The Nature of an Early Lapita Ceramic Assemblage from Tamuarawai, Emirau Island, Papua New Guinea

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Nature of an Early Lapita Ceramic Assemblage from Tamuarawai, Emirau Island, Papua New Guinea EARLY LAPITA SETTLEMENT IN THE COLONISATION PROCESS: THE NATURE OF AN EARLY LAPITA CERAMIC ASSEMBLAGE FROM TAMUARAWAI, EMIRAU ISLAND, PAPUA NEW GUINEA ALEXANDER SCAHILL A thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Arts at the University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand July 2020 Abstract Pottery has long been the artefact of choice for establishing migrations in the West Pacific, as demonstrated by the discovery in the 1940s that dentate-stamped pottery of the Lapita Cultural Complex had a distribution that spanned thousands of kilometres (Kirch 1997: 6-70. Traditionally the decorative attributes of pots were assessed to infer cultural connections and establish migration patterns (ibid: 12). More recently archaeologists have turned to methods of physicochemical analysis to provide insight into these migrations with much greater resolution. Previous investigations of Early Lapita settlement all recognise a high degree of mobility (Anson 1983: 1986; Hennessey 2007; Hunt 1989; Summerhayes 2000a; Thomson and White 2000). There are however, two quite different interpretations of these mobility patterns. The first of these interpretations, “Specialised Regional Production” (Hogg 2012: 28), suggests that pottery production is being conducted by sedentary specialist potters belonging to a large regional exchange network (Hunt 1989; Kirch 2000; 2017). In this model significant movements of ceramics are occurring when exchanged between communities, with little in the way of local production occurring (Hogg 2012: 1; Hunt 1989). The second interpretation of these mobility patterns, “Mobile Specialised Production” (Hogg 2012: 28), suggests that most ceramics were produced locally by mobile specialist potters who moved around the landscape collecting resources with which to produce their ceramic assemblages (Anson 1983; 1986; Hennessey 2007; Summerhayes 2000a; Thomson and White 2000). With these differences in mind, this research was undertaken with the aim of assessing these models of mobility through the physicochemical analysis of an Early Lapita assemblage from Tamuarawai (EQS), Emirau Island, Papua New Guinea. By analysing the patterns of pottery production at Tamuarawai we can assess the nature of mobility at the site and provide further insight into the nature of Early Lapita settlement and mobility through comparison with existing settlement models. Evidence demonstrated that a wide variety of resources were being utilised in the production of the Tamuarawai ceramic assemblage, with a high number of clay sources and a range of temper minerals employed in the production of the assemblage. With little in the way of discernible correlation between clays, tempers, and vessel form, the evidence suggests that potters were highly mobile, collecting resources for local production of pottery. There was limited evidence of the importation of complete vessels. These results suggest that ceramic production at Tamuarawai was being conducted through a process of “Mobile Specialised Production”. ii Acknowledgements A number of people were vitally important in helping me throughout this study. Firstly, to my supervisors Professor Glenn Summerhayes, Dr. Anne Ford, and Associate Professor James Scott. Your guidance, support, and extreme patience has been invaluable. To all those others in the department who helped along the way. To Phil Latham, Katrin Wellnitz, and Brent Pooley for all your technical support. To the other postgraduate students in the department, especially Dylan Gaffney, Gabe Vilgalys, Helen Heath, Nick Hogg, and Nick Sutton, for being supportive, providing great discussion, and making for an enjoyable environment to work. A special thanks goes out to my psychologist Megan Turnbull. To say this journey has been a rollercoaster would be putting it mildly, and you have been an immense help when I’ve needed it. Postgraduate study is tough, and I would encourage any students who are struggling to reach out for that extra support. Thanks to all my family and friends who have supported and encouraged me along the way, especially my parents Bryan and Robina for their imaging assistance, and my sister Tamara for her excel skills. To anyone I have forgotten to mention by name, thanks. Finally, to my darling Imogen Roth. Your love and support have been unwavering, and you have never doubted me, even when I’ve doubted myself. Your support has been crucial in my success in this project. iii Contents Contents Abstract .................................................................................................................................................... ii Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................ iii Contents .................................................................................................................................................. iv List of Figures .......................................................................................................................................... vi List of Tables ......................................................................................................................................... viii 1. Introduction and Lapita background ............................................................................................... 10 1.1. What Is Lapita? ......................................................................................................................... 