1. Interpretation ........................................................................................................................................... 98 2. Relevant Legislation ................................................................................................................................ 99 3. Notifying The Plan ................................................................................................................................ 102 Appendix 1 Significant Sports Fish and Game Bird Habitats in the Eastern Fish and Game Region .................................................................................................................................................................. 103 Appendix 2 Land Managed by Eastern Fish and Game Council ............................................................... 105 Appendix 3 Iwi Rohe (Tribal Areas) Overlapping the Eastern Fish and Game Region ........................ 107 Appendix 4 Schedule of Sports Fish and Game Bird Species .................................................................... 111 Appendix 5 Extract From the Conservation Act 1987 ................................................................................ 113 3 PART ONE INTRODUCTION Figure 1 – The Eastern Fish and Game Region 4 A. INTRODUCTION The Eastern Fish and Game Region is one of twelve Fish and Game regions in New Zealand. In 1990 the management of New Zealand’s sports fish and game bird resource was restructured by an amendment to the Conservation Act 1987. The former Acclimatisation Societies were replaced by twelve regional Fish and Game Councils and one national Fish and Game Council. Each of these Councils became Crown Entities and then Public Entities with the passing of the Crown Entities Act 2004. They have specific functions, responsibilities and powers to manage sports fish and game birds, as specified in Sections 26Q, 26R, and 26S of the Act1. ‘Fish & Game New Zealand’ is the operating name of the New Zealand Fish and Game Council together with the twelve regional Fish and Game Councils established to manage, maintain, and enhance the sports fish and game resource in the recreational interests of anglers and hunters. Fish and Game Councils are statutory managers of the sports fish and game bird resource and their sustainable recreational use by anglers and hunters New Zealand wide. The only exceptions to this are the sports fishery in the Lake Taupo catchment, and the game bird resource in the Chatham Islands, which are managed by the Department of Conservation. The sports fish and game bird resource is the property of the Crown. Fish and Game Councils are empowered to administer the resource on the Crown’s behalf, and to levy licence fees from anglers and hunters to cover the costs of doing so. Fish and Game Councils receive no government funding to undertake their statutory purposes and activities are financed mainly through the sale of sports fish and game bird licences. Anglers and hunters purchase licences to fish or hunt and in return have input to the sports fish and game bird management in their region. Councillors are anglers and or hunters elected through a democratic process by whole season licence holders. The main purpose of Fish and Game Councils is to: “Manage, maintain and enhance the sports fish and game resource in the recreational interests of anglers and hunters.” 2 In fulfilling this purpose, the primary functions of Fish and Game Councils are to: Assess and monitor sports fish and game bird populations, habitats and harvests. Assess and monitor angler and hunter satisfaction. Maintain and improve the sports fish and game bird resource. Provide information and promote angling and hunting. Represent the interests of anglers and hunters in the statutory planning process. 3 The Eastern Fish and Game Region (see Figure 14) extends from Waihi Beach around the east coast to a few kilometres north of the Mohaka River mouth. It then follows the southern side of the Waiau River catchment, and south along the Kaimanawa ranges to Mount Ruapehu. From 1 Because of their relevance to this Sports Fish and Game Management Plan Sections 26Q, 26R, and 26S of the Conservation Act 1987 are reproduced in full in Appendix 5, supra at 113. 2 Conservation Act 1987, s 26Q(1). 3 Ibid, s 26(Q). 4 Supra at 4. 5 Mount Ruapehu, the region boundary runs north to Lake Maraetai, along the Mamaku Plateau and the Kaimai range to Waihi Beach. The elected Council cannot consist of more than twelve members. Only those who hold a current adult whole season licence to fish for sports fish or hunt for game birds are eligible to become members of the Council through the election process. Elections are held every three years, at which time all seats on the Council are up for re-election. The election process is democratic and prescribed in the Fish and Game Council Election Regulations 1990. The Eastern Fish and Game Council represents the interests of more than 19,000 anglers and 4,300 hunters5 who purchase sports fish or game bird licences in the Eastern Fish and Game Region. B. WHAT IS A SPORTS FISH AND GAME MANAGEMENT PLAN? It is intended that the goals, objectives, policies and methods set out in this plan will allow Eastern Fish
