DOCSLIB.ORG

Volume 25, 2016 D Nott-Law Jnl25 Cover Nott-Law Cv 25/07/2016 13:18 Page 2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Volume 25, 2016 D Nott-Law Jnl25 Cover Nott-Law Cv 25/07/2016 13:18 Page 2 d_Nott-law jnl25_cover_Nott-Law_cv 25/07/2016 13:18 Page 1 N O T T I N In this issue: G H A M L Helen O’Nions A EDITORIAL W J O U R N A ARTICLES L How Many Contracts in an Auction Sale? James Brown and Mark Pawlowski NOTTINGHAM LAW JOURNAL The Legal Prospective Force of Constitutional Courts Decisions: Reflections from the Constitutional Jurisprudence of Kosovo and Beyond Visar Morina Journal of Nottingham Law School Don’t Take Away My Break-Away: Balancing Regulatory and Commercial Interests in Sport Simon Boyes The Creative Identity and Intellectual Property Janice Denoncourt THEMATIC ARTICLES: PERSPECTIVES ON THE ISLAMIC FACE VEIL Introduction Tom Lewis Articles S.A.S v France : A Reality Check Eva Brems Human Rights, Identity and the Legal Regulation of Dress Jill Marshall No Face Veils in Court Felicity Gerry QC Face Veils and the Law: A Critical Reflection Samantha Knights The Veiled Lodger – A Reflection on the Status of R v D Jeremy Robson Why the Veil Should be Repudiated* Yasmin Alibhai-Brown 2 0 1 6 *Extract from Refusing the Veil, 2014. Published with kind permission of Biteback V Publishing, London. O L U Continued on inside back cover M E T W E N Nottingham Law School T The Nottingham Trent University Y Burton Street F I V Nottingham E NG1 4BU England £30.00 Volume 25, 2016 d_Nott-law jnl25_cover_Nott-Law_cv 25/07/2016 13:18 Page 2 Continued from outside back cover Book Reviews E Brems (ed.) The Experiences of Face Veil Wearers in Europe and the Law Cambridge University Press, 2014 Amal Ali Jill Marshall Human Rights Law and Personal Identity Routledge, 2014 Tom Lewis CASE NOTES AND COMMENTARY Killing the Parasite in R v Jogee Catarina Sjolin-Knight Disputing the Indisputable: Genocide Denial and Freedom of Expression in Perinçek v Switzerland Luigi Daniele Innocent Dissemination: The Type of Knowledge Concerned in Shen, Solina Holly v SEEC Media Group Limited S.H. Chan Pledges over Inventory in France Jonathan Wood BOOK REVIEWS George A Akerlof and Robert J Shiller Phishing for Phools: The Economics of Manipulation and Deception Princeton University Press, 2015 Graham Ferris STUDENT ESSAY Winner of the Nottinghamshire Law Society’s Kevin De Silva Memorial Essay Competition. Should there be Cameras in Court? Thomas Goodman Printed in the United Kingdom by Henry Ling Limited, at the Dorset Press, Dorchester, DT1 1HD NOTTINGHAM LAW JOURNAL VOL. 25 2016 General Editor Dr Helen O’Nions, LLB (Middlesex), LLM (Leicester), PGDip HE Associate Editor Ms Janice Denoncourt, BA (McGill), LLB (W.Aust.), LLM, Solicitor Advisory Board The Rt Hon the Lord Saville of Newdigate The Rt Hon Sir Philip Otton Judge Bostjan Zupancic, the European Court of Human Rights Prof Conor Gearty, London School of Economics Prof Mark Findlay, University of Sydney Prof Michael J. Gunn, University of Staffordshire Mr Jonathan Griffiths, Queen Mary, University of London Prof Geraint Howells, Lancaster University Prof Martin Hunter, Essex Court Chambers & Nottingham Prof Robert G. Lee, Exeter Law School Law School Mr Christopher Muttukumaru, Director of Legal Mr Roger Leng, University of Warwick Services, Department of Transport Prof Gary Watt, University of Warwick Prof John Peysner, University of Lincoln Prof Barry Rider, University of Cambridge Prof Mary Seneviratne, Nottingham Law School Mr Paul Smith, Partner, Eversheds Mr Marc S. Stauch, Leibnitz University, Hannover Mr John Snape, Warwick University Prof Adrian Walters, Nottingham Law School Dr Kim Stevenson, University of Plymouth Prof George A. Sarpong, former Director Ghana Dr Christian Twigg-Flesner, University of Hull School of Law Prof Stephen Weatherill, University of Oxford Mr Chuka Agbu, Lexavier Partners, Nigeria Editorial Board Development: Mrs Louise Taylor, LLB (Hons), Scots Law, University of Dundee (2002) Diploma in Legal Practice, University of Dundee (2003), PGCHE, Nottingham Trent University (2008). Marketing: Alfonso Valero, LLB (Complutense of Madrid), LLM (QMUL), PGC Sports Law (King’s College), PGC HE (Nottingham Trent University) Administrative Assistant Ms Carole Vaughan The Nottingham Law Journal is a refereed journal, normally published in Spring each year. Contributions of articles, case notes and book reviews to the Journal are welcomed. Intending contributors are invited to contact the Editor for a copy of the style sheet, which gives details of the format which submissions must follow. Submissions and enquiries should be addressed to: Dr Helen O’Nions, Nottingham Trent University, Burton Street, Nottingham, NG1 4BU. Telephone 0115 941 8418. Ms O’Nions can also be contacted on the following e-mail addresses: helen.o’[email protected]. Style notes and further details about the Journal are available on request. Intending subscribers should please contact Ms Carole Vaughan at the above address. Intending subscribers in North America are advised to contact Wm W Gaunt & Sons. Inc, Gaunt Building, 3011 Gulf Drive, Holmes Beach, Florida 3417 2199. The citation for this issue is (2016) 25 Nott L J. ISSN No. 0965–0660 Except as otherwise stated, © 2016 Nottingham Trent University and contributors. All rights reserved. No part of this Journal may be reproduced or transmitted by any means or in any form or stored in a retrieval system of whatever kind without the prior written permission of the Editor. This does not include permitted fair dealing under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 or within the terms of a licence issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency for reprographic reproduction and/or photocopying. The authors of material in this issue have asserted their rights to be identified as such in accordance with the said Act. NOTTINGHAM LAW JOURNAL VOL. 25 2016 CONTENTS v EDITORIAL Helen O’Nions ARTICLES 1 How Many Contracts in an Auction Sale? James Brown and Mark Pawlowski 16 The Legal Prospective Force of Constitutional Courts Decisions: Reflections from the Constitutional Jurisprudence of Kosovo and Beyond Visar Morina 28 Don’t Take Away My Break- Away: Balancing Regulatory and Commercial Interests in Sport Simon Boyes 39 The Creative Identity and Intellectual Property Janice Denoncourt Thematic Articles: Perspectives on the Islamic Face Veil 55 Introduction Tom Lewis Articles 58 S.A.S v France: A Reality Check Eva Brems 73 Human Rights, Identity and the Legal Regulation of Dress Jill Marshall 86 No Face Veils in Court Felicity Gerry QC 97 Face Veils and the Law: A Critical Reflection Samantha Knights 105 The Veiled Lodger – A Reflection on the Status ofR v D Jeremy Robson 112 Why the Veil Should be Repudiated* Yasmin Alibhai- Brown Book Reviews 119 E Brems (ed.) The Experiences of Face Veil Wearers in Europe and the Law Cambridge University Press, 2014 Amal Ali 124 Jill Marshall Human Rights Law and Personal Identity Routledge, 2014 Tom Lewis *Extract from Refusing the Veil, 2014. Published with kind permission of Biteback Publishing, London. iii CASE NOTES AND COMMENTARY 129 Killing the Parasite in R v Jogee Catarina Sjolin- Knight 141 Disputing the Indisputable: Genocide Denial and Freedom of Expression in Perinçek v Switzerland Luigi Daniele 152 Innocent Dissemination: The Type of Knowledge Concerned in Shen, Solina Holly v SEEC Media Group Limited S.H. Chan 158 Pledges over Inventory in France Jonathan Wood BOOK REVIEWS 162 George A Akerlof and Robert J Shiller Phishing for Phools: The Economics of Manipulation and Deception Princeton University Press, 2015 Graham Ferris STUDENT ESSAY 167 Winner of the Nottinghamshire Law Society’s Kevin De Silva Memorial Essay Competition. Should there be Cameras in Court? Thomas Goodman iv NOTTINGHAM LAW JOURNAL VOL. 25 2016 EDITORIAL I am very pleased to introduce Volume 25 of the Nottingham Law Journal. I hope you will agree that this is a particularly strong issue with a diverse and stimulating range of contributions. Our articles of contemporary legal significance include