11 1.2. Origins of the Lapita Cultural Complex .................................................................................... 12 1.3. Lapita Provinces and Periods: Spatial and temporal classification of the Lapita Cultural Complex ................................................................................................................................................ 13 1.4. Lapita Ceramics ......................................................................................................................... 15 1.5. Ceramic Function ...................................................................................................................... 16 1.6. Lapita Settlements .................................................................................................................... 18 1.6.1. Settlement locations .......................................................................................................... 18 1.6.2. Settlement scale ................................................................................................................. 18 1.6.3. Settlement structure .......................................................................................................... 19 1.7. Focus of research ...................................................................................................................... 19 2. Settlement and mobility in the Lapita Cultural Complex ................................................................ 21 2.1. Early Lapita sites ....................................................................................................................... 21 2.1.1. Lagenda Plantation (FCR/FCS) ............................................................................................ 24 2.1.2. Boduna (FEA), Boduna Island ............................................................................................. 24 2.1.3. Kabakan (SEE), Duke of York Islands, East New Britain ..................................................... 25 2.1.4. The Mussau sites: Talepakemalai (ECA), Etakosarai (ECB), and Etapakengaroasa (EHB) .. 26 2.1.5. The Arawe Islands sites: Makekur (FOH), Adwe Island, and Paligmente (FNY), Pililo Island 28 2.1.6. Kamgot (ERA), Babase Island, the Anir island group .......................................................... 28 2.2. Studying mobility through non-ceramic means ...................................................................... 29 2.3. Studying mobility through ceramic analysis ............................................................................ 32 2.4. The role of CPCRUs in the study of mobility ............................................................................ 39 3. Tamuarawai (EQS) ............................................................................................................................ 42 3.1. Emirau ....................................................................................................................................... 42 3.2. Tamuarawai (EQS) .................................................................................................................... 43 iv 3.3. Tamuarawai: Excavations and Archaeology ............................................................................ 43 3.4. Material Culture ....................................................................................................................... 45 3.5. Chronology ................................................................................................................................ 47 3.6. Interpretation of occupation at Tamuarawai .......................................................................... 48 3.7. Previous EQS pottery investigations ........................................................................................ 49 4. Methodology .................................................................................................................................... 53 4.1. Ceramic sherd sampling strategy ............................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Lx1/Rtetcanjviuseum
    lx1/rtetcanJViuseum PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY CENTRAL PARK WEST AT 79TH STREET, NEW YORK 24, N.Y. NUMBER 1707 FEBRUARY 1 9, 1955 Notes on the Birds of Northern Melanesia. 31 Passeres BY ERNST MAYR The present paper continues the revisions of birds from northern Melanesia and is devoted to the Order Passeres. The literature on the birds of this area is excessively scattered, and one of the functions of this review paper is to provide bibliographic references to recent litera- ture of the various species, in order to make it more readily available to new students. Another object of this paper, as of the previous install- ments of this series, is to indicate intraspecific trends of geographic varia- tion in the Bismarck Archipelago and the Solomon Islands and to state for each species from where it colonized northern Melanesia. Such in- formation is recorded in preparation of an eventual zoogeographic and evolutionary analysis of the bird fauna of the area. For those who are interested in specific islands, the following re- gional bibliography (covering only the more recent literature) may be of interest: BISMARCK ARCHIPELAGO Reichenow, 1899, Mitt. Zool. Mus. Berlin, vol. 1, pp. 1-106; Meyer, 1936, Die Vogel des Bismarckarchipel, Vunapope, New Britain, 55 pp. ADMIRALTY ISLANDS: Rothschild and Hartert, 1914, Novitates Zool., vol. 21, pp. 281-298; Ripley, 1947, Jour. Washington Acad. Sci., vol. 37, pp. 98-102. ST. MATTHIAS: Hartert, 1924, Novitates Zool., vol. 31, pp. 261-278. RoOK ISLAND: Rothschild and Hartert, 1914, Novitates Zool., vol. 21, pp. 207- 218.
