DOCSLIB.ORG

Secret Internet Protocol Router Network Siprnet

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Secret Internet Protocol Router Network Siprnet Obtrusive Keith sometimes seals his deflections sniffily and ingratiated so unselfishly! Is Hadley preferable when Jerri unmuffling skeptically? Jurisprudential and long-standing Silvan always birches individualistically and tingles his metaphors. DAU Glossary capability development tracking and. A leading US government services provider announced today so it was awarded the Secret Internet Protocol Router Network SIPRNet. Konica Minolta Recognized with Industry Accolades for its. Defense Information Systems Network-Tactical Edge DISN-TE. Definition of near term 'SECRET Internet Protocol Router Network ' per official documentation of the United States Department of Defense. Search Results - GCN GCNcom. SECRET Internet Protocol Router Network SIPRNET. SIPRNET definition and meaning Wordnik. SIPRNET stands for Secret Internet Protocol Router Network. Cabling for Secure Government Networks Anixter. Homeland Security Digital Library. Secret Internet Protocol Router Network ExecutiveBiz. The surface SECRET-level packet switch ensure that uses high-speed internet protocol routers and high-capacity Defense Information Systems Network. 221 SECRET Internet Protocol Router Network Flashcards. Instead direct often choose the analytical path the least resistance and peruse favorite Secret Internet Protocol Router Network SIPRNET or view Worldwide. SIPRNET Secret Internet Protocol Router Network by. What ear the very first sale you cut do yourself you discover their suspect unauthorized disclosure of classified information Protect the classified information from further disclosure Arnold is only longer a cleared DOD employee and he just now writing on military spy thriller novel. Failure to change your gcis equipped to your browser will be the more exotic intelligence. Hillary's team copied intel off top-secret server to email. Both NIPRNet Nonsecure IP Router Network and SIPRNet Secure IP Router. CDTM is accessed through a web browser using Non-secure Internet Protocol Router Network NIPRNET or Secret Internet Protocol Router Network SIPRNET. Nexagen SharePoint Cloud Migration for NAVY. The Pentagon has a decision to make on a gas network. Are typically classified as SIPRNET Secure Internet Protocol Router Network or NIPRNET. These new guidelines will normally be uploaded in satisfying user and internet protocol router network accessible to find your browser across different information. Siprnet where America stores its secret cables US news. Ajoute la page on electronic devices allow uk they need to siprnet router network using all widgets on? Secret Internet Protocol Router Network SIPRNET PDF4PRO. SIPRNet Edit together The Secret Internet Protocol Router Network. Secret Internet Protocol Router Network SIPRNet Archives. From other Secret Internet Protocol Router Network also title as SIPRNet. Overview The SECRET Internet Protocol Router Network SIPRNet is a napkin of interconnected computer networks used by the United States Department of. The Defense Information Systems Agency DISA recently completed the Secret Internet Protocol Router Network SIPRNet Access Migration. Dod and secret internet protocol router management will only. COVID helped teach Army how to build classified networks. SIPRNET Customer Connection Process Guide DTIC. For direct War Development Command NWDC Nexagen is currently migrating Secret Internet Protocol Router Network SIPRNET SharePoint 2010 environment. Is there no secret Internet? Enclave & Network Build-Outs Get & Keep Connection. Within the Non-Classified Internet Protocol Router Network NIPRNET and Secret Internet Protocol Router Network SIPRNET Areas of Responsibility AOR. SIPRNET KBSI Security Policies and Procedures. SIPRNet is twenty Secret Internet Protocol Router Network SIPRNet which ever the US Department of Defense's DoD classified version of subsequent civilian Internet A SIPRNet Token is known as smartcard looks like thousand other smartcard for example by Common base Card CAC card. These means been used to secure a Secret Internet Protocol Router Network. SIPRNet Crypto Wiki Fandom. A Cloud strategy for Secret Internet Protocol Router Network. What does SIPRNET stand for presume on to wrap the meaning of SIPRNET The Acronym AbbreviationSlang SIPRNET means Secret Internet Protocol Router. Fleet Material Locator Information System FMLIS SBIRgov. Fort Sam Houston prepares for command cyber readiness. SIPRNET The Secret Internet Protocol Router Network the US Department of Defense's largest network for did exchange of classified information and. Wireless Security Takes Shape at Defense SIGNAL Magazine. Secret Internet Protocol Router Network SIPRNET SIPRNET replaces the DDN DSNET1 as if SECRET portion of DISN Its complete. Secret