something of interest to international lawyers, contract lawyers, public lawyers, sports lawyers and those working and researching in the field of intellectual property. Professor Mark Pawlowski and Dr James Brown explore how contract law applies in auction sales, a hitherto unexplored field of enquiry and, by their own admission, ‘no easy task’. An entirely different field, albeit equally unexplored and intricate, is examined by Visar Morina from the University of Pristina in his analysis of the role of precedent in Kosovan constitutional courts. Our third article sees Simon Boyes extending his considerable knowledge of sports law to investigate the legal position of sports regulatory bodies. Finally, Dr Janice Denoncourt combines theory and practice in an interdisciplinary consideration of how best to protect the creative identity through intellectual property law. Our thematic articles arise from a symposium held at Nottingham Law School in March 2015 on the legal implications relating to the ban on the face veil which became the subject of a particularly contentious European Court of Human Rights’ decision in SAS v France. The section includes submissions from highly respected academics and legal practitioners who critically examine the reasoning and impact of the Court’s judgment through perspectives grounded in personal autonomy and religious freedom. A contrasting and reliably challenging angle is provided by the feminist, Muslim jour- nalist, Yasmin Alibhai- Brown, who views the veil as a ‘rejection of progressive values’. The papers are introduced by director of the Centre for Conflict, Rights and Justice at Nottingham Law School, Tom Lewis. As is customary I would like to extend my sincere gratitude to all the contributors, reviewers, subscribers and readers of the Nottingham Law Journal. Particular thanks are owed to my assistant editor, Janice Denoncourt who not only managed to offer her own erudite contribution to this edition but was also called upon at the eleventh hour to review a case commentary from the Paris Court of Appeal. Additionally I wish to thank Louise Taylor for checking my proof- reading, thus enabling me to dilute my own accountability for any editorial errors.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • RE-VISITING the FRAUD ACT 2006 – a STEP TOO FAR? Hannah Willcocks
    RE-VISITING THE FRAUD ACT 2006 – A STEP TOO FAR? Hannah Willcocks Brought into force on 15th January 2007,1 the Fraud Act 2006 (‘the Act’) has now been part of the criminal law of England and Wales for over 12 years. Through the introduction of a new general offence of fraud, its aim was to improve the law by making it: a. more comprehensible to juries, especially in serious fraud trials; b. a useful tool in effective prosecutions; c. simpler and therefore fairer; and d. more flexible so able to encompass all forms of fraud 2 and “deal with developing technology”.3 Following the Act’s implementation, it has generally4 been accepted5 that the Act has managed to overcome the vast majority of the difficulties previously encountered with the old offences of deception.6 In 2012, in its Post-Legislative Assessment of the Fraud Act 2006, the Ministry of Justice (‘MoJ’) concluded that the aims and objectives of the 1 The Fraud Act 2006 (Commencement) Order 2006 (SI 2006/3200). 2 Law Commission, Fraud (Law Com No 276, Cm 5560, 2002), para 1.6. 3 Home Office, Fraud Law Reform: Consultation on Proposals for Legislation (2004) p. 5. 4 For a contrary view see Anthony Arlidge QC, Jonathan Fisher QC, Alexander Milne QC and Polly Sprenger, Arlidge and Parry on Fraud (5th edn, Sweet & Maxwell 2016) 44, para 3-005. 5 See e.g. Simester and Sullivan’s Criminal Law, Theory and Doctrine (5th edn, Hart Publishing Ltd 2013) 610; Andrew Ashworth & Jeremy Horder, Principles of Criminal Law (7th edn, Oxford University Press 2013) 405; Carol Withey ‘The Fraud Act 2006 – some early observations and comparisons with the former law’ (2007) 71(3) Journal of Criminal Law, 220 – 237, 228 – 236; Nicholas Yeo, ‘Bull’s-Eye’, 157 NLJ 212 & 418.
