Town and Country Planning Act 1990 Appeal by Starbones Ltd

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Town and Country Planning Act 1990 Appeal by Starbones Ltd Town and Country Planning Act 1990 Appeal by Starbones Ltd Summary proof of Evidence of Philip Grover BA (Hons), BTP, DIP ARCH (CONS), MRTPI, IHBC relating to Design and Heritage matters on behalf of London Borough of Hounslow Planning application Reference: 00505/EY/P18 & 00505/EY/AD22 Appeal Reference: APP/F5540/W/17/3180962 & APP/F5540/Z/17/3173208 May 2018 1.0 Witness details 1.1 My name is Philip Russell Grover and I am a Director of Grover Lewis Associates Limited, a specialist town planning and built heritage consultancy. I have over 35 years’ experience as a built heritage professional dealing with all aspects of development in the historic environment, including issues related to integration of new development within sensitive historic contexts. 1.2 I hold an Honours Degree (BA) in Architecture from Oxford School of Architecture (now Oxford Brookes University), a Bachelor’s Degree in Town Planning from South Bank Polytechnic (now South Bank University) and a Postgraduate Diploma in Architectural Conservation from the University of Bristol. I am a member of the Royal Town Planning Institute (RTPI) and a founder member of the Institute of Historic Building Conservation (IHBC). 1.3 The evidence that I have prepared and provide for this appeal, Ref. APP/F5540/W/17/3180962 & APP/F5540/Z/17/3173208 in this proof of evidence, is true and has been prepared and is given in accordance with the guidance of my professional institution, the Royal Town Planning Institute. I confirm that the opinions expressed are my true and professional opinions. Planning appeal: Chiswick Curve © Grover Lewis Associates Ltd. Summary PoE: Philip Grover – Design & Heritage matters May 2018 1 2.0 Appeal background and scope of evidence Appeal details 2.1 The appeal is in respect of the refusal of an application for full planning permission by the London Borough of Hounslow for the redevelopment of land adjacent to the Chiswick Roundabout, Great West Road, London W4 for a 32- storey building, plus two basement levels, comprising 327 residential units and office, retail/restaurants uses (LPA Ref: 00505/EY/P18), and refusal of an associated application for advertisement consent for three internally illuminated signage panels to the proposed building (LPA Ref: 00505/EY/AD22). Scope and nature of evidence 2.2 My evidence is given on behalf of the London Borough of Hounslow. Grover Lewis Associates was appointed by the Council in January 2018. I have been engaged as an independent expert witness to assess the scheme and to provide specialist design and heritage evidence. I have not previously advised the Council with regard to the application for planning permission. 2.3 My evidence deals solely with those aspects of the Council’s reasons for refusal that relate to design and heritage, namely matters cited in Reasons for Refusal 1 and 2 of the planning application and Reason 1 and 2 of the application for advertisement consent. I should emphasise that my evidence does not seek to weigh any harm against the wider public benefits claimed the proposals. This aspect of the case is addressed by Mr. Baker who deals with the overall planning balance. 2.4 My evidence is informed by relevant published guidance, professional experience, and a critique of assessments made by others. I have made myself familiar with the case and carried out fieldwork and research between January and April 2018. Planning appeal: Chiswick Curve © Grover Lewis Associates Ltd. Summary PoE: Philip Grover – Design & Heritage matters May 2018 2 3.0 Decision-making context 3.1 My evidence takes account of relevant legislation as well as both the national and local heritage policy context. It also has regard to relevant national guidance relating to design and heritage matters. 3.2 Statutory duties relating to proposals affecting listed buildings and conservation areas are contained in the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 (CDH.01). 3.3 Central Government planning policy is set out in the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) (CDC.01), published in March 2012. Of particular relevance to my evidence are policies relating to the need for good design and policies relating to the conservation and enhancement of the historic environment. These matters are dealt with in section 7 and section 12 of the NPPF respectively, and I summarise the key policies in my main proof of evidence. Interpretation of the policies in the NPPF is provided by the on-line National Planning Practice Guidance (NPPG) (CDC.02) (March 2014). I summarise the relevant content of the NPPG in my main proof of evidence. 3.4 The development plan policy context that is relevant to this appeal comprises both the strategic policies set out the London Plan (2016) (CDC.04) and the local development plan policies set out in the London Borough of Hounslow Local Plan (September 2015) (CDD.01). I summarise the development plan policies that are particularly relevant to the design and heritage aspects appeal proposals in my main proof of evidence. 