2036 Site Allocations Flood Risk Sequential Test

South East Lincolnshire Local Plan 2011 – 2036

Site Allocations Flood Risk Sequential Test (February 2017)

1.0 Introduction

1.1 This document provides the sequential test for proposed allocations identified in the pre-submission draft South East Lincolnshire Local Plan (SELLP). The approach taken considers all the potential sites considered in the consultations undertaken in the:

• Preferred Options consultation (January/ February 2016); and • Further Preferred Sites consultation (July/ August 2016). • Sites considered to be developable which have not been selected as allocations1.

1.2 The report initially provides an overview of the flood risk issues for the SELLP area, alongside a summary of both national and local policy requirements in relation to flood risk. Following this, the document describes the methodology applied to undertake the Sequential Test for the housing sites identified in the SELLP to establish whether it would be possible for development to be directed to locations with a lower risk of flooding and, where relevant, also identifies when the Exception Test will need to be applied to proposed allocations. The tables included in Appendix 1 provide commentary on each settlement and divides the sites considered into those proposed to be allocated in the pre-submission SELLP; and those, which are considered developable, but are not proposed for allocation.

2.0 Overview and Policy Context

National Policy

2.1 The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) sets out the Government’s planning policy for England including the consideration of flood risk. The NPPF states in paragraph 99 that,

‘Local Plans should take account of climate change over the longer term, including factors such as flood risk, coastal change, water supply and changes to biodiversity and landscape’.

2.2 Paragraph 100 of the NPPF elaborates upon the requirements in relation to flood risk and specifically states that

‘...inappropriate development in areas at risk of flooding should be avoided by directing development away from areas at highest risk, but where development is necessary, making it safe without increasing flood risk elsewhere’.

1 This includes sites submitted for consideration in the SHLAA and any additional sites submitted as a result of the various rounds of consultation on the emerging local plan.

1 2.3 The NPPF therefore advocates the use of a sequential, risk-based approach to allocating sites for development in order to, where possible, avoid flood risk to people and property and manage any residual risk. It is advised that this should be achieved by: • applying the Sequential Test; • if necessary, applying the Exception Test; • safeguarding land from development that is required for current and future flood management; • using opportunities offered by new development to reduce the causes and impacts of flooding; and • where climate change is expected to increase flood risk so that some existing development may not be sustainable in the long-term, seeking opportunities to facilitate the relocation of development, including housing, to more sustainable locations.

Sequential Test

2.4 The Sequential Test is, in effect, a sieving process designed to ensure that development is steered away from areas at high risk of flooding, where possible. If flood risk avoidance was the sole consideration in the selection of development sites, this would mean that when a local planning authority is allocating sites for development in their local plan all sites that are in Flood Zone 1 would be allocated before those in Flood Zone 2, and sites in Flood Zone 2 before those Flood Zone 3 until sufficient land is found. Other sources of flood risk also need to be considered, for example a site in Flood Zone 1 may still be at risk of surface water flooding. Moreover, the information contained in the SFRA documents for South East Lincolnshire provides additional detail on flood hazard and flood depth which has been incorporated into the analysis of the sequential test in this report.

2.5 The test takes a hierarchical approach to flood risk management of avoidance wherever possible. Paragraph 101 of the NPPF states that:

‘The aim of the Sequential Test is to steer new development to areas with the lowest probability of flooding. Development should not be allocated or permitted if there are reasonably available sites appropriate for the proposed development in areas with a lower probability of flooding. The Strategic Flood Risk Assessment will provide the basis for applying this test. A sequential approach should be used in areas known to be at risk from any form of flooding’.

2.6 Additional guidance is available in the Planning Practice Guidance (PPG) to explain the application of the Sequential Test. In accordance with this guidance, the Level 1 and Level 2 SFRAs for the Local Plan area will be used

2 as the basis for undertaking a Sequential Test for the proposed allocations in terms of flood risk.

2.7 If, following the application of the Sequential Test, it is not possible, consistent with wider sustainability objective, for the development to be located in zones with a lower probability of flooding; the Exception Test can be applied if appropriate. The accompanying SA to the pre-submission SELLP considers a range of sustainability objectives including flood risk.

Exception Test

2.8 Having completed the Sequential Test, the Exception Test aims to provide a method of managing flood risk whilst still allowing necessary development to occur in the interests of sustainable development.

2.9 Paragraph 102 of the NPPF allows the application of the Exception Test by a local planning authority where following application of the Sequential Test it is not possible, consistent with wider sustainability objectives, for the development to be located in zones with a lower risk of flooding. The Exception Test therefore provides a method of managing flood risk while still allowing for development to occur.

2.10 There are two elements to the Exception Test as set out below. Both elements need to be passed:

• It must be demonstrated that the development provides wider sustainability benefits to the community that outweigh flood risk, informed by a SFRA where one has been prepared; and

• A site-specific FRA must demonstrate that the development will be safe for its lifetime taking account of the vulnerability of its users, without increasing flood risk elsewhere, and, where possible will reduce flood risk overall.

2.11 Site-specific FRAs have not been completed for each of the proposed allocations and these are usually undertaken at the planning application stage. Consequently, at this stage it is only possible to determine whether the proposed allocations identified by the pre-submission SELLP would need to be subject to the Exception Test. The sustainability appraisal of the proposed allocations and “reasonable alternatives” sites has informed the consideration of sites with respect to flood risk and wider sustainability matters, fulfilling the first element noted above in paragraph 2.10.

3 Flood Risk Vulnerability Classification

2.12 The Planning Practice Guidance sets out flood risk vulnerability classification for various land uses as per Table 1 below. The classification acknowledges that not all land uses have the same vulnerability to flooding. Some land uses, such as residential development, are more vulnerable to the potential loss of life and damage to personal property and possessions than retail or office developments for example.

2.13 By way of example, Table 1 below shows that within Flood Zone 1 all land uses are acceptable as flood risk is not considered to be significant constraint to development. However, a site-specific Flood Risk Assessment (FRA) will be required on sites that are greater than one hectare in size and this assessment will need to consider other potential sources of flood risk, such as ground and surface water flooding. In Flood Zone 3a, potentially suitable land uses are water compatible (e.g. minerals development) and less vulnerable uses (e.g. employment uses). More vulnerable uses (e.g. residential) and essential infrastructure uses (e.g. transport infrastructure) should only be permitted in this zone if the Exception Test is passed. Highly vulnerable development (e.g. caravans) should not be permitted in this zone.

Flood Risk Essential Water Highly More Less Vulnerability Infrastructure Compatible Vulnerable Vulnerable Vulnerable and Flood Zone e.g. Transport e.g. open e.g. Police e.g. e.g. offices, Compatibility and Utility space, Stations, Hospitals, industry and Infrastructure docks, mobile residential storage or marinas and homes and institutions distribution wharves emergency and dispersal buildings points used for dwelling houses Flood Risk Zone 1 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes - low probability Flood Risk Exception Zone 2 Yes Yes Test Yes Yes - medium Required probability Flood Risk Exception Exception Test Zone 3a – high Yes No Test Yes Required probability Required Flood Risk Zone 3b – the Exception Test Yes No No No Functional Required Flood Plain Table 1: Flood Risk Vulnerability Classification (Planning Practice Guidance March 2014)

4 Local Policy

2.14 The Environment Agency's Flood Map shows that almost the whole of the Borough of Boston and a large part of the South Holland District are subject to flooding. Approx 85% of Boston lies within areas that could flood (84% in Flood Zone 3 'high probability', 1% in Flood Zone 2 ' medium probability') resulting in 26,503 residential and 1,212 commercial properties being at risk. Approximately 74% of South Holland lies within areas that could flood (68% in Flood Zone 3, 6% in Flood Zone 2) resulting in 29,922 residential and 1,296 commercial properties being at risk.

2.15 The approach to flood risk in the pre-submission SELLP is a key aspect of the strategy given the significant issues faced by potential flooding incidents in the area. The Lincolnshire Coastal Study Group was formed in 2008 to progress a coastal strategy covering the districts of Boston, East Lindsey and South Holland. Consultants were commissioned and the study was completed in March 2010. The study set out three guiding principles to inform its work. The first two principles set out the need to manage the level of development in areas identified as hazardous with respect to flooding; and the general approach to mitigation where it was necessary and feasible to do so. The third principle set out the aim to improve social, economic and environmental conditions in existing and new communities by:

• Minimising the loss of high quality agricultural land;

• Diversifying the tourism industry;

• Improving green infrastructure;

• Protecting and enhancing water infrastructure;

• Protecting natural, cultural and historic assets;

• Improving transport infrastructure and services;

• Improving the quality of existing housing stock and access to jobs, training and services for local people.

2.16 The proposals to revoke the EMRS in 2010 led to joint statement being issued by the local authorities involved in the study plus the Environment Agency and Natural England. This confirmed the intention to utilise the study as part of the evidence base for the emerging Core Strategy (Strategy and Policies Plan). A further statement in 2011 reconfirmed this position.

2.17 Work has continued on developing the policies and allocations in the SELLP including the consultation undertaken in January/February 2016; and the further consultation on preferred site allocations (July/August 2016). The pre-

5 submission SELLP includes a strategic policy approach to flood risk that is set out below.

Policy 5: Strategic Approach to Flood Risk

Major development shall be located in areas at the lowest hazard or probability of flooding and shall not, in itself, increase flood risk. Where the development would be for uses defined as Essential Infrastructure, Highly Vulnerable or More Vulnerable, it will be a requirement to show why the need for the development is exceptional where the hazard or probability of flooding of the sequentially-selected areas is constrained. Development will be permitted following the satisfactory completion of the Sequential and Exceptions Test and through the submission of a site-specific flood risk assessment that demonstrates appropriate flood risk mitigation measures for the protection of occupants. Mitigation for the identified flood risk, including appropriate allowances for climate change, required by such development to make it safe will be provided and maintained for the lifetime of the development.

Flood-risk management infrastructure shall be provided at the strategic level, where development opportunities allow, to reduce the hazard and probability of flooding.

2.18 Policy 5 serves two main purposes. The first is to explain how flood risk considerations have shaped the main proposals in the SELLP, and how, as a strategic approach to flood risk the SELLP may be reviewed in the future. The second is to provide a policy commitment by which strategic improvements to flood risk which may be brought forward during the SELLP period can be assessed, and enhanced, where possible.

2.19 The allocations in the SELLP have been assessed in terms of flood risk. The key information utilised have been the Strategic Flood Risk Assessments (SFRAs) produced to cover the local plan area.

2.20 The SFRAs provides an overview of how flood risk has been considered in shaping the proposals of the SELLP; including the spatial strategy and the assessment of housing options. The SFRAs provide detailed information about all types of flooding and risks based upon likely flood depths, velocity and categories of ‘danger’.

2.21 The SELLP area has a number of agencies with responsibilities for assessing and managing flood risk including Lincolnshire County Council as Lead Local Flood Authority; the Environment Agency; Internal Drainage Boards; as well as the Local Authorities. In addition to their individual responsibilities, these agencies work in various partnerships in order to bring about betterment to flood risk whether by policy or by innovation and infrastructure. Policy 5 is

6 both a commitment to work within the partnerships and also help realise opportunities to enhance strategic flood protection through development proposals where opportunities may arise.

7 Methodology

2.22 The application of the Sequential Test in this report has been undertaken to conform to the approach in the Planning Practice Guidance. It has drawn upon the findings of the Level 1 and Level 2 SFRAs.

2.23 The Draft Local Plan proposes a spatial strategy that allocates development in the following hierarchy of settlements:

• Sub-Regional Centres: Boston and Spalding

• Main Service Centres: Crowland, Donington, Holbeach, Kirton, Long Sutton, Pinchbeck, Sutterton, Sutton Bridge, and Swineshead

• Minor Service Centres: Bicker, Butterwick, Cowbit, Deeping St Nicholas, Fishtoft, Fleet Hargate, Gedney Hill, Gosberton, Moulton, Moulton Chapel, Old Leake, Quadring, Surfleet, Sutton St James, Tydd St Mary, Weston, Whaplode, Wigtoft, and Wrangle

2.24 Planning Practice Guidance (PPG) identifies that:

“As some areas at lower flood risk may not be suitable for development for various reasons and therefore out of consideration, the Sequential Test should be applied to the whole local planning authority area to increase the possibilities of accommodating development which is not exposed to flood risk.”

2.25 Having noted the approach set out in the PPG, the sequential test has been applied at a settlement by settlement level within each of the three levels of settlement hierarchy where allocations are proposed. This approach has been adopted to ensure the spatial strategy for the draft Local Plan is delivered by focusing development within the settlements that are considered to be the most sustainable areas within the Boston and South Holland.

2.26 The sites set out in this report consist of those considered in: • Preferred Options consultation (January/ February 2016); and • Further Preferred Sites consultation (July/ August 2016). • Sites considered to be developable which have not been selected as allocations (“reasonable alternatives” in the sustainability appraisal).

2.27 Accompanying background evidence papers have been produced to consider the evidence in selecting housing sites for each settlement. These have taken account of additional sites suggested as a result of consultation responses.

2.28 The flood risk information held within the SFRA documentation for Boston and South Holland has been distilled into the tables set out in Appendix 1 for all potential developable sites considered. The spreadsheet sets out the flood zone(s) a site is within, and the projected potential flood hazard and depth associated with the site in the year 2115.

2.29 The information in the tables is briefly explained below:

• Flood Zone: The information sets out the flood zone or zones that the site sits within. A percentage figure is given for the various elements of flood zone present where appropriate.

• Hazard and Depth: The information notes the hazard and depth that the sites sits within based on a modelled year of 2115. The table shows the percentage figure for the various proportions of hazard and depth of flow.

• Sequential Test: This follows the guidance as set out in the PPG (Diagram 2 - Paragraph: 021 Reference ID: 7-021-20140306) and, where appropriate, indicates whether the exceptions text is required

• Commentary: A commentary is provided for each settlement bringing together information from the sustainability appraisal and South East Lincolnshire Strategic Flood Risk Assessment documentation. Where sites have been rejected, the commentary reflects a brief summary of the main issues that contribute to that decision to reject the site.

2.30 The analysis in the sequential test document will also need to be read alongside the information contained in the SFRA documents and the Sustainability Appraisal of sites with particular reference to Objective 11 covering flood risk.

9 APPENDIX 1 – Sequential Test Tables

Boston

Spalding

Main Service Centres (Crowland, Donington, Holbeach, Kirton, Long Sutton, Pinchbeck, Sutterton, Sutton Bridge, and Swineshead)

Minor Service Centres (Bicker, Butterwick, Cowbit, Deeping St Nicholas, Fishtoft, Fleet Hargate, Gedney Hill, Gosberton, Moulton, Moulton Chapel, Old Leake, Quadring, Surfleet, Sutton St James, Tydd St Mary, Weston, Whaplode, Wigtoft, and Wrangle)

10 Boston - General Points

Environment Agency Standing Advice - Allocations in areas of hazard would need to ensure that finished floor levels (FFL) are raised to the appropriate level with additional flood resilient construction incorporated into proposals. Developers would need to confirm that they can achieve the required mitigation and that their proposals would still be deliverable. Anglian Water has commented that the capacity of the surface water network has major constraints, and that all developments should seek to reduce flood risk and incorporate Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS). They indicate that surface water may not be discharged to the public foul sewerage network, and that no new surface water flow will be permitted to discharge to the combined network.

Boston - Allocated Sites

Site_ref Name Area (ha) No. DwellFLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDEPTH % DEPTHSequential Test - Stage Required Land to the east of Fenside Fen006 Road, Boston 7.32 240 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For Most 74.7% 0.5m to 1m 47.8% Apply Exceptions Test Danger For Some 19.6% 0.25m to 0.5m 44.7% Small areas of surface water flooding (low risk) Low Hazard 4.8% 0m to 0.25m 6.2% within the site. No Hazard 0.9% No Hazard 0.9% 1m to 2m 0.4% Land to the west of Church Fis038 Green Road, Boston 1.76 53 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For Most 91.4% 0.5m to 1m 68.9% Apply Exceptions Test Danger For Some 7.6% 0.25m to 0.5m 29.1% Areas of surface water flooding (low, medium and Low Hazard 1.0% 0m to 0.25m 2.0% high risk) within the site. Land to the north-east of Fis002 Fishtoft Road, Boston 0.41 12 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For Most 93.5% 0.5m to 1m 94.9% Apply Exceptions Test Danger For All 6.1% 1m to 2m 4.8% Areas of surface water flooding (low, medium and No Hazard 0.3% No Hazard 0.3% high risk) within the site. Danger For Some 0.0% 0.25m to 0.5m 0.0%

Wyb041 291-293 London Road, Boston 1.36 41 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger for Most 93.9% 0.5m to 1m 75.5% Apply Exceptions Test Danger for Some 2.9% 1m to 2m 14.9% Areas of surface water flooding (low risk) within Danger for All 2.5% 0.25m to 0.5m 8.8% the site. Low Hazard 0.7% 0m to 0.25m 0.7% Land to the west of Horncastle Nor006 Road, Boston 2.38 71 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For Most 98.2% 0.5m to 1m 76.2% Apply Exceptions Test Danger For Some 0.9% 1m to 2m 22.3% Small area of surface water flooding (low risk) No Hazard 0.8% No Hazard 0.8% within the site. Low Hazard 0.1% 0.25m to 0.5m 0.5% 0m to 0.25m 0.1%

11 Boston - Allocated Sites

Site_ref Name Area (ha) No. DwellFLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDEPTH % DEPTHSequential Test - Stage Required Land to the south of Main Pil002 Ridge East, Boston 0.32 13 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For Most 98.4% 0.5m to 1m 69.0% Apply Exceptions Test Danger For Some 0.8% 0.25m to 0.5m 28.3% Danger For All 0.7% 1m to 2m 2.6% No surface water flooding issues identified. Land to the west of Freshney Wes001 Way, Boston 0.37 11 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For Most 92.3% 1m to 2m 53.0% Apply Exceptions Test Danger For Some 6.3% 0.5m to 1m 43.9% Areas of surface water flooding (low, medium and No Hazard 1.4% 0.25m to 0.5m 1.7% high risk) within the site. Low Hazard 0.0% No Hazard 1.4% 0m to 0.25m 0.0% Land to the east of Lindis Fis001 Road, Boston 7.46 180 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For Most 95.2% 1m to 2m 90.3% Apply Exceptions Test Danger For All 4.0% 0.5m to 1m 9.0% Areas of surface water flooding (low risk) within Danger For Some 0.8% 0.25m to 0.5m 0.7% the site. Land to the west of Fenside Fen001 Road, Boston 1.83 55 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For Most 94.8% 1m to 2m 53.0% Apply Exceptions Test Danger For All 5.2% 0.5m to 1m 46.0% Areas of surface water flooding (low and medium >2m 1.0% risk) within the site. Boston Delivery Office, South Pil006 End, Boston 0.48 19 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For All 54.8% 0.5m to 1m 57.2% Apply Exceptions Test Danger For Most 40.5% 0.25m to 0.5m 27.4% Danger For Some 4.7% 1m to 2m 8.7% Small area of surface water flooding (low risk) Low Hazard 0.0% 0m to 0.25m 6.8% within the site. Land to the north of Cen001 Whitehorse Lane, Boston 0.48 19 Flood Zone 3 99.5% Danger For All 58.7% 0.5m to 1m 45.2% Apply Exceptions Test Flood Zone 2 0.5% Danger For Most 38.5% 1m to 2m 33.6% Areas of surface water flooding (low, medium and No Hazard 2.7% 0.25m to 0.5m 18.1% high risk) within the site. Danger For Some 0.1% No Hazard 2.7% Low Hazard 0.0% 0m to 0.25m 0.4% Land to the west of Toot Lane, Fis033 Boston 18.98 569 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For All 63.8% 1m to 2m 89.8% Apply Exceptions Test Danger For Most 36.2% 0.5m to 1m 9.7% Areas of surface water flooding (low, medium and high risk) on the western and northern boundaries >2m 0.4% of the site. 0.25m to 0.5m 0.1%

12 Boston - Allocated Sites

Site_ref Name Area (ha) No. DwellFLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDEPTH % DEPTHSequential Test - Stage Required Land to the east of White Fis003 House Lane, Boston 3.01 90 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For All 65.7% 1m to 2m 78.7% Apply Exceptions Test Danger For Most 34.3% 0.5m to 1m 21.3% Areas of surface water flooding (low, medium and high risk) on the eastern and northern boundaries >2m 0.0% of the site. Land to the south of North Wes002 Forty Foot Bank, Boston 45.92 1378 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For All 78.8% 1m to 2m 90.9% Apply Exceptions Test Danger For Most 21.2% 0.5m to 1m 6.6% Areas of surface water flooding (low and medium >2m 2.4% risk) within the site. 0.25m to 0.5m 0.0% Land to the south of Wyb013 Swineshead Road, Boston 2.84 85 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For All 87.9% 1m to 2m 99.2% Apply Exceptions Test Danger For Most 12.1% 0.5m to 1m 0.6% Areas of surface water flooding (low risk) within 0.25m to 0.5m 0.2% the site. Land to the south of Chain Sou006 Bridge Road, Boston 63.38 1400 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For All 95.4% 1m to 2m 95.5% Apply Exceptions Test Danger For Most 4.6% >2m 3.5% Areas of surface water flooding (low, medium and No Hazard 0.0% 0.5m to 1m 1.0% high risk) within the site. Danger For Some 0.0% Land to the north of Langrick Fen002 Road, Boston 1.16 35 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For All 99.3% 1m to 2m 96.6% Apply Exceptions Test Danger For Most 0.7% >2m 3.4% Areas of surface water flooding (low and medium risk) within the site. Land to the north of Tytton Wyb033 Lane East, Boston 8.33 250 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For All 99.7% 1m to 2m 98.8% Apply Exceptions Test Danger For Most 0.3% >2m 1.2%

Areas of surface water flooding (low and medium risk) on the northern boundary of the site.