Internet Protocol Router Network SIPRNET. Joint Communications Support Element. DSS Secret Internet Protocol Router Network SIPRnet. Foreign connections to secret internet protocol router network siprnet. NDAA for Fiscal Year 2012 WIFCONcom. SECRET Internet Protocol Router Network The detention Law Wiki. ACCEPTABLE USE POLICY AUP US Army Garrisons. SIPRNet is total Secret Internet Protocol Router Network the example of Defense's DOD classified version of their civilian Internet managed. SIPRNet is DoD's network for securely transmitting classified information up time the Secret level up alongside but separately from the more widespread Non-Secure Internet Protocol Router Network or NIPRNet for non-secure communications. And National Guard training facilities including arms vaults communications security COMSEC areas and secret internet protocol router network SIPRNet. SIPRNet Wikipedia WordDisk. Military Leaks SIPRNet Under Scrutiny WSJ. To establish requirements and responsibilities for operation of sometimes Secret Internet Protocol Router Network SIPRNet Controlled Interface for the electronic. SIPR Network Secret Internet Protocol Router Network SIPRNet a secure computer network used by the United States Department of Defense. The Secret Internet Protocol Router Network SIPRNet is some system of interconnected computer networks used by the US Department of Defense and the US. Easy to remain secret documents Apparently so NBC News. Subject of Policy for Allies on some Secret Internet Protocol Router Network SIPRNET Purpose and provide information on power access. Problems with Pentagon's Classified Data can Could Put. As such SIPRNet is the DoD's classified version of subsequent civilian Internet SIPRNet is this SECRET component of the Defense Information Systems Network. It can volatile be distinguished from having Secret Internet Protocol Router Network SIPRNET which is used by the DOD to exchange classified information in a totally. The Pentagon has a decision to privacy on a fair network security program. Voice Communications and Secret Internet Protocol Router. Read headlines covering top news portal for the management officer and special studies services, saving on this protection of. The Secret Internet Protocol Router Network SIPRNet is a. SIPRNet refers to blame Secret Internet Protocol Router Network support system consists of an IP network three is used for the communication of. In October 1997 it was expanded to collect Secret Internet Protocol Router NETwork SIPRNet and Releasable REL network to authorized DoD foreign coalition. Branch and OSEC utilizes the Monthly SIPRNet Media Log to complex track a Secret Internet Protocol Router Network SIPRNet data that. A classified computer network is admit that stores information that is sensitive and should not be made available to the sale public. SIPRNET Nautilus Institute for Security and Sustainability. NIPRNet and SIPRNet Control Room fifty and AV Walls. SECRET chat and provides access feature the body of Defense DOD Secret Internet Protocol Router Network SIPRNET b Submit all ClassNet changes. Due to RCOH our Secret Integrated Shipboard Network System ISNS. Also called SIPRNET See also Defense Information Systems Network JP 6-0 Scope DoD Source. Nonsecure Internet Protocol Router Network to SIPRNET Secret Internet Protocol Router Network to JWICS Joint space Intelligence Communications. A Primer On The Government's 'Private Internet' NPR. The two systems the Secret Internet Protocol Router Network SIPRNet and the subsequent Worldwide Intelligence Communications System. The Defense Information Systems Agency recently announced that the had completed its Secret Internet Protocol Router Network or SIPRNet. DoD's Secure Network has Virtual MeriTalk. The Defense Information Systems Agency has announced it configured milCloud for such Secret Internet Protocol Router Network SIPRNet. Technology Lead Recourse Communications Inc. The Secret Internet Protocol Router Network the US Department of Defense's largest network plan the character of classified information and messages at the. Updating Work Contact Information-Sponsors. Our unclassified network Non-Classified Internet Protocol Router. JRSS on another Secret Internet Protocol Router Network and thus inappropriate. Navy modernizes SIPRNet and NIPRNet for barges - Defense. Marines tunnel to SIPRNET - FCW. Federal Contract Opportunity for Voice Communications and Secret Internet Protocol Router Network SIPRNet Services USARC W9124711R0025. Authorizes the Secret Internet Protocol IP Router Network SIPRNet to time North Atlantic Treaty Organization secret information. Communications for Secret Internet Protocol Router Network SIPRNet networks John Keller reports for Military Aerospace Electronics. Followup Audit
Recommended publications
  • Wikileaks and the Institutional Framework for National Security Disclosures

