DOCSLIB.ORG

Rudolf Von Jhering's Influence on Karl Llewellyn

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Tulsa Law Review Volume 48 Issue 1 Summer 2012 Rudolf von Jhering's Influence on Karl Llewellyn Julie E. Grise Martin Gelter Robert Whitman Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.utulsa.edu/tlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Julie E. Grise, Martin Gelter, & Robert Whitman, Rudolf von Jhering's Influence on Karl Llewellyn, 48 Tulsa L. Rev. 93 (2013). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.utulsa.edu/tlr/vol48/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by TU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Tulsa Law Review by an authorized editor of TU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Grise et al.: Rudolf von Jhering's Influence on Karl Llewellyn RUDOLF VON JHERING'S INFLUENCE ON KARL LLEWELLYN Julie E. Gris6,* Martin Gelter,** & Robert Whitman*** PART I. AN OVERVIEW OF THE LIFE AND WORK OF KARL LLEWELLYN ....................... 96 A. The Early Years of Karl Llewellyn: Life, Education, and Career ............... 96 B. The Later Years of Karl Llewellyn: Scholarship and Philosophy ............... 98 P A R T 11............................................................................................................................ 10 4 A. German Jurisprudence in the 19 th Century ..................................................... 104 B. The Early Years of Rudolf von Jhering: Life and Education ......................... 106 C. The Later Years of Rudolf von Jhering: Scholarship and Philosophy ........... 107 PART III. THE INFLUENCE OF GERMAN JURISPRUDENCE ON AMERICAN JURISPRUDENTIAL THEORY AND THOUGHT ......................................................... 109 A. The Foundations in America for the Reception of German Jurisprudence .... 109 B. The Germ an Free Law M ovem ent ................................................................. 110 C. Reception of the Free Law Movement in the United States ........................... 113 PART IV. RUDOLF VON JHERING'S INFLUENCE OF THE LIFE AND WORK OF KARL L LE W E LL Y N ......................................................................................................... 1 14 A . D ism issal of Germ an Jurisprudence ............................................................... 114 PA RT V . C O N C LU SION ....................................................................................................116 Karl Llewellyn I is today considered one of the most prominent representatives of * Legal Counsel with the Connecticut House Republican Office, J.D. 2009, University of Connecticut School of Law. ** Associate Professor of Law, Fordham University School of Law. *** Professor of Law, University of Connecticut School of Law. The authors wish to thank Amrita Singh and Renae Flemmings, J.D. 2010, for their editing assistance, and Professor Stephan Utz for valuable sugges- tions. 1. The breadth and scope of Karl Llewellyn's lifetime of experiences and work is remarkable in today's era of legal concentration and specialization. Llewellyn's contributions, whether in his academic, professional Published by TU Law Digital Commons, 2012 1 Tulsa Law Review, Vol. 48 [2012], Iss. 1, Art. 4 TULSA LAW RE VIEW Vol. 48:1 the American Legal Realist School. Although American legal realism is no longer the predominant school of jurisprudence in the United States, it still plays an important role in the formation of our legal traditions. Consider President Obama's recent statement concerning the candidate successfully nominated to the United States Supreme Court: I will seek someone who understands that justice isn't about some abstract legal theory or footnote in a case book, it is also about how our laws affect the daily re- alities of people's lives, whether they can make a living, and care for their fami- lies, whether they feel safe in their homes, and welcome in their own nation.3 Several of Llewellyn's contemporaries in the American legal academy, including Arthur Corbin, 4 Jerome Frank 5 and Roscoe Pound 6 have been cited as influences on his or personal life, are demonstrative of a unique ability to approach situations with a new and revolutionary per- spective. Throughout his life, Llewellyn compiled an impressive and lengthy list of "singular" accomplish- ments, including but not limited to: the only American ever to have been awarded the Iron Cross; the most fer- tile and inventive legal scholar of his generation; legal theory's most colorful personality since Jeremy Bentham, the only common lawyer known to have collaborated successfully with an anthropologist on a major work; a rare example of a law-teacher poet; the chief architect of the most ambitious law code of recent times; the most romantic of legal realists and the most down-to-earth