3.5 In my main proof of evidence, I summarise other relevant guidance, namely Historic England publications: Managing Significance in Decision-Taking in the Historic Environment (GPA2) (March 2015) (CDF.12 The Setting of Heritage Assets (December 2017) (GPA3) (CDF.13) and Tall Buildings (GPA 4) (CDF.14). 3.6 I have had regard to the above statutory duties, planning policies, and guidance, in my assessment of the impact and effects of the appeal proposal on the surrounding areas including designated heritage assets. In reaching my conclusions I have also had regard to relevant case law relating to impacts on heritage assets, namely Barnwell Manor (CDH.05), Bedford (CDH.04) and Irving (CDH.06). Planning appeal: Chiswick Curve © Grover Lewis Associates Ltd. Summary PoE: Philip Grover – Design & Heritage matters May 2018 3 4.0 The appeal site and proposals The appeal site 4.1 I describe the appeal site and its wider context in my main proof of evidence. I summarise the main aspects below. 4.2 The appeal site is located to the north-west of the Chiswick Roundabout, which forms the busy traffic intersection at the junction of the A4 Great West Road, the A406 North Circular Road (Gunnersbury Road), the A205 South Circular Road, the A315 Chiswick High Road, with elevated M4 motorway passing overhead. The site and its immediate surroundings are dominated by traffic routes that converge at this point, and in particular by the elevated section of the M4. Currently, the site has advertising hoardings around its perimeter, including three large advertisements on each of its three corners. The appeal building 4.3 The appeal proposals comprise a building formed of three connected volumes of curved plan form; an east tower rising to a maximum of 32 storeys (120.29m AOD), a west tower rising to 98.57m AOD) and a 17-storey linking element. From its narrow base the building flares out gradually over the first five storeys, then rises up vertically from that point. The first six floors of the proposed 32- storey building would be used for offices, retail and/or café space and amenity space. A public atrium is proposed on the ground floor. The floors above would contain 327 residential units. Two basement levels would provide motorcycle and cycle parking, space for refuse, plant, substations and switch rooms. 4.4 The external envelope of the building predominantly comprises clear glass curtain walling and will have a reflective appearance. The elevations are proposed to be articulated by horizontal and vertical fins of anodised aluminium, ‘wedged balconies’ and coloured panels. Advertisements 4.5 The appeal proposals, as amended, incorporate illuminated LED digital advertisements at three locations on the lower parts of the façade to maximise viewing exposure on the principal roads that converge at the Chiswick Roundabout. Planning appeal: Chiswick Curve © Grover Lewis Associates Ltd. Summary PoE: Philip Grover – Design & Heritage matters May 2018 4 5.0 Heritage assets and impacts Background 5.1 The appeal site does not fall within a conservation area and there are no statutorily or locally designated heritage assets within the site. Likewise, the immediate context of the appeal site in the vicinity of the Chiswick Roundabout is not sensitive from a heritage standpoint. However, given the very large bulk and height of the appeal proposal, there are a great many heritage assets beyond the immediate vicinity of the site that could potentially be impacted upon by the appeal proposal. 5.2 A number of important area-based heritage assets, each containing individually designated and non-designated heritage assets, are located in relatively close proximity to the site and would be impacted upon by the appeal proposal. Most notably these include the Royal Botanical Gardens, Kew, which is inscribed as a World Heritage Site as well as being designated as a grade I Registered Park and Garden and a conservation area. Part the World Heritage Site also lies within the Kew Green Conservation Area. Also notable is the grade II* Registered Park and Garden at Gunnersbury Park (which is located within the Gunnersbury Park Conservation Area). In addition to the designated historic landscapes referred to above, a number of conservation areas would be impacted upon by the appeal proposals 5.3 In my main proof of evidence, I set out the significance of each of the area- based heritage assets (including where appropriate the individual designated assets within them). I highlight the contribution that setting makes to their significance. I then discuss the impacts that the appeal proposals would have on the setting and significance of heritage assets most affected by the appeal proposal. I summarise the impacts below. Summary of heritage impacts Royal Botanical Gardens, Kew 5.4 Contrary to the Appellant’s claims, I consider that the appeal proposal would form a harmful and intrusive feature from a number of positions within the Royal Botanical Gardens and in some cases would be visible in juxtaposition with listed buildings located within the designated area.