13 Boston - Other Developable Sites

Comments (including reasons for rejection Site_ref Name Area (ha) No. Dwell FLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/3HAZARD % HAZAR DEPTH % DEPTH where applicable) Wit014 18 Wide Bargate, Boston 0.11 10 Flood Zone 3 100% No Hazard 99.2% No Hazard 99.2% Site has planning permission Low Hazard 0.8% 0m to 0.25m 0.8% Land to the north of Puritan Sits within Fen006 which is proposed to be Fen010 Way, Boston 2.16 65 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For Most 77.7% 0.25m to 0.5m 57.7% allocated Danger For Some 17.0% 0.5m to 1m 33.8% Low Hazard 4.9% 0m to 0.25m 8.3% No Hazard 0.3% No Hazard 0.3% Land to the east of Fenside Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site moderately Fen017 Road, Boston 5.02 151 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For Most 74.0% 0.25m to 0.5m 40.2% poorly compared to other sites. Danger For Some 21.1% 0.5m to 1m 53.9% Areas of surface water flooding (low risk) within Low Hazard 4.1% 0m to 0.25m 4.6% the site. No Hazard 0.8% No Depth 0.8% 1m to 2m 0.5%

Fen004 36 Witham Bank West, Boston 0.29 9 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For Most 64.2% 0.5m to 1m 55.5% Identified as a small site to include in the supply. Danger For Some 20.4% 0.25m to 0.5m 31.4% Areas of surface water flooding (low and medium Low Hazard 14.9% 0m to 0.25m 12.7% risk) within the site. No Hazard 0.4% No Hazard 0.4% 0.5m to 1m 13.6% Land to the south of Norfolk Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site moderately Wit008 Street, Boston 1.21 36 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For Most 93.7% 0.5m to 1m 67.5% poorly compared to other sites. Danger For All 6.3% 1m to 2m 32.4% Areas of surface water flooding (low, medium and 0.25m to 0.5m 0.0% high risk) within the site. Land to the rear of 41 Linden Nor017 Way, Boston 0.46 6 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For Most 100.0% 0.5m to 1m 78.9% Site has planning permission 1m to 2m 21.1% Land to the north of Ward Fis019 Crescent, Boston 0.15 4 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For Most 100.0% 0.5m to 1m 100.0% Identified as a small site to include in the supply.

Small area of surface water flooding (low risk) within the site.

14 Boston - Other Developable Sites

Comments (including reasons for rejection Site_ref Name Area (ha) No. Dwell FLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/3HAZARD % HAZAR DEPTH % DEPTH where applicable) Land to the east of Broadfield Sts001 Lane, Boston 5.20 200 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For Most 79.1% 0.5m to 1m 68.6% Site has planning permission Danger For All 19.2% 1m to 2m 24.5% Danger For Some 1.7% 0.25m to 0.5m 6.6% 0m to 0.25m 0.4% Land to the east of Punchbowl Fen003 Lane, Boston 3.87 116 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For Most 99.3% 0.5m to 1m 70.6% Site has resolution to grant planning permission Danger For All 0.7% 1m to 2m 29.4% Land to the east of Toot Lane, Fis031 Boston 3.21 96 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For Most 99.8% 0.5m to 1m 85.1% Site has resolution to grant planning permission Danger For All 0.2% 1m to 2m 14.9% Land to the east of Kitwood Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site moderately Ski004 Road, Boston 0.85 26 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger for Most 100.0% 0.5m to 1m 86.8% poorly compared to other sites. 1m to 2m 13.2% Areas of surface water flooding (low and medium risk) within the site. Land to the north of Main Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site moderately Pil005 Ridge East, Boston 0.25 14 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For Most 100.0% 0.5m to 1m 99.6% poorly compared to other sites. 1m to 2m 0.4% No surface water flooding issues identified. Site less sequentially preferable in terms of flood risk. Moreover, whilst the site is in single Land to the south of Wainfleet ownership there is no housebuilder involved so Fis017 Road, Boston 76.81 1400 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For Most 93.9% 1m to 2m 50.9% concerns regarding deliverability Danger For All 4.0% 0.5m to 1m 42.6% Areas of surface water flooding (low, medium and Danger For Some 1.9% 0.25m to 0.5m 6.1% high risk) within the site. Low Hazard 0.2% 0m to 0.25m 0.2% No Hazard 0.0% >2m 0.1% No Hazard 0.0% Land to the south of Vauxhall Ski002 Road, Boston 0.13 4 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For Most 100.0% 1m to 2m 94.7% Identified as a small site to include in the supply. 0.5m to 1m 5.3% Areas of surface water flooding (low and medium risk) within the site. Land to the north-east of Ski003 Freiston Road, Boston 0.26 8 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For Most 98.5% 1m to 2m 97.5% Identified as a small site to include in the supply. Danger For All 1.5% 0.5m to 1m 2.5% Areas of surface water flooding (low and medium risk) within the site.

15 Boston - Other Developable Sites

Comments (including reasons for rejection Site_ref Name Area (ha) No. Dwell FLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/3HAZARD % HAZAR DEPTH % DEPTH where applicable) Land to the east of Fen Road, Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site poorly Fra025 Boston 0.85 18 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For Most 59.6% 1m to 2m 98.0% compared to other sites. Danger For All 40.4% 0.5m to 1m 2.0% Areas of surface water flooding (low and medium risk) within the site. Land to the west of Toot Lane, Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site poorly Fis015 Boston 6.54 196 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For Most 58.3% 1m to 2m 83.4% compared to other sites. Danger For All 41.7% 0.5m to 1m 16.5% Areas of surface water flooding (low and medium >2m 0.1% risk) within the site. 2 Fydell House, Fydell Street, Stn006 Boston 0.10 13 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For All 58.1% 0.5m to 1m 39.1% Site has planning permission No Hazard 21.8% No Hazard 21.8% Danger For Most 20.2% 0.25m to 0.5m 20.2% 1m to 2m 19.0% Land to the north of Fountain Wit009 Lane, Boston 0.29 9 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For All 81.4% 0.5m to 1m 80.3% Identified as a small site to include in the supply. Danger For Most 18.6% 0.25m to 0.5m 19.7% Areas of surface water flooding (low, medium and Danger For Some 0.0% 1m to 2m 0.0% high risk) within the site. Land to the west of Carlton Stn001 Road, Boston 0.18 6 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For All 86.0% 0.5m to 1m 92.5% Site has planning permission Danger For Most 14.0% 1m to 2m 7.5% Wit011 49 Norfolk Street, Boston 0.14 6 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For All 99.9% 0.5m to 1m 56.1% Site has planning permission Danger For Most 0.1% 1m to 2m 43.9% Fen008 42 Punchbowl Lane, Boston 0.21 3 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For All 62.4% 1m to 2m 100.0% Site has planning permission Danger For Most 37.6% Site less sequentially preferable in terms of flood risk. Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site poorly compared to other sites. Natural England Land to the south and east of concerns with respect to Habitats Regulations Fis025 Toot Lane, Boston 21.21 636 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For All 69.4% 1m to 2m 80.9% issues. Danger For Most 30.6% 0.5m to 1m 18.3% Areas of surface water flooding (low, medium and >2m 0.8% high risk) within the site. Land to the south and east of Site less sequentially preferable in terms of flood Toot Lane and east of risk. Natural England concerns with respect to Fis023 Whitehouse Lane, Boston 47.90 1400 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For All 73.5% 1m to 2m 84.7% Habitats Regulations issues. Danger For Most 26.5% 0.5m to 1m 14.6% Areas of surface water flooding (low, medium and >2m 0.8% high risk) within the site.

16 Boston - Other Developable Sites

Comments (including reasons for rejection Site_ref Name Area (ha) No. Dwell FLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/3HAZARD % HAZAR DEPTH % DEPTH where applicable) Land to the south and east of Site less sequentially preferable in terms of flood Toot Lane and east of risk. Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site poorly Fis024 Whitehouse Lane, Boston 35.52 1066 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For All 76.3% 1m to 2m 85.0% compared to other sites. Danger For Most 23.7% 0.5m to 1m 14.3% Areas of surface water flooding (low, medium and >2m 0.7% high risk) within the site. Site less sequentially preferable in terms of flood Land to the west of Toot Lane, risk. Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site Fis018 Boston 1.06 32 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For All 79.6% 1m to 2m 93.0% moderately poorly compared to other sites. Danger For Most 20.4% 0.5m to 1m 7.0% Areas of surface water flooding (low and medium 0.25m to 0.5m 0.0% risk) within the site. Land to the east of South End, Pil001 Boston 0.13 5 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For All 100.0% 1m to 2m 54.7% Small site (below allocation threshold) 0.5m to 1m 45.3% Former Norton Lea Hospital, Sou007 London Road, Boston 2.08 60 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For All 92.1% 1m to 2m 86.5% Site has planning permission Danger For Most 7.9% 0.5m to 1m 13.5% Land to the west of Toot Lane, Fis014 Boston 4.39 132 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For All 81.5% 1m to 2m 99.7% Site has planning permission Danger For Most 18.5% 0.5m to 1m 0.3% Site less sequentially preferable in terms of flood Land to the north of Toot Lane, risk. Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site Fis013 Boston 4.77 143 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For All 86.1% 1m to 2m 95.1% moderately poorly compared to other sites. Danger For Most 13.9% 0.5m to 1m 4.0% Areas of surface water flooding (low, medium and >2m 0.6% high risk) within the site. 0.25m to 0.5m 0.3% Disused petrol station, London Wyb040 Road, Boston 0.26 8 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For All 94.6% 1m to 2m 76.9% Identified as a small site to include in the supply. Danger For Most 5.4 0.5m to 1m 23.1% Areas of surface water flooding (low risk) within the site. Land to the north of Tytton Wyb011 Lane East, Boston 0.60 28 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For All 96.7% 1m to 2m 98.2% Site has planning permission Danger For Most 3.3% 0.5m to 1m 1.8% Land to the south of Tytton Wyb009 Lane East, Boston 20.91 500 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For All 97.7% 1m to 2m 98.5% Site has resolution to grant planning permission Danger For Most 2.3% >2m 0.8% 0.5m to 1m 0.7%

17 Boston - Other Developable Sites

Comments (including reasons for rejection Site_ref Name Area (ha) No. Dwell FLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/3HAZARD % HAZAR DEPTH % DEPTH where applicable) Roseberry Meadows extension, Wes005 Boston 4.49 120 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For All 98.5% 1m to 2m 98.9% Site has planning permission Danger For Most 1.5% 0.5m to 1m 0.6% >2m 0.5% Land to the south of North Wes003 Forty Foot Bank, Boston 5.44 164 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For All 98.8% 1m to 2m 99.0% Site has planning permission Danger For Most 1.2% >2m 0.5% 0.5m to 1m 0.5% Land to the west of Wyberton Sits within Wyb033 which is proposed to be Sou001 Low Road, Boston 3.29 99 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For All 99.3% 1m to 2m 96.7% allocated Danger For Most 0.7% >2m 3.3% Land to the south of North Sits within Wes002 which is proposed to be Wes004 Forty Foot Bank, Boston 18.22 547 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For All 99.4% 1m to 2m 95.3% allocated Danger For Most 0.6% >2m 4.6% 0.5m to 1m 0.1% Land to the south of Blue Cen003 Street, Boston 0.67 59 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For All 100.0% 1m to 2m 100.0% Site has planning permission Land to the west of Frampton Sts002 Place, Boston 0.13 4 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For All 100.0% 1m to 2m 100.0% Identified as a small site to include in the supply.

No surface water flooding issues identified.

18 Spalding - General Points Environment Agency Standing Advice - Allocations in areas of hazard would need to ensure that finished floor levels (FFL) are raised to the appropriate level with additional flood resilient construction incorporated into proposals. Developers would need to confirm that they can achieve the required mitigation and that their proposals would still be deliverable. South Holland IDB have commented that their target standards of protection are ‘water levels 0.6m below land level for a 1 in 10 year event for agriculture and 0.3m below land level for a 1 in 100 year event for development.’ Welland and Deepings IDB have commented that ‘there is no specific risk from their drainage system. Byelaws apply for sites adjacent to Board watercourses. The use of Sustainable Drainage Systems should be considered as a first approach to dealing with surface water run off. The Board would need to approve any surface water flows above its designed greenfield run off rate of 1.4litres/sec/ha to its system.’

Anglian Water has commented that the capacity of the surface water network has major constraints, and that all developments should seek to reduce flood risk and incorporate Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS). They indicate that surface water may not be discharged to the public foul sewerage network, and that no new surface water flow will be permitted to discharge to the combined network.

Spalding - Allocated Sites

Site_ref Name Area (ha) No. Dwell FLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/3HAZARD % HAZAR DEPTH % DEPTH Sequential Test - Stage Required Land to the east of Spalding Stm004 Common, Spalding 4.66 140 Flood Zone 2 51% Danger for Most 89.9% 0.5m to 1m 78.0% Apply Exceptions Test Flood Zone 3 44% Danger for Some 3.9% 0.25m to 0.5m 12.5% Flood Zone 1 5% Danger for All 2.8% 1m to 2m 6.1% Low Hazard 2.8% 0m to 0.25m 2.9% Small areas of surface water flooding (low risk) on No Hazard 0.5% No Depth 0.5% the site. Land to the south of Mon005 Horseshoe Road, Spalding 39.21 1176 Flood Zone 3 100% No Hazard 100.0% No Depth 100% Apply Exceptions Test

Small areas of surface water flooding (low and medium risk) on the site. Land to the north of Bourne Mon008 Road, Spalding 54.20 1400 Flood Zone 3 100% No Hazard 99.9% No Depth 99.9% Apply Exceptions Test Low Hazard 0.1% 0m to 0.25m 0.1%

Small areas of surface water flooding (low, medium and high risk) on the site. Spalding Lifestyle, Spalding Pin050 Road, PE11 3PB 1.68 50 Flood Zone 3 100% Low Hazard 33.8% 0m to 0.25m 33.8% Apply Exceptions Test No Hazard 32.5% No Depth 32.5% Danger for Some 25.4% 0.25m to 0.5m 26.9% Danger for Most 8.3% 0.5m to 1m 5.3% Small areas of surface water flooding (low risk) on 1m to 2m 1.5% the site.

19 Spalding - Allocated Sites

Site_ref Name Area (ha) No. Dwell FLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/3HAZARD % HAZAR DEPTH % DEPTH Sequential Test - Stage Required Land to the east of Spalding Pin025 Road, Pinchbeck 0.37 11 Flood Zone 3 100% Low Hazard 47.7% 0m to 0.25m 48.0% Apply Exceptions Test Danger for Some 46.0% 0.25m to 0.5m 47.3% Danger for Most 3.6% No Depth 2.8% Small areas of surface water flooding (low risk) on No Hazard 2.8% 0.5m to 1m 1.9% the site. Land to the north of Vernatt's Pin024 Drain, Pinchbeck 160.92 1400 Flood Zone 3 100% Low Hazard 42.3% 0m to 0.25m 42.3% Apply Exceptions Test Danger for Some 31.6% 0.25m to 0.5m 31.6% No Hazard 21.7% No Depth 21.7% Danger for Most 4.4% 0.5m to 1m 4.1% Small areas of surface water flooding (low, 1m to 2m 0.3% medium and high risk) on the site. Land to the west of Spalding Pin045 Road, Pinchbeck 26.15 784 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger for Most 58.7% 0.5m to 1m 47.5% Apply Exceptions Test Danger for Some 28.3% 0.25m to 0.5m 38.6% Low Hazard 9.8% 0m to 0.25m 9.8% No Hazard 3.1% No Depth 3.1% Small areas of surface water flooding (low and 1m to 2m 1.0% medium risk) on the site. Land to the west of Spalding Stm010 Common, Spalding 2.09 63 Flood Zone 3 81.5% Danger for Most 76.9% 0.5m to 1m 60.3% Apply Exceptions Test Flood Zone 2 17.5% Danger for Some 12.7% 1m to 2m 16.4% Flood Zone 1 1.5% Low Hazard 7.0% 0.25m to 0.5m 13.0% No Hazard 3.3% 0m to 0.25m 7.0% No Depth 3.3% No surface water flooding issues identified.

The Elders Stm028 98 Spalding Common Spalding 3.60 108 Flood Zone 3 99.5% Danger for Most 73.0% 0.5m to 1m 59.6% Apply Exceptions Test Flood Zone 2 0.5% Danger for Some 11.7% 1m to 2m 13.2% No Hazard 8.5% 0.25m to 0.5m 11.8% Low Hazard 6.9% No Depth 8.5% Area of surface water flooding (low risk) in the 0m to 0.25m 6.9% northern part of the site

20 Spalding - Other Developable Sites

Comments (including reasons for rejection Site_ref Name Area (ha) No. DwellFLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDEPTH % DEPTHwhere applicable) Land to the south of Horseshoe Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site moderately Mon002 Lane, Spalding 0.326 10 Flood Zone 3 100% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% poorly compared to other sites.

Small areas of surface water flooding (low risk) on the site. Site lies within safeguarded corridor for proposed Spalding Western Relief Road and hence could jeopardise delivery of the road. Sustainability Land to the south of Horseshoe Appraisal ranks the site moderately poorly Mon011 Road, Spalding 2.00 60 Flood Zone 3 100% No Hazard 100% No Depth 100% compared to other sites.

No surface water flooding issues identified. Land between Bourne Road, Site lies within safeguarded corridor for proposed Horseshoe Road and East Spalding Western Relief Road and hence could Mon013 Road 77.32 1400 Flood Zone 3 100% No Hazard 100% No Depth 100% jeopardise delivery of the road.

Small areas of surface water flooding (low and medium risk) on the site. Farm Yard Blue Gowt Drove Pin051 Pinchbeck 0.243 7 Flood Zone 3 100% No Hazard 100% No Depth 100% Small site (below allocation threshold) Highfield Nursery Highfield Lane Pinchbeck Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site moderately Pin061 PE11 3PT 0.85 26 Flood Zone 3 100% No Hazard 100% No Depth 100% poorly compared to other sites.

No surface water flooding issues identified. Orchard House Blue Gowt Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site poorly Pin054 Drove Pinchbeck 3.98 119 Flood Zone 3 100% No Hazard 100% No Depth 100% compared to other sites.

No surface water flooding issues identified. Fox Glove Cottage 4 Blue Gowt Drove Spalding Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site poorly Pin056 PE11 3PX 1.48 44 Flood Zone 3 100% No Hazard 100% No Depth 100% compared to other sites.

Small areas of surface water flooding (low risk) on the site.

21 Spalding - Other Developable Sites

Comments (including reasons for rejection Site_ref Name Area (ha) No. DwellFLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDEPTH % DEPTHwhere applicable) Land at Mill Green Road / Blue Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site poorly Pin057 Gowt Drove 12.82 373 Flood Zone 3 100% No Hazard 100% No Depth 100% compared to other sites.

Small areas of surface water flooding (low risk) on the site. Pin058 Blue Gowt Drove Pinchbeck 0.244 9 Flood Zone 3 100% No Hazard 100% No Depth 100% Small site (below allocation threshold) Stj003 2-4 St John's Road, Spalding 1.00 53 Flood Zone 3 100% No Hazard 100% No Depth 100% Site has planning permission Former PO Sorting Office, The Stj004 Crescent, Spalding 0.10 12 Flood Zone 3 100% No Hazard 100% No Depth 100% Site has planning permission Stj005 Hawthorn Bank, Spalding 0.223 7 Flood Zone 3 100% No Hazard 100% No Depth 100% Small site (below allocation threshold) Land off Cradge Bank, Stm014 Spalding 0.18 10 Flood Zone 3 100% No Hazard 100% No Depth 100% Site has planning permission Land to the west of Fen End Stm027 Lane, Spalding 0.245 7 Flood Zone 3 100% No Hazard 100% No Depth 100% Small site (below allocation threshold) Land between Spalding and Pinchbeck Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site poorly Pin053 PE11 3PU 7.78 233 Flood Zone 3 100% No Hazard 99.8% No Depth 99.8% compared to other sites. Low Hazard 0.2% 0m to 0.25m 0.2% Small areas of surface water flooding (low and medium risk) on the site. Site lies within safeguarded corridor for proposed Spalding Western Relief Road and hence could jeopardise delivery of the road. Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site poorly compared to other Pin055 Land to the East of Tydd Road 0.82 25 Flood Zone 3 100% No Hazard 94.4% No Depth 94.4% sites. Low Hazard 5.5% 0m to 0.25m 5.5% Small areas of surface water flooding (low risk) on Danger for Some 0.1% 0.25m to 0.5m 0.1% the site. Site lies within safeguarded corridor for proposed Spalding Western Relief Road and hence could jeopardise delivery of the road. Sustainability Land to the south of Horseshoe Appraisal ranks the site moderately poorly Mon007 Road, Spalding 6.94 208 Flood Zone 3 100% No Hazard 74.8% No Depth 74.8% compared to other sites. Low Hazard 20.2% 0m to 0.25m 20.2% Danger for Most 2.5% 0.25m to 0.5m 2.5% Small areas of surface water flooding (low risk) on Danger for Some 2.4% 0.5m to 1m 2.4% the site.