of legal theorists; the most ardently evangelical of legal skeptics; the most unmethodical of methodologists; the least controvertible of claims, the possessor of one of the most exotic prose styles in all legal literature. See ROBERT WHITMAN, SOIA MENTSCHIKOFF & KARL LLEWELLYN: A COMPILATION OF ARTICLES ABOUT Two ICONIC LAW PROFESSORS (The Graduate Group 2011); Karl Llewellyn & William Twining, Two Works of Karl Llewellyn, 30 MOD. L. REV. 514, 514-15 (1967). See also N. E. H. HULL, ROSCOE POUND AND KARL LLEWELLYN: SEARCHING FOR AN AMERICAN JURISPRUDENCE 224 (1997). As Dean of Harvard Law School, Roscoe Pound is one of the most influential figures in the American legal realism. Roscoe Pound was both Llewellyn's critic and ally. "[H]e was also the mentor of a generation ofjurisprudents, the patron of many young scholars, and the best-placed American aca- demic jurisprudent of his time." Id. 2. See David E. Ingersoll, Karl Llewellyn, American Legal Realism, and Contemporary Legal Behavior- alism, 76 ETHICS 253, 253 (1966). Jerome Frank was born in New York in 1889, and served as ajudge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in 1941. Llewellyn and Frank were close friends as well as prominent figures in legal realist thought. Despite their deaths (1957 and 1962 respectively), their views continue to influence many legal theories today. Id. at 253-54. In describing legal realism, Ingersoll notes that the realists performed an extremely valuable and successful "ground-breaking" task in introducing social sci- ence methodology in legal scholarship. Indeed, when one compares the assumptions and the concepts of con- temporary legal behavioralism with those of the realists, one is stuck by an amazing similarity. It appears as though the modem "radicals" of legal scholarship are very much the intellectual progeny of the old realists. Id. at 253. Legal realism is also thought of as having influenced or having the led the way for the infusion of eco- nomic analysis into contemporary legal thought. See, e.g., Kristoffel R. Grechenig & Martin Gelter, The Trans- atlantic Divergence in Legal Thought: American Law and Economics vs. German Doctrinalism, 31 HASTINGS COMP. & INT'L L. REV. 295, 316-19 (2008) (arguing that the widespread acceptance of realist ideas was a pre- condition for the success of economic analysis of law); Joseph William Singer, Legal Realism Now, 76 CALIF. L. REV. 465, 516 (1988) (reviewing LAURA KALMAN, LEGAL REALISM AT YALE: 1927-1960 (1986)) ("[theo- ries] associated with legal process, rights theory, and law and economics all attempt to absorb the insights of legal realism . j..."). 3. Jake Tapper & Sunlen Miller, POTUS Interrupts Press Briefing to Announce Souter's Retirement, An- nounce Qualificationsfor Next Supreme, ABC NEWS (May 1, 2009, 3:45 PM). In his May I statement, Presi- dent Obama also stated: I view that quality of empathy, of understanding and identifying with people's hopes and struggles, as an essential ingredient for arriving as just decisions and outcomes. I will seek somebody who is dedicated to the rule, who honors our constitutional traditions, who respects the integrity of the judi- cial process and the appropriate limits of the judicial role. I will seek somebody who shares my re- spect for constitutional values on which this nation was founded and who brings a thoughtful under- standing of how to apply them in our time. Id. 4. Early Years, 1869-1916, Arthur L. Corbin, YALE LAW SCHOOL, http://www.law.yale.edu/cbl/3075.htm (last visited July 8, 2012). Even though Llewellyn referred to Corbin as "Dad" and considered him a "Realist," Corbin never formally accepted the realist label. Instead, he responded to Llewellyn: "I can join cheerfully with you and your kind of 'Realism' but I never wanted to belong to the 'Realist School' or any other School (ex- https://digitalcommons.law.utulsa.edu/tlr/vol48/iss1/4 2 Grise et al.: Rudolf von Jhering's Influence on Karl Llewellyn 2012 RUDOLF VON JHERING 'S INFLUENCE thinking. Given his significant links with the German legal academy, it is not surprising that Llewellyn's work appears also to have benefited from his acquaintance with the work of German-speaking contemporaries and predecessors. In particular, Llewellyn's debt to the work of Rudolf von Jhering 7 deserves exploration. The purpose of this Article is to shed light on the influence of Rudolf von Jhering on Karl Llewellyn. Part I offers a brief overview of Llewellyn's life, education, major work, and jurisprudential philosophy. 8 Part II offers the same overview for Jhering. 9 Part III gives a general account of the influence of German jurisprudence on American juri s- prudential theory and thought. 10 Finally, Part IV surveys the recognized influence from German jurisprudence
Recommended publications
  • The Virtue of Vulnerability

