UKRAINE NATIONAL REPORT on Compliance with Obligations Under

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

UKRAINE NATIONAL REPORT on Compliance with Obligations Under UKRAINE NATIONAL REPORT On Compliance with Obligations under the Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management KYIV 2017 FOREWORD Ukraine signed the Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management (hereinafter the Joint Convention) on 29 September 1997 and was one of the first countries to ratify it by the Law of Ukraine on 20 April 2000. After the Joint Convention came into force, Ukraine became an active participant of all processes and events under the Joint Convention in order to fulfill its tasks. The First, Second, Third, Fourth and Fifth National Reports of Ukraine were presented to the Contracting Parties of the Joint Convention at Review Meetings. The comments and recommendations of the review processes are incorporated in national action plans in the area of nuclear energy as regards improvement of spent nuclear fuel and radioactive waste management system. The Sixth National Report has been developed by the State Nuclear Regulatory Inspectorate of Ukraine in full compliance with requirements of the Joint Convention and Guidelines Regarding the Form and Structure of National Reports INFCIRC/604/Rev.3 with amendments, as well as the Summary Report of the Fifth Review Meeting of the Contracting Parties (JC/RM5/04/Rev2). By submission of National Reports, Ukraine fulfills its obligations according to Article 32 of the Joint Convention. This Report, as well as the previous ones, is based on legislative and regulatory documents in force in Ukraine and official reports of state executive bodies responsible for the national policy in nuclear energy use and regulation and radioactive waste management as well as operating organizations (operators). The key objective of this Report is to provide objective information to the Contracting Parties of the Joint Convention and to the public of Ukraine regarding the safety of spent fuel management and the safety of radioactive waste management and actions taken to protect personnel, the public and the environment against hazardous effects of radiation. The Report highlights the changes and progress in the legislative and regulatory framework since the Fifth Review Meeting and identifies prospects and plans for further development and issues to be resolved. Based on this Report and according to the powers entrusted by the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine, the Acting Chairman of the State Nuclear Regulatory Inspectorate of Ukraine declares the following: Ukraine adheres to the principle of priority to safety of people and the environment at all stages of spent fuel and radioactive waste management in the area of nuclear energy and radiation safety. In this regard, Ukraine completely fulfills its obligations under the Joint Convention, which is proved by: establishment and development of the legislative and regulatory framework of safety in the area of nuclear energy; functioning of the state nuclear regulatory body with relevant competence, which establishes safety requirements and criteria, develops and approves standards and regulations on nuclear and radiation safety, conducts licensing and state supervision and applies legislative enforcement measures in case of incompliance; independence of the state nuclear regulatory body from other state authorities, establishments, enterprises and officials that deal with nuclear energy and independence from local authorities and public associations; 2 safety assessments and reviews of existing and new spent fuel and radioactive waste management facilities and measures to improve safety and security; development of the emergency preparedness and response system; full responsibility of the licensee for safety and measures intended to protect people and the environment; development of safety culture and implementation of safety self-assessment practices. The actual data in this Report, except for those specially stated, are provided as of 1 July 2017. The changes to take place by May 2018 will be additionally reported by the Ukrainian Delegation at the Sixth Review Meeting. Kyiv, September 2017 Borys Stolyarchuk Acting Chairman State Nuclear Regulatory Inspectorate of Ukraine 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD .................................................................................................................................. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................... 4 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ...................................................................................... 9 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................... 11 Section A ........................................................................................................................................ 15 A.1. Introduction ............................................................................................................... 15 A.2. Basic Conclusions from the Fifth Review Meeting................................................. 18 Section B. POLICES AND PRACTICES (Article 32, Para. 1) ................................................ 19 B.1. Spent Fuel Management Policy ................................................................................ 19 B.2. Spent Fuel Management Practices ........................................................................... 20 B.2.1. Spent Fuel Management at Operating NPPs ............................................ 20 B.2.2. Spent Fuel Management at Chornobyl NPP ............................................. 23 B.2.3. Spent Fuel Management for Research Reactors ..................................... 24 B.3. Radioactive Waste Management Policy .................................................................. 24 B.4. Radioactive Waste Management Practices ............................................................. 25 B.4.1. Radioactive Waste Management at Operating NPPs ............................... 25 B.4.2. Radioactive Waste Management at Chornobyl NPP ............................... 29 B.4.3. Radioactive Waste Management in Exclusion Zone ................................ 32 B.4.4. Radioactive Waste Management at UkrDO Radon SISPs ...................... 38 B.4.5. Radioactive Waste Management for Research Reactors ......................... 41 B.5. Criteria Used to Define and Classify Radioactive Waste ....................................... 41 Section C. SCOPE OF APPLICATION (Article 3) .................................................................. 42 Section D. INVENTORIES AND LISTS (Article 32, Para. 2) ................................................. 43 D.1. List of Spent Fuel Management Facilities Subject to the Joint Convention, Their Location, Main Purpose and Essential Features ................................................. 43 D.2. Inventory of Spent Fuel Subject to the Joint Convention ..................................... 43 D.3. List of Radioactive Waste Management Facilities Subject to the Joint Convention, Their Location, Main Purpose and Essential Features ............................ 44 D.4. Inventory of Radioactive Waste Subject to the Joint Convention ........................ 44 D.4.1. List of Radioactive Waste in Temporary Storage at Nuclear Facilities and Research Reactors .......................................................................... 44 D.4.2. List of Disposed Radioactive Waste ........................................................... 44 D.4.3. List of Radioactive Waste Resulting from Past Practices ........................ 44 D.5. List of Nuclear Facilities under Decommissioning ................................................. 44 Section E. LEGISLATIVE AND REGULATORY SYSTEM ................................................. 45 4 E.1. Implementing Measures (Article 18) ....................................................................... 45 E.2. Legislative and Regulatory Framework (Article 19).............................................. 45 E.2.1. National Safety Requirements and Radiation Safety Regulations .......... 45 E.2.2. Licensing System for Spent Fuel and Radioactive Waste Management ............................................................................................................ 46 E.2.3. System of Prohibition to Operate a Spent Fuel or Radioactive Waste Management Facility without a License ................................................... 46 E.2.4. System of Institutional and Regulatory Control and Documentation and Reporting ......................................................................................................... 