    [Show full text]
  • Principles of Criminal Liability
    Criminal Law G153 PPRINCIPLES OF CCRIMINAL LLIABILITY 22:: Mens Rea By the end of this unit, you will be able to: Explain what is meant by the term ‘mens rea’ and illustrate your explanation with cases Understand what is meant by the terms: o Direct intent, o Oblique intent, o Specific & basic intent. Explain the current legal test for recklessness, and understand how the test evolved. Explain the scope of the doctrine of transferred malice and how the courts have developed the concept of coincidence. You will also be able to evaluate: The development of the law on oblique intent and the proposals for reforming it. The limitations of the doctrines of coincidence and transferred malice. Homework During this unit, you will be set the following. In completing homework, you will be expected to do your own research and supplement your own notes. This is essential to show understanding. 1. Complete Homework Sheet (2) 2. Complete Case Cards for Actus Reus and Mens Rea. End of Unit Assessment As with AS, you will sit a DRAG test on elements, but this will be done at the end of this unit. You will also complete the following problem question (from Part B of the exam), which we will plan in lesson time, and you will then write up in timed circumstances as your termly assessment. Wayne belongs to a terrorist organisation. He telephones the police to say that he has placed a bomb in a van on Westminster Bridge and confirms that it is timed to explode in fifteen minutes. The police telephone operator mistakenly thinks that Wayne has said 'fifty minutes' and immediately communicates this information to his superior officer.
    [Show full text]
  • Leigh Centurions V ROCHDALE HORNETS
    Leigh Centurions SUvN DRAOY C17HTDH AMLAREC H O20R1N9 @ET 3S PM # LEYTHERS # OURTOWNOURCLUB# OURTOWNOURCLUB # LEYTHERS # OURTOWNOURCLUB# OURTOWNOURCLUB engage with the fans at games and to see the players acknowledged for their efforts at the Toronto game, despite the narrowness of the defeat, was something Welcome to Leigh Sports Village for day 48 years ago. With a new community that will linger long in the memory. this afternoon’s Betfred stadium in the offing for both the city’s Games are coming thick and fast at FChamRpionshOip gameM agains t oTur HfootbEall team s iTt could Oalso welPl also be present and the start of our involvement in friends from Rochdale Hornets. the last time Leigh play there. the Corals Challenge Cup and the newly- Carl Forster is to be commended for It’s great to see the Knights back on the instigated 1895 Cup and the prospect of taking on the dual role of player and coach up after years in the doldrums and to see playing at Wembley present great at such a young age and after cutting his interest in the professional game revived opportunities and goals for Duffs and his teeth in two years at Whitehaven, where under James Ford’s astute coaching. players. The immediate task though is to he built himself a good reputation, he now Watching York back at their much-loved carry on the good form in a tight and has the difficult task of preserving Wiggington Road ground was always one competitive Championship where every Hornets’ hard-won Championship status in of the best away days in the season and I win is hard-earned and valuable.
    [Show full text]
  • China Media Bulletin
    Issue No. 130: October 2018 CHINA MEDIA BULLETIN Headlines ANALYSIS Amid U.S.-China Tension, Beijing’s Propaganda Machine Charges On P2 IN THE NEWS • New rules and innovation enhance police surveillance P4 • Xinjiang crackdown: Writers jailed, foreign investment questioned, state responds to outcry P5 • Censorship updates: Online religious content, foreign television, VPN crackdown P7 • Hong Kong: Expulsion of ‘Financial Times’ editor undermines press freedom P8 • Beyond China: Africa influence, US campuses, CCTV heckler, Malaysia Uighurs, motherboard chips P8 FEATURED PUSHBACK #MeToo Movement P10 WHAT TO WATCH FOR P11 TAKE ACTION P12 IMAGE OF THE MONTH Skeletons in the Communist Party’s closet This seemingly innocuous image was shared 12,000 times on Sina Weibo within 11 hours on September 23 before being deleted by censors. The caption accompanying the image said it portrayed a caving expedition in Guilin, Guangxi Province, that discovered the skeletons of 93 people who were killed at the height of the Cultural Revolution: “From October 2 to 3, 1967 … the militia battalion commander of Sanjiang Commune … pushed 93 local rich people into the bottomless sinkhole…. One of the big landlord families had a total of 76 people, young and old; all were all pushed into the pit, including married daughters and their children. The youngest one is less than one year old and the oldest is 65 years old.” Credit: Weiboscope Visit http://freedomhou.se/cmb_signup or email [email protected] to subscribe or submit items. CHINA MEDIA BULLETIN: OCTOBER 2018 ANALYSIS Amid U.S.-China Tension, Beijing’s Propaganda Machine Charges On By Sarah Cook The regime’s recent media interventions may have unintended consequences.