    The Virtue of Vulnerability

    THE VIRTUE OF VULNERABILITY Nathalie Martin* My vulnerability to my own life is irrefutable. Nor do I wish it to be otherwise, As vulnerability is a guardian of integrity. Anne Truitt, sculptor and psychologist Ten years ago, vulnerability scholar Martha Fineman began examining how vulnerability connects us as human beings and what the universal human condition of vulnerability says about the obligations of the state to its institutions and individuals.1 Central to Fineman’s work is recognition that vulnerability is universal, constant, and inherent in the human condition.2 Fineman has spent the past decade examining how structures of our society will manage our common vulnerabilities, in hopes of using these vulnerabilities to move society toward a new vision of equality.3 While Fineman focuses on how vulnerability can transform society as a whole, here I examine the role of vulnerability in transforming individual relationships, particularly the attorney-client relationship. I argue that lawyers can benefit greatly by showing their vulnerabilities to clients. As a common syllogism goes, “All men are mortal. Socrates is a man. Therefore, Socrates is mortal.”4 Similarly, we could say that a particular * I am grateful for Nancy Huffstutler, who first brought the virtue of vulnerability into my conciseness, to my colleagues Jennifer Laws and Ernesto Longa for their fine research assistance, my friend John Brandt for teaching me what doctors know about vulnerability, for my friends Jenny Moore and Fred Hart, and my beautiful husband Stewart Paley. I also thank my wonderful editor, William Dietz. 1. Martha A. Fineman, The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition, 20 YALE J.L.
  • Rediscovering Williston

    Rediscovering Williston

    St. John's University School of Law St. John's Law Scholarship Repository Faculty Publications 2005 Rediscovering Williston Mark L. Movsesian St. John's University School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/faculty_publications Part of the Contracts Commons, Jurisprudence Commons, Legal Biography Commons, and the Legal History Commons This Article is brought to you for free and open access by St. John's Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of St. John's Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Rediscovering Williston Mark L. Movsesian* Abstract This Article is an intellectualhistory of classicalcontracts scholar Samuel Williston. Professor Movsesian argues that the conventional account of Williston's jurisprudencepresents an incomplete and distortedpicture. While much of Williston 's work can strike a contemporary readeras arid and conceptual, there are strong elements ofpragmatismas well. Williston insists that doctrine be justified in terms of real-world consequences, maintains that rules can have only presumptive force, and offers institutionalexplanations forjudicial restraint. As a result, his scholarship shares more in common with today's new formalism than commonly supposed. Even the undertheorizedquality of Williston 's scholarship-to contemporary readers, the least appealing aspect of his work-makes a certain amount of sense, given his goals and intended audience.
  • In Quest of a Theory for Lawyering: Some Hypotheses and a Tribute to Dean Soia Mentschikoff

    In Quest of a Theory for Lawyering: Some Hypotheses and a Tribute to Dean Soia Mentschikoff

    University of Miami Law Review Volume 29 Number 2 Article 5 1-1-1975 In Quest of a Theory for Lawyering: Some Hypotheses and a Tribute to Dean Soia Mentschikoff Charles D. Kelso Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/umlr Recommended Citation Charles D. Kelso, In Quest of a Theory for Lawyering: Some Hypotheses and a Tribute to Dean Soia Mentschikoff, 29 U. Miami L. Rev. 159 (1975) Available at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/umlr/vol29/iss2/5 This Leading Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Miami Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. university of miami law review VOLUME 29 WINTER 1975 NUMBER 2 IN QUEST OF A THEORY FOR LAWYERING. SOME HYPOTHESES AND A TRIBUTE TO DEAN SOIA MENTSCHIKOFF CHARLES D. KELSO* I. INTRODU CTION ............................................................ 159 II. A THEORY OF LAWYER COMPETENCIES ...................................... 161 III. TEACHING STRATEGY SKILLS FOR REACHING LAWYER DECISIONS: A CLASS TAUGHT BY DEAN SOIA MENTSCHIKOFF ............................. 176 IV . A DDEN DU M ............................................................... 195 I. INTRODUCTION A conference on future research possibilities was held in San Francisco on September 27 and 28, 1974, by the Law School Admis- sions Council. The conferees devised research policy for approximately the next five years. Top priority was assigned to the study of career performance criteria for law school admission. In short, the L.S.A.C.
  • Summary of Academical Accomplishments 1. Christoph-Eric

