DOCSLIB.ORG

(EC) No 798/2008 of 8 August 2008 Laying Down a List of Third Countries

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(EC) No 798/2008 of 8 August 2008 Laying Down a List of Third Countries 02008R0798 — EN — 01.01.2021 — 049.001 — 1 This text is meant purely as a documentation tool and has no legal effect. The Union's institutions do not assume any liability for its contents. The authentic versions of the relevant acts, including their preambles, are those published in the Official Journal of the European Union and available in EUR-Lex. Those official texts are directly accessible through the links embedded in this document ►B COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 798/2008 of 8 August 2008 laying down a list of third countries, territories, zones or compartments from which poultry and poultry products may be imported into and transit through the Community and the veterinary certification requirements (Text with EEA relevance) (OJ L 226, 23.8.2008, p. 1) Amended by: Official Journal No page date ►M1 Commission Regulation (EC) No 1291/2008 of 18 December 2008 L 340 22 19.12.2008 ►M2 Commission Regulation (EC) No 411/2009 of 18 May 2009 L 124 3 20.5.2009 ►M3 Commission Regulation (EU) No 215/2010 of 5 March 2010 L 76 1 23.3.2010 ►M4 Commission Regulation (EU) No 241/2010 of 8 March 2010 L 77 1 24.3.2010 ►M5 Commission Regulation (EU) No 254/2010 of 10 March 2010 L 80 1 26.3.2010 ►M6 Commission Regulation (EU) No 332/2010 of 22 April 2010 L 102 10 23.4.2010 ►M7 Commission Regulation (EU) No 925/2010 of 15 October 2010 L 272 1 16.10.2010 ►M8 amended by Commission Regulation (EU) No 364/2011 of 13 L 100 30 14.4.2011 April 2011 ►M9 Commission Regulation (EU) No 955/2010 of 22 October 2010 L 279 3 23.10.2010 ►M10 amended by Commission Regulation (EU) No 364/2011 of 13 L 100 30 14.4.2011 April 2011 ►M11 Commission Regulation (EU) No 364/2011 of 13 L 100 30 14.4.2011 April 2011 ►M12 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 427/2011 of 2 L 113 3 3.5.2011 May 2011 ►M13 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 536/2011 of 1 L 147 1 2.6.2011 June 2011 ►M14 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 991/2011 of 5 L 261 19 6.10.2011 October 2011 ►M15 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1132/2011 of 8 L 290 1 9.11.2011 November 2011 ►M16 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1380/2011 of 21 L 343 25 23.12.2011 December 2011 ►M17 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 110/2012 of 9 L 37 50 10.2.2012 February 2012 ►M18 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 393/2012 of 7 L 123 27 9.5.2012 May 2012 02008R0798 — EN — 01.01.2021 — 049.001 — 2 ►M19 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 532/2012 of 21 L 163 1 22.6.2012 June 2012 ►M20 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1162/2012 of 7 L 336 17 8.12.2012 December 2012 ►M21 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 88/2013 of 31 L 32 8 1.2.2013 January 2013 ►M22 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 191/2013 of 5 L 62 22 6.3.2013 March 2013 ►M23 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 437/2013 of 8 L 129 25 14.5.2013 May 2013 ►M24 Commission Regulation (EU) No 519/2013 of 21 February 2013 L 158 74 10.6.2013 ►M25 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 556/2013 of 14 L 164 13 18.6.2013 June 2013 ►M26 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 866/2013 of 9 L 241 4 10.9.2013 September 2013 ►M27 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1204/2013 of 25 L 316 6 27.11.2013 November 2013 ►M28 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 166/2014 of 17 L 54 2 22.2.2014 February 2014 ►M29 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 952/2014 of 4 L 273 1 13.9.2014 September 2014 ►M30 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/198 of 6 L 33 9 10.2.2015 February 2015 ►M31 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/243 of 13 L 41 5 17.2.2015 February 2015 ►M32 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/342 of 2 March 2015 L 60 31 4.3.2015 ►M33 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/526 of 27 L 84 30 28.3.2015 March 2015 ►M34 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/608 of 14 April 2015 L 101 1 18.4.2015 ►M35 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/796 of 21 May 2015 L 127 9 22.5.2015 ►M36 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/908 of 11 June 2015 L 148 11 13.6.2015 ►M37 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1153 of 14 July 2015 L 187 10 15.7.2015 ►M38 