DOCSLIB.ORG

The US Commitment to NATO in the Post-Cold War Period

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The US Commitment to NATO in the Post-Cold War Period Accepted version downloaded from SOAS Research Online: https://eprints.soas.ac.uk/30241/ The US Commitment to NATO in the Post-Cold War Period Yanan Song i Contents List of Abbreviations............................................................................................................ iii 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 1 2 The Purpose of the Transatlantic Community .......................................................... 9 3 A New Framework: Two Levels of Analysis ........................................................... 27 4 The Clinton Administration’s Recommitment to NATO ..................................... 65 5 NATO’s Engagement in Kosovo ................................................................................ 99 6 NATO’s Ongoing Engagement after Kosovo ........................................................ 132 7 NATO’s Engagement in Libya ................................................................................. 173 8 Libya: The US Policy-Making Process ................................................................... 201 9 Conclusion ..................................................................................................................... 248 Appendix ............................................................................................................................. 275 Notes .................................................................................................................................... 279 Bibliography....................................................................................................................... 346 Index .................................................................................................................................... 420 ii List of Abbreviations ANSF Afghan National Security Force AFRICOM US Africa Command ACTWARN Activation Warning ACTORD Activation Order Av-Det Air Force Aviation Detachment CPG Comprehensive Political Guidance CJTF Combined Joint Task Forces CSCE Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe DCI Defence Capabilities Initiative EU European Union ESDP European Security and Defence Policy FPA Foreign Policy Analysis GCC Gulf Cooperation Council HATs Humanitarian Assessment Teams ISAF International Security Assistance Force ICC International Criminal Court ICISS International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty KPJ Communist Party of Yugoslavia KLA Kosovo Liberation Army KVM Kosovo Verifying Mission LIFG Libyan Islamic Fighting Group LNC National Liberation Movement LCY League of Communist iii List of Abbreviations LDK Democratic League of Kosovo MAP Membership Action Plan NATO North Atlantic Treaty Organisation NACC North Atlantic Cooperation Council NRF NATO Response Force NTM-A NATO Training Mission-Afghanistan NSS National Security Strategy NSC National Security Council NOP Libya’s National Oil Corporation OAF Operation Allied Force OEF Operation Enduring Freedom OOD Operation Odyssey Dawn OUP Operation Unified Protector OIC Organisation of the Islamic Conference OECD Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development PfP Partnership for Peace PRTs Provincial Reconstruction Teams QDR Quadrennial Defence Review R2P Responsibility to Protect SOPs Standard Operating Procedures TNC Transitional National Council UN United Nations USFOR-A US Force Afghanistan USAID US Agency for International Development UNSCR United Nations Security Council Resolution iv List of Abbreviations WTO World Trade Organisation WWII World War Two WMD Weapons of Mass Destruction XFOR Extraction Force v 1 Introduction The geopolitical conditions which led to the creation of NATO in 1949 rapidly disappeared following the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989. According to neorealism, if alignment is formed because of threat, it will falter in the absence of a threat. Scholars like John Mearsheimer and Kenneth Waltz even predicted that without the Soviet threat, NATO would cease to be