    [Show full text]
  • Obsidian Sourcing Studies in Papua New Guinea Using Pixe
    I A ••••'IWlf ilJIJIJj 1QJ OBSIDIAN SOURCING STUDIES IN PAPUA NEW GUINEA USING PIXE- PIGME ANALYSIS Glenn R Sumroerhayes (1), Roger Bird (2), Mike Hotchkiss(2), Chris Gosden (1), Jim Specht (3), Robin Torrence (3) and Richard Fullagar (3) (1) Department of Archaeology, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Vic 3083 (2) Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, Private Mail Bag 1, Menai, NSW 2234 (3) Division of Anthropology, Australian Museum, P.O. Box A285, Sydney South, NSW 2000. Introduction The extraction and use of West New Britain obsidian has a twenty thousand year history in the western Pacific. It is found in prehistoric contexts from Malaysia in the west to Fiji in the east. Of significance is its spread out into the Pacific beginning at c.3500 B.P. It is found associated with the archaeological signature of this spread, Lapita pottery, in New Ireland, Mussau Island, South east Solomons, New Caledonia, Vanuatu, and Fiji. Yet the number of places where obsidian occurs naturally is few in number, making the study of obsidian found in archaeological contexts away from their sources a profitable area of research. The chemical characterisation of obsidian from the source area where it was extracted and the archaeological site where it was deposited provides important information on obsidian production, distribution and use patterns. The objective of this project is to study these patterns over a 20,00 year time span and identify changing distribution configurations in order to assess the significance of models of exchange patterns or social links in Pacific prehistory. To achieve this objective over 1100 pieces of obsidian from archaeological contexts and over 100 obsidian pieces from sources were analysed using PIXE-PIGME from 1990 to 1993.
    [Show full text]
  • New Britain New Ireland Mission, South Pacific Division
    Administrative Office, New Britain New Ireland Mission, Kokopo, 2012. Built after volcanic eruption in Rabaul. Photo courtesy of Barry Oliver. New Britain New Ireland Mission, South Pacific Division BARRY OLIVER Barry Oliver, Ph.D., retired in 2015 as president of the South Pacific Division of Seventh-day Adventists, Sydney, Australia. An Australian by birth Oliver has served the Church as a pastor, evangelist, college teacher, and administrator. In retirement, he is a conjoint associate professor at Avondale College of Higher Education. He has authored over 106 significant publications and 192 magazine articles. He is married to Julie with three adult sons and three grandchildren. The New Britain New Ireland Mission (NBNI) is the Seventh-day Adventist (SDA) administrative entity for a large part of the New Guinea Islands region in Papua New Guinea located in the South West Pacific Ocean.1 The territory of New Britain New Ireland Mission is East New Britain, West New Britain, and New Ireland Provinces of Papua New Guinea.2 It is a part of and responsible to the Papua New Guinea Union Lae, Morobe Province, Papua New Guinea. The Papua New Guinea Union Mission comprises the Seventh-day Adventist Church entities in the country of Papua New Guinea. There are nine local missions and one local conference in the union. They are the Central Papuan Conference, the Bougainville Mission, the New Britain New Ireland Mission, the Northern and Milne Bay Mission, Morobe Mission, Madang Manus Mission, Sepik Mission, Eastern Highlands Simbu Mission, Western Highlands Mission, and South West Papuan Mission. The administrative office of NBNI is located at Butuwin Street, Kokopo 613, East New Britain, Papua New Guinea.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology and Offshore Resources of Pacific Island Arcs--New Ireland and Manus Region, Papua New Guinea, Volume 9, 1988
    © Circum-Pacific Council for Energy and Mineral Resources 2009 – Geology and Offshore Resources of Pacific Island Arcs--New Ireland and Manus Region, Papua New Guinea, Volume 9, 1988. GEOLOGY AND OFFSHORE RESOURCES OF PACIFIC ISLAND ARCS- NEW IRELAND AND MANUS REGION, PAPUA NEW GUINEA Circum-Pacific Council for Energy and Mineral Resources Earth Science Series, Volume 9 GEOLOGY AND OFFSHORE RESOURCES OF PACIFIC ISLAND ARCS- NEW IRELAND AND MANUS REGION, PAPUA NEW GUINEA Edited By Michael S. Marlow, Shawn V. Dadisman, and Neville E Exon Published by the Circum-Pacific Council for Energy and Mineral Resources Houston, Texas, U.S.A. 1988 Copyright © 1988 by The Circum-Pacific Council for Energy and Mineral Resources