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Heading/Title Aquatic Pest Report 2019
    Aquatic Pest Report 2019 Bay of Plenty Regional Council Environmental Publication 2019/03 FebruaryHeading/title 2019 PreparedSubheading by Freya Ewing and Thomas Bailey (Summer Students) 5Month Quay YearStreet P O Box 364 WhakatānePrepared by NEW ZEALAND ISSN: 1175-9372 (Print) ISSN: 1179-9471 (Online) Cover photo: Rowan Wells (NIWA) Acknowledgements We would like to thank Hamish Lass, Biosecurity Officer for his support and guidance, and Lucas MacDonald, Biosecurity Officer for his assistance and advice across all advocacy work. Our acknowledgements also go to Greg Corbett and the remainder of the Biosecurity Team at the Bay of Plenty Regional Council, we are grateful for the encouragement and support we received from all of you. We would also like to show our gratitude to Geoff Ewert for his continued commitment to the Rotorua Lakes, in particular with fixing weed cordons and the running of the boat wash station. We are also immensely grateful to Sarah Van Der Boom from Freshwater Biosecurity Partnership Program for her help with data collection. Lastly, we would like to thank Sam Beaumont and the remainder of the team at Ministry for Primary Industries, for the supplying of merchandise and collateral, signage and guidance. BAY OF PLENTY REGIONAL COUNCIL TOI MOANA 1 Executive summary Many of New Zealand’s most well-known lakes and rivers can be found in the Bay of Plenty region and are therefore known to attract significant visitor numbers annually. The preservation and protection of these waterways are what attracts so many international and domestic tourists to them. Due to the close proximity of the Bay of Plenty lakes and rivers, and their popularity, they are extremely susceptible to invasive pest species.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Impacts of COVID-19 on the Rotorua Economy – Early Estimates for Rotorua Lakes District Council
    Economic Impacts of COVID-19 on the Rotorua Economy – Early Estimates for Rotorua Lakes District Council April 2020 Authorship This report was prepared by Rob Hayes with assistance from Gareth Kiernan and Dr Adolf Stroombergen. Email: [email protected] All work and services rendered are at the request of, and for the purposes of the client only. Neither Infometrics nor any of its employees accepts any responsibility on any grounds whatsoever, including negligence, to any other person or organisation. While every effort is made by Infometrics to ensure that the information, opinions, and forecasts are accurate and reliable, Infometrics shall not be liable for any adverse consequences of the client’s decisions made in reliance of any report provided by Infometrics, nor shall Infometrics be held to have given or implied any warranty as to whether any report provided by Infometrics will assist in the performance of the client’s functions. 3 Economic impacts of COVID-19 on the Rotorua economy – April 2020 Table of contents Executive Summary ........................................................................5 Introduction ...................................................................................... 7 The greatest economic shock in living memory ..................................................................7 Modelling of the impacts of COVID-19 are based on key assumptions ....................... 8 The Level 4 lockdown has rocked the Rotorua economy ... 10 Consumer spending has fallen off a cliff ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Pest Plants