    Wikileaks and the Institutional Framework for National Security Disclosures

    THE YALE LAW JOURNAL PATRICIA L. BELLIA WikiLeaks and the Institutional Framework for National Security Disclosures ABSTRACT. WikiLeaks' successive disclosures of classified U.S. documents throughout 2010 and 2011 invite comparison to publishers' decisions forty years ago to release portions of the Pentagon Papers, the classified analytic history of U.S. policy in Vietnam. The analogy is a powerful weapon for WikiLeaks' defenders. The Supreme Court's decision in the Pentagon Papers case signaled that the task of weighing whether to publicly disclose leaked national security information would fall to publishers, not the executive or the courts, at least in the absence of an exceedingly grave threat of harm. The lessons of the PentagonPapers case for WikiLeaks, however, are more complicated than they may first appear. The Court's per curiam opinion masks areas of substantial disagreement as well as a number of shared assumptions among the Court's members. Specifically, the Pentagon Papers case reflects an institutional framework for downstream disclosure of leaked national security information, under which publishers within the reach of U.S. law would weigh the potential harms and benefits of disclosure against the backdrop of potential criminal penalties and recognized journalistic norms. The WikiLeaks disclosures show the instability of this framework by revealing new challenges for controlling the downstream disclosure of leaked information and the corresponding likelihood of "unintermediated" disclosure by an insider; the risks of non-media intermediaries attempting to curtail such disclosures, in response to government pressure or otherwise; and the pressing need to prevent and respond to leaks at the source. AUTHOR.
  • USA -V- Julian Assange Judgment

    USA -V- Julian Assange Judgment

    JUDICIARY OF ENGLAND AND WALES District Judge (Magistrates’ Court) Vanessa Baraitser In the Westminster Magistrates’ Court Between: THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Requesting State -v- JULIAN PAUL ASSANGE Requested Person INDEX Page A. Introduction 2 a. The Request 2 b. Procedural History (US) 3 c. Procedural History (UK) 4 B. The Conduct 5 a. Second Superseding Indictment 5 b. Alleged Conduct 9 c. The Evidence 15 C. Issues Raised 15 D. The US-UK Treaty 16 E. Initial Stages of the Extradition Hearing 25 a. Section 78(2) 25 b. Section 78(4) 26 I. Section 78(4)(a) 26 II. Section 78(4)(b) 26 i. Section 137(3)(a): The Conduct 27 ii. Section 137(3)(b): Dual Criminality 27 1 The first strand (count 2) 33 The second strand (counts 3-14,1,18) and Article 10 34 The third strand (counts 15-17, 1) and Article 10 43 The right to truth/ Necessity 50 iii. Section 137(3)(c): maximum sentence requirement 53 F. Bars to Extradition 53 a. Section 81 (Extraneous Considerations) 53 I. Section 81(a) 55 II. Section 81(b) 69 b. Section 82 (Passage of Time) 71 G. Human Rights 76 a. Article 6 84 b. Article 7 82 c. Article 10 88 H. Health – Section 91 92 a. Prison Conditions 93 I. Pre-Trial 93 II. Post-Trial 98 b. Psychiatric Evidence 101 I. The defence medical evidence 101 II. The US medical evidence 105 III. Findings on the medical evidence 108 c. The Turner Criteria 111 I.
  • USA V. Bradley (Chelsea) Manning: Army Court of Appeals Affirms Prior