22 Spalding - Other Developable Sites

Comments (including reasons for rejection Site_ref Name Area (ha) No. DwellFLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDEPTH % DEPTHwhere applicable) Sits within Pin024 which is proposed to be Pin052 Land to the East of Tydd Road 4.95 149 Flood Zone 3 100% No Hazard 48.0% No Depth 48.0% allocated Low Hazard 45.9% 0m to 0.25m 45.9% Danger for Some 5.9% 0.25m to 0.5m 5.9% Danger for Most 0.2% 0.5m to 1m 0.2% Land to the east of Wygate Wyg006 Park, Spalding 7.81 226 Flood Zone 3 100% No Hazard 47.0% No Depth 47.0% Site has planning permission Low Hazard 45.8% 0m to 0.25m 45.8% Danger for Some 6.4% 0.25m to 0.5m 6.4% Danger for Most 0.9% 0.5m to 1m 0.9% Land to the east of Tydd Road, Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site poorly Pin026 Pinchbeck 31.37 800 Flood Zone 3 100% No Hazard 31.5% No Depth 32.0% compared to other sites.

Danger for Most 25.2% 0.25m to 0.5m 25.3%

Low Hazard 22.9% 0m to 0.25m 23.2% Danger for Some 19.6% 0.5m to 1m 18.5% Small areas of surface water flooding (low risk) on Danger for All 0.7% 1m to 2m 1.0% the site. Site lies within safeguarded corridor for proposed Land to the south of Horseshoe Spalding Western Relief Road and hence could Mon023 Road, Spalding 8.67 260 Flood Zone 3 100% Low Hazard 41.8% 0m to 0.25m 41.8% jeopardise delivery of the road. Danger for Some 40.6% 0.25m to 0.5m 41.7% Danger for Most 9.2% No Depth 8.4% Small areas of surface water flooding (low risk) on No Hazard 8.4% 0.5m to 1m 7.9% the site. Site lies within safeguarded corridor for proposed Land to the west of Spalding Western Relief Road and hence could Mon020 Monkshouse Lane 28.64 800 Flood Zone 3 100% Low Hazard 34.5% 0m to 0.25m 34.5% jeopardise delivery of the road. No Hazard 30.4% No Depth 30.4% Danger for Some 26.5% 0.25m to 0.5m 26.5% Danger for Most 8.6% 0.5m to 1m 7.0% Small areas of surface water flooding (low, 1m to 2m 1.6% medium and high risk) on the site.

23 Spalding - Other Developable Sites

Comments (including reasons for rejection Site_ref Name Area (ha) No. DwellFLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDEPTH % DEPTHwhere applicable) Site lies within safeguarded corridor for proposed Spalding Western Relief Road and hence could jeopardise delivery of the road. Sustainability Land at Horseshoe Bridge, Appraisal ranks the site moderately poorly Mon021 Horseshoe Road, Spalding 1.47 44 Flood Zone 3 100% Low Hazard 54.4% 0m to 0.25m 54.4% compared to other sites. No Hazard 20.3% No Depth 20.3% Danger for Most 14.8% 0.25m to 0.5m 11.4% Danger for Some 10.5% 0.5m to 1m 8.6% Small areas of surface water flooding (low risk) on 1m to 2m 5.4% the site. Land on Blue Gowt Drove Sits within Pin024 which is proposed to be Pin059 Pinchbeck 1.14 34 Flood Zone 3 100% Low Hazard 68.2% 0m to 0.25m 68.2% allocated Danger for Some 24.9% 0.25m to 0.5m 24.9% Danger for Most 3.7% No Depth 3.2% No Hazard 3.2% 0.5m to 1m 2.9% 1m to 2m 0.9% Land to the east of Spalding Pin013 Road, Pinchbeck 0.276 8 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger for Some 77.6% 0.25m to 0.5m 79.0% Small site (below allocation threshold) Low Hazard 19.5% 0m to 0.25m 19.9% Danger for Most 2.8% 0.5m to 1m 1.1% Site lies within safeguarded corridor for proposed Spalding Western Relief Road and hence could jeopardise delivery of the road. Sustainability Land to the south of Horseshoe Appraisal ranks the site moderately poorly Mon012 Road 5.70 171 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger for Some 74.4% 0.25m to 0.5m 74.4% compared to other sites. Low Hazard 22.1% 0m to 0.25m 22.1% Small area of surface water flooding (low risk) on No Hazard 3.5% No Depth 3.5% the site. Site lies within safeguarded corridor for proposed Spalding Western Relief Road and hence could jeopardise delivery of the road. Sustainability Land to the south of Horseshoe Appraisal ranks the site moderately poorly Mon010 Road, Spalding 9.60 299 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger for Some 51.5% 0.25m to 0.5m 51.6% compared to other sites. Low Hazard 39.4% 0m to 0.25m 39.4% No Hazard 5.6% No Depth 5.6% Danger for Most 3.3% 0.5m to 1m 2.1% Small area of surface water flooding (low risk) on Danger for All 0.1% 1m to 2m 1.0% the site.

24 Spalding - Other Developable Sites

Comments (including reasons for rejection Site_ref Name Area (ha) No. DwellFLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDEPTH % DEPTHwhere applicable) Land west of The Hayfields, Wyg005 Spalding 5.36 195 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger for Some 29.7% 0.25m to 0.5m 29.7% Site has planning permission No Hazard 27.9% No Depth 27.9% Low Hazard 25.4% 0m to 0.25m 25.4% Danger for Most 17.0% 0.5m to 1m 17.0% Land to the north of Burr Lane, Stm023 Spalding 0.293 9 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger for Some 54.4% 0.25m to 0.5m 79.1% Small site (below allocation threshold) Danger for Most 45.6% 0.5m to 1m 20.9%

Land to the south of Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site poorly Pin011 Wardentree Lane, Pinchbeck 5.05 152 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger for Some 57.0% 0.25m to 0.5m 65.2% compared to other sites. Danger for Most 28.0% 0.5m to 1m 19.4% Low Hazard 11.4% 0m to 0.25m 11.6% No Hazard 3.7% No Depth 3.7% Small areas of surface water flooding (low risk) on 1m to 2m 0.2% the site. Site less sequentially preferable in terms of flood Land to the north of Burr Lane, risk. Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site poorly Stm029 Spalding 0.03 28 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger for Some 36.1% 0.25m to 0.5m 36.1% compared to other sites. Danger for Most 33.7% 0.5m to 1m 30.1% Low Hazard 27.6% 0m to 0.25m 27.6% No Hazard 2.6% 1m to 2m 3.5% Small areas of surface water flooding (low risk) on No Depth 2.6% the site. Land to the north of Bourne Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site moderately Mon014 Road 8.49 323 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger for Some 48.3% 0.25m to 0.5m 48.3% poorly compared to other sites. Danger for Most 37.7% 0.5m to 1m 30.9% Low Hazard 11.0% 0m to 0.25m 11.0% No Hazard 2.6% 1m to 2m 6.8% Danger for All 0.4% No Depth 2.6% Small areas of surface water flooding (low, >2m 0.4% medium and high risk) on the site. Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site moderately Mon019 366 Bourne Road Spalding 1.34 40 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger for Some 49.2% 0.25m to 0.5m 49.2% poorly compared to other sites. Danger for Most 45.8% 0.5m to 1m 41.0% Low Hazard 3.7% 1m to 2m 4.7% No Hazard 1.3% 0m to 0.25m 3.7% Small areas of surface water flooding (low, No Depth 1.3% medium and high risk) on the site.

25 Spalding - Other Developable Sites

Comments (including reasons for rejection Site_ref Name Area (ha) No. DwellFLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDEPTH % DEPTHwhere applicable) Land to the north-west of Stm012 Spalding Common, Spalding 102.18 2000 Flood Zone 3 99% Danger for Most 54.9% No Depth 39.8% Site has planning permission Flood Zone 2 0.5% No Hazard 39.8% 0.5m to 1m 29.7% Flood Zone 1 0.5% Danger for Some 3.4% 1m to 2m 25.0% Low Hazard 1.4% 0.25m to 0.5m 3.7% Danger for All 0.4% 0m to 0.25m 1.4% >2m 0.3% Land to the west of Spalding Sits within Pin045 which is proposed to be Pin031 Road, Pinchbeck 3.04 91 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger for Most 40.3% 0.25m to 0.5m 43.3% allocated Danger for Some 39.4% 0.5m to 1m 34.9%

Low Hazard 17.8% 0m to 0.25m 17.8%

No Hazard 2.5% No Depth 2.5% 1m to 2m 1.5% Tydd Road, Pinchbeck, Sits within Pin024 which is proposed to be Pin060 Spalding, PE11 3QA 7.47 224 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger for Most 60.4% 0.25m to 0.5m 57.1% allocated Danger for Some 38.2% 0.5m to 1m 39.7% Low Hazard 0.7% 1m to 2m 2.5% Danger for All 0.6% 0m to 0.25m 0.7% Land to the west of Spalding Sits within Pin045 which is proposed to be Pin016 Road, Pinchbeck 1.98 59 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger for Most 70.7% 0.25m to 0.5m 53.2% allocated Danger for Some 26.4% 0.5m to 1m 44.0% Low Hazard 2.9% 0m to 0.25m 2.8% Land to the south of Market Sits within Pin045 which is proposed to be Pin040 Way, Pinchbeck 1.05 32 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger for Most 75.3% 0.25m to 0.5m 61.6% allocated Danger for Some 24.1% 0.5m to 1m 33.9% Danger for All 0.5% 1m to 2m 4.5% Land to the east of Spalding Stm008 Common, Spalding 0.124 4 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger for Most 35.4% 0.5m to 1m 35.4% Small site (below allocation threshold) Low Hazard 32.4% 0m to 0.25m 32.4% Danger for Some 32.2% 0.25m to 0.5m 32.2% Land to the east of Wygate Wyg003 Park, Spalding 3.60 112 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger for Most 46.2% 0.5m to 1m 41.8% Site has planning permission Low Hazard 27.0% 0m to 0.25m 26.9% Danger for Some 16.4% 0.25m to 0.5m 16.4% No Hazard 10.4% No Depth 10.4% 1m to 2m 4.4%

26 Spalding - Other Developable Sites

Comments (including reasons for rejection Site_ref Name Area (ha) No. DwellFLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDEPTH % DEPTHwhere applicable) Land to the east of Wygate Wyg004 Park, Spalding 6.79 105 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger for Most 48.4% 0.5m to 1m 45.5% Site has planning permission No Hazard 24.9% No Depth 24.5% Low Hazard 16.9% 0m to 0.25m 16.7% Danger for Some 9.7% 0.25m to 0.5m 9.6% 1m to 2m 3.7% Land to the west of Spalding Sits within Pin045 which is proposed to be Pin001 Road, Pinchbeck 39.50 1185 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger for Most 55.3% 0.5m to 1m 44.8% allocated Danger for Some 30.7% 0.25m to 0.5m 40.2% Low Hazard 10.6% 0m to 0.25m 10.6% No Hazard 3.2% No Depth 3.2% Danger for All 0.1% 1m to 2m 1.2% Pode Hole Highways Depot, Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site moderately Mon022 Bourne Road, Spalding 1.21 24 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger for Most 59.0% 0.5m to 1m 53.8% poorly compared to other sites. Danger for Some 22.7% 0.25m to 0.5m 21.9% Low Hazard 17.0% 0m to 0.25m 16.4% No Hazard 1.3% 1m to 2m 6.7% Small areas of surface water flooding (low, No Depth 1.2% medium and high risk) on the site. Land to the north of Bourne Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site moderately Mon004 Road, Pode Hole 2.01 60 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger for Most 78.4% 0.5m to 1m 74.3% poorly compared to other sites. Danger for Some 15.3% 0.25m to 0.5m 14.8% Low Hazard 4.1% 1m to 2m 4.8% No Hazard 2.2% 0m to 0.25m 3.9% Small areas of surface water flooding (low risk) on No Depth 2.2% the site. Land to the north of Bourne Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site moderately Mon001 Road, Pode Hole 1.49 45 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger for Most 81.1% 0.5m to 1m 80.7% poorly compared to other sites. Danger for Some 12.0% 0.25m to 0.5m 11.5% No Hazard 4.8% No Depth 4.6% Low Hazard 2.1% 0m to 0.25m 2.0% Small area of surface water flooding (low risk) on 1m to 2m 1.3% the site. Land to the North of Bourne Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site moderately Mon017 Road 1.27 38 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger for Most 84.2% 0.5m to 1m 80.0% poorly compared to other sites. Danger for Some 13.7% 0.25m to 0.5m 13.7% Low Hazard 1.8% 1m to 2m 4.2% No Hazard 0.3% 0m to 0.25m 1.8% Small areas of surface water flooding (low risk) on No Depth 0.3% the site.

27 Spalding - Other Developable Sites

Comments (including reasons for rejection Site_ref Name Area (ha) No. DwellFLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDEPTH % DEPTHwhere applicable) Land to the west of Spalding Sits within Pin045 which is proposed to be Pin020 Road, Pinchbeck 2.99 90 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger for Most 97.5% 0.5m to 1m 87.8% allocated Danger for Some 2.3% 0.25m to 0.5m 10.9% Danger for All 0.1% 1m to 2m 1.3% Land to the north of Bourne Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site moderately Mon016 Road 7.90 241 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger for Most 74.2% 0.5m to 1m 46.0% poorly compared to other sites. Danger for Some 12.5% 1m to 2m 27.9% Low Hazard 9.7% 0.25m to 0.5m 12.6% No Hazard 3.6% 0m to 0.25m 9.8% Small areas of surface water flooding (low, Danger for All 0.1% No Depth 3.6% medium and high risk) on the site. Land to the north of Burr Lane, Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site poorly Stm009 Spalding 0.87 27 Flood Zone 3 98% Danger for Most 82.0% 0.5m to 1m 49.7% compared to other sites. Flood Zone 2 2% Danger for Some 18.0% 0.25m to 0.5m 26.1% Small areas of surface water flooding (low risk) on 1m to 2m 24.1% the site. Land off Monks House Lane Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site moderately Mon018 Spalding 1.23 37 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger for Most 65.2% 0.5m to 1m 37.6% poorly compared to other sites. Danger for Some 16.3% 1m to 2m 27.6% No Hazard 9.6% 0.25m to 0.5m 16.3% Low Hazard 8.9% No Depth 9.6% Small areas of surface water flooding (low risk) on 0m to 0.25m 8.9% the site. Site less sequentially preferable in terms of flood Land to the west of Spalding risk. Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site poorly Stm005 Drove, Spalding 11.97 359 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger for Most 74.8% 0.5m to 1m 42.6% compared to other sites. Low Hazard 16.7% 1m to 2m 31.8% Danger for All 6.4% 0m to 0.25m 16.7% Danger for Some 1.9% 0.25m to 0.5m 8.6% Small areas of surface water flooding (low and No Hazard 0.2% No Depth 0.2% medium risk) on the site. Land to the east of Barrier Bank and north of Burr lane, Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site poorly Stm030 Spalding 5.19 104 Flood Zone 3 99.3% Danger for Most 86.4% 1m to 2m 62.5% compared to other sites. Flood Zone 2 0.7% No Hazard 5.4% 0.5m to 1m 23.1% Areas of surface water flooding (low, medium and Danger for Some 4.1% No Depth 5.4% high risk) within the site. Low Hazard 4.1% 0.25m to 0.5m 4.8% 0m to 0.25m 4.1%

28 Spalding - Other Developable Sites

Comments (including reasons for rejection Site_ref Name Area (ha) No. DwellFLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDEPTH % DEPTHwhere applicable) Site less sequentially preferable in terms of flood Land between Cowbit Road risk. Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site poorly Stm015 and Spalding Drove, Spalding 5.79 174 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger for Most 91.3% 1m to 2m 50.2% compared to other sites. Low Hazard 4.0% 0.5m to 1m 41.6% Danger for Some 2.2% 0m to 0.25m 4.0% Small areas of surface water flooding (low risk) on Danger for All 1.7% 0.25m to 0.5m 3.3% the site. No Hazard 0.9% No Depth 0.9% Site less sequentially preferable in terms of flood Land to the north of Bourne risk. Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site poorly Mon015 Road, behind Hectare House 0.76 22 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger for Most 99.4% 1m to 2m 59.6% compared to other sites. Danger for Some 0.6% 0.5m to 1m 39.8% Small areas of surface water flooding (low, 0.25m to 0.5m 0.6% medium and high risk) on the site. Site less sequentially preferable in terms of flood Land to the east of Spalding risk. Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site Stm007 Common, Spalding 0.66 20 Flood Zone 3 78.5% Danger for Most 93.6% 1m to 2m 79.4% moderately poorly compared to other sites. Flood Zone 1 20.5% Danger for Some 6.4% 0.5m to 1m 12.0% Small areas of surface water flooding (low risk) on Flood Zone 2 1% 0.25m to 0.5m 8.6% the site. Land to the north of Burr Lane, Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site poorly Stm021 Spalding 1.75 52 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For Most 100.0% 1m to 2m 54.0% compared to other sites. 0.5m to 1m 46.0% Small areas of surface water flooding (low risk) on the site. Land to the north of Burr Lane, Stm025 Spalding 0.263 8 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger for Most 100.0% 1m to 2m 75.6% Small site (below allocation threshold) 0.5m to 1m 24.4%

Site less sequentially preferable in terms of flood Land to the north of Burr Lane, risk. Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site poorly Stm019 Spalding 2.15 65 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For Most 100.0% 1m to 2m 95.3% compared to other sites. 0.5m to 1m 4.7% Small areas of surface water flooding (low risk) on the site. Former Jewsons premises, Stp003 Roman Bank, Spalding 0.49 63 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger for Most 73.3% 1m to 2m 79.8% Site has planning permission Danger for All 26.7% 0.5m to 1m 20.2%

29 Spalding - Other Developable Sites

Comments (including reasons for rejection Site_ref Name Area (ha) No. DwellFLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDEPTH % DEPTHwhere applicable) Site less sequentially preferable in terms of flood Land between Cowbit Road risk. Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site poorly Stm018 and Spalding Drove, Spalding 37.60 1128 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger for Most 66.6% 1m to 2m 91.8% compared to other sites. Danger for All 29.2% 0.5m to 1m 3.0% No Hazard 2.2% No Depth 2.2% Small areas of surface water flooding (low, Danger for Some 1.1% 0.25m to 0.5m 1.2% medium and high risk) on the site. Low Hazard 0.9% >2m 0.9% 0m to 0.25m 0.8% Site less sequentially preferable in terms of flood Land to the west of Spalding risk. Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site poorly Stm017 Drove, Spalding 8.66 260 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger for Most 93.4% 1m to 2m 83.4% compared to other sites. Danger for All 3.7% 0.5m to 1m 13.5% Danger for Some 1.2% 0.25m to 0.5m 1.5% Low Hazard 0.8% 0m to 0.25m 0.8% Small areas of surface water flooding (low and No Hazard 0.8% No Depth 0.8% medium risk) on the site. Site less sequentially preferable in terms of flood Land between Cowbit Road risk. Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site poorly Stm016 and Spalding Drove, Spalding 26.29 789 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger for Most 87.6% 1m to 2m 84.9% compared to other sites. Danger for All 8.0% 0.5m to 1m 10.4% Small areas of surface water flooding (low, Danger for Some 3.1% 0.25m to 0.5m 3.1% medium and high risk) on the site. No Hazard 0.8% No Depth 0.8% Low Hazard 0.5% 0m to 0.25m 0.7% Site less sequentially preferable in terms of flood Land to the east of Spalding risk. Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site Stm006 Common, Spalding 1.41 42 Flood Zone 3 82.5% Danger for Most 87.3% 1m to 2m 60.1% moderately poorly compared to other sites. Flood Zone 2 14.5% Danger for All 10.5% 0.5m to 1m 35.2% Flood Zone 1 3% Danger for Some 1.9% 0.25m to 0.5m 4.3% Small areas of surface water flooding (low risk) on Low Hazard 0.4% 0m to 0.25m 0.4% the site. Site less sequentially preferable in terms of flood Land to the east of South risk. Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site Stm002 Drove, Spalding 0.80 24 Flood Zone 3 86% Danger for Most 96.2% 1m to 2m 97.6% moderately poorly compared to other sites. Flood Zone 2 14% Danger for All 3.8% 0.5m to 1m 2.4% Small areas of surface water flooding (low risk) on Flood Zone 1 0.5% the site.