46 E.2.5. Enforcement of Applicable Regulations and Terms of Licenses ............. 47 E.2.6. Allocation of Responsibilities for Bodies Involved in Different Stages of Spent Fuel and Radioactive Waste Management ................................ 47 E.3. Regulatory Body (Article 20) .................................................................................... 48 Section F. OTHER GENERAL SAFETY PROVISIONS ........................................................ 50 F.1. Responsibility of the License Holder (Article 21) ................................................... 50 F.2. Human and Financial Resources (Article 22) ......................................................... 51 F.2.1. Qualified Staff Needed for Safety-Related Activities during the Operating Lifetime of a Spent Fuel and Radioactive Waste Management Facility
Recommended publications
  • Smart Water Presentation (SWGS)
    Water for Life and Peace Smart Water for Green Schools in Ukraine Mission: providing sustainable access to safe drinking water and sanitation in Zhytomyr region General Information about Ukraine Location: Central Eastern Europe Capital: Kyiv Area: 603,000 km2 Population: 46 million people Ukraine consists of 24 oblasts and 1 autonomous republic of Crimea Neighbors: Poland, Slovakia, Hungary, Romania, Moldova, Russian Federation and Belarus Black and Azov Sea wash Ukraine at the South Major Ukrainian rivers: Dnieper (total length of 2285 km), Dniester (1352 km), Southern Bug (806 km), Desna (1187 km), Seversky Donets (1053 km). Ukraine has a large amount of transboundary river basins with the neighboring countries: the Republic of Belarus, the Russian Federation, the Republic of Moldova, Romania, Hungary, the Slovak Republic, Poland. Ukraine is a country with an insufficient water supply - about 1.6 km³ of waters per inhabitant per year. Water Situation in Ukraine 69 percent of the drinking water delivered to homes does not meet sanitary standards in Ukraine. Every year the quality deteriorates, and one of the reasons for this is a catastrophic state of public water supply system. Some 18 thousand cities and villages around Ukraine have no access to safe water. Inhabitants of more then 1’150 settlements have to use imported and/or bottled water and public wells for their daily needs. General Information about Zhytomyr Region The Zhytomyr region is located in the North Western part of Ukraine. It consists of 23 districts including Ovruch and has a population of 1,271,000 people. Nearly half of the population resides in rural areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Korosten City of Zhytomyr Region
    Korosten City of Zhytomyr region Korosten City is an integral part of Zhytomyr Region in Ukraine with access to the key markets of Ukraine and the European Union by virtue of its position on the E373 and access E40 highways. Market access is also guaranteed through five rail routes suitable for freight and passengers. With a total population of over one hundred thousand in the region, Korosten has a skilled workforce of almost 40,000 people. A local technical college provides trained personnel for Korosten industry, to which can be added graduates from two universities and other higher educational establishments in the nearby regional centre of Zhytomyr. Korosten economy has 18 larger enterprises and some 3000 small and medium businesses. The largest sector is related to timber and wood processing from lumber through to furniture, other sectors include machine building and metalworking, raw materials and extractive industries and chemical industry. International business is greatly facilitated by the fact that Korosten has its own customs clearance facilities. Key enterprises in Korosten include: Company Contacts Information UKRAINIAN SAWMILL https://rezult.pro/ specializes in wood processing HOLDING COMPANY LIMITED PJSC Korostenskii MDF http://www.kmm.ua/ specializes in environmentally Plant friendly production - production of medium-density fibreboard (MDF) and high-density fibreboard (HDF) PE «Pharmaceutical http://www.elfa.ua production of perfume, cosmetics Factory «Research and P and similar products roduction Association «ELFA»
    [Show full text]
  • Epidemiology of Parkinson's Disease in the Southern Ukraine