    REFERENCES AND SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY © Crown Copyright 2010 145 Contract Report No. 2075 REFERENCES AND SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY Adams, J. 1885: On the botany of Te Aroha Mountain. Transactions and Proceedings of the New Zealand Institute 17: 275-281 Allaby, M. (ed) 1994: The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England. 415 pp. Allan, H. H. 1982: Flora of New Zealand. Vol 1. Government Printer, Wellington. Allen, D.J. 1983: Notes on the Kaimai-Mamaku Forest Park. New Zealand Forest Service, Tauranga (unpublished). 20 p. Allen R.B. and McLennan M.J. 1983, Indigenous forest survey manual: two inventory methods. Forest Research Institute Bulletin No. 48. 73 pp. Allen R.B. 1992: An inventory method for describing New Zealand vegetation. Forest Research Institute Bulletin No. 181. 25 pp. Anon 1975: Biological reserves and forest sanctuaries. What’s New in Forest Research 21. Forest Research Institute, Rotorua. 4 p. Anon 1982: Species list from Kopurererua Stream. New Zealand Wildlife Service National Habitat Register, May 1982. Bay of Plenty Habitat sheets, Folder 2, records room, Rotorua Conservancy. Anon 1983a: Reserve proposals. Northern Kaimai-Mamaku State Forest Park. Background notes for SFSRAC Meeting and Inspection, 1983. Tauranga. 12 pp. Anon 1983b: The inadequacy of the ecological reserves proposed for the Kaimai-Mamaku State Forest Park. Joint campaign on Native Forests, Nelson. 14 p. plus 3 references. Anon 1983c: Overwhelming support to save the Kaimai-Mamaku. Bush Telegraph 12: 1-2. Wellington. Anon 1989: Conservation values of natural areas on Tasman Forestry freehold and leasehold land. Unpublished report for Tasman Forestry Ltd, Department of Conservation and Royal Forest & Bird Protection Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Ruakituri River
    Ruakituri River Key Values Cultural Recreation (angling, rafting, kayaking) Ecology (fisheries, wildlife) Landscape (scenic) Natural character Table 1: List of documents reviewed Year Name Author 1979 64 New Zealand Rivers Egarr, Egarr & Mackay 1981 New Zealand Recreational River Survey G & J Egarr 1982 Submission on the draft Inventory of Wild and Scenic Rivers of National Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries Importance 1986 A List of Rivers and Lakes Deserving Inclusion in A Schedule of Protected Waters Grindell & Guest 1994 Headwater Trout Fisheries in New Zealand NIWA 1998 Conservation Management Strategy, East Cast Conservancy 1998 – 2008 Department of Conservation 2002 The Ruakituri River - A hidden gem Whitewater New Zealand 2004 Potential Water Bodies of National Importance Ministry for the Environment 2012 River Values Assessment System (RiVAS) Lindis Consulting 2012 Te Urewera Act 2014 – Section 126 Ruakituri Wilderness Area New Zealand Legislation 2013 Huiarau Range Wilderness Magazine 2013 Te Urewera-Tūhoe Bill - Submission to the Māori Affairs Committee From the Fish and Game Council Eastern Fish and Game Council 2014 Ruakituri River Fish and Game New Zealand Eastern Region 2016 Iwi and Hapū of Te Rohe o Te Wairoa Deed of Settlement + Documents Schedule Iwi and Hapū of Te Rohe o Te Wairoa and the Crown 2017 Timeline Wilderness Protection Wilderlife 2018 Cultural Values Table Hawke’s Bay Regional Council 2018 Ruakituri River Trout Fishing NZ Fishing website 2018 Waterfalls in Hawke’s Bay and East Coast Waterfalls New Zealand Website 2018 Land Air Water Aotearoa (LAWA) Hawke’s Bay Regional Council 2018 Famous New Zealand Rivers Fishing New Zealand Discussion Purpose of report 1.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introductory Review
    1 Citation: Lowe, D.J. 2010. Quaternary volcanism, tephras, and tephra-derived soils in New Zealand: an introductory review. In: Lowe, D.J.; Neall, V.E., Hedley, M; Clothier, B.; Mackay, A. 2010. Guidebook for Pre-conference North Island, New Zealand „Volcanoes to Oceans‟ field tour (27-30 July). 19th World Soils Congress, International Union of Soil Sciences, Brisbane. Soil and Earth Sciences Occasional Publication No. 3, Massey University, Palmerston North, pp. 7-29. Quaternary volcanism, tephras, and tephra-derived soils in New Zealand: an introductory review David J. Lowe Department of Earth and Ocean Sciences, University of Waikato, Hamilton Introduction This two-part article comprises brief introductions to (1) volcanism and its products in general and to the broad pattern of Quaternary volcanism and tephrostratigraphy in North Island, and (2) the ensuing tephra-derived soils of North Island. Part 1 derives mainly from Smith et al. (2006), Leonard et al. (2007), and Lowe (2008a). Other useful reviews include those of Neall (2001), Graham (2008: Chapter 7), Wilson et al. (2009), and Cole et al. (2010). Recent reviews on tephras include Shane (2000), Alloway et al. (2007), Lowe (2008b, 2011), and Lowe et al. (2008a, 2008b). A history of tephra studies in New Zealand was reported by Lowe (1990). Part 2 describes the distribution and character of the main tephra-derived soils, these being Entisols and Andisols (mostly Vitrands and Udands) and Ultisols (Lowe and Palmer, 2005). Books on these and other soils in New Zealand include NZ Soil Bureau (1968), Gibbs (1980), McLaren and Cameron (1996), Cornforth (1998), and Molloy and Christie (1998).