30 Spalding - Other Developable Sites

31 Crowland - General Points

Environment Agency has commented that tidal and River Nene sources do not reach the sites but other potential sources (including fluvial could).

Anglian Water has commented that the capacity of the surface water network has major constraints, and that all developments should seek to reduce flood risk and incorporate Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS). The North Level IDB has commented that ‘there is no specific risk for their drainage network for Crowland. If new developments follow government guidelines and SuDS are used then there will be no impact on the drainage network. If surface water run-off rates increase as a result of development these should be addressed at the application stage with improvements funded by the developer. Some of the sites are adjacent to the IDB’s watercourses and byelaws will apply.’

Crowland - Allocated Sites

Site_ref Name Area (ha) No. DwellFLOOD ZONE % FZ HAZARD % DEPTH % Sequential Test - Stage Required South View Community Primary School, Broadway, Cro046 Crowland 0.68 14 Flood Zone 1 100.0% Danger for Most 63.5% 0.25m to 0.5m 60.0% Sequential Test Passed Low Hazard 28.0% 0m to 0.25m 27.9% Danger for Some 7.9% 0.5m to 1m 12.2% Areas of surface water flooding (low and medium Danger for All 0.6% risk) across the site. Land at 18 Low Road, Cro036 Crowland 1.48 30 Flood Zone 2 56.5% Danger for Most 63.0% 0.5m to 1m 87.8% Sequential Test Passed Flood Zone 1 43.5% Danger for All 33.4% 0.25m to 0.5m 9.5% Low Hazard 2.1% 0m to 0.25m 2.3% Danger for Some 1.4% 1m to 2m 0.3% Small area of surface water flooding (low risk) on No Hazard 0.1% No Depth 0.1% the site. Land to the east of Crease Cro043 Drove, Crowland 1.54 31 Flood Zone 2 63.0% Danger for Most 68.6% 0.25m to 0.5m 42.4% Apply Exceptions Test Flood Zone 3 37.0% Low Hazard 24.1% 0m to 0.25m 40.0% Danger for Some 7.3% No Depth 11.6% Small areas of surface water flooding (low risk) on 0.5m to 1m 5.9% the site.

Land to the rear of 11 Barbers Cro044 Drove North Crowland 1.47 29 Flood Zone 2 55.0% Danger for Most 73.6% 0.5m to 1m 61.8% Apply Exceptions Test Danger for Some 23.0% 0.25m to 0.5m 34.1% Flood Zone 3 45.0% Low Hazard 2.8% 0m to 0.25m 3.2% Small areas of surface water flooding (low and No Hazard 0.7% No Depth 0.8% medium risk) on the site.

32 Crowland - Allocated Sites Comments (including reasons for rejection Site_ref Name Area (ha) No. DwellFLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDEPTH % DEP where applicable) Land to the north of Barbers Cro011 Drove North, Crowland 1.54 31 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger for Most 97.8% 0.5m to 1m 97.3% Apply Exceptions Test Danger for Some 2.2% 0.25m to 0.5m 2.7% Areas of surface water flooding (low risk) across the site. Land to the east of Normanton Cro050 Road 3.50 70 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger for Most 96.3% 0.5m to 1m 72.1% Apply Exceptions Test Danger for All 3.7% 1m to 2m 22.1% Areas of surface water flooding (low risk) across 0.25m to 0.5m 5.8% the site.

Crowland - Other Developable Sites

Comments (including reasons for rejection Site_ref Name Area (ha) No. DwellFLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDEPTH % DEP where applicable) Former PO Sorting Office, 6 Cro028 Reform Street, Crowland 0.02 1 Flood Zone 1 100.0% Low Hazard 100% 0m to 0.25m 100% Small site (below allocation threshold) Land to the rear of 2-6 West Cro030 Street, Crowland 0.13 1 Flood Zone 1 100.0% Low Hazard 99.6% 0m to 0.25m 99.6% Small site (below allocation threshold) No Hazard 0.4% No Depth 0.4%

Land to the east of Peterborough Road, Crowland Cro020 0.27 5 Flood Zone 2 100.0% Danger for Some 60.7% 0.25m to 0.5m 70.6% Small site (below allocation threshold) Low Hazard 20.4% 0m to 0.25m 20.4% Danger for Most 13.8% No Depth 5.0% No Hazard 5.0% 0.5m to 1m 3.9% Land at Alderlands Close, Cro025 Crowland 0.16 8 Flood Zone 2 79.0% Danger for Most 50.5% 0.25m to 0.5m 40.6% Small site (below allocation threshold) Flood Zone 3 21.0% Low Hazard 28.2% 0m to 0.25m 28.2% Danger for Some 13.5% 0.5m to 1m 23.4% 0.04 No Hazard 7.8% No Depth 7.8% 65 Peterborough Road, Cro023 Crowland 0.19 3 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger for Most 81.6% 0.5m to 1m 69.5% Small site (below allocation threshold) Danger for All 14.2% 1m to 2m 24.4% Low Hazard 4.1% 0m to 0.25m 3.6% 0.25m to 0.5m 2.5% Land to the rear of 60 North Cro024 Street, Crowland 0.33 10 Flood Zone 1 100.0% Danger for Most 88.4% 0.5m to 1m 62.6% Site has planning permission Danger for Some 4.0% 1m to 2m 26.6% Danger for All 3.5% 0.25m to 0.5m 6.5% No Hazard 3.0% No Depth 3.1% Small areas of surface water flooding (low and Low Hazard 1.2% 0m to 0.25m 1.2% medium risk) on the site. Land adjacent to 27A Chapel Cro027 Street, Crowland 0.12 1 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger for Most 93.9% 0.5m to 1m 65.0% Small site (below allocation threshold) Danger for All 6.1% 0.25m to 0.5m 35.0% Crowland - Other Developable Sites Comments (including reasons for rejection Site_ref Name Area (ha) No. DwellFLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDEPTH % DEP where applicable)

33 Site within Sand and Gravel Minerals Land to the north of Postland Safeguarding Zone. Sustainability Appraisal ranks Cro041 Road, Crowland 4.19 84 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger for Most 63.8% 1m to 2m 85.7% the site poorly compared to other sites. Danger for All 36.0% 0.5m to 1m 13.8% Danger for Some 0.2% 0.25m to 0.5m 0.3% Small area of surface water flooding (low risk) on No Depth 0.2% the site.

Land to the east of Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site poorly Cro002 Peterborough Road, Crowland 1.86 37 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger for Most 86.3% 1m to 2m 67.6% compared to other sites. Danger for All 7.7% 0.5m to 1m 25.1% Danger for Some 3.3% 0.25m to 0.5m 4.3% Low Hazard 2.6% 0m to 0.25m 2.8% Small areas of surface water flooding (low risk) on No Hazard 0.2% No Depth 0.2% the site. Land to the west of Barbers Cro013 Drove South, Crowland 0.11 1 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger for Most 88.4% 1m to 2m 100% Small site (below allocation threshold) Danger for All 11.6% Site within Sand and Gravel Minerals Safeguarding Zone. Sustainability Appraisal ranks Cro031 Land off Cloot Drove, Crowland 8.41 168 Flood Zone 3 81.0% Danger for All 55.1% 1m to 2m 65.2% the site poorly compared to other sites. Flood Zone 2 19.0% Danger for Most 44.9% 0.5m to 1m 31.9% 0.25m to 0.5m 2.4% Small areas of surface water flooding (low risk) on >2m 0.6% the site. Site within Sand and Gravel Minerals Crowland Garden Centre, Safeguarding Zone. Sustainability Appraisal ranks Cro038 Postland Road, Crowland 3.92 78 Flood Zone 3 99.5% Danger for All 57.7% 1m to 2m 67.6% the site poorly compared to other sites. Flood Zone 2 0.5% Danger for Most 41.6% 0.5m to 1m 25.8% Danger for Some 0.6% >2m 5.1% Low Hazard 0.1% 0.25m to 0.5m 1.4% Small areas of surface water flooding (low and 0m to 0.25m 0.1% medium risk) on the site. Land West of Cloot Drove Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site poorly Cro045 Crowland 5.16 102 Flood Zone 3 95.0% Danger for All 95.0% 1m to 2m 91.8% compared to other sites. Flood Zone 1 4.0% Danger for Most 4.4% 0.5m to 1m 5.1% Flood Zone 2 1.0% No Hazard 0.2% >2m 1.8% Danger for Some 0.2% 0.25m to 0.5m 0.9% Low Hazard 0.2% No Depth 0.2% Areas of surface water flooding (low risk) across 0m to 0.25m 0.2% the site.

Land to the west of Cro010 Peterborough Road, Crowland 1.82 49 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger for All 90.8% 1m to 2m 95.8% Site has planning permission Danger for Most 8.5% 0.5m to 1m 2.5% Danger for Some 0.6% 0.25m to 0.5m 1.6% Areas of surface water flooding (low risk) across Low Hazard 0.1% 0m to 0.25m 0.1% the site. Land to the west of James Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site poorly Cro017 Road, Crowland 1.76 35 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger for All 95.3% 1m to 2m 97.3% compared to other sites. Danger for Most 4.0% 0.5m to 1m 1.9% Danger for Some 0.4% 0.25m to 0.5m 0.4%

Areas of surface water flooding (low risk) and a Low Hazard 0.3% 0m to 0.25m 0.3% small area of medium risk flooding across the site.

34 Donington - General Points Anglian Water has commented that the capacity of the surface water network has major constraints, and that all developments should seek to reduce flood risk and incorporate Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS).

Donington - Allocated Sites

Site_ref Name Area (ha) No. DwellFLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDEPTH % DEP Sequential Test - Stage Required Land to the north of Quadring Don018 Road, Donington 2.59 52 Flood Zone 1 88.5% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% Sequential Test Passed Flood Zone 3 11.5% Small areas of surface water flooding (low risk) on the site. Land to the east of Town Dam Don030 Lane, Donington 0.61 12 Flood Zone 2 72.0% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% Sequential Test Passed Flood Zone 1 24.5% Flood Zone 3 4.0% No surface water flooding issues identified. Land to the south of Town Dam Don001 Lane, Donington 2.65 53 Flood Zone 2 51.0% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% Sequential Test Passed Flood Zone 1 37.0% Small area of surface water flooding (low risk) on Flood Zone 3 12.0% the site. Land to the east of Town Dam Don006 Lane, Donington 5.49 110 Flood Zone 2 49.0% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% Apply Exceptions Test Flood Zone 3 29.5% Small area of surface water flooding (low risk) on Flood Zone 1 21.5% the site. Land to the west of Maltings Don008 Lane, Donington 3.61 72 Flood Zone 3 98.0% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% Apply Exceptions Test Flood Zone 2 1.0% Small areas of surface water flooding (low risk) on Flood Zone 1 1.0% the site.

35 Donington - Other Developable Sites

Site_ref Name Area (ha) No. DwellFLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDEPTH % DEP Sequential Test - Stage Required Land to the north of 12 Market Don010 Place, Donington 0.39 8 Flood Zone 1 100.0% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% Small site (below allocation threshold) Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site poorly Land to the north-east of Park compared to other sites. Impact on designated Don032 Lane, Donington 2.12 42 Flood Zone 1 100.0% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% heritage assets also identified.

No surface water flooding issues identified. Land adjacent to 69 Quadring Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site moderately Don029 Road, Donington 0.57 11 Flood Zone 1 88.0% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% poorly compared to other sites. Flood Zone 3 12.0% No surface water flooding issues identified. Land to the north of Church Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site moderately Don033 Lane, Donington 10.13 203 Flood Zone 1 78.5% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% poorly compared to other sites. Flood Zone 3 17.5% Small areas of surface water flooding (low and Flood Zone 2 4.0% medium risk) on the site. Land to the north of Park Lane, Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site moderately Don012 Donington 1.00 20 Flood Zone 1 74.5% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% poorly compared to other sites. Flood Zone 3 18.5% Approximately half of the site is subject to surface Flood Zone 2 7.0% water flooding (low risk).

Land to the north of Town Dam Concerns regarding potential impact on character Don017 Lane, Donington 6.19 124 Flood Zone 1 50.5% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% of settlement and potential highways issues. Flood Zone 3 43.0% Small areas of surface water flooding (low and Flood Zone 2 6.5% medium risk) on the site. Land to the north-east of Don031 Quadring Road, Donington 0.31 7 Flood Zone 3 94.0% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% Small site (below allocation threshold) 0.02 Flood Zone 1 6.0% E & S Forklift Sales, Malting Don024 lane, Donington 1.13 51 Flood Zone 3 98.5% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% Site has planning permission Flood Zone 2 1.0% Small area of surface water flooding (low risk) on Flood Zone 1 0.5% the site. Site less sequentially preferable in terms of flood Land to the south of Town Dam risk. Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site Don016 Lane, Donington 1.35 27 Flood Zone 3 100.0% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% moderately poorly compared to other sites.

Small areas of surface water flooding (low risk) on the site.

36 Holbeach - General Points

Holbeach - Allocated Sites

Site_ref Address Area (ha) No. DwellFLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDEPTH % DEP Sequential Test - Stage Required Land to the west of Fen Road, Hob010 Holbeach 0.79 16 Flood Zone 3 100.0% No Hazard 66.0% No Hazard 73.9% Apply Exceptions Test Low Hazard 31.2% 0m to 0.25m 26.1% Small areas of surface water flooding (low and Danger For Some 2.8% medium risk) on the site. Land to the east of Balmoral Hob004 Way, Holbeach 5.44 109 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger For Some 34.4% 0.25m to 0.5m 33.0% Apply Exceptions Test Danger For Most 24.0% 0m to 0.25m 23.3% Small areas of surface water flooding (low and No Hazard 21.9% No Hazard 21.9% medium risk) on the site. Low Hazard 19.7% 0.5m to 1m 21.5% 1m to 2m 0.3% Hob048 Land to the east of the A151 41.95 800 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger For Most 40.4% 0.25m to 0.5m 39.5% Apply Exceptions Test Danger For Some 36.6% 0.5m to 1m 32.0%

Small areas of surface water flooding (low and medium risk) on the site. One small area of high Low Hazard 18.5% 0m to 0.25m 22.6% risk surface water flooding identified. No Hazard 3.8% No Hazard 3.7% Danger For All 0.6% 1m to 2m 2.1% >2m 0.0% Land off Battlefields Lane, Hob032 Holbeach 6.27 185 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger For Most 48.8% 0.25m to 0.5m 58.9% Apply Exceptions Test Danger For Some 48.4% 0.5m to 1m 36.6% Areas of surface water flooding (Low risk) in the No Hazard 1.6% 0m to 0.25m 2.8% western half of the site. Low Hazard 1.3% No Hazard 1.6% 1m to 2m 0.2%

37 Holbeach - Other Developable Sites Comments (including reasons for rejection Site_ref Address Area (ha) No. DwellFLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDEPTH % DEP where applicable)

18 Edinburgh Walk, Holbeach Hob033 0.20 2 Flood Zone 3 100.0% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% Small site (below allocation threshold) Concerns regarding impact on character of area Land to the south of Wignals which can only be potentially resolved if Hob039 Hob011 Gate, Holbeach 3.48 70 Flood Zone 3 100.0% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% was proposed to be allocated.

Small area of surface water flooding (low risk) on the site. Holbeach House, Fleet Road, Fle015 Holbeach 0.44 32 Flood Zone 3 100.0% No Hazard 99.5% No Hazard 99.5% Site has planning permission Danger For Some 0.5% 0m to 0.25m 0.5% Low Hazard 0.0% Land to the south of Wignals Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site moderately Hob039 Gate, Holbeach 4.76 96 Flood Zone 3 100.0% No Hazard 67.3% No Hazard 68.3% poorly compared to other sites. Low Hazard 31.2% 0m to 0.25m 29.9% Small areas of surface water flooding (low, Danger For Some 1.3% 0.25m to 0.5m 1.1% medium and high risk) on the site. Danger For Most 0.3% 0.5m to 1m 0.4% 1m to 2m 0.3% Land to the north of Spalding Hob008 Road, Holbeach 0.28 6 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Low Hazard 56.0% 0m to 0.25m 68.6% Small site (below allocation threshold) Danger For Some 22.3% No Hazard 21.7% No Hazard 21.7% 0.25m to 0.5m 9.6% Land to the north-west of Sits within Hob004 which is proposed to be Hob009 Foxes Low Road, Holbeach 1.06 21 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Low Hazard 40.8% 0m to 0.25m 43.5% allocated No Hazard 39.0% No Hazard 39.0% Danger For Some 12.5% 0.25m to 0.5m 7.9% Danger For Most 7.7% 0.5m to 1m 6.9% Danger For All 0.1% 1m to 2m 2.8% Land to the south of Wignals Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site poorly Hob002 Gate, Holbeach 39.62 792 Flood Zone 3 90.0% Low Hazard 36.5% 0m to 0.25m 40.3% compared to other sites. Flood Zone 2 10.0% No Hazard 36.5% No Hazard 36.7% Small areas of surface water flooding (low and Danger For Some 25.7% 0.25m to 0.5m 21.8% medium risk) on the site. Danger For Most 1.2% 0.5m to 1m 1.2% 1m to 2m 0.1% Land to the east of Branches Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site moderately Fle007 Lane, Holbeach 1.09 22 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Low Hazard 72.5% 0m to 0.25m 85.9% poorly compared to other sites. Danger For Some 16.1% No Hazard 11.4% No Hazard 11.4% 0.25m to 0.5m 2.7% No surface water flooding issues identified.

38 Holbeach - Other Developable Sites Comments (including reasons for rejection Site_ref Address Area (ha) No. DwellFLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDEPTH % DEP where applicable) Land to the east of Penny Hill Hob005 Road, Holbeach 0.64 30 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Low Hazard 71.0% 0m to 0.25m 74.6% Site has planning permission Danger For Some 15.0% No Hazard 12.0% No Hazard 12.0% 0.25m to 0.5m 11.4% Danger For Most 1.4% 0.5m to 1m 1.4% Danger For All 0.6% 1m to 2m 0.6% Land to the north of Northons Sits within Hob048 which is proposed to be Hob042 Lane, Holbeach 10.08 202 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Low Hazard 58.2% 0m to 0.25m 67.4% allocated Danger For Some 28.7% 0.25m to 0.5m 19.2% No Hazard 9.3% No Hazard 9.3% Danger For Most 3.5% 0.5m to 1m 3.4% Danger For All 0.3% 1m to 2m 0.7% Land at Northons Lane, Hob035 Holbeach 0.11 2 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Low Hazard 48.8% 0m to 0.25m 77.0% Small site (below allocation threshold) Danger For Some 42.0% 0.25m to 0.5m 12.3% No Hazard 9.2% No Hazard 9.2% 0.5m to 1m 1.6% Land to the north of Northon's Hob044 Lane, Holbeach 1.21 24 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger For Some 61.9% 0.25m to 0.5m 59.1% Site has planning permission Low Hazard 26.6% 0m to 0.25m 31.1% Danger For Most 7.8% 0.5m to 1m 6.1% No Hazard 3.7% No Hazard 3.7% Land to the west of Barrett's Hob023 Close, Holbeach 0.15 3 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger For Some 87.1% 0.25m to 0.5m 89.5% Small site (below allocation threshold) Danger For Most 12.9% 0.5m to 1m 10.5% Land to the east of the A151, Sits within Hob048 which is proposed to be Hob006 Holbeach 29.26 585 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger For Most 45.6% 0.25m to 0.5m 47.0% allocated Danger For Some 45.2% 0.5m to 1m 39.6% Low Hazard 6.2% 0m to 0.25m 8.8% No Hazard 2.3% 1m to 2m 2.4% Danger For All 0.7% No Hazard 2.1% >2m 0.1% Land to the north of Spalding Sits within Hob048 which is proposed to be Hob013 Road, Holbeach 1.94 39 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger For Most 72.1% 0.5m to 1m 71.2% allocated Danger For Some 25.8% 0.25m to 0.5m 26.6% Low Hazard 1.4% 0m to 0.25m 1.5% No Hazard 0.6% No Hazard 0.6% Land to the north of Foxes Low Sits within Hob004 which is proposed to be Hob026 Road, Holbeach 2.12 42 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger For Most 41.8% 0.5m to 1m 38.3% allocated Danger For Some 28.3% 0.25m to 0.5m 30.3% No Hazard 15.9% No Hazard 15.9% Low Hazard 13.9% 0m to 0.25m 14.8% 1m to 2m 0.7%

39 Kirton - General Points Environment Agency Standing Advice - Allocations in areas of hazard would need to ensure that finished floor levels (FFL) are raised to the appropriate level with additional flood resilient construction incorporated into proposals. Developers would need to confirm that they can achieve the required mitigation and that their proposals would still be deliverable. Anglian Water has commented that the capacity of the surface water network has major constraints, and that all developments should seek to reduce flood risk and incorporate Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS).