    — !!!cifra_MNJ_№5_(tom16)_2020 01.07. Белоусова 07.07.Евдокимова ОРИГІНАЛЬНІ ДОСЛІДЖЕННЯ /ORIGINAL RESEARCHES/ UDC 616.858-036.22 DOI: 10.22141/2224-0713.16.5.2020.209248 I.V. Hubetova Odessa Regional Clinical Hospital, Odesa, Ukraine Odessa National Medical University, Odesa, Ukraine Epidemiology of Parkinson’s disease in the Southern Ukraine Abstract. Background. Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a slowly progressing neurodegenerative disease with accumulation of alpha-synuclein and the formation of Lewy bodies inside nerve cells. The prevalence of PD ranges from 100 to 200 cases per 100,000 population. However, in the Ukrainian reality, many cases of the disease remain undiagnosed, which affects the statistical indicators of incidence and prevalence. The purpose of the study is to compare PD epidemiological indices in the Southern Ukraine with all-Ukrainian rates. Material and methods. Statistical data of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine, public health departments of Odesa, Mykolaiv and Kherson regions for 2015–2017 were analyzed. There were used the methods of descriptive statistics and analysis of variance. Results. Average prevalence of PD in Ukraine is 67.5 per 100,000 population — it is close to the Eastern European rate. The highest prevalence was registered in Lviv (142.5 per 100,000), Vinnytsia (135.9 per 100,000), Cherkasy (108.6 per 100,000) and Kyiv (107.1 per 100,000) regions. The lowest rates were in Luhansk (37.9 per 100,000), Kyrovohrad (42.5 per 100,000), Chernivtsi (49.0 per 100,000) and Ternopil (49.6 per 100,000) regions. In the Southern Ukraine, the highest prevalence of PD was found in Mykolaiv region.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ukrainian Weekly 1989
    І HCL Г^"^^^'^^^^ ^У ^^^ Ukrainian National Association Inc.. a fraternal non-profit associitiori UbainianWeekl Vol. LVJ! No. 27 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, JULY 2, 1989 50 cents Chornovil accuses Shcherbytsky Tour of Chornobyl plant enmom of crimes against Ukrainian people provides insight into 1986 tragedy JERSEY CITY, NJ. - During his from a prison cell in Zolochiv, Lviv On June 9-18, Dr. David Marples, by Dr. David R. Marples IS^day incarceration last month, Ukrai­ region, was released by the UHU's press author of two books on the Chornobyl nian Helsinki Union activist and Ukrai­ service after Mr. Chornovil's release nuclear accident, visited the Chornobyl I have returned from a most re­ nian Herald editor Vyacheslav Chorno­ from prison on June 6. He was arrested area and Kiev, courtesy of the Ukrai­ markable journey to Ukraine. My vil penned a stingmg open letter to on May 21 on charges of "petty hooli­ nian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. In intention at the outset was to visit Volodymyr Shcherbytsky, accusing the ganism" for participating in an April 26 addition to holding interviews with Chornobyl; something that I had been first secretary of the Communist Party Chornobyl demonstration. leaders of the Kombinat production granted permission to do, and to exa­ of Ukraine of "criminal" deeds against Titled "Don't try the people's pa­ association based at Chornobyl, he mine other areas of Ukrainian life as far the Ukrainian people, and called for his tience: an open letter to V. Shcherbyt­ interviewed the plant director, Mikhail as possible. I did much more than that.
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine: Travel Advice
    Ukraine: Travel Advice WARSZAWA (WARSAW) BELARUS Advise against all travel Shostka RUSSIA See our travel advice before travelling VOLYNSKA OBLAST Kovel Sarny Chernihiv CHERNIHIVSKA OBLAST RIVNENSKA Kyivske Konotop POLAND Volodymyr- OBLAST Vodoskhovyshche Volynskyi Korosten SUMSKA Sumy Lutsk Nizhyn OBLAST Novovolynsk ZHYTOMYRSKA MISTO Rivne OBLAST KYIV Romny Chervonohrad Novohrad- Pryluky Dubno Volynskyi KYIV Okhtyrka (KIEV) Yahotyn Shepetivka Zhytomyr Lviv Kremenets Fastiv D Kharkiv ( ni D pr ni o Lubny Berdychiv ep Kupiansk er LVIVSKA OBLAST KHMELNYTSKA ) Bila OBLAST Koziatyn KYIVSKA Poltava Drohobych Ternopil Tserkva KHARKIVSKA Khmelnytskyi OBLAST POLTAVSKA Starobilsk OBLAST OBLAST Stryi Cherkasy TERNOPILSKA Vinnytsia Kremenchutske LUHANSKA OBLAST OBLAST Vodoskhovyshche Izium SLOVAKIA Kalush Smila Chortkiv Lysychansk Ivano-Frankivsk UKRAINEKremenchuk Lozova Sloviansk CHERKASKA Luhansk Uzhhorod OBLAST IVANO-FRANKIVSKA Kadiivka Kamianets- Uman Kostiantynivka OBLAST Kolomyia Podilskyi VINNYTSKA Oleksandriia Novomoskovsk Mukachevo OBLAST Pavlohrad ZAKARPATSKA OBLAST Horlivka Chernivtsi Mohyliv-Podilskyi KIROVOHRADSKA Kropyvnytskyi Dnipro Khrustalnyi OBLAST Rakhiv CHERNIVETSKA DNIPROPETROVSKA OBLAST HUNGARY OBLAST Donetsk Pervomaisk DONETSKA OBLAST Kryvyi Rih Zaporizhzhia Liubashivka Yuzhnoukrainsk MOLDOVA Nikopol Voznesensk MYKOLAIVSKA Kakhovske ZAPORIZKA ODESKA Vodoskhovyshche OBLAST OBLAST OBLAST Mariupol Berezivka Mykolaiv ROMANIA Melitopol CHIȘINĂU Nova Kakhovka Berdiansk RUSSIA Kherson KHERSONSKA International Boundary Odesa OBLAST