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1220 of 24 July 2015 L 197 1 25.7.2015 ►M39 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1349 of 3 August L 208 7 5.8.2015 2015 ►M40 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1363 of 6 August L 210 24 7.8.2015 2015 ►M41 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1884 of 20 October L 276 28 21.10.2015 2015 ►M42 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2258 of 4 December L 321 23 5.12.2015 2015 ►M43 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/15 of 7 January 2016 L 5 1 8.1.2016 ►M44 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/39 of 14 January L 11 3 16.1.2016 2016 ►M45 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/57 of 19 January L 13 49 20.1.2016 2016 ►M46 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/148 of 4 February L 30 17 5.2.2016 2016 02008R0798 — EN — 01.01.2021 — 049.001 — 3 ►M47 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/433 of 22 March L 76 29 23.3.2016 2016 ►M48 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/151 of 27 January L 23 7 28.1.2017 2017 ►M49 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/193 of 3 February L 31 13 4.2.2017 2017 ►M50 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/481 of 20 March L 75 15 21.3.2017 2017 ►M51 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1414 of 3 August L 203 4 4.8.2017 2017 ►M52 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1650 of 5 November L 275 10 6.11.2018 2018 ►M53 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/298 of 20 February L 50 20 21.2.2019 2019 ►M54 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1395 of 10 L 234 14 11.9.2019 September 2019 ►M55 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1872 of 7 November L 289 47 8.11.2019 2019 ►M56 Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/2124 of 10 October 2019 L 321 73 12.12.2019 ►M57 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/352 of 3 March 2020 L 65 4 4.3.2020 ►M58 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/393 of 11 March L 76 1 12.3.2020 2020 ►M59 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/544 of 20 April 2020 L 121I 1 20.4.2020 ►M60 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/626 of 7 May 2020 L 146 1 8.5.2020 ►M61 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1166 of 6 August L 258 11 7.8.2020 2020 ►M62 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1752 of 23 L 394 5 24.11.2020 November 2020 ►M63 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/2083 of 14 L 423 20 15.12.2020 December 2020 ►M64 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/2205 of 22 L 438 11 28.12.2020 December 2020 ►M65 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/24 of 13 January L 11 1 14.1.2021 2021 Corrected by: ►C1 Corrigendum, OJ L 124, 20.5.2010, p. 10 (215/2010) ►C2 Corrigendum, OJ L 147, 12.6.2015, p. 24 (2015/608) ►C3 Corrigendum, OJ L 326, 11.12.2015, p. 68 (2015/608) ►C4 Corrigendum, OJ L 326, 11.12.2015, p. 69 (2015/1884) 02008R0798 — EN — 17.01.2021 — 049.001 — 4 ▼B COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 798/2008 of 8 August 2008 laying down a list of third countries, territories, zones or compartments from which poultry and poultry products may be imported into and transit through the Community and the veterinary certification requirements (Text with EEA relevance) CHAPTER I SUBJECT MATTER, SCOPE AND DEFINITIONS Article 1 Subject matter and scope 1. This Regulation lays down veterinary certification requirements for imports into and transit, including storage during transit, through the Community of the following commodities (the commodities): (a) poultry, hatching eggs, day-old chicks and specified pathogen-free eggs; (b) meat, minced meat and mechanically separated meat of poultry, including ratites and wild game-birds, eggs and egg products. It lays down a list of third countries, territories, zones or compartments from which the commodities may be imported into the Community. 2. This Regulation shall not apply to poultry for exhibitions, shows or contests. 