All Rights Reserved Published August, 1988 ISBN: 0-933687-10-9 Cover Design: Ben Servino, U.S. Geological Survey Cover Illustration: Tectonic diagram of New Ireland and Manus region, Papua New Guinea, after W. D. Stewart and M. J. Sandy (this volume) with inserts of seismicity in the Bismarck Sea region (McCue, this volume), the "bright spot" along seismic- reflection line 401 (Exon and Mariow, petroleum potential, this volume), and a photography of field work on New Ireland (M. Marlow). Layout work by Phyllis Swenson. Circum'Pacific Council for Energy and Mineral Resources Earth Science Series E L. Wong and H.G, Greene, Editors 1. Tectonostratigraphic Terranes of the Circum-Pacific Region edited by D. G. Howell 2. Geology and Offshore Resources of Pacific Island Arcs—Tonga Region compiled and edited by D. W. Scholl and T L. Vallier 3. Investigations of the northern Melanesian Borderland edited by T M.
    [Show full text]
  • A Rapid Biodiversity Survey of Papua New Guinea’S Manus and Mussau Islands
    A Rapid Biodiversity Survey of Papua New Guinea’s Manus and Mussau Islands edited by Nathan Whitmore Published by: Wildlife Conservation Society Papua New Guinea Program PO BOX 277, Goroka, Eastern Highlands Province PAPUA NEW GUINEA Tel: +675-532-3494 www.wcs.org Editor: Nathan Whitmore. Authors: Ken P. Aplin, Arison Arihafa, Kyle N. Armstrong, Richard Cuthbert, Chris J. Müller, Junior Novera, Stephen J. Richards, William Tamarua, Günther Theischinger, Fanie Venter, and Nathan Whitmore. The Wildlife Conservation Society is a private, not-for-profit organisation exempt from federal income tax under section 501c(3) of the Inland Revenue Code. The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Wildlife Conservation Society, the Criticial Ecosystems Partnership Fund, nor the Papua New Guinean Department of Environment or Conservation. Suggested citation: Whitmore N. (editor) 2015. A rapid biodiversity survey of Papua New Guinea’s Manus and Mussau Islands. Wildlife Conservation Society Papua New Guinea Program. Goroka, PNG. ISBN: 978-0-9943203-1-5 Front cover Image: Fanie Venter: cliffs of Mussau. ©2015 Wildlife Conservation Society A rapid biodiversity survey of Papua New Guinea’s Manus and Mussau Islands. Edited by Nathan Whitmore Table of Contents Participants i Acknowledgements iii Organisational profiles iv Letter of support v Foreword vi Executive summary vii Introduction 1 Chapters 1: Plants of Mussau Island 4 2: Butterflies of Mussau Island (Lepidoptera: Rhopalocera)
    [Show full text]
  • ROBERT JOHN FOSTER University Of
    ROBERT JOHN FOSTER University of Rochester Department of Anthropology Rochester, NY 14627-0161 USA Tel: 585-275-3691 Fax: 585-273-5331 [email protected] PERSONAL Born: August 22, 1957, Brooklyn, New York EDUCATION 1981 - 1988 Ph.D., Anthropology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. Thesis: “Social Reproduction and Value in a New Ireland Society, Tanga Islands, Papua New Guinea.” 1980 - 1981 Diploma in Social Anthropology, University of Oxford, Oxford, England. 1979 - 1980 M.A., Anthropology, Columbia University, New York, New York. M.A. Paper: “Hierarchy and Value: The Organization of Mehinaku Ideology.” 1975 - 1979 B.A. (Hons.), Anthropology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. Honors Thesis: “Exchange, Ritual, and Identity among the Maring of Papua New Guinea.” CURRENT POSITIONS 2004 - Professor of Anthropology, The College, University of Rochester; (Professor and Mercer Brugler Distinguished Teaching Professor, 2005-2008; Professor & Chair of Anthropology 2004-2005; 2008- 2011; 2012-2015; Assoc. Professor & Chair of Anthropology 2001-2004; Associate Professor 1996-2001; Assistant Professor 1990-1996). 2007 - Professor of Visual and Cultural Studies; Associated Faculty Member, Graduate Program in Visual and Cultural Studies (1994- 2007); Steering/Advisory Committee Member (1995- ). 2007 - Research Associate, Buffalo Museum of Science 2010 - Adjunct Professor, College of Asian and Pacific Studies, School of Culture, History and Language, Australian National University 2 PREVIOUS APPOINTMENTS 2011 Wyse Visiting Professor, Department of Social Anthropology, University of Cambridge. 2011 Visiting Fellow, Centre for Critical and Cultural Studies, University of Queensland. 2010 Visiting Fellow, College of Asian and Pacific Studies, School of Culture, History and Language, The Australian National University. 2009 Visiting Fellow, Gender Relations Centre, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, The Australian National University.