Kirton - Allocated Sites

Site_ref Name Area (ha) No. DwellFLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDEPTH % DEP Sequential Test - Stage Required Land to the east of Woodside Kir034 Road, Kirton 2.05 41 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Low Hazard 61.8% 0m to 0.25m 69.3% Apply Exceptions Test No Hazard 23.5% No Hazard 24.0% Small areas of surface water flooding (low and medium risk) on the northern and southern Danger For Some 11.8% 0.25m to 0.5m 4.3% boundaries of the site. Danger For All 1.5% 0.5m to 1m 1.3% Danger For Most 1.4% 1m to 2m 1.1% >2m 0.1% Kir016 31-33 London Road, Kirton 1.25 25 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger For Some 57.4% 0.25m to 0.5m 44.2% Apply Exceptions Test Low Hazard 27.5% 0m to 0.25m 42.4% Areas of surface water flooding (low risk) within the No Hazard 13.4% No Hazard 13.4% site. Danger For Most 1.7% Land to the west of London Kir041 Road, Kirton 5.10 102 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger for Some 70.4% 0.25m to 0.5m 66.6% Apply Exceptions Test Danger for Most 13.1% 0m to 0.25m 18.7% Low Hazard 12.7% 0.5m to 1m 10.2% Areas of surface water flooding (low risk) within the No Hazard 2.6% No Depth 2.6% site. Danger for All 1.3% 1m to 2m 1.8%

>2m 0.1%

40 Kirton - Other Developable Sites

Comments (including reasons for rejection Site_ref Name Area (ha) No. DwellFLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDEPTH % DEP where applicable)

Land to the west of London Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site moderately Kir015 Road, Kirton 4.93 99 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger For Some 37.7% 0m to 0.25m 35.4% poorly compared to other sites. Low Hazard 28.2% 0.25m to 0.5m 30.1% Areas of surface water flooding (low, medium and No Hazard 17.3% No Hazard 17.7% high risk) within the site. Danger For Most 16.4% 0.5m to 1m 12.8% Danger For All 0.4% 1m to 2m 4.0%

Land to the west of London Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site moderately Kir038 Road, Kirton 0.57 11 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger For Some 58.6% 0m to 0.25m 60.2% poorly compared to other sites. Low Hazard 41.4% 0.25m to 0.5m 39.8% No surface water flooding issues identified. Land to the west of London Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site moderately Kir022 Road, Kirton 3.83 77 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger For Some 29.8% 0m to 0.25m 33.3% poorly compared to other sites. Low Hazard 29.0% 0.25m to 0.5m 24.3% Areas of surface water flooding (low, medium and No Hazard 20.6% No Hazard 21.1% high risk) within the site. Danger For Most 20.2% 0.5m to 1m 16.2% Danger For All 0.5% 1m to 2m 5.1% Land to the west of London Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site moderately Kir037 Road, Kirton 16.74 335 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger For Some 49.0% 0.25m to 0.5m 45.3% poorly compared to other sites. Low Hazard 25.4% 0m to 0.25m 32.1% Areas of surface water flooding (low, medium and Danger For Most 15.1% 0.5m to 1m 10.6% high risk) within the site. No Hazard 9.6% No Hazard 9.8% Danger For All 0.8% 1m to 2m 2.1% >2m 0.0% Land to the west of Boston Kir007 Road, Kirton 6.30 140 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger For Some 54.6% 0.25m to 0.5m 81.7% Site has planning permission Danger For Most 42.7% 0.5m to 1m 11.9% Low Hazard 2.7% 0m to 0.25m 6.2% No Hazard 0.1% 1m to 2m 0.1% No Hazard 0.1% Land to the west of London Site less sequentially preferable in terms of flood Kir033 Road, Kirton 4.21 84 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger For Some 75.6% 0.25m to 0.5m 74.4% risk. Danger For Most 14.5% 0.5m to 1m 11.7% Small areas of surface water flood risk (one area of medium risk and two areas of low risk) within Low Hazard 7.6% 0m to 0.25m 11.1% the site. Danger For All 1.3% 1m to 2m 1.8% No Hazard 0.9% No Hazard 0.9% >2m 0.0%

41 Kirton - Other Developable Sites Comments (including reasons for rejection Site_ref Name Area (ha) No. DwellFLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDEPTH % DEP where applicable) Land to the east of London Kir014 Road, Kirton 2.03 19 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger For Most 60.9% 0.25m to 0.5m 54.7% Site has planning permission Danger For Some 21.7% 0.5m to 1m 22.2% Low Hazard 11.4% 0m to 0.25m 17.0% No Hazard 6.1% No Hazard 6.1% Land to the west of Boston Kir006 Road, Kirton 2.65 53 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger For Most 66.8% 0.25m to 0.5m 75.0% Site has planning permission Danger For Some 33.1% 0.5m to 1m 24.5% No Hazard 0.1% 1m to 2m 0.3% Low Hazard 0.0% 0m to 0.25m 0.1% No Hazard 0.1% Land to the south of London Kir009 Road, Kirton 1.60 16 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger For Most 51.5% 0.5m to 1m 36.3% Site has planning permission Danger For Some 23.5% 0.25m to 0.5m 27.5% No Hazard 13.5% 0m to 0.25m 19.5% Low Hazard 11.2% No Hazard 13.5% Danger For All 0.2% 1m to 2m 3.2% Site less sequentially preferable in terms of flood Land to the north of Middlegate risk. Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site Fra005 Road, Kirton 2.44 49 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger For Most 94.5% 0.5m to 1m 57.3% moderately poorly compared to other sites. Danger For Some 2.8% 1m to 2m 38.7% Small areas of surface water flood risk (low risk) Danger For All 1.5% 0.25m to 0.5m 2.7% within the site. Low Hazard 1.2% 0m to 0.25m 1.3% Land to the north of Craven Site less sequentially preferable in terms of flood Kir036 Avenue, Kirton 3.84 77 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger For Most 95.7% 0.5m to 1m 82.1% risk. Danger For Some 2.4% 0.25m to 0.5m 14.4% Small areas of surface water flood risk (low and Danger For All 1.7% 1m to 2m 2.9% medium risk) within the site. Low Hazard 0.2% 0m to 0.25m 0.5% Land to the west of Horseshoe Site less sequentially preferable in terms of flood Kir029 Lane, Kirton 2.37 47 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger For Most 97.8% 0.5m to 1m 83.9% risk. Danger For All 1.9% 0.25m to 0.5m 13.2% One small area of surface water flooding (low risk) Danger For Some 0.3% 1m to 2m 2.8% in south eastern corner of the site Site less sequentially preferable in terms of flood Land to the north of Middlegate risk. Natural England concerns with respect to Fra024 Road, Kirton 9.82 196 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger For Most 92.7% 0.5m to 1m 71.0% Habitats Regulations issues. Danger For All 5.5% 1m to 2m 26.4% Small areas of surface water flooding (low, Danger For Some 1.3% >2m 1.1% medium and high risk) on the site. Low Hazard 0.6% 0.25m to 0.5m 0.9% 0m to 0.25m 0.6%

42 Long Sutton - General Points

Long Sutton - Allocated Sites

Site_ref Name Hectare No. DwellFLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDEPTH % DEP Sequential Test - Stage Required Land to the east of Seagate Los015 Road, Long Sutton 10.74 215 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger For Most 52.2% 0.25m to 0.5m 52.1% Apply Exceptions Test Danger For Some 30.0% 0.5m to 1m 25.9% Small areas of surface water flooding on the boundaries of the site - primarily low risk with a Low Hazard 11.1% 0m to 0.25m 15.1% small area of high risk. No Hazard 5.4% No Hazard 5.4% Danger For All 1.3% 1m to 2m 1.4% Land to the east of Lime Walk, Los008 Long Sutton 1.82 36 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger For Most 99.5% 0.5m to 1m 92.4% Apply Exceptions Test Danger For Some 0.5% 1m to 2m 7.0% Small areas of surface water flood risk (low risk) 0.25m to 0.5m 0.5% within the site. Land to the east of Station Los046 Road, Long Sutton 0.68 14 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger For Most 100.0% 0.5m to 1m 96.0% Apply Exceptions Test 1m to 2m 3.9% Small areas of surface water flood risk (low, medium and high risk) within the site. Land to the east of Lime Walk, Los026 Long Sutton 2.13 42 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger For Most 97.8% 0.5m to 1m 77.9% Apply Exceptions Test Danger For All 2.2% 1m to 2m 20.8%

Small areas of surface water flood risk (low and >2m 1.3% medium risk) on western boundary of the site.

43 Long Sutton - Other Developable Sites

Comments (including reasons for rejection Site_ref Name Hectare No. DwellFLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDEPTH % DEP where applicable) Land to the south of Bull Lane, Los021 Long Sutton 0.43 39 Flood Zone 3 96.5% Danger For Some 38.3% 0.5m to 1m 35.1% Site has planning permission Flood Zone 2 3.5% Danger For Most 35.1% 0.25m to 0.5m 34.6% No Hazard 20.8% No Hazard 20.8% Low Hazard 5.8% 0m to 0.25m 9.5% Land to the west of Wisbech Sits within Los015 which is proposed to be Los012 Road, Long Sutton 0.75 15 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger For Most 45.2% 0.25m to 0.5m 52.9% allocated Danger For Some 41.8% 0.5m to 1m 29.9% Low Hazard 7.7% 0m to 0.25m 12.0% No Hazard 5.3% No Hazard 5.3%

Land to the west of Garnsgate Los028 Road, long Sutton 0.68 14 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger For Most 44.5% 0.5m to 1m 42.2% Site no longer available for consideration Danger For Some 42.4% 0.25m to 0.5m 35.9% Low Hazard 13.1% 0m to 0.25m 21.9% Los039 Market Street, Long Sutton 0.12 2 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger For Most 52.1% 0.5m to 1m 55.5% Small site (below allocation threshold) Danger For Some 39.3% 0.25m to 0.5m 30.1% No Hazard 8.4% No Hazard 8.4% Low Hazard 0.2% 0m to 0.25m 6.1% Land to the east of Seagate Sits within Los015 which is proposed to be Los030 Road, Long Sutton 1.27 25 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger For Most 81.5% 0.5m to 1m 63.3% allocated Danger For Some 18.5% 0.25m to 0.5m 36.2% Low Hazard 0.0% 0m to 0.25m 0.5% Cold store, Gedney Road, Long Los032 Sutton 0.32 4 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger For Most 89.7% 0.5m to 1m 86.7% Small site (below allocation threshold) Danger For Some 5.4% 1m to 2m 8.6% Danger For All 4.3% 0.25m to 0.5m 4.1% No Hazard 0.6% No Hazard 0.6% Land to the south of Woad Los001 Lane, Long Sutton 0.09 2 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger For Most 91.1% 0.5m to 1m 82.8% Small site (below allocation threshold) Danger For Some 8.9% 0.25m to 0.5m 17.2% Land to the east of Roman Los022 Bank, Long Sutton 0.75 15 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger For Most 93.0% 0.5m to 1m 93.7% Legal and access issues highlighted Danger For Some 5.0% 0.25m to 0.5m 4.1% Small areas of surface water flood risk (low risk) Low Hazard 2.0% 0m to 0.25m 2.2% on northern boundary of the site. No Hazard 0.0% No Hazard 0.0%

44 Long Sutton - Other Developable Sites

Comments (including reasons for rejection Site_ref Name Hectare No. DwellFLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDEPTH % DEP where applicable) Former Butterfly & Wildlife Park, Little London, Long Los037 Sutton 6.23 87 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger For Most 95.9% 0.5m to 1m 92.2% Site has planning permission Danger For Some 3.3% 0.25m to 0.5m 4.3% Danger For All 0.4% 1m to 2m 2.5% Low Hazard 0.4% 0m to 0.25m 0.9%

Land to the west of Garnsgate Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site moderately Los014 Road, Long Sutton 1.23 25 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger For Most 99.9% 0.5m to 1m 98.5% poorly compared to other sites. Danger For Some 0.1% 1m to 2m 1.1% Small area of surface water flood risk (low risk) on 0.25m to 0.5m 0.5% the site. Site less sequentially preferable in terms of flood Land to the south of Lancaster risk. Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site Los019 Drive, Long Sutton 1.24 25 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger For Most 71.9% 0.5m to 1m 52.1% moderately poorly compared to other sites. Danger For Some 14.8% 1m to 2m 29.4% Areas of surface water flooding (low and medium risk) on the western, southern and eastern Danger For All 9.3% 0.25m to 0.5m 12.1% boundaries of the site. Low Hazard 4.0% >2m 4.0% 0m to 0.25m 2.4% Site less sequentially preferable in terms of flood Land to the east of Station risk. Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site Los006 Road, Long Sutton 4.71 94 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger For Most 99.1% 0.5m to 1m 63.7% moderately poorly compared to other sites. Danger For All 0.9% 1m to 2m 36.0% Areas of surface water flooding (low, medium and high risk) on the northern and southern boundaries >2m 0.2% of the site.

Land to the west of Garnsgate Road, Long Sutton Los027 0.18 4 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger For Most 100% 0.5m to 1m 83.8% Small site (below allocation threshold) 1m to 2m 16.2% Site adjacent to employment uses that are considered to be detrimental to residential Land to the south of Bridge amenity. Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site Los043 Road, Long Sutton 2.63 53 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger For Most 83.8% 0.5m to 1m 78.8% poorly compared to other sites. Danger For Some 9.3% 1m to 2m 8.2% Areas of surface water flooding (low, medium and No Hazard 3.0% 0.25m to 0.5m 7.7% high risk) within the central part of the site. Low Hazard 2.0% No Depth 3.9% Danger For All 1.9% 0m to 0.25m 1.3%

45 Long Sutton - Other Developable Sites Comments (including reasons for rejection Site_ref Name Hectare No. DwellFLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDEPTH % DEP where applicable) Site less sequentially preferable in terms of flood Land to the south of Spring risk. Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site Los020 Gardens, Long Sutton 9.87 195 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger For Most 98.0% 0.5m to 1m 67.2% moderately poorly compared to other sites. Danger For All 2.0% 1m to 2m 32.2% Areas of surface water flooding (low, medium and high risk) on the northern, western and southern >2m 0.6% boundaries of the site. Site less sequentially preferable in terms of flood Land to the east of Station risk. Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site Los009 Road, Long Sutton 1.98 40 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger For Most 98.5% 1m to 2m 52.8% moderately poorly compared to other sites. Danger For All 1.5% 0.5m to 1m 46.8% Areas of surface water flooding (low, medium and high risk) on the northern and western boundaries >2m 0.4% of the site. Site less sequentially preferable in terms of flood Land to the west of Lime Walk, risk. Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site poorly Long Sutton Lut011 6.79 136 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger For Most 99.0% 1m to 2m 78.8% compared to other sites. Danger For All 1.0% 0.5m to 1m 21.1% >2m 0.1% No surface water flooding issues identified. Land to the north of Gedney Site less sequentially preferable in terms of flood Ged001 Road, Long Sutton 4.43 89 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger For Most 95.1% 1m to 2m 94.6% risk. Danger For All 4.9% 0.5m to 1m 4.7% Small areas of surface water flood risk (low risk) >2m 0.6% within the site. 0.25m to 0.5m 0.1%

Land to the west of Garnsgate Site less sequentially preferable in terms of flood Los047 Road, Long Sutton 0.38 8 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger for Most 100.0% 0.5m to 1m 61.7% risk.

1m to 2m 38.3% No surface water flooding issues identified.

46 Pinchbeck - General Points Environment Agency has commented that he settlement also lies on the River Glen which is a tide locked watercourse so there may be a hazard from this potential flood source. Welland and Deepings IDB have commented that ‘there is no specific risk from their drainage system. Byelaws apply for sites adjacent to Board watercourses. The use of Sustainable Drainage Systems should be considered as a first approach to dealing with surface water run off. The Board would need to approve any surface water flows above its designed greenfield run off rate of

Pinchbeck - Allocated Sites

Site_ref Name Area (ha) No. DwellFLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDEPTH % DEP Sequential Test - Stage Required Land to the north of Market Pin002 Way, Pinchbeck 1.32 26 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger for Some (67.6% 0.25m to 0.5m 72.8% Apply Exceptions Test Low Hazard 27.1% 0m to 0.25m 27.1% Small area of surface water flooding (low risk) on Danger for Most 5.3% 0.5m to 1m 0.1% the western boundary of the site. Land to the east of Surfleet Pin019 Road, Pinchbeck 1.69 34 Flood Zone 3 100.0% No Hazard 90.3% No Depth 90.3% Apply Exceptions Test Low Hazard 9.7% 0m to 0.25m 9.7% Area of surface water flooding (low and medium risk) within the site. Birchgrove Garden Centre, Pin065 Surfleet Road, Pinchbeck 2.44 49 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Low Hazard 52.7% 0m to 0.25m 52.7% Apply Exceptions Test No Hazard 40.3% No Depth 40.3% Danger for Some 6.4% 0.25m to 0.5m 6.7% Danger for Most 0.6% 0.5m to 1m 0.3% No surface water flooding issues identified.

47 Pinchbeck - Other Developable Sites

Comments (including reasons for rejection Site_ref Name Hectare No. DwellFLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDEPTH % DEP where applicable) Land to the east of Church Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site moderately Pin008 Street, Pinchbeck 0.67 13 Flood Zone 3 100.0% No Hazard 75.5% No Depth 75.5% poorly compared to other sites. Low Hazard 20.1% 0m to 0.25m 20.1% Areas of surface water flooding (low and medium risk) on the western and southern boundaries of Danger for Some 4.4% 0.25m to 0.5m 4.4% the site. Land to the west of Bear Lane, Pin003 Pinchbeck 0.26 5 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Low Hazard 94.2% 0m to 0.25m 94.2% Small site (below allocation threshold) Danger for Some 4.8% 0.25m to 0.5m 5.8% Danger for Most 1.0% Land to the north of Milestone Pin046 Lane 0.21 4 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Low Hazard 60.3% 0m to 0.25m 60.3% Small site (below allocation threshold) Danger for Some 32.7% 0.25m to 0.5m 34.3% No Hazard 5.3% No Depth 5.3% Danger for Most 1.6% Former Dairy Depot, Pennytoft Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site moderately Pin062 Lane, Pinchbeck 0.44 10 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger for Some 64.1% 0.25m to 0.5m 64.1% poorly compared to other sites. Low Hazard 35.9% 0m to 0.25m 35.9% Areas of surface water flooding (low risk) within the site. Land to the west of Flaxmill Part of the site has planning permission and is Pin034 Lane, Pinchbeck 7.85 157 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger for Most 89.7% 0.5m to 1m 53.4% under construction Low Hazard 5.5% 0.25m to 0.5m 36.8% Small areas of surface water flooding (low and medium risk) within the site and on the eastern and No Hazard 4.8% 0m to 0.25m 5.1% southern boundaries of the site. No Depth 4.4% 1m to 2m 0.3% Land to the south of Flaxmill Site less sequentially preferable in terms of flood Pin021 Lane, Pinchbeck 1.53 31 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger for Most 87.9% 0.5m to 1m 76.3% risk. Danger for Some 9.7% 0.25m to 0.5m 21.3% Small areas of surface water flooding (low risk) within the site and some areas of low and medium risk on the eastern and western boundaries of the Low Hazard 2.5% 0m to 0.25m 2.5% site. Land to the south of Milestone Pin017 Lane, Pinchbeck 0.40 8 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger for Most 96.8% 0.5m to 1m 90.5% Small site (below allocation threshold) Danger for Some 3.2% 0.25m to 0.5m 9.5%

48 Sutton Bridge - General Points Environment Agency Standing Advice - Allocations in areas of hazard would need to ensure that finished floor levels (FFL) are raised to the appropriate level with additional flood resilient construction incorporated into proposals. Developers would need to confirm that they can achieve the required mitigation and that their proposals would still be deliverable.

South Holland IDB have commented that their target standards of protection are ‘water levels 0.6m below land level for a 1 in 10 year event for agriculture and 0.3m below land level for a 1 in 100 year event for development.’