Recommended publications
  • London Borough of Hounslow the Civic Centre Lampton Road Hounslow TW3 4DN
    London Borough of Hounslow The Civic Centre Lampton Road Hounslow TW3 4DN Committee Services If you require further information about this agenda please contact: Carol Stiles Tel. 020 8583 2066 or email [email protected]. CHISWICK AREA COMMITTEE (MONITORING) A meeting of the Chiswick Area Committee (Monitoring) will be held in The Hogarth Hall, Chiswick Town Hall, Heathfield Terrace, Chiswick W4 on Wednesday, 10 December 2003 at 7:30 pm MEMBERSHIP Councillor Lynch- Chair Councillors Barwood, Gilson, Day, Thompson, Lee, Kinghorn, Davies and Oulds. Co-optees - David Beattie and David Hopkins AGENDA PART I - ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION WHILE THE PRESS AND PUBLIC ARE IN ATTENDANCE 1. Apologies for absence, declarations of interest or any other communications from Members 2. Minutes of the meeting held on 12 November 2003 (Pages 1 - 17) Public Forum The Open Forum will take place as close as possible to 9.00 p.m. for approximately 20 minutes. Members of the public may raise matters of local concern. Please bear in mind the guidelines for public participation and that it may not be possible to have a detailed discussion or response at the meeting. Points raised will be noted and used to inform the work of the Area Committee. Protocol for the Open Forum ♦ Written items to be submitted where possible. (Proformas will be available at the back of the hall). ♦ Where they are so submitted this should be by 8.30 p.m. ♦ Speakers will be allowed at the Chair’s discretion. ♦ The Chair will normally only allow one contribution per person per item and one item per person per meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Past Spring 2021 Summer 2021 Winter 2021/2022 What Is
    1 Who we are & Why we are here Habinteg are a Housing Association specialising in providing accessible homes to those who need them, within inclusive and welcoming The Lindens Bolton Road neighbourhoods. Our focus is on providing much-needed homes for those with disabilities, alongside other high-quality and well-designed properties for those who don’t currently have specialist requirements, but may in the future. Our intention for this site, and other small sites within the Borough, is to maximise the opportunities to create high-quality homes, whilst minimising disruption to existing residents. In order to achieve these The Lindens goals, we are working in partnership with Hounslow Council, and have employed a team of specialist consultants, with vast experience in similar developments. The architects for the development are Levitt Bernstein, an award-winning design practice, and the planning consultants are Magenta Planning, a dynamic London-based consultancy. What is happening As part of London Borough of Hounslow’s commitment to providing 5,000 new affordable homes by 2022. This site will provide affordable housing and be well- designed to meet the Council’s ambitions to become energy efficient. Inspired by the GLA’s “Small Sites, Small Builders Programme”, the London Borough of Hounslow Council has identified a number of small sites within the Borough that may be able to be developed, to provide much-needed affordable and accessible housing. The garage area within The Lindens has been identified as one such potential development site. Habinteg, a Housing Association who specialise in providing accessible and adaptable homes, are proposing to develop the site, in partnership with the Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Build a New Home?