a durable alliance.1 The ending of the Cold War unlocked a period of profound soul-searching within the Alliance. The new conditions indeed led to an American rethinking of the US commitment to NATO, just as it led to a refocusing of priorities within European members of the Alliance. In May 1990, NATO’s Military Committee announced that it no longer considered the Warsaw Pact a threat to the Alliance. President George H.W. Bush then called for spending cuts which would eventually result in significant reductions in funding and force levels for NATO’s conventional and nuclear forces. He also proclaimed the emergence of a “New World Order”, suggesting that NATO was bereft of a strategic anchor. In addition, President Francois Mitterrand of France and Chancellor Helmut Kohl of Germany delivered a Franco-German statement on joint defence policies in late 1991, the provisions of which facilitated the formation of the Eurocorps on May 22, 1992.2 This symbolic gesture was even interpreted by some observers as indicating that the two leaders hoped to replace NATO with a European defence “identity” as Europe’s primary security apparatus. 3 In short, the possibility of the termination of institutionalised US support for European security was seriously raised in this period, as was the possibility of NATO ceasing to exist. The survival of NATO 1 Introduction Following major debates about the appropriate direction for post-Cold War American internationalism, the administration of President Bill Clinton not only committed itself to the continuation of NATO, but also began to sponsor a major programme of NATO renewal and enlargement. After progressive transformation, NATO expanded rather than disbanded. It went on to participate in “out-of-area” action in Bosnia, Kosovo, Afghanistan and Libya. It developed a set of more or less concerted doctrine regarding “new threats”, and broadened the function of NATO to include effective mechanisms for solving disputes and coordinating foreign and political policies instead of strictly focusing on military responses. 4 All these commitments were accompanied by major debates about the purpose and capabilities of NATO. Relevant debates included continuing tensions between Washington and European capitals over defence spending levels; accusations that the US was using NATO as an instrument of extra-United Nations unilateral power; especially the preference of Washington immediately after 9/11 for working through ad hoc rather than institutionalised alliance structures; and the developing relationship between NATO and Russia (particularly in the context of possible Georgian and Ukrainian membership of the organisation). However, NATO continued to exist and Washington remained formally committed to the defence of Europe. The recent history of the US commitment has been dominated by economic pressures, squabbles over NATO’s military performance in Afghanistan, and the apparent American preference for “leading from behind” in Libya. The current tensions within NATO were graphically expressed in retiring Defence Secretary Robert Gates’ June 2011 speech, “Reflections on the Status and Future of the Transatlantic Alliance”: In the past, I’ve worried openly about NATO turning into a two-tiered alliance, between members who specialise in “soft” humanitarian development, peacekeeping, 2 Introduction and talking tasks, and those conducting the “hard” combat missions…This is no longer a hypothetical worry. We are there today. And it is unacceptable.5 But no matter how complicated the history of NATO debates has been, there was always a consensus on the fact that the US attitude was most crucial to the survival as well as continued existence of NATO. The US and NATO Looking back on the period since the end of the Cold War, Washington was more than once expected to support NATO dissolution: when the Soviet threat subsided; when US decision on bypassing NATO was announced after 9/11; when NATO demonstrated its incapability to assume the overall responsibility for all military operations in Afghanistan; when the US insistence on “leading from behind” in Libya became conspicuous. Nevertheless, by 2011 when the Libyan crisis subsided, NATO