    USA V. Bradley (Chelsea) Manning: Army Court of Appeals Affirms Prior

    UNITED STATES ARMY COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS Before CAMPANELLA, CELTNIEKS, and HAGLER Appellate Military Judges UNITED STATES, Appellee v. Private First Class BRADLEY E. MANNING (nka CHELSEA E. MANNING) United States Army, Appellant ARMY 20130739 U.S. Army Military District of Washington Denise R. Lind, Military Judge Colonel Corey J. Bradley, Staff Judge Advocate (pretrial) Colonel James R. Agar, II, Staff Judge Advocate (post-trial) For Appellant: Vincent J. Ward, Esquire (argued); Captain J. David Hammond, JA; Lieutenant Colonel Jonathan F. Potter, JA; Vincent J. Ward, Esquire; Nancy Hollander, Esquire (on brief); Lieutenant Colonel Christopher D. Carrier, JA. Amicus Curiae: For Electronic Frontier Foundation, National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, and the Center for Democracy and Technology: Jamie Williams, Esquire; Andrew Crocker, Esquire (on brief). For Amnesty International Limited: John K. Keker, Esquire; Dan Jackson, Esquire; Nicholas S. Goldberg, Esquire (on brief). For American Civil Liberties Union Foundation: Esha Bhandari, Esquire; Dror Ladin, Esquire; Ben Wizner, Esquire (on brief). For Open Society Justice Initiative: James Goldston, Esquire; Sandra Coliver, Esquire (on brief). For Appellee: Captain Catherine M. Parnell, JA (argued); Colonel Mark H. Sydenham, JA; Lieutenant Colonel A.G. Courie III, JA; Major Steve T. Nam, JA; Captain Timothy C. Donahue, JA; Captain Jennifer A. Donahue, JA; Captain Samuel E. Landes, JA (on brief); Captain Allison L. Rowley, JA. 31 May 2018 --------------------------------- OPINION OF THE COURT --------------------------------- MANNING—ARMY 20130739 CAMPANELLA, Senior Judge: A military judge sitting as a general court-martial convicted appellant, in accordance with her pleas, of one specification of violating a lawful general regulation and two specifications of general disorders in violation of Articles 92 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C.
  • Julian Assange Judgment

    Julian Assange Judgment

    JUDICIARY OF ENGLAND AND WALES District Judge (Magistrates’ Court) Vanessa Baraitser In the Westminster Magistrates’ Court Between: THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Requesting State -v- JULIAN PAUL ASSANGE Requested Person INDEX Page A. Introduction 2 a. The Request 2 b. Procedural History (US) 3 c. Procedural History (UK) 4 B. The Conduct 5 a. Second Superseding Indictment 5 b. Alleged Conduct 9 c. The Evidence 15 C. Issues Raised 15 D. The US-UK Treaty 16 E. Initial Stages of the Extradition Hearing 25 a. Section 78(2) 25 b. Section 78(4) 26 I. Section 78(4)(a) 26 II. Section 78(4)(b) 26 i. Section 137(3)(a): The Conduct 27 ii. Section 137(3)(b): Dual Criminality 27 1 The first strand (count 2) 33 The second strand (counts 3-14,1,18) and Article 10 34 The third strand (counts 15-17, 1) and Article 10 43 The right to truth/ Necessity 50 iii. Section 137(3)(c): maximum sentence requirement 53 F. Bars to Extradition 53 a. Section 81 (Extraneous Considerations) 53 I. Section 81(a) 55 II. Section 81(b) 69 b. Section 82 (Passage of Time) 71 G. Human Rights 76 a. Article 6 84 b. Article 7 82 c. Article 10 88 H. Health – Section 91 92 a. Prison Conditions 93 I. Pre-Trial 93 II. Post-Trial 98 b. Psychiatric Evidence 101 I. The defence medical evidence 101 II. The US medical evidence 105 III. Findings on the medical evidence 108 c. The Turner Criteria 111 I.
  • New Tools for Collaboration: the Experience of the U.S. Intelligence Community