3. This Regulation shall apply without prejudice to specific certifi­ cation requirements provided for in Community agreements with third countries. Article 2 Definitions For the purposes of this Regulation, the following definitions shall apply: (1) ‘poultry’ means fowl, s, guinea fowl, ducks, geese, quails, pigeons, pheasants, partridges and ratites (ratitae), reared or kept in captivity for breeding, the production of meat or eggs for consumption, or for restocking supplies of game; (2) ‘hatching eggs’ means eggs for incubation, laid by poultry; (3) ‘day-old chicks’ means all poultry less than 72 hours old, not yet fed and muscovy ducks (Cairina moschata) or their crosses, less than 72 hours old whether or not fed; (4) ‘breeding poultry’ means poultry 72 hours old or more, intended for the production of hatching eggs; 02008R0798 — EN — 17.01.2021 — 049.001 — 5 ▼B (5) ‘productive poultry’ means poultry 72 hours old or more, reared for: (a) the production of meat and/or eggs for consumption; or (b) the restocking of supplies of game; (6) ‘specified pathogen-free eggs’ means hatching eggs which are derived from ‘chicken flocks free from specified pathogens’, as described in the European Pharmacopoeia (1 ), and which are intended solely for diagnostic, research or pharmaceutical use; (7) ‘meat’ means edible parts of the following animals: (a) poultry, which, when relating to meat, means farmed birds, including birds that are farmed as domestic animals without being considered as such, with the exception of ratites; (b) wild game-birds that are hunted for human consumption; (c) ratites; (8)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Perception of Local Geographical Specificity by the Population of Podolia
    88 ЕКОНОМІЧНА ТА СОЦІАЛЬНА ГЕОГРАФІЯ PERCEPTION OF LOCAL GEOGRAPHICAL SPECIFICITY BY THE POPULATION OF PODOLIA Oleksiy GNATIUK Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Ukraine [email protected] Abstract: The article reveals the perception of local geographical specificity by the population of Podolia. Attention is focused on five elements of the local geographical specificity: natural, historical and cultural monuments; prominent personalities; trademarks and producers of goods and services; the origin settlement names; figurative poetic names of settlements. The tasks were the following: to determine basic qualitative and quantitative parameters of regional image-geographical systems, to find the main regularities of their spatial organization, and, finally, to classify administrative-territorial units of the region according to the basic properties of image-geographic systems using specially worked out method. Analysis made it clear that the population of Podolia is characterized by a high level of reflection of the local geographic specificity. Local image-geographical systems from different parts of the region have different structure and level of development. In particular, image-geographical systems in Vinnytsia and Ternopil oblasts are well developed, stable and hierarchized, in Khmelnitskyi oblast it is just developing, dynamic and so quite unstable. To further disclosure the regularities and patterns of local geographical specificity perception, it is advisable to carry out case studies of image-geographic systems at the level of individual settlements. Key words: territorial identity, local geographical specificity, geographic image UDC: 911.3 СПРИЙНЯТТЯ МІСЦЕВОЇ ГЕОГРАФІЧНОЇ СПЕЦИФІКИ НАСЕЛЕННЯМ ПОДІЛЛЯ Олексій ГНАТЮК Київський національний університет імені Тараса Шевченка, Україна [email protected] Анотація: У статті розглянуто сприйняття місцевої географічної специфіки населенням Подільського регіону.
    [Show full text]
  • Photogrammetry ‑Based Spatial Analyses of Settlements in Severynivka and Nemyriv
    Baltic‑Pontic Studies vol. 21: 2016, 54‑68 ISSN 1231‑0344 Marcin Ławniczak* PHOTOGRAMMETRY ‑BASED SPATIAL ANALYSES OF SETTLEMENTS IN SEVERYNIVKA AND NEMYRIV ABSTRACT During the Polish‑Ukrainian archaeological project “Fortresses of Ukraine” it was proposed to study two of the most significant sites with the newest possible technology. The final decision was made to apply the digital photogrammetry that was acquired with the use of drones. Key words: photogrammetry, Scythian time, hillfort, fortification, defensive structures, Early Iron Age A significant obstacle towards the study of the settlements of the forest‑steppe zone in the Pontic area was their size and the construction of the fortifications. In Nemyriv the size of the settlement ranged from 100 ha [Smirnova 1996: 67] to 250 ha, with the final version being 145 ha [Daragan 2010: 38‑41]. Similar inaccu‑ racies were recorded for other sites. Due to the constant erosion of the escarpment, caused by the construction of a railway track in the 19th century, the area of sites is constantly decreasing. As a result, the descriptions presented by G.I. Smirnova [Smirnova 1961: 89‑92] and B.M. Lobay [Lobay 1986] are no longer valid. During the Polish ‑Ukrainian archaeological project “Fortresses of Ukraine”, it was proposed to study two of the most significant sites with the newest possible technology. Due to the size of the settlements in Nemyriv and Severynivka, the possibility of measuring the sites using ground methods was rejected. However, the application of LIDAR, which requires renting an airplane and employing a com‑ pany with the necessary equipment, would generate costs, exceeding the financial * Institute of Archaeology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Umultowska 89D, 61‑614 Poznań, Poland, e‑mail: [email protected] 55 possibilities of the project.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Cemetries, Synagogues, and Mass Grave Sites in Ukraine