    [Show full text]
  • A Rapid Biodiversity Survey of Papua New Guinea’S Manus and Mussau Islands
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280134331 A rapid biodiversity survey of Papua New Guinea’s Manus and Mussau Islands Book · June 2015 CITATIONS READS 2 2,000 11 authors, including: Ken P Aplin Arison Arihafa Smithsonian Institution New Britain Palm Oil 238 PUBLICATIONS 2,714 CITATIONS 5 PUBLICATIONS 18 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Kyle Armstrong Richard Cuthbert University of Adelaide World Land Trust 108 PUBLICATIONS 421 CITATIONS 163 PUBLICATIONS 3,322 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Optimising an acoustic lure for survey and study of "microbats" View project Conservation of seabirds and island endemics View project All content following this page was uploaded by Nathan Whitmore on 19 July 2015. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. A Rapid Biodiversity Survey of Papua New Guinea’s Manus and Mussau Islands edited by Nathan Whitmore Published by: Wildlife Conservation Society Papua New Guinea Program PO BOX 277, Goroka, Eastern Highlands Province PAPUA NEW GUINEA Tel: +675-532-3494 www.wcs.org Editor: Nathan Whitmore. Authors: Ken P. Aplin, Arison Arihafa, Kyle N. Armstrong, Richard Cuthbert, Chris J. Müller, Junior Novera, Stephen J. Richards, William Tamarua, Günther Theischinger, Fanie Venter, and Nathan Whitmore. The Wildlife Conservation Society is a private, not-for-profit organisation exempt from federal income tax under section 501c(3) of the Inland Revenue Code. The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Wildlife Conservation Society, the Criticial Ecosystems Partnership Fund, nor the Papua New Guinean Department of Environment or Conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nature of Prehistoric Obsidian Importation to Anir and The
    © Copyright Australian Museum, 2004 Records of the Australian Museum, Supplement 29 (2004): 145–156 ISBN 0-9750476-3-9 The Nature of Prehistoric Obsidian Importation to Anir and the Development of a 3,000 Year Old Regional Picture of Obsidian Exchange within the Bismarck Archipelago, Papua New Guinea GLENN R. SUMMERHAYES Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia [email protected] ABSTRACT. The results of obsidian sourcing studies from the Anir Island assemblages are presented and compared with other studies to develop a regional picture of obsidian distribution and use over a three and a half thousand year period for the Bismarck Archipelago, Papua New Guinea. Predicted changes in technology and mobility patterns are correlated with regional changes in the frequency and distribution of obsidian from particular sources in the region. Early Lapita assemblages in most parts of the archipelago were dominated by west New Britain obsidian. In the Middle Lapita period changes occurred in the northern and eastern Bismarck Archipelago and assemblages here became dominated by Admiralty Islands obsidian. In later periods, west New Britain obsidian re-gained dominance in some areas. Nevertheless, in the Lapita phases pottery assemblages suggest exchange was between culturally similar, socially related groups. SUMMERHAYES, GLENN R., 2004. The nature of prehistoric obsidian importation to Anir and the development of a 3,000 year old regional picture of obsidian exchange within the Bismarck Archipelago, Papua New Guinea. In A Pacific Odyssey: Archaeology and Anthropology in the Western Pacific. Papers in Honour of Jim Specht, ed. Val Attenbrow and Richard Fullagar, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Library of Congress Subject Headings for the Pacific Islands