    Summary of Academical Accomplishments 1. Christoph-Eric

    Summary of academical accomplishments 1. Christoph-Eric Mecke 2. Diploma of general studies of French law (“Diplôme d'Études Juridiques Générales Françaises”) at the Faculty of Law and Economics of the University of Tours (France) obtained in 1986 after completing studies in France during one year. Diploma after legal studies at the Faculty of Law at the Georg August University in Göttingen obtained in 1991 (first state law examination). Diploma after a two-year law application in courts, public administration, public prosecutor's office and private law offices, conferral of the title of an assessor of law (entitles in Germany to practice as judge, prosecutor and attorney) granted by the High Court of Lower Saxony in Celle in 2007 (second state law examination). Degree of a Doctor of Legal Science awarded by the Council of the Faculty of Law at the Georg August University in Göttingen on July 17, 2007 on the basis of a comprehensive law examination (“Rigorosum”) and the presented monographic dissertation entitled Begriff und System des Rechts bei Georg Friedrich Puchta [= Concept and legal system in the legal thought of Georg Friedrich Puchta] marked with the highest possible final grade “summa cum laude”. 3. Information on employment in academic positions: 1991-1993 - junior researcher at the Department of Legal Theory at the Faculty of Law at the Georg August University in Göttingen; from February 1, 2008 to March 31, 2016 – researcher at the Department of Civil Law and History of Law and lecturer at the Faculty of Law at the Leibniz University in Hanover, there I’m still an academic teacher in the field of legal history from April 15, 2016 to December 31, 2017 – researcher at the Department of Roman Law and Pandetics at the Faculty of Law of the Georg August University in Göttingen; from January 1, 2018 until today – researcher and lecturer at the Brunswick European Law School at the Ostfalia University of Applied Sciences in Brunswick (Braunschweig).
  • Universidade Federal Do Rio Grande Do Sul (Ppgdir – UFRGS), Cujo Tema Foi “Puchta E a Ciência Das Pandectas”

    Universidade Federal Do Rio Grande Do Sul (Ppgdir – UFRGS), Cujo Tema Foi “Puchta E a Ciência Das Pandectas”

    A CIÊNCIA DO DIREITO NA CONCEPÇÃO DE GEORG FRIEDRICH PUCHTA1 Albenir Itaboraí Querubini Gonçalves2 RESUMO: O presente trabalho analisa a compreensão do jurista alemão Georg Friederich Puchta sobre a Ciência do Direito e seus principais temas. PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Ciência do Direito. Escola Histórica do Direito. Metodologia do Direito. Fontes do Direito. Jurisprudence in Georg Friederich Puchta’s thought ABSTRACT: The present essay examines the German jurist Georg Friederich Puchta's understanding of Jurisprudence and its main themes. KEY WORDS: Jurisprudence. German Historical School of Law. Methodology of Law. Sources of Law. SUMÁRIO: 1 Introdução. 2 Breves apontamentos sobre a vida e a obra de Puchta. 3 Ideias iniciais: Ciência do Direito, diferenças e relações entre a Filosofia do Direito e a Jurisprudência, sistema e História do Direito, objeto da Ciência do Direito. 4 Sobre o desenvolvimento da ideia do Direito na história. 5 Sobre a origem e fontes do Direito, o Direito Consuetudinário, o Direito Legislativo, o Direito Científico, os modos de reconhecer o Direito e a sua mutação. 6 Considerações finais. 7 Referências bibliográficas. “A vida no tempo é um perene movimento, uma ininterrupta sucessão”. (Puchta) 1 INTRODUÇÃO O presente trabalho tem por finalidade realizar uma análise sobre a ideia e compreensão da Ciência do Direito (ou Jurisprudência) segundo a concepção desenvolvida pelo jurista alemão Georg Friedrich Puchta, que foi integrante da chamada Escola Histórica do Direito3, além de ser considerado o principal discípulo de Friedrich Carl von Savigny (1772-1840). 1 O presente texto foi elaborado com base em apresentação realizada no Seminário apresentado no dia 19 de outubro de 2009, na Disciplina “Temas de História do Direito: II – Codificação e Ciência Jurídica no Séc.
  • Holmes, Cardozo, and the Legal Realists: Early Incarnations of Legal Pragmatism and Enterprise Liability