    Syracuse University SURFACE Religion College of Arts and Sciences 2005 Jewish Cemetries, Synagogues, and Mass Grave Sites in Ukraine Samuel D. Gruber United States Commission for the Preservation of America’s Heritage Abroad Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/rel Part of the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Gruber, Samuel D., "Jewish Cemeteries, Synagogues, and Mass Grave Sites in Ukraine" (2005). Full list of publications from School of Architecture. Paper 94. http://surface.syr.edu/arc/94 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts and Sciences at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Religion by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. JEWISH CEMETERIES, SYNAGOGUES, AND MASS GRAVE SITES IN UKRAINE United States Commission for the Preservation of America’s Heritage Abroad 2005 UNITED STATES COMMISSION FOR THE PRESERVATION OF AMERICA’S HERITAGE ABROAD Warren L. Miller, Chairman McLean, VA Members: Ned Bandler August B. Pust Bridgewater, CT Euclid, OH Chaskel Besser Menno Ratzker New York, NY Monsey, NY Amy S. Epstein Harriet Rotter Pinellas Park, FL Bingham Farms, MI Edgar Gluck Lee Seeman Brooklyn, NY Great Neck, NY Phyllis Kaminsky Steven E. Some Potomac, MD Princeton, NJ Zvi Kestenbaum Irving Stolberg Brooklyn, NY New Haven, CT Daniel Lapin Ari Storch Mercer Island, WA Potomac, MD Gary J. Lavine Staff: Fayetteville, NY Jeffrey L. Farrow Michael B. Levy Executive Director Washington, DC Samuel Gruber Rachmiel
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Introduction
    State Service of Geodesy, Cartography and Cadastre State Scientific Production Enterprise “Kartographia” TOPONYMIC GUIDELINES For map and other editors For international use Ukraine Kyiv “Kartographia” 2011 TOPONYMIC GUIDELINES FOR MAP AND OTHER EDITORS, FOR INTERNATIONAL USE UKRAINE State Service of Geodesy, Cartography and Cadastre State Scientific Production Enterprise “Kartographia” ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Prepared by Nina Syvak, Valerii Ponomarenko, Olha Khodzinska, Iryna Lakeichuk Scientific Consultant Iryna Rudenko Reviewed by Nataliia Kizilowa Translated by Olha Khodzinska Editor Lesia Veklych ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ © Kartographia, 2011 ISBN 978-966-475-839-7 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction ................................................................ 5 2 The Ukrainian Language............................................ 5 2.1 General Remarks.............................................. 5 2.2 The Ukrainian Alphabet and Romanization of the Ukrainian Alphabet ............................... 6 2.3 Pronunciation of Ukrainian Geographical Names............................................................... 9 2.4 Stress .............................................................. 11 3 Spelling Rules for the Ukrainian Geographical Names....................................................................... 11 4 Spelling of Generic Terms ....................................... 13 5 Place Names in Minority Languages
    [Show full text]
  • State Building in Revolutionary Ukraine
    STATE BUILDING IN REVOLUTIONARY UKRAINE Unauthenticated Download Date | 3/31/17 3:49 PM This page intentionally left blank Unauthenticated Download Date | 3/31/17 3:49 PM STEPHEN VELYCHENKO STATE BUILDING IN REVOLUTIONARY UKRAINE A Comparative Study of Governments and Bureaucrats, 1917–1922 UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO PRESS Toronto Buffalo London Unauthenticated Download Date | 3/31/17 3:49 PM © University of Toronto Press Incorporated 2011 Toronto Buffalo London www.utppublishing.com Printed in Canada ISBN 978-1-4426-4132-7 Printed on acid-free, 100% post-consumer recycled paper with vegetable- based inks. Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publication Velychenko, Stephen State building in revolutionary Ukraine: a comparative study of governments and bureaucrats, 1917–1922/Stephen Velychenko. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-4426-4132-7 1. Ukraine – Politics and government – 1917–1945. 2. Public adminstration – Ukraine – History – 20th century. 3. Nation-building – Ukraine – History – 20th century 4. Comparative government. I. Title DK508.832.V442011 320.9477'09041 C2010-907040-2 The research for this book was made possible by University of Toronto Humanities and Social Sciences Research Grants, by the Katedra Foundation, and the John Yaremko Teaching Fellowship. This book has been published with the help of a grant from the Canadian Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences, through the Aid to Scholarly Publications Programme, using funds provided by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. University of Toronto Press acknowledges the fi nancial assistance to its publishing program of the Canada Council for the Arts and the Ontario Arts Council. University of Toronto Press acknowledges the fi nancial support of the Government of Canada through the Canada Book Fund for its publishing activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Cemeteries, Synagogues, and Mass Grave Sites in Ukraine
    JEWISH CEMETERIES, SYNAGOGUES, AND MASS GRAVE SITES IN UKRAINE United States Commission for the Preservation of America’s Heritage Abroad 2005 UNITED STATES COMMISSION FOR THE PRESERVATION OF AMERICA’S HERITAGE ABROAD Warren L. Miller, Chairman McLean, VA Members: Ned Bandler August B. Pust Bridgewater, CT Euclid, OH Chaskel Besser Menno Ratzker New York, NY Monsey, NY Amy S. Epstein Harriet Rotter Pinellas Park, FL Bingham Farms, MI Edgar Gluck Lee Seeman Brooklyn, NY Great Neck, NY Phyllis Kaminsky Steven E. Some Potomac, MD Princeton, NJ Zvi Kestenbaum Irving Stolberg Brooklyn, NY New Haven, CT Daniel Lapin Ari Storch Mercer Island, WA Potomac, MD Gary J. Lavine Staff: Fayetteville, NY Jeffrey L. Farrow Michael B. Levy Executive Director Washington, DC Samuel Gruber Rachmiel Liberman Research Director Brookline, MA Katrina A. Krzysztofiak Laura Raybin Miller Program Manager Pembroke Pines, FL Patricia Hoglund Vincent Obsitnik Administrative Officer McLean, VA 888 17th Street, N.W., Suite 1160 Washington, DC 20006 Ph: ( 202) 254-3824 Fax: ( 202) 254-3934 E-mail: [email protected] May 30, 2005 Message from the Chairman One of the principal missions that United States law assigns the Commission for the Preservation of America’s Heritage Abroad is to identify and report on cemeteries, monuments, and historic buildings in Central and Eastern Europe associated with the cultural heritage of U.S. citizens, especially endangered sites. The Congress and the President were prompted to establish the Commission because of the special problem faced by Jewish sites in the region: The communities that had once cared for the properties were annihilated during the Holocaust.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Introduction R a y B r a n d o n a n d W e n d y L o w e r Before the Second World War, the Jews of Ukraine constituted one of the largest Jewish populations in Europe.1 They were without a doubt the largest Jewish population within the Russian Empire and the Soviet Union.2 And between July 1940 and June 1941—af­ ter Stalin occupied the interwar Polish territories of eastern Gali­ cia and western Volhynia as well as the interwar Romanian territo­ ries of northern Bukovina and southern Bessarabia—the number of Jews in the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic (UkrSSR) rose to at least 2.45 million persons, thus making it for a brief period home to the largest Jewish population in Europe.3 Despite the size of Ukraine’s Jewish population, academics and laypersons alike have for over two generations tended to talk about the Holocaust in the Soviet Union, Poland, Romania, or Hungary, but not about the Holocaust in Ukraine, which is the subject of this book. The reason for this traditional approach is evident. Unlike any of the aforementioned countries, Ukraine from the mid-thir­ teenth until the mid-twentieth century was but an ensemble of disparate territories partitioned among several neighboring pow­ ers. Ukrainian efforts to establish a state in these lands in the aftermath of the First World War were thwarted by internecine factionalism as well as Polish national aspirations and Soviet rev­ olutionary ambitions. Between the Polish-Soviet peace of 1920 and the Nazi-Soviet pact of 1939, the lands of modern Ukraine were split among Poland (eastern Galicia and western Volhynia), Czechoslovakia (Transcarpathia), Romania (northern Bukovina and southern Bessarabia), and the Soviet Union.