    [Show full text]
  • Annoucements of Conducting Procurement Procedures
    Bulletin No�24(98) June 12, 2012 Annoucements of conducting 13443 Ministry of Health of Ukraine procurement procedures 7 Hrushevskoho St., 01601 Kyiv Chervatiuk Volodymyr Viktorovych tel.: (044) 253–26–08; 13431 National Children’s Specialized Hospital e–mail: [email protected] “Okhmatdyt” of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine Website of the Authorized agency which contains information on procurement: 28/1 Chornovola St., 01135 Kyiv www.tender.me.gov.ua Povorozniuk Volodymyr Stepanovych Procurement subject: code 24.42.1 – medications (Imiglucerase in flasks, tel.: (044) 236–30–05 400 units), 319 pcs. Website of the Authorized agency which contains information on procurement: Supply/execution: 29 Berezniakivska St., 02098 Kyiv; during 2012 www.tender.me.gov.ua Procurement procedure: open tender Procurement subject: code 24.42.1 – medications, 72 lots Obtaining of competitive bidding documents: at the customer’s address, office 138 Supply/execution: at the customer’s address; July – December 2012 Submission: at the customer’s address, office 138 Procurement procedure: open tender 29.06.2012 10:00 Obtaining of competitive bidding documents: at the customer’s address, Opening of tenders: at the customer’s address, office 138 economics department 29.06.2012 12:00 Submission: at the customer’s address, economics department Tender security: bank guarantee, deposit, UAH 260000 26.06.2012 10:00 Terms of submission: 90 days; not returned according to part 3, article 24 of the Opening of tenders: at the customer’s address, office of the deputy general Law on Public Procurement director of economic issues Additional information: For additional information, please, call at 26.06.2012 11:00 tel.: (044) 253–26–08, 226–20–86.
    [Show full text]
  • QUARTERLY REPORT for the Development Initiative for Advocating Local Governance in Ukraine (DIALOGUE) Project
    QUARTERLY REPORT for the Development Initiative for Advocating Local Governance in Ukraine (DIALOGUE) Project October – December, 2013 QUARTERLY REPORT October – December, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS RESUME 5 Chapter 1. KEY ACHIEVEMENTS IN THE REPORTING PERIOD 6 Chapter 2. PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION 9 2.1. Component 1: Legal Framework 9 Activity 2.1.1. Legislation drafting based on local governments legislative needs 9 Local government legislation need assessment 9 and work on local government technical profiles Legislation monitoring 11 Activity 2.1.2. Expert evaluation of conformity of draft legislation 15 to the European Charter of Local Self-Governance Activity 2.1.3. Introduction of institutional tools for local governments 15 to participate in legislation drafting Round table discussions in AUC Regional Offices and meetings of AUC Professional 15 Groups Setting up a network of lawyers to participate in legislation drafting 19 2.2. Component 2: Policy dialogue 20 Activity 2.2.1. Increasing the participation of the AUC member cities 20 in the policy dialogue established be the Association at the national level Dialogue Day: answers to the questions raised 20 Cooperation with central government authorities 20 Parliamentary local government support inter-faction group (local government caucus) 24 Participation in the work of parliamentary committees 26 Activity 2.2.2. Setting up advisory boards at the regional level with participation 31 of AUC Regional Offices and local State Executive agencies at the oblast level Working sessions of Local Government Regional Advisory Boards 31 Activity 2.2.3. Establishing formal and regular coordination 35 mechanisms with other USAID supported activities and other donor organizations Forum of Donor Organisations working in the local government sector 35 Cooperation with other USAID projects and projects supported by other donor 35 organisations 2.3.
