Report of the Working Group on the Ecosystem Effects of Fishing Activities (WGECO)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Report of the Working Group on the Ecosystem Effects of Fishing Activities (WGECO) ICES WGECO REPORT 2012 ICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE ICES CM 2012/ACOM:26 Report of the Working Group on the Ecosystem Effects of Fishing Activities (WGECO) 11–18 April 2012 Copenhagen, Denmark International Council for the Exploration of the Sea Conseil International pour l’Exploration de la Mer H. C. Andersens Boulevard 44–46 DK-1553 Copenhagen V Denmark Telephone (+45) 33 38 67 00 Telefax (+45) 33 93 42 15 www.ices.dk [email protected] Recommended format for purposes of citation: ICES. 2012. Report of the Working Group on THE Ecosystem Effects of Fishing Activ- ities (WGECO), 11–18 April 2012, Copenhagen, Denmark. ICES CM 2012/ACOM:26. 192 pp. For permission to reproduce material from this publication, please apply to the Gen- eral Secretary. The document is a report of an Expert Group under the auspices of the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea and does not necessarily represent the views of the Council. © 2012 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea ICES WGECO REPORT 2012 | i Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................... 5 1 Opening of the meeting ................................................................................................ 7 2 Adoption of the agenda ................................................................................................ 8 3 ToRa) MSFD indicator and target evaluation ........................................................ 10 3.1 Criteria and a process for evaluating the scientific soundness and feasibility of national proposals for indicators and targets used to support the achievement of Good Environmental Status ............................. 10 3.1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................ 10 3.1.2 Criteria to evaluate metrics and indicators ........................................ 10 3.1.3 Process to evaluate metrics and indicators using criteria ................ 15 3.1.4 Criteria to evaluate targets ................................................................... 16 3.1.5 Targets evaluation process ................................................................... 19 3.1.6 Relationships between indicator and targets ..................................... 20 3.1.7 Final comments ...................................................................................... 20 3.1.8 References ............................................................................................... 21 3.2 Approaches for combining information provided by indicators and targets into an assessment of status .......................................................... 21 3.2.1 Regional sea scale assessments from subregional sea scale surveys .................................................................................................... 21 3.2.2 Multiple indicators for single assessments ......................................... 23 3.2.3 References ............................................................................................... 24 4 ToRb) DCF indicators ................................................................................................. 26 4.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 26 4.2 Conservation status of fish species ................................................................... 26 4.2.1 Method of calculation ............................................................................ 27 4.2.2 Calculation .............................................................................................. 27 4.2.3 Synthesis and recommendations ......................................................... 37 4.3 Proportion of large fish ...................................................................................... 41 4.3.1 Method of calculation ............................................................................ 41 4.3.2 Calculation .............................................................................................. 41 4.3.3 Synthesis and recommendations ......................................................... 42 4.4 Mean maximum length of fishes ...................................................................... 43 4.4.1 Method of calculation ............................................................................ 43 4.4.2 Calculation .............................................................................................. 43 4.4.3 Synthesis and recommendations ......................................................... 44 4.5 Size at maturation of exploited fish species .................................................... 44 4.5.1 Method of calculation ............................................................................ 44 4.5.2 Issues ....................................................................................................... 45 ii | ICES WGECO REPORT 2012 4.6 Fishing pressure based on VMS........................................................................ 46 4.6.1 Method of calculation ............................................................................ 46 4.6.2 Calculation: Dutch case study .............................................................. 47 4.6.3 Calculation: Italian case study ............................................................. 56 4.6.4 Synthesis and recommendations ......................................................... 61 4.7 Discarding rates of commercially exploited species ...................................... 62 4.8 Fuel efficiency of fish capture ........................................................................... 63 4.9 Link of DCF indicators to the MSFD ................................................................ 64 4.10 References ............................................................................................................ 65 5 ToRc) Ecosystem impact assessment of bottom fishing ....................................... 69 5.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 69 5.2 Approaches to ecological risk assessment ....................................................... 