    [Show full text]
  • My Mother Found Me in Alice Springs
    THE MAN WHO EXPLODED WITH FIRE AND GRACE Wally McArthur 22 February 2019 A top athlete denied a chance to compete for Olympic Gold, Wally McArthur lived at “The Bungalow” in Alice Springs before being evacuated to NSW during WW2. After the war he went to St Francis House in Adelaide, became a rugby star in England and was a member of the Aboriginal rugby league team of the century. Wally McArthur was a rising sprinting champion in the late 1940s and early 1950s. Wally McArthur was an inspiration. His younger cousin John Moriarty, who was taken from the same Borroloola area of the Northern Territory, has said, “He could have been one of the world’s great athletes. He just exploded with fire and grace.” “He was a leader. He looked after us younger kids. He was such a humble compassionate person. Wally set a standard for us, as to what could be achieved in sport.” Born in 1933 McArthur’s father was a policeman named Langdon, but the authorities, who registered many of these births, gave him the name of McArthur, after the river at Borroloola. McArthur recalled his removal from his family in a 1998 interview with John Pilger, “It was a government car, because only the government had cars at that time. The driver put me in the front seat with him and he drove around while I waved at my family. I have never seen them since, you know. They were sitting around the camp fire. They didn't understand what was happening.” In a 1999 interview with Peter Hackett for The Advertiser McArthur said, “I don’t feel angry about it.
    [Show full text]
  • Whats in It for Blackpool
    __________________________________________________________________________ Lancashire Record Office: What’s in it for Blackpool? Contents Lancashire Record Office Who we are and what we do……………………… 2 Information for planning a ………………………... 3-4 Online access and contact details……………...... 5 Introduction to this guide ……………............................ 6 Maps …………………….…………..…………………….... 7-9 Aerial photographs ………………………………………. 9 Photographs and illustrations ..………………………… 10 Blackpool archive collections Blackpool Collections…………………………..... 11 Blackpool Library Collection ……………………... 12 Smaller collections………………………………… 11 Local Businesses and Organisations Business records …………..…..………………...... 16 Clubs and Societies .………………..…………….. 17 Trade Unions …………..…..…………………….... 18 Official Records Local Government Lancashire County Council ……………………... 19 Blackpool County Borough Council ..………….. 20-22 Urban District Councils …………………………... 23 Rural District Councils …………………………... 23 Parish and Town Councils ……………………… . 23 Electoral registers .………………………………………... 24-25 Courts Quarter Sessions ……………………………….... 26-27 Petty Sessions and Magistrates ………………... 28 Coroners ………………………………………….. 28 Police …………………………………………………….... 29 Water Board ……………………………………………..... 29 Probate …………………………………..………………... 30 Education ………………………………………………..... 31-34 Hospitals……. ……….………………………………….... 35-36 Poor Law ………….………………………………………. 37 1910 Finance Act records.............................................. 38 Insurance Committees..................................................