    [Show full text]
  • Māori Spaces in Foreign Places: the Case of Hinemihi O Te Āo Tawhito
    MAI Review, 2007, 3, Doctoral Conference Abstracts Māori spaces in foreign places: The case of Hinemihi o te āo tawhito Keri Wikitera Tuhourangi/Ngāti Wahiao Auckland University of Technology Auckland, New Zealand [email protected] This study is in the preliminary stages of a PhD candidature. The purpose of this thesis is to investigate Māori economic development opportunities in tourism. Many of which are intrinsically linked to cultural identity (Te Awekotuku, 1981; Ryan, 2002). This study aims to demonstrate that Māori notions of cultural identity are not confined to connections to geographical place alone. Cultural identity are socially created spaces dependent on relationships of people to each other and to iconic cultural references existent in both physical and metaphysical representation. The study will examine the history of Hinemihi, a whare tipuna that was situated at Te Wairoa, Tarawera until the eruption of 1886. She was built in response to the burgeoning tourism trade and she is now situated at Clandon Park, London. Clandon Park is a quintessential English estate, now also a tourist destination. Embedded in her history are significant periods of change for Māori. The study will investigate her relationships with Tuhourangi and Ngāti Hinemihi in her early years through to her relationship with Ngāti Ranana now. Also how she has linked people through whakapapa and now contemporary notions of identity. Māori spaces created in foreign places will be considered drawing on perspectives of people who, through Hinemihi,
    [Show full text]
  • Whakatangata Kia Kaha
    Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. WHAKATANGATA KIA KAHA: TOITŪ TE WHAKAPAPA, TOITŪ TE TUAKIRI, TOITŪ TE MANA – AN EXAMINATION OF THE CONTRIBUTION OF TE AUTE COLLEGE TO MĀORI ADVANCEMENT. A THESIS PRESENTED IN FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN EDUCATION AT MASSEY UNIVERSITY, PALMERSTON NORTH, NEW ZEALAND. JAMES PHILIP HECTOR GRAHAM 2009 i ABSTRACT The thesis examines the contribution of Te Aute College to Māori advancement by exploring the whakapapa of Te Aute College and the brand that has developed out of the school’s whakapapa from its beginnings in 1854 prior to major European settlement in the Hawkes Bay through to the 21st century. In doing so, the notion of whakapapa is used to reveal the layers of tradition, history, connections, narratives, achievements and setbacks that have enabled the realisation of Māori potential and the ability of Te Aute College to sustain a contribution to the advancement of Māori. This thesis contends that the contribution of Te Aute College to Māori advancement stems from its whakapapa and its brand that is unequivocally Te Aute in focus and character. An Indigenous Māori research paradigm, a whakapapa research methodology, provides the context for researching Te Aute College, the basis of this thesis. The thesis also explores whakapapa as a tool that can be used as a legitimate research framework when engaging in Māori research.
    [Show full text]
  • Bay of Plenty Community Carbon Footprint 2015/16
    BoPRC CF Bay of Plenty Regional Council 08-Dec-2017 Doc No. R001 Bay of Plenty Community Carbon Footprint 2015/16 Final Results P:\605X\60545822\8. Issued Docs\8.1 Reports\60545822_BoPRC Summary of Final Results_20171208.docx Revision B – 08-Dec-2017 Prepared for – Bay of Plenty Regional Council – Co No.: N/A AECOM BoPRC CF Bay of Plenty Community Carbon Footprint 2015/16 – Final Results Bay of Plenty Community Carbon Footprint 2015/16 Final Results Client: Bay of Plenty Regional Council Co No.: N/A Prepared by AECOM Consulting Services (NZ) Ltd Level 3, 80 The Terrace, Wellington 6011, PO Box 27277, Wellington 6141, New Zealand T +64 4 896 6000 F +64 4 896 6001 www.aecom.com 08-Dec-2017 Job No.: 60545822 AECOM in Australia and New Zealand is certified to ISO9001, ISO14001 AS/NZS4801 and OHSAS18001. © AECOM Consulting Services (NZ) Limited. All rights reserved. No use of the contents, concepts, designs, drawings, specifications, plans etc. included in this report is permitted unless and until they are the subject of a written contract between AECOM Consulting Services (NZ) Limited (AECOM) and the addressee of this report. AECOM accepts no liability of any kind for any unauthorised use of the contents of this report and AECOM reserves the right to seek compensation for any such unauthorised use. Document Delivery AECOM Consulting Services (NZ) Limited (AECOM) provides this document in either printed format, electronic format or both. AECOM considers the printed version to be binding. The electronic format is provided for the client’s convenience and AECOM requests that the client ensures the integrity of this electronic information is maintained.