    Holmes, Cardozo, and the Legal Realists: Early Incarnations of Legal Pragmatism and Enterprise Liability

    Holmes, Cardozo, and the Legal Realists: Early Incarnations of Legal Pragmatism and Enterprise Liability EDMUND URSIN* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 538 II. SETTING THE STAGE: TORT AND CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AT THE TURN OF THE TWENTIETH CENTURY ............................................................................ 545 III. HOLMES AND THE PATH OF THE LAW ................................................................. 550 A. Holmes and the Need for Judicial Creativity in Common Law Subjects ............................................................................................ 550 B. The Path Not Followed ............................................................................ 554 IV. THE INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT CRISIS, THE WORKERS’ COMPENSATION SOLUTION, AND A CONSTITUTIONAL CONFRONTATION ....................................... 558 A. The Industrial Accident Crisis and the Workers’ Compensation Solution ............................................................................ 558 * © 2013 Edmund Ursin. Professor of Law, University of San Diego School of Law. Thanks to Richard Posner for valuable comments on an earlier draft of this Article and to Roy Brooks and Kevin Cole for always helpful comments on previous articles upon which I expand in this Article. See Edmund Ursin, Clarifying the Normative Dimension of Legal Realism: The Example of Holmes’s The Path of the Law, 49 SAN DIEGO L. REV. 487 (2012) [hereinafter Ursin, Clarifying];
  • A Nice Place to Lib & Learn

    A Nice Place to Lib & Learn

    Jessica, also attended Normal College. ITH THE turn of the century, Today, Miss Eagleson is one of the old- life for women began to be est living Hunter alumnae. W slightly less restrictive. By 1900, Hunter's "Normal Five," the col- At ninety-three, she is a sprightly, dimin- A Nice Place to Lib & Learn lege's first basketball team-dressed in utive woman who has retained a biting bloomers with their hair piled demurely sense of humor and a clear vision of the in buns-had already traveled to Staten past. Miss Eagleson, who never married, Island and Southhampton to play. Hunter College, established as Normal College more than 102 enrolled in Normal College at age 14 in 1894 and took what was then called the In 1906, Miss Annie E. Hickenbottom, a years ago, has always offered bold, educational opportunities classical course, graduating five years warm-hearted, merry and sympathetic later in 1899. woman who wore a pince-nez, was ap- to women.. In fact, it> still a far from normal place. Interviewed in her 79th Street apartment pointed superintendent. Soon after- overlooking the East River, Miss Eagle- wards, her duties were enlarged and she son vividly recalled a New York City became the first dean ,of students-a post she held until her retirement in 1934. By Joan Dim without skyscrapers and pollution. She described Hunter College's first perma- The college was growing and rapidly nent building, which was opened in 1873 gaining status in the community. In 1909, and which burned down in 1936. the faculty marched in full academic re- .ORIA STEINEM and Germaine in the United States to provide a free galia.
  • Rules of Law, Laws of Science

    Rules of Law, Laws of Science

    Rules of Law, Laws of Science Wai Chee Dimock* My Essay is a response to legal realism,' to its well-known arguments against "rules of law." Legal realism, seeing itself as an empirical practice, was not convinced that there could be any set of rules, formalized on the grounds of logic, that would have a clear determinative power on the course of legal action or, more narrowly, on the outcome of litigated cases. The decisions made inside the courtroom-the mental processes of judges and juries-are supposedly guided by rules. Realists argued that they are actually guided by a combination of factors, some social and some idiosyncratic, harnessed to no set protocol. They are not subject to the generalizability and predictability that legal rules presuppose. That very presupposition, realists said, creates a gap, a vexing lack of correspondence, between the language of the law and the world it purports to describe. As a formal system, law operates as a propositional universe made up of highly technical terms--estoppel, surety, laches, due process, and others-accompanied by a set of rules governing their operation. Law is essentially definitional in this sense: It comes into being through the specialized meanings of words. The logical relations between these specialized meanings give it an internal order, a way to classify cases into actionable categories. These categories, because they are definitionally derived, are answerable only to their internal logic, not to the specific features of actual disputes. They capture those specific features only imperfectly, sometimes not at all. They are integral and unassailable, but hollowly so.
  • New Legal Realism at Ten Years and Beyond Bryant Garth