    delivered to your door propertyYour paper, local London & Southern Edition March/April 2016 PROPERTY OF THE MONTH P8 MORTGAGES P23 BUDGET P41 INTERIORS P42 GARDENING P46 Why build a The first step new home? P3 – six great starter homes P6 One of the most exclusive addresses in Mill Hill. Computer generated illustration indicative only. Final elegantly appointed apartments now released Completions from March 2016 Available to view Information Centre and Showhomes open daily 10am - 5pm 2 and 3 bedroom apartments from £875,000 - £1,850,000 For further information telephone 01753 336594, email [email protected] or visit www.stjosephsgate.co.uk St Joseph’s Gate, Lawrence Street, Mill Hill, London, NW7 4JZ London, Kent, Sussex, Surrey, Hampshire, Isle of Wight – Find your new home at Whathouse.com The Halebourne Group Find your new home at whathouse.com/new-homes new home 3 Open March 2016 Welcome! Show Home Why buy a new his March’s Budget speech merely confirmed one or two of the changes to the property market previously Tintroduced, with the Lifetime ISA the only brand new announcement with effect on potential homebuyers – and even that is a very similar build home? product to the Help to Buy What are the reasons why house-hunters should consider buying a new build home? ISA he brought to the market last November. rand new is special. Many Some of us will certainly be THE LATEST disappointed that the Chancellor house-hunters simply love the STANDARDS The Ridge ‘blank canvas’ of a brand new did not clarify – or modify – last New-build homes are built to high year’s stamp duty changes for buy- RIDGEMOUNT ROAD SUNNINGDALE SL5 9JQ home.
    [Show full text]
  • Chiswick Station House Chswick Station House
    Chiswick Station House Chswick Station House Location: Located on the platform edge of the current Chiswick Railway Station the once Stationmaster’s workplace during the golden age of steam is idealy located for any thriving business. By Train - The Grade II listed building sits on the Eastbound platform of Chiswick railway station, 25 minutes from Waterloo. By Tube - The nearest underground station is Turnham Green on the District Line. From there, the site is either a 5 minute cab ride, a 10 minute E3 bus ride, or a leafy twenty minute walk through the historic grounds of Chiswick House. By Car - From Heathrow and the West, take the M4 Eastbound until it runs in to the A4 at Chiswick. Follow signs for Grove Park, turning onto Sutton Court Road which leads into Burlington Lane and Chiswick Station. The Listed Building History Originall designed and constructed in 1849 by william Tite for the Windsor, Staines and South Western Railway, Chiswick Station House is a predominantley a two storey building with small single storey wings abutting each side. Constructed from London stock brick and adorned with rendered quoins and dressings Chiswick Station House is a beautiful example of the Tite ‘Classical Villa. The station house ceased being used by the railway in 1989 and was subsequently taken into private ownership and houses commercial premises. In 2003, with the support and co-operation of London Borough of Hounslow, the then unoccupied and poorly maintained listed building was extended and refurbished to create circa 2,500 sqft of net lettable high quality commercial space.
    [Show full text]
  • A Little Extra Golden Years – Properties with Annex – Our 20-Page Retirement Accommodation P6 Property Supplement P25
    delivered to your door propertyYour paper, local London & Southern Edition May 2016 BUY-TO-LET P3 LONDON NEW HOMES P18 MORTGAGES P23 INTERIORS P62 GARDENING P66 Canaletto – property of the month P8 A little extra Golden years – properties with annex – our 20-page retirement accommodation P6 property supplement P25 Your first stop for Surrey New Homes www.curchods.com What House DPS.indd 3 24/03/2016 15:59:40 London, Kent, Sussex, Surrey, Hampshire, Isle of Wight – Find your new home at Whathouse.com Find your new home at whathouse.com/new-homes buy-to-let 3 Mortgage Advisers What makes a good buy-to-let? Welcome! eorge Osborne’s latest Before you plunge into the buy-to-let property market, there are a number of Budget surprised many of us by hardly touching considerations you should take into account upon the property market, Gbut this year has certainly seen a LOCATION TYPE OF PROPERTY This dramatically affects your sums when great deal of change based on his working out what you’ll charge and what The type of buy-to-let property you policies from the last couple of years. A good location is one where people rental yield you might expect. purchase is related to the type of tenant The first quarter of the year saw want to live. It doesn’t have to be you’re looking to target. Find a type of a surge in activity in the property the cheapest or most expensive area. property which will appeal to the type PROPERTY and mortgage industries as investors It’s an area that has the most of tenant you’re wanting to move in.