69 5.2.1 Ecological risk assessment of the effects of fishing (Hobday et al., 2007, 2011) ..................................................................................... 69 5.2.2 The MarLIN Approach ......................................................................... 74 5.2.3 US National Research Council approach ............................................ 77 5.2.4 Extended overlap models ..................................................................... 78 5.2.5 Population level models........................................................................ 79 5.2.6 Conclusions............................................................................................. 80 5.3 Background to NEAFC Request ....................................................................... 80 5.4 Response to NEAFC Request ............................................................................ 82 5.5 References ............................................................................................................ 89 6 ToRd) Indicators of Foodweb condition in reference to MSFD Descriptor 4 ................................................................................................................... 92 6.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 92 6.2 Gaps and shortcomings of current MSFD foodweb indicators .................... 93 6.3 Function, structure, and dynamics ................................................................... 95 6.4 Linking function, structure and dynamics through models ......................... 96 6.4.1 The heuristic value of models .............................................................. 96 6.4.2 Specific modelling examples ................................................................ 97 6.5 Fluxes as foodweb functions ........................................................................... 100 6.6 Determining abundances of functional groups from survey data ............. 103 6.7 Attributes of foodweb structure ..................................................................... 104 6.7.1 Rationale ............................................................................................... 105 6.7.2 Types of models ................................................................................... 105 6.7.3 Attributes of GES: size spectra ........................................................... 105 6.7.4 Attributes of GES: foodwebs at species resolution .......................... 106 6.7.5 Attributes of GES: functional groups ................................................ 108 6.7.6 Summary ............................................................................................... 109 6.8 Conclusions and recommendations ............................................................... 109 6.9 References .......................................................................................................... 109 7 ToRe) LFI development ............................................................................................ 118 ICES WGECO REPORT 2012 | iii 7.1 Comparison of LFI trends based on the North Sea beam trawl and otter trawl surveys ...........................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Early Stages of Fishes in the Western North Atlantic Ocean Volume
    ISBN 0-9689167-4-x Early Stages of Fishes in the Western North Atlantic Ocean (Davis Strait, Southern Greenland and Flemish Cap to Cape Hatteras) Volume One Acipenseriformes through Syngnathiformes Michael P. Fahay ii Early Stages of Fishes in the Western North Atlantic Ocean iii Dedication This monograph is dedicated to those highly skilled larval fish illustrators whose talents and efforts have greatly facilitated the study of fish ontogeny. The works of many of those fine illustrators grace these pages. iv Early Stages of Fishes in the Western North Atlantic Ocean v Preface The contents of this monograph are a revision and update of an earlier atlas describing the eggs and larvae of western Atlantic marine fishes occurring between the Scotian Shelf and Cape Hatteras, North Carolina (Fahay, 1983). The three-fold increase in the total num- ber of species covered in the current compilation is the result of both a larger study area and a recent increase in published ontogenetic studies of fishes by many authors and students of the morphology of early stages of marine fishes. It is a tribute to the efforts of those authors that the ontogeny of greater than 70% of species known from the western North Atlantic Ocean is now well described. Michael Fahay 241 Sabino Road West Bath, Maine 04530 U.S.A. vi Acknowledgements I greatly appreciate the help provided by a number of very knowledgeable friends and colleagues dur- ing the preparation of this monograph. Jon Hare undertook a painstakingly critical review of the entire monograph, corrected omissions, inconsistencies, and errors of fact, and made suggestions which markedly improved its organization and presentation.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Mass-Balance Food Web Model of the Eastern Chukchi Sea
    NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-AFSC-262 Preliminary Mass-balance Food Web Model of the Eastern Chukchi Sea by G. A. Whitehouse U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service Alaska Fisheries Science Center December 2013 NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS The National Marine Fisheries Service's Alaska Fisheries Science Center uses the NOAA Technical Memorandum series to issue informal scientific and technical publications when complete formal review and editorial processing are not appropriate or feasible. Documents within this series reflect sound professional work and may be referenced in the formal scientific and technical literature. The NMFS-AFSC Technical Memorandum series of the Alaska Fisheries Science Center continues the NMFS-F/NWC series established in 1970 by the Northwest Fisheries Center. The NMFS-NWFSC series is currently used by the Northwest Fisheries Science Center. This document should be cited as follows: Whitehouse, G. A. 2013. A preliminary mass-balance food web model of the eastern Chukchi Sea. U.S. Dep. Commer., NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-AFSC-262, 162 p. Reference in this document to trade names does not imply endorsement by the National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-AFSC-262 Preliminary Mass-balance Food Web Model of the Eastern Chukchi Sea by G. A. Whitehouse1,2 1Alaska Fisheries Science Center 7600 Sand Point Way N.E. Seattle WA 98115 2Joint Institute for the Study of the Atmosphere and Ocean University of Washington Box 354925 Seattle WA 98195 www.afsc.noaa.gov U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Penny. S. Pritzker, Secretary National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Kathryn D.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vita Is Available Here