    New Legal Realism at Ten Years and Beyond Bryant Garth

    UC Irvine Law Review Volume 6 Article 3 Issue 2 The New Legal Realism at Ten Years 6-2016 Introduction: New Legal Realism at Ten Years and Beyond Bryant Garth Elizabeth Mertz Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.uci.edu/ucilr Part of the Law and Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Bryant Garth & Elizabeth Mertz, Introduction: New Legal Realism at Ten Years and Beyond, 6 U.C. Irvine L. Rev. 121 (2016). Available at: https://scholarship.law.uci.edu/ucilr/vol6/iss2/3 This Foreword is brought to you for free and open access by UCI Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in UC Irvine Law Review by an authorized editor of UCI Law Scholarly Commons. Garth & Mertz UPDATED 4.14.17 (Do Not Delete) 4/19/2017 9:40 AM Introduction: New Legal Realism at Ten Years and Beyond Bryant Garth* and Elizabeth Mertz** I. Celebrating Ten Years of New Legal Realism ........................................................ 121 II. A Developing Tradition ............................................................................................ 124 III. Current Realist Directions: The Symposium Articles ....................................... 131 Conclusion: Moving Forward ....................................................................................... 134 I. CELEBRATING TEN YEARS OF NEW LEGAL REALISM This symposium commemorates the tenth year that a body of research has formally flown under the banner of New Legal Realism (NLR).1 We are very pleased * Chancellor’s Professor of Law, University of California, Irvine School of Law; American Bar Foundation, Director Emeritus. ** Research Faculty, American Bar Foundation; John and Rylla Bosshard Professor, University of Wisconsin Law School. Many thanks are owed to Frances Tung for her help in overseeing part of the original Tenth Anniversary NLR conference, as well as in putting together some aspects of this Symposium.
  • Security and Freedom-That Is Today’S Great Challenge

    Security and Freedom-That Is Today’S Great Challenge

    SECURITYand FREEDOM the GREAT CHALLENGE Thirtieth Annual Report of the American Civil Liberties Union Dedicated to ROGER N. BALDWIN Esecntive Director 1920-1910 JOHN HAYNES HOLMES Chairman of the Board of Directors 1940- 19 T 0 EDWARD A. ROSS Chairman of the National Committee 1940-1950 with Respect, Gratitude and Affection TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION--“A FREE NATION OF FREE PEOPLE” 5 SECURITY AND CIVIL LIBERTIES .,.. 10 A. GENERAL ANTI-SEDITION LBGISLAI‘IVE EFFORTS 10 1. The McCarran Act ,. .,, 10 2. “Little McCarran” Acts 3. The Smith Act .,. ,.,..... ,.. :i 4. House Un-American Activities Committee ,........ .,............ 5. House Lobbying Committee ::, 6. State Investigations 17 B. SKIJRITY AND LOYAL’IY AMONG EMPLOYEES 17 1. Federal Program 2. The McCarthy Charges ::, 3. State and Local Programs; 4. Private Programs’ 22 C. OTHER THREATS TO FREEDOM OF OPINION 25 1. General Free Speech .,,....,,..,.... 2. Radio and Movies ., :: 3. Magazines and Books ..,. .._........... 29 4. Schools and Colleges .._.......... 5. Labor Unions .._...... 6. Aliens .._ .,..... .,.. .._ 7. Conscientious Objection __....,.._.........._.,..,,.......,,........................... D. OTHER THREATS TO DUE PROCESS OF LAW 1. Wiretapping ..,,...., .,..... 2. Bail Cases 3. Picketing of Courts 4. Grand Juries 38 THE FIRST FREEDOM .._............... 39 A. GENERAL FREE EXPRESSION .._.............................. B. LABOR ,,., . .. .. .. .. .. :; C. CENSORSHIP .,,,,.. ,.,... 40 D. RELIGION .,.. 44 DUE PROCESS OF LAW ,. 46 A. WIRETAPPING ,, ., .,,.... ..,...,_ .,, .,... .., .,.. 46 B. FAIR TRIAL .., 48 C. PUNISHMENT ,,... ,, 49 EQUALITY 49 A. MINORITIES ..~... 50 B. STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACTIVITIES .._......... .._...... 53 1. Employment and Education .._ 2. Housing and Public Accommodations :; 3. Voting and Fair Trial .,.... ,... 55 C. PRIVATE ORGANIZATIONS 56 1. Social 56 2.
  • A Student's Tribute to Fritz Kessler