    [Show full text]
  • Job 122037 Type
    wonderful townhouse with outstanding river views & secluded garden Chiswick Wharf, Chiswick, London W4 2SR Freehold Well proportioned rooms, garage and residents parking Chiswick Wharf, Chiswick, London W4 2SR Freehold 5 bedrooms ◆ reception room ◆ kitchen ◆ 4 bathrooms (2 en suite) ◆ garden ◆ garage ◆ 152.7sq m (1,643 sq ft) ◆ EPC rating = C Situation Chiswick Wharf is a development situated on the banks of the River Thames in Chiswick, providing easy access to central London via the A4, and via the M4 for Heathrow Airport and the west of England. Turnham Green Underground station (District line) and Chiswick railway station are close by. Description This magnificent house offers copious amounts of accommodation over four floors and includes superb river views. The ground floor comprises of a garage at the front, allowing for hassle free and convenient parking, along with additional parking on the driveway. At the rear of the ground floor is the open and airy kitchen which has access to the south east facing garden via glass French doors, which allows for plenty of light to come in making this room a real asset of the property. The first floor includes a good sized bedroom with built in storage and a cloakroom off the hallway. Opposite is the exquisite well sized reception room, which enjoys views of the river via large windows. This room is a superb entertaining space with high ceilings and décor. The second floor houses two further double bedrooms (one a master with an en suite and built in wardrobes), a further bathroom and another room which can either be used as a bedroom or home office.
    [Show full text]
  • BB Master Aug-Dec 2018 Final B
    The London Appreciation Society [Founded in 1932 by Dr H.L. Bryant Peers] Secretary: John Mann, 109 Chatsworth Road London NW2 4BH Website: www.las.org.uk * The Society is a secular, non-political and non profit-making organization for adults interested in the past, present and future of London * President: The Rt. Hon. The Viscount Norwich, CVO Vice Presidents Roger Cline Valerie Colin-Russ The Ven. Peter Delaney Gerald R. Charles Dickens Committee Chairman: Christopher Claxton Stevens Deputy Chairman: John Mann Secretary: John Mann Registrar: Clive Page Treasurer: John Tritton Assistant Treasurer: Mary Moore Shelagh Blackham MBE Don Buchanan Arthur Fordham Patricia Howard Anne Oxenham MBE Officers Membership Secretary: Christine Bevan Committee Secretary: Roger Cline Honorary Life Members John Barrett Roger Cline Valerie Colin-Russ Daphne Hart 1 Programme Organisers Shelagh Blackham Liz Harwood & Robin Key James Nadarajah Rosemary Bolingbroke Carole Lee Anne Oxenham Arthur Fordham Joy & Mike Lever Anne Ramon Julia Foyle [IT support] Margaret & John Mann Chris & Daphne Steele Simon Gillingham Gayna Martine & Simon Masterton Smith Judith & Richard West Tour Leaders Pat Howard [Co-Ordinator] John Ackroyd Julie Crouch Rhoda Lewis Jacqueline Anda John Dodwell John Mann Rosemary Bolingbroke Geoff Donald Mary Moore Christopher Claxton Stevens Paul Dye Chris Redfern Roger Cline Keith & Mary Evans Hilary Taylor Valerie Colin-Russ Simon Gillingham John Tritton Contacts If you have a query, please email or write to the relevant
    [Show full text]