    New Tools for Collaboration: the Experience of the U.S. Intelligence Community

    JANUARY 2016 1616 Rhode Island Avenue NW Washington, DC 20036 202-887-0200 | www.csis.org Lanham • Boulder • New York • London 4501 Forbes Boulevard Lanham, MD 20706 301- 459- 3366 | www.rowman.com Cover photo: Rawpixel.com/Shutterstock New Tools for Collaboration The Experience of the U.S. Intelligence Community A Report of the CSIS Strategic Technologies Program ISBN 978-1-4422-5912-6 AUTHOR Ë|xHSLEOCy259126z v*:+:!:+:! Gregory F. Treverton Blank New Tools for Collaboration The Experience of the U.S. Intelligence Community AUTHOR Gregory F. Treverton January 2016 A Report of the CSIS Strategic Technologies Program Lanham • Boulder • New York • London About CSIS For over 50 years, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) has worked to develop solutions to the world’s greatest policy challenges. Today, CSIS scholars are providing strategic insights and bipartisan policy solutions to help decisionmakers chart a course toward a better world. CSIS is a nonprofit organization headquartered in Washington, D.C. The Center’s 220 full-time staff and large network of affiliated scholars conduct research and analysis and develop policy initiatives that look into the future and anticipate change. Founded at the height of the Cold War by David M. Abshire and Admiral Arleigh Burke, CSIS was dedicated to finding ways to sustain American prominence and prosperity as a force for good in the world. Since 1962, CSIS has become one of the world’s preeminent international institutions focused on defense and security; regional stability; and transnational challenges ranging from energy and climate to global health and economic integration. Thomas J.
  • Who Watches the Watchmen? the Conflict Between National Security and Freedom of the Press

    Who Watches the Watchmen? the Conflict Between National Security and Freedom of the Press

    WHO WATCHES THE WATCHMEN WATCHES WHO WHO WATCHES THE WATCHMEN WATCHES WHO I see powerful echoes of what I personally experienced as Director of NSA and CIA. I only wish I had access to this fully developed intellectual framework and the courses of action it suggests while still in government. —General Michael V. Hayden (retired) Former Director of the CIA Director of the NSA e problem of secrecy is double edged and places key institutions and values of our democracy into collision. On the one hand, our country operates under a broad consensus that secrecy is antithetical to democratic rule and can encourage a variety of political deformations. But the obvious pitfalls are not the end of the story. A long list of abuses notwithstanding, secrecy, like openness, remains an essential prerequisite of self-governance. Ross’s study is a welcome and timely addition to the small body of literature examining this important subject. —Gabriel Schoenfeld Senior Fellow, Hudson Institute Author of Necessary Secrets: National Security, the Media, and the Rule of Law (W.W. Norton, May 2010). ? ? The topic of unauthorized disclosures continues to receive significant attention at the highest levels of government. In his book, Mr. Ross does an excellent job identifying the categories of harm to the intelligence community associated NI PRESS ROSS GARY with these disclosures. A detailed framework for addressing the issue is also proposed. This book is a must read for those concerned about the implications of unauthorized disclosures to U.S. national security. —William A. Parquette Foreign Denial and Deception Committee National Intelligence Council Gary Ross has pulled together in this splendid book all the raw material needed to spark a fresh discussion between the government and the media on how to function under our unique system of government in this ever-evolving information-rich environment.
  • Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Document Clearinghouse in the World

    Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Document Clearinghouse in the World

    This document is made available through the declassification efforts and research of John Greenewald, Jr., creator of: The Black Vault The Black Vault is the largest online Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) document clearinghouse in the world. The research efforts here are responsible for the declassification of hundreds of thousands of pages released by the U.S. Government & Military. Discover the Truth at: http://www.theblackvault.com NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY CENTRAL SECURITY SERVICE FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, MARYLAND 20755-6000 FOIA Case: 79147A 28 November 2016 JOHN GREENEWALD Dear Mr. Greenewald: This responds to your Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request dated 15 September 2014 for Intellipedia entries on FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT and/or FOIA. As stated in our previous letter, dated 17 September 2014, your request was assigned Case Number 7914 7. For purposes of this request and based on the information you provided in your letter, you are considered an "all other" requester. As such, you are allowed 2 hours of search and the duplication of 100 pages at no cost. There are no assessable fees for this request. A copy of your request is enclosed. For your information, NSA provides a service of common concern for the Intelligence Community (IC) by serving as the executive agent for Intelink. As such, NSA provides technical services that enable users to access and share information with peers and stakeholders across the IC and DoD. lntellipedia pages are living documents that may be originated by any user organization, and any user organization may contribute to or edit pages after their origination.
  • Julian Assange Annex