    [Show full text]
  • Classic Palace Architecture of the Eastern Podillia in Ukraine: Historical Background and Key Factors
    ARCHITECTURE CIVIL ENGINEERING E NVIRONMENT The Silesian University of Technology No. 3/2018 doi : 10.21307/ACEE-2018-034 CLASSIC PALACE ARCHITECTURE OF THE EASTERN PODILLIA IN UKRAINE: HISTORICAL BACKGROUND AND KEY FACTORS Oksana KHOROSHA a*, Volodymyr SMOLIAK b a Grad. Student; Faculty of Civil Engineering, Thermal Power Engineering and Gas Supply, Vinnytsia National Technical University, 95 Khmelnytske shose, Vinnytsia, Ukraine, 21021 * E-mail address: [email protected] b PhD; Faculty of Civil Engineering, Thermal Power Engineering and Gas Supply, Vinnytsia National Technical University, 95 Khmelnytske shose, Vinnytsia, Ukraine Received: 14.04.2018; Revised: 24.07.2018; Accepted: 11.09.2018 Abstract The article deals with the palace architecture of the style of classicism in the Eastern Podillia in Ukraine of the late 18 th and early 20 th centuries, in the context of historical and socio-political backgrounds. This issue remains poorly studied, because it was not considered comprehensively for Eastern Podillia. The purpose of the article is to establish the factors and his - torical preconditions of the architecture of the palace complexes in accordance with the world tendencies and regional fea - tures of Eastern Podillia. The complex of general scientific and special research methods was applied in the work. It was established, that the palace architecture of Eastern Podillia was formed dependent on socio-economic and political changes in society, a complex of the main factors and worldview-cultural desires of the owners of estates. Determined, that the prin - ciples of the European classicism had an impact on the creation of conceptual features and typical signs of the palace com - plexes of the Eastern Podilia in the context of regional architectural tendencies and belonging to the territory of the Polish- Lithuanian Commonwealth in the 18 century.
    [Show full text]
  • Official Journal L 256 of the European Union
    Official Journal L 256 of the European Union Volume 64 English edition Legislation 19 July 2021 Contents II Non-legislative acts INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS ★ Council Decision (EU) 2021/1172 of 18 June 2021 on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Agreement with Respect to Time Limitations on Arrangements for the Provision of Aircraft with Crew between the European Union, the United States of America, Iceland, and the Kingdom of Norway . 1 REGULATIONS ★ Council Regulation (EU) 2021/1173 of 13 July 2021 on establishing the European High Performance Computing Joint Undertaking and repealing Regulation (EU) 2018/1488 . 3 ★ Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1174 of 12 July 2021 approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications ‘Asparago di Badoere’ (PGI) . 52 ★ Commission Regulation (EU) 2021/1175 of 16 July 2021 amending Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the use of polyols in certain energy-reduced confectionery products (1) . 53 ★ Commission Regulation (EU) 2021/1176 of 16 July 2021 amending Annexes III, V, VII and IX to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards genotyping of positive TSE cases in goats, the determination of age in ovine and caprine animals, the measures applicable in a herd or flock with atypical scrapie and the conditions for imports of products of bovine, ovine and caprine origin (1) . 56 ★ Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1177 of 16 July 2021 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/408 as regards the deletion of propoxycarbazone from the list of active substances to be considered as candidates for substitution (1) .
    [Show full text]
  • Viva Xpress Logistics (Uk)
    VIVA XPRESS LOGISTICS (UK) Tel : +44 1753 210 700 World Xpress Centre, Galleymead Road Fax : +44 1753 210 709 SL3 0EN Colnbrook, Berkshire E-mail : [email protected] UNITED KINGDOM Web : www.vxlnet.co.uk Selection ZONE FULL REPORT Filter : Sort : Group : Code Zone Description ZIP CODES From To Agent UA UAAOD00 UA-Ukraine AOD - 4 days POLISKE 07000 - 07004 VILCHA 07011 - 07012 RADYNKA 07024 - 07024 RAHIVKA 07033 - 07033 ZELENA POLIANA 07035 - 07035 MAKSYMOVYCHI 07040 - 07040 MLACHIVKA 07041 - 07041 HORODESCHYNA 07053 - 07053 KRASIATYCHI 07053 - 07053 SLAVUTYCH 07100 - 07199 IVANKIV 07200 - 07204 MUSIIKY 07211 - 07211 DYTIATKY 07220 - 07220 STRAKHOLISSIA 07225 - 07225 OLYZARIVKA 07231 - 07231 KROPYVNIA 07234 - 07234 ORANE 07250 - 07250 VYSHGOROD 07300 - 07304 VYSHHOROD 07300 - 07304 RUDNIA DYMERSKA 07312 - 07312 KATIUZHANKA 07313 - 