  • Thornton Avenue 1- Brochure Nn 21/01/2016 12:01:57 THORNTON AVENUE CHISWICK • W4
    THORNTON AVENUE CHISWICK • W4 Thornton Avenue 1- Brochure nn 21/01/2016 12:01:57 THORNTON AVENUE CHISWICK • W4 A substantial end‐of‐terrace Victorian family house, offering over 3,600 sq ft of living space. The house is a short walk from the shops, restaurants and amenities of Chiswick High Road and Turnham Green Underground Station. 6 Double Bedrooms • 3 Bath/Shower Rooms Single Bedroom/Study • Large Kitchen/Dining Room Double Reception Room • Basement ﴾with scope for further development﴿ • West Facing Garden Central London 6.1 miles Heathrow Airport 10.3 miles Turnham Green Underground 0.2 miles ﴿All distances are approximate﴾ These particulars are intended only as a guide and must not be relied upon as statements of fact. Your attention is drawn to the Important Notice on the last page of the text. Thornton Avenue 1- Brochure nn 21/01/2016 12:01:57 Thornton Avenue, Chiswick W4 This stunning Victorian family home was originally built as the master builders property and benefits from being the widest house on the street, with a large basement which offers scope for further development. These enhanced proportions are evident throughout the property, which comprises a generous entrance hall with original floor tiling leading to a large double reception room with feature fireplace, wood floors and downstairs wc. To the rear of the property there is a bespoke kitchen and family dining area with with bi‐folding doors leading to a beautifully landscaped garden. The first floor offers a luxurious master bedroom with ensuite bathroom,, two further double bedrooms, family bathroom and wc.
    [Show full text]
  • Town and Country Planning Act 1990 Appeal by Starbones Ltd Proof Of
    Town and Country Planning Act 1990 Appeal by Starbones Ltd Proof of Evidence of Philip Grover BA (Hons), BTP, DIP ARCH (CONS), MRTPI, IHBC relating to Design and Heritage matters on behalf of London Borough of Hounslow Planning Application Reference: 00505/EY/P18 & 00505/EY/AD22 Appeal Reference: APP/F5540/W/17/3180962 & APP/F5540/Z/17/3173208 May 2018 Contents Page 1.0 Witness details 2 2.0 Appeal background and scope of evidence 4 3.0 Decision-making context 9 4.0 The appeal site and appeal proposals 23 5.0 Heritage assets and impacts 27 6.0 Design issues 59 7.0 Conclusions 69 Appendix A: Plates 71 Planning appeal: Chiswick Curve © Grover Lewis Associates Ltd. Proof of evidence: Philip Grover – Design & Heritage matters May 2018 1 1.0 Witness details 1.1 My name is Philip Russell Grover and I am a Director of Grover Lewis Associates Limited, a specialist town planning and built heritage consultancy. I have over 35 years’ experience as a built heritage professional dealing with all aspects of development in the historic environment, including issues related to integration of new development within sensitive historic contexts. 1.2 I hold an Honours Degree (BA) in Architecture from Oxford School of Architecture (now Oxford Brookes University), a Bachelor’s Degree in Town Planning from South Bank Polytechnic (now South Bank University) and a Postgraduate Diploma in Architectural Conservation from the University of Bristol. I am a member of the Royal Town Planning Institute (RTPI) and a founder member of the Institute of Historic Building Conservation (IHBC).