Sutton Bridge - Allocated Sites

Site_ref Name Area (ha) No. DwellFLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDEPTH % DEP Sequential Test - Stage Required Land to the south of Bridge Sub013 Road, Sutton Bridge 9.31 207 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger For Most 94.8% 0.5m to 1m 96.8% Apply Exceptions Test Danger For Some 4.7% 0.25m to 0.5m 2.3% Small areas of surface water flooding (low and Low Hazard 0.5% 0m to 0.25m 1.0% medium risk) within the site. Land south of Bridge Road, Sub027 Sutton Bridge Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger for Most 72.8% 0.5m to 1m 78.7% Apply Exceptions Test Danger for All 24.5% 1m to 2m 19.2% Danger for Some 2.5% 0.25m to 0.5m 1.6% Small areas of surface water flooding (low and Low Hazard 0.2% 0m to 0.25m 0.3% medium risk) within the site. >2m 0.2%

Sutton Bridge - Other Developable Sites

Comments (including reasons for rejection Site_ref Name Hectare No. DwellFLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDEPTH % DEP where applicable) The Chippings, New Road, Sub020 Sutton Bridge 0.18 3 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger For All 100% 0.5m to 1m 90.7% Small site (below allocation threshold) 1m to 2m 9.3%

Land to the north of Nightingale Way, Granville Site less sequentially preferable in terms of flood Terrace, Chestnut Terrace and risk. Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site poorly Sub018 Allenby's Chase, Sutton Bridge 5.46 109 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger For All 79.8% 0.5m to 1m 65.4% compared to other sites. Danger For Most 20.2% 1m to 2m 34.6% Small areas of surface water flooding (low risk) within the site. Land to the south of Bridge Sub017 Road, Sutton Bridge 0.24 5 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger For All 65.5% 1m to 2m 64.1% Small site (below allocation threshold) Danger For Most 24.6% 0.5m to 1m 23.8% Danger For Some 9.9% 0.25m to 0.5m 12.1% Land to the rear of 76 New Sub021 Road, Sutton Bridge 0.20 2 Flood Zone 3 92.0% Danger For All 88.8% 1m to 2m 67.7% Small site (below allocation threshold) 0.02 Flood Zone 1 7.6% Danger For Most 11.0% 0.5m to 1m 32.3% 0.00 Flood Zone 2 0.4% Danger For Some 0.2%

49 Sutton Bridge - Other Developable Sites

Comments (including reasons for rejection Site_ref Name Hectare No. DwellFLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDEPTH % DEP where applicable)

Land to the north of Withington Site less sequentially preferable in terms of flood Street and Chestnut Terrace, risk. Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site poorly Sub024 Sutton Bridge 3.72 74 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger For All 98.7% 1m to 2m 59.2% compared to other sites. Danger For Most 1.3% 0.5m to 1m 40.8% Small areas of surface water flooding (low risk) within the site. Site less sequentially preferable in terms of flood Land to the west of New Road, risk. Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site poorly Sub016 Sutton Bridge 3.09 62 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger For All 98.9% 1m to 2m 88.5% compared to other sites. Danger For Most 1.1% 0.5m to 1m 11.5% Small area of surface water flooding (low risk) within the site.

Sutterton - General Points Environment Agency Standing Advice - Allocations in areas of hazard would need to ensure that finished floor levels (FFL) are raised to the appropriate level with additional flood resilient construction incorporated into proposals. Developers would need to confirm that they can achieve the required mitigation and that their proposals would still be deliverable. Anglian Water has commented that the capacity of the surface water network has major constraints, and that all developments should seek to reduce flood risk and incorporate Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS).

Sutterton - Allocated Sites

Site_ref Name Area (ha) No. DwellFLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDEPTH % DEP Sequential Test - Stage Required Land to the south of Spalding Sut028 Road, Sutterton 0.70 14 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Low Hazard 57.6% 0m to 0.25m 61.6% Apply Exceptions Test No Hazard 37.0% No Hazard 37.2% Danger For Some 5.1% 0.25m to 0.5m 1.2% Area of surface water flooding (low risk) on the Danger For Most 0.3% 0.5m to 1m 0.4% northern boundary of the site. Land to the south of Spalding Road and west of Station Road, Sut009 Sutterton 12.44 249 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger For Some 70.6% 0m to 0.25m 61.8% Apply Exceptions Test Low Hazard 26.3% 0.25m to 0.5m 34.0% Danger For Most 2.6% 0.5m to 1m 3.5%

Areas of surface water flooding (low, medium and high risk) within the site and on the eastern, No Hazard 0.4% No Hazard 0.4% western and southern boundaries of the site. Danger For All 0.1% 1m to 2m 0.3%

50 Sutterton - Other Developable Sites

Comments (including reasons for rejection Site_ref Name Hectare No. DwellFLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDEPTH % DEP where applicable) Poor access issues identified dependent on Land to the north of Wigtoft allocation of Sut007 and/or Sut026 (neither site Sut005 Road, Sutterton 0.85 17 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Low Hazard 51.6% 0m to 0.25m 57.0% proposed as allocations). Danger For Some 41.3% 0.25m to 0.5m 35.9%

Areas of surface water flooding (low risk) within the No Hazard 4.7% No Hazard 4.7% site and on the western boundary of the site. Danger For Most 2.4% 0.5m to 1m 2.4% Land to the north of Wigtoft Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site moderately Sut026 Road, Sutterton 1.60 32 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Low Hazard 58.9% 0m to 0.25m 60.7% poorly compared to other sites. Danger For Some 25.7% 0.25m to 0.5m 19.0% Areas of surface water flooding (low, medium and Danger For Most 14.2% 0.5m to 1m 14.1% high risk) within the site. No Hazard 1.2% 1m to 2m 5.0% No Hazard 1.2% Land to the south of Spalding Sut010 Road, Sutterton 0.31 6 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger For Some 83.6% 0m to 0.25m 52.8% Small site (below allocation threshold) Low Hazard 15.2% 0.25m to 0.5m 44.0% Danger For Most 0.8% 0.5m to 1m 2.8% No Hazard 0.4% No Hazard 0.4%

Land to the north of Post Office Site has planning permission and additional small Sut008 Lane, Sutterton 0.60 8 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger For Some 37.2% 0.25m to 0.5m 35.9% area for 8 dwellings included as a small site Danger For Most 37.0% 0.5m to 1m 30.6% Areas of surface water flooding (low and medium risk) on the western and northern boundaries of the Low Hazard 17.3% 0m to 0.25m 22.3% site. No Hazard 8.5% No Hazard 8.5% 1m to 2m 2.6% Land to the west of Station Sut023 Road, Sutterton 0.51 10 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger For Some 43.7% 0.25m to 0.5m 41.1% Site has planning permission No Hazard 28.8% 0m to 0.25m 30.1% Low Hazard 27.4% No Hazard 28.8% Danger For Most 0.1% 0.5m to 1m 0.0% Land to the south of Wigtoft Site less sequentially preferable in terms of flood Sut027 Road, Sutterton 1.88 38 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger For Some 75.1% 0.25m to 0.5m 67.5% risk. Low Hazard 20.2% 0m to 0.25m 26.3% Small areas of surface water flooding (low risk) Danger For Most 3.6% 0.5m to 1m 5.1% within the site. No Hazard 1.1% No Hazard 1.1%

51 Sutterton - Other Developable Sites Comments (including reasons for rejection Site_ref Name Hectare No. DwellFLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDEPTH % DEP where applicable) Land to the north of Wigtoft Sut007 Road, Sutterton 0.85 17 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger For Some 45.7% 0.25m to 0.5m 34.8% Currently subject to a planning appeal. Danger For Most 24.1% 0m to 0.25m 20.0% Areas of surface water flooding (low, medium and high risk) within the site and on the eastern Low Hazard 15.6% 0.5m to 1m 18.0% boundary of the site. No Hazard 14.6% No Hazard 14.6% 1m to 2m 12.6% Land to the west of Station Sits within Sut009 which is proposed to be Sut011 Road, Sutterton 0.65 13 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger For Some 81.9% 0.25m to 0.5m 76.9% allocated Danger For Most 18.1% 0.5m to 1m 16.6% 0m to 0.25m 6.5% Site less sequentially preferable in terms of flood Land to the north of Spalding risk. Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site poorly Sut029 Road, Sutterton 3.23 65 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger For Some 50.3% 0.25m to 0.5m 47.0% compared to other sites. Danger For Most 44.3% 0.5m to 1m 43.0% Areas of surface water flooding (low and medium risk) within the site and on the eastern boundary of Low Hazard 5.5% 0m to 0.25m 10.0% the site. Land to the north of Wigtoft Site less sequentially preferable in terms of flood Sut032 Road, Sutterton 5.08 102 Flood Zone 3 100.0% Danger For Some 40.3% 0.5m to 1m 38.6% risk. Danger For Most 38.7% 0.25m to 0.5m 36.4% Low Hazard 20.6% 0m to 0.25m 23.1% Small areas of surface water flooding (low risk) within the site and some medium to high risk on the southern, western and northern boundaries of No Hazard 0.3% 1m to 2m 1.6% the site. No Depth 0.3%

52 Swineshead - General Points Environment Agency Standing Advice - Allocations in areas of hazard would need to ensure that finished floor levels (FFL) are raised to the appropriate level with additional flood resilient construction incorporated into proposals. Developers would need to confirm that they can achieve the required mitigation and that their proposals would still be deliverable. Anglian Water has commented that the capacity of the surface water network has major constraints, and that all developments should seek to reduce flood risk and incorporate Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS).

Swineshead - Allocated Sites

Site_ref Name Area (ha) No. DwellFLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDEPTH % DEP Sequential Test - Stage Required

Swi018 Land at North End, Swineshead 1.74 35 Flood Zone 1 100.0% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% Sequential Test Passed

Areas of surface water flooding (low and medium risk) within the site. Land to the west of High Street, Swi037 Swineshead 2.94 59 Flood Zone 1 96.5% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 22.5% Sequential Test Passed Flood Zone 2 3.5% Areas of surface water flooding (low and medium risk) within the site. Land to the west of Station Swi038 Road, Swineshead 3.77 75 Flood Zone 1 93.0% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% Sequential Test Passed Flood Zone 2 6.5% Areas of surface water flooding (low, medium and high risk) on the southern and western boundaries Flood Zone 3 0.5% of the site. Land to the west of Station Swi015 Road, Swineshead 5.81 116 Flood Zone 1 50.0% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% Sequential Test Passed Flood Zone 2 50.0%

Areas of surface water flooding (low risk) within the site and on the northern boundary of the site.

53 Swineshead - Other Developable Sites

Comments (including reasons for rejection Site_ref Name Hectare No. DwellFLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDEPTH % DEP where applicable) Land to the west of High Street, Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site moderately Swi031 Swineshead 2.30 46 Flood Zone 1 100.0% No Hazard 2.304 No Hazard 2.304 poorly compared to other sites. The Golden Cross, North End, Swi035 Swineshead 0.15 9 Flood Zone 1 100.0% No Hazard 0.148 No Hazard 0.148 Small site (below allocation threshold) Land to the west of Station Swi027 Road, Swineshead. 0.34 14 Flood Zone 1 94.0% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% Site has planning permission Flood Zone 2 5.5% Flood Zone 3 0.5%

Permission on adjacent site for one dwelling restricting access to this site. Site size and density Land to the south of Coles of neighbouring development likely to mean site Swi029 Lane, Swineshead 0.64 13 Flood Zone 1 62.5% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% falls below allocation threshold of 10 dwellings. Flood Zone 2 37.5% Multiple ownership on sites suggesting Land to the east of High Street, deliverability concerns. Impact on nearby Swi036 Swineshead 13.08 262 Flood Zone 1 84.5% No Hazard 72.4% No Hazard 72.4% Scheduled Ancient Monument also of concern. Flood Zone 2 15.5% Low Hazard 14.1% 0m to 0.25m 15.7% Danger For Some 12.7% 0.25m to 0.5m 10.9% Danger For Most 0.8% 0.5m to 1m 1.0% 1m to 2m 0.0% Land to the east of Manwaring Similar flood risk as allocation site Swi015. Impact Way and La Milesse Way, on nearby Scheduled Ancient Monument also of Swi039 Swineshead 3.09 62 Flood Zone 2 51.5% No Hazard 96.0% No Hazard 96.0% concern. Flood Zone 1 49.5% Low Hazard 4.0% 0m to 0.25m 4.0% Areas of surface water flooding (low and medium risk) within the site and on the northern boundary of the site. Land to the north of Michael Swi016 Moses Way, Swineshead 0.43 19 Flood Zone 2 95.5% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% Site has planning permission Flood Zone 1 4.5%

Areas of surface water flooding (low and medium risk) on the eastern boundary of the site.

54 Bicker - General Points Anglian Water has commented that the capacity of the surface water network has major constraints, and that all developments should seek to reduce flood risk and incorporate Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS).

Bicker - Allocated Sites

Site_ref Name Area (ha) No. Dwell FLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDDEPTH % DEPTH Sequential Test - Stage Required Land to the west of Low Gate Bic005 Lane, Bicker 0.48 10 Flood Zone 1 100% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% Sequential Test Passed

Areas of surface water flooding (low risk) within the site and on the western boundary of the site. Land to the west of Drury Lane, Bic015 Bicker 0.51 10 Flood Zone 1 100% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% Sequential Test Passed

Areas of surface water flooding (low risk) on the northern and southern boundaries of the site. Land to the east of St Swithins Bic017 Close, Bicker 0.91 18 Flood Zone 1 100% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% Sequential Test Passed

Areas of surface water flooding (low risk) on the eastern and western boundaries of the site.

Bicker - Other Developable Sites

Comments (including reasons for rejection Site_ref Name Hectare No. Dwell FLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDDEPTH % DEPTH where applicable) Land to the west of Drury Lane, Bic001 Bicker 0.10 2 Flood Zone 1 100% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% Identified as a small site to include in the supply.

Areas of surface water flooding (low risk) within the site. Land to the east of Donington Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site poorly Bic004 Road, Bicker 1.35 27 Flood Zone 1 100% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% compared to other sites.

Land between Milkinghilll Lane and St Swithins Close, Bicker Bic010 0.33 7 Flood Zone 1 100% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% Small site (below allocation threshold) Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site moderately poorly compared to other sites. Concerns Land to the west of Gauntlet regarding proximity and impact to Conservation Bic014 Road, Bicker 2.00 40 Flood Zone 1 100% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% Area.

Areas of surface water flooding (low and medium risk) on the southern and western boundaries of the site. Sharpe's Paddock, off Morley Bic023 Lane, Bicker 0.09 2 Flood Zone 1 100% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% Identified as a small site to include in the supply.

No surface water flooding issues identified.

55 Bicker - Other Developable Sites Comments (including reasons for rejection Site_ref Name Hectare No. Dwell FLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDDEPTH % DEPTH where applicable) Land to the rear of Madeira Bic027 Lodge, Drury Lane, Bicker 0.18 4 Flood Zone 1 100% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% Identified as a small site to include in the supply.

Small area of surface water flooding (low risk) on the northern boundary of the site. Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site moderately poorly compared to other sites. Concerns Land to the south of Rookery regarding potential visual impacts of developing Bic019 Road, Bicker 2.42 48 Flood Zone 1 99.5% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% the site. Flood Zone 3 0.5% Areas of surface water flooding (low and medium risk) on the eastern and southern boundaries of the site.

Butterwick - General Points

Butterwick - Allocated Sites

Site_ref Name Area (ha) No. Dwell FLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDDEPTH % DEPTH Sequential Test - Stage Required Land to the east of Sea Lane, But002 Butterwick 1.026 21 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For Most 63.9% 0.5m to 1m 58.4% Apply Exceptions Test Danger For All 36.1% 1m to 2m 41.6% Small area of surface water flooding (low risk) within the site. Land to the east of Benington But004 Road, Butterwick 1.037 21 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For Most 84.4% 0.5m to 1m 64.2% Apply Exceptions Test Danger For All 15.6% 0.25m to 0.5m 21.0%

Areas of surface water flooding (low and medium risk) within the site and medium/high risk on the 1m to 2m 14.8% eastern and southern boundaries of the site. Land to the north of Peter But020 Paine Close, Butterwick 0.769 15 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For All 93.6% 1m to 2m 96.0% Apply Exceptions Test Danger For Most 6.4% 0.5m to 1m 4.0% Areas of surface water flooding (low risk) within the site.

56 Butterwick - Other Developable Sites

Comments (including reasons for rejection Site_ref Name Hectare No. Dwell FLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDDEPTH % DEPTH where applicable) Land to the north of Watery Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site moderately But003 Lane, Butterwick 1.170 23 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For All 99.2% 1m to 2m 99.2% poorly compared to other sites. Danger For Most 0.8% 0.5m to 1m 0.8% Areas of surface water flooding (low risk) within the site.

Cowbit - General Points Environment Agency comment - Need to consult Welland & Deepings IDB + South Holland IDB. Also whole of Cowbit is shown to be at risk on EA Reservoir flood maps, due to presence of Cowbit washlands. South Holland IDB have commented that their target standards of protection are ‘water levels 0.6m below land level for a 1 in 10 year event for agriculture and 0.3m below land level for a 1 in 100 year event for development.’ Anglian Water has commented that the capacity of the surface water network has major constraints, and that all developments should seek to reduce flood risk and incorporate Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS).

Cowbit - Allocated Sites

Site_ref Name Area (ha) No. Dwell FLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDDEPTH % DEPTH Sequential Test - Stage Required Land to the west of Backgate, Cow009 Cowbit 1.03 21 Flood Zone 2 61.5% Danger for Some 37.4% 0.25m to 0.5m 37.6% Apply Exceptions Test Flood Zone 3 23.5% No Hazard 27.2% No Depth 27.2% Flood Zone 1 15% Low Hazard 23.5% 0m to 0.25m 23.5% Areas of surface water flooding (low and medium Danger for Most 11.9% 0.5m to 1m 11.7% risk) within the site. Land to the west of Backgate, Cow004 Cowbit 1.63 33 Flood Zone 2 45.5% Danger for Some 38.3% 0.25m to 0.5m 38.3% Apply Exceptions Test Flood Zone 3 31.5% No Hazard 24.4% No Depth 24.4% Flood Zone 1 23% Danger for Most 21.1% 0.5m to 1m 20.9% Areas of surface water flooding (low and medium Low Hazard 16.2% 0m to 0.25m 16.2% risk) within the site. 1m to 2m 0.2%

57 Cowbit - Other Developable Sites

Comments (including reasons for rejection Site_ref Name Hectare No. Dwell FLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDDEPTH % DEPTH where applicable) Land to the rear of 55 Cow013 Backgate, Cowbit 0.12 2 Flood Zone 1 96.5% No Hazard 95.9% No Depth 95.9% Identified as a small site to include in the supply. Flood Zone 2 3.5% Low Hazard 4.1% 0m to 0.25m 4.1% No surface water flooding issues identified. Land to the west of Backgate, Cow007 Cowbit 0.38 8 Flood Zone 1 73.5% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% Identified as a small site to include in the supply. Flood Zone 2 26.5% Small area of surface water flooding (low risk) within the site. Land to the west of Mill Drove, Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site moderately Cow008 Cowbit 0.50 13 Flood Zone 1 67% No Hazard 72.6% No Depth 72.6% poorly compared to other sites. Flood Zone 2 22.5% Low Hazard 18.9% 0m to 0.25m 18.9% Flood Zone 3 Danger for Some 7.4% 0.25m to 0.5m 7.9% Small area of surface water flooding (low risk) on 10.5% Danger for Most 1.2% 0.5m to 1m 0.7% northern boundary of the site. Land to the west of Mill Drove Cow014 South, Cowbit 0.43 8 Flood Zone 1 55.3% Low Hazard 40.9% 0m to 0.25m 40.9% Identified as a small site to include in the supply. Flood Zone 2 26.2% No Hazard 26.1% No Depth 26.1% Flood Zone 3 Danger for Some 19.5% 0.25m to 0.5m 20.1% Areas of surface water flooding (low risk) on the 18.5% Danger for Most 13.5% 0.5m to 1m 12.9% western boundary of the site. Land to the west of Backgate, Cow001 Cowbit 1.53 37 Flood Zone 2 96% Low Hazard 46.6% 0m to 0.25m 46.6% Site has planning permission Flood Zone 3 3.5% No Hazard 27.9% No Depth 27.9% Areas of surface water flooding (low risk) on the Flood Zone 1 0.5% Danger for Some 25.5% 0.25m to 0.5m 25.5% western boundary of the site. Land to the west of Mill Drove, Site less sequentially preferable in terms of flood Cow010 Cowbit 0.75 15 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger for Some 88.5% 0.25m to 0.5m 88.8% risk. Low Hazard 7.3% 0m to 0.25m 7.3% Areas of surface water flooding (low risk) within the Danger for Most 4.2% 0.5m to 1m 3.9% site.

58 Deeping St Nicholas - General Points

Environment Agency comment - No apparent hazard from tidal sources but other forms of flooding need investigation – in particular South Drove Drain (Consult Welland and Deepings IDB).

Welland and Deepings IDB have previously advised there is no specific risk from their drainage system which requires highlighting for Deeping St Nicholas. Some sites are adjacent to the Boards watercourses and therefore their bye laws apply. In line with current recommendations the use of Sustainable Drainage Systems should be considered as a first approach to dealing with surface water run off. The Board would have to agree and give prior approval for any surface water flows above its designed Greenfield run off rate of 1.4litres/sec/Ha to its system.

