The Navy Vol 77 No 2 Apr 2015
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
@NavyLeagueAust APR-JUN 2015 VOL 77 No2 NLA 2015 WHITE PAPER SUBMISSION THE LPA THE JAPANESE LEGACY SUBMARINE OFFENSIVE TAFFY 3 $5.95 AUSTRALIA’S LEADING NAVAL MAGAZINE SINCE 1938 INCL. GST is the tailoring of purpose-built logistic solutions which deliver the most effective, efficient and sustainable outcomes for our clients. Our engineered approach is built on STRANG’s 90 years of experience, expertise, dedication and innovation. STRANG engineers world-leading solutions encompassing Supply Line Logistics, Project Freight Forwarding, Advisory Services and Port and Terminal Operations. We Engineer these Logistic Solutions globally, for example at Port Ehoala Madagascar depicted above, where we provide cargo handling, logistics, stevedoring and port services. Contact us www.stxgroup.com.au +61 2 9669 1099 Volume 77 No.2 THE MAGAZINE OF THE NAVY LEAGUE OF AUSTRALIA FEDERAL COUNCIL SOUTH AUSTRALIAN DIVISION President: Graham M Harris, RFD (Incl. Northern Territory) Senior Vice-President: Patron: His Excellency, John Jeremy, AM The Governor of South Australia. Vice-Presidents: President: Dean Watson, RFD 06 THE 2015 NAVY LEAGUE LCDR Roger Blythman, RFD, Hon. Secretary: Miss J E Gill Mark Schweikert PO Box 3008, Unley, SA 5061 OF AUSTRALIA DEFENCE Hon. Secretary: Philip Corboy Telephone: (08) 8272 6435 PO Box 128, Clayfield, Qld 4011 WHITE PAPER SUBMISSION Mob: 0421 280 481 WESTERN AUSTRALIAN DIVISION Email: [email protected] Patron: Her Excellency, The Governor of Western Australia. 10 LPA LEGACY NEW SOUTH WALES DIVISION President: Mason Hayman THE VALUE OF LEMON AND LIME (Incl. Australian Capital Territory) 33 Keane Street Patron: His Excellency, Peppermint Grove, WA 6011 By Greg Swinden The Governor of New South Wales. Telephone: (08) 9384 5794 President: R O Albert, AO, RFD, RD Mob: 0404 949 282 Hon. Secretary: Elizabeth Sykes Hon. Secretary: Trevor Vincent, 20 THE JAPANESE SUBMARINE GPO Box 1719, Sydney, NSW 2001 3 Prosser Way, Myaree, WA 6154 Telephone: (02) 9232 2144 Telephone: (08) 9330 5129 OFFENSIVE MAY - JUNE 1942 Email: [email protected] Mob: 0417 933 780 Fax: (08) 9330 5129 By Murray Dear Email: [email protected] VICTORIA DIVISION (Incl. Tasmania) CORPORATE MEMBERS Patron: His Excellency, 25 TAFFY 3 - USING A WALNUT TO The Governor of Victoria. The Australian Shipowners’ Association Hawker De Haviland Limited CRACK A SLEDGEHAMMER President: LCDR Roger Blythman, RFD Strang International Pty Ltd Hon. Secretary: Ray Gill JP By Jamie McIntyre Correspondence: PO Box 2340, Mt Waverley Vic 3149 Email: [email protected] Web: www.netspace.net.au/~navyleag QUEENSLAND DIVISION Patron: His Excellency, The Governor of Queensland. President: Harvey Greenfield Correspondence: REGULAR FEATURES GPO Box 1481, Brisbane Qld 4001 02 From the Crow’s Nest State Branch: Cairns: A Cunneen, 04 From Our Readers PO Box 1009, Cairns, Qld 4870 The President’s Page Telephone: (07) 4054 1195 05 14 Flash Traffic 31 Hatch, Match, Dispatch 32 League Policy Statement All letters and contributions to: The Office of The Editor THE NAVY Navy League of Australia GPO Box 1719 The opinions or assertions expressed in THE NAVY are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Federal Council of the Navy League of Australia, the Sydney, NSW 2001 Editor of THE NAVY, the RAN or the Department of Defence. The Editor welcomes E-mail to: [email protected] correspondence, photographs and contributions and will assume that by making submissions, contributors agree that all material may be used free of charge, edited All Subscriptions, Membership and Advertising enquiries to: and amended at the Editor’s discretion. No part of this publication may be reproduced The Hon Secretary without the permission of the Editor. Navy League of Australia, NSW Division Front cover: HMAS SYDNEY enters Sydney Harbour for the last time flying her GPO Box 1719, Sydney NSW 2001 decommissioning pennant. SYDNEY will stay alongside Garden Island as a training ship until her eventual decommissioning at the end of the year. (RAN) Deadline for next edition 5 May 2015 FROM THE CROW’S NEST Themistocles THE JSF DEBATE – WHY IS LOGIC SO HARD shared as needed. Hence the ‘Joint’ in Joint Strike Fighter. Since Prime Minister Tony Abbott hinted that the B model F-35, the STOVL The next argument is “the B model doesn’t have the range of the A (Short Take Off and Vertical Landing) version of the Joint Strike Fighter model”. True, but, deploying a B model onto a ship means it takes the (JSF), was being included in the capability options for the new Defence air base (and logistics support) with it thus the aircraft’s range is less of White Paper for use on the Canberra class ships, naysayers, such as the an issue. STOVL also makes it usable for