07313 TOLOKUN 07323 - 07323 DYMER 07330 - 07331 KOZAROVYCHI 07332 - 07332 HLIBOVKA 07333 - 07333 LYTVYNIVKA 07334 - 07334 ZHUKYN 07341 - 07341 PIRNOVE 07342 - 07342 TARASIVSCHYNA 07350 - 07350 HAVRYLIVKA 07350 - 07350 RAKIVKA 07351 - 07351 SYNIAK 07351 - 07351 LIUTIZH 07352 - 07352 NYZHCHA DUBECHNIA 07361 - 07361 OSESCHYNA 07363 - 07363 KHOTIANIVKA 07363 - 07363 PEREMOGA 07402 - 07402 SKYBYN 07407 - 07407 DIMYTROVE 07408 - 07408 LITKY 07411 - 07411 ROZHNY 07412 - 07412 PUKHIVKA 07413 - 07413 ZAZYMIA 07415 - 07415 POHREBY 07416 - 07416 KALYTA 07420 - 07422 MOKRETS 07425 - 07425 RUDNIA 07430 - 07430 BOBRYK 07431 - 07431 SHEVCHENKOVE 07434 - 07434 TARASIVKA 07441 - 07441 VELIKAYA DYMERKA 07442 - 07442 VELYKA
    [Show full text]
  • Eugenics and Racial Anthropology in the Ukrainian Radical Nationalist Tradition
    Science in Context (2019), 32,67–91 doi:10.1017/S0269889719000048 RESEARCH ARTICLE Eugenics and racial anthropology in the Ukrainian radical nationalist tradition Per Anders Rudling Lund University, Lund, Sweden and National University of Singapore, Singapore Emails: [email protected], [email protected] Argument Eugenics and race played significant roles in Ukrainian interwar nationalism, yet remain largely unstudied. The Ukrainian nationalists’ understanding of the racial makeup of their imagined community was contradictory as they struggled to reconcile their desire for racial “purity” with the realities of significant variations between the populations inhabiting the enormous territories which they sought to include in their intended state project. The “turn to the right” over the 1930s placed an increased onus on race, and eugenics came to occupy an increasingly prominent place in Ukrainian radical nationalism from around 1936. In 1941, the leading Ukrainian far-right organization, the OUN had developed a project for eugenic engineering, for their aborted state, declared in L’viv on June 30, 1941. Racial conceptualiza- tions of the Ukrainian community figured prominently well into the Cold War era, gaining a new actuality and meaning in an émigré community dispersed across several countries. Keywords: Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists; eugenics; race; Teodosius Dobzhansky; Iaroslav Stets’ko; Dmytro Dontsov; anti-Semitism Introduction Only in recent years has the intellectual history of eugenics in Eastern Europe become the sub- ject of a more systematic academic inquiry. A number of important studies have significantly expanded our understanding of eugenic thought in the European states that emerged following the collapse of the multiethnic empires at the end of World War I (Turda and Weindling 2007; Boskovic and Hann 2013; Felder and Weindling 2013; Turda 2015).
    [Show full text]
  • Hasidism: Ukrainian Origins and the World Context
    Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe Volume 40 Issue 8 Article 4 10-2020 Hasidism: Ukrainian Origins and the World Context Ihor Turov National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine Serhii Ishchuk Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/ree Part of the Christianity Commons, and the Eastern European Studies Commons Recommended Citation Turov, Ihor and Ishchuk, Serhii (2020) "Hasidism: Ukrainian Origins and the World Context," Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe: Vol. 40 : Iss. 8 , Article 4. Available at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/ree/vol40/iss8/4 This Article, Exploration, or Report is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ George Fox University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ George Fox University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HАSIDISM: UKRAINIAN ORIGIN AND THE WORLD CONTEXT By Ihor Turov and Serhii Ishchuk Ihor Turov, Doctor of Historical Sciences, Senior Researcher at I.F. Kuras Institute of Political and Ethnic Studies of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. Associate Professor of the National University “Kyevo-Mogilyanska Academiya.” Research interests: history of rabbinical teachings, Cabbala, and Hasidism. E-Mail: [email protected]. Serhii Ishchuk, Candidate of Philosophical Sciences, Associate Professor, independent researcher, Kyiv, Ukraine. Research interests: culture, religious anthropology, religious communication, dialogue, and adaptation processes in modern society. E-Mail: [email protected] Abstract The article represents an overview of the history and specificity of the teachings of the Jewish religious movement called Hasidism. In the introductory part, the foundations of the teachings and social organization of this community are considered.
    [Show full text]