    [Show full text]
  • State Nuclear Regulatory Inspectorate of Ukraine 2011
    STATE NUCLEAR REGULATORY INSPECTORATE OF UKRAINE 2011 STATE NUCLEAR REGULATORY INSPECTORATE OF UKRAINE NATIONAL REPORT ON STRESS TEST RESULTS ABBREVIATIONS AC Alternating Current AEFS Additional Emergency Feedwater System BDBA Beyond Design Basis Accident BRU-A Steam Dump Valve to Atmosphere BRU-K Steam Dump Valve to Condenser C(I)SIP Comprehensive (Integrated) Safety Improvement Program for Ukrainian NPPs ChNPP Chornobyl Nuclear Power Plant CP Cooling Pool CPS Control and Protection System DBA Design Basis Accident DC Direct Current DCH Direct Containment Heating DG Diesel Generator DSF Dry Spent Fuel Storage Facility (Zaporizhzhya NPP) ECCS Emergency Core Cooling System ECR Emergency Control Room EDG Emergency Diesel Generator EFS Emergency Feedwater System ENSREG European Nuclear Safety Regulators Group EOP Emergency Operating Procedure FCP Fuel Channel Cooling Pool FSS Full-Scope Simulator HPIS High-Pressure Injection System ISF Interim Spent Fuel Storage Facility (Chornobyl NPP) ISF-1 Wet Interim Spent Nuclear Fuel Storage Facility ISF-2 Dry Interim Spent Nuclear Fuel Storage Facility KhNPP Khmelnitsky Nuclear Power Plant LOCA Loss-of-Coolant Accident LPIS Low-Pressure Injection System MCCI Molten Corium/Concrete Interaction MCP Main Coolant Pump MCR Main Control Room MDGPU Mobile Diesel Generator and Pumping Unit MDGS Mobile Diesel Generator Station MGV Main Gate Valve MSB Multi-Assembly Sealed Basket MSIV Main Steam Isolation Valve NF Nuclear Facility NNEGC National Nuclear Energy Generating Company Energoatom Energoatom NPP Nuclear
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Cemetries, Synagogues, and Mass Grave Sites in Ukraine
    Syracuse University SURFACE Religion College of Arts and Sciences 2005 Jewish Cemetries, Synagogues, and Mass Grave Sites in Ukraine Samuel D. Gruber United States Commission for the Preservation of America’s Heritage Abroad Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/rel Part of the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Gruber, Samuel D., "Jewish Cemeteries, Synagogues, and Mass Grave Sites in Ukraine" (2005). Full list of publications from School of Architecture. Paper 94. http://surface.syr.edu/arc/94 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts and Sciences at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Religion by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. JEWISH CEMETERIES, SYNAGOGUES, AND MASS GRAVE SITES IN UKRAINE United States Commission for the Preservation of America’s Heritage Abroad 2005 UNITED STATES COMMISSION FOR THE PRESERVATION OF AMERICA’S HERITAGE ABROAD Warren L. Miller, Chairman McLean, VA Members: Ned Bandler August B. Pust Bridgewater, CT Euclid, OH Chaskel Besser Menno Ratzker New York, NY Monsey, NY Amy S. Epstein Harriet Rotter Pinellas Park, FL Bingham Farms, MI Edgar Gluck Lee Seeman Brooklyn, NY Great Neck, NY Phyllis Kaminsky Steven E. Some Potomac, MD Princeton, NJ Zvi Kestenbaum Irving Stolberg Brooklyn, NY New Haven, CT Daniel Lapin Ari Storch Mercer Island, WA Potomac, MD Gary J. Lavine Staff: Fayetteville, NY Jeffrey L. Farrow Michael B. Levy Executive Director Washington, DC Samuel Gruber Rachmiel
    [Show full text]
  • Format for Progress Report
    Improving local capacity to promote and sustain entrepreneurship and SMEs development in Chernobyl affected territories by transferring best practices and experience of using smart instruments for boosting business Project Final Report 2015 _______________________________________________ Kyiv 2015 Improving local capacity to promote entrepreneurship and SMEs development in Chernobyl affected territories TABLE OF CONTENT Annotation .......................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Purpose of the Report ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 Acronyms ........................................................................................................................................................................... 4 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................. 4 II. BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................ 6 2.1. Project genesis ..................................................................................................................................................... 6 2.2. Project strategy ..................................................................................................................................................... 6