Deeping St Nicholas - Allocated Sites

Site_ref Name Area (ha) No. Dwell FLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDDEPTH % DEPTH Sequential Test - Stage Required Caulton's Field, Littleworth Dsn007 Drove, Deeping St Nicholas 3.19 64 Flood Zone 3 80% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% Apply Exceptions Test Flood Zone 2 20% Small areas of surface water flooding (low risk) within the site.

Deeping St Nicholas - Other Developable Sites

Comments (including reasons for rejection Site_ref Name Hectare No. Dwell FLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDDEPTH % DEPTH where applicable)

Land to the East of Littleworth Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site poorly Dsn013 Drove, Deeping St Nicholas 4.70 71 Flood Zone 2 70.4% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% compared to other sites. Flood Zone 3 29.6% Small areas of surface water flooding (low and medium risk) within the site.

Land to the west of Littleworth Concerns with respect to proximity to rail line and Dsn011 Drove, Deeping St Nicholas 2.23 45 Flood Zone 2 65.7% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% upgrade of freight services. Flood Zone 3 34.3% Small areas of surface water flooding (low risk) within the site. Site less sequentially preferable in terms of flood Land to the west of Littleworth risk. Concerns with respect to proximity to rail line Dsn005 Drove, Deeping St Nicholas 2.82 56 Flood Zone 3 70.5% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% and upgrade of freight services. Flood Zone 2 29.5% Small areas of surface water flooding (low risk) within the site.

59 Fishtoft - General Points Environment Agency Standing Advice - Allocations in areas of hazard would need to ensure that finished floor levels (FFL) are raised to the appropriate level with additional flood resilient construction incorporated into proposals. Developers would need to confirm that they can achieve the required mitigation and that their proposals would still be deliverable. Fis046 is a ‘dry island’ in the 200 year event – consideration of safe access and egress required. Anglian Water has commented that the capacity of the surface water network has major constraints, and that all developments should seek to reduce flood risk and incorporate Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS).

Fishtoft - Allocated Sites

Site_ref Name Area (ha) No. Dwell FLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDDEPTH % DEPTH Sequential Test - Stage Required Land to the east of Gaysfield Fis046 Road, Fishtoft 2.69 54 Flood Zone 3 100% No Hazard 67.4% No Hazard 68.6% Apply Exceptions Test Low Hazard 22.8% 0m to 0.25m 26.1% Small area of surface water flooding (low risk) Danger For Some 8.6% 0.25m to 0.5m 4.4% within the site. Danger For Most 1.0% 0.5m to 1m 0.7% Danger For All 0.2% 1m to 2m 0.2%

Fishtoft - Other Developable Sites

Comments (including reasons for rejection Site_ref Name Hectare No. Dwell FLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDDEPTH % DEPTH where applicable) Norwood Yard, Church Green Site less sequentially preferable in terms of flood Fis040 Road, Fishtoft 0.62 12 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For Most 91.7% 0.5m to 1m 78.9% risk. Danger For All 8.3% 1m to 2m 15.6% Area of surface water flooding (high risk) on the 0.25m to 0.5m 5.5% western boundary of the site. Land to the east of Church Site less sequentially preferable in terms of flood Fis041 Green Road, Fishtoft 1.97 39 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For All 100% 1m to 2m 100% risk. 0.5m to 1m 0.0% Areas of surface water flooding (low, medium and high risk) on the western, northern and eastern boundaries of the site. Land to the north of Fishtoft Site less sequentially preferable in terms of flood Fis022 Road, Fishtoft 1.71 34 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For All 99.9% 1m to 2m 99.5% risk. Danger For Most 0.1% >2m 0.5% Areas of surface water flooding (low, medium and high risk) within the site.

60 Fleet Hargate - General Points Environment Agency comment - There does not appear to be any potential flood sources nearby that could impact on settlement.

Fleet Hargate - Allocated Sites

Site_ref Name Area (ha) No. Dwell FLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDDEPTH % DEPTH Sequential Test - Stage Required Land to the south of Fleet Fle003 Road, Fleet Hargate 3.90 78 Flood Zone 3 100% No Hazard 98.6% No Hazard 99.7% Apply Exceptions Test Low Hazard 1.4% 0m to 0.25m 0.3% Areas of surface water flooding (low, medium and high risk) within the site.

Fleet Hargate - Other Developable Sites

Comments (including reasons for rejection Site_ref Name Hectare No. Dwell FLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDDEPTH % DEPTH where applicable) Land to the north of Old Main Sits within Fle020 which is proposed to be Fle017 Road, Fleet Hargate 0.49 10 Flood Zone 3 87% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% allocated Flood Zone 2 13% Land to the east of Lowgate, Fle012 Fleet Hargate 0.36 7 Flood Zone 3 91.6% No Hazard 87.5% No Hazard 87.5% Small site (below allocation threshold) Flood Zone 2 8.4% Low Hazard 11.6% 0m to 0.25m 11.6% Danger For Some 1.0% 0.25m to 0.5m 1.0% Similar flood risk as site Fle003. Sustainability Land between Old Main Road Appraisal ranks the site moderately poorly Fle020 and the A17, Fleet Hargate 3.07 61 Flood Zone 3 99.2% No Hazard 82.2% No Depth 84.8% compared to other sites. Flood Zone 2 0.8% Low Hazard 15.5% 0m to 0.25m 14.5% Areas of surface water flooding (low and medium Danger For Some 2.3% 0.25m to 0.5m 0.6% risk) within the site. Similar flood risk as site Fle003. Sustainability Land to the west of Eastgate, Appraisal ranks the site moderately poorly Fle010 Fleet Hargate 5.58 112 Flood Zone 3 100% No Hazard 95.0% No Hazard 95.0% compared to other sites. Low Hazard 4.3% 0m to 0.25m 4.5% Areas of surface water flooding (low and medium Danger For Some 0.7% 0.25m to 0.5m 0.5% risk) within the site.

61 Gedney Hill - General Points Environment Agency comment - Two sites in FZ3a (Geh005 and Geh007) but no hazard and no other obvious flood sources nearby.

Gedney Hill - Allocated Sites

Site_ref Name Area (ha) No. Dwell FLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDDEPTH % DEPTH Sequential Test - Stage Required Land to the west of Hillgate, Geh003 Gedney Hill 3.34 67 Flood Zone 1 100% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% Sequential Test Passed

Small area of surface water flooding (low risk) within the site.

Land to the north of Mill Lane, Geh004 Gedney Hill 0.82 16 Flood Zone 1 100% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% Sequential Test Passed

Areas of surface water flooding (low and medium risk) within the site. Land to the east of West Drove 29 Geh015 South, Gedney Hill 1.44 Flood Zone 1 100% No Hazard 100% No Depth 100% Sequential Test Passed

Small area of surface water flooding (low risk) within the site.

Gedney Hill - Other Developable Sites

Comments (including reasons for rejection Site_ref Name Hectare No. Dwell FLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDDEPTH % DEPTH where applicable) Land to the east of North Road, Geh001 Gedney Hill 0.19 4 Flood Zone 1 100% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% Identified as a small site to include in the supply.

Area of surface water flooding (low risk) on the northern boundary of the site. Land to the west of Sycamore Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site poorly Geh006 View, Gedney Hill 0.49 10 Flood Zone 2 43.5% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% compared to other sites. Flood Zone 3 34% Flood Zone 1 22.5% No surface water flooding issues identified. Land to the west of Station Geh013 Road, Gedney Hill 0.14 3 Flood Zone 3 100% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% Identified as a small site to include in the supply.

Area of surface water flooding (low risk) on the northern boundary of the site. Land to the east of Hillgate, Concerns regarding potential impact on listed Geh012 Gedney Hill 0.93 18 Flood Zone 1 97% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% Church and Churchyard Flood Zone 2 3% Area of surface water flooding (low risk) on the southern boundary of the site.

62 Gedney Hill - Other Developable Sites Comments (including reasons for rejection Site_ref Name Hectare No. Dwell FLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDDEPTH % DEPTH where applicable) Land to the south of Highstock Site less sequentially preferable in terms of flood Geh005 Lane, Gedney Hill 1.45 29 Flood Zone 3 81.5% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% risk. Flood Zone 2 12.5% Areas of surface water flooding (low and high risk) on the northern and southern boundaries of the Flood Zone 1 6% site. Land to the west of Sycamore Site less sequentially preferable in terms of flood Geh007 View, Gedney Hill 0.83 17 Flood Zone 3 61% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% risk. Flood Zone 2 26% Area of surface water flooding (low risk) within the Flood Zone 1 13% site. Land to the north of Mill Lane, Site less sequentially preferable in terms of flood Geh017 Gedney Hill No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% risk.

Area of surface water flooding (low risk) within the site.

Gosberton - General Points

Environment Agency comment - No apparent hazard from tidal sources but other forms of flooding need investigation – in particular South Drove Drain (Consult Welland and Deepings IDB).

Welland and Deepings IDB have previously advised there is no specific risk from their drainage system which requires highlighting for Gosberton. Some sites are adjacent to the Boards watercourses and therefore their bye laws apply. In line with current recommendations the use of Sustainable Drainage Systems should be considered as a first approach to dealing with surface water run off. The Board would have to agree and give prior approval for any surface water flows above its designed Greenfield run off rate of 1.4litres/sec/Ha to its system. Anglian Water has commented that the capacity of the surface water network has major constraints, and that all developments should seek to reduce flood risk and incorporate Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS).

Gosberton - Allocated Sites

Site_ref Name Area (ha) No. Dwell FLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDDEPTH % DEPTH Sequential Test - Stage Required Land to the west of Quadring Gos003 Road, Gosberton 4.05 81 Flood Zone 1 73% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% Apply Exceptions Test Flood Zone 3 24% Areas of surface water flooding (low risk) within the Flood Zone 2 3% site. Land to the east of York Gos001 Gardens, Gosberton 3.80 76 Flood Zone 3 94.5% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% Apply Exceptions Test Flood Zone 2 5% Areas of surface water flooding (low, medium and Flood Zone 1 0.0% high risk) within the site.

63 Gosberton - Allocated Sites

Site_ref Name Area (ha) No. Dwell FLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDDEPTH % DEPTH Sequential Test - Stage Required Bowgate Lane Gosberton Gos023 Spalding 3.49 70 Flood Zone 3 98.5% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% Apply Exceptions Test Flood Zone 1 1% Areas of surface water flooding (low, medium and Flood Zone 2 0.5% high risk) within the site. Land to the north of Westhorpe Gos006 Road, Gosberton 0.56 10 Flood Zone 3 100% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% Apply Exceptions Test

Areas of surface water flooding (low and medium risk) within the site.

Gosberton - Other Developable Sites

Comments (including reasons for rejection Site_ref Name Hectare No. Dwell FLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDDEPTH % DEPTH where applicable) Land to the north-west of Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site poorly Gos011 Belchmire Lane, Gosberton 4.95 99 Flood Zone 3 96% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% compared to other sites. Flood Zone 2 2% Areas of surface water flooding (low risk) within the Flood Zone 1 2% site.

Site less sequentially preferable in terms of flood risk compared to Gos003 and Sustainability Land adjacent High Street and Appraisal ranks the site moderately poorly Gos024 Boston Road, Gosberton 2.21 44 Flood Zone 3 100% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% compared to the other proposed allocated sites.

Areas of surface water flooding (low risk) on the northern and southern boundaries of the site. Land to the east of Wargate Gos014 Way, Gosberton 0.46 9 Flood Zone 3 100% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% Identified as a small site to include in the supply.

Small area of surface water flooding (low risk) within the site.

64 Moulton - General Points

Environment Agency comment –Need to consult South Holland IDB re Moulton Mere drain.

South Holland IDB have previously advised their target standards of protection are; water levels 0.6m below land level for a 1 in 10 year event for agriculture and 0.3m below land level for a 1 in 100 year event for development. They are undertaking flood modelling which is not yet complete. Anglian Water has commented that the capacity of the surface water network has major constraints, and that all developments should seek to reduce flood risk and incorporate Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS).

Moulton - Allocated Sites

Site_ref Name Area (ha) No. Dwell FLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDDEPTH % DEPTH Sequential Test - Stage Required Land to the east of Broad Lane, Mou016 Moulton 2.20 44 Flood Zone 1 92.5% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% Sequential Test Passed Flood Zone 3 7.5% No surface water flooding issues identified. Land to the east of Church Mou023 Lane, Moulton 0.51 10 Flood Zone 3 73% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% Apply Exceptions Test Flood Zone 1 26.5% Area of surface water flooding (low risk) within the Flood Zone 2 0.5% site.

Moulton - Other Developable Sites

Comments (including reasons for rejection Site_ref Name Hectare No. Dwell FLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDDEPTH % DEPTH where applicable) Land to the north of Broad Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site poorly Mou003 Lane, Moulton 1.89 38 Flood Zone 1 99.5% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% compared to other sites. Flood Zone 3 0.5% No surface water flooding issues identified.

65 Moulton Chapel - General Points

Environment Agency comment - There does not appear to be any potential flood sources nearby that could impact on the settlement.

Moulton Chapel - Allocated Sites

Site_ref Name Area (ha) No. Dwell FLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDDEPTH % DEPTH Sequential Test - Stage Required Land to the south of Roman Mou029 Road, Moulton Chapel 2.05 41 Flood Zone 1 100% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% Sequential Test Passed

Areas of surface water flooding (low and medium risk) on the northern and eastern boundaries of the site. Land to the north of Roman Mou042 Road, Moulton Chapel 3.90 78 Flood Zone 1 100% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% Sequential Test Passed

Areas of surface water flooding (low and medium risk) within the site.

Moulton Chapel - Other Developable Sites

Comments (including reasons for rejection Site_ref Name Hectare No. Dwell FLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDDEPTH % DEPTH where applicable) Land to the north of Roman Sits within Mou042 which is proposed to be Mou014 Bank, Moulton Chapel 0.62 12 Flood Zone 1 100% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% allocated

Land to the north of Roman Mou017 Road, Moulton Chapel 0.37 7 Flood Zone 1 100% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% Identified as a small site to include in the supply.

No surface water flooding issues identified.

Land to the east of Braybrooks Sits within Mou042 which is proposed to be Mou034 Way, Moulton Chapel 1.41 28 Flood Zone 1 100% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% allocated Flood Zone 2 0%

Land to the north of Roman Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site poorly Mou013 Bank, Moulton Chapel 4.18 84 Flood Zone 1 56% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% compared to the other sites. Flood Zone 2 44% Areas of surface water flooding (low risk) on the northern boundary of the site.

66 Moulton Chapel - Other Developable Sites Comments (including reasons for rejection Site_ref Name Hectare No. Dwell FLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDDEPTH % DEPTH where applicable) Land off Fengate Road, Mou031 Moulton Chapel 0.37 7 Flood Zone 1 100% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% Small site (below allocation threshold) The Plough Public House, Woodgate Road, Moulton Mou032 Chapel 0.09 2 Flood Zone 1 100% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% Small site (below allocation threshold) Land to the east of Roman Mou028 Road, Moulton Chapel 1.68 34 Flood Zone 1 80% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% Impact on Grade 2 Listed Mill Flood Zone 2 20% Areas of surface water flooding (low risk) on the northern boundary of the site. Land to the south of Roman Mou030 Road, Moulton Chapel 3.81 76 Flood Zone 1 90.5% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% Impact on Grade 2 Listed Mill Flood Zone 2 9.5% Areas of surface water flooding (low risk) on the northern boundary of the site.

67 Old Leake- General Points

Old Leake- Allocated Sites

Site_ref Name Area (ha) No. Dwell FLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDDEPTH % DEPTH Sequential Test - Stage Required

Old Leake - Other Developable Sites

Comments (including reasons for rejection Site_ref Name Hectare No. Dwell FLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDDEPTH % DEPTH where applicable) Land to the south and east of Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site moderately Old005 School Lane, Old Leake 0.66 13 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For Most 72.1% 0.5m to 1m 60.9% poorly compared to the other sites. Danger For Some 15.3% 0.25m to 0.5m 19.6% Areas of surface water flooding (low, medium and No Hazard 12.7% No Hazard 12.7% high risk) within the site. Low Hazard 0.0% 1m to 2m 4.9% 0m to 0.25m 2.0%

Land to the rear of The White Old016 Hart, Church Road, Old Leake 0.66 21 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For Most 91.8% 0.5m to 1m 61.1% Site has planning permission Danger For All 6.1% 1m to 2m 35.2% Danger For Some 1.5% 0.25m to 0.5m 2.0% No Hazard 0.7% 0m to 0.25m 1.0% No Hazard 0.7%

Site less sequentially preferable in terms of flood risk. Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site poorly Land to the south of Meadow compared to other sites. Part of the site developed Old008 Way, Old Leake 1.47 29 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For All 87.9% 1m to 2m 97.4% with Co-op store leading to access concerns. Danger For Most 12.1% 0.5m to 1m 2.6% Areas of surface water flooding (low and medium risk) within the site. Land to the north of Old Main Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site moderately Old003 Road, Old Leake 1.91 38 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For All 93.2% 1m to 2m 90.7% poorly compared to the other sites. Danger For Most 6.8% >2m 7.3% Areas of surface water flooding (low risk) within the 0.5m to 1m 2.0% site. Site less sequentially preferable in terms of flood Land to the south of Old Main risk. Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site poorly Old001 Road, Old Leake 1.08 22 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For All 97.5% 1m to 2m 97.7% compared to other sites. Danger For Most 2.5% 0.5m to 1m 2.3% Areas of surface water flooding (low risk) within the site.

68 Quadring- General Points

Environment Agency comment - Some site in FZ3a but no hazard and no other obvious flood sources nearby. Anglian Water has commented that the capacity of the surface water network has major constraints, and that all developments should seek to reduce flood risk and incorporate Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS).

Quadring- Allocated Sites

Site_ref Name Area (ha) No. Dwell FLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDDEPTH % DEPTH Sequential Test - Stage Required Land to the south-west of Main Qua002 Road, Quadring 0.69 14 Flood Zone 1 71% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% Sequential Test Passed Flood Zone 2 14.5% Areas of surface water flooding (low risk) within the Flood Zone 3 14.5% site. Land to the north-east of Main Qua003 Road, Quadring 4.15 83 Flood Zone 1 51.5% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% Apply Exceptions Test Flood Zone 3 25.5% Areas of surface water flooding (low risk) within the Flood Zone 2 23% site. Land to the east of Casswell Qua004 Drive, Quadring 0.88 18 Flood Zone 2 40% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% Apply Exceptions Test Flood Zone 3 63.5% Areas of surface water flooding (low risk) on the Flood Zone 1 23.5% southern boundary of the site.

Quadring - Other Developable Sites

Comments (including reasons for rejection Site_ref Name Hectare No. Dwell FLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDDEPTH % DEPTH where applicable) Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site moderately Qua012 Land off Main Road, Quadring 0.52 10 Flood Zone 1 39.5% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% poorly compared to other sites. Flood Zone 3 36.5% Areas of surface water flooding (low risk) on the Flood Zone 2 24% western boundary of the site. Land to the south of Town Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site poorly Qua011 Drove, Quadring 4.95 99 Flood Zone 2 52.5% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% compared to other sites. Flood Zone 1 28% Areas of surface water flooding (low and medium Flood Zone 3 19% risk) within the site. Land to the south of Site less sequentially preferable in terms of flood Qua006 Watergate, Quadring 1.90 38 Flood Zone 3 76.5% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% risk. Flood Zone 2 18.5% Areas of surface water flooding (low and medium Flood Zone 1 5% risk) within the site. Land to the east of St Qua009 Margarets, Quadring 0.53 12 Flood Zone 3 99.5% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% Site has planning permission Flood Zone 2 0.5%

Areas of surface water flooding (low and medium risk) on the northern boundary of the site.

69 Land to the north-west of Qua007 Watergate, Quadring 0.440 6 Flood Zone 3 100% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% Small site (below allocation threshold) Land to the south-east of Qua008 Watergate, Quadring 0.185 4 Flood Zone 3 100% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% Small site (below allocation threshold) Land to the north-west of Qua014 Watergate, Quadring 0.087 2 Flood Zone 3 100% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% Small site (below allocation threshold)

Surfleet - General Points

Environment Agency comment - Settlement lies on River Glen, which is a tide locked watercourse so there may be a hazard from this potential flood source. Also consult Welland & Deepings IDB. Welland and Deepings IDB have previously advised there is no specific risk from their drainage system which requires highlighting for Surfleet. Some sites are adjacent to the Boards watercourses and therefore their bye laws apply. In line with current recommendations the use of Sustainable Drainage Systems should be considered as a first approach to dealing with surface water run off. The Board would have to agree and give prior approval for any surface water flows above its designed Greenfield run off rate of 1.4litres/sec/Ha to its system. Anglian Water has commented that the capacity of the surface water network has major constraints, and that all developments should seek to reduce flood risk and incorporate Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS).

Surfleet - Allocated Sites

Site_ref Name Area (ha) No. Dwell FLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDDEPTH % DEPTH Sequential Test - Stage Required Land to the north of Station Sur003 Road, Surfleet 1.23 25 Flood Zone 1 56% No Hazard 98.6% No Depth 98.6% Apply Exceptions Test Flood Zone 3 35.5% Low Hazard 1.4% 0m to 0.25m 1.4% Flood Zone 2 8.5% No surface water flooding issues identified.