    A Student's Tribute to Fritz Kessler

    A Student's Tribute to Fritz Kessler John K. McNulty t Fritz Kessler beamed as he sat down for a lunch to celebrate his ninety- third birthday last August at the home of Joan and Egon von Kaschnitz (the daughter and son-in-law of the late Professor Albert Ehrenzweig) with just a couple of other friends and his indispensable caretaker Hilde Lorentz. Fritz looked as happy as those in his company themselves felt to be with him. Egon, and Fritz's accountant, Gretchen Smith, had remembered to find some of his favorite Boodles gin for a little martini, the sun was streaming in through the windows in Orinda, near Berkeley, and all was well with the world. Now, after the spring California rains have subsided, Fritz sits in his Berkeley living roomy overlooking San Francisco Bay and speaks of his late wife, Eva, and their daughters, Maria and Inge, all of whom he lost within a short span of time more than a dozen years ago. Figuring too in the conversation are the grandchildren, Anne, Jack, Paul, and Gregory, their spouses, and the great- grandchildren. It seems a long way from the Yale Law School dining hall in the Fall of 1956 when he spoke to my incoming class of 1959, in his precise and formal English, with a flavor of the Continent, of the history and majesty of the law, of Arthur Corbin's great contributions to it,2 and of the wonderful Yale Law School we could all look forward to. Fritz taught Contracts I so wonderfully that many of us went on to take everything he offered, Contracts II and even Negotiable Instruments.
  • ''Nor Double Tongue''

    ''Nor Double Tongue''

    7 JUSTICE FOR ALL , ''Nor Speak ith Double { ---­ .. ' .. Tongue'' 37th Annual Report of the American Civil Liberties Union July 1, 1956 to June 30, 1957 AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION 170 Fifth Avenue New York 10, N. Y. Telephone: ORegon 5-5990 Price 75¢ ------------~~--~-------------- --------------~- Board of Directors Chairman-Ernest Angell Honorary Chairman-John Haynes Holmes Vice Chairmen-Ralph S. Brown, Elmer Rice, Norman Thomas General Counsel-Edward J. Ennis, Osmond K. Fraenkel, Barent TenEyck Mrs. Katrina McCormick Barnes Lewis Galantiere John Paul Jones Daniel Bell Walter Gellhorn Dan Lacy Mrs. Dorothy Dunbar Bromley Julian E. Goldberg Walter Millis Lisle C. Carter Louis M. Hacker Gerard Piel Richard S. Childs August Heckscher George Soli William A. Delano FrankS. Horne J. Waties Waring John F. Finerty B. W. Huebsch Howard Whiteside Walter Frank Mrs. Sophia Yarnall Jacobs Edward Bennett Williams John Jessup National Committee Chairman-E. B. MacNaughton Vice Chairman Emeritus-Bishop Edward L. Parsons Vice Chairmen-Pearl S. Buck, Albert Sprague Coolidge, J. Frank Dobie, Lloyd K. Garrison, Frank P. Graham, Palmer Hoyt, Karl Menninger, Loren Miller, Morris Rubin, Lillian E. Smith Sadie Alexander Melvyn Douglas Prof. Robert Mathews Thurman Arnold Rev. Frederick May Eliot Dr. Millicent C. Mcintosh Bishop James Chamberlain Baker Prof. Thomas H. Eliot Dr. Alexander Meiklejohn Roger N. Bald win Walter T. Fisher Harry C. Meserve Alan Barth James Lawrence Fly Donald R. Murphy Francis Biddle Rev. Harry Emerson Fosdick Dr. J. Robert Oppenheimer Dr. Sarah Gibson Blanding Prof. Ralph F. Fuchs Bishop G. Bromley Oxnam Catherine Drinker Bowen Prof. Willard Goslin James G. Patton Prof. Julian P.