    COLLEGE OF WILLIAM AND MARY Curriculum Vita Standard Format PERSONAL INFORMATION Name: John A. Musick Date: 21 October 2014 Office Address: School of Marine Science, Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William and Mary, Gloucester Point, VA 23062 Phone: (804) 684-7317 Fax: (804) 684-7327 Email: [email protected] Home Address: 7036 Sassafras Landing Road, Gloucester, VA 23061 Phone: (804) 693-0719 Professional position: Marshall Acuff Professor of Marine Science Emeritus EDUCATION B.A. Rutgers University 1962 M.A. Harvard University 1964 Ph.D. Harvard University 1969 ACADEMIC POSITIONS 2008- Marshall Acuff Professor in Marine Science Emeritus, College of William and Mary 1999-2007: Marshall Acuff Chair in Marine Science, Head Vertebrate Ecology and Systematics Programs, College of William and Mary 1981-1999: Professor of Marine Science, Head, Vertebrate Ecology and Systematics programs, College of William and Mary, Virginia Institute of Marine Science. Gloucester Point, Virginia 2000-2006 Adjunct Graduate Faculty: School of Fisheries, Animal and Veterinary Science, University of Rhode Island 1971-1978: Scientific Collaborator. U.S. National Park Service, Cape Hatteras National Seashore 1979-1980: Associate Professor of Marine Science, College of William and Mary 1969-1979: Assistant Professor of Marine Science, University of Virginia 1968-1969: Instructor in Marine Science, College of William and Mary HONORS, PRIZES AND AWARDS 2009, Distinguished Fellow Award, American Elasmobranch Society 2008, Lifetime Achievement Award in Science, Commonwealth of Virginia 2002, Excellence in Fisheries Education Award, American Fisheries Society. 2001, Outstanding Faculty Award, State Council on Higher Education in Virginia 2000, Distinguished Service Award, American Fisheries Society [“You are recognized for your contributions toward providing understanding of the risks to long-lived marine fish species.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity of Arctic Marine Fishes: Taxonomy and Zoogeography
    Mar Biodiv DOI 10.1007/s12526-010-0070-z ARCTIC OCEAN DIVERSITY SYNTHESIS Biodiversity of arctic marine fishes: taxonomy and zoogeography Catherine W. Mecklenburg & Peter Rask Møller & Dirk Steinke Received: 3 June 2010 /Revised: 23 September 2010 /Accepted: 1 November 2010 # Senckenberg, Gesellschaft für Naturforschung and Springer 2010 Abstract Taxonomic and distributional information on each Six families in Cottoidei with 72 species and five in fish species found in arctic marine waters is reviewed, and a Zoarcoidei with 55 species account for more than half list of families and species with commentary on distributional (52.5%) the species. This study produced CO1 sequences for records is presented. The list incorporates results from 106 of the 242 species. Sequence variability in the barcode examination of museum collections of arctic marine fishes region permits discrimination of all species. The average dating back to the 1830s. It also incorporates results from sequence variation within species was 0.3% (range 0–3.5%), DNA barcoding, used to complement morphological charac- while the average genetic distance between congeners was ters in evaluating problematic taxa and to assist in identifica- 4.7% (range 3.7–13.3%). The CO1 sequences support tion of specimens collected in recent expeditions. Barcoding taxonomic separation of some species, such as Osmerus results are depicted in a neighbor-joining tree of 880 CO1 dentex and O. mordax and Liparis bathyarcticus and L. (cytochrome c oxidase 1 gene) sequences distributed among gibbus; and synonymy of others, like Myoxocephalus 165 species from the arctic region and adjacent waters, and verrucosus in M. scorpius and Gymnelus knipowitschi in discussed in the family reviews.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Feeding by grey seals in the Gulf of St. Lawrence and around Newfoundland M.O. Hammill1, G.B. Stenson2, F. Proust3, P. Carter1 and D. McKinnon2 1 Maurice Lamontagne Institute, Dept. of Fisheries & Oceans, P.O. Box 1000, Mont-Joli, QC. G5M 1L2 Canada. 2 NW Atlantic Fisheries Centre, Dept of Fisheries & Oceans, P.O. Box 5667, St. John’s, NF. A1C 5X1 Canada. 3 E-mail address: [email protected] ABSTRACT Diet composition of grey seals in the Gulf of St. Lawrence (Gulf) and around the coast of Newfound- land, Canada, was examined using identification of otoliths recovered from digestive tracts. Prey were recovered from 632 animals. Twenty-nine different prey taxa were identified. Grey seals sampled in the northern Gulf of St. Lawrence fed mainly on capelin, mackerel, wolffish and lumpfish during the spring, but consumed more cod, sandlance and winter flounder during late summer. Overall, the southern Gulf diet was more diverse, with sandlance, Atlantic cod, cunner, white hake and Atlantic herring dominating the diet. Capelin and winter flounder were the dominant prey in grey seals sam- pled from the east coast of Newfoundland, while Atlantic cod, flatfish and capelin were the most im- portant prey from the south coast. Animals consumed prey with an average length of 20.4 cm (Range 4.2-99.2 cm). Capelin were the shortest prey (Mean = 13.9 cm, SE = 0.08, N = 1126), while wolffish were the longest with the largest fish having an estimated length of 99.2 cm (Mean = 59.4, SE = 2.8, N = 63). In the early 1990s most cod fisheries in Atlantic Canada were closed because of the collapse of the stocks.