    [Show full text]
  • The London Rail
    A B C D E F G H Towards Towards Towards Towards Towards Towards Aylesbury Hemel Hempstead Luton Stevenage Stevenage Stansted Airport Luton Airport Parkway Outside fare zones, Welwyn Garden City Hertford North Hertford East St Margarets London’s Outside fare zones Watford Junction Oyster not valid. Hatfield Bayford Harpenden Welham Green Ware Chesham 9 St Albans City Brookmans Park Cuffley Outside fare zones Rye Amersham Potters Bar House Watford High Street Radlett Hadley Wood Crews Hill Rail & Tube 6 Broxbourne Cockfosters Gordon Hill Bushey Elstree & Borehamwood New Barnet Chalfont & 8 Enfield Chase Cheshunt Epping Latimer Watford Oakwood 7 8 High Barnet Towards 5 Grange Park Theydon Bois Chelmsford services Carpenders Park Theobalds Waltham Outside Oakleigh Park Grove 6 7 8 and Southend Towards Chorleywood Southgate Cross Debden fare Croxley Totteridge & Whetstone Enfield High 7 Winchmore Hill Town zones Turkey Loughton Wycombe Rickmansworth Street Hatch End Edgware Woodside Park Arnos Grove Shenfield New Southgate Enfield Lock Moor Park Palmers Green Southbury Buckhurst Hill Stanmore Mill Hill Broadway West Finchley Bounds Bush Hill Brentwood 1 1 6 Headstone Lane Green Park Brimsdown Chingford Northwood Roding 5 West Ruislip Burnt Oak 4 Mill Hill East Valley Grange Hill Canons Park Ponders End Northwood Bowes Park Hills Harrow & Wealdstone Colindale Chigwell Finchley Central Edmonton Green Highams Hainault Hillingdon Ruislip Harold Wood Queensbury Hendon Central Alexandra Wood Green Meridian Water Park Pinner 5 Woodford Ruislip Manor
    [Show full text]
  • South Chiswick Liveable Neighbourhood
    South Chiswick Liveable Neighbourhood Commonplace Public Consultation Results & Traffic Data Analysis 29 May 2020 Commonplace data analysis undertaken by Sustrans Contents Executive Summary .........................................................................................3 Part 1: Overall Consultation Results ..............................................................7 Responses ................................................................................................................... 8 Hotspots ..................................................................................................................... 10 Issues Overview ......................................................................................................... 12 Improvements Overview ............................................................................................ 13 Part 2: Consultation Results by Zone ........................................................... 14 Responses by Zone ................................................................................................... 15 Zone A: Strand on the Green ..................................................................................... 16 Zone B: Harvard Hill and Fauconberg Road ............................................................... 18 Zone C1: Chiswick Station and Grove Park ............................................................... 20 Zone C2: Sutton Court Road ...................................................................................... 22 Zone D:
    [Show full text]
  • Intermodal Passenger Flows on London's Public Transport Network
    Intermodal Passenger Flows on London’s Public Transport Network Automated Inference of Full Passenger Journeys Using Fare-Transaction and Vehicle-Location Data by Jason B. Gordon B.A., University of California, Berkeley Submitted to the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and the Department of Urban Studies and Planning in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degrees of Master of Science in Transportation and Master in City Planning at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology September 2012 © 2012 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. All rights reserved. Signature of Author . Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Department of Urban Studies and Planning August 10, 2012 Certified by . Nigel H.M. Wilson Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering Thesis Supervisor Certified by . Harilaos Koutsopoulos Professor of Transport Science, Royal Institute of Technology Thesis Supervisor Certified by . John P. Attanucci Lecturer & Research Associate, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Thesis Supervisor Accepted by . Alan Berger Professor of Urban Studies and Planning Chair, Master in City Planning Committee Accepted by . Heidi M. Nepf Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering Chair, Departmental Committee for Graduate Students Intermodal Passenger Flows on London’s Public Transport Network Automated Inference of Full Passenger Journeys Using Fare-Transaction and Vehicle-Location Data by Jason B. Gordon Submitted to the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and the Department of Urban Studies and Planning on August 10, 2012 in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degrees of Master of Science in Transportation and Master in City Planning AbstrAct Urban public transport providers have historically planned and managed their networks and services with limited knowledge of their customers’ travel pat- terns.
    [Show full text]