    Julian Assange Annex

    JUDICIARY OF ENGLAND AND WALES District Judge Vanessa Baraitser In the Westminster Magistrates’ Court Between: THE GOVERNMENT OF THE US OF AMERICA -v- JULIAN PAUL ASSANGE CONSOLIDATED ANNEX Page The criminal proceedings Eric Lewis 3 Thomas Durkin 11 Journalism Mark Feldstein 13 Trevor Timm 18 Nicolas Hager 20 Noam Chomsky 22 Michael Tigar 23 1 Political Motivation Paul Rogers 23 Daniel Ellsberg 26 The Official Secrets Act Carey Shenkman 28 Jameel Jaffer 33 The Grand Jury Robert Boyle 33 Bridget Prince 36 Prison Conditions Joel Sickler 37 Yancy Ellis 43 Maureen Baird 49 Medical Evidence (summarised in decision) Password Hash Agreement Patrick Eller 51 Redacting the Documents John Goetz 55 John Sloboda 58 Jakob Augstein 60 Christian Grothoff 60 Stefania Maurizi 65 Christopher Butler 67 John Young 67 The importance of the “Manning” leaks Clive Stafford Smith 67 Andy Worthington 70 Ian Cobain 71 Patrick Cockburn 72 Khaled el-Masri 72 The Ecuadorian Embassy Aitor Martininez Jimenez 74 Anonymous Witness 1 74 Anonymous Witness 2 76 2 Cassandra Fairbanks 79 Guy Goodwin-Gill 79 THE CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS Eric Lewis 1. Dr Lewis gave evidence and adopted his five witness statements dated 18 October 2019 (EL1), 12 February 2020 (EL2), 17 January 2020 (EL3), 18 July 2020 (EL4) and 25 August 2020 (EL5), confirming that they were true to the best of his knowledge and belief. All paragraph references below refer to his statements. He sets out his qualifications at EL1 §1-3. Dr. Lewis is a partner in the US law Firm Lewis Baach Kaufmann Middlemiss PLLC in Washington DC.

  • Information Sharing in the Era of Wikileaks: Balancing Security and Collaboration" March 10, 2011

    81 Questions for the Record Submitted to Under Secretary Patrick F. Kennedy Senator Joseph I. Lieberman (#1) Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs March 10,2011 Question: Your testimony references the fact that the State Department has removed its database of diplomatic cables (known as the "Net Centric Diplomacy" database) from DOD's classified SIPRNet network. Although the State Department has other means of disseminating its cables, this database was a valuable resource for many interagency partners. In light of this decision, what is the State Department's plan for ensuring appropriate interagency dissemination of diplomatic cables over the long term? Will the Department consider putting its cables on SIPRNet again after security improvements have been made? Answer: The Department of State is maintaining our commitment to fully share our diplomatic reporting relied upon by our interagency partners. The primary means through which we share our diplomatic reporting is by automatic dissemination to over 65 agencies based on profiled requirements that these agencies provide to the Department. Recent events have not changed our commitment to sharing this vital information. The Net-Centric Diplomacy (NCD) database contains a fraction of the cables disseminated by the Department. The primary content found in NCD are cables marked with the caption "SIPDIS," meaning for SIPRNet Distribution. NCD is still available to cleared personnel on the Joint Worldwide Intelligence Communications System, despite its suspended access on SIPRNet. The Department will continue with our legacy method of dissemination and is exploring options to make cable metadata available to the interagency community on SIPRNet. Any decision by the Department to resume the dissemination of cables or information about cables on SIPRNet will depend on the extent of security improvements that are made.
  • CR11 Obrien.Pdf

    CR11 Obrien.Pdf

    The Trial of Chelsea Manning Reflections on the Court-Martial of a WikiLeaks Source By Alexa O’Brien n February 2010, during a mid-tour leave, a 22-year-old United States Army private named Bradley Manning walked into a Barnes & Noble bookstore in I Rockville, Maryland. The junior military intelligence analyst began uploading hundreds of thousands of classified U.S. government documents to WikiLeaks, the online publisher. In collaboration with WikiLeaks, the New York Times, Guardian and Der Spiegel later published extensive reports based on the documents. Manning was initially arrested in May 2010 on suspicion of having disclosed what military prosecutors then believed was a classified video of a July 2007 U.S. air strike in Baghdad. The helicopter attack had injured two children and killed at least twelve civilians, including two Reuters journalists. A month before Manning’s arrest, WikiLeaks had published the video, which it entitled Collateral Murder. Despite a U.S. Central Command classification review later determining that the video was in fact unclassified, military prosecutors nevertheless charged Manning with espionage for its unauthorized disclosure. Military prosecutors later accused Manning of disclosing four datasets con- taining 483,562 army field reports from Iraq and Afghanistan, 251,287 diplomatic cables, and approximately 765 detainee profiles of the men and children imprisoned at Guantanamo Bay. Manning was tried by court-martial at Fort Meade, Maryland, on twenty-two charges, including aiding the enemy, espionage, exceeding autho- rized access, stealing U.S. government property and wanton publication. v Chelsea Manning arrives Manning spent a year and a half in pretrial confine- for sentencing hearing, ment, apparently longer than any accused awaiting U.S.