    [Show full text]
  • I No. 14-35095 in the UNITED STATES
    No. 14-35095 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT AMERICAN FREEDOM DEFENSE INITIATIVE; PAMELA GELLER; and ROBERT SPENCER Appellants, v. KING COUNTY Appellee, ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON CASE NO. 2:13-cv-01804-RAJ (HON. RICHARD A. JONES) PROPOSED AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF OF THE AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF WASHINGTON VENKAT BALASUBRAMANI SARAH A. DUNNE Focal PLLC Legal Director 800 Fifth Avenue Suite 4100 LA ROND M. BAKER Seattle, WA 98104-3100 Staff Attorney Telephone: (206) 529-4827 ACLU of Washington Foundation 901 Fifth Avenue Suite 630 Seattle, WA 98164 Telephone: (206) 624-2184 i CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Pursuant to FRAP 26.1, the American Civil Liberties Union of Washington certifies that it is a Washington non-profit corporation. It has no parent corporations, and no publicly held company owns 10 percent or more of its stock. ii STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH FED. R. APP. P. 29(C)(5) No party’s counsel authored this brief in whole or in part. No party or party’s counsel contributed money that was intended to fund preparing or submitting this brief. And no person other than the American Civil Liberties Union of Washington, its members, or its counsel contributed money that was intended to fund preparing or submitting this brief. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT .................................................... ii STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH FED. R. APP. P. 29(C)(5) ............ iii I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................. 1 II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND ........................................................................... 2 III. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND ............................................................... 3 IV. ARGUMENT .................................................................................................. 4 A. Viewpoint Discrimination is Offensive to the First Amendment in Both Designated and Limited Public Forums.
    [Show full text]
  • Dolus Eventualis in South African Criminal Law
    THE INTERPRETATION AND APPLICATION OF DOLUS EVENTUALIS IN SOUTH AFRICAN CRIMINAL LAW by LINUS TAMBU AWA Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF LAWS in the subject Criminal and Procedural Law at the UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA SUPERVISOR: PROF NINA MOLLEMA NOVEMBER 2019 i Table of Contents Page DECLARATION .......................................................................................................... v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .......................................................................................... vi DEDICATION ............................................................................................................ vii SUMMARY ............................................................................................................... viii KEY WORDS ............................................................................................................. ix GLOSSARY OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ............................................ xi CHAPTER ONE .......................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background information ................................................................................. 1 1.2 Research problem .......................................................................................... 3 1.3 Research questions and hypotheses of study ...............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Working Party No. 3 on Co-Operation and Enforcement
    Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development DAF/COMP/WP3(2020)5 Unclassified English - Or. English 14 September 2020 DIRECTORATE FOR FINANCIAL AND ENTERPRISE AFFAIRS COMPETITION COMMITTEE Cancels & replaces the same document of 23 April 2020 Working Party No. 3 on Co-operation and Enforcement Cartel Criminalization and the Challenge of ‘Moral Wrongfulness’ By Peter Whelan 9 June 2020 This paper by Peter Whelan was submitted by the author as part of the background material in support of their presentation at Item 1 of the 131st meeting of Working Party 3 on Co-operation and Enforcement on 9 June 2020. This paper was not commissioned nor vetted by the OECD Secretariat; the opinions expressed and arguments employed herein are exclusively those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official views of the Organisation or of the governments of its member countries. The document is available in PDF only. More documents related to this discussion can be found at http://www.oecd.org/daf/competition/criminalisation-of-cartels-and-bid-rigging-conspiracies.htm Ms Sabine ZIGELSKI [Email: [email protected]] JT03465237 OFDE This document, as well as any data and map included herein, are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. 2 DAF/COMP/WP3(2020)5 CARTEL CRIMINALIZATION AND THE CHALLENGE OF ‘MORAL WRONGFULNESS’ Unclassified Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 33, No. 3 (2013), pp. 535–561 doi:10.1093/ojls/gqt010 Published Advance Access April 29, 2013 Cartel Criminalization and the Challenge of ‘Moral Wrongfulness’ Peter Whelan* Abstract—There is considerable debate at present, particularly in the Member Downloaded from States of the European Union, concerning the necessity and appropriateness of imposing custodial sentences upon individuals who have engaged in cartel activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Penamerica Principles Oncampus Freespeech
    of speech curtailed, there is not, as some accounts have PEN!AMERICA! suggested, a pervasive “crisis” for free speech on campus. Unfortunately, respect for divergent viewpoints has PRINCIPLES! not been a consistent hallmark of recent debates on ma!ers of diversity and inclusion on campus. Though ON!CAMPUS! sometimes overblown or oversimplified, there have been many instances where free speech has been suppressed FREE!SPEECH or chilled, a pa!ern that is at risk of escalating absent concerted action. In some cases, students and univer- sity leaders alike have resorted to contorted and trou- The State of Free Speech on Campus bling formulations in trying to reconcile the principles One of the most talked-about free speech issues in the of free inquiry, inclusivity, and respect for all. There are United States has li"le to do with the First Amendment, also particular areas where legitimate efforts to enable the legislature, or the courts. A set of related controversies full participation on campus have inhibited speech. The and concerns have roiled college and university campuses, discourse also reveals, in certain quarters, a worrisome dis- pi"ing student activists against administrators, faculty, and, missiveness of considerations of free speech as the retort almost as o#en, against other students. The clashes, cen- of the powerful or a diversion from what some consider tering on the use of language, the treatment of minorities to be more pressing issues. Alongside that is evidence and women, and the space for divergent ideas, have shone of a passive, tacit indifference to the risk that increased a spotlight on fundamental questions regarding the role sensitivity to differences and offense—what some call “po- and purpose of the university in American society.