    [Show full text]
  • HELCOM Red List of Threatened and Declining Species of Lampreys and Fishes of the Baltic Sea
    Baltic Sea Environment Proceedings No. 109 HELCOM Red list of threatened and declining species of lampreys and fishes of the Baltic Sea Helsinki Commission Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission Baltic Sea Environment Proceedings No. 109 HELCOM Red list of threatened and declining species of lampreys and fishes of the Baltic Sea Helsinki Commission Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission Editor: Dr. Ronald Fricke, Curator of fishes, Ichtyology Contact address: Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart Rosenstein 1, 70191 Stuttgart, Germany E-mail: [email protected] Photographs © BfN, Krause & Hübner. Cover photo: Gobius niger For bibliographic purposes this document should be cited to as: HELCOM 2007: HELCOM Red list of threatened and declining species of lampreys and fish of the Baltic Sea. Baltic Sea Environmental Proceedings, No. 109, 40 pp. Information included in this publication or extracts there of is free for citing on the condition that the complete reference of the publication is given as stated above. Copyright 2007 by the Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission - Helsinki Commission ISSN 0357-2944 Table of Contents 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................6 2 Species and area covered.............................................................................................7 2.1 Species covered..............................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Parasites of Fishes of Canada Part V: Nematoda
    Zootaxa 4185 (1): 001–274 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Monograph ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2016 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4185.1.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0D054EDD-9CDC-4D16-A8B2-F1EBBDAD6E09 ZOOTAXA 4185 Guide to the Parasites of Fishes of Canada Part V: Nematoda HISAO P. ARAI3, 5 & JOHN W. SMITH4 3Pacific Biological Station, Nanaimo, British Columbia V9R 5K6 4Department of Biology, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3C5. E-mail: [email protected] 5Deceased Magnolia Press Auckland, New Zealand Accepted by K. DAVIES (Initially edited by M.D.B. BURT & D.F. McALPINE): 5 Apr. 2016; published: 8 Nov. 2016 Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 HISAO P. ARAI & JOHN W. SMITH Guide to the Parasites of Fishes of Canada. Part V: Nematoda* (Zootaxa 4185) 274 pp.; 30 cm. 8 Nov. 2016 ISBN 978-1-77670-004-2 (paperback) ISBN 978-1-77670-005-9 (Online edition) FIRST PUBLISHED IN 2016 BY Magnolia Press P.O. Box 41-383 Auckland 1346 New Zealand e-mail: [email protected] http://www.mapress.com/j/zt © 2016 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5326 (Print edition) ISSN 1175-5334 (Online edition) *Editors of the series: MICHAEL D. B. BURT & DONALD F. McALPINE 2 · Zootaxa 4185 (1) © 2016 Magnolia Press ARAI & SMITH Table of contents Dedications . 4 Preface . 5 Abstract . 5 Résumé . 5 Introduction . 6 Collection and Examination of Nematodes . 9 Geographical Distribution . 10 Glossary of Terms . 10 Keys and Descriptions.