    [Show full text]
  • Tukituki River Catchment Cultural Values and Uses
    Tukituki River Catchment Cultural Values and Uses June 2012 Report For Hawke’s Bay Regional Council Te Taiwhenua O Tamatea In Partnership with Te Taiwhenua O Heretaunga Research Teams Te Taiwhenua O Tamatea: Te Taiwhenua O Heretaunga: Dr. Benita Wakefield Marei Apatu Marge Hape Dale Moffatt Jorgette Maaka Donna Whitiwhiti Bruce Wakefield Hirani Maaka Acknowledgments Te Taiwhenua O Tamatea wish to acknowledge the following whanau for providing their aroha and tautoko to this project: our kaumatua Aunty Ahi Robertson, Aunty Lily Wilcox, Aunty Ahi Heperi, Professor Roger Maaka and Morris Meha; Joanne Heperi, JB Smith, Jamie Graham, Hinewai Taungakore and finally all the Board for their input and feedback. Te Taiwhenua O Heretaunga wish to acknowledge: Kaumatua - Owen Jerry Hapuku, Haami Hilton, Miki Unahi, Heitia Hiha, Hawira Hape, Rumatiki Kani, Waa Harris, Wini Mauger; Te Rūnanganui o Heretaunga - Owen Jerry Hapuku, Peter Paku, Kenneth Jones, Jill Munro, Bernadette Hamlin, Koro Whaitiri, Ripia Waaka, Hariata Nuku, Mike Paku, Hira Huata, Keita Hapi, Mataora Toatoa, Tom Mulligan; focus group/ hikoi members/ interviewees – Morry Black, Waa Harris, Bernadette Hamlin, Ripia Waaka, Robin Hape, Jenny Mauger, Sandra Mauger, Hariata Nuku, Bayden Barber, Hinehau Whitiwhiti, Richard Waerea, Karen Apatu, Paul Blake, Glen MacDonald, Roger Maaka, Jorgette Maaka, Paul Blake, Miki (Darkie) Unahi, Owen Jerry Hapuku, Advisory - Jeremy Tātere MacLeod, Ngahiwi Tomoana, Dr Adele Whyte, Ngatai Huata. Tukituki River Catchment Cultural Values & Uses Page 2 Mihi
    [Show full text]
  • Huharua, Pukewhanake and Nga Kuri a Wharei
    HUHARUA, PUKEWHANAKE, AND NGA KUru A WHAREI by Heather Bassett Richard Kay A research report commissioned by the Waitangi Tribunal forWai 47 December 1996 238 J ~ TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Figures 3 "11 Introduction 4 The Claim 4 :l 1. Buharua 6 '''-.- 1.1 Introduction 6 ~ 1.2 Raupatu and the Creation of Reserves 6 1.3 Alienation of Maori Reserves 12 1.4 Control, Management and Access to Huharua 17 J 1.5 Summary 20 2. Pukewhanake 22 J 2.1 Location and People ofPukewhanake 22 2.2 Raupatu West of the Wairoa River 23 2.3 Lot 178 Parish ofTe Puna 26 :1 2.4 Control, Use and Management ofPukewhanake 27 2.5 Summary 31 :J 3. Nga Kuri a Wharei 33 3.1 Traditional Boundary: 'Mai Tikirau ki Nga Kuri a Wharei' 33 :1 3.2 Raupatu Boundary 35 3.3 Summary 37 ] Bibliography 39 Appendix One: Statement of Claim, Wai 47 41 :J :J .J J "1 L ~ 1 ! u , ' ,- .. 2 239 TABLE OF FIGURES Figure 1: Cultural Sites Around Tauranga Harbour (from Stokes, 1992, p 45) Figure 2: Fords from Plummers Point (from WI 35/161 Omokoroa - Te Puna, National Archives Wellington) Figure 3: Reserves in the Katikati Te Puna Purchase (from Stokes, 1990, p 192) Figure 4: Lot 210 Parish ofTe Puna (ML423A) Figure 5: Plummers Point 1886 (SO 5222) Figure 6: Lot 178 Parish ofTe Puna Today (SDIMap) Figure 7: Pa Sites on the Wairoa River 1864 (from Kahotea, 1996) Figure 8: Boundaries of the Katikati Te Puna Purchases (from Stokes, 1996) Figure 9: Plan of Native Reserves (ML 9760) Figure 10: Pukewhanake 1 October 1996 (Photos by author) Figure 11: Plan of the "Ngaiterangi" Purchase Deed (from Stokes, 1996) Figure 12: Plan of the Tawera Purchase Deed (from