had remained for 20 of the most eventful and challenging years in the post-Cold War history, regardless of how frequently NATO was relegated to the very margins of debate. This interesting phenomenon raised a question: why did the US remain committed to NATO in the post-Cold War period? In the immediate aftermath of the Cold War, Americans had high expectations of seeing the US scaling down its international commitments. They believed that there was no need to continue the institutionalised protection for European security, and that it was time to focus on domestic affairs. With respect to this domestic demand, why did the Clinton administration nonetheless choose the opposite course: to remain committed to NATO and to support NATO enlargement? Moreover, NATO not only expanded its membership, but also participated in “out-of-area” actions, which were regarded as “the most visible manifestation of NATO’s development in the post-Cold 3 Introduction War period”.6 Kosovo was basically a NATO operation, though 80 per cent of its tasks were completed by the US. Hence why did the US support the Kosovo mission to be accomplished under the framework of NATO? On the contrary, Afghanistan at first saw the US declining to work through NATO. Why did the Bush administration prefer an ad hoc
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Excesss Karaoke Master by Artist
    XS Master by ARTIST Artist Song Title Artist Song Title (hed) Planet Earth Bartender TOOTIMETOOTIMETOOTIM ? & The Mysterians 96 Tears E 10 Years Beautiful UGH! Wasteland 1999 Man United Squad Lift It High (All About 10,000 Maniacs Candy Everybody Wants Belief) More Than This 2 Chainz Bigger Than You (feat. Drake & Quavo) [clean] Trouble Me I'm Different 100 Proof Aged In Soul Somebody's Been Sleeping I'm Different (explicit) 10cc Donna 2 Chainz & Chris Brown Countdown Dreadlock Holiday 2 Chainz & Kendrick Fuckin' Problems I'm Mandy Fly Me Lamar I'm Not In Love 2 Chainz & Pharrell Feds Watching (explicit) Rubber Bullets 2 Chainz feat Drake No Lie (explicit) Things We Do For Love, 2 Chainz feat Kanye West Birthday Song (explicit) The 2 Evisa Oh La La La Wall Street Shuffle 2 Live Crew Do Wah Diddy Diddy 112 Dance With Me Me So Horny It's Over Now We Want Some Pussy Peaches & Cream 2 Pac California Love U Already Know Changes 112 feat Mase Puff Daddy Only You & Notorious B.I.G. Dear Mama 12 Gauge Dunkie Butt I Get Around 12 Stones We Are One Thugz Mansion 1910 Fruitgum Co. Simon Says Until The End Of Time 1975, The Chocolate 2 Pistols & Ray J You Know Me City, The 2 Pistols & T-Pain & Tay She Got It Dizm Girls (clean) 2 Unlimited No Limits If You're Too Shy (Let Me Know) 20 Fingers Short Dick Man If You're Too Shy (Let Me 21 Savage & Offset &Metro Ghostface Killers Know) Boomin & Travis Scott It's Not Living (If It's Not 21st Century Girls 21st Century Girls With You 2am Club Too Fucked Up To Call It's Not Living (If It's Not 2AM Club Not
    [Show full text]
  • Songs by Artist
    Reil Entertainment Songs by Artist Karaoke by Artist Title Title &, Caitlin Will 12 Gauge Address In The Stars Dunkie Butt 10 Cc 12 Stones Donna We Are One Dreadlock Holiday 19 Somethin' Im Mandy Fly Me Mark Wills I'm Not In Love 1910 Fruitgum Co Rubber Bullets 1, 2, 3 Redlight Things We Do For Love Simon Says Wall Street Shuffle 1910 Fruitgum Co. 10 Years 1,2,3 Redlight Through The Iris Simon Says Wasteland 1975 10, 000 Maniacs Chocolate These Are The Days City 10,000 Maniacs Love Me Because Of The Night Sex... Because The Night Sex.... More Than This Sound These Are The Days The Sound Trouble Me UGH! 10,000 Maniacs Wvocal 1975, The Because The Night Chocolate 100 Proof Aged In Soul Sex Somebody's Been Sleeping The City 10Cc 1Barenaked Ladies Dreadlock Holiday Be My Yoko Ono I'm Not In Love Brian Wilson (2000 Version) We Do For Love Call And Answer 11) Enid OS Get In Line (Duet Version) 112 Get In Line (Solo Version) Come See Me It's All Been Done Cupid Jane Dance With Me Never Is Enough It's Over Now Old Apartment, The Only You One Week Peaches & Cream Shoe Box Peaches And Cream Straw Hat U Already Know What A Good Boy Song List Generator® Printed 11/21/2017 Page 1 of 486 Licensed to Greg Reil Reil Entertainment Songs by Artist Karaoke by Artist Title Title 1Barenaked Ladies 20 Fingers When I Fall Short Dick Man 1Beatles, The 2AM Club Come Together Not Your Boyfriend Day Tripper 2Pac Good Day Sunshine California Love (Original Version) Help! 3 Degrees I Saw Her Standing There When Will I See You Again Love Me Do Woman In Love Nowhere Man 3 Dog Night P.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Reducing Nuclear Risks in Europe a FRAMEWORK for ACTION