    [Show full text]
  • Scr13-005.Pdf
    Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization Serial No. N6154 NAFO SCR Doc. 13/005 SCIENTIFIC COUNCIL MEETING – JUNE 2013 List of Species as recorded by Canadian and EU Bottom Trawl Surveys in Flemish Cap by Antonio Vázquez1, José Miguel Casas2, William B. Brodie3, Francisco Javier Murillo2, Mónica Mandado1, Ana Gago2, Ricardo Alpoim4, Rafael Bañón5, and Ángeles Armesto2 1 Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas, Muelle de Bouzas, Vigo, Spain. 2 Instituto Español de Oceanografía, Apdo. 1552, 36200 Vigo, Spain. 3 Fisheries & Oceans Canada, P.O. Box 5667, St. John's, NL, Canada. 4 Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera. Av. Brasília 1400 Lisboa, Portugal. 5 Consellería do Mar e Medio Rural, Santiago de Compostela, Spain. Abstract A list of species has been prepared with all records in each haul of both Canadian (1977-1985) and EU (1988-2002 and 2003-2012) bottom trawl surveys. Even though sampling intensity and taxonomic interest changed with time, the three periods can be considered almost homogeneous. Main change occurred when the EU survey increased the depth range, from 730 to 1460 meters depth, and all invertebrates were recorded. Material and methods Table 1 contains percentage of hauls in which each species has been recorded in each survey, but three periods are identified: 1977-1985: Canadian bottom-trawl surveys (Wells and Baird 1989) on board RV A.T. Cameron (1977) and RV Gadus Atlantica (1978-1985). 1988-2002: EU bottom-trawl survey up to 730 m depth on board RV Cornide de Saavedra – period indicated in light grey in Table 1. 2003-2012: EU bottom-trawl survey up to 1460 m depth on board RV Vizconde de Eza, and emphasis in benthonic invertebrates.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of the Hudson Bay Marine Ecosystem
    A-1 Appendices Appendix 1 Benthic, multicellular algae reported from Hudson Bay and James Bay .......................................................... A-3 Appendix 2 A partial listing of invertebrates and urochordates of the James Bay, Hudson Bay, Hudson Strait, and Foxe Basin marine regions. ....................................................................................................................... A-7 Appendix 3 Marine, estuarine and anadromous fishes reported from the James Bay, Hudson Bay, and Hudson Strait marine regions. ...................................................................................................................................... A-29 Appendix 4 Bird species that use the shorelines and waters of James Bay and Hudson Bay. ......................................... A-41 Appendix 5 Samples for which metals were determined showing geographic coordinates, depth (m) and proportions of particles of size >2mm, sand, silt and clay (from Henderson 1989). ....................................... A-47 Appendix 6 Concentrations of metals in samples of clay-size sediment from Hudson Bay (Data from Henderson 1989). .............................................................................................................................................................. A-51 Appendix 7 Metal pair correlations (r) for Henderson (1989) data. .................................................................................... A-55 Appendix 8 Pair correlations (r) for radionuclides and particle sizes in sediments
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Ecology Progress Series 495:205
    The following supplement accompanies the article Functional diversity of the Barents Sea fish community Magnus Aune Wiedmann1,*, Michaela Aschan1, Grégoire Certain2, Andrey Dolgov3, Michael Greenacre1,4, Edda Johannesen5, Benjamin Planque2, Raul Primicerio6 1Norwegian College of Fishery Science, University of Tromsø (UiT), 9037 Tromsø, Norway 2Institute of Marine Research (IMR), PO Box 6404, 9294 Tromsø, Norway 3Knipovich Polar Research Institute of Marine Fisheries and Oceanography (PINRO), 6 Knipovich Street, 183038 Murmansk, Russian 4Universitat Pompeu Fabra and Barcelona Graduate School of Economics, Ramon Trias Fargas 25−27, 08005 Barcelona, Spain 5Institute of Marine Research (IMR), PO Box 1870, Nordnes, 5817 Bergen, Norway 6Department of Marine and Arctic Biology, University of Tromsø (UiT), 9037 Tromsø, Norway *Corresponding author: [email protected] Marine Ecology Progress Series 495: 205–218 (2014) Supplement 2. Literature cited for functional trait matrix presented in Supplement 1 Albert OT (1993) Distribution, population structure and diet of silvery pout (Gadiculus argenteus thori J. Schmidt), poor cod (Trisopterus minutus minutus (L.)), four-bearded rockling (Rhinonemus cimbrius (L.)), and Vahl’s eelpout (Lycodes vahlii gracilis Reinhardt) in the Norwegian Deep. Sarsia 78:141–154 Albert OT, Nilssen EM, Stene A, Gundersen AC, Nedreaas KH (2001) Maturity classes and spawning behavior of Greenland halibut (Reinhardtius hippoglossoides). Fish Res 51:217– 228 Andriyashev AP (1954) Fishes of northern seas of the U.S.S.R. Academy of Science Press, Moscow-Leningrad. Translated from Russian by the Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem 1964 Atkinson EG, Percy JA (1992) Diet comparison among demersal marine fish from the Canadian Arctic. Polar Biol 11:567–573 Bagenal TB (1963) The fecundity of witches in the Firth of Clyde.