    [Show full text]
  • 2Featherstone.Pdf
    # LEYTHERS # OURTOWNOURCLUB# OURTOWNOURCLUB # LEYTHERS # OURTOWNOURCLUB# OURTOWNOURCLUB MIKEFROMWelcome to LSV forLATHAM this afternoon’s THEthe top threeCHAIRMAN away trips for manyTOP Leigh the Wheatsheaf in Atherton for hosting a Betfred Championship game fans and the home officials and coach team breakfast on the Saturday morning against Featherstone Rovers. Richard Marshall were full of praise for before the Toulouse game. This was a A lot of water has flowed under Mather Leigh’s display after the game. tremendous success as Duffs organised Lane bridge since the two sides met in the The Saints players that have represented many legendary former players to come Championship Shield Final in early the club so far have done so with along and present shirts to the current October and both sides will have a lot of distinction and the relationship between squad. new personnel on duty this afternoon. the two clubs has been excellent with the To hear the likes of Alex Murphy OBE, Games against Fev are always keenly dual registration system operating to the Kevin Ashcroft, Rod Tickle, Tony Barrow, fought and entertaining encounters and benefit of both parties. John Woods, Des Drummond, Mick this afternoon’s game should be no Jack Ashworth was sponsors’ man of the Stacey, Phil Fox, Tony Cooke, Timmy exception. Rovers had a good win against match after the Toulouse game and his Street, Dave Bradbury, Tommy Goulden Batley last Sunday after an agonising one- performances will see push for a first and Mark Sheals waxing lyrical about what point defeat against Bradford and with a team recall at Saints in the near future.
    [Show full text]
  • RL GUIDE 2006 FRIDAY PM 17/1/12 14:40 Page 1
    rfl official guide 2012 working.e$S:RL GUIDE 2006 FRIDAY PM 17/1/12 14:40 Page 1 RFL Official Guide 201 2 rfl official guide 2012 working.e$S:RL GUIDE 2006 FRIDAY PM 17/1/12 14:40 Page 2 The text of this publication is printed on 100gsm Cyclus 100% recycled paper rfl official guide 2012 working.e$S:RL GUIDE 2006 FRIDAY PM 17/1/12 14:40 Page 1 CONTENTS Contents RFL B COMPETITIONS Index ........................................................... 02 B1 General Competition Rules .................. 154 RFL Directors & Presidents ........................... 10 B2 Match Day Rules ................................ 163 RFL Offices .................................................. 10 B3 League Competition Rules .................. 166 RFL Executive Management Team ................. 11 B4 Challenge Cup Competition Rules ........ 173 RFL Council Members .................................. 12 B5 Championship Cup Competition Rules .. 182 Directors of Super League (Europe) Ltd, B6 International/Representative Community Board & RFL Charities ................ 13 Matches ............................................. 183 Past Life Vice Presidents .............................. 15 B7 Reserve & Academy Rules .................. 186 Past Chairmen of the Council ........................ 15 Past Presidents of the RFL ............................ 16 C PERSONNEL Life Members, Roll of Honour, The Mike Gregory C1 Players .............................................. 194 Spirit of Rugby League Award, Operational Rules C2 Club Officials .....................................
    [Show full text]