    Reducing A FrAmework For Action Nuclear Risks e dited by Steve AndreASen in Europe And iSAbelle williAmS Featured essay: “the race between ­Cooperation and catastrophe” by sam NuNN Reducing Nuclear Risks in Europe a FrameWork For acTIoN Edit eD by STeve aNDreaSeN aND ISabelle WIllIamS Featured essay: “The race between ­Cooperation and catastrophe” by sam NuNN Nuclear ThreaT INITIaTIve Washington, D.c. t he Nuclear threat INItIatIve NTI is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization with a mission to strengthen global security by reducing the risk of use and preventing the spread of nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons, and to work to build the trust, transparency, and security that are preconditions to the ultimate fulfillment of the Non-Proliferation Treaty’s goals and ambitions. www.nti.org The views expressed in this publication are the authors’ own and do not reflect those of NTI, its Board of Directors, or other institutions with which the authors are associated. © 2011 the Nuclear Threat Initiative All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval sys- tem, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without written permission of the publisher and copyright holder. c over phoTo oF a u.S. aIr Force F-16 FIghTINg FalcoN aIrcraFT courTeSy oF The u.S. aIr Force. phoTo by maSTer SgT. WIllIam greer/releaSeD. ii T able oF coNTeNTS Acknowledgments v Authors and Reviewers vii summary coNteNt executive summary: Reassembling a More Credible NATO Nuclear Policy and Posture 1 Joan Rohlfing, Isabelle Williams, and Steve Andreasen featured essay: The Race Between Cooperation and Catastrophe 8 Sam Nunn chaPters 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Regolamento Parlamento Eu Alla Proposta
    Parlamento europeo 2019-2024 Documento di seduta A9-0214/2020 10.11.2020 ***I RELAZIONE sulla proposta di regolamento del Parlamento europeo e del Consiglio che istituisce un dispositivo per la ripresa e la resilienza (COM(2020)0408 – C9-0150/2020 – 2020/0104(COD)) Commissione per i bilanci Commissione per i problemi economici e monetari Relatori: Eider Gardiazabal Rubial, Siegfried Mureşan, Dragoș Pîslaru (Commissioni congiunte – articolo 58 del regolamento) Relatori per parere (*): Dragoș Pîslaru, commissione per l'occupazione e gli affari sociali Pascal Canfin, commissione per l'ambiente, la sanità pubblica e la sicurezza alimentare François-Xavier Bellamy, commissione per l'industria, la ricerca e l'energia Roberts Zīle, commissione per i trasporti e il turismo (*) Commissioni associate – articolo 57 del regolamento RR\1217780IT.docx PE655.950v03-00 IT Unita nella diversitàIT PR_COD_1consamCom Significato dei simboli utilizzati * Procedura di consultazione *** Procedura di approvazione ***I Procedura legislativa ordinaria (prima lettura) ***II Procedura legislativa ordinaria (seconda lettura) ***III Procedura legislativa ordinaria (terza lettura) (La procedura indicata dipende dalla base giuridica proposta nel progetto di atto.) Emendamenti a un progetto di atto Emendamenti del Parlamento presentati su due colonne Le soppressioni sono evidenziate in corsivo grassetto nella colonna di sinistra. Le sostituzioni sono evidenziate in corsivo grassetto nelle due colonne. Il testo nuovo è evidenziato in corsivo grassetto nella colonna di destra. La prima e la seconda riga del blocco d'informazione di ogni emendamento identificano la parte di testo interessata del progetto di atto in esame. Se un emendamento verte su un atto esistente che il progetto di atto intende modificare, il blocco d'informazione comprende anche una terza e una quarta riga che identificano rispettivamente l'atto esistente e la disposizione interessata di quest'ultimo.