    Library of Congress Subject Headings for the Pacific Islands First compiled by Nancy Sack and Gwen Sinclair Updated by Nancy Sack Current to January 2020 Library of Congress Subject Headings for the Pacific Islands Background An inquiry from a librarian in Micronesia about how to identify subject headings for the Pacific islands highlighted the need for a list of authorized Library of Congress subject headings that are uniquely relevant to the Pacific islands or that are important to the social, economic, or cultural life of the islands. We reasoned that compiling all of the existing subject headings would reveal the extent to which additional subjects may need to be established or updated and we wish to encourage librarians in the Pacific area to contribute new and changed subject headings through the Hawai‘i/Pacific subject headings funnel, coordinated at the University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa.. We captured headings developed for the Pacific, including those for ethnic groups, World War II battles, languages, literatures, place names, traditional religions, etc. Headings for subjects important to the politics, economy, social life, and culture of the Pacific region, such as agricultural products and cultural sites, were also included. Scope Topics related to Australia, New Zealand, and Hawai‘i would predominate in our compilation had they been included. Accordingly, we focused on the Pacific islands in Melanesia, Micronesia, and Polynesia (excluding Hawai‘i and New Zealand). Island groups in other parts of the Pacific were also excluded. References to broader or related terms having no connection with the Pacific were not included. Overview This compilation is modeled on similar publications such as Music Subject Headings: Compiled from Library of Congress Subject Headings and Library of Congress Subject Headings in Jewish Studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Agricultural Systems of Papua New Guinea
    AUSTRALIAN AGENCY for INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS OF PAPUA NEW GUINEA Working Paper No. 17 NEW IRELAND PROVINCE TEXT SUMMARIES, MAPS, CODE LISTS AND VILLAGE IDENTIFICATION R.L. Hide, R.M. Bourke, B.J. Allen, W. Akus, D. Fritsch, R. Grau, P. Hobsbawn, P. lgua, R. Kameata, S. Lyon and N. Miskaram REVISED and REPRINTED 2002 THE AUSTRALIAN NAllONAL UNIVERSITY PAPUA NEW GUINEA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND LIVESTOCK UNIVERSITY OF PAPUA NEW GUINEA AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS OF PAPUA NEW GUINEA Working Paper No. 17 NEW IRELAND PROVINCE TEXT SUMMARIES, MAPS, CODE LISTS AND VILLAGE IDENTIFICATION R.L. Hide, R.M. Bourke, B.J. Allen, W. Akus, D. Fritsch, R. Grau, P. Hobsbawn, P. Igua, R. Kameata, S. Lyon, and N. Miskaram Department of Human Geography, The Australian National University, ACT 0200, Australia REVISED and REPRINTED 2002 Correct Citation: Hide, R.L., Bourke, R.M., Allen, B.J., Akus, W., Fritsch, D., Grau, R., Hobsbawn, P., Igua, P., Kameata, R., Lyon, S. and Miskaram, N. (2002). New Ireland Province: Text Summaries, Maps, Code Lists and Village Identification. Agricultural Systems of Papua New Guinea Working Paper No. 17. Land Management Group, Department of Human Geography, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, The Australian National University, Canberra. Revised edition. National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication Entry: New Ireland Province: text summaries, maps, code lists and village identification. Rev. ed. ISBN 1 920695 07 9 1. Agricultural systems – Papua New Guinea – New Ireland Province. 2. Agricultural geography – Papua New Guinea – New Ireland Province. 3. Agricultural mapping – Papua New Guinea – New Ireland Province. I.