    [Show full text]
  • Scorpaeniformes: Cottidae)
    NOAA Professional Paper NMFS 10 U.S. Department of Commerce May 2010 Larval development and identification of the genus Triglops (Scorpaeniformes: Cottidae) Deborah M. Blood Ann C. Matarese U.S. Department of Commerce NOAA Professional Gary Locke Secretary of Commerce National Oceanic Papers NMFS and Atmospheric Administration Jane Lubchenco, Ph.D. Scientific Editor Administrator of NOAA Richard D. Brodeur, Ph.D. Associate Editor National Marine Julie Scheurer Fisheries Service Eric C. Schwaab National Marine Fisheries Service Assistant Administrator Northwest Fisheries Science Center for Fisheries 2030 S. Marine Science Dr. Newport, Oregon 97365-5296 Managing Editor Shelley Arenas National Marine Fisheries Service Scientific Publications Office 7600 Sand Point Way NE Seattle, Washington 98115 Editorial Committee Ann C. Matarese, Ph.D. National Marine Fisheries Service James W. Orr, Ph.D. National Marine Fisheries Service Bruce L. Wing, Ph.D. National Marine Fisheries Service The NOAA Professional Paper NMFS (ISSN 1931-4590) series is published by the Scientific Publications Office, National Marine Fisheries Service, The NOAA Professional Paper NMFS series carries peer-reviewed, lengthy original NOAA, 7600 Sand Point Way NE, research reports, taxonomic keys, species synopses, flora and fauna studies, and data-in- Seattle, WA 98115. tensive reports on investigations in fishery science, engineering, and economics. Copies The Secretary of Commerce has determined that the publication of of the NOAA Professional Paper NMFS series are available free in limited numbers to this series is necessary in the transac- government agencies, both federal and state. They are also available in exchange for tion of the public business required by other scientific and technical publications in the marine sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Marine Fishes of the Arctic Region Annotated with Common Names and Zoogeographic Characterizations
    List of Marine Fishes of the Arctic Region Annotated with Common Names and Zoogeographic Characterizations November 2013 . Photo: Shawn Harper, University of Alaska Fairbanks of Alaska University Harper, Shawn . Photo: Boreogadus saida Polar cod, cod, Polar Acknowledgements CAFF Designated Agencies: • Directorate for Nature Management, Trondheim, Norway • Environment Canada, Ottawa, Canada • Faroese Museum of Natural History, Tórshavn, Faroe Islands (Kingdom of Denmark) • Finnish Ministry of the Environment, Helsinki, Finland • Icelandic Institute of Natural History, Reykjavik, Iceland • The Ministry of Domestic Housing, Nature and Environment, Government of Greenland • Russian Federation Ministry of Natural Resources, Moscow, Russia • Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Stockholm, Sweden • United States Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, Alaska CAFF Permanent Participant Organisations: • Aleut International Association (AIA) • Arctic Athabaskan Council (AAC) • Gwich’in Council International (GCI) • Inuit Circumpolar Council (ICC) • Russian Indigenous Peoples of the North (RAIPON) • Saami Council This publication should be cited as: Mecklenburg, C.W., I. Byrkjedal, J.S. Christiansen, O.V. Karamushko, A. Lynghammar and P. R. Møller. 2013. List of marine fishes of the arctic region annotated with common names and zoogeographic characterizations. Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna, Akureyri, Iceland. Front cover photo: Polar cod, Boreogadus saida: Shawn Harper, University of Alaska Fairbanks Layout, photographs and editing: the authors For more information please contact: CAFF International Secretariat Borgir, Nordurslod 600 Akureyri, Iceland Phone: +354 462-3350 Fax: +354 462-3390 Email: [email protected] Internet: www.caff.is ___ CAFF Designated Area Arctic Marine Fish List, 11 November 2013 List of Marine Fishes of the Arctic Region Annotated with Common Names and Zoogeographic Characterizations By: Catherine W.
    [Show full text]