    [Show full text]
  • Songs by Artist 08/29/21
    Songs by Artist 09/24/21 As Sung By Song Title Track # Alexander’s Ragtime Band DK−M02−244 All Of Me PM−XK−10−08 Aloha ’Oe SC−2419−04 Alphabet Song KV−354−96 Amazing Grace DK−M02−722 KV−354−80 America (My Country, ’Tis Of Thee) ASK−PAT−01 America The Beautiful ASK−PAT−02 Anchors Aweigh ASK−PAT−03 Angelitos Negros {Spanish} MM−6166−13 Au Clair De La Lune {French} KV−355−68 Auld Lang Syne SC−2430−07 LP−203−A−01 DK−M02−260 THMX−01−03 Auprès De Ma Blonde {French} KV−355−79 Autumn Leaves SBI−G208−41 Baby Face LP−203−B−07 Beer Barrel Polka (Roll Out The Barrel) DK−3070−13 MM−6189−07 Beyond The Sunset DK−77−16 Bill Bailey, Won’t You Please Come Home? DK−M02−240 CB−5039−3−13 B−I−N−G−O CB−DEMO−12 Caisson Song ASK−PAT−05 Clementine DK−M02−234 Come Rain Or Come Shine SAVP−37−06 Cotton Fields DK−2034−04 Cry Like A Baby LAS−06−B−06 Crying In The Rain LAS−06−B−09 Danny Boy DK−M02−704 DK−70−16 CB−5039−2−15 Day By Day DK−77−13 Deep In The Heart Of Texas DK−M02−245 Dixie DK−2034−05 ASK−PAT−06 Do Your Ears Hang Low PM−XK−04−07 Down By The Riverside DK−3070−11 Down In My Heart CB−5039−2−06 Down In The Valley CB−5039−2−01 For He’s A Jolly Good Fellow CB−5039−2−07 Frère Jacques {English−French} CB−E9−30−01 Girl From Ipanema PM−XK−10−04 God Save The Queen KV−355−72 Green Grass Grows PM−XK−04−06 − 1 − Songs by Artist 09/24/21 As Sung By Song Title Track # Greensleeves DK−M02−235 KV−355−67 Happy Birthday To You DK−M02−706 CB−5039−2−03 SAVP−01−19 Happy Days Are Here Again CB−5039−1−01 Hava Nagilah {Hebrew−English} MM−6110−06 He’s Got The Whole World In His Hands
    [Show full text]
  • NATO Partnerships and the Arab Spring: Achievements and Perspectives for the 2012 Chicago Summit by Isabelle François
    TRANSATLANTIC PERSPECTIVES 1 NATO Partnerships and the Arab Spring: Achievements and Perspectives for the 2012 Chicago Summit by Isabelle François Center for Transatlantic Security Studies Institute for National Strategic Studies National Defense University Center for Transatlantic Security Studies Institute for National Strategic Studies National Defense University The Center for Transatlantic Security Studies (CTSS) serves as a national and international focal point and resource center for multi- disciplinary research on issues relating to transatlantic security. The Center provides recommendations to senior U.S. and inter- national government and North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) officials, publishes its research, and conducts a broad range of out- reach activities to inform the broader U.S. national and transatlantic security community. CTSS develops and conducts education and orientation programs for U.S. and allied military officers, government civilians, and interna- tional partners on issues relating to NATO and transatlantic security and defense. In partnership with both U.S. and international govern- ments and with academic and private sector institutions engaged in transatlantic security issues, the Center builds robust and mutually beneficial relationships. Cover: Chicago Skyline from Lake Michigan Photo by Esben Ehrenskjold NATO Partnerships and the Arab Spring: Achievements and Perspectives for the 2012 Chicago Summit NATO Partnerships and the Arab Spring: Achievements and Perspectives for the 2012 Chicago Summit By Isabelle François Center for Transatlantic Security Studies Institute for National Strategic Studies Transatlantic Perspectives, No. 1 National Defense University Press Washington, D.C. December 2011 Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the contributors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Defense Department or any other agency of the Federal Government.