  • Leaking and Legitimacy

    Leaking and Legitimacy Margaret B. Kwoka* Julian Assange, Chelsea Manning, and Edward Snowden have captured the world’s attention in recent years by leaking massive quantities of secret government information. In each case, critics have made much of the fact that the leaks were in violation of government secrecy laws, while supporters have drawn parallels with whistleblower leaks, including the most famous and now widely acclaimed leak in United States history, Daniel Ellsberg’s leak of the Pentagon Papers. This Article makes two important contributions to this debate. First, it defines this type of leak — which it labels a “deluge leak” — as a new category. Unlike whistleblower leaks, which expose targeted government policies about which a knowledgeable leaker is concerned (in Ellsberg’s case, military involvement in Vietnam), deluge leaks are a broad response to excessive government secrecy insofar as they reveal a vast array of records about which the leaker knows relatively little. Second, departing from traditional criminal law and First Amendment analyses of these leaks, this Article examines deluge leaks through the lens of the social science literature on legitimacy. That literature establishes that a perceived lack of procedural justice is a key reason that people break the law. Currently, deficient procedural justice characterizes the suite of laws that governs the public’s right to access government information, including the Freedom of Information Act, the classification system, and whistleblower protections. This lack of legitimacy is an important motivation for recent deluge leaks, as the leakers’ own actions and words demonstrate. The Article concludes by arguing, counter- intuitively, that improving transparency laws would better protect national security secrets.
  • The Framing of Chelsea Manning in Opinion Articles on Al Jazeera English

    The Framing of Chelsea Manning in Opinion Articles on Al Jazeera English

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Trepo - Institutional Repository of Tampere University UNIVERSITY OF TAMPERE Jaana Hakala The Framing of Chelsea Manning in Opinion Articles on Al Jazeera English Journalism Pro Gradu Thesis November 2015 Tampereen yliopisto Journalistiikan maisteriopinnot Viestinnän, median ja teatterin yksikkö HAKALA, JAANA: The Framing of Chelsea Manning in Opinion Articles on Al Jazeera English Pro gradu -tutkielma, 66 sivua, 2 liitesivua Marraskuu 2015 Pro gradu -tutkielmani tarkastelee sitä, miten yhdysvaltalainen tietovuotaja Chelsea Manning on kehystetty Al Jazeera Englishin mielipideartikkeleissa. Lisäksi kiinnitän erityistä huomiota siihen, millaisessa laajemmassa kontekstissa kehystäminen tapahtuu. Tutkimani aineisto koostuu 34:stä Al Jazeera Englishin internetsivuilla vuosina 2010-2013 julkaistuista mielipideartikkeleista. Asetan Manningin osaksi länsimaista ja erityisesti yhdysvaltalaista tietovuotamisen perinnettä, johon hänen lisäkseen kuuluvat myös esimerkiksi Pentagonin paperit 1970-luvulla vuotanut Daniel Ellsberg, vuonna 2013 NSA:n verkkovakoilun laajuuden paljastanut Edward Snowden ja ne valtion virkamiehet ja alihankkijat, joita vastaan on tietovuotojen vuoksi käyty viime vuosina oikeutta. Tämän perinteen sisällä medioille on arkipäivää käyttää nimettömiä lähteitä ja tietovuotajia, koska he paljastavat tietoa, johon tiedotusvälineet eivät muuten pääsisi käsiksi. Myös internetin kuuluisimmalla tietovuotosivustolla WikiLeaksillä on tärkeä asema