    [Show full text]
  • Culture, Capitalism and Contestation Over Marine Resources in Island Melanesia
    Changing Lives and Livelihoods: Culture, Capitalism and Contestation over Marine Resources in Island Melanesia Jeff Kinch 31st March 2020 A thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Archaeology and Anthropology Research School of Humanities and the Arts College of Arts and Social Sciences Australian National University Declaration Except where other information sources have been cited, this thesis represents original research undertaken by me for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology at the Australian National University. I testify that the material herein has not been previously submitted in whole or in part, for a degree at this or any other institution. Jeff Kinch Supervisory Panel Prof Nicolas Peterson Principal Supervisor Assoc Prof Simon Foale Co-Supervisor Dr Robin Hide Co-Supervisor Abstract This thesis is both a contemporary and a longitudinal ethnographic case study of Brooker Islanders. Brooker Islanders are a sea-faring people that inhabit a large marine territory in the West Calvados Chain of the Louisiade Archipelago in Milne Bay Province of Papua New Guinea. In the late 19th Century, Brooker Islanders began to be incorporated into an emerging global economy through the production of various marine resources that were desired by mainly Australian capitalist interests. The most notable of these commodified marine resources was beche-de-mer. Beche-de-mer is the processed form of several sea cucumber species. The importance of the sea cucumber fishery for Brooker Islanders waned when World War I started. Following the rise of an increasingly affluent China in the early 1990s, the sea cucumber fishery and beche-de-mer trade once again became an important source of cash income for Brooker Islanders.
    [Show full text]
  • International Airport Codes
    Airport Code Airport Name City Code City Name Country Code Country Name AAA Anaa AAA Anaa PF French Polynesia AAB Arrabury QL AAB Arrabury QL AU Australia AAC El Arish AAC El Arish EG Egypt AAE Rabah Bitat AAE Annaba DZ Algeria AAG Arapoti PR AAG Arapoti PR BR Brazil AAH Merzbrueck AAH Aachen DE Germany AAI Arraias TO AAI Arraias TO BR Brazil AAJ Cayana Airstrip AAJ Awaradam SR Suriname AAK Aranuka AAK Aranuka KI Kiribati AAL Aalborg AAL Aalborg DK Denmark AAM Mala Mala AAM Mala Mala ZA South Africa AAN Al Ain AAN Al Ain AE United Arab Emirates AAO Anaco AAO Anaco VE Venezuela AAQ Vityazevo AAQ Anapa RU Russia AAR Aarhus AAR Aarhus DK Denmark AAS Apalapsili AAS Apalapsili ID Indonesia AAT Altay AAT Altay CN China AAU Asau AAU Asau WS Samoa AAV Allah Valley AAV Surallah PH Philippines AAX Araxa MG AAX Araxa MG BR Brazil AAY Al Ghaydah AAY Al Ghaydah YE Yemen AAZ Quetzaltenango AAZ Quetzaltenango GT Guatemala ABA Abakan ABA Abakan RU Russia ABB Asaba ABB Asaba NG Nigeria ABC Albacete ABC Albacete ES Spain ABD Abadan ABD Abadan IR Iran ABF Abaiang ABF Abaiang KI Kiribati ABG Abingdon Downs QL ABG Abingdon Downs QL AU Australia ABH Alpha QL ABH Alpha QL AU Australia ABJ Felix Houphouet-Boigny ABJ Abidjan CI Ivory Coast ABK Kebri Dehar ABK Kebri Dehar ET Ethiopia ABM Northern Peninsula ABM Bamaga QL AU Australia ABN Albina ABN Albina SR Suriname ABO Aboisso ABO Aboisso CI Ivory Coast ABP Atkamba ABP Atkamba PG Papua New Guinea ABS Abu Simbel ABS Abu Simbel EG Egypt ABT Al-Aqiq ABT Al Baha SA Saudi Arabia ABU Haliwen ABU Atambua ID Indonesia ABV Nnamdi Azikiwe Intl ABV Abuja NG Nigeria ABW Abau ABW Abau PG Papua New Guinea ABX Albury NS ABX Albury NS AU Australia ABZ Dyce ABZ Aberdeen GB United Kingdom ACA Juan N.
    [Show full text]