    [Show full text]
  • NATO Summit Warsaw 2016: a Primer
    BRIEFING PAPER Number 7640, 4 July 2016 NATO Summit Warsaw By Louisa Brooke-Holland 2016: a primer Summary The NATO summit in Poland begins on Friday 8 July 2016. The Secretary General of NATO expects it to be a ‘landmark’ summit. NATO faces challenges on two fronts: to the east from Russia and to the south from ongoing conflict in Middle East and North Africa. The Summit will see NATO adopt further measures, building on those made at its previous summit in 2014, to deter Russia from any militarily aggression against its members. This includes the deployment of four multinational battalions to the Baltic States and Poland (one of which will be led by the UK). In addition the summit will discuss how the Alliance address instability in North Africa and the Middle East, including countering Daesh/ISIS and the refugee and migration crisis. This will include a joint statement with the EU. Members are expected to reaffirm the commitment to spend 2% of GDP on defence. Other topics include missile defence and cyberspace as an operational domain. Montenegro will be at the Summit as an observer nation, while it awaits the formalities of joining NATO as the 29th member of the Alliance to be completed. Key information Poland hosts the next summit meeting of NATO heads of state and government in Warsaw on 8-9th July. Decisions are issued in declarations and communiqués throughout the two day summit. The last summit hosted by the UK in Newport in Wales in September 2014. Defence and Foreign Ministers of the 28 members of the Alliance meet regularly between summits.
    [Show full text]
  • English Song Booklet
    English Song Booklet SONG NUMBER SONG TITLE SINGER SONG NUMBER SONG TITLE SINGER 100002 1 & 1 BEYONCE 100003 10 SECONDS JAZMINE SULLIVAN 100007 18 INCHES LAUREN ALAINA 100008 19 AND CRAZY BOMSHEL 100012 2 IN THE MORNING 100013 2 REASONS TREY SONGZ,TI 100014 2 UNLIMITED NO LIMIT 100015 2012 IT AIN'T THE END JAY SEAN,NICKI MINAJ 100017 2012PRADA ENGLISH DJ 100018 21 GUNS GREEN DAY 100019 21 QUESTIONS 5 CENT 100021 21ST CENTURY BREAKDOWN GREEN DAY 100022 21ST CENTURY GIRL WILLOW SMITH 100023 22 (ORIGINAL) TAYLOR SWIFT 100027 25 MINUTES 100028 2PAC CALIFORNIA LOVE 100030 3 WAY LADY GAGA 100031 365 DAYS ZZ WARD 100033 3AM MATCHBOX 2 100035 4 MINUTES MADONNA,JUSTIN TIMBERLAKE 100034 4 MINUTES(LIVE) MADONNA 100036 4 MY TOWN LIL WAYNE,DRAKE 100037 40 DAYS BLESSTHEFALL 100038 455 ROCKET KATHY MATTEA 100039 4EVER THE VERONICAS 100040 4H55 (REMIX) LYNDA TRANG DAI 100043 4TH OF JULY KELIS 100042 4TH OF JULY BRIAN MCKNIGHT 100041 4TH OF JULY FIREWORKS KELIS 100044 5 O'CLOCK T PAIN 100046 50 WAYS TO SAY GOODBYE TRAIN 100045 50 WAYS TO SAY GOODBYE TRAIN 100047 6 FOOT 7 FOOT LIL WAYNE 100048 7 DAYS CRAIG DAVID 100049 7 THINGS MILEY CYRUS 100050 9 PIECE RICK ROSS,LIL WAYNE 100051 93 MILLION MILES JASON MRAZ 100052 A BABY CHANGES EVERYTHING FAITH HILL 100053 A BEAUTIFUL LIE 3 SECONDS TO MARS 100054 A DIFFERENT CORNER GEORGE MICHAEL 100055 A DIFFERENT SIDE OF ME ALLSTAR WEEKEND 100056 A FACE LIKE THAT PET SHOP BOYS 100057 A HOLLY JOLLY CHRISTMAS LADY ANTEBELLUM 500164 A KIND OF HUSH HERMAN'S HERMITS 500165 A KISS IS A TERRIBLE THING (TO WASTE) MEAT LOAF 500166 A KISS TO BUILD A DREAM ON LOUIS ARMSTRONG 100058 A KISS WITH A FIST FLORENCE 100059 A LIGHT THAT NEVER COMES LINKIN PARK 500167 A LITTLE BIT LONGER JONAS BROTHERS 500168 A LITTLE BIT ME, A LITTLE BIT YOU THE MONKEES 500170 A LITTLE BIT MORE DR.