Land to the west of Coalbeach Sur016 Lane South, Surfleet 2.19 44 Flood Zone 3 92.8% Low Hazard 93.3% 0m to 0.25m 96.1% Apply Exceptions Test Flood Zone 2 3.7% Danger for Some 4.1% 0.25m to 0.5m 3.9% Flood Zone 1 3.5% No Hazard 2.6% Area of surface water flooding (low risk) within the site. Land to the south of Park Lane, Sur006 Surfleet 5.26 105 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger for Most 69.2% 0.25m to 0.5m 79.2% Apply Exceptions Test Low Hazard 22.1% 0m to 0.25m 18.7% Area of surface water flooding (low and medium Danger for Some 8.7% 0.5m to 1m 2.1% risk) within the site.

70 Surfleet - Other Developable Sites

Comments (including reasons for rejection Site_ref Name Hectare No. Dwell FLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDDEPTH % DEPTH where applicable) Land to the west of Gosberton Sur005 Road, Surfleet 0.43 9 Flood Zone 1 60.2% No Hazard 89.9% No Depth 89.9% Small site (below allocation threshold) Flood Zone 3 26.9% Low Hazard 9.3% 0m to 0.25m 9.3% Flood Zone 2 12.9% Danger for Some 0.8% 0.25m to 0.5m 0.8% Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site poorly Sur011 Land off Station Road, Surfleet 1.30 26 Flood Zone 3 98.5% No Hazard 56.4% No Depth 56.4% compared to other sites. Low Hazard 40.8% 0m to 0.25m 40.8% Flood Zone 1 1.5% Danger for Some 2.0% 0.25m to 0.5m 2.2% Area of surface water flooding (low risk) within the Flood Zone 2 0% Danger for Most 0.9% 0.5m to 1m 0.7% site. Land to the east of Coalbeach Sur009 Lane, Surfleet 0.38 2 Flood Zone 3 100% Low Hazard 99.3% 0m to 0.25m 99.3% Small site (below allocation threshold) Danger for Some 0.7% 0.25m to 0.5m 0.7%

Land to the south of Seas End Sur008 Road, Surfleet Seas End 0.22 4 Flood Zone 1 89.5% Low Hazard 87.7% 0m to 0.25m 91.9% Identified as a small site to include in the supply. Flood Zone 3 10.5% No Hazard 8.1% No Depth 8.1% Danger for Some 4.2% No surface water flooding issues identified.

Land to the north of Seas End Sur014 Road, Surfleet Seas End 0.46 9 Flood Zone 3 45.3% Low Hazard 51.9% 0m to 0.25m 94.8% Identified as a small site to include in the supply. Flood Zone 1 41.3% Danger for Some 27.2% No Depth 5.2% Flood Zone 2 13.4% Danger for Most 15.7% No surface water flooding issues identified. No Hazard 5.2% Land to the south of Station Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site poorly Sur004 Road, Surfleet 1.95 39 Flood Zone 1 100% Danger for Most 43.3% 0.5m to 1m 36.3% compared to other sites. Low Hazard 24.3% 0m to 0.25m 24.9% No Hazard 17.1% 0.25m to 0.5m 21.7% Area of surface water flooding (low risk) within the Danger for Some 15.3% No Depth 17.1% site. Land to the south of Park Lane, Sur012 Surfleet 0.18 4 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger for Most 91.9% 0.5m to 1m 78.3% Small site (below allocation threshold) Danger for All 8.1% 0.25m to 0.5m 21.7%

71 Sutton St James - General Points

Environment Agency comment - No apparent hazard from tidal/fluvial sources but other forms of flooding need investigation - in particular South Holland Main Drain (Consult South Holland IDB).

The North Level IDB previously advise there is no specific risk for their drainage network which requires highlighting for Sutton St James. If new developments follow government guidelines and SUDs are used, then there will be no impact on the drainage network. If surface water run-off rates increase as a result of development these should be addressed at the application stage with improvements funded by the developer. Some of the sites are adjacent the Boards watercourses and the byelaws will apply.

Sutton St James - Allocated Sites

Site_ref Name Area (ha) No. Dwell FLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDDEPTH % DEPTH Sequential Test - Stage Required Land to the south of Chapel Suj007 Gate, Sutton St James 0.53 11 Flood Zone 2 67% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% Apply Exceptions Test Flood Zone 3 30% Area of surface water flooding (low risk) within the Flood Zone 1 3% site. Land to the south of Chapel Apply Exceptions Test. Outline planning Suj012 Gate, Sutton St James 2.10 42 Flood Zone 3 100% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% application on the site.

Area of surface water flooding (low risk) within the site.

72 Sutton St James - Other Developable Sites

Comments (including reasons for rejection Site_ref Name Hectare No. Dwell FLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDDEPTH % DEPTH where applicable) Land off Bette Camplings Suj010 Close, Sutton St James 0.240 4 Flood Zone 3 98.7% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% Small site (below allocation threshold) Flood Zone 2 1.3% Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site moderately poorly compared to Suj007 but slightly better than Suj012. Concerns regarding proximity to pumping station and water recycling centre. Sits within Land to the east of Baulkins encroachment advisory zone to water recycling Suj002 Drove, Sutton St James 2.78 56 Flood Zone 3 100% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% centre.

Area of surface water flooding (low and medium risk) within the site.

Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site moderately poorly compared to Suj007 but slightly better than Suj012. Concerns regarding proximity to water Land to the east of Bell's recycling centre. Sits within encroachment Suj004 drove, Sutton St James 3.52 70 Flood Zone 3 100% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% advisory zone to water recycling centre.

Areas of surface water flooding (low, medium and high risk) within the site. Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site relatively well compared to other sites. Concerns regarding access to site and proximity to water recycling Land to the east of Sutton centre. Sits within encroachment advisory zone to Suj005 Gate, Sutton St James 0.82 16 Flood Zone 3 100% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% water recycling centre.

Areas of surface water flooding (low risk) on the western boundary of the site.

73 Tydd St Mary - General Points

Environment Agency comment - No apparent hazard from tidal/fluvial sources but other forms of flooding need investigation - IDB Drain (Consult North Level IDB).

The North Level IDB previously advise there is no specific risk for their drainage network which requires highlighting for Tydd St Mary. If new developments follow government guidelines and SUDs are used, then there will be no impact on the drainage network. If surface water run-off rates increase as a result of development these should be addressed at the application stage with improvements funded by the developer. Some of the sites are adjacent the Boards watercourses and the byelaws will apply.

Tydd St Mary - Allocated Sites

Site_ref Name Area (ha) No. Dwell FLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDDEPTH % DEPTH Sequential Test - Stage Required

Apply Exceptions Test. Site not the most sequentially preferable but lesser impact on Conservation Area and does not require upgrade to water cycling centre. Sustainability appraisal is Tyd014 Land at Lowgate Tydd St Mary 1.54 31 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger for Most 38.8% 0.25m to 0.5m 36.9% relatively good for the site compared to other sites. Danger for Some 36.4% 0.5m to 1m 36.7% Areas of surface water flooding (low risk) within the site and on the western and southern boundaries No Hazard 17.0% No Depth 17.2% of the site. Low Hazard 7.8% 0m to 0.25m 9.2%

Tydd St Mary - Other Developable Sites

Comments (including reasons for rejection Site_ref Name Hectare No. Dwell FLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDDEPTH % DEPTH where applicable) Tysdale Manor, Common Way, Tyd005 Tydd St Mary 0.58 2 Flood Zone 3 80.8% No Hazard 88.3% No Hazard 80.8% Small site (below allocation threshold) 19.2% Low Hazard 10.0% 0m to 0.25m 19.2% Danger For Some 1.6% 0.25m to 0.5m

74 Weston - General Points

Weston - Allocated Sites

Site_ref Name Area (ha) No. Dwell FLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDDEPTH % DEPTH Sequential Test - Stage Required Land to the north of High Apply Exceptions Test. Planning Application Wsn003 Road, Weston 6.10 122 Flood Zone 1 46% Danger For Some 67.8% 0.25m to 0.5m 38.6% submitted. Flood Zone 3 31% No Hazard 17.9% 0.5m to 1m 27.8% Flood Zone 2 23% Danger For Most 10.5% No Hazard 18.0% No surface water flooding issues identified. Low Hazard 3.8% 0m to 0.25m 15.6% Land to the east of Small Apply Exceptions Test. Planning Application Wsn022 Drove, Weston 3.91 78 Flood Zone 2 79% No Hazard 99.4% No Hazard 100% submitted. Flood Zone 3 16.5% Low Hazard 0.6% 0m to 0.25m 0.0% Small area of surface water flooding (low risk) Flood Zone 1 4.5% Danger For Some 0.0% within the site Wsn029 Land off High Road, Weston 2.83 57 Flood Zone 3 83.3% No Hazard 42.0% No Depth 36.2% Apply Exceptions Test. Flood Zone 1 11.3% Danger For Some 22.7% 0.5m to 1m 35.7% Small areas of surface water flooding (low and Flood Zone 2 5.3% Danger For Most 20.9% 0.25m to 0.5m 15.2% medium risk) within the site Low Hazard 14.4% 0m to 0.25m 10.7% 1m to 2m 2.2%

75 Weston - Other Developable Sites

Comments (including reasons for rejection Site_ref Name Hectare No. Dwell FLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDDEPTH % DEPTH where applicable) Land to the east of Small Sits within Wsn022 which is proposed to be Wsn004 Drove, Weston 2.83 57 Flood Zone 2 76% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% allocated Flood Zone 3 20.5% Flood Zone 1 3.5% Land to the east of Pinfold Wsn011 Lane, Weston 0.91 6 Flood Zone 3 72.5% No Hazard 79.1% No Hazard 81.3% Identified as a small site to include in the supply. Flood Zone 2 23% Low Hazard 19.8% 0m to 0.25m 11.6% Small area of surface water flooding (low risk) Flood Zone 1 4.5% Danger For Some 1.1% 0.25m to 0.5m 7.1% within the site Land to the south of Small Sits within Wsn015 which is proposed to be Wsn006 Drove, Weston 0.62 12 Flood Zone 3 100% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% allocated

Land to the south of Small Wsn015 Drove, Weston 1.93 39 Flood Zone 3 100% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% Planning Application submitted.

No surface water flooding issues identified. Land to the south of High Concerns with respect to drainage improvements Wsn021 Road, Weston 1.23 25 Flood Zone 3 100% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% required at the site.

Areas of surface water flooding (low, medium and high risk) within the site. Land to the north-west of Concerns with respect to drainage improvements Wsn012 Broadgate, Weston 1.12 22 Flood Zone 3 91.5% No Hazard 75.4% No Hazard 69.7% required at the site. Flood Zone 1 5.5% Low Hazard 12.5% 0.25m to 0.5m 16.8% Flood Zone 2 3% Danger For Some 12.0% 0m to 0.25m 10.4% No surface water flooding issues identified. Danger For Most 0.2% 0.5m to 1m 3.1%

Concerns with respect to drainage improvements Land to the east of Beggars required at the site. Sustainability Appraisal ranks Wsn010 Bush Lane, Weston 3.17 63 Flood Zone 3 58% No Hazard 45.9% No Hazard 48.9% the site moderately poorly compared to other sites Flood Zone 1 36% Danger For Some 34.3% 0.5m to 1m 21.3%

Areas of surface water flooding (low, medium and Flood Zone 2 6% Low Hazard 11.7% 0.25m to 0.5m 16.4% high risk) on the eastern boundary of the site. Danger For Most 8.1% 0m to 0.25m 12.1% 1m to 2m 1.3% Land to the south of High Location concerns in terms of relationship to main Wsn030 Road, Weston 1.54 31 Flood Zone 3 67.6% Low Hazard 35.3% 0m to 0.25m 30.2% part of Weston. Flood Zone 1 20.0% No Hazard 25.4% 0.5m to 1m 28.8% Areas of surface water flooding (low, medium and high risk) within the site and on the western Flood Zone 2 12.4% Danger For Most 20.6% No Depth 22.2% boundary of the site. Danger For Some 18.7% 0.25m to 0.5m 11.5% 1m to 2m 7.3%

76 Weston - Other Developable Sites Comments (including reasons for rejection Site_ref Name Hectare No. Dwell FLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDDEPTH % DEPTH where applicable) Land to the south of High Location concerns in terms of relationship to main Wsn033 Road, Weston 0.09 23 Flood Zone 3 100% Low Hazard 76.0% 0m to 0.25m 82.3% part of Weston. Danger For Some 23.9% 0.25m to 0.5m 17.1% No Hazard 3.3% No surface water flooding issues identified. Site less sequentially preferable in terms of flood risk. Concerns with respect to impact on Scheduled Ancient Monument. Sustainability Land to the east of Pinfold Appraisal ranks the site poorly compared to other Wsn007 Lane, Weston 3.29 66 Flood Zone 3 48% Danger For Some 32.3% 0m to 0.25m 32.6% sites. Flood Zone 1 28% Low Hazard 30.3% 0.25m to 0.5m 31.8% Area of surface water flooding (low risk) within the Flood Zone 2 24% No Hazard 17.9% 0.5m to 1m 19.9% site. Danger For Most 17.1% No Hazard 15.7% Danger For All 2.4% Land to the South of A151 Site less sequentially preferable in terms of flood Weston By-pass off Pinfold risk. Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site Wsn024 Lane 0.56 11 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For Some 49.2% 0.25m to 0.5m 39.7% moderately poorly compared to other sites. Low Hazard 19.3% 0m to 0.25m 36.9% Danger For Most 16.9% No Hazard 14.6% No surface water flooding issues identified. No Hazard 14.6% 0.5m to 1m 8.9% Land to the South of A151 Site less sequentially preferable in terms of flood Weston By-pass off Pinfold risk. Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site poorly Wsn023 Lane 0.69 14 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For Some 41.0% 0.5m to 1m 34.6% compared to other sites. Low Hazard 30.4% 0m to 0.25m 33.6% Area of surface water flooding (low risk) within the Danger For Most 28.6% 0.25m to 0.5m 31.7% site. Land to the South of A151 Site less sequentially preferable in terms of flood Wsn025 Weston By-pass 4.17 83 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For Most 67.2% 0.5m to 1m 46.7% risk. Flood Zone 2 0% Danger For All 16.4% 1m to 2m 37.2% Area of surface water flooding (low risk) within the Danger For Some 8.7% 0.25m to 0.5m 13.0% site. Low Hazard 7.3% 0m to 0.25m 2.3% No Hazard 0.4% No Hazard 0.8%

77 Whaplode - General Points

Environment Agency comment - No apparent hazard from tidal/fluvial sources but other forms of flooding need investigation - in particular Whaplode River (Drain) (Consult South Holland IDB).

Whaplode - Allocated Sites

Site_ref Name Area (ha) No. Dwell FLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDDEPTH % DEPTH Sequential Test - Stage Required Land to the south of Cob Gate, Wha019 Whaplode 1.37 27 Flood Zone 1 100% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% Sequential Test Passed

Small area of surface water flooding (low risk) within the site

Wha029 Land off Main Road, Whapode 1.29 26 Flood Zone 3 94% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% Apply Exceptions Test. Flood Zone 2 6% Areas of surface water flooding (low risk) within the site with low/medium/high risk areas on the western and southern boundaries of the site. Land to the east of Stockwell Wha002 Gate, Whaplode 1.95 39 Flood Zone 3 100% No Hazard 92.3% No Depth 93.8% Apply Exceptions Test. Low Hazard 5.7% 0m to 0.25m 6.2% Areas of surface water flooding (low, medium and Danger for Some 2.1% high risk) within the site

Whaplode - Other Developable Sites

Comments (including reasons for rejection Site_ref Name Hectare No. Dwell FLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDDEPTH % DEPTH where applicable)

Land to the east of Church Wha023 Gate, Whaplode 0.79 10 Flood Zone 1 100% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% Site has planning permission Land to the east of Church Wha031 Gate, Whaplode 0.74 10 Flood Zone 1 100% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% Site has planning permission Land to the east of Kirkgate, Wha008 Whaplode 0.20 4 Flood Zone 2 45.0% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% Small site (below allocation threshold) Flood Zone 1 30.3% Flood Zone 3 24.7% Concerns with respect to neighbouring employment site and impact on this site. Land to the north of Cob Gate, Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site poorly Wha010 Whaplode 2.68 54 Flood Zone 3 72% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% compared to other sites Flood Zone 1 24.5% Areas of surface water flooding (low risk) within the site with low/medium/high risk areas on the eastern, northern and western boundaries of the Flood Zone 2 3.5% site. Land to the west of Stockwell Wha021 Gate, Whaplode 0.23 5 Flood Zone 3 100% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% Small site (below allocation threshold)

78 Whaplode - Other Developable Sites Site_ref Name Area (ha) No. Dwell FLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDDEPTH % DEPTH Sequential Test - Stage Required Concerns with respect to neighbouring employment site and impact on this site. Land to the north of Abbots Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site moderately Wha009 Garden, Whaplode 2.47 49 Flood Zone 3 98% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% poorly compared to other sites.

Flood Zone 2 2% risk) within the site.

Wigtoft - General Points

Wigtoft - Allocated Sites

Site_ref Name Area (ha) No. Dwell FLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDDEPTH % DEPTH Sequential Test - Stage Required Land to the west of Asperton Wig014 Road, Wigtoft 0.94 19 Flood Zone 3 100% Low Hazard 44.7% 0m to 0.25m 51.3% Apply Exceptions Test. Danger For Some 23.4% No Hazard 20.0% Areas of surface water flooding (medium risk) on No Hazard 20.0% 0.25m to 0.5m 15.8% the northern boundary of the site. Danger For Most 11.8% 0.5m to 1m 12.9%

Wigtoft - Other Developable Sites

Comments (including reasons for rejection Site_ref Name Hectare No. Dwell FLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDDEPTH % DEPTH where applicable) Jasmine House & works Asperton Road Wig001 Wigtoft 0.21 4 Flood Zone 1 66% No Hazard 100% No Hazard 100% Identified as a small site to include in the supply. Flood Zone 2 25.5% Flood Zone 3 8.5% No surface water flooding issues identified. Land to east of Asperton Road, Wig002 Wigtoft 0.32 6 Flood Zone 1 42.5% No Hazard 89.6% No Hazard 89.6% Identified as a small site to include in the supply. Flood Zone 3 33% Low Hazard 10.4% 0m to 0.25m 10.4% Flood Zone 2 24.5% No surface water flooding issues identified.

79 Wigtoft - Other Developable Sites Comments (including reasons for rejection Site_ref Name Hectare No. Dwell FLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDDEPTH % DEPTH where applicable) Site less sequentially preferable in terms of flood Land to the north of Main risk. Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site Wig012 Road, Wigtoft 1.06 21 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For Some 71.2% 0.25m to 0.5m 59.7% moderately poorly compared to other sites. Low Hazard 20.5% 0m to 0.25m 31.1% Danger For Most 8.2% 0.5m to 1m 8.9% risk) on the southern boundary of the site. 1m to 2m 0.3% Site less sequentially preferable in terms of flood Land to the east of Asperton risk. Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site slightly Wig015 Road, Wigtoft 0.52 10 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For Some 51.1% 0.25m to 0.5m 45.4% more poorly than Wig014. Danger For Most 31.5% 0.5m to 1m 31.5%

Areas of surface water flooding (low and medium Low Hazard 17.3% 0m to 0.25m 22.9% risk) on the western boundary of the site. No Hazard 0.1% No Hazard 0.1%

Wrangle - General Points

Wrangle - Allocated Sites

Site_ref Name Area (ha) No. Dwell FLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDDEPTH % DEPTH Sequential Test - Stage Required Land to the west of Tooley Lane and north of Main Road, Wra013 Wrangle 2.246 45 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For Most 98.1% 0.25m to 0.5m 87.3% Apply Exceptions Test. Danger For Some 1.9% 0.5m to 1m 12.7% Small areas of surface water flooding (low risk) within the site.

Wrangle - Other Developable Sites

Comments (including reasons for rejection Site_ref Name Hectare No. Dwell FLOOD ZONE % FZ 1/2/ HAZARD % HAZARDDEPTH % DEPTH where applicable) Geo H Kime & Co., Main Road, Wra009 Wrangle 0.495 27 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For Some 74.0% 0.25m to 0.5m 54.3% Site has planning permission Low Hazard 22.3% 0m to 0.25m 44.1% Small area of surface water flooding (low risk) Danger For Most 3.7% 0.5m to 1m 1.6% within the site. Site less sequentially preferable in terms of flood Land to the west of Broadgate, risk. Sustainability Appraisal ranks the site poorly Wra015 Wrangle 1.384 28 Flood Zone 3 100% Danger For Most 88.5% 0.25m to 0.5m 72.8% compared to other sites. Danger For Some 11.3% 0.5m to 1m 26.3% Areas of surface water flooding (low and medium Low Hazard 0.2% 0m to 0.25m 0.9% risk) within the site.