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Introduction
    State Service of Geodesy, Cartography and Cadastre State Scientific Production Enterprise “Kartographia” TOPONYMIC GUIDELINES For map and other editors For international use Ukraine Kyiv “Kartographia” 2011 TOPONYMIC GUIDELINES FOR MAP AND OTHER EDITORS, FOR INTERNATIONAL USE UKRAINE State Service of Geodesy, Cartography and Cadastre State Scientific Production Enterprise “Kartographia” ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Prepared by Nina Syvak, Valerii Ponomarenko, Olha Khodzinska, Iryna Lakeichuk Scientific Consultant Iryna Rudenko Reviewed by Nataliia Kizilowa Translated by Olha Khodzinska Editor Lesia Veklych ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ © Kartographia, 2011 ISBN 978-966-475-839-7 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction ................................................................ 5 2 The Ukrainian Language............................................ 5 2.1 General Remarks.............................................. 5 2.2 The Ukrainian Alphabet and Romanization of the Ukrainian Alphabet ............................... 6 2.3 Pronunciation of Ukrainian Geographical Names............................................................... 9 2.4 Stress .............................................................. 11 3 Spelling Rules for the Ukrainian Geographical Names....................................................................... 11 4 Spelling of Generic Terms ....................................... 13 5 Place Names in Minority Languages
    [Show full text]
  • Too Much to Handle Radioactive Waste Management in the Post Nuclear Accident Country Ukraine
    Too much to handle Radioactive waste management in the post nuclear accident country Ukraine Kyiv, 2017 Too much to handle Radioactive waste management in the post nuclear accident country Ukraine Olexi Pasyuk Centre of Environmental Initiatives ‘Ecoaction’ www.ecoaction.org.ua [email protected] This paper is a contribution to the publication: Achim Brunnengräber, Maria Rosaria Di Nucci, Ana María Isidoro Losada, Lutz Mez, Miranda Schreurs (Eds.). Nuclear Waste Governance: An International Comparison. Vol. II, to ap- pear in Springer VS, c. 300 pp We gratefully acknowledge language editing effort by Jess Wallach. Abstract In 1986, Ukraine experienced a major nuclear accident at the Chornobyl nuclear power plant (NPP); over three decades later, this event continues to define Ukraine’s waste management situation. Today, radioactive waste at the Chornobyl NPP site and surrounding exclusion zone constitutes over 98% of total solid radioactive waste. Spent nuclear fuel is excluded from this figure as it has special legal status and is not considered to be radioactive waste. Following Ukraine’s independence from the Soviet Union, its institutional system to manage nuclear waste problems has continually changed and has not reached the state of clear responsibilities and distribution of roles between various institutions. However, the need for this clarity is recognized by experts and proposals have been made to centralise the management system. EU and IAEA funding enables research on the waste management system most suitable for Ukraine, including deep geological disposal (DGD), regulatory system improvements and physical infrastructure. Adaptation of the Ukrainian standards and practices to the European standards will be ac- celerated in view of the EU-Ukraine Association Agreement.
    [Show full text]