    [Show full text]
  • Thursday, 24 June 2021, with Nathalie Loiseau (Chair) Presiding
    European Parliament 2019-2024 Subcommittee on Security and Defence SEDE_PV(2021)0624_01 MINUTES Meeting of 24 June 2021, 16.00 - 17.00 BRUSSELS The meeting opened at 16.01 on Thursday, 24 June 2021, with Nathalie Loiseau (Chair) presiding. 1. Adoption of agenda SEDE_OJ(2021)0624_01 The agenda was adopted in the form shown in these minutes. 2. Chair's announcements Jointly with the Committee on Foreign Affairs and in association with the Delegation for relations with the United States 3. Exchange of views with Dr Amanda Sloat, Special Assistant to President Biden and Senior Director for Europe, National Security Council of the United States, on the EU-US relations Speakers: Nathalie Loiseau, David McAllister, Dr Amanda Sloat (US National Security Council), Radosław Sikorski, Željana Zovko, Sven Mikser, Petras Auštrevičius, Alviina Alametsä, Witold Jan Waszczykowski, Mick Wallace, Fabio Massimo Castaldo, Michael Gahler, Tonino Picula, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Reinhard Bütikofer, Anna Fotyga. 4. Any other business 5. Next meetings 28 June 2021, 14.00 – 15.00 (Brussels) PV\1236143EN.docx PE695.239v01-00 EN United in diversityEN 12 July 2021, 13.45 – 16.15 and 16.45 – 18.45 (Brussels) 13 July 2021, 9.00 – 12.00 and 13.45 – 16.15 and 16.45 – 18.45 (Brussels) The meeting closed at 17.12 on Thursday, 24 June 2021, with Nathalie Loiseau (Chair) presiding. PE695.239v01-00 2/6 PV\1236143EN.docx EN ПРИСЪСТВЕН ЛИСТ/LISTA DE ASISTENCIA/PREZENČNÍ LISTINA/DELTAGERLISTE/ ANWESENHEITSLISTE/KOHALOLIJATE NIMEKIRI/ΚΑΤΑΣΤΑΣΗ ΠΑΡΟΝΤΩΝ/RECORD OF ATTENDANCE/ LISTE
    [Show full text]
  • 11 NATO and the Partnership for Peace
    11 NATO and the Partnership for Peace Frank Boland1 uring 1989 and 1990, as the hold of the Soviet Union and the authority of com- munist regimes evaporated across the countries of Central and Eastern Europe, North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Allies attempted to make sense of Dthis new situation. There was unease that the old certainties of the Cold War era were being swept away without any guarantees that their replacements would be more comfortable to live with. There was disquiet that the security linkage with the United States, through NATO, might no longer be sustainable or, at least, might be substantially more difficult to sustain than it had been. The complete dissolution of the Soviet Union was barely conceiv- able at that time. Allies were also wrestling with the complexities of extremely challenging arms control agreements, while also trying to define the wider role of the Atlantic Alliance in a Europe where the Conference on Security Cooperation in Europe and, subsequently, the European Union would also be significant political players.2 As they contemplated these uncertainties, the idea began to take hold that the Alliance had to provide practical assis- tance and institutional structures to support emerging democratic institutions and states in resisting the almost inevitable pressures that could emerge and drag them back toward the authoritarian practices to which they had been accustomed for a generation, or more. In July 1990, in their London Summit Declaration, NATO Heads of State and Government extended the “hand of friendship” to the countries of the East that had been their adversaries in the Cold War.3 They also noted that NATO would adapt and could “help build the structures of a more united continent, supporting security and stability with the strength of our shared faith in democracy, the rights of the individual, and the peaceful resolution of disputes.”4 They also proposed that the countries of the former Warsaw Pact establish regular diplomatic liaison with the Atlantic Alliance.