Stokes, 1996) Figure 13: Plan of the "Pirirakau" Purchase Deed (from Stokes, 1996) Figure 14: Boundaries of the Katikati Te Puna Purchases (from Stokes, 1996) Figure 15: Nga Kuri a Wharei and the Confiscation Line (from Stokes, Whanau a Tauwhao, p 19) 3 240 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    Annual Report 2017/2018 Bay of Plenty Regional Council, Rotorua #love our lakes Lakes Council and Te Arawa Lakes Trust. rotorualakes.co.nz Working as one to protect our lakes with funding assistance from the Ministry for the Environment. Contents Purpose 1 Overview 2 Lake Rotorua 2 Lake Rotoehu 3 Lake Okareka 4 Lake Rotoiti 4 Summary of TLI results 4 Key achievements 6 Lake operations 6 Land management 9 Policy, planning, communications and information technology 11 Sewerage 13 Rotorua Te Arawa Lakes annual water quality results 14 Introduction 14 Lake Rotorua 16 Lake Rotoehu 16 Lake Rotoiti 17 Lake Ōkāreka 17 Lake Tarawera 18 Lake Okaro 19 Lake Rotomahana 19 Lake Rerewhakaaitu 20 Lake Tikitapu 21 Lake Okataina 21 Lake Rotomā 22 Lake Rotokakahi 22 ROTORUA TE ARAWA LAKES PROGRAMME i Annual Plan of Interventions – Deed Funded Lakes 24 Lake Rotorua 24 Lake Rotoehu 29 Lake Rotoiti 31 Lake Ōkāreka 33 Te Tuapapa o ngā Wai o Te Arawa/Te Arawa Cultural Values Framework 34 Annual Plan of Interventions - Non-Deed Funded 36 Lake Tarawera 36 Lake Ōkaro 37 Lake Rotomā 37 Lake Rotokakahi 37 Lake Tikitapu 38 Financials 39 ii Annual Report 2017/2018 Purpose The purpose of this document is to report against the 2017/2018 Annual Work Plan of the Rotorua Te Arawa Lakes Programme. This report is in accordance with Clause 5.1 and 5.2 of the Deed of Funding. This report provides an update on deed funded projects, including their financial status. It also provides an update on non-deed funded projects that fall under the Programme.
    [Show full text]
  • Salmonid Angling in Hawke's
    Salmonid Angling in Hawke’s Bay: Application of the RIVAS Salmonid Angling in Hawke’s Bay: Application of the River Values Assessment System (RiVAS) Kay Booth (Lindis Consulting) Larissa Coubrough Tom Winlove LEaP Research Paper No. 16 July 2012 HBRC Plan No: 4374 Salmonid Angling in Hawke’s Bay: Application of the RIVAS Salmonid Angling in Hawke’s Bay: Application of the River Values Assessment System (RiVAS) Kay Booth (Lindis Consulting) Larissa Coubrough Tom Winlove Land Environment and People Research Paper No. 16 July 2012 HBRC Plan No: 4374 ISSN 2230-4207 (online) ISBN 978-0-86476-305-1 (online) Lincoln University, Canterbury, New Zealand ©LEaP, Lincoln University, New Zealand 2012 Contacts - email: [email protected] web: http://www.lincoln.ac.nz/leap This information may be copied or reproduced electronically and distributed to others without restriction, provided LEaP, Lincoln University is acknowledged as the source of information. Under no circumstances may a charge be made for this information without the express permission of LEaP, Lincoln University, New Zealand. Series URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10182/3410 TABLE OF CONTENTS FORWARD BY EXPERT PANEL ............................................................................................. III 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 PURPOSE ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 PREPARATORY
    [Show full text]