forward basing on rough strips Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI), have been out in force with (something utilised in both recent Gulf Wars to great effect). the usual unenlightened arguments. ASPI’s most recent assault on the B Sea-based aircraft also have historically experienced higher sortie rates model JSF was a paper entitled “Jump Jets for the ADF”. The title itself than their land-based cousins, so return rates to the target area are serves to highlight how out of touch the authors are as no one has used higher, thus providing a combat multiplier effect to the user. the term “jump jet” for over 30 years. Even then, it was only used to “The B model can’t pull 9G so it can’t dog fight”. Sort of true. Its limit is describe the early developmental Harriers at air shows. Simple fact is that 7G. However, if you need to pull high G in the battle area then you are the Harrier could not hold a candle to an F-35B. in deep trouble. Fifth generation off bore-sight imaging infra red anti- The naysayers first attack concerns the need/strategic justification; “we aircraft missiles mean the pilot can fire ‘over his shoulder’ and still kill will never be in a situation that will require that sort of capability”. The the opposing aircraft, even if going the other direction. In any event, the point of war is that it is episodic and unpredictable – we know only that RAAF’s A model JSF cannot dog fight the modern canard fitted 4th - 5th it will occur and so we need to prepare and to strategize. The lesson of generation fighters like the European Typhoon and Su-30 Flanker so it’s history is if you want peace then prepare for war and learn to expect the a moot point anyway. unexpected. And this has industrial and economic implications – in war It is worth noting though that the JSF, regardless of version, is still a we would be designing and utilising commercial and civil vessels to a supersonic stealth aircraft designed specifically to conduct strikes. It is much greater extent to re-capitalise Navy. If we are at war now – and most adept against defended enemy air bases and hitting aircraft on the there are those who consider we are but have yet to articulate what this ground where they are most vulnerable. Strike is thus a legitimate form war is – we would be doing this. The lesson is not simply to prepare for of offensive air defence. war but to do in peace what you would do in war; not vice versa! Another argument aimed at the aircraft is that “too many ISR (Intelligence, After the ‘strategic’ attack they then attack the aircraft; “it’s not common Surveillance and Reconnaissance) assets are required to fully exploit the to the land based A model the RAAF is buying”. Actually its commonality is JSF’s capability, so it would be a waste of money”. Actually the JSF is better than that of the RAAF’s current Hornet vs. Super Hornet fleet. From classified as an ISR asset. No aircraft in history has ever been more the outset all JSF versions were designed to share avionics, weapons, situationally aware than the JSF. airframe components etc. In fact, the JSF’s maintenance concept is for So after the naysayers are through with attacking the aircraft they then any F-35 to be maintained in any F-35 maintenance facility in the world turn to the ship, in this case the Canberra class. “Fixed wing and rotary and that nearly all F-35 parts in all bases will be globally tracked and wing can’t work together on the Canberra class. There’s not enough room”. In fact ships of the 27,000 tonne Canberra class are much larger Three identical JSF in formation, or are they? (from top to bottom) An A model, B model and than the previous 19,000 tonne aircraft carrier MELBOURNE, which had C model. Commonality of airframes and other fixed and rotary wing. The USN also operated six Harriers with 15 USMC systems is no accident. (USN) helicopters on their 18,000 tonne Iwo Jima class LPHs, and still had over 2,000 marines on board. “JSFs on board will mean the ship can’t do the amphibious role”. The Spanish Navy designed the Juan Carlos/Canberra class to use JSFs and embarked troops together. The ship’s design has its origins in the 1970’s USN Sea Control Ship concept with amphibious capabilities added. The Canberra class can comfortably accommodate 13 MRH-90 helicopters on the flight deck alone (seven with blades unfolded – see image) leaving the hangar free to easily accommodate six-eight JSF aircraft. However, even if it were the case that JSFs would disproportionally impact the ships total amphibious capability, then just one of the Canberras being turned into a dedicated strike/sea control carrier would still represent a The flight deck of the Canberra class showing 13 MRH-90 helicopters on deck (seven with blades unfolded) and with room for more storage on deck and in the hanger.