    [Show full text]
  • Nato Enlargement: Qualifications and Contributions—Parts I–Iv Hearings
    S. HRG. 108–180 NATO ENLARGEMENT: QUALIFICATIONS AND CONTRIBUTIONS—PARTS I–IV HEARINGS BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED EIGHTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION MARCH 27, AND APRIL 1, 3 AND 8, 2003 Printed for the use of the Committee on Foreign Relations ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.access.gpo.gov/congress/senate U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 90–325 PDF WASHINGTON : 2003 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate 11-MAY-2000 17:42 Nov 12, 2003 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 90325 SFORELA1 PsN: SFORELA1 COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS RICHARD G. LUGAR, Indiana, Chairman CHUCK HAGEL, Nebraska JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., Delaware LINCOLN CHAFEE, Rhode Island PAUL S. SARBANES, Maryland GEORGE ALLEN, Virginia CHRISTOPHER J. DODD, Connecticut SAM BROWNBACK, Kansas JOHN F. KERRY, Massachusetts MICHAEL B. ENZI, Wyoming RUSSELL D. FEINGOLD, Wisconsin GEORGE V. VOINOVICH, Ohio BARBARA BOXER, California LAMAR ALEXANDER, Tennessee BILL NELSON, Florida NORM COLEMAN, Minnesota JOHN D. ROCKEFELLER IV, West Virginia JOHN E. SUNUNU, New Hampshire JON S. CORZINE, New Jersey KENNETH A. MYERS, JR., Staff Director ANTONY J. BLINKEN, Democratic Staff Director (II) VerDate 11-MAY-2000 17:42 Nov 12, 2003 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 90325 SFORELA1 PsN: SFORELA1 CONTENTS Thursday, March 27, 2003—Part I Page Allen, Hon. George, U.S. Senator from Virginia, opening statement .................
    [Show full text]
  • NATO Summit Guide Brussels, 11-12 July 2018
    NATO Summit Guide Brussels, 11-12 July 2018 A stronger and more agile Alliance The Brussels Summit comes at a crucial moment for the security of the North Atlantic Alliance. It will be an important opportunity to chart NATO’s path for the years ahead. In a changing world, NATO is adapting to be a more agile, responsive and innovative Alliance, while defending all of its members against any threat. NATO remains committed to fulfilling its three core tasks: collective defence, crisis management and cooperative security. At the Brussels Summit, the Alliance will make important decisions to further boost security in and around Europe, including through strengthened deterrence and defence, projecting stability and fighting terrorism, enhancing its partnership with the European Union, modernising the Alliance and achieving fairer burden-sharing. This Summit will be held in the new NATO Headquarters, a modern and sustainable home for a forward-looking Alliance. It will be the third meeting of Allied Heads of State and Government chaired by NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg. + Summit meetings + Member countries + Partners + NATO Secretary General Archived material – Information valid up to 10 July 2018 1 NATO Summit Guide, Brussels 2018 I. Strengthening deterrence and defence NATO’s primary purpose is to protect its almost one billion citizens and to preserve peace and freedom. NATO must also be vigilant against a wide range of new threats, be they in the form of computer code, disinformation or foreign fighters. The Alliance has taken important steps to strengthen its collective defence and deterrence